20120383 Ver 1_Middle South Muddy Field Notes - Apr 19 2017 - 3-01 PM_20170419

IM
C[a */� J
[ f
Project/Site Name:
M�d4 SOu�'1 Mitigation Monitoring Review Checklist
14,
Review Meetin 0Date of meeting: 04/03/2017 201
1 17 -
Notes from review meeting:
Mac H.1 Todd i ° se"Divi B. e tail -mss .gym Cdp �l
Nta
,
-+, f �1. - 4tS s sem) - r Cre L
OLL4 Zr Y
T�e - VI 8 S S4 WI YY^ .3 for
P�se�V U1'�a.
V Ca app'-p-a� h Sfih D IVn h IJTtLJ 3at�S�j &- #14e
s les-qfea k�UI
-
r4clAPJAN. 'Bea;;' l 14-S and i To�o1, said, not Cpr4-a�,le w j6': l
d11,6'is $ Pc al S. 4451&,,
Iii c.iSed
Preliminary Determination
❑ Site Visit/Additional Data Required ❑ Full Credit Release Approved ❑ Partial Credit Release Approved
❑ Additional Monitoring/Corrective Measures Required
Contingencies/Follow-up Actions:
Pr
Mitigation Credit Summary: (credits for release):
• .°' `'i:ct x 1 Stream Credits _
Wetland Credits
2 r o ii ; Warm Cool Cold Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-riverine Non -Riparian Coastal
Total Potential Credits y� c� �•
Prior Released Credits 2� v
Current Request 4`r .
[during
s Approved
SITE VIS1 i
USACE Project Manager Name/Signature Date of Signature
m is not valid unless signed by the USACE Project Manager. This form is used to document office and field findings
he monitoring review of USACE-approved mitigation sites. This form does not apply to isolated wetland credits,
buffer credits, or nutrient offsets as approved by NCDWQ. For questions regarding this form or any of the conditions of the
permit authorization, contact the USACE Project Manager shown above.
Page 2 of 2
Form Updated 20 April 2015

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Mitigation Project Monitoring Review Checklist
Project Information
Project/Site Name: Middle South Muddy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year: Year 1
Provider/Designer: Equinox
Mitigation Type: NCEEP Stream Site
Site Coordinates: 35.56361 -N -81.9233 °W
Action ID: SAW -2011-02233
NCDWR Project Number:.
NCEEP Project Number (if applicable):
HUC and Basin: 03050101, Catawba,River Basin
County: McDowell
Project Review Checklist
If a concern is noted during the office or field review, check the box and provide detail in the appropriate section below.
General Site Issues: S�Ipv� ;LL�i�rnaC Ih{v�'- Valu
El Vegetation concerns (species composition, vigor, stem density, etc.):
❑ Beaver issues (management plan?):
❑ Excessive soil manipulation (compaction, fertility, etc.):
❑ Invasive/exotic species concerns:
❑ Crossings or utility line impacts:
❑ BMP implementation and locations (if proposed").
V Fencing missing or inadequate: � YA ��D WZ1v Q s i h -
Evidence of encroachment (livestock, easement clearing, etc.): tVQS 1
❑ Upstream/downstream or adjacent property owner concerns:
F1 Conservation easement concerns: ___ _._.._..._._._
❑ Easement marking/signage concerns: _^
Stream Issues:
HOT t
❑ Stream buffer issues (width, comp` itlOr, +' =Y' `' i c GL .. rvCW r
❑ Channel stability issues (aggrading o,' degrauing, i evetmeiits, grade control?): OK -L na J l s
❑ Substrate concerns (scour, particle size, embeddedness, habitat, excess sediment):
❑ Channel hydrology 1/8flow, jurisdiction) a.,_. r10 Inydoloy_ ,4 ti
. �1q, � •u �. i;T e SCrs' 7
�j' Other: 1?�1OtO
Wetland Issues: N/A
❑ Groundwater monitoring well':ccatirr:JFla::ernentroncerns:,_
❑ Hydro period concerns (too dry or V)o wet):
❑ Hydric soil indicator and/or soil type concerns:
❑ Onsite/adjacent ditch drainage concerns:
❑ Other: �— -
Office Review:
�r
Notes from office review: R5
.,°rid ',�'
AAA
I "f 7
Date of office review:
elrukis {{i1 14
�l, CNoSS��
_ M0