20141148 Ver 3_Email_20170530

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: Brian Rubino <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:09 PM
To: Hauser, Jennie
Cc: Burdette, Jennifer a; Warlick, Peter; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Warlick Property Variance
Thank you very much for the prompt response. I missed this. Brian Rubino
From: Hauser, Jennie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:05 PM
To: Brian Rubino <[e-mail]>
Cc: Burdette, Jennifer a <[e-mail]>; Warlick, Peter <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Warlick Property Variance
Mr. Rubino:
Thank you for your inquiry. I think your understanding agrees with that of the EMC, which was captured in the decision.
On page six of the decision you will see a statement that the EMC specifically is not requiring mitigation and on page 7 you
will see that the only condition for the variance is related to stormwater diversion.
I hope this information is responsive to your inquiry. If for some reason that is not the case, please feel free to give me a
call.
Jennie Wilhelm Hauser
Special Deputy Attorney General
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602-0629
919.716.6600
IMPORTANT: This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may
contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product information. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy, or distribute the message or any of the
information contained in the message. Any information not protected by attorney-client privilege may be subject to
North Carolina Public Records Act requests (N.C. Gen. Stat. Section 132.1, et seq.) Please delete the message immediately
if you are not the intended recipient and notify the Attorney General's Office by return e-mail or by telephone (919) 716-
6600.
From: Brian Rubino [mailto:brubinoCa quible.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 1:50 PM
To: Hauser, Jennie
Cc: Burdette, Jennifer a; Warlick, Peter
Subject: Warlick Property Variance
Ms. Hauser,
I just received a copy of the DWR Buffer Zone Major Variance (attached here). There is a revision that I would like to
request related to mitigation. I do not believe this is an appeal, since this was an item specifically discussed during the

hearing. As for NCDMF payment for in -lieu impacts for compensatory mitigation, this requirement was waived during the
hearing. A motion was made to waive DMF payment for mitigation and was unanimously supported by the Commission
members present. Please let me know if this is consistent with your understanding. Feel free to call or email me any time
to discuss. Thanks for your attention to this matter and for working on this project with us.
Sincerely,
Brian
Brian D. Rubino, P.G.
Vice President
Quible & Associates, P.C.
8466 Caratoke Highway, Bldg 400
Powells Point, NC 27966
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
t 252.491.8147
f 252.491.8146
www.guible.com
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or
taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.