The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170621 Ver 1_401 Application_20170518Carpenter,Kristi From: Rivenbark, Chris Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:51 PM To: Andrew Williams (Andy) Cc: AI-Dhalimy, Nadia A; AI-Ghandour, Majed N; Chapman, Amy; gary�jordan@fws.gov; Jones, Brandon H; King, Art C; Carpenter,Kristi; Lauffer, Matthew S; Mellor, Colin; NCDOT Service Account - Roadway Design; Ridings, Rob; Staley, Mark K; Wilson, Travis W.; Twisdale, John W; Barclay, Carl A; Dilday, Jason L; Norton, April R; Yamamoto, Brian F Subject: Permit Application for B-5362, Montgomery and Moore Counties Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged The permit application for B-5362 has been prepared. The electronic copy can be viewed/downloaded at https://connect.ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/ This email serves as our permit application submittal to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources. Chris Rivenbark Natural Environment Section Technical Services North Carolina Department of Transportation 919 707 6152 office crivenbark(c�ncdot.gov 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27610 , �� :-"� 'T� _ Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR May 17, 2017 Raleigh Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 ATT'N: Mr. Andy Williams NCDOT Project Manager JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 3, 12, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 53 over Drowning Creek on NC 73 in Montgomery/Moare Counties, North Carolina; TIP No. B-5362; Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-0073(31); Debit $270 from WBS No. 46077.1.1 Dear Sir, The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 97-foot, three-span bridge with a 145-foot, two-span bridge on existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained on an offsite detour. There will be 0.08 acre of permanent impact to riparian wetlands due to roadside fill and mechanized clearing. The filling of a small backwater section adjacent to Drowning Creek will account for 701inear feet of permanent stream impact. The backwater section will be backfilled with rip rap to the bed elevation of the main channel. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), stormwater management plan, permit drawings, utility drawings, and roadway plans for the above referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in June 2016 and distributed shortly after. Additional copies are available at the NCDOT website: https://con nect. ncdot.�ov/resou rces/Envi ron menta I/. This project calls for a letting date of October 17, 2017 and a review date of August 29, 2017. The project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Pernut: We anticipate that the bridge replacement, including all approach work will be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3 and necessary utility relocations will be authorized under Section 404 NWP No. 12. Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 Water Quality Certification numbers 4085 and 4086 will apply to this project. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources. MailingAddress: Telephone: (919)707-6000 Location: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: (919) 212-5785 I O2O BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION CuStO»12Y S¢YVZC2: 1-H%%-36H-496H RALEIGH NC 2%61O 1598 MAiL SExv[CE CEtsrex Website: www.ncdot.gov RALEIGH NC 2%699-1S9g A copy of this pernut application and its distribution list will be posted at the NCDOT website at https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Jason Dilday at (919) 707-6111 or jldilday@ncdot.gov Sincerely, Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M., Manager Natural Environment Section cc: NCDOT Pernut Application Standard Distribution List ��,,��F�� Office Use Only: i � � F Corps action ID no. `� r DWQ project no. i��i � � �" �` Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 53 on NC 73 over Drowning Creek 2b. County: Montgomery/Moore 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Jackson Springs 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P, or state g_5362 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6111 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jldilday@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.187753 Longitude: -79.648582 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.8 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Drowning Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-II; Sw, HQW 2c. River basin: Lumber 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The land use is primarily forested and agriculture. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 250 feet perennial 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing the 97-foot, three-span bridge with a 145-foot, two-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: Request to R. Smith made on 6/17/13 for PJD. No response received. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: RK&K 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Mechanized ❑ Yes � Corps Site 1� P❑ T Clearing Riparian � No � pWQ 0.03 Site 1� P❑ T Fill Riparian ❑ Yes � Corps 0.05 � No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.08 Permanent 2h. Comments: There will be 0.04 ac of hand clearing in wetlands due to bridge construction and 0.14 ac of hand clearing in wetlands due to utility relocation. Temporary fill in wetlands in hand clearing areas for installation of erosion control measures equals <0.01 acre. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1� P❑ T Fill Drowning Creek � PER � Corps 15 70 ft (back water) ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (0.03 ac) Site 1❑ P� T Fill Drowning Creek � PER � Corps � 5 5 ft (back water) ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (<0.01 ac) Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts �0 ft Perm 5 ft Temp 3i. Comments: Stream impacts due to backfill a backwater section of Drowning Creek to the bed elevation of the main channel 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Tem ora T 02 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge will be longer than the existing bridge; the replacement bridge will be a 2-span, removing a bent in the water from the current 3-span bridge; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade and alignment as the existing structure; the new bridges will have no deck drains or direct discharge to Drowning Creek. An off-site detour will be used during construction. See Stormwater Management Plan for more measures. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT Design Standards in Sensitive Waters will be implemented 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Compensatory mitigation is not proposed due to the minimal im act to 'urisdictional resources 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: See attached permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Moore/Montgomery Counties. No habitat exists for the listed species. NCDOT will adhere to conditions of the programmatic biological opinion for the northern long-eared bat. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Digitally signed by Colin Mellor C o I i n M e I I o r DN: cn=Colin Mellor, o=NCDOT, ou=NES, email=cmellor@ncdot.gov, c=US Philip S. Harris III, p.E., C.P.M. Date:2017.O5.V 13:33:31 -04'00� 05-17-2017 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 1� �� y��t��• North Carolina Department of Transportation :�t(ll'� 114yi1lf'Y Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 46077.1.1 TIP No.: B-5362 County(ies): Montgomery Moore Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 46077.1.1 TIP Number: B-5362 Project Type: Bridge Re lacement Date: 9/20/2016 NCDOT Contact: William Bill H. Elam, Jr., PE Contractor I Desi ner. Emest J Hahn, PE Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Phone: 919-707-6718 Phone: 919-707-6724 Email: belam@ncdot. ov Email: ejhahn ncdot. ov Cit /Town: Count ies : Mont ome Moore River Basin(s : Lumber CAMA Count ? No No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Description Project Length lin. miles or feet : 0.082 miles Surrounding Land Use: rural; predominantly wetlands and forested Proposed Project Existin Site Pro'ect Built-Upon Area ac. 