20170502 Ver 1_401 Application_20170424

o C @[M0MC
ANR 2 4 20011
April 20, 2017
DLAN
�INEERING �y�
Ms. Karen Higgins
Division of Water Resources, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification
Trough Branch and UT to Nantahala River
Macon County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Higgins:
The subject project involves the following:
• Stabilization of an unnamed tributary (UT) to the Nantahala River;
20170502
u \,
• Retrofits to existing ponds;
• Profile adjustments in Trough Branch to address an aquatic organism passage barrier; and
• Periodic diversion of a portion of the base flow of Trough Branch to a proposed off-line grist mill.
The project is being sponsored by Greg Mullins and Stacy Bredendieck who own the parcel on the east side of
Trough Branch (Greg is listed as the landowner on Macon County's land records). Members of the Slagle family
own property on the west bank of Slough Branch and have agreed to participate in the proposed work along
Trough Branch. Agent Authorization letters from both parties are attached.
Project Overview and Proposed Impacts
Trough Branch is classified as Class C; ORW and the Nantahala River is classified as B; Tr; ORW. The UT is
considered to have the same classification as the Nantahala River. Proposed construction along Trough Branch
is limited to approximately 80 linear feet (LF) while the proposed stabilization work on the UT will extend for
approximately 350 LF. The enclosed plans show the proposed work.
The concept for Trough Branch involves constructing a series of boulder step structures across the bed of the
stream. The purpose of these structures is twofold. First, the steps will raise the bed elevation in order to
promote aquatic organism passage through the pair of culverts under West Old Murphy Road, which are
currently perched more than 3 feet above the downstream bed. Second, the upstream step will create a pool
from which water can be diverted through a head gate to an off-line sluice, which will deliver water to a
proposed grist mill near the downstream end of the Mullins property. Mr. Mullins has indicated that diversions
to the grist mill will be temporary and occasional, on the order to 2 to 4 times per month for no more than 6
hours at a time. At no time will the discharge to the diversion exceed 50% of the normal base flow in Trough
Branch.
Work on the UT will address bank erosion that is threatening the stability of a driveway culvert and causing a
loss of land. Bank erosion is also contributing excess fine sediment to the Nantahala River. Stabilization
measures will include in -stream structures, bank grading and planting native woody species on the banks and
adjacent floodplain areas.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 828.774.5547 • 167-B Haywood Road • Asheville, NC 28806

The ponds were constructed decades ago by the previous owners of the Mullins property and are fed by an
apparently ephemeral conveyance that originates on the property. The ponds are connected in series by plastic
pipes laid across the embankments, two of which have failed and will be removed and replaced with stone
spillways. We do not believe that the proposed pond retrofits require agency approval, but we mention this
work because it appears on the enclosed plan set.
As outlined below, work will be staged in a manner that minimizes disturbance and sediment migration.
1. The disturbance will be a temporary impact and disturbed areas will be stabilized at the end of each day
with erosion control matting and straw mulch. The long term benefits include: reducing bank erosion,
establishing deep-rooted vegetation along the banks, and promoting aquatic organism passage on
Trough Branch by raising the bed profile to match culvert invert elevations.
2. Pump -around flow diversions will be used in both streams to divert flow around the work areas.
Excavators will be used to install in -stream structures and grade the stream profiles and banks.
Disturbed banks will be seeded, mulched and matted, and live staking will be used to establish deep-
rooted vegetation on the banks.
3. A 3 to 4 -week construction period is anticipated. Work efforts will be sequenced to allow for
stabilization of completed work at the end of each working day.
4. The primary erosion control practices will include: the pump -around flow diversion, silt fence around
staging areas, and seeding, mulching and matting on the disturbed banks. Adjacent floodplain areas will
be seeded and mulched, or silt fence or wattles will be installed on the streamside of the disturbance
area if the area is to be subject to continued use for access to on-going work. Mulch will be placed on all
disturbed areas when rain is anticipated.
5. The designer will be on-site periodically during construction to verify that erosion control measures are
being installed and maintained. Erosion control practices will be reviewed prior to anticipated
precipitation and shored up as necessary to maximize protection. Equipment fueling and maintenance
will be required to occur a minimum of 100 feet from the stream. It has been specified that equipment
brought on-site must be in good working order, clean and free of leaks.
This submittal includes:
• PCN form; (5 >_C S) i
• 11" x 17" copy of the 60% plan set; C C7.5 st )
• Signed Agent Authorization Forms;
• Sizing calculations for the UT; and
• Example photos from the site.
d' 1 70 cke� ja,- Pwk V^2ViA- AG
This same information has been submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Office, and North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. If you have any questions, please contact
me at 828.606.0306 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Andrew Bick, PE
Project Manager
WWildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 828.774.5547 • 167-B Haywood Road • Asheville, NC 28806

