Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0000353_Memo_19961014 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY October 14, 1996 Memorandum To: Forrest Westall Mike Parker From: Susan A. Wilson Paul Clark Subject: Mining Facilities on the North Toe River Please review the enclosed effluent sheets regarding the renewal of the mining/processing facilities located on the North Toe River in the French Broad River Basin. The following summarizes the P&E's review of these facilities: • No changes are proposed to the fluoride loadings at each facility [ref. SWT's letter 6/21/95]. The P&E Unit would like to be involved in the future re-allocation development of fluoride at these facilities. • P&E recommends effluent monitoring frequencies (TF, TSS) of weekly for facilities <1 MGD; daily for facilities> 1 MGD [most facilities reflect this frequency]. • P&E recommends that instream monitoring be weekly for facilities <1 MGD; 3/week for facilities > 1 MGD. This should provide the Division ample data to review during the next permit cycle. [Some facilities currently have daily instream monitoring]. • As recommended by your office, chloride monitoring has been implemented quarterly (during the same months as toxicity testing). • Effluent settleable solids, pH, and turbidity monitoring has been continued on a daily frequency. Reviewed by Regional Supervisor: Date: Permits &Engineering: Date: MINING FACILITIES, NORTH TOE RIVER FACILITIES: NC0000361 (Schoolhouse Quartz). Located at River Mile 41.5, this is the first mine discharge of the five within close proximity. This facility was recently permitted to construct a tertiary treatment system to meet a fluoride limit of 109 lbs/day. The UNIMIN facility NC0000175 traded 109 lbs/day fluoride load to the Schoolhouse facility. which subsequently reduced its existing load of 219 lbs/day to 109 lbs/day. Stormwater is covered under GP NCG020112. NC0000353 (The Feldspar Corporation). Located at River Mile 33.8, this facility has phased effluent limits. After Unimin Crystal begins to discharge directly to North Toe River,Feldspar's total fluoride monthly average limit will decrease from 225 to 174 lbs/day. As noted in Mike Parker's staff report (7/18/96), the facility has never discharged from outfalls 002 and 003 (both of which are non-contact cooling water discharges). Please investigate the possibility of terminating one or both of these outfalls since it appears the facility is not discharging from these outfalls. Stormwater is covered under general permits: NCG020256 and NCG020257. NC0084620 (Unimin Crystal). Located at River Mile 33.8, this facility currently discharges to the Feldspar plant (NC0000353). UNIMIN requested an increase in flow from 0.173 MGD to 0.36 MGD for incidental wastewater associated with the process. The facility is to begin discharging directly via this permit in the near future. The increase in flow increased the IWC, and consequently,the toxicity testing percentage. NC0000400 (K-T Feldspar Corporation). Located at River Mile 29.2, this facility does not have a non-contact cooling water discharge. The Biocide Condition will be omitted from this permit, unless the region provides a reason for retaining this condition. Review of instream monitoring data for the period January 1993 through July 1996 indicated six violations of the fluoride water quality standard at the downstream station. Feldspar facility (NC0000353)did not have any violations over the same time period. Stormwater is covered under general permits: NCG020273 and NCG020274. NC0000175 (Unimin Quartz). Located at River Mile 28.6, this facility is the last mine of the five in close proximity. This facility was recently permitted to construct a tertiary treatment system to meet a fluoride limit of 109 lbs/day [see note under NC0000361]. Stormwater is covered under the NPDES permit. • Sludge(Solids) Management Plan The Feldspar Corporations Wastewater Plant thickens and dewaters all solids (99.9%using standard efficiency calculations) from the mineral processing plants. The solids are thickened in 3 clarifiers and then pumped to a disk filter for dewatering. The dewatered solids are then conveyed out to stockpiles to be hauled to disposal areas or to be sold as raw materials for the ceramics industry. The solids