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: twelve-foot lanes with four-foot full depth paved shoulders and four-foot eleven-inch ten-foot lanes with variable width grass shoulders shoulders on the bridge Annual Avg Daily Traffic (vehlhrlday): Design/Future: 2100 Year: 2040 Existing: 1674 Year: 2017 General Project Narrative: This project consists of the replacement of bridge 53 over Drowning Creek and the associated roadway grade improvements along NC 73 in Montgomery and Moore counties. (Description of Minimization of Water The existing structure is a 97-foot long, triple span bridge (1@32'-3", 1@32'-7", 1@32'-1") constructed in 1926, and the proposed replacement structure is a 145-foot long, Quality Impacts) double-span bridge (1 @60'-0", 1@85'-0") at the existing location. The existing bridge had deck drains over Drowning Creek; spread calculations indicate deck drains will not be required for the proposed bridge. Instead, runoff from the proposed bridge will collect via shoulder berm gutter into a storm drain system and flow overland before reaching the waterbody. In addition, the proposed design reduces surface water impacts by reducing the number of interior bents from two to one. Roadway improvements are designed to minimize water quality impacts by promoting sheet flow and infiltration along grassed shoulders. Surface water impacts occur solely within a small backwater pool near the west bank which is proposed to be backfilled with rip rap to the bed elevation of the main channel; viz., 390 feet. The cumulative total area of impact equals approximately 0.03 acres of fill within wetlands, 0.07 acres of inechanized clearing within wetlands, 0.03 acres of permanent surface water impacts, and less than 0.01 acres of temporary surface water impacts. Existing channel impacts equals approximately 70 linear feet of permanent and 5 feet of temporary impacts. Waterbody Information SurFace Water Body (1): Drowning Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 14-2-(1) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply II (WS-II) Supplemental Classification: High Quality Waters (HQW) Other Stream Classification: Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: biological conclusion for Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) is unresolved NRTR Stream ID: Drowning Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) �/ � � •, � V � � O V See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 9B For Conventlonal Symbols See Sheet iC 9 For Survey Control Sheets OFFSITE DETOUR �� ) � 1�� $�II�� v � ��`� �� M01�lTGOMER Y/ MOORE CD U1�TIES r�� LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 53 OVER DROWNING CREEK 011I 1VC 73 TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG, AND STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT ,�°I eTAT¢ PROI.NO. 46077.1.1 46077.2.1 STATE PROlCCT IIEPER8NC8 NO. B-5362 P. A. VROJ. NO. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. GRAPHIC SCALES I 50 25 0 50 100 PLANS I 50 25 0 50 100 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FILE IVERTI 0 DESIGN DATA ADT 2017 = 1674 ADT 2040 = 2100 K = 10 % D = 65 % T = 10 %* V = 55 MPH *TTST=3% DUAL=7% FUNC CLASS = MAJOR COLLECTOR "REGIONAL TIER" PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.054 MILES LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.028 MILES TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROIECT B-5362 = 0.082 MILES P�epared in /he Office of; DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 2J610 2012 STANDARD SPEC7FlCATIONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE OCTOBER 21. 2016 �'ROJECT ENG7NEER LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE OCTOBER 17, 20�7 PROJECT DES[GN ENGlNEER HYDRA[ILICS ENGINEER r.E. sicxarune: ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P.6. BRSTP-0073 �- OeSCRIPT PE WW /UTILT. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 7 UOCUMENT NOT LONSIDERED FINAL UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED z O vS E c' �E �E �3E MECHANIZED CLEARING � HAND CLEARING F� FILL IN WETLANDS � SURFACE WATER IMPACTS � TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS TROY LUMBER COMPANY �� i � � ,�w�o s,� � � � � � � � ,� � ,� � � '� � � .� � � � � ��s�ri��Fao�c' w000� i"�"'��;,-��. �� e�n��'��,�� . � � � �/'}e � � " � _� � � � � � G � � � -� _ - -a� _ - -� �austr� � � � . � _� � _� �___ _�� __� � -� .,M� _� E 70 � � � � rc— � � �--L— ---� � ELLERBE _ � ��—==� � � � � � � � � ^^^^^^^ � 24'RCP ��— � � ��_� __— --- �� ,� � �� 'T—� w�a— < _ _ � —� . \ . _ � � ExISiiNG RiW��'.r.` \ � ,� � � � ,� � � `� `� .�' . � � �� . . � � `K � �� _ '� � � '� � �� "? �� wd"os��'��'��'�� PUE V � ,_ .Y � ,Y � � � � '� �K •K � � .K � � � � '� � �CLA�S B $IP�RAP I ViViAN TUCKER NAMMOND EST i rox�s � GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EST.S SYWOODS CLA55 II ftIP R „ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ DETAIL 1 TOE PROTECTION � Nm m s�oie� <F�O�\e Naw,ai ,�� °\�S�oe Gro��d �.