20170490 Ver 1_401 Application_20170421

E
McGill
A S S O C I A T E S
April 18, 2017
Attn: Ms. Catherine Janiczak
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue. Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Dear Ms. Janicza PAID
201 T 0 4 9 0
RE: Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream
Stabilization
Pre -Construction Notification, NWP #13
Catawba County, North Carolina
On behalf of our c ent, reverend Karla Woggon, please find the enclosed Pre -Construction
Notification (PCN) application for the referenced project dated April 18, 2017. The purpose of the project
is to stabilize the section of Fitz Creek located on the church property. The stream banks have severely
eroded and are nearly vertical. The applicant proposes to stabilize approximately 360 linear feet of Fitz
Creek, utilizing grade control structures, outlet protection, and a boulder wall. A NWP-13 is requested to
complete the proposed work. Please see the attached copy of the PCN application.
Four copies of the PCN application are being provided to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources with a check for $570 to cover the 401 WQC written
approval fee. A copy is also being provided to the USFWS. McGill Associates, P.A. is the Authorized
Agent (form included) and should be copied on all project correspondence. Please let us know if you have
any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
MCGILL ASSOCIATES, P.A.
John C. Vllas D
Program Services Manager- Environmental Ate' 2 j 2017
Cc:
Reverend Karla Woggon — Episcopal Church of the Ascension
NCDEQ, DWR — Main Office
Byron Hamstead — USFWS
H:\Projects\2015 PROJECTS\15.05303 - Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization
E n v i r o n m e n t a l 0 P l a n n i n g a F i n a n c e
McGill Associates. P.A. • 468 New Market Blvd. Ste. B, Boone, North Carolina 28607
Office: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

JMcGill
A S S O C I A T E S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL ID.370318208196 LOT NO. PLAN NO.
STREET ADDRESS:
702 1 st Avenue Northwest
NC 28601
Please Print Mayo, Robert Pearson
Property Owner/Representative:
(If Representative) Title:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
John C. Vilas of McGill Associates P.A.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
stream and wetland jurisdictional determinations and related permits or certifications and any
and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's/ Representative's address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized
� Signature j
Date: / % 7 Date: tl r 10
`� !
Envir<>ninintitI n11i11 Finance
11. hill ., :r,� i,r!� �. )'..1 GJ It ,..,. •.., r� fi,-�_; r1. N.,;: ;; r, lir,._ A",,. c ,n nil N.. .. �: 1,OJ

McGill
A S S O C I A T E S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL ID. 370318206285:370318208387 LOT NO. PLAN NO.
STREET ADDRESS; 726 1st Avenue Northwest
Hickory. NC 28601
Please Print Episcopal Church of the Ascension
Property Owner/Representative:
(If Representative) Title: Reverend Karla Woggon
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
John C Vilas of McGill Associates P.A.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
stream and wetland jurisdictional determinations and related permits or certifications and any
and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's/ Representative's address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
SLG', M LA)m4n� -
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: / 1 t S , a % Date:
En v i r o n m e n t a I & III anliing Finance
11cGill Ax%octores. 1'. ,I. • 364 K„mit,gei Ro.ul. Neuer I.W. oilh ('.alma 2N604

JMcGill
A S S O C I A T E S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL ID.370318209166 LOT NO. PLAN NO.
STREET ADDRESS.
650 1st Avenue Northwest
Hickory, NC 28601
Please Print Belk, Mary Catherine
Property Owner/ Representative:
(If Representative) Title:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
John C Vilas of McGill Associates P.A.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
stream and wetland jurisdictional determinations and related permits or certifications and any
and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's/ Representative's address (if different than property above):
Telephone: � a8 __ 431- 'ti 3 0A C ,z I (
�' 3,0)-x'707- ?Vonje-
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized ignatur
Date: �/ 6
Authorized Signature
Date:
En vi r o n i n e n tit l P I� t n 11 i 11 2 I= i n it I) C C.

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 04/11/2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Reverend Karla Woggon, Episcopal Church of the Ascension
726 1st Avenue Northwest, Hickory, NC 28601
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Hickory, North Carolina
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Catawba City: Hickory
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.734044 °N; Long. -81.349195 °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Fitz creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
360 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine - Intermittent
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑✓ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app ' nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:48,000 Hickory
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
❑✓ Other (Name & Date): Photmheets 09113/16
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
4

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later lurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
-�� �A2A l
Signature and date(b,10
person requesting pre minary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
I !1700

SAMPLE
Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic
aquatic
resource in
resource
review area
1
0.1 acre
Non -section 10
— non -wetland
2
100 linear feet
Non-section10
— wetland
3
15 square feet
Non -section 10
— wetland
4
0.01 acre
Non -section 10
— non -wetland

Corp Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: Episcopal Church of the Ascension
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: McGill Associates, P.A.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID numbers(s):
5. Site Address: 726 1 st Avenue Northwest
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: Hickory
8. County: Catawba
9. Lat:35.734044°N -81.349195°W
10. Quadrangle Name: Hickory
11. Waterway: Fitz Creek
12. Watershed: Catawba
13. Requested Action:
®Nationwide Permit # 13
❑ General Permit#
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Pre -Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project
Page 1 of 13
NWP #13 PCN Application
April 18, 2017
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization
2b. County:
Catawba
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Hickory
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension; Robert P. Mayo; Joe and Mary Belk
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 0378 P 0072 & DB 1108 P 0980; DB 2083 P 1552; DB 2308 P 1024;
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Karla Woggon
3d.
Street address:
(See section 4)
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project
Page 1 of 13
NWP #13 PCN Application
April 18, 2017