P � •
o�o� wAr�9°c
Vj 'P
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Rainbow Springs Enhancement
2b. County:
Macon
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Franklin
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Gregory L. Mullins
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
L-37/1764
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7984 West Old Murphy Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Franklin, NC 28734
3f.
Telephone no.:
828-369-5280
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Andrew Bick
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
4d. Street address:
167-B Haywood Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28806
4f.
Telephone no.:
828-606-0306
4g.
Fax no.:
n/a
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Andrew Bick
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
167-B Haywood Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28806
5e. Telephone no.:
828-606-0306
5f.
Fax no.:
n/a
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
6542018597
Latitude: 35.098617 Longitude: -
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
83.547386
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
15.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Trough Branch; Nantahala River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, ORW (Trough Br.); B; Tr; ORW (Nantahala)
2c.
River basin:
Little Tennessee
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Trough Branch appears to have been straightened decades ago and has become incised such that a roughly 3 -foot high
perch exists at a double barrel culvert at the upstream end of the project reach. A UT to the Nantahala River through the
property also appears to have been straightended years ago and it too is incised with eroding banks. Land uses in the
watershed are primarily forest and cleared pasture, with a small cluster of low density residential upstream of the site.
The landowners operate a small farm, with various livestock and fowl.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2000 LF
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to stabilize eroding banks on the UT and to raise the bed of Trough Branch in order to
improve aquatic organism passage and allow for temporary diversions of a portion of the base flow to a grist mill.
Additional activities that do not appear to require regulatory approval include renovation to pond outlet structures and
improvement to drainage swales.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will involve sloping banks and installing in -stream rock structures to improve aquatic organism passage,
provide grade control and promote formation of a pool from which a portion of the base flow in Trough Branch can be
diverted to a grist mill. As indicated on the plans (Sheet 3.3), no more than 50% of the base flow in Trough Branch will be
diverted to the grist mill at any time. Diversions will be temporary and occur roughly once per week. The grist mill will
serve as a demonstration of traditional mill operations for visitors to the farm. Additional detail is provided in the attached
plan set.
Graded banks will be seeded with temporary and permanent (native) seed mixes, covered with coir matting and live
staked with native woody species. Conventional construction equipment will be used, including a track mounted
excavator, dump truck and assorted hand tools. A pump -around flow diversion will be employed for all in -stream
construction. Measures will be taken to limit the amount of construction traffic in the streams, but some in -stream
equipment access will be necessary to construct the measures.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary El Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Bank Stabilization
Trough Branch
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
15
80
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
Bank Stabilization
UT Nantahala
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
6
350
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
430
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P
04 ❑P❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
I
I
I
I
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f, Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number— Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temoorary (Tl impact
131 ❑P❑T
B2 ❑P❑T
B3 ❑P❑T
6i. Comments:
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e. I 6f. I 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impactI Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project represents a long-term benefit to the streams and larger Little Tennessee River watershed by stabilizing an
eroding banks, enhancing aqautic habitats, and reducing fine sediment inputs. Construction phase best management
practices will help minimize the short-term impacts, as described in below.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The will begin only after all construction materials are stockpiled nearby. Equipment will operate from the top of bank to the
extent feasible, but some in -stream equipment access will be necessary to install the restoration measures. A pump -around
flow diversion will be employed to dewater work areas. The contract documents will require well-maintained and functioning
equipment and daily checks for leaks. An emergency spill plan will also be required.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
n/a %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project does not constitute development
or an increase in impervious area.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
n/a
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS review in progress.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation Mapping Tool
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIS service (nearest site is MA 0304, about 1/4 mile east of any disturbance)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? ncfloodmaps.com
Andrew Bick
a,11a '4 41C
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

March 21, 2017
Mr. David Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: NWP Application Agent Authorization
Rainbow Springs Stream and Pond Restoration Project
Macon County, NC
Dear Mr. Brown:
I hereby authorize Andrew Bick of Wildlands Engineering, Inc., to serve as my agent and apply on my
behalf for a Nationwide Permit for the subject project.
If you have any questions, please call me at 828-369-5280.
Sincerely,
Gregory L. Mullins

April 4, 2017
Mr. David Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: NWP Application Agent Authorization
Rainbow Springs Stream and Pond Restoration Project
Macon County, NC
Dear Mr. Brown:
I hereby authorize Andrew Bick of Wildlands Engineering, Inc., to serve as my agent and apply on my
behalf for a Nationwide Permit for the subject project.
If you have any questions, please call me at 828- 712-1114.
Sincerely,
C—a`
Christine le
g

81 UT to Nantahala Abkf = 3.6 sf_
$0 I --�---Existing �Design
79
--�
78
c 77 r
0
76
m
LU 75
74 -------
73
----- 73
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00
Station (ft)
Discharge Calculation overall reach
Q = 1.49/n R2/3 s1/2 A
WP (ft)
6.81
est - AlanW-
0.53
design slope
0.08
Channel n
Rural
est. Rural
24.7
Boundary ShearyRs = 2.64 psf
PiedMtn
Piedmont
est - Rural
BKF Area
BKF Area
Mtn BKF
Drainage Areas
s. mi.
sq
(sq
Area s
Trough Branch
0.52
12.14
13.77
13.77
UT to Nantahala
0.05
2.67
2.92
2.89
Seep channel eastern drainage
0.01
1.01 1
1.08
1 1.06
Discharge Calculation overall reach
Q = 1.49/n R2/3 s1/2 A
WP (ft)
6.81
R (ft)
0.53
design slope
0.08
Channel n
0.04
Q (cfs)
24.7
Boundary ShearyRs = 2.64 psf
largest particle from Shields = 300 mm 11.8 inches
Class B stone 5' to 12" for riffles OK