� b { F I I d d=1N b=4 k Geotextile Type of Liner- Class I Rip Rop FROM --L $TA 15+70 TO STA 17+00 LT � � � � � �� 3( � � .� � � � '� �o�c�r�Eea�c� � :�J� wirn avet� oec� ,4%� � R/W SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �P� I. w000s TNOMAS L.FUNDERBURK n � '� � � � � 4�Ee �rr.�niecr�N � � � � .� � ' '� � .� � � � �r � � T � � � � � � -�. �� ''0�°°�� . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��rU � � � � � � � � � . � � . � .. ,i" � � '� � _ �BR� � � �C� � � � � � � � � � � � ��3 � Y _ — _ _ --� �k— �----� CONC HW _ _rc_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.c_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �� \ NL MNY 73 20' PAVED ROAOWAY _ _ _ _ 70 WEST END y �.:�. �_ r 19 ;6.Cw�� —_--_�_.wa--_—i � � � � 1 E _ � � � � �� YG CLA55 II P RAP � � '� � � ,� � � � � � � � � � I RIP RAP � '` � � ` WOODS SAMMY & BiLLiE �L � RETAIN � � -'�— � —� — zw�B�� v- I��_ �� '�r"�-r" II�� I��PUF�-��1 K � � � � � � � � � � � �� vo�os� PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 7 SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE PS PS �Nrs� PS - PAVED SHOULDER SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER PS PS � ; ; � ��` � \ f � � �� ; % / , f . � � (� � � �� _� � �_ � -�,o, ��' � � .,� � c � � �ti �l �,-_��J„- � � � � � � .� � � � � v / � �� ; ( � � ,� �,�� > l��_�\� j` i1 � `, - -� � �-� � � � �� , � � -� / / ��!�� — � � � �� \ "� 2 � � �/ � �s,.� � `-� '��.\ � � � I � \ � � �g� � 1 � � \ \ CLASS;'� RIP RAP � . � �\ \ '� f L .'' � � � � �- � � � � J \ � /��, � EST.1 TONS �_ � 1 f C 7 , GE6�EXTILE FABRIC \— ` / � " EST 5 SY �--� •-�Be` ~ i \ � RETAIN � -� �A._ �� --°°`�/ \ � � � r 1 —• ---.a�� ,«. � � � � � � � � '� � � '� �� -� — - ' � . �Gto � '� -� �__-�ar� -\ � �� =� -. _ � � � � � - - � — -'�``-� — -� �— � / — � _ .- - — � � � �1 -__ -�. — `` - — - � � ��-�— �^ v�- ' -� �==t � � -- �-_ ) _ �,�ti .-�—� 9 ,� � � /� `-�-� �-� � � re-i�r �j� i � �--`-�� — - � > — � �,a� � -��-._ __ � --- TB 2G /' �� v S � �1 �� \ � -.`,` _ -_ - - �� I 1 — __ � � � I =� — - ___ � - "•.- ., � j� ` / f f� � �_ `� `_ '_�`f {� �" � � � �eC� � � � � � � � � ��\\ �� ,I � r/�� f � � � � � a� I � PUE CLA55 B RIP RAP ��.� � � � I `� �� / f ��' EST.',1 TONS \ \ I \ � GEO7EXTILE�FABRIC � �� ESL 5 SY . � � CLA55 II ftIP RAP �� ` .a�t_ � � � .e��,� � � � ;� � � � � i-�E_—� - �r� �� , � � � ,9.� f � � � �� j .�� '� � 1 J � �P � � & �. �� '�� l� � � � � � ��l � ,, � � �� s , � HAND CLEARING � r � � ' � � �E �E �E MECHANIZED CLEARING � � � �,�� - � � - '`� �F FILL IN WETLANDS � � � � i�� C - � �,� � �- - '� -� � SURFACE WATER IMPACTS � \ � _ � � � � �� , � � � ti � TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS '� �a• � �,00 o ,00 � � --� < _ -�� ,� I / � S�A�E:, - ,00 �� _ � . , _--. ; -� � vSE . , I I\.. �• / _ .� PROJtCCI REYERENCE N(J. SHEET NO. B-5362 4 � � � � � R/W SHEET NO. DETAIL 1 �\ ✓` ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS TOE PROTECTION � ENGINEER ENGINEER � N � io s�oiel �\ —' � F� �s` _ � ... . Na�vrol �� oee /� � � � � �,o��d �.� b { �� F�\S � � , � I I d rl / '� 6=4 k Geotextile � �J �� J � � / i i �Type ofLiner=CIas5lRip Rop � /� � ` \ 1 . j ' Jl� � �a / �,.1 � '\�\ ROM irl= A�73+�O�jO STA 17'+0 li �� d� � �\ �/ �,� � � % Q I� �/ �� , / \J,*\ � ��` �� l � 1 �/ �� P\� UNLESS ALL SIGNA URES COMPLETED l �s�, � � � �� 1 � � 1 � ��j��\/ �� i �_ �i �� l'- �, � � � s�� /�' ( ( ,o,/� �' � � i -- � ` \ � � � \ /, \\ _ . ^ ./ � � \ ��/` 1 � / �/ � � � � \� � / (� � � ,� � � �� ,�- � � � �, ��> � � --��- � � V � ,� � �� ' �� -�,l �°� �✓ � � \ � � � � � � � � �� \ Gl J � �� >I � � _ _ � � -'�� - � ' � .a� .� � � `� � �,,. � � = � � �� -� —�\ � % / � � �� n .. � _ _ . � � ... I / \ �� , �� ,W` �j � ��-- �� , 'e��+ -TOE PR'OTECTIONI ` . � � � � � �^ia' SEE DETAIL i �,�� ) � � � � � � ��- � T�!f. � '� � � �, a � / � ~ mc � ° �/ : ' F � - � �-, �- --- - — _ - i- � , �� . w� _ _ _ — _ — — _— � �°,.�. �' � � � � — _ _ - _ _ �� 4; _ cb i _ � '! � � - j r � ,��3 � - .�`, e w- — _ - �.:�' __ __ _ _ � � � - '� � _� — - ° - _ — — �kErain - � - �`jjr � w '_ _ --�, _ '�-- _ — _- �--= a.� �' � � ' . ` � ry—`� �,� u '. o r � � UE .� QUE. DUE � P E� PUE--I PUE PUE 1 � E � I . �� I . . ~PUFf . �PUEJ l / y � m Y, CLA55 II P RAP . m � � f _ ✓ ! f l J�� CLASS I RIP RAP ... �� ) . y , .. _ _ ,.. 1 r : (% ` � � ,i -� �, —��/ ► BEGIN SB L STA. 13+88 00 LT. & RT � � END AT APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT \. J � ��, _. . � � / , _ —� �> / —�.�� , � �—.s�__ � .