20170568 Ver 1_401 Application_20170509

1017 Main Campus Dr, Suite 1200 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 • 919-582-5859 • fax [phone]
May 5, 2017
INC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
www.freese.com
201 76566
Re: Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for Donna Road Storm Drain Improvements Project in Raleigh,
NC
To Whom It May Concern,
Enclosed is the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for the Donna Road Storm Drain Improvements
project located in Raleigh, NC. The project is being undertaken by the City of Raleigh to improve safety
and prevent erosion and undermining of a City -maintained road and adjacent private driveways along a
residential street located in northeast Raleigh. The following items are enclosed:
• Four (4) copies of the PCN and backup documentation
• 2 copies of 11 x 17 Plan Sheets and 2 copies of Full Size Plan Sheets
• Application fee of $240.00
If you have any questions or need additional copies of these documents I can be reached at 919-418-
8430 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Ian Jewell
Environmental Scientist
Freese & Nichols, Inc.
cc: r"_'
Susan Locklear, PE, City of Raleigh Engineering Services
2017
9

f
O�0� W A TF9OG
0 Nii� -t
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW3, 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑x Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yesx❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Donna Road Storm Drain Improvemen
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
3.
-0,17-
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A p _
Owner Information & UFF R p MIR S
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
City of Raleigh
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A- Project is in City of Raleigh Street Right of Way
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3801 - 3808 Donna Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27604
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

_V
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agentx❑ Other, specify: Local government- City of Raleigh
4b. Name:
Blair Hinkle
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh Engineering Services
4d. Street address:
127 W. Hargett St., 8th Floor
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
4f. Telephone no.:
919-996-3940
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Ian Jewell
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
5c. Street address:
1017 Main Campus Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone no.:
919-418-8430
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Tax Pin:
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.826943 Longitude: -78.574002
1 c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Unnamed Tributary to Marsh Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project is located in a medium density residential area and runs along Donna Road. The project encompasses repair and up-sizing of failing pipe
culverts that are undersized and have been damaged by recent storms. Project also includes ditched portion of stream that runs parallel to Donna
Rd and is eroding and is threatening to undermine the the road as well as residential driveway access across the stream.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 208.0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to repair and replace portions of the existing culvert network adjacent to Donna Rd. in order to increase size to
adequately handle stormflows and also to extend the culvert through existing stream channel in order to prevent undermining of Donna Rd. and
provide safety for adjacent landowners and vehicles traveling along Donna Rd.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached narrative.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): James Graham
Agency/Consultant Company: NCDEQ
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Februrary 23, 2014
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes x❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑x Streams —tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3.- Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Marsh Creek
PER
Corps
9
107
S2 P
Dissipater basin
UT to Marsh Creek
PER
Corps
12
27
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
134
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑x Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 T
Bank stabilization grading.
Unnamed tributary to Marsh Creek
No
310
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
310
6i. Comments: Stream banks and riparian area to be re -vegetated after installation of new headwall and outfall.
Page 5 of 10

-. Y
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimized the proposed impacts to existing stream channel to maximum possible extent to meet public safety needs adjacent to Donna Rd. Several options for bank
stabilization were considered, and extension of culvert through stream channel was considered necessary protect public safety, to provide clear zone adjacent to road
and help remove unsafe condition for residents. At downstream end of project, rip -rap basin downstream of outfall is added to dissipate energy from the culvert and
thereby prevent erosion of downstream stream banks and channel bed.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion control measures will be installed in the channel during construction to prevent downstream suspension of sediments. Measures will include surface water
diversion through pump -around , a check dam structure to trap sediments within the work area and prevent mobilization of sediment downstream, and a sediment pump and
sediment bag to remove sediment from any water that is pumped downstream. Erosion control fabric and vegetation will be placed on channel banks to prevent future
erosion. Silt fence will be used on upland areas including around stockpile areas to prevent sediment -laden flows from reaching stream during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitiplation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
E]Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

IF
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Proposed work impacts existing culvert and immediate downstream channel. There are no other
❑ Yes ❑X No
structures, impervious surfaces or built -upon area planned adjacent to or within the buffer which will
discharge stormwater and therefore require a diffuse flow plan.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project does not increase built -upon area/impervious surface and will therefore not produce additional stormwater runoff for which a stormwater
managment plan would be required. Exception are several storm drain inlets which will be installed above the proposed culvert to provide roadside
drainage.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Raleigh
❑x Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑x No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
ElCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
E] Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑x No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑x Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes x❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑x No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional development will be created as part of the project, with the exception of a new headwall at the downstream end of the existing culvert
and rip -rap dissipater basin placed in the bed of the channel. It is not anticipated that either of these measures will impact nearby downstream water
quality. The existing stream channel is currently incised and eroding adjacent to Donna Rd. and it is expected that the project will remove the erosion
and significantly increase vehicle and pedestrian safety.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes X[] No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the I ISFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes 0 No
impacts?
5c. if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
GIS data of NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrences, US Fish and Wildlife Service IpAC tool.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
GIS data
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
El Yes Q No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Office GIS data
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping program Flood Risk Information System. Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel # 1725
S- L N� T,>- 14 { 1_ V- �- G�
r
^�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant Isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

ATTACHMENTS
Narrative Description of Project
Photo Log
DWR Stream Identification Form
Figure 1- Vicinity Map
Figure 2- USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3- Published NRCS Soils Map
Figure 4- Project Delineation Map
DWR Stream/Buffer Determination Letter

