20170507 Ver 1_WhiteOakCreek_PCN_Application_20170424_20170426

Kimley>>> Horn
April 24, 2017
Ms. Tasha Alexander
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 14 Applicafion — White Oak Creek Greenway
Town of Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of the Town of Cary, Kimley-Horn is submitting the attached application for authorization
under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 for the above referenced project. The Town of Cary, in
coordination with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), proposes the
construction of new greenway trail between MacArthur Drive and Davis Drive to connect two
previously disconnected sections of the White Oak Greenway. Kimley-Horn staff investigated the
project corridor in January 2014 and identified three wetlands (W1, W2, and W3) and two streams
(S1 and S2). A field review with both the USACE and NC DWR was conducted on February 27, 2014.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was issued by the USACE for the project on August 1,
2014 and NC DWR issued a Surface Water Determination Letter on February 27, 2014.
Impacts to the jurisdictional features have been minimized to the greatest extent practical, and a
boardwalk will be constructed through a majority of the corridor to avoid stream and wetland impacts
where crossings are necessary. In addition, Kimley-Horn plans to relocate Stream S2 to avoid the
placement of boardwalk piles in the thalweg and to improve the channelized feature by adding riffles
and stabilizing the banks through planting. Minor stream, wetland, and buffer impacts will result from
the construction of the greenway and boardwalk as well as the stream relocation.
The following information is included as part of this application:
• PCN Application Form
• Signed Agent Authorization
• Map Figures
• Stream and Wetland Data Forms
• Signed Preliminary JD
• NC DWR Buffer Determination Letter
• Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
Approval
• Permit Drawings
• Plan Sheets

Kimley>>> Horn
If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this NWP application,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-678-4155 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
� ,��=f v `---'
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: White Oak Creek Greenway - MacArthur Section
2b. County: Wake County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cary
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state C-5604 IB
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Town of Cary
3b. Deed Book and Page No. n/a (Linear Transportation Easement)
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Amy Mackintosh, PLA
applicable):
3d. Street address: 316 N. Academy Street
3e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27513
3f. Telephone no.: 919-460-4973
3g. Fax no.: 919-469-4344
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Pagelof12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: � Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jason Hartshorn, PWS
5b. Business name Kimley-Horn
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
5e. Telephone no.: 919-677-2000
5f. Fax no.: n/a
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
0743660161
0743683180
0743663975
0743676121
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0743676187
0743676386
0743676484
0743676595
0743771026
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.774552 Longitude: - 78.843063
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Crabtree Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the proposed project will occur in new locations that range from wooded natural areas to cleared and
maintained utility easements. The project corridor is bounded to the north, south, and east by high-density residential
housing, and to the west by Davis Drive Park. The project vicinity is composed primarily of inedium- to high-density
residential housing.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.54 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,432 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project will construct new greenway trail between MacArthur Drive and Davis Drive in order to link two
previously disconnected sections of the White Oak Greenway.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will construct approximately 0.4 miles of multiuse greenway path to include a grade-separated rail
crossing, a boardwalk for a majority of the length of the trail, and pedestrian signal and crossing improvements at the
Davis Drive at-grade crossing. The project will be constructed using excavators, skid-steers, pavers, and other equipment
typical of greenway projects.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
issued for the project on August 1, 2014 (USACE AID: SAW-
2014-00303).
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Jason Hartshorn Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
David Shaeffer of the USACE issued a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for the project on August 1, 2014 (USACE
AID: SAW-2014-00303). Additionally, Sara Knies of the NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination for the project on
February 27, 2014 (NBRRO#14-041)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
n/a
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland Type of jurisdiction
impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
number - (if known) DWQ - non-404, (acres)
Permanent other)
(P) or
Temporary
(T)
Site 1� P � Yes � Corps
� T CuUFill Headwater Forest � No ❑ pWQ 0.0159 (P)
Site 2� P Cut; Bottomland Hardwood � Yes � Corps 0.0902 (P)
� T Construction Access Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ 0.0274 (T)
Site 5❑ P ❑ Yes � Corps
� T Construction Access Headwater Forest � No ❑ pWQ 0.0075 (T)
Site 6� P CuUFill; Bottomland Hardwood � Yes � Corps 0.0223 (P)
� T Construction Access Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ 0.0902 (T)
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.1284 ac. (P)
0.1251 ac. (T)
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts will result from both permanent grading (cut/fill) and temporary construction access.
Temporary wetland impact areas disturbed for construction access will be stabilized by the use of mud mats during
construction.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact
impact (PER) or jurisdiction stream width length
number - intermittent (Corps - 404, (feet) (linear
Permanent (INT)? 10 feet)
(P) or DWQ - non-
Temporary 404, other)
(T)
Site 2❑ P goardwalk Construction Stream S2 ❑ PER � Corps 4 30
� T UT to Crabtree Creek � INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3� P Stream Relocation for Stream S2 ❑ PER � Corps 4 172.71
❑ T Boardwalk UT to Crabtree Creek � INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P goardwalk Construction Stream S2 ❑ PER � Corps 4 28.81
� T UT to Crabtree Creek � INT ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P Construction Access Stream S1 � PER � Corps 5 39.81
� T UT to Crabtree Creek ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 271.33
LF
3i. Comments: Stream S2 is an excavated channel (deep, encised feature, large spoil piles on both banks, linear flow) that
was likley dug as a drainage conveyance between residential developments. S2 will be impacted temporarily in two locations
to facilitate construction of two boardwalk crossings. A short reach of S2 will also be relocated by the project due to the narrow
size and deep depth of the stream channel, and its location between two residential areas. Boardwalk construction along S2
would impede or alter the flow of S2 and present long term maintenance challenges for the greenway. The Town is proposing
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

to relocate a reach of stream S2 using natural channel design to relocate the stream in a more natural location in the valley
and at a more stable cross section. Two riffle features will be constructed at the beginning and the end of the relocated reach
and the installation of live stake plantings will be utilized for bank stability. Stream S1 is a intermittent feature that will be
temporarily impacted to allow for construction access in two locations. Temporary construction access locations will be
stabilized using either 15" temporary pipe, or wood bridgemats.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact
— Permanent (acres)
(P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will result from the proposed construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total 0
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be constructed as part of the proposed project.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit
required? ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area n/a
(acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): n/a
5k. Method of construction: n/a
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
(T)
Buffer Site 1 goardwalk Construction Stream S2 ❑ Yes 2,707.66 (T) 0(T)
� P� T UT to Crabtree Creek � No 3,619.79 (P) 1,177.81 (P)
Buffer Site 2 Stream Relocation; Stream S2 ❑ Yes 5,514.43 (T) 580.71 (T)
� P� T Boardwalk Construction UT to Crabtree Creek � No 3,187.66 (P) 119.49 (P)
Buffer Site 3 Boardwalk/Greenway Stream S1 ❑ Yes 15,693.52 (T) 1,872.68 (T)
� P� T Construction UT to Crabtree Creek � No 5,493.94 (P) 2,695.71 (P)
Buffer Site 4 Construction Access; Stream S1 ❑ Yes 1,976.41 (T) 1,239.14 (T)
� P� T Boardwalk/Greenway UT to Crabtree Creek
Construction � No 67.34 (P) 272.21 (P)
6h. Total buffer impacts 25,892.02 (T) 3,692.53 (T)
12,368.73 (P) 4,265.22 (P)
6i. Comments: Impacts to buffers within the project area will primarily result from the construction of the boardwalk and
greenway. Permanent impacts will result from the clearing of forested buffers, the conversion to paved greenway trail, and the
stream relocation associated with this project. Temporary impacts will result from the boardwalk construction and temporary
construction access areas.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to streams, wetlands, and buffers in the project corridor have been avoided and minimized to the extent practical.
Impacts to streams and wetlands were avoided throughout most of the corridor by implementing a boardwalk trail design. The
implementation of the boardwalk design will allow streams and wetlands to remain continous. Additionally, the proposed
boardwalk height of 3' will prevent shading impacts. The stream relocation of S2 also avoids additional impact to the area by
avoiding impounding water or limiting baseflow by the installation of boardwalk piles within the narrow stream channel. Buffer
impacts were reduced through design by tightening the limits of disturbance to the greatest extent practical.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to streams, wetlands, and bufferes within the corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the
construction process by avoiding these features wherever possible. Where feasible, staging and construction access routes
will be located in upland areas. Tempoorary stream and wetland crossings will be protected with mud mats, wood bridgemats,
or pipes and riprap, and will be restored to pre-construction conditions upon completion of the project. Impacted and cleared
wetlands and buffers will be replanted and/or reseeded to the restore vegetation after construction. Additionally, tree protection
fencing, silt fencing, and other standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) and measures will be used throughout the
construction process to minimize impacts to downstream receiving waters and minimize runoff from the construction sites.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts ❑ Yes � No
to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: n/a
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type n/a Quantity n/a
3c. Comments: Mitigation is not required for this project due to the self-mitigating nature of the stream relocation of S2 and the
small amount of permanent impacts elsewhere in the corridor.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: n/a linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): n/a square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: n/a acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: n/a acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: n/a acres
4h. Comments: n/a
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that ❑ Yes � No
requires buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for
Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 0
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments: Greenway/hiking trails are listed as "Allowable" under the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rule: Table of Uses.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
Comments: n/a
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 18.5 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This project will not increase or collect
stormwater. Any stormwater concentrated by the greenway will be treated through the use of vegetated swales before
discharging through the buffers.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
n/a
� Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? The Town of Cary
� Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes � No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments: A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion was approved for the project on
February 24, 2017 and documentation is attached.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): n/a
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project will not result in additional development. The greenway and sidewalk facilities proposed will serve
existing communities and connect existing public locations.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from the poposed project.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
� Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS lists four federally protected species for this area: northern long-eared bat, Michaux's sumac, red-cockaded
woodpecker, and dwarf wedgemussel. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) element occurrence
database records (updated January 2017) did not identify any federally listed species occurrences within the study area
or within 1-mile of the project limits. Based on NCNHP records and the pedestrian survey conducted, the proposed
project will have "no effecY' on Michaux's sumac, red-cockaded woodpecker, and dwarf wedgemussel.
The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB)
(Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including
all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect,
Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section
7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which
includes Wake County, where C-56041B is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a
final listing determination through April 30, 2020.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on April 24, 2017. No essential fish habitat was found within the
project area or within the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service was reviewed on April 24, 2017 and no historic or
archaelogical resources were found to occur within 1.0 mile of the project area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: n/a
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM)
Panel 3720074300J (effective May 2, 2006) indicates there are no 100-year floodplains or FEMA regulatred floodways
within the study corridor.
Pagellof12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Jason Hartshorn, PWS G�� /��'� `—'�' 4/24/2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
ApplicanUAgent's Signature
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
FORM

Letter of Authorization
Ms. Sarah Alexander, with the Town of Cary authorizes Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to act as our limited agent to coordinate with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality for the
preparation and submittal of jurisdictional determinations and 404/401 permits
applications associated with the White Oak Creek Greenway project Iocated in
Wake County, North Carolina. Authorization will terminate on either final
agency action or upon written notification from either parties involved.
Company Name: Kimlev-Horn and Associates Inc
Contact Name: Jeff Moore. P.E.
Client Name: Sarah Alexander
Client Address: 316 N. Academv Street
Carv, NC 27513
Client Phone #: [phone]
Client Fax #: [phone]
Clieut EmaiL• sarah.alexander(r�townofcarv ore
(Signatu •e of Client) �--
%2 •ZO%3
Date

FIGURE S

Aq�qO/�A ; Nq
ti � � < !� �
N� �
o,�
� �G\\F DR
MINT HILL DR
�NOW CAMP p�
---�
� QG 1
�
I ��
� �m
/ 0�� ART , VR DR _— p�
\
►
� 54 � �
r
Project Location
i\ � �'' DISRAGLI DR
f � F-P'��.
O
/ �Q— \O�G��hB� ��
; Q., �_�1
/,,�
Q�
� ��0�
( Q� \ a
0
� ` e �� �
v,A � n y�p�, o
F< oR � ti�,� Q
� �� �
�
�
L �
�x., PP�ovP
sy2 Mo��
�
��
�-�
��
� 0 500 1,000 Feet
�
� h—V U G;—
`,�
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
White Oak Creek Greenway
Town of Cary, Wake County
January 2014

�.z ° ` �y "I/ _ � i �, , �° � 4 +�� ' f'� �.,��+, ��'� I� � r
..
. � � �—_ _ ,°, � r � - � „ � .
^L� �� N ,��- _ �. s -. .� i� . r' . `� �"+. � k
� �, ���"lr� J 4�. i `i
•�m���-�� � I� _�� � II _ i � � ��. b � + �
' `� �n�_`4'q I � ,r � �, .. '�t
,e^ ,P,._ .'` " _ � � � f. � . .
1�� � .4 i I
` �. �
��—.. „4, 5��`4i��.' ! ���� . � r . 1���. '�' � ..
...' � • � �1 H t �p .
4 y �� � r' . �-,r�
1 '�, � �
�� ~� d � i �� ,_a.-r��.4 - ',�.. 1 s � � - �{ -_� - .
+ � � � ` ,� Y �, I �"� .
_ � i I r� f s _ `�+ �r
`-�' p`+� l- _ • /' � - " ,� I M ,'r ,, •. . � •.� ",t���` �.;i� y !,P`-
" �.� . ��y4 � . .�r � �i � ` � � j P.
. r� . � '�'�''.. �' :
��,�, �'� f'�,� �.•' y a � t.., .� I...� � + r� 4� t -.
— 1, 'M � ' 4 ' � Y�4 • --- � i� _ r � M � �
. '•�� � � - � P ' ! � ?!�' � �` �� i'f a� • I • d .
' � ~s "'L�.. � � � r + I�'�� � I �,� -'� �� t .
� -� „ � �"i� w f . ��``� ,� ' 4 ...� � r: �� � , . j"d "
■ i '� . , u , + � i. � � "'_--.. . I ,
�� �� � '•��a. �1' � �� � � �� �'��r� r �� ��" 44 ��� � �p � �" � ` , � � � � .�r-
LL� : y� f d' ��. .� -. a s ^ I I
- � - _ �I y�*:;t • J`� !�S�°� +* i���� � � �� 4� �y �"e,.�� � • ( p�r �A �i
� � , .'� , � E + , � � �� -� a ' �
' �' �_ 4tM1 . ��'� , a.,� J� V }� � �� �'' �� . � �'� ,/� a
i�5 �p 1• . �i� � � ''1. �
�.:. .'t� I _ �!� . .� �\Y �r��� f; �. ��� � ��:� �� �1 t_� �� ���' .
� �s., J � ,{ n+h j � �r ��
�� � � N i .�
, I �yI ,f��� ((�� y, � _
+s I� �`'�� ���{� � - �� � ffl�y � � � 1 � � �_�#� � _. Ff � #+ ,r� �Jr
_ ¢' ,. ,� .�,� � � f � � �"� � � ���� _ �
��, � ' � � �'y�,� � �� �'� �" � � � _ _ r � � �f� �' � ,V� ,�, ``�� - �0.
J vq ✓`�� .�•+� �..�. � z � � � � - �''� �_ � -,�� ,�'� 4e il
���I k�"'�,,.��s � x,:9 ': � y- +a � � '�� � ' �,.
'� � �� .� , }
I . ,� b ^�._ °, . ', I �'• ,�'� ,� � � f z
� M� � i M .F �. . a � ��,V '�7 � - ) �'� � j'` ..t � 1� 5
: i �y �� rF� I � � � — " � r r �,�'� F � �� � r ��h, .� .
� ' ' _ � . �-�'` , f �' "5 � �'-.
�, A l .,� � �, .,�' q. 1� v
:� I v�` � �'� — �P� ��y � .���,. i � '
�, , �, k � � ,� � � f „"—.y � ,�'
. ,�. -�,a ' �.: `n `I �,".`� v" . �.�.,_� ,� S '�`� � �� y��� f � r�" : � 1� .
' �- '�r,�) ' �1,,. . J '�:�... ��._ '�p ,/' � fr' � � w�� �"� p���'�s '1��
. q , _ ; $�
•r�° j � ^. '� � � ��� - ���"� . .� � _ �..� i_�` _ :�`�, � �F� _ �^,,� � ��`
r' 1 '`
',,r� *� � � -� � y I` '•ro � -�,i ,v- � � + �� _ ��� r) �"�� 's, - -
' °�'� —'° � � ��+�+ '.�► M1 ti �� � �" i —' '+,!° .�
�� � i t . - .F .. .���F r f � ��.. � '�� 1 I� �� # �i� ��{� ��' � �dS� ��'� .
�= I � _ �'� ' - _ � �, r � � r� �' -
_ �� � w+` � 4.; � i
■ 4� �`4'�= • � �_ 9-� I � �4 `'u ��� ��� ± �� �� � f - s..� � _
J.r, � �' ' T� � ` a
� �.,� j ' � � ~ , ,,� � ' a ���k � �'y, �+� �� �'� n4�
��� � . � 1�� -� ,�_� �
. �; — �T ,
A v �• � .S1� ` . � ..� F '��� LL _
. * 44� ,y � `� � - +„� ` , � � _. � � ' � Y " �� 1�q �? _ � _ .�,•�"' . .��'-� ��1 � �',h �. . .
. � 1 i . . . �; � ■ i � � �i; ii� � ' a. . � .
. I ��M1 L� 1 "� :rL� y ` � 1 i _ .
.�� � a �� ��( ' � '�� ' " _� "'•y� JI' ✓�} � j
F f S ( i� f� .� � �4. � �4.
�,'� � i�+'�'r �I �7 � �i - � f� — - - 'r 5� , � ^i ~,,�h� � e,�l�� F�, ��'"��' ��� �:•�b��� � r
� I ��, � 5 5 I � `�+-``'' �-� � ' � 5 � d � �irf���. .,q,y� �� �r.
e� ' � �X � P s+. �
� - I� � {� '��lv r ' ��'�rB. � ��_ ' . i ,s y� _ �� e,'�
�r .1� �r � ��,,.��� - . �,-.R. tl _ � ` '� ,' y _ �� �pf y..'�-�,r •
f ��f t �`._ - - y'•_ ' d .- 4 ' �' � ,� C f '' z=�t 1
,r � :te,y�. � > ' i � ' f ' � � � � '� � � � �� :� ���
��,r''�,��„��-.. -= r� ;��� . �' = � r h . _ �
''` �,t`�{�` �''•'�� ?_ N I�,,�-. _ �* r a _ • il � r�#°l''�� '� .� '� e, 1
'-�'`r }� � ���' _''+, ' `�s` �`�I � �r � �•- �;�1 �.+ ;`�` 11 "' �•`�1` : • ,r�ff j� ����'�� �
��� +A �� M ,' �a � � , I �y �� �
'�r r" � - a,� �� ' l '` 4 ' I� ='� ''��, y vs� ;� I - ' � `� � ,°. +
� � c--m� •• �S — '"+_ � " � � I y� ��" �
�.� 4� � �X�� ._ $,.44y1h1 Iy Y. � 4����'' �� ��� , �a� �,p �8° r� s� �' ��~ � 1 ,� . `�+�I
� a r �'_ - ' . � �;� � � � ,r" r - ^�
. � ,, -- t � ,
� � . - 1 �1,+ h �� i a� _� .�- ,. . -- �"' w� ; �.. ��� .� � � � - - � �1 � .° ,
� ~�h � � �`;-^ 4 � , °� ° - � ` d� '� 'S''7 tl �
.�" aF � 1+ Y ��. fi,r i J' r
-� .�� � �r r - �� g � � l t t � .- ���^�` � = d
-,�. °. i '� �' u � � 5 �, _" � y ' �,.
� �'�'�'y' . I " p ����� _ � i_ ���� ��� !� !'s i" �FJ�_ ;�� = ay y r,l 6 . 'iti�• �
� ` . -��'��'., � � V IL/ f�/ �,A .�- _ _ I '�• � =,t' F � � �'
.1 4 "-�` s' r °- � � �y ,�
�'•„ � rt. � \\�'% � e. I _. 41� �' �'� ;� f^ 4� �� �r` �l j,.
�;,g,4 �i �i �� f „ . — - '�`�.� - � ;;� - �,��ir� �,, ��,� 0 500 1,000 Feet
p � �, _ � �
° �'�`-�� ' V � : . ,,�• �� �� �_�� `��.} � {� � z� =�r �� � � �
� ' ;� . �' " t { ' � , r , � t .�, : �-•' � �
- �,-� , � , i" , ��`�� � , � ,:� � ` d� � �:�a - � _ ° ;' � �' ti , � Legend
.� -,... � ;.�, � , f---`•��, _ , � ' � � � `r��. � a '��i
� ^ ,r..��. �
' � . � '��`�� � �� � '', oa' � ��i i���� �� � �X �' - `�° � PrOJeCt StUdy Area
� . 'y q�' ,f , � � �
— � '� -;� pt' � �'� � f� '�i � — y� ���+
, ' � F
��j—�\ Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map (Cary Quad, 1987)
H � i White Oak Creek Greenway
��
�- ,// Town of Cary, Wake County
��
January 2014

�` '' - -0 �i�e -'�c1� e y"w ,-. .'� ,%�y'�.� . � II `�C �FM� hi �'' ' 1 S� � � '�`�. . (y,�sc� �� ` +,�6 fe.
. ��' � � wj';- � . � - � 1S w ' �4 �^s a l ,/� V
���� �1 :_s.� �� � ar �� % ,�1- � � �� E r �`' � � � ' i! \ .
N �+.�'S `+ � k J°�`' � w � �n' r t�, ` ' R t I�'i��3 G` '� 1 Y. t �`
-�`. +' � � � ' .'�' � ��� r�� +-n{�� S
� �' � �:'M w � � r �m+; Z a y 1,� � � '* ,
r: , .
{, � � . �
.
,
-
t t � ': . '�.. .Ilt ,. � ♦ � �. �. ' � .. M � �y �: � �
� ��
"'' ,�' �', ��'��` � '" � ''`�" , .� � vJ �" " .` ��r d►� �.
, � . � ��. �� � � �,� F� _
,
e , 2,� r s�. t> ! � ,�¢� .�
�+, �
� � �. ,� - .�� . Z,. ��W .�.� � y� p-�9.p '�:. ,::F .;1E.� g fJJ� J vn} .
R' � .� y�� v� � � .�? .. ,� � � +!'.y �� ��� ,� %�" � 4 'i.F � � .. `� � � �/����� � ` t �
�S' �, -� . � , �r �� @. ,�� 1' ?°'� �a '� � _ IA y _ �,`. _ _ �'
�..�� �,�,i.,, { �i ,a. _ b; �./ , �. .',7 ` -�'4 � �!� t•� ' � .� �o_� �A � q '•�I, :� � �.
x `4 r � � : r - � x a1! n�
t,� 1}� 1 �a �� ri�.�. �.��, � . ♦ ��,', �r� �� ��r�✓� D�.
� � .`l�� A, l� ��� ��`.�l +� ��'' 'r� , ,i.. �1, 4r.�� T. . ' l� � M, �.. r���#�
4T� �i. � .. . y ^ . � ;�.. � � �� tt� �r.t .I �� e�� I�1. � S�S
�` c ��'� � ��,��~�� �,� ' � _ � . �"'"'' 1 ' { . �- M� � � ,.�j� � " � � �� ����h.
� -�`,�r;. �'v� �,. � + �-. 1 ,�rd3 ���. _� � '� 7 :R. �,+� :.� . .a • yt �k DA� �� F�� (q' l.�t.
t 211,- ��4F�° +� � .. i� *�[_. 1 { ' '�' \ � �� ,��4�1 w � - ti , .;� �. � � � I��iK�
"�,����t�'�'�� t5�'.` j. yy�.' �'1 �i" \�a, ',`' t �� > .� . ��'fr ..i i
� J"�•��, .� � •��)�!� ' .� �, r� r . �..
4 � �P�� ,�//��� ` ^ t� 1 '.O �q�y R �I( � � ��''Ip11" � w �,a ��4:�' , � Acdv Y .I.. �� F }!�9 J , ��``
� rk., �t��'•1 '•� A,� C� �. � - P�� �,� �� � � � �i ``� �; . ' `�, x����' . ,ak � �
, �� � � .. z q , � "�,�.�` � _ y; ' ti,� ".,�, � �
� �" _ � ` � "�i �, v �'� � ,� 'y�; . � . v � �. � ' y � � � j �, � , �
n � �'
� �1-� .� ,� e � . ,� � �'�,_ ., � 1�'�' ' ��N� g;� . 1 y�i.
- `:`, � a �. .�"e � ` -b d- ._Y� s 9 �r �5�'�� jl � �
��� l. � '- �� r'+i ��`�n, � t ro,.� �a �;n. � , � i I .
'� �¢J �����' �?'��� �a��� � �n "r ���,,J "'k � s �`����ib , . -
a
� � � a �� ry� ,.. ,��.;�YM l`� � � ' � 3;1' yy �..�,` ' � � 1 L _� «� � � '1 � .
� � �{'i�¢� �'� �L.\ - ! `�� � .'.I , a . �j�'u` ..i�`� � ";, .�" ya �� r
. \ ,F ` . i_ L .,` � . i7F i�,. . 1 "' -� k : �'e�y � � � �,y � �� � - !
�. R , it � N 1, � ��. 4 � '�
k�
� K: . '+, M � � : � �l�� AS �� 4 � � � � �� L�
F. ! �. .�: a�� r��� � _ �'r' . �� L �`+• F � a Fhi ��� • + �� 1�,; 1 ,c,K :
'�� � a '� "` .,,� ^ p .� �, PC. `; �� �!, �' "�+�
1 B ' .• �' � , � ,f 2 � lr�. � .� F `Y �,�. � d � j"�'� �j � A � `�� �' 4 '�. �M, j,�
�':� { � 1 i "k,' a -� • ..� � � <+ ,r'~ v ,� �I ` , � ^' .��'�� " �� �ti n` � , � �
� �ip� i � � > �;`�, ,- - � ', ,. �i.,y �` , � - 1 • _ � �
� �F ` t � �, ` � R .. - � x C�E''.�
:�i!�� + j •�PS� �E` �; Y��.y. f: �'��. . , "��•1 �� �` ����.M�f ..h t ��f'aiOK����,
.. � �11, � :� . � � fT ��'���'��
� .� � � ���, �` �' �f � �`� � ; ����� �� � � � �
+` �t ' ' ,; S ' � � ` , s: � - "�, a�t �'� -'1j� �;��'.
�'���� • ,sf,�
�- �,. �� ,� ., � _,� �� �� `. " ' �`,�'�i '�^. .�� •''
� �°.� �4 � � M � � � � r �,� � � ;�� `� t �A N , �..
I� t, �;, l,+i� , �.?� � �� � ��"I� '�h - .�;; '� ' ,r�� ,r,;. �� A� �'�
,"` �t, �. '• ti��- �. i �� r '�" ' .�, '� � �,
.
_ �. , � ; _. '. y .
��� �1 r ,. � , `_ � �' -`..:.��� �',�!' �� � .� .. - �.�y/ ���\s .. 1 -�• �.
� �! y,
� � ,� .�, : �-�"=•�r �,; ,� ^ : d � . X
�r ' ' ;� . ." p � ��'. � �`-,!�,� �� �'; � �
Q � i � y t� � , �4«�7' `} � 3� '1 �T� : .' . ! ` �
' '" ' c 7 #L� . I:i'�j� �+�t�� � � ��F��� ,.� � ' I p a��e��
�a � y� _�� ��� r L � � i � ����i�.
� • a�"i'� Y Rf � . Y„ � ,�i.,.� , ' �4t� ��r � ��J-�� . - �/y �� ?�1
ti � #L�.i r i Iyy���� �// �
� � �i�, .A . � � i � _ � l,,. �_.1{�, r � �� ; ?�� '',YI �� � �; �. �� � ; • ; t' � � �' f , �111%(� # ....
t -, � � . � i°Fx . . . c. . , M+hfiP . . ll" r. .� , �a! ` � �
^^' f ' [ +. �'�` � �... � �� r• '"�. .- � , �G � ��;
.� f, � �, �, � �.
p k. � �`� . �, f �; ' .� � '� .;� _ , �
,
,
�� �i _ 14 �'�1 ' .. � �: , ' � '� J� a�..� � . . �� � � �, ai' •� � 4 F
�
;;.� , k _°-� � .,.. i i:. � � � > •*�` �r j � � k�.�`a � ��1�. �eh, �:��� ' �
: �,� - � T�� � � � .�� W ► 4�� � ; i e'�'.'"� '� ��� �. fl , ,�� � � �
� �J �� �-.1�- � � i � ��(t �
�f �, ��1,,, C�� - � ,�� � �;j,���,,� ' " t, ,;
��� yJ � _ ",��a �v.'�'��`~.r , �,�'. ��. „�p � :� � 4 7 ' �`�'Y �� � �.� � • � �� �. �
"�.. �• � �:�� { `''�' .. �i'' � � � � .l�+�"� � �� � 4� � � ��1�
� r� � w .�"i__�_ " yy ' � 9 � . ,�„ ,y;�'�. '� k _
� � �� { � �: 1� � �� �k.. � % -��k � � � y��Y"'' _�I '��q{� � h
' � � . � ' 1'>,'�. '�,� .- . . _ 3 �¢ � �� t . , E. �� .
� 1�•- - '�`^` � ^ �d4.Y,r £ � y i i �I � �^�� v, i '_w .�� i
� � � � � �. _i� ' � '��%�_ _ ,� Y �� �� ^ � 'r � '. .' - -
� ' � � -�; � �; ��""�';.�� Le end
�, V ��� b i t, ���' �' '��"�,� r.s� -`� g
� ��� ^,�- ' � �� y, � .
,,�' �, � . � ' - � .�`��'` �� � � �`� Ephemeral Stream
� � � �
:.r � '-�� .,�` � ` '� ;�~ �,���'- `� �� �^- Intermittent Stream "
� ,� ��� � � - ,`�' ; '��! a � `, Wetlands
,>
i � ' {4 . „�'�„
' 0 200 400 Feet R µ '� ,� , s Project Study Area ;�
,� �: �s�� �
:, ,
. , , ,� - �,� � , ;,:
� � �t � �r. ,ti. � d � �,. �,,� � � �rs ,E e���,�1�
+� �: � -
��.�—
j�\ Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map (2010 Aerial Photo)
���) i White Oak Creek Greenway
�(�- ,// Town of Cary, Wake County
��
January 2014

Wetland and Stream
D ata Fo rms

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 1/21/2014 Project/Site: White Oak Grnwy Latitude: 35.775282
Stream S1
Evaluator: � Hartsnorr, (KHa), County: Wake Longitude: -78.842474
R. Sullivan (KHA)
Total Points: 21.5 Stream Deter ' ' circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemer Intermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if> 19 or perennial if>_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 7 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 0
pool sequence -
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = g
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
S1 is an intermittent headwater stream that eventually empties into Crabtree
Creek. S1 has very little sinuousity and has experienced some channelization
where the slope becomes steep. The stream corridor runs between two rows
of houses and is mostly clear of woody vegetation. S1 flows through a utility
corridor and was recently maintained through mowing.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 1/21/2014 Project/Site: White Oak Grnwy Latitude: 35.774542
Stream S2
Evaluator: � Hartsnorr, (KHa), County: Wake Longitude: -78.843923
R. Sulliavn (KHA)
Total Points: 18 S etermination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemera ntermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if> 19 or perennial if>_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 8.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence -
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
S2 is a headwater ephemeral stream that eventually drains into a UT to
Crabtree Creek. S2 begins at a culvert outlet carrying storm water beneath the
Durham and Southern railroad. S2 does not have a primary consolidated flow
path within the headwater wetland W 1, but downstream of the wetland S2 has
historically channelized.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2 °y,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: �
1. Applicant's name:TOWCI Of Ca�/ 2. Evaluator's name: �• Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 01�21�ZO14
s. Name ofstream: White Oak Grnwy - Stream S1
7. Approximate drainage area: 49.1 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 81S feet
4. Time of evaluation: 1:30 pm
6. River basin: NeUSe
8. Stream order:, FII'St OI'd21'
io. coun�y: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n�d
La�i�ude �eX. s4.s�z3 �z�: 35 J75282 Longi�ude �eX. -��.ss66� 1�: -78 • 842474
Metbod location determined (circle): �PSO✓ I'opo Shee ✓t�rtho (Aerial) Pboto/GIS�ther GIS�ther
13. Location of reacb under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
The reach runs under MacArthur Drive, south of the intersection of Stokesay Court.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): n�a
is. Re�em Weacner �ona�t�ons: Temperature between 27 and 60 degrees Farenheit with clear dry conditions.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cl2al', temperature in the low 30's Fahrenheit.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,�Section 10 �Tidal Waters �,Essential Fisheries Habitat
nTrout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters nWater Supply Watershed , (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 90 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
10 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 5� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3�
24. Channel slope down center of stream: �Flat (0 to 2%) �Gentle (2 to 4%) �Moderate (4 to 10%) �Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: �Straight �Occasional bends �Frequent meander �Very sinuous �Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown far the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scares should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments:
S1 is an intermittent headwater stream that eventually empties into Crabtree Creek. S1 has very little sinuosity and has
experienced some channelization where the slope becomes steep. The stream corridor runs between two rows of houses and
is mostly clear of woody vegetation. S1 flows through a utility corridor and was recently maintained through mowing.
Evaluator's Signature �`�''`9 "' `�a'"�''`9 �"�r'' Date O 1/21/2O 14
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

White Oak Grnwy - Stream S1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saniration = 0; strong flow = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(extensive alteration = 0; i�o �lteration = �nax �oints)
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) Q— C 0— 4 0— 5 1
Evidence of nutrient or chemical clischarges
4 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
,.� Groundwater discharge
5 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
d' (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, weNands, etc. = max points)
� Presence of adjacent floodplain
� 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2 2
�
� Entrenchment / tloodplain access
� � (deeply ei�trenched = 0; frequent flooding = inax points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 2
Presence of adjacent wetlands
� no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max oints) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 2
Channel sinuosity
9 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = 0; nariiral meander = max oints)
� � Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sedimei�t = max poii�ts)
�� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA 0— 4 0— 5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) * 1
Evidence of channel incision or widening
�; �� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banl<s = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 1
� Presence of major bank failures 2
13 0-5 0-5 0-5
I� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banlcs = max poiuts)
� Root depth and density on banks
14 (no visible roots = 0; de��se roots throughout = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 1
E�
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max poii�ts)
16 Presence of riftle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 1
� no riffles/ri les or pools = 0; well-develo ed = max points)
� Habitat complexity
� ]7 0-6 0-6 0-6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� Canopy coverage over streambed
l8 0-5 0-5 0-5 1
(no shadin = vegetation = 0; continuous cai�opy = max poii�ts)
� 9 Substrate emUeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 1
(dee 1 embedded = 0; loose sn�uchire = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
�� (no evidence = 0; common, n�i�nerous rypes = max points) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 �
�Presence of amphibians
21 0-4 0-4 0-4 �
O (no evidence = 0; conlmon, nun�erous rypes = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
Evidence of'wildlife use
23 0—( 0-5 0-5 3
(no evide��ce = 0; abundant evide��ce = max poii�ts)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 37
* These c{�aracteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2 °y,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: �
1. Applicant's name:TOWCI Of Ca�/ 2. Evaluator's name: �• Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 01�21�ZO14
s. Name ofstream: White Oak Grnwy - Stream S2
7. Approximate drainage area: 4.6 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 617�
4. Time of evaluation: 2:00 pm
6. River basin: NeUSe
8. Stream order:, FII'St OI'd21'
io. coun�y: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n�a
La��de �eX. 34.s�z3�z�: 35J74542 Longi�de �eX.-��.ss66�1�: -78•843923
Method location determined (circle): �PSO✓ I'opo Sheet�rtho (Aerial) Photo/GIS�ther GIS�ther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
The reach between Barthel Dr. and Covington Square Dr. runs under the Durham and Southern RR Tracks.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): n�a
is. Re�em weatner �ona�t�ons: Temperature between 27 and 60 degrees Farenheit with clear dry conditions.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cleal', temperature in the low 30's Farenheit.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,�Section 10 �Tidal Waters �Essential Fisheries Habitat
nTrout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters ,� Nutrient Sensitive Waters nWater Supply Watershed , (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: $� % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
20 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 4� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2�
24. Channel slope down center of stream: �Flat (0 to 2%) �Gentle (2 to 4%) �Moderate (4 to 10%) �Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: �Straight �Occasional bends �Frequent meander �Very sinuous �Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown far the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scares should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 34 Comments:
S2 is a headwater ephemeral stream that eventually drains into a UT to Crabtree Creek. S2 begins at a culvert outlet carrying_
storm water beneath the Durham and Southern railroad. S2 does not have a primary consolidated flow path within the
headwater wetland W1, but downstream of the wetland S2 has historically channelized.
Evaluator's Signature ��°�12 `���°�"�'�' Date O1/21/2014
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

White Oak Grnwy - Stream S2
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saniration = 0; strong flow = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 1
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; i�o �lteration = �nax �oints)
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) Q— C 0— 4 0— 5 1
Evidence of nutrient or chemical clischarges
4 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
,.� Groundwater discharge
5 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
d' (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, weNands, etc. = max points)
� Presence of adjacent floodplain
� 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2 1
�
� Entrenchment / tloodplain access
� � (deeply ei�trenched = 0; frequent flooding = inax points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 1
Presence of adjacent wetlands
� no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max oints) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 2
Channel sinuosity
9 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = 0; nariiral meander = max oints)
� � Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sedimei�t = max poii�ts)
�� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 1
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widenina
�; �� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banl<s = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 1
� Presence of major bank failures
i3 o-s o-s o-s 4
I� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banlcs = max poiuts)
� Root depth and density on banks
14 (no visible roots = 0; de��se roots throughout = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 2
E�
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max poii�ts)
16 Presence of riftle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 1
� no riffles/ri les or pools = 0; well-develo ed = max points)
� Habitat complexity
� ]7 0-6 0-6 0-6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� Canopy coverage over streambed
l8 0-5 0-5 0-5 1
(no shadin = vegetation = 0; continuous cai�opy = max poii�ts)
� 9 Substrate emUeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 1
(dee 1 embedded = 0; loose sn�uchire = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
�� (no evidence = 0; common, n�i�nerous rypes = max points) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 �
�Presence of amphibians
21 0-4 0-4 0-4 �
O (no evidence = 0; conlmon, nun�erous rypes = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
Evidence of'wildlife use
23 0—( 0-5 0-5 2
(no evide��ce = 0; abundant evide��ce = max poii�ts)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 34
* These c{�aracteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC Sampling Point: W1-UP
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range: Cdly
Hillslo e None o °
Landform (hillslope, terrao p Local relief (concave, convex Slope (/o): 2��
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P � 35.774514 N �ong: 78•844771 W Datum: NAD 1983
soii MaP unit Name: MfC2-Mayodan Sandy �oam
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes No �
The sampling point is located approximately 50' east of railroad at the toe of a south facing hillslope.
Recent conditions have been dry, with 0.0" of rainfall recorded by NOAA/NWS in the last 72 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No II Depth (inches): �
� � No n Depth (inches): 24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
Saturation Present. Yes
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators were observed at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum _ 30% Y FAC
2�Liquidambar styraciflua 20% Y FAC
g Liriodendron tulipifera 15% N FACU
q�Ulmus alata 10% N FACU
5�Prunus serotina 5% iv FACU
6.
7.
8.
Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1. nce-r � �b� wrr�
2 �Viburnum prunifolium
3 �Quercus nigra
4. Vacciniumfuscatum
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1. none
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� .Lonicera japonica
Z.Campsis radicans
3.Smila� rotundifolia
4.
5.
6.
80°�o = Total Cover
Sampling Point: W1-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species g5.7%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
_ 5% Y FA� FAC species x 3=
_ 5% Y FACU FACU species x 4=
_ 2% N FAC UPL species x 5=
2% N FAC Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
14% _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�% = Total Cover
5% Y FAC
2% Y FAC
2% Y FAC
g% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5" 7.5YR 4/3 100% Clay Loam
5-24" 10YR 5/8 100% Loamy Clay
24-30" 10YR 6/6 100% Sand Saturated
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
8 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at this sampling location. Saturation was present at 24", but
the water table was not observed within the upper 30".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC Sampling Point: W1-WET
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range Cary
Landform (hillslope, terrao BOttOmldnd Local relief (concave, convex Concave Slope (%): � 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P 35.774481 N �ong: 78•844438 W Datum: NAD 1983
soii MaP unit Name: MfC2-Mayodan Sandy Loam
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
The sampling point is located approximately 20' inside of flag W1-13. The sampling point is in a low
lying bottomland. Recent conditions have been dry, with 0.0" of rainfall recorded by NOAA/NWS in the
last 72 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches): 6
Water Table Present. Yes ✓ No II Depth (inches): ��
� � No n Depth (inches): 3�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
Saturation Present. Yes
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
The data point location was taken within a headwater wetland depression adjacent to rail road
tracks. Soils were saturated at 3", with the water table observed at 6".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�.Liquidambarstyraciflua 40% Y FAC
z. Acer rubrum 20% Y FAC
g Quercus alba 10% N FACU
q�Liriodendron tulipifera 10% N FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
80°�o = Total Cover
Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�. Ulmus alata 10% Y FACU
2�Ilex opaca 1(l% Y FAC
3�Quercus phellos 10% Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1. none
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�.Gelsemium sempervirens
Z,Lonicera japonica
3.Smila� rotundifolia
4.Vitis rotundifolia
Sampling Point: W1-WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: $ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species g], 5%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
3�% _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�% = Total Cover
5% Y FAC
5% Y FAC
5% Y FAC
2% N FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6• Present? Yes � No
17% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Canopy cover was well established at W1-Wet, with no herbaceous species observed during site visit.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 2.5Y 4/2 100% Loam
3-20" 2.5Y 6/2 60% 7.5Y 6/6 40 C M Sandy Clay
20-30" 2.5Y 6/1 70% 7.5YR 5/8 30 C M Sandy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
8 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Soils were saturated at 3", and the water table was observed at 6".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC Sampling Point: W2-UP
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range Cary
Hillslo e Convex o °
Landform (hillslope, terrao p Local relief (concave, convex Slope (/o): 6/o
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P _ � 35.776250 N �ong: 78•842215 W Datum: NAD 1983
so�i MaP ur,�t Name: WsC2-White Store sandy ioam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes No �
The sampling point is located on a maintained road fill slope west of MacArthur Drive. Recent
conditions have been dry, with 0.0" of rainfall recorded by NOAA/NWS in the last 72 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No II Depth (inches): �
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the data point location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�. Ulmus alata 30% Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1. none
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� Festuca sp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1.none
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
30% = Total Cover
�% = Total Cover
100% Y
1��% = Total Cover
�% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W2-Up is a maintained roadside fill slope.
FAC
Sampling Point: WZ-�P
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 50%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species _100 x 3= 300
FACU species 3� x 4= 12�
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 130 �q� 420 �g�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.23
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Sampling Point: WZ-UP
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2" 7.5YR 3/3 100% Clay Loam
2-24" 2.5Y 6/6 30% Clay Split Matrix
7.5YR 5/6 40% Clay Split Matrix
2.5Y 6/2 30% Clay Split Matrix
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
BPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
There were no indicators observed at the sampling point. W2-Up is a roadside fill slope.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC Sampling Point: W2-WET1
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range Cary
Swale Concave o °
Landform (hillslope, terrace, Local relief (concave, convex Slope (/o): 2��
Subregion (LRR or ML LRR P 35.775759 N �ong: 78•842314 W Datum: NAD 1983
so�i MaP ur,�t Name: WsC2-White Store Sandy Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
This sampling point is located in a wet swale that runs between two rows of houses. The area
appears to be a maintained easement (recently mowed). There is surface water present throughout
the wetland, and soils are saturated at surface throughout the wetland area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Prese�t? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 8
��
WaterTable Present. Yes ✓ No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): SUCfdC2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation was present at the surface throughout the wetland, and the water table was observed at
8". W2 is bounded by topographic breaks on all sides.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
1. none
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1. none
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size 3�� )
� Festuca sp.
Z. Lamium purpureum
g. Rumex crispus
4 �Allium canadense
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1.none
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0% = Total Cover
�% = Total Cover
30%
15%
10%
2%
Y FAC
Y NI
N FAC
N FACU
57% = Total Cover
�% = Total Cover
Sampling Point: WZ-WET1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The vegetative community at W2-Weti is significantly disturbed due to location within a utility easement. Natural
vegetation is better represented by W2-Wet2.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WZ-WET1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8" 10YR 4/2 95% 10YR 5/8 5% C M Clay Loam
8-24" 2.5YR 6/2 70% 7.5YR 6/8 30% C M Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
8 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Soils were saturated at the surface, and the water table was observed at 8".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC _ Sampling Point: W2-WET2
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range Cary
Landform (hillslope, terrac BOttOmldnd Local relief (concave, convex Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P 35.776082 N �ong: 78•84203 W
so�i MaP ur,�t Name: WsC2-White Store Sandy Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
_ Slope (%); <1%
Datum: NAD 1983
Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
This sampling point is located in the forested area adjacent to the easement and south of sampling
point W2-WET1. The forested area's eastern boundary is MacArthur Drive. The area is low lying and
appears to be composed of plants typical of a bottomland hardwood forest community.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
✓ Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Prese�t? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 2
��
WaterTable Present. Yes ✓ No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): SUCfaC2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
W2-Wet2 is a forested bottomland adjacent to the maintained easement. This data point
inventories the forested community that was likely present within W2 prior to the construction of
the easement. Similar to W2-Weti, soils were saturated at the surface and the water table was
observed at a depth ot Z".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum 30% Y FAC
2�Pinus taeda 20% Y FAC
g Fra�inus pennsylvanica 15% Y FACW
q�Carya tomentosa 10% N NOnInd
5.
6.
7.
8.
75°�o = Total Cover
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� .Fra�inus pennsylvanica 10%
Z Acer rubrum 10%
3 � Ulmus alata 10%
4. Elaeagnus pungens 2%
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Sampling Point: WZ-WET2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species g5.7%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
Y FACW FAC species x 3=
Y FAC FACU species x 4=
Y FACU UPL species x 5=
N NonInd Column Totals: (A) �s�
32% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� .Lonicera japonica 10%
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Y FAC
1�% = Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Canopy cover at W2-Wet2 was well established and the understory was comprised of various sapling and shrub species.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WZ-WET2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1" 10YR 3/2 100% Sandy Clay Loam
1-12" 2.5Y 6/2 70% 7.5YR 6/8 30% C M Sandy Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
8 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Below 12", the soil was too wet for removal and analysis. Soils were saturated at the surface and
the water table was observed at a depth of 2".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC Sampling Point: W3-UP
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range Cary
Landform (hillslope, terrac Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P �
soii MaP unit Name: MfC2-Mayodan sandy loam
Local relief (concave, convex Convex Slope (%): � 1%
35.774164 N �ong: 78•84496 W Datum: NAD 1983
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes No �
The sampling point is located on the west side of the train tracks east of the Davis Drive Park parking
lot. The sampling point is approximately 20' south of the wetland boundary. Recent conditions have
been dry, with 0.0" of rainfall recorded by NOAA/NWS in the last 72 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No II Depth (inches): �
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
There were no wetland hydrology indicators observed at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�. Pinus taeda _ 20% Y FAC
2�Liquidambar styraciflua 20% Y FAC
g Quercus phellos 20% Y FAC
q�Diospyros virginiana 10% N FAC
5�Acer rubrum 10% N FAC
6.
7.
8.
80°�o = Total Cover
Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�. Pinus taeda i� o � v �h�
Z�Ulmus alata 10% Y FACU
3�Liquidambar styraczflua 5% N FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
1. none
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Sampling Point: W3-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species g5.7%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
3�% _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
11.
12.
�% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�.Lonicerajaponica 10% Y FAC
Z,Smila� rotundifolia 10% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
20% = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Canopy cover was well established and the understory was sparsely vegetated.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth
�inchesl
0-1��
1-14"
14-24"
24-30"
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moistl % Color (moisU % Tvoe' Loc2
2.5Y 3/3 100%
2.5Y 5/6 100%
2.5Y 6/2 70% 2.5Y 7/6 30%
2.5Y 7/1 90% 7.5YR 5/6 10%
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: W3-UP
Texture Remarks
Sandy Loam
Sandy Loam
Loamy Sand
Clay
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
8 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
There were no indicators observed at the sampling point.
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: White Oak Greenway cityicounty: Cary / Wake County Sampling Date: 1/21/2014
ApplicanUOwner: TOWCI Of Cdly State: NC Sampling Point: W3-WET
Investigator(s): �• HdItShOI'11 (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) section, TownsniP, Range Cary
De ression Concave o °
Landform (hillslope, terrao p Local relief (concave, convex Slope (/o): �
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P 35.774334 N �ong: 78•845052 W Datum: NAD 1983
soii MaP unit Name: MfC2-Mayodan sandy loam
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
W3 is a small depression that is sustained by stormwater discharge from Davis Drive Park's parking lot
and recreational facilities. Recent conditions have been dry, with 0.0" of rainfall recorded by
NOAA/NWS in the last 72 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) �/ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches): 6
Water Table Present. Yes ✓ No II Depth (inches): ��
� � No n Depth (inches): 3�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
Saturation Present. Yes
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Larger trees located within the wetland depression have buttressed trunks. Based on topography in
the vicinity, W3-Wet is likely subject to inundation during high rainfall events. Soils were saturated
at 3", and the water table was observed at a depth of 6".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum _ 50% Y FAC
2�Liquidambar styraciflua 20% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� . Acer rubrum
Z � Ulmus alata
3.Vaccinium fuscatum
4. Ligustrum sinense
5 �Viburnum prunifolium
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�. Tipularia discolor
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�,Smila� rotundifolia
Z,Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
6.
��°�o = Total Cover
5% Y FAC
5% Y FAC
2% N FAC
2% N FACU
2% N FACU
16% = Total Cover
2% Y
2% = Total Cover
Sampling Point: W3-WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species g5.7%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
FACI.I _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10% Y FAC
10% Y FAC
20% = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Canopy cover is well established, but the understory is diverse but lightly vegetated.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth
�inchesl
0-1��
1-10"
10-20"
20-30"
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moistl % Color (moisU % Tvoe' Loc2
10YR 3/3 100%
10YR 5/1 60% 10YR 5/8 40% C M
2.5YR 6/2 60% 10YR 6/6 40% C M
2.5Y 6/1 80% 5YR 5/8 20% C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
BSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: W3-WET
Texture Remarks
Loam
Sandy Clay Loam
Sandy Clay
Sandy Clay
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
8 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Saturation of the soil was observed at 3". The water table was observed at 6".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

Property Owner:
Address:
'�elephone Number:
IJmSa Y C S OI+, ENGINEE S
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2014-00303 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NGCARY
�. �� • ! � 1 < '' � 1 �- �� � � 1< � '� ' �_ • �� �
Sarah Alegander
Town of Carv
316 North Academv Street
Cary, North Carolina, 27513
919-462-2075
Size (acres) 4
Nearest Waterway Crabtree Creek
USGS HUC 3020201
Nearest Town Carv
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude:35.7752
Longitude: -7�.842�
� `� i� . �F r � �
� i ����'l� �f5z� � �
���t ;�s`rl \ ii��� ��� ^,`a.
Location description: The subiect propertv is part of a Town of Carv sewer easement loca4ed 750 feet south of the
intersection of Stokesav Court and MacArthur I)rive.
Inelicate �'hich of the F'ollowin� Appl�:
r�. Prelianinary 1)eter�inaiion
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property.
, , ' . This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
�. Approved Deter�aination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed iive years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your properiy delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered fmal, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed iive years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

�� �`�� � + �
i t+ +'``
��� published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
detennine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Shaeffer at 919-554-4884 X31 or
David.L. Shaeffernu,usace. a rmv. mil.
�. ��SiS F0�' I)e$e�'1�1i1�4io11: �ased on the delineation report submitted bv the ap�licant, the site exhibits
criteria for waters of ihe U S as defined in 33 CFR 328.3 the 19�7 Wetland Delineation 1Vlanuai, the �2e�ional
Supplement to the 1987 Manual• Eastern 1Vlountains and Piedmont v2.0 Re�ulatorv Guidance I.etter OS-O5, and the
Jurisdictional l)etermination k'orm Instructional Guidebook (i.e. Rapanos �uidance).
D, �2e111�r1�s: The waters of the U S includin� wetlands on the above referenced propertv have been delineated and
the delinea4ion was verified bv the Corus in the �eld on Februarv 27 2014. The delineation is deuicted in the enclosed
map titled "Fi�ure 3 Jurisdictional Features Map (20120 Aerial Photo)" dated Februarv 2014.
E. r�ttention USIDA Progra�a Partieipants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting wark.
F. Appeals I�1for111ation (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an adminisirative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In arder for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by lv/A.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
carrespondence.** / n
Corps Regulatory �fficial: � �--�
%�
�
Date: August 1, 2014

���,,.
l„
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://re ur�latory.usacesurvev.com/.
Copy furnished:
Property Owner: Kimlev-Horn and Assocaates, Incora�orated
Jason Hartshorn
Address: 3001 Weston Parkwav
Carv, North Carolina, 27513
Telephone Number: 919-417-17�1

NCDWR BUFFER
DE TERMINATION
�_�_� �� � .�

Q��
-- -�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Pat McCrory
Governor
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc
Attn: Jason Jartshorn
3001 WestonPazkway
Cary, NC 27513
Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Thomas A. Reeder
Director
February 27, 2014
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO#14-041
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Ca0 Isolated or EIP Call
� Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar-Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) � Ephemeral/IntermittenUPerennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Project Name:
Location/Directions:
Subject Stream:
Nhite Oak Creek Greenway
The project proposes to conshvct a mulri-use geenway path between
Macarthur Drive and Davis Drive
UT to White Oak Cceek
Determination Date: February 27, 2014 Staff: 5ara Knies
S1
52
Not Subject Start@
�b'ect
X Througho
X W1-8
Stop@
ll'OU° C
onfluen
w/S]
Soil I USGS
X
X
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Cazolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1.24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not SubjecP' has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the proparty. Features that aze checked
"SubjecP' have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, srill may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
i�w�).
NorthCarolina
�atura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-7628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwateraualiN.om Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffrmalive AcGon Employer- 50% Recycletl/10'Yo Post Consumer Paper

White Oak Creek Greenway
Wake County
February 27, 2014
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within s�ty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (inclading downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sisty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division'of Water Resources (Central OfSce) at (919)-807-630Q and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4854.
If you have quesrions regazding this determination, please feel free to contact Saza Knies at [phone].
Respectfully,
�a�� �� �
Danny S th, Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO/SVJP File Copy

,, , + i � �� � � �-.�-_ �
N - - � ,� -
��,-
�' '; ' `
A :; � �`i �`� '; �, . � � �—�f ', � /, ' ��` �+� ' + ' J �
`• � ��i `�- _ - � i-• � I ! �,��_ -
' ,� �.
. . ,, �� 7- :#, 4; ,
. ; � . , ,,,.,,
.. . Y ' �-J��: i l��� �_'-1 �� ' iI �+� `' � �� ~V � % %/• �i . ,: � � . .
, � , j.�` � , .,- j � , `, � i \� � � � � .. "' �+� . ' . � ��, ..
` �
�� F'.� l . [r �� � � �� ^ \ � l �•� I �
' . � � . - �� � . �� '• � � % Y.'
t ._ .,`i ; �,
I, I� ,, ��� \ --. . , �6 - � ��`ti� �__� y�/ _ �til;
Y /, }��� '�' � , ' ! � + \` � ' 1 i
•J;'''� - , ,� , , ( ' , �`�` `_ _ �n .
� i + � ., ' �f ' . I I . � �� %r %\. � �� i °
• I �
! I � IL �. '��� - ` I 1/ f : � . .
ir: � i - ' � I . . � -� i`
'��� �� ._
, 1/ � y�� � ' ,� � ` .
{ ' . � I — � - 1 j � � ' i � `�
� , � � � i- ' -
/� � � \ ' I � � r , �1I �i ( '' r �' . � � ` � .� �' - - -
�I � . �l�, . . _ ' � r . • � � / ` � � � .
� ! ',/� 4 '_ = 1 � /�`� � �- �'� l � �
_� i, � c, ,/ � _
.�.
t"` ! �` � I'' ' 1 �f '�'' �-:.
� 1�., ; . -�' L , , , �--. .�� �;-,..• i r ;�0� �
, ` :Y --� ,
ty � , � - ,---,��;� � ...
3 � % � ��.` ` -� ,
� r 1 --1� � �, � �,
1 i, , � ,.\� � � ciz
'—' •' - .. �_r _- '- � L -�•` � ' r. � . � � ��
` i� - `—. ��� � ' ` �� � : ( `.� I
_�`��
- _ . �� Eem ��' � ��� � � :� _ .
_ � , �' _
,.
�' ' � i , �
, ., . . �t � �� ,
� ' .. � , ,." f : :_ �!� �. \ I ��,�✓ 1
,` _ r �
� � -. ( - _ i �.+: - � �/� � �`
. .,\� I� �' ' ' �,�� , � -- '� ,:, . ,�lr' ���� � � � � _ � ' . .
, \-- - .� ��_:�• � -. •� ��.� D � I
,, �'�,�J r� ' �` . . �� i��` ` , _�'�"�A,�(
,,� " ! I,' ' \\` � ��( � ; .' , � ` i' -,
� - "• 4
,, � � . .'1 i .'T� �. . �i��' i ' �
,��� �' �.��'�- �► �"'� ���� � u r— � � _� �
_\ ,1� e9 - .,� , , ; � -
, ,�. :�_�
• � � �. ` s_ , �� ,
� �J� �. =_� ?, � � �
' ' ' �' ,.''�� �"` ,�, !�• ' : �� ' , � - ,
J, ,��� J� �, ,
• i•'' -- � '�a �_ 0 500 1,000 Feet
. � �� . �� � � '� � � I , I—�—I
.. � , •� `� -` r- ��� �� • Legend
1 • • ' i, � ��.� �'I • � _i
. ' , ; ,,�,[� ,i , '',1�,.'' ProjectStudyArea
� ii ', � � " � —
,. ' - �
��; •�+;
;;; ��� Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map (Cary Quad, 1987)
��iY ���� White Oak Greek Greenway
'\����i% ��� �� Town of Cary, Wake County
.., —� %
��— . January 2014
S�

. � � �� �
. ' �� � �- � �.
, o.
�. �
� —
�� '
r 4
�� �
� .'� j`` �r�!'�
�
� ��

W
� • ' �•
.
- ___. �-;��
+_.�^����._+r��r�
_�'-'� �
� �.-��.�r:,��,>�.�.
�P•,.°'. ..
f �`� -�
�-
\ a
� Y
a� �a
� �:�� ; +`I
ri L �R �1' n
A
� � �� '
� y., n .
<s�

PCE APPROVAL

DocuSign Envelope ID: EDE81674-89BF-4532-8744-02CDAE727AE3
NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE�
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
G. PCE A�roval
TIP Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
Project Description:
C-5604IB
43714.3.5
CMAQ-0503(033)
The Town of Cary, in coordination with the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT), proposes to construct a new segment of the White Oak
Creek Greenway. The new greenway will extend approximately 0.4 miles from Davis
Drive at Park Village Drive to MacArthur Drive, connecting two sections of the White
Oak Creek Greenway, the Davis Drive Street-Side Trail, and Davis Drive Park. The
10-foot wide greenway will consist of approximately 1,200 feet of paved trail and 900
feet of boardwalk. A 100-foot long pedestrian underpass crosses under the CSX
Railway. Improvements are also being made to the Davis Drive/Park Village Drive
intersection, including adding pedestrian push buttons to the existing trafiic signal,
high-visibility crosswalks, and ADA compliant wheelchair ramps.
No right of way will be acquired as part of this project. It is part of a group of CMAQ
projects scheduled in the 2016-2025 STIP for construction in FY 2017.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
TYPE I (A)
X TYPE I (B)
Prenared By:
2/20/2017
Date
TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
NO BOXES Checked
ANY BOX Checked
NO BOXES Checked
ANY BOX is Checked
DocuSigned by:
,�t,� �I.bbVY,
�o��oore, P.E.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., [phone]
Prepared For: Town of Cary
Local Government Agency
Reviewed: UocuSigned by:
2/24/2017 �� �"�"`
Fas��,
Date Pro�ect Dev. LTnit Head / Division Representative
NCDOT - PDEA / NCDOT Division 5
Approved: For Type I(B) or II(B) projects only:
(N/A)
Date Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
PCE-100L 9 February 2017

PERMIT DRAWINGS

�
d`
�
�
�
�
V
..
�
V
W
O
�
�
�
�
m
�
U
Y
O
O
m
c
3
i
0
�
�
0
0
0
�
2
Y
�
O
N
P
\
HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES PROJECT LENGTH PI,ANS PREPARED Fox Kimley>>> Horn
THE TOWN OF CARY BY.• �,�,, PRELIMINARY PLANS
40 20 0 40 80 TOTAL LENGTH C-560416 PROJECT = 0.405 MILE ` "°' uo xoT usa Fae coxsreucr�oN SEAN R. STEGAI.I.
TOWN MANAGER
PLANS
PE.
SIGNA7'URE:
coxsrxt�cr �o xct�� zon_ JEFFREY W. MOORE, P.E. ROADWAY DESIGN ENG[NEER
IO S O �O ?O S7ANUAXD SPEf.IFlCA"I'fONS PROJf.'CT F,NGINb"b'X
AND TOWN OF CARY
SPEf,IFICATlONS FOR HAROLD WEINBRECHT, JR.
PROFILES IHE TOWN OF CARY CATHERINE A. MURRELL, RE. MAYOR
PROJEf,! UESlGN LTtGlNLER
P.E.
SICiNAT'L�XIi:

0
w
�
.E
�,
a
U
.�
O
L
O
2�
'c
0
d
'6`
3
c
m
m
�

0
w
�
.E
�,
a
U
.�
O
L
O
2�
'c
0
d
'6`
3
c
m
m
�

0
w
�
.E
�,
a
U
.�
O
L
O
2�
'c
0
d
'6`
3
c
m
m
�

�
J
INSTALL 7EMPORARY STREA.0 CROSSING
VSING 90 LF OF l@ 24"TEMPORARY PIPE INSTALL TE.UPORARY STREAdI CROSSING —
OR yY00D BRIDGE.NAT USING 20 (F OF 2 m 36'TEMPORARY PIPE
CROSSING WIDTH = APPROX l0'(MIN�MIZEI QR WOOD BRI�EMAT
CROSSING LENGTH = SEE DE7AlL L1/lNI�UIZEI CROSS/NG WIDTH = APPROX l0'f.NINI�IZEI
PIPE CWER = l2' MllyldlUM CRO55/NG LENGTH = SEE OETAIL l.NINI�IZEJ
BACKFILL = EARTH ��IATERIAL PIPE COVER = l2"MlNIMUM
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGA7E BACKFILL = EAR7H MATERIAL
BANK STABIUZATION = CLA55 'B'RlPR.4P SURFACE STONE = COARSE aGGREGA7E
OU7LET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP, BANK STA6/UZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
� EST 7 70NS.EST l5 SY FF OVTLET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP,
SITE I SEE T� DETAIL N0.040�/l EST l9 TQly5.E57 42 SY FF
� ADJUS7 /NLET PR07ECTlON WHEN SEE TOC DETAIL N0.04�J1
PROP STRUCTURE IS INSTALLE�
INSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
USING ZO LF OF l� l5`7E.NPQRARY PIPE
yy/ MH, TOC DETAIL '1\ OR WOOD BRIDGE.NAT
08000.05 \ CROSSING WlD7H = APPROX ld L1/IN�MIZE)
��. CROSSING LENGTH = SEE DETNL (MlNIMIZEI
/ PIPE COVER = l2' MlNl,1/UM
� BACKFILL = EAR7H ��IA7ERlAL
-20'-36' � SURFACE 57QNE = COARSE AGGREGATE
BANK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
� QUTLET PR07ECTlQN = CLA55'B'RlPR.4P.
JB �/ MH, TOC DETA1 EST 3 70NS.E57 6 SY FF
N0. 80�0.05 SEE T� DETNL N0.04LYT0Jl
OUTLET PROTECTION. CLASS 8 R�P RAP
\EST.IITONS
EST.28 SY GFD
. D
SILT htN�t a( LOW
POINTS ALONG SILT
FENCE lTYPJ
llySTALL SILT FENCE 3'FROtiI 'F
TOP OF BANK lTYPJ N
SITE 2 �
tNRAP $lL7 FENCf AROUND TOP OF —
PIPE Af7ER INSTALLA7'lON ?YPI
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 5 OF 6
�.- � .���' ._. . _ ..
� \����� PEkMANENT IMPACTS ZONE 2
TEMPORARV IMPACTS ZONE 1
� TEMPORAkY IMPACTS ZONE 2
DENOTES LIMITS OF
DISTUR6ED AREF
BZ 2
__ _ a— e�
__E��E_
�[ 2
PLACE REINFORCED SILi FENCE INSTALL SILT FENCE
AT LOW POlN7S ALONG SICT 3' FROM TOP OF
FENCE l7YP1 BANK fTYPo
INSTALL TEMPORARY SiREAM CROSSING
USING 20 LF OF l@ 24'TE.NPORARY PIPE
OR WOOD BRIL�E.NAT
CROSSING WIDTH = APPROX /O'f.NINI�NIZEJ
CRO55/NG LENGTH = SEE DETAIL fMINI�NIZEI
PIPE COVER = l2' MIN�MUM
BACKFILL = EARTH MATERIAL
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGATE
BANK STABIIJZATION = CLA55 'B'RIPRAP
O(IiLET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B' RIPRAP,
fST 7 TONS.EST l5 SY FF
SEE 70C DETNL NO 04000J1
� ev No� reevsoN� onre� ore wN e7� �
N�rnis doo�ment, togetna� wrtn tna oon�apts and desrgns p�esantad ne�ein, as an �nst��mant ot se��iae, is
a ��+e�ded o��y for +na sPe��f�� P�rPosa a�d ���e�+ for wn��n �+ was PraParad. Ra�se af a�d �mProPar
� n thls document wlthout wrltten authorization and adoptlon by Klmley-Horn and Assoolates, Ino.
� ShaII beewlYhout Ilablllty to Klmley-Horn and Assoclates. lnc.
Copyrlght Klmley-Horn and Assoclates, Ino., 20 17
gz ,
SITE 3
PLACE REINFORCED
SILi FENCE AT LO{N �
PoiNrs �oNc si�r
FENCE frYPl
eZ
/ �
�� � ��
8'P���
��� �\
\ .
INSTACL CHECK DAdI�
TOC S7D.640Q�.�
�, 2
E
PE
/�
�\
^_` �
�� \�
/ \\
� ���
�
/,,� REMOVE EX FES AND� ��� � `
PLACE 8'OF 30°RCP-P' ��
y�ITH CONC COLLAR
OUTLET PROTECTION
CLASS 8 RIP RAP
E5T.8 TONS
EST.2ISY GF�
FENCE trYPl
SPEGAL LATERAL V D CH� '�'
SEE �ETAIL 8 M /
FE
F
�- �� �F
,a� i
.6 BZ l ; � '.
� F �
/
STALL .UPORARY r.:-` .
gz� 7ALL SlL7 FfNCE s2 PIPE fAPPRQ 1 �.= /
3'FRDM TOP OF REMOVE EX�ST �,�` "
BANK rTr i5' CMP ANO f.�5 i
gZ � ACE REINFORCED SILT PLACE 44'-i5' / ;
FENCE AT LOW POINTS RCP-IV � /_�/
ALONG SILT fENLE lTYPI SITL R 090�1.26AIL ./.:f� .
� // 5 /
/�;= /
� %/.; i
�
F /!
CONCRE7'E TRUCK yyASNOUT � �:,'� /
AREA AlyO 570CKPlLE -�
STAGING AREA /_� �
> /
/':
/_
' 20�,
' `� a
NP
/ /.
�
/ /.
/y0 570CKPlLING AC7NlTlES
,�/,.::'� ,� yvliHlN SdOF STREA,1/
-. �./.:.. .
7EMPORARY SILT
FENCE liYPl
�
iN�er PRorEcnoN \
fTYPJ �..
.\
\
'E\
—STOCKPILE STAGING AREA
—PROTEC7 EXIST TRAIySFORMER �-
AND CABCES
iEMPORARY COIySTRUCTlOIy AGCE55/
CONCRf7E TRUCK CLEANOU7
\
/': � �
� �.: .
/':� / ei'
�N57ALL TEMPORARY STRE.4til CRQSSING /:5'� �"
USING 20 LF QF l� l5"TE�IIPORARY P/PE :� � / �
OR W�D BRIA?fMA7 F a \ �
CROSSING WIDTH = APPROx l0'f.UINI�NlZE7 !%- �
CRO55/NG LENG7H = SEE DETAIC !dIINl.4�lZE1 /_:'� �'
PIPE CO✓ER = l2' MlNI.LiUM � � �
BACKFILL = EARTH MATERIAC � '\
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGATE � �
BANK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP �
OVTLET PROrECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP. �--
ES7' 3 TONS.EST 6 S/ FF
SEE TOC DETAIL N0.04000J1
PREPARED IN THE OFFlCE OF:
Kimle >>>Horn
v
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600 - RALEIGH, NC 2760 I
PHONEe (9 19) 677-2000 FAXe (9 19) 677-2050 PE No.F-oioz
MULTI-USE TRAIL
AND DRAINAGE PLANS
��NLET PROTECTION �TYP1
� � /SX�O
16-SP-077
HTE p NIA
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF CHRY
DEVeLOPMENT REV!EW COMMIT7EE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNlE55 ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETED PLANNER'. DATE:
PROJECT:
z��„`_ u WHITE OAK CREEK GREENWAY
PRELIMI�NARYRPLANb `:�.� MACARTHUR TO DAVIS DRIVE
e NUMsea. C-560418 Ee, NUMeEF. 5

�
J
2\ �,��
. 5� P��
or
iNsra�c rEMPORaRr srREa� cRossiNc
VSING 90 LF OF l@ 24"TEMPORARY PIPE INSTALL TE.UPORARY STREAdI CROSSING —
OR yY00D BRIOGE.NAT USING 20 !F OF 2 m 36'TEMPORARY PIPE
CROSSING WIDTH = APPROX l0'61/IN�MIZEI QR WOOD BRI�EMAT
CROSSING LENGTH = SEE DE7NL fMINIMIZEI CROSS/NG WIDTH = APPROX l0'f.NINI�IZEI
PIPE COVER = l2' Mllyl,llUM CRO55/NG LENGTH = SEE OETAIL l.NINI�IZEI
BACKFILL = EARTH ��IareR�a� PiPE covER = iz�MiNiMuM
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGA7E BACKFILL = EAR7H MA7ERlAL
BANK STABIUZATION = CLA55 'B'RlPR.4P SURFACE STONE = CQARSE aGGREGA7E
OU7LET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP, BANK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
� EST 7 70NS.EST l5 SY FF OVTLET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP,
SITE I SEE T� DETAIL NO.Q40�/l EST l9 TQly5.E57 42 SY FF
� ADJUS7 /NLET PR07ECTlON WHEN SEE TOC DETAIL N0.04�J1
PROP STRUCTURE l5 /NSTALLE�
INSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
yy USING ZO LF OF l� l5'7EUPORARY PIPE
08000,pOC DETAIL °\�� CROS�� WID�E�AAPPROX ld(MIN�MIZE)
��. CROSSING LENGTH = SEE DETNL (MlNIMIZEI
/ PIPE COVER = l2' MlNl,1/UM
� BACKFILL = EAR7H ��IA7ERlAL
-20'-36' � SURFACE 57QNE = COARSE AGGREGATE
BANK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
\ QUTLET PR07ECTlQN = CLA55'B'RlPR.4P.
JB �/ MH, TOC DETA1 EST 3 70NS.E57 6 SY FF
N0. 80�0.05 SEE T� DETNL N0.04LYT0Jl
STREAM RELOCATlO ., ��o
lS lNCIDfNTAL c^ w�E$TLETONS TECTION. CLASS 8 RIP RAP
20'-36' NESL 28 SY GFD
7EMPORARY SILT �\ ~ SILT FENCE A7' LOW
FENCE lTYP7 POlN75 ALONG SILT
\\ FENCE lTYPJ
llySTALL SILT FENCE 3'FROtiI 'F
TOP OF BANK lTYPJ N
SITE 2 �
yvRAP $lL7 FENCf AROUND TOP OF —
PIPE Af7ER INSTALLAiION lTYPI
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 6
�.- � .���' ._. . _ ..
� \����� PEkMANENT IMPACTS ZONE 2
TEMPORARV IMPACTS ZONE 1
� TEMPORAkY IMPACTS ZONE 2
DENOTES LIMITS OF
DISTUR6ED AREF
BZ 2
o—•a—�e— � e r
—E--_—E�E
�[ 2
PLACE REINFORCED SILi FENCE INSTALL SILT FENCE
AT LOW POlN7S ALONG SICT 3' FROM TOP OF
FENCE l7YP1 BANK fTYPo
INSTALL TEMPORARY SiREAM CROSSING
USING 20 LF OF l0 24'TE.NPORARY PIPE
OR WOOD BRIL�E.NAT
cRossiNG WrorH = aaPRox id rMiNiNiZE�
CRO55/NG LENGTH = SEE DETAIL fMINI�NIZEI
PIPE COVER = l2',1/IN�MUM
BACKFILL = EARTH MATERIAL
SURFACE STONE = COARSf AGGREGATE
BANK STABIIJZATION = CLA55 'B'RIPRAP
O(IiLET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B' RIPRAP,
EST 7 TONS.EST l5 SY FF
SEE 70C DETNL NO 04000J1
� E� No. RE�saN. oArE. ofi wN e7. �
NTh�s doo�me�+, +oge+ha� w�+h +na oo��aP+s a�d des�gns P�esa�+a� he�e��, as a� �ns+��ma�t of se���ae, �6
a ��+e�ded o��y for +na sPe��f�� P�rPosa a�d ���e�+ for wn��n �+ was PraParad. Ra�se af a�d �mProPar
� n thls document wlthout wrltten authorization and adoptlon by Klmley-Horn and Assoolates, Ino.
� ShaII beewlYhout Ilablllty to Klmley-Horn and Assoclates. lnc.
Copyrlght Klmley-Horn and Assoclates, Ino., 20 17
gz ,
SITE 3
PLACE REINFORCEO
SILi FENCE AT LOW �
PoiNrs �oNc sicr
FENCE frYPl
eZ
/ �
':.vc 8P'`//
��� �\
\ .
INSTACL CHECK DAdI�
TOC S7D.640Q�.�
_BZ 1
SPECIAI LATERAL V
SEE �ETAiI 8
FE
\
/� ^`�
�
`\ \
� /\`
\
/,.� REMOVE EX FES AND� ��� � `
PLACE 8 OF 30 RCP-P
y�ITH CONC COLLAR
OUTLET PROTECTION
CLASS 8 RIP RAP
E5T.8 TONS
EST.2iSY GPD
FENCE tTYPI
OO
M /
r
.,� '- �� �F
—. — .a�
�PE .6 BZ�
� F
E S7ACL .NPORARY
� 3'FRDM T�OP OFNCE g2 P/REMOV�REXiST , �����`j �
BANK fTY IS' CMP AND :� /
gZ � ACE REINFORCED SILT P�ACE 44'-i5'
FENCE AT LOW POINTS RCP-IV � _�� /
C
' 20�,
' `� a
NP
/ /.
�
/ /.
/y0 570CKPlLING AC7NlTlES
,�/,.::'� ,� yvliHlN SdOF STREA,1/
-. �./.:.. .
7EMPORARY SILT
FENCE liYPl
// \
�
�
-'���/
,
iN�er PRorEcnoN \
fTYPJ �..
.\
\
'E\
—STOCKPILE STAGING AREA
—PROTEC7 EXIST TRAIySFORMER �-
AND CABCES
iEMPORARY COIySTRUCTlOIy AGCE55/
CONCRf7E TRUCK CLEANOU7
ALONG SILT fENLE lTYPI SITL R 090�1.26AIL ,/...c . . � /��:;�
� !/ 5 /
/�:'��� / \ /� F��-
�-" /.�' � �/
F/!. /1 �/ r-
CONCRE7'E TRUCK yyASNOUT � �:'� \
AREA AlyO 570CKPlLE /:i: �� / / � � �
STAGING AREA .
/, i
/';� /
/` / �
/': � �'
� �.:
/':� / ei'
�NSTALL TEMPORARY STREAtiI CRQSSING /:5' �"
USING 20 LF QF l� l5"'fE�lIPORARY P/PE :� � / �
OR W�D BRIA?EMA7 F a \ �
CROSSING WIDTH = APPROx l0'f.UINI�NlZE7 !%- �
CRO55/NG LENG7H = SEE DETAIC !dIINl.4�lZE1 /_:'� �'
PIPE CO✓ER = l2' MlNI.LiUM � � �
BACKFILL = EARTH MATERIAC � '\
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGATE � �
BANK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP �
OVTLET PROrECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP. �--
ES7' 3 TONS.ES7' 6 SY FF
SEE TOC DETAIL N0.04000J1
PREPARED IN THE OFFlCE OF:
Kimle >>>Horn
v
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600 - RALEIGH, NC 2760 I
PHONEe (9 19) 677-2000 FAXe (9 19) 677-2050 PE No.F-oioz
MULTI-USE TRAIL
AND DRAINAGE PLANS
��NLET PROTECTION �TYP1
� � /SX�O
16-SP-077
HTE p NIA
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF CHRY
DEVeLOPMENT REV!EW COMMIT7EE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNlE55 ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETED PLANNER'. DATE:
zo o qo
PRELIMI�NARY qPLANb 'TT
Y
PROJECT:
WHITE OAK CREEK GREENWAY
MACARTHUR TO DAVIS DRIVE
�oe NUMsea. C-560418 Ee, NUMeEF. 5

�
d`
�
�
�
�
V
. .
�
V
W
O
�
�
�
�
�
U
Y
O
O
m
c
3
i
0
�
�
0
0
0
�
2
Y
�
N
�
\
M
HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES PROJECT LENGTH PI,ANS PREPARED Fox Kimley>>> Horn
THE TOWN OF CARY BY.• �,�,, PRELIMINARY PLANS
40 20 0 40 80 TOTAL LENGTH C-560416 PROJECT = 0.405 MILE ` "°' uo xoT usa Fae coxsreucr�oN SEAN R. STEGAI.I.
TOWN MANAGER
PLANS
PE.
SIGNA7'URE:
coxsrxt�cr �o xct�� zon_ JEFFREY W. MOORE, P.E. ROADWAY DESIGN ENG[NEER
IO S O �O ?O S7ANUAXD SPEf.IFlCA"I'fONS PROJf.'CT F,NGINb"b'X
AND TOWN OF CARY
SPEf,IFICATlONS FOR HAROLD WEINBRECHT, JR.
PROFILES IHE TOWN OF CARY CATHERINE A. MURRELL, RE. MAYOR
PROJEf,! UESlGN LTtGlNLER
P.E.
SICiNAT'L�XIi:

0
W
h
F
m
a
h
U
.�
O
U
2�
'c
0
a
'6`
3
c
m
m
�
J�
�
O
t[1
�
�
�
D
3
a
0
0
�
J
Q
�
Y

�
0
INSTALL TEMPORARY 57'RE.MI CROSSING
24'-i8' RCP-IV USING 90 FEET OF l� 24'7E�PORARY PIPE
JB �/ MH, TOC DETAIL OR �'000 BRIU;EMAT
N0. 8000.05 CROSSING WIDTH = APPROX l0'!.UININIZE)
\ CROSSING LENGTN = SEE DETAIL (MlNIMlZE1
\ `\ �\ �� � PIPE COVER = l2'A�INIGIUM
ADJUST INLET PROTECTION VIHEN BACKFILL = EARTH MATERIAC
PROP STRUC7URE l5 /NSTALLED SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGA7'E
\ \ �� BANK STABIUZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
� \� �\ �� ��� OU7LE7 PR07ECTlON = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP.
\ DN'IS ORryE PA4K \ -�- q4'-IB' RCP-IV EST 7 TONS.EST l5 SY FF
\ sacErr coNP�x SEE DETAiL iN PLANS
\\ \ �y TIE STANDARD BASE ���
\ �' \ �� `� DITCH TO ExiSTiNG � SITE 3
,� STAN�ARO BASE �_,
� DITCH y�/ CLA55 B RR
\ E5T 70 TONS RR
\ EST i50 SY GFD
INSTALL CHECK DA.0 SEE DETAIL z SITE 2
L � RAD.��DITCH IO OO
� SEE DETAIL I COLLAR AND EXTEND
REMfNE EXIST DRNEWAY, Z��-18� ��P
� � z lB'RGP.& RlP RAP CHAHNEL
za COORDIIyATE WITH 70WN TO MAINTAIN INSTALL 39'xl9'x3' SKI,{l,1/ER SEDIMENT
OPENING FOR SOCCER CO.NPLEX BASIN flD.u1WlTH 075"ORIFICE
pI TOC DETAIL DIAMETER AND 4'WEIR AqiUS7 /NLE7 PR07ECT�ON O
Nb. OBOOOA2 36'-i8' RCP-IV '�/ � J8 yy/ MH, TOC DETAII INSTALL SILT FENCE y-
\ 48'-15' RCP-IV ,.� N0.08000.05 6HlNSiALLEDSTR�TURE 3'FROM TQP OF N
AIyK fTYPI
48'-18° RCP-ifl "/C � c���- 260'-36" y. Qul
STA DARD BASE DITCH y I�
W/ LASS B' RR WRAP SILT FENCE O N�
c.-' / _ �„ � EST 40 50 S D TOP OF gZ 2 W
r. T N RR AHOUN
_. ���/� j —� ,(� �� SEE DETAL 3FD PIPE �A7i0N fTYPo eZ �Z
RE�Oy E 12 L,F. OF 18" RCP , � �' F�- "� ' �� � ` \�, � _ ____.�_. — . ___ E. __—__ __. _ g�` fE �
TIE JB yy/ MH TO EX i8', / �� � � 1 � -- _ W
TOC DETAIL N0. 08000.05 � � . - � �� � � + , � ZW
� � � " � G �1 �5 ST ARp BAS � �W
� '\ W/� CONCRE - �
� � Fk's � % � _ � \ (� E5T Sv � � � � � � �-
� � ��
A, � Ex�B�4�N \., � \\�SEE 7�� -;G z ���;s� — _ — — — U
RETAi, i �/ g--� � , �A, � , �j-f�� . _!�. I�
=iv � �� 1 SVSTEId� � � , v, A. F F � . � exisi sraenM � � �� - - - Q
�I � A d�, �� � \� C?_ F�ANK � (; , • �
�n
�, . � � F'� 60\� �,� �' i .d- iNsru� reMP
EXMH 'I '��' � � � I � p p . - g �j 24'TE.NPORARY PIPE
\
� \ BRILG�MA7'
��� �� � A�� � � � RETAIN, 40'-15' RCP ��' � �� . � i� � CROSSING WIDTN = APPROX lP'f l l.L�IZEI
SYSTEM � � F ,\ I' V// � CRO55/NG LENGTH - DETAIL ! I l l
� � � �� ' � � NS7ACL S EC/AL �� � � PL REINFORCED SILT �-e�7{ - �Z��
\ ADJU57 /NLET PROTECTION ' II� \ r' REMOVE �5' AND I y lLLIN� ASIN � �� � FENCE OW P0l TE BACKF�LL = EARTH MATERIAL
WHENPRDP STRUCTURE l5 �� �1� \ PLUG STRUCTURE y� j• � / � ACONG SILT ?YPI
` SURFACE S70NE = COARSE 4GGRE6ATE
'. s�,� INLET 40' � � , \ �
\ �y INSTALLEO 1 � \ \ 11 12" RCP . '�� ��.� � Q BANK STABILlZA7/ON = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
PROTECTION
� �Typ� I TOC DETAIL ,'� � TEMPORARY SILT OUTLE7 PROTECTION = CLA55 'B'RIPRAP,
� �ib. oe000.oz � / esr � ToNs.Esr is sr FF
� i� �� ,�� 1 iNsra�c cHeCK oalA Aoo ^�� � FENCE rrrP�
1 � SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' ' �"'�s�A � F SEE DETNL lN PLAlyS
- �1 � . � � �,���� �'. TOC STD.04000A6 ��T�� DETAiL 2A � A � � o � SEE DETAII 6
i36'-15' RCP-III �- �_ `� / STANDAR CUi BASE DiiCH
�' � ES 7E�PORARY
10+00 � ��� �
1 � � � ACCESS GATE
1, "I I�'. /� � �� \ 16'-15' cy�/ E180�'1
� �� � � ' � pi 70C DEiAiL �
� � - - — I I i Nb28 B 500.02 � —� _ ,� � \
- � / ��o, � REMOVE 8 L.F. OF � - A � � .
.Fa .- — -� �� 15'RCP TIE PROP �� V � �
"��� � JB TO ExiSTiNG. '" �� � �
_ � � � 70C DETAiL N0.06000.05 /, — � . A � � ��
— — 1
_ _ / �� C —� �' � � �'. � FOR�OHS7RUCTION OF �UNNEOSSING
1 J �
PARK Vl E OR,b -». �. l � \ ��
/ C \
g U �W PRQP IS' �
\ �\'z — �B�✓��j� R`��� RETAIN . :� � ' . �� l8" iEMPORARY PIPE ..� \
��= SVSTEM - . ... .\\ .. � � \
-- ; - .c�P�cx��`� � SEE DETA�L 7 fOR DITCH PLAN ��� �
INSTALL �-�g�TEIAPORARY PIPE
— F�P — _ �4: /�, � \ TENPORARY � .
�� \ � \ �� � �t,,f � 1 \��' � � DNERSION / p EXiSN NG � EE OETAILC 5
- , �. / � � DITCH �
� EXC6 \ � TEMPORAR/
\ � `ACCESS` \
GATE
� IMPACT ZOOM-IN SITE 3(SCALE 1"-40')
� A APED II „, 7ENPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS/ � �
II �� u\ IMPACT ZOOM-IN SITE 2(SCALE 1"=40') O
� � I �I � \� � BANCE l5'BACK BZ
� s�
� � om� II \\ O L/A TREES _
s III i L PE
� 1� � �� m�a� � � BZ 2
g X� � �
9 II I �wl� �
� n i�
�' PERMIT DRAWING � pC
3 SHEET 3 OF b �,`1 � � I I \\\ � � � r G— — — � _ QZ � - - - - - -
' OENOTES PERMANENT IMPACTS 1` 1 � � /
p � IN SURFACE WATER \ `�I 1�µ ��E �
� � �, 1 � .._.._.._.._.
\ \ `\ I 1 `1 1 EA \ T �i � •�..�..�..�
\ \ � ^ - -
DDENOTES PERMANENT F-.t� 11I11 � II LT �/ � _ _ T ti� J\„_- _�_'_'._...�_.-.'�'_-.-_'� � � � � - _ - _ - _ -
D F F FILL IN WETLAND — 1� ` B,R�p 1 �� �; � '(� _ �
O - LT 1� ��a.CP_- -� — 1I � TBf_ _— TB
1
0
N
�
��
Z
� DENOTES TEMPORARY ��.. �. � I I 11 � ��� -` —TB — , " � ��,�1 TB�- "
� -- _ IS'RGP 1 1 \ _ �— TB i % -� �8 � L,�' ' ' - - 16-SP-077
� � 1 11 � 1 I TB � 8 _ / �(8 Y�� i SB I� HTE tt�. NIA
Y IMPACT IN WETLANO 1 11� d I� y I � � � ' � T� T8 / APPROVEDBYTHETOWNOFCHRY
^ 1' DEVeLOPMENT REV!EW COMMIT7EE
DtNOItS LIMIIS OF � � � � /� Q I_� �
DISTUR6EC Hf;EA \ � ` � L� , � `
PREPAREo iN rHE oFFicE aF:
� Kimle >>> Horn MULTI-USE TRAIL
o E�.No.: reE�soN: oArE: ore wN e7: � � PRELIMI�NARY�PLAN&
� Th�s doo�me�+,+oge+ha� w�+h +na oo��aP+s a�d des�gns P�esa�+a� he�e��,as a� �ns+��ma�t of s� AND DRAINAGE PLANS
� ��+e�ded o��y for +na sPe��f�� P�rPosa a�d ���e�+ for wn��n �+ w s PraParad. Ra�se af a�d �mProPare, �6
� rei�a�oe o� +nis aoo�men+ wi+no�+ wri++e� a�+noriza+�on a�a aaop+io� ey Kimiay-Horn a�a assoma+es,ina. 42 I FAYETTEVILLE STREET SUITE 600 - RALEIGH, NC 2760 I
M snauoe wi7no�t uaenir to KimiaY-Horr, ar,d assooiata6.ir,�. PHONEe (9 19) 6�7-2000 FAXe (9 19) 677-2050 PE No.F-oioz
Copyrlght Klmley-Horn and Assocldtes, Ino., 20 17
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNlESS ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETED PLANNER'. DATE:
PRo�Ecr:
WHITE OAK CREEK GREENWAY
MACARTHUR TO DAVIS DRIVE
�oe NUMsea. C-560418 Ee, NUMeEF. �

�
0
INSTALL TEMPORARY 57'RE.MI CROSSING
24'-i8' RCP-IV USING 90 FEET OF l� 24'7E�PORARY PIPE
JB �/ MH, TOC DETAIL OR �'000 BRIU;EMAT
N0. 8000.05 CROSSING WIDTH = APPROX l0'!.UININIZE)
\ CROSSING LENGTN = SEE DETAIL (MlNIMlZE1
\ `\ �\ �� � PIPE COVER = l2'A�INIGIUM
ADJUST INLET PROTECTION VIHEN BACKFILL = EARTH MATERIAC
� PROP STRUC7URE l5 /NSTALLED SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGA7'E
\ \ �� BANK STABIUZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
� \� � � �� ��� OU7LE7 PR07ECTlON = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP.
EST 7 TONS.EST l5 SY FF
� DN'IS ORryE PA4K �� \ -�- 44'-IB' RCP-IV
\ sacErr coNP�x � -� SEE DETAiL iN PLANS
\\ � \ � .� TIE STANDARD BASE ���
\ �' \ �� ��� �\. DITCH TO ExiSTiNG � SITE 3
,� STAN�ARO BASE �_,
� � �\ V� DITCH y�/ CLA55 B RR
� ��-,� E5T 70 TONS RR
EST i50 SY GFD
INSTALL CHECK DA.0 SEE DETAIL 2 SITE Z
L � RAD.��DITCH IO OO
� SEE DETAIL I COLLAR AND EXTEND
REMfNE EXIST DRNEWAY, Z��-18� ��P
� � z lB'RGP.& RlP RAP CHAHNEL
za COORDIIyATE WITH 70WN TO MAINTAIN INSTALL 39'xl9'x3' SKI,{l,1/ER SEDIMENT
OPENING FOR SOCCER CO.NPLEX BASIN flD.u1WlTH 075"ORIFICE �
pI TOC DETAIL D/AMETER AND 4'WEIR AqiUS7 /NLE7 PR07ECT�ON �
� Nb. 08000.02 36'-i8' RCP-IV �� �i � J8 �V/ MH, TOC DETAII yyHEN PROP STRUCTURE INSTALL SILT FENCE N
48'-15' RCP-N ,.� N0. 68000.05 /S 1N57ALLED fTYPI 3' FROM TQP OF
��� AIyK f7YP1 �
48'-18° RCP-III . � �- - STA DARD BASE DITCH 260'-36" y. 2��
W/ LASS B'RR WRAP SILT FENCE O
� c.' / _ _ �„ � � EST 40 5TONS RR ARGUND TOP OF gZ 2 I W
� ' . � ���� --� . ` � ` ' � SEE DETAtL 3F�---� -- E PIPE AA7/ON f7rPo aZ �N
���� REMOyE 12 F.OP 18"RCP .�\�'��- / �,l- . � '------�---BZ'1` -PE
TIE JB / �N TO EX 18', � �, � � 1 � � - - ZW
`� TOC DE AIL NO.OB000.05 � G/ . - � �i�� � �
; � � - 55 p '
� � � �i � _ i G � � _ '� 15k �%� CONCRES � � ��
� ' F�5 � /� - - �"' (�- ST . SY ..y � �� �_ . . ��.
I \ / bX�l`� \, \ \�EE ?�� � -'% � � Y ���.z � — .' _ _ _ �
RETAiN � �/ � �--� � � � F �' � 'K/%�SreEaM � � _ .. .. .. �
=iv � �� SVS7EM� �� � , �' � F '�\ � - �' o FonNK � - - - �
� I �, , �� I � � �' ,. 60� 30 � � -
'�� � �� F � i� �d— _ iNsru� rEMP
EXMH I� 'I1� � � � �' � � �� . . F F ,� � � : � B��¢ 24'TEUPORARY PIPE
; � � ' �I BRILG MA7'
��� �\ � � RETAIry� AO'-15' RCP � d� ` y \, \ i / / CRQSSING WIDTN = APPROX lP'f l ll,�lZE/
� ���� _ SYSTEM �A F ,� �� V�/ CROSSING CENG7H = DETAIL f l l l
\ �� � i � \� NSTALL S EC/AL � / PL REINFQRCED SILT Q�7{ _/Z'MIN��AUIr�
ADJU57 /NLET PROTECTION ' II� \\ \�' REMOVE i5' AND h' / lLCING ASIN l�� � FENCE OW P0l T�
PLUG STRUCTURE II �� BACKF�LL = EARTH MATERIAL
WHENPROP STRUCTURE l5 �� �1\ \ \ � /' \ / / ACONG SILT �TYP� SURFACE S70NE = COARSE 4GGRE6ATE
�y INSTALLEO ' \ � I�� INLET 2 RCP . �\ �\, `' � \ I Q BANK STABILlZA7/ON = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
+ ��'�` \ PROTECTION
� � �� � �, � �, �Typ� p TOC DETAIL � � \ '� �� � TEMPORARY SILT OUTLE7 PROTECTION = CLA55 'B'RIPRAP,
' I �� Nb. 09000.02 ��� � S� PENCE lTYP) ESi 7 TONS,EST l5 SY FF
`',i .I � �� ',��,, � INSTALL CHECK DA�A V '�o ` .�� /
� TOC STD.04000.06 SPECiAL LA7ERAL 'V' ����,� ,, F SEE DETNL lN PLAlyS
p �a, DITCH,SEE DETAIL 2A � A � V • / p
�,� �.�.1' /�+� �� �� �,136'-IS'RCP-III (l�r�� � ��-,� / o SEE��ETAIICU�i BASE DiiCH
� ES � � �-� ��� 7E�PORARY
� ( � J � /: � �� . . � I \ 16•_ACCE�S �A18 �
\ _' I� -I I I 1 Oi TOC DEiAiL =—
� � - - I � � Nb28 B �OOAZ � ss � _ a �. � \ �
- � �����o, � REMOVE 8 L.F. OF � � � �� � � �
r � . ,� :- - � 15' RCP TIE PROP 7 � V �V A ��
�'-- I� " �� � F� JB TO EXISTING. � '" "�� � �
