McKee Creek_92573_MY5_2016

McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Monitoring Report - Year 5 of 5
FINAL
Contract # 004391
DMS Project # 92573
Cabarrus Countv, North Carolina
Construction 2010
Collected October/November 2016
Report November 2016
Submitted to:
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1601 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC27699-1601

Prepared By:
,10-
WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
WithersRavenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340
f: 919.467.6008
Project Manager: Martin Richmond
Email: [e-mail]

Executive Summary/ Project Abstract
The project goals and objectives stated in the McKee Creek Restoration Plan (NCEEP
2008) are as follows:
Project Goals:
• Restore through stream enhancement (Level I and Level II) McKee Creek;
• Restore Clear Creek (Priority I restoration);
• Restore the physical and biological processes of McKee and Clear Creeks;
• Restore riparian vegetation to the maximum extent feasible.
Project Objectives:
• Improve water quality by reducing bank erosion, restricting livestock access to the
creeks, and re-establishing the riparian buffer;
• Stabilize McKee Creek through the use of in -stream structures and pattern re-
alignment in selected areas;
• Restore the dimension, pattern, and profile of Clear Creek;
• Improve the floodplain functionality of Clear Creek by matching floodplain
elevation with bank full stage;
• Improve the wildlife habitat functions of the site through riparian buffer
establishment, improved stream bed form diversity, and improved floodplain
functionality to reduce stream incision;
• Protect the site through a permanent conservation easement along the project
reaches.
The subject site is located approximately 10 miles northeast of Charlotte, NC in the Lower
Yadkin River Basin. Land use in the area consists of agricultural use and suburban
residential development.
Vegetation Results
Success Criteria
Success of the riparian buffer plantings is based on vegetation success criteria established
in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003). Four (4) permanent monitoring plots
were established in Spring 2012. Successful restoration must contain a minimum of 260
live stems per acre at Year 5.
Year 5 shows an average of 426 planted live stems per acre, with a minimum count of 243.
These estimates are based on Level 2 of the CVS-EEP monitoring protocol and include
only planted woody stems. The stem count is based on the average of the stem counts
within the four vegetation plots. Year 5 shows a total average of 1,447 stems per acre
McKee Creek WithersRavenel
DMS Project No. 92573 December 2016
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

including volunteers, with a minimum count of 445. Reference pictures of each monitoring
plot were taken and attached to this report.
Vegetation Plot 1 (McKee Creek Reach 1)
Total stem count was 6 planted live stems (243/acre) and 7 volunteer stems, yielding a
total count of 13 stems (526/acre). The planted live stem count is below the success
criteria, possibly due to mowing activity in 2012. The 6 live stem count is consistent with
the live stem count in Year 3 and Year 4 monitoring (6 live stems each year), and the
volunteer stem count of 7 is a decrease from Year 4 monitoring (11 volunteer stems).
Vegetation Plot 2 (McKee Creek Reach 1)
Total stem count was 11 planted live stems (445/acre) and 44 volunteer stems, yielding a
total count of 55 stems (2,227/acre). The total planted live stem count is well above the
success criteria. The 11 planted live stem count is consistent with the live stem count in
Year 4 monitoring (11 live stems), and the volunteer stem count of 44 is an increase from
Year 4 monitoring (36 volunteer stems).
Vegetation Plot 3 (McKee Creek Reach 2)
Total stem count was 7 planted live stems (283/acre) and 4 volunteer stems, yielding a
total count of 11 stems (445/acre). The total planted live stem count exceeds the success
criteria of 260 stems/acre at Year 5. The 7 planted live stem count is consistent with the
live stem count in Year 4 monitoring (7 live stems), and the volunteer stem count of 4 is an
increase from Year 4 monitoring (3 volunteer stems).
Vegetation Plot 4 (Clear Creek Reach)
Total stem count was 17 planted live stems (688/acre) and 47 volunteer stems, yielding a
total count of 64 stems (2,591/acre). The total planted live stem count is well above the
success criteria. The 17 live stem count is reduced from the live stem count in Year 4
monitoring (18 live stems), and the volunteer stem count of 47 is increased from Year 4
monitoring (44 volunteer stems).
Invasive Vegetation
Minor non-native invasive vegetation was noted within Vegetation Plots 1, 2 and 3,
primarily comprised of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Vegetation plot 2
continues to have Lonicera intertwined with the hardwood species along the eastern edge
of the plot; however, this presence is diminished greatly, and is not considered to be
problematic in Year 5.
McKee Creek
DMS Project No. 92573
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
2
WithersRavenel
December 2016

Invasive species have been treated in the past along and within the conservation
easement. Visual inspection indicates treatment has been successful, but has not fully
eradicated invasives to the maximum extent possible. For persistent existing invasive,
DMS will implement two invasive treatments on site in the 2017 growing season. Invasive
treatments will include the entire conservation easement.
Overall Performance
Overall vegetation within the project easement appears to meet or exceed the defined
success criteria. Although planted species are below the criteria in Plot 1, the total stem
count for this plot is above criteria when combined with volunteer stems (526/acre). This
plot was impacted by mechanized mowing of the adjacent sewer easement in 2012. Plot
data after this time showed only six of the planted stems remaining (243/acre). Based on
this, the remaining live stems could not reach the success criteria of 280 stems per acre,
regardless of survival rate. The six stems have survived during the last three annual
monitoring events, and should be considered successful under the circumstances.
Stream Results
NOTE: Qualitative and quantitative stream assessment data was collected in October
and November of 2016. As part of the monitoring, each reach was visually inspected, and
survey data was collected for the restored sections of McKee Creek and all of Clear
Creek.
McKee Creek Reach 1
McKee Creek Reach 1 was visually inspected throughout the easement, and survey data
was collected within the Enhancement (Level 1) portion of McKee Creek Reach 1 between
Stations 25+00 and 27+00. No disturbance or alteration of the Enhancement (Level 1)
area was noted during the visual assessment.
The majority of McKee Creek Reach 1 is Enhancement (Level 11). No disturbance or
alteration of the Enhancement (Level 11) area was noted during the visual assessment.
Surveyed elevation data for the enhancement section shows the channel to be
approximately in the same profile as prior surveys, with possible evidence of minor
aggradation over time, likely the result of natural stabilization. Sediment bars and pools
were noted in this area, with consistent pattern and profile, differentiated substrate, and
groundwater discharge throughout the reach. The constructed J -hook near Station
27+00 has naturalized and appears to have met intended function.
McKee Creek
DMS Project No. 92573
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
3
WithersRavenel
December 2016

This reach appears to meet the stated objective of the stabilization of McKee Creek
through the use of in -stream structures and pattern re -alignment in selected areas.
McKee Creek Reach 2
McKee Creek Reach 2 was visually inspected throughout the easement, and survey data
was collected between Stations 10+00 and 16+50. Surveyed elevation data for this reach
shows profile variations over past surveys; however, the stream pattern remains stable
throughout the reach, and visual inspection indicates the stream has naturalized within
the realignment. The five J -Hooks constructed within the realignment have naturalized,
and riparian vegetation is established throughout the easement.
In 2012, the lower section of McKee Creek Reach 2 was heavily impacted by a tornado,
starting near Station 17+00, which has resulted in downed and broken mature trees in
and along the channel. Much of the woody debris remains, and has caused partial blockage
of the channel, resulting in the accumulation of natural and man-made debris. This
blockage causes backwater buildup, reducing flow velocity as the stream approaches this
area. Over time, the reduced flow velocity may have led to increased sedimentation
upstream, possibly increasing aggradation within the channel, as reflected in the surveyed
profile; however, the run/riffle/pool profile of the entire reach appears to have stabilized.
This reach appears to meet the stated objective of the stabilization of McKee Creek
through the use of in -stream structures and pattern re -alignment in selected areas.
Clear Creek
Clear Creek was visually inspected throughout the easement, and survey data was
collected throughout the reach, between Stations 10+00 and 28+00. Surveyed elevation
data for this reach shows minor profile variations over past surveys; however, the stream
pattern remains stable throughout the reach, and visual inspection indicates the stream
has naturalized. Strong riparian vegetation is well-established throughout a majority the
easement.
The majority of constructed features within the restored stream channel have provided
the intended structural function for the stream to naturalize throughout the easement.
Numerous run/riffle/pools - both constructed and natural - are present, along with alluvial
deposits, depositional bars, macrobenthos, habitat structures, groundwater, and other
common stream features.
Between Stations 25+00 and 27+00, there is evidence of channel degradation in the
lower reach of the stream, primarily in the form of channel incising and reduced substrate
sorting. This area was also impacted during the 2012 tornado, and a majority of the
mature hardwood vegetation was lost in the riparian area of this reach.
McKee Creek
DMS Project No. 92573
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
4
WithersRavenel
December 2016

Structures located approximately between Stations: 23+00 - 27+25 are failing and have
significant downcutting. DMS will be implementing project repair on the failing reach of
Clear Creek. The repair will include the installation of six (6) constructed ruffles and the
removal or repair of existing structures to stabilize and re-establish the channel profile to
approximately the original design configuration. The repair will also include minimal
supplemental planting and planting of the disturbed areas. The repair work will be
completed in February 2017.
The Clear Creek reach appears to meet the stated objectives of restoration of the
dimension, pattern, and profile, and improving the floodplain functionality by matching
floodplain elevation with bank full stage.
Hydrology Results
Vegetative assessment data and visual stream/buffer assessment data was collected Sept
27, 2016. Field surveying was conducted Oct 25 and 26, 2016. Additional survey data
was collected Nov 22, 2016. During these field monitoring events, obvious signs of
floodplain interaction were noted within all three reaches of the project.
• Flattened vegetation, wrack/debris lines, and standing water were noted in all
three reaches, and throughout the easement.
• On Clear Creek, drainage patterns were noted both towards the channel and away
from the channel. On both reaches of McKee Creek, water was observed flowing
into the channel from the riparian area.
• Three crest gauges were no longer in working order (two had been dislodged) and
were removed, as this was the final monitoring event.
• Rainfall data for Cabarrus County during the period between Nov 2015 and Nov
2016 totaled 51.95 inches of rain.
• A new crest gauge will be installed on the downstream end of Clear Creek during
the February 2017 repair in an effort to capture any 2017 growing season bankfull
events.
It should be noted that the hydrology monitoring requirements of the restoration were
met prior to the Fall 2016 monitoring.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items, such as beaver or
encroachment, and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring
elements, can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in
McKee Creek
DMS Project No. 92573
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
G
WithersRavenel
December 2016

the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan
(formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the DMS website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS upon request.
McKee Creek
DMS Project No. 92573
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
6
WithersRavenel
December 2016