Rainbow Springs Enhancement Project
Representative Photographs
Perched Culverts on Trough Branch
Looking Downstream at Trough Branch
Bank Erosion on Trough Branch
Incised Conditions on UT to Nantahala River
Bank Erosion on UT to Nantahala River
Detail of Bank Erosion on UT to Nantahala River

i
e
Rainbow Springs Enhancement
Macon County, NC
for
Stacy Bredendieck and Greg Mullins
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
PRELIMINARY PLANS
ISSUED APRIL 7, 2017
I Apg242017
Sheet Index
Title Sheet
0.1
Project Overview
0.2
General Notes, Symbols, and Typicals
0.3
Stream Plan and Profile
1.1-1.2
Ponds Plan and Profile
2.1
Details
3.1-3.3
Project Directory
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F-0831
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Andrew Bick, PE
828-774-5547
Owner:
Stacy Bredendieck
7984 West Old Murphy Road
Franklin, NC 28734
zunNoo
zO V O ry 0
w TZ��v
.aZ�QILLE
3W LL
A-
U
Wz
� U
0
0

It
vir
_ r
' GULLY '
STABILIZATION
SITE ACCESS AT
ENTRANCE GATE
START : ^•`
STREAM L
ENHANCEMENT �'} r •�
STA 1+00
a
.i
GRASSED
.`
SWALE
CONSTRUCTION
ji
4 .g
2o
r
f t. END STREAM
+�. { a° t- ; . ENHANCEMENT s.
:v ♦ jtq ! n• ® STA 4+50
POND
{:. o= s
) �-
\... SPILLWAY
CONSTRUCTION s+ppf
r
,
u
g—of • ,. CLQ- ti � A, - . i� � �`. � x0 t� 1,\ 4
Y -y�
art -Y•
t x oma "� . # ,. .l�^•��' ,,.
, y
��t c '��. M`, Y Y- .' _. ��i` _ �,•�-,yam s.,
+3. .., �4 t't {(�JJ ,� : \.1r. i *' .4' - - �•• • -r. yt_ ,Z' ry -\'s', '` .�v
r _
0UGy
�-
Pat
ov
ry
t r��
t�
�r rn
w.
PN
0)
tiJ
X
G g
z i mm
E c
�, - 60' 120' 180' z o V N
rn
'ZZ9�Nmo
g�nmo
z
ai=rvo
S –oah�
a= agLL E
4�4 �54,4J
5�ANW
PN
0)
tiJ
X
G g
z i mm
E c
�, - 60' 120' 180' z o V N
4�4 �54,4J
5�ANW
PN
0)
tiJ
X
G g
z i mm
E c
�, - 60' 120' 180' z o V N

Construction Notes:
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA "ONE CALL" CENTER (1-800-632-4949) PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ALL DAMAGE TO UTILITIES BY CONTRACTOR SHALL
BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS TO PRE -PROJECT CONDITIONS
PRIOR TO DE -MOBILIZING.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF EXCESS SOIL, ROCK, GRAVEL AND CLEARED AND
GRUBBED MATERIALS ON PROJECT SITE AT A LOCATION DESIGNATED BY THE
OWNER OR HAULED AND DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED
DURING MOBILIZATION, STAGING, AND ACCESS TO THE RIVER AND LICKLOG
CREEK. TRAFFIC CONTROL WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUTCD AND
NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS 1101.01 SHEET 3, 1101.02 SHEET 1, AND 1101.04
SHEET 1 AS APPROPRIATE.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BASED ON WEATHER
CONDITIONS OR ADDITIONAL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE AT CONTRACTOR'S
EXPENSE.
2. LOCATE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS STAGING LOCATIONS SO AS TO MINIMIZE
SITE DISTURBANCE. ENGINEER TO APPROVE ANY STAGING AREAS NOT DEPICTED
ON PLANS.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE ON RIVER SIDE OF ALL SOIL STOCKPILE AREAS OR STAGING
AREAS THAT CREATE BARE GROUND CONDITIONS.
4. EQUIPMENT BROUGHT TO PROJECT SITE SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF LEAKS.
S. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM FUELING AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES AT LEAST
100 FEET AWAY FROM RIVER AND SHALL MANAGE ALL FLUIDS TO PREVENT
LEAKING ONTO GROUND OR TO ALLOW FOR IMMEDIATE CLEAN-UP.
6. RIVER BANK GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO AN AREA THAT CAN BE STABILIZED
WITH SEED, STRAW AND MATTING BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ROADWAYS FREE OF ANY DIRT OR DEBRIS THAT COULD
BE TRACKED ONTO THEM DURING CONSTRUCTION
6.50' r 1�
EXISTING \ 0.80' I ��
GRADE L L,,�,
PROPOSED 1.50' 2.50— F— 1.50' VARIES
GRADE
STA 1+00 - STA 2+85 3:1 BANK
Riffle Typical SLOPE
Scale: 1" = 5'
6.50'
EXISTING)
GRADE
PROPOSED —�^
GRADE =1.60
1.50' VARIES
STA 1+00 - STA 2+85
Pool Typical
Scale: 1" = 5'
Existing Features
-- — Existing Stream Centerline
---TB —TB--- Existing Top of Bank
■IMI■I■ Existing Culvert
---3300----- Existing Major Contour (5' Intervals)
Existing Minor Contour
NOTE:
SLOPE DIMENSIONS MAY BE
MANIPULATED AS DIRECTED BY
ENGINEER TO AVOID TREES ALONG
TERRACE
Proposed Features
3+00
Proposed Stream Centerline A
zZ��aoo
z��NmLL
`1 — — — — — -- Proposed Terrace Tie-in gu11 Z
.iZ U6.64 5:
_.... _Pro osed Bankfull (Top of Bank)_...._...._....Q - "
emr_x�
�Z�ar2E
�R Proposed Silt Fence ; y
— — — — — — — — Proposed Grassed Swale
Proposed Boulder/Rock Step
A
Proposed Constructed Riffle
P�
yO0�0�
go Proposed Gully Stabilization
O�
L
TIE LEFT BANK
INTO EXISTING
GRADE
EXISTING
GRADE
STA 3+15 - STA 4+50
Riffle Typical
Scale: 1" = 5'
TIE LEFT BANK
INTO EXISTING
GRADE
EXISTING
GRADE
STA 3+15 - 4+50
Pool Typical
Scale: 1" = 5'
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
6.50' T
I
2.50'
RIES [--
1
1 BANK
SLOPE
6.50'I —}-VARIES I-- —_—__--- _--_—_

