HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170621 Ver 1_401 Application_20170518Carpenter,Kristi
From: Rivenbark, Chris
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:51 PM
To: Andrew Williams (Andy)
Cc: AI-Dhalimy, Nadia A; AI-Ghandour, Majed N; Chapman, Amy;
gary�jordan@fws.gov; Jones, Brandon H; King, Art C;
Carpenter,Kristi; Lauffer, Matthew S; Mellor, Colin; NCDOT Service
Account - Roadway Design; Ridings, Rob; Staley, Mark K; Wilson,
Travis W.; Twisdale, John W; Barclay, Carl A; Dilday, Jason L; Norton,
April R; Yamamoto, Brian F
Subject: Permit Application for B-5362, Montgomery and Moore Counties
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
The permit application for B-5362 has been prepared. The electronic copy can be
viewed/downloaded at
https://connect.ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/
This email serves as our permit application submittal to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources.
Chris Rivenbark
Natural Environment Section
Technical Services
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6152 office
crivenbark(c�ncdot.gov
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610
,
��
:-"� 'T� _
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
May 17, 2017
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
ATT'N: Mr. Andy Williams
NCDOT Project Manager
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 3, 12, and Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 53 over Drowning
Creek on NC 73 in Montgomery/Moare Counties, North Carolina; TIP No. B-5362;
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-0073(31); Debit $270 from WBS No. 46077.1.1
Dear Sir,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 97-foot,
three-span bridge with a 145-foot, two-span bridge on existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained on
an offsite detour. There will be 0.08 acre of permanent impact to riparian wetlands due to roadside fill
and mechanized clearing. The filling of a small backwater section adjacent to Drowning Creek will
account for 701inear feet of permanent stream impact. The backwater section will be backfilled with rip
rap to the bed elevation of the main channel.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), stormwater management plan,
permit drawings, utility drawings, and roadway plans for the above referenced project.
The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in June 2016 and distributed shortly after.
Additional copies are available at the NCDOT website:
https://con nect. ncdot.�ov/resou rces/Envi ron menta I/.
This project calls for a letting date of October 17, 2017 and a review date of August 29, 2017. The
project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Pernut: We anticipate that the bridge replacement, including all approach work will be
authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3 and necessary utility relocations will be
authorized under Section 404 NWP No. 12.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 Water Quality Certification numbers 4085 and 4086 will apply to
this project. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
MailingAddress: Telephone: (919)707-6000 Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: (919) 212-5785 I O2O BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION CuStO»12Y S¢YVZC2: 1-H%%-36H-496H RALEIGH NC 2%61O
1598 MAiL SExv[CE CEtsrex Website: www.ncdot.gov
RALEIGH NC 2%699-1S9g
A copy of this pernut application and its distribution list will be posted at the NCDOT website at
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/. Should you have any questions regarding this
information, please contact Jason Dilday at (919) 707-6111 or jldilday@ncdot.gov
Sincerely,
Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M., Manager
Natural Environment Section
cc: NCDOT Pernut Application Standard Distribution List
���,,��F��� Office Use Only:
i � � F Corps action ID no.
`� r DWQ project no.
i���i � �
�" �` Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 53 on NC 73 over Drowning Creek
2b. County: Montgomery/Moore
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Jackson Springs
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P, or state g_5362
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6111
3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785
3h. Email address: jldilday@ncdot.gov
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.187753 Longitude: -79.648582
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 0.8 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Drowning Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-II; Sw, HQW
2c. River basin: Lumber
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land use is primarily forested and agriculture.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.5
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
250 feet perennial
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing the 97-foot, three-span bridge with a 145-foot, two-span bridge on the existing alignment
with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Request to R. Smith made on 6/17/13 for PJD.
No response received.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other: RK&K
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
Mechanized ❑ Yes � Corps
Site 1� P❑ T Clearing Riparian � No � pWQ 0.03
Site 1� P❑ T Fill Riparian ❑ Yes � Corps 0.05
� No ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.08 Permanent
2h. Comments: There will be 0.04 ac of hand clearing in wetlands due to bridge construction and 0.14 ac of hand clearing in
wetlands due to utility relocation. Temporary fill in wetlands in hand clearing areas for installation of erosion control measures
equals <0.01 acre.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1� P❑ T Fill Drowning Creek � PER � Corps 15 70 ft
(back water) ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (0.03 ac)
Site 1❑ P� T Fill Drowning Creek � PER � Corps � 5 5 ft
(back water) ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (<0.01 ac)
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts �0 ft Perm
5 ft Temp
3i. Comments: Stream impacts due to backfill a backwater section of Drowning Creek to the bed elevation of the main channel
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Tem ora T
02 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge will be longer than the existing bridge; the replacement bridge will be a 2-span, removing a bent in
the water from the current 3-span bridge; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade and alignment as
the existing structure; the new bridges will have no deck drains or direct discharge to Drowning Creek. An off-site detour
will be used during construction. See Stormwater Management Plan for more measures.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
NCDOT Design Standards in Sensitive Waters will be implemented
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Compensatory mitigation is not proposed due
to the minimal im act to 'urisdictional resources
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
Comments: See attached permit drawings.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
� Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N.C. Natural Heritage Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected
species listed for Moore/Montgomery Counties. No habitat exists for the listed species. NCDOT will adhere to conditions
of the programmatic biological opinion for the northern long-eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Digitally signed by Colin Mellor
C o I i n M e I I o r DN: cn=Colin Mellor, o=NCDOT, ou=NES,
email=cmellor@ncdot.gov, c=US
Philip S. Harris III, p.E., C.P.M. Date:2017.O5.V 13:33:31 -04'00� 05-17-2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
1�
����� y���t��• North Carolina Department of Transportation
:�t(ll'� 114yi1lf'Y Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 46077.1.1 TIP No.: B-5362 County(ies): Montgomery Moore Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 46077.1.1 TIP Number: B-5362 Project Type: Bridge Re lacement Date: 9/20/2016
NCDOT Contact: William Bill H. Elam, Jr., PE Contractor I Desi ner. Emest J Hahn, PE
Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 1590 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Raleigh, NC 27699-1590
Phone: 919-707-6718 Phone: 919-707-6724
Email: belam@ncdot. ov Email: ejhahn ncdot. ov
Cit /Town: Count ies : Mont ome Moore
River Basin(s : Lumber CAMA Count ? No No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Project Length lin. miles or feet : 0.082 miles Surrounding Land Use: rural; predominantly wetlands and forested
Proposed Project Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-Upon Area ac. 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: twelve-foot lanes with four-foot full depth paved shoulders and four-foot eleven-inch ten-foot lanes with variable width grass shoulders
shoulders on the bridge
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (vehlhrlday): Design/Future: 2100 Year: 2040 Existing: 1674 Year: 2017
General Project Narrative: This project consists of the replacement of bridge 53 over Drowning Creek and the associated roadway grade improvements along NC 73 in Montgomery and Moore counties.
