FiveMileBranch_92185_MY4_2016

YEAR 4 OF 5 MONITORING REPORT - FINAL
Five -Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration, Iredell County
NCDMS IMS ID# 92185
DEQ Contract# 6036
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
Division of Mitigation Services Raleigh North Carolina
April 25, 2017
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
r r RESTORATION

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
1. Project Summary
1.1
Goals and Objectives
1.2
Project History
1.3
Vegetation
1.4
Streams
1.5
Wetlands
1.6
Note
2. Methodology
2.1
Vegetation
2.2
Stream Hydrology
2.3
Stream Stability
2.4
Wetland Hydrology
3. References
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Appendices
Vicinity Map
Project Components
A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
B Visual Assessment Data
C Vegetation Plot Data
D Stream Survey Data
E Hydrology Data
F Photographs
G Problem Areas
1
1
1
3
4
0
6
7
7
7
7
7
8
April 25, 2017 Page ii

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rJ
1. Project Summary
1.1 Goals and Objectives
The primary goals of this restoration project focus on the following:
• Increase bank stability, nutrient filtration and aquatic habitat
• Reduce soil disturbance and nutrient inputs to stream
• Improve soil physical and chemical properties in the near term
• Improve hydrologic connectivity with floodplain
• Attenuate site impacts of storm flows
• Restore ground water hydrology to pre -agricultural levels
• Restore wetland and riparian habitat
These goals were accomplished by:
Establishing a minimum 50 -foot buffer consisting of a mix of native species representative of
piedmont/mountain bottomland hardwood forest. The planted species were selected by evaluation of
adjacent reference sites and reviewing species listed in Classification of Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation (Schafale and Weakley 1990). A total of 1.9 acres of bottomland
hardwood forest were preserved through land ownership or conservation easements. Land preservation
reduced soil disturbance and nutrient input to the streams.
Grading stream banks, installation of in -stream structures, and removal of an adjacent berm increased
bank stability, improved in -stream habitat diversity and improved the hydrologic connectivity with the
adjacent floodplain. Gently sloped, vegetated, stream banks in conjunction with in -stream structures
increased bank stability. The in -stream structures all increased stream habitat diversity by establishing
riffle -pool sequences and establishing stable woody debris. Removal of the berm reduced the water
surface elevation required to reach the floodplain.
Fill existing drainage ditches and excavating floodplain pools. Elimination of the drainage ditches and
grading the floodplain restored groundwater hydrology to pre -agriculture conditions, in -turn restoring
wetlands and riparian habitat.
Ripping floodplain soil prior to planting to reduce ground compaction cause by past agricultural practice
and allowing water infiltration.
1.2 Project History
The Five Mile Branch Mitigation site was selected for stream and wetland restoration originally by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) then transferred to the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS). The purpose of this restoration project was to restore, enhance and preserve streams and
wetlands within the site. Beaver and Fifth creeks are the primary stream within the site. There are five
unnamed tributaries that were preserved. The site's original design was developed while the project was under
NCDOT auspices and was a very sinuous, priority 2 stream restoration with a great deal of structure, which
April 25, 2017 Page 1

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rj
presented concerns in terms of cost and stability (risk/cost-benefit). The proposed alignment also led to
retrospective concerns of hydrologic trespass by NCDOT for the 1-40 right of way. Collectively, this prompted an
enhancement approach to the stream channel through stabilization, improvement of the profile, and the
removal of berms to provide additional floodplain connection. (NCEEP 2013)
The Five Mile Branch Site (Site) is east of Statesville in Iredell County, southeast of Interstate 40 (1-40) and
northwest of US Route 64 in the South Yadkin Watershed (03040102). The Site is in the Township of Cool
Springs on the Statesville East, NC, 7.5 -minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle
(Figure 1). The Site comprises 12 adjacent parcels totaling approximately 229 acres (92.67 ha). It is bordered
to the north by 1-40 and to the south, east, and west by various forested, pasture, and residential properties.
Swann Road (SR 2167), running north and south, bisects the site. Chimney Lane dead -ends on the site west
of Swann Road.
The drainage area at the downstream end of the site (Reach 3) is 26.0 square miles. The drainage area for
Beaver Creek (Reach 1) and Fifth Creek (Reach 2) at their confluence just west of Chimney Lane is 10.7 and
13.9 square miles respectively.
The restoration strategy implemented on Beaver and Fifth creeks consisted of Enhancement Level 11. Both
streams were stabilized in their current locations. Their north banks were re -graded to a flatter slope and
boulder grade control structures were installed. No work was performed on the unnamed tributaries. They were
preserved through conservation easements or property purchase. Wetland restoration was accomplished by
filling in the drainage ditches, grading floodplain pools and replanting with native vegetation. Through these
practices 11,676 linear feet if stream were enhanced, 1,537 feet of stream preserved, 27.7 acres of wetland
restored and 1.9 acres of wetlands preserved. Due to the near systemic nature of the improvements to the
channel cross section and the localized improvements to the profile/in-stream habitat, a credit ratio of 2:1 is
being used.
Five vegetation monitoring plots are meeting the year four success criteria for planted stems. Twenty
vegetation monitoring plots are meeting success criteria when including both planted and volunteer stems.
Project components were recalculated during Year 3. Inconsistencies between the as -built survey and existing
site conditions were identified during monitoring site visits.
Wetland delineations were conducted in November and December 2016 using procedures outlined in January
1987 Technical Report Y-87-1, Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement
to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0),
April 2012. The wetland boundary was mapped using handheld GPS units and ARCMap software. Wetland
delineations identified a total of 29.6 acres of wetlands on the Site. Delineation have not been verified by the
USACE. This is significantly less acreage than presented in the Baseline Monitoring Report. The reason for
the reduction is due to an over estimation in the restored acreage and inaccuracies in the as -built topographic
survey elevations. The proposed wetland line was estimated to be 1-2 feet higher than the ditch top of bank
elevation. For the most part the proposed wetland line does follow as -built contour elevation. However, there
are areas where the as -built contours are a foot or greater lower than the delineated wetlands. These low
areas were not observed in the field. There are also topographic breaks observed on the site that are not
reflected in the as -built topographical survey. The proposed wetland acreage was based on estimates that the
wetlands would develop to a general topographic contour; however, it appears that the as -built topographic
April 25, 2017 Page 2

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rJ
contours may not be completely accurate, and there are likely site variabilities that are affecting wetland
development.
1.3 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring was conducted on September 23, and October 24-25, 2016. Five (Plots 1, 4, 6, 9, and
11) of the 23 vegetation plots are meeting the year four success criteria of 288 planted stems per acre.
Including both planted and volunteer woody stems, 20 (Plots 2-12; 15-17; 19-23) of the 23 plots are far
exceeding the year four success criteria.
Planted woody stem densities are low in Plots 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12-16, and 18-23. River birch, silky dogwood
(Cornus amomum), willow oak and cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda) are the most successful and commonly
occurring planted stems. Other planted species include possumhaw (Ilex decidua), black walnut (Juglans
nigra), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), sycamore and swamp chestnut oak (Q. michauxii). Natural stems
observed in the floodplain of the conservation easement include red maple (Acer rubrum), ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sycamore, sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), silky
dogwood, cottonwood (Populus deltoides), box elder (Acer negundo), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), river
birch, and red elm (Ulmus rubra). Beyond the wetland boundaries in the conservation easement, natural stems
such as black walnut (Juglans nigra), sweetgum, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), American hazelnut (Corylus
americana), and Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) were commonly observed.
Plot 13, 14, and 18 do not meet success criteria when combining both planted and volunteer woody stems due
to frequent inundation. These plots are dominated by wetland herbaceous vegetation.
Plots 13 is situated on the edge of a non -tidal freshwater marsh and has only one surviving planted woody
stem, a sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and no natural woody stems. The plot and the immediate
surroundings is dominated by herbaceous vegetation mostly consisting of sedges (Carex sp.), rushes (Juncus
sp.), and bur -reed (Sparganium americanum).
Plot 14 is also situated in a frequently flooded area that is herb dominated with giant cutgrass (Zizaniopsis
miliacea), sedges, and rushes. There are no surviving planted woody or volunteer stems in this plot.
Plot 18 has only two surviving planted trees, river birch (Betula nigra) and willow oak (Q. phellos), with no
volunteer woody stems. This site is herb dominated with rushes, marshmallow (Hibiscus moscheutos),
arrowleaf tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum), and cattails (Typha latifolia).
Planted woody stem may not be detected during a particular monitoring year for various reasons, but could be
detected the following monitoring period, resulting in a fluctuation in the total planted woody stems per acre.
This undetectability is likely a result of a stem dying, being browsed by an herbivore (i.e. deer), or smothered by
herbaceous vegetation. Some vegetation monitoring plot woody stem counts increased over the monitoring
period based on the observations of planted woody stems in the plot that were likely overlooked during
previous monitoring years due to reasons mentioned above. Vegetation plots 1, 6, 9, 11, 15, and 23 had an
increase in their planted woody stems. Vegetation plot 1 increased due to being replanted after the adjacent
landowner mowed the plot. This is the only area that has been replanted within the conservation easement.
Plot 6 increased from 8 to 10 planted woody stems. During MY -03, a possumhaw was detected and an
additional river birch was detected therefore increasing the stem count. Plot 9 increased from 10 to 12 planted
woody stems, due to an additional river birch and ironwood was detected. Plot 11 increase from 7 to 8 planted
April 25, 2017 Page 3

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rj
woody stems, due to one additional blackgum. Plot 15 increased from 2 to 3 planted woody stems, due to a
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) that was undetected in previous monitoring years. Plot 23 increased
from 1 to 2 planted woody stems, due to a river birch that was undetected during the previous monitoring years.
Herbaceous vegetation diversity and density is high throughout the Site. The only area vegetation is absent is
on some of the streambanks where erosion was observed. Mowing appears to have subsided and vegetation
appears to be recovering within the vicinity of Plot 1. Due to landowner encroachment, Plot 1 was replanted in
January 2016 with red maple (Acer rubrum), sycamore, redbud (Cercis canadensis) bare root seedlings.
NCDMS has resolved the encroachment issue with the adjacent landowner and the area has also been further
delineated with NCDMS signage to avoid future encroachment. On the east end of the Site, a 0.6 acre swath
of vegetation was cleared and baited with corn for hunting. Refer to CCPV map.
Invasive vegetation is present throughout the site. Six invasive species were observed during the year four
monitoring season; Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Johnson grass (Sorghum ha/apense), and tree -of -
heaven (Ailanthus altissima). NCDMS does not consider Lespedeza an invasive species of high concern.
Johnson grass, Lespedeza and honeysuckle continue to persist throughout the site. Johnson grass and
Lespedeza was observed within slightly dryer areas beyond the wetland boundaries and were most abundant
north and adjacent of the main stem streams. Tree -of -heaven is very sparse throughout the floodplain;
however, some dense patches were observed on the slopes near the NCDOT 1-40 Right -of -Way (ROW)
boundary. Some stems were observed in the understory within the undisturbed forested community on the
south side of the main channel. Chinese privet was mainly observed in areas that were not disturbed during
construction. Some privet stems were dead from herbicidal treatments.
The location of Johnson grass, Lespedeza, and honeysuckle are not shown on the CCPV. They occur
throughout the planted areas of the Site. Depicting their locations would cover the majority of the site. The
location of well-defined stands of Chinese privet and multifora rose are depicted in the CCPV.
The project site is owned fee simple by NCDOT. People are illegally encroaching onto the site for hunting
purposes. DMS has contacted the NCDOT, Iredell County Sherriffs office and the NCWRC in an effort to
eliminate the encroachment. A hunting blind was observed near gauge 19 on 12/8/216. There was an obvious
foot trail leading from Swann Road to the blind. During the same visit, Sergeant Ron Robertson with the NC
Wildlife Resource Commission Law Enforcement Division was on site. He was aware of the trespassing and
additional illegal dumping on site. He had discussed the trespassing issue with NCDMS staff. The blind was
still present on 12/15/2016. Evidence of a climbing tree stand was seen south of Beaver Creek near station
47+00 BVR on 12/15/2016.
1.4 Stream
There were no significant changes is the channel cross section dimensions. The bankfull width and cross
sectional area decreased on riffle section 1 and pool cross section 3 causing a change in the W/D ratio, mean
depth and entrenchment ratio. The decrease in bankfull width and area are a result of deposition on the upper
stream bank and floodplain not channel instability. Pool cross section 9 increased in depth but the cross-
sectional area remained consistent. Based on the cross-section surveys, all streams are meeting the
established success criteria of maintaining a relatively consistent bankfull width, depth, cross-sectional area
and bank height ratio.
April 25, 2017 Page 4

