Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050034 Ver 2_401 Application_20170525To: RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers Attn: Tasha Alexander 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 From: Kevin C. Martin Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Im 17th, 2017 NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Attn: Karen Higgins Archdale Building — 9th Floor 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 Re: Westgate Park Dr. & Westgate Business Center Raleigh, Wake County, NC NOTE: A DWR application fee of $240 is attached On behalf of the applicant, Sycamore Creek, LLC (Attn: Trent Ragland) please find attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting a Nationwide Permit 39 from the USACE and a Buffer Authorization from N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The proposed project is the extension of an existing road and a BMP bypass channel thru a stream buffer for Lot 16 of the Westgate Business Park. For more details see the attached site plans, maps and PCN form. The project purpose is to provide access to a commercial development. PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name Westgate Park Dr. & Lot 16 Westgate Business Park Project Type Road Owner / Applicant Sycamore Creek LLC County Wake Nearest Town Raleigh Waterbody Name UT Sycamore Creek Basin Neuse Class B; NSW IMPACT SUMMARY Stream Impact (acres): Wetland Impact (acres): 0 Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 150' Perennial 150' Intermittent 0' Zone 1 Buffer 7893 sqft Zone 2 Buffer 4662 sqft Attachments: Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form USGS and Soil Survey Map Impact Exhibits (3 pages) Wetland Sketch Map after USACE site Meeting C! o1?10�, W A T f9q h 7� O iiiii�'I Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 A. 1. Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Formnno Applicant Information Processing R @ [ Q F [�? MAY 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:T_ MSection 404 Permit -.AT UPF lf1R $ 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Q Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express Q Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes X❑ No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes Q No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In below. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes Q No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Westgate Park Dr. 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality /town: Raleigh 2d. Subdivision name: Westgate Business Park 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Syacamore Creek LLC 3b. Deed Book and Page No. (PIN)0778557080 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): W Trent Ragland III 3d. Street address: 305 Transylvania Ave. 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, INC 27606 3f. Telephone no.: 919-782-7283 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: I raglandcon@aol.com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 J� 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 10 7,� B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0778557080 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.90725 Longitude: -78.743724 1c. Property size: 24.91 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Sycamore Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: B, NSW (stream index 27-33-9) 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Extension of existing road to serve commercial lot development. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.01 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,580 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Provide access to commercial lots. Also BMP discharge for road & Lot 16 3e. Typical Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: construction equipment for road construction, 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: preliminary JD requested 10/7/16 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Kevin Martin Agency/Consultant Company: S&EC, PA Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Tasha Alexander (USACE) visited the site with Kevin Martin of S&EC on 11/8/16. Since we are buffering all streams shown on the USGS topo and county soil survey, no site meeting with DWR was performed. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes 0 No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 rA C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P Culvert UT Sycamore Creek PER Corps 7.5 110 S2 P Stabilization UT Sycamore Creek PER Corps 7.5 20 S3 Choose one S4 Choose one S5 Choose one S6 Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 130 3i. Comments: the 20 linear feet of rock energy dissipaters will be constructed such that the post -construction top elevation of them do not exceed the elevation of the existing stream bed. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 Choose one Choose 02 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 P Road Crossing UT Sycamore Creek No 7,443 4,362 B2 P BMP Outlet UT Sycamore Creek No 450 300 B3 Yes/No B4 Yes/No B5 Yes/No B6 Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 7,893 4,662 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 Ii/ D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. road crossing was designed perpendicular to stream and all other streams and buffers onsite were avoided. Development will be outside the 100 year floodplain. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. In keeping with recent Corps interpretations, the rock energy disipaters will be constructed such that the post -construction top elevation of them do not exceed the elevation of the existing stream bed. We have been advised that this would be considered by the Corps as an impact but not a permanent loss of stream and there fore they would not require mitigation for such impacts. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). ____j 6h. Comments: Page 7 O 10 ./ E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Stormwater management plan to be approved by the city of Raleigh. BMP's are being designed to ❑ Yes ❑X No discharge thru the buffers and into the stream after treatment. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 33.3% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? 9 Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: % imperviousness is for LOT 16 other lots have not been designed at this time but will be subject to the same city of Raleigh requirements 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The stormwater plan will be reviewed and approved by the City of Raleigh. Approximate BMP locations are shown on the plans submitted with this application. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Raleigh 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? Raleigh 0 Phase II ❑X NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑X No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑X No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 .✓ F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval E] Yes E] No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in E] Yes ❑X No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. Westgate Business Park is a small commercial development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Connection to existing municipal sewer Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? `Threatened/Endangered Species have not been identified within the project area via a NC -Natural Heritage Programs Data Search. Northern long eared bat was listed for Wake county 4/2/15, this project involves the removal of some trees the Corps will initiate consultation with USFWS 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No structures are present onsite and no structures are identified on the NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service within 3/4 miles. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: while there is floodplain on the property none of the development is proposed within it. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Wake county GIS and FEMA firm Panel 3720077800J W. Trent Ragland III Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Dat i n re pp t s S g atu lican /A%only (Agent's signature is if an authorization letter from the nt isprovided.) Page 10 of 10 4J 500 3� < 4 ,DR V— I�i6 v f 500 � (WESTGATERO Ln 00 0 50 Project Number: 5297.W2 Map Title: 700 1,400 N Project Manager: Figure 1- USGS Map I i I I I I_J KM Westgate Business Park Property Feet Scale: Wake County, NC Date: 1 = 700' Source: Wake County USGS Soil & Environmental Consult . ants, P. 8/18/16 Ba leaf Quadrangle IIIIIIIII I : WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 18 4T - (�{ 5b. Cti p G&82 � A ASC ASB l f s k. % As62 CSB2 AgC- ` Ag 2 4a•; �, ... +' ° h� AsC2 Ag6 -, v eG ✓ _ <i VaB Ap B2/ • �' �wo �� - Ge, ApB VYy '1 WrhE 90, Q�i ASH2 ��r--. r 1 a AgB rc o o e - crc�� q AiC, Cr8 ' u hAgC q< MgB2 l �j EnB2 o0 1 CrC2 AsC 8� (S�` 'A(YC2 OD e. - .. GeC2 AgC Cn - Ge82 Agg US � GeC2 E F wCrB CrC? CrH2 -> ASBLC?_ CcC i CrE ��� y \� GeC2._ a ` ���»�kkFFF"��� GiG Cr621 +,,moi n CrCz j 4( CeF . An cc �1 wa �h2 L CcCi^ CrEr^ S p�\ C C t g_ ru CIE f IJtt r" 1 GeC �� -q { S 98? i • } /!.r4 r Mt8 $ J ( o \ Ag ( AgC 7, % k ✓ c\j rC � n �ti C B ASB2 ., rrE 'f 2' -- I'- GeB C, DuB 7� � L ' . ra 1 If c /GC Duc 2 M�L( r , LU Ag ° mic / n-. __.. __ -' �u A CeD ✓' Cn r\ ��� f n D `frr �/ Ag B� �� ! r, Cgp G ! MPJifB- C€B r' �� r- z 'APD 0 CeP C 2 r. AgC i p Crn U GEE 2 Cr 1 GeC2 GeC2 i �, � �.--- ' t �� .i VBG m Cg82 I FAQ GeB? ? q ' CeC on C982- •e IitB2 Ce _ � GeBz t � ID ; • - �e.� \.GeC 2 � r Cr�2 i ��HrC Cgc2 Sia>-' /Gad $G —F" CgC2 o HrH HrB` Cgs ceO2 — oo - S HrC 7U Hrfie\; D2 — ,gc2 I floodplain and topo O �-) OA -1a ,-A P"IC4 c c `, <- C, dRi! c lea V%1 r r r r C72 Ifich 200 4e! Q '► C r^ Y 1r � —O C- I O OscIet" /\ s� Q • Q Y -0t�ti &taps rna*e% every eftrt to pr[X " and pub,sh tree, must wirent and occur" a,tomlateOn pOssrbhr HcxNever. the maps me produced tOr rnbrmaaon purpows -v,d we NOT sersevs No warranses, expressed uv rrWk4d ,,re• un,Ndetil du grit! data therea+. u1 usr.•.ur ,rt ,nterprewon i a I-540 --- -- _ (VARIABLE R/W) V =.v SITE IMPACr \_ 100' NEUSE SEE Z RC �RIVER BUFFER , MEASURED / } 4 50' FROM EACH / CREEK BANK % VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) N/F UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE PIN# 0778451308 \ \ DB 6036, PG 015910. �'- � LEGEND - BOOK DPIA" MN MANHOLE 08 DEEDBODR - WATERLINE PG PADE VM WATERMETER R RNr GNT-01' Y NN WATER VILLVE AC. ACREAGE S.F. SOUMEFEET N/3 WATER SERVICE FH FIRE EIS RPE uNE FL FlOVIDP I— PIPE IPS RONPIPE SET BO BLOWOFF NLF -M- OW OR FOIBAERLY EX EU:VATIDN NC NIMIINCAP TC TOR OF CAR IX. EXISTING 1W TDPOFWALL EOP EDGE DF PAVEMENT 1. SN' 8- 1. LB GTLN WIN C DROP INET HB NAND, PBOTTOM HT NANDICAPTOP D.I. DJCTILE IRON MIN. MINIMLM OAP CORRUGTEDMETALPIPE TYP TYPICAL M JUNLnONBOX TNM. INVERT N,y HEADWML SW SIDEWALK 33 S TARY SEVER SP SPACES FES-REDENDSEn- 0. 0.EANOUT n FFE FIW511E0 FLOOR ELEVATOR PVC PMWI'_"DE PIPE Y..'. ET ESMT. EASEMENT FDL PRE DEPARTMENT CDNECDDN CONC. CONCRETE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CSG NRB AND GUTTER RPZ REDULEO PRESSURE ZDFE TSP TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE DCVq DOUBLE QECK VALVEASSENBLY RPDA REWCED PRESSURE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY a CONCRETE `D+ E%. POWER POLE N NEW WATER VALVE CjVO EX.-TERVE . NEWVMTERREDUCER V EX, FIRE MYDWRT ,.JEW FIRE NrpiANT C3 EX -TER METER - NEWWATERAIMR EX SAWTARY SEVER MMIKIE NEW SANITARY SEVER1MN110.E O EX SANITARY SEWER MEANDUT NEW SANITARY SEVER 0.EANDUT = EX STORM GTpI BASIN _ VIEW M CA— WIN ® E%. STORM DROP INET <•, EX. STORM FLARED END SECTIO! II, NEW STORM DROP INLET ;i EX. UGM NEW STORM FLARED END SE -0N SYCAMORE N/F MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC. PIN# 0778536990 BM 2011, PG 1208 i N/F MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC. PIN# 0778740512 BM 2011, PG 1208 IMPACT AREA #2 SEE SHEET 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 400 ( IN FEET ) I inch = 200 ft. JOHN A. EDWARDS & COMPANY Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors NC License F-0289 333 Wade Ave., Raleigh, N.C. 27605 Phone: (919) 828-4428 Fax: (919) 8284711 E-mail: info@jaeco.com www.jaeco.com Seals WESTGATE PARK DRIVE EXTENSION LOT 16 W. TRENT RAGLAND, III 3725 NATIONAL DR., SUITE 150 RALEIGH, NC 27612 SITE PLAN Revisions I Numt*rl Description I Date Drawing Scale V= 200' Drawn By BE PROPERTY UNE - - RIGNr-of-wAr uNE ----------- LGTUfE EASEMENT UNE ---- W EXISTING VMTER UNE ----SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING I- DRAINAGE W NEW WATER UNE NEV, 3AWTARY SEVER NEW STORM DRAINAGE - - - -Z70- EXISTING CONTOUR UNE 270 NEWCONT-UNE - PENA I.. P.000 WN FW FW FLODD+WY NRB NEUSE RIVER BUFFER - - - CENTERLINE OF CREEK '= =2�>=J• INVERSION DTDI SYCAMORE N/F MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC. PIN# 0778536990 BM 2011, PG 1208 i N/F MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC. PIN# 0778740512 BM 2011, PG 1208 IMPACT AREA #2 SEE SHEET 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 400 ( IN FEET ) I inch = 200 ft. JOHN A. EDWARDS & COMPANY Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors NC License F-0289 333 Wade Ave., Raleigh, N.C. 27605 Phone: (919) 828-4428 Fax: (919) 8284711 E-mail: info@jaeco.com www.jaeco.com Seals WESTGATE PARK DRIVE EXTENSION LOT 16 W. TRENT RAGLAND, III 3725 NATIONAL DR., SUITE 150 RALEIGH, NC 27612 SITE PLAN Revisions I Numt*rl Description I Date Drawing Scale V= 200' Drawn By BE Checked By JAE, JR. Date Issued 5/16/17 Of IMPACTS , ;';'`'% `', �, `'', �� IMPACT LEGEND S1- PERMANENT STREAM PIPE ................. 110 LF!'�i'' S2 - PERMANENT STREAM RIP-RAP........... 20 LF ZONE 1 IMPACT JOHN A. EDWARDS & COMPANY STREAM IMPACT PIPE................................ 823 SFCIO„i \`. \\\ \' \ Consulting Engineers STREAM IMPACT RIP-RAP .......................... 150 SF and Land Surveyors ' NC License F-0289 BI - ZONE 1 NRB........................................ 7,443 SF ;' 333 wade Ave., Raleigh, N.C. 27605 ` Phone: (919)828-0428 ZONE 2 IMPACT B1 -ZONE 2 NRB ..... 4,362 SF %,, -��-�� E Fax: 919 828.47„ `a /VE(7S� 1pp; 44 E-mail: info@jaeco.com g »i^ ' > ..: °'•.>ti •;,.:. t NOTE: "ROCK ENERGY DISSIPATERS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH FFgsIJRF www.jaeco.com �RB�F — - ..,.,,. �.���•� THAT THE POST-CONSTRUCTION TOP ELEVATION OF THEM DO qCH �RFFk19 FRpMR I `, \ `` g, ' 4a' Seals NOT EXCEED THE ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING STREAM BED” � f' ANk ' ' ; -'- % I LOT 16 SO THAT MITIGATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE RIP-RAP. zC' LOT AREA .......................... 2.63 AC. IMPERVIOUS AREA ............ 0.87 AC. � ;�— <; 3 % IMPERVIOUS .................. 33% A- 40 'm' Project Al ,ti WESTGATE PARK DRIVE // \ \ ;' / , ?p• i N;,. EXTENSION LOT 16 30 16 O{ RIP 117, Client \\\ 1 \\\ \\ \\`7\ r— W. TRENT RAGLAND, III \\ l 12 \ \ I 1 j f� r� +Op N/F 3725 NATIONAL DR., SUITE 150 �" " 14+00 I ' j 1115+00 ( °' 16+'� MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC. RALEIGH, NC 27612 \ \ \ ( a fes%. , 13+0 — -J—�� + —r ( 00 PIN# 0778740512 1 1 ````1 \ \ \ ; \ ti / ,- BM 2011, PG 1208 1 Approvals ' WESTGATE PARK DRIVE (64' PUBLIC R/W) 4 ; i4 ..:-RAP ----- ---- - GRAPHIC SCALE ------------------- - j' / 800 40 80 160 NEW N W 20' PRIVATE DRAINAGE 17 --------------- O; ! : r, S /Irl ' O \ EASEMENT ''I -'d �',,�------------ IN FEET ) 1 inch 80 ft. 430 '.. '.. '. / 430 ...._.._ ._ ................... ..... .. .. . / Drawing Title EXISTING GRADE �� `� ................................ 425 425 IMPACT AREA #1 PROPOSED GRADE ' ,.... PROPOSED -, —' _ Revisions .-- -��.- _ -..._ _. Number Description Date CONC. HEADWALL _ STREAM INV. 419.20 .... 420 420 PROPOSED <. '' 10" PIPE BURY NOTE: 60" RCP PIPE INV. 418.30 COFFER DAM TO BE CONSTRUCTED UPSTREAM OF PIPE CROSSING. 415 EXISTING FLOWS TO BE PUMPED AROUND. 415 _ EX. 15" SS 1„ = 80' (HORIZ) Drawing Scale V = 8' (VERT.) INV.= 416.52 ^ 410 410 Drawn By BF L Checked By JAE, JR. 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 Date Issued 5/15/17 of „I y•, 1d 7 JOHN A. EDWARDS & COMPANY Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors _ 11, m 1 NEW 20' PRIVATE FEMA 100 YR FLOOD PLAIN NC License F-0289 333 Wade Ave., Raleigh, N.C. 27605 Phone: (919) 628-0428 r� iyy ' 1 Z DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 1 REF PANEL 3720077800J Fax: (919) 828-4711 E-mail: info@jaeco.com www.jaeco.com Z Seals i!. e8N U Z 1 •`\ Project \\�\ \ \` m z m Z / WESTGATE PARK DRIVE �;, z EXTENSION w ^� w LOT 16 I� ZO 7 N N Qf z ... O 1 1'1 WET DETENTION / Client / U POND / W. TRENT RAGLAND, III 3725 NATIONAL DR., SUITE 150 z j RALEIGH, NC 27612 Approvals 4i in fi Z "xi RIP-RAP CHANNEL TO IMPACT LEGEND TOP OF CREEK BANK ' ! goo ZONE 1 IMPACT F FER t�EVSS�RED 50 F ' MEA CREEK gA NK Drawing Title EACH„ 1 i, lu z 1 ZONE 2 IMPACT IMPACT AREA #2 Revisions Number Description Date ';;� • \ , I M PACTS BYPASS CHANNEL GRAPHIC SCALE B2 - ZONE 1 NRB BYPASS ............ 450 SF 40 0 20 40 80 B2 - ZONE 2 NRB BYPASS ............ 300 SF Drawing Scale 1"=40' ( IN FEET) Drawn By BF 3 1 inch = 40 ft. Checked By JAE, JR. Date Issued 5/15/17 of