Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0028746_Complete File - Historical_19921231State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 aures G. Martin, Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. E. William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Acting Director Leonard StoDecember 31, 1992 gner 4200 Highway 29 TT_ __�' _7- T �l ) �r7,r 1"laIII�Uu1g, INC ._80! J Dear Mr. Stogner: Subject: Permit No. NCO028 746 Rayco Utilities, Inc. Stokes County In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on March 3, 1992, we are forwarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 -7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. Please take notice this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Charles Lowe at telephone number 919/733-5083. Sincerely, cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA Winston-Salem Regional Office Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2 762 6-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Permit No. NCO028746 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Fater Pollution Control Act, as amended, Rayco Utilities, Incorporated is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at Briarwood Subdivision on NC Highway 66 southeast of Mount Olive Stokes County to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Brushy Fork Creek in the Roanoke River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, and III hereof. This permit shall become effective February 1, 1993 This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on January 31, 1997 Signed this day December 31, 1992 ' r aginai silgind By A. Preston Howard, Jr., Acting Director Division of Environmental Management By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit No. NC0028746 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET Rayco Utilities, Incorporated is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate an existing 0.050 MGD activated sludge package -type wastewater treatment facility consisting of an influent sedimentation chamber, aeration clarification, tablet chlorination and contact chambers located at Briarwood Subdivision, on NC Highway 66, southeast of Mount Olive, Stokes County (See Part III of this Permit), and 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an unnamed tributary to Brushy Fork Creek which is classified Class C waters in the Roanoke River Basin. \I ( ���� _ 146 h' ;Cem Op -M 1153 K 1 J All /5" ?0 19 -Al er G` i ;�n\t "�� ;o°,;• V ��1� .1� ��///. ��iv,1 i \ \ ,((rel s t ✓\�� % 0 1FT8 Ual 08/-• C .'� �, J �l<- �,�\�•� li / ��i�i.` `� ,�� `, •/r 0 C h N—X r\ %'� =�: �J� \CP Rayco Utilities, Incorporated Briarwood Subdivision NCO028746 - /-� X18 )`�� Discharge Point: Latitude: 36019'12" � `// L Y� //00 Longitude: 80019'16" NOW If L ;1026 7- L)4=� 0 9 nlff 0 6 2 j, To (BM -t olive, 1122 % 91 jr7• `\ ` ` / Z, or, 100 Oi C. -to !{ / /�/ten\!1_ \,!,��( In _r\ : `,\'\��'�j�.�/ Oj FF / V I r CA m — O -- O ca 0) E ca O E E C V O — W W W W W W W W W w, +- c m O— m rn _0 cn w 0 cn U) E0 m co L ~ o a E 0 a E 0 a� .a E 0 .n � E 0 a .Q E Ui a O CL O U O U O ►- U 0 0 ►- i- O 0 0 U O U 0 O cc O :3'—�' c c L m .5C c m O E V m + O C: C to � >' A C — c C 21 c0 O O -� s O LL O w m C x-- -- O ca 0) 0) O ci E E W O O O — L6 Lo' O O N E + a c co O O :3'—�' .5C c m a m + 0o U a O O rn .c N O cn .c U o O rn A m Z N _0 Ox L a m O a cu >; -0 O O a) a) m O m L E E E O O U M m z a. U 0 0 0 0 O _= ❑ C O O O r O O t� cr) c00 0 o A N O >. 7-7 A mac: i i S 0 ? •r -+ J cn N a� 0 C4 rl cd b a� U O U a� N N bA b d� O cn bA d� Cd b H a� N U ct Ca 0 a; .S O cn cn O �D .r cn cn a) N O cn Cd cn --. Z ci W Y N E + i U co O :3'—�' m U ca* a c E r + z- m U a O O rn .c N O cn .c U o O rn A `. U Z N _0 Ox 6 m O a >; -0 O O- m L a Z m > O O U M m z a. U 0 � co W m H Z 0 U- FO— t� FO— t� 0 •r -+ J cn N a� 0 C4 rl cd b a� U O U a� N N bA b d� O cn bA d� Cd b H a� N U ct Ca 0 a; .S O cn cn O �D .r cn cn a) N O cn Cd cn 0 �D 1 a> c — O N W D D 0 0 CTJ 00 — W W W Lil LLl W 11.J W W D 00 0 E a_ a a. o c o E E E a_ a E E !