20170594 Ver 1_401 Application_20170515

O�O� W A r�gpG
0 �
2 0 1 70 5 94
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 13
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
becausewritten approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit.-
ermit:because
® Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: McBee Stream Enhancement
2b. County: Watauga
2c. Nearest municipality/ town: Boone
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: -
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Scott Allen McRee 7017
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
1769, 201 MIMI
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
ER E OUR tN
R P t
3d. Street address:
113 Nestle Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Boone, NC 28607
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Teresa Buckwalter
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Destination by Design Planning, LLC
4d.
Street address:
815 West King Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Boone, NC 28607
4f.
Telephone no.:
828.386.8166
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
5d.
City, state, zip:
5e.
Telephone no.:
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 12829763392000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): ILatitude. 36.184711 Longitude: -81.617906
1c.
Property size: 0.413 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: East Fork of the South Fork of the New River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS -IV; Tr
2c.
River basin: j New
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This single family residence is located in Boone, NC and is surrounded by other single family residences. An existing concrete retaining wall has
collapsed into the East Fork of the South Fork of the New River.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 220
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to restabilize a stream bank.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
An approximately 80' long and W high section of a longer concrete retaining wall collapsed has collapsed into the East Fork of the South Fork of the Ne
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
YewNo
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d. 3e.
Perennial (PER) or Type of
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Choose one
E Fork S Fork New River
PER DWQ
18
80
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
80
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c. 4d.
Type of impact Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1
Choose one Choose
O2
Choose one Choose
03
Choose one Choose
04
Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the com tete the chart below.
5a. 5b.
Pond ID number Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
YesMo
B5
Yes/No
B6
YesMo
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
Ia. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed work utilizes natural materials (boulders) and native vegetation to stabilize the sal along the stream bank. The project replaces a
concrete wall, which recently failed, with a sloped, vegetated bank that will provide wildlife habitat and shade the channel. Two short sections of
concrete wall will be replaced to shore up the foundation for the house and a nearby vehicular bridge.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
No hydraulic leaks will be tolerated on equipment working in or around the project area. Disturbance of channel banks and equipment access areas
shall be held to the minimum necessary to allow for construction/ excavation. Wire -backed silt fences will be used to avoid stream sedimentation
during construction. Sandbags will be utilized to divert the stream around areas for the pouring of concrete footers for the wing walls. No amount of
excess concrete in the channel will be tolerated. Wood fiber mats with Silky Dogwood live stakes will be installed immediately along the stream bank.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
14%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project is less than 12 acre.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSessionLaw 2006-246
❑Other.
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H. 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ®No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is for a residential landowner in a developed neighborhood, no further impact for this projed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
29 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
© Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS;
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
JA Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USFWS
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The minimal impacts from construction are justifiable due to the resulting benefits laid out through the streambank enhancements. All relevant
floodway/ floodplain permitting is being administered by Watauga County Planning and Inspections department. A no -rise certificate will be provided by
IONCON engineering.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Watauga County GIS
Teresa Buckwalter1���',►�/
5/1/2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
II n Age is Ign t re
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
IN
Page 10 of 10

United States Department of the Interior
Nicole Higgins
Destination by Design
815 West king Street, Suite 2
Boone, North Carolina 28607
Dear Ms. Higgins:
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
May 4, 2017
Subject: McRee Bank Stabilization Project; Watauga County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-17-317
FUM & WILDI.IFF.
SERVICE
y ` CSS
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence received via email on April 20, 2017 wherein you request our comments with
regards to potential project impacts to federally protected species. The Service submits the
following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321
et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, you (on behalf of your client) are seeking a Nationwide
Permit 13 to stabilize a failing concrete retaining wall on the East Fork South Fork New River in
Boone, North Carolina. Specifically, you are seeking Department of Army authorization for 80
linear feet of permanent impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with the construction of a 9 -foot
tall reinforced rebar and concrete retaining wall to protect a single family residence located on
the wetted edge of the river. Proposed work also includes the construction of a retaining wall
wing wall upstream from the residence adjacent to an existing bridge. Streambanks would be
sloped back and native woody tree species would be planted.
Impact minimization measures would include the installation of a stream diversion around work
areas within the active channel to ensure that live/wet concrete does not contact aquatic habitats.
Sloped banks would be stabilized with biodegradable woodfiber matting and live -stakes.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
Suitable roosting habitat may be present within the action area for the federally threatened
northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). However, the final 4(d) rule (effective as of
February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared bat associated with activities
that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from

