20120107 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report Ph IV_2016_20170515

SECOND ANNUAL (2016) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 4
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
April 2017

SECOND ANNUAL (2016) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 4
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
April 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................
1.1
History ................................................
1.2
Location ..............................................
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria.........
2.0
REQUIREMENTS ...............................
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season
2.2
Hydrology ...........................................
2.3
Vegetation ..........................................
2.4
Photographic Documentation .............
2.5
Reporting ............................................
3.0
2016 RESULTS ...................................
3.1
Rainfall ...............................................
3.2
Hydrology ...........................................
3.3
Vegetation ..........................................
4.0
SUMMARY ..........................................
LITERATURE CITED
Cover Photo: Aerial photo looking north over Phase 4 and sections of Phase 3. 15 March 2016.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 4 performance criteria, methods summary, and current
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
status..........................................................................................................................
T-1
Table 2 Hydroperiods of eight non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 4
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during all rainfall conditions in
2016............................................................................................................................
T-2
Table 3 Hydroperiods of eight non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 4
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during WETS normal and below
normal rainfall in 2016................................................................................................
T-6
Table 4 Second annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in eight 0.3 -acre plots at P
andU Lands Phase 4.................................................................................................
T-8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations
Figure 3 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Soils
Figure 4 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations on As Built LiDAR
Figure 5 2016 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 2016 Longest Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones during All Rainfall Conditions
Figure 7 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 2016 Hydroperiods and Estimated
Hydrologic Zones during WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
APPENDICES
Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4
Appendix B Selected First Annual Restoration Photograph
NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology data included on accompanying CD.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of
the PCS Phosphate Company Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable
impacts to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Action ID: 200110096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water
Quality Certification (WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. The P and U designation have no special
meaning other than that was the historic label given to PCS and Weyerhaeuser properties with
similar ownership agreements.
The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s
(PCS) Parker Farm Mitigation Site, Bay City Farm Mitigation Site, Gum Run Mitigation Site, and
the South Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved
natural areas (South Creek Corridor Complex). Unlike most other PCS mitigation sites, the P and
U Lands are not prior -converted agricultural fields. Other than the existing roads, most of the
acreage in which earthwork occurred was in some stage of silviculture, usually various -aged pine
stands, and contained regularly spaced ditches (deeper than the agricultural ditches on other
restoration sites that were filled in as part of restoration work) and the bedding common to pine
plantations. The removal of all standing timber and stumps and post-harvest debris presented
particular challenges as the organic soils precluded safe burning of the timber slash on site.
Consequently, some of the debris was piled into somewhat evenly shaped and sized mounds
throughout the site which provide additional wildlife habitat.
As described in the mitigation plan prepared for the pre -construction notification (PCN) to
the USACE (CZR 2012), the site was planned to be constructed in three phases as shown on
Figure 1. These three phases were completed during the following three years: Phase 1
construction was completed in 2011 and planted in February 2012, Phase 2 construction began
in 2012 and was planted in 2013; however, construction at the lower elevations took additional
time due to excessive wetness. This delay prevented the restoration of approximately 268 acres
of the original Phase 2 which included Gum Swamp Run. During the third year, these 268 acres
and Gum Swamp Run were restored and included with the Phase 3 work completed in 2013
(planted in February of 2014). Because Phase 3 was the largest of the three phases, some of the
Phase 3 work, approximately 138 acres, was not completed until later in 2014 and was not
planted until spring of 2015. This report includes results of second annual hydrology and
vegetation monitoring for the 138 acres of P and U Lands Phase 4 conducted by CZR
Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington, NC.
The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the
restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land
Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Phase 1 and 2
restoration activities occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Phase 3 construction began in Gum
Swamp Run on 9 May 2012 and on 22 June 2012 on the larger Phase 3 area. Phase 3 was
constructed with a total of 14 NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control
(DLR) permits for land clearing which were subsequently modified to all for the construction of the
interior ditch plugs and perimeter berms and ditches. Phase 4 activities were included in three of
the Phase 3 DLR permits (#s 22, 23, and 24). Planting of Phase 4 occurred in mid-February
2015.
1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road
(SR1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay
City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918
(Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a
gated gravel road along the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of the site
lies west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site referred to as
the "panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands). South Creek and the South Creek
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