� N a� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C7 ,� O O U N O r-1 r --r — •LU C O � OO c U y� C �A 0 C C A J t+C cc 1 n� . .. r --;-- (1) (2) -f = 0 M QJ QJ od r-1 O 0 x 0) 0) 00 a E E a o 0 0 Ca LO ori -,r v- o o C/) b�o. o z � � � g > v p� o — O� O En > Q E b ca L 0) 0) 0) p O V •- -_� OO o 0)O s 4� cn C O 0 O O In C7 C) O O , N *� O N 4J O C/) . O � Z CTJ E + 7 0 co O G , d 1-��-� •� y., a) m E •L z + Q� C Cc CD OO m e N O p°>,' U Z 2 N c O 0 m a A W Q o *. ° Z t' -0 o �' M 0 �. `O U) ? U m Z n- cz m a 0 W U- F0- Z 0 LL F0- Fes- I Fes- U 0 �D 1 Part III Permit No. NC0028746 D. ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS CONDITION The permittee shall continuously evaluate all wastewater disposal alternatives and pursue the most environmentally sound alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the facility is in substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit or governing rules, regulations or laws, the permittee shall submit a report in such form and detail as required by the Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan of action within sixty (60) days of notification by the Division, 1n lv q co -0 U) _ v� E O ? 'o O a V U- � � U � Q � (Q m c� N T 1 O Ocl QJ 4-4E4-1 � o o ~ C.� 00 N O a A.; Q q co -0 U) _ v� E O ? 'o O a V U- O C o � � Q � (Q m c� N T 1 O Ocl QJ 4-4E4-1 � o o ~ C.� CD 0000 \ O� N O W o 00 N O a A.; co -0 U) v� E O ? 'o O V U- O C o � � Q � (Q m c� N � 1 O Ocl � o o ~ C.� CD 0000 \ O� N O W o � i .r-4 N J cs � >, v �r P4 V V 00 N O a A.; 0 I I S-11 co -0 U) v� E O ? 'o O U- C o � � Q � (Q m c� N � 1 O Ocl 0 I I S-11 w I O � c� N Ocl � o o CD CIS O� N O W o � i .r-4 N � >, v �r P4 V V w I Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: RECEIVEf'f N.C. Dept. of ,NFA MAY I t '13''2 FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Winston-Salem Briarwood Subdivision NCO028746 Domestic - 100% Existing Renewal UT to Brushy Fork Creek C 03-02-01 Stokes Winston-Salem Regional Office Charles Lowe 3/19/92 B17SE Request # 6827 Regional Office Stream Characteristic: USGS # 1986 WLA Date: Drainage Area (mi2): 0.42 Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.2 Average Flow (cfs): 0.5 30Q2 (cfs): 0.2 IWC (%): 100 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) cording to SOP, fa '1't hould be given a choice between an ammonia limit orc_ a chronic toxicity test % . Instream data show no violations of DO standard but the data look suspect. In summer months, instream concentrations of DO of 10-12 mg/l are recorded at r temperatures of 26-27° C. Chlorine letter sent at 17 µtg/l. Special Schedule and additional comments from Reviewers: AL O W `) A /../� r'� "' /L� ,•ter � r�='G'�r'� �ters'c�' �- �iS/� i CS AXE / W s, Recommended by. �V Date: / xo / 91. Reviewed by Instream Assessment:2Date: a Regional Supervisor: Date:,?�`'�� Permits & Engineering: - Date: %�- RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: A 1992 Existine Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Recommended Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Toxicity test (P/F): CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Monthly Average Summer Winter 0.05 0.05 30 30 monitor monitor 6 6 30 30 1000 1000 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0 monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor Monthlv Average with Toxicity Test Summer Winter 0.05 0.05 30 30 monitor monitor 6 6 30 30 200 200 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0 monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor Chronic at 907o Limits Changes Due To: Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures X New facility information Monthlv Average with Ammonia Limit Summer Winter W or EL 0.05 0.05 30 30 EL 1.0 WQ 6 6 WQ 30 30 EL 200 200 WQ 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0 EL monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor Parameter(s) Affected Fecal Coliform X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. X' No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: 100 feet upstream of discharge point Downstream Location: 200 feet downstream of discharge point Parameters: DO, Temperature, Fecal Coliform Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS AA �uacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No If no, which parameters cannot be met? 7 l2 /t; Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? let e /4 41 ���- j� �' / ;mss. Special Instructions or Conditions Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. p � X01 .31 Zt 1�8� �ui �r�p,nwoo 6 qA= o•S-� u�o'� = �O � Q sir,�l0 O w1q�°=o•� =0.�(Z DD— 6 n VAL ' �l j 1 ,f �J 0_i.. � 2 3 G I to qA _ �•6 jc �`U'k cat G9U Zoe V` 1 C^ lR S \f VZVA �. �S i State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office James G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT May 13, 1992 CERTIFIED MAIL N0. P-536 301 837 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Leonard Stogner Rayco Utilities, Inc. Route 31 Box 283 Harrisburg N•C• 28075 SUBJECT: Briarwood S/D WWTP NPDES Permit No. NCO028746 Stokes County Dear Mr. Stogner: As you are aware, our Division is currently processing the NPDES permit renewal application for the Briarwood facility. Since the WWTP discharges into a stream with a 7Q10=0, several revisions will be made to the new permit. Attached you will find a preliminary wasteload allocation form denoting the proposed changes in the effluent limitations that will be incorporated into the new permit. As proposed, the new permit will be issued with -a chronic toxicity monitoring requirement. Please note, however, that the wasteload approval form states that the facility has the choice between chronic toxicity testing or the stricter NH -N limits. If you agree to a more strict NH -N limit (1.� mg/1 summer), the toxicity testing requirement would be dropped. please advise our office your preference. If you fail will go to Public Notice with chronic toxicity testing. by June 1, 1992, concerning to comment, the draft permit the existing NH3-N limits and 8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106-3203 ® Telephone 9 A_ C____1 /l_____ Arf- (919) 896-7007 (919) 896-7005 FAX Mr. Leonard Stogner Page #2 May 13, 1992 Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Abner Braddy or me at (919) 896-7007. Sincerely, M. Steven uney Water Quality Supervisor MSM/vm cc: Norman Bedwell Central Files WSRO _ VA, 3 V� fro ar t -A A I r �� 670 or Aj4 �. ® 0 rrL r" -n I ar j�JJ�1 e1 �M �♦�l' al:Ci�ci R �clil cc: Permits and Engineering f�tl AY 2 6 1999 Technical Support Branch County Health Dept. TECHNICAL SUPPORT T BRANCH Central Files WSRO `s Date May 1'9, 1992 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS County Stokes NPDES Permit No. NC0028746 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Briarwood S/D WWTP C/O Rayco Utilities, Inc. 4200 Highway 29 Harrisburg, N.C. 28075 2. Date of Investigation: April 28, 1992 3. Report Prepared by: Abner Braddy 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. Leonard Stogner, (704) 788-9497 5. Directions to Site: From Winston-Salem, travel Hwy. 66 North into Stokes County. The subdivision is located approximately .5 mile South of the community of Mount Olive, on the right; the WWTP is located at the end of the northeastern -most road within the subdivision. Alp Discharge Point(s) - List for all discharge points Latitude: 360 19' 12" Longitude: 800 19/ 16" Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicated treatment plant site and discharge point on map. USGS Quad No. B17SE or USGS Quad Name Kin 7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): There is adequate land adjacent to the plant for expansion, but that land is under separate ownership. 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The WWTP is located upon a ridge, well above the flood -plain. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: Several homes located within 1000.0. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T. to Brushy Fork Creek. a. Classification: "C" b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-02-01 (Roanoke) c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Brushy Fork Creek is a rural watercourse, and becomes tributary to Town Fork Creek. Its users are consistent with its "C" classification. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of wastewater: 100% Domestic % Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: .050 MGD b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: N.A. C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: Chlorine, ammonia. d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N.A. in development approved should be required not needed 2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day: N.A. a. Highest month in the last 12 months: lbs/day b. highest year in last 5 years: lbs/day 3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N.A. 4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): Existing: Activated sludge package plant, consisting of influent sedimentation chamber, aeration clarification, tablet -chlorination, contact chambers, and outfall line. 5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: Pumped by septage hauler and taken to a City of Winston-Salem POTW. 6. Treatment plant classification: (attach completed rating sheet) 2 7. SIC Code(s) 4952 Wastewater Code(s) Primary 05 Secondary Main Treatment Unit Code: 0 9 0 7 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds (municipals only)? N.A. 2. Special monitoring requests: None. 3. Additional effluent limits requests: 4. Other: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Operation and maintenance of this package plant are marginal, at best. In the past, solids have left the plant due to surge flows, as the timers cut return sludge off. Appreciable head is created in the aeration basins due to the high rate of sludge returned, and the flow equalizes thru the clarifiers when the RAS is stopped. The waste load for the facility indicates that the permittee should be given a choice of Chronic Toxicity or NH3 @ N limit. Conversation with the Permittee indicates that the facility can meet neither. The Permittee states that he intends to dispute the allocations' reported stream flow (1101'7Q10). The Region recommends the Permit be handled in accordance with current Division policy. gnature of • •�•�:i�� Water Quality Regiwilal Supervisor Date X 14V \ ■ to II < cam: � ;. '✓ �� /� n � _� � • ,-o-alt=��1 r °— - . ` / f f u° \O / :Cem fJ ° �� �f. V g?I 1• % Ger a 168 all / I o% II oo rte`, �J ` / 1~ /if �• ��,: c r1 � / ' G J p Qi4`/� 1 >° • • 'o p\/53 � �f r • �� � ;��• ,, \< Lupe [t, ep OB/ 72 04 Ca 1 �' •� �' , : -�° x /096 • \ l- ��% ''�/ `'/ � .�1 � J { � �^ ` �� �''n�� �j i \�� / 171 • . 1 s 8 • �-, ��-'` , ' . \ C�°,.�, \; ��'/.� /�/ ' ! �� • J . o , • Q60rJ x r... (I \ 1/00 ° o. •II . n v �s Il 11 / JJ x/off%\ l ° . • ° % 962 b U) o v p� U > v P �4 Q Q O U) .0 a to 'v y v 40 u m J N 4-4 LH � 3 O y pp U 4-1 0O LH U .. ti �J o v4 a o ro �7 r -- u u 4- o^ ^ y Y -PV 4-4 E V (d cn O � V O rO ) ul c O O � o a a 0 �E ^ Q C14.. a --r ... U)".. 4-4 CD .j V) 4-1 U2 N rti b !W �' r%I U U co O 3-I (�o P V' I` •• W " J G r -I U) r. H -P r -I v rNd N V r�+i 4-4 3 x� L r9 V) I o E v o .. Ali •• �O •i'1 4-)• •ri ro � � 4-)a � C •• . Q A • • ^ c il+ LH 4-1 +a S u - w v >1 o U r~ 0 >1 4J r�•I -P QQN 9 •r�•I SN -i LO U •r•I U b f/) Ri O p •r•Ir•I V) W 1H v • N O (d r�-I w r a a r% U) v p� U > v P �4 Q Q O U) .0 a to 'v ro LH .aLH9dW0O OL aDIdAO 'IVNOIDaH) (al IdWOD OCL MI11MS 'IVOINHOS.L) a a4 rg Request No. :3336 --------------------- WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM - - ------------------- Facility Name : BRIARWOOD SUBDIVISION Type of Waste : DOMESTIC Status : EXIIS" TING Receiving Gtream : BRUSHY FORK CREEK Stream Class : C Subbasin : 030201 County : STOKES Regional Office : WSRO Drainage Area (sq mi) Requestor : LISA CREECH Summer WHO (cfs) Date of Request : 9/2/86 Winter WHO US : 0.2 Quad : 13178E Average Flow ((afs) : 0.5 --------~---------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ------------------------- : Wasteflow (mgd): 0.05 5 -Day BOD (mg/l): 30 Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/l>: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l): 6 TS (mg/l): 30 Fecal Coliform (#/100m1.>: 1000 pH (SU): 6-9 : : : ----------------------~----------- COMMENTS Excoav'r FOR FOR THE DO, THESE ARE THE EXISTIN8 LIMITS. ' LIMITS AQE BASED UPON BIVISION P8LICY CONCEANINC BISCHAACES TO ZEAO FLOW STAEAMS. ff / I Recommended by In Date _ Reviewed by: Tech. Support Supervisor 799 Regional Supervisor Permits E. Engineering ___