The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0084662_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20170509ti y Water Resources Environmental Quality Mr. Greg Simpson, Sr. Project Manager Textron, Inc. 40 Westminster St. Providence, Rhode Island 02903 Dear Mr. Simpson: May 9, 2017 ,J i u i l jEL ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN - 4 -gym Secretary . S. JAY ZRvB4ERMAN' Director RECE1VEDINCDE0jDWR MAY 1.5` 20V Nater Quality on Permitting SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Former Homelite/John Deer GW -Rem. NPDES Perrrlit NCO084662 Gaston County, NC On May 5, 2017, Edward Watson and Ori Tuvia of this office conducted an inspection at.the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) to insure compliance with' permit requirements and conditions. At the time -of the, inspections, the treatment system appeared to be well. maintained and operating. We wish to thank Mr. Jon Wakeman for his assistance during this inspection event. A copy of this inspection report will be forwarded to the facility's Operator -In- Responsible -Charge (ORC). The enclosed. report should be self-explanatory. However, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to myself or Edward Watson of this -office at (704) 2356-2198 or edward.watson@ncdenr.gov Sincerely, W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Enclosure: Inspection Report CC::Jon S. Wakeman, AECOM, 1600 Perimeter Park Dr.,'Suite 400, Morrisville, NC 27560-8421 �WasteWater Branch j MSC 1617 - Central files basement State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations. Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 704-663-1699 s Environmental Protection Agency United Sttashington, Form Approved. EPA D.C. 20460 Water Compliance Inspection Report OMB No. 2040-0057 Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: N ional Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/dby Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 N 2 15, 3 NC0084662 11 12 17/05/05 17 18 LCj 191sl 20I I 211 I I I. 1 I, 1 I .I 1. .1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11.6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evalua on Rating 61 QA 67 1.0 1.0 701 I L� 71 Lj 72 I ti I 1 73 � 74 71 LU 80 I- Section B: Facility. Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Us rs discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number) 01:OOPM 17/05/05 16/05/01 Textron remediation site Little Mtn Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Gastonia NC 28053 02:OOPM 17/05/05 20/08/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Official(fitle/Phone and Fex Number Contacted Christopher Milici,40 Westminister St Providence RI 029 32596/Manager No EHS/401-457-3576/4014576028' Section C: Areas Evaluate During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measuremer t' E Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports Self-Monitoring Progran Facility Site Revie fv. Effluent/Receiving WatE Laboratory - "- Section-D: Summary of Finding/Commgnts (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) gency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Edward Watson MRO GW/// Ori A Tuvia MRO WQ/1704-663-1699/ Sighature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date �. c -r�.�. P4c- b -V . -Ow— • ilk god EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94).Brevious editions are obsolete. Page# NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.) 31 NC0084662 I11 12 17/05/05 17 18 I r Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) On May 5, 2017, staff of the Mooresville Regional Office(MRO), performed a routine compliance inspection of the groundwater remediation system present at the Textron facility located in Gaston County. John Wakeman, ORC met MRO staff and reviewed the system and provided some site history of the chlorinated solvent plume being remediated. Apparently, this facilty had mulitple point sources due to leaking ASTs that were present at the facility. The remediation system was found to be in good condition and operating within the scope of the permit. Page# Permit: NCO084662 Owner - Facility: Textron remediation site Inspection Date: 05/05/2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit 4 Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less).. Has the.permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ application? ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the per it? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the genral public? ❑ ElEl Is the inspector granted access to all areas fo� inspection? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable Does the facility analyze process control pai Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other th Comment: General Housing keeping is. Effluent Pipe Is right of way to the outfall properly maintai Are the receiving water free of foam other tt If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are Comment: Access to the effluent pipe Inspection and Entry. usekeeping? Teeters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable are applicable? were i trace amounts and other debris? I operating properly? Record.Keepina Are records kept and maintained as requir d by the permit? Is all required information readily available complete and current? Are all records maintained for -3 years (lab reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data eported on DMRs? Is the chain -of -custody complete? Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individualperforming the* sam Ang Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Yes No NA NE ■' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ M ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ M ❑_ ❑ ❑ M ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes. No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 11 ❑ ❑ ❑. M ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ 01 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Comment: Records were availble for review. Only current data was reviewed during the site visit. Historic data was not reviewed. Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Permit: NCO084662 Owner - Facility: Textron remediation site ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection Date: 05/05/2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Record No--NA--NE -- Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑- ❑ N. (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operato ❑ ❑ E ❑ on each shift? - preservation rather than marking Not Preserved on the C.O.C. Is the ORC visitation log available and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification' ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑. ❑ ❑ Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Comment: Records were availble for review. Only current data was reviewed during the site visit. Historic data was not reviewed. Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the facility using a contract lab? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? EJ ❑ E ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/-1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ M ❑ Comment: A comment was made -to make sure that the C.O.C. reflects Ice being used as a method of preservation rather than marking Not Preserved on the C.O.C. Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? •❑ ❑ M ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume•collected? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ # Is proper temperature' set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees E . ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? ds the facility sampling performed as, required by the permit (frequency, sampling type ® ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: Page# 4 ON