a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Based on the
information provided, the project (which may require tree clearing) would occur at a location
where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
The Service has no other records of federally protected species, or suitable habitats in the project
area. Therefore, we consider the requirements under the Act to be complete and require no
further action at this time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Act must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
In addition to the impact avoidance/minimization measures you propose, we offer the following
recommendations in the interest of further minimizing impacts to fish, wildlife, and other natural
resources.
Bank Reconstruction
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated bed load (sediment) while maintaining channel features and neither degrading
(accelerating the erosion of banks and scour of the channel bed) nor aggrading (accelerating the
deposition of sediment within the channel). The majority of property damage associated with
flood events in areas that contain, or are adjacent to, streams often can be tied to
human -caused alterations within the stream corridor, such as the removal of streambank
vegetation, channelization, and/or dredging of the stream and the placement of fill within
floodplains. To avoid impacts to natural resources, and future property damage, it is critical that
proposals to repair property within stream corridors emphasize the restoration of natural, stable
stream conditions. Accordingly, we recommend the following:
1. As proposed, and to the extent that is practicable, work in or adjacent to stream waters
should be conducted in "the dry" by diverting base flow away from work areas. We
encourage you consider the use of silt bag filtration to remove turbid water from the
active channel.
2. As proposed, uncured concrete, concrete leachate, or excess concrete waste should not
contact surface waters. Concrete contains lime which is highly toxic to aquatic
organisms. Until concrete is fully cured, lime is mobile and dissolves easily in water
(water soluble). Inputs of lime increase the pH of water, and may create caustic
conditions that could burn organic tissue of fish and/or result in the direct mortality of
many aquatic organisms. Plans should be established to safely dispose excess concrete
waste.
3. Reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be stabilized with
seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion -control matting preferably by the
end of each workday. No erosion -control matting or blankets should contain synthetic
(netting) materials. Synthetic materials may take years to break down and may trap
wildlife. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or, wherever possible,
2

live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed establishment,
additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along slopes and
overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or other
geotextile material).
4. We recommend planting deep -rooting woody vegetation along riparian areas where any
channel work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no
greater than 10 feet along stream banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as
wide as practical.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments and for your consideration of
our mission to protect fish and wildlife resources. Please contact Mr. Byron Hamstead of our
staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future correspondence
concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-17-317.
E.c William Elliott; USACE
Andrea Leslie; NCWRC
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor
3

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: ��a�1�(o33�2 Dov
STREET ADDRESS: 113 Nestle Road Boone, NC 28607
Please print: s
- _ 1./� C��G
Property Owner: XOTt / 1
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do
hereby authorize _Teresa Buckwalter, R.L.A._, of Destination by Design
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and
acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
13511 LOA G il"Ov, _x no I
Telephone: ^1011-a T 3►a f
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
"" K
Autho zed Sig4ature
Date: 4 is

r- 4
Scott McRee Residence from small vehicular bridge. Before concrete retaining wall fell.

Scott McRee Residence from small vehicular bridge. After concrete retaining wall fell.

Map of McCree Site
Prepared by Destination by Design - Apr 19, 2017
U.S. DEPARTET or THE NT
MUSGS U.S. GEMOLOGNICAL SURVIEYERIOR
31rY6 45—E -4E 47
. ........
c-M*ro;o
1, U T
DEEP CAP QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 -MINUTE SERIES
'54, 1 —T
-m
IV
MA
"00
mv
J-
81-vw- 45 '47 3W07W '49 '52
=umd by the United StatesGeoWgIcal Su SCALE 1:24 000 CLAW--
LM mbn twt �bml eumm:mm. PiamMn` mune axa5 ]000 wlE9 900D ltt6 awa.rxxF anm .inlentxle Yale �1A anile :Lee arY ��
Mon OHorenmM
now.
. ...... ............... . ............
.. .............
. ............
6-
w Sprang Wt
. ..e...T 7 DEEP GAP, NC
TI -. --
2016