�� _..i ,� � ' � �� j�� 1 ��ti�'� �� 1�� j � �� l _ � � � � �_ ) �S �/ � r � �� .�� i .�/1 �I �� ,, �� ' f) �_ � � v� ri � � s i � � ��(� , �,' � � �g,, �,�`�� R L � � � �'�/�� , �-� � �' ` V �,, �l �� '�� -�'� � � � PERMIT DRAWING �_°:� � ��J,�� °� � L� � , S�i E ET 3 O F 7 � � � � i � �� SE�` SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE Z 0 > � s SITE 1 ENGLARGEMENT CLASS B RIP RAP - ,� E T. 1 TONS WOODS OT�CTILE.�FAB C � � � ' �- � � � EST�5 Sl,� � � � � � � � � ,� � � � ,� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � '� � ,� � F�I.B�WS � ,� � � � � � ,� � � � � � � , �,�� -�-� _�� -�-� � ,� i _ �- — ��iN� C —� � '� rn � - - =�,, �,i - re �`� - ,� � -_-'--r�__ �;'�� -- � -- l �. � - - / / _ _.. . � /� . � �l \ \ � _ � � _ � �� ' ^ � V � �W � � _.� �` � -�� `� � � � � � �� ,� � � � ,�� PU � � ,� � � �L�W$ � � �CLA�S B RIP RAP '' EST. 1 TOI�IS `� � GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EST. 5 SY CLASS II RIP RAP E �D U � \ W I -� � -� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � -� � � �P� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 04 ILW SHEET NO. ;OADWAY DESIGN HYDR4ULIC5 ENGINEER ENGINEER dNC�A�P]L]E ]E �Il..�NS DO NOT USE POR 6 W ACQUISITlOh DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED � ,� � ��re—�� TO� PRO�kECT�ON � � > ,� � ,�� ,,��9,� �E D�TAIL,�1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � � � � - \�18 � � '� '� '� � �- � � � l�.�T(.�F� � �s -��k; � � � ,� � �BRU � `� � � , - - - �� _ �y� � � v � � � � T C � � � � � � I � / ' � � _ _ - �� .�-'-� — — — — — —� � P D � -� .� � - W � � T - �� 1 I� E \ \ � ��, �-P+ � � � ,� �� '� � � � ,� ��UF CLASS II RIP RAP \� H�ND CL�ARING�L � � � � � � F�YL W �TLAND�S � � I �CLASS I RIP RAP � � SURFACE WATER IMPACTS WOODS � TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BEGI N SBG —L— STA. 13 + 88.00 LT. & RT. END SBG AT APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT. �*� MECHANIZED CLEARING PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 7 T PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � � � r� � P E RM I T D RAW I N G ROADWAY DESI�N HYDRAULIC� s S H E ET 5 O F 7 ENGINEER ENGINEER DES GN ISCH E _ l CFS DES GN E EVA lON =�¢,4 __ FT BAS F OU NCY = l YRS OVE TOP lNG lSC ARG = l CFS OVE TOP lNG LE Tl0 = �,l_ _ FT WS. LEV TION OVE TOP ING ELE Tl0 E ALS NOR AL C AT AG OCA ION. TATI N l+pp —— Pl = l3+ AO Pl = 16+0 AO Pl = l7+ ,pp EL 40 0' EL 40 EL 40 EGl GR E—L— TA/ +95 VC 60' VC 76' VC 60' —— T 7+ �- K= i32 OS 55 MPH K= �l4 t S= 55 PH1 K= l25 OS 55 PH = r � sr ,a+a -�- i 60', 1@ 5' 33" OX BE O 4' BE T CAPS SK W=90 - - - - �+1p l4". -JO 4% +IOJ 33'. - - - - � � .5 FEE TYPIC L OBSE VED E= 91.2 SEPTE BER 9, 2015 EXISTI G AB TMENT EXCAV TION CLA S II RIP RAP 100 UBIC Y RDS T ELEV TION 94.0 (STR PAY IT M) (STR. AY ITE ) M A A RET IN EXI TING BUTM T 550 C BIC Y RDS T ELEV ION 4.5 TO ELEVA ION 3 4.0 (STR. P Y ITEM C 55 II R P RAP ELE ATION 394.5 CLASS I RIP P TO LEVATI N 39 0 BMl LEV Tl0 = 96.0 ' // / -L- S A lON l4+ .00 IG RR PlK lN ASE OF l8° A H T EE � � � w � � � � �s �� BRIDGE PROFILE �� SITE 1 �� >� �� SEE SHEE 4 F R P N IEW ��- "`� 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ��; �� SE a� O 2.5 5 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. N � B-5362 X-3 � 5 1 1 1 1 5 .� 0 .�2 B UNDA `��' � � - - .02 .02 .� OU D RY � � � -' - -- -- .02 .02 :) W TLA D � W TLA D BO N RY `L�� ' � BO N AR \ i _ -- � � -- -- -- -- �-- ;' .0 0 0. 10 E +A fA 6� `� 3�� - U D Y � � �� , � B UNDA � ;� � O � /i � o � Z �� EfA� � � � � � _ _ � � � � � � � � c (y y}Hl ��i �� N��fH �W �� -�Q a'}iA2 _«�w S E ET F 7 �� — o�� ,r» �� 5 1 1 7 1 2 5 5 5 �� WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 -L- 13+35 to 14+02.5 LT Roadway 0.01 -L- 14+02.5 to 15+71.5 Bridge < 0.01 0.03 0.03 < 0.01 70 5 -L-15+71.5 to 17+27 LT Roadway 0.04 0.02 TOTALS*: 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 < 0.01 70 5 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: Temporary fill in wetland in areas of hand clearing for installation of erosion control measures =<0.01 ac. 2013 10 24 •� � -� -� -� OFFSITE DETOUR GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 PLANS 50 25 0 50 100 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 10 5 0 10 20 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SHEET 1110.: UE-1 UE-2 �� r� ELLERBE LOCATI01�1: BRIDGE 1�10. �3 OVER DROW11rl11tG CREEl� 01� 1�C 73 WETLAND IMPACTS DROWNING CREEK SITE 1 MONTGOMERY �,�� MOORE END BRIDGE \ —L— STA. ?? + ??.?? ,� � COUNTY / , COUNTY SITE 2 � �/ �� . � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� c�� c�� c�� '��--� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �: �� /�—� '�_��,��.