(Description of Minimization of Water The existing structure is a 97-foot long, triple span bridge (1@32'-3", 1@32'-7", 1@32'-1") constructed in 1926, and the proposed replacement structure is a 145-foot long,
Quality Impacts) double-span bridge (1 @60'-0", 1@85'-0") at the existing location.
The existing bridge had deck drains over Drowning Creek; spread calculations indicate deck drains will not be required for the proposed bridge. Instead, runoff from the
proposed bridge will collect via shoulder berm gutter into a storm drain system and flow overland before reaching the waterbody. In addition, the proposed design reduces
surface water impacts by reducing the number of interior bents from two to one. Roadway improvements are designed to minimize water quality impacts by promoting sheet
flow and infiltration along grassed shoulders.
Surface water impacts occur solely within a small backwater pool near the west bank which is proposed to be backfilled with rip rap to the bed elevation of the main channel;
viz., 390 feet. The cumulative total area of impact equals approximately 0.03 acres of fill within wetlands, 0.07 acres of inechanized clearing within wetlands, 0.03 acres of
permanent surface water impacts, and less than 0.01 acres of temporary surface water impacts. Existing channel impacts equals approximately 70 linear feet of permanent and
5 feet of temporary impacts.
Waterbody Information
SurFace Water Body (1): Drowning Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 14-2-(1)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply II (WS-II)
Supplemental Classification: High Quality Waters (HQW)
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: biological conclusion for Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) is unresolved
NRTR Stream ID: Drowning Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
�/
�
�
•,
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 9B For Conventlonal Symbols
See Sheet iC 9 For Survey Control Sheets
OFFSITE DETOUR
����� ) � 1����� ���$�II�� v �
��������`� �� ��������
M01�lTGOMER Y/ MOORE CD U1�TIES
r��
LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 53 OVER DROWNING CREEK 011I 1VC 73
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG, AND STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
,�°I
eTAT¢ PROI.NO.
46077.1.1
46077.2.1
STATE PROlCCT IIEPER8NC8 NO.
B-5362
P. A. VROJ. NO.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALES
I 50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
I 50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
FILE IVERTI
0
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2017 = 1674
ADT 2040 = 2100
K = 10 %
D = 65 %
T = 10 %*
V = 55 MPH
*TTST=3% DUAL=7%
FUNC CLASS =
MAJOR COLLECTOR
"REGIONAL TIER"
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.054 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.028 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROIECT B-5362 = 0.082 MILES
P�epared in /he Office of;
DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 2J610
2012 STANDARD SPEC7FlCATIONS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE
OCTOBER 21. 2016 �'ROJECT ENG7NEER
LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
OCTOBER 17, 20�7 PROJECT DES[GN ENGlNEER
HYDRA[ILICS ENGINEER
r.E.
sicxarune:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.6.
BRSTP-0073
�-
OeSCRIPT
PE
WW /UTILT.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 7
UOCUMENT NOT LONSIDERED FINAL
UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
z
O
vS E c'
�E �E �3E MECHANIZED CLEARING
� HAND CLEARING
F� FILL IN WETLANDS
� SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
� TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
TROY LUMBER COMPANY
�� � �
i � � ,�w�o s,� � � � � � � � ,� � ,� � � '� � � .� � � � � ��s�ri��Fao�c' w000�
i"�"'��;,-��. ������� ��e�n����������'������,�������� �
� � � � � � � �. � � � �/'}e � � " �
_� � � � � � G � � �
-� _ - -a� _ - -� �austr� � � � . �
_� � _� �___ _�� __� � -� .,M� _� E
70 � � � � rc— � � �--L— ---� �
ELLERBE _ � ���—==� � � � � � � � � ^^^^^^^
� 24'RCP ��—
� � ��_� __— ---
�� � � � ,� � �� �'T—� w�a— < _ _ � —� .
\ . _ � � ExISiiNG RiW��'.r.`
\ � ,� � � � ,� � � `� `� .�' . � � �� . . � � `K � �� _
'� � � '� � ��� �"?
������ wd"os�������'���������'���������'���� PUE
V � ,_ .Y � ,Y � � � � '� �K •K � � .K � � � � '� � �CLA�S B $IP�RAP I
ViViAN TUCKER NAMMOND EST i rox�s �
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
EST.S SYWOODS
CLA55 II ftIP R
„
■■■■■
■■■■■
DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
� Nm m s�oie�
<F�O�\e
Naw,ai ,�� °\�S�oe
Gro��d �.� b { F
I I d
d=1N
b=4 k Geotextile
Type of Liner- Class I Rip Rop
FROM --L $TA 15+70 TO STA 17+00 LT
� �
�
� � �� � � � � �� � �
� � � � � � 3(
� � .� � � � '� �o�c�r�Eea�c� � :�J�
wirn avet� oec� ,4%�
�
R/W SHEET NO.
DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
�P�
I. w000s TNOMAS L.FUNDERBURK n
� '� � � � � 4�Ee �rr.�niecr�N � � � � .� � ' '� � .� � � � �r
� � T � � �
� � �
-�. �� ���� � ����������������� �������������''0�°°���
.
�
� � � � � � � � � � � � � ��rU � � � � � � � � � . � � . �
.. ,i" � � '� � _ �BR� � � �C� � � � � � � � � � � � ��3
� Y _ — _ _ --� �k— �----�
CONC HW
_ _rc_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.c_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ �� \ NL MNY 73 20' PAVED ROAOWAY _ _ _ _ 70 WEST END
y
�.:�. �_ r 19
;6.Cw��
� —_--_�_.wa--_—i
� � � � 1
E _ �
� � � ���� YG
CLA55 II P RAP � � '� � � ,� � � �
� � � � � �
I RIP RAP � '` � � `
WOODS
SAMMY & BiLLiE �L
� RETAIN �
� -'�— � —� — zw�B�� v-
I���_ ��� ��'�r"�-r"
II�� � � �� � � � � � � I��PUF�-��1
K � � � � � � � � � � �
��������� �������vo�os�
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 7
SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
PS
PS
�Nrs�
PS - PAVED SHOULDER
SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
PS
PS
� ; ; � ��` �
\
f � � �� ; % / , f .
�
� (� �
� �� ��
_� �
�_ � -�,o,
��' �
�
.,� �
c � � �ti �l
�,-_��J„- � �
� � � � .�
� � � � v
/ �
�� � � �;
( � � ,� �,�� � >
l��_�\� j` i1 � `,
- -� � �-� � � � ��
,
� � -� / / ��!�� �� — � � �
��� � �\ "�
2 � � �/ � �s,.�
� `-� '���.\ � � � I � \ � � �g� � 1 � � \ \ CLASS;'� RIP RAP � .
� �\ \ '� f L .'' � � � � �- � � � � J \ � /��, � EST.1 TONS
�_ � 1 f C 7 , GE6�EXTILE FABRIC
\— ` / � " EST 5 SY
�--� •-�Be` ~ i \ � RETAIN
� -�
�A._ �� --°°`�/ \ �
� � r 1
—• ---.a�� �,«. � � �
� � � � � '� � � '� �� -� — - ' � . �Gto
� '� -� �__-�ar� -\ � �� =� -. _ � � � �
� - -
� — -'�``-� — -� �— � / — � _ .- - — � �
� �1 -__ -�. — `` - — -
� � ��-�— �^ v�- ' -� �==t
� � -- �-_
) _
�,�ti .-�—� 9
,�
� �
/� `-�-� �-� � � re-i�r
�j� i � �--`-�� �— -
� > —
� �,a� � -��-._ __ � --- TB 2G
/' ����� � v S � �1 �� � \ � -.`,` _ -_ - -
�� � I 1 — __
� � � I =� — - ___ � - "•.-
., � j� ` / f f� � �_ `� `_ '_�`f {� �"
�
� � �eC� � � � � � � �
� ���\\ �� � �,I � r/��
� � �f � � � � � a� I � PUE
CLA55 B RIP RAP
����.� � � � I `� �� / f ��' EST.',1 TONS
\ \ I \ � GEO7EXTILE�FABRIC
� ���� � � � �� � ESL 5 SY .
� � CLA55 II ftIP RAP
�� � ��� ` .a�t_ � � �
.e��,� � � �
;� � � � � i-�E_—� -
�r� �� �
��� �� � , � � � ,9.� f � �
� ���
j .�� '� � 1 J � �P � �
& �.
�� �� � �'�� � � l� � �
� � � ��l
� ,, �
� �� s ,
� HAND CLEARING � r � �
' � �
�E �E �E MECHANIZED CLEARING � � �
�,�� �
- � � - '`�
�F FILL IN WETLANDS � � � � i��
� C - � �,�
� �- - '� -�
� SURFACE WATER IMPACTS � \ � _ � � � � ��� � ,
� � �
ti
� TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS '� �a• �
�,00 o ,00 � � --� <
_ -�� � ,� I
/ � S�A�E:, - ,00 �� � � _
� . , _--. ; -�
�
vSE
. , I I\.. �• / _ .� PROJtCCI REYERENCE N(J. SHEET NO.
B-5362 4
� � � � � R/W SHEET NO.
DETAIL 1 �\ ✓` ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
TOE PROTECTION � ENGINEER ENGINEER
� N � io s�oiel �\ —' �
F� �s` _ � ... .
Na�vrol �� �oee /� � � � �
�,o��d �.� b { �� F�\S � � , �
I I d rl / '�
6=4 k Geotextile � �J �� J � � /
i
i �Type ofLiner=CIas5lRip Rop � /� � `
\ 1 . j ' Jl� � �a / �,.1 � '\�\
ROM irl= A�73+�O�jO STA 17'+0 li �� ��
d� � �\ �/ �,� � � % Q
I� �/ �� , /
\J,*\ � ��` �� l � 1 �/ ��� P\� UNLESS ALL SIGNA URES COMPLETED
l �s�, � � � ���� � 1 � � 1
�
���j���\/ ������ �� �i �_ �i
���
l'- �,
� � � s��� /�' ( ( ,o,/� �' � � i -- � ` \
� � � \ /, \\ _ .