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rj
During the Year 3 monitoring several discrepancies were notices between the as -built survey and the stream
components presented in Table 1. The as -built survey incorporated only area where construction occurred.
There are short sections of Beaver and Fifth Creeks where work did not occur and were therefore not included
in the as -built survey. All preservation reaches were not included in the as -built survey either. The lengths of
all stream reaches (restoration and preservation) were recalculated using a combination of the as -built survey
data, GPS data and preconstruction topographic data. The revised lengths were calculated in ArcMap and
used to complete Table 1. All feature locations on Beaver and Fifth creeks still use the as -built stationing.
Several bank stress areas were identified in the Year 4 monitoring; 350 feet (6% of the stream length) on
Beaver Creek, 100 feet (6%) on Fifth Creek upstream Beaver Creek and 490 feet (9%) on Fifth Creek
downstream of Beaver Creek, totaling approximately 950 feet (7.5%). Their locations are shown in the Current
Condition Plan View. For the most part they are in the same areas as year previous years. Four areas are
significant enough to consider repairs; 40 feet near 27+50 BVR, 60 foot near 29+00 BVR, 75 feet near 45+00
FTH and 60 feet near 59+00 FTH. These areas have increased in length and severity. A final determination
will be made during the 2017 Initial Site Assessment and presented to NCDMS. Other areas of erosion and
stress are shown on the CCPV and Appendix F.
Most the boulder structures are functioning as designed. However, several structures are compromised due to
boulders moving, settling or dislodging. Structures of concern are identified below. None of the structures
appeared to be on the verge of failure. Their performance will continue to be monitored. Photographs of the
structures are included in Appendix F.
Beaver Creek
Cross vane 25+15 boulders in right arm settled. Directing main flow towards left arm. Portion of left arm
has collapsed. Banks still appear stable.
Cross vane 32+25 Header boulder settled. Center of head is higher than sides. Banks are still stable.
Cross vane 37+10 Boulders in left arm dislodged. Some erosion around collapsed area.
Rock vane 65+50 Boulders in arm dislodged. Banks are still stable.
Fifth Creek Upstream Beaver
Cross vane 18+75 Boulders in left arm dislodged. Vegetated and stable around structure.
Fifth Creek Downstream Beaver
J -hook 46+10 Large gaps in boulders of left arm. Erosion around left arm.
Three bankfull events were recorded on Beaver Creek, one on Fifth Creek Upstream and one on Fifth Creek
Downstream. Bankfull events occurred on February 3, May 3 and August 3, 2016. The cumulative total of
documented bankfull events for the monitoring period is 11, exceeding the established success criteria of a
minimum of two bankfull events within the five-year monitoring period.
April 25, 2017 Page 5

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rJ
Two beaver dams were present during the 2016 monitoring year. They were located at the Chimney Land
bridge (56+80 BVR) and downstream of the Chimney Lane bridge (65+75 BVR). The dams were reported to
the NCDMS project manager on 11/17/2016. The dams were removed by a NCDMS contractor and were not
present on 12/15/2016.
1.5 Wetland
Wetland hydrology was monitored for the entire growing season (April 17 — October 17) in the Year 4
monitoring term. Two gauges (2 and 18) of the 30 on site gauges did not meet the established success criteria
of saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for 9 consecutive days of the growing season (5% of the
183 -day growing season). Gauge 22 and 23 had ground water within 12 inches of the ground surface for 100%
of the 2016 growing season and the previous three growing seasons. Gauges 6, 11 and 28 barely meet the
established success criteria.
As with previous years, the functionality of the gauges was very unpredictable. Some gauges functioned during
one download event, not the next and then functioned properly at the next event. Batteries were replaced and
historical data was deleted from most gauges to help improve their functionality. Sometime this was
successful. Gauges 7 and 17 malfunctioned during the 2016 monitoring year. These gauges were
reprogrammed during the 4/12/2016 site visit. They were not functioning on subsequent visits and
reprogrammed again. They will be replaced in the 2017 monitoring period.
During the 4/12/2016 site assessment, gauges 19 and 20 were missing. The screen was in place; only the
gauge was missing. They were replaced and reprogrammed during the initial site assessment. With the
gauge's proximity to the Swann Road access, it can be presumed that these gauges were taken by individuals
illegally accessing the site.
In October 2016, the invasive vegetation management contractor's equipment damaged gauges 6 and 13. The
gauges are not functioning and will be replace during the 2017 Initial Site Assessment. Data was collected
from the gauges for April 2016 — September 2016 and the gauges met the established success criteria.
1.6 Note
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of such things as beaver or encroachment, and statistics
related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the
report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be
found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the
Restoration Plan) documents available on NCDMS' website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in
the appendices are available from NCDMS upon request.
April 25, 2017 Page 6

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site ;A
Methodology
2.1 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring followed Carolina Vegetative Survey Level 2. Vegetation monitoring was conducted on
September 23, October 24, and 25, 2016 and all planted and volunteer stems were tallied.
2.2 Stream Hydrology
Stream water depth was measured and recorded with HOBO° pressure sensor gauges manufactured by
onset". Three HOBO' devises were installed at the Five Mile Branch restoration site, one on Beaver Creek
upstream of Chimney Lane, one on Fifth Creek upstream of the confluence with Beaver Creek and one on Fifth
Creek downstream of Swann Road. The dataloggers were downloaded periodically during the monitoring
period.
2.3 Cross Section Surveys
Cross sectional surveys were conducted by ARCADIS staff on May 14, 2015 using a Topcon total station. The
survey data was imported and plotted using AutoCAD 2013 software.
2.4 Wetland Hydrology
Wetland hydrology was monitored using RDS Ecotone' WM Water Level Instruments (gauges). The gauges
were programmed to take one reading daily at 8:00 AM EST. Gauges were downloaded using a MeazuraTM
handheld device manufactured by ACEECATM. Data from the handheld device was then transferred to a
Lenovo laptop computer and processed using Microsoft' Excel software.
April 25, 2017 Page 7

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 7rj
3 References
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2008. Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basinwide Water Quality
Plan. Prepared by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCDEQ) 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content
Guidance, February 2014.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2013. Letter dated February 28, 2013.
Schafale, M.P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, A Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2003. April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2011 Soil Survey of Iredell
County, North Carolina. (Available online at http://soils.usda.goc/survey.printed_surveys/)
April 25, 2017 Page 8

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendix A
April 25, 2017 Page 9

Directions: Take 140 west from Raleigh to US 64 west (exit 162)
toward Cool Springs. Turn left onto US 64. Turn right onto Swann
Road. Swann Road crosses the Site just before 140
fad
0*
panYaP his RB
�O
a,d Mayr svilEe R� .
� tta
ar Qt _ �o Lo99�na
ar
s'aa�Q Cool Syaren9 Rn
Project Areaa
$10000v
s
c 84'v
T '
Nla�'4aY
� o9ja
ny
CryeS'try41 Gray a � ..
a RO py ii1 ftd
{IYM�
M �
� n
3
dg µAnusteY Ru �� Fp
pDp �
+t � LA0
s WY pap" r
#1 r
r
4 r
� r
a` r
N Dr J
_ y
O
M asks
�ksvittc IpK,y M
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the
site may require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in the
development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms and time frames of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
Prepared For 0 0.5 1 2 N
Miles
SCALE: 1:50,000 w E
Source: USGS Quadrangle Maps Statesville East and Cool Springs, NC
frivironmrnf[t!
DualHy $
Prepared By: VICINITY MAP Figure No.
ECOSYSTEM
PLANN[NG & Five Mile Branch Restoration Site
RESTORATION Iredell County, North Carolina

Not Included in y* io
-.
Restoration Calculations
Reach 8 - ,
r
f , UT @ Swann Road_I
L
i, -- . �. Ott]►.
3
t`y+�
n
r
�' � .� ;• � '` "'yam r �R, �ti r— _* < , `it � • ' 4vr.
pip" WWWMI
0
22 LV�
y'w•' "
lb
S
O' •
2La�'4'a+"Y+•s •y d'�
• Ag,
Reach 9
UT @ Freeze Property ;
-. -�., ._-�;:.:.•� �� • Reach 3 -
,r x • Y a• � ` Fifth Creek •,,� - '
Reach 1
"' Beaver Creek �I
row
�... T-9 rit
Reach 7
UT @ Ch� e imn
_
Legend
low-
^'+ ter_ ' r S .+ ,,i +` #µ r�� irSy ,:"•. d`•i' _ -+1i5, ti Boundary
s,
:�' • , f '•' � 'w` M A h e _ `' . `. .> t o k rile
- Y a q• "y d- �'
S'i 't - ' - ' ' Easement
Reach 6
r
Reach 4 UT '� ,;; `4 'w�X r �c - '�? Floodplain Pools
Beaver Creek `. r;\ 4` `y mr .v t
\ 4�',-_1rp Year 4 Wetland Delineations
z # r y COMPONENTS
Lr'
O Stream Gauge
a Vegetation Plots
ty
Cross Sections
g Reach 5,� `�
UT to Beaver Creek ' { _ ", ��, Groundwater Gauge
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM PROJECT COMPONENTS 600 300 0 600 Figure No.
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE Feet
Environmental
RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 inch = 700 feet 2
Quality
Aerial: 2014 NC OneMap Ortho Imagery

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185
Mitigation Credits
Non -riparian
Nitrogen
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Wetland
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
5,838.1
153.8
27.7
0.38
-
-
-
-
-
Project Components
Restoration -
Restoration
Project Component -or- Reach
Stationing/Location
Existing
Approach
or -
Footage or
Mitigation Ratio
ID
Footage/Acreage
(PI, PII etc.)
Restoration
Acreage
Equivalent
Reach 1 - Beaver Creek
10+87.03 PRBVR to Fifth
5,794.1
E II
R
5,794.1
2:1**
Creek
Reach 2 - Fifth Creek upstream
1-40 to Beaver Creek
1,586.4
E II
R
1,586.4
2:1**
of Beaver Creek
Reach 3 - Fifth Creek
Beaver Creek to 78+60.00
5,215.2
E II
R
4,295.6`
2:1 **
downstream of Beaver Creek
PRFTH
Reach 4 - Beaver Creek
Property line to 10+87.03
Upstream
PRBVR
205.8
Pres.
RE
205.8
10:1
Reach 5 - UT to Beaver Creek
property line to Beaver Creek
200.7
Pres.
RE
200.7
10:1
(Upstream)
Reach 6 - UT
Property line to Beaver Creek
203.1
Pres.
RE
203.1
10:1
Reach 7 - UT at Chimney Lane
Property line to Beaver Creek
173.3
Pres.
RE
173.3
10:1
Reach 8 - UT at Swann Road
Property line to Fifth Creek
576.0
Pres.
RE
576.0
10:1
Reach 9 - UT at Freeze
Within the Conservation
178.9
Pres.
RE
178.9
10:1
Property
Easement
Wetlands
Throughout the site
27.7
Rest.
R
27.7
1:1
Wetlands
Throughout the site
1.9
Pres.
RE
1.9
5:1
Component Summation
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Restoration Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
N/A
27.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement I
N/A
Enhancement II
11,676.1
Creation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation
1,537.8
1.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
High Quality
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation
* Difference between existing and restoration footage is due to the absence of ownership of both side of the downstream most
919.6 linear feet of stream.
**Due to the near systemic nature of the improvement to the channel cross-section and the localized improvements to the
profile/in-stream habitat, a credit ratio of 2.0:1.0 is being used.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Dec -09
Dec -09
Final Design — Construction Plans
Nov -10
Nov -10
Construction
Apr -1 1
A r-12
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
Jun -12
Mar -13
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec -13
Dec -13
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct -14
Dec -14
Year 3 Monitorin
Nov -15
Dec -15
Year 4 Monitoring
Dec -16
Feb -17
Year 5 Monitoring-
-

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185
Designer
ARCADIS G&M of NC, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 300, Raleiqh NC 27607
Primary ro'ect desi n POC
Brian Whitaker 813-353-5753
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Construction contractor POC
Michael Anderson 336-245-1253
Survey Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Survey contractor POC
David K. Alley, PLS 336-250-9225
Planting Contractor
Southern Garden, Inc.
PO Box 808, Apex, NC 27502
Planting contractor POC
Todd Laasko 919-362-1050
Seeding Contractor
Canady's Landscape and Erosion Control
256 Fairview Acres Road, Lexington NC 27295
Contractor POC
336-236-1182
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, Colfax, NC 27235
336-855-6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Foggy Mountain Nursery 336-384-5323
Claridge Nurser 919-731-7988
Brook Run Plantation 434-292-1677
Monitoring Performers
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
801 Corporate Center Dr. Suite 300 Raleigh NC 27607
Ecosystem Planninq and Restoration LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road Suite 150 Raleigh NC 27606
Three Oaks Enqineerinq
324 Blackwell St. #1200 Durham NC 27701
Stream Monitoring POC
Brian Whitaker 813-353-5753
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Brian Whitaker 813-353-5753
Wetland Monitoring POC
Brian Whitaker 813-353-5753

Table 4. Attributes
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185
Project Information
Project Name
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
County
Iredell
Project Area (acres)
229
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
035° 50'40.18" N 080° 46'27.37" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
3040102
DWQ Sub -basin
03-07-06
Project Drainage Area (square miles)
26
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
10-20
CGIA Land Use Classification
Heavily developed, cultivated, herbaceous and
shrubland, forest land, water bodies
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Length of reach (linear feet)
5,794.1
1,586.4
5215.2*
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (square miles)
10.7
13.9
26.0
NCDWQ stream identification score
12-108-13-1
12-108-13
12-108-13
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
Class C
Class C
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type)
E5
E5
E5
Evolutionary trend
Underlying mapped soils
Codorus loam
Codorus loam
Codorus loam
Drainage class
somewhat poorly drained
somewhat poorly drained
somewhat poorly drained
Soil Hydric status
Yes
Yes
Yes
Slope
0-2%
0-2%
0-2%
FEMA classification
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE

Native vegetation community
Bottomland hardwood
Bottomland hardwood
Bottomland hardwood
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
<5
<5
<5
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Size of Wetland (acres)
29.6
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-
riverine)
Riparian riverine
Mapped Soil Series
Codorus loam
Drainage class
somewhat poorly drained
Soil Hydric Status
Yes
Source of Hydrology
groundwater, precipitation
and overbank flooding
Hydrologic Impairment
Ditching
Native vegetation community
Bottomland hardwood
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
<5
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
* included 919.6 linear feet of stream at downstream end without State ownership of both sides of stream.