are referred to in the mining industry as tailings and are actually a feldspatic sand(feldspar, quartz,mica,garnet and clay) We are presently seeking more customers for this product but the lack of natural gas in our area limits us to markets that require shipping cost which effects the market value of the product. All landfill areas over 1 acre in size are regulated under the Land Quality Section and have a Soil and Erosion Control Plan filled and approved before any fill is placed. These fill sites are constructed to prevent the materials from leaving the site via runoff flows and are inspected after each runoff producing rainfall and no less than once per week. Sites less than 1 acre in size are regulated by the company with mandatory controls and preventative measures in place before any material is landfilled. All property owners who have solids placed on their property must sign an agreement with the company specifying responsibilities. Once the solids are placed and proper grades are established topsoil is placed and the areas are seeded and stabilized. Because of the excellent compaction of these solids over 40%of the landfills constructed in the last 10 years have been used for commercial purposes. F October 7, 1996 The Feldspar Corporation has applied for renewal of their NPDES permit to discharge 3.5 MGD treated industrial wastewater. The WWTP consists of treatment process with lime and acid feed systems for pH adjustment, polymer feed systems, cyclone separator, vacuum filters, three clarifiers, flow measuring and totalizing equipment and recycle pumps. Air compressors are permitted to discharge non-contact cooling water from outfalls 002 and 003. There has been no discharge from either of these outfalls over the past several years. A proposed upgrade at the facility would include improvements which would allow discharge from these two outfalls to begin. Wastewater from Plant#1 is stripped of solids which are stored for resue. Process water is recycled in both plants for re-use. Fluoride and non-fluoride wastew waters are separated for maximum fluoride removal. pH adjustment is used for maximum fluoride removal and neutralization. Coagulation is made possbile using flocculant plymer aided by lime addition. solids are thickened in claridiers and pumped to a vacuum filter for dewatering. Waste tailings are sold as raw materials to anotehr compay with the remainder land filled. There are no effluent guidelines for this industry and the effluent limits were developed using production and process information and the NC Water Quality Standard for fluoride of 1.8 mg/l. There are four other companies, The Feldspar Corporation, Unimin Corporation-Mica Operations, Unimin Corporation-Quartz Operations, and Unimin Corporation-Crystal which have similar industrial processes and wastewater characteristics. Each company discharges or proposes to discharge fluorides to the North Toe River. It has been determined that there is a maximum assimilative capacity of 574 lbs/day of fluoride in the North Toe River at the mouth of Little Bear Creek, which is the most downstream point fluoride is discharged. All five permits are interdependent on each other because the total assimilative capacity for the fluoride is allocated between the five industries and all permits should be issued at the same time. WLA Summary The attached summary documents the effluent limits and monitoring requirements' development for the five mining facilities that discharge into the North Toe River. This summary specifically addresses process wastewater limits and monitoring requirements development. The facility conducts a quarterly chronic pass/fail toxicity test with a 11% limit and has consistently passed their toxicity tests since July 1994. Feldspar has two general stormwater permits NCG020256 and NCG020257. Thus, the stormwater discharge does not have to be incorporated into the process wastewater discharge permit(as has been done with one of the Unimin facilities). • ` ,. S8 Jf1U5da �Gal +SIV rte., .1?I • • uauaU0J1 �o �uaua� d V 6 eUI�Oa�3Au� 1410N �O al iS c.......c. EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 1 PERMIT--NC0000353 PIPE--001 REPORT PERIOD: 9506-9605 LOC---E FACILITY--FELDSPAR CORP. / SPRUCE PINE DESIGN FLOW-- 3.5000 CLASS--3 LOCATION--SPRUCE PINE REGION/COUNTY--01 MITCHELL 50050 00530 TGP3B 00076 00400 00545 00951 MONTH Q/MGD RES/TSS CERI7DPF TURBIDTY PH RES/SET FLUORIDE LIMIT F 3 .5000 F 1568.0 NOL NOL 10.0 6.0 NOL F224.000 95/06 2.7720 1285.0 16.60 9.5-6.2 .0 203.057 95/07 2.6683 1109.2 1 13 .77 8.5-6.0 .0 237.782F 95/08 2.6100 1160.6 14.90 9.8-6.3 .0 207.485 95/09 2.6293 1091.4 11.40 9.0-3.3F .0 225.217F 95/10 2.5193 1135.9 1 15.67 7.4-6.2 .0 176.635 95/11 2.6440 1129.0 11.73 7.2-6.3 .0 203.643 95/12 2.7467 1040.7 11.45 7.3-6.4 .0 172.203 96/01 2.5548 1159.6 1 16.70 7.6-6.4 .0 191.674 96/02 2.9248 1390.1 20.24 8.2-6.5 .0 222.253 96/03 2.7167 1237.2 19.12 7.4-6.6 .0 202.287 96/04 2.9553 1338.8 1 14.93 7.6-6.7 .0 220.589 AVERAGE 2.7037 1188.8 1 15.13 .0 205.711 MAXIMUM 3.5600 2126.7 1 70.00 9.810 1.5 1571.923 MINIMUM 1.1500 71.7 1 4.00 3 .390 .000 UNIT MGD LBS/DAY PASS/FAI NTU SU ML/L LBS/DAY t 11 07/03/96 c. EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 1 PERMIT--NC0000353 PIPE--001 REPORT PERIOD: 9406-9505 LOC---E FACILITY--FELDSPAR CORP. / SPRUCE PINE DESIGN FLOW-- 3.5000 CLASS--3 LOCATION--SPRUCE PINE REGION/COUNTY--01 MITCHELL 50050 00530 TGP3B 00076 00400 00545 00951 MONTH Q/MGD RES/TSS CERI7DPF TURBIDTY PH RES/SET FLUORIDE LIMIT F 3.5000 F 1568.0 NOL NOL 10.0 6.0 NOL F224.000 94/06 2.8278 1241.8 16.50 7 .5-6.0 .0 198.122 94/07 2.5683 1165.4 1 13.45 9 .7-6.3 .0 176.297 94/08 3.0651 1382.8 16.48 8.7-5.9F .0 208..588 94/09 3.2126 1402.7 17.76 7.0-5.8F .0 223.494 94/10 3.0145 1241.9 1 17.41 7.4-6.0 .0 199.416 94/11 3.0880 1340.0 19.33 8.8-6.2 .0 216.724 94/12 2.4664 1082.7 12 .55 7.2-6.2 .0 171.222 95/01 2.4045 1073.2 15.32 7.7-6.4 .0 168.626 95/02 2.7371 1312.7 18.39 7.7-6.4 .0 201.269 95/03 2.7480 1256.4 17.96 8.2-6.3 .0 8.400 95/04 2.7026 1191.2 1 10.50 8.3-6.6 .0 185.100 95/05 2.8238 1216.2 11.45 8.0-6.4 .0 198.113 AVERAGE 2.8048 1242.2 1 15.59 .0 179.614 MAXIMUM 3.9700 2909.3 1 75.00 9.700 .5 334.601 MINIMUM .0200 .6 1 .10 5.850 .016 UNIT MGD LBS/DAY PASS/FAI NTU SU ML/L LBS/DAY • NC0000353 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY APPLICATION FOR NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TREATED WASTEWATER Application No. NC0000353 Date: 10/16/96 1. SYNOPSIS OF APPLICATION Applicant's Name The Feldspar Corporation Applicant's Address 1040 Crown Point Parkway - Suite 270 Atlanta, GA 30338 Facility Address P.O. Box 99 530 Altapass Road Spruce Pine, NC 28777 Type of Operation Process includes milling, processing, and flotation of ore to produce feldspar, mica, and quartz. Mica and sand are by-products of the feldspar flotation process. Design Capacity of Facility 3.5 MGD Applicant's Receiving Water Receiving Stream: North Toe River Classification: C-Tr Sub-Basin: 04-03-06 See Attachment A for a map showing the discharge location(s). Page 1 NC0000353 Description of Wastewater Treatment Facilities A 3.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility (outfall 001) consisting of a treatment process with lime and acid feed systems for pH adjustment, polymer feed systems, cyclone separator, vacuum filters, three clarifiers, flow measuring and totalizing equipment and recycle pumps. There is also discharge of non-contact cooling water from outfalls 002 and 003. Type of Wastewater(as reported by applicant). 100 % Industrial 2. PROPOSED EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS See attached copy of Effluent Page(s) from Draft Permit. 3. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS The applicant will be required to monitor regularly for flow and those parameters limited in Section 2 above with sufficient frequency to ensure compliance with the permit conditions. Frequency, methods of sampling, and report dates will be specified in the final permit. 4. EFFbCTIVE DATE OF PROPOSED EFFLUENT LIMITS (AND COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE IF APPLICABLE) The limits become effective on the date of permit issuance. 5. PROPOSED SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE DISCHARGE Chronic Toxicity Fluoride Re-opener Page 2 t 1-At`lJl N C00003 5 3 6. BASIS FOR PROPOSED EFFLUENT LIMITS There are no federal guidelines for processing of ore for quartz and feldspar. The fluoride limit is based on allocated load to the five mining facilities which produce quartz (in close proximity). The total load from all plants is based on protection of an instream fluoride level of 1.8 mgl. Total suspended solids is based on treatability levels from the WWTP and BPJ. North Carolina has no water quality standard for total suspended solids. Chloride is a by-product from the precipitation process and has been recommended for quarterly monitoring(there is no NC water quality standard for chloride, but there is an action level). The toxicity testing requirement is placed on all major facilities and other facilities with complex wastestreams (Departmental memo 7/22/87). The toxicity limit is based on the instream waste concentration under 7Q10 conditions. The pH limit was based on the water quality standards contained in NCAC 2B .0211. Turbidity and settleable solids monitoring are included due to the potential for solids from the ore processing and the wastewater treatment process to be in the effluent. 7. REQUESTED VARIANCES OR ALTERNATIVES TO REQUIRED STANDARDS None 8. DISCUSSION OF PREVIOUS NPDES PERMIT CONDITIONS The previous effluent sheet/limits are attached. No major changes have been made to the permit. The NPDES Permit expires on: 12/31/2001 Page 3 a A.0"1-JH13L-;_1- NC0000353 9. THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD The administrative record, including application, draft permit. fact sheet, public notice, comments received, and additional information is available by writing the Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, P. O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535. The above documents are available for review and copying at the Archdale Building, 9th Floor,Water Quality Section, Permits and Engineering Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Copies will be provided at a charge of 10 cents per page. 10. STATE CONTACT Additional information concerning the permit application may be obtained at the above address during the hours stated in item No. 9 by contacting: Paul Clark at (919) 733-5083, extension 580. 11. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE Draft Permit to Public Notice - 10/23/96 Permit Scheduled to Issue - 12/9/96 12. PROCEDURES FOR THE FORMULATION OF FINAL DETERMINATIONS a. Comment Period The Division of Water Quality proposed to issue an NPDES Permit to this applicant subject to the effluent limitations and special conditions outlined above. These determinations are tentative and are open to comment from the public. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the permit application or on the Division of Water Quality's proposed determinations to the following address: DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY SECTION POST OFFICE BOX 29535 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535 Page 4 t-/N. I NC0000353 All comments received within thirty days following the date of public notice will be considered in the formulation of final determinations with regard to this application. b. Public Hearing The director of the Division of Water Quality may hold a public hearing if there is a significant degree of public interest in a proposed permit or group of permits. Public notice of such a hearing will be circulated in newspapers in the geographical area of the discharge and to those on the Division of Water Quality's mailing list at least thirty days prior to the hearing. c. Appeal Hearings An applicant whose permit is denied, or is granted subject to conditions he deems unacceptable, shall have the right to a hearing before the Commission upon making written demand to the Director within 30 days following issuance or denial of the permit. d. Issuance of the permit when no hearing is held If no public hearing or appeal hearing is held, and after review of the comments received, the Division of Water Quality's determinations are substantially unchanged, the permit will be issued and become effective immediately. This will be the final action of the Division of Water Quality. If a hearing is not held, but there have been substantial changes, public notice of the Division of Water Quality's revised determinations will be made. Following a 30- day comment period, the permit will be issued and will become effective immediately. This will be the final action of the Division of Water Quality unless a public or appeal hearing is granted. Page 5