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: Owner's Representative
4b. Name:
Reverend Karla Woggon
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Episcopal Church of the Ascension
4d. Street address:
726 15' Avenue Northwest
4e. City, state, zip:
Hickory, NC 28601
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. en Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
John C. Vilas
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
McGill Associates, P.A.
5c. Street address:
468 New Market Blvd. Ste B
5d. City, state, zip:
Boone, NC 28607
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
[phone]
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 2 of 13 April 18, 2017

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
370318206285; 370318208387; 370318208196;
370318209166
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.734044 Longitude: -81.349195
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
3.41 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Fitz Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV
2c. River basin:
Catawba
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 3 of 13 April 18, 2017

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project Site consists of four properties (two owned by
church — see Aaent Authorization Forms) located along an approx. 360 linear foot section of Fitz Creek. The Project Site
contains two areas that are in need of stabilization to function properly and avoid further erosion and sedimentation
issues. Area 1 is an approx. 170' section along the left bank of Fitz Creek near the upstream extent of the project above
the footbridae that has vertical stream banks and has become eroded. Area 2 is the remaining downstream extent which
consists of vertical streambanks (see Sheet 1). The surrounding area of the Project Site is commercial, industrial, and
single family residential. The Project site is located on 151 Avenue NW near downtown Hickory (See Location Map).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Project Site
encompasses approximately 360 linear feet of perennial Fitz Creek
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration Project proposes to stabilize approximatey 360 LF
of Fitz Creek which contains severely eroded and vertical stream banks creating safety, environmental, and aesthetic
concerns.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration Project is proposed to stabilize approximately 360 linear feet of
Fitz Creek located within the Project Site. In the upstream area of the project extent (Area 1: 170 L.F.). the stream will be
stabilized using boulder wall and grade control structures (See Boulder Wall and Grade Control Structure detail). The
Qroposed work will involve the following:
1) Installation of boulder structure (approx. 65 L.F. and 4ft tall) along the left bank of Fitz Creek. Compacted stone backfill
(washed ballast stone) shall be placed between the boulders and the soil bank to fill voids and promote positive drainage.
Geotextile non -woven filter fabric shall be installed between the boulder wall and stone backfill. Boulders are to have a
median diameter of 2.5ft.
2) Grade control structures will be installed at Cross Sections A. B. C. and 1 (see Sheet 3 Detail). Compacted stone backfill
(washed ballast stone) mixed with existing channel bed material shall be placed upstream and downstream adjacent to the
boulder to raise the channel bed.
3) Outlet protection shall be installed at Cross Section C below a 12" stormwater pipe with Class II Riprap (or approved equal)
and geotextile non -woven fabric between the riprap and backfill (see Sheet 3 Detail).
4) The downstream portion of the project (Area 2: 190 L.F.) will be stabilized through minor bank grading to establish a
bankfull bench. Graded stream banks will be stabilized with coir matting and native vegetation (see Sheet G-2). Instream
construction to be performed in the dry through use of mechanical pump around. Grading will occur along the length of the
stream. and excess material will be used to form an earthen berm with side slopes no steeper than 2:1. A temporary silt fence
will be installed around the berm and removed once the berm is stabilized. (See attached Plan Sheets).
Typical excavation equipment will be used for the proposed work including track hoes, front end loaders. and dump trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 4 of 13 April 18, 2017

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 5 of 13 April 18, 2017

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
Yes
❑ No
U Corps
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Stream Bank
® PER
® Corps
S1 ®P ❑ T
Stabilization/
Fitz Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
10
360
Structures
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
PER
11 Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
77 PER
❑ INT
LJ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
360
3i. Comments: 360 linear feet of permanent impacts associated with streambank stabilization. Stream structures within the
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 6 of 13 April 18, 2017

upstream 170.' Bank grading only in lower 190'.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indM ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03❑PC] T
04❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Tota I
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 7 of 13 April 18, 2017

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico C3 Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
❑ Yes
131 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 8 of 13 April 18, 2017

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Stabilization of the stream will improve overall function of site and reduce erosion Excavation will be limited to the
eroded/damaged areas minimizing disturbance Special care
will be taken not to disturb the areas during high water or
rain events.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Streambanks and disturbed areas will guickly be stabilized with erosion control matting and native erosion control seed
mixes. No sediment and erosion control measures in stream
channel. Instream construction to be performed in the dry
through use of mechanical Dump around.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters ofthe U.S. or Waters ofthe State?
❑ Yes CO No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool El cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 9 of 13 April 18, 2017

4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes CO No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 10 of 13 April 18, 2017

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
No chanae in site imoerviousness.
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No stormwater rules using a NWP #13
application.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemment's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Hickory
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other: None
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other: None
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 13

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No chance from the original or intended use: no extension of services.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage disposal associated with this project.
Page 12 of 13

