20011043 Ver 1_Monitoring Report Year 4_20070101

a/- /oq3
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
SMITH AND AUSTIN CREEKS
STREAM RESTORATION
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 343)
Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
January 2007
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Smith and Austin Creeks Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in northern Wake County,
approximately 1 mile southeast of the Town of Wake Forest adjacent to the Heritage Development and
Golf Course. The restored stream reaches extend upstream from Forestville Road near the intersection of
Forestville Road and Rogers Road (Figure 1). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin in
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03020201070070 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-04-02).
The primary goals of the project included the following.
1. Establish stable dimension, pattern, and profile along approximately 11,000 linear feet of
Smith and Austin Creeks.
2. Improve aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in-stream structures in Smith and
Austin Creeks.
3. Provide a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area that is highly developed for
residential and commercial purposes.
4. Establish a forested riparian buffer adjacent to Smith and Austin Creeks.
5. Incorporate this project into a watershed management plan.
Sixteen vegetation plots (10 meters square) were established and permanently monumented. These plots
were surveyed in late July and early September 2006 for the 2006 (year 4) monitoring season. Based on
the number of stems counted, the average plot density monitored at this Site is greater than 260 stems per
acre and is considered successful. The average plot density has been measured at 923 stems per acre, or
23 stems per plot for 2006 (year 4) monitoring. The dominant species identified at the Site were green
ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and river
birch (Betula nigra). Each of the sixteen individual vegetation plots were well-above the success criteria
with 445 to 2227 planted stems per acre.
No vegetation problem areas were noted during year 4 (2006) monitoring. The Site is characterized by
planted seedlings exhibiting various degrees of vigor. Overall, vigor was noted as good or excellent,
although a few seedlings appeared to be lacking vigor as the result of plastic mesh collars installed after
planting or stems that were flatten as the result of flooding from Tropical Storm Alberto in June 2006.
Several of the plastic collars were removed during vegetation sampling.
Twenty-three permanent cross-sections were established after construction was completed for the as-built
mitigation plan. Longitudinal profiles were measured after construction and are scheduled to be
completed in year 1 (2003), year 3 (2005), and year 5 (2007) for a total of four measurements; therefore,
longitudinal profile measurements have not been completed for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report. In
addition, channel substrate is not expected to coarsen over time and is not monitored for success at this
Site. As a whole, the majority of Site riffle cross-sections have decreased in cross-sectional area. This
may result from various factors including beaver activity, high sediment loads, and/or stream adjustments
towards a stable, vegetated, natural channel. Width-depth ratios were similar to previous years with
slightly elevated values in Austin Reach 3. This may result from sediment deposition in a stable, low
shear stress reach with good vegetation establishment; width-depth values are expected to lower as the
banks continue to colonize with vegetation and capture sediment. Pools and associated point bars have
remained relatively stable.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page i
The as-built channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable E/C stream type stream
reaches as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and construction plans. The current monitoring has
demonstrated dimension was stable over the course of the year 4 (2006) monitoring.
Approximately 85 percent (9300 linear feet) of onsite reaches are characterized by a moderate Bank
Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and moderate Near Bank Stress (NBS) values for the year 4 (2006)
monitoring period. All values of BEHI and NBS are higher than expected; however, elevated values
result primarily from high levels of sand in the stream bed and banks, which significantly raises
BEHI/NBS values.
Several stream problem areas noted in previous annual monitoring reports were no longer present.
Beaver dams were removed in 2005 from Smith Reach 2; therefore, backwater effects resulting from the
dams are no longer present. In addition, many of the mid-bars present in 2004 have shifted and are
currently point bars. During the current site assessment several areas of bank erosion mostly around root
wads, mid-point bars, and reduced structure integrity/compromised vane arms were noted. Erosion may
be attributed to two bankfull events documented for the year 4 (2006) monitoring period.
In summary, the restoration site achieved success criteria for vegetation and stream attributes in the
Fourth Monitoring Year (2006).
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page ii
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT ................................................................................ i
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................1
1.1 Location and Setting ................................................................................................................... ..1
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives ..............................................................................................1
1.3 Project History and Background .................................................................................................. .. 3
1.4 Monitoring Plan View ................................................................................................................. ..5
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ............................................................ .. 5
2.1 Vegetation Assessment ............................................................................................................... .. 5
2.1.1 Soil Data ................................................................................................................. .. 5
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas ....................................................................................... ..5
2.1.3 Stem Counts ............................................................................................................ .. 5
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos ............................................................................................ 15
2.2 Stream Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 15
2.2.1 Bankfull Events ...................................................................................................... 15
2.2.2 Bank Stability Assessments ..................................................................................... 16
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas ............................................................................................. 17
2.2.4 Stream Fixed Station Photos .................................................................................... 19
2.2.5 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .......................................... 20
2.2.6 Quantitative Stream Measurements ......................................................................... 22
3.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 30
List of Figures
Figure 1. Site Location ...........................................................................................................................2
Figures 2A-2H. Monitoring Plans ...................................................................................................... 6-13
List of Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives ............................................................................. 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History .................................................................................... .. 3
Table 3. Project Contact Table .............................................................................................................. ..4
Table 4. Project Background Table ....................................................................................................... ..4
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events ............................................................................................... 16
Table 7. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates ..................................................................................... 17
Table 8. Stream Problem Areas ............................................................................................................. 17
Table 9A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Smith Reach 1 ............................... 20
Table 9B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Smith Reach 2 ................................ 20
Table 9C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Smith Reach 3 ................................ 21
Table 9D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Austin Reach 1 .............................. 21
Table 9E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Austin Reach 2 ............................... 21
Table 9F. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Austin Reach 3 ............................... 22
Table 10. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ...................................................................... 24
Table I IA. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Smith Reach 1 ....................................... 25
Table 11B. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Smith Reach 2 ....................................... 26
Table I IC. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Austin Reach 1 ...................................... 27
Table I ID. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Austin Reach 2 ...................................... 28
Table 11E. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Austin Reach 3 ...................................... 29
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page iii
Appendices
APPENDIX A. VEGETATION RAW DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX B. GEOMORPHOLOGIC RAW DATA
1. Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
2. Stream Fixed-Station Photos
3. Tables B1-B6. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
4. Cross-section Plots and Tables
APPENDIX C. CVS LEVELS 1 & 2 DATA FORMS
APPENDIX D. BEHI & NBS DATA FORMS
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page iv
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The Smith and Austin Creeks Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in northern Wake County,
approximately 1 mile southeast of the Town of Wake Forest adjacent to the Heritage Development and
Golf Course. The restored stream reaches extend upstream from Forestville Road near the intersection of
Forestville Road and Rogers Road (Figure 1). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin in
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03020201070070 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-04-02).
Directions to the Site:
From Raleigh, North Carolina
? Travel north on US Highway 1/Capital Boulevard for approximately 9 miles
? Turn right/northeast on US Highway 1-A for approximately 1 mile
? Turn right on Rogers Road for approximately 1 mile (Note: the downstream end of the project is
located northeast of Rogers Road approximately 0.25 mile before the intersection with Forestville
Road/Heritage Lake Road)
? Turn left on Heritage Lake Road approximately 0.5 mile to parking area at soccer fields on left
The Site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province, within the Northern Outer Piemont
ecoregion. The Site is situated within a rapidly developing area on the outskirts of the Town of Wake
Forest. Housing developments and new housing construction surrounds the Site; a golf course is located
at the upstream end of the Site east of Heritage Lake Road, which bisects Austin Creek on the Site, and a
park with soccer fields is located between Smith and Austin Creeks west of Heritage Lake Road.
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Historically, the Site was characterized by agricultural land. Site streams were channelized in support of
land uses, resulting in low-sinuosity, incised stream channels. Streambanks and bed features were
unstable throughout the Site due to high shear stress and poor riparian vegetation. The location of the
confluence of the two streams was altered as evidenced by old USGS topographic mapping and United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil survey maps, which show Austin Creek flowing into
Smith Creek approximately 2500 linear feet upstream of the current confluence. A large flood in the
early 1990s caused an avulsion to occur, which rerouted Austin Creek to its current downstream
confluence with Smith Creek. A previous landowner completed the avulsion by excavating a channel and
rerouting Austin Creek to the edge of the valley.
Smith and Austin Creeks were restored by traditional alterations to channel dimension, pattern, and
profile, as outlined in Applied River Morphology (Rosgen 1996) with the establishment of a riparian zone
adjacent to the creeks ranging from 15 to 100 feet in width from the top of bank. Stream implementation
consisted primarily of stream restoration (Priority 1 and Priority 2) where feasible (i.e. the floodplain and
easement widths allowed). Stream enhancement occurred on incised channel reaches where pattern
alterations were not feasible due to a narrow valley and/or existing development. Stream enhancement
consisted of excavation of a new floodplain bench at the bankfull stage and installation of structures to
improve bed features and provide grade control. Structures were installed throughout restoration and
enhancement reaches of Smith and Austin Creeks to maintain the restored channel profile (rock cross-
vanes) and to maintain channel pattern (single vanes). In addition, stream banks were revegetated to
provide bank stabilization.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 1

Axiom Environmental, Inc SITE LOCATION Drawn by: FIGURE
.
592 CLF
2126 RowlSpringand, NC Pond 27592
callow SMITH AND AUSTIN CREEKS RESTORATION SITE
[phone] EEP Project Number 343 Date Jan 2007
(9 19) 341-3839 fax
Year4 (2006) Monitoring Report
Poles.
??? M. Wake County, North Carolina 06-002
The primary goals of the project included 1) establishing stable dimension, pattern, and profile along
Smith and Austin Creeks, 2) improving habitat, 3) establishing a forested riparian buffer, and 4)
incorporating this project into a watershed management plan. Project structures and objectives are
summarized below.
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)

F ?
=
O s
v
Project o Linear
Segment or o. Footage or
Reach ID °' Acrea a Stationing Comment
SRIa El P3 875 00+00 to 08+75 Reach SRI includes a mix of P2 and P3,
with a dominance of P2 as indicated in
SRlb R P2 1080 08+75 to 19+55 stationing
Includes 2618 feet of excavation of new
SR2 R Pi 2618 19+55 to 45+73 channel at the existing floodplain elevation
SR3 S SS 794 45+73 to 53+67 Erroding reaches were stabilized with root
wads and instream structures
ARl El P3 2581 00+00 to 25+81 Benching, instream structures, and planting
banks
AR2 El P3 526 25+81 to 31+07 Benching, instream structures, and planting
banks
AR3 R P1 2480 31+07 to 55+87 Includes 2480 feet of excavation of new
channel at the existing floodplain elevation
* R =Restoration
El = Enhancement (Level 1)
S = Stabilization
** PI = Priority I
P2 = Priority II
P3 = Priority III
SS = Stream Bank Stabilization
1.3 Project History and Background
Completed project activities, reporting history, and completion dates are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)

Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion Data
Collection
Completion Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Construction Completion * * August 2002
Mitigation Plan/As-builts Fall 2002 * Fall 2002
Structural Maintenance * * January 2003
Year 1 Monitoring (2003) September 2003 * July 2004
Beaver Removal * * 2005
Year 2 Monitoring (2004) September 2004 * April 2005
Year 3 Monitoring (2005)
Year 4 Monitoring (2006) Dec 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2006
* - Historical project documents necessary to provide this data were unavailable at the time of this report submission.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 3
Contact information regarding project designer, construction, planting contractor, monitoring personnel,
and relevant project background information are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Designer Buck Engineering
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Will Pedersen [phone]
Construction Contractor Shamrock Environmental Corporation
PO Box 14987
Greensboro, NC 27415
Bill Wright [phone]
Riparian Restoration Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Monitoring Performer Axiom Environmental, Inc.
2126 Rowland Pond Dr.
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Grant Lewis [phone]
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Project County Wake County, North Carolina
Drainage Area 12.6 square miles at Site outfall (Smith Reach - 3.6
square miles, Austin Reach -8.4 square miles)
Drainage impervious cover estimate (%) < 5
Stream Order Smith (third and fourth), Austin (fourth)
Physiographic Region Piedmont
Ecoregion Northern Outer Piedmont
Rosgen Classification of As-built E-/C-type
Cowardin Classification R3UB2
Dominant Soil Types Chewacla
Reference Site ID
USGS HUC for Project and Reference Project - 03020201
Reference - *
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project and Reference Project - 03-04-02
Reference - *
NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference Project - C NSW (Stream Index # 27-23-2 and 27-23-3)
Reference -
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d

listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor Not Applicable
% of project easement fenced 0
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 4
1.4 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in Figures 2A through 2H.
Site features including vegetation, stream dimension (cross-sections), evaluations of bank erosion and
near bank stress, and photographic documentation were monitored in year 4 (2006). Sixteen vegetation
plots were installed in year 4 (2006) and permanently monumented with five-foot metal fence posts,
driven into each of the four corners of the plot, with PVC pipe attached to the origin for ease in plot
location identification. Twenty-three cross-sections, which were installed after project construction and
permanently monumented with PVC pipe were located and measured for year 4 (2006).
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Following Site construction three 25-foot by 100-foot vegetation plots were measured for the as-built
mitigation plan. Monitoring plots were changed during the following years with eight 10-meter square
plots measured in year 1 (2003), four 10 meter square plots measured in year 2 (2004), and fifty 10-meter
square plots measured in year 3 (2005). Plots were not permanently marked.
During the 2006 (year 4) monitoring period, sixteen 10-meter by 10-meter plots were established and
permanently marked with five-foot metal fence posts. Sampling was conducted as outlined in the CVS-
EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al. 2006). The locations of vegetation monitoring plots
were placed to accurately represent the entire Site and are depicted on Figures 2A through 2H.
2.1.1 Soil Data
Soils within the Site are composed of the Chewacla series. Soil data including percentage of clay on the
surface, levels of erosion, and percentage of organic matter are not included in the soil survey for Wake
County. Chewacla series (Aquic Fluventic Dystrochrepts) consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly
drained, moderately permeable soils on floodplains of most streams in Wake County. The depth to the
seasonal high water table is approximately 1.5 feet; the soils are frequently flooded for brief periods.
Natural fertility and the content of organic matter are low (USDA 1970).
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
A plan view illustrating vegetative problem areas was not included in this report due to an absence of
observed vegetative problems. The Site is characterized by planted seedlings exhibiting various degrees
of vigor. Overall, vigor was noted as good or excellent, although a few seedlings appeared to be lacking
vigor as the result of plastic mesh collars installed after planting or stems that were flatten as the result of
flooding from Tropical Storm Alberto in June 2006. Several of the plastic collars were removed during
vegetation sampling.
2.1.3 Stem Counts
Sixteen vegetation plots were established and permanently marked as depicted in Figures 2A through 2H.
The plots are 10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site. These plots were surveyed in
late July and early September 2006 for the 2006 (year 4) monitoring season; results are included in Table
5. No reference area was studied; therefore no comparisons could be made to reference conditions.
Due to the revised monitoring protocol during each year of vegetation surveys, no comparisons of as-built
to the subsequent monitoring years can accurately be made. Therefore, planted species have been based
upon previous annual monitoring reports and percent survival is based on a comparison of as-built (year
0) total stems per acre. The number of "planted" species were based on the experience and judgment of
the monitoring team, and counts for planted species may be influenced by naturally recruited stems.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 5
(n r
U) U(A M.S?m d ` 7 N
U) 0 (D E
m
/ I
o 5pr0?.. ';,
h l ?+00
O UGZ?z
+ / ?yt
Z
N
?00
60
O0Z
002
ww2
O m
I \ 3
O
O?
CO
00
I OL
Wa
o
? r + i mE
d mm
nJ?
o? T2
°O I
i
m E of
? mLLf/1 ?0
CL O Y I
O O ? N N
U) ml
a
L N 2 L O J
a > c)
h
q¦lii
o
o°
a it a O1
m c 4
w > o nU
y N m
o > m W M
U N 2 C U
o U m
c U co m
O N O t h
U- li W m o
® b
A A
O I , I • Q] w
d
J y
Y n p
C d o c c Q? ti
?. > u O U C
Z?Yr H O
W ? W a 06 VJ ?O O? O C ?a ,n o 0
O ? O N Z O ? o' N o
•? ? - z Z o
fn } m ?' o
N O d`
CD r
Y a z M
N M w r^'W1'
Uc? ?_ ? ` V
y? O O a° o a_2) LL
c o C
E > v ?' OV E>
> o Q Z?YL H 0 cu E
CL in °1 °o Zo E Oa o 0
N
z L N °N O a N o
C Z =o
y ? } rn o" a
;" tiP?AQv
4 .\
o?
a onx°,,
0
_ m
m o0
N ? 05
s
W W
F
p N U
4 6] O
b (n
O) E
O
4
n
M
L k
m 5Q=
ay oo y1+2?5P`
1\ c0
S O
a
r °o 1 c
O O
a ? l1 m
0 o°? \ rn
m
o ?
0 0 ? ? 1
a? U d m `\ 1
o ? 3 0
a > U 2 2
~
1 ¦ I I ? X0/5
a
> o y
N y O
O > W co
U m ° - N x
o U c c
co
U I L--53+0? /
o
a D
LL lwwi q
A
J
U) r
r? ? W
0 C?
U) AL
O
n
N 6+00. .
P ~-? Y
P"
+ o
yyQ00 ? d C ? l0
y o? L O m
// Jy - J Q r?i. m L
w 3 _ ? m
! £ ? o° 900
ti ? cL
I ma ? o ?E
O ?"^? wmam
N p x?,,,
w 0 ..
? ono `,Z
p moo 2x
J O ?oL ?ti
r/ (D a W
a O m o E of
- mmm i%
H O w?
? ?c m o
O) aE? x00
a) ?o?m tiry o 1.
m v
`o v
mom': r 6 cm
m._tna '/ 3o mL
?3L aoo mcn
d -oa
0 m E O
p JUo mm
d N ? m O P
µ ye
O P ^QFF'
1
',. 24fpp yt?
(6
N ^.
? M1
00s'.
o m + `.
w3a O
DoE
> ti^ m
E
p C (?
CL O Y
0 o v O b
a U m m
o y w ; `o
o a o m a
a > U H H
4¦Iii 00
o _
_ E d
y ¢ m ° m C
c m c
0
> N m 'w OQ t m O
> o o ?O' U ? f0
w¢
o > y W co
o U c %
U ? m m ?
O N Q L
U 00 i
7 t9 ? N ? n / Pry
LL LL w m OJ .y y
c ®® I y?+
A n
d
N
J
ry
ye
ti
TO
Y a p '
N 2
? M W V
Z Utn ?O1 m d ?3 j` V
Y a 76 C p
W U d Q O U? N? H .0 ?? E m M
E ? 06 ? NQ? p C O? o0 0
r
Z N
o O L N ?N O a N o
? - z v
=o
f0

a
N w OF
? o Q

E

_
N

w

? M? m
Cc:
= °C)

) w
K

L N
LL
c
C? a C
m
O Q L Z?YL
a` O OO?m
W
E w C,
Z
w C OD-
O o 0
N
O
z ? p N
CL N
> C?
C Z Zo
Y y o a`
? 0 0
?I o
o r I
wa
p L
I 5
` m m n
o l 8
O o
a o ?c
O p
EL cn m
L d L O
a > U F
? d c
0
w c > o
m
O > y W in
U ° Y
o U ? c
c U a co
m
g a ° U
v
U. LL fn co
a AA
J
-_ ox
?m
U
° W J
? m
a
O
¢ E
m<
W m p
SF07
a E r
c ? m
m c
o,m a
c
ot=
Wmm mo
o °
. J °
p o r
O W 30.
g?2 m o E
0 m¢w
?O
x
°o
0
1 m
I N
m
O
L X
U
? m
t o
c E ?
m¢ o m3
m
ma m?o
°mz
o
WJm
SR-1
STA' tte'/0
XS113 RIFFLE 50.-1
0
¢mt
o-
o .-
E
WNm
XSAN4IPOOL SR-1
R51 1A
? E
oQ
¢ x
° m 5x00
o=
W J
36Xo
?mN oa
d? w STA. 17J0.
OT' XS#s POOL SR"
N O C o
? m o
m¢ ?
?% s18
0
Aa}00
0
°
0
w
m
c E
? n\ c
N
? C d m
3 m
m E E a
E v ° m
mmm?
d
o
mt
o W o
Q c o
caa
o s
° o E
w°m
0
a o
d z
N
w
LU
(D
Z Ucn MO?m d
cco ?o-a 0,0Q?_ `v
..;
> u to o0m ,CCE>
Q Z?YL om m
'c
"U
w d 06 ? N O> O C Oa E o
E may.
0 4) L aO> Z O m O
__. z d u o Z 0
C _ z °
? rn ? o a`
to /
I ?
? i
I I
I
c
>y4
I ?m ?d 1 r/ ?? ?V
IN I ?
> d
w ?
i
r` I
0
s a ??
w p P
_N
N \ Y xo
o
o .p \
?l
oO ? yPy A U?`
m o?, xp0.'? a
LO Py
c Ea O j ?+
rn E M1\ d % p
}` O
( ` o v
+ d
o C `.
CL o x .O
0 C
o ?\
o
a m U m m 1`\ m
o rn o m n +Q\. ?1 0) \\ \
o i
> d m m --%
0 /
N C O
U y 2 a
-iu o U
o w m`o r ' S3'`p? %
U i
LL ti tp m Sq+Op
+
A ®® ?.po
a
I x

C: LLI
z

o
t
y
y N
m n
?
U
tw N ?
`ma

_ 0
*
N
ao

OZ

; P1 1 `..?

m N Pti
+OJ
1
00 ? ?P
F4
P
w ?
O lc?
_ 00 1
m 1
1

s p
o ,,
`.

?
K
?

\
ry PP%Y I
O
0 t N
U? M.
m '?- ci?00
Q I
N ? m
2 U 5xry I
I
,?O PP
\
+y
\ °o
0
\ 3 \
op
o p
C
O

/ ? F a r?
QQ
i0
?? u
oz

>a ?
I o
N
? ?

1
1
x
d O Y
O p O ? 9 P
O m N
O 3 O
O w?ryP ,?
' P`
5P
m .
N }
o
I i c°
{ U?

C
/ v
? m

c o NN
> N N y ?r-•
520 I y
? l
O > y
U u0i °
o U W m
Y N
m >d P PP
e1?a.. pp
O
x ,
o U ? m t +y+?
a °

li li (n
w A
a
C
N

m ?
®® r

/

.

?
y I y PP
?
y+5 i
? r
-Y o. O
?o Uoo C E'j
c ?^ ? o Q co z?Yr ? O??(6
E w .206 ? ° C Od ? 0 0
O Q ?? O` v z 0 ? N N
z > o°
C ? - Z Z°
N
} rn f o a`
U)
El T5 • ?" 7 O
w ? +y
N op °o
CY)
m a ,`
h t ?
- o /
Op ,
f
W ^p
a
m10a pp N
c o _
O /
O / ? x
ti
e a
P pp? -
C c p
O U
a
0 3 0 ' ry
o m o
a m n /
> U
H
N
f?
c o
N > O` N O
O y
C
O > N w m + I
° ?i m P
_ ID
O ? N O U C
-O o
.C - ' c O
LL LL (n m O C L
® Q ma
m co
n
A
J `N O O N
co Q'Q
Y o.
? O

N N
?
C
w
V
?,?
?'yi
? O C O d o o- QO LL
s ? o ? ? Z? mL i=
O??(d E
W
w
,? m o o
.
o?Z •
C Od
m
o
o
0
o ..-. ? o
L? O? a y
c o
? Z Zo

U) r
2,2 M2' C W
z C) U) D
J_
tt
z o /
o
`? I 1 S a
i ?J ILL
kl `? j " a
F m j o ?
t o _ °' I m
U Q m
ti ? m m U c
Q O
w _ c c i +
w ¢ j
f j o
w o °
o
E t +
a
o Q c
L 1
wm¢ I I*rc c
I?x m
w
a
?• m
m
i
i
0
h
I I
I I ?„
I rJ
? I m
/ o 0
o I m o
m o
-
I m ^ m K
/ ma
C)
O
? m
? I
o ?
a o ?e /
c c
0 0 ? m
O p N c
co
a > U0 ?
~ w a o a ? /
¦ I I ? m Q? m¢ ? x
Y` ? ? of
o
o
? L c
c °? c o ?' a I I o
ow I o O a E Q t
y c >
o
> W m o I o I v°a
U ?] c m m a I Oo ? o N o y
o
c t I >d N? m o¢¢
o ° 0 w p OT'
m
li li 6)
^ ^
c ®® j
J

z
c
m

E
?

??..
? 0
U

n
w It m

C C ? o?0

.. O

° VU
7? o M M

? Q?
C-O

Q1 'C C
CC

LL
o
'
? ? 2'
i 2
O Q ? ZY L
` H 0m?(d
n
H a
O C. r
in ? ? co °
°6
Z ?-
O
.C `a
O E

m

o

°
O

z L N ° v

? a?
. L

2 I..
N
>
c
:o
? ? z i o
? o a`
a

' s
*
?y
a, O M O N O O - O O N O ?/1 ?O O O v? V O N O O N ?D 0 0 0 7 0 0 N
} N.F M a
.n
N y
y
a
R o
x
x
#
#
#

r

x

x

Y

#

r

r
N O
x
x
x
Y
#
r
x
r
r
Y
r
x
Y
Y
N .?. *
y
?
aq ? ?
N
M
\D
.-.
?
7
7
M
M
N
7
,--
a
N
? .O.
?

*
W a r ? M - M 00 ? .n - N V ? ? V Q O

?Ri
0 C
3 C
3 C
3 c
3 G
3 C
3 G
3
0 c
3 c
3 C
3 G
3 C
3 c
3 c
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 c
3 C
3 C
3 C
3 c
3 C
3 c
3 C
3 C
3 c
3 G
3 C
3 C
3

F 0
. E C0c''
?C 0
Y CC0
?L C0c
?C ?co
.1L c
Y GoG
X CC0
Y 0
Y Cc0''
?L ?0?
Y 0 0
.?Ci q0q
JC 0
Y ?0?
?E 0
.]L 0
?i C0C
?C C0'
?L C0c''
Y C0C
Y 0
X G05
Y. GC0
Y 0
Y ??0
?E 0
Y C0C
Y 0
Y q0q
Y ??0
Y G0G
?L G0G
X 0
Y ??0
Y ?0?
?C
Q

W
C
C
C
G
G
C
c
C
G
G
G
c
c
G
G
G
C
c
c
c
c
C
c
c
G
G ,
C
c
C
G
G
C
C .
G
G
C
C
C O
O
.C
.D
?D
f
r
b

N .d. M M ry ? R
•C
.? .M. 7 .n M -- M 0` ?
r
W
r
N
n
N
i/1
-
^
O
O

F

?

-

7

N

.--

JO

?D

N

.?

N
?
O
R
^
N
7
U1
?
O
O

L N ?
Y
E

O
O\
V
VI
M
-
N
-
I?
n
0?0
?
_
h
_
O
a

?

fV

N

M

N

N
e
wr.
s
eC
l?
N
O
...
M
n
?
C
V
b
N
.--.
?
N

O N h N '

C d

-AD
N

v

N

N

ry

ry

...

N c
o u
O

d ..
.
O
M
lp
7 ? M ?. M '-' ry N

b0 00

M N ? ?
L?
Q
` ^ ry ry ?
-

G
Q E N M N -- N N a j

O V ... R i
R O`

F.
w Y p
y ? 5
O `
o U
a
°
a
€

° 13
s
l
= d
Z
d°
Q
tl a
o
?
a o
o
?
?
tl a
? a
r
?
a
a
tl
v
a
g `.
s
a
?

c
?
v Q
i t
J5

i
C F im ?
rn
G `C C m U U U U U :J U C ?t ? 3 3 ] 3 .
y 7 A
N
C
0
_ q
i `U" m v o '
o ? ? n v
O
3 `" o
ygg ao a?
i `" m 3 0 0
vi ? v
i s ?? c v 3
H 3.5 y
0
j O d
C A C ? O
H c
I c c? c c 00
0 o W o ?>
a
a v y v
bv
n c
6 v
a ._
0 0 ? ? ? o
000 o tQ
0 0 0 o N
A A ? ? L
Based on the number of stems counted, the average plot density monitored at this Site is greater than 260
stems per acre and is considered successful. The average plot density has been measured at 923 stems per
acre, or 23 stems per plot for 2006 (year 4) monitoring. The dominant species identified at the Site were
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and
river birch (Betula nigra). Each of the sixteen individual vegetation plots were well-above the success
criteria with 445 to 2227 planted stems per acre.
Shrub diversity was not particularly high within plots; however, various species would be expected to
colonize the Site over time. Species documented within the shrub layer include eastern baccharis
(Baccharis halimifolia), river birch (Betula nigra), and blackberry (Rubus argutus) with tag alder (Aluns
serrulata), black willow (Salix nigra), and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) along the stream banks.
The herbaceous vegetation is dense in all plots. An inventory of the dominant herbaceous species on the
Site was also taken. It should be noted that species composition is seasonally dependant; surveys for
2006 (year 4) were completed in late July and early September. Dominant herbaceous species over the
Site as a whole are listed below:
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium)
Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense)
thoroughwort (Eupatorium sp.)
rush species (Juncus spp.)
microstegium
sericea lespede
goldenrod spec
polygonum species ovum spp
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos
Photographs were taken at all permanent photo points and are included in Appendix A. The photographs
show that vegetation is generally growing well and consists of a good combination of woody and
herbaceous species.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Twenty-three permanent cross-sections were established after construction was completed for the as-built
mitigation plan. Measurements of each cross-section includes points at all breaks in slope including top
of bank, bankfull, and, thalweg. Riffle cross-sections have been classified using the Rosgen stream
classification system. Longitudinal profiles were measured after construction and are scheduled to be
completed in year 1 (2003), year 3 (2005), and year 5 (2007) for a total of four measurements; therefore,
longitudinal profile measurements were not completed for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report.
Longitudinal profile measurements should include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank;
each should be taken at the head of facets (i.e. riffle, run, pool, and glide) and the maximum pool depth.
The survey will also be used to calculate sinuosity. In addition, channel substrate is not expected to
coarsen over time and is not monitored for success at this Site.
2.2.1 Bankfull Events
Documented bankfull events are included in the table below. Documents for year 0 through year 3 (2002
through 2005) did not provide this data; therefore, data presented prior to year 4 (2006) is limited to
available peak discharge data for a nearby station. Two bankfull events were documented during the year
4 (2006) monitoring period.
t ineum)
za (L ea
ies
.)
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 15
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Date of Data Date of Occurrence Method Photo (if
Collection available
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for October
January 18, 2007 October 11, 2002 11, 2002 of 523 cfs (bankfull discharge for station is --
approximately 357 cfs)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for October
January 18, 2007 October 13, 2004 13, 2004 of 478 cfs (bankfull discharge for station is --
approximately 357 cfs)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for
January 18, 2007 November 12, 2004 November 12, 2004 of 361 cfs (bankfull discharge for --
station is approximately 357 cfs)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for June 7,
January 18, 2007 June 7, 2005 2005 of 951 cfs (bankfull discharge for station is
approximately 357 cfs)
Total of 5.56 inches* of rain reported for June 14, 2006
June 14, 2006 June 14, 2006 resulting from Tropical Storm Alberto; water covered the --
soccer fields between Smith and Austin Creeks
Total of 3.75 inches* of rain reported to fall over 3 days
September 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 (August 30 - September 1, 2006); overbanking was --
observed in several locations along Smith and Austin
Creeks
* Reported at KNCWAKEFI Weather Station on Welcome Drive in Wake Forest.
** Reported at USGS Gage Station 0208732885 on Marsh Creek near New Hope. Marsh Creek at this station has a 6.84 square
mile watershed, which is expected to have a bankfull discharge of approximately 357 cfs based on the North Carolina Rural
Piedmont Curves.
2.2.2 Bank Stability Assessments
Detailed Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and Near Bank Stress (NBS) assessments were completed
for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report. Results of the assessments are presented in the table below.
BEHI and NBS assessments were not included in the previous monitoring reports and therefore no
comparisons between preconstruction or previous monitoring years can be made.
The majority of onsite reaches are characterized by a moderate BEHI and moderate NBS. Reaches that
are characterized by high or extreme BEHI include a section of the downstream preservation reach (Smith
Reach 3) and sections of the upper extents of Smith and Austin Creeks (Smith Reach 1 and Austin Reach
1). These sections of stream are incised, show evidence of prior bank erosion and tree loss with low
rooting densities and some bare soil exposure.
Approximately 84.6 percent or 9300 linear feet of onsite reaches are characterized by moderate
BEHI/NBS indicating that stream reaches are relatively stable, exhibiting low erosion rates
(approximately 624.5 tons per year). Site BEHI/NBS values indicate a successful stream restoration
project, particularly when the project location is considered; the project is located within a developing,
urbanized watershed that is targeted for restoration (Targeted Local Watershed 03020201070070).
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 16
Table 7. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Time Approximate Very Sediment
Point Reach Linear Extreme High Moderate Low Low Export
Footage* (tons/year)
linear feet % of total linear feet on Site
Smith Reach 1 2100 400 1600 100 -- 490.7
(3.
6%) (14.6%) (0.9%)
Smith Reach 2 2550 -- 25 2
5 -- -- 32.0
(3 (2
2
Smith Reach 3 819 -- ? 4 -- -- -- 58.6
4 (
o)
Year 50 2550
(2006) Austin Reach 1 2600
(0.5%)
(23.2%) -- 27.6
Austin Reach 2 500 -- -- 4 5 Vi -- -- 4.3
(
a)
Austin Reach 3 2425 -- -- 2425 -- -- 11.4
(22.1%)
Total 10,994 400 1194 9300 100 624.6
(3.6%) (10.9%) (84.6%) (0.9%)
* The total length/linear footage for each stream reach is approximate.
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas
Stream problem areas within the Site are depicted on Figures 2A through 2H and are outlined in Table 8.
Several problem areas noted in previous annual monitoring reports were no longer present. Beaver dams
were removed in 2005 from Smith Reach 2; therefore, backwater effects resulting from the dams are no
longer present. In addition, many of the mid-bars present in 2004 have shifted and are currently point
bars. During the current site assessment several areas of bank erosion, mid-point bars, and reduced
structure integrity/failure were identified. Example problem area photographs are included in Appendix
B.
Table 8. Stream Problem Areas
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Station
Feature Issue Suspected Cause Photo*
Numbers
Smith Creek
Bank erosion with potential for future
1+50-1+75 Continuation of erosion around tree S1
tree loss
Old bank sloughing 3+10-3+20 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion on left bank of structure 4+004+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion around structure depositing in center
Mid-channel bar 5 x 25 feet) 4+30-4+55 --
of channel
Mid-channel bar 5 x 10 feet) 5+50-5+60 Sediment deposition in center of channel. --
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tight meander
Erosion on right bank of structure 4+004+10 --
bend
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 6+55-6+90 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, erosion
around root wads
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 17
Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo*
Numbers
Smith Creek (continued)
Erosion on left bank of structure 7+00-7+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of S2
structure arm on bend
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of
Erosion on right bank of structure 8+00-8+10 S3
structure arm on bend
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 8+80-9+20 Vertical banks on somewhat tight bend, S4
erosion around root wads
Bank erosion, sediment input 10+90-11+50 Input from stormwater, tight meanderbend --
Erosion on left bank of structure 12+95-13+05 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion on left bank of structure 14+00-14+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of S5
structure arms
Vertical banks on tight bend, erosion around
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 15+50-15+75 root wads
Bank erosion 17+30-17+50 On outer bend, lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion around structure 18+00-18+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation S6
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 18+70-19+00 banks on slight bend, erosion around root S7
wads
Loose sewage pipe below structure
20+20-20+30
Sewage pipe possibly dumped in stream
S8
collecting sediment
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank erosion 21+10-21+40 --
banks on sharp bend
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 23+50-23+90 banks on slight bend, erosion around root S9
wads
Widening of stream above and below Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of
24+00-24+30 --
structure structure arms
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Erosion around root wad 28+30-28+50 banks on slight bend, erosion around root --
wads
Very small mid-channel bar 30+90-30+95 Sediment deposition in center of channel
behind structure.
Bank erosion 33+80-34-70 Runoff from adjacent soccer fields --
Mid-channel bar (- 3 x 15 feet) 36+40-36+55 Sediment deposition in center of channel -
behind structure
Bank erosion, overflow area 46+10-46+60 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical S10-11
banks
Bank erosion, future tree loss 47+60-48+20 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical S12-13
banks
Austin Creek
Mid-channel bar forming (-1 x 2 feet) 0+20-0+25 Sediment deposition at stump in center of
channel
Bank erosion 2+30-2+60 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
banks
Erosion on right bank of structure 3+70-3+80 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 18
Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo*
Numbers
Austin Creek (continued)
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 4+30-4+50 banks, erosion around root wads
Erosion around structure 4+70-4+80 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of Al
structure arms
Sediment deposition in center of channel
Mid-channel bar (- 3 x 4 feet) 5+00-5+05
behind structure. --
Bank sloughing, root wad and rock loss 6+00-8+00 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical A2
on banks at four locations banks, erosion around root wads and rocks
Migration of stream around structure 8+90-9+00 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, structure at an A3
angle with large drop, tie in of structure arms
Erosion around structure 10+80-10+90 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, structure at an A4
angle, tie in of structure arms
Mid-channel bar (- 8 x 10 feet) 12+10-12+20 Sediment deposition in center of channel
Some erosion around structure 19+30-19+40 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Loss of root wads 20+40-20+55 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, erosion A5
around root wad
Mid-channel bar (- 5 x 20 feet) 21+70-21+90 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Erosion on right bank of structure 22+.70-22+80 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, structure at an A6
angle, tie in of structure arm
Mid-channel bar 5 x 20 feet) 27+30-27+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel A7
behind structure
Mid-channel bar 3 x 20 feet) 30+30-30+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
behind structure
Mid-channel bar 4 x 10 feet) 36+40-36+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Mid-channel bar 3 x 30 feet) 37+20-37+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Bank sloughing 38+90-39+10 Stormwater runoff from adjacent development A8
Mid-channel bar 3 x 12 feet) 39+10-39+20 Sediment deposition in center of channel from -
adjacent bank sloughing/stormwater runoff
Mid-channel bar 3 x 6 feet) 41+45-41+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Mid-channel bar 3 x 20 feet) 43+30-43+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
*Problem area photographs: A = Austin, S = Smith
Stream problem areas are relatively infrequent within the Site and are considered minor in respect to the
Site location within an urban watershed, upstream watershed development, and the channel size. Most
problem areas are expected to stabilize over time with further vegetation establishment. Areas of
significant erosion are almost always associated with a tight radius of curvature or turbulence associated
with a root wad. A few areas of erosion are associated with a compromised structure. In general, stream
problems are minor with little to no lateral erosion or head cutting within the Site. Additional inspections
and monitoring of bed and banks up and downstream of root wads or compromised structures is
recommended prior to initiation of proactive maintenance measures.
2.2.4 Stream Fixed Station Photos
Photographs were taken at fixed station photo points and are included in Appendix B. The photographs
show that the stream is generally functioning well with few minor problem areas as discussed above.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 19
2.2.5 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Each stream reach was visually inspected during the year 4 (2006) monitoring period using seven feature
categories and various metrics within each category. Assessment features included riffles, pools, thalweg,
meanders, channel bed, structures, and root wads/boulders. Tables for semi-quantitative assessements of
each reach are included in Appendix B (Tables B1-B6). The mean percentage of performance for
features within each reach are summarized in the tables below. Data for the as-built and years 1 through 3
(2003-2005) were not provided in previous monitoring reports; therefore, no comparison can be made.
Table 9A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Smith Reach 1 (1986 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
2003 Year 2
2004 Year 3
2005 Year 4
2006 Year 5
2007
A. Riffles * * * * 85%
B. Pools * * * * 86%
C. Thalweg * * * * 93%
D. Meanders * * * * 99
E. Bed General * * * * 98%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 7
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * 0%
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monito eport, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Table 9B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Smith Reach 2 (2618 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 90%
B. Pools * * * * 93%
C. Thalweg * * * * 100%
D. Meanders * * * * 76%
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * 330/.
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monito`rhn keport, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc- Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 20
Table 9C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Smith Reach 3 (794 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 85%
B. Pools * * * * 78%
C. Thalweg * * * * NA**
D. Meanders * * * * NA**
E. Bed General * * * * 100%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 100%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * NA
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
** - Smith Reach 3 is a large channel that was targeted for stablilization/preservation; this reach is fairly straight with little to no
meanders.
Table 9D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Austin Reach 1 (2581 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 76%
B. Pools * * * * 77%
C. Thalweg * * * * NA
D. Meanders * * * * NA
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 38%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * 4%
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitlirc? eport, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Table 9E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Austin Reach 2 (526 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 100%
B. Pools * * * * 100%
C. Thalwe * * * * 100%
D. Meanders * * * * 67%
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 100%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * NA
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 21
Table 9F. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Austin Reach 3 (2480 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
2003 Year 2
2004 Year 3
2005 Year 4
2006 Year 5
2007
A. Riffles * * * * 98%
B. Pools * * * * 90%
C. Thalweg * * * * 95%
D. Meanders * * * * 95%
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 90%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * NA
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Problem area trends observed during year 4 (2006) monitoring, as described above, included erosion
around root wads with bank sloughing, potential for future root wad loss, and erosion around structure
arms.
2.2.6 Quantitative Stream Measurements
During the year 4 (2006) monitoring period 23 cross-sections were measured (21 onsite and two just
upstream of the Site). Tables for quantitative assessements are included below; these tables include data
from previous years. No cross-sections are located on Smith Reach 3, which was targeted for
stabilization/preservation; therefore, there is no table summarizing morphology monitoring for this reach.
Cross-section plots for the 21 onsite cross-sections for year 4 (2006) monitoring are included in Appendix
B. Longitudinal profiles were measured after construction and are scheduled to be completed in year 1
(2003), year 3 (2005), and year 5 (2007) for a total of four measurements; therefore, longitudinal profile
measurements were not completed for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report.
Success criteria dictate that there should be little or no change in the as-built cross-sections. If a change
takes place it should be determined if the change is to a more unstable condition (downcutting, erosion) or
to a more stable condition (settling, increase in vegetative diversity, deposition along the banks, decrease
in the width-depth ration, decrease in cross-sectional area). The as-built longitudinal profile should show
that bed features are neither aggrading or degrading; however, short-term aggradation/degradation may
occur depending on the peak annual discharge. Bed features should be consistent with those observed in
typical E- and C-type channels. The as-built pattern should not change and the riffle-pool sequence
should remain constant. A significant coarsening of bed materials is not expected due to the sand/gravel
substrate; therefore, bed materials will not be analyzed for stream success.
Permanent cross-sections in the Site are included in Appendix B. Each cross-section is graphically
depicted for as-built through year 4 (2006) for analysis of dimension attributes. Photographs of each
cross-section for year 4 (2006) are included with graphs in Appendix B. As a whole, the majority of Site
riffle cross-sections have decreased in cross-sectional area moving toward a more stable channel. All
reaches classify as E-type or C-type channels. Width-depth ratios are similar to previous years with
slightly elevated values in Austin Reach 3. This may result from sediment deoposition in a stable, low
shear stress reach with good vegetation establishment; width-depth values are expected to lower as the
banks continue to colonize with vegetation and capture sediment. Pools and associated point bars have
remained relatively stable.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 22
The as-built channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable E/C stream type stream
reaches as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and construction plans. The current monitoring has
demonstrated dimension was stable over the course of the year 4 (2006) monitoring.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 23
7 v'i

N O?

N -.

[\ M

O N

N

_ ti O I y "b C .?. y m G " y 'b
3
N oc M p N 4 b
N
.^ ..+ Yl N y 3 7 O CD N - =" b
N
.^ ..+ h 4J ?n
.
y ' .,.
L
U G cC C, O R ,Y y V O
O ?
?
O O E A D W
'L

01

0?0

0 V
?
?O

M

M

c+''

,-.

p

b Q• O N G O

ie U .
.+
G• to
'D W O N O
•

d X M N
.-r M Vl N .•-? M N .CO+ _ 'y
.n ? N ? ? O
.
c
• tCC p N O
N 'O a' o
k b
O C 4.
? .N N cd ? O
.
C i.
o c
•?
G co ? o
y ? °
'
o a
•? c ? ? c
"`" oo D\ . O d O
?
? ?

iG M - N [? M N --
M
?
Q'.
?
U
CO O
M

d
y to
L-?i y p
NO
£• N ? V1 CJ
iY"
bD

• k

'? }+
0 0 0 0
p N bq N
'O
y
A l
IG N C G
~ ? N? O O
A .
G ?

Q
M

V ,y Y ? N 'O
N
C M O
G
41 .?
00 N G '1V• G b
v? U .n
N
Q O
O;
0 cd C O ?.
v
Q
y

CL

r

to
b O
p- O
G
.?
•G
r t
C ? .
O G o
.40
L ? N ctl S O
ro
a'
p
O G m a
i
0
U
Q • O
Q

? N
C C ? $_ .n n' y
a
0 11 G pO ,
'?
04

03 a
..
O
O OA y
a to
?
•b
W C
? c c
^?
_
G
?
O
`? N? y0 O
p m
•
???ga
o
G
a G ?
?

O O
°
o.5y0.9
p
E
N
° V1 ?• ?
p O
? .
0 0? p 0??
7 k
ca

G N ,
O
O
?
O
?.r
y N c
V
p m •
O
t: o a
•
G ?
? xM
E
E •? ??
M A b w
L m
L , O
un Un

, a c FC ?" J t Y ew E E y 7 w ~? j w
O L d c
i 0.
1

m GO 10, -0

v

?

b

°
0
3
? A. 0
a
ci
6
w
o
?
?
a o
o N ?
m c 3 w ?
a x N
b 0
a > ?
U rn °
? o
a? ? ?T- y U cc y u a`i " A w
°0 d ? 3

.?y
w x z y
° ea +' g y c w

.yi
n d d
t r 0. A a o. v d

G M ? 00 M ? (? M
p F4 ," '? ., M o
O O
y
Vl
ti NyryC N oo
--+ h
M
N N M
C 00
?" "O
F n C C
I.O. '' a N N .-. N y? N
N N M kn O

aC V'1 O 01
C'i 00
r
4 Vl O ??r
,

O O

O p ? y
y
f?? ?

0 0

O lp
17 M M 01 l? N ?'

N ,
N
.--.
M
N
'-

W en en
p
"r en

?

T
N
o

M
en N -- N ~ Vl ? `
'? O
C M M
~
O W O O

C?7 M ?N Q\ O
.-.
N M
? 'fyN?? ao
O l?
N N 'k O% 00 C,
M o
01 ID O, N
y ry /-. N

M
/.
O
~
N

M

O
1 1
? p
'?y ? C' O O v'1 ?O
Ln m N C,
00 ? V'1 '1 ?
M .-. N N M M

O O
V1 00 h N N ?N,,, K
M M

' ?.I
N h N M v
1
?

C O
u
+
N
V
N
NO
o0
O
N

M
N
Q\

vi
N
O
O
O
N

N
"a

N
A
O
O
O
O
U C,

'n
???y
y
N r
II
O
O i.
O
-••
- 1c! r
N l"R
O
L
'O ?.+ ? N V1 N M ? ? ?

6 W 4:.? V:. '*.' W 4=r W W i . 4:r O ? N .?'.
N
GM c ? ? ? o o
? a k a a Cn
w U
O. C Q\ ? b ? ? p•, ? y °3 ,b ? O ? C ? v.. ? a pw ? ? w ? y C1 ?
a? 7
te
o a, e
Q a o v
x
PC
o U
w

++

a+
i°

C
3
z y

O
d y y •? G%i sC. W U
y ? ad+

>4
C N
da M ? ? M
O iG
O
N N p N
G
C 0
? ? ? ?'
M N M 00 oG !+
iG

iG M

!+ ? M N M oo V1 ? .--? l?

C a lr
G ? M N N l? Vi l"i
C O --
=
•y ?y p ... N
00
7
?y
t?0
A
C
d
"'

Vl a
M
!+
G A
M
N
M
o0
v1
!?
G
C
r
?
n
C
U C
y
>y
M
M
M
',y O O
VJ ? ? R N M M 00 Vl ? l £ Q

m m
N M V1 '?

'?"
?
10
N
N
M
N
N
Yi
d
C?
rr

O O
M
q O
R
,? In
M O?
?
M 7
N
'?" R
o O
O kn
N
?
M
O
?
?
~
?
?
O
V] ? m n M C C
G
H C
O
y O
•y
r-
'IR
'o
N
..1
961

x
co N

7 M
N ?p O M N
_ ?p Q
,^? l^
iG V. l^
iG
N ? N ^ N f2?
O ?Yr? 7
N
'IT d v1
C, N
IC
M F M
V
0
G R 0 0
3

V] ?

N eq

N

^O

N

7

p r4

O

p
0
C4

^'T
.

a,

M

C

C
0
N

? ? N N M o0 ? ?y C, n l? N ? eC ttl M p
N N M .-. lw
/
• "`y ?D V N N
m 00 ? 6i
N V '. M M M

O O O
L.y N 4 N M O O? N .-. tl ?'
Q Q
,
fy
C
G C Y' N M vl ?p O O? ,7Mi ? O ?
iG

b-0
. O
L
0 d
y +
N
l'?
n C? N
N T
M T
00 O
p
~
!w M
O M
N
?"
r
+
O
G
/ O
O O
O
C. M
O
y

U

R

?+

O

M

M

O?

O.

^ry

O

e¢

O
a
+ / G
? ? -•

O
_
fA ZO
C p?err
G
'fl U iG M 7 ? M N ? ? iG

y
4,'..
W
4+
W
.?
?
?
O
?
?

03
Q
Q
Q
?
?
?
b
?
?
?
3
?
?
?
A
?
?
?
^
y

t6 „
p
. u N 54
O 00
a c ° i W
°
w
° - a
o CO
c U
°
3
G ??„
x
`? O
a o
a° V
w G
ro
_CO W u ro

m G
`o'ff N 3 N awi °? 3 w 3 x b ? ? v CA
Q ? ? o p U ? y 4a y; ? .° p

OC d _ .D
0 w `
m z r
x
4w
i
d
'?-? 0.1 ea
`
`
ar
Z
W

a
ea y
W

a
I A-1 e
U
R
°z
L
a> a+
i ?
O a ?
o U o^'o
a
Q
U ?
a
F ? d
b
d

°o °O
R
?
o
4

°? cp O p
M l? tV cn N cr•? C
?r
C
O
O O
N.+
0 a N M ^, N M O IG O
4 O
?
y G ?y ? ? M h 00 ? ?y N V'1 ?'
/

U
to

N

m h v

M b
V] ? N M r N ? IA ? In
O O
O O
fyO M N
? ? ?

N N O `. Yt N+
iG N
?
O
O
p
N N m N N
d
N M 00
M .--i 00
M M --i
M M PC cd cd [? i!1
'"r T l
iD
r -^
] G ?i?CCC
y
i W
v O' N 00 p M O? 01 cN N M .N,, ro O cC o
't N
r- l?
N N
N
GGG
?? N A N N M O\ M O N
?G C
i
H L'
L
V ?+
R+ ~

N N N

N N
M .?

? 00

M O

Z 0

f- cz p c M

-- M

N
a , .

O 00 O N O h O 'O
N N M N M ^ M en
O O
O O

N 4 ?c h N -A O F. O

N ?y M V'1 M 00 _? l? >y M M O iG

C
O W7
y + ,r '? p - p +
>4 ca ca
? d
C/]
H 'V N A cq N M M ?r C f.. O O
i
ii
u
?-
?
7. p N
C v
4
M
7 M
N M O
C F
y
d

M ?Y M N M ^C
R

.. N v? E .L' U
c .? ti ,r ,r.'
10 w O W is j c~a d

3 c0 u
u
¢

A
EL
Ca

?

'

o

b '" .?

3

o Q

ed

a

a

o

o U

W 7
w a x q > o cn n u
45
b 0. r

It 3 C

W v

x q

C y

c v

ci

U a

o o w

W ..

o
0.R v
°
. v
° U R
x ed
x
s

c
o ?
k,
„
d
ns ?
z
°' y
vf O CLl R a? V+ G x L
y R ?"' .Q
om u
A rig R 0. PL, Q
' z
y ?
•0 M
67
u ?
?z
0.
° U
s
a c
o
o
Q
.b
A ?
c?
d
o° °o

Z
1,4
00
I'-
N N
N N M --? Ln O
O O
40 en
OC
'D
rr
O '? ?

N y ?
r
y +
M .-.
N O, N
N N
M DD 00
v1
+
C
r.
c'
y
rn q n t) C.

U O
O

i
N
N
00
^O
O
" N v
i N M ?
O O
O O
01 N ,.? .N.. v
V N N M '- O O
?
y
00 v7 O O, ID f
r
N M V [? N N C.
_
p
,"?
N
V
M
l-
>y
cd
cd
cC
O? o
M
N
O
O
p iG
O \O
O
?

r
>y
l?
O O
.N.s
R
O
cd
O
O o
o
00
? O
eq
cn N

c ?+
/ .
-i
n N M lO O N N

f
p
I\
~ N
C
: -
>1
O
G
? 00
Ln M '- M ' L' N
m '""?
? h \p N 'y d

?,.
N l
M t+ N

O

O

O O
?y N D1 M ?y eq
/. N Cl
V
l?
V7
N
N
"
O
/-.
O

w
w ?
en ""' O 00 en

O N
O

y
v

}
+
N
''y
0O
O
N
,?

O

O

O

00
N
?

cC

cC
"C1
y

V?

y
N
tr

F
^ M
l-
-n

G
C
N

N
H
p r.
O
O
U O ?y V \O OR V 'y O O O

I TW N 'O
M ?
? N
IO ^

E '?' w '.?
. '?. .'?. y w ?• 7 U
V . . .
p L M o u a CA U ` °' ° w j c? a
= a
i o o u ?

N cc
R p O O U O
? a O
X ? o LUz. ; w ? ? z
L

co ^O

A
v?
P.
d u =
O N 'V M ? M i
n
b O } N S :d
?
F
O L
o ic•
C T
M ? .-. M N C•i
/. ? G
y N N ? 0? ° N 7 M N vl O
yv. F G G
U m 7^ ? m ? ? `" }

iG
} 7 ° M M r ? ? N }
M ? - M N - M ^ C
C M N M d °
a G M O? G

Vl

H

F
2

G

?
n

a

N

C

.?

O
^

?

O

N
O

M a O N ?

? rn N ? ? 1 1
F
O pG ,?" n M c c
O
M A
LO.

U F
7
M
O
O
?
Q,
?
%
?
? ?+
G M ^ N R N '?^
F p
l ? Q

G M S N ? ? L N G C ? C

?
?
<f0
V1
M
?
?O
?
?y
eC O
?
? O
y
C Q l
?
G ^? G` N M I ?
?rr
G ? ? 1 ? Q

G M A
G

y
G -
O
7 77
?
?
•?
M
'O

o
--
?o 0 0

Y ?+

F ? G M T N M .v: d' l? _: ry ? iei O? U M N O N ... ?
W + Y? y?j b r W y? ',N. O N T r C I\ a N
? ? l•? M ^ ? N M .,., ? !+ O M ryO ?' ry .-- y? M R N?

U W
Vl Y
? ^
M
N C
M M
h '?
? M
? 7•
l? G F
?" ^
t? ^
00 N
M .--
N N 7 N G

G O ?
+ O

a
?.,
v
o,
o,
v,
r
? O
C
x O
C
t ?^
v?

•L o
Vi v,
?
?
?
?
.-.
n
N
!
?L
?G

Y
?i?GGG n
G N ? N
C to v ?
N
Vt
^
?
? N
x N

Wz'

S •O^ W C y ? ? C ._ ._ C ?' E E ? ? ? ? C C U C C ? ? C o c
L L
? L 6 A S '.F, Ri FC v E E L_ d t 'O" L_ . t U > V
O
u
bi
? ? b
3 ro v
d
Ga
0 •G
- C
? E
. A °
.o 0?0
a ?
3 q C
? 7 C
°' G,
o C
?: .C
:a d
«y C
j C
a C
v? L
o
o C:.
'y W C
n
o
L u
pQ 'a F
m x
`° Q ? _°
=
? ?
o 3
° E F
w " ?e
o
?
c ? s o a
i ? F ? V ? ? o o i v ? V m
L L E 3 ? w m 3 = m i, c m 0.' r > r E `o w
o m ?n
F r
A
c
o R7 W4 3 X ?
Ci
A c
? ? u
v U vi
a`> o
?
? G7
o
7 y L F 6 V ' ai 9
3 C
g ; O o z K
?
u t L e w v
E F
d u w
i 00
F v? d O v°, 9m, 00 , aL Q
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa
Springs, Colorado.
United States. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1970. Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, InG Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 30
Appendix A
(Click here)
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION RAW DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina Appendix A
N
0
O
N
M
J
c
(9
(D

m
v
C.
m a
a d
a
o
d
?o
rn
C
O
c
O
C
O
.(0
N
v)
a)
C
N
7
Q
06
L
E
U)
c
O
c
O
a.
W
W
E O
O
N (O
O
>I O
C U
W a)
O
CU d
a)
w c
W N
7
cn m
(.)b
C
_o
E .r
m
m V
? o
a -tea
t
U
co
(D
T
a)
a)
U
m
a
E
(n
E
? a
m :3
O U
X
w a)
O N
C (6
O U
E
a) N
d y
m O
_p C
-a m C
c
a) U
a) N
°' U E
O C
CL _0
c
(D O m
+L U -O
U U
O a) O m
a)
c U ? L7
m O
a) , _
U y a) O
a
o E m c
O p U _ m
a) CD a) L a O m
L (n a
?O uj 3 L L
c?a m
N (n N O O
E O O U O
U U M O O a
U
7 O O O Q QL
m 5 +.. +..
i 5.
CEO T a 4m)
L o o m ?c -0 -
U 6 O 0- a) a) N
ZLa =m m m E
w 3 a) L L
Z c .E 0' to to y
a) U) N w?? m
0 70
>, !n N m >_
U N .6.. >,
D--`oO c c O
o a) a)
E rn 0)
= U) to ° 6 a ° E E 7
F- !E N w m m O
Z F- J LL LL J U
H
w
w
2 a
N a
Y N
? c
O
U- o
O d
Z CL O T
O a cna?_
?- cn m b m
Ix m ? rn a? ?U
U'owL"mmm
UU) m. o o E E E E
w d_._._
mmm.,
G 2 a:55 to
Cl) CO
M
Y
a)
m
U c
C O
c
? O
Q U)
a ?
E
L ?
U) V)
m
? m
V
Q •3 m
(D y
d N 01 ++
cnoEc w o
-CL
o m o E
U U Z= $ a p
L 4) °'
w ? ?.°-s E y ° -
-1 o cn m a E
y
°° m c w i 0 m
a s G, o ?2 (n m w cn
(0
(4 N
O Y
U N
N PD
2 ()
a.s°o:°.
o N 2 G
7
Z' a T O
CL
E c (D
7 L }
U E
(n
U
N 00 00 00 O co (t) O O C) 00 Lo 00
d

d
N

0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD
N
E

c
N
_N

A
d
D
N M N (O f` O O O In CO O CD
? N N N 7 (n A N N N r-
N
E

c

J
V
0)
E
N
y O (0 CD O O CO (D (0 O (O O O O CD (D (O
y
R O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0
? N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
(n (!')
?5 (f)
a (O
a) CO
W (O
8 (O
6) CO
8) (D
m 00
m 00
Cn (0
a5 00
m W
a CO
a t0
m
V 7 d' It V 7 V d' V V 7 V V <t V <t
00 00 00 00 00 co co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 co 00
0 (7 (D (D (D ( 0 (9 c7 0 0 (D (D (D (D c9
E U) CO U U U U U co U U U U U U U U
m 2
< 2
G

? Cl) Cl) co CO M co
D Cl) Cl)
aD M
W co
M M
O M
W M
W M
OD co
00 M
O
c0 O M O W O 00
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
m
c

N
2
r
7
W

r

m
v

N n O r- r.- N 04 v oo
Q O (O ? O u' N N ? N N M
(D ( N N V
J O O O O O Lo
to
LO
LO
U') O m m O)
LO
LO
LO In to to Lo
"T
et
V
W M O O ao W W M ao W co
-
Z
f
r

'm
v
+?+ 0 V I- C) 00 (n V O 7 M ? O (O LO W m
y 00 N N N M M
M M N (17 fD C O r• CO 'IT
(n 0 0 ( ') (f) If) In 0 0 In In C n

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O i
O
In (n In ( ) (() LO (f) (f) (f) (n (f) (n ( f)
M M M M M M M M M M M M
?- N M V 0 C D r O Z N M l O 02
0 0 0 0 0 0 c) 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
x
Q x
Q x
x
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
Q

Ce M d' V d' V 7 ct 'ct ?t V V 7
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Vigor
vigor Count Percent
103 28.1
1 3 0.8
2 53 14.4
3 141 38.4
4 170 46.3
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing
Alnus serrulata 3
Baccharis halimifolia
Betula nigra 16 8 1
Ca rya cordiformis
Corpus amomum 2
Dios pyros virginiana 4
Fraxinus americans 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 82 65 10
Gleditsia triacanthos
Ligustrum sinense
Liquidambar st raciflua
Nyssa aquatica 1
Pinus taeda 42 8 3
Quercus albs
Quercus falcata 2
Quercus lyrata 6
Quercus michauxii 1 6 6 1
Quercus nigra 9 1
Quercus pagoda 2 9 2 1
Quercus phellos
Rhus glabra
Salix nigra
Sambucus canadensis 1
Ulmus rubra 1 2 1
Morella cerifera 2
Juniperus virginiana
Carya 1
Liriodendron tulipifera 1 4
Myrica 2
N ssa 1 10
Platanus occidentalis 10 16 3
Prunus serotina
Acer negundo 2 5 2
Acer rubrum
Ulmus $6 1
TOT: 35 170 141 53 3
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Damage
Damage Count Percent Of Stems
no damage) 327 69.6
Insects 69 14.7
Flood 25 5.3
[Enter other damage] 22 4.7
Unknown 16 3.4
Deer 7 1.5
Drought 2 0.4
Other/Unknown Animal 1 0.2
Diseased 1 0.2
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Damage by Species
O
w0? ?F
m O a
C?
Q
3C
°
a ?J ?0
cc? S o Jc
Acernegundo 14 8 4 2
Acer rubrum 8 8
Anus serrulata 4 4
Baccharis halimifolia 4 4
Betula nigra 33 29 1 1 2
Carya 1 1
Carya cordiformis 2 2
Corpus amomum 4 3 1
Diospyros virginiana 8 4 4
Fraxinus americana 2 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 173 110 6 4 1 5 43 4
Gleditsia triacanthos 1 1
Juniperus virginiana 2 2
Ligustrum sinense 1 1
Liquidambar styraciflua 8 8
Liriodendron tulipifera 8 3 2 1 2
Morella cerifera 2 2
Myrica 3 3
Nyssa 12 2 2 3 4 1
Nyssa aquatica 1 1
Pinus taeda 64 60 2 1 1
Platanus occidentalis 38 27 3 2 6 1 1
Prunus serotina 2 2
Quercus alba 1 1
Quercus falcata 2 1 1
Quercus lyrata 6 4 2
Quercus michauxii 14 10 2 2
Quercus nigra 12 10 1 1
Quercus pagoda 15 3 3 3 5 1
Quercus phellos 1 1
Rhus glabra 1 1
Salix nigra 4 4
Sambucus canadensis 1 1
Ulmus 13 5 2 3 1 2
Ulmus rubra 5 2 1 2
TOT: 35 470 327 22 7 1 2 25 69 1 16
TOT:
343-AXE-0001
343-AXE-0002
343-AXE-0003
343-AXE-0004
343-AXE-0005
343-AXE-0006
343-AXE-0007
343-AXE-0008
343-AXE-0010
343-AXE-0011
343-AXE-0012
343-AXE-0013
343-AXE-0014
343-AXE-0015
343-AXE-0016
16
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Damage by Plot
o?
wow ?F
co ?? oo .`yo ?o `oo ?y?
14
23
35
30
49
57
22
34
23
26
36
24
27
24
24
22
470
8 2
17 3
27 1
25 2
28 2
32
22
25 3
12
15 5
26 4
21
18
16
19
16
327 22
O O O Q ?
1
21 1
a
Q'
3c
c°
c
of c3
Or Jr
21 1 1
1 18
2 20 1
2 1
11
1 5
2 3 1
3
8
4 2
1 1 3
4
L
7
Q R' y0.
LC 0
' 0
00 0
M 0
? 0
? ?
?? c
p
CQ n
00
O,
k/l
Qi
l O

d C.
O
L?
e O R y
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0

k
0
0
0
C 6 (A
y r-
[- M
O., r-
l- I-
l- M
D,
00
oc
00
oc
00
00 M
Os M
a\ O
in rq
N
oo
00
l? ?
O? C,
O, en
en 00
09
00
00 00
00

O

O
C
?
^ U
y? w ? i+ Q Q Q Q ? ? ? ? Q Q Q Q Q Q
z
z
z
z
p
7 z z z z z Z Z z z z z z z z ¢ o z -. z
E
,
w
z =
L ?
6!
•?

7

-

-

-

-

-

7

7

z

M

M

M

M

M

M

DU
y L O PC

vi
CC L
M
M
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
O
Z
Z
N
O
O

L
O
C

C c•
C
O
O
U

C
C ^
iC ? O
E -C

?
m
Q O
U U '?
F, w bfj
C
y rl C C, 7C
C _
W? C
O U O
y p
C. Cl.
rn
y r^ 1 c y. ^ O 'O Q_ L .
I
??/I H Cl. C t U U O O U .C .?
lu cc
G?
?
? y C
Q
? U
'b U
?
? b o a
w i
.
?
y L V
C- -p m cC cC O
^"S Q L

CL
fn

U v pr api ?. O U U O C
CI.
C U in
i/1 ?+ epa o W
C-
Cl. c"i c 3 v d ° N

w .?
O ° ai U a o U °' `o
...
bA ? 4y
o
0
0
0
0
o
U
r_
a
o
0
b
r. ?. a O U ti C ti C
N `
U _ U U CL -
., o
y ti
6t
rL x
? 6?
a y
y.
O C
.s. C-.
o- C
•U Ri
.C F
y in .O U
y C"
N O
.U
U O
N U
C p
W
O c0
,t C
y W
O W
O
C
y n
r Ui a?
`"

a

¢ U

i C U
N

c

v rn

A aU+

O !e

O
r-L

i

7 C.

U 'y

U
w

x

U

N
w

p
U ~ ? Q ? C

?
.r H
?
N
M
V
?n
N
M
N
N
M
V
--
N v
N
M
? .
N

y rl
y a y
L
Q V o ^O
41 L _
rl
a L
U 67
d
y y 3 q 4D v
a a h m > 3
?- GL :Q ti A w w
O Op k
N O
? U
0.
0.
? > Q
U
C
O
O
G
ti
O
d
,i
W
0

y M
U o
•? z
Qz,;
b?o
rnw3
s..
y p C R
o
o
?
0
0
0
0
R W R O
y L
dI ? y O
Q? M
p? O ?
[? O?
p? M
?O M
M
??
? O
it ? y
e O R o
o 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
\ 0
o 0
c \°
° \°
° 0
o 0
0 0
0 \°
° o
o e 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0

y ? C M
? M
O? M
O\ M
Q\ Q\
? M
p1 M
Q1 M
O? ?
? O
? D1
l? M
M M
O? O
? Q,
U
? h
?O [?
?O O
V1 h
?O M
M M
M
O
p" ^ U
o ?'? ?? d d ¢ ¢ d d Q d d d d ¢ Q d ? o ¢ Q d Q ¢ Q
z z z z z z z z z O z z z z z z
w C M
Z .? N
L ?
p 7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
d
M .
am
z z ?O ?O ?O \O M M

e a
c ^a

0.

0
ao
c

C•

?•

C c'
O
O

c

U
?p ?
N
c° o

a? M N y a f?

M R
Q'
y as c ?" w 0 c ? Y ? a? c? o p w
/
?,
/? ?? N N /
?
A b ?? . p (u 3..
'•
42 cz
c w:-. 'D
r?? a ?:
.4 °
0 a c ° 6 2

^i V ^ O L O U ti O 7; 4) N k O U O
?^
wi N U R cd (C R 'y' ^ R M E) U
L
? 4.w
Vl
y
R
b tn.
O 0
.O E.
O e
W
O
.?
'O
U
O
C
p
U
O
v
a it Q -0 SM. `' ,00 U U ? p m
r
?+.?
?
Q

?

?

?
y
?
?
N
R
UU
W
R
w
w y
Q,, ?
'^7
it ? O O
O _ ti U
' }'
N S 0+ .?.. cad O a~i
C C C'
R O
d .? N O
a? O
a? ?
6?
L
+ yL„
d
0. +-
Q v
R
W _
? C
rJ
G4 ..
O
V] O
C)
?.7 O
Q a
O w
¢ O
V] O
0 u
U sU. O O ate. O
?S?C
i U ?•
.
iG
-
N
M
7
V'1
--+
N
M
••-•
N
--+
N
M
•-
N U .
•--
N
M
V
--?
N

i+
? ? N
y

M cue
U ou
" y
"C

d 0.1

\
v
C y a a a > 3
[-? v? vs ? ? ra ti A w ?; L7
r- M
eq x
°o N
U
in.
O
R
U
O
0
ci
ti
ti
w
i
W

?E R
a? MU
U E o
Z
?w3
L

o
0
L? ;_,
0 o ca o
o o
0 c ?
0 o ?
o o o
?
d
d
Q
Q
Q
d ?
o ?
0 c
0
0
o
d
d
v? 0
o o o Z Z Z Z Z Z o 0 0
0 0 0 o Z Z
a
^ U
'
;° ? ;:, ?? d Q Q d d d ¢ Q Q d d d Q d o o Q d Q Q Q Q
Fs z z z z z Z Z z z z z z z z o o z z z z z z

z
y ?
O E y a V 7 7 M M M Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z N N N N z z
F o d ?
c c4

8 a
y m M M M N N z z z z z z z z N N N N z z

a

0
ou
c
C.
C
Li
O
? N ,.
O ?c
U a w° c
i to
C
?
G U ° ? •
C y
;A y

•
co
-?4

°
O
73
i
•
i
rA N
M ?--I ee
? C c
no
? a
co a
i
r
U
? o
^
? =
?„ s
?
•?

^? ?r cd O Q , y O 'b '
•Ir y a+ b
y p U u ` o 0 U

?z -0 ID a
i tp o CL
y U n) Yt C p

++
v

ai U
CL U
U
r-

'C

C

'i ??
cd ?
?++
F+ yC

v

o .?.. ?

b

v {cci
op
U cC U
c6
C U v

°

C
r O
.
W u fm.

C
o
.
y d N _ ° 0 x U L b
•, U
Q eC C y y ?, _ U H rii
en
co C, 5k -E 4) E

O 34.0.i

d
eUC
o
aoi
7
aoi
O
Ca

O
w
O CL
aoi
t G
'
yU,

x
o
Q
O
U d a r? .a a v a ¢ rn CD U k w w
ON .--? N M .•. N M -• N r- N M q --? N U -- N M V' -^ N
_
i+
y ? M
y

v i,
o a
i
b

M rr ? ? DD y p ?

H V? i/? Lz Q ? U CA W fi, L7
? O k
N ? U
a
U
0
0
ci
ti
w
r
i
W
0

to M
r?i U
L•. ? O
• ,z
? N O
?w3
L
£
O
C?
R w R p o
?O ?
h d
' Q
' o
01 0
90 0
7
z ?
GT. Ry
0
L? +r
e O? o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o 0
c 0
o
d
Q
d
d
d
Q 0
o c 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
o 'O
C O O O O O
l O O
C O
l- Z Z Z z z z 00
O\ O
N O
Vl 00
en 00
M
F`
^ U 00 00 00 a0 0 00 O
'
;° a?? °+?' d d Q Q d d d d d Q d Q Q d ? o Q d d d d d
z z z z z z ?. Z z z z z z ti o Z 7, Z Z Z Z
F C
z o
ImJ
O L 7
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
z
z
z
r
F a d ? z z z z z
a a
on
00 00 00 00 ?D 00 00 l- • N M M
+U+ z z z z z z z

a

0

cc C O O C
C a cd c
a. N w p b0
M .-.
y
y O U U
U y
O ~ W
•
O
1?1
..
O
O
O
O CZ
-0 N
U
h
y
y ?
?
N
W
!"I d
y C L?
U ba7 O
4r y v i
6t RT

VJ it
M

C
C

?
t\

cOd
p

N

O
Y
O

a
C
G

o
C
O

w
d w ? c_ ?
ti Q b O

'? 6?
i-a
v
'O
c
V
cd
+
.? "? CL L _y A U a N O U V C y

C E

U

C

..

.d

p

U

a?

a

O

O
U

C

i.
y
-p
V •?
? O O .? O O .4 w O W m m
o 0
•bA "
" b o b o o b 3 o
o c
a b o C
o c- N
O U q 0 U ? C's CL •..
r/J W 03 cd ?.. ca a
i a) C C m _
U -a
W O W W

Ud p O O d n 0 i ? °o
U oo a w a w c U w x Q w w w
i.r ? N ? N M ? v'? N M N N M ?t --? N U N M ? N
? rl y
V
O

? C y ayi y 3 C G?J` y °'
i-a w z. O y Ts C R

F?+ va d w Q o4 t.i a w w ?7
?=
? O k
0.
O.
a?
C
.O
0
c
i
w
O
8
N M U
~ y Y
U E o
z
a
?z
"F u
• a?
?w3
L
i y F °o °o °o ? ? ? Z
wa ?
?a
C R +'
: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢' o c 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ d
fl
c
z/? ?. O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
z o
O O
O
? O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
z
z
?
F`
^ U
'
o??? y d d ¢ ¢ Q d d Q d d ¢ d Q d ? O
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z O z z z z z z
F O w C m
z
L ?
p ?. N N N N N M M m N N N Z N N Z Z M M M M z z
F d
a a
en
;, L c o
a E PC
N
N
N
N
N
m
m
M
N
N
N
O
N
z
z
M
M
M
M
Z z z
zt

s
to

C
C Cl.
U
C O C
y N a?i 19. w p by
?
r O U U ° ? ? • C
,
??
,
_' ry d C' cba X O O O a p c• m
N '
101 e
!
'1 C. ? Q
O O O 11
ca O
L U v
\ +"
U c r. O C
d
C 0 O
t. w
y ^C C >
A a?
" O
U y .p y
Gi
.. y U 'O y
°
° s.. C F ca iC ca
` 42
y
r? r^?? ii d
L
y
-C
.O
U

D

U
O
U

U

Q Cl.

O c
a
U FS
V
,
4- Z a O CJ U U G O
a U 0

??
c
N U is ca ? G y am„ ? Y. ca U 4
w
O i? > o o 0 0 c ° o u ° ° ° n
r
i.
L °
o a?
C a b
C c
a
" ° ° o
m
n C?
G? a
i
G s. ca a ?. a r cls w w
?' " C r y v' y r r
L C a ?•

o s. • v

¢
ca . C.
°
o Q
°
o
w -
o
° c
s Y
'
°' y
w
?
°
V ° a w a s a Q O O d cn O U
. u x c w
r ? ? ? N M ? v'? N M N N M ? - N U N M ? N
O y N ?,

?"
al Ge U
cu

H

C

%

1?1 ? L E
y
'C
O
A

O O k
N
a
t7
O
0
w
,i
W
0

a?mU
? o
? z
° U
Y?
?w3
L E O .
+_„
40 C R
R O e
O o
O e
v o
v e e Q
R
? *• 44 F
rn
rn l
Cl l

o, O?

o? O

rn

z
? 0.
y G
O
?
e O R.
w +r " 0
O 0
O 0
O e o
O e \° c c 0
° c 0 0 ° °
° o o
°
d
o
fA O O O O O O O 0, O O O O O ?° ?°
O ?D Z
O
p
? C? 5 O, oo 00 OO 00
"
U
o? '? ?? ¢ ¢ d d ¢ d Q d ¢
d

d d ¢ d ?O ° d d ¢ d d d
z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z o z z z z z z
F Z y
y
a
L ?
O?? •a
O
O
O
?
?
O
O
O
Q
d
?
?
?
?
Q
d
F,; z z z z
C a
^ C a

oCd ° rn rn a 00 0? 0. 0 ° Z Z Z z

a

0
c

O ? G c. O o c?v
C s 0
M y O ° ° w
? w a
H
y 1
y •-• N y
C
C•

CIC
b

a /?
G

?E
O

o U O
y c
C
O ?,
R

° • m
R

y

c
.

m
? M y c (? y v ai
Q
I O c R O ?
a it
? u
Q N
U

C ti

>

Q C

O c

«9 U -

y O
CL
r c

+ce•

6?
d U
b
m
r.
'b
?
?
cC
iC
? r-L
R
y

O p? Cr.
i
y
°?
0.°
o
v
v
`M C- M
t)
r?+ Z LA O O a?i u p b v a? v O ° ti
R
cc M
•? i. a o 0 0 C-

p a y
Q o
'? o
`
° b o
d cs
Oa
v
°
O t?c
° • O
y Q m R R C• R N N C U •n R "•'
a

~ c y 0 y p y a?

R

It

a
+-

"o

o

c

U v C A
a y Q `?' O O w N t i
'
x
Q sue. O
P. c Q O O d C2
C7
U
s
ix
w
w
i.r N N M V V'1 N M N N M 7 •-- N U N M '? N
O M
y
r.l
0

? 04
a
R
ao
y
C
CQ
d CD y C: L y
"
1. ? ?
C R R O
4
Fv?d aj
?
09
v
A
w
F?;
?
? O k
N
? a
v
G
O
0
ti
r
0
•N
w
0
Q'

y M
N M U
ar ~?".+
v ? a
? z
az,;
d U C
? O O
O U
0. R
rnW?
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
ARI-2
RifFlc
9/18/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 S urvey 2005 S urvey 2004 S urvey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
-7.4 239.9 7.2 240.3 2.6 239.7 20 239.7
8.0 240.5 12.3 2409 13.2 241.4 3.0 239.7
13.2 240.9 17.9 239.1 17.2 239.5 6.0 240.0
18.4 238.5 21.1 236.8 22.1 235.5 9.0 240.7
21.4 236.3 23.3 234.5 23.4 233.6 12.0 241.1
23.5 233.9 25.4 232.8 25.7 232.3 15.0 240.7
24.9 232.8 26.5 232.1 30.6 231.9 17.8 239.5
26.8 231.1 27.6 2317 33.0 231.5 21.0 237.2
28.2 231.0 29.2 231.5 34.4 231.5 23.1 236.4
30.5 231.0 30.4 231.5 38.1 232.0 26.4 235.7
33.0 230.7 33.4 230.7 38.8 233.1 27.9 234.8
35.0 230.5 37.0 231.2 41.2 234.8 29.3 233.7
37.4 230.6 37.2 231.7 45.5 235.1 30.4 233.2
38.2 231.6 38.2 232.1 52.9 235.8 32.5 232.7
39.2 232.8 39.2 233.1 73.9 235.8 32.9 232.3
40.4 233.5 39.5 233.9 83.5 236.2 33.7 232.1
42.2 234.7 40.1 2343 35.4 231.7
46.6 235.1 40.1 2343 36.2 231.7
59.0 235.7 41.4 234.7 37.9 231.9
77.0 235.7 45.0 23571 38.7 232.4
8L8 235.9 50.6 235.6 39.8 233.1
85.1 236.2 59.7 235.8 40.8 233.9
65.3 235.8 42.2 234.7
810 236 2 49.6 234.9
83.7 236.3 59.0 235.6
70.0 235.7
76.0 235.8
80.5 236.1
84.0 236.2
84.7 236.2
89.5 237.3
97.9 239.6
102.0
1100 239.5
111) 1 i
242.0
240.0
238.0
n
R
t.
236.0
c 234.0
d
w
232.0
230.0
228.0
0.0
6.6 - 11
U1I) fMJ7 6.,,rde sly
Cross Section
Smith and Austin ARI-2 Riffle
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 63.5 62.4 51.2 49.0 57.6
Width 27.3 29.5 31.1 32.4 19.6
Mean Depth 2.3 2.1 1.6 1.5 29
Max Depth 4.8 4.0 3.8 3.9 4.2
W/D 11.7 14.0 18.9 21.4
Photo of Cross-Seetion ARI-2 - Looking Downstream @. STA 4+42
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -;- 2005 Survey
Project Name Smith and Austin
Cross Section ARI-3
Feature Riffle
Date 9/18/06
Crew Lewis. Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 238.2 2.0 237.1 0.0 238.2 1.8 238.2
2.5 237.5 2.8 238.1 2.4 237.7 3.8 237.9
5.2 235.4 4.0 237.9 12.7 231.0 5.7 236.7
6.6 232.6 5.7 236.9 14.4 229.3 7.7 234.4
9.4 231.3 7.0 235.8 19.6 228.9 9.1 232.4
14.0 229.9 8.8 232.7 22.3 228.6 10.4 231.4
16.2 230.1 10.6 231.5 24.6 227.9 13.9 230.4
18.2 229.5 13.7 230.4 28.5 230.0 15.2 229.8
19.7 228.6 13.9 230.3 32.5 231.9 15.5 229.6
23.9 228.2 15.1 229.7 46.7 231.4 18.2 229.6
26.6 228.2 15.6 229.4 54.4 232.2 20.1 229.2
27.5 228.5 16.9 229.3 60.5 232.2 21.3 228.8
28.4 230.0 17.8 228.9 21.9 228.6
29.8 231.3 19.9 229.0 23.9 228.8
30.8 231.9 21.3 228.8 26.3 228.9
32.4 232.3 23.0 228.7 28.1 228.9
34.2 232.2 23.6 228.5 28.5 229.3
37.2 231.3 24.9 228.3 31.0 230.5
44.2 231.3 25.7 228.2 34.2 231.9
50.3 231.6 26.9 228.1 42.0 231.8
54.5 232.2 28.1 228.1 52.4 232.1
28.2 228.3 59.0 232.2
29.0 228.7 62.4 232.2
29.8 229.8 63.5 232.2
32.1 231.2 65.4 232.5
33.3 231.8 70.0 233.6
35.2 231.8 74.4 234.6
38.6 231.5 78.4 234.6
43.4 231.4 82.0 234.9
52.4 231.6 86.0 235.9
54.0 232.1 89.0 236.5
240.0
238.0
-236.0
L
CC
L
,234.0
w
-232.0
a
w 230.0
228.0
226.0
0.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 54.7 52.7 51.2 49.8 60.6
Width 23.5 22.8 23.8 24.4 25
Mean Depth 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.4
Max Depth 3.8 3.9 3.2 3.2 4.1
W/D 10.1 9.9 11.1 12.0 10.3 -
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -W- 2005 Survey

70.0 80.0 90.0
Photo of Cross-Section %Rl-3 - Looking Do-stream (a' STA 13+95
Cross Section
Smith and Austin ARI-3 Riffle
Project Name Smith and Austin
Cross Section ARI-4
Feature Pool
Date 9/18/05
Crew Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
31.7 235.4 33.3 235.5 31.7 235.4 6.0 234.8
34.1 235.1 35.0 234.8 36.4 234.2 18.0 235.1
38.1 233.8 36.8 234.3 42.7 231.2 31.7 235.4
40.2 233.0 39.0 233.3 48.8 228.6 33.1 235.6
45.9 230.4 42.2 231.8 53.8 227.0 34.3 234.7
48.2 230.1 43.8 231.1 60.7 226.8 35.7 234.5
50.3 229.1 45.2 230.4 62.7 227.5 39.4 233.1
51.2 228.6 46.4 230.1 68.5 229.4 42.0 231.9
52.8 226.6 47.8 229.5 83.2 230.2 46.8 229.5
54.1 226.4 50.1 228.6 96.1 230.7 49.7 229.1
56.1 226.7 50.9 228.3 51.3 227.5
59.5 226.9 51.9 227.9 53.1 227.4
62.1 227.1 52.8 227.7 54.7 227.1
63.3 227.7 53.0 227.6 56.4 227.2
64.3 228.0 54.2 226.9 59.1 227.2
65.4 228.6 55.5 227.0 60.8 227.7
67.2 229.0 58.1 227.0 63.0 227.6
69.1 229.5 61.0 227.3 64.8 227.2
72.2 230.0 62.2 227.1 68.0 229.2
83.7 230.3 63.4 227.6 69.3 229.6
92.5 230.6 63.9 227.7 74.3 230.0
97.8 230.7 64.9 228.6 85.0 230.3
66.1 228.7 94.6 230.7
67.9 229.6 96.1 230.8
69.6 229.8 97.5 230.7
7Z0 230.3 103.0 232.0
81.7 230.3 108.6 233.4
238.0
236.0
234.0
L
A
L
--- -- --
232.0
t
w
c 230.0
W
228.0
226.0 1
Photo of Cross-Section ARI4- Looking Downstream at, STA 20+90
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 34.0 38.3 38.5 38.2 47.6
Width 21.4 22.7 22.5 23.3 23.9
Mean Depth 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 2
Max Depth 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.6
W/D 13.4 13.5 13.1 14.2 A
Cross Section
Smith and Austin ARI-4 Pool
516??
224.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -x- 2005 Survey
:t Name Smith and Austin
Section AR2-1
re Rifflc
9/18/06
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
10.5 234.7 15.6 234.3 10.5 234A 7.5 234.8
15.1 234.7 21.5 232.3 15.1 234.5 10.3 234.5
19.1 233.0 22.5 230.3 22.4 232.3 10.6 234.5
21.6 232.4 25.0 229.2 26.3 228.2 12.5 234.4
23.3 230.0 27.7 226.9 29.2 225.1 15.0 234.6
25.8 228.4 29.5 225.2 30.4 225.1 17.8 233.4
28.6 226.2 32.4 225.0 30.9 224.8 21.7 232.4
30.5 225.3 32.6 224.9 34.4 224.5 23.1 231.1
32.0 224.6 34.6 224.6 36A 224.2 25.2 230.1
36.4 224.6 36.3 224.3 36.7 224.3 26.1 229.0
40.1 225.4 37.4 224.2 38.0 224.6 27.2 227.5
42.0 225.6 39.0 224.6 41.8 224.4 28.5 225.9
43.7 226.6 40.4 224.7 42.7 224.9 30.2 225.9
44.9 227.6 42.2 224.8 47.2 228.2 30.9 225.4
47.1 228.9 410 225.0 59.5 228.6 31.8 225.1
52.2 229.2 43.1 225.0 68.6 228.3 343 224.7
57.7 229.6 44.4 226.1 79.6 228.2 37.3 224.9
82.4 228.7 45.4 227.1 96.2 227.9 39.2 225.0
91.1 228.3 46.2 227.7 109.3 228.1 40.2 226.2
102.4 228.3 48.3 228.4 120.6 228.7 40.6 226.5
120.3 228.7 54.5 228.7 44.7 226.4
63.4 228.6 46.0 229.3
74.3 228.2 50.2 228.4
85.0 228.2 61.0 229.8
104.9 228.1 73.6 228.6
115.6 228.2 85.0 228.4
120.6 228.4 105.0 228.3
118.0 228.6
236.0
234.0
232.0
E
V
R
L
R 230.0
v
c 228.0
v
W 226.0
224.0
222.0
10.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 56.1 62.1 45.4 48.1 63.8
Width 20.6 20.8 18.8 19.3 22.2
Mean Depth 2.7 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.9
Max Depth 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.3
W/D 7.5 7.0 7.8 7.7 7.7
- f?ucr?A??r
57.A.*l ?
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section A112-I - Looking Downstream (¢I STA 27+90 1
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR2-1 Riffle
Project Name Smith and Austin
Cross Section AR-2-2
Feature Pool
Date 9/18/06
Crew Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
4.8 232.3 8.4 232.4 4.8 232.7 2.9 233.4
8.2 232.0 10.3 232.0 7.3 232.5 5.0 232.8
9.8 231.2 11.2 231.7 12.7 228.2 5.5 232.7
11.3 230.1 12.7 230.6 15.7 225.6 7.6 232.7
13.4 226.9 13.2 230.2 15.9 225.0 10.4 232.4
14.5 226.2 15.8 226.8 18.9 224.3 11.6 231.7
15.3 224.5 16.4 225.6 20.2 224.6 12.6 230.8
17.1 224.3 16.5 224.4 20.7 224.6 14.1 228.3
20.7 224.0 18.6 224.5 22.6 224.5 16.1 226.1
24.8 223.9 20.7 224.7 25.1 224.3 17.5 225.2
26.2 224.5 22.3 224.5 25.3 224.9 18.3 224.4
27.2 225.8 25.6 224.5 27.9 227.1 19.7 224.2
27.9 226.4 26.6 224.8 33.0 227.7 21.3 224.4
28.9 227.2 28.2 226.3 44.4 227.9 24.0 224.9
31.0 227.9 29.6 227.3 55.3 227.9 25.8 225.1
35.0 228.8 34.0 227.7 62.9 227.9 26.8 226.2
49.0 228.9 43.2 228.0 74.4 227.5 28.0 227.1
57.9 228.0 54.8 227.8 83.8 227.3 29.4 227.2
71.1 227.4 64.4 227.6 98.1 227.4 35.8 227.8
92.2 227.1 75.2 227.4 108.5 227.5 54.4 227.7
101.5 227.2 86.4 227.3 71.6 227.6
108.6 2275 101.9 227.4 90.0 227.3
108.1 227.5 103.0 227.3
108.1 227.5 107.0 227.4
107.8 227.5
109.0 227.6
114.0 228.8
119.0 230.0
12 L2 230.6
130.0 230.9
136.0 231.1
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR2-2 Pool
234.0
232.0
v 230.0
L
L
zi 228.0
4+
C
O
226.0
W
224.0
222.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 43.0 43.9 36.9 37.1 68.5
Width 18.2 17.3 19.7 21.3 22.8
Mean Depth 2.4 2.5 1.9 1.7 3
M- Depth 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 49
W/D 7.7 6.8 10.5 12.2
0?
Distance (feet)
- 2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -_- 2005 SurveyJl
Photo of Cross.1-tion AR---2 - Looking Uuscnel r:nnh rit S I k 28+15
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
AR2-3
Riffle
9/18/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
EA 232.3 2.1 232.0 1.4 232.3 0.6 232.3
2.4 231.6 3.8 230.3 5.5 229.2 2.7 231.9
5.0 229.5 6.0 228.8 8.7 227.0 3.9 230.6
6.9 228.3 8.6 226.7 110 224.9 6.5 228.6
8.5 227.3 10.3 225.8 12.0 224.5 9.2 2262
9.7 226.8 110 225.3 16.3 224.1 11.2 225.1
11.1 226.3 12.5 224.4 18.1 224.3 12.8 224.8
12.5 224.9 14.2 224.3 20.0 224.5 15.2 225.0
13.3 224.6 15.7 224.2 21.8 224.6 16.3 224.3
16.9 224.7 18.1 224.4 23.5 224.5 17.4 224.0
23.5 225.0 21.3 224.5 26.6 223.9 19.3 224.1
26.4 224.8 25.1 224.4 28.1 224.5 21.4 224.2
28.1 2245 27.4 224.0 28.9 225.2 23.4 224.2
29.0 224.5 27.7 224.0 32.8 227.0 25.5 223.9
29.9 225.9 28.6 224.4 43.0 227.2 27.4 224.0
30,6 226.0 28.9 225.2 50.2 227.6 28.1 224.3
32.3 227.4 29.5 225.6 64.6 227.8 29.7 225.2
33.6 227.7 30.9 226.3 81.6 228.2 30.5 225.3
41.8 227.4 32.0 227.0 31.7 226.6
50.8 227.6 33.7 227.1 33.2 227.0
717 227.9 41.2 227.3 40.0 227.2
83.8 228.3 50.5 227,6 48.0 227.3
63.0 227.8 50.2 227.5
75.2 228.0 60.0 2228
82.2 228.2 73.7 228.0
81.5 228.1
82.4 228.2
83.1 228.2
91.0 229.4
96.5 230.0
103.3 230.5
112.0 231.1
121.0 231.6
140.0 231.9
145.0 232.0
233.0
232.0
231.0
230.0
L
R
L
:S 229.0
L
R
228.0
4.
C
227.0
R
W 226.0
225.0
224.0
223.0
0.0
Photo of Cross-Section AR2-3 - Looking Downstream d STA 30+45
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2
Area 53.4 53.9 56.4 544 82
Width 25.1 24.1 24.0 24.9
Mean Depth 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.3
Max Depth 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.2
W/D 11.8 10.8 10.2 11.4 11.3
,5fA81E-
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
i
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -_-- 2005 Survey
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR2-3 Riffle
Cr- Section AR3-1
Feature Pool
Date 9/19/06
Crew Lewis. Jeffe
2006
2006 Survey
Station Elevation
16.9 227.0
38.2 227.4
64.8 227.1
70.8 226.8
74.7 226.1
78.4 225.2
83.6 224.9
85.8 224.1
86.9 224.0
88.0 223.3
93.8 223.7
95.9 223.3
97.8 223.7
101.4 225.2
105.7 226.9
110.8 227.4
115.3 227.7
231.0
230.0
229.0
228.0
227.0
1.
226.0
w
c
°- 225.0
v
W 224.0
223.0
222.0
221.0
20.0
2005
2005 Survey
Station Elevation
30.6 227 1
48.0 227.1
59.9 226.9
70.5 2266
73.0 226.0
74.5 225.9
75.6 225.4
75.9 225.3
77.5 224.8
79.2 224.7
81.0 224.4
83.5 224.1
84.6 223.7
85.9 223.5
97.6 223.5
90.1 223.1
92.3 222.6
94.4 222.5
95.5 222.9
96.9 223.3
97.3 2236
98.7 225.0
101.5 225.5
101.7 225.5
103.2 226.3
103.2 226.4
107.0 226.9
109.0 227.1
110.7 227.1
113.9 227.4
2004
2004 Survey
Station Elevation
6.9 227.0
316 2-72
45.1 2274
60.0 227.0
70.6 226.7
75.1 225.7
77.9 224.7
83.5 223.9
87.0 223.6
88.9 223.3
93.3 222.9
95.0 223.1
96.7 223.2
97.5 225.2
101.3 225.4
105.8 226.6
110.3 227.2
113.9 227.4
2Su
2003 Survc}
Station Elevation q t„1
2.0 2300 .
4.4 2301 # A
y ?i -
?
6.0 230.3 #?
?-'
tAF
t/_4
7.9 2302
10.0 229.7 -? --
11.3 229.3 1
i"
v 1
12.2 2285 '
13.0 2271 . 5.
14.0 226.9 _
16.9 227.0
25.0 227.0
38.0 227.' _
47.0 2'_7_
60.0 2261 .Y?
67.0 226s "'"
69.8 226 J
74.0 225.0
79.0 224.3
85.2 222.8
85.6 222.5 Photo of Cross Section AR3-1 - Looking Downstream C' STA 34+55
86.7 222.0
87.7 221.9
89.5 2220
91.0 222.1
92.7 221.9
94.6 222.0
95.5 222.3
96.2 222.8
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 77.7 72.7 87.5 97.1 83.4
Width 38.5 39.6 41.2 37.3 44.5
Mean Depth 2.0 1.8 2.1 26 1.9
Max Depth 4.2 3.8 4.8 4.8 3
W/D 19.0 21.6 19.4 14.3 NA
97.4 223.5
99.5 224.6
102.1 225.6
104.5 226.4
106.2 226.5
107.7 226.9
111.0 227.1
113.9 227.4
114.6 227.5
116.0 2278
119.0 228.8
1220 229.9
132.0 230.2
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-1 Pool

30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
AR3-2
Riffle
9/19/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
12.3 227.6 12.3 227.5 12.3 227.6 3.0 229.6
25.9 227.7 13.2 227.5 285 227.2 4.0 226.8
36.7 227.2 18.7 227.4 41.8 226.3 6.0 227.0
40.5 226.9 26.9 227.3 44.7 224.9 9.4 227.3
41.9 226.5 34.9 226.9 47.3 223.6 12.6 227.6
43.8 225.9 39.5 226.6 50.6 222.9 20.0 227.5
44.5 225.6 41.7 226.2 53.4 223.2 30.0 227.1
46.4 225.1 42.9 225.6 56.3 223.8 36.0 227.0
47.1 224.5 44.4 225.0 69.1 223.9 38.6 226.7
48.0 223.7 46.0 224.4 77.4 226.7 42.0 225.5
48.6 223.3 46.8 2217 92.1 227.1 46.5 223.6
50.1 223.4 48.0 223.1 104.9 227.4 48.9 2227
532 2218 49.3 222.9 122.7 227.4 50.4 222.0
54.5 224.1 50.5 223.1 52.3 221.9
56.0 224.6 5L8 223.2 55.0 221.7
59.9 225.0 53.6 223.3 58.1 221.4
68.5 224.6 55.5 223.7 61.1 221.9
72.7 225.3 57.5 224.0 64.2 221.7
77.3 226.8 59.9 224.2 65.1 221.9
85.0 227.3 60.6 224.1 66.0 222.5
108.8 227.6 64.6 224.1 68.0 223.3
124.1 227.7 67.6 223.9 69.4 223.7
69.1 224.3 73.4 225.4
72.5 224.9 77.2 226.8
77.1 226.6 83.0 227.0
90.4 226.8 95.0 227.2
96.2 227.1 108.0 227.4
113.8 227.3 117A 227.2
122.4 227.4
124.0 227.5
128.0 228.1
132.0 228.9
136.0 229.6
145.0 230.1
161.0 230.6
231.0
230.0
229.0
>. 228.0
L
L
,p 227.0
L
R
226.0
G
-° 225.0
A
d
W 224.0
223.0
222.0
221.0
2
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 91.5 97.1 125.1 126.5 74.4
Width 37.6 35.5 37.2 38.4 39.7
Mean Depth 2.0 2.7 3.4 3.3 1.9
Max Depth 3.8 3.9 5.3 5.3 16
W/D 15.4 13.0 11.1 11.7 20.1
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-2 Riffle
b '207 EAP/J ?
-+ IJCRZAs?NG
).0
Photo of Cross-Section AR3-2 - Looking Downstream @?, STA 35+15
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -¦-- 2005 Survey
Project Name Smith and Austin
Cross Section AR3-3
Feature Pool
Date 9/19106
Crew Lewis. Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
44.3 226.5 51.2 226.1 44.3 226.5 4.0 230.2
51.5 226.3 60.0 2263 67.7 226.5 15.0 229.4
71.1 226.7 75.3 226.5 77.5 226.6 25.0 228.8
99.1 226.8 92.3 226.5 93.8 226.6 35.7 228.5
102.5 226.7 102.7 226.5 102.2 226.5 39.3 227.8
105.4 226.3 109.3 224.7 108.5 224.8 43.7 226.4
107.2 225.8 111.6 224.4 115.1 223.7 44.2 226.4
112.7 224.8 114.2 224.1 115.5 223.2 51.6 225.9
116.2 224.8 115.6 223.3 118.6 222.7 62.0 226.2
118.2 223.5 117.6 223.1 120.9 222.7 72.9 226.5
119.1 222.6 119.3 222.8 124.8 223.1 88.0 226.5
120.9 222.7 120.4 222.7 127.9 223.3 102.3 226.5
124.1 223.0 122.5 222.7 131.7 223.2 109.0 224.7
125.1 223.3 124.8 223.3 135.3 223.5 114.0 223.2
127.0 224.2 126.5 223.6 141.3 226.8 115.8 222.5
131.9 224.1 127.4 223.5 148.2 226.7 118.7 220.9
136.5 224.3 129.3 223.4 148.8 226.7 121.0 219.6
138.0 224.6 132.0 223.4 123.8 219.5
140.2 225.8 134.8 223.6 126.0 219.4
142.4 226.9 136.3 224.1 127.2 219.4
144.5 227.0 137.4 224.5 130.0 219.8
150.4 227.0 141.5 226.7 132.3 220.6
143.9 226.7 133.6 221.5
148.8 2'6.7 135.8 223.6
149.1 226.7 141.7 226.9
148.9 226.8
149.4 226.9
153.0 227.8
156.9 228.7
164.0 228.9
180.0 228.8
201.0 228.8
232.0
230.0
228.0
L
226.0
4ai
0 224.0
Y
w 222.0
220.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 90.5 93.0 151.2 153.8 85.6
Width 38.8 39.1 39.4 38.5 39.6
Mean Depth 2.3 2.4 3.8 4.0 2.2
Max Depth 3.8 3.8 7.1 7.1 4.2
W/D 16.6 16.4 10.3 9.6 NA
218.0 ?- --
60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-3 Pool
Project Name Smith and Austin
Cross Section AR3-4
Feature Riffle
Date 9/18/06
Crew Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
18.5 225.2 19.0 225.3 185 225.3 65 228.6
34.4 225.5 22.1 225.3 22.1 225.3 10.0 228.2
41.8 225.5 33.1 225.5 30.8 225.6 11.6 228.0
44.4 224.8 42.3 2253 41.2 225.5 14.4 225.6
46.0 224.2 46.3 223.9 48.7 223.0 16.9 225.2
47.6 224.0 48.6 223.0 51.8 222.7 18.5 225.2
48.7 223.5 50.5 223.0 54.5 223.1 21.0 225.2
51.1 223.4 54.5 223.1 56.2 222.9 29.0 225.4
54.2 223.4 57.1 223.0 61.3 222.2 38.0 225.4
56.7 223.5 60.2 222.4 64.8 222.9 42.1 225.4
57.7 223.3 61.7 222.3 66.5 223.2 45.4 224.1
58.6 222.1 63.2 222.5 69.9 224.0 48.6 222.5
59.1 221.7 65.2 222.8 76.3 226.4 54.7 222.1
60.7 221.6 66.6 223.4 80.2 226.2 57.6 221.9
61.9 221.6 68.7 223.7 90.4 226.4 58.4 221.5
62.7 221.7 70.1 224.2 99.0 226.4 58.9 221.5
63.5 222.5 71.1 224.8 99.9 226.5 60.3 221.7
66.6 223.5 71.2 224.8 61.0 221.9
69.5 2217 75.0 225.9 61.7 222.2
70.9 224.2 76.9 226.2 625 222.4
73.3 225.2 80.1 226.2 65.5 222.5
76.3 225.9 88.6 226.5 67.3 222.8
79.4 226.2 91.9 226.1 70.4 224.1
955 226.0 99.9 226.4 75.0 226.0
100.9 226.2 77.0 226.2
86.0 226.4
91.0 226.3
95.0 226.2
99.0 226.4
99.9 226.5
100.6 226.5
103.6 227.5
106.3 228.2
112.0 228.2
128.0 228.2
133.0 228.5
147.2 228.3
150.0 228.6
Photo of Cross-Section AR34 - Looking Downstream taSTA 41+00
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 61.0 63.7 77.4 78.8 64.2
Width 32.7 35.1 34.1 31.6 32.9
Mean Depth 1.9 1.8 2.3 2.5 2
Max Depth 3.2 3.3 4.0 4.0 39
W/D 17.6 19.3 15.0 12.7 16.8
Cross Section
229.0
228.0
L
R
226.0
L
R
225.0
C
O
e 224.0
w
223.0
222.0
221.0 L---
10.0
227.0
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0
Distance (feet)
2004 Survey - 2003 Survey - 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Section AR3-5
-e RiftJc
9/18/06
Lewis. Jeff-
2006 2005 2004 2003
**2006 Survey** 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
37.1 226.2 21.2 226.5 16.6 226.8 2.0 226.9
70.1 226.1 52.1 226J 33.0 226.3 7.0 226.7
89.2 225.7 81.7 226.6 60.3 226.5 15b 226.7
98.4 225.6 104.9 226.2 92.2 226.7 31.0 226.4
101.2 224.8 108.5 225.6 107.8 226.2 44.0 226.1
102.0 224.5 111.6 224.0 113.5 223.3 58.0 226.4
104.0 224.2 115.0 222.5 114.7 222.9 75.0 226.6
111.5 223.9 117,8 222.3 114.8 222.9 91.0 226.6
114.3 224.1 119.7 222.5 115.0 222.7 103.0 226.3
120.9 224.3 124.3 222.2 115.3 222.8 IOT9 225.9
123.2 223.9 127.2 221.9 119.8 222.3 109.3 225.6
124.4 223.7 128.8 221.8 127.0 222.2 113.0 223.5
125.2 223.2 129.8 22L8 130.1 221.8 115.3 222.4
125.6 222.1 130.6 222.0 132.8 222.2 116.5 221.7
126.5 222.0 133.1 222.1 134.9 222.6 117.7 221.5
127.6 222.0 135.2 222.8 135.0 222.8 119.7 221.5
128.6 222.0 136.4 223.2 136.2 223.2 121.3 221.1
129.7 222.4 139.0 223.8 143.4 225.9 122.4 221.2
130.5 223.4 144.3 225.5 166.5 226.2 124.5 221.0
131.9 223.6 154.2 226.0 186.9 226.2 127.5 221.1
134.4 224.4 181.0 226.0 201.5 225.8 1303 221.4
140.6 225.5 229.5 225.3 229.0 225.6 132.7 221.5
147.4 225.6 284.9 225.6 257.8 225.6 134.7 221.9
1843 225.9 338.9 225.4 282.8 225.8 136.2 222.0
228.4 226.4 299.7 225.9 137.1 222.3
274.4 226.5 310.9 225.8 140.0 223.7
321.5 226.6 334.7 225.7 143.0 225.0
347.4 226.6 358.6 224.8 144.2 225.2
358.6 226.7 147.0 225.7
157.0 225.9
177.0 226.0
200.0 225.6
208.0 225.4
219.0 225.5
247.0 225.4
274.0 225.5
293.0 225.8
300.0 225.7
306.0 225.7
320.0 225.4
337.0 225.4
356.0 225.6
359.6 225.6
363.5 225.6
368.0 226.2
376.0 226.7
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 93.4 88.9 116.0 99.9 64.2
Width 36.4 35.6 39.1 34.3 32.9
Mean Depth 2.6 2.5 3.0 2.9 2
Max Depth 3.9 3.9 4.7 4.2 3.9
W/D 14.2 14.2 13.2 11.8 16.8
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-5 Riffle
228.0
227.0
226.0
L
L
a 225.0
L
R
v 224.0
c
0
'? 223.0
a,
W
222.0
221.0
220.0
80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** - 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section AR3-5 - Looking Downstream (d STA 46+40 1
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
AR3-6
Pool
9/18/05
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
79.9 224.9 95.3 224.8 79.9 225.1 2.0 226.6
100.3 224.6 126.9 224.7 94.7 224.8 20.0 226.2
124.4 224.5 146.7 224.5 126.9 224.7 37.0 225.9
147.6 224.2 165.6 224.0 157.7 224.1 61.0 225.4
157.7 223.9 169.4 223.4 167.2 223.1 79.9 2252
163.6 223.6 170.7 223.0 171.0 222.4 101.0 224.7
169.4 222.8 173.4 222.8 174.8 222.1 125.0 224.7
176.1 222.3 175.1 222.5 179.8 222.0 140.0 224.7
180.9 222.6 178.6 222.2 182.2 221.8 153.0 224.1
181.9 222.5 180.5 222.5 187.0 221.6 165.0 223.7
182.8 220.9 181.8 222.4 189.3 221.1 171.0 222.3
184.4 220.9 184.2 222.0 192.6 222.1 176.0 222.7
185.6 220.6 187.4 221.9 197.8 224.5 178.9 219.7
187.4 220.2 189.4 221.7 206.6 225.3 181.4 219.2
188.9 220.6 191.2 221.6 227.4 226.2 182.9 218.1
189.4 220.5 192.2 221.3 185.0 217.8
190.9 220.7 194.3 223.0 186.7 218.1
192.2 220.7 196.5 223.3 188.1 218.7
194.5 223.0 199.1 224.8 189.4 219.0
197.8 224.5 204.7 225.2 191.3 219.4
208.8 225.0 220.7 225.8 192.8 220.7
221.5 225.4 227.4 226.2 194.1 221.2
226.6 225.6 196.3 223.3
198.4 224.7
201.0 225.0
205.3 225.3
213.3 225.6
223.0 225.9
227.4 226.2
229.0 226.2
Photo of Cross-Section AR.3-6 - Looking Downstream (a. STA 48+20
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 63.7 70.0 108.9 135.7 79.4
Width 39.1 56.9 58.4 58.3 59.5
Mean Depth 1.6 1.2 1.9 2.3 1.3
Max Depth 3.2 3.4 6.7 6.9 4.1
W/D 24.0 46.2 31.3 25.0 NA
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-6 Pool
228.0
227.0
226.0
225.0
L
i 224.0
L
223.0
v
w
222.0
0
ca
,>, 221.0
W
220.0
219.0
218.0
217.0
120.0
-?
Bankfull Elev.
130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0 190.0 200.0 210.0 220.0
Distance (feet)
- - 2003 Survey - 2006 Survey 2004 Survey - 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SRI-2
Riffle
9/18/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
-2006 Survey* 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
33.99 23337 22.47 234.92 22.475 234.9 1.0 235.7
43.35 232.98 28.49 234.59 28.455 234.55 12.0 235.6
48.32 233.49 34.91 233.28 33.665 233.37 21.0 234.9
50.21 233.08 44.78 232.91 43.765 232.97 22.5 234.920
53.01 231.33 48 231.46 45.555 232.43 25.0 234.8
53.50 230.80 50.29 230.19 46.615 232.2 28.6 234.4
55.48 230.53 51.01 230.24 48.935 230.27 30.9 233.7
58.95 230.81 52.33 230.27 49.295 230.03 33.1 233.3
64.13 231.60 56.54 229.91 50.925 230.17 39.7 233.1
65.03 232.11 58.2 229.98 53.305 230.21 44.0 233.1
68.80 233.30 59.7 229.96 55.035 230.21 46.6 231.8
75.57 234.10 61.57 229.93 57.525 230.18 49.3 230.5
87.36 233.65 64.4 231.1 59.3 230.3 50.2 229.5
66.0 231.7 61.7 230.3 51.5 229.4
68.8 233.1 66.4 230.8 52.8 229.4
70.9 233.8 66.8 231.9 56.1 229.5
79.5 233.5 66.9 231.9 57.7 229.5
93.8 233.5 68.8 233.3 58.8 229.5
106.5 232.9 78.6 233.4 59.1 229.7
115.01 232.91 99.92 233.14 61.7 229.9
115.33 232.60 64.0 231.2
67.6 233.09
72.1 233.38
92 233.09
112 232.52
115.3 232.58
116.2 232.66
122 233.57
130 234.8
136 235.39
140 235.42
237.0 1-
236.0 -- -
235.0
L
234.0
L
R
Z 233.0
c
0
c; 232.0
w
231.0
230.0
229.0
20.0
Photo of Cross-Section SRI-2 -Looking Downstream (a,' STA 9+35
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 54.6 55.9 60.8 59.6 32.8
Width 26.1 25.1 23.6 23.5 19.5
Mean Depth 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.5 1.7
Max Depth 3.2 3.1 3.7 3.7 2.8
W/D 12.5 11.3 9.2 9.3 11.6
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SRI-2 Riffle
30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** -¦- 2005 Survey
100.0 110.0 120.0
Project Tame
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SRI-3
Riffle
9/18/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
--2006 Survey-` 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
58.0 232.5 27.2 232.2 27.0 232.2 2.8 236.6
70.5 233.0 489 232.2 40.0 232.3 7.0 236.3
803 232.4 55.4 232.5 51.1 232.7 13.0 235.1
83.5 231.7 67.6 232.5 67.8 232.8 18.0 233.7
84.5 231.5 72.9 232.8 75.0 232.6 24.0 232.5
89.0 230.7 74.7 232.7 81.2 231.3 27.4 232.3
90.1 228.9 77.9 232.2 84.2 230.5 33.0 232.2
92.2 228.7 80.8 2313 85.1 229.8 50.0 232.4
94.6 229.7 84.6 230.3 90.7 229.7 69.0 232.6
97.8 231.0 87.5 229.9 93.0 229.5 76.7 232.5
103.8 232.0 88.1 229.9 96.5 229.8 80.0 231.6
115.8 2311 89.0 229.4 97.2 230.8 84.0 230.2
123.5 232.2 90.7 229.2 103.8 231.9 84.4 229.9
92.1 229.5 126.0 232.2 86.8 229.6
94.5 229.5 147.4 232.6 88.0 229.2
95.8 229.6 172.9 232.7 90.6 229.2
96.5 229.9 93.6 229.3
97.7 230.9 95.2 229.5
106.6 232.0 96.2 229.7
118.1 232.0 96.8 229.9
134.1 232.1 98.7 230.4
153.2 232.4 103.3 231.7
165.6 2316 110.0 231.9
116.0 231.9
136.0 232.2
169.0 232.6
172.5 232.7
174.5 232.7
179.0 233.6
185.0 234.4
191.0 235.0
194.0 235.4
204.8 235.4
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 41.3 36.6 47.5 44.9 29.6
Width 25.8 25.9 25.6 31.3 22
Mean Depth 1.6 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.3
Max Depth 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.8 3.3
W/D 16.1 183 13.8 21.8 16.4
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR1-3 Riffle
237.0
236.0
235.0
R 234.0
L
A
L
R 233.0
w
? 232.0
0
231.0
w
230.0
229.0
228.0
40.0
Photo of Cross-Section SRI-3- Looking Downstream (aSTA 11+30
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey - **2006 Survey** -x- 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SRI-4
Pool
9/18/06
Lewis. Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
**2006 Survey** 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
71.1 232.7 30.1 232.5 30.1 232.5 11.2 236.8
75.5 232.5 37.3 232.6 48.0 232.6 13.7 236.6
76.6 2323 50.8 232.8 63.4 232.6 17.7 235.4
78.9 232.5 63.8 232.6 81.6 232.4 22.3 233.7
99.2 231.9 72.8 232.5 98.9 232.0 26.2 232.6
107.4 231.8 78.1 232.5 104.6 2311 30.2 232.5
109.1 231.6 86.1 232.0 107.9 231.1 39.7 232.3
110.9 231.3 98.2 231.4 111.2 230.3 49.4 232.5
112.9 230.8 102.2 231.4 116.0 229.8 59.4 232.7
113.6 230.1 105.0 231.2 119.0 229.8 70.5 232.6
116.7 229.4 107.8 231.3 121.0 228.8 81.0 232.2
118.0 229.0 109.1 231.0 122.5 229.7 95.0 232.1
120.4 228.6 112.1 229.9 123.4 230.9 100.5 231.9
121.6 229.4 114.3 229.9 123.5 231.1 105.3 231.2
122.3 230.3 114.7 229.6 124.5 231.1 108.1 230.2
123.8 231.2 116.6 229.4 125.6 231.7 110.3 230.4
129.9 233.0 118.2 229.1 126.7 232.5 110.8 229.9
132.7 233.4 119.5 229.0 128.5 233.4 113.2 229.5
119.7 228.8 129.6 233.4 115.2 229.0
121.7 228.7 129.9 233.3 117.0 228.4
122.4 229.7 132.8 233.6 118.8 228.4
122.5 230.0 137.2 233.8 121.0 229.0
123.3 230.5 123.2 229.8
123.7 230.9 125.0 230.8
128.2 232.9 128.4 232.7
136.4 233.9 130.3 233.4
134.0 233.6
137.1 233.9
155.0 234.6
238.0
237.0
236.0
235.0
234.0
a
L
233.0
232.0
c
0
231.0
W
230.0
229.0
228.0
227.0
40.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 53.4 43.8 69.3 57.9 54.5
Width 49.7 45.1 47.4 46.5 52.8
Mean Depth 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.2 1
Max Depth 3.8 3.7 4.1 3.8 3.9
W/D 46.3 46.4 32.4 37.3 NA
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey . 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** -*- 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section SR 1-4 - Looking Do-stream fa SPA 12+00
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SRI-4 Pool
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SR1S
Pnol
9/18/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
**2006 Survey" 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
7.9 232.0 11.2 232.2 8.2 231.8 0.6 232.1
13.3 231.9 13.6 232.0 17.5 231.9 5.2 232.2
16.5 231.4 14.8 231.9 20.0 230.8 7.6 232.2
17.8 231.0 17.7 231.7 23.5 230.2 14.8 232.1
22.6 230.1 23.8 230.0 25.3 229.4 16.8 231.6
24.4 229.7 25.5 229.5 26.1 228.6 19.0 230.7
25.8 228.3 26.5 228.2 28.4 228.6 22.0 229.2
28.4 227.0 27.5 228.1 31.9 228.6 23.0 228.8
32.6 227.8 28.7 228.3 35.7 229.1 24.5 228.8
35.0 228.5 31.5 228.7 41.7 229.8 26.2 227.9
35.8 229.2 31.9 228.7 47.5 231.2 27.9 227.3
37.9 230.2 32.7 228.9 60.7 232.1 29.8 227.2
41.1 230.7 34.8 229.2 87.7 231.5 33.7 226.8
43.3 230.5 36.2 229.9 117.1 231.9 34.7 227.3
44.8 2304 38.2 230.1 139.2 231.4 36.4 226.6
49.8 231.2 41.3 230.5 38.4 227.4
56.9 231.7 44.9 230.6 41.3 227.7
68.5 231.5 49.8 231.3 43.8 228.2
53.1 231.6 45.9 228.9
56.2 231.8 47.6 229.3
74.5 231.8 51.7 230.1
93.1 231.8 55.8 231.0
120.5 231.9 59.0 231.4
139.2 2314 63.0 231.5
75.0 231A
86.0 231.0
96.6 231.0
101.5 231.3
113.0 231.7
122.0 231.5
135.0 231.2
139.8 231.1
153.5 231.4
166.0 231.9
172.0 232.0
233.0
232.0
,E231.0
L
230.0
v
w
c 229.0
r,
W 228.0
227.0
226.0
0.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 55.8 78.9 123.2 109.2 70.2
Width 41.4 43.2 44.2 41.8 41.9
Mean Depth 1.3 1.8 2.8 16 1.7
Max Depth 3.6 3.1 5.1 4.8 4.7
W/D 30.7 23.6 15.9 16.0 NA
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0
Distance (feet)
80.0 90.0 100.0
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** - 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section SRI-5 - Looking Downstream L.. STA 16+90
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SRI-5 Pool
Yoss Section SR2-1
Feature Riffle
)ate 9/18/06
:rew Lewis, Jeffers
2006
2006 Survey
Station Elevation
100.0 229.9
109.5 229.7
132.9 229.5
140.1 229.2
144.9 229.3
147.8 228.8
149.5 227.1
150.5 226.7
151.1 225.5
153.8 225.1
156.7 225.0
158.6 225.4
159.2 225.7
159.8 226.4
161.9 227.6
168.8 228.7
179.5 228.7
186.1 228.9
2005
2005 Survey
Station Elevation
112.4 229.7
129.8 229.7
146.4 229.3
148.7 228.0
149.4 227.5
150.0 227.1
150.8 226.9
151.2 226.7
153.5 225.5
154.3 225.5
156.2 225.6
158.4 226.1
158.5 226.3
162.9 227.3
167.5 228.8
168.9 228.8
172.6 229.0
188.0 229.0
2004 2003
2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation
100.0 229.9 0.0 2323 LL.
115.5 229.7 11.0 232.0
125.5 229.7 20.0 231.2
138.4 229.4 22.8 231.1
146.5 229.1 39.0 2314
148.9 227.7 50.0 231.2
150.8 226.1 60.4 231.2 ?tl
152.1 225.8 69.0 231.2
153.6 225.3 79.0 230.8
155.0 225.6 89.0 230.4
155.7 225.9 97.0 230.1
156.6 225.8 99.8 229.9
157.6 226.1 120.0 229.7
158.8 226.2 136.0 2294
159.2 226.4 145.2 229.1
160.8 226.7 147.4 229.0
164.1 228.0 148.4 228.0
166.5 228.5 149.5 227.6
1697 2286 1500 2265
1855 228.9 152.2 226.2 Photo of Cross-Section S112.1 - Looking Downstream L% STA 24+30
154.1 226.1
155.0 225.9
155.4 225.8
156.6 225.8
157.6 226.0
158.2 226.3
160.3 226.3
162.3 226.5
233.0
232.0
231.0
E
R 230.0
L
L
229.0
d
a 228.0
O
v 227.0
W
226.0
225.0
224.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 51.3 44 9 45.9 46.5 41.8
Width 20.2 20.0 20.2 332 20.8
Mean Depth 2.5 2.2 2.3 1.4 2
Max Depth 3.6 3.9 3.3 3.1 3.7
W/D 7.9 8.9 8.9 23.7 10.3
163.3 227.5
165.8 227.8
167.2 228.5
170.0 228.6
175.1 228.5
180.7 228.9
185.7 228.9
188.3 228.6
192.5 228.1
193.9 228.1
195.3 227.7
198.3 227.9
204.8 228.3
212.8 227.9
215.5 227.8
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-1 Riffle
100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey - 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
1811.V IYD.tI LUDA

Section SR2
e Pool
9 ,18,05
2006 200, 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
-9.2 231.2 4.0 229.9 4,0 229.7 0.0 230.1
-3.6 230.9 13.2 229.6 4.5 229.7 3.7 229.6
14 230.0 16.7 2284 4.7 229.3 4,0 229.7
13.7 229.5 16.9 228.1 13.7 229.7 10.0 229.8
17.1 228.4 18.7 227.5 18.1 228.0 14.0 229.7
19.6 227A 20.0 227.0 18.5 227.3 17.2 2283
21.1 226.8 20.6 226.4 22.2 225.9 20;1 227.0
22.1 225.0 21.1 225 4 23.0 224.8 203 226.4
23.3 224.3 22.6 224.4 23.9 224.0 22.3 225.0
25.4 224.3 23.2 224.2 26.5 224.3 22.7 224.8
27.1 224.9 23.8 224.1 29.2 224.7 24.0 225.2
293 225.2 24.5 224.0 31.0 226.2 24.9 225.4
303 225.1 26.9 224.2 31.3 226.6 27.5 225.5
30.6 226.4 27.9 224.5 35.7 227.8 30.3 225.9
311 227.2 29.3 224.9 43.8 228.7 36.9 227.6
31.9 227.5 33.4 226.1 51.4 228.6 41.0 228.4
33.5 227.9 34.6 227.2 43.4 228.6
38.8 228.6 37.9 228.1 48.8 228.5
48.1 228.9 43.0 228.1 51.5 228.6
519 221.6 50.1 228.7 53.0 228,5
57.4 228.7 55.3 228.1
60.0 221.1
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 64.5 60.8 59.2 41.5 44.6
Width 26.1 25.7 262 26.9 22.3
Mean Depth 2.5 2.4 23 1.8 2
Max Depth 4.6 4.6 3.8 3.8 43
W/D 10.5 10.9 11.6 14.9 NA
92.2 226.4
99.4 226.2
101.8 226.1
103.1 228.1
104.4 228.4
074 2289
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-2 Pool
68.0 228.3
71.7 228.2
77.1 227.6
R2 R 228.4
89.6 228,5
909 228.1
232.0
231.0
230.0
L
L 229.0
.Q
L
228.0
d
227.0
C
O
'226.0
_d
W
225.0
224.0
223.0
0.0
Photo of CrossSection SR2-2 - Looking Downstream (a STA 24+87
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -x- 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SR2-3
Pool
9/18/06
Lewis. Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
5.40 226.40 7.8 226.5 7.4 226.6 2.0 226.7
41.38 226.39 8.6 226.6 8.1 226.7 7.0 226.6
71.54 226.17 19.5 226.5 22.2 226.5 7.6 226.5
80.84 225.63 32.7 226.6 42.4 226.7 21.0 226.5
85.87 225.36 51.3 226.5 59.9 226.4 310 226.5
9148 224.98 60.5 226.5 75.0 226.1 53.0 226.3
94.69 223.82 71.6 226.4 78.8 225.8 69.0 226.3
97.44 223.10 74.5 226.3 87.2 225.3 74.0 226.1
100.51 223.05 76.4 226.1 90.2 224.7 81.9 225.5
101.99 22109 81.9 225.9 92.9 224.4 88.0 224.9
102.46 223.37 84.3 225.7 95.2 223.6 92.7 224.2
103.29 223.46 84.8 225.5 100.5 223.1 94.7 223.3
105.94 225.86 86.4 225.2 101.8 223.1 97.5 223.1
111.09 228.16 88.0 224.8 104.1 223.7 100.1 222.3
115.44 229.44 92.3 224.6 105.8 225.1 101.8 223.1
123.07 229.40 94.4 223.8 108.3 226.6 104.2 223.1
97.6 223.6 114.7 229.4 105.0 223.3
99.0 223.1 123.7 229.4 106.3 225.1
100.8 222.9 107.9 226.1
102.4 223.8 108.2 226.4
104.1 224.6 110.9 227.6
104.7 224.9 114.5 229.3
105.2 225.1 119.9 229.7
105.5 225.1 122.1 229.5
106.5 225.8 123.5 229.4
108.10 226.68
114.22 229.58
115.56 229.64
123.66 229.45
231.0
230.0
229.0
228.0
L
3
i
:2 227.0
s.
A
Z 226.0
c
°- 225.0
v
W 224.0
223.0
222.0
221.0
20.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 49A 52.4 59.6 64.0 46.8
Width 35.1 36.3 37.7 39.1 38.7
Mean Depth 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.2
Ma¦ Depth 16 3.4 4.2 4.1 3.2
W/D 25.0 25.1 23.8 23.9 NA
30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section SP-2-3 - Looking Downstream (a. STA 31+25
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-3 Pool
Project Dame Smith and Austin
Cross Section SR2-4
Feature Riffle
Date 9/18/06
Crew Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
4.9 226.9 17.3 226.1 4.9 226.9 2.0 226.8
22.1 226.2 26.2 226.1 18.6 226.2 4.9 226.9
35.5 226.2 26.5 226.1 30.8 226.0 8.0 226.7
38.3 224.3 35.5 225.9 35.8 225.8 15.3 226.2
40.6 223.9 35.7 2253 36.5 225.5 22.3 226.1
42.7 223.2 35.9 225.0 38.1 223.8 29.3 226.0
43.4 2210 37.9 224.5 40.8 223.2 35.0 225.8
44.2 222.9 38.8 223.6 43.7 222.7 37.1 225.1
455 222.7 395 2235 44.6 222.9 39.2 2233
46.9 222.7 43.0 223.1 47.3 223.1 39.7 223.1
47.5 223.1 43.5 223.1 50.2 224.1 41.4 222.8
48.9 223.4 47.4 223.1 52.1 225.2 43.0 2217
50.1 224.5 50.4 224.1 54.2 226.1 44.3 222.7
53.8 226.1 505 224.2 60.4 225.8 46.1 222.7
61.4 225.8 5L6 224.5 67.0 226.2 47.4 222.7
71.5 225.9 53.1 225.9 69.8 226.4 4T8 223.1
816 226.0 53.1 226.2 71.0 226.0 48.7 223.3
90.8 225.9 58.4 225.8 81.5 225.9 51.9 224.7
58.7 225.8 91.1 225.8 53.9 225.9
62.0 225.7 57.0 225.9
64.8 225.9 60.8 225.6
69.5 226.4 68.3 226.0
72.5 225.8 71.3 225.7
78.4 225.5
86.0 226.0
90.2 225.7
91.1 225.8
100.1 225.8
108.0 226.0
113.6 226.3
117.0 226.5
118.6 228.2
121.3 228.5
124.6 228.1
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 39.5 38.4 42.7 38.9 37.3
Width 17.6 18.4 18.9 18.7 18
Mean Depth 2.2 2.1 23 2.1 2.1
Mas Depth 2.8 3.2 33 3.1 3.4
W/D 7.8 8.8 8.4 9.0 8.7
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR24 Riffle
227.5
227.0
226.5
226.0
L
R
225.5
L
225.0
m
224.5
C
O
224.0
_d
223.5
223.0
222.5
222.0
0.0
Photo of Cross-Section SR24 - Looking Downstream (q. STA 32+45
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -a- 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SR2-5
Riffle
9/18/06
Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
9.0 224.4 0.7 224.5 0.8 224.5
24.4 224.5 7.0 224.7 4.6 224.5
36.2 224.2 8.1 224.5 14.3 224.6
41.4 224.3 9.1 224.5 24.8 224.4
413 221.4 10.2 224.6 32.0 224.2
45.1 221.0 10.3 224.6 36.1 224.0
48.4 221.5 10.7 224.6 383 223.3
50.5 22L6 11.0 224.6 39.8 221.5
52.0 221.6 12.5 224.5 41.2 220.9
53.1 223.1 12.5 224.6 42.3 221.0
53.8 223.1 26.0 224.4 43.7 220.8
55.5 2218 30.0 224.4 46.1 220.8
61.3 223.9 31.6 224.1 47.4 220.8
70.7 224.3 34.0 224.1 48.0 221.0
78.8 224.4 37.7 223.3 49.8 221.1
39.2 222.3 51.0 2214
41.1 222.2 51.5 222.1
42.3 221.4 52.7 222.8
44.0 221.4 53.3 223.2
45.2 221.4 55.2 223.8
46.4 221.2 59-9 2237
48.0 220.9 67.5 224.1
49.1 221.1 75.2 224.6
51.4 222.0 90.9 225.5
51.7 222.6 102.5 226.1
52.7 223.2 111.6 227.3
55.5 224-2 121.0 228.1
57.8 224.2 125.9 2283
66.9 224.5 13L11 228.2
229.0
228.0
Bankfull Elev.
(approx.) - --
227.0
226.0 -
I
to 225.0 - -
224.0 - -
0
223.0
c?J
222.0
221.0 - -
220.0 - -
0.0 10.0 20.0 3
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 314 35.8 37.2 25.8
Width 164 16.9 18.4 13.9
Mean Depth 1.9 2.1 20 1.9
Max Depth 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.8
W/D 8.6 8.0 9.1 7.4

0.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2006 Survey 2005 Survey
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-5 Riffle
70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Photo of Cross-Section SR2-5- Looking Downstream (a) STA 39+20
Appendix C
(Click here)
APPENDIX D
BEHI and NBS DATA FORMS
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina Appendix D
Total Sank Erosion Calculation
0
V4
sV
P,rnf 3-
S
Q
F}US•hV _
P,e.Q ch2
Avs?in
Recfk3
Stream: cJM i AU 5-t1 V-l Total Bank Length: i p Stream Type: /C-
A?,
obvenrerr. Ax Dyy)
Date: 911? lo v NR,(S
, NCS r
Graph Used: C SW C
BEHI
(adjective) Near Bank Show
(adjective) Erosion Raft
( r) Length of
Bank (ft) Bank Height
(ft) Erosion
Total (ft'

2 EXT M °D 10 10)000-0
3 LoW LOW 0., 01 100 3.5 3.5
a MOD Lo?W 0,01b -7"15 4 ??b$
5 1\'1oD MOD 0.oL) 4 13
6 M0) Wvv 0.01? IgI5 (oc?.
7 MOD. o o. u? ?? I ao
8 HI&H MOD 0,t7 3-P- S 5 H3?1
a 'NIGH NIDD 0,2'1 ?•Iq 5?5
10 AVSTI N (SEEr.,
11 H ? ? }} N ? Ca (?} 0 . ?j cj O ! 1 IP r". 0
12 M. OD G.09 2550
13 MoD MOD 500 96,0
14 MoD IUibj? 6,0? 102S 3 193.0
15 OD I LO0 O.01Cj. IgOO t13.q

1. Sum erosion sub-totals for each BENUMBS combination ota ros on
feiyr q
t'a,911, I
III. Divide total erosion (feet) by 27 tnetyards (yd3lyr) (J? .

III. Multiply Total Erosion (yard) by 1.3 (am a Ww aVeoebmforawr00 ffawwtoo) Total Erosion
(ton*ear)
I ` ' I
0
X?
0L
U
V
5
M ?
? w
a
Z
C S
i
C
a
` I?
V
cnI
MI
U{
x
e
z
? B
E ?
N

S
A

-? a
? O R

•w w E
m O ?
O
m Y
c
c w

e
a
? o
pt

C 2

CP CYJ _
T
00
O
d
V
S
3
c
iO
m
W ?
m
c
?
mmr. '?' e

I
O
N

Q

o ° m

t '? t

a v' ?
r
Afa
93
0
0
4
3
Q
0
v
PO
z
0
LL.
c
m
Q

r1l
LA
Z
3
a?
I
3
0
s
z
x
E7
5
? a oV,,F
ANC 00
OD0N
N 0 +
cr1 <9 CPT M
?- M -

E
a
o
e
r
ar i ? v +?
Z V
3
s
I
1 of
z

X
C
Cb
I

4<
d
U
O?? O
t 1 ??
Vll O V
w v+N
o+ - m
-ro
u,t o?
sr Gp ?- eT
? 1 1
r -r 4-
T? (-4 A?
e
.S
a
Jr
d
e
L
m
A
A
'm
A
t
4
m
c
=
e j

v a
?

m
m
g =

? ? C r

7
a
U
a? s
a
N.
a
C
O C
?
?
r Q
a
E

c
? g
C
? a
Y
c

? ece ?
02
o
•
m
s ? _
L $
3 ? a'
Q ? ?
C
o
a
a

A
N h
J
c?
a
U
Q
.4? a
cr. 8

a

0
T
S
'CQ
R
.y
3
c
o
m
t ?
m v
as
o ? c

Qj<-6j ?

s

CL o
T-
i
N
r
N

e
?55
.5
u
i
a
W d
0
a?
cn ?
s
-91
41J
rm
4
3
cn
B
M
a
8
o
n a .
0
o
M
t ? r
O
+ °
g
17
?xd
v
V ?
_j
0
lS?
F
s
m
O?
c3 0 ? o
0
3
Z
3

o a
w
e
4

M r
r ?
.r2
a
?

i s
i ! s?

l!)

s ? T x
c
q
c

a ? ? ? a
P
L
U
9
M
m
N
a
M
a
m
0
U
E m;p p p o?o °';!o o?p
C? r 1l1 . ^ I[ r y r
{ T
?f f
aD O sic o 0 O?r0 p10
x !V Qi O ? O! Kj Oi rr.CO r ? Qi
Z^ r O f O f 0 O 't;0
C m r m Ql i to r i m
j
? o o, w T as ? o, ' + as
_ tp10 fiO A O r?0 O O
S rt10 C!O N m mit0 N m
43! 4?
a An
ev;o ? o ? o ?0 0
r 1{ !
m ? C2 ? f 1 f
3 ?. d! O M Uf l'?'! m (rf off en
r 0 O C6 O r 0.p O
'? !V O N r` N N N N N
r
J r? r O r ? ? r?
?^ oko a o$ o p o$ o
a
SM"A ftlQ Pa3
a?
O?
N
0 0 ?
g a
c
4
Al a
? O m ?
r ? a
m
49
a
€3
y `o .+
2 3
r
atac

W b >
x D ?, D

c -
m
a
S ?
Jf
r lu
to
rn
rm
m
C? ? O
£a U
0
U1
0
?ao
S
V?1
Q
a
h
>7
1,
Y?
L

O

s m v

z
5¢?
O ?
N
C ?t O
N

s

? ?
t Z

? O [ c, t ? 0
y- ? t M t

5 ?

W y
ydj
X

0
e'd
0
a,
s
?_
3
Q
S
c5'?
> ??
?l
d
z
N
X
Etll
C
O
C
O1
O
N } Q
-r
T ?
O? U
A- o
C'n S ?
O aj
C
M N
1 U) M
oa?
MO ?
r
S
x
•
G
m
fig
t
4
m
m
E ap?O c o p?v °'•o °ip
W ^t? C «. ? ??? V ?
r$ `
ae o 040 0}0 ?,o oo
lV Oi O 0/ vj Oi CS '7i}} T
r o v`o ?'o '1o <?o
Nf'.6 Qm-ma?,a* w
t
o? as ? o T` o oS o, ,n o?
0 Z N I A O 1? IA ?f ? r A
C ? t t
d = ?a(o ? O ae o r;o c??o
C '• O O?O N O mom N m
0
m ? Q
nt•O fO!tO r O O
ot? '? o
r Dist 4
m a w 1 a+ ,?, ddd ai I' or ,e Q?
r M O M ?iS Pf 11+f t!? l'?f
?`O ? O O O +-j?0 CI O'
N C N A N N? N A N
T
J r j r O r N r r
?' O}O O p g O p 0$ O
> I
'MCI
1X. "MRA ftMNM3 I

Bi
? o
A
E
c
m 'S
8g a
s, e
3 a
4 m `O
a
a
m o ?_
4
= g a
h g » r
w?p g
us o O
r
m
V

s _75 3
1 jp C = p o

m
J ?
E
oil
N
t m M
m
Q is
g
c
?U
0

2
C
a
e
? m
o
W ?
kn
p M
O
0
S
3

?
o

?
'
0 h
J O1
-
_7?
? < g ? o
o r°-
I
-a ?
1 ?1
rs1

-J-1
T t C'16 [

f

3
S
O },
v
Uj
^ ?T
to
K
rz
a
eo
0
0
v
a,
?o
3
N p(3)V
r .r y- r
po0U
T Mco ?l
iT
Im
in
Q
3
D
N
s
a
N
X
O
c
_a?
m
D