6
3335
1(
STA =1+00.05,
ELEV = 3332.55
3330
3325
m
n
N
+
~
M
o
M
M
11
g
3315
II
w
w—o
� w
�4
M
Q
~n
Ln
II
3335
,•
�
O In
W II
p
\
F
N ri
Ln
In m O W
+ M n l0
\
> M
\
"
T
Q
LMD
M m
PROPOSED BANKFULL
+
ALONG PROPOSED
N
W to
1\
'�
J mm
ALIGNMENT
v
\
t~i1 11 m N
lo
w v II
`
1
Q J
m
Lri
3310
�
n O
I \
+ M
>
g
G �
ri O
= 3+84.39
\ \
h w
m
N+
= 3307.99
v II
3330
\
m
? ++
PRO POSEDBANKFULLALONGPROPOSEDALIGNMENT
H J
N W
\
M
O m
ro
\
+ M
3305
1 \
H W
II
Q W
ELEV =
304.36
\,
H
cq
N
\
W
N
m
M
o
rr
STA = 4+34.03
m v
N M pn
ELEV = 3302.85
`
+
m AD
M o1pp
w M
\
•\
\/
In
w II u
} M
N II
N W
3325
PROPOSED THALWEG ALONG PROPOSED ALIGNMENT
EXISTING GROUND ALONG PROPOSED ALIGNMENT
3320
1 I 3315 4-
1+00
VICONSTRUCT
RASSED SWALE
Mm
EXISTING CULVERT
(TYP.)
EXISTING CULVERT
3320
EXISTING
CULVERT
3315STA = 3
1 M Mry
1 II 11OM1 ry O
1 Q J m mp N
1 W } mw
g-1 M H+M O�1
II M
1 Q W
It
V�1 WF J M
l\
`\ /A\
EXISTING GROUND 1�
ALONG PROPOSED
ALIGNMENT
3310 ��
ELEV = 3311.5
PROPOSED THALWEG ALONG PROPOSED ALIGNMENT
3305
0' 20' 40' 60' 0' 2' 4' 6'
(NORQOMAL) IVEpIKgLI
3320
m
3315
II
w
M
Q
~n
Ln
II
W II
p
n
W 00O
M
\
> M
Q
vii w m
M m
PROPOSED BANKFULL
+
ALONG PROPOSED
1\
'�
J mm
ALIGNMENT
v
\
of
w v II
`
1
Q J
m
Lri
3310
�
n O
I \
+ M
>
AD1 N
G �
ri O
= 3+84.39
M
= 3307.99
v II
H J
N W
.
ro
\
3305
STA =
+20.46
ELEV =
304.36
\,
STA = 4+34.03
ELEV = 3302.85
`
—iI I 11 3315 3300 1 1 I I
1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+20 2+80 3+00 3+50 4+00
NO LEFT BANK /
BENCHING OR
3a� / GRADING STA 1+35
.3 TO 1+55 TO i NO LEFT BANK BENCHING OR GRADING
�O STA 3+15 TO 4+50 TO PRESERVE TREES.
PRESERVE TREES
3 1`, TIE IN TO EXISTING BANK AT TYPICAL
BANKFULL
i' PROTECT SEPTIC DRAIN ^
#. FIELD, OFFSET iS'
FROM LEFT TOP OF BANK _ // o
- ROCK STEP (TYP.)04
` m PROTECT i
ATURE /
POPLAR Ir
CONSTRUCTED RIFF (TYP.)
TYP)
I
i
BIN WORK
_
STA 1+00 - _ -.
F : v
'! 1
x
EXISTING RCP TO BE PLUGGED M -+ �` h/ ♦ ��_ i �. ��? ..-_ 5}00
WITH CONCRETE AT BOTH ENDS/
l '•.., ,3''�� -� - MEND -
i
•wc'`r,. ��. WORK
/
r _
- I / �' ♦ � -- _ STA 4+50
MODIFY BENCH AND TERRACE SLOPE
' \ POND " f' DIMENSIONS AS NECESSARY TO \
PRESERVE TREES Pd�
r -
i F 3300
4+50 4+75
0' 20' 40' 60'
Ixox¢oxrul
zo,2124
Za�ulm
W O V V m 0
a gZnmy
q = Wp
Z
m �

.1
3325
EXISTING 60" _
CULVERTS
3320
BOULDER STEPS (TYP.) -
3315
3310
1+00
as
.+
e•l
m
n
m
ry
�wf
�m
¢ u mm
+ .r
� J '••I M
a u v
II M
I" a n
vai v,
--
yl W
,••I M
---
w
u m
¢ II o
Zs
n m
\
� W
PROPOSED THALWEG
\ \ 1
ALONG ALIGNMENT
t—_
EXISTING
GROUND
\
ALONG
ALIGNMENT
1+50
2+00
2+50
3+00
3+50
4+00
4+50
3325 A
m 1D
zo-�o4
We,•, 6
0a
2 -OO U
4Z �Q9LLE
3W LL
3320
3315
3310
5+8904
0' 20' 40' 60'
EXISTING FENCE TO
/ \F� �a L �; •. r �� d BE MOVED ASNEEDED# /
. ; 'fit �"► ` ' TO AVOID SLUICE AND 40 /
MILL BUILDING
OHEAD GATE 4
a\
•�' WOODEN SLUICE
'' ON PIERS .�
1 .
0.i
r tivow
BOULDER STEPS FOR
FISH PASSAGE AND
POOL CREATION
MILL BUILDING
AND WHEEL
TAIL RACE
SEE SHEET 3.3�
FOR DETAILS
ft,
4
\',�¢ *�,
.1► ��'�• z EWmm
0' 70' 40' 60' a `u

a SPILLWAY INVERT: i o z a 6'
3330.9'
rvcx Knu
I
zo' ao' fio'
SPILLWAY INVERT: o'
' IxonaoM�y
\ I 3326.6'
BERM BETWEEN ,
3330 PONDS (TYP.)
\ I 3330
\I
\ I , SPILLWAY INVERT: I
\I / 3326.9
r , I
i=_- 1
\w
\ � I
3325 \ 3
I SPILLWAY INVERT: 3325
\ 3320.1' /
BED OF SPILLWAY (TYP.) 1 \
\ I
\ I
\ 1
\1 I\I
i
EXTEND SPILLWAY SO THAT IT -- �— -----� I
3320 ENDS BELOW EXISTING WATER 3320 /
ELEVATION
� I
EXISTING GROUND ALONG DRAIN PIPE INVERT:
ALIGNMENT ` II 3315.3'
L
I �I SPILLWAY INVERT:
` I / 3315.4
I
I I SPILLWAY INVERT:
3315 �— \ 3313.3'
3315
EXISTING WATER \
ELEVATION AT SURVEY \
3312 - —
— 3312
1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
p7- yF'
VVV
EXISTING PIPE TO BE
REMOVED
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ADD CLASS I INLET E + - `
o _ -
AND -SW BANK OF POND
k
EXISTING 12" RCP TO BE - y w y tipx
REMOVED OR PLUGGED AT g� d
BOTH ENDS POND 1 EXISTING PIPE TO +
1
REMAIN /'1R
}� E
t ,_ POND 2
�AfPIID
• r
4
CONSTRUCTSPILLWAY i +
SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 3.1 (TYP ALL PONDS) ` r °
+ EXISTING PIPE TO BE REMOVED'
I � z
All
CONSTRUCTSPILLWAY. r "+f'+_ i �`
I .. .. i �.e i � i ter t 0' 20' 40' 60'
CONSTRUCT SPILLWAY EXISTING PIPE TO REMAIN
EXISTING PIPE TO BE REMOVEDAll 't
\
1
PROTECT EXISTING POWER
.I
POLE - ' 2
t "millNall
i+
A 9 '"
pyn D°0
zZ_ °CC„OOutm4
9ry �nm
4W2ZnmN
1-1 Sd pp
Z �FLL
i
4�
�P
44w�°5w4o�•
co
s