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendix B
April 25, 2017 Page 10

tiR • . r
Legend
' ..
Al
� b+� !"syr v}� � � � '► ��+ �
Boundary
Easement '� '' • '4- i��- h�ya' '��.r. 4ti� ' � ,�'i�qt ?�. !P _ - �. f ..*;�' g '��-� �� /'�
Stable Structureza+
Stressed Structure7;
r ,.. � �'�a; r4� ti - - ��y"J� '�` y�"e �, a '#:' �s � +• t � "�-' y�; 'L" �s'u 5`,
Bank Stress '' r;.'
Cross -Section ��"a_5� a Nr�., ■ --f' R F. `.
Year 4 Wetland Delineations= a, '�*�C�� *F1
•
Mowed
Invasives
■ Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
■ Vegetation Plot Meeting ` „c c ter.
Photo Point; , ®419 ,- s
Gageimp—
® Ground Water Gauge MalfunctioningAL
Ground Water Gauge Not MeetingElm
a.. i t•
® Ground Water Gauge Meeting F, ., . `.�+ , }�.,, i},' ti.,.,. 1 t
® Rain Gauge' S: `S� ■,` , t_ ®v. t �� Kms{ ,`4 ,� r
,
7'Ali T_
'•- p F " •' 1
,
• � / ! _., . to � x `� Y jjty. :t',,,, � ;
gar � � � , {- i�':-. � + ♦ r r �, x
ion n N a
1
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW 0 750 1,500 Figure No.
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE Feet
Environmental
Y RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 inch = 750 feet 3
Quality Aerial: 2014 NCDOT Aerial

Legend /,% e��r
Jr '
Boundary / :`.. r Snw':.•,,,.� K� L:tit� .$. 4r�JXy`- I a �;�� r � �`4� �v,�E'
#
e•. ;1SY�''�.yri.'.�,���-..-.�1»-: - �'',`- ,Y ..��.,. �,. �"a, k.
Easement
QVC -''%i •' / d 't'Y: �r :' r. .�_ 4', `. •'`': `x t ''�Xfi, '�i.. ,:�'�i `�,`� •k, y�' y3 A':�r--".J`:. 15
'x- '`�d.4'S' �'"k a ....k. •6..'
Stable Structure \. ,� �'� �. ¢ .�',r, <,�,°,- f
S
Stressed Structure ,�; �� `, ��', �, � : �_� ; ����., �_� �� � ,:,�• �;; �.
Bank Stress
01
,
:'�' '`\�;��' a°� � �� Stix r �,� ' �,�
Cross -Section y} � Sta' s: ,, F - �, =.'a r4\
'aiq d �v •�++\ r. ,: �.��'s •L' s ^'-`, ~'`fit, #. '."� 4 �t .._�—�.i"C _ • -.a`: �,�i '\���\. . ,t�
$ 4 4k
Year 4 Wetland Delineations
.. ° ' i - s'�.,ti.'e\.•'r 7, '`a. 'iii �i",yt;`+"s �•.' �\
7 VA
Mowed' a is
�� .- x o � V •7i ".%wl
41"
Invasives't:K5 'L,
_ r ..� . 5` • ,il • / '► g - h t �:,.-k,< _ •'1 i?>' : 4t ,^"--�.-'y'4`.-.Cr.�;; 1, 3�:
' � �` ..y-., '1, 7 i1, � ` >� P" � Y � ��... ,• `fit '.4 j .�, ,x-.1y,1'f 5�i '1 � .'�.- 3` 7 �l'•. ; � �h�. .� �'t •� •
■ Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
�4. v /.,� 4 ^c ,`..L.•s %
-.r �.� / eik << , _ 'e•i, , -: :. t` \ , "Sr r �• 1y; _` . �•
'' T.-; -rrTi .�""-'.,.�i",6 �, > �#e"
■ Vegetation Plot Meeting r, - �=` �,� `r � k , • • �:
i4 +l'�,.,x �� y;�p .� �h '.. i .�'.4.r �• P y\ k�� ',{�'1x, — y 1* Y� yte `�- ;'�11`' '.
Photo Point F �K
f9r, Y • T "lV � � �Y illi- ,'
- t
•Q, y�irY y, �S sem^" 1. \r• \ : i9'e `;vn-\__l
r 'f
At� 'g :
Gage fir. ,� +,;�" ' , � . -•� -' -, �a -,•. s S �� �,• = �:, �� '' °��'k*- -�;�
;• , �. +rPi 7 ����� ' .: \� �`i. v�;-' � `� - �` '\ � 'tit ti
® Ground Water Gauge Malfunctioning :' r ` n :' it
-
wr ` '3•
c °i,
Ground Water Gauge Not Meeting
,y
m,
Ground Water Gauge Meetingr. �,g
r
w �+� '+��
�!1 �`�•7.,,.-:,.,, 3. +,.�' .\.•.'w"��r t•....�'R.--.r'a} .� •i -.x. roti y _1� "'"•�:.
® Rain Gauge*M y.'
�, M ~ i i p' 4 U�
t
,
, ..
-
P",
4 r s
e 5,
k^: �� *. �, +s, _ •t'!� "ri �.�c. '\ \ 1\, ., \. ,y4. ad` a •A '-
' �F••I.f P`' '� fz'._,y, ±i`�t' ` 4". rx'} '�/'� 1,` -'•' �� - `, '�'. _lq,.'\,
,
\ \ _
y �y
- .:, ,,, ml�:rr `a, 4.'-f' - w' ,►.� sf'= '�.S iK ,'•C.:}, ' `' `tea A''r.'!'$, 't v.K. - 4e_.
� < °i. •, .
r
till
tilt
,
1��
,yg' r . ., .y.,, ._Ch c, ".. ,: ;�. -.'l - \ �.`a_ t ?.�Sfi 'id'• 4 a Tom' » ire _ ':z. <u, -
�; .' �•• r
• r mss„ � 4,. , ,.., _ „�.. ;.. .: ��,, .,." ,', � , g3M3 , �. �r' is ,,t• . '� ' � _ '' Z , t : h . 4 `4 i
''�,, .-, . ,: , .. -� \ � ,- V. .� - - •-fit �•i' , � �e.
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW 0 200 400 Figure No.
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE Feet /�
Era uirsrrm�rrtat
Y RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 inch = 200 feet 3A
Quality Aerial: 2014 NCDOT Aerial

'i w s. t - r►a4�i,yrs R t' S� _ - �gY,i $ Y.p•.(� -.
4�'R. i � y - � ti r { "rf� .� � � �• 'M1"- - , y'1 � �� a,�i �Y�.. $ � '�:-
Legend
k � � t nr .:t �•��I, - �'' ' � - ` �'*►= ! _.. �i .fir +S•`p� i ,t
i tl.
Boundaryri
Easement "�" a.hr p ►^J rte' . _ l .w.. : ;, ,. f.
171
Stable Structure?:
Stressed Structure
Bank Stress:�.,,"�
to ®
Cross -Section
Year 4 Wetland Delineations ,�`w r` ate; /'" �►, _``�{'
Mowed.,t�'"�,
F
r= `
� �v; `dam ,�S �- 4.. .. � � ,+ P`_ ''�` �"y `•� .'i^�.•+.-,R �'4„yS!r_4• �pM
vN4I'r
Invasives
�fi:�. ! �� � _ .Y � 1 �' � .i' _ i/�eP' IYl .�••fo *'�{sM'4�y. `ie'�"',. .,�; .�4g �•,•. •'t '�j,r,K r :,-,c�f��aaa �{_.
■ Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
• Vegetation Plot Meeting
Photo Point r •.� �'�
Gage
V
® Ground Water Gauge Malfunctioning
Y
Ground Water Gauge Not Meeting
® Ground Water Gauge Meeting
® Rain Gauge + 'Q►' ® `'4
>// sir
• - 'y�y� ,.+ �Y f y'�.. �, k�..
1
!` � /' �• Q� .. �... ��. f-. /' '+p ,4. Y 141 - �.1 ,tr� ':, .. °. �.: �. „y,\ �,•r � ,,,.
S
J a
! 4 ► ,
i�t:�'r y�,;;.�'"r _' `""`•.,� ��,
t .
All
vvi
'_ -,� + -• � +� - ` - ,k Y�,•i `r � a +may
•A*'•” _R - .r - - U„+ ,. til, a. ._�.•' 1 e
•
ir: r a ® '�^h. �, - _ +jyc 'k-,. 'i } •,\Ly ;Y• ,�.�,,.. i. ,R.
,
r
, -# �.• '\7 t'l'. . �.�` \�.-� 'c`r tea, `_�. \ �` '\ '� '''3 � .
,
v
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW 0 200 400 Figure No.
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE Feet
Environmental
Y RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 inch = 200 feet 3B
Quality Aerial: 2014 NCDOT Aerial

Legend
Boundary
Easement
Stable Structure
Stressed Structure
Bank Stress
Cross -Section
Year 4 Wetland Delineations
■ Vegetation Plot Meeting
Photo Point
Gage
® Ground Water Gauge Malfunctioning
Ground Water Gauge Not Meeting
® Ground Water Gauge Meeting
® Rain Gauge
y3: `T'`l t�-.rF �w -y ,rr +.. •-.cam F -o `n. _
b'rc�.lTAw;
` it�Y:;{ p�l.: a �: � .1�f,�-�M►F w � _ i'4: ' !•4'y''V',.�1: � .._ -
i �"°°`` •..%�'3t r"` IAA. �,�T ;,.{ JSE." ..
��77rrcc��•• s 4'rr ` 1'
F
t
41
Tai . Y.- r � •. h `b �
.. a
f 6vt-
te
ki -4L 4
t
�: rr
} t qry
' � P
-' ill
0
r 1 16 n }} A
i
44
Pe
jL
±-
W� R •t"F, : -Y�..eysr �+F���µ� ' X 6�'��{K r ' _ y;� +r. �' �T � '.. '� ' -`
a
A
F
�:r. yam' tci[-E�.Y1t•*,.. ,y Y., ,yr... x � 1,
w '
-
J p d•.
1. �+
r
•18
t
4A�_�' - . - . �a �ti's - '. •
ok
r -e 4
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
Era uirsrrmerrtat 10 RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Quality Aerial: 2014 NCDOT Aerial
Figure No.
0 200 400
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet I 3C
Mowed
d day
Invasives
■
Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
■ Vegetation Plot Meeting
Photo Point
Gage
® Ground Water Gauge Malfunctioning
Ground Water Gauge Not Meeting
® Ground Water Gauge Meeting
® Rain Gauge
y3: `T'`l t�-.rF �w -y ,rr +.. •-.cam F -o `n. _
b'rc�.lTAw;
` it�Y:;{ p�l.: a �: � .1�f,�-�M►F w � _ i'4: ' !•4'y''V',.�1: � .._ -
i �"°°`` •..%�'3t r"` IAA. �,�T ;,.{ JSE." ..
��77rrcc��•• s 4'rr ` 1'
F
t
41
Tai . Y.- r � •. h `b �
.. a
f 6vt-
te
ki -4L 4
t
�: rr
} t qry
' � P
-' ill
0
r 1 16 n }} A
i
44
Pe
jL
±-
W� R •t"F, : -Y�..eysr �+F���µ� ' X 6�'��{K r ' _ y;� +r. �' �T � '.. '� ' -`
a
A
F
�:r. yam' tci[-E�.Y1t•*,.. ,y Y., ,yr... x � 1,
w '
-
J p d•.
1. �+
r
•18
t
4A�_�' - . - . �a �ti's - '. •
ok
r -e 4
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
Era uirsrrmerrtat 10 RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Quality Aerial: 2014 NCDOT Aerial
Figure No.
0 200 400
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet I 3C