Methodoln
All survey was preformed utilizing total station tradition survey methods to capture
points with high horizontal and vertical accuracy. The longitudinal stationing was
formatted as close as possible to the original restoration plan stationing. The methodology
used in this monitoring assessment followed the prescribed recommendation of the CVS-
EEP Vegetation Monitoring Protocol Level -2.
References
Lower Yadkin LWP- PFR, 2003 and WMP&R - Lower Yadkin LWP, 2004
http://www.nceep.net/services/Iwps/Clarke Creek/F R Rocky Yadkin.pdf
Wolman Pebble Count,
http://limnotogy.wisc.edu/courses/zoo548/Wolman%2OPebb/e%2OCount.pdf
Rainfall Data for Cabarrus County,
http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/Cronos
McKee Creek WithersRavenel
DMS Project No. 92573 December 2016
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

The subject project site is an environmental restoration
site of the NCDENRDivision of Mitigation
Services (DMS) and is encompassed
by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership.
Therefore access by the general public is not permitted.
Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees/ contractors involved
in the development, monitoring and stewardship of the
restoration site is permitted within the terms and
timeframesof their defined,
pre -approved roles. Any intended site visitation
or activity by any person outside of these
previously sanctioned activities/roles requires
prior coordination with DMS.
%1 Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 MacKenan Dr ICary NC, 27511
t: 919.46 9 .3340
license #: C-0832
www.withersravenel.com
Take US -64 West from the Raleigh area to 1-85
(approximatley 85 miles). Take 1-85 south toward Charlotte
(approximately 48 miles). Take exit 48 onto 1-485 toward
Rock Hill (approximately 8 miles) Take exit 39 onto
Harrisburg Road north stay on Robinson Church for
approximately 1 mile and then turn right onto
NCSR 1169 Peach Orchard Road.
Peach Orchard Road intersectsthe project site.
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
tet_. _
McKee Creek
Reach 1
Vicinity Map Restoration
DMS # 92573
Cabarrus County, NC
November 2016
Figure
1

� •• f 19+00 � -
Vi 20+00
�•• 21+00
I�. zz+oo
23+00
24+00 -
25+00
r.
26+00 ,i:
"'r
Of
Ilk
01WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel mm
0 150 300 600
Feet
1 inch = 300 feet
litf�I i
F
FSl «rri •,
ash 2Re �, Y
r�reeK r•-� : " ,
STATUS
r
RES Or RATION -OR- EQUIVALENT
f 12,00
1� a
1300
y _a--
pp,
/ '14+00
NO CREDIT
�
'15+00
16+00
� •• f 19+00 � -
Vi 20+00
�•• 21+00
I�. zz+oo
23+00
24+00 -
25+00
r.
26+00 ,i:
"'r
Of
Ilk
01WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel mm
0 150 300 600
Feet
1 inch = 300 feet
litf�I i
F
FSl «rri •,
ash 2Re �, Y
r�reeK r•-� : " ,
AXE
18+00 16+00 --
15+00 11+00
..
- 39+00 36+00
35+00 19+00 s.
IF
0-00
23+00 21+00 r
t
..
Ai
L Ale
t i
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
CabarrusCounty, North Carolina
Legend
STATUS
r
RES Or RATION -OR- EQUIVALENT
A STATIONING
E1
• 4 C r
T.�F;
pp,
NO CREDIT
�-- R
AXE
18+00 16+00 --
15+00 11+00
..
- 39+00 36+00
35+00 19+00 s.
IF
0-00
23+00 21+00 r
t
..
Ai
L Ale
t i
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
CabarrusCounty, North Carolina
Legend
STATUS
RES Or RATION -OR- EQUIVALENT
A STATIONING
E1
CONSERVATION
E2
......
EASEMENT
NO CREDIT
�-- R
McKee Reach 1 - E2 - 2988 LF
McKee Reach 1 - E1 - 400 LF
McKee Reach 2 - E1 - 678 LF
Clear Clear Creek - R- 1505 LF
No Credit - 490 LF
Asset
Map
Path: K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\G1512016 Fall\AssetMap.mxd Aerial Date: 2015 Printed Date: 2/17/2017 Created By: GLP

Table 1. ProjectComponents and Mitigation Credits -
McKee Creek Project #: 92573
Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R RE R
RE R RE
Totals
3419
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach ID Stationing/Location
ExistingApproach
Footage/Acreage (PI, PII, etc.)
Restoration -or- Restoration
Restoration Footage or
Equivalent Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
McKee Reach 1
10+00 - 25+00, 29+00 - 46+40 2988 P4
E2 2,988
2.5:1
McKee Reach 1
25+00 - 29+00 400 P2
E1 400
1.5:1
McKee Reach 2
10+00 - 17+23.67 678 P2
E1 678
1.5:1
Clear Creek
11+03.05 - 27+59.18 1 1505 P1
R 1,505
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetlands
(linear feet) (acres) (acres)
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
1,505
Enhancement
Enhancement I
1078
Enhancement II
2,988
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = BioretentionCell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS =
Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 6 yrs 7 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 6 yrs 7 months
Number of Reporting Years: 5
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
August -08
Final Design — Construction Plans
April -09
Construction
May -10
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments 1 &2
May -10
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Spring Year 1 Monitoring
April -12
May -12
Fall Year 1 Monitoring
October -12
November -12
Spring Year 2 Monitoring
April -13
May -13
Beaver Removal
Summer -13
Invasives Treatment
Fall -13
Fall Year 2 Monitoring
October -13
November -13
Spring Year 3 Monitoring
April -14
April -14
Invasives Treatment
Summer -14
Fall Year 3 Monitoring
October -14
December -14
Spring Year 4 Monitoring
April -15
May -15
Fall Year 4 Monitoring
Oct/Nov-15
January -16
Spring Year 5
1 May -16
I June -16
Fall Year 5 Monitoring
I Oct/Nov-16
1 December -16

Table 3. Project Contacts Table - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Designer
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, NC 27511
Primary project design POC
Martin Richmond 919 469-3340
Construction Contractor
River Works Inc.
6105 Chapel Hill Road Raleigh, NC 27607
Construction contractor POC
Edward Haynes
Survey Contractor
Turner Land Surveying
Survey contractor POC
Elisabeth Turner
Planting Contractor
River Works Inc.
6105 Chapel Hill Road Raleigh, NC 27607
Planting contractor POC
Edward Haynes
Seeding Contractor
Green Resources
5204 Highgreen Ct Colfax, NC 27235
Contractor point of contact
Rodney Montgomery
Seed Mix Sources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Not Known
Monitoring Performers
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, NC 27511
Stream Monitoring POC
Martin Richmond [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Martin Richmond [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
Martin Richmond 919 469-3340

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes - 2016 (MY5)
Project Name
McKee Creek, Project #92573
County
Project Area (acres)
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude)
Cabarrus
17.41
35.265562°N; -80.639582°W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 3040105
DWQ Sub -basin
Thermal Regime
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
Piedmont
Yadkin Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 3040105010050
Clear- 03-07-11/03-08-34
Warm Thermal Regime
8980
36
Single Family and Wooded
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
McKee Reach 1
McKee Reach 2
Clear Creek
Length of Reach
3640
696
1641
Valley Classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage Area(acres)
4131
4214
635
NCDWQ stream identification score
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C
C
C/C
Morphological Description (stream type)
E4
E4
E/C5
Evolutionary trend
C4
C4
C5
Underlying mapped soils
CHEWACLA
CHEWACLA
CHEWACLA
Drainage class
Soil Hydric status
Yes
Yes
Yes
Slope
0.005
0.005
0.014
FEMA classification
AE
AE
Mckee (Backwater)
Native vegetation community]
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive ve itation
<1 %
< 1 %
< 1 %
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Size of Wetland acres
Wetland Type(non-riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine)
Mapped Soil Series
Drainage class
Soil Hydric Status
Source of Hydrology
Hydrologic Im airment
Native vegetation community
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved? Supporting Dcumentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
SAW -2008-2808
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Land Quality
Yes
CABAR-2009-0024
Endangered Species Act
No
Historic Preservation Act
No
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA)/Costal Area Management Act(CAMA)
No
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

.<V' •a.+,;_;'��L> � � r. `'. d^ • �,r JM „� f t� ., ,;�� 'r Y,, ✓ � �'it° fin.,. �„r, k.. yr
z'
.f
W3
12+00
"1V1
cid: `3 1Rp
3+00
d If`,
,;,..v • ,•/';�y„� a �. ,J{�, { '.'�lit
�-.� � �;: - r,� ,r ��;. - r �."'IfP''� ,�� , `'?+' l►
{- - T ,• Mi ,�" ,..� GJ •, • 14+00 _ of � _ ,._ . �.�.� w, l ,
✓ _:� t.
1 1,.
r
PI 0,
- , ,rf"r�s $✓.� *s,,, } reg tr J `� J ..1: : +r� + '7
l IP� n�� A •'� I s• a+y
c I I
00 L�IiJ
• .._.,.�._„_.. ree Rech ,
4,1# 00 � - - •• G7ri7fr...r...w.er.>l r.r-- r... r...�. ..�. - . - - -
17+00
00
t 12+00
+
r
32 00 30+00' 49+00 28+00 18+00 16+00
31 00
34+00 33+00 i 1, � >r � •, � •
r 39+00 36+00 35+00 '' '•, 19+00
a+00 37+00 + --• ............. ............26+00
BOOMr 27+ +00
20+00
/ 14 11
1 11+00
4 +0
23+00 21+00'A
22+00
Ike
LO
,
' p-* f . , r ! _ __ - ► – – m _-11_1_1 -
•
�'-mss` ►�
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t;919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel.com
0 150 300 600
Feet
1 inch= 300 feet
Path: K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monit
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
6 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
Vegetation Plot
A Stationing
►- — Centerline Fall 2016
Failing
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
No Credit
NA -High Water
1111--
Easement
..." Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
■ Photo Points
�0 Q�ossSedion
Stable
211111111116
- : Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
® Invasives
Stressed
7111111111r
Aerial Date: 2015 Printed Date
Figure
2
:017 Created By: GLP

C
•I' � _ s
i 7' y„�•-� t i�AV
^•s �t 1 5f k tf fpr ����^'t'� _l. .+ V "
Mir—
,
' M3+0
,x+00
'21+00A
23+00
pt
7
All
1.
r
e
:
• w r,
i e
r
t
a
• .
_
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel.com
0 50 100 200
Feet
1 inch= 100 feet
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
CabarrusCounty, North Carolina
Path:K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\GI&2016 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
6+00
A Stationing
' 29 00 _
28+00,Y
_
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
-
Z
t,
,
J
14+00 10+00
...� Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
15+00
11+00
Stable
p,I1„1411ti
:
- : Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
>, r.
Stressed
71111"11r
"
0+0
n
25+0
r
F
1
24+00
'21+00A
23+00
pt
7
All
1.
r
e
:
• w r,
i e
r
t
a
• .
_
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel.com
0 50 100 200
Feet
1 inch= 100 feet
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
CabarrusCounty, North Carolina
Path:K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\GI&2016 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
Vegetation Plot
A Stationing
►- — Centerline Fall 2016
Failing
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
� � I
No Credit
NA -High Water
-••-•--
Easement
...� Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
■ Photo Points
�0 Q�ossSedion
Stable
p,I1„1411ti
- : Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
® Invasives
Stressed
71111"11r
Figure
2A
Aerial Date:2015 Printed Date: 3/29/2017 Created By: GLP

k
_. I, .�C.
Q
46+00 a
W
t
t 44+00 ..
xx
43+00
- - - 42+00
F4 a
.!� T
Jti
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.withersravenel.com
0 50 100 200
Feet
1 inch= 100 feet
0
_. ................
0 00
32+00 WWR37+0028
,
•+,. - _ - 34+00 33+00 +00,'
j - i
39+00 36+00 jdc
35+00
8+00
1
w.
5
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Path:K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\GI&2016 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
Vegetation Plot
A Stationing
►— — Centerline Fall 2016
Failing
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
No Credit
NA -High Water
.......
Easement
...� Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
■ Photo Points
�0 Q�ossSedion
Stable
2MI111!!!!ti
- : Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
® Invasives
Stressed
7111111111r
Figure
213
Aerial Date:2015 Printed Date: 3/29/2017 Created By: GLP

/• � J.. � �'�t�ey ��� � iia •�" �`: y �� - � H•
•
> • .A1"
ZI
F !,
OR, I P
r. iii 'f
12-00
0
�.
41 13+00
Z/
e ` /
is a 1s oo
00 .w°14+,0000
y :yr
'~b� `Y..uf�. �C-.,, r r s ��4. �' '-d I'F.1" l _ - '`��J �Ir / - .-{•- -� - -
i- - - I ►�
� { C' i _ , •�•,� - 44+00
i
17+00
t. �['. i'f; .� - s ► • -sem--- ''`... _ .-- ' ..
1►�
18+00
AV
f,' /, ">�;�•t fc .f � a � f „// y ' R - l �•.. - - ,} � ka -fir ,
i a 0001,
� R o 'V' "� % •bn P -K„1C iy �e _ e'er^'
'40
10
41
Y
`�i?.r S� / ��. '1.01. 0.', _ ..-'A �'t �• � `s. � 1 �
..�_J�������f `.�c Ste. - , � - f M • � •� - • \ � a
�J � - � rte" �,�.'{ � F,l' 1 y � / �• � •"`� +`� �,. y� '
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel.com
0 35 70 140
Feet
1 inch= 70 feet
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
CabarrusCounty, North Carolina
Path:K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\GI&2016 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
Vegetation Plot
A Stationing
►- — Centerline Fall 2016
Failing
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
No Credit
NA -High Water
.......
Easement
...� Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
■ Photo Points
�0 Q'ossSedion
Stable
- Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
® Invasives
Stressed
Figure
2C
Aerial Date: 2015 Printed Date: 3/29/2017 Created By: GLP

r f .., y • _
v
f 4" 1111' � r'� � •Ir
� f -
r
4r. AkrN
Ak
-g
T "Pq pp �- - rr '�ht -18+00 �!T4� !' '.�""' - ti ♦� -
_ _ I IF►�Ty7r'
.w
y,
---- ... ....
,.. �.
Oty -.
r 44_
'R
AL
Oc ,1
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel.com
0 25 50 100
Feet
1 inch= 50 feet
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Path:K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\GI&2016 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
Vegetation Plot
A Stationing
►- — Centerline Fall 2016
Failing
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
No Credit
NA -High Water
-1111--
Easement
...� Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
■ Photo Points
�0 Q�ossSedion
Stable
2,1111,,,116
- : Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
® Invasives
Stressed
7111111111r
Figure
2D
Aerial Date: 2015 Printed Date: 3/29/2017 Created By: GLP

AkIlk
Jo
r i .
_ .. �=i w .. �• ♦ � Y+ r• � �\ _ 144 i� � � �� '
,R VobArea: Undercutting - __.� • '�F ''
...........x %
Problem Undercutting
PblAUndttin`"
g Problem Area: Undercutting
11 I.+���
26+00
y7+00
25+06 00
• ,re _
i�
`nRR ;t
•
1Ai
[F
:
22+00.
41
Afk
Sp
. _ �' �,r �1 i rr11 - , .rte' •�, _- � `y ;7�"k .
,l
`
� � . �`- : � r t .cam ° r \ 7'' � ►_, N
- o
:�
Wit hersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 M acKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t:919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.w it hersravenel.com
0 25 50 100
Feet
1 inch= 50 feet
McKee Creek & Clear Creek Restoration
Stream Current Condition Plan View
CabarrusCounty, North Carolina
Path:K:\07\07-0560\070568.01-EEP-McKee Creek Monitoring\GI&2016 Fall\ReportMap Overall.mxd
Legend
► - — Centerline
Structures
Vegetation Plot
A Stationing
►- — Centerline Fall 2016
Failing
Gitereia Unmet
Conservation
No Credit
NA -High Water
.......
Easement
...� Sewer Easement
Criteria Met
■ Photo Points
�o Q'ossSedion
Stable
2MI111!!!Rti
- : Tornado Damage April 2012
ROW
® Invasives
Stressed
71111"11r
Figure
2E
Aerial Date: 2015 Printed Date: 3/29/2017 Created By: GLP

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment - 2016 (MY5)
Reach ID McKee Creek Reach 1
Assessed Length 3301
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Number of StableTotal
Number in
Number of Unstable
Amount of Unstable
%Stable Performing as
Number with Stabilizing
Footage with Stabilizing Woody
Adjusted %for Stabilizing
Category
Category
Metric
Performing as
As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Woody Vegetation
Vegetation
Wood Vegetation
Intended
Aggradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100%
Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
Degradation -Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
0 0
100%
Bed
Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth=
Meander Pool
1.6
0 0
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate(>30% of centerline distance between tail
0 0
100%
of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle
Thalweg Position
Thalweq centering at upstream of meander bend Run
0 0
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend(glide)
0 0
100%
Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
growth and or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting
Bank
Undercut
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
appear sustainable and are providing habitat
Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
1
1
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
1
1
100%
across the sill
Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
1
1
100%
Engineered
arms
Structures
Bank erosion within the stuctures extent of influence does not
Bank Protection
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring
1
1
100%
guidance document
Pool forming structures maintaining -- Max Pool Depth: Mean
Habitat
Bankfull Depth — 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
base -flow

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment - 2016 (MY5)
Reach ID McKee Creek Reach 2
Assessed Length 723
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Number of StableTotal
Number in
Number of Unstable
Amount of Unstable
%Stable Performing as
Number with Stabilizing
Footage with Stabilizing Woody
Adjusted %for Stabilizing
Category
Category
Metric
Performing as
As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Woody Vegetation
Vegetation
Wood Vegetation
Intended
Aggradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100%
Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
Degradation -Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
0 0
100%
Bed
Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth=
Meander Pool
1.6
4 4
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate(>30% of centerline distance between tail
4 4
100%
of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle
Thalweg Position
Thalweq centering at upstream of meander bend Run
4 4
100%
Thalweg centering at dowsntream of meander bend(glide)
4 4
100%
Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
growth and or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting
Bank
Undercut
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
appear sustainable and are providing habitat
Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
5
5
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
5
5
100%
across the sill
Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
5
5
100%
Engineered
arms
Structures
Bank erosion within the stuctures extent of influence does not
Bank Protection
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring
5
5
100%
guidance document
Pool forming structures maintaining – Max Pool Depth: Mean
Habitat
Bankfull Depth — 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover
5
5
100%
at base -flow

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment - 2016 (MY5)
Reach ID Clear Creek
Assessed Length 1566
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category
Metric
Number of StableTotal
Performing as
Intended
Number in
As -Built
Number of Unstable
Sections
Amount of Unstable
Footage
%Stable Performing as
Intended
Number with Stabilizing
Woody Vegetation
Footage with Stabilizing Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %for Stabilizing
Woody Vegetation
Vertical Stability
Aggradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
Deg rad ation-Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
2 2
100%
Bed
Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth=
1.6
16 16
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail
of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle
16 16
100%
Thalweg Position
Thalweq centering at upstream of meander bend Run
16 16
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend(glide)
16 16
100%
Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
growth and or scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Bank
Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,
4
60
99.96%
0
0
99.96%
appear sustainable and are providing habitat
Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse 0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Totals
4
60
100%
0
0
99.96%
Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
13
13
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill
5
7
100%
Engineered
Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
arms
16
20
100%
Structures
Bank erosion within the stuctures extent of influence does not
Bank Protection
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring
14
20
100%
guidance document
Pool forming structures maintaining – Max Pool Depth: Mean
Habitat
Bankfull Depth — 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover
5
5
100%
at base -flow

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Planted Acreage 4.44
Easment Acreage 17.41
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Acreage in
% of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
300 SF
Pattern and
Color
4
0.1104
0.053
0.30%
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Easement
Acreage
Areas
Easement EncroachmentColor
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
None
Pattern and
0
0
0%
Bare Area
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
.1 acres
0
0
0%
Color
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4,
1 acres
Pattern and
0
0
°
0/°
or 5 stem count criteria
Color
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
25 Acres
Pattern and
0
0
°
0 /°
given the monitoringyear
Color
Easment Acreage 17.41
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
Acreage in
Easement
% of
Easement
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
300 SF
Pattern and
Color
4
0.1104
0.053
0.30%
Areas
Easement EncroachmentColor
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
None
Pattern and
0
0
0%

Or
may-"
or
�4 77
`3 1K J i
Rep.� ,� �► ,o -+y i � k��
41
alu
In
r

d
1
li, 40
u �� r
w ! r or A
.1i
! ov,
1� 07
�3y
> * . '-�•
.Y
9
Y
is
4

r 4.. ,' ... � it '�ti �Y •i
All
-s'Aik-
d F --�.,� _ `+!'ir{�'M1 . �' W .yet-. — � - � .'�+'• _
•
iii ♦ e.E �� . � �' YA