��,�'� ��.��,�� ,�� '� ��.��,�'� ��.��,�'� ��,��,��1 %�l"'�'/� �.�T '��.�� '��'��.�� '�� .�� • — — e�iM _ '� _�!= ,� _ � � � '� Y �I=_ � � � �l=� � .� � � � � � � � ,� � � � � � � �!= � �� `� ,e <n� � � '� � � ,� � � � � � � v� ,� � � � � � .� � ,� � � � � '!= � � � .� � � � � '� � � � _ � _.� a�M � /i �'� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � '� � � S� \`� ' � .,; � `Y `F J' � .., � —�= �'HlM—�. �— `� —'�L —� —K—BIfN— — � —� —�— � — � � —�— � --- —L— NC 73 T \ �i� e,� _ `�\� � � �W�B � _ � — — —� —W�e— -- � � � �-. �— � -� �, � � �\ �,�� .��,�� .��,�� .��,�� -_'_— �� \ � �� K � �� I � � � � � � � � � ! SITE 5 -L- STA. 12 + 95.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT I11tDEX OF SHEETS DESCRIPTI011t: TITLE SHEET UBO PLAN SHEETS l�:.s /% �/ V 1 / 1�� MONTGOMERI� � � MOORE COUNTY � I COUNTY ,I DROWNING CREEK � � � �� .� � . � � .� \ SITE 4 � � � � � • � �� ,��.. -L- STA. 17 + 30.00 END TIP PROJECT \ UTILITY O W1�ERS WITH C01�FLICTS (A) TELEPH0111E - BROADPLEX (B) POWER DISTRIBUTI0111 - DUKE E11lERGY (C) POWER DISTRIBUTI011t - PEE DEE EMC TO WEST EN� SITE 3 PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: � 1223 lones Franklin Road � �► Raleigh, N.C. 27606 , ETHERILL License No. F-0377 ENGINEERING Bus: 919 851 8077 Fax: 919 851 8107 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/DESIGN - BRIDGE/STRUCTURE DESIGN ClVIL/SITE DESIGN - GlS/GPS - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION John D. Schriner, PLS PROJECT UTILITY COORDINATOR �[°,�,ll�o I��, B-5 3 6 2 ��-�[��°� ��e U E-1 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 3 UTILITIES �Py Donna .Iackson Don Proper Ed Reams DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS UTILITIES U1VIT 1555 MAIL SERVICES CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1555 PHONE (919) 707-6690 FAX (919) 250-4151 UTILITIES REGIONAL E1VGIIVEER UTILITIES PROJECT E111GI11tEER UTILITIES AREA COORDI11lATOR Tanga Sampson UTILITIES COORDINATOR TIE TO EXISTING PEE DEE POLE 1 TROY LUMBER COMPANY DB 285 PG 784 SITE 1 0.0113 ACRES HAND CLEARING TEMPORARY UTILITY � EASEM�NT � �� - , ''� ,�o �__>> ,� � � � ,� � � . PROPOSED PEE� ��E � � � � ,� � � � � � � ,� � � PO L E ,_` � � ,� � � � ,� � ,� � � � ��''r`;� ��-�, �,�_'� � '� J `,� ,�E�AIN � .� `� � � � v� 'PROP 0/H POW LIN� /� � � _ � `� .� , . �`� `��J :'� -�t ,r�-U : � `� —�_ — _titi � ,—� _ — — �hl PROPOSED TEMPORARY PEE DEE POLE WGOU� � � � '� � ' '�- � �- ��,�� T�E��(��fCI�TI�IG.��.��i� � �/� T�� ,� � � ��_ �' � � `� .� � � `� S I �l C T l� [ � I''J : 5� � �C/ _ `� .� � ' '�- �' �� t - _ '�9R B./�, p�'-�'INES � _�V— — � ,� ---_ � �, � `� ,� ��p � ,�ONC -TL CPi�� `� �� r��—��,� �.,�W�— `� �E w i T A v �� E c� c� � � ��-�'�- � - `��''�r w� _ - � � � � � , - � — -" _ � EX��r�Nc Ri�/ TO ELLER�E —_ _� � — — Tc — — _ _ `-^Js _ — — — a,� , .� l� - ----- i — �_ __� -- TF — — � II -- - - — � p�9 0/H P-91 - 24" RCPII --- �i � ,� � �T,r _ ��_- � — W L�B — T _ S �,r� � �`� .� ,� � � � � � � �� W � r s - � _ F � � ��r�-z�� -,, �rr,,��L��-,�,� � � ,� Exi�riNc - PROP�H �ii� .— � � � .� � � � .� � � �� `�' �.' �� E D D U I� � �E�I E F�GY ,� � � '� T E�ll P � R�A� � ��-��`�E� .� �'�'� � � � �� ,� � � .� ,� �/�Fi� PQ�NE� ,� � � .� ,� � � � � �, �, w � os � ,� � � ,� '� � ,� � � < .� ,,, � �'�� ,� � �� '� �� ,� � �� '� �� . � � � .�, ,. � � � � PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY �v000s POLE i I 1C I V �..��TING DUKE ENERGY POLE � VIVIAN TUCKER HAMMOND DB 230 PG 665 SITE 5 0.0012 ACRES HAND CLEARING — \ �- T�-2�1- - - -f . - -�B �C31 -i �-I,_ � -- - --� TEMf� 0/ OW I�S C N ' T PROP.A/ OW I ES , �'� "J' �� ;=rn _ BU�� =-� — . � D E / -- E�E 5 � � � I �� . � �� I-v' ^� � �. � �. � SITE 4 0.0425 ACRES HAND CLEARING WOODS �- � � � � � � � � � � � � �� h � � � � � � � � � �� `� � � � � .1, _�`, � . . - � . � .,�. .� : � . �K � � __ PROPOSED BROADPLEX BORE 1' INSIDE R/W 10' MIN UNDER CREEK BED / � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �. — � , .,. � _. � � � � � � �� TE � �� — � ' F 24 RC — — — _/ ./,� . . p � � — — - — �' �l-1�E � �� :� �— ��= . �_r _r � �� ,� � ,� �' F . � � � � � � � 1 � � � � \ � ,� � \ .Y `� � 1 WOOCS TIE TO EXISTIN U/G TELEPHONE� UTILITY WETLAND IMPACTS I�`'%�� . . . . HAND CLEARING ON ALL UTILITY IMPACTS SITE 2 0.0185 ACRES HAND CLEARING 3 THOMAS Le FUNDERBURK III DB 3130 PG 440 TEMPORARY UTILITY EASEMENT � � � � � � � �� T� E �T� �J��T I�NG � � � � PLE �� `P LE � �� - � �—�..