Canal form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner/Rodman Road forms the western
boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U Lands
(County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands as the
western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line). The
entire site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County Line
Road, Gum Road, and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico
Hydrologic Unit 03020104 of the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at
latitude 35.233831 and longitude 76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS
Aurora, Bayboro, South Creek, and Vandemere quadrangles (Figure 1).
1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the entire project is to re-
establish a self-sustaining functional wetland complex to allow surface flow to move through
vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and performance
criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U
Lands Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance criteria for Phase 4 are summarized in Table 1.
Over time the 138 -acre Phase 4 portion of the site is expected to successfully re-establish
approximately:
❖ 17.8 wetland acres of headwater forest and
❖ 116.5 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest.
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the
adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in
conjunction with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from
NOAA's site at Aurora and rain gauges at other nearby monitoring sites) to determine normal
rainfall during the monitoring period. Bay City data were compared to the WETS range of normal
precipitation to determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal
precipitation for this report refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of
having onsite rainfall amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal
and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the WETS -Aurora
monthly precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days during
non -leap years (WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent
probability) (US Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington
regulatory field office, data collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important
information related to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part
of the hydroperiod calculation for success.
2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment,
Figure 3 shows these locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows all
monitoring locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all
wetland types on the site, eight semi -continuous electronic Level Troll water level monitoring
wells (manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across
all planted areas of Phase 4. Exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence
posts were built around each well to reduce likelihood of disturbance or equipment loss by black
bears.
To serve as additional hydrology controls for the entire P and U Lands site, three Level
Trolls were installed in the Rodman Tract in 2013 in an area mapped as Ponzer soil at elevations
similar to portions of Phase 4 (7 to 9 feet) and four Level Trolls were installed at previous well
locations within the adjacent Bay City Farm in late 2015. According to the soils map and LiDAR
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

data, these four locations also are underlain by Ponzer soils but two are at slightly higher
elevations than the three Rodman wells (9 to 11 feet) and two are slightly lower (4 to 6 feet).
Level Trolls collect data every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and the data
evaluated to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods are calculated by counting
consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the soil surface during the
growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions and then for all rainfall
conditions.
2.3 Vegetation. The first annual survey of the eight 0.3 -acre planted vegetation
monitoring plots occurred August -October 2015 and the second annual survey occurred October -
November 2016. The plots represent approximately 2 percent of the restoration area (Figure 2).
2.4 Photographic Documentation. Due to the small size and similarity to the
surrounding areas of Phase 3, no photo stations were established specifically for Phase 4. The
view for Phase 3 photo station PLPS 21 faces into Phase 4, so this station is included in
Appendix B. The first annual photo was taken December 2015 and the second in October 2016.
2.5. Reporting. The First Annual Report (CZR 2016) on monitoring results was
provided as required in 2016.
3.0 2016 RESULTS
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall in 2016 at Bay City was 60.6 inches, 4.2 inches more than
2015. The 30 -day rolling total of 2016 Bay City rainfall shows the following periods as above
normal (above the WETS 70th percentile longer than several days): 4 February — 4 March, 7 — 28
June, 2 July — 5 August, 12 September — 2 October, and 7 October — 5 November (Figure 5).
Wetland hydroperiods were calculated for the entire year regardless of rainfall and also calculated
with above normal rainfall periods excluded.
The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a
weekly basis (updated each Thursday). In 2016, three of the 41 weeks of the growing season
were considered abnormally dry (DO) (19 April — 3 May); the remaining weeks were normal with
no drought status in the vicinity of the P and U Lands project area.
3.2 Hydrology. During all rainfall and normal and below normal rainfall conditions, all
of the eight wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod (Table 2, Figure 6). Of the eight wells in Phase
4, one well had a hydroperiod for the entire growing season, four wells for >25-75 percent of the
growing season, and three wells for >12.5-25 percent of the growing season. After excluding the
five periods of above normal rainfall, four wells had a hydroperiod for >25-75 percent of the
growing season and four wells for >12.5-25 percent of the growing season.
During all rainfall conditions, the three Rodman control wells recorded a wetland
hydroperiod for 25-75 percent of the growing season, which is the same as half of the wells in
Phase 4. The four Bay City control wells had a wetland hydroperiod, but each well was in one of
the four hydrologic zones: >6-12.5 percent, >12.5-25 percent, >25-75 percent, and >75 percent.
Hydroperiods for the control wells were not affected by the above normal rainfall.
3.3 Vegetation. Planting zones of Phase 4 were divided into two zones or community
types: headwater forest (Z2) and non- riverine swamp forest (Z3). Using only the number of
planted stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring plots, the most conservative
estimate of survival is presented. Some stems may appear dead or questionable, but based on
prior monitoring experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be found) for two consecutive
fall survey events before it can be confidently counted as dead. At the year two 2016 survey,
percent survival for Z2 was 85 percent and Z3 was 88 percent with a combined total of 18
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

identified species (12 trees and six shrubs). Appendix A contains the number of stems that were
alive in each plot for the fall 2016 survey.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the eight plots from the time of
planting to the second annual fall survey was 92 percent, with a corresponding density of 338
trees per acre (Table 4). There were five identified tree species that had 90 percent or higher
survival: swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), willow oak (Q. phellos), overcup oak (Q.
lyrata), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and laurel oak (Q. laurifolia) with 100, 100, 99, 98,
and 90 percent respectively. The trees that could only be identified down to the genus Nyssa had
the lowest survival with 40 percent; all other tree species had 84 percent or higher survival. If
trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be confirmed) are included
with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 99 percent and a density of 367 trees
per acre.
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
second annual fall survey was 86 percent with a corresponding density of 13 shrubs per acre
scattered among the eight species planted (Table 4). Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica),
fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), and possumhaw (Viburnum nudum) all had 100 percent survival and
silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) had 0 percent survival. When the trees, shrubs, and unknown
species that were definitely alive are combined, density increases to 351 stems per acre and if
stems with uncertain survival are added, the density increases to 386 stems per acre.
The Corps determined that three tree species have the possibility to outcompete young
planted trees at a mitigation site and need to be monitored as nuisance species to ensure they do
not take over a mitigation site. These species are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer
rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). A total of 40 stems were identified in the eight
nuisance plots. Only one stem was a nuisance species, a loblolly pine, representing 2.5 percent
of all stems present in the nuisance plots.
4.0 SUMMARY
Total rainfall in 2016 at Bay City was 60.6 inches, 4.2 inches more than 2015. The 30 -
day rolling total of 2016 Bay City rainfall shows the following periods as above normal (above the
WETS 70th percentile longer than several days): 4 February — 4 March, 7 — 28 June, 2 July — 5
August, 12 September — 2 October, and 7 October — 5 November. During all rainfall and normal
and below normal rainfall conditions, all of the eight wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod. Of the
eight wells in Phase 4, one well had a hydroperiod for the entire growing season, four wells for
>25-75 percent of the growing season, and three wells for >12.5-25 percent of the growing
season. After excluding the five periods of above normal rainfall, four wells had a hydroperiod for
>25-75 percent of the growing season and four wells for >12.5-25 percent of the growing season.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the eight plots from the time of
planting to the second annual fall survey was 92 percent with a corresponding density of 338
trees per acre. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting
to the first annual fall survey was 86 percent with a corresponding density of 13 shrubs per acre,
scattered among the eight species planted. When the trees, shrubs, and unknown species that
were definitely alive are combined, density increases to 351 stems per acre and if stems with
uncertain survival are added, the density increases to 386 stems per acre.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated. 2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated. 2016. First Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps
regulatory program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2). U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley,
R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

�
C)
�
/
/
§
�
k
/
2
/
%
%
E
E
§
0
k
E
.$
/
(D
\
E
2
0-
U) U)
k
/
2
@
/
/
Pand uLands Restoration sb Phase a, PCSPhosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017
2.2 7
D
e% o
y-
Q£ Q n
o£ m ¥
n
a § q
o
E m
E [ @ a.m -0 2
¥
a 2 0
E o= 2
±
5 e 6
%
e
/ 0 a 0§@ e
■
p-
2%
o E o t o=
c
6
o &
J 7 0@ c E
E-
E m 2±«$®
7
c
E m 2 a E m o
.2
FD 2 0@
e 2- Q Q--
2 2§@
._ n
E
m= m Q E °/
2/
= 2®°
£%3�.En�\§/f/%�%
?/k5/%ef
o
Cn
/
/ /
} / \ \ ƒ /
M 0 ƒ
/ %
M /
0/$$ E 2[
$ ° k
D
U
@ e
� -
• E
® m q 4._
* o§
0 2 o
0
m k f_0 m®
= E o.
� £ @ > ® Co
7� E
2 'E
ƒ E A B
c
@
o «-0
E
m
£ * E 7§ƒ
®@_
q
o E
e 2 e
5 0 §/\§%(
2
7\ 2® 2/
3 0
o£
o
a
k
0
2
2
m°
LJ
E
/
z
0
C:
/
06
@
g 2 k
0
E
Ch
E
§
« �
5
.
c
/Lm
/
2
ƒ ( k
k
o
g
2
�
ob
@
\
0
E
E m
a y
c
(n E m
/
0
=37
0
c �
/
0
2 >1
R )
§
CU
0
�.E
M
.¥ (n
ƒ 0
E
U)
k
E
@
m \
§
a 3
f
.0
m % 5
k%
2�f�
u
0 m
g e 2 E
§
2•g
y 0 0 a)
\
® @R
m
> 2
/
0
' @ 3
CO CU
k
0.f
k ,
k
0
077
M
@ c E
@
«
0
2 0.
of^��e
0
E ±
E
+
= 2
O 5 7
@ 20
Mn 2
7\
2
°
C
(n
@ »
.g
0
Pand uLands Restoration sb Phase a, PCSPhosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

E $ 2
y
ƒ%2 x
\
/
\
/
7
a
6
ȤC:
$
\
\
=
©
y
\
4
»\\
/
m/7
C14
%
«
§ b %
/
a
\
2)2
%
+
\
2\
\
.g
° a
.\
0
3
w
a
\
E
I
y
\fƒ
n
)
£ CL
CO
&2\
$ co E
2
v
/ (n =3
% 0
/ e_ £
2 = 7
g
f G�
2 g o n\\
E 0 S 0\/
\k\
����0>�
U)
� >,'—
,'U)m°
U) co M
7
6
_ CO n
2
g
\/f
^
k/
m m =
\ \ %
/ / > o
Mƒ
a)
k 2 /
CO
U)
__
/ 0
f / \
~
\ / U)
ƒ \LL
0
R
E \ \
'�
/
% / \
D e e
o
f 3 2/
/\�
ƒk
CO
M g
-o
\ kCN
CD
C:\
E
: \ � §
c
� r_
G \ E y
U »-
/ \ �
% 2
% \ E
\ / ƒ
\
-
0 C / E
/ m
\
( — = o
®7 w
RG =
/
�c�.g
m s
»CU2
\ e 0
0 = E —
�22$
IsE=
\
\CO
\ 0 \
5f\%
= o M _
R o = o
Pand uLands Restoration
sb Phase
Second Annual
Report
94:
�
n
ƒ \ \ 2 2
\
k
T-2
x
\
\
\
/
7
@
6
\
$
\
\
\
©
/
\
4
�
&
C14
$
«
¥
6
ƒ \ \ 2 2
\
k
T-2
x
\
\
94:
/
M
/ /
/ ®$
\ \ « &
A @ « a
/ \ 7 /
\
\
\
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2017
\
2
/
©
/
\
4
/
6
$
a
00
\
»
\
\
\
6
@
«
w
a
\
\
94:
/
M
/ /
/ ®$
\ \ « &
A @ « a
/ \ 7 /
\
\
\
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2017

N
O
L6
P ani
Seca
I U L
nd Ar
U O -0
U N LL
O L
U rn
a�
>' Z > U
N O L6
>" CO
L6 � 0 N
O O N LL
E00
CO
L
O LL
N �
� � N
N '
L
U O
CO
>N
Inds Restoration Site
inual Report
X
'It
0
CO
Lf )
I, -
N
n
Cfl
0
,
LO
LO
N
A
0
LO
N
N_
A
0
Lfj
N
r
A I
V
O
C O
CO Q
>'
N O
L
U
4)
U O -0
U N LL
O L
U rn
a�
>' Z > U
N O L6
>" CO
L6 � 0 N
O O N LL
E00
CO
L
O LL
N �
� � N
N '
L
U O
CO
>N
Inds Restoration Site
inual Report
X
'It
N
CO
M
N
Cfl
N
,
O
r
1�- Ln r rl- It
CT r N r 'It
phase 4
ti
N
N
O
N
x
i
4
Lf) �
r CO
O
i 00 r
00 M '
N - M
N r- 0)
00 N ,It 'IT LO
r
r -
N
0
V
T-3
x
M
� r
Ln C N
00 r
N N N
N LO
N
N
rl-
N
O
N
x
V
CO O r- N
T 00 r
00
00 M r
M
N N M
r N
N L 7 00
M M CD LO
It N 'It 00
M
N
N
rl-
N
LO
O
N
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2017

E
q
0
a
0
I
ƒ
\
ƒ
K
\
A
\
9
@
%
/
r
C14
AI
f
%==�70
k \ f f / k
e e 0n 2 0
ƒ )U) 06 N4—
_
\
e
00
CO
f 3 \ o
> -0
CO
\ 2 0 2
U) L
0 / / ±
U R ,§
fCO0
ƒ k CO
\2/\
=f & ±
% / \ Co
U R �—
G�=
7 0 =
�&\
\ \ C\j
R = m
0
I
LO
COC
nr
U) 5 0
r_
2
C)
�3\
/
Y)
/
6
/
0
6
%
\
«
\
0
N
M
&
@
»
J
+
/
=
w
±
O
_
/
CO
2
m
/
PCS Phosphate
\
2
\
m
\
\
�
T-4
0
x
%
\
\
U) 5 0
$
2
C)
�3\
@
/
0
U
0
0
M
~
J
/
=
)
±
O
_
CO
m
PCS Phosphate
Company, Inc.
/
0
Pand uLands Restoration sb
Phase
Second Annual Report
\
m
\
\
�
T-4
0
x
%
\
■
\
/
o r o 0
/
\
C\1
C)
w
ƒ
■
\
/
o r o 0
/
�
ƒ
U
[
M
~
LL
\
\
±
O
_
CO
m
PCS Phosphate
Company, Inc.
April 2017

ƒ
\
ƒ
K
\
A
ƒ
9
9
%
/
r
N
AI
f
0 0) 0
0\2f/k
e e 0n 2 0
ƒ�U) 06�N4—
_
\
e
00M
f 3 \ o
ƒk-03
\ 2 0 2
U) L
0 / / ±
C) U)
fM0
ƒ k M
\2/\
= f & ±
% / \ \
U R �—
G�=
7 0 =
�&\
\ \ C\j
° \
U) 5 0
i3\
\
0
I- n 9
/ / / /
C14 Nk
A @ » c
\ / ƒ /
\
x
x
/ / $
7
CO
\
\
7
/
U
_
Pand uLands Restoration sb Phase a5 PCSPhosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

E2 / \
�
#±co /
� —
�J/\
CO\\U)
0
CO E \ /
c=»cu s
E \ \
co
.\
2^�2
±$es
/ \ G j
£ %
(.0
/
k\7�
/k§\
/ � n
0 In
Z3-0
co
CLL O
CL \\ cu
�/
_
CU 0 0
_j = n %
2�$0
=/c=
§\\�
1770
«= 0)
2 f C 0
\ ) 0
EO »
E -0 _
C: 2\
/ \ \
§ 2 ©g
)-0 7
650-0
E E O \ 0
0)
s m 7 Co _
R = 0 0
Ow 0 0
$R�Ea
0Go"2
c — 0 0
'C:
/J-0
^ / \
15 §.: c
a f = s §
E ° _
0 2$ ® o
55E2�
/ E / 0 ƒ
Pand uLands R #
Second Annual Rep(
ƒ
\
/
CN
E A
( /
.\ \
0 \
A
I y
\
(6
Q0
0 _ _
\\/f�
L) o m n :
ƒ&U)\,
\
2
\/\
f3\�
.ƒ a)2 i
0 0
\\\L
O R .§
fc/c
o% _
''£ 0 \
CU f R=,
=mqL
E a)
%�2
£ o =
a)
\ & r-
\�
°\
U) 2 0
M3\
\
)ration Site Phase
,rt
x
\
x
\
x
x
x
x
/
x
x
x
x
/
B
It
B
/ /
\ k
m 2
7 CO
%
/
LO \ /
/ k
m
/ 7
\\C1M 0 1 N CO
N��I C'4
\ I\I\I \ I\I\
\
�
ae
k
\
CO
\
\
\
\
/
\
/
\
\
/
§
\
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2017

0
LO
ti
n
0
LO
I,-
6 6
N
A
0
Ln
N
Ln
N_
A
0
U?
N
r
A I
CD
V
O (M0 CO
m 3 Cs
L O CU M00
C
4)
j N �
7 C O
U
0-0
O N LL
O L
U cn
m
CU CU
> U
-0 C)
OO O
> + L (.0
l6 O N
O N Ll
00
N
L
CU
O LL
O N r�-
I X
O
i rn
N
1
LO
O
N N
� r
L? r
LO Cp
M r
r
N Ln
00 r
x
00
00 O
r �
M ,
LO Ln
M N
M
N
x
I.0
,'I- LO
N N N
LO 00
, , O
M 000 r
r
r Or
00 N M
X
Ln
LO
M
d'
d'
x
y
r
� r N
O � r
LO O
C O
M 00 r
r
M M
LO O I CO I �
r -
C'4
N�
N
U
M
N
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2017
L - N
O
L
CO
>
O
uJ O
CO
L
�
Co (6
�
O
U
U
O
L
CO
Ll
N
CO
_
Lo
M
�
m
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase
4
Second Annual Report
r -
C'4
N�
N
U
M
N
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2017

o W M
C ON
N M O M- Ln N It�� N O M
O
O O N M
U C
I� O 6 0 6 6 CO (6 O O m N O
O N M CO
Ci
(6
d o :
CU -ca
O O o 0 o O O o o O
O o 0 0 0 0
0
°N°
io
� o 0 0 0 0 M o 0 0 a o p o
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
cq �
° o
O N
2 >
M O � 00 O O O O O M O .d. M
N
N O O f� O
O
O Q
M Iq M M M O 0 0 0 0 0 O O M
O
O M O O M O
CC)
M
Nfp
O)N r --O
cc Ln O LO M- Q M M Cl) Ln O0 (D M
I,,ti
M ON
�- CM t
M
M
N 00
O
N
CD M
`-
0) M
E
0)
N
M M LO O I� �- O O N O O �-
M N
N N O O O
LO N
LO
W
o
M
j
m
LL
:
h LO O O t`
(D N M M M
N
O O N
M r
W M
Q
00 N
CO (+Mj
CO
N
LO 00 O
N- M I -CO
M LO
WM
N M
Mt}to
to
oS
M
E
0)
to Q)
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O
O O
M
M
_ O
N
M
m
O)
(0 O O M CO r• OM M V M
W LO
N N C-4 r• M V
M
N 00
Q
N N
00 M
O1 M
(6 N
0 S
n O�C
M MWN
M
O)
rN
M
CON)
(D �
CO
U)
y w
E 'y
to
Cl) N
y
+
y
l6
Y
-
0 w
E
C'i
H
O
N (D Y
N
i
O O
Q O N ° N
N
-° .�
rn En w
N
° Q O)
N
U
O
U
O 0) T Y Y N y 0)
Q
O 3 0) 2
Q
0)
m 3 3 a U ° a° n
E=
oO a (6 = E
3
°° m E—° m L E 3° a) a)
E Q 3°
C7 (n Q .J O (n CO CO H (n
(n (n > u_ 2 0 -
CU N
y
N j j dCO
CO
COU
°
y
Z
E
CO
y G U 0- y y �O i` a1
N 03
N
L)
c �= CO ti� m o 'm m
m° E
3
•m
CU
N G
t m
•U
N
k
LO Q O >` Q 'i 0)
i
G _
C
i h x
in
� U- Z� Z Z ET 8 O C'I O O v�j U U
co U U ,'
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 T-8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017

a. IyI C�
di y
SOUTH CREEK
CORRIDOR
,
,
-
j-
-
w
u `g
P LANDS 9a ' •'
SOUTH CREEK
,.: CORR DOR
g
s°��
o PHASE 2
-
m PHASE 2 P LANDS
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
BAY CITY
CONTROL SIT
... .1
f
U LANDS
m PHASE
-
- < PHASE 1
-
_
P LANDS PARKER FARM
SECTIONS A -J
35'14'15.04"
.., LONG:
76'46'19.20"
RODMANSITE
qq
PHASE 4
CASEY TRACT /' - --- -
U LANDS
P LANDS
-
m m
U LANDS
_ a
LEGEND
P and U LANDS BOUNDARY
P and U LANDS PHASE 4
0 6,000 12,000
SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND
PARKER FARM BOUNDARY
SCALE IN FEET
VICINITY MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
SITE LOCATION
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
P and U LANDS
SOURCE:
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
DATE: 10/20/16
FILE: PLANDS_VIC_PH4_
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
2016
NAERT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
D 1983FEET
CP#1745.59.32.4
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE,
EIV2
�^^ 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
lV_ K
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
INCORPORATED TEL [phone]
FIGURE 1
NAD83, FEET, 1:24000—SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

Q
PPACF 9
LAA
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT A. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW. Co
BEAU FORT.NC,US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
LEGEND
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPENWATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
-
ROADS
®
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
TREE SAMPLING PLOT
•
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE)
�•
PHOTO STATION NUMBER AND LOCATION
PULPS 21
n
CONTROL WELL
AREAS PLANTED IN PHASE 4
0
ZONE 2 HEADWATER FOREST
0
ZONE 3 NON-RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
NOTE:
P AND U LANDS (3,666.92 ACRES)
(TOTAL ACREAGE INCLUDES 12.52 ACRES OF
RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG STATE ROADS NOT
PLANTED.)
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET

Pt
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
EXECUTIVE ROAD/ To
JAIME ROAD
190
Pt
__ -- 0
-;a CO D
00 0
pZ
�Z
Dm
-Z
RC -1 00 199
TO RC -2 >> 200
RC -3 202
203 ®cam
205
RODMAN 204
CONTROL
SITE
. s
SOURCE:—�
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY CIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
2016 AERIALS DOWNLOAD FROM FROM NC ONE MAP
WEBSITE: http://data.,conemop
SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE,
ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995
U LANDS
PHASE 3
BA -Y FARM ("Z7
BCW-44
V
LANDS
PHASE 3
c BAY CITY N° 2
z
z
z
m
z
0
N
G�UNTY LINE`
m
BCW -29 BCW -33
BAY CITY FARM
CONTROL SITE
BCW -17
. m
LEGEND
P AND U LANDS BOUNDARY
O
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT
MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.)
Eel
CONTROL WELLS
SOILS
SYMBOL
SOIL NAME
D° DARE (ORGANIC)(72.81 ACRES)
Do DOROVAN (ORGANIC)
Po PONZER (ORGANIC)(62.32 ACRES)
Pt PORTSMOUTH (MINERAL)(3.22 ACRES)
To TOMOTLEY (MINERAL)
Wd WASDA (ORGANIC)
HYDRIC SOILS
NOTE:
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED
MINERAL OR ORGANIC.
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET
SOILS
=� P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 and TWO CONTROL SITES
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 02/27/17 FILE: P_U_LANDS_SOILS_
.L._4 016
4-c".FRIPORATED
ZR A
CP#1745.59.32.44709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone] FIGURE 3
'_ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

0
ik
ku
lw 6"p � I .
�'
F
—Z 111111" IF I
J
*,*W,. SOUTH CREEK CANAL
G* EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
_iso 1r
* --
P H 4
RC -1 U LANDS
RC -3 � \ \ 199 200
O
203
O204
ROMAN z
CONTROL � ,,
SITE 1. 0
0
v
SCJ
O
0
D
Z
O
D
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND PAMLICO COUNTIES,
UDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET, WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM
PHASE 4
U LANDS
202 '1 At
r•�
nr�
e
189
BAIL
3 P
BCRW-44 ❑0
40 JL
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
D
C)
0
D
P 0
— N
ITY REARM
_ O
o
N
i
4,1 29 BCRW-33
- _ r A BCRW-17
- C q N T,R O LEMANDMO 4;im!
S 11T .
BAY CITY N°' 2
LE END
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
— ROADS
® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
0 FORESTED WETLAND
® WELL LOCATION
n CONTROL WELL
Legend
Elevation in Feet
Value
Q 0-2
Q 2-4
=4-5
=5-6
=6-7
=7-8
=8-9
=9-10
_ 10-11
�11-12
I� 12-13
13-14
_ 14-15
_ 15-16
Q 16-21
0 21-48
P LANDS
COUNTY LINE ROAD
MONITORI
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET

Figure 5. 2016 BAY CITY and WETS -AURORA RAINFALL
16
14
—
12
a�
5
v
c
—
10
c
Cr
2-
g
0
2t
6
a
c
�o
4
2
0
ti0 ti0 ti� ti0 ti� tiIL
� ti0 ti� ti� ti� ti� ti�
<�� fat' Pic �aJ ,J� ti��\ P�Qo �eQ O�� �oA' Oed
O
O,
pti O� Oy Oti O� Oy Oti Oy Oy Oti
X2016 Bay City Daily Rainfall Bay City 30 -day Rolling Total • 2016 Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total
30% Less Chance 30% More Chance 2016 Bay City Monthly Rainfall
Figure 5. 2016 BAY CITY and WETS -AURORA RAINFALL
NOTE: "Range of Normal" and "Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total" plotted on last day of each month.
"Range of Normal" refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of onsite rainfall amounts outside of the normal
range (based on historical averages from 1981-2010). WETS Data subject to periodic revision. Data shown are latest available from
http://agacis. rcc-acis.org/?fips=37013
"Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total" refers to monthly totals from the PCS -Aurora 6 N NOAA Station.
Figure 5. 2016 BAY CITY and WETS -AURORA RAINFALL

24
LAS
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
LEGEND
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPENWATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
®
ROADS
®
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
D
FORESTED WETLAND
O
WELL LOCATION
CONTROL WELL
WELL MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN AN
--
ESTIMATION OF EXACT HYDROPERIOD
LENGTH; REPORTED HYDROPERIOD COULD
POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT
ACTUALLY OCCURRED
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
0
O = >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 0 = >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(48.9 ACRES)
0 O = >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(68.9 ACRES)
® • = >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(15.8 ACRES)
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET

SOUTH CREEK CANAL
ar
ar
V
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
190
RC -1 U LANDS PHASE 4
RC -2 U LANDS
RC -3, \ 199 2000 r
R DAN 0
CONTROL m
SITE �u
O
-- 202
0203,
205
X204 O
A
O
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
PPACF 9
LEGEND
r iPHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
D OPENWATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
0
N ® ROADS
BAY CITY FARM A ® BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0 0 FORESTED WETLAND
O WELL LOCATION
CONTROL WELL
BCRW PHASE
PH E � WELL MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN AN
ESTIMATION OF EXACT HYDROPERIOD
u LENGTH; REPORTED HYDROPERIOD COULD
© BCRW 33 POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT
B RW -29: ACTUALLY OCCURRED
G
BAY -CITY
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
W W BCRW 17
�•
FARM � O Q = >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
189 W W W CONTROL 0 Q = >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
v. SITE (66.3 ACRES)
O O = >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
W (67.3 ACRES)
W W
® _ >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
Y W
W W W I NOTE:
W W HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
1 REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
Zol WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
rrl C: CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
Z BOUNDARIES.
BAY CITY No. 2
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 and TWO CONTROL SITES
LONGEST 2016 HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING WETS NORMAL AND BELOW NORMAL RAINFALL
- - LANE ROAD (EXCLUDES FEBRUARY 2ND - MARCH 4TH, JUNE 6TH - 28TH,
CpUNTY JULY 2ND - AUGUST 5TH, SEPTEMBER 12TH - OCTOBER 2ND,
OCTOBER 7TH - NOVEMBER 5TH)
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 03/07/17 FILE: PLANDS_MON-WET-
PH4 016
CP# 1745.59.32.4
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
ZR SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
A, TEL [phone] FIGURE 7
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

APPENDIX A
Second Annual (2016) Stem Counts at Individual Plots at
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4

Appendix A. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 4 first (2015) and second (2016) annual fall monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate trees unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre.
Zone 3
189
Zone 2
200
202
115
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
Unknown
?
1
2nd
1
2nd
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
7
1
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
9
1
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
1
1
2
2
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
2
2
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
2
1
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
3
3
2
1
Buttonbush"
Cephalanthus occidentalis
12
9
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
2
2
3
1
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
1
1
1
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
2
16
2
8
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
6
4
10
11
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
4
4
16
12
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
1
4
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
5
5
1
1
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
1
10
13
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
Inkberry
I. glabra
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
1
2
1
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
2
2
2
2
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1
1
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
2
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
6
2
Mulberry
Morus rubra
20
17
22
19
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
22
16
20
19
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
52
35
52
35
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
10
11
10
11
Red bay
Persea borbonia
11
7
12
11
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
2
1
2
2
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2
2
1
1
Oak
Quercus spp.
8
7
White oak
Q. alba
1
1
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
1
1
7
7
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
18
18
10
8
Water oak
Q. nigra
5
5
10
9
Willow oak
Q. phellos
25
25
15
14
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
16
15
23
25
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
19
20
130
131
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
59
60
59
60
American elm
Ulmus americana
2
2
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
1
1
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
27
27
15
14
Dusty zenobia
I Zenobia pulverulenta
18
18
35
35
TOTALI
127
1 109
1 127
109
Zone 3
189
199
200
202
203
204
205
Total
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
2
7
1
9
1
4
4
1
1
2
2
2
2
9
9
2
1
1
3
3
2
1
4
4
12
9
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
7
1
1
3
3
1
1
15
16
10
8
16
16
6
4
10
11
5
5
4
4
16
12
67
60
1
4
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
13
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
7
7
2
4
2
6
2
24
22
20
17
22
19
29
26
22
16
20
19
15
13
152
132
1
2
24
22
23
15
8
6
6
6
11
7
12
11
85
69
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
8
7
1
1
1
1
7
7
8
10
18
18
10
8
18
12
5
5
10
9
76
69
25
25
15
14
15
15
16
15
23
25
17
17
19
20
130
131
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
4
3
27
27
15
14
16
15
18
18
35
35
58
58
29
28
198
195
3
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
107
99 11
119
106
112
1 95
113
1 109 11
115
1 104 11
126
1 121
108
1 100
1 800
1 734
P and U Lands Phase 4 Second Annual Report A-1

APPENDIX B
Second Annual (2016) P and U Lands Phase 4 Restoration
Selected Photograph

NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from the
camera is visible in all photos. The photo is identified with the station number (see Figure 2) and
direction of view, and date taken.
PLPS 21: southeast, top photo 19 October 2016, bottom photo 10 December 2015.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 B-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2017