N / CtE
NRCS Soil Survey
Uk UkE
McCree Residence Streambank Enhancement CtE
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles
UkE U kD
EdC
W
RdA
CuA
Ed D
Sn B
CSC
HE
Ed D
EdC
EdC
NkA.--`
SnB
SnB rkAc�E
E
CtD
�
UkE I I �'E
UkE s
UkE
CtD UkF
N
PuD
Ukd

wa
cores
ust Al c 00
0 WildIA,
6 Indy
-Z Wood
0
Quail
e ti
\Ac
ad t e ine of
ve ep he t 1336 V,,j Ights
Ho
I.,aUr
HI/ d a ur
r CD
y
s 0
43
scho I sse
ek0°owe e&
IG Ivy u -
gers
Meai—
Otpt-,
ti
to mo

r.
STREAMBANK ENHANCEMENTS - SITE PLAN
MCCREE RESIDENCE 113 NESTLE RD. BOONE, NC
\PROPOSED
CONCRETEAJ
WINGWALL*
CREEK-'AC(ESS�
&SITTING AREAS -
� , ♦. • may,
FAYLL�V� � yf •
HEAD BOULDER c
Q !i RETAINING„
WALLS
TIMBER
STAIR S
A FLAGSTONE,^-
b/ \PATH1` \vQ
STREAMBANKI-I
STABILIZING-
PLANT'S��'ry 'W
O t
•
1
REN�N—I� LS
LAWN
rvL �•, -
F PROPOSED �` BRID
_ CONCRETE f
WINGWALL �
'l ? 'O
w "V,
olAPF
"I Jj 6 'A
0 5' 10' 15'
DESTINATION DESIGN
ISSUED 03.29.17

STREAMBANK ENHANCEMENTS - TYPICAL SECTION
MCCREE RESIDENCE 113 NESTLE RD. BOONE, INC
')DESTINATION DESIGN
l
ISSUED 03.29.17