1
FLOW
ELEVATION POINT VARIES BY
STEP ARRANGEMENT BACKFILL IS MIX OF STON
SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION STONE, CLASS A
AND NATIVE GRAVIRAVI
MATERIALS, MUST I
COMPACT, VOIDS MUST I
FILLED WITH MATERIJ
HORSESHOE
B ARCHED
ANGLED
THALWEG ON UPSTREAM 1/3 OF ANGLED
STEP
HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS BACKFILL DEPTH
Types of Step TO BOTTOM OF
Configurations FOOTER FOR NONWOVEN
MINIMUM OF 3' FILTER FABRIC
TYPE MAY BE VARIED BY DESIGNER UPSTREAM HEADER BOULDER
IN FIELD- INTENDED TYPE IS FOOTER BOULDER
GENERALLY REFLECTED BY PLANS. RIFFLE OR OTHER
DETAILS TO RIGHT REFLECT HORSE -7 "'PER
ORSE/PER PLAN Section View (Section A -A')
POOL
SHOE OR ARCHED AND SHALL BE
ADAPTED FOR OTHER TYPES.
Plan View
UPPERPOND _UPPERINVERT
LOWER POND
Plan View
TOP OF
SPILLWAY
TOP OF BERM
UPPER
"\,,
UPPER POND
TOP OF BERM
— — — — BASE WATER ELEVATION
NER INVERT �— VARIES
TOP OF BERM
2 (TYP)
1 r :,
12" THICK CLASS
A STONE OIT—
RIVER COBBLE
(6' MEDIAN SIZE)
NON -WOVEN 2
FILTER FABRIC
Section View (Section A -A')
— — — --BASE WATER ELEVATION
'BOTTOM OF- LOWER INVERT
a EXTEND BELOW BASE
WATER ELEVATION
Profile View n Pond Spillway
\,L'J Not to Scale
CLASS 1 STONE
PLACED IN
LOWEST POINT
NOTE: CLASS 1 ROCK 15 REQUIRED
FOR HEADERS AND FOOTERS,
IF 2x2xl BOULDERS ARE USED,
NO FOOTER IS REQUIRED
I�
PROTECT
EXISTING VEG.
AT TOP OF BANK
Section View (Section A -A')
1' LAYER #57
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIO
POINT PER PROFIL
RIFFLE VENEER
Profile A -A'
Profile View
n Gully Stabilization
3.1 Not to Scale
SEE PROFILE
Plan View LB
18" DEPTH CLASS B STONE
MIX WITH ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL AND SAND
TO FILL VOIDS. MIX SHOULD
CONSIST OF NO MORE THAN
20% GRAVEL AND SAND.
Constructed Riffle
3.1 Not to Scale
)F RIFFLE ELEVATION
f PER PROFILE
Section &B'
INVERT PER PROFILE
--TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIGHT AND LEFT EDGE OF
CHANNEL 0.1-0.2' HIGHER
THAN INVERT
SCARIFY SUBGRADE, REMOVE ROCKS EROSION CONTROL
AND DEBRIS, SEED WITH TALL MATTING (NAG OL BN OR
FESCUE AND APPLY STRAW MULCH E
IVALNT
BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING APPROVED EQUIVALENT)
6'
3 (TYP)
1�
OP OF BANK (TYP)
NOTE:
1. INSTALL CLASS A STONE
CHECK DAMS AT 50' TO 80'
INTERVALS, WITH CLOSER
SPACING FOR STEEPER
SECTIONS.
Section
5 Grassed Swale
3.1 Not to Scale
6" CLASS A STONE CHECK
DAM, SEE NOTE
Tn
A9
p n m m
zZ�"Znm4
a01 uJ W0
Z =gig
i—mnw
r�Z ^myQ�LLE
►q m �,
3
C'A
44w�o�w¢�b`
GO
NOTES:
NONWOVEN
1. WHERE STRUCTURE ARMS ON PIANS ARE
FILTER FABRIC
SHOWN LONGER THAN SYMBOL, CONTRACTOR
MUST EXTEND STRUCTURE (ROCK AND FABRIC)
FURTHER INTO BANK (GENERALLY INTO OR
Profile View
FIRMLY ABUTTING SOLID GROUND, AS
DIRECTED)
2. WHERE WITHIN 9" VERTICALLY OF ORIGINAL
CHANNEL INVERT, ROCK MUST TIE INTO
Boulder/Rock Ste
ORIGINAL INVERT AND MINIMUM HEIGHT
\Z-1/Not to Scale
SHALL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
BOWL OUT PER
TYPICAL POOL
CONTINUE
SECTION, AS SHOWN
BOULDERS AND
ON PROFILE, OR AS
FABRIC T MIN.
DIRECTED
INTO BANK
BOTTOM WIDTH (TYPICAL SECTIONS) (HEADERSAND
FOOTERS),
V BOTH SIDES
UPPERPOND _UPPERINVERT
LOWER POND
Plan View
TOP OF
SPILLWAY
TOP OF BERM
UPPER
"\,,
UPPER POND
TOP OF BERM
— — — — BASE WATER ELEVATION
NER INVERT �— VARIES
TOP OF BERM
2 (TYP)
1 r :,
12" THICK CLASS
A STONE OIT—
RIVER COBBLE
(6' MEDIAN SIZE)
NON -WOVEN 2
FILTER FABRIC
Section View (Section A -A')
— — — --BASE WATER ELEVATION
'BOTTOM OF- LOWER INVERT
a EXTEND BELOW BASE
WATER ELEVATION
Profile View n Pond Spillway
\,L'J Not to Scale
CLASS 1 STONE
PLACED IN
LOWEST POINT
NOTE: CLASS 1 ROCK 15 REQUIRED
FOR HEADERS AND FOOTERS,
IF 2x2xl BOULDERS ARE USED,
NO FOOTER IS REQUIRED
I�
PROTECT
EXISTING VEG.
AT TOP OF BANK
Section View (Section A -A')
1' LAYER #57
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIO
POINT PER PROFIL
RIFFLE VENEER
Profile A -A'
Profile View
n Gully Stabilization
3.1 Not to Scale
SEE PROFILE
Plan View LB
18" DEPTH CLASS B STONE
MIX WITH ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL AND SAND
TO FILL VOIDS. MIX SHOULD
CONSIST OF NO MORE THAN
20% GRAVEL AND SAND.
Constructed Riffle
3.1 Not to Scale
)F RIFFLE ELEVATION
f PER PROFILE
Section &B'
INVERT PER PROFILE
--TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIGHT AND LEFT EDGE OF
CHANNEL 0.1-0.2' HIGHER
THAN INVERT
SCARIFY SUBGRADE, REMOVE ROCKS EROSION CONTROL
AND DEBRIS, SEED WITH TALL MATTING (NAG OL BN OR
FESCUE AND APPLY STRAW MULCH E
IVALNT
BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING APPROVED EQUIVALENT)
6'
3 (TYP)
1�
OP OF BANK (TYP)
NOTE:
1. INSTALL CLASS A STONE
CHECK DAMS AT 50' TO 80'
INTERVALS, WITH CLOSER
SPACING FOR STEEPER
SECTIONS.
Section
5 Grassed Swale
3.1 Not to Scale
6" CLASS A STONE CHECK
DAM, SEE NOTE
Tn
A9
p n m m
zZ�"Znm4
a01 uJ W0
Z =gig
i—mnw
r�Z ^myQ�LLE
►q m �,
3
C'A
44w�o�w¢�b`
GO
NONWOVEN
POSITION OF POOL SHALL
FILTER FABRIC
BE PER DETAIL OR AS DIRECTED
WHEN INAPPARENT CONFLICT
WITH PROFILE
Profile View
STONE PROTECTION
REQUIRED WHEN FILL IS
EXPOSED BELOW FOOTER
Boulder/Rock Ste
\Z-1/Not to Scale
UPPERPOND _UPPERINVERT
LOWER POND
Plan View
TOP OF
SPILLWAY
TOP OF BERM
UPPER
"\,,
UPPER POND
TOP OF BERM
— — — — BASE WATER ELEVATION
NER INVERT �— VARIES
TOP OF BERM
2 (TYP)
1 r :,
12" THICK CLASS
A STONE OIT—
RIVER COBBLE
(6' MEDIAN SIZE)
NON -WOVEN 2
FILTER FABRIC
Section View (Section A -A')
— — — --BASE WATER ELEVATION
'BOTTOM OF- LOWER INVERT
a EXTEND BELOW BASE
WATER ELEVATION
Profile View n Pond Spillway
\,L'J Not to Scale
CLASS 1 STONE
PLACED IN
LOWEST POINT
NOTE: CLASS 1 ROCK 15 REQUIRED
FOR HEADERS AND FOOTERS,
IF 2x2xl BOULDERS ARE USED,
NO FOOTER IS REQUIRED
I�
PROTECT
EXISTING VEG.
AT TOP OF BANK
Section View (Section A -A')
1' LAYER #57
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIO
POINT PER PROFIL
RIFFLE VENEER
Profile A -A'
Profile View
n Gully Stabilization
3.1 Not to Scale
SEE PROFILE
Plan View LB
18" DEPTH CLASS B STONE
MIX WITH ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL AND SAND
TO FILL VOIDS. MIX SHOULD
CONSIST OF NO MORE THAN
20% GRAVEL AND SAND.
Constructed Riffle
3.1 Not to Scale
)F RIFFLE ELEVATION
f PER PROFILE
Section &B'
INVERT PER PROFILE
--TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIGHT AND LEFT EDGE OF
CHANNEL 0.1-0.2' HIGHER
THAN INVERT
SCARIFY SUBGRADE, REMOVE ROCKS EROSION CONTROL
AND DEBRIS, SEED WITH TALL MATTING (NAG OL BN OR
FESCUE AND APPLY STRAW MULCH E
IVALNT
BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING APPROVED EQUIVALENT)
6'
3 (TYP)
1�
OP OF BANK (TYP)
NOTE:
1. INSTALL CLASS A STONE
CHECK DAMS AT 50' TO 80'
INTERVALS, WITH CLOSER
SPACING FOR STEEPER
SECTIONS.
Section
5 Grassed Swale
3.1 Not to Scale
6" CLASS A STONE CHECK
DAM, SEE NOTE
Tn
A9
p n m m
zZ�"Znm4
a01 uJ W0
Z =gig
i—mnw
r�Z ^myQ�LLE
►q m �,
3
C'A
44w�o�w¢�b`
GO

1
e
D
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FILL
�i.
EXTEND FABRIC _/-H 4
INTO TRENCH
NOTES:
1. USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32" IN WIDTH
AND WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF
WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING.
2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36"
IN WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO
THE WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
3. PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE
SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
Temporary Silt Fence
Q-
3,2/ Not ro Scale
6" MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS
STAKE (TYPK ( I TOP OF BANK
FILTER FABRIC
A
SpgC/� A A A
G A A A A
A A A
SANDBAG
TOE OF SLOPE (24" X 12" X 6")
OR STONE.
Plan View
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (700g/sm COI R) �T�c nF BANK
EXISTING GROUND e/L/�a�/��' "
ECOSTAKE(TYP)
OF
s o
8' MAX. WITH WIRE
w 4
N
(6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)
N
MIDDLE AND
c TOP AND
VERTICAL WIRES
BOTTOM
SHALL BE 12 }
STRAN
GAGE MIN.
SHALL BE 10
_TN
0.6"
TOE STAKE
GAUGE MIN.
20
Eco Stake
U U
WIRE
So9tantrten mfrs
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FILL
�i.
EXTEND FABRIC _/-H 4
INTO TRENCH
NOTES:
1. USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32" IN WIDTH
AND WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF
WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING.
2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36"
IN WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO
THE WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
3. PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE
SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
Temporary Silt Fence
Q-
3,2/ Not ro Scale
6" MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS
STAKE (TYPK ( I TOP OF BANK
FILTER FABRIC
A
SpgC/� A A A
G A A A A
A A A
SANDBAG
TOE OF SLOPE (24" X 12" X 6")
OR STONE.
Plan View
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (700g/sm COI R) �T�c nF BANK
EXISTING GROUND e/L/�a�/��' "
ECOSTAKE(TYP)
OF
s o
Section View
w 4
N
TOE STAKE (TYP
N
ECOSTAKE (TYP 'j 4 r
Sky Wikrn
\ 1.25"
N'suhork
T_ F o
Eldwbe ry
Ll
Strtaxthm
_TN
0.6"
TOE STAKE
Sip Swnnwm
20
Eco Stake
- nr-- dr -
n Erosion Control Matting
So9tantrten mfrs
3.2 Not to Scale
NOTE:
1. LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS SHOWN ON TYPICALS
AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
2. 3x3' AVG SPACING (2 STAGGERED ROWS AT TOP OF BANK, AS
SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW OF DETAIL)
3. LIVE STAKING SHOULD BE COMPLETED DURING THE DORMANT
SEASON, GENERALLY DECEMBER TO APRIL
LIVE STAKE (TYP) \ (- I 3' Max (Typ)
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
Lin "kes
Sdantse NNW
Ammon Noma
Comm amamun
Sky Dagrood
Salk serica
Sky Wikrn
Phyawrgs opuNdiur
N'suhork
Somi txxn caredorsis
Eldwbe ry
CephlaMhtn ocoidertalis
Strtaxthm
Section View
0
YO
LIVE STAKETYP ?q„ F BANK \y p
cc
-36 1/2" 1/2" TO 2" >
A DIAMETER a
w
O�
H D.
iry ¢
Live Stake Detail
Plan View TOE OF SLOPE
Live Staking_
k.L2j Not to Scale
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED gH'
WN IN SPOUT NOTE:
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
BAG PLACED ON,,,,,,,1. PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET to
AGGREGATED ORGH STRENGTH TO STREAMBED. Q ^
RAPPING DEWATERING BAG
STRAW. EXISTING TERRAIN o o �,o
R HOLDING HOSE x --o °p 4
o DEWATERING PLACE. m
9
�� WZhm d
BAG ;;t<ar,C•� •t :iv:} + �: ^ }a..�^.: �q. STREAM BED Z x w gn R
WATER FLOW STABILIZED OUTLET Q 0 m 5 u
FROM PUMP2 USING CLASS B ►a Z a LL E
15' .•i w s
'of CLASS B RIPRAP RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO
FLEXIBLE EXISTING
DISCHARGE HOSE FILTER FABRIC GROUND A MINIMUM
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING Inset "A" SIZE
1S'to 20' LOCATION TO BE
` Dewatering Bag DETERMINED IN THE
FLOW 10' MIN
HEIGHTVARIES(2'
MIN)
MAINTAIN V MIN. OF/FORINTAKEHOSE.
DIG SUMP 1' DEEP
FREEBOARD WHILE
PUMPING.
�APPROX.� DISCHARGE HOSE
3'
Inset "B"
Impervious Dike PUMP
INTAKE HOSE`
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
INTAKE
ACTIVE WORK AREA -
Plan View
3 Pum Around System
3.2 Not to Scale
sQRiparian Seeding
3.2 Not to Scale
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
"don Sid IMix
ING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
3"M Sant, Dahaasd Stiller rd LWW Amar
2 FILTER FABRIC.
PUMPEE
CDISCHARGE
See ft Rab: M Olncw
Saw Mulch 1,000
Spseia Name
Common Noma Prow"M
PaNctrn chwK onion
Dar Tatpn
20
Ardmpq)on grantii
Sip Swnnwm
20
Flyrm+tkpnicus
VIr"*11"
20
So9tantrten mfrs
tdirpraw
20
CAamanOwm la"urn
Rtw CiW
10
anon sinus
SaR Rush
10
sQRiparian Seeding
3.2 Not to Scale
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
1•
ING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
ERINGDOTTYPE
2 FILTER FABRIC.
PUMPEE
CDISCHARGE
INSET "C")
Saw Mulch 1,000
FILTER FABRIC FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE
&VMtop Mllot 10
FROM PUMP AROUND
PUMP HELD IN PLACE
20.1010 FoUlzr TSD
EWATERING BAG
LO
WITH SAND BAGS AS
Inset"C" NEEDED.
Ground Apiataaol Umsstone x,ow
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B' )
'X 5'STABILIZED OUTLET
1•
ING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
ERINGDOTTYPE
2 FILTER FABRIC.
PUMPEE
CDISCHARGE
INSET "C")
Saw Mulch 1,000
SILT FENCE
&VMtop Mllot 10
(SEE DETAILS/3.2)
20.1010 FoUlzr TSD
EWATERING BAG
HOSE
(SEE INSET "A")
SEEDING:
1. SEEDBED WILL BE AMENDED WITH TOPSOIL OR LIME ON AN AS
NEEDED BASIS
2. SEEDBED SHALL BE LOOSE AND FREE OF ROCKS AND DEBRIS
PRIOR TO SEEDING AND MULCHING
3. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED SHOULD BE APPLIED
TOGETHER IF PLANTING DATES ALLOW.
MULCHING:
1. 2 TONS PER ACRE
2. GRAIN STRAW PREFERRED, ALTERNATIVES SUCH AS LEAVES WILL
BE CONSIDERED UPON REQUEST
Twnpwory wNog On OWASpy Arnandmals b Sbam Ike"
1•
Two FLrMrrgIYt. fbhaal
Jon 1 -May ti
Rya Grain 120
d
Gmtm Aacul uLim.waa ZODD
20.10.10 Fsditw TW
Saw Mulch 1,000
May 15 -Aug 15
&VMtop Mllot 10
Ground AWbAural Limestone 2,000
20.1010 FoUlzr TSD
Straw Haan 1,000
>s - Die 30
Rya Grain 120
Ground Apiataaol Umsstone x,ow
2010.10 Ferdizer 1,00D
Straw Mulch 1,000
©Temporary Seeding and Mulching
OlNot to Scale
r,