4:WithersRavenet
Our People. Your Success.
Frame No. 7
Description: Photo Station #7 - Clear Creek Reach 3
McKee Creek Stream Restoration WR No. 02070568.01
Photographic Record October 2016

�.�` ter �. r��.. �i• �`►<: �; � �r ��' ' C.ry �'1or—K
•4 r �
1• aF jj � :eft to F � .a �t �-_ �; wv

19�
St t} , - p
ti �` .T t'�'
# E yr4kw

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Veg Plot Criteria Attainment - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Mean
1
No
2
Yes
3
Yes
66%
4
Yes
100%
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Report Prepared By
Martin Richmond
Date Prepared
03/29/2017 10:47
database name
Withers&Ravenel-McKee Yr5.mdb
database location
C:\Users\lwelch\Downloads
computer name
WR1398
file size
110056752
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
Metadata
project data.
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes
Proj, planted
live stakes.
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live
Proj, total stems
stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
Plots
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total
Damage
stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
missing stems are excluded.
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
92573
project Name
McKee Creek
Description
McKee Creek Upstream and Downstream of Peach Orchard and Clear Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-Pee Dee
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
8

Table 9. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means) - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Species
Common Name
Type
Plot 1
Current Data - 2016 (MY5)
Plot 2 Plot 3
Plot 4
Current Mean
MY 1 (2012)
Annual Means
MY 2 (2013) MY 3 (2014)
MY 4 (2015)
MY 5 (2016)
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acer negundo
Box Elder
Tree
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
15
0
4.75
0
1.25
0
1.75
0
2.25
0
5
0
4.75
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
2
4
1
3
0
0
1
2
0.75
1.25
0.75
1.25
0.75
2
1
2
1
2
Carya aquatica
Water Hickory
Tree
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1 1
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5 1
0.5
0.5
0.75
0.75 1
0.75
0.75
Diospyrus virginiana
Persimmon
Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0.25
0
1
0
1.25
0
1
0
0.5
0
0.25
Eleagnus umbellata
Autumn Olive
Shrub
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.75
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1
1
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
1 3
6
0
3
0
0
0
2
0.75
2.75
1.75
1.75
1.25
1.75
1.5
3
0.75
2.5
0.75
2.75
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
0
1
0
36
0
2
0
5
0
11
0
9.5
0.25
9.5
0
9.75
0
9.5
0
11
Liriodenron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Tree
0 1
0
0
0
1 1
1
3
4
1
1.25
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.5
1
1.25
1
1.25 1
1
1.25
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
2
2
5
5
2
2
7
24
4
8.25
4.5
4.25
4.75
5.5
4.5
4.75
4
8.25
4
8.25
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0.25
0.25
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
0.25
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
Tree
0
0
1 0
2
1 0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0.5
Quercus falcata
Oak
Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0
0
Rhus copallinum
Winged Sumac
Shrub
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
0 1
0
0
0 1
0
0
0
0
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
12
1.5
3
2.25
2.25
2.25
3
2
2.5
1.5
2.25
1.5
3
Ulmus a/ata
Winged Elm
Tree
0 1
0
0 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
0 1
0
0 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Plot Area (acres)
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
Species Count
Stem Count
Stems Per Acre
3
6
1 243
5
13
526
4
1 11
1 445
8
55
2227
5
7
1 283
6
11
445
4
1 17
1 688
8
64 1
2591 1
4
10.25
415
6.75
35.75
1447
14
567
30 1
1204 1
12
486
29
1164 1
12
486
29
1164
10
415
34
1366
10
415
36
1447

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
McKee MY -05
XS -ID
RXS-1
Drainage Area
6.42 sq. mi
Date
10/25/2016
Field Crew
Phillips/McLauren
Summary Data
MY2-2013
Bankfull Elevation
583.378
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area
149.18
Bankfull Width
34.320271
Flood Prone Area Elevation
589.009
Flood Prone Width
30.5
Max Depth at Bankfull
5.592
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
4.24
W/D Ratio:
8.09
Entrenchment Ratio:
0.89
Bank Height Ratio:
1.43
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
MY 5 - 2016
MY1-2012
MY2-2013
MY3-2014
MY4-2015
MY5-2016
MY5-2015
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
0.00
584.08
0.00
584.02
0.00
584.03
0.00
584.66
0.00
583.46
42.26594
577.812
2.00
583.37
2.60
583.01
1.36
583.50
2.22
583.78
5.47
583.76
44.41177
577.908
4.00
582.17
4.22
582.09
3.32
582.95
3.20
583.13
10.19
583.96
45.57667
577.929
6.00
580.67
6.35
579.97
4.29
582.27
6.17
580.59
15.13
584.17
46.87189
577.835
8.00
578.38
7.42
578.13
5.05
581.53
6.47
577.98
17.19
583.83
48.32585
578.323
10.00
578.43
10.27
577.78
5.92
580.62
8.67
577.84
19.16
583.04
50.60553
578.9
12.00
578.49
12.16
577.75
7.15
580.08
10.17
577.73
20.38
582.58
51.06902
582.512
14.00
578.26
14.35
577.90
8.38
579.64
12.27
577.55
21.03
581.80
53.48351
583.161
16.00
578.08
16.32
577.89
9.71
579.35
13.77
577.80
22.46
581.05
54.18797
584.085
18.00
577.99
18.21
577.66
12.84
579.05
15.07
577.85
22.97
580.64
55.28448
584.416
20.00
578.06
20.23
577.65
16.05
578.31
17.17
577.75
25.59
580.26
56.88621
584.598
22.00
577.97
22.24
577.93
18.47
578.16
18.67
577.86
26.28
579.50
58.38179j
585.133
24.00
577.91
24.74
578.02
21.38
578.03
20.17
577.78
27.64
578.00
59.53558
585.03
26.00
578.88
26.70
579.06
23.51
578.04
20.97
577.94
29.42
577.87
61.58937
585.185
28.00
578.76
28.39
579.30
26.12
579.10
22.27
578.09
30.51
578.15
63.80636
585.578
30.00
580.33
30.23
580.93
27.76
579.93
23.97
578.37
31.57
577.92
66.03413
585.483
30.27
580.67
32.20
583.44
30.14
580.92
25.57
579.35
32.40
577.79
70.74629
585.5
32.00
582.86
34.42
584.90
31.23
581.86
26.37
580.03
33.60
577.84
73.47931
585.573
34.00
583.99
31.86
583.47
27.77
580.43
35.07
577.79
77.53915
585.574
33.14
584.75
28.77
580.91
36.65
577.79
83.50004
585.793
30.57
581.54
37.31
577.83
32.27
582.51
37.73
577.79
33.47
583.39
38.66
578.08
36.07
583.92
39.47
577.84
37.27
584.16
40.57
577.88
Left Bank to Right Bank
Note: Historical station data has been offset by 20 ft to provide comparative analysis to current station data
1 11
111
1 11 1 11 1 11
1 11 1 11 1 11
1 11 .1 11 1 11 :1 11
:. 111
!!
!!MEE
!!!!!!COME
��! !!!!
EEEEEE EEa1�EEE
___
MMM
E EEE
111
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE��----
MEEEEEMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEII.aeC���
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEy��EEEEEEE
MEEEEEEEEMMMEEEEEEEMEEEEE
MEEMEM=MMEMEEEEEEEEMEEEE
■�,./IEEEEEEEE
MRIMEEEEEEEE�EEEE
E EEE
IE MEE
M EEE
EE EEE
111
EEEEEEEE��EEEEEEEEEMMEEEE
EM�� EEEEEEEEEEEEE
=MC EEEEEEMEEEMCMr/�
�EEE� MEEEEEEEEEEE�viii�MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMEEE
�,r� .aMEEEEEEEE
s �►�MMEEEEEMM MM
rMMEMEEEEEEEEEEEEMEMEEE
EEE EEE
EE EM
111
yam MEEEEEMMEMMM
Ear
EEE EEEEEEEEEEEE
MESEEEEEEEMEEEEE"MMM
,�/�EEEEEE��EEMMMMMMEMMEME
MOM ��MMMM�=aEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
%/..MMEEMMMEEMMMMMMEEEEEEEE
EEMMM
EEEEEEEEEEEEMEEE
MMEE EEEEEMMEEEE
MM I Z OCOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
111
EEEEEEEE EEE_EEEEEEE■iEEEMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMEEE
MCEEME
.CEEEMCCCOC
=MMMMM=
MMMEMMW
111
MEMEEE EEEEMEEEE�.
EMEEMMMC MMMCEEMEE,
■EEEEEEEEi
■MMMMEMMM.
EEEEE
�MMMECCCE=
MEEEE
EE
EEEEEEM ❑■CCCCCCECI
MEEEEEMMMMM
iii���MMC��
EEMMf ug■OMOOMMM
MMEMENEC
on OCOCMME
EE
EE
EEM
MEMMM ■u.■MMMEEME
EMMM.L 1/II■CCCCCCE
MMEEt. ■LMEEEEEEEI
EMMCMMCEMEM
0EEEOEMEMMM
SCM CCMEMM
• 111
EMEEME MMMT l
EEMEMMMMEMEu1
MMME. a�1.MMMEMEEEI
MMM■ ���raMEEEEMMMI
� ME MEM
�=MMMMMEMME
:161
MEMMMMMMCMEMI�
MEEEMEEEEEEEE!! !.
M_ WIMMMMMMMMMMEEEEMMMMMMEMMEME
.­... a.- - w/MMMEMMEEEEEEMEEEEEEEEMMMMM
MOOMMOO
111
fell
1 111 1 111 1 111
1 111 1 111 .1 111
1 111 :1 111 • 1 111 11 111
Note: Historical station data has been offset by 20 ft to provide comparative analysis to current station data

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
McKee MY -5
XS -ID
PXS-1
Drainage Area
6.42 sq. mi
Date
10/26/2016
Field Crew
Phillips/McLauren
Summary Data
MY2-2013
Bankfull Elevation
582.715
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area
126.8268
Bankfull Width
29.29
Flood Prone Area Elevation
588.327
Flood Prone Width
50
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.258
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.80
W/D Ratio:
7.70
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.71
Bank Height Ratio:
1.21
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
MY 5 - 2016
MY1-2012
MY2-2013
MY3-2014
MY4-2015
MY5-2016
MY5-2016
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
0.00
582.92
0.00
582.99
0.00
582.70
0.00
583.16
0.00
582.98
54.12511
576.637
1.90
582.23
1.55
582.50
1.17
582.18
2.02
582.53
4.83
583.24
54.7685
576.95
3.80
580.98
4.01
581.08
2.65
581.63
3.83
581.06
9.28
583.03
55.93684
577.24
4.75
579.63
4.92
577.93
3.95
579.00
4.83
580.58
14.26
583.20
57.91341
578.281
5.70
577.78
7.52
578.01
4.73
578.07
6.33
578.67
19.41
583.30
58.54454
579.402
7.60
1 577.57
10.52
1 577.39
5.93
577.62
8.19
578.31
24.67
1 583.40
60.88951
579.931
9.50
577.11
12.78
576.31
7.80
577.35
9.42
577.85
28.02
583.49
61.03625
581.215
11.40
576.25
16.82
576.71
9.93
577.05
12.00
577.13
30.50
583.37
61.96585
581.859
13.30
576.02
19.44
576.72
12.06
576.96
13.95
576.80
31.52
583.14
63.97351
582.765
15.20
575.73
22.42
576.88
15.39
577.32
15.70
576.63
32.88
582.69
65.64229
583.284
17.10
575.79
24.34
578.77
18.59
577.31 1
17.79
576.46
33.82
582.00
66.36113
583.592
19.00
575.97
26.94
579.92
22.61
577.10
20.38
576.56
35.01
581.15
67.9829
583.845
20.90
576.18
28.88
581.26
24.80
579.30
21.55
576.70
35.69
580.30
69.107231
583.99
22.80
577.07
31.25
582.90
26.69
580.74
22.96
576.88
36.13
579.41
71.327321
584.059
24.70
578.62
28.02
581.78
24.81
578.30
36.90
578.01
74.91986
584.273
26.60
579.63
29.78
582.67
26.75
578.83
37.84
577.64
77.74708
584.578
28.50
580.53
31.66
583.34
28.12
580.30
38.85
577.34
82.43154
584.455
30.40
581.98
28.76
581.24
40.45
577.03
87.62854
584.473
32.30
582.92
30.03
581.87
42.14
576.77
92.53217
584.682
31.31
582.64
43.87
576.41
95.87134
584.749
45.35
576.02
46.46
576.13
47.92
576.59
47.99
576.61
51.45
576.58
Left Bank to Right Bank
Note: Historical station data has been offset by 30 ft to provide comparative analysis to current station data
SEE
SEE
-is
mom_ _
ZAMMEM
oas=
r -- -----
MMMMM
-----MMM�
E ------
---��-E�� Iii`
ZZ
�r
i=�CCC���■C���■C�
WA
==w_
SEES
Note: Historical station data has been offset by 30 ft to provide comparative analysis to current station data

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
Clear MY -5
XS -ID
RXS-2
Drainage Area
0.95
Date
10/27/2016
Field Crew
Phillips/McLauren
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
MY 5- 2016
Summary Data
MY2-2013
Bankfull Elevation
580.836
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area
19.39526
Bankfull Width
10.51099
Flood Prone Area Elevation
582.666
Flood Prone Width
120
Max Depth at Bankfull
2.181
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.55
W/D Ratio:
6.77
Entrenchment Ratio:
11.42
Bank Height Ratio:
1.32
MY1-2013
MY2-2013
MY3-2014
MY4-2015
MY5-2016
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
0.50
581.29
0.00
581.11
0.00
581.29
0.00
581.36
0.00
581.17
1.50
580.54
1.32
580.79
1.00
580.54
1.27
580.90
3.93
581.10
2.50
579.95
4.14
580.09
2.00
579.95
2.91
580.50
7.25
581.22
3.50
579.78
5.59
578.89
3.00
579.78
4.29
579.80
10.94
581.34
4.50
579.31
7.49
578.75
4.00
579.31
5.82
578.76
15.31
581.08
5.50
578.86
9.94
578.95
5.00
578.86
6.72
578.60
18.65
580.85
6.50
578.88
12.33
579.74
6.00
578.88
7.77
578.55
20.13
580.38
7.50
578.86
14.35
580.27
7.00
578.86
8.91
578.56
21.32
579.58
8.50
579.03
17.40
580.92
8.00
579.03
10.33
578.67
22.21
578.87
9.50
579.13
9.00
579.13
11.66
579.02
23.40
578.66
10.50
579.24
10.00
579.24
13.11
579.82
25.72
578.75
11.50
579.43
11.00
579.43
15.00
580.41
27.65
578.92
12.50
579.94
12.00
579.94
17.11
580.69
29.25
579.32
13.50
580.27
13.00
580.27
30.64
579.80
14.50
580.39
14.00
580.39
31.84
581.53
15.50
580.58
15.00
580.58
33.39
580.74
16.50
580.80
16.00
580.80
35.19
580.85
17.50
581.09
17.00
581.09
37.56
581.31
18.50
581.29
18.00
581.29
40.44
581.11
a .�.
}
C,
Ar............ 0000......
............. ... 0000.. ...................
............. ...._...... Cra.................
............. ... 0000.. �.... ............
..........•...000�•i000000 Ci`�'i,■0000 ...........
A���ri�i�'��rr� .. +0000.. ■11\....� +�..........
ii00000 000r 000000 `■n•...� �►�.........
�� ii0r.0000000 .� ..� 0000.. ••RI000� 00r�u0000000
000000000r---IVA - �. 0000 ..
..........iii MUM0 :00ii eriii00i0000i00
0000000000000
000000000000 wMMMMMMMMwNNa000 u00 .........
iiiiiiiiiiMM MO
i�0 iii ' ����i/i�� NO
ii
00000000000 00 �..
iiiiiiiiMM Mw iii ilii Imm/: ai000 ������M�
MM M
0000000000000 ON
�.. �..... �
iiMowwwo i� ii ii iiioi
............. ... .0 .00..0= IC::
..0000000100. ...1 91 �■. �...... i00�
0000000000000 000 0000000 i00
ON NOMON20=1000 0000000000000 000 .0000000 OWN
0000000000000 000 �i0000000
0000000000000 000 �A0000000
00000000000.0 00 00000000 0t
00000000 0 0000000
0000000000000 0 00000000 i00
00000000
00000000
00000000

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
Clear MY -05
XS -ID
PXS-2
Drainage Area
0.95
Date
10/26/16
Field Crew
Phillips/McLauren
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
MY 5 -2016
Summary Data
MY1
Bankfull Elevation
580.155
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area
40.42198
Bankfull Width
11.59
Flood Prone Area Elevation
583.545
Flood Prone Width
150
Max Depth at Bankfull
3.88
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.45
W/D Ratio:
4.73
Entrenchment Ratio:
12.94602
Bank Height Ratio:
1.31
Left Bank to Right Bank
MY1
IrL..
MY2
11 1 11
MY3
MY4
MM MO ImminsimillIM111
MY5
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
1.00
581.16
0.00
581.28
1.00
581.66
0.00
581.26
0.00
580.82
2.00
580.44
1.46
581.00
2.00
580.89
1.28
580.86
4.03
580.83
4.00
576.57
4.13
576.57
4.00
576.97
2.30
579.67
8.17
580.84
5.00
576.61
5.97
576.57
5.00
576.96
3.58
577.34
11.65
581.01
6.00
576.47
7.76
576.85
6.00
576.77
4.53
576.89
16.82
581.29
7.00
576.58
9.76
577.36
7.00
576.83
7.22
576.52
18.32
581.30
8.00
577.37
10.45
577.56
8.00
577.57
9.04
576.75
19.81
581.26
9.00
577.56
11.66
579.47
9.00
577.71
10.44
577.26
21.39
580.09
10.00
577.96
14.39
580.05
10.00
578.06
11.33
577.74
21.79
576.52
11.00
578.67
16.35
580.39
11.00
578.72
13.01
579.47
23.54
576.28
12.00
579.39
12.00
579.89
14.76
580.09
29.78
576.31
13.00
580.08
13.00
580.53
16.23
580.37
30.92
576.83
14.00
580.07
14.00
580.47
19.17
580.74
31.91
577.65
15.00
580.29
15.00
580.64
32.32
578.17
16.00
580.47
16.00
580.77
32.98
579.79
17.00
580.81
17.00
581.06
34.58
580.26
18.00
581.16
18.00
581.36
37.62
580.75
42.04
580.88
46.01
581.27
48.75
581.37
Left Bank to Right Bank
Note: Historical Station data has been offset by 20 ft to provide comparative analysis to current data
IrL..
1 11
11 1 11
11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11
MM MO ImminsimillIM111
- IYW�1•W1\
MMMOMOMOMMMOMMOMPPMOM
MMOMMOOMMOMMAWWWIT! �Wm
WOMMONOMMA
MMMOM
MOMMOM V,srmmw�������
Bankfull
iii
���Ni���������1��WAMMMOMMOMMOMMMM
MNaSMII1�
11
��W�1•����m
1� WS►7��������������
mmmfllin\1�1
�mm
OMMMEMMMMMM101
t
MM
NININNISIMMO
n
r� r•MUSSESSOMO
11
- MMMMOMMMMEI
ATAMMMMMMMM���
MOMMMOIN
WOMOMMMMM 0�
11
.
oil
11 1 11
11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 see
Note: Historical Station data has been offset by 20 ft to provide comparative analysis to current data

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
Clear MY -05
XS -ID
RXS-3
Drainage Area
0.95
Date
10/26/2016
Field Crew
Phillips/McLauren
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
MY 5 - 2016
Summary Data
MY2-2013
Bankfull Elevation
579.868
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area
28.58
Bankfull Width
12.93157
Flood Prone Area Elevation
582.156
Flood Prone Width
250
Max Depth at Bankfull
2.388
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.65
W/D Ratio:
7.83
Entrenchment Ratio:
19.33
Bank Height Ratio:
1.07
r
s
Left Bank to Right Bank:1 1--------o------o--------o-----
----------------------------------------
:1 11 ���IIIID�l111--PRON'S------ ------------- -----
------- \w -- ---- -----
. 1--------_� �------- -��' ---- mmmmm
-----
---------------- -- w` -----
--------- �------ - ��wi -----
• 11 --------- ----MMMM mm �------ -----
---------� w--- ►�-■ -mmmm
----
v-------mmmmm
/------- :s--- - --■ -----
-------� ■ ��--- �--■ -----
--_---- -n'■--- _--■ -----
-- ---- -�i,� �--- --■ -----
11 ommmm mmm -------mmmm
--------� ►��- -----
---------------•i ��� -----
---------------� -----
----------------•• -----
1
111100000000000
14.00
-----
-----------------=-`w -----■ -----
ii�ii��iii�i�ii�i-�i-i�i i�imi
------------------------ -----
111 11 /11 /1 /11 11 111 11 X111
MY1-2012
MY2-2013
MY3-2014
MY4-2015
MY5-2016
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
0.00
579.87
1.00
579.63
0.00
579.99
0.00
579.96
0.00
580.03
1.00
579.67
2.91
579.08
2.47
579.20
1.48
579.58
3.53
579.96
2.00
579.28
4.33
578.64
4.31
578.55
3.43
578.98
6.65
579.98
3.00
578.91
6.15
577.78
6.20
577.91
5.26
578.57
9.60
579.89
4.00
578.71
8.29
577.76
7.83
577.58
6.06
577.77
11.56
579.53
5.00
578.47
10.68
578.02
8.89
577.74
7.06
577.56
12.88
578.92
6.00
577.96
12.44
578.46
9.35
577.82
9.01
577.59
14.14
578.66
7.00
578.04
14.88
579.10
10.72
577.76
10.18
577.62
15.20
577.80
8.00
577.91
16.22
579.50
12.04
578.65
12.32
577.65
16.94
577.59
9.00
577.93
13.99
579.03
14.61
578.49
18.46
577.58
10.00
578.01
16.54
579.54
15.56
578.65
20.05
577.48
11.00
577.97
17.25
579.39
21.98
577.64
12.00
578.17
19.14
579.43
22.83
578.42
13.00
578.50
21.63
579.47
24.50
578.54
14.00
578.71
25.93
579.40
15.00
579.21
28.77
579.38
16.00
579.59
31.62
579.46
17.00
579.73
34.58
579.54
18.00
579.87

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
Clear MY -05
XS -ID
PXS-3
Drainage Area
0.95
Date
10/26/2016
Field Crew
Phillips/Mclauren
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
MY 5 -2016
Summary Data
- 2012
Bankfull Elevation
579.138
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area
42.80913
Bankfull Width
29.63
Flood Prone Area Elevation
583.458
Flood Prone Width
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
4.191
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.83
W/D Ratio:
16.23033
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.750471
Bank Height Ratio:
1.057027
MY1
- 2012
MY2
- 2013
MY3
- 2014
MY4
- 2015
MY5
- 2016
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
0.00
578.64
1.00
578.29
0.00
578.29
0.00
578.42
0.00
579.27
1.00
578.18
2.32
577.97
1.00
578.23
1.12
578.23
3.43
579.06
2.00
578.37
4.43
577.44
2.75
577.98
4.37
577.97
6.99
579.07
3.00
577.40
6.06
576.07
4.60
577.46
5.45
577.80
10.76
578.73
4.00
577.39
7.57
575.12
5.01
576.47
5.64
577.03
13.91
578.61
5.00
576.13
9.64
575.34
8.73
574.82
7.84
575.43
17.87
578.57
6.00
576.15
11.16
576.03
10.34
575.01
8.20
574.65
19.44
578.18
7.00
575.47
12.74
576.70
10.54
575.89
13.04
574.95
20.58
577.24
8.00
575.79
14.16
578.23
11.12
576.52
14.01
575.62
21.47
576.05
9.00
575.18
15.45
579.53
12.52
577.46
15.08
577.21
22.80
575.14
10.00
575.23
17.60
579.17
18.60
579.17
16.52
578.06
24.58
574.95
11.00
576.11
17.03
578.49
25.81
575.00
12.00
576.66
20.63
579.34
27.20
575.13
13.00
577.72
22.45
579.30
27.97
575.56
14.00
578.28
28.60
576.67
15.00
578.64
30.17
577.66
31.10
578.26
32.13
578.72
33.06
579.06
34.76
579.38
37.54
579.27
41.58
579.34
Left Bank to Right Bank
Historical Station MY1 - MY4 (ft)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
580.00
579.00
578.00
w
c
° 577.00
m
W
576.00
575.00
574.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
Current Station (ft)
Note: Historical Station data has been offset by 15 ft to provide comparative analysis to current data
,, v
xA IA
x
Left Bank to Right Bank
Historical Station MY1 - MY4 (ft)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
580.00
579.00
578.00
w
c
° 577.00
m
W
576.00
575.00
574.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
Current Station (ft)
Note: Historical Station data has been offset by 15 ft to provide comparative analysis to current data

Longitudinal Profile Plot
River Basin
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed
McKee Reach 1
Station
24+00 - 28+00
Date
10/26/2016
Field Crew
Richmond/McLaurin
MY5-2016
Station
Elevation
2566.40
—Thalweg MY -2
586.67
Thalweg MY -3
2593.60
Thalweg MY -4
586.33
7Tha�iwegY-5
2607.70
i
586.35
2618.59
586.24
2623.97
585.62
o
2632.85
585.50
2644.50
585.75
2657.54
585.64
586
2666.75
586.08
2683.47
585.98
2695.26
585.98
w
2703.92
585.68
2713.38
585.89
2719.481
585.76
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
590
+Thalweg MY -1
589
—Thalweg MY -2
Thalweg MY -3
Thalweg MY -4
588
7Tha�iwegY-5
587
i
o
586
w
-
585
584
583
582
2400
2500 2600 2700 2800
Station (ft)

McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Station
Elevation
1046.84
576.89
1061.65
River Basin Yadkin Pee -Dee
1115.38
576.86
1145.46
mond/McLaurin
1174.17
Watershed McKee Reach 2
1200.56
575.84
1212.00
574.72
1248.72
576.85
Station 10+00 - 17+00
576.89
1324.87
576.66
1362.78
576.52
1390.69
576.38
Date 10/26/2016
Field Crew Rich
1448.92
576.59
1486.73
576.47
1521.55
576.39
1564.93
575.42
580
576.29
1630.63
575.59
1653.70
575.98
579
Thalweg MY -1
578
Thalweg MY -4
577
0
a
w
575
574
573
1000
1200
1400 1600
Station (ft)
MY5-2016
Thalweg MY -2
576
Station
Elevation
1046.84
576.89
1061.65
577.23
1115.38
576.86
1145.46
mond/McLaurin
MY5-2016
Thalweg MY -2
576
Station
Elevation
1046.84
576.89
1061.65
577.23
1115.38
576.86
1145.46
576.73
1174.17
576.66
1200.56
575.84
1212.00
574.72
1248.72
576.85
1285.02
576.89
1324.87
576.66
1362.78
576.52
1390.69
576.38
1423.57
576.02
1448.92
576.59
1486.73
576.47
1521.55
576.39
1564.93
575.42
1605.05
576.29
1630.63
575.59
1653.70
575.98
-�--
f
Thalweg MY -3
--*---Thalweg MY -5
I
i
r
1

McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Cabarrus County, NC
DMS Project# 92573
584
582 Thalweg MY -2
580
---*-Thalweg MY -5
578
2 576
LU
574
572
570
568
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800
Longitudinal Profile Plot
River Basin Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed Clear Creek
Station 11+00 - 28+00
Date 11/22/2016
MY5-2016
-Thalweg MY -1
Station (ft)
MY5-2016
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Field Crew
Phillips/McLaurin
584
582 Thalweg MY -2
580
---*-Thalweg MY -5
578
2 576
LU
574
572
570
568
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800
Longitudinal Profile Plot
River Basin Yadkin Pee -Dee
Watershed Clear Creek
Station 11+00 - 28+00
Date 11/22/2016
MY5-2016
-Thalweg MY -1
Station (ft)
MY5-2016
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
1066.83
581.72
2031.78
577.15
1093.89
581.26
2035.86
577.63
1132.58
580.03
2103.49
578.41
1176.47
580.73
2136.85
577.47
1227.05
581.10
2161.29
577.20
1253.94
579.62
2233.64
574.72
1287.03
580.88
2284.45
577.33
1314.41
579.91
2343.27
576.14
1349.49
580.81
2383.85
574.55
1451.64
580.63
2413.27
573.88
1468.09
580.32
2426.24
574.63
1475.74
579.84
2441.58
573.58
1530.74
579.92
2447.99
572.96
1579.26
579.41
2451.32
573.37
1587.77
579.68
2485.67
574.48
1633.97
579.16
2503.76
574.10
1650.92
579.30
2524.34
574.00
1687.80
578.88
2553.25
573.52
1717.83
579.08
2580.52
572.51
1790.00
579.08
2592.92
571.47
1820.19
578.22
2595.22
572.62
1855.77
579.29
2607.15
572.57
1887.53
577.93
2613.43
572.63
1943.93
578.59
2640.86
572.92
1972.62
578.97
2652.98
572.77
2007.36
578.46
2705.99
569.50
f
Thalweg MY -3
Thalweg MY -4
/I
i� -

Pebble Count Exhibit - 2016 (MY5)
Mckee Creek Stream Resotration
20
Mckee Creek
v
Riffle
CL 15
Particle
Size
Count Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Silt Clay
0.062
0 0%
0%
Sand
2
20 20%
20%
2.8
3 3%
23%
4
9 9%
32%
Gravel
5.6
6 6%
38%
8 6 6%
44%
11 7 7%
51%
16 11 11%
62%
22.6 5 5%
67%
32
7 7%
74%
45
3 3%
77%
64
3 3%
80%
90
8 8%
88%
Cobble
128
4 4%
92%
180
8 8%
100%
Boulder
309
0 0%
100%
437
0 000
100%
Bedrock
2048
0 0%
100%
Total
100 1 100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 10.57
D84 77
D95 147.5
25
20
v
CL 15
LO
0 10
U
A
5
c 0
0.062 0.1875 0.75
Individual Class Percent
3 6.85 13.65 27.3 54.5 109 218 437 1536
Particle Size (mm)

Pebble Count Exhibit - 2016 (MY5)
Mckee Creek Stream Resotration
Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
Clear Creek Upstream
Riffle
Particle
Size Count Percent Cumulative
Percent
70%
Silt Clay
0.062 0 0% 0%
60%
Sand
2 11 11% 11%
50%
2.8 3 3% 14%
40%
AMY -5
-MY-1
-MY-2
MY -3
Gravel
4 7 7% 21%
CL 30%
5.6 9 9% 30%
20%
10%
0%
8 5 5% 35%
11 9 9% 44%
16 12 12% 56%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Grain Size (mm)
22.6 7 7% 63%
32 5 5% 68%
45 10 10% 78%
64 9 9% 87%
Cobble
90 9 9% 96%
Individual Class Percent
128 4 4% 100%
180 0 0% 100%
25
J zo
a 15
a ■MY -5
A
U 10 - - ■ MY -1
■ MY -2
5
I d I, MY -3
- 0
0.062 0.1875 0.75 3 6.85 13.65 27.3 54.5 109 218 437 1536
Grain Size (mm)
Boulder437
309 0 0% 1 100%
0 0% 100%
Bedrock
2048 0 0% 100%
Total
100 100% 100%
Summary Data
D50 13.5
D84 154
D95 154

Pebble Count Exhibit - 2016
Cobble
Clear Creek Downstream
5
5%
Riffle
180 6 6%
Particle
Size
Count Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Silt Clay
0.062
0 0%
0%
Sand
2
7 7%
7%
2.8 4 4%
11%
Gravel
4
10 10%
1 21%
5.6 13 13%
34%
8 7 7%
41%
11 8 8%
49%
16 8 8%
57%
22.6 5 5%
62%
32 6 6%
68%
45 6 6%
74%
64 8 8%
82%
Cobble
128
5
5%
94%
180 6 6%
100%
Boulder
309
0
0%
100%
437 0 0%
100%
Bedrock
2048
0
0%
100%
Total
100
100%
100%
I Summary Data I
Individual Class Percent
25
v
20
d
a
15
uy
■MY -5
U
'79
10
_
- MY -1
'p
. MY -2
Z
MY -3
MY
0
0.062 0.1875 0.75
3 6.85 13.65 27.3 54.5 109
218 437 1536
Particle Size (mm)

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
McKee Creek Project # 92573 - Mckee-Reach 1
Parameter
Gauge2
Regional Curve
I
Pre-Existing Condition I
Design
I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Med Max SD5 n
Min
Med
Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)
27.5
31.8
31
Floodprone Width (ft)
75
160
75
160
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.6
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.5
4.4
3.4
4.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
68.2
77.6
80
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
14.9
12
Entrenchment Ratiol
2.6
5.5
2.4
5.2
1 Bank Height Ratio
1
2.1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
1.9
4.5
1.9
3.3
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
3.1
6.4
5.2
7.7
Pool Spacing (ft)l
50
205
123.9
216.9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
65
145
93
139
Radius of Curvature (ft)
48
195
62
108
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
27.5
31.8
31
Meander Wavelength (ft)
101
305
235
350
Meander Width Ratiol
2.2
1 5
2
4.5
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
0.49
0.52
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
45
45
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.4-5.0
4.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
350
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.28
1.16
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0029
0.0032
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0029
0.0032
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 =For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate ofthe bankfidl floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bade to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary -R2
McKee Creek Project # 92573 - Mckee-Reach 2
Parameter Gauge2 Regional Curve
I
Pre-Existing Condition
I
Design
I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Med Max SD5
n Min
Med
Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.5
26.8
31.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
75
160
75
160
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.6
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.5
4.4
3.4
4.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
68.2
77.6
80
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
14.9
12
Entrenchment Ratiol
2.6
5.5
2.4
5.2
1 Bank Height Ratio
1
2.1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
101
305
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0055
0.0131
0.0061
0.0106
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
6.5
6.5
5.3
8
Pool Spacing (ft)l
45
180 1
127.7
1
223.6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
135
240
96
287
Radius of Curvature (ft)
95
240
64
144
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
25.5
26.8
31.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
208
377
243
477
Meander Width Ratiol I I 1
1 5 1
1 9.2 1
3
1
9
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
0.33
0.38
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
45
45
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.0-4.5
4.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
350
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.5
1.17
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0027
0.0027
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0018
0.0018
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 =For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate ofthe bankfidl floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bade to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be tilled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary -R2
McKee Creek Project # 92573 - Clear Creek
Parameter
Gauge2
Regional Curve
I
Pre-Existing Condition
I
Design
I Dixon Branch
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL UL
Eq. Min
Med Max SD5 n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Med
Max
Bankfull Width(ft)
11.5
16.7
17.3
7.9
13.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
150
90
190
35
100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
2
1.4
0.8
1.4
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
6.1
2.2
2.5
2
2.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
21.8
24.8
25
11.3
13.2
Width/Depth Ratio
5.8
12.8
12
5.4
10.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
11.3
5.2
11
3.1
8.9
1 Bank Height Ratio
1.4
2.3
1
1.1
1.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0059
0.0084
0.0061
0.0106
0.012
0.018
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.8
3.3
5.3
8
2.1
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)l
1 57.51
1 116.9
1 1127.7
1 1
223.6
10
1
45
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
35
47
52
78
29
50
Radius of Curvature (ft)
15
25
35
52
6
22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
11.5
16.7
17.3
7.9
13.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
45
75
132
196
48
85
Meander Width Ratiol
Transport parameters
I I 1 1 3.4 1
1 5.6 1 1
3
1 1
4.5
1 4.3
1
7.6
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E/C5
C4
E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.3-3.9
3.6
3.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
89
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.12
1.21
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0071
0.0055
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0032
0.0055
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be tilled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 10b.
Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
McKee Creek Pro'ect # 92573- Reach 1
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
1Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
1SC%/Sa% G%/C%/B%/Be%
1d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /dip/ disp (mm)
0.7
27.8
49.4
83.2
109.5
0.7
27.8
49.4
83.2
109.5
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
31ncision Class <1.2 11,2-1.49 / 1.5-1.99 / >2.0
1-7
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
2 = Entrenchment Class - Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as visual estimates
3 = Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Footnotes 2,3 - These classes are loosley built around the Rosgen classification and hazard ranking breaks, but were adjusted slightly to make for easier assignment to somewhat coarser bins based on visual estimates in the field such that measurement of every segment for ER would not be necessary.
The intent here is to provide the reader/consumer of design and monitoring information with a good general sense of the extent of hydrologic containment in the pre-existing and the rehabilitated states as well as comparisons to the reference distributions.
ER and BHR have been addressed in prior submissions as a subsample (cross-sections as part of the design survey), however, these subsamples have often focused entirely on facilitating design without providing a thorough pre-constrution distribution of these parameters, leaving the reader/consumer with a sample that is weighted heavily on the stable sections of
the reach. This means that the distributions for these parameters should include data from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile and in the case of ER, visual estimates. For example, the typical longitudinal profile permits sampling of the BHR at riffles beyond those subject to cross-sections and therefore can be readily integrated and provide
a more complete sample distribution for these parameters, thereby providing the distribution/coverage necessary to provide meaningful comparisons.

Table 10b.
Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
McKee Creek Pro'ect # 92573- Reach 2
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
1Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
1SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
1d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 /d95 /dip/ disp (mm)
0.7
27.8
49.4
83.2
109.5
0.7
27.8
49.4
83.2
109.5
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
31ncision Class <1.2 / 1.2-1.49 / 1.5-1.99 / >2.0
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
2 = Entrenchment Class - Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as visual estimates
3 = Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Footnotes 2,3 - These classes are loosley built around the Rosgen classification and hazard ranking breaks, but were adjusted slightly to make for easier assignment to somewhat coarser bins based on visual estimates in the field such that measurement of e
The intent here is to provide the reader/consumer of design and monitoring information with a good general sense of the extent of hydrologic containment in the pre-existing and the rehabilitated states as well as comparisons to the reference distributions
ER and BHR have been addressed in prior submissions as a subsample (cross-sections as part of the design survey), however, these subsamples have often focused entirely on facilitating design without providing a thorough pre-constrution distribution of the
the reach. This means that the distributions for these parameters should include data from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile and in the case of ER, visual estimates. For example, the typical longitudinal profile permits sampling
a more complete sample distribution for these parameters, thereby providing the distribution/coverage necessary to provide meaningful comparisons.

Table 10b.
Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
McKee Creek Pro'ect #92573- Clear Creek
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
1Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
1SC%/Sa% G% C%/B%/Be%
1d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.35
0.7
1.2
3.2
6
0.4
1.3
3
14
18
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
31ncision Class <1.2 /1.2-1.49 /1.5-1.99 / >2.0
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
2 = Entrenchment Class - Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as visual estimates
3 = Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross-sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Footnotes 2,3 - These classes are loosley built around the Rosgen classification and hazard ranking breaks, but were adjusted slightly to make for easier assignment to somewhat coarser bins based on visual estimates in the field such that measurement of e
The intent here is to provide the reader/consumer of design and monitoring information with a good general sense of the extent of hydrologic containment in the pre-existing and the rehabilitated states as well as comparisons to the reference distributions
ER and BHR have been addressed in prior submissions as a subsample (cross-sections as part of the design survey), however, these subsamples have often focused entirely on facilitating design without providing a thorough pre-constrution distribution of the
the reach. This means that the distributions for these parameters should include data from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile and in the case of ER, visual estimates. For example, the typical longitudinal profile permits sampling
a more complete sample distribution for these parameters, thereby providing the distribution/coverage necessary to provide meaningful comparisons.

Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Cross Section 1 (Riffle -1)
Cross Section 2 (Pool -1)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle -2)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1
Base MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
583.4 581.0 583.40
583.38
583.38
582.7 580.0
580.74 582.72 582.72
580.8
580.5
580.70
580.84
580.84
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.27 22.00
24.44
21.00
34.32
22.5 23.00
22.74
15.60 29.29
18.00
13.00
10.00
13.11
10.51
Floodprone Width (ft)
160.0 33.00
30.50
30.50
30.50
160.0 36.0
50.00
50.00 50.00
150.0
150.0
120.00
120.00
120.00
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.89 1.98
1.18
4.93
4.24
2.45 2.37
2.75
3.95 3.80
1.36
1.05
1.02
1.39
1.55
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.76 2.85
2.59
5.83
5.59
3.90 3.69
3.78
6.26 6.26
2.43
1.75
1.61
2.29
2.18
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
53.00 51.40
32.06
91.05
149.18
63.68 58.50
71.95
69.69 126.83
30.61
13.40
11.26
20.36
19.40
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.82 11.11
20.72
4.26
8.09
9.20 9.70
8.26
3.95 7.70
13.23
12.33
16.87
9.45
6.77
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
6.59 1.50
1.25
1.45
0.89
7.10 1.57
2.20
3.20 1.71
8.82
11.54
12.00
9.15
11.42
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
2.53 2.23
2.32
1.22
1.43
1.84 1.81
1.69
1.21 1.21
1.00
1.20
1.73
1.25
1.32
Based on current/developing bankfull feature2
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
Cross Section 4 (Pool -2)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle -3)
Cross Section 6 (Pool -3)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1
Base MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Fase MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+
Base MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
580.2 580.4 580.53
580.16
580.16
579.87 579.60 579.54 579.87 579.87
579.14
578.29 578.29
579.14
579.14
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.00 14.30
8.00
11.33
11.59
17.00 13.88
14.07
14.08 12.93
15.00
13.20
11.52
14.99
29.63
Floodprone Width (ft)
150.0 150.0
150.00
150.00
150.00
250.00 200.00 250.00 250.00 250.00
250.00 200.00 200.00
200.00
200.00
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.55 2.62
2.81
2.10
2.45
1.11 0.96
1.29
1.67 1.65
1.70
1.68
1.64
2.41
1.83
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.97 3.82
3.76
3.63
3.88
1.96 1.84
1.96
2.31 2.39
3.46
3.17
3.47
4.49
4.19
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
30.61 31.60
25.53
25.35
40.42
21.02 14.73
12.27
27.52 28.58
27.27
21.35
17.81
45.25
42.81
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.66 5.46
2.85
5.39
4.73
15.37 14.51
10.87
8.44 7.83
8.80
7.87
7.01
6.23
16.23
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
8.82 10.49
18.75
13.24
12.95
14.71 14.41
17.77
17.76 19.33
16.67
15.15
21.70
16.68
6.75
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.18 1.00
1.30
1.32
1.31
1.00 1.01
1.23
1.04 1.07
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.05
1.06
Based on current/developing bankfull feature2
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ll
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established.
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the n
performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
2 = Based on the elevation of any dominant depositional feature that develops and is observed at the time of survey. If the baseline datum remains the only significant depositional feature
then these two sets of dimensional parameters will be equal, however, if another depositional feature of significance develops above or below the baseline bankfull datum then this should be tracked and quantified in these cells.

Exhibit • • Monitoring I
McKee Creek Project # 92573 McKee Creek- Reach 1
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle only
Bankfull Width
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2),
Width/Depth Ratioli===MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Entrenchment Ratio�
1 Bank Height Ratio
itional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classifi
Channel Thalweg len(
Sinuosity (ft
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft
BF slope (ft/ft
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S°/
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank!
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or Othe
ells indicate that these will typically not b
E4/C4
3274
1.12
0.0019
0.0019
0%
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)l
P•• Length
Pool Max depth (ft)
itional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classifi
Channel Thalweg len(
Sinuosity (ft
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft
BF slope (ft/ft
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S°/
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank!
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or Othe
ells indicate that these will typically not b
E4/C4
3274
1.12
0.0019
0.0019
0%
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Radius of Curvature (ft)l
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
itional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classifi
Channel Thalweg len(
Sinuosity (ft
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft
BF slope (ft/ft
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S°/
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank!
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or Othe
ells indicate that these will typically not b
E4/C4
3274
1.12
0.0019
0.0019
0%
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate
Not enough stream data to calculate

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 11 b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573 McKee Creek- Reach 2
Parameter Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4
n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Min Mean Med Max SD4
n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.7
1
22.00
1
24.44
1
N/A (survey limitations)
34.32
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
160
1
33.00
1
30.5
1
N/A (survey limitations)
30.50
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.89
1
1.98
1
1.179
1
N/A (survey limitations)
4.24
1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.76
1
2.85
1
2.587
1
N/A (survey limitations)
5.59
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
53
1
51.40
1
32.058
1
N/A (survey limitations)
149.18
1
Width/Depth Ratio
12.82
1
11.11
1
20.723
1
N/A (survey limitations)
8.09
1
Entrenchment Ratio
6.59
1
1.50
1
1.2479
1
N/A (survey limitations)
0.89
1
1Bank Height Ratio
2.53
1
2.23
1
2.316
1
N/A (survey limitations)
1.43
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10
32.2
34 44
13.54
5
45
53.5
53.5 62
2
40
2
1 N/A (survey limitations)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-0.049 -0.003
0.012 0.028
0.035
5
0.002
0.005
0.005 0.008
2
0.002
0.005
0.005 0.007
2
N/A (survey limitations)
Pool Length (ft)
24
36.6
39 55
12.74
5
15
27.8
30 40 12.32
5
20
32.8
29 39
12.1
5
N/A (survey limitations)
48.64
73.21
79.03 86.14
14.82
4
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.242
2.386
2.187 3.287
0.423
5
0.442
1.498
1.683 2.46 0.88
5
0.5
1.5
1.6 2.2
0.78
5
N/A (survey limitations)
0.57
1.0925
0.84 1 2.12
0.61
4
Pool Spacing (ft)l
45
1 178.8
206 267
87.81
5
0
141 1
162.5 239 1 101.2
4
1 50
185
1 200 260
80.23
4
N/A (survey limitations)
0
62.23
72.63 114.1
47.14
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
97
101
101 105
5.657
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
65
128.3
120 200
67.88
3
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
282
322
322 362
56.57
2
Meander Width Ratio I I 1
4.042 4.208 4.208 4.375 0.236
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4/C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1422
464 (survey reduction)
464 (survey reduction)
377 (survey reduction)
661
Sinuosity (ft)
1.39
1.15
1.2
1.19
1.18
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0026
0.0026
0.003
N/A
0.0014
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0026
0.0026
0.003
N/A
0.0015
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0
7.27
54.55121.821
5.45
0
0
6 1
73 1 16 5
0
0
5.62
73.03 15.73
5.62
0
0
23
57 20
0
0
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
19.3
38.5
54.5 1 109 1
309
3
19.3 1
27.3 1 77 154
4.85
19.3
27.3 77
309
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
10%
2%
4%
5%
5%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 11 b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary - 2016 (MY5)
McKee Creek Project # 92573 Clear Creek
Parameter Baseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4
n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
21.02
17.5
25.85
2
13.2
13.5
13.9
2 10
12.04
14.07
2
13.11
13.59
14.08
2
10.51
11.72
12.93
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
150
200
250
2
200.0
200.0
200.0
2 120
185
250
2
120
185
250
2
120.00
185.00
250.00
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.11
1.23
1.36
2
1.0
1.3
1.7
2 1.02
1.16
1.29
2
1.39
1.53
1.67
2
1.55
1.60
1.65
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)'
1.96
1 2.19
1 2.43
2
1.8
2.5
3.2
1
2 1.61
1 1.79
1.96
1
2
2.289
2.3
2.31
1
2
2.18 1
2.28
1
2.39
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
21.02
23.44
25.85
2
14.7
18.0
21.4
2 11.26
11.77
12.27
2
20.37
23.95
27.52
2
19.40
23.99
28.58
1
2
Width/Depth Ratio
13.23
14.29
15.37
2
7.9
11.2
14.5
2 9.77
10.32
10.87
2
8.44
8.95
9.45
2
6.77
7.30
7.83
2
Entrenchment Ratio
8.333
11.52
14.71
2
14.4
14.8
15.2
2 12.00
14.89
17.77
2
9.15
13.46
17.76
2
11.42
15.38
19.33
2
Bank Height Ratio'
1
1
1
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
2 1.23
1.48
1.73
2
1.04
1.15
1.25
2
1.07
1.20
1.32
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
12
16.5
18 22
4
6
10
29.36
30 45
10.7
11 11
27.14
35 50
10.6
6
9.13
28.53
23.59 57.83
23
4
11.93
27.85
22.58
58.82
15.74
6
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.021
0 0
0
6
0.019
0.034
0.034 0.049
0.02
6 0.012
0.032
0.034 0.045
0.018
6
0.004
0.020
0.021 0.033
0.012
4
0.0044
0.0161
0.0178
0.0210
0.006
6
Pool Length (ft)
15
35.09
33 66
17
13
10
29.36
30 45
10.7
11 15
29.14
32 45
10.4
11
15.35
27.78
22.01 50.23
11.28
11
26.63
63.25
59.98
123.16
30.56
7
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.502
2.297
2 6
1
16
0.78
1.33
1.219 1.408
0.492
11 1.2
2.1
2.1 5
1.2
11
0.191
0.859
0.8 1,722
0.504
11
0.96
1.45
1.30
2.47
0.474
7
Pool Spacing (ft)
26
105
98 189
55
8
20
94.18
86 158
51.12
11 25
98
100 200
57
11
26.45
132.2
147.8 219.9
73.36
7
0.00
178.42
110.14
657.88
219.5
6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
42
64.17
65 85
16
6
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20
44.82
40 84
23
11
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
153
171.5
168 195
16
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.333
3.565
3.611 4.722
0.867
6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1660
1658
1587
1638
1603
Sinuosity (ft)
1.19
1.17
1.17
1.18
1.195
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0033
0.0033
0.004
0.00496
0.008
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0033
0.0034
0.004
0.004
0.009
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
10
7
35 1 47
1
0
7.5
9
30 51
2.5
0 6.32
14.94
30.46 45.41
2.87
0
0
12.5
72
15.5
0
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /'�J
1.5
27.3
38.5 1 109
154
0.75
54.5
77 154
218
0.75
1 27.3
54.5 154
218
% of Reach with Eroding BankS2
1%
5%
5%
5%
5%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events - 2016 (MY5)
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurance
Method
Photo #
(if available)
Crest Gauge 1
10/01/12
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/01/13
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/28/14
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/25/15
10/25/2015
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation
11/11/15
11/11/2015
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation
10/16 - 11/16
Unknown
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation; Floodplain interaction
10/26/16
Crest Gauge Removed
Crest Gauge 2
10/01/13
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
Fall 2014
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/25/15
10/25/2015
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation; Floodplain interaction
11/11/15
11/11/2015
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation; Floodplain interaction
10/16 - 11/16
Unknown
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation; Floodplain interaction
11/22/16
Crest Gauge Removed
Crest Gauge 3
10/01/12
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/01/13
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/28/14
Unknown
Crest Gauge, Wrack of Flow Stage
10/25/15
10/25/2015
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation
11/11/15
11/11/2015
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation
10/16 - 11/16
Unknown
Visual observation; Debris lines; Flattened vegetation; Floodplain interaction
11/22/16
Crest Gauge Removed

Month
Monthly Total (in)
Nov -15
9.12
Dec -15
9.08
Jan -16
2.21
Feb -16
3.36
Mar -16
1.35
Apr -16
1.80
May -16
7.16
Jun -16
4.00
Jul -16
5.54
Aug -16
3.06
Sep -16
4.36
Oct -16
3.10
Nov -16
0.42
Total
54.56
Cabarrus County Rainfall Data
■Cabarrus Rainfall Data
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
c
5.00
.Q
aUi
4.00
IL`
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Nov -15 Dec -15 Jan -16 Feb -16 Mar -16 Apr -16 May -16 Jun -16 Jul -16 Aug -16 Sep -16 Oct -16 Nov -16
Month