�-�� I�P��f�-1(��E`"J � � '� � _ _ ,��/ H �P OI�IE F� � � / � � � �- �- �� — — —T� — — — — NC HWY 73 20'PAVFD ROADWAY REM. RETAIN _� �. � �� i� � � � �� I�`��,� ��`�� 'K��S"'�' PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY POLE TEMPORARY PEE DEE 0/H POWER PERMANENT DUKE ENERGY 0/H POWER PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY POLE SAMMY & BILLIE HILL DB 719 PG 179 4 ro wEsr Ervo PROPOSED DUKE ENERGY POLE PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 3 UTILITIES TIE TO EXISTING DUKE ENERGY POLE PROP 0/H POW LINES PROP 0/H POW L DUKE ENERGY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS AND EASEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THIS SECTION OF 0/H POWER SITE 3 0.0652 ACRES HAND CLEARING WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS and Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 12+g4 LT Power Pole & guy 0.01 2 17+g0 LT Power Pole & guy 0.02 3 18+06 to 19+61 RT Power Lines 0.07 4 16+30 to 17+50 RT Power Lines 0.04 5 13+64 RT Power Pole & guy 0.00 TOTALS: 0.14 N � M � � •, See Sheet � A For Index of Sheets See Sheet � B For Conventi onal Symbols See Sheet 9 C- � For Survey Control Sheets OFFSITE DETOUR �� 1LI J� � J� � � J� �I J� � � J� � LOCA TI01�1: BRIDGE 1�0. �3 0 T�ER DR O W1�I1�G CREEI� 01�1 1�1C 73 TYPE OF WORI�: GRADI1�lG, DRAI1�lAGE, PA VI1�G, A1�lD STR UCTURE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION -L- STA. 12 + 58.00 r� ELLERgE BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA. 14 + 13.31 � �,� � � '� � � �- '`' ,� , � .� � � ,� . DROWNING CREEK MONTGOMERY � �� MOORE COUNTY / �, COUNTY (/ END BRIDGE -L- STA. 15 + 60.69 � � ' � � � � � � ,� � ,� '� � � � .� � ,� � �` � � ,� � ,� '� � � � ,� � ,� � ,� ' ,� '`" � �= � � ,� ,� � � � � � ,� ,� � � � ,� � . ,� ,� � � � ,� ,� � • � � ,� ,� � � � � � ,� ' ,� �` � '� �= �� j �� /�� _� �,��,�,��.��,��,��,��,��,��,��/,�.', ./�� .��,��,��,��.��,��,��,��` �v � B�M � '� _,� � � `� ,�' � `i� ,�' � `� .� � � `�' .(C �, �� '� ,(C � `f' ,� � � � � '1'' ,(C �. � � � `(� ,�' �. � � � `� •�' `� .� � � `i� •(c '� _ _ _ 'K �Y_ _ _ — e�M _ `� _`� � _ 'F= `�'' � - �_.�_ �`_�-a�.---=�--�-�' ,� ��.�� '��=�� '�� `�'�� s,�--��=��'��-��=� -�� __ ---_ -L- NC 73 5` ; ,� e,� _�__� �_.�---�,.-.._-- --- ----- — � - -� ----- -- `i= �NLB � � NL8— t _ \� ,� `i� `� g —,�— `i�— `� — —� ,� `� '(: � � � `F; � � � � � � �' � � `(c � � `�t `(= � `� `i, .(c � `� '� � 'e� �.� _ ��ve� � �� yC� � ��K �l=� � �� m � � � � � � � � � � � � �\�,� �� '� � � �,� �� `� � �.� �� `� �` � �,� �,� ��'� v� I � .,, �,'��.� ��`�`��,� ��,�� `��1I � � � '� .� � .� � .. � '� � � � ,� � 1 \ � �✓ ✓� `1`` // �S � \' / �t � I MONTGOMERI� � ; MOORE COUNTY � I COUNTY :I DROWNING CREEK /—L— STA. 12 +95.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. �— — —�r � — w� — — �-- —•� � � � � � � � � � 1 �� '� � v� ,� � � 1 \�� \ � � ,Y � . '`� � � �1 r �c— � — — — �w�a-g_ �, — I`� .� ,� � � `� � ,�e � —' — 1 � � � �� `� '� � ,� � � `� � ,� �\ ��`�� .. � � � � � .. � � � .. � —L— STA. 17 + 30.00 EN D TI P PROJ ECT \ END CONSTRUCTION -L- STA. 19 + 61.00 TO WEST END_ �Py DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED Prepared In the Offlce of: HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH ADT 2017 = 1674 DIVISI01� OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 0 50 100 qDT 2040 = 2100 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 �� ►�G�� o LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.054 MILES � �� K = � O �0 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �� PLANS D= 65 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 6-5362 = 0.028 MILES P.E. � � � * SIGNATURE: � � 50 25 0 50 l00 T= 10 �o TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5362 = 0.082 MILES RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE �� V— 5 5 M P H OCTOBER 21 ZO� 6 I' R O J E C T E N G I N E E R R O A D W A Y D E S I G 1 1 t �� o�� P R O F I L E ( H O R I Z O N T A L) * T T S T = 3% D U A L = 7% ' E11tGI11tEER �� p��Q l0 5 0 l0 20 'A LETTIIIIG DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE F U N C C L/�S S = PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER MAJOR COLLECTOR OCTOBER 17, 2017 PROFILE (VERTICAL) "REGIONAL TIER" P�E� SIGNAT URE: J � � � � c � � �; c � N O N > w � BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA. 