Legend
`�'4Ai`x
Boundary
s
Easement AL
Stable Structure �, �:'�•'' � . t„ - ��.
0
Stressed Structure
Bank Stress ''r "A F
.� r � r � to _ , �� • . - * ,. ~ �73
_
Cross -Section
,.� �'��� .. art `� � ,'�`' • `� .
R. 4
5 1
Year 4 Wetland Delineations
MowedFb INA
�n
d day "!, J ,c+ n , � _ 1• n. "..� , ` /��'" /
Invasives
■ Vegetation Plot Not Meeting. . ;sm
� '��,y�t# Y <i ` �. ` `. « � .
f Y 1 �
■ Vegetation Plot Meeting .r �'
Al
.., yam•; r• '.PPS, w� +G.5+5'�. Kl, � ,. to 'I ' �'�'. . � ,'r �^. ss.�'Y °`� � �,/.i• ~ `y4'i�r # � ! h` . � �+'
Photo Point -? ` x e -� li;,t w { s ' ' C\. +` y�' • `� n.1
Gage
�+'� _- /T`. T- `_ " ` �ix< � � _ . ` . ♦'�. '!! .b _: � ,' .Y:'7 �/�s �r*i-a ,
Ground Water Gauge Malfunctioning® i".n. t_-�.- ,,+. `..�h�A,�• .,rf: • a. -*`�"T `.wn ��.r .x;fi'�. _,at !. •�,. +..�- .`- •` 'j1 "; 1*+ -_`:•.. w �t. li�' .i�i..�� �-:. .�-- �-:�T^gsi,y�rvp- `a.. �W;Yi�,7�.i
Ground Water Gauge Not Meeting �am. ,� +I,.1 - h'_r_,'i.�L•µ,� ...T `ti�'.,,,S�
r
�-
4'a' - ,..T «.�`*p . �Y •`• �'^ `�{ .:.. +.'^ 4°�i.£.:: rF �,,! .� l f -' ---
a., •►. 1 :.�'t,, �.�• � � �. x.,■. t'�"' t _ Vic, ti � Y �t�`'-.
�, b' � '!�ky, r•' Y+.i3w`.J .'-" .; vS �' 1 'AG ®• ,.i'+�y�,,e 1 S 'iJ� :�,t -,�.� # .
®
Ground Water Gauge Meeting �, /i t. �+:; �.. Yl z -#.Y • �c„ .�'�"•�.�y � •. �%.E'�i!" ; - w -.'�' -�- "• r�`� �>•'��, yll J. -
® Rain Gauge s ,'�r'j� ti i�u,.4'� •,, y•�. � . t ''�� - - ;��.�� . - �:+,x i� _ � 1� 4.yr •,��.`-_.
4
WWI
+ ."A.
Prepared For: Prepared By: N
ECOSYSTEM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW 0 200 400 Figure No.
PLANNING & FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE Feet
Environmental
Y RESTORATION IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 inch = 200 feet 3D
Quality Aerial: 2014 NCDOT Aerial
:PI

Table 5a Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Beaver Creek
Assessed Lenqth 5794.1
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occurring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 1 of 4
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Stable,
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
as Intended
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1. Bed
Riffle and Run Units
flow laterally not top include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition`
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Condition -
2. Length sufficient (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Thalweg Position"
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
6
220
96%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is
2. Undercut
expected. Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are providin habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
3
131
98%
Totals
8
351
94%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
19
24
80%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
4
4
100%
sill.
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
20
20
100%
Structures (cont'd.)
arms.
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
17
20
85%
15%. See exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms.
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull
8
8
o
100 /o
-Depth ratio > 1.5. Rootwads/los providingsome cover at low flow.
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occurring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 1 of 4

Table 5b Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek
Assessed Lenqth 1586.4
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occurring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 2 of 4
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Stable,
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
as Intended
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1. Bed
Riffle and Run Units
flow laterally not top include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition`
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Condition -
2. Length sufficient (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Thalweg Position"
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
1
38
98%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is
2. Undercut
expected. Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are providin habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
2
63
96%
Totals
3
101
94%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
5
6
83%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
2
2
100%
sill.
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
3
3
100%
Structures (cont'd.)
arms.
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3
3
100%
15%. See exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms.
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull
5
5
o
100 /o
-Depth ratio > 1.5. Rootwads/los providingsome cover at low flow.
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occurring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 2 of 4

Table 5c Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek
Assessed Lenqth 5,215.20
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occutring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 3 of 4
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Stable,
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
as Intended
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1. Bed
Riffle and Run Units
flow laterally not top include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition`
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Condition -
2. Length sufficient (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Thalweg Position"
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
4
267
95%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is
2. Undercut
expected. Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are providin habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
3
226
96%
Totals
7
493
91%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
19
20
95%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
3
3
100%
sill.
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
20
20
100%
Structures (cont'd.)
arms.
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
16
20
80%
15%. See exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms.
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth/Mean Bankfull
8
9
°
89 �°
-Depth ratio > 1.5. Rootwads/los rovidin some cover at low flow.
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occutring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 3 of 4

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
Planted Acreage 67.3
Easement Acreage 229
% of
Mapping
pp g
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Planted
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of
Very Limited cover of both woody and
0.1 acres
None
0
0
0%
1. Bare Areas
herbaceous material.
1000SF
Green
9
1.6
2.4%
Woody stem densities clearly below target
Areas or points (if too small to render as
None
Open
1
0.6
<1%
levels based on MY 4, or 5 stem count
0.1 acres
None
0
0.44
<1%
2. Low Stem Density Areas*
criteria.
Total
0.44
<1%
3. Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class that
are obviously small given the monitoring
0.25 acres
None
0
0
0%
Rates or Vigor
year.
Cumulative Totall
1 0.44
1 <1%
Easement Acreage 229
* Acreage is combined acreage of 20 vegetation monitoring plots not meeting planted stem success criteria.
Page 1 of 1
% of
Mapping
pp g
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Planted
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as
Grassland/
Concern
polygons at map scale).
1000SF
Green
9
1.6
2.4%
5. Easement Encroachment
Areas or points (if too small to render as
None
Open
1
0.6
<1%
Areas
polygons at map scale).
Pasture/Green
* Acreage is combined acreage of 20 vegetation monitoring plots not meeting planted stem success criteria.
Page 1 of 1

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
,4p
Appendix C
April 25, 2017 Page 11

Vegetation Monitoring Plot #1 9/23/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #2 9/23/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #3 9/23/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #4 9/23/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #5 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #6 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #7 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #8 10/24/2016
Page 1 of 3

Vegetation Monitoring Plot #9 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #10 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #11 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #12 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #13 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #14 10/25/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #15 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #16 10/24/2016
Page 2 of 3

Vegetation Monitoring Plot #17 10/25/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #18 10/24/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #19 10/25/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #20 10/25/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #21 10/25/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #22 10/25/2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #23 10/25/2016
Page 3 of 3

DMS Project Code 92185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
29185-01-0001
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0005
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0006
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0009
Pnol-S P -all T
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
3
1
19
5
2
59
20
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
Ailanthus altissima
tree of heaven
Exotic
Alnus serrulate
hazel alder
Shrub
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
3 3
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2 2 2
4
4
4
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
1
1
1
1
Crataegus
hawthorn
Tree
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
1
2
1
1
4
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
7
2
2
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
17
30
71
32
82
1
1
4
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
3
1
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 4
4
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
14
15
2
6
5
2 2 2
3
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
5
5
5
3 3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
3 3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rosa multiflora
multiflora rose
Exotic
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
10
3
404.7
10
1
0.02
3
404.7
16
7
647.5
5
4
202.3
5
1
0.02
4
202.3
44
9
1781
71 71
1
0.02
3 3
283.3 283.3
59
10
2388
91
6
364.2
91
1
0.02
6
364.2
112
11
4532
5
4
202.3
5
1
0.02
4
202.3
43
7
1740
10
5
404.7
10
1
0.02
5
404.7
100
8
4047
7 7
1
0.02
2 2
283.3 283.3
19
8
768.9
41 4 64
1
0.02
2 2 4
161.9 161.9 2590
121
5
485.6
121
1
0.02
5
485.6
48
12
1942
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

DMS Project Code 92185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Current Plot Data (MY4 2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
29185-01-0010
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0013 29185-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0015
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0016
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0017
PnoLS P -all T
29185-01-0018
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0019
Pnol-S P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
111
12
57
2
1
10
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
56
1
Ailanthus altissima
tree of heaven
Exotic
Alnus serrulate
hazel alder
Shrub
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1 1
1
2 2
6
21
1 1
1 2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
2
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1 1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
3
1 1
1
1 1
1
2
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
Crataegus
hawthorn
Tree
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
14
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
33
1 1
2
35
1 1
3
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
2
1
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
56
3
68
2
40
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
14
1 1 1
6
29
2
3
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
3
Rosa multiflora
multiflora rose
Exotic
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
ITree
6
1
1
7
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
6
61
242.81
6
1
0.02
61
242.81
119
7
4816
8
41
323.71
81
1
0.02
41
323.71
126
8
5099
33
1
0.02
31 31
121.41 121.41
68
8
2752
1 1 1 01 01
1 1
0.02 0.02
11 1 1 01 01
40.471 40.471 40.47 01 01
0 31 31
1
0.02
0 21 21
0 121.41 121.41
172
6
6961
31 3 9
1
0.02
31 31 5
121.41 121.4 364.2
0 0
1
0.02
0 01
01 01
61
7
2469
2 2 6
1
0.02
21 21 4
80.941 80.941 242.81202.31
51
41
51
1
0.02
41
202.31
84
11
3399
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

DMS Project Code 92185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
29185-01-0020
Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0021 29185-01-0022
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
29185-01-0023
Pnol-S P -all T
MY4 (2016)
Pnol-SIP-all T
MY3 (2015)
Pnol-S P -all T
MY2 (2014)
Pnol-S P -all T
MY1 (20 3)
Pnol-S P -all T
MYO (2012)
Pnol-S P -all T
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
1
9
1
13
326
442.6
372
182
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
4
74
12
24
22
Ailanthus altissima
tree of heaven
Exotic
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
2
2
2
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2 2
3
1 1
1
1 1 1
25
25
53
25
25
57
22
22
62
16
16
67
19
19
50
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
3
3
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
2
1
2
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
1
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
4
4
6
5
5
9
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1 1
61
1 1
2
2
7
1
1
10
1
1
8
4
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1 1 1
1
9
9
15
10
10
11
11
11
12
7
7
9
12
12
12
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Crataegus
hawthorn
Tree
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
15
21
25
11
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
12
4
4
95
5
5
42
4
4
53
2
2
17
2
2
3
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
12
12
12
14
14
14
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
6
6
6
7
7
8
6
6
13
3
3
7
15
15
15
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
]Tree
15
2
1
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
2
72
96
579
428
615
393
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
6
3
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1 1
1
10
10
10
9
9
9
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
1
1
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
1 1 3
2
10
10
116
6
6
128
6
6
117
6
6
159
5
5
37
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
9
9
9
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
15
15
15
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2 2
2
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
22
22
24
24
24
24
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1 1 1
2 2 2
12
12
16
13
13
13
10
10
10
6
6
6
10
10
10
Rosa multiflora
multiflora rose
Exotic
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
4
4
1
1
10
4
3
3
28
5
5
5
Ulmus rubra
Islippery elm
ITree
11
1
1
16
11
1
8
1
1
10
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
3 3
1
0.02
21 21
121.41 121.41
24
101
971.21
3 3 86 4 4
1 1
0.02 0.02
3 31 51 31 31
121.41 121.41 34801161.91 161.91
119
9
4816
3 3 18
1
0.02
21 21 4
121.41 121.41 728.41
113
151
198.81
113
23
0.57
151
198.81
1398
281
24601188.31
1071
15
1071
23
0.57
151
188.31
1244
30151
2188117
102
9.5
102
23
0.57
151
179.5
1381
301
24301
90
14
158.41
90 956
23
0.57
14 19
158.41 16821
137
151
241.11
1371 206
23
0.57
151 16
241.1 362.5
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendix D
April 25, 2017 Page 12

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-1 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
IE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
764366.575
1472878.02
734.8
764369.841
1472874.75
733.655
739.18
764372.188
1472872.18
727.635
6.2
764372.43
1472872.47
727.086
6.5
764374.161
1472869.5
726.912
1.0
764376.234
1472866.75
726.698
764379.45
1472862.98
727.096
764380.834
1472861.28
727.371
764381.08
1472860.83
727.691
CT10N
764383.141
1472857.41
730.122
764386.47
1472852.49
732.864
�
764395.776
1472838.5
733.244
764405.93
1472822.83
733.063
F
764414.39
1472809.56
732.645
764419.724
1472802.56
732.397
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the
following year's cross sections are
the result of the as -built cross
sections being generated from the
surface contours created from the
as -built field survey, which was not
surveyed by ARCADIS staff. The
annual monitoring surveys of the
channel were generated using field
surveys and accurately represent
actual field conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
732.98
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
119.5
Bankfull Width:
27.9
Floodprone Area Elevation:
739.18
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.3
W/D Ratio 1
6.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 1 - Riffle
7 4L
740
735
CR
S5 -S
CT10N
#1
---
---
�
��� .
Af�IE<F
'� L
LL EL
V. 732.98
F
730
725
AS -b U I LT ----------
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAP. 4
715
B
R
710
t
t
-t--L

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-2 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
IE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
765692.418
1473870.9
731.339
765700.264
1473864.37
730.481
765703.228
1473864.56
725.179
765703.36
1473864.43
724.702
765705.996
1473862.37
724.169
765709.343
1473858.92
724.838
765712.941
1473855.94
724.759
765715.113
1473854.33
724.693
765714.883
1473853.74
725.139
765718.646
1473851.1
728.009
765723.377
1473847.81
730.157
765736.804
1473837.7
730.563
765750.317
1473826.12
730.72
765762.37
1473815.84
730.427
765771.15
1473808.57
730.494
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result
of the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field
survey, which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
729.37
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
119.9
Bankfull Width:
29.5
Floodprone Area Elevation:
735.37
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.1
W/D Ratio 1
7.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 2 -Riffle
745
740
1 �5
CROSS-SELTION
2
725
720
AS-13IJ I LT ----------
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
715
44+C
D. C i�

River Basin: Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-3 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
JE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
766029.514
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Ai
1474321.59
Bankfull Width:
730.048
Floodprone Area Elevation
766031.922
Floodprone Width:
1474317.2
Max Depth at Bankfull
729.402
Mean Depth at Bankfull
766032.705
W/D Ratio 1
1474313.67
Entrenchment Ratio:
725.996
Bank Height Ratio:
766033.968
1474309.38
724.264
766034.432
1474308.28
724.276
766034.446
1474308.16
CR4
724.204
TION
766034.813
1474307.87
723.472
766035.504
1474306.8
723.701
766036.755
1474304.5
722.501
766038.864
1474301.25
722.64
766039.705
1474300.77
723.825
�rV
766040.769
ELEV'
1474299.6
4
723.858
766040.608
AS -BUILT ----------
YEAH 1
YEAR
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
1474299.15
724.297
`s.
766042.195
1474297.27
725.441
766043.882
1474293.46
49+80_00
13\/P
728.782
766047.711
1474285.89
711)
730.378
766054.671
1474270.99
730.099
766062.264
1474254.1
728.982
766068.968
1474238.78
728.559
766074.251
1474226.6
728.443
766077.155
1474220.41
728.431
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result of
the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by ARCADIS
staff. The annual monitoring surveys
of the channel were generated using
field surveys and accurately
represent actual field conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
730.54
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Ai
124.0
Bankfull Width:
30.6
Floodprone Area Elevation
737.44
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.1
W/D Ratio 1
7.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 3 - Pool
745
740
CR4
S --SE
TION
'3
7?
�rV
kJI<FULL
ELEV'
: 3--l.
4
AS -BUILT ----------
YEAH 1
YEAR
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
`s.
J
ti
49+80_00
13\/P
711)

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-4 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
IE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
766238.751
1474788.7
729.519
766241.893
1474787.02
729.262
766248.19
1474782.81
723.368
766248.056
1474782.73
722.736
766249.595
1474782.22
722.68
766251.555
1474781.21
722.328
766255.193
1474778.83
722.604
766257.647
1474776.95
722.41
766259.026
1474775.9
722.793
766259.504
1474775.83
723.293
766264.32
1474773.66
727.161
766272.26
1474768.06
728.911
766287.799
1474757.75
728.696
766302.567
1474747.02
728.284
766319.18
1474735.54
727.282
766335.246
1474722.75
727.341
766343.139
1474716.591
727.268
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result
of the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field
survey, which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
728.25
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
134.4
Bankfull Width:
35.8
Floodprone Area Elevation:
734.85
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull
3.8
W/D Ratio 1
9.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
t:.
Section 4 -Riffle
740
735
73D
�
BANK
JLL ELEV.
72-8.20
r
!.
?13
72D
AS -BUIL -T -_-, --
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
715
71 D,

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-5 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
IE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
766934.913
1475551.73
726.508
766928.764
1475568.1
726.811
766922.404
1475581.93
727.13
766918.524
1475591.14
726.808
766915.612
1475597.88
726.159
766913.696
1475602.8
724.189
766912.114
1475606.9
720.615
766912.223
1475607.08
720.243
766910.529
1475609.2
719.645
766908.853
1475612.16
718.827
766906.858
1475613.99
719.326
766905.681
1475615.58
719.868
766905.222
1475615.93
720.617
766902.424
1475619.13
723.813
766900.598
1475621.31
727.006
766900.207
1475623.53
727.06
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result of
the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
725.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
118.2
Bankfull Width:
27.6
Floodprone Area Elevation:
733.2
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.3
W/D Ratio 1
6.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
77 Stream Type: E5
Section 5 - Pool
7413
735
730
CR
SS -S
CTION
#5
ANKF
LL EL
V. 7
.0 -
7 5
2°
`�
f
y
AS -BUILT - - - - - - - - - -
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
715
r
'10
,

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-6 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
13.9
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767028.479
1474608.55
729.86
767038.853
1474611.26
729.161
767042.314
1474612.25
728.435
767045.762
1474613.14
726.028
767047.211
1474614.35
722.495
767047.614
1474614.6
721.126
767049.987
1474615.02
720.767
767053.586
1474615.22
721.358
767056.502
1474615.95
721.874
767060.003
1474617.12
721.41
767061.406
1474617.36
721.698
767061.503
1474617.09
722.487
767062.066
1474617.8
723.675
767066.743
1474619.05
725.631
767072.336
1474619.88
728.103
767079.964
1474621.21
729.331
767083.888
1474622.21
729.134
767087.509
1474622.92
728.594
767091.209
1474624.2
728.331
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result of
the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
729.99
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
149.6
Bankfull Width:
33.8
Floodprone Area Elevation:
737.69
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.4
W/D Ratio
7.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
77
Stream Type: E5
Section 6 - Pool
i
35
40y1r
b.rn. •
3�!� `�l "'�i erbbe{�A d!L � �4fraY tpf�,i.
.. � aTi'.. .t _ .r_
35
CIRDSS-SECTION
#6
NKFIU
L ELE
{'. 7,3g.9011
25
100
f.
AS -BUILT - - - - - - - - - -
_-
�'
`'EAR 1
YEAR t
11+
Cf.O
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
f-
H
4
TIO -.;_
-

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-7 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
13.9
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767178.603
1475524.18
727.974
Bankfull Width:
767182.182
1475522
727.319
Floodprone Width:
767186.274
1475520.34
720.282
Mean Depth at Bankfull
767186.72
1475520.21
719.353
Entrenchment Ratio:
767188.748
1475519.43
719.345
767190.222
1475517.79
719.036
767194.345
1475515.78
719.629
767196.731
1475514.05
719.563
767198.58
1475512.54
719.808
767199.049
1475512.17
720.304
725
767199.702
1475511.58
722.422
767204.762
1475508.26
725.696
B A Ind K
767217.13
1475501.3
726.488
767230.191
1475493.85
727.424
767245.862
1475484.13
727.508
767256.12
1475477.76
727.07
767262.273
1475474.86
726.914
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result
of the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field
survey, which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
726.85
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
118.7
Bankfull Width:
25.7
Floodprone Area Elevation:
733.55
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.6
W/D Ratio
5.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
77 Stream Type: E5
Section 7 - Riffle
.yy.a n
,i� b F % �y4�yy�ilyw� 1N �,�1}x7�
b
1'
CP.OS
-SEC
10141 #.
725
.
B A Ind K
U LL E
EV. 7:6.8720
-.
AS -BUILT --- -
YEAR 1
YEA R 2
YEAR �3
YEAR 4
715
E
H
n
705

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-8 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26.0
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
JE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767560.038
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Ar
1476433.82
Bankfull Width:
726.661
Floodprone Area Elevation:
767566.988
Floodprone Width:
1476431.99
Max Depth at Bankfull
725.598
Mean Depth at Bankfull
767570.673
W/D Ratio 1
1476435.03
Entrenchment Ratio:
719.442
Bank Height Ratio:
767571.016
1476435.2
718.307
767574.627
735
1476434.7
718.059
767578.103
1476433.35
718.352
767578.202
1476433.33
718.352
767581.307
1476432.01
718.02
iSS-
767585.968
#B
1476431.06
718.432
767591.408
1476429.46
718.765
767592.032
1476429.15
719.479
767597.315
1476427.21
724.867
767609.385
1476423.14
725.588
767622.938
1476419.4
V,1
725.466
767640.635
1476415.01
'
725.215
767656.255
1476409.73
724.734
767661.03
1476408.06
725.034
31 + E
FM
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the
following year's cross sections are
the result of the as -built cross
sections being generated from the
surface contours created from the
as -built field survey, which was not
surveyed by ARCADIS staff. The
annual monitoring surveys of the
channel were generated using field
surveys and accurately represent
actual field conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
726.25
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Ar
172.4
Bankfull Width:
32.2
Floodprone Area Elevation:
733.05
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull
5.4
W/D Ratio 1
6.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 8 - Riffle
45
735
CR
iSS-
ECTICP
#B
----77
TE
V,1
,T
AS-BUILT- - - - - - - - - -
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAH 3
YEAP
'
31 + E
FM
OM
s ,

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-9 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26.0
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
JE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767645.114
1477906.04
724.222
767650.244
1477905.86
723.805
767657.004
1477905.23
718.061
767658.5
1477905.44
717.976
767661.396
1477905.39
717.689
767661.605
1477905.32
717.636
767663.17
1477905.39
715.604
767665.577
1477905.13
714.33
767670.502
1477908.16
714.462
767672.563
1477907.57
715.506
767673.041
1477907.46
717.488
767674.03
1477907.08
717.71
767673.271
1477907.23
717.513
767674.875
1477907.27
716.109
767678.709
1477906.95
717.081
767679.21
1477907.2
717.747
767681.444
1477907.23
719.39
767685.198
1477907.24
722.694
767702.941
1477906.7
723.344
767719.91
1477906.15
722.447
767730.882
1477906.52
721.947
767734.826
1477906.73
721.957
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result of
the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by ARCADIS
staff. The annual monitoring surveys
of the channel were generated using
field surveys and accurately represent
actual field conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
723.78
Bankfull Cross -Sectional An
183.2
Bankfull Width:
34.9
Floodprone Area Elevation:
732.18
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
8.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull
5.2
W/D Ratio 1
6.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 9 -Pool
740
7J5
G
OSS- SECTI _
N #9
Brl f.N IFULL
FLEV.
723.78
Q4\
A5 BUILT - - - - - - - - - -
YFA R. 1
YFAFR ?
YEAR 3
46+F 0,00
-
YE�.R 4
705

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-10 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26.0
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
IE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767715.446
1478250.83
723.953
Bankfull Width:
767722.149
1478248.85
723.902
Floodprone Width:
767724.603
1478247.13
717.349
Mean Depth at Bankfull
767724.974
1478247.03
716.661
Entrenchment Ratio:
767729.183
1478246.44
716.286
767734.053
1478245.54
715.834
767739.493
1478243.94
716.583
767744.705
1478242.61
716.218
767747.389
1478241.59
716.532
767747.615
1478242.01
717.363
767754.117
1478242.46
722.998
767771.823
1478238.8
722.924
767789.6
1478235.12
722.002
767804.043
1478232.49
721.58
- —
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result of
the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by ARCADIS
staff. The annual monitoring surveys
of the channel were generated using
field surveys and accurately
represent actual field conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
723.68
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
186
Bankfull Width:
33.1
Floodprone Area Elevation:
730.88
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull
5.6
W/D Ratio 1
5.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
77
Stream Type: E5
Section 10 - Riffle
,40
755
7,-0
7�4
CPOSc_—SEC
1DN
110
- —
--
�t
131'.1-OfFULL
---EE\/.
723,68
.1
715
r
AS—BUILT----------
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
710
50+00.00
705
'
F
H

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-11 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26.0
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
IE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767829.713
1478833.7
722.909
Bankfull Width:
767833.356
1478830.47
722.252
767835.57
1478827.27
721.772
6.3
767838.056
1478824.03
718.692
8.5
767838.216
1478823.51
718.553
1.0
767839.063
1478822.36
716.857
767840.047
1478822.5
715.669
767842.224
1478821.19
715.54
767845.311
1478819.81
715.08
767850.073
1478816.77
715.704
767854.826
1478812.51
715.928
767857.555
1478810.42
716.333
HAI\,
767857.854
1478810.63
716.795
767859.095
1478809.21
717.947
767863.24
1478804.26
721.352
715
767876.765
1478792.98
721.831
767885.835
1478783.47
722.188
767894.11
1478775.92
722.101
767898.335
1478772.13
721.859
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result
of the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
722.98
Bankfull Cross -Sectional At
158.7
Bankfull Width:
36.6
Floodprone Area Elevation:
729.28
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.3
W/D Ratio 1
8.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 11 - Riffle
,.rrrd
735
730
725
CR
SS -S
CTION
#11
HAI\,
KFULL
ELEV.
722.918
�
7�Q
715
710
nn
AS -BUILT
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
705
tH
700

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-12 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26.0
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
JE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767980.178
1479276.86
722.64
767984.356
1479276.41
722.338
767990.706
1479276.31
719.637
767993.183
1479275.47
718.08
767994.813
1479275.07
716.417
767995.421
1479275.07
716.085
767996.898
1479274.28
716.144
767997.093
1479274.41
714.702
768000.424
1479273.79
714.655
768003.267
1479272.69
713.82
768005.994
1479272.02
713.14
768012.436
1479270.98
714.125
768015.543
1479269.49
715.289
768015.536
1479269.19
715.784
768015.559
1479269.23
716.271
768016.981
1479268.94
716.066
768019.917
1479267.96
718.185
768024.554
1479266.14
720.836
768036.219
1479261.45
721.512
768051.587
1479254.96
721.126
768068.117
1479248.35
720.479
768084.67
1479240.2
720.446
768094.865
1479236.54
720.538
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result of
the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field survey,
which was not surveyed by ARCADIS
staff. The annual monitoring surveys
of the channel were generated using
field surveys and accurately represent
actual field conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
720.24
Bankfull Cross -Sectional An
181.2
Bankfull Width:
38.7
Floodprone Area Elevation:
727.94
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.7
W/D Ratio 1
8.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 12 -Pool
75
7
CR
SSS
CTION
#12
A
71
AS -BUILT
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
61+(0,00
F
H
7CO

River Basin: Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X-13 FTH
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26.0
Date:
4/28/2016
Field Crew:
JE. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
768795.655
1480319.7
720.096
768798.317
1480316.95
719.655
768802.321
1480312.34
714.494
768802.41
1480311.51
713.678
768804.469
1480308.94
713.34
768806.681
1480306.56
712.711
768812.774
1480301.76
713.388
768817.28
1480296.72
713.564
768819.968
1480293.24
713.61
768820.163
1480292.96
714.468
768825.159
1480289.39
719.412
768833.917
1480280.27
719.869
768845.377
1480269.54
719.194
768856.125
1480257.05
717.9
768865.464 1
480248.14 1
717.592
The discrepancies between the as -
built cross sections and the following
year's cross sections are the result
of the as -built cross sections being
generated from the surface contours
created from the as -built field
survey, which was not surveyed by
ARCADIS staff. The annual
monitoring surveys of the channel
were generated using field surveys
and accurately represent actual field
conditions.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
719.53
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Ai
191.1
Bankfull Width:
38.6
Floodprone Area Elevation
726.23
Floodprone Width:
200+
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.9
W/D Ratio
7.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type: E5
Section 13 - Pool
CP
SS -S
CTION
#1.3
715
-
HAMS
FULLLEII:.
710
cz
70�
F
�I
I
AS -BUILT - - - - - - - - - -
YEAR 1
`r'EAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
7a�

Exhibit Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,794.1 feet
Parameter
Gauge Regional Curve
0.0
Pre -Existing Condition
0.0094
0.003
References Reach(as) Data'
25.7 19.1
Design
27.5
4.7
6.7 6.6
As -Built / Baseline'
0.9
20.6
Dimension and substrate - Riffle
748.9
Equation
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
51.0
41.9*
20.2
26.7
26.3
35.2
4.3
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.7
27.6
38.8
24.1
29.5
26.3
38.1
7.5
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
180.0
-
250.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100.0
180.0
250.0
-
>200
-
-
0.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.2*
3.3
4.5
4.5
5.9
0.5
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.3
4.2
5.0
3.5
4.2
4.4
4.7
0.6
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
0.35
5.0
6.9
6.9
8.1
0.7
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.6
5.9
7.2
6.4
6.8
7.0
7.1
4.0
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
139.3
92.9**
79.7
119.4
116.9
176.0
22.9
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
75.0
115.5
163.2
105.4
121.1
124.5
133.4
14.3
3
Width/Depth Ratio
18.8
4.4
6.0
5.9
9.1
1.2
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.1
6.6
9.5
5.5
7.3
5.6
10.9
3.1
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
4.6
8.2
-
10.9
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.6
6.4
9.0
5.2
7.0
7.6
8.3
1.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.0
1.2
1.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
-
-
0.0
3
d50 (mm)
-
0.2
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%_
SC% / Sa% /G.% / C% / B% / Be%
16/d35/d50/d84/d95/dip/di" (mm)
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f'
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream power (transport capacity) W/m'
kdditional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
Impervious cover estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
Additional Reach Parameters
Proportion over wide (%)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHIVL%/L%/M%/ H%/VH%/E%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Bioloaical or Other
47.0
235.0
0.0
0.0020 0.0014
0.0094
0.003
5.5
25.7 19.1
161.9
27.5
4.7
6.7 6.6
7.8
0.9
20.6
176.7 19.1
748.9
27.5
80.9
100.6 -
119.8
N/A
47.0
235.0
N/A
443.0
60.0
3527.0
-
-
14000.0
2.7
161.8
N/A
N/A
642.2
575.0
1380.0
0.0020
0.0094
2132.0
26.3
63.3
N/A
N/A
97.8
> 2.0 mm
0.43
33.0
1.58
N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A I
N/A
47.0
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0
0.0020
0.0094
3527.0
14000.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.5
25.7
161.9
N/A
2.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.7
6.7
7.8 4.3
4.3 4.3
4.3 0 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.6
176.7
748.9 -
- -
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
80.9
100.6
119.8 74.4
40.4 40.4
52.1 16.5 2
N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A I
N/A
47.0
1 235.0
443.0 1
47.0
235.0
443.0
E5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
60.0
3527.0
14000.0
60.0
3527.0
14000.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.2
127.8
507.2
2.2
127.8
507.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
575.0
1380.0
2132.0
575.0
1380.0
2132.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.8
50.0
77.2
20.8
50.0
77.2
N/A
-
N/A
N/A
0.35
0.31
24.0
22.7
1.3
1.29
* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
** NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
***Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singular reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10.76
N/A
10-20
N/A
B
E5
N/A
E5
E5
3.9 4.1***
3.8
3.7
3.6
539.9 379.2**
453.7
-
N/A
-
N/A
-
-
1.07
N/A
1.07
1.07
0.0032
0.0016
N/A
0.0016
0.0014
-
-
N/A
-
-
N/A
* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
** NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
***Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singular reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Exhibit Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,586.4 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
References Reach(es) Data'
Design
As -Built / Baseline'
Dimension and substrate - Riffle
Equation
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
51.0
46.0*
23.9
30.7
30.3
40.3
4.8 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
25.1
29.0
33.0
24.2
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
>200.0
-
-
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
-
>200.0
-
-
>200.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.3*
3.8
4.2
4.2
5.0
0.4 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
3.8
4.1
4.6
-
4.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
6.7
7.8
7.9
9.1
0.6 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
6.4
7.4
8.3
-
7.7
-
- -
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
139.3
112.5**
94.0
130.1
128.2
176.4
4.8 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
104.5
119.7
144.7
104.2
1
Width/Depth Ratio
18.8
5.3
7.0
7.1
8.4
1.0 11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
5.5
7.0
8.6
-
5.6
-
- -
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
-
6.5
-
-
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
-
6.5
-
8.3
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.1
1.1
-
1.2
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
-
- -
1
d50 (mm)
-
0.2
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
Profile
Rifle Length (ft)
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
Riffle Slope (ft)
0.0009
0.0010
0.0010
0.0011 0.0001
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
0.0009
0.0010
0.0011
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
81.2
112.8
144.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
7.5
7.8
8.0
-
7.2
-
- -
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
272.0
297.0
322.0
-
Pool cross Sectional Area (ft2)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
104.5
119.7
144.7
136.3
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
48.0
639.0
-
1566.0
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
48.0
639.0
1566.0
48.0
639.0
-
1566.0 -
-
Radius of curvature (ft)
1275.0
2693.0
3800.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
1275.0
2693.0
3800.0
1275.0
2693.0
3800.0
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
49.6
104.8
-
147.8
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
49.6
104.8
147.8
49.6
104.8
-
147.8 -
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
4464.0
4618.0
-
4771.0
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
4464.0
[44618.04771.0
4464.0
4618.0
-
4771.0 -
-
Meander Width Ratio
173.7
179.7
-
185.6
- -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
173.7
179.7
185.6
173.7
179.7
-
185.6 -
-
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
-
N/A
-
-
- - -
-
SC% / Sa% /G.% / C% / B% / Be%
N/A
1 6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di P / di'p (mm)
>2.0mm
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
0.38
0.3
0.37
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
28.0
17.0
27.9
Stream power (transport capacity) W/m 2
1.36
1.46
1.79
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
13.93
N/A
Impervious cover estimate (%)
10-20
N/A
Rosgen Classification
B
E5
N/A
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
4.1***
3.4
3.4
3.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
539.9
466.8**
442.3
Valley length (ft)
-
N/A
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
-
N/A
-
-
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
N/A
1.04
1.04
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0032
0.0013
N/A
0.0013
0.00171
BF slope (ft/ft)
-
-
N/A
-
-
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Proportion over wide (%)
N/A
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
N/A
Incision Class (BHR Range)
N/A
BEHI VL% / L% I M% / H%/VH%/E%
N/A
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
'* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
***Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singular reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profle parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11

Exhibit Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS IN 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 5,215.2 feet
Parameter
Gauge' Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
References Reach(es) Data'
Design
As -Built / Baseline2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Equation
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
51
58*
27.9
35.6
34.7
44.1
3.9
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.3
33.4
40.8
28.4
34.1
32.2
41.7
6.9
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
250
316.7
-
400.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
>200.0
-
-
>200.0
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.8*
4.5
5.3
5.1
6.8
0.5
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.0
4.7
5.7
4.0
4.3
4.1
4.7
0.4
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
5.8
7.6
7.2
9.3
0.7
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.1
6.5
7.8
5.6
6.3
6.3
7.1
0.8
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
139.3
179.2**
192.6
202.5
175.5
222.2
22
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
120.3
157.8
202.7
115.3
143.5
150.2
165.2
25.6
3
Width/Depth Ratio
18.8
4.7
6.6
6.8
8.2
1.0
25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2
7.1
8.8
6.9
8.1
6.9
10.4
2
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
7.1
1 8.6
1 -
10.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
>6.5
4.8
1 6.0
1 6.2
7.0
1.1 1
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.3
1.5
-
1.7
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
3
d50 (mm)
0.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RifFleslope(ft)
0.0
0.0017
0.002
0.004
0
18
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0022
0.0026
0.003
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Length (ft)
15.2
30
27.5
69.8
15
19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
81.2
112.8
144.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
8
9.4
9.5
11.4
1.1
15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.5
7.8
8.0
6.1
6.4
6.2
7.0
0.5
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
62.3
256.3
150.6
1206
298
18
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
272.0
297.0
322.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
199.0
N/A
N/A
N/A I
N/A
I N/A
N/A
120.3
157.8 1
202.7 1
148.3
1 169.9
1 152.2
1
209.2 1
34.1 1
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
48
639
1556
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
48
639
1556
48
639
-
1556
-
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
1275
2693
-
3800
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AL4464
2693
3800
1275
2693
-
3800
-
-
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
34.7
73.4
-
103.5
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
73.4
113.8
38.2
80.6
-
113.8
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
4464
4618
-
4771
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4618
4771
4464
4618
-
4771Meander
Width Ratio
121.6
125.8
-
130
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
125.8
46.9
1.4
19.1
-
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
SC% / Sa% /G.% / C% / B% / Be%
N/A
16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
> 2.0 mm
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f
0.46
0.35
0.36
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
35
20
27.1
Stream power (transport capacity) WIM21
1
1
2.76
1
11.06
1.49
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
26.05
N/A
Impervious cover estimate (%)
10-20
N/A
Rosgen Classification
B
E5
N/A
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
4.3***
5.2
3.9
3.7
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
539.9
772.1**
1166.3
Valley length (ft)
-
N/A
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
-
N/A
-
Sinuosity (ft)l
1.04
N/A
1.04
1.04
Additional Reach Parameters
BF slope (ft/ft)
-
N/A
-
-
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
N/A
Proportion over wide (%)
N/A
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
N/A
Incision Class (BHR Range)
_
N/A
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H%/VH%/E%
N/A
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
" NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Burry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
***Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singular reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11

Exhibit Table 11a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5794.1 feet
Dimension .. substrateBased
®®®®®�®®®�®®�®®®�®®�®®®�®®�®®®�®®
an fixed baseline bankf
•' MMMMM--MM®MM--MMMMM--mmm®m--®mmmm--
..... mmm
rrr rrr--
rrrmmm
res--
rsrmm
rrr rrr--
rrrmmm
rrr--
rrrmmm
rsr--
-. . 'mmmmm--mmm®®--m®mm®--®mmmm--mmm®m--
®®M®M■■®®®®®■■®®®EM■■®®®®®■■®®®®®■■
ankful
Based on current/developing It I
' -----------------------------------
Crass SectonalArea beWeen end pins
Cross Section #
Cross Section #
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
elevation
' -----------------------------------
Bankfull Mean Depth (fr,
.h •..-----------------------------------
Bankful[En"nehmentR.t!,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
BasedoncurrentIdeveloping
r ----------------------------m------
. . -----------------------------------

Exhibit Table 11b. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters --Cross Section)
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,586.4
Dimension .. substrate®®®®®�®®®�®®�®®®�®®�®®®�®®�®®®�®®
elenration
NONE
Bandull Width (ft)
FloodpmneWidmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
D" mmmmm-mmmmmm--m--m---------------m-
... mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BankfullWidthIDepthRati.MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Based on currentdeveloping.." _.■.■.■...■.■...■.■.■...■.■...■.■.■..
BankfullWidOVDepthRati,mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
---M----------M----M-----M---------
.
- -MMMM---M®m®-----------------------
CmssSeaionalAmabetweenendpins(A)MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-mm--m-m--mmm---mmm----m--m-m---mm-
.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Based on cunrentfdoveloping bankfull
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BankfullMeanDepth(ft;mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BankfullWidthiDepthRafiimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
--M--M-M--MMM----MM--M-M--M-®---MM-
. -..-----------------------------------

Exhibit Table 111c. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters -- Cross Section)
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS IN 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 5,215.2
Dimension and subamate
Based on fixed baseline bankf
on
BankfullWidth/DepthRab.MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BankftjilWidth(ft)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BankfullE�chmentRati�MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BankfullBa,kHeighiR.fi,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
CrossSectionflO)
CmssSection#(##)
CrossSeationflft)
Based on fixed baseline bankf-ll
elevation
BankfuliM�nDepth(ftimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bankful[W,dth/DepthR.UiMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Bankful[E�nch.entRWilMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Bankful[BankHeightR.t.IMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMENEEMENNEEMENE
BankfuliM�nDepth(ftmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BankfullWidth/DepthRafi#mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bankful[EntrenchmentRati,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
B.nkf.IIB.nkHeightR.t�MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,794.1 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD'
n Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n Min Mean Med Max SD' n
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.1
29.5
26.3
38.1
7.5
3
27.9
30.1
30.7
31.8
2.0
3
27.7
30.9
30.5 34.6
3.6
3
28.6
30.7
30.3 33.3
2.4
3 27.9
31.1
29.5
35.8
4.2
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
200
200
200
200
0.0
3
200
200.0
200
200
0.0
3
200
200
200 200
0.0
3
200
200
200 200
0.0
3 200
200
200
200
0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
3.5
4.2
4.4
4.7
0.6
3
3.7
3.9
3.7
4.4
0.4
3
3.8
4.0
3.9 4.4
0.3
3
3.8
4.1
4.1 4.3
0.3
3 3.8
4.1
4.1
4.3
0.3
3
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
6.4
6.8
7.0
7.1
4.0
3
5.2
5.5
5.5
5.9
0.4
3
5.1
5.9
6.3 6.4
0.7
3
5.6
6.1
6.3 6.4
0.4
3 6
6.3
6.2
6.6
0.3
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
105.4
121.1
124.5
133.4
14.3
3
115
118.7
117.4
123.7
4.5
3
103.9
124.2
134 134.8
17.6
3
108.9
124.7
130.1 135.1
13.9
3 119.5
124.6
119.9
134.4
8.5
3
Width/Depth Ratio
5.5
7.3
5.6
10.9
3.1
3
6.3
7.7
8.3
8.6
1.3
3
6.9
7.7
7.4 8.9
1.0
3
7.0
7.5
7.5 8.1
0.6
3 6.5
7.7
7.2
9.4
1.5
3
Entrenchment Ratio,5.2
7.07.6
8.3
1.6
3
6.3
6.7
6.5
7.2
0.5
3
5.8
6.5
6.6 7.2
0.7
3
6.0
6.5
6.6 7.0
0.5
3 5.6
6.5
6.8
7.2
0.8
3
Bank Height Rati
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1 1
0
3
1
1
1 1
0
3 1
1
1
1
0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft
2,794
2.794
2,794
2794.1
2794.1
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
'SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit D. Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DIVIS IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,586.4 feet
Dimension and Substrate Riffle
M
EWE
M
MEM
M
MEM
E
ME
Bankfull Wi
•a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaaoa®aaao������
•••• •
a
•
aaaoa
•
aaaoa
•
aaaoa
•
aaaoa
•
aaao������
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bankfull Max Depth
CrossBankfull
a�aaaoa®aaaoa�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaao�����
Width/Depth Ratio
a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaaoa®aaaoa�aaao�����
Entrenchment -•a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaaoa®aaaoa�aaao�����
'Bank Height -•Pool
aoaaaoaoaaaoaoaaaoaoaaaoaoaaao�����
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
Spacing (ft)
eeeee�eeeee�eeeee
eeeee
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel length (ftli
(ft�
Water Surface SlopeSinuosity
BF slope
2% of Reach with ••
Channel bility .
Biological.Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, DMS IMS ID# 92185 Se ment/Reach: Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 5,215.2 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.4
34.1
32.2
41.7
6.9
3
34
34.5
34.5
34.9
0.5
3
34
35.4
34.1
38.2
2.4
3 33.3
35.0
33.7
38.1
2.7
3
32.2
34.0
33.1
36.6
2.3
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
200
200
200
200
0
3
200
200.0
200
200
0.0
3
200
200
200
200
0.0
3 200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
0.0
3
200
200
200
200
0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
4
4.3
4.1
4.7
0.4
3
4.8
4.9
4.9
4.9
0.1
3
4.1
4.9
5.1
5.3
0.7
3 4.5
5.1
5.3
5.6
0.6
3
4.3
5.1
5.4
5.6
0.7
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
5.6
6.3
6.3
7.1
0.8
3
5.7
6.1
5.9
6.8
0.6
3
6.6
6.9
6.9
7.2
0.3
3 6.5
6.9
6.9
7.3
0.4
3
6.3
6.8
6.8
7.2
0.5
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
115.3
143.5
150.2
165.2
25.6
3
162.8
167.9
170.2
170.7
4.4
3
155.9
170.9
174.5
182.2
13.5
3 172.9
179.6
177.7
188.1
7.8
3
158.7
172.4
172.4
186
13.7
3
Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
8.1
6.9
10.4
2
3
7
7.1
7.1
7.1
0.1
3
6.4
7.5
6.6
9.4
1.7
3 6.1
7.0
6.3
8.5
1.3
3
5.9
6.8
6.0
8.5
1.5
3
Entrenchment Ratio
4.8
6
6.2
7
1.1
3
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.9
0.1
3
5.2
5.7
5.9
5.9
0.4
3 5.2
5.7
5.9
6.0
0.4
3
5.5
5.9
6.0
6.2
0.4
3
'Bank Height Rati
1
1 1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3 1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacing (ft
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
5,215
5.215
5,215
5215.2
5215.2
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendix E
April 25, 2017 Page 13

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCDMS # 92185
Date of Data
Date of
Greater than Qbkf
Method
Notes
Collection
Occurrence
Stage
5/30/2012
Unknown
Debris on floodplain
Y
10/8/2013
7/6/2013
On-site transducer/data logger
Y
On-site transducer/data logger
10/8/2013
7/27/2013
and silt inside rain gauge. 3.71
Y
inches of rain.
12/5/2013
11/27/2013
On-site transducer/data logger
Y
Beaver Creek, Fifth Creek
7/18/2014
1/11/2014
On site Transducer
Y
Upstream and Fifth Creek
Downstream
7/18/2014
3/7/2014
On site Transducer
Y
Beaver Creek
7/18/2014
4/7/2014
On site Transducer
Y
Beaver Creek
Beaver Creek and Fifth Creek
4/18/2015
3/15/2015
On site Transducer
Y
Upstream
4/21/2016
2/3/216
On site Transducer
Y
Beaver Creek
Beaver Creek, Fifth Creek
10/25/2016
5/3/2016
On site Transducer
Y
Upstream and Fifth Creek
Downstream
10/25/2016
8/3/2016
On site Transducer
Y
Beaver Creek

14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Jan
Five Mile Branch
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
X30%
X70%
2016

Annual Precip
Total
39.0
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCDMS # 92185
45.4
44.1
WETS 30th Percentile
31.8
32.0
32.8
Gauge
Max Consecutive Hydroperiod: Saturation within 12 Inches of Soil Surface (Percent of
Growing Season) WETS Station: USGS 354822080521501
Growing Season: April 18 - Oct 17
Year 1 (2013) Year 2 (2014) Year 3 (2015) Year 4 (2016) Year 5 (2017)
Mean
1
68.3
36.1
32.8 31.1
42.1
2
23.0
3.8
5.5 4.9
9.3
3
23.0
13.1
13.7 21.3
17.8
4
54.1
13.1
13.7 20.7
25.4
5
48.6
8.7
9.3 82.5
37.3
6
16.9
7.7
8.2 7.7
10.1
7
16.4
3.0
6.0 M
8.5
8
100.0
42.1
32.8 31.1
51.5
9
22.4
33.9
20.7 30.6
26.9
10
100.0
33.3
19.1 30.6
45.8
11
16.4
11.5
8.2 6.0
10.5
12
42.6
20.8
12.6 26.2
25.6
13
44.3
19.7
12.6 18.6
23.8
14
37.2
10.9
10.4 14.8
18.3
15
23.0
0.0
11.5 17.5
13.0
16
23.5
0.0
12.6 19.1
13.8
17
2.2
0.0
1.6 M
1.3
18
9.8
8.2
6.0 4.9
7.2
19
34.4
0.0
11.4 15.3
15.3
20
20.8
14.2
11.4 18.6
16.3
21
100.0
42.1
36.6 81.4
65.0
22
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
23
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
24
16.9
13.7
13.7 30.0
18.6
25
53.6
27.9
14.7 29.0
31.3
26
54.6
20.8
13.7 27.9
29.3
27
16.4
0.0
8.7 15.8
10.2
28
7.7
8.2
6.0 5.5
6.9
29
67.2
34.4
19.1 30.6
37.8
30
20.2
10.9
9.3 15.8
14.1
Annual Precip
Total
39.0
33.5
45.4
44.1
WETS 30th Percentile
31.8
32.0
32.8
41.9
WETS 70th Percentile
40.4
40.2
41.1
49.4
Normal
Y
Y
H
Y

Table 14. Groundwater Gauge Downloading History
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCDMS # 92185
Download Event Date
Number
Initial Gauge
3/20/2013
4/3/2013
5/29/2013
6/4/2013
8/20/2013
12/5/2013
12/15/2013
7/18/2014
10/17/2014
4/17/2015*
8/28/2015
11/4/2015
Serial Number
1
13D4B648
ok
ok
Failed
No attempt.
ok
Replaced with EBD3010.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
weather.
Keprogrammed clue to
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
OK. Missing 6/5 - 8/24
2
14E14322
inconsistent logging
Replaced with 12D4C9D8.
ok
No attempt.
ok
failed
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
Replaced battery.
weather.
data.
3
1314FC9A
Failed
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
Replaced with 13152502.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
weather.
4
13D49A3B
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
Deleted old data.
weather.
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
OK. Missing 6/5 - 6/12
5
14E16DC9
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
Replaced battery.
weather.
data.
6
14E1A3C5
Reprogrammed due to not
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
ok
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
downloading.
Deleted old data.
weather.
7
13D4CA32
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
Replaced with 1314FC9A
Partial data
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
weather.
8
13D49BC4
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
weather.
9
136B6377
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
Replaced with EBD20B9.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
weather.
10
13D4B632
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
weather.
11
14E178FC
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
Replaced with EBD074F.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
Replaced battery.
weather.
12
14E13DAE
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
OK. Missing 6/5 - 6/11
weather.
data.
Ok. Reprogrammed.
OK. Deleted old data.
Wrong logging dates.
13
13D4A9D9
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
Deleted old data.
ok
Replaced battery.
ok
Reprogrammed.
14
13D4C9C5
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
Replaced battery.
15
A28B85B
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
No attempt due to
No attempt.
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
failed
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
malfunctioning handheld.
Deleted old data.
16
11312B9E
ok
Failed
ok
No attempt.
No attempt due to
No attempt. Submerged
No attempt.
Replaced with EBCFF2F
Partial data
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
malfunctioning handheld.
weather.
No attempt due to
Ok. Replaced battery.
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
OK. No data after 6/27.
17
14E16DE5
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
malfunctioning handheld.
ok
No attempt.
Deleted old data.
Partial data
Replaced battery.
weather.
Reprogrammed.
18
13153397
Failed
Replaced with 13D493A9.
No attempt due to
No attempt. Could not
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
No attempt due to
ok
accident.
locate.
malfunctioning handheld.
weather.
No attempt due to
No attempt due to
OK. Missing 10/29 - 11/7
19
14E15453
ok
ok
accident.
ok
malfunctioning handheld.
No attempt.
ok
Replaced with 13D4B648
Partial data
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
data.
20
9DE6C32
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
21
9DE6D1 F
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
Failed
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
22
EBD1038
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
23
13D4B61 D
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
24
A287DCE
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
25
13D4B624
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
26
EBDD6BE
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
Reprogrammed due to no
No attempt due to
Reprogrammed due o
No attempt due to
27
14E13D38
data.
°k
accident.
inconsistent logging
malfunctioning handheld.
No attempt.
ok
Failed
Partial data
Replaced with 136B1CB7
ok
ok
28
14E1973F
ok
ok
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
Failed
Partial data
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
29
14E177C0
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
30
13D4CA00
ok
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
RAIN
13D4BAF9
ok
ok
ok full of ants
No attempt.
Failed. Silt in gauge from
Failed
Failed
No attempt. Wasp nest on
No attempt
No attempt
No attempt
No attempt
flooding.
gauge.
* Batteries replaced in several gauges.

