20170617 Ver 1_401 Application_20170517

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
107-B Commerce Street
GREENVILLE, NC 27858
[phone]
TO NCDEQ-Water Quality
943 Washington Street
Washington, NC 27889
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
��� Lt �� OU LJ � e LJ�I�LJlJL1L�L�-ti�L�
DATE 5/5/17
1 JOB NOPM741-4001
ATTENTION
AnthonyScarbrau h
RE:
Kia -Mazda of New Bern
Wetland Fill Request
o 6 1 7
1
the following items:
Samples ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
4
PCN with attachments
1
A Li ca-I1OVA "c 24t� �d ;e- �c'11
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
❑ As requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
A
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑
phone: [phone], ext. 233
email: [e-mail]
COPY TO
ments.
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNED:
Thank you,
Ginger Y. Turner, PE

Montalvo, Sheri A
From: Montalvo, Sheri A
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 12:43 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Mazda Kia of New Bern
Attachments: Agent Authorization Form.pdf
Importance: High
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Ginger,
We received the PCN for the above. The signature page, 10 of 10 has your signature
on it. We will need a completed agent authorization form emailed to
sheri.montalvo c(�.ncdenr.gov before we can take the project off hold and forward it
through the review process. I have attached one for your use.
Thanks
Sheri Montalvo
Administrative Assistant
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6303 (office)
919 807-6494 (fax)
sheri.montalvo(a-.ncdenr.gov
Physical: 512 N. Salisbury St., Ste 942-D, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no. _
Form Version 1.4 0,
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?(�X
Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
9 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes Q No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
0 Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Mazda Kia of New Bern
2b. County:
Craven
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
City of New Bern
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Genman Property Management, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3439-0777
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Kurtis Dean Wagaman. Managing Member
3d. Street address:
3405 Dr. M.L. King Jr. Blvd.
3e. City, state, zip:
New Bern, NC 28562
3f. Telephone no.:
252-638-6161
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant Is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e: City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g., Fax, no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Ginger Y. Turner, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
5c. Street address:
107 B Commerce Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27858
5e. Telephone no.:
252-756-9352 ext 233
5f. Fax no.:
252-756-2345
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7-016-005,7-016-006,7-016-007,7-016-008,7-018-001
Ib. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.068208 Longitude: -77.025436
1 c. Property size:
5.49 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Scotts Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SC; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing automobile dealerships on the larger parcel and single family residential on the property south of the dosed Buoy Street
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.39
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Provide additional franchised contractual showroom area for both Kia and Mazda and attached automobile services for the Kia Dealership
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Renovate and expand the existing buildings and parking to provide additional automobile display. New parking
layout to provide tractor trailer access behind the expanded building.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary Q Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Gay H. Beecher
Agency/Consultant Company: Land Management croup, LLC
Other: do Wes Fryar
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
March 2, 2017
5. Project history
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributarles ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of Impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Small -Basin Wedand
Yes
Corps
0.39
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 _
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.39
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g•
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
'
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID number
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
purpose of pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any Impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact
Reason for impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary T
feet)
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
YestNo
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5of10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing project.
Please see the attached.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing and regular maintenance after rain events vdll be part of the construction techniques to avoid any additional impacts to any
additional wetlands off site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
© Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ © Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
© Mitigation bank
0 Payment to In-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Brices Creek
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Non-riparian wetland
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 0.4 acres
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measure taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project.
The existing businesses located at 1715 E US Highway 70 in New Bern, North Carolina are
automotive dealerships for the manufacturers, Mazda and Kia. The Mazda (most northern) building was
constructed in the 1970's and the Kia (center of tract) building in the late 1980's. Both buildings have
received only minor improvements over the last thirty to forty years and are in need of major
improvements to meet the current manufacturers modern sales requirements and is also a contractual
obligation of the dealership owners. The Kia and Mazda of New Bern are approximately a thirty -mile
radius from the same manufacturer located in other counties. This radius includes the counties of
Craven, Carteret, Pamlico and Jones. Based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the population for this
area has increased by 70% since 1970, also increasing the demand for automobiles.
The existing Kia building is located near the center of the property and around twenty-five feet
from the 404 -wetland line. It is approximately 2,025 square feet, including the showroom and sales
offices. The Kia parts and service center is located at the rear of the Mazda showroom which is shared
space between the manufacturers. The Mazda building provides a showroom, sales and the current
shared parts and service center. Both manufacturers require modernization and expansion to both the
showrooms and sales area. Kia is also requiring the addition of a parts and service center contiguous to
its showroom and sales area to meet the current 2015 facility standards.
The proposed building depth for Kia is 186' and is being expanded 46' on the roadside and 99.5'
to the rear. The placement of the building provides the necessary employee, customer and service
parking, including handicap accessible spaces, with a single row of exterior automobile display spaces
along Highway 70. Kia's current building standards requires haulers and delivery trucks to have direct
access to all sides of the building for sales and service operations. The typical maximum turning radii for
a automobile hauler is 46'. The maneuvers expected for the various deliveries have been included in the
attached drawing. Not providing truck access at the rear of the building disrupts the logical flow of
traffic and could potentially reduce the number of display spaces needed for the expansion.
The business model for the Mazda and Kia dealership expansion and modernization is to create
an additional ten to fifteen employment opportunities. The projected sales volume indicates the need
for approximately 280-300 parking display spaces for inventory. The approximate parking needed for
employees and customers for sales and service is 65, totaling around 350 spaces expected for the
current market. The site plan proposes an additional 60 spaces in the prospect for further growth within
the area and an increase in demand.
The proposed site design for the expansion of the buildings and parking requires submittal to
NCDEQ-DEMLR for a coastal stormwater permit. The additional impervious on the site must be treated
by a Stormwater Control Measure for the one -inch storm, since the site drains to Scotts Creek, Class C
waters. A wet detention pond is proposed at the south west portion of the property. This State
requirement will direct all runoff from the proposed impervious to the pond eliminating any runoff
currently draining to the wetland area, potentially changing the hydrology of the wetland.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes [] No .
fib. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
87.29
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Pian, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The impervious surface area in excess of the previously existing built upon areas to be treated by a wet detention pond proposed located at the south
west portion of the project for the 1-1/2" storm.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NCDEQ-Washington Regional Office
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
N/A
❑ Phase 11
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
USMPWater
(check all that apply):
®apply Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
®Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs applyHSession
ORW
(check all that apply):
Law 2006-246
[-]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
© Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
© No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in_violation of-DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
®No
2c. If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
©No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer gravities to an onsite pump station that is then pumped to the City of New Bem public sewer system
Page 9 of 10
RCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. WIII this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
© Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
[] Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife Service, IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation, Regulatory Documents(http://crithab.fws.govhpaelgetUngStartedl
Index), the document from the website states there are no critical habitats
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur In or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Contacted Ken Riley, Fishery Biologist, National Marine Fisheries Services Southeast Region
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes © No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Verified that no historic or archaeological resources were listed for the property on the interactive NCSHPO HPOWEB GIS Services.
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur In a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
-T
❑ Yes © No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Ginger Y. Turner, PE
t7 ! l
c
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
lican gent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

KIA/MAZDA SITE
Coastal Carolina � �\
EP = Regional 70
RD's
Rp �
AIRPORT RI)
46
,\ 1
NER GRANT RD
���SELL'HORN BLVD.
Fort
t Point
V
S r�
AOR tih
70
.L,
�1

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-00011 County: Craven U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -NEW BERN
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Wes Fryar
Land Management Group, Inc.
Address: 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 5.51 acres
Nearest Waterway Neuse River
USGS RUC 03020204
Nearest Town New Bern, NC
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 35.068208
Longitude: -77.025436
Location description: This 5.51 acre site is located on Highway 70 beside the KIA Dealership on Bogy Street and
Church Road in New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Followinp- Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described 5.51 acre project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 5

SAW -2017-00011
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your 5.51 acre project area have been delineated and the delineation
has been verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey
upon completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Gary Beecher at
[phone] or Gary.H.Beecher(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps of
Eniineers wetland Delineation Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional
Supplement and is hydraulically connected to a UT of Brice Creek which is hydraulically
connected to the Neuse River.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Page 2 of 5

SAW -2017-00011
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by April 30, 2017.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. * * Digitally signed by BEECHER.GARY.H.1052973208
BEECH ER.GARY.H.1052973208 ou=USAscn=B ECHER.GARY.H.105297D2008=PKI,
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2017.03.0216:07:15-05'00'
Date: March 2, 2017 Expiration Date: March 2, 2022
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://cori2smapu.usace.an-ny.mil/cm-apex/Pp= 136:4:0.
Copy Furnished:
Page 3 of 5

fk1TaMbEIIITIMI
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQfiWfi&FOR
Applicant: Wes Frvar File Number: SAW-2017-00011Date: March 2, 2017
Land Management Grou Inc.
Attached is: See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
®
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
nj
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at 1i; its.asp"x or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Page 4 of 5

SAW -2017-00011
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Gary Beecher
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Gary Beecher,
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
Page 5 of 5

Property Boundary - 5.51 ac
Areas considered to be uplands - 5.16 ac or 9476
Flagged areas considered to be jurisdictional wetlands as regulated
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 0,35 ac or 6%
NOTE: This is not a survey All boundaries and distances are considered approximate.
This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated
areas and review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior
to specific Sete planang
L:\WETLANDS\2016 WETLAND FILES\40-16-018 --- KIA Hwy 70, Dean Wagaman\Maps
Map Source: 2016 NC One Map
ON"
SCALE 1" = 200'
KIA, Hwy 70, New Bern LMG
,�,
Craven County, NC Figure 7
www.lmgroup.net Preliminary
December 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue Upland/Wetland Sketch
LMG # 40-16-018 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

w'r%IAw'uuIF
7ym United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
x7h Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0480
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01203
Project Name: Mazda Kia Dealership
April 24, 2017
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the

U4124`2017 E v(,,nt Code 04FN2000-2011 r 01'21)3
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
httn://www. fws. Lov/miaratoi vbirds/C urrentB irdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.htm 1.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

04-24:2017 Event Code 04ENIIWO- 017-F-01203
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List

)1:'2=1,'2iJ17 Fven1 Code 04FWil(1ti-<'0I _F_ul il';
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01203
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0480
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01203
Project Name: Mazda Kia Dealership
Project Type: FILL
Project Description: 1715 East US Highway 17, New Bern
Expansion of existing automobile dealership
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps:
htips://www.google com/maps/place/35 068335303017776N77 02539298090619W
Counties: Craven, NC
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species on
this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area. Please contact the
designated FWS office if you have questions.
2

04x'24,12017 Event Code
Mammals
NAME STATUS
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) Threatened
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: httns://ecos.fws.g_ov/ecp/species,%4469
Birds
NAME
Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecl2/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.Ais.tov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/si2eciesi776
STATUS
Threatened
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of Appearance
(Threatened)
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Endangered
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.goN,/ecp/species%1493
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) Endangered
Population: Carolina DPS
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.goy/ec}Lpecies/3252
Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: littl2s://ecos.fws.gov/ecl)/si)ecies/6635

0412412017 Event Code: 04EN2000.2017-E-01203
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Sensitive Joint -vetch (Aeschynomene virginica)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/855
Critical habitats
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
STATUS
Endangered
Threatened
4

--bcti% /�-x C `ct
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 7-016-005,7-016-006,7-016-007,
7-016-008,7-018-001
STREET ADDRESS: 1715A US -70, New Bern, NC 28560
Please print:
Property Owner: Genman Property Management, LLC - Kurtis Dean Wagaman. Managing Member
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Ginger Y. Turner, PE of Stroud Engineering, PA
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
3405 Dr. M.L. King Jr. Blvd. New Bern, NC 28562
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: ---f 11 Date:

z
0
x
- •►.a--]
E
US Hwy 70
PROJECT #: PM741-4001
DESIGN FILE #: PM741-4-001.DGN
Ru
ROAD
cHERRr
RAILROAD
US HWY 70
US HWY 70
RAILROAD
US Hwy 7o
70 HAVELOCK
RAILROAD
�RREEVISIONS:
1 N0. I BY I DATE I DESCRIPTION
KIA-MAZDA OF NEW BERN
NUMBER SEVEN TOWNSHIP, CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
`,e�ueegUtth DESIGNED:
��`% , ,�A CAF104* CLIENT: GENMAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENTGYT
�`�OQ,.•'ESS/p'•. y'�, ADDRESS: 3405 DR M L KING JR BLVD DRAWN:
=.�pF N,9 NEW BERN. N.C. 28562 GYT
t¢ SEAL f PHONE: [phone] CHECKED:
36970 = RDC
=, Qo:•�.�'' S STRUUD ENGINEERING, P.A. APPROVED= GYT
�•. �j•••:C/VG 5�;••��V �` 107 8 COMMERCE STREET
�� '•••••••'• �� GREENVILLE. N.C. 27858 DATE: i
Y., (2=766-9352(l, LICENS NO. C-0647 4/26/17
:2 SCAL :
GIN R .TURNER P. NOT TO SCALE

--- -- -- --------------- JCS+ 1153 (US 70 SERVICE ROAD
_—NCS.R.-. 153- U&-�a—S€RVIC—E —ROAf3 —------- ----- -- -- - - - -
v.x_ _ Y °': _ = =-.Y= - i°.s_at= ::����*�s o s =- ^.x:=.-\� _- _ =u ==.=-s•zz= -_ =u."= -,�-- --5r �: - ----`- -- '_'_
v//ice � / - - -srr \ / q •� •5 h f J •s '4' � r. I ( 11
OMMERC I A t 1
BLDG t,
VA
/ y
EX.SINGLE
FAMILY
\
`/ \
HOME
\ 1 ` Yd
EXISTING
MAZDA
DEALERSHIP Ov
EXISTING J \` 1`)\\ `� "_5-__�'-�'y \�'•'l/ t\\
DEALER HIP
q k� r t a \\ i t t \✓ t` +~,x.s / / "2='
-`z�.s EX. S I NGLE - - - - - - - - - \
I t \ Et�C.FENCE - -- ---2t� _ z°.s- / - \ FAMILY HOME ?"'�
o - r
,,Ij.. ..I..�y _�vl� �if� �L � 1 � - - - - 21 - -
�I
\ �
1 b ic. L�� �I.�.� � Ali ��u
I- - - - - - _ \ 1
�
�Y.�' 5��:.i�ic_� styyk_ `'
\L LI
i 1 \ � ) s I "• \ r � Jc. I �I i :. s'c. �...'� "s+
y •, t ! I jI,FENCtE
E
t r �.c.�4fi�iNl&T�AND3`3"'� �` � s l " \ +• .;r 1 1 1
1 p
_vim -Ni
OF PAVEMENT \ 11 ♦ i l �lr 1 1)'\t.• �. LSx >'.oh\4Z,,t i
• \ \ '1 � � � / /
Vol \1 t \\ t - _ f / t 1 ; Z tl 1;1�L 1 L
Ott t
h
1 \ `o� \rt�t`
11
�4r J 3` o
�1�itnssA '' i' /
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD
EXISTING SITE DATA
TOTAL TRACT AREA = 238.937.74 SF (5.485 ACI
EXISTING BUILT UPON AREA
PAVEMENT 88.709 SF
CONCRETE 3.675 SF
BUILDINGS = 21.976 SF
TOTAL = 114.360 SF
EXISTING % IMPERVIOUS = 47.86%
SHEET #1 OF 3
PROJECT #: PM741-4-001
DESIGN FILE #: PM741-4-001.DGN
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD
REVISIONS:
Na I Br I DATE I DESCRIPTION
REFERENCES:
OWNER: N/F GENMAN PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT. LLC
D.B. 3439 PG. 777
PID 7-016-005
ADDRESS: 1715 U5 HIGHWAY 70 EAST
USACE WETLANDFILL R UE5T - EXISTING CONDI IONS PLAN
KIA--MAZDA OF NEW BERN
NUMBER SEVEN TOWNSHIP. CRAVEN COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: GENMAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DESIGNED:
`����tn�ttttttti GYT
I
�,�N go*@ � �� ADDRESS: 3405 DR M L KING JR BLVD DRAWN:
%� 0 •.•FESSIp'•.• -� ��.e NEW BERN, N.C. 28562 GYT
Z �Qp ti •.
!Q PHONE: [phone] CHECKED: RDC
SEAL.
60 3a o so 1 0 36970 STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
APPROVED:GYT
,Q•. Q % 107 B COMMERCE STREET
�• �'•�NG�NE�'• ���� GREENVILLE, N.C. 27858 DATE:
SCALE: 1 60 ,i�i••R•Y•••�,�,, _ 52)756:83 LIC E 0.0-0847 4/`26/17'
„_ ♦ Fltqus�2F'� __ _ SCALE:
GI GER . TURNER P.E. 1 = 60

°---NCSR--T-T5-3--NS--7-0,-SE-W-C---RO-AD
6
TRUCK WITH
TURNING RADII.
TYPICAL
—118, 191 92T3H
-T%
5 9M —,
99 10 01 10 1
aIa
-----------------------------
_----------------------
f�CSR 1153 {US 70 SERVICE ROAD-
----
BB
87
86
85
84
83
62
81
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
aIa
-----------------------------
_----------------------
f�CSR 1153 {US 70 SERVICE ROAD-
----
`—
•107108109IH
34134033933833733533}334333332'331330329�327326325324
32
321320319
354353I35
M�,1114�.141111�1�141-4-143342
233
232
NCS���;:�
a kI I
-
_
-
M
�0
2991
00
301
30 1303
304
305
30!'130730130
31
31171231
31
315316317318
22 9
228
PROPOSED MAZDA-
DEALERSHIP i
o WITH EXPANDED £ vii
SHOWROOM ; ..°M
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Q
133`
i41
r n d
'L21
_
`yy r ,crr tr�c�nrso� �..• .i.-.- ! ��11
o mu
58 57 56 55 54 53
�.
K -S
_r l- -
v 17
�8
47 48 49 50 51 52
20 y
22 \
\46
3
23 \ 45 44 43
\
25 4041 42 Q�� ®' ®n® ®® ®� r—�` .•_-.:._I F
26 v_ �/
l 2=�__----
29
~J 1301 31 32-33 34- - 35 36 371 38 I 9®�I7 113114115 16 11 118 19 20121 122123 24 2512 127 128 129 130 131 132 1331
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD
MrlTrt 1rr1-S=IB3 € _1
I� TM•;Y;aWETLAND FI I
EMPLOYEE. CUSTOMER AND
SERVICE DEPT PARKING
SHEET #2 OF 3
PROJECT #: PM741-4-001
DESIGN FILE #: PM741-4. OOI.DGN
(IIC111 1
)�
rens
.• 30 • .•
.• •
�b 2982 2961295 9493 29 211119012.i2 -1287128121112812831211 B1 280 792181 221
\ X223 J.
256 57258259 260261 26 263264 265 266267 26826 127 1271 27 27 274 275 27 277
25525425325 251 50249248 24724 245244243242 41 4023912382372361235 234 \ 220
PROPOSED KA DEALERSHIP 1 I 216
WITH EXPANDED SHOWROOM
AND SERVICE DEPARTMENT / 217
/ ! 216
196197 198 199 2 00 201 02 203 204 205 206207 208 201 211 211 21 213 21 / / r' 15
188 187 186185 18,183 1481
I
IMPACT u1 1 1
FILL REQUEST i
0.39 AC 1
711,17 17 17418 / I
/ f
161 16 /� /
4 9 11 5 011 5
NORFOLK SO
e,,�it1it11►1j1/1
<,%oPIV1 CA/30f*,�,
SEAL
°
36970
°
41
0
57
PROPOSD WET
DETENTION POND
ERN RAILROAD
i--[
REFERENCES:
OWNER: N/F GENMAN PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT, LLC
D.B. 3439 PG. 777
PID 7-016-005
ADDRESS: 1715 US HIGHWAY 7
TRUCK WITH
TURNING RADII,
TYPICAL
REVISIONS:

IIIIII%%%/%/%%%%%/%%%%0m0���
SHEET #3 OF 3
PROJECT #: PM741-4-001
DESIGN FILE #: PM741-4-0OI.DGN
REVISIONS:
1 Na I BY I DATE I DESCRIATKMf 1
SACE WETLAND FILL REQUEST
]A FLOOR PLAN WITH INGRESS/EGRESS LOCATIONS
KIA-MI %z-7DA OF NEWBERN
NUMBER SEVEN TOWNSHIP, CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: GENMAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DESIGNED:
GYT
ADDRESS: 3405 DR M L KING JR BLVD DRAWN:
NEW BERN. N.C. 28562
PHONE: [phone] jLhtL;Ktu:
/§ STROUD ENGINEERING. P.A.
ArrNL
107 B COMMERCE STREET
GREENVILLE. N.C. 27858
DATE:
(�76
L�,I,,C��NSEN0. C-0847
�LSCALE
E Y. TURNER P.E.
GYT
RDC
GYT
4/26/17
.1"= 20'