20011043 Ver 1_Mitigation Site Visit_20070413

Draft Stream Mitigation Site Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Feb ?: Draft Version 2.1
?l
Evaluator's name(s): 6/L2
Date of Office Review: I 1 77
Other individuals/agencies present:
T_ Office Review Information:
Project Name: A S' Monitoring reports available? _No
DWQ Project Number: 01-10413 Problem areas identified in reports? No
ation Project Type (Circle One) Problem areas addressed on site? Yes
EE Private Mit. Bank Date(s) of monitoring reports: 2005; 2.006
Project mitigation was constructed for (if

applicable): Year(s) of monitoring: 1/17-4 1
Location of project (narrative): it E o E Oe OA4£ col
Nearest named stream (WQ classification):
County: 4JO

River basin: 4&2-TF

Approved Mitigation plan available? Yes o
Goal of Mitigation (stream length): l G 000 1- Buffer Mitigation? Yes No
re g re : -A
tiga 10 95 Zone 1 Acreage
Type of Mitigation t (circle all applicable) Zone 2 Acreage

7/
estoratio (priority level 4 Creation
Preservation
nhancem nt
Dates of Activities m nth/ ear :
Monitoring requirements and frequency: Start of Construction:
??[?FTAT10? Aa15 c, )9S1L1 v`?Y`aIRS Construction Completed: 0z
1 Corrective Measures Taken:
Type Date
3FA V 92 /RM90V I- 00
Success Criteria:
1.Physical: AW X41 020 /CFA4J
2. Vegetation: 260 STEM J
3. Aquatic biota: A)A -'-
200,5
The space below may be used to provide any additional, important information that was found
during the office review of information, or to list any additional info ?ation that needs to be
obtained during , the site visit: Pi????i- LlT'?
/N10N1710i tAd'20T0 0,b 15 ?fl6E6 QV U
PLOTSCHAA) yLF)I) ()VM MOMTVr?)( F?A Ivil . A)UA4&2S Avl? zaC,oTO-Aus
NoJ Cc?VS1$?'?',
G?oMVnP1J?c ??TA /CDT r 11,411 I8U rA010 firFX W041170rl * J
N?1c+F?)0? 6 C V a -U?v?es?t?
Nd I raft page I of 3
-zoo l 10'13
Evaluator's Agency:
Date of Field Review: 3
11. tllata reported trom site visit
Streambank Stability:
Are Streambanks Stable? Yes
If no, provide description and notes regar Ping bilit is qs•
aU?7?rJ _ SOW grl"( r/1cy51ojj 6 SOXI
0? (to 01 b-) FD

Structures:
List all Types of structures present on site: 1?tN5
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes o
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
,q1 n/ IN Gatf PO>/r6? - ' ruc Jj?,A/ JNd / ! SUE (Xlr-
Stream Features:
Are riffles and pools appropriately spaced? Yes No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? Yes ; No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the Thalweg? Yes
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water 0 X Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel
bars, downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
/???'vi CV ( V z
Sl'?i 1?(? " / iJ/ f.? I
Vegetation:
Approved Success Criteria: (O f3oe t Dominant plant species TPA/% cover
1.
2.
Vegetation planted on site?: No 3.
According to the approved plan? INK Yes No 4.
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No 5.
Date of Latest planting: a/L161A/A L *16 26V Z
Ave trees per acre (buffer)
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of
vegetation, etc.) n nn nn l
lJUP gQzb SQIt J
0?1
T

S1L1r FFJ)O--e tl o ov.
Draft page 2 of 3
I?
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no woody vegetation:
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with large areas of bare ground:
Site total % or estimated acreage of unvegetated areas:
Observations on invasive species (type, % cover, etc.)
JC IVT-?
Gener mments on vegetation issues(e.g. plant survival, major concerns, etc):
"Co' ?Oew 4 /YJ-,
//I%o /fz?'
Aquatic Biota: AJOI 2?gvV
Is aquatic life present in the channf
r
Yes No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of rota.
Mitigation Success:
Compared to the mitigation plan, the site is: (circle one)
successful partially successful not Ruccessful
List specific reasons for any lack of success for this site:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Notes: Attach site maps showing problem areas and/or important stream features.
Attach digital photographs of representative sites with photo locations shown on ."site map.
1 Use the definitions in the joint state/federal stream mitigation guidelines to determine tthe
correct type of mitigation used for this project.
Draft page 3 of 3