PROPO ED'
fVAIvik
�' ,e� � (�► �.� �i�T r 1`. � f lr �y .�• .i '7;1 �({ �.,. J _ �•♦�\• ` j'� ` �� a' _ A s,.'- .r' .. ' .
kE. •,ate - ��'t}Sy'a `. - r t;,� � ' � _ — � 1y'
�z'e"', y.' 'r�•}(�q ` � � � ip'+� a .a��s'..• ,Z Y`,�.-�4 +tory! � �• � ' aJ
,:: .y.s;1L1{'�iF�a+'•�+"��Ffa((-$•�-.4yy•.�yJk.•�~$♦ir,�. .-;. '"'�1.YY,4.aa t�i w;�� -�+:.�.'.t`d.y _..,Q .�.�+.►•�.xtYr..,'xL•-'�..'.•'il�'B.YF•.-
.}(.<r' -'} •t-��X�'aa' •,•l_�.b�_ '*��.-*s'• .�..;,r.:t.•_.' '�:j!,,, ,L:.tp,',. . ' t'•r ti.-.t^�_.,K Fj.. 'c� ti'J
• � ,� +`Yr.r.�ai•l�-.�-.�jzf.�,-. ;1' /,Aywr.-.rY•3lw��,+
��/..l *a .'a�@'tZ�/ �'�•``,j..s'3�59�a.Y��'.�.`,_:��em.:N.a5w'r�" gi�,w,•,��•'n . .`�J�} ��.; .~F.'�,,,� . -t� .',f �ia�,�i7 s-.,�_��te- .aY �s'.+h,i..r:���`�jjr��`.7T',i��•!,,,.�i"" i�F:•'ar++-'�e, r9•-��'.N; ��'y.;.<l,i f.'�.' �,��}7ri'x, • ',�r ^ir.`!.v•a���,l}.�#ty�f._a•—..' �.. . _:-:��Y.h.: <.•�g.t"�' „ •_ o �i1R f�Ifa>_#' _�'`:.,,a.r-. . S �a?�x"'.`v-r .j^.4"�",5!°t,''',.� .�.W$Y�+'- � �$� t ,+�-.���Y�a,:
•'?#;.•*S♦n•,, ' , ;rKr�S;ar.+"aa'..., R� ..+.�1.l. ',.. •xmdia1a"r"`,�f[41-.la.hrya�•�'-rLL' �.'f. yt���.a,i�.',,.-i''(j�!�f+a*aw• '� . +:
-rdv••r... itp�_N`ati.i•'t:C�.(`�%}.
,_".�,,'y't+F..'.,y.,.gi. •••t .``�ptmat,omiy.Yyv'. ,*. !,r.,*�,q+.�a' sa�r"�v2`#.^ti'��'a, � '.._,r''r'ti!+r.k LFVl,jiIrt."�_j`'srQ �.F'ro,.,h..r`.c.r,_ : r3Y,.J�',-_•~`:�r- -f tp't��'R.x�-;' r.t5-. , I),,;. `-.14�f�'..� .�` �l • -��a . -r�. ;t ,�� -'v- is,.';�` �ry ���-� €�.ii . ms,_..�- r,a" _ 1s ��.`. .'i ►_-s4� �,�t. -m $_1is! .1:_em, ry:�;,f�:�4Vu! � _ '•g�'�'e"�.�a tJ- •),-<' •��S`'"tr�y•1,'•-is;fYa•Y�•,J',
�'.,' c+- fa�'w•�y�hsinv7`'r..-yi�.c"{.a
,�J',ti 'f.'. . 'r'/4-4L:,)s.t.% _.>'.,I��>. �?,�4t��♦�tiy �Y♦ evfY7w�'a�iT�m~' r,i�ds'.-�n`r},,�'':,.•'
/}/.e,;g�� `'-",�`'v2 y',��i'4se• �_r.` '`=�jY'� �i'L L'�D'�♦ ;+,-��H'7�;�-.• . 1ray� %� �� �rr�y.,.'i".-w%i.� .��i�.-��#,�L:'S•s:•y: •`• _
.,ww�ay,H 'of� /jJ,�✓`'! •�-n'-�
:��.-;Z..-- �• fta `''ii;t
•�.i:1��)_.)
`
�•y1
�xon
:flQ
V,k
IF
MW
tb
lk
Zlklla
r
sj UAW,
a•,�tj�"��a� t
'•Ii?_v
_•
.-
♦�`�,
te,
1�Jt
:
J3
�i
t
,
.: Ifs � 1I♦
}
R
s

Deck
(Impervious)
IMP.,.
Mai A
Ai
t;
Aft Driveway
h
e
(Impervious)
3
Ali,
tea.
4
2 ft Contours
Preconstruction/ Pre Existing Conditions N N Area of Disturbance
McCree Residence Streambank Enhancement 1 inch = 10 feet w ^` NC Wetlands (none present)
0 12.5 25 50 Feet
AE floodzone
Nestle Road
(Impervious)
3�6�

EAST FORK SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER
- RIVER COBBLES
EXISTING
BRIDGE
1 PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Scale: 1/a• = r -o•
MCCREE RESIDENCE
STREAMBANK ENHANCEMENT
113 NESTLE RD.
BOONE NC 28607
0
DESTINATION DESIGN
..Project 1f:
Drawn Dy:
Checked BD:
Scale: Varies
Issue
Destination bg Design
B15 W. King St.
Boone, NC 28607
Ph: 828.386.1866
Data
I
n—Ing Till.:
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ml
Drawing 11 -
PCN -1

_ _ _ _-APPROX. CREEKBANK. _ _ — — _ _ _ _ — — _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _
FAILED RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED; BANK
TOE OBACK IN 1:3 AND HAVE A
ES BOULDERULDER RETAINING WALLS;
SERIB
STREAMBANK TO BE STABILIZED WITH
I
VEGETATION
EAST FORK SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER
EXISTING
BRIDGE
CONC. WINGWALL TO BE INSTALLED W/ SANDBAG Si
- DIVERSION TECHNIQUES -- --- --
_ — ——CREEKSANK — — — — — _ G _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
q
- --
CONC. WINGWALL /
KISTING
DECK -
O
WH �
W
W
t
(PROPOSED IMPACTS
�_ J scale: 1/a• = •
MCCREE RESIDENCE
STREAMBANK ENHANCEMENT
113 NESTLE RD.
BOONE 128607
0 I
DESTINATION- DESIGN
Plano Lng design p,
Destination by Design
815 W. King St.
Boone, NC 28607
Ph: 828.386.1866
Project #:
Brawn By:
Chocked By:
Scala: Varlas
Issue Date
I
0—ing Tli
PROPOSED IMPACTS
I
orawlne i
PCN -2

EXISTING
DEC
EXISTING
RESSIDENC
1 DRAINAGE PLAN
Scale:
EAST FORK SOUTH FORK NEW RIVER i
EXISTING CREEK EDGE AT EXISTING
ELEVATION OF APP OX. 5' BRIDGE
HEIGHTS BELOW EXISTING DRNEWAV
BOULDER RETAINING WALL;
HEIGHTS VARY j
+B — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — .£AADS PIPE TO EXIT
— — — — — — — — — _ — — — TH�UGhFW1NfxWAL7
L —�
W
+1' +1' 7'
w w r 7' PROPOSED CATCH BASIN i
a
a
i
p g" O _ i
/ +3' 11'
--
+4'6'
I I
+TO l
WELLHEAD
7' IMBER RISERS
0 o g
h N f/1 I I
6' ADS PIPE TO TIE INTO
EXISTING CATCH BASIN
EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING I
DRIVEWAY I
1V l
MCCREE RESIDENCE
D—Mg MI.:
GRADING PLAN
Seas:
J I DCNIIIDNI111 LI1NN114GIIIL111
113 NESTLE RD.
BOONE NC 28607
0
DESTINATION - DESIGN
Destination bgDesign
9
815 W. King St.
Boone, NC 28607
Ph: 828.386.1866
Project Y:
Drawn BB:
ChaelEt BB:
Scala: Yaries
Issue
Data
i
�a
D—Mg MI.:
GRADING PLAN
Seas:

RETAINING WALL REINFORCEMENT. VERTICAL
REINFORCEMENT: PROVIDE (1) #5 REBAR AT 1T O.C.
BEGINNING AND ENDING AT 3' FROM ENDS OF WALLS. TIE TO
FOUNDATION DOWELS, MINIMUM 30' SPLICE OVERLAP. TIE TO
CONNECTION DOWELS AT EXISTING FOOTING. HORIZONTAL
REINFORCEMENT: PROVIDE (1) #4 REBAR AT IT O.C.
BEGINNING AND ENDING AT W FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION
AND TOP OF PLANTER WALLS. TIE TO DOWELS AT EXISTING
WALL CONNECTION. PROVIDE MINIMUM 30' SPLICE OVERLAP
AT DOWEL AND FIELD LOCATIONS.
PLANTER RETURN WALL:
9
W
L7
O
X:
w
y
O
S
DECK FRAMING
EXISTING BRICK BELOW DECK TO REMAIN
TO REMAIN DOWEL CONNECTION TO EXISTING FOOTING. DRY FR 18'#4 REBAR, 3'
EMBED. ALIGN W REPLACEMENT WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT
v EXISTING MORTARED ROCK SEPARATION
BETWEEN CONCRETE WALL AND BRICK T
PORTION OF EXISTING
CONCRETE WALL TO REMAIN
11.11.1.1111.III.i�ii�i.�_®ii11_■i�iil�ii�.ii�
FOUNDATION DOWELS. (1) 40' #5 REBAR
AT 17 O.C., S' EMBED, EPDXY FIT. ALIGN
WITH WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.
NEW FOUNDATION. FORM AND POUR
36'.18' CONCRETE FOOTING HAVING
(4) #5 LONGITUDINAL REBAR AND 30"
#5 TRANSVERSE REBAR AT 12' O.C.,
MAINTAIN 3' CLEAR COVER.
RETAINING WALL $ FOOTING REINFORCEMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1/2' = 1'-0'
WATERLINE
RIVER BED
NOTES:
1) TEMPORARY DECK SUPPORT BY OTHERS
2) REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING
WALL TO LOCATION INDICATED ABOVE
3) LOCATE HORIZONTAL DOWELS
4) LOCATE VERTICAL FOUNDATION DOWELS
5) LOCATE AND TIE HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT
6) IMAGE SHOWN IS PLANAR PROJECTION
OF SKEWED ANGLE WALL. SEE PLAN VIEW,
DETAIL XX, FOR GEOMETRY.
7) FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.
BRICK WALL TO REMAIN
EXISTING FOOTING TO REMAIN
NEW CONCRETE SUPPORT WALL.
PROVIDE REINFORCEMENT AS PER
DETAIL 1/1. CLOSELY FIR OR GROUT
FINISH TO EXISTING FOOTING.
NEW WALL INFILL.
CONTRACTOR ACCESS MAY
BE THROUGH EXISTING DECK.
_ RIVER BED _
WALL FOUNDATION. SIZE,
FOUNDATION DOWELS AND
REINFORCEMENT AS PER DETAIL 1/1.
3"
3'-0'
RETAINING WALL SECTION
3 SCALE: 1/2" = I'-0"
_--
SCHEDULE OF VALUES:
DESIGN LOAD&
ELEVATION: 3164 AMSL
WIND ZONE: 110 MPH
GROUND SNOW LOAD: 30 PSF
ROOF LOAD: 35 LL + 15 OL
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY: C
MATERIALS,
CONCRETE: 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS
EPDXY: SIMPSON SET EPDXY OR EQUAL
REBAR: 60 KSI
CONVENTIONAL LUMBER: SYP, SPF #2 OR BTR
NOTES:
1) ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET 2012
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING CODE:
RESIDENTIAL CODE.
2) CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL
DIMENSIONS, DRAWINGS REPRESENT
TYPICAL CONDITIONS.
3) FASENERS AND HARDWARE CONTACTING
PRESSURE TREATED MATERIALS TO BE
APPROPRIATE FOR WOOD TREATMENT.
4) WATERPROOFING BY OTHERS.
5) IONCON ENGINEERING IS ONLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL
ASPECTS AND THEIR CONNECTIONS AS
REFERENCED HEREIN.
V1
Z
O_
E
0
U 0 U a
O Q
w z
LL 0 s
F- U
C
U
a o
a Q
_ CO
W w N
J CL � H Z O
aa`nov
0 to
O-1 J O Q N
w —1 0 co
5 EL cliLy p
ag mo-jitz
Nw QULLIaO
Yz -m
NW U_'tza
ow O
WN a m
NZ
m w g
<w Z Ih
z W OD
D
W W
wN
Zm
N
Zm
rn W w
z ZO
UJ
}Z
w O
wmZ
f F < 0
L z
g(CID) �3
y3 _rn�
O Q
2 aO
w w
= W
WF tD7Z
02) LU
�Oa
w Z
(n >gz
w¢ Waw
aF 7��
oLL wZ0
¢o Qz
w�
x
F j N K
Q m
YuJ
Z w
Z W
OQ
W
cn
WL
(I_
Z�
QZD w
0' Z Z Q C)
}
0
C3 04Lu
Fa �FF--Z
z� W w
w `LL Z
It Z
O
z� U m
oLU N ��
U) LU
F
ro JOB NUMBER
W 172028
a ) DATE
p N 4/19/2017
z
z
z0 � SCALE
O AS SHOWN
C7 SHEET:
IL Z
ILr
00 OF: SHEETS

EXISTING
DECK
4-HQP
5 -AJ
0
4 -AJ _ ---a-O
3-HQP
7 -CV O c
8 -DP
6 -BM -
EXISTING
RESIDENCE
OLANDSCAPE PLAN
Scale:
11
F
- - 3-RY
— 4 -CA - - 3 -IV
5 -MF
PO
27K ftv-wJTH FORK NEW` R1\9-CN1
5 -MF - 8 -ED
j 3 -IV 3-13N
12 -RF O
6 -LS - O - - -
98 -PS O
-CAH
! * * N.�`"
w _
Scheduled
ID
Quantity Latin Name
Common Name
Spacing
Size
Trees
1 1
17 -DP
•D
PO
1 Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
n/a
3.5" Caliper
CAH
1 Cedrus adantka'Horstmann'
Horstman, Blue Atlas Cedar
n/a
5 Gallon
CVF
30etula Nigra Little King"
River Birch'Little King'
10'O.C.
3G on
Shrubs
HQP
15 Hydrangea quercifolia'Pee Wee'
Pee Wee Oak Leaf Hydrangea
3'2'O.C.
3Gallon
BM
usm
6 Buxicrophylla'Faulkner'
Fa ulkner Boxwood
O.C.
2Ga lion
RY
3 Rhododendron x'Yellow Petticoats' (H-3)
Yellow Petticoats Rhododendron
4' O.C.
2 Gallon
Perennials
GH
60 Geranium himalayeme
Johnson's Blue Cranesbill
12" O.0
4" Pot
CV
54 Coreopsisverticillata'Moonbeam'
M oonbeam Threadleaf Tickseed
12"O.0
4"Pot
DP
25 Dianthus plumarius' Everlast'
Evedast Dianthus
12-0 . C
4" Pot
PS
17 Phlox stolonifera'Blue Ridge'
Blue Ridge Creeping Phlox
10"O.0
4"Pot
RF
12 Rudbeckia fulgida'Goklsturm'
Goldsturm Black Eyed Susan
2' O.C.
4" Pot
MF
10 Monarda flstulosa'PMer's Purple'
Summer Love Hyssop
2'O.C.
4- Pot
AI
9 Astilbe ja ponica'Peach Biossom'
Peach Blossom Japanese Astilbe
2'O.C.
4" For
ED
9 Eupatorlu mdubium'Lktle Joe'
Little Joe Pye Weed
2'O.C.
4- Po"
IV
6 Irisvirgnica
Southern Blue Flag
2' O.C.
4" Pot
LS
6 Liatris spicata
Spiked Gayfeather
12" O.0
4" Pot
PA
4 Per-ski.atriplicifolia
Russian Sage
T O.C.
4" Pot
0 .....I Grasses
FG
13 Festuca glauca'Elijah Blue'(F. ovina var. glauca)
Elijah Blue Fescue
10"O.0
4"Pot
Live Stakes For Straambank 5tabilizadon
CA
13 Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
6' O.C.
Live Stake
PLANT SCHEDULE
2
11
F
- - 3-RY
— 4 -CA - - 3 -IV
5 -MF
PO
27K ftv-wJTH FORK NEW` R1\9-CN1
5 -MF - 8 -ED
j 3 -IV 3-13N
12 -RF O
6 -LS - O - - -
98 -PS O
-CAH
! * * N.�`"
w _
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
BRIDGE
STING TREE
REMAIN
G
4:J
LU
Z
MCCREE RESIDENCE
STREAMBANK ENHANCEMENT
113 NESTLE RD.
BOONE NC 28607
0
DESTINATION DESIGN
Destination by Design
815 W. King St.
Boone, NC 28607
Ph: 828.386.1866
Project #:
Brawn BV:
Checked BV:
Scale: Varies
Issue Date
Drawing Title:
LFINDSCRPE
Beal:
Drawing No.:
L-1
:
4 -PA
9 -PS
13 -FG .1
37 -CV
1 1
17 -DP
•D
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
BRIDGE
STING TREE
REMAIN
G
4:J
LU
Z
MCCREE RESIDENCE
STREAMBANK ENHANCEMENT
113 NESTLE RD.
BOONE NC 28607
0
DESTINATION DESIGN
Destination by Design
815 W. King St.
Boone, NC 28607
Ph: 828.386.1866
Project #:
Brawn BV:
Checked BV:
Scale: Varies
Issue Date
Drawing Title:
LFINDSCRPE
Beal:
Drawing No.:
L-1