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
https://eoos.fm.aoWipacAocationfndex, Areas within the vicinity of the project site contain potential habitat for two
species: HexastNis naniflora and ti sgWfiatal2aalis. No critical habitat was observed for these species within the proiect
for the removal of one immature tree whi h is not suitableli habita .
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
httg*Hy ww.habitat.noaa.govlprotection/efh/efhmapor/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
govemments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
El Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://ais.ncdcr.goy/hpoweb/. Several National Register Historic Districts and points are within a 0.5 mile radius from the
site, but are buildings or houses that will not be affected by this DWect.
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project Site mapped as Flood Zone AE. The project will not
increase water -surface elevation.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http:/Ifris,nc,00v/fis/Home.aspx?ST=NC (see attached
FEMA map) Project has been coordinated with Catawba Co. Floodplain Administrator to ensure compliance with
applicable Lea tions.
*contact Er nfly Morris for questions
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
/-
A plicantlAgent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signatu f is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabil¢ation Project NWP #13 PCN Application
Page 13 of 13 April 18, 2017

Location Map
SCALE 1:48000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
YARDS
081.380000°
W 081.36 000° W 081.344000- W 081.320
000° W
O
.... f. ul.-
O
LO
CD
� ..
Z
CO
n
CO-
AuKir
LO
Cl
fiICKORY 1
19
C)rte
Ir-
04
U'l
1
• �, . It `o _� .f.
LO
m —
ty
Z-':
p
..• ���.�� -_.:;. -
Z
o
o
�...CD
C 2W8 T
081.380
000° W 081.36000° W 081.34400'0-'W 081.32 000° W
SCALE 1:48000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
YARDS

FEMA Flood Zones:
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Stabilization
0 30 60 120 Feet N
L i I I n

35° 44' 5" N
35° 43'58"N
3 Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
3
r
ro
35° 44'5"N
I
466320 468W 488360 468380 468400 468420
Map Scale: 1:1,060t printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
N
a0 N 0 15 30 60 90
A0 50 100 Z00 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: IJTM Zone 17N WGS84
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
1
35° 43'59'N
468480
3
4/10/2017
Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (A01)
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
F7
Area of Interest (AOI)
d.
Stony Spot
1:15,800.
Soils
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
.�
Soil Map Unit Lines
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Soil Map unit Points
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
•�
Special Line Features
Special
Point Features
scale.
V
Blowout
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Borrow Pit
measurements.
Transportation
X
Clay Spot
+-+4
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Closed Depression
Web Soil Survey URL:
..,
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
r
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Gravelly Spot
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Landfill
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Lava Flow
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
Marsh or swamp
.
Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Mine or Quarry
Soil Survey Area: Catawba County, North Carolina
Miscellaneous water
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 19, 2016
Perennial water
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
Rock Outcrop
1:50,000 or larger.
Saline Spot
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 22, 2010—Apr
30, 2011
Sandy Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Severely Eroded Spot
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
Sinkhole
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/10/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Catawba County, North Carolina (NC035)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CfB
Clifford sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
1.3
25.8%
FcC
Fairview gravelly fine sandy
loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
1.2
23.3%
FdE2
Fairview soils, 10 to 25 percent
slopes, moderately eroded
2.6
50.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.0
100.0%
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/10/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Vicinity Map
a ,
2ND AVE. NW
M,
1ST AVE'NW—w
MIL� vAV' '- M-I&mi
1 inch = 100 ft.
!f
N
A

Pre -construction Conditions
2nd AVENUE N.W.
( PAVED )
S 88'45'21"E • 367.19',,
I>✓� TOP OF 54• CONCRETE PIPE -68.83r'
°Ar
INV -64.33' J? JJ r30F �S lQ, p4plrwr
unm A¢1c i � d m
NAIL AT BASE OF 0.04' REBAR� 73. 3 NanY �] GW —�F• i Z i
RAW—.—.75 J7 rolc ur4Rr vow "1RF
BO ^ / - \ 69 r sbx 0.08• PIPE- 79,78'
85 Jt J3 ' a 90 � �_ ,.
L-MULG
Y[TK rpx �H AREA
1¢1.60'
FLOOR- 101.69'
I STORY STONE
uIS
W iM• WM1- O ^T .
O
a uNmon�
."o—ft.,
CARp`4
b 2 issTOv
SEAL
L-3313
X w?"I"AV"
REVISED: AUGUST 7th, 2014;
ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY.
I, JAMES M. BRADSHAW'CERTIFY THAT THIS PUT WAS PREPARED UNDER AIV
SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK108 , NR ; THAT THE BOUNDARIES
NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFO FOUND
IN DEED BOOK , PAGE THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS
CALCULATED IS 80,000+.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL. 3HI5
DAY OFJULY, A0.. 2014.
JAMES M. BRADSHAW. N.C.P.L.S. L-3313
77o
N 88'41'05"W 77
-01b
I N 68'41 `05w
I 97.10'
NOTES
I
0
I.
AREA BY COORDINATE METHOD.
N
0
2.
WATER BYCITY OF HICKORY.
w
O
�a
o a
3.
SEWER BYCRY OF HICKORY.
4'
ao0'0
4.
THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS.
w
&Y
N y
RIGHTS OF WAY. COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS. CONDITIONS @
S
N O m
D:m
RESERVATIONS OF RECORD AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY.
O
� w
e o
w
0
5.
NO NCGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN
ti
2000 FEET OF THIS SITE.
O
f
�
�
N
U1 r
74
y
a00
5w
W
J N
O
O
m
o�
o
7\
g o
I • 30 60 90
GRAPHII SCALE - FEET
I N 68'41 `05w
I 97.10'
N
0
h
m
m�
N
I
I CoQ I
w
O
�a
o a
I �a
ma6
i N
ao0'0
0
VN
w
&Y
N y
mY
Q0
iQ
N O m
D:m
O
� w
e o
w
0
�
I • 30 60 90
GRAPHII SCALE - FEET