Donna Rd Storm Drain Improvements Project
Narrative Description of Project
The purpose of the Donna Rd. Storm Drain Improvements Project is to 1) improve safety for
vehicular traffic along Donna Rd and across two residential driveways that cross an existing small
stream channel, and 2) to protect the infrastructure of the city -maintained Donna Rd. and
residential driveways by reducing erosion that threatens to undermine the roadway and
driveways. The site consists of a small, perennial stream channel that is incised and channelized
between two residential driveway crossings and flows immediately adjacent to Donna Rd., a
residential street located in northeast Raleigh, NC. The stream originates in the project site after
coming out of a storm drain that runs adjacent to and crosses under Donna Rd. The two driveway
crossings consist of existing culverts. The stream is deeply incised and is eroding both towards
the driveway crossings and towards Donna Rd., There are a few individual hardwood trees
located on the banks of the stream. A new 36" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) is proposed to
replace the existing pipe crossing and concrete junction boxes under Donna Rd. for approximately
35 linear feet. Another 42" RCP will replace the existing driveway crossings and the existing
stream bed between the two driveway crossings for approximately 173 linear feet. Of this length,
approximately 107 linear feet will impact existing streambed while 66 feet will replace existing
culverts. The proposed culvert is necessary to maximize safety of the residents traveling over the
driveway crossings and along Donna Rd. The City is undertaking the project in response to
resident concerns over safety and, after consideration of several alternatives, a new culvert was
considered the safest and most practical solution given the narrow constraints between the
stream channel, roadway and hillside on the residential properties. The stream runs entirely within
City Right of Way for the length of the project.
In addition to the new culvert, a riprap basin is proposed below the outfall of the new culvert which
will consist of a dissipater pool. This basin is necessary to ensure energy from stormflows is
dissipated, which will help protect the existing streambanks and streambed downstream.
Equipment used to construct the project will consist of grading equipment such as excavators and
dump trucks. Erosion control measures will be used in the channel and overbank areas during
construction to prevent release of sediments downstream. This will include the use of surface
water diversion through pump -around, impervious dikes and sediment bags.

Donna Road Storm Drain Improvements
Photo Log
Photo 1. Looking upstream at the second (downstream) driveway crossing culvert. This will be
replaced with a 42" RCP with a rip -rap dissipater basin located downstream.
Photo 2. Looking at the streambed of the channel downstream of the second driveway
crossing.

Photo 3. Looking downstream past project boundary at existing stream channel.
Photo 4. Looking upstream from 2nd driveway crossing towards 1 st driveway crossing.
Proposed culvert will extend through existing channel between driveway crossings to increase
safety for residents.

Photo 5. Looking downstream at second (downstream) driveway crossing and existing culvert
underneath driveway.
Photo 6. Looking downstream at existing stream channel between two driveway crossings
along Donna Rd.
3

Photo 7. Looking into existing stream channel between two driveway crossings along Donna
Wei

_ e
Y
i
,. • i r sr ..,,t, r ., e
-e1J�,. S} �•: .fit a l:eet' � ��: `.i
6T
'- Ex4s}tAng Culvert from
Across Ro,ald
kt

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1/19/2017
Project/Site: Donna i Improvements Storm DrainLatitude:
35.826943
Evaluator: ICJ
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.574002
Total Points: (� �j
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent v , .J
Ephemeral terry Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2: 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geonnor holo (Subtotal = 11 * 0 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0��
0.5
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C 2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
<Z__�
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
1
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = T75
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= B )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 <:Z::H:D 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0. 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes = 3
0.5
0.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= h )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
23. Crayfish
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

utner
Creed in oor
Burlington I lebane
oro Hillsborough
Durham Wa
Forest
Chapel
Hill
Libi rty I;
,t
Cary Ralek,', Knighttlal
Sil er
City Apert
Pi ttsboro
Garner
Holly
Springs Clay to
LSA Rd i.ee Hd ^7 04
P` !l Fu FIGURE 1
A
� Gusty Ln w<; V
Sur Lit- D, Sur Elfen Dr 01dV r,
CITY OF RALEIGH
a
DONNA ROAD CULVERT REPAIR
t,' p R • y
VICINITY MAP
° BYtlnSoe R !T
0' Legend
Sur In
u Raleigh County
5° City Limits Boundaries
` m n ponnand � DAnnaRd Sanford
Wby Cr %ni Dr Memory Ln MAu Y Lu ''vr .
r:m y. Ln r-----1 Wake County
"ara stWmounr nrnr eNd j ___ Boundary Project Site
0 2,100a ,"k Rd HannCOAkRd Lillin 0 36,000
e
SCALA IN FEET
a M9nftl�IrrKP° k, SCALE IN FEET
apmy n is pen r ap con ri u ors, ser ommun y

i
'x
I � ►
.ars
r
irA
IM
ow
`? 0 300 600
�`• Feet
#CopyrighY0 0W Nva
N
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Donna Road
FIGURE 2
1017 Main Campus Dr
Repair
91111 NICHOLS Raleigh, 27603
Raleigh, NC
Raleigh,N
Z 919-582-5850
8

.. e
y
!�. � t", ate. • � - �y {/�� / . � G
�C �V
r ,t
f
I low IL
711
fYea''
� f
mar
fo
4 {A�4 rpt • _ _ d w � �yV "`"" .ax.
L .
c

FIGURE 4
N
LEGEND
Stream
Existing Contours
1-1�1 Project Area
-,Surrounding
L-- ! Parcels
CITY OF RALEIGH
DONNA ROAD
CULVERT REPAIR
DELINEATION
MAP
0 32.5 65
11111E� Feet

Ap
KDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
March 18, 2015
City of Raleigh
Susan Locklear
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRO# 15-073
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Start@
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
USGS
[1 Isolated Wetland Determination
[:1 Jordan (15A NCAC 26 .0267)
To
Project Name:
3803 Donna Rd
Location/Directions: Property is located at 3803 Donna Rd in Raleigh, NC
Subject Stream: Marsh Creek
Determination Date: February 23, 2014 Staff: James Graham
Feature
Not
Subject
E/1/P*
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
/Flag
Subject
To
Survey
Topo
To
Buffers
Buffers
A
X
I
X
X
*E/l/P - Ephemeral/intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
NCarolina
oJl�Wura!!r,
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality_org Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

3803 Donna Rd
Wake County
March 18, 2015
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact James Graham at [phone]
Respectfully, !
J l
Danny Smith upervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO/SWP File Copy

R
v
The City of Raleigh
STORMINATER MANAGEMENT
DIVISION
CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR
DONNA ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
MARCH 2017
lrFREESE
omil'WIlICHOLS
1017 Main Campus Dave, Suite 1200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27505
Phone - [phone]
Fo. - (www) 582-5851
Web
RAL16101
I�
OF DRAWINGS
�m
SHT. N0. DESCRIPTION
e�
c
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
MARCH 2017
lrFREESE
omil'WIlICHOLS
1017 Main Campus Dave, Suite 1200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27505
Phone - [phone]
Fo. - (www) 582-5851
Web
RAL16101
MAY 92017. I
'.no F'nm C-3916
PRE -FINAL SUBMITTAL
INDEX
OF DRAWINGS
SEll
SHT. N0. DESCRIPTION
GENERAL
COVER
#############
CIVIL
1
C-1
SURVEY CONTROL
2
C-2
STORM DRAIN PLAN AND PROFILE
C-3
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
C-4
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
TAI
DT -1
STANDARD DETAILS
DT -2
STANDARD DETAILS
DT -3
STANDARD DETAILS
DT -4
STANDARD DETAILS
DT -5
STANDARD DETAILS
DT -6
STANDARD DETAILS
MAY 92017. I
'.no F'nm C-3916
PRE -FINAL SUBMITTAL

v
ALLISON Y KING I JOSHUA GRAY TALLEY U
THOMAS MARSHALL LOT 11 LOT 12&13 LL
L07 9&10 I D.B.15186. PG 1768
D. B. 14969. PG.641 a
.154 41, PG.2071 RM.1962, PG."' B.M.1962. PG.199
D.8c c
B. M.196 PG. 199\ I P.I.N. 7725.11-66-3300 P.I.N. 1725.11-66-4350
P.I.N. 1725.1 6-1351
i a
u c
TEMPORARYC\ DAM
WITH PUMP AND SILT BAGS
38.00LF OF 42" RCP O 0.50 �% 53 F OF 42" RCP O .08 _ - _ -
uz
j - - 82.00LF OF 42" RCP O 2.40 - -
- - c
REMOVE EX 40" CULVERT --- - - - - - - - o
/ ` '----- REMOVE EX 40" CULVERT - - r 1! `
STA 1+73.00 ------_, o
-- - - c
-- -
1N DROP
- --- -Vj
T-
INLET
756195.77
/D =
NSE 1) N o
E=2126360.38
-- _
. ----`E
INV IN:288.35 36" ^�
INV OUT:287.85 42" - E
R MO X 4 E c�
4.791E OF 36 RCP O 16.10 o '� / --- • /G --- -. .. N6
U RT
_ oma t
-- -
w w W---_--- W ____--�_ W ___--___ W W W W_- Vy T----- W ci..vs
_. w __ _.. __ _ W - W -____ ___-_-- - --____ _ .I
W - ___ w -_ -__ W W'--- __ - nLc
DONNA RD BEGIN STORM DRAIN ALIGNMENT __ _ __ _-_----- - -- 02 • o
w --
I
_ -- -- .78
- - - - --- - ---.---�- -- -- - STA 0+91.00 - STA 2+: n�
- - INSTALL: - ss ss -- ss --- ss -------
-- -
- -- s------
- INSTALL: \\
--- -- - - - - ----------- - �- _ -3/DT-
/ � -- i -HEADWALL
- -- -- - - - 1 -DROP INLET -- ss -- - - ss�--- ss
--- -- s s (SEE DETAIL 1/DT-1) Z
___ s ss SEE DETAIL 3 D7 1
�s -- ss ---- ss - ----s SS --- ss s ( / ) o N=7ss1 so.99
STA 0+38.00 N=756198.25 = E=2126359.42 W W
END STORM DRAIN ALIGNMENT INSTALL: E=2126278.42 -------_ - ___-_ 'G -- ----
G ---� G - c c---- _J
INSTALL: N� DROP
7561E99 863/DT-1) / INV OUT85 88 4"2" -� - �- G -- -. s _ W L�
- - -- - _ - - G -- -- INV IN:293.95 36" /
c - - - G
STA
OLIT:2 -HEADWALL 2126225.45 - - = F/v _ _
N ,
INV OUT:284.59 42" - so
% _
1 INV IN•284.78 42" � _�' � •-- _ _--�'�' 1-� ��� __ �
INV OUT:284.78 42"
-
/�
SSA IRO TIO
DORO�ATONA
-
10TiZ__rD.8.225,PG.1716
BM1962PG.47
1725.1 1-66-4002
iLUAR III HENDERSON J Q
LLJ
711,1-� LOT 14 Q
Z
DONrWAYNE HUFF AN D.B. 14285, PG.2425 Q
47 PG
1962
M
.., .
LOT is&16 Bo p Of ' J
D. B.5971, PG.298 P.I.N. 1725.11-66-3003
B.M.1962, PG.47
P.LN. 1725.11-66-1037 - \ I } L N
U Z
-VT4U VtVV
02, 2017 - 5:35Dm User: h
U + Z)U
Z+VU
60% SUBMITTAL
O
i
(
325
--- - - ---� --- -- - --- ROADWAY
-
p
325
EOP
Q
320PROFILE
Z
H
320
Z
END STORM DRAIN ALIGNMENT EX UTILTIY BEGIN STORM DRAIN ALIGNMENT
p
315
STA 0+00.00 EL = 296.50 STA 2+07.78
FIELD VERIFY INSTALL:
INSTALL: ( ( )
315
0 w
N_
m a
�310
o
_
1 -HEADWALL _ _ _ EX WL INV N HEADWALL293 95 36"
INV OUT:284.59 42" FL EL = 294.75
z
N
310
305
ROADWAY EX UTILITY (FIELD VERIFY)
-- EDP -- _ - - EL = 296.50 TOP HEADWALL
305
I
LL �
300
PROFILE (FIELD VERIFY) = 298 38 TOP OF PIPE = 297.02
00
c
ai
300
TOP HEADWALL
OCV
- -_----- --
- _ = - -
_
295
= 289.49
- - i s
- - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � PIPE INVERT = 293.62
I � - - �
0c
ON
295
TOP OF PIPE
L J
cow
c0
290
= 288.46
_ _
7 --'
' - BOTTOM HEADWALL = 292.71
290
_.3 N
O E!'
maw
285
285
PIPE INVERT
EX GAS LINE
280
= 284.59
C-2
SEQ.
FL EL = 289.80
280
BOTTOM HEADWALL
5 LF 36" RC (FIELD VERIFY)
275
= 283.29
1 1 Ex SS
275
38 LF 42" RC
53 LF 42" RC
2 LF 42 RC
FL EL = 290.89
270
0
® .40%
(FIELD VERIFY)
270
EX FOC
265
FL EL = 296.00
265
(FIELD VERIFY)
260
260
255
255
250
250
245
245
240
240
235
j
235
-VT4U VtVV
02, 2017 - 5:35Dm User: h
U + Z)U
Z+VU
60% SUBMITTAL
O
N
p
p
Q
O
Z
H
Z
p
0 w
N_
m a
o
z
N
a
i a4
I
LL �
00
c
ai
OCV
c0H
0c
ON
L J
cow
c0
�
O
�L
YICN
_.3 N
O E!'
maw
P!0
SHEET
C-2
SEQ.
2

0
0
r I
n
dA3XV
MtlaM
_ � atlou
D I
0
O
U)
C
Cu
D
r
n END
LJ ROAD WORK
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
North Carolina Reoistered Enaineedno Firm C-3916
U) UI N0. ISSUE BY I DATE E8N JOB 110.
o m RAI -16101- CITY OF RALEIGH
DAR APR 2017
DONNA RD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FREESE
(7 DESIGNED NICHOLS
DRAWN KAC1017 Main Campus Drive, Suite 1200
REVISED STORMWATER am
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone — [phone]
VERIFY SCALE Bar is one inch on original GNEGKED 8MD Fa. - [phone]
0 1 drawing. If not one inc on FIFE "AME web - www.o-eese.com
this sheet, adjust scale. SW-RAL-PL-TRAF01.dwg TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN

5'-4"
8" 4'-0" 8"
00
I
I
a
00
STANDARD DROP INLET
3/4"=1 '
GRATE PER CITY STANDARDS
USE STD. SW -10.08 OR SE -10.09.
NOTES:
1. FOR 24" RCP & LARGER USE PIPE
DIAMETER PLUS 12" FOR MINIMUM
INSIDE DIAMETER.
2. 24"x24" CASTING WITH 12",15"&18
24"x36" CASTING USED WITH 24" PIPE
OR LARGER. IF PLACED WITHIN PUBLIC
R/W CASTING MUST BE TRAFFIC BEARING
TYPE PER NCDOT STANDARDS.
3. USE 4"x4"x8" OR 4"x8"x16" SOLID
CONCRETE BLOCK. CAST IN PLACE OR
PRECAST CONCRETE TO MEET NCDOT
STANDARDS ACCEPTABLE.
4, FOR STEP REQUIREMENT; SEE NOTE 2
ON STANDARD SW -10.13.
ADJUST TO TOP
OF �-
Z
N
1/2" PLASTER j
J
m
Q
a
8" MINIMUM, OVER 8' DEEP
12" MINIMUM UP TO 6'
FROM TOP OF CURB
Q
N
'0 d
3000 PSI CONCRETE' -lot
8"• 4'-0" 8-
5,-4"
�z1 STANDARD DROP INLET - SECTION VIEW
3/4"=1'
60% SUBMITTAL
dwo
W!3 s
N
W= N$
MID
m�
m s
�rca,°3
z
W
W
O
Of
cl- Lf)
: J
Q
Z w
w Q w 0
J
< ch H
Q
O
O
U z
O Q
N V)
IC)
Z
z
O
o= s a m rn
O W Y m 0
_ N
Q o
0
i
5�
3
N
00
C
OVO
O C 0
c 0 0
0 cV;
Oy
L J
COV
-CO
CW�
— y
O
c
yCy
0 0._
Ln
0
SHEET
DT -1
SEQ.

wx
GRATE PER CITY STANDARDS
USE STD. SW -10.08 OR SE -10.09 I I N0.3 REBAR 3' O.C. I . g
PLACED 3' FROM
GROUT FRAME EDGE, ALL SIDES. -"
TO SLAB TOP S
3'-6"
_ NOTES: I o
1 — _ — 1. FOR 24" PIPE 8 LARGER USE
1\IIII u'
=1111 ,ni�llll Il�I%II PIPE DIAMETER PLUS IYFOR
1111\ MINIMUM INSIDE DIMENSION.
1/2" PLASTER �
f~ 2'-0" —�I I I o� °' • 1111 I z
ADJUST TO TOP °. CLA 'A' CONCRETE ,• • . °. O 2. USE 4" X 4" X 8" OR 4" X 8" X 16" $
OF BRICK SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK. CAST ��
2,A, IN PLACE OR PRECAST CONCRETE 0
1/'2" PLASTER 2' MIN. TO MEET NCDOT STANDARDS ( W=
ACCEPTABLE. W fr2
W 3' MAX. �� c F'�i' m o
8' MINIMUM; OVER 8' DEEP, e MINIMUM, OVER aDEEP w
m 3. FOR STEP REQUIREMENTS,
' ' ° < 1Y MINIMUM UP TO V SEE NOTE #2 ON STANDARD
12- MINIMUM UP TO 6' �i
a ar+• w 8
° . Q FROM TOP OF CURB •• •° 2 NO SW -10.13. E
FROM TOP OF CURB. ' ° ° ° > I o • • R I o °�S? ►
!°.o iiIs
iw
e °
° 3000 PSI CONCRETE . ° • ° •�•° •
3000 PSI CONCRETE° o • " • • n • o ° :• O ° iI °e I
°. •° CONCRETE SLAB TOP I LJ_I
• .. .. � 4.� —moi
F— 8".i-�-- 3,-0" — I - 8"+{ T-6'
4'-4" I W
CLASS"A'CONCRETE I O
J
NOTES: I I I
1. FOR 24" RCP $ LARGER USE I I I Q
PIPE DIAMETER PLUS 12" FOR I I CD Z W
MINIMUM INSIDE DIMENSION. I 4�E I Q L
2. 24' X 24" CASTING WITH 12", I I I I 3 W
J
Bo
15"& 18" PIPE, 24"X 36" Q I I I L� �
CASTING USED WITH 24" PIPE O O Z
OR LARGER. IF PLACED WITHIN I I I I — — — I I v1 Q
PUBLIC RNV CASTING MUST BE I 1 LL — — — U c)
O
TRAFFIC BEARING TYPE PER Z
NCDOT STANDARDS.
m
I I F-
- I I I N
3. USE 4"X4"X8"OR 4"X8"X16" NO.3 REBAR 3"O.C.
SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK. CAST PLACED 3" FROM 0
Y Y 9 4 IN PLACE OR PRECAST CONCRETE TO I I – EDGE, ALL SIDES.
a oina
MEET N.C.D.O.T. STANDARDS
ACCEPTABLE. Q
4. FOR STEP REQUIREMENT; SEE NOTE
YN O
2 ON STANDARD SW -10.13. Z0
0
m I T-0" —� I I I o w Y m a
CITY OF RALEIGH ;o 3'1" -� CITY OF RALEIGH o
■ 4'-4" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT m < o o
REVISIONS DATE 911113 NOT TO STALE 144"� REVISIONS D4TE:47/13 NOT TO SCALE
0
w I
DTANDINRD I STANDARD
ROP JUNCTION BOX I 4 N
SW -10.03 SW -10.04 0 o
CNN
OCz
ON
L J
� 00
•-C O
N
A, C— y
0,12
N_C_rA
N
Q70«
W�
Q
U
VI
z >O
SHEET
DT -2
60% SUBMITTAL SEQ.
Date: May 02. 2017 – 5:36om User: KAC File: N:\SW\Drowinas\SW–RAL–DT–SDET02.dwo

i
V
E
iW
DRIVEWAY GRADES
8
EXISTING
OR
Vic
MONOLITHIC 6" POUR OF 3000 psi
CONCRETE IN RIGHT-OF-WAY.
PROPOSED
DRIVE WAY SIDEWALK I
W A
W gym_
PAVEMENT GUTTER LINE /APRON
�iwy
+2.08% �111�1114 9%.
I
o a�X
EXPANSION JOINTr
111_111 =III=
V:a
`_
PIPE CULVERT - SEE NOTE t
,
"+9.6%
15�
0
�•
RAN
RNV
?5%
2' 6.5' 6' * 5'
5'
V)
5' MIN
~
RADIUS T.B.D. BY STREET
I
I
Z
OF DITCH — - — -
— _ _ DESIGN MANUAL
* 5' FOR SENSITIVE AREA AVENUE
LLJ
AND SENSITIVE AREA RESIDENTIAL STREET
LI J
EDGE OF SHOULDER
�
A. CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK SECTION
O
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
I
I
Ln
O J
(Y Q
MAIN ROADWAY
~
PAVEMENT
=~
2 Zw
Z w
--—-_-—-—-—-—
-—-—-—-—-—-
—-—-—-— - — - — -—
VARIABLE 6' 8' 5'
Q
w
PAVEMENT WIDTH SHOULDER
51°
Q
QOM
WIDTH
Y4"/FT +16°lo
O
O Z
08%
�_ �
V) O Q
NOTES:
+8°�
Y4" PER FT. -2.08R
2
O
I
111-111=111-
O
N Z
1. PIPE TO BE RCP OR HDPE AND SIZED TO CARRYI
-8.33%
I
A
THE DESIGN FLOW OF TE24-HOUR
OR"/FT /�8�
^
STORM E ENTHT EI MINIMUM ACCEPFOR
TABLE
1
V '
��/1
PIPE SIZE IS 15' IF THE DESIGN FLOW WOULD REQUIRE
A SMALLER PIPE.
?S%
Lu y
I
S
C)
WITH UNPAVED ROADSIDE DITCH
2. 1Y MINIMUM COVER OVER PIPE MEASURED FROM
of
TOP OF PAVEMENT.
5' MIN.
3. STEEPER SLOPES CAN BE ALLOWED WHERE SPECIAL
Q
(SEE NOTE 3)
LOW POINT
NOTE 4)
STABILIZATION IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
I
B. SHOULDER SECTION
Z
DRIVEWAY
(SEE
/
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ORDINANCE.
Z
4. USE 5' ERTICAL CURVE FOR TRANSITION.
O
5. SEE CITY OF RALEIGH STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND I
Q
MGMS3�_
VEWAY CCESS HANDBOOK FOR COMMERCIAL
_,
C
DRIVEWAYS.DR
n
O W
Y
m
E tpp�' 6. NO EXPOSED AGGREGATE OR OTHER SPECIAL SURFACE
S`�5
(SEE NOTE 2) 4.1
SHOULDER
SLOPE
TREATMENTS IN RIGHT OF WAY
I I
NOTE:
o J
o
<
o
(1'/Fr.)
IF THE SLOPE BETWEEN THE TOP OF CURB AND GUTTER
x N
(SEE NOTE 1)
CITY OF RALEIGH
AND A POINT 30 FEET FROM THE CURB AND GUTTER
CITY OF RALEIGH
;,
I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXCEEDS 20%, THIS SLOPE SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
U
I
MAXIMUM OF 8.33% ( 1"/FT) UP OR 4.17% (1/2" /FT)
REVISIONS DATE. 911113 NOT TOSC4LE
DOWN. REVISIONS
DATE. 911113 NorroscuE
W
RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
INSTALLATION ON NON
I
DRIVEWAY GRADES
CURB & GUTTERED STREETS
I
5 o
T-10.03
T-10.04
ocV
OCr
ON
L J
-CO
O N
�L
Q0 T
O._
m Oms
W"
V
}N
4
Z
W
>O
SHEET
DT -3
60% SUBMITTAL
SEQ.
Dote: May 02, 2017 - 5:36om User: KAC File: N:\SW\Drawings\SW-RAL-DT-SDET03.dwo

S1I`d134 42i`daNb'1S 6MP'40130S-10-1V8-MS 'apps lsnfpo 'laaLls siyl
---j-- O.M 3NVN 3113 UO gou! auo l00 11 '6ulMDJp l 10
ISHS-LHS (6l6) - •O3 OY18 03MAH3 IOD!DUO UO youi allO Si Jog 31YOS AJIN3A
OS9S-LHS (616) - •U04d
909LZ 0-4-3 MI.ON 'ARION 03SP3a
OOZI .l!nS •a!jo sndwoo upVt uOl b3lVMW80lS
NMVtlO
S1N3W3A08dh1 NIV80 W2i01S Qd b'NNOo �IOZ a V w�
H0131V8 Jo u10 10191 tla a
'ON HOP M 31V0 .1B 3nsSl ONJO In
wyJ 6uytt. U3 P.wlMatl agaOO VUON
'-ul 'MWOIN Pu.. J
-O-N `H0131VU M3)4S .06 - 3did „8v nHH1 „S G m TM
u.
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIa S1113Ain0 3dId man0a (INVo
NOI1b1HOdSNba1 30 '1d30 3'19NIS a0d llVMaN3 313HONOD T °D
dN I lOadO H1dON W co)
30 31b1S d03 ONIMbba aHbaNVIS HSIl9N3 y DO
2 r.
-
J X
11J �
d r
Z
O
D co)
Wcr
Q
V CL L
0 4b
2
M
Q
W
O
J wg -co LU
N le t
O J�O�
Z
\�l 8a ILL, 1 NCL Mo Lu
-T o4,�£ m W
J
01 a� 0
zUA
/ W
W Q W
oaco
>LL H 00 1
ui M m
800
w
W W Q 0 w
2
fn
V J W W
W
ami v z +�
Z 0
H 0
H
U.
lL M
II
I
v --
- I
- -I-
ol Zo o
0
�I >
d I W
I z W
I J
--I I o
— a
o
v
I
I
STATE OF11-12 ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR co TM
NORTH CAROLINA CONCRETE ENDWALL FOR SINGLE o
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DOUBLE PIPE CULVERTS T co
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Wcq
RALEIGH, N.C. 15" THRU 48" PIPE - 900 SKEW x w
•
N
m
O
O
N
W
�
d
V
X
W
O
W
W
#
Y
N
ic1
1
ip
1
o
I
m
1
0
N
J
N
a
x
v
N
a
W
N
P
In
O
O
O
co
(p
W
�
1
N
N
K�
1
�
Icy
I't
N
F
F
C
M
r.
o
m
d
O
o
a�
C
d
T
�
X
O
N
C7
�
W
J
Z
t0
a'
O
N
=
�
m�
W
�
d
W
x
O
m
N
01
e
N
r
N
N
C9
T
o
o����
T
T
T
T
O
0
V
�
r
T
T
T
CZ
r
O
X
N
r
N
N
r
M
N=
0
N
N
��
W
to
V
W
X
�
T
v
O
1
O
O�
1
m
I
Q
I
N
1
O
Z
N
l+/
V
V'
IA
tD
N
m
X
W
r
m
m
I
H
b
1
`
r
M
N
N
N
O
3
J
i
Y
N
P
N
N
W �
GD
N
�
_
i�
ih
x
a
I
v
m
=
W
a
O
in
r
m
T
it
N
CrJ
a0
co
CV
�
m
�
z
to O
ch
N
x
0
1
N
�
r
m
X
N
1
N
Co
_
W
X
N
1
N
01
Lu
Q
O
Y
Y
Y
m
CL D�
O
d
O
CJ
0
t7
i
C7
J
1(�
O
O
d
1"I
W
�
r
ic1
1
ip
1
o
I
m
1
0
J
N
g
N
P
In
O
O
O
co
(p
W
�
1
N
N
I
Cq
1
�
1n
T
1
tp
F
F
a�
r.
o
m
o
a�
C
T
T
N
ai
v
m
�
W
w
W
J
Z
t0
a'
O
N
=
�
m�
W
�
d
W
M
�%
O
m
O
01
e
r
r
o
v
m
o
o����
T
T
T
T
O
0
V
�
r
T
T
T
T
r
N
M
N=
N
N
��
W
to
v
O
1
N
1
O�
1
m
I
Q
I
N
1
O
Z
N
l+/
V
V'
IA
tD
1�
m
m
O
r
m
m
I
T
1
b
1
r
1
N
N
N
O
lrJ
=
co
P
N
p
GD
N
Qi
i�
ih
a
ip
in
io
m
O
in
r
m
T
it
N
CrJ
a0
co
CV
�
m
�

ME
1 1.
CIO
OD m M3NS 006 - 3dId „9t, nUHl „5L '7'N `H0131VU
N Sla3 w 3dId 318110a aNd SAbMHJIH 30 NOISIAIa
NOIldlaOdSNVHI d0 'ld3a
310NIS a0d 11VMaN3 313HONOD VNI10ab0 HlaON
W BOA 91"llm Ia aabaNblS HSIION3 d0 31VIS
i
I
O
0
f '
IF _ L�
n
M
co
M - I
! I�
M
N O
O Z
Z C-
I '
O p II
z I
r I ,
I
1
1-_
1
M
A" S
O �
w
R Uzi O
W o H
zi I.D. + 12"
w D
w
C i
Z O rt1
ITI
m 3 �� i
a
�n
CA
Z
THICK M. THICK
10" Fie-�15"
W
r
0
M
N
M
z
v
A n
-i
M
N v
0
z
0 p Z
X r
` 119.12
Qpm ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR STATE OF
N CONCRETE ENDWALL FOR SINGLE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
AND DOUBLE PIPE CULVERTS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
w 15" THRU 48" PIPE - 90 SKEW RALEIGH, N.C.
OD
N
W
O
A
1
1
0
O
N
N
A
A
r
�
V
I
1
=
C,
O
O
�
�
�
C
�
_
N
�
N
X
OD
Z
O
Of
N�
A
W
N
N
�
W
Z�
GAS
M
CD
i
N
N
W
s=
w
s
W
X
C.0
w=j
s
s
s
s
V
N
VI
INi
9
�
0
n
1
A
p
1
A
1
0
A
i
0�
r
z
r
-1
z
W
rt1
m
m
v
m
A
W
N
N
i
1
O
•�
�
(n
m�
Oo
O
A
O
`I
O
m
=
N
M
�j
N
�
_
m
_
m
z
r
i
i
�
N
1
w
K
W
_
1
o
1
w
I
a�
I
m
1
o
W
i
v�
N
w
_
r
o
m
w
m
t0
V
A
N
O
CD
,
r
�
N r N
X
N
r
m
i
N
N i N
X
m
=
W
A
V
UI
1p
N
i
9
M
m
-
N
O
CO
V
m
jV
0
�
�
CV N W
X
Fres and Nichols, Inc.
North Carolino Fisaistsrs0 Enoinssrin9 Firm C-3916
N 0 ND. ISSUE BY PATE 1&11 " W.
"o m RAL16101 CITY OF RALEIGH
0� a� D 20M7D DONNA RD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Mr
oaawN KAC STORMWATER 1017 Main Compus Dr,, Suite 1200
LTIREVISED p^Q^g&h, N(919)C582-5850
VERIFY SCALE Bar is one inch on original aeCKED BMD Fo. — [phone]
0 1 drawing. H not one ins on FILE NAME web — rww.hrsess.cam
this sheet, adjust stole. SW-RAL-DT-SDE705.dwg STANDARD DETAILS
r
O
r
m
N
1
N
K
tlt
m
N
�
N
X
OD
N
�
W
w
X
A
A
w
W
X
C.0
w=j
�z�
X
W
rt1
M
m
rw,
=
N
M
�j
N
�
_
_
m
z
O
1
w
K
W
_
m
N
N
w
_
r
�
M
N
N r N
X
N
i
N
N i N
X
m
=
W
A
�
W i W
X
9
-
m
�
CV N W
X
O
X
�
M
V
�
N
w
m
N
�
s
X71 N GT
X
N
�
N
+
Fres and Nichols, Inc.
North Carolino Fisaistsrs0 Enoinssrin9 Firm C-3916
N 0 ND. ISSUE BY PATE 1&11 " W.
"o m RAL16101 CITY OF RALEIGH
0� a� D 20M7D DONNA RD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Mr
oaawN KAC STORMWATER 1017 Main Compus Dr,, Suite 1200
LTIREVISED p^Q^g&h, N(919)C582-5850
VERIFY SCALE Bar is one inch on original aeCKED BMD Fo. — [phone]
0 1 drawing. H not one ins on FILE NAME web — rww.hrsess.cam
this sheet, adjust stole. SW-RAL-DT-SDE705.dwg STANDARD DETAILS

A
0
am
N �
>"- m
rom.-Ia)
mz =-i
=-nDym
=fnC)0
-0r,m
ni7Dz
• CC
D1��
C 0
z
_ O
CA Z n z
M
N
c C m =
o MZ>
vz
roan
m M r
M v
n
co
C
o r z
C') C y ,0
MH-n
IT!� Z o
y
M
838.01
GENERAL NOTES:
CHAMFER ALL CORNERS 1" OR HAVE A RADIUS OF 1".
PLACE 2 #6 "Y" BARS IN THE TOP OF ALL ENDWALL FOR PIPE CULVERTS 42"
AND OVER WITH A MINIMUM OF 3" COVER AND A LENGTH OF 6" LESS THAN
ENDWALL LENGTH.
CONSTRUCT BOTTOM SLAB WITH FORMS.
DO NOT INTERPRET WALL THICKNESS (T) SHOWN FOR THE THICKNESS
ACCEPTABLE, BUT IS USED IN COMPUTING ENDWALL QUANTITIES.
WHEN THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO USE A CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT THE BOTTOM
OF THE PIPE, PLACE BAR "X" DOWELS IN THE BASE AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
SPACE BARS APPROXIMATELY ON 12" CENTERS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
WHEN THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO USE A CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT THE BOTTOM
OF THE PIPE AND POUR THE BASE SEPARATELY LEAVE THE POUR ROUGH.
USE CLASS "B" CONCRETE.
Z
oco
� Q
Qa
NACU
00003=z
QUO(D
coI=—u-OJ
00N°C
I—
Qo
W
J co)
O
E -
ow H W
�
CD > o
3 OV rn
cc,
W
J J CL (L a
o3�a
W -00
co
W m
WCDCC
D
J
w V Z
Z Q •'
O
v
838-01
60% SUBMITTAL
N
z
w
w
O
w
CL
M
N
J
Lu
0
U � N
0
a`
z
z
0
DT -6

ASPHALT PAVEMENT PATCH
COMPACTED FILL
NOTES
1. THE PAVEMENT EDGE SHALL BE DEFINED BY A STRAIGHT EDGE FORMED BY A MACHINED SAW CUT.
2. THE TRENCH SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED TO A DENSITY
OF AT LEAST 95% OF THAT OBTAINED BY COMPACTING A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO
T-99 AS MODIFIED BY NCDOT.
3. THE FINAL 1' OF FILL SHALL CONSIST OF ABC MATERIAL COMPACTED TO A DENSITY EQUAL TO 100% OF THAT
OBTAINED BY COMPACTING A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO T-80 AS
MODIFIED BY NCDOT. BITUMINOUS BASE OR BINDER MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IF APPROVED BY CITY OF RALEIGH ENGINEER.
4. THE ENTIRE THICKNESSNERTICAL EDGE OF THE CUT SHALL BE TACKED.
5. THE SAME DEPTH OF PAVEMENT MATERIAL WHICH EXISTS SHALL BE REINSTALLED, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL
THE ASPHALT BE LESS THAN 3" THICK.
6. THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND COMPACTED THOROUGHLY AND ROLLED WITH A SMOOTH
DRUM ROLLER TO ACHIEVE A SMOOTH, LEVEL PATCH.
- - - - - - - - - - - - I
W� s
WE �s
Noww
�6wv E'
ae
3i ice.
�rc`a43
Z
LLJ
LLJ
0
a J
- Q
2z a✓ W
w Q w 0
J
Of U. Q
O Of
o Q
0 Z
F— Q
V)
0
Q
z
Z
0
0
p am rn
� p W Y m �
N
o J n
rp
Q o IV
0
i
i
— C
00
C
OPV y
° C V
C°o
O C
ON
L 7
BOO
C— y
O y
O�
Q
0.0
fn -6:5
W
U
4
_ K
> O
SHEET
DT -7
60% SUBMITTAL SEO.
SAW CUT
SAW CUT
AND TACK
AND TACK
EXISTING PAVEMENTI
EXISTING
PAVEMENT
II NEW ASPHALT 3" MINIMUM
�0000o
00
000
oo•o.eo ° QOO °� e0O O °OOQeo °00°.000
e
oI�O°OoO
$0 0
-"q O O NEW ABC 12" MINIMUM DEPTH
13.00
a O.0 o e
e°•
001{OeOe0 000OO OOeOe013OO.O'°O
e0e 0e0e0
EXISTING ABC
V KEY -IN
111.EXISTING
V KEY -IN
EXISTING ABC
I
FrFirl
SUBGRADE
1'rI
I I�I
11
COMPACTED FILL
NOTES
1. THE PAVEMENT EDGE SHALL BE DEFINED BY A STRAIGHT EDGE FORMED BY A MACHINED SAW CUT.
2. THE TRENCH SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED TO A DENSITY
OF AT LEAST 95% OF THAT OBTAINED BY COMPACTING A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO
T-99 AS MODIFIED BY NCDOT.
3. THE FINAL 1' OF FILL SHALL CONSIST OF ABC MATERIAL COMPACTED TO A DENSITY EQUAL TO 100% OF THAT
OBTAINED BY COMPACTING A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO T-80 AS
MODIFIED BY NCDOT. BITUMINOUS BASE OR BINDER MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IF APPROVED BY CITY OF RALEIGH ENGINEER.
4. THE ENTIRE THICKNESSNERTICAL EDGE OF THE CUT SHALL BE TACKED.
5. THE SAME DEPTH OF PAVEMENT MATERIAL WHICH EXISTS SHALL BE REINSTALLED, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL
THE ASPHALT BE LESS THAN 3" THICK.
6. THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND COMPACTED THOROUGHLY AND ROLLED WITH A SMOOTH
DRUM ROLLER TO ACHIEVE A SMOOTH, LEVEL PATCH.
- - - - - - - - - - - - I
W� s
WE �s
Noww
�6wv E'
ae
3i ice.
�rc`a43
Z
LLJ
LLJ
0
a J
- Q
2z a✓ W
w Q w 0
J
Of U. Q
O Of
o Q
0 Z
F— Q
V)
0
Q
z
Z
0
0
p am rn
� p W Y m �
N
o J n
rp
Q o IV
0
i
i
— C
00
C
OPV y
° C V
C°o
O C
ON
L 7
BOO
C— y
O y
O�
Q
0.0
fn -6:5
W
U
4
_ K
> O
SHEET
DT -7
60% SUBMITTAL SEO.