^ ./ � � \ ���/` 1 � / �/ � � �
� \� � / (�
� � ,�
� � ����� ��,�- � �
� �, ���> � � --��- � � V �
,� �
������ ��� ' ��
� -�,l �°� �✓ � � \ � � � � � �
� �
��� \ Gl J � �� � � � >I � �
_ _ � � -'�� �- � ' � .a� .� � � `� � �,,. � �
= � � �� -� —�\
� % / � � �� n
.. � _ _ . � � ... I /
\
�� � � �
, �� � � ,W` �j � ��-- �� , 'e���+ -TOE PR'OTECTIONI ` . � � � � �
�^ia' SEE DETAIL i
�,��� ) � �
� � � � ��- � T�!f. � '� �
� �,
a �
/ � ~ mc
� ° �/ : ' F � - � �-, �- --- - — _ - i-
� , �� � �. w� _ _ _ — _ — — _—
� �°,.�. �' � � � � — _ _ - _ _ ��
�4; _ cb i _
�
'! � � - j r
� ,��3 �
- .�`, e w- — _ - �.:�' __ __ _ _
� � � - '�
� _� — - ° - _ — —
�kErain - � -
�`jjr � w '_ _ --�, _ '�-- _ — _- �--= a.�
�' � � ' . ` � ry—`�
�,� u '. o r � �
UE .� QUE. DUE � P E� PUE--I PUE PUE 1 �
E � I
. ���� �I . . ~PUFf . �PUEJ l / y
�
m Y, CLA55 II P RAP .
m �
� f _ ✓ !
f l J��� CLASS I RIP RAP ... �� ) .
y , .. _ _ ,.. 1
r
: (% ` � � ,i -� �, —��/ ►
BEGIN SB L STA. 13+88 00 LT. & RT
� � END AT APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT \. J �
���, _. . � � /
, _ —�
�> / —�.�� �, � �—.s�__ � .�� � � _..i
,� �
' �
�� �� � j�� � � �
1 ��ti�'� ��� � � � ��
� �1���� �� � ��j � �� l _ � � �
�
�_ ) �S �/ � r �
�� ���.�� � � � � � �i
.�/1 �I �� �� �,, ��� ' f) �_
�
� v� ri � � s i �
� ���(� , �,' � � �g,,
�,�`�� R
L �
� � �'�/��� �� , �-� � �' ` V �,,
�l �� � �
� � �����'�� � -�'� � � � PERMIT DRAWING
�_°:� � ���J,��� ��°� � L� � , S�i E ET 3 O F 7
� � � � i � ��
� SE�` SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
Z
0
>
�
s
SITE 1 ENGLARGEMENT
CLASS B RIP RAP
- ,� E T. 1 TONS WOODS
OT�CTILE.�FAB C � � � ' �- �
� � EST�5 Sl,� � � � � � � � � ,� � � � ,� �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � �
'� � � '� � ,� � F�I.B�WS � ,� � � � � � ,� � � � � � � ,
�,����� � � ��� � � � �� � � �
�
�-�-� _��� -�-� � ,� i
_ �- — ��iN� C —� �
'� rn � - - =�,, �,i - re �`�
- ,� �
-_-'--r�__ �;'��� � -- � --
l �. �
- - / / _ _.. . � /� .
� �l
\
\
� _ � �
_ � �� � �� � � �� ' ^
� V �
�W � � _.� �` �
-������ `� � �
� �
� ������ ��
� ,� � � � ,�� PU
� � ,� � � �L�W$
� � �CLA�S B RIP RAP
'' EST. 1 TOI�IS `� �
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
EST. 5 SY
CLASS II RIP RAP
E �D
U
�
\ W
I
-� � -�
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
� -�
�
�
�P�
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
04
ILW SHEET NO.
;OADWAY DESIGN HYDR4ULIC5
ENGINEER ENGINEER
dNC�A�P]L]E ]E �Il..�NS
DO NOT USE POR 6 W ACQUISITlOh
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
� ,� � ��re—��� � TO� PRO�kECT�ON � �
> ,� � ,�� �,,��9,� �E D�TAIL,�1 � �
� � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � � �
,
� � � � � � � � �
- \�18 � � '� '� '� � �- � � � l�.�T(.�F�
� �s -��������k;
�
� � ,� � �BRU � `� � �
, - - - ��
_
�y� � �
v � � � � T C � � � � � �
I �
/ ' � �
_ _ -
�� .�-'-� — — — — — —� �
P D � -� .� � - W � � T - �� �
� � � � � � � 1 I�
E \ \ � ��, �-P+
�
� � ,� ��� �'� � � � ,� ��UF
CLASS II RIP RAP \� H�ND CL�ARING�L � �
� � �
� F�YL W �TLAND�S � � I
�CLASS I RIP RAP �
� SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
WOODS
� TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
BEGI N SBG —L— STA. 13 + 88.00 LT. & RT.