Table 14. Groundwab
Five Mile Branch Stre
NCDMS # 92185
Number
Initial Gauge
Serial Number
4/12/2016*
9/23/2016*
11/16/2016*
12/15/2016*
1
13D413648
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
2
14E14322
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
3
1314FC9A
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
4
131D49A313
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
5
14E16DC9
OK. Deleted old data.
OK. Missing 8/26 - 8/28
and 9/19 - 9/23 data.
ok
ok
6
14E1A3C5
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
Failed. Damaged
Failed
7
13D4CA32
OK. Deleted old data.
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
8
13D49BC4
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
9
13686377
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
10
13D413632
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
11
14E178FC
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
12
14E13DAE
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
13
13D4A9D9
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
Failed. Damaged
Failed
14
13D4C9C5
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
15
A28B85B
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
16
1131269E
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
17
14E16DE5
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
ok. Partial Data.
Reprogrammed.
18
13153397
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
19
14E15453
Missing. Replaced with
EBDD9DE
ok
ok
ok
20
9DE6C32
Missing. Replaced with
136AC084
ok
ok
ok
21
9DE6D1 F
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
OK. Missing 9/23 - 9/30
data.
OK. Missing 9/23 - 9/30
data.
22
EBD1038
ok
ok
ok
ok
23
13D41361 D
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
ok
ok
24
A287DCE
ok
ok
ok
ok
25
13D413624
ok
ok
ok
ok
26
EBDD6BE
ok
ok
ok
ok
27
14E13D38
ok
ok
ok
ok
28
14E1973F
ok
ok
ok
ok
29
14E177C0
ok
ok
ok
ok
30
13D4CA00
ok
ok
ok
ok
RAIN
13D4BAF9
No attempt
No attempt
No attempt
No attempt
* Batteries replaced in several

-2
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #1 EBD3010
4
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
N
d
L
U
c
0
57 Cc
isecutive Days
2
m
Q
V'
-
0
,I,. I I I. 1� Jill'! 1 m 1! 111! 1 im! 1 m w 11
C >+ C >, 0) > U
li .2a QQ 0 Z D
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
-2
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

m
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #2 13D4C9D8
0
(E CL f6 7 m Q U O N
LL Q Q Z
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 y
d
t
U
-6
c
0
-8
m
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

-2
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #3 13152502
4
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
inAA
U
39
secutive ys
C
0 2
.Q
a
0
11�!i 11 H H !1! 11
Q U) z o
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
-2
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

4
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #4 13D49A3B
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
it
ii
8
nsecutive Da s
I A-
........... .......................
.
......
C-0 - Q >, C >, 15-
U
(D m
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
O N
Z C)
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
m
t
U
-6
c
0
-8
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

4
2
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #5 14E16DC9
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
V
v
151 Consecutive Days
I
w
Him
HiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiF
U- 75 Q
� � Q
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
a O
m
U)
0 aa)
Z 0
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #6 14E1A3C5
4
6
GROWING SEASON
4
April 18 - October 17
�` 1
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
l
-102
u
14 =
_
_-
-16
0 2
14 Cons acutive Days
-18.0
-20 >
a
-22.2
w
°1
-24 3:
a
-260
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
0
-44
c cL
CL CU 75
i C � a) O
LL Q Q
im U
Z
co
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #7 1314FC9A
4
6
GROWING SEASON
4
April 18 - October 17
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
_
m
•�
-14
v
-16
'_-
- 0 2
-18
0
-20
w
Q
•�
-22
°1
w
L
-24
?�
a
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
0
-44
CU ccC i>, C >, > U
O
LL
U)
z O
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation

4
2
H
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #8 13D49BC4
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17'
57 nsecutive Days
i H
1..i
......, ..,miiiiHHHHHHH—++++
C T CT O7
LL Q Q
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
a U
m 0
U)
O O
Z 0
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
N
m
s
U
C
C
0
w
m
Uj
C9

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #9 EBD20B9
4
-
6
GROWING SEASON
4
April 18 - October 17
2
VVJ
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Lit
-12
-14
u
-16_-
0 2
56 C
nsecutive Days
-18
o
ip
v
-20
-22
T
w
v
L
-24
3:
a
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
0_
-44
_
(6 N N Q N 7 :3Q VO
LL .2:Q Q i(D O Z
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #10 13D4B632
4
6
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
4
PN Y
2
0
-2
in
-4
w
s
U
-6
s
U
c
c
° 2
=
2
56 C nsecutive Days
-8
I
-10
�
a`
�1
-�
11 I
-
-12
ly
-14
16
-18
-20
0-22
La)
C N 5 7' Q O O aa)i
Q z o
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation

4
2
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #11 EBD074F
LL 2t <
Q � Z
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

4
2
[d
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #12 14E13DAE
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
48 C i insecutive Day
ALAH111,44HA41111111111
LL Q > �
� � Q
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
fl o m
0 z o
Co
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42

4
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #13 13D4A9D9
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
I
rl
34
onsecutive ays
Co CLL L cc 75T
LL -a Q g -7
Date
Q U O N
Q O z o
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 w
t
U
-6
c
-8 0
m
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #14 13D4C9C5
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
iN
7 Consecutive ays
C: -0 L>, c >
UQ Co
Date
Precipitation —GW EI

4
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #15 A28B85B
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
32
nsecutive Days
1,111, 1
01-1111 11 11 11 1 11 11 A1111 11
-0 Q > c >
LL .2t Q
Date
Q U > U
Q m 0 z
oPrecipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 y
d
t
V
-6
c
-8 .a
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

4
m
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #16 EBCFF2F
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
35 C nsecutive D ys
HHHHHH111111II!,
L L
u_Q g Q c/ O
Date
oPrecipitation GW Elevation
Z 0
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 w
N
s
-6
c
0
-8 -
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #17 14E16DE5
4
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
y
d
t
V
C
C
2
.0
W
.a
L
a
0 JLIA� o il., 1,11,111,01.141, 111,01''PH'', I
C-0 >, C >+ � > U
Q Q (3)O (1)
LL z D
Co
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
-38
-40
y
U

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #18 13D493A9
4
6
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
in
4
2
0
-2
w
-4
s
v
s
�
c
-6
v
c
9 Consec
iv
D
ys
C
G
° 2
-8
m
—
>
-10
w
L
IL
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
0
:..0
-22
C �
LL
T
QQ ° o
z° o
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation

4
2
x
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #19 EBDD9DE
C L >. C >+ > 0
LL Q Q Z 0
U)
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
T
a)
.c
c
C
0
m
m
n
�i
u

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #20 136AC084
4
—
6
GROWING SEASON
4
April 18 - October 17
2
II
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
_
w
d
-14
v
c
_-
34 Cc nsecutive Days
-16
_
�-
2
-18
0
00
-20
Q-
-22
LU
L
-24
?�
IL
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
0
-HHHHUHHH
-44
� Q Cc T O �,.
LD
Q
Z 0
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation

4
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #21 9DE6D1 F
C,
C LL T C T > U
LL a Q 2 Q °' z o
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
d
L
U
-6 5
c
-8
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

4
Cz
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #22 EBD1038
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - O ober 1
/V �/
r
183 Consecutive
I lays
I
[L
Ll
HHH04111
..................
1! i 1! i 1 p 1 1! 1! 1 1 1 1! 1 1! 1 1 1! m 1 m
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
fl O 0 N
Z Cl
U)
8
6
4
2
0
-2
w
m
-4 v
C
-6
0
-8 >
LU
-10 ?�
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #23 13D4B61 D
4
6
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
4
2
0
-2
w
-4
w
d
183 Consecutive Day
c
-6
v
c
° 2
�
°
:°
-8
>
Q'
-10
w
L
IL
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
0
-22
c i Q m > �'
LL Qz
o (D
o
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation

4
2
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #24 A287DCE
C >+ C >, 0) > U
LL .2tQ Q a) O z o
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #25 13134B624

4
2
9
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #26 EBDD6BE
CL L �. C �, 0) > 0
—moi It 2 Q g Q °� Z
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
w
V

4
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #27 13681 CB7
9
Q U) Z
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 w
d
L
U
-6
c
-8 m
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #28 14E1973F
4
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
\,j N\,)
L Ilk
10
onse uti ell
y
m
t
�uc
0 2
w
.Q
L
0
11 111011 [1 : .
> U..
� Q ¢ O o
�i
z°
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #29 14E177C0
C >, C >+ 0) t > U
LL Q Q m 0 Z
Date
Precipitation —GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12 y
-14 v
c
-16
-18 0
-20 >
-22 w
-24 ?�
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

Five Mile Branch
Gauge #30 13D4CAOO
4
8
GROWING SEASON
6
A "1 18 - O ber 7
4
NI
2
9
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
N
-10
-12
r
c
-14
E
-16
c
0 2
-18
29 C nsecutive Day
0
-20
m
a
-22
w
a
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
0
-44
Q U)
z o
Date
�USGS Precipitation —GW Elevation

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site y
Appendix F
April 25, 2017 Page 14

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 1. Boulder Vane
11/16/2016
Photo Point 1. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 2. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
t,
A
Photo Point 3. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 4. Floodplain looking east 11/16/2016
Photo Point 4. Boulder Vane 11/16/2016
Page 1 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 5. Cross Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 6. Boulder Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 7. Boulder Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 7. Floodplain looking east 11/16/2016
Photo Point 7. Floodplain looking west 11/16/2016
Photo Point 8. Floodplain pool looking east
11/16/2016
Page 2 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 9. Cross Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 10. Cross Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 10. Floodplain looking east 11/16/2016
Photo Point 10. Floodplain looking west 11/16/2016
Photo Point 11. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 12. Floodplain looking west 11/16/2016
Page 3 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 12. Floodplain pool looking east
11/16/2016
Photo Point 13. Floodplain pool looking west
11/16/2016
Photo Point 13. Floodplain looking east 11/16/2016
Photo Point 14. Floodplain pool looking east
11/16/2016
Photo Point 15. Floodplain pool looking west
11/16/2016
Photo Point 15. Floodplain looking east 11/16/2016
Page 4 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 16. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 16. Looking upstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking west 11/16/2016
Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking north 11/16/2016
Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking east 11/16/2016
Photo Point 18. Cross Vane 11/16/2016
Page 5 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 19. Boulder Vanes 11/16/2016
Photo Point 20. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 20. Looking upstream 11/16/2016
Page 6 of 13

Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek
rfa
Photo Point 21. Rootwads 11/16/2016
Photo Point 21. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 22. Cross Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 23. Boulder Vane 11/16/2016
Photo Point 23. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 24. Rootwads 11/16/2016
Page 7 of 13

Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 24. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 25. Cross Vane 11/16/2016
ar �.
Photo Point 25. Cross Vane. Left arm scour.
11/16/2016
Photo Point 26. Rootwads 11/16/2016
Photo Point 26. Looking downstream 11/16/2016
Photo Point 27. Floodplain pool looking west
11/16/2016
Page 8 of 13

Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 28. Floodplain looking west 11/16/2016
Page 9 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 28. Confluence looking east 11/16/2016
Photo Point 29. Looking downstream 12/08/2016
Photo Point 29. Floodplain looking east 12/08/2016
Photo Point 30. Cross Vane 12/08/2016
Photo Point 31. Floodplain pool looking northwest 12/08/2016
Photo Point 31. Floodplain looking east 12/08/2016
Page 10 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 32. Looking downstream 12/08/2016
Photo Point 33. Floodplain looking west 12/08/2016
Photo Point 34. Boulder Vane 12/08/2016
Photo Point 34. Boulder Vane 12/08/2016
Photo Point 35. Boulder Vane 12/08/2016
Photo Point 35. Boulder Vane 12/08/2016
Page 11 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
°�h y y SAT
Photo Point 36. Looking downstream
12/08/2016
Photo Point 36. Looking upstream 12/08/2016
Photo Point 37. Floodplain pool looking north 12/08/2016
Photo Point 37. Floodplain looking east 12/08/2016
Photo Point 38. Cross Vane
12/08/2016
Photo Point 38. Looking south
Page 12 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 39. Looking upstream 12/08/2016
Photo Point 39. Looking downstream 12/08/2016
Photo Point 39. Floodplain looking east 12/08/2016
. _
Photo Point 40 Cross Vane 12/08/2016
Photo Point 40. Looking downstream 12/08/2016
Photo Point 41. Floodplain looking west 12/08/2016
Page 13 of 13

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Appendix G
April 25, 2017 Page 15

Stream Problem Areas MY4 2016
Five Mile Branch 92185
Feature
Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Bank Erosion
19+00 BVR
Back eddy from structure
2499
Bank Erosion
23+00 BVR
2505
Bank Erosion
27+50 BVR
Back eddy from structure
2511
Bank Erosion
29+00 BVR
2512
Bank Erosion
30+25 BVR
N/A
Bank Erosion
31+25 BVR
Back eddy from structure
N/A
Bank Erosion
34+25 BVR
2514
Bank Erosion
41+00 BVR
2519
Bank Erosion
65+75 BVR
Back eddy from structure
N/A
Structure boulder settled/fell
25+25 BVR
2502
Structure boulder settled/fell
32+50 BVR
2513
Structure boulder settled/fell
37+25 BVR
N/A
Structure boulder settled/fell
60+75 BVR
2526
Structure boulder settled/fell
68+50 BVR
N/A
Bank Erosion
11+50 FTH
N/A
Bank Erosion
14+25 FTH
2536
Bank Erosion
17+25 FTH
2542
Structure boulder settled/fell
18+75 FTH
2545
Bank Erosion
32+00 FTH
Back eddy from structure
N/A
Bank Erosion
45+00 FTH
121
Bank Erosion
52+00 FTH
Back eddy from structure
110
Bank Erosion
54+00 FTH
107
Bank Erosion
59+00 FTH
106
Bank Erosion
67+00 FTH
99
Bank Erosion
73+25 FTH
94
Structure boulder settled/fell
32+50 FTH
84

Five Mile Branch Stream Problem Areas
NCDMS IMS# 92185
MY4 2016
Bank Erosion 19+00 BVR
Bank Erosion 29+00 BVR
Bank Erosion 23+00 BVR Bank Erosion 34+25 BVR
Bank Erosion 27+50 BVR
Bank Erosion 41+00 BVR

Five Mile Branch Stream Problem Areas
NCDMS IMS# 92185
MY4 2016
Cross Vane 25+25 BVR
Cross Vane 32+50 BVR
Cross Vane 60+75 BVR
s i �
i {f'
Bank Erosion 14+25 FTH
Bank Erosion 17+25 FTH
Bank Erosion 18+75 FTH

Five Mile Branch Stream Problem Areas
NCDMS IMS# 92185
MY4 2016
Bank Erosion 45+00 FTH
Bank Erosion 59+00 FTH
Bank Erosion 52+00 FTH Bank Erosion 67+00 FTH
Bank Erosion 54+00 FTH
Bank Erosion 73+25 FTH

Five Mile Branch Stream Problem Areas
NCDMS IMS# 92185
MY4 2016
Cross Vane 32+50 FTH