STREAM RESTORATION
EPISCOPAL CHURCH
OF THE ASCENSION
HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
MmcGill
A S S O C I A T E S
ENGINEERING -PLANNING -FINANCE
55 BROAD STREET ASHEVILLE, NC 28801 PH. [phone] FIRM LICENSE # C-0459
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY
MARCH 2017
SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS
G-1..........
COVER SHEET
G-2 .........
GENERAL NOTES
SHEET 1 .....
PLAN VIEW STREAM RESTORATION
SHEET 2 ....
CROSS SECTIONS
SHEET 3.....
DETAILS

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. - INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REWIRED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES. LAND QUAUTY SECTION.
2. - PROCEED NTH GRADING. CLEARING AND GRUBBING. NOTE NO OFF SITE DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL IS ALLOWED
UNLESS THE DISPOSAL SITE HAS AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
3. - SEED AND PLACE EROSION CONTROL MATTING ON ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES THAT ARE NOT ROCK IMMEDIATELY
UPON COMPLETION OF PROPOSED WORK.
1. -
*,j
MATTING NTN SEED SHALL BE PUCED N1NIN 48 HOURS O GRADING ON STREAM BANKS. SEED AND SOIL
AMENDMENTS SHALL BE PLACED ON A PREPARED SEEDBED AT THE FOLLOWING RATES PER ACRE. STRAW MULCH
SHALL BE TACKED NTH TACKING AGENT APPLIED BY HYDROSEEDER.
LIME 4,000 LBS
FERTIUZER (10-10-10) 1,000 LBS
CREEPING RED FESCUE100 LBS
STRAW MULCH 60-80 BALES
FOR SUMMER SEEDING ADD TO THE ABOVE:
GERMAN MILLET (SETARIA ITALICA) 40 UBS/AC
SMALL -STEMMED SUDAN GRASS (SORGHUM BICOLOR) 50 LBS/AC
FOR WINTER SEEDING ADD TO THE ABOVE:
RYE GRAIN (SECASE CEREAP) 120 UBS/AC
WINTER WHEAT 30 LBS/AC
IF HYDROSEEDING, WOOD CELLULOSE MAY BE USED IN ADDITION 70 STRAW MULCH AT THE RATE OF 1,000 LBS
PER ACRE.
ALL SEEDING SHALL BE MAINTAINED, WATERED ETC.., UNTIL A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER IS
ESTABLISHED OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS.
FOR ALL SLOPES 2 1 OR SZOER ADD TO THE ABOVE,
PMS' LRE SEED SWIT04GRASS 4 LBS
BROWNTOP MILLET OR PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUN GLAUCUM) 8 LBS
GRAIN SORGHUM (SORGHUM BICOLOR (l) MOENCM SSP. BICOLOR) Z LBS
Ali IOPc II B RED BY SINGLE LAYER BIODEGRADABLE STRAW/NET EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NATIVE SEEDING:
THE CORRECT SEEDBED pH IS 5.5 TO 6.5.
APPLY ZERO NITROGEN AT PUNTING.
INCORPORATE SOIL AMENDMENTS INTO TOPSOIL/ROOT ZONE
FIRM SEEDBED BEFORE SEEDING (TRAVEL WITH DOZER CLEATS)
SEEDING DEPTH FOR ALL NATIVE SSP. EXCEPT E.GAMAGRASS (TRPSACUM DACTYBIDES) NEED TO BE 1/4' - 1/2'
GREATER DEPTHS CAUSE HIGH SEED MORTAUTY.
SPECIAUZED SEEDING IMPLEMENTS ARE REQUIRED. SEED MIXES AND RATES TO MATCH SEEDER USED. A NO -TILL
DROP SEEDER OR BROADCASTER WITH PRECISION METERING TO CONTROL SMALL SEED FLOW AND PICKER WHEEL
AGITATORS TO HANDLE FLUFFY SEED ME BEST SUITED FOR NATIVE SEED.
NATIVE PLANT SEEDING MIX FOR STREAM OR RIVERBANK STABILIZATION
SEEDING FOR STREAM OR RIVERBANK STANUZATION SHALL BE A MIXTURE OF NATIVE GRASSES. PLANTS AND
TREES. NATIVE PUNT MIX SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLCWING:
GRASSES - BIG BLUESTEM (ANDROPOGAN GERMDII), INDIAN GRASS (SORGASTRUM NUTANS), LITTLE BWESTEM
(SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPMIUM), SWITCHGRASS (PANICUM VIRGATUM). 15 LBS/ACRE EACH
AUGUST THRU MAY - GREENRYE (SECALE CEREALS) 25 LBS/ACRE EACH
MAY 1 THRU AUGUST - MILLET (PENNISETUM GLLAUCUM) 25 LBS/ACRE EACH
NOTE: NO FERTILIZER SHALL BE USED WITHIN IV OF TOP OF STREAM OR RIVER BANK.
NPDES PERMITS • NOTE -FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING NPDES PERMITS, THE
FOLLOWING STABILIZATION SCHEDULE SHALL APPLY:
STE O
OESIMEN
STABILIZATION
TM
IEfB_
STARR RATION
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES AND SLOPES
< F
¢a
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
HIGH QUALITY WATER
7 DAYS
NONE
(HOW) ZONES
�w
CHANGES AS REOLRRED N THE TREED WITHOUT EFFECTING THE LUMP SUNT PRICE.
REQUIRED IN F
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
T DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ME
2 UNLESS TEROTHERWISEADDED STATED, ALL AREAS SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN LAYERS OF 8' MAXIMUM THICKNESS,
WInl WATER ADDED TO THE POSTURE CONTENT AS BY TITS
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
( ) z m
95XNEER
F T OWRaJJDRROADWAYS CLOT
OBTAINED INEDII IN THE TOP 2' A TIME SIB GRADE BELOW ROADWAYS AND PANTING LOTS) ND THE RENTOR
BY COMPACTING SI SAMPLE OF 111E AIN ACCORDANCE NTH THE STANDARD PROCTOR
FORSLOPESSER
ROPES 3:1 OR MITER14
DAYS
MAN 50 IINPLENGTHU
ALL O1HER MEAS NTN
3. ENTIRE AREA TO BE GRADED SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. NO FILL SHALL BE ARCED ON ANY AREA
NOT CLEARED AND GRUBBED.
NONE (EXCEPT fOR PERIMETERS
ROPES MITER THAI 4:1
14 DAYS
AND HOW ZONES)
5. - MAINTAIN SOL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
C - REMOVE SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND STABILIZE THESE AREAS.
BO.TE; IF ME EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES PROVE INEFFECTIVE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE
ADDITIONAL STEPS TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE STE. EACH SEDIMEN7 STORAGE DEVICE MUST BE INSPECTED
AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. MAINTAIN AND/OR CLEAN OUT WHEN ANY DEVICE RUCHES 50% CAPACITY.
8. ALL MEAS WHERE THERE IS EXPOSED ORT SHALL BE SEEDED, FERTIUZED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE
SPECIFICATIONS. THE FINISHED SURFACE SHALL BE TO GRADE AND SMOOTH, FREE OF ALL ROCKS LARGER
THAN S, EQUIPMENT TRACKS, DIRT CLODS, BUMPS, RIDGES AND GOUGES PRIOR TO SEEDING; ME SURFACE
SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF B:4'-6' TO ACCEPT SEED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED NTH
SEEDING OPERATIONS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF THE GRADED SURFACE. ALL
SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A MECHANICAL 'HYDRO -SEEDER'. HAND SEEDING SHALL BE AUTHORIZED
ON AN MEA BY AREA APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. DISTURBED MEAS SHOULD THEN BE MATTED WITH
SHORT-TERM PHOTODEGRADABLE EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ELEVATIONS BEFORE INSTALLATION OF FACILITIES.
REVISION
=z
w OZ
O= —i
''2 Z O
Ov U
F-
�� O
LJ
Z
wO TW O
i Y
LL
a0
W
SHEET
G-2
�U$
. -
Z.-
< F
¢a
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
E'' z
1. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE AS NOTED THE SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENGINEER MAY MAKE GRADE
�w
CHANGES AS REOLRRED N THE TREED WITHOUT EFFECTING THE LUMP SUNT PRICE.
REQUIRED IN F
V' �
�z4
2 UNLESS TEROTHERWISEADDED STATED, ALL AREAS SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN LAYERS OF 8' MAXIMUM THICKNESS,
WInl WATER ADDED TO THE POSTURE CONTENT AS BY TITS
A SOL THSH CONDITIONED OPTNUM
TO OR
AND COMPACTED A $HEEDS FOOT TO A COMPACTION TO OR GREATER THAN
( ) z m
95XNEER
F T OWRaJJDRROADWAYS CLOT
OBTAINED INEDII IN THE TOP 2' A TIME SIB GRADE BELOW ROADWAYS AND PANTING LOTS) ND THE RENTOR
BY COMPACTING SI SAMPLE OF 111E AIN ACCORDANCE NTH THE STANDARD PROCTOR
v
'Z, v
�4
METHODMOISTURE-DEVISOR RFUTI(INSi 7EST, ASTM D698 OR MSMTO-99 UNLESS SPECIFIED N OTHER
METHOD OFTEST.
SPECIFICATIONS.
SPECIFICATIONS.
a
3. ENTIRE AREA TO BE GRADED SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. NO FILL SHALL BE ARCED ON ANY AREA
NOT CLEARED AND GRUBBED.
,^ a
v,
4. ALL SOL EROSION COITROL MEASURES REQUIRED BY THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO
GRADING. CLEARING OR GRUBBING. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCES. ETC., SHALL BE
z
MAINTAINED N WORKABLE CONDITION FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT AND SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE
z
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT ONLY ON THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PAYMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING IE IF DURING TLIFE OF THE PROJECT, A STORM CAUSES SOIL
ai
ER09O! MHICH CHANCES FLASH GRADES OR CREATES 'GlALES' AND 'WATER AREAS, THESE SHALL BE
REPAIRED AT NO EXTRA COST, AND ALL SILT WASHED OFF OF THE PROJECT SITE ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY
W S
SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO EXTRA COST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE
TO ANY APPROVED EROSION CONTROL KARS NHETHER INDICATED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS OR UNDER
w ~
SEPARATE COVER.
z�
5. DISPOSSESS MATERIAL
r
O
Fail
A. CLEARING AND GRUBBING WASTES SHALL BE CHIPPED AND USED AS GROUND COVER BY THE
z m
CONTRACTOR.
w Z2
B. SOA WASTES TO BE REMOVED, SUCH AS CONCRETE RUBBLE, MAY BE PLACED N SPECIFIC AREAS
DELINEATED ON THE PLANS
C. ON SITE BURNING MS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF DISPOSING OF FLAMMABLE WASTES.
6. IN THE EVENT EXCESSIVE GROUNDWATER OR SPRINGS ARE ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE LIMITS O
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL WELL POINTS, IMPS, OR ADDITIONAL CONTROL OF WATER
rte_
METHODS.
O
T. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL ALL 'OUST BY PERIODIC WATERING.
=7
8. ALL MEAS WHERE THERE IS EXPOSED ORT SHALL BE SEEDED, FERTIUZED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE
SPECIFICATIONS. THE FINISHED SURFACE SHALL BE TO GRADE AND SMOOTH, FREE OF ALL ROCKS LARGER
THAN S, EQUIPMENT TRACKS, DIRT CLODS, BUMPS, RIDGES AND GOUGES PRIOR TO SEEDING; ME SURFACE
SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF B:4'-6' TO ACCEPT SEED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED NTH
SEEDING OPERATIONS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF THE GRADED SURFACE. ALL
SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A MECHANICAL 'HYDRO -SEEDER'. HAND SEEDING SHALL BE AUTHORIZED
ON AN MEA BY AREA APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. DISTURBED MEAS SHOULD THEN BE MATTED WITH
SHORT-TERM PHOTODEGRADABLE EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ELEVATIONS BEFORE INSTALLATION OF FACILITIES.
REVISION
=z
w OZ
O= —i
''2 Z O
Ov U
F-
�� O
LJ
Z
wO TW O
i Y
LL
a0
W
SHEET
G-2

Ib
J �
J W
za
0
0<ID
W N
a Y
00
U0
U W
U W
UTILITY POLE X X
______-______-�---2____,
R/W — — --_
__
_______ -_-_
I • T5- HgRD��O•
IFFLO
I �
I 3
O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION
DEED BOOK 0378, PAGE 0072 AND
DEED BOOK 1108, PAGE 0980
PLAN
ZO 0 10 20 JO (A
GRAPHIC SCALE I INCH . 20 FEET
2nd AVENUE N.W.
( PAVED )
q
1 ,1
— Z i
--1
LL.
HAROMOOD,6'
I � ae. Fr, a Ft WITH
WASHED STON -.
SEE DETAIL
IF.: It
P.
I
I
I1
I
1 I
I
DOLLY M. HUSS i DEEDERT BOOK 2080
IDEED BOOK 1286, PAGE 838 I PAGE 1552
I I
I I
I I
TEMFIPARY GLT FEN -E, REV- EE
ONCE BERM iS STABILI7ED _
�1' '-v Ak TH �I MA'BAAI`
I AIT.i I.�IUE
I , FES '10 STS FE^' THAN 2: 1.�
PAVEMENT
i uv GUY WIRE
UTILITY POLE
77`-087"—PE= 79.76' - —
M 2e
I I
I I
I �
iavT —
XS—B unxMp):
L I
�
1
1 I
I I PATRICK
MILLER AND I
DEENA WHITENER I
JOE AND MARY BELK DEED BOOK 2690,
DEED BOOK 2308, I PAGE 1545
IPAGE 1024 I
I I
1
t
REVISION DESCRIPTION
".I J o
n
I
z
Q
J
a_
SHEET
1

-15\15-3\A.—\l 5.5303 bflpn.lw9 —20174.24 PM CHRI— BROWN
--------------
1111 .41111
INEENEM
IN
D
11111111111
■■■■■■■■■■■
11111 1111111111
..11 i 1111111111
11 1 1111111111
1
O N W A N O J 00 6 O
O J
O A
N A
0
'8=8888000
JUAU 01-4 IOO�N
O
10 0
'DOO�N W ANOJO
O
0
DATE: MARCH2017
DESIGNED BY: JV
0
FOR
McGm
A
IV m
m
CROSS SECTIONS
o�� REVIIEW
CONST. REVIEW.
A
REVIEW
A
zo
O
.n
y
—1
o
A S S O c i A T E S
0
N
Vt
HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
_y
ENGINEER
NC 2880 APH.(828)252NN -0575 G•� NCASN C.a1E
AAD FRREET ASEVILL
N
o
z
N
`
O
z
o
11111 1111111111
..11 i 1111111111
11 1 1111111111
1
O N W A N O J 00 6 O
O J
O A
V,
A
O
O)
Q+
m O
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 t O N U A 0 O J M
O
N A
c N
V,
A
O
O)
Q+
m O
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 t O N U A 0 O J M
O
JOB NO.. 15.05303
STREAM RESTORATION
DATE: MARCH2017
DESIGNED BY: JV
EPISCOPAL CHURCH
FOR
McGm
IV m
m
CROSS SECTIONS
o�� REVIIEW
CONST. REVIEW.
S
REVIEW
W
m
y
—1
_
FILE NAME:
A S S O c i A T E S
15.5303 Design.dwg
HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
ENGINEER
NC 2880 APH.(828)252NN -0575 G•� NCASN C.a1E
AAD FRREET ASEVILL
O
0+
03
O A
0
OD
f f i f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
00
O O
0 O
Y A O
O
CJ
C
z
A
> O
W
L 0
A 003 N 000 O A OD
A
0
n
I
JOB NO.. 15.05303
STREAM RESTORATION
DATE: MARCH2017
DESIGNED BY: JV
EPISCOPAL CHURCH
FOR
McGm
IV m
m
CROSS SECTIONS
o�� REVIIEW
CONST. REVIEW.
OF THE ASCENSIONoNLY
REVIEW
—1
_
FILE NAME:
A S S O c i A T E S
15.5303 Design.dwg
HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
ENGINEER
NC 2880 APH.(828)252NN -0575 G•� NCASN C.a1E
AAD FRREET ASEVILL

INSTALL MATTING AND NATIVE SEED
1112
1111
1110
1109
1108
1107
1106
1105
1104
1103
1102
1101 80 40 0 40
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. GRADE BANKS AS SHOWN IN DESIGN DRAWINGS.
2. STABILIZE BANKS BY INSTALLING COIR FIBER MATTING AND NATIVE SEED (SEE
SEED SPECIFICATIONS ON 0-002).
2.1. COIR MATTING SHOULD BE PLACED LOOSELY AND EVENLY ON THE PREPARED
SLOPE. SECURED WITH STAPLES 2' ON CENTER. ADJACENT FABRIC SHOULD
OVERLAP 12- WITH UPSLOPE FABRIC OVERLAPPING DOWNSLOPE FABRIC.
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
GRADE
CONTROL
AT XS—A
GRADE
CONTROL —
1105 AT XS—B
1104 5
:m
PROPOSED CHANNEL BED
(AVERAGE GRADE LINE)
GRADE
CONTROL
AT XS—C
EXISTING THALWEG
60 80 100
PROPOSED REVISED PROFILE SECTION
NON—WOVEN FILTER CLOTH.
WRAPPED TO TOP OF BOULDER
AND BURIED BELOW STREAM BED.
BACKFILL WITH WASHED STONE
AND FILL MATERIAL TO RAISE
CHANNEL BED TO PROPOSED
r---- ------------------
EXISTING CROSS SECTION
EXISTING CHANNEL BED J GRADE CONTROL
FOOTER BOULDER
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION 1' X 1.5' X 2.5'
MEDIAN SIZE.
BOULDER WALL — 4' MAX
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND.
BENCH AT 1.5 FT DEPTH BOULDERS 3' X 4' X 2'
MEDIAN SIZE.
WASHED #57 STONE
BACKFILL
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE 1
FABRIC
MAX 2"
OBSTRUCTION TO
FLOW
GRADE CONTROL BOULDER —
1' X 1.5' X 2.5' MEDIAN SIZE.
MAX 2" OBSTRUCTION TO FLOW
FLOW
r— PROPOSED CHANNEL
BACKFILL WITH WASHED STONE
AND FILL MATERIAL TO RAISE
CHANNEL BED TO PROPOSED
PROPOSED GRADING
BANKFULL BENCH
GRADE CONTROL BOULDER — —
TIE INTO BANK A
1' X 1.5' X 2.5' MEDIAN SIZE.
MINIMUM 2'
EXISTING CHANNEL BED
BOULDER WALL AND GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE
B' MAX. STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
MIN. 1{ GAUGE 6-X6- WIRE
6' MAX EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT
wilt, FENCE
5' STEEL POST
(MIN. 1.33 LBAF)
GRADE
CONTROL 1e- To zr
AT XS -1 WIRE
FENCES
EROSION CONTROL MAT
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1104
\�
1103.5
IURBFAAREA)
1103
RAISE CHANNEL TO
---
THALWEG AVERAGE
1102.5
WITH FILL MATERIAL
1102
AND WASHED STONE.
1101.5
�l
11010
20 41
:m
PROPOSED CHANNEL BED
(AVERAGE GRADE LINE)
GRADE
CONTROL
AT XS—C
EXISTING THALWEG
60 80 100
PROPOSED REVISED PROFILE SECTION
NON—WOVEN FILTER CLOTH.
WRAPPED TO TOP OF BOULDER
AND BURIED BELOW STREAM BED.
BACKFILL WITH WASHED STONE
AND FILL MATERIAL TO RAISE
CHANNEL BED TO PROPOSED
r---- ------------------
EXISTING CROSS SECTION
EXISTING CHANNEL BED J GRADE CONTROL
FOOTER BOULDER
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION 1' X 1.5' X 2.5'
MEDIAN SIZE.
BOULDER WALL — 4' MAX
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND.
BENCH AT 1.5 FT DEPTH BOULDERS 3' X 4' X 2'
MEDIAN SIZE.
WASHED #57 STONE
BACKFILL
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE 1
FABRIC
MAX 2"
OBSTRUCTION TO
FLOW
GRADE CONTROL BOULDER —
1' X 1.5' X 2.5' MEDIAN SIZE.
MAX 2" OBSTRUCTION TO FLOW
FLOW
r— PROPOSED CHANNEL
BACKFILL WITH WASHED STONE
AND FILL MATERIAL TO RAISE
CHANNEL BED TO PROPOSED
PROPOSED GRADING
BANKFULL BENCH
GRADE CONTROL BOULDER — —
TIE INTO BANK A
1' X 1.5' X 2.5' MEDIAN SIZE.
MINIMUM 2'
EXISTING CHANNEL BED
BOULDER WALL AND GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE
B' MAX. STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
MIN. 1{ GAUGE 6-X6- WIRE
6' MAX EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT
wilt, FENCE
5' STEEL POST
(MIN. 1.33 LBAF)
GRADE
CONTROL 1e- To zr
AT XS -1 WIRE
FENCES
EROSION CONTROL MAT
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
EARTHEN BACKFILL —
CLASS II RIPRAP
OR APPROVED EQUAL
1. loosen flier fabric on t bank; place fabric
loosely and evenly on the prepared slope
secured with staples 2' centers. Adjacent
strips should overlap 12"; upslope filter fabric
IURBFAAREA)
WIRE
should overtop downslope fabric.
---
APPROX.
2. Install Class II RipRap (or approved equal)
ontop of filter fabric, forcing rocks to settle
into bank for stabilization.
BANKFULL
EXISTING
GROUND
BACKFILL TRENCH
AND COMPACT
THarsoucHLv
�l
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
FILTER FABRIC--1�
APPROX. I! BANKFULL
1. Class II Riprop or approved equal
2. Filter fabric: 10-12 oz. non—woven geo—textile
specific to aggregate separation.
T � �
NORMAL BASEFLOW
TREE
TOE PROTECTION
HEIGHT
EMBEDMENT
DEPTH 1.0'
OUTLET PROTECTION CROSS—SECTION
B' DOWN k {'
FORWARD ALONG
THE TRENCH
SECTION VIEW
IURBFAAREA)
WIRE
FENCE
FILTER
/FABRIC
STEEL /
POST
EXISTING
GROUND
BACKFILL TRENCH
AND COMPACT
THarsoucHLv
y�
PROTECTIVE
BARRIER
1'x4' RAIL SAFETY FENCING
2':{' Posr
F1 r Yx4' POST
TYPES OF OF PRO�CTI�BARRIERS
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
0 c'
m
M O Q
o� Cl)
2 �
T
oV V
F- Cl)
W
0 1 ' of
O
� 111
'
Z
LU 0 W o
C/3U U
A�
■� O
W
U)
J
Q
LLI
0
SHEET
3
(01',UpSUOPE
IURBFAAREA)
24'
y�
PLASTIC OR
W RE PES
T � �
tl41E£
TREE
1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED
24 FT.
IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND
\�
DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL
EXISTING
REPAIR SHALL BE MADE AS NECESSARY.
GRADE
`
— ' /
24 I NCH
DIAMETER TRUNK
DI1TE
SLOPE LENGTH (FT) MAXIMUM AREA(SOFT)
EXISTING
CRITICAL
ROOT ZONE
100
0
3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED
GROUND
10000
75 T'=
AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND WHEN
DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 1/3
5 TO 10x
10 TO 20x
PLAN
VIEW
II
4—
15 1.500
4. REFERENCE NCDENR LAND QUALITY
Cl Root z.E —
ELEVATION VIEW
PROTECTIVE
BARRIER
1'x4' RAIL SAFETY FENCING
2':{' Posr
F1 r Yx4' POST
TYPES OF OF PRO�CTI�BARRIERS
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
0 c'
m
M O Q
o� Cl)
2 �
T
oV V
F- Cl)
W
0 1 ' of
O
� 111
'
Z
LU 0 W o
C/3U U
A�
■� O
W
U)
J
Q
LLI
0
SHEET
3
(01',UpSUOPE
IURBFAAREA)
24'
y�
T � �
tl41E£
1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED
IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND
DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL
REPAIR SHALL BE MADE AS NECESSARY.
2, FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY
SLOPE
SLOPE LENGTH (FT) MAXIMUM AREA(SOFT)
IF FW NO TO BE IN DISREPAIR.
100
0
3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED
2 TO 5x
10000
75 T'=
AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND WHEN
DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 1/3
5 TO 10x
10 TO 20x
50
25 5,
00
HEIGHT OF BARRIER.
>20x
15 1.500
4. REFERENCE NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SECTION DESIGN MANUAL 6.62.
SEDIMENTATION/SILT FENCE
REVISION DATE -NOVEMBER 3, 2008
PROTECTIVE
BARRIER
1'x4' RAIL SAFETY FENCING
2':{' Posr
F1 r Yx4' POST
TYPES OF OF PRO�CTI�BARRIERS
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
0 c'
m
M O Q
o� Cl)
2 �
T
oV V
F- Cl)
W
0 1 ' of
O
� 111
'
Z
LU 0 W o
C/3U U
A�
■� O
W
U)
J
Q
LLI
0
SHEET
3

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ��1 l�'7
Project/S pisCG ( ALtrc
4 -kc C"e,n6 i C' 1-1
Latitude: 35..E O y y
Evaluator: JGirlV1 V 1OL5
County: U-_+l-)�Wion_
Longitude: -8 ,JLAq icl5
Total Points: 1+1, A5
Stream Determination (circle-anal.Other
2
Stream is at least intermittent
IF z 19 orperennial if? 30'
Ephemeral Intermitter erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = GLO
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-poolsequence
0
1�2
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
YeS(= 3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
00.5
1
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artficial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
YeS(= 3
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 10 %-75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
?2
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
(222
3
22. Fish
M
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
Oub
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
.5(71D
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW 2T.7V
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Photo Sheets 1
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration
Photo Sheets
Looking upstream on Fritz Creek from
northern property boundary
Looking downstream toward northern
property boundary
Vertical stream bank at foot bridge toward
upstream project extent
S
I g
Looking upstream toward upstream
project extent
w
Eroded bank near upstream project extent Looking upstream toward 12" stormwater
pipe

V
Photo Sheets 2
Episcopal Church of the Ascension - Stream Restoration
Photo Sheets
Looking upstream at eroded banks 12" stormwater pipe near upstream
toward upstream project extent project extent