END SBG AT APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT. �*� MECHANIZED CLEARING
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 7
T PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
� � � r�
� P E RM I T D RAW I N G ROADWAY DESI�N HYDRAULIC�
s
S H E ET 5 O F 7 ENGINEER ENGINEER
DES GN ISCH E _ l CFS
DES GN E EVA lON =�¢,4 __ FT
BAS F OU NCY = l YRS
OVE TOP lNG lSC ARG = l CFS
OVE TOP lNG LE Tl0 = �,l_ _ FT
WS. LEV TION
OVE TOP ING ELE Tl0 E ALS NOR AL C AT AG OCA ION. TATI N l+pp ——
Pl = l3+ AO Pl = 16+0 AO Pl = l7+ ,pp
EL 40 0' EL 40 EL 40
EGl GR E—L— TA/ +95 VC 60' VC 76' VC 60' —— T 7+
�- K= i32 OS 55 MPH K= �l4 t S= 55 PH1 K= l25 OS 55 PH = r
� sr ,a+a -�-
i 60', 1@ 5' 33" OX BE O 4' BE T CAPS
SK W=90
- - - - �+1p l4". -JO 4% +IOJ 33'. - - - -
� �
.5 FEE TYPIC L OBSE VED E= 91.2
SEPTE BER 9, 2015
EXISTI G AB TMENT EXCAV TION
CLA S II RIP RAP 100 UBIC Y RDS T ELEV TION 94.0
(STR PAY IT M) (STR. AY ITE )
M A A RET IN EXI TING BUTM T
550 C BIC Y RDS T ELEV ION 4.5 TO ELEVA ION 3 4.0
(STR. P Y ITEM C 55 II R P RAP
ELE ATION 394.5
CLASS I RIP P TO LEVATI N 39 0
BMl LEV Tl0 = 96.0 '
// /
-L- S A lON l4+ .00 IG
RR PlK lN ASE OF l8° A H T EE
�
�
�
w
�
�
�
�
�s
�� BRIDGE PROFILE
�� SITE 1
��
��
>�
�� SEE SHEE 4 F R P N IEW
��-
"`� 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
��;
��
�SE
a� O 2.5 5 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
N � B-5362 X-3
� 5 1 1 1 1 5
.� 0 .�2
B UNDA `��'
�
� - -
.02 .02
.�
OU D RY �
�
� -' - -- --
.02 .02
:)
W TLA D � W TLA D
BO N RY `L�� ' � BO N AR
\
i _
-- � � -- -- --
-- �--
;' .0 0 0. 10
E +A
fA
6� `� 3�� - U D Y
�
�
��
, � B UNDA �
;�
�
O � /i �
o �
Z ��
EfA� � � � � � _ _ � � � � � � � �
c (y y}Hl
����i
��
N��fH
�W
��
�-�Q
a'}iA2
_«�w S E ET F 7
������ —
o���
� �,r»
���� 5 1 1 7 1 2 5 5 5
�� �
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- 13+35 to 14+02.5 LT Roadway 0.01
-L- 14+02.5 to 15+71.5 Bridge < 0.01 0.03 0.03 < 0.01 70 5
-L-15+71.5 to 17+27 LT Roadway 0.04 0.02
TOTALS*: 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 < 0.01 70 5
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES: Temporary fill in wetland in areas of hand clearing for installation of erosion control measures =<0.01 ac.
2013 10 24
•�
�
-� -� -� OFFSITE DETOUR
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SHEET 1110.:
UE-1
UE-2
�� �� �� � ��� � � ���
������ � �� ���� ��
r� ELLERBE
LOCATI01�1: BRIDGE 1�10. �3 OVER DROW11rl11tG CREEl� 01� 1�C 73
WETLAND IMPACTS
DROWNING CREEK
SITE 1 MONTGOMERY �,�� MOORE END BRIDGE
\ —L— STA. ?? + ??.??
,� � COUNTY / , COUNTY SITE 2
� �/
��� � � �� � � � . �
� � � � � � � � � � � �
��������������������������� ������������������� �c������ �� c�� � � ���� � �c���� � ������ � ������ �������
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��'���--� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �: ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
�/�—� '�_��,��.��,�'� ����.��,�� ����,�� '� ����.��,�'� ����.��,�'� ����,��,��1 %�l"'�'/� �.�T '������.�� '��'����.�� ��'���� ������.�� �������•
— — e�iM _ '� _�!= ,� _ � � � '� Y �I=_ � � � �l=� � .� � � � � � � � ,� � � � � � � �!= � �� � � � `� ,e <n� � � '� � � ,� � � � � � � v� ,� � � � � � .� � ,� � � � � '!= � � � .� � � � � '� � �
� _ � _.� a�M � /i �'� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � '� �
� S� \`� ' � .,; � `Y `F J' � .., � —�= �'HlM—�. �— `� —'�L —� —K—BIfN— — � —� —�— � — � � —�— �
--- —L— NC 73 T \ �i� e,� _
`�\� � � �W�B � _ � — — —� —W�e— --
� � � �-. �— � -� �, � �
�\ �,��� ���.��,��� ���.��,��� ���.��,��� �-_'_—
��� � ��� � � ��� � � ��� � ��� �
���� � ���� � ���� � �� � �
�\ � �������� �������� �������� ������
� � K � �������� �������� �������� I
� � � � � � � � � !
SITE 5
-L- STA. 12 + 95.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT
I11tDEX OF SHEETS
DESCRIPTI011t:
TITLE SHEET
UBO PLAN SHEETS
l�:.s /% �/
V
1 /
1��
�
MONTGOMERI� � � MOORE
COUNTY � I COUNTY
,I
DROWNING CREEK
� � �
��� �� � � �� �
� � � � � ��
� � � � � �
� .� � . � � .� \
SITE 4
� � � � � • �
��������������� � �
��,����������������..
-L- STA. 17 + 30.00 END TIP PROJECT \
UTILITY O W1�ERS WITH C01�FLICTS
(A) TELEPH0111E - BROADPLEX
(B) POWER DISTRIBUTI0111 - DUKE E11lERGY
(C) POWER DISTRIBUTI011t - PEE DEE EMC
TO WEST EN�
SITE 3
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
� 1223 lones Franklin Road
� �► Raleigh, N.C. 27606
, ETHERILL License No. F-0377
ENGINEERING Bus: 919 851 8077
Fax: 919 851 8107
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/DESIGN - BRIDGE/STRUCTURE DESIGN
ClVIL/SITE DESIGN - GlS/GPS - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION
John D. Schriner, PLS PROJECT UTILITY COORDINATOR
�[°,�,ll�o I��,
B-5 3 6 2
��-�[��°� ��e
U E-1
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 3
UTILITIES
�Py
Donna .Iackson
Don Proper
Ed Reams
DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS
UTILITIES U1VIT
1555 MAIL SERVICES CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1555
PHONE (919) 707-6690
FAX (919) 250-4151
UTILITIES REGIONAL E1VGIIVEER
UTILITIES PROJECT E111GI11tEER
UTILITIES AREA COORDI11lATOR
Tanga Sampson UTILITIES COORDINATOR
TIE TO EXISTING
PEE DEE POLE
1
TROY LUMBER COMPANY
DB 285 PG 784
SITE 1
0.0113 ACRES HAND CLEARING
TEMPORARY UTILITY �
EASEM�NT �
�� � � � � �-
, ''� ,�o �__>> ,� � � � ,� � � .