14 + 13.31 : r r TYPE III � PS � �SB � - `� '�►S B `� PS TYPE III � � � BEGIN APPR. SLAB -L- STA. 14 + 02.44 END BRIDGE -L- STA. 15 + TYPE II 33'-10" TYPE II END APPR. SLAB -L- STA. 15 + 71.56 �� 4'PS 1� � �' N 4' PS (NTS) PS - PAVED SHOULDER SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER SKETCH SHOWING MAINLINE BRIDGE/ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP 10+00.00 +7 -L - Pl Sto 12+25.37 �_% 28' 49.3" fLT 1 D = 2° 30' 00.0" L = 299.2/' T = 149.82' R = 2,29/.83' SE SEE PLANS -L - PT Sto. l3 +74.76 DETAIL 1 TOE PROTECTION ( Not to Scale) �\oi,�gt Natural .L•��°`�S�°pe Ground b � �d d=1 ft b = 4 ft Geotextile Type of Liner=Class I Rip Rap FROM -L- STA 15 + 70 TO STA 17 + 00 LT NOTEo PROPERTY LINE RUNS WITH THE CENTER OF DROWNING CREEK TROY LUMBER COMPANY ABUTMENT EXCAVATION OROwN� G CREEK DB 285 PG 784 (STR. PAY ITEM) � % + 80.00 -L- P 30.00' LT m N � ^ + 91.00 -L- 7 45.00' �LT; � � + 77.00 -L- { iv� .�. � 30.00' (LT) 60.00' (LT) l� °�'�/ � v +86.00 -L- �o w +40.00 -L- 30.00 LT / �� ' �- ,� � 51.00' (LT) CLASS B RIP RAP +00.00 -L- "' � 47 00 LT /'� W�0 S,� � � .� � �+71b0 �-- E`,�T. 1 TONS WoODS 60.00' (LT) N 2� 2'34° W / � '1= ,� � v� `t` � ,� � � .00'�LT) � 6�OT�3CTILE�FAB�1C� �- `� �' ,� ' � � + .00 5�L- / � .� ,� `� � � `� � ,� EST�5 S� � ,� �+4UlDO p,� � / `� . � ,� � � `� � � '� + .00 L- � + 8.00 �- `� � � 4�.00'.�T) � 4�.�� (LT�`� � .� E�AIN � `� �30.0 ' (L ) � � � 4 00' LT) � v� + 0 8 /� � � .. '� .� .� � 53.0�(LT)`� ,t. � +tl{�.00�KL- �B�WS � � � ,(= 34,1 ' �,� - - - �- � ,� r�`1'��.�- . .`� � ��j O.ObI� (LT),� � .� � '� R�1CT�� E N0, 5� � <v - � �?�- `� `� .� p `� 0 N C I E R I�G E �� -e�n+- � -`� �RUSH�(= � � �%F WIT VE DEC� � � _ �c' �Y- - � - a n, c Lfi � - � -� - - - o TO ELi� ��e i - �ti EXISTING R W rn � � F �_ 1 .��r„ ERaE �� /2.6" E - _ - - - - - - - -_-_-__�__-f - - � - - �.` �� - - �� O � O �� o � _ _ 24" RCP � � ��_B= --� � -WLB- ` `f.�� `� .� � �' �� T -.= � � _ _ _ � \O � 'r~� � � ��`'-til�f-ti_� � `� � EXI$TING R/W _ � -� \ � ,� � � '� � .� ,� � � '� � � � '� �� '� � � � � � � � ��Y� � '�� '� �� '�� '� Y� I ��-�.��.�w�o�s ,�� ,�� '� � �� '� � P � � BEGIN CONSTRUCTION � � � � � � � � � � '� � � � '�� W� � ,�. � � �CLA�S B �IP RAP �n E PROJECT REFERENCE NO. B -5362 R�W SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. 4 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED / END CONSTRUCTION -L- STA. 19 + 61.00 30.00 (LT) • 62.00' (LT) 47.00' (�T) woo�s THOMAS L. FUNDERBURK III �DB �130 PG 440, ,� �- ,� � � ,� � ' /F'TB-�� TO PRO�ECTI�JN � � � �14.0 -L- � � � ,� � � � e �G�RK� °h�~+�0`�L- +7 0 E D�TAI� ,� � � 53.(�0' (LT� �i= '� � `�WOOD� v� �, �� ,� 0 0 (LT)v� 4,�.00' T) �5.0 -L- � � ,� � � �= ,� � � � ,� � `l`L 30.�A' LT�) `� � ,� '� � ,� � � `� � � � � + .00 -L- v� +'�07.0� -L � ,� s tg . . v� �. � 30.0 ' T) �I= ,��JF 30.0l0' (LT,� �, � � v� .� � �r� � 81 � • � '�BRU � � '� c� � ,� � '� '� � ,� - B � I 0� � � �- `�-' _.� CONC HW � -K-a�xr- - � - � �!'- �r - � - - �� ' - - � TC It- - - - - - - -TC- - - - - - � "' II ' " � 0 o p � � � o �� NC HWY 73 20' PAVED ROADWAY � TO WEST END � �� GRAU-350 $�F - - •� �F 2q R� CONC�HW RETAIN � � R� F F�-r-�- 25 �--�-- r�-� ---�WLB-�._�.- � � + � '� �'� � ,� � � '� � c- -. _ � E '� _ + 77.00 -L- \�, � � ,� � � � `� .� � � � + 6,20 30.00' (RT) � ,� ,� �/F � � ,� ,� � PU � 31, 0' 55.00' (RT) \ `� � .� � � \ + . 0 L� � `� � � �(= STR PAY RTEM P � � � .� ,� �= � .� � 55I.OQ� (RT)� � � �(= � .� � � � � O�D � `�' CLASS II RIP RAP CLASS I RIP RAP v� ,� „ v� .� `� � �• • +61.00 -L- -L- STA. �2 �- J�H.00 VIVIAN TUCKER HAMMOND '" EST. � To S`� � / �' APPROXIMATELY 90 TONS � ,Y � � � � +3fi.00 -L- GEOTEXTILE FABRIC STR. PAY ITEM L � +71.00 -L- 30.00' (RT) DB 230 PG 665 EST. 5 SYWOODS +50.00 -L- o� +43.00 -L- GRADE TO DRAIN 73.00' (RT) 55.00' (RT) 69.00' (RT) 55.00' (RT �� (RDWY PAY ITEM) 55.00 (RT) 69.00' (RT) BEGIN PROJECT B-5362 -L- STA. 12 + 95.00 30 00 (RT)L_ 68.00' (RT) �� 62.°° (RT) END PROJECT B-5362 -L- STA. 17 + 30.00 WOODS , 40.00' (RT) Hl H WATER MARK �' BEGIN SBG -L- STA. 13+88.00 LT. & RT. SAMMY & BILLIE HILL +00.00 -L- 68.00' (RT) ELEv 395.95 �� END SBG AT APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT. DB 719 PG 179 30.00' (RT) F OM FIELD OBSERVATION \� + 80.00 -L- 8�2��4 DROWNING CREEK 4 30.00' (RT) NOTEa PROPERTY LINE RUNS WITH THE CENTER OF DROWNING CREEK 55.00' (RT) � 68.00' (RT) / BMI ELEVATION = 396e00 SEE SHEET IC-I SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS