20071806 Ver 2_401 Application_20080908

7?
NUYC40CK YA 418 50I
P.O. Box 27052
ENVIRONMENTAL Rdleigh. NC 27611-7052
www.MaviockCnvir oiinmental.com
September 17, 2008 'A%
Mr. Thomas Brown D
Regulatory Field Officer SEP ?2008
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office k ,?,tERnUAL?TY
j?,N?sAi?ostoRM`N???RBcK
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject: Preconstruction notification under Nationwide Permit Number 29, Residential
Development and 39, Commercial Development, and Water Quality Certification
No. 3631, for East Village of Clayton, a proposed 112.24-acre residential
subdivision located in east Clayton, on US 70 in Johnston County. Property
Identification Numbers: 166849-49-4104, 166807-59-6270, and 166806-39-4560.
DWQ Project No. 04-917 and NBRRO #04-0300.
Dear Mr. Brown:
Enclosed are two courtesy copies of the completed preconstruction notification (PCN)
application package for Nationwide Permit No. 29, Residential Development and for No. 39,
Commercial Development, for the proposed development of the subject property as a mixed-use
residential and commercial development, located in east Clayton, in Johnston County. By copy
of this letter, we also submit five copies of this PCN to the North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) primarily for buffer authorization and for
review under Water Quality Certification # 3631.
Project impacts to waters of the U.S. and the state have been effectively avoided and minimized
to the extent that only 0.0949 acres (4133.84 square feet) of wetlands and 30 linear feet of
stream impacts are proposed. The wetlands in question would be considered isolated, but for
the existence of a linear wetland feature (manmade ditch) connecting the wetland area to a
nearby stream. It is our understanding that as of March 2008, written notification is required
under Nationwide Permits 29 and 39, even if the impacts are less than 0.1 acre. Proposed
buffer impacts due to the proposed installation of a sewer line easement require that we obtain a
buffer authorization from DWQ.
On December 6, 2004, Mike Horan of DWQ documented a wetland, stream and buffer
determination on the subject property. The DWQ response letter and maps are enclosed for
NBRRO #04-0300 and DWQ Project No. 04-917. If necessary, field review of the wetland
delineation and further documentation can be provided at your convenience. A USACE
jurisdictional determination form has been completed for the proposed impacts and is included
with this application package.
Project Description:
The proposed mixed-use residential and commercial development, East Village of Clayton, is
located in Johnston County, east of Clayton, immediately west of the junction of eastbound NC
42 with US 70. The proposed development drains to an unnamed tributary to the Neuse River.
The subject site is currently mostly wooded with existing unpaved access roads and some
disturbed areas. The proposed project construction will include 282 residential lots and
approximately 20,433 linear feet of paved roads. Mechanical clearing, grading and cut and fill
will be used to construct the roads, storm water management basins, sewer lines and buildings.
The subject project area consists of 112.24 acres of wooded and partially cleared, undeveloped
land, and is located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection NC 42 east with US 70. The
general project vicinity map is shown on Figure 2. The subject property is shown on the USGS
Topographic Quadrangle map, Clayton, N.C. on Figure 1, and on an excerpt from the USDA
NRCS Johnston County Soil Survey map (Sheet 1), on Figure 3. An aerial photograph also
shows the site on Figure 4. Figures 5 and 6 show the proposed road crossings and existing
wetlands. The reference reach for the proposed project is shown on Figure 7. The Natural
Heritage Program (NHP) database maps and documentation for the subject site are also
enclosed.
The proposed site plans are enclosed,-which show the locations of the proposed roads with
culvert locations, wetland and stream impacts and the proposed subdivision lot layout. The
project site plans include three sheets; Sheet 1 shows a plan view of the road and lot layout of
the proposed East Village of Clayton development. Sheet 2 shows the two proposed wetland
impact areas (1 & 2) with plan views and cross-sectional road profiles in those areas. Sheet 3
shows the stream impact plan view and cross-sectional profiles of the proposed road crossing.
The plans are provided on 11" by 17" sheets as well as on 24" by 36" sheets for your
convenience. Also included are two 11" by 17" sheets of the surveyed wetland and stream
features denoted in the impact tables on the preconstruction notification form.
Proposed Project Environmental Impacts:
The subject property consists of three tracts of land, totaling approximately 112.24 acres. There
are approximately 25 acres of wetlands on the subject property, and approximately 4000 linear
feet of jurisdictional stream channels. Only 0.0949 acres of wetlands will be impacted for road
construction, and 30 linear feet of jurisdictional stream will be impacted for a road crossing.
Riparian buffer impacts for two utility easements are shown on the site plans. Figure 5 shows a
proposed road crossing with a 30-foot long 60 inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) in a
non jurisdictional channel which drains the proposed storm water basins. In Figure 6, 0.0791
acre of wetland impacts are shown due to unavoidable impacts from the proposed main access
road, along with 0.0158 acre of linear wetland impacts due to the same road, where a 156 foot
long 18 inch diameter RCP will be installed to maintain effective drainage on the linear wetland
feature identified by Mike Horan of DWQ.
No federal or state listed species will be adversely impacted by the development of the subject
property. A search of the Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database was performed on August
10, 2007 and only one countywide element occurrence for the loggerhead shrike was found for
the subject site. The NHP database did not show any observations of federally or state listed
plant or animal species or their critical habitats within 1 mile of the subject property.
Impact Justification:
Wetland, stream and stream buffer impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum
extent practicable by the proposed subdivision road and lot layout. The main entrance road was
shifted to minimize buffer, stream and wetland impacts to the greatest extent practicable. In
order to avoid Neuse River Basin riparian buffer impacts and to avoid work in the 100 foot
riparian buffer required by the Clayton Watershed Protection Overlay District, the minor impacts
to the wetland areas considered unavoidable. The wetlands on the northeast part of the
property were avoided completely. The impacted wetlands are disturbed wet flats and
marginally meet the parameters set in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual. The
streams on the property are relatively permanent waters with ordinary high water marks.
Please contact Ms. Robin Maycock at [phone] if any additional information is needed on
this application. Any efforts to expedite the review of this application will be greatly appreciated.
Si rely,
C?
Robin L. Maycock
CC: Mr. Ian MacMillan, DWQ 401 Certification and Wetlands Unit
Mr. T. Patrick Shillington, PE, Engineering and Environmental Sciences (E2S)
Mr. James E. Thiem, III, ASLA, Hager-Smith Design
Mr. Shane Hensley, UHF Development
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If anv particular item is not annlicable to this oroiect. please enter "Not Amlicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: (Written notification
required under NWP # 29/39, WOC #3631/3705)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information p m0_/ A 5
1. Owner/Applicant Information SEP 2 2 2008
Name: East Village CTJ, LLC
c/o Mr. R. Edwin Coleman, Jr., CCIM °ENR wTORMti AT RSFMCH
yes Anon
Mailing Address: UHF Development Group
304 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone Number: (919) 8284808 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Robin Maycock
Company Affiliation: Maycock Environmental
Mailing Address: PO Box 27052
Raleigh. NC 27611-7052
Telephone Number:- f919) 418-7645 Fax Number: [phone]
Page 5 of 12
E-mail Address: robin.maycock6d?gmail.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: East Village of Clayton
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 70.85 ac tract: 166849-49-4104, 24.39 ac. tract:
166807-59-6270 17 ac. tract: 166806-39-4560
4. Location
County: Johnston Nearest Town: Clayton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): East Village of Clayton
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): US 70 East from Raleijzh to
Clayton, access property from East Front Street Extension or from NC 42.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): UTM 17 731096E, 3947279N
Lat/long: 35.6442 N, 78.4810 W ,
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 112.24 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin,'maps/.)
Page 6 of 12
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Wooded/disturbed/cleared with sewer lines and access
roads.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Residential development consisting of 282 lots 20,433 linear feet of paved roads on 112.24
acres Mechanical clearing, _grading `and cut and fill will be used to construct roads,
stormwater management facilities, sewer lines and buildings
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Provide commercial and residential
development with single family dwellings traditional and garden town homes with three
stormwater facilities and two open mace areas
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NBRRO #04-0300 - Buffer determination conducted by Mike Horan of DWQ on 12/6/04.
DWQ Project # 04-917 - DWQ field review on stream and wetlands by Mike Horan on 12/06/04
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Excavation and fill for
installation of culvert for road crossing over stream A and wetland areas 1 and 2.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Mechanized

1 clearing,
0.0791
no
175 ft
Wet flat
fill,
grading,
drainage
Mechanized
clearing,
2 grading, fill, 0.0158 no 175 ft Wetland/ditch
drainage, install
culvert
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:; %%Nk??.fcma.eo%.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.733 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0949 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )
A Culvert, rip rap 30 UT to Neuse River 3 ft intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us0.=ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., w N .topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Page 8 of 12
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 30 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact Area of
Impact
(acres) Name Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and,
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Subdivision layout and road crossing locations were designed to minimize and avoid
wetland, stream and riparian buffer zones to the Ueatest extent practicable Location of wetland
areas allowed almost total avoidance except for main road into subdivision
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:'/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h-o.enr.state.nc.us/wEp/index.htm. If use of
the NC WRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 900 3 0
2 3020 1.5 0
Total 3920 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel: Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Existing impervious area is approximately 5%. Proposed impervious area will be 30%, or
approximately 33 7 acres impervious out of 112.4 acres.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Public sewer available.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/As(ent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
FROM : THE COLEMAN GROUP. INC. PHONE NO
CLAYTON :AST VILLAGE CT,1, 1,LC
304 Glenwood Ave., Raleigh, NC 27603
Phone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
August 21, 2008
USACE, Regulatory Field Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Aug. 24 2ooe 10:49PM P2
Subject: Authorized Agent for East Clayton Village, U C for field review and permitting
issues on proposed subdivision on 112.24 acne property located on US 70 and NC
42 east of Clayton in Johnston County.
Dear Mr. Brown:
By copy of this letter, i hereby authorize Ms. Robin Maycock to act as an agent and
representative for East Clayton Village LLC in the field and regulatory review of the subject
property, located near Clayton, in Johnston County, North Carolina. It is our intention to pursue
authorization under Nationwide Permit 29, Residential Development Activities to develop the
subject property.
As an independent sub-contractor for Engineering and Environmental Sciences Company (E2S),
Ms. Maycock has prepared the preconstruction notification for the proposed project and will
represent East Clayton Village I.LC interests in this matter. Ms. Maycock can be reached at
[phone] if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter,
Sincerely,
Shane Hensley
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District,
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Johnston City: Clayton
Center coordinates of site (tat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35 38.65' N, Long. 7828.86' W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 731096E, 39 47279N
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Neuse River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201 101
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 9/04/07
® Field Determination. Date(s): 2/22./07
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the t-.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used. or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.. S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): ?
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters- (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Non-RPWs that flow directh or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN W's
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW's
® Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 4000 linear feet: 2 - 3 width (ft) and/or 0.275 acres.
Wetlands: 2 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) :3
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least -seasonally"
le a tynically 3 months)
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section II1.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.L; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody' is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 367acres
Drainage area: 367 acres
Average annual rainfall: 52 inches
Average annual snowfall: 6 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TN W.
Project waters are 1-2 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW'.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW`: North.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1 st.
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes. and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
' Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g.. tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TVA'.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ® Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ® Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding. sloughing banks]. Explain: highly eroding.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 6 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 11-20
Describe flow regime: relatively permanent.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: No. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHW'M6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear. natural line impressed on the bank 21
? changes in the character of soil ?
® shelving
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away 21
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
? High Tide Line indicated by: ?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum:
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation t%pes.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored. oily film: water quality. general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: clear to turbid with sediment..
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbodv's flow
regime (e.g.. flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacenev Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximitv (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1-2 river miles from FN W.
Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles from FN W.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g.. water color is clear. brown. oil film on surface: water quality; general watershed
characteristics: etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 2
Approximately ( 0.099 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y,N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TN'Ws, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any). provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding. nesting. spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself. then go to Section I1I.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributan in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands. then go to Section 111.13:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. then go to
Section 111.13:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Tributaries ofTNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g.. typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section I11.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonal ly:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 4000 linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2. above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW. but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNWW' are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule. the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.." or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6). or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATEI WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote 4 1
' To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III. D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA ,1fentorandum Regarding CW,4,4t7 Juriszdicdon Following Rapanos.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the ogle potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
CSC ,r ifek Sah - -. y J s
owl,
WPOF
.00
Ce l
IDu« D iooa 2000 uia? < ?n boot
FT
1t% N.
322,
'?il'Ifl
0
z
0
z
T
F
O
Z
ON
0
z
? 4 r
d}4 p
?At 0
Y
AYC®CK ENVIRONMENT/
O FIGURE 5: SITE MAP - AREA 1
Z
EAST VILLAGE OF CLAYTON
NEAR INTERSECTION OF HWY 70 & HWY 42
CLAYTON, NORTH CAROLINA
4.
1
P ?w
?t?
4r.
4
MAYCOCK ENVIRONMENTAL
O FIGURE 6= SITE MAP - AREA 2
Z
EAST VILLAGE OF CLAYTON
NEAR INTERSECTION OF HWY 70 & HWY 42
CLAYTON, NORTH CAROLINA
,r
.p +? ?? '3 L 11? r? ?,'i ? I ?, I I';'4,•'• ,'III -+j
4 ??:?,? I ti I i ?'J : ' ? t ' I 11, I I I ? I I) ?} '1 115
?•? AAA I I ? y. I t I J ? ? , 1? I, 1 ? ? I II I
?Cj? I ' }}? 1 t lri 'r? ' a I
?,•?11 1? 1 ,^? I I I h ? 'A. r i I ( I ? ,'' ? ? i ?`.?,1 ?4 T?--
TM. ?I I.. 1 I
11 , l I
i tt. 1 {' ? 1 '• II I ? I 1 ' i ?,{ 1 .tl'1 •?. (I ' „r^ I ,r._ I •' 1
I l 1
_ --.21.}11:_ •{ ?, ? ? I I .Y. ? 1 ', ; - -. I I. 1 '• I
1'r'.. - 4 1y
IL i'i ti I 1 r 1 1 I -{`r ?^
.-
f 1

Le 1

N
Q. ?
06
Q Z O
W
Ix Q
W }_K
J
U
WUZ10 0
<
W ®OU P:c
LL L) F-
W
W ww
W Z
w>ZO
?Qw?
u- WZU
IHI iON
z
7 off$
rn .a
� F
L
C
Eo. (6U Odirn X02, ootid'
t� 3� Q(6 5gem >mo 6a:
OIL
C
(� c
a` U •� ou
N
v f- X m ass
LU akin ZU a
w
�>O Q r -NM w
;7 .>
O Z N N N C7 •R\.., a ;,`.
0N00 LLL
N O 00 (n(n (n i 1�
U�
i w C Z rn LLi z
O
O
N
1
5, rel
-
�r -
�,
J � ,
I
4-4 y s
ct
rI
4-4
ct
CD
,C
i
1.� C
I �
z
Y
r

ri ? ^ ?
\ cTSia 9 1
rr °af ? ? E
?

C\l
6 6 3/
C) (10
Q c d
W
- ?..? oAeq. ??ir
LO ODU ?
W
-
V- 4?
Q

m zz
?? v
ap q` ?w V
?wz
¢ a o N
R
o °oU`r
> GzN
(6 PCS d 6.S rv m
O _. I l l'60 w
C x
$ R w
' Z $
O , ^A

n rl r
WO, ?F-

4:: Ly

?./ ?MT
vng u 3 $¢ N 9aU ro MR4
?? 11
" S m ma
zg?V
?WW Saw
It;? ' o
60 a S LO ^
a?f
.
W di.•
O-
:.
Rt 09
9 x R R +
I-- ,
G?
\V
4
- xfi 00 A„o N 4.
N. YO
a
0
=2566
T SI
O VA
1 ?0- SS'04

o
W.
l`' 1
.
G? P
d
co
c\l LL?ii )))
rf'?
? T oslg wC'=i ? ? ? '
? ' y
m °& a O
aJb- n Ott
+
?
00.9 co
N
rl o
zL'zl §'„` w ? ?
Q-L ti r/ i %- L+
1; 0
Rr r% ? x ? s
`CP
€e
yasa.^r
a6
El
r ^ S O
O
??
/
tzi
43 Vie,
c E
a
d g
a# g
k
N
Q
/
/r:
U
w
n ^
o
? / CQ G 94'yL
N pp a z
?4 dxw?
N

/ U 1
b
f) S w v R O
~
V ?r, .9 ? yr-l 6 v 'rJ_ ? ? OO.y
y ; ? N
VwA?7

9SL LO
c
\
A`? / p 4 i ? N
\
?
u
`\
a •" w ati E?9L
t-t +

yJ? /L d d d ?
e - o
z o. a ! al
Z z z z sou +
os.z N

yC ?tl 6 ?`` v /
R
?1
oES
-15
g^FO
: ?:
?^po
N
'
?
a a O
A OJ ?J N
?
X-
r /
\'?
t • g O
v
,
.
V /_310 O
OSb,?
- G r
E v y _ ???
y +
Y
-
t / N 09.1
C 3 U
I I _
_
R _
N
9.99 \?..r fm,\ ? lu O 4. a Y gp?o
QQ
U
X a
w, f y OOI
1\
Y
(? g +

fil
? \ £
U C LO
.
i?l
0s
', \• 5 -1 b Q ,t
E 0
N
j
g e
fl .a p C A = O
..
s ooz x

\
3v ? ?a
O C G sa e?p
\
T
Q
.s0ri H 'F7 .? BCIIt O

+
o
-6 09
J ? \ ? '.NMI °xo Gm io

" 0
'AS T 00 00.6
N

Os.e K -7-7 OD

,; O6•B

/'

R^
97 W
a 0
d ?
,$
4 BS.L
' c
-
W
a s i ,
4a X
m E ?ae' tia°J W R Y ,5 W
?
1
? g
@ a O
. S
b ry .
?? oo'sz ++
it
s
s?,
_ r
; a
+

O\ 9zi

\
Pts . `t\ \ yy'9Z
?
.
'

-- O
+
(O
.
Z. - J
00.9 R;; oom.d Ste.
g ?^
r LS'9Z _
' SI SI msL•si - 5 g
,.w
n O
tL'9Z g
- +
L/?
O
=
Y _ ° 3 II
o () o v
9L
fi
_ C-) (U C B I o r c-
+
II
O
0 _
?n E O U °
m a).S Q) 0)
x vJ
LO
O c0 O O L m O O Q. N vNi - II y?zz
C
N -
d O N
O p -a-° + /??
O
N j, N N O
O
J
Uo >? ?
w? ?J)
mo - __

I W
/ 1
_ N _V
.
F- N C O N N` > O C_ = N C a z ^'
_ (O C
C C C
N W 3 " V R
a ,a O `? •L
O
_
_
co N o F- co U N J 3 J T J J O N J J Fv- N L1 .N 6°.y4
0) 0 -- • +
O Q?
L'
'
0 O N C Cn0 "'
o c N U N E_ 49 L n n m 3 ?$
?w??ew n ° ° ? T
//
?
L
L Z
'
L
n o y co 2 =
O V
3 o 6 2) o M m rn ? m? O ? LO
rn ?
N
N ..
0
d ?U M LLUw v^ J
r-°a w in U U) r ii m =
0
t U Lr)) a
?
°
J o
o rf
rrte
II
?. c U)0_ av
+
II o U) U?
} =
+ I - cam.
1 0
E?? yap
a
fH
/-0
?V
E

M
0

a) ?- r-

U
C/) (6
C ?
N N
4? ?L
L.L 2
a
o.BB

\ w
U

oy'oMe 5 5 3 E
S.B 6'" _ _
U

u O S? e g -
- U o as

s
s?? ? ?a
gg

0088+8
is o

u ,

?I
as o j

" u
R

c E
III -
w
d

mama, `?
e
= , dr ® U
g

cu

j
3 _

3

I' `' J

CCU M
a
P: W?z?

eNw
d03
6'86+L-

cy _ S E E° h w Cl) p p O 0) 00
_

??
Erna
_ ? ? •
.
,
.
E€ _ (n s

a
? 3
"
-I-- r, a
z
3
43
110
C:
rn g k KS' 'a w a b c 9 y

N S u U U F
V/
U J
d Q
? - > T U N U
N
T F- N
~ C ? d W d J
? ? p
c N ?
?
?'
_ 3 U m ? 3
E O
J ? 4 >
m m ? ?
m N
?
N c y
a w o
rn v in in Y o
LL m = a 3
3 N E
?, a °o Y
I I ? a N? ?

I L _
? N LL- d
nv ovN _

U
II g _
I?
I 1I 1T F t`1 N N S M
N ? Z
1+0

) T f N o
°_
m N d>
U j m
C m p m

°
t
O ?
^ N n ? ?
p Z ?
O O
r
N N
T
i2
m
'°?atlc?tla?o'?
S ? a9
s
O k 68 $ 0l ?
F eB
e =f
G <9 g?$u

N
`o
0
T
i
CE V
? e0 'o„
G
E? w
.n 6 c
0 ? ion

? U c
O
G
Q

C
a \
U \ Wes' L a
? ? is
?
5 o L ? ? C

0
o L
u
d
1®a So
Z z

o ?.
? Z
0 1
??IF a ?>+
r o¢a
? s as
+ o,

+m
?
a z
z
wU;
a
°?
Q ?Il{p'
p 5 U
oz
°o bA 4V at l; jU]
co &)
13 `t•
O u
+ z I W
?
t?
?I,,11a,I, U

+ Jt f
Z '
4
/
t 1
I{

co 3 r?(?} II {I? {??
r ?fllf 1'11,Il
?
ii l?

LO
+

O " Iti
'l,1
L ?}y}??{{ lJf ?tlt 1
a -,ii{tl f?fl (f
I
{{ F
? j?l{I !?
v !f7 r
t??5r
f1

lA//J?}
7 (
+ t
i
J
E +t? j
o
cr

O
O
+•
L

O

=
++

o
a
- o

it
++
S
o U
O N \ , u
M LL
m
e
?
a ! M
lO o
rn ;
°o
+

04 +
u

U

O
+
N

C ?

I
I
O
O I.
O
r
m
O
p Q is
p Q ?3 p
p O
LO U < O
? [n U
+
O U '
+
+ _ at ?
O H
O ?y
+
N
O H
N
J. `o
N v
J o
w
w =r
U
Q
E a'
E
44
Z
,or
45 D
qqlt? O
1a U
O
. N Q
Z
a
Eftm 1404
0
00 ? Q
H -
ZO
0 Z
H
Z
.? O
U

O
O ?
a.
t 04
O /
04
O /
N N /
w
? ?h J
` \ O' N
C4 (0
W I LL-
/ 1 00
/ z??o?
? to^?
r-:
O
N z ZOZ
r? g
U ,?; ao o v
V) Go h? V
NO* of v
,,
?za°-to -7
z3cVnrn
0 to
LLJ Co
im°az
2 V-- / z°
a / ?d3 ?o ??
z /
a
9 U-
o v) , O' 3 a coo
LAJ
.? _ J Z
/
o?
?o
(7
?G
cn
Cl
Qz
J
i
s0
Z
v

Z
S
wZi
ZP
a
rr
a
m
a ,°n ry
O
L 2
\N.
a
Q ?
LL_ F
v X. cmo

?a?ss9?s M IL
w^
Z i 'sss ` a
/
O m

a
/ate ` N

\ d
\ s

?
1 1 /

1
OIL
A
00

Z
0
Z?
w
a
W
a
Z
Z
O

44,,
r`
N

POM
J ,

/

• o E
11-- O
W p I N U

???
J /
/
• WNO?
HrOO C
s? a-/ zQcrnM Z
9
!
a wOZus 4v
?
a LO :5 a 3
Z NC)JW 3
w
O
.-. ?
W
J 8?? ?
M

w3

F- O
z
O
w
LL.
,r, ?a ,.
p
r????11111
W
8
cn NO
00
ZZ
H?
Z J J
w
zz
? ? a 3 a 0, w
ss?go S 2",gflm t5 z
-6 aELMO «-oaa o
LLN
WZZV)
a4
aarc?acui< aa.a.m`? I
o*0o•
0 o O_ y) X
?W ~ ?20
U) <Zw~Z
=zza-3: vi 0
VZ?DO
10-0 w V)
rya OUOQ?W
LLI a?Oj ? r?fal N r?i W=?OW
w co?nna na n rn? o F- F- NW -
I I N I as l virn i mw l g
rnm Ba?Qt?ia?a? ana,$a?a,$Wm??a,?mMa? O O W W
m
e n^vio?n n nza cert. c: U ?Z=> ~
Z a
z c»wO J
'°aa°?jrQi < nro°?aaao?° W Z 0m
ap
WWn? w~ C7 W
go
Zaaaaz3azoa?azsamanzoa o z Fwda (jF-
_ nWIa.W =OQ U
W =NOWO?O Li
U ~V)z0: LA-
L- i a 0?=
Ln O°?? -?F- W
Z ao )A*2 W
z d W
Z 3 c?Qrnmizo z
o ° ~N WW SOZUWa? LA
i 85 85 ° 0?5 Oj cv5 ro F-?HZWtn O
n N OZ apps Ol
n ?n n j
I-S iOuILLW N
Jas -2 08 09
G: 0
I Z Iz I Iz t, Iz 1 NW 2
W
W ?OIO?O?O?OO ?o?O?mW?aO?n Oli
S U
fp ? Yap ? ?N<t-
? n S8m?8m? o? m: ? OZ< ? U
W Q
W zg 0
°rNi n ^pi?M ?- W
z \m?\m z\m z\ z4 ^\ Z'
Z U D Q W
z8a zcazo?zo?z?psz8?z°?a N d W W Vi
F- Z w a
3:0 a: D
< m U ari C! F-
mQ4F-0<

W
?
ofD,

?
F,
OR

0

o
r-
Iq

n
0

S''r
ap

?
o9,

t
n

j
no,

w
8

'r4

w
o

n
'?

?i
a'?

r?
8

8
8

8

.-

?
w
a8

$
'c4

8
g

t
$

g

.
n

8
z
p r-
r? ?
r? ? n
o
a'?v n
n .-
.- ?
.- co
r? ap
p? ? n
n
o ?
o o
g
g ^ m
ro
?

++ pp
n pm
p
M
t
h
?
*
*
0
s
N
N ?p
N
S ?m
p
n
9
q ?
p
O pp
rt l

S ;t
po
N 4
a
4 y 1
N q
(l1
N
N
H f ?
A
N
Y
H .
D
'.

Z
J Nr?
J
?
J
?
?
J m
.. ] p?
J O
J ?
J N
J e7
J ?
J g
J rD
J n
J tl0
J 0?
J n
J
? Ol
J
W

H
pp
N

?
oo
M1
qr
rq
h

e°v
n
?i
S
r?
? w la p
a =

z

N o
M °a
I w Xi n "a ° Si ?i a r'•3 n ? 00 1 8
O N ? MI S M N S S M 40 0
S p
O ?
p
S ? pp
n ? r ? +
+
O ? M
3 ? 7 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? a} i ? i z
rn a r
? n
?
Nr?
J N?r
J (((q???
J rrr??y?y
- r Nr?r
J 11NN??
J ?r?//
J d?r
J N?r
J ?pp?yy
J pMor?
J Mr?
J
? /111????
J
? ann?yy
J
> ?
z °'

t
CD

Z

O

O O
A ?
S S
a,
\

0 rp O
e
Z b
VI b
aA
?
/

m b
S
C
??
O
U
Z
oQ
zoo
N
M
N
CY)
z
0
Law- D)
0
W?Ln0
2?0 Z il
a. 0 ?
-
i Ld
00z e
Z ? -
?wgo?Li
HH
cr
Of
N
_
3- w
LA-
OONF'Wm
Q O w 0
?
w
Q
w m
d z
U gzzzao

LL. d-wo PLj J
F
W L_nULL.
2NOWONO U
LL

U
~WV)2irRV)
LA-
O .
0
o
-)F-
O
°w°
Ln
Z }z0w3.*
a0 =g°M w
g ~ to
O U P} w W
0
3 ?N?m?orn Lz
WWZUQ w
H?FF-- wN O
Q
2wO?Zliw
d
HF-WQ
O>
tT 0-

i
LL. Q O
W
U 0 W

U
QQ0 }
LY LY x Ln Z 0
U°aaD
jri
Q
w
fnO?ZWEa vi
H m Q 2 H O Q

0
O
Z
Z
?.5
vo?
00
/
pR?P/
?OR?ER/
0
Z
5
W
3
g
L Q
W U)
F-=3
N H O
Z :r
z o In
ir3?
O
U)?
Lnza
F-O0
°Z n.
ww
?¢
V
1
%V .,
P • „ ,.ss,,,,?
:d =?W
v ?' o Jam:
?g
N
g O

In? pa ?np pa aoo?b nnn ?°?p o h .°-° nn n a tap a ap$ w c? 0 mIq 1Ni ?Q? "qd n n °? a n
ii ?o r? °n a`DO a
n w Po N ? ? w '? ? o io ec? °
$ o ry
p N M M 10 17 rq + N g p 07 H n _ N O? p N ED N do Q
?
?f O p
CF Ql ?
p
O N17 N p g
N lOV p M'1 Ml p
N p
1?
ZZ

p
?

_N +

M
O p

O OS

+
b N

M
N M

?

q?

.-

Q W

n

n q

o•-

NV

g Ol

?
0 N

rq h

.- ?-

M

? A

N ?

O M?

?Oy fQ

O

(?? N

N

pp N

? aD?p

Nn 1?

10 n

.-O

M) N

p

M1
0 1?

.- yp

pl
A? N

? N

a p

"? e

'8 p

"d p

P
a
i
I
P
ral

•

?
t
N

O

?

?

8 N

z

? N
h p
"a;
b
vNi
b
Z 17
h
? p
(??j, O
m M
1
H 17
br? N ?
F?
z N
x O N
F,
R 1
q
b
RO N
a o
Z Mf
h
i M
Mh n
ja?
M N
:r
O ?
ja?
Z N
ya?
Z ?
h
2 17
:-
2 ?
h
2 ?[f
io
Z ?
bb gM

??

2 ?p
p
n1r1
ja?frd? M
t?
2 'f
:r
2 ?
ff
HMf
?h$
? Ml
ja? q
?gg
.N-
?? g '?

? °? 11 ? ?
y
N
jai l
?
9
?N
??? M?
p ? .n- ?
^ 1
?
Q
? ?
y
1?fi ppp
N
CiDS
2 ZZ t/1 fA N N N //1 N N fA 2 2 Z ? 2
m
2
Z

J

?

?

J

?

J

J

?

J
O
J
?
J
N
J
M
J
t
J
1q
J
t0
J
1?
J
07
J
0
J
N0
N
N?
N
((y?
J
1(??
J
(?y
N

?
NN
J
N
N
N
N
Mp
? J
M
? 1
M
.. ]?

?

?

??

?

??+
J J

?
J

?
J

?
J

?
J

?
J

?
J

???
J J
_
?
n
J
w
U

Z
O

-
r?
W

-00
-

l
-

0
0

N

0

O

0

.

-

N

O

O

W

N

N
?: 3 ? ?: fi: ?: W
Z
0 f-
' l-
t 0
Pf) 0
- 0 f-
O *
M *
M *
M f?
.?
H .- ? ? in in o 00 00 r- :-
U N O M N N n It st .-
w
? a,
m fo
m b
? f-
d' Fh
? 4
d' Po
it k)
'•t
?t io
M
O Z Z Z Z Z z z z z m
x

m
fi r- 0 O 0 N K m l0
Z 0 J J 0 (JO w w LJO 0 00
O
3 DON
640
Q I?
go
3 I ?\
z0Q
O o
z
.? o
U `? Q
2
2
p ?ZZ F- r
0 ?Ix
24Ha 3~ * a rc
a s o ?? gmm '? g z
ggUdLILIr a? ?aa :3 0 d n =1
I
1ZyZ? N
'LIN-C no'
r-
N
4-
0 E
t5 1 CC104 00
aLnLO O O a,
N 04
.-.O) m
QV-'n7
Z
C
ZW
0)
3 0•2
LO:5 a. LL- 3:
0OW 3
F-