PROPOSED PEE� ��E � � � � ,� � � � � � � ,� � �
PO L E ,_` � � ,� � � � ,� � ,� � � �
��''r`;� ��-�, �,�_'� � '� J `,� ,�E�AIN � .� `� � � � v�
'PROP 0/H POW LIN� /� � �
_ � `� .� , . �`� `��J :'� -�t ,r�-U : � `�
—�_ —
_titi �
,—� _ — — �hl
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
PEE DEE POLE
WGOU�
� � �
'� � ' '�- � �-
��,����� T�E��(���fCI�TI�IG.���������.��i�
� �/� T������ � � ,� � � ��_
�' � � `� .� � � `� S I �l C T l� [ � I''J : 5� � �C/
_ `� .� � ' '�- �' �� t
- _ '�9R B./�, p�'-�'INES � _�V— — �
,� ---_
�
�, � `� ,� ����p � ,�ONC -TL CPi��� `� ��
r��—��,� �.,�W�— `� �E w i T A v �� � E c� c� �
� ��-�'�- � - `��''�r w� _ - � � �
� � ,
- � — -" _ � EX��r�Nc Ri�/
TO ELLER�E —_ _� � — — Tc — — _ _ `-^Js _ — — — a,� , .�
l� - ----- i
— �_ __� -- TF — —
� II -- - -
— � p�9
0/H P-91 - 24" RCPII --- �i
� ,� � �T,r _
��_- �
— W L�B — T _ S
�,r� � �`� .� ,� � � � � � � �� �W � r s - � _ F
�
� �����r�-z��� �� -,, �rr,,��L��-,�,� � � ,� Exi�riNc - PROP�H �ii� .—
� � � .� � � � .� � � �� � � � `�' �.' ��
� E D D U I� � �E�I E F�GY ,� � � '� T E�ll P � R�A� � ��-��`�E� .� �'�'� � � � �� � �
�� ,� � � .� ,� �/�Fi� PQ�NE� ,� � � .� ,� � � �
� �, �, w � os � ,� � � ,� '� � ,� � � <
.� ,,, � �'�� �� �� �,� � �� �'� �� �,� � �� �'� �� �.
� � � .�, ,. � � � �
PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY �v000s
POLE i
I 1C I V �..��TING
DUKE ENERGY POLE
�
VIVIAN TUCKER HAMMOND
DB 230 PG 665
SITE 5
0.0012 ACRES HAND CLEARING
— \ �-
T�-2�1- - - -f .
- -�B �C31 -i �-I,_ � -- -
--�
TEMf� 0/ OW I�S C N ' T
PROP.A/ OW I ES , �'�
"J' ��
;=rn _ BU�� =-� — . � D E / --
E�E 5 �
� �
I ��� � ��.
� �� �
�
I-v' ^�
� �.
� �.
�
SITE 4
0.0425 ACRES HAND CLEARING
WOODS
�- � �
� � � � � � � � � �
�� � � � �� � � �
�h � � � � � � � � �
�� � `� � � �
� .1, _�`, � . . - � . � .,�. .� : � . �K
�
� __
PROPOSED BROADPLEX BORE
1' INSIDE R/W
10' MIN UNDER CREEK BED
/ � �
� � �
� � �
� � �
� �
� � �
� � �
�. — � , .,. � _.
� � �
� � � ��
TE � �� � �
— � ' F 24 RC
— — — _/ ./,� . .
p � �
— — - — �' �l-1�E � �� :� �— ��= . �_r _r
�
�� � � � ,� � ,� �' F .
� � � � � � � 1
� � �
�
\ � ,� �
\ .Y `� � 1
WOOCS
TIE TO EXISTIN
U/G TELEPHONE�
UTILITY WETLAND IMPACTS
I�`'%�� . . . .
HAND CLEARING ON ALL
UTILITY IMPACTS
SITE 2
0.0185 ACRES HAND CLEARING
3
THOMAS Le FUNDERBURK III
DB 3130 PG 440
TEMPORARY UTILITY EASEMENT
� � � � � � �
�� �� � � � �� � � � �
� � T� E �T� �J��T I�NG
� � � � PLE ��� `P LE �
�� � � � � � � � � � � � -
� �—�..�-��� ��I�P���f�-1(�����E`"J �
� '� � _ _ ,��/ H �P OI�IE F� � � /
�
� � �- �- �� � �
— — —T� — — — —
NC HWY 73 20'PAVFD ROADWAY
REM.
RETAIN
_� �. � ���
i� � � � �� � � �
� � � �� � � � � �� � ��
I�`����,� ���`���� 'K���S"'�'
PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
TEMPORARY PEE DEE 0/H POWER
PERMANENT DUKE ENERGY 0/H POWER
PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
SAMMY & BILLIE HILL
DB 719 PG 179
4
ro wEsr Ervo
PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 3
UTILITIES
TIE TO EXISTING
DUKE ENERGY POLE
PROP 0/H POW LINES PROP 0/H POW L
DUKE ENERGY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL
COSTS AND EASEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THIS
SECTION OF 0/H POWER
SITE 3
0.0652 ACRES HAND CLEARING
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
and Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 12+g4 LT Power Pole & guy 0.01
2 17+g0 LT Power Pole & guy 0.02
3 18+06 to 19+61 RT Power Lines 0.07
4 16+30 to 17+50 RT Power Lines 0.04
5 13+64 RT Power Pole & guy 0.00
TOTALS: 0.14
N
�
M
�
�
•,
See Sheet � A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet � B For Conventi onal Symbols
See Sheet 9 C- � For Survey Control Sheets
OFFSITE DETOUR
�� �� � � ��� � � ���
� 1LI J� � J� � � J� �I J� � � J� �
LOCA TI01�1: BRIDGE 1�0. �3 0 T�ER DR O W1�I1�G CREEI� 01�1 1�1C 73
TYPE OF WORI�: GRADI1�lG, DRAI1�lAGE, PA VI1�G, A1�lD STR UCTURE
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 12 + 58.00
r� ELLERgE
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 14 + 13.31
� �,� � � '� � � �- '`' ,� ,
� .� � � ,� .
DROWNING CREEK
MONTGOMERY � �� MOORE
COUNTY / �, COUNTY
(/
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 15 + 60.69
� � ' �
� �
� � � ,� � ,� '� � � � .� � ,� � �` � � ,� � ,� '� � � � ,� � ,� � ,� ' ,� '`" � �= � � ,� ,� � � � � � ,� ,� � � � ,� � . ,� ,� � � � ,� ,� � • � � ,� ,� � � � � � ,� ' ,� �` � '� �=
�� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � j ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
�� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
/�� _� �,��,�,������.��,���������,���������,���������,���������,��,�����/,�.', ./�� � ��.��,�������,��,�������.��,���������,���������,����`
�v
� B�M � '� _,� � � `� ,�' � `i� ,�' � `� .� � � `�' .(C �, �� � '� ,(C � `f' ,� � � � � '1'' ,(C �. � � � `(� ,�' �. � � � `� •�' `� .� � � `i� •(c '�
_ _ _ 'K �Y_ _ _ — e�M _ `� _`� � _ 'F= `�''
� - �_.�_ �`_�-a�.---=�--�-�' ,� �����.��� ��'���=��� ��'������� �`�'���� s,�--��=��'���-�����=� -��
��__
---_ -L- NC 73 5` ; ,� e,� _�__� �_.�---�,.-.._--
--- ----- —
� - -� ----- --
`i= �NLB � � NL8— t _
\� ,� `i� `� g —,�— `i�— `� — —� ,� `� '(:
� � � `F; � � � � � � �' �
� `(c � � `�t `(= � `� `i, .(c � `� '� � 'e� �.� _
��ve� � ��� yC� � ���K �l=� � ��� � ��� �m
� � � � � � � � � � � �
�\�,� �� �'� � � �,� �� �� `� � �.� �� �`� �` � �,� �,� ��'� v� I
� .,, �,'������.� ��`�`����,� �����,��� �`���1I
� � � '� .� � .� � .. � '� � � � ,� � 1
\ � �✓
✓� `1`` // �S
� \' /
�t
� I
MONTGOMERI� � ; MOORE
COUNTY � I COUNTY
:I
DROWNING CREEK
/—L— STA. 12 +95.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
�— — —�r � — w� — — �-- —•� � �
� � � � � � � 1
�� '� � v� ,� � � 1
\����� �������
�
� � � � � � �
\ � � ,Y � . '`� � � �1
r �c— � — — — �w�a-g_ �, —
I`� .� ,� � � `� � ,�e � —' — 1
� � � ���� � � ����
�� `� '� � ,� � � `� � ,� �\
��������`������������
� � .. � � � � � .. � � � .. �
—L— STA. 17 + 30.00 EN D TI P PROJ ECT \
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 19 + 61.00
TO WEST END_
�Py
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared In the Offlce of: HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH
ADT 2017 = 1674 DIVISI01� OF HIGHWAYS
50 25 0 50 100 qDT 2040 = 2100 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 �� �►�G���
o LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.054 MILES � ��
�
K = � O �0 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �� ��
� ��
PLANS D= 65 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 6-5362 = 0.028 MILES P.E. � �
� * SIGNATURE: � �
50 25 0 50 l00 T= 10 �o TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.082 MILES RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE �� ��
V— 5 5 M P H OCTOBER 21 ZO� 6 I' R O J E C T E N G I N E E R R O A D W A Y D E S I G 1 1 t ��� o��
P R O F I L E ( H O R I Z O N T A L) * T T S T = 3% D U A L = 7% ' E11tGI11tEER �� p����Q
l0 5 0 l0 20 'A LETTIIIIG DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
F U N C C L/�S S = PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
MAJOR COLLECTOR OCTOBER 17, 2017
PROFILE (VERTICAL) "REGIONAL TIER" P�E�
SIGNAT URE:
J
�
�
�
�
c
�
�
�;
c
�
N
O
N
>
w
�
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 14 + 13.31 :
r
r
TYPE III �
PS
� �SB � -
`� '�►S B `�
PS
TYPE III �
�
�
BEGIN APPR. SLAB
-L- STA. 14 + 02.44
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 15 +
TYPE II
33'-10" TYPE II
END APPR. SLAB
-L- STA. 15 + 71.56
��� 4'PS
1� �
�' N
4' PS
(NTS)
PS - PAVED SHOULDER
SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
SKETCH SHOWING MAINLINE BRIDGE/ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP
10+00.00
+7
-L -
Pl Sto 12+25.37
�_% 28' 49.3" fLT 1
D = 2° 30' 00.0"
L = 299.2/'
T = 149.82'
R = 2,29/.83'
SE SEE PLANS
-L - PT Sto. l3 +74.76
DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
( Not to Scale)
�\oi,�gt
Natural .L•��°`�S�°pe
Ground b
� �d
d=1 ft
b = 4 ft Geotextile
Type of Liner=Class I Rip Rap
FROM -L- STA 15 + 70 TO STA 17 + 00 LT
NOTEo PROPERTY LINE RUNS WITH THE CENTER OF DROWNING CREEK
TROY LUMBER COMPANY ABUTMENT EXCAVATION OROwN� G CREEK
DB 285 PG 784 (STR. PAY ITEM) � %
+ 80.00 -L-
P
30.00' LT m N � ^
+ 91.00 -L- 7 45.00' �LT; � � + 77.00 -L-
{
iv� .�. � 30.00' (LT) 60.00' (LT) l� °�'�/ � v +86.00 -L-
�o w +40.00 -L- 30.00 LT
/ �� � � �' �- ,� � 51.00' (LT) CLASS B RIP RAP +00.00 -L- "' � 47 00 LT
/'� W�0 S,� � � .� � �+71b0 �-- E`,�T. 1 TONS WoODS 60.00' (LT) N 2� 2'34° W
/ � '1= ,� � v� `t` � ,� � � .00'�LT) � 6�OT�3CTILE�FAB�1C� �- `� �' ,� ' � � + .00 5�L-
/ � .� ,� `� � � `� � ,� EST�5 S� � ,� �+4UlDO p,� �
/ `� . � ,� � � `� � � '� + .00 L- � + 8.00 �- `� � � 4�.00'.�T) � 4�.�� (LT�`�
� .� E�AIN � `� �30.0 ' (L ) � � � 4 00' LT) � v� + 0 8
/� � � .. '� .� .� � 53.0�(LT)`� ,t. � +tl{�.00�KL- �B�WS � � � ,(= 34,1 ' �,�
- - - �- � ,� r�`1'��.�- . .`� � ��j O.ObI� (LT),� � .� � '� R�1CT�� E N0, 5� � <v
- � �?�- `� `� .� p `� 0 N C I E R I�G E ��
� -e�n+- � -`� �RUSH�(= � � �%F WIT VE DEC� � �
_ �c' �Y- - � - a n, c Lfi � - � -� - - - o
TO ELi� ��e i - �ti EXISTING R W rn � � F �_ 1 .���r„
ERaE �� /2.6" E - _ - - - - - - - -_-_-__�__-f -
- �
- - �.`
�� - -
�� O � O
��
� o
� _ _ 24" RCP � �
��_B= --� �
-WLB-
` `f.�� `� .� � �' �� � T -.= � � _ _ _ � \O
� 'r~� � � ���`'-til�f-ti_� � `� � EXI$TING R/W _ � -�
\ � ,� � � '� � .� ,� � � '� � � � '� �� � '� � �
� � � � �
��Y� � '��� �� ��'� �� � '��� �� � '� Y� I
��-�.��.�w�o�s ,���� � ,���� '� � ��� '� � P
� �
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION � � � � � � � � � � '� � � � '�� W�
� ,�. � � �CLA�S B �IP RAP
�n
E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
B -5362
R�W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
4
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
/
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 19 + 61.00
30.00 (LT) • 62.00' (LT)
47.00' (�T) woo�s THOMAS L. FUNDERBURK III
�DB �130 PG 440, ,� �- ,� � � ,�
� ' /F'TB-�� TO PRO�ECTI�JN � � � �14.0 -L- � � � ,� �
� �
e
�G�RK� °h�~+�0`�L- +7 0 E D�TAI� ,� � � 53.(�0' (LT� �i= '� � `�WOOD� v�
�, ��� ,� 0 0 (LT)v� 4,�.00' T) �5.0 -L- � � ,� � � �= ,� � �
� ,� � `l`L 30.�A' LT�) `� � ,� '� � ,� � � `� �
� � � + .00 -L- v� +'�07.0� -L � ,�
s tg . . v� �. � 30.0 ' T) �I= ,��JF 30.0l0' (LT,� �, � � v� .� �
�r�
� 81 � • � '�BRU � � '� c� � ,� � '� '� � ,� - B � I 0� �
� �- `�-' _.� CONC HW � -K-a�xr- - � - � �!'- �r - � -
- �� ' - - � TC It- - - - - - - -TC- - - - - -
� "' II ' " �
0 o p �
� � o �� NC HWY 73 20' PAVED ROADWAY � TO WEST END
� �� �
GRAU-350 $�F - - •� �F 2q R� CONC�HW RETAIN
� �
R� F F�-r-�- 25 �--�-- r�-� ---�WLB-�._�.-
� � + � '� �'� � ,� � � '� � c- -. _ �
E '�
_ + 77.00 -L- \�, � � ,� � � � `� .� � � �
+ 6,20 30.00' (RT) � ,� ,� �/F � � ,� ,� � PU �
31, 0' 55.00' (RT) \ `� � .� � � \ + . 0 L� � `� � � �(=
STR PAY RTEM P � � � .� ,� �= � .� � 55I.OQ� (RT)� � � �(= � .� � � � � O�D � `�'
CLASS II RIP RAP CLASS I RIP RAP v� ,� „ v� .� `� � �• • +61.00 -L-
-L- STA. �2 �- J�H.00 VIVIAN TUCKER HAMMOND '" EST. � To S`� � / �' APPROXIMATELY 90 TONS � ,Y � � � � +3fi.00 -L-
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC STR. PAY ITEM L � +71.00 -L- 30.00' (RT)
DB 230 PG 665 EST. 5 SYWOODS +50.00 -L- o� +43.00 -L-
GRADE TO DRAIN 73.00' (RT) 55.00' (RT) 69.00' (RT)
55.00' (RT �� (RDWY PAY ITEM) 55.00 (RT) 69.00' (RT)
BEGIN PROJECT B-5362 -L- STA. 12 + 95.00 30 00 (RT)L_ 68.00' (RT) �� 62.°° (RT) END PROJECT B-5362 -L- STA. 17 + 30.00
WOODS ,
40.00' (RT) Hl H WATER MARK �' BEGIN SBG -L- STA. 13+88.00 LT. & RT. SAMMY & BILLIE HILL
+00.00 -L- 68.00' (RT) ELEv 395.95 �� END SBG AT APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT. DB 719 PG 179
30.00' (RT) F OM FIELD OBSERVATION \�
+ 80.00 -L- 8�2���4 DROWNING CREEK 4
30.00' (RT) NOTEa PROPERTY LINE RUNS WITH THE CENTER OF DROWNING CREEK
55.00' (RT) �
68.00' (RT) / BMI ELEVATION = 396e00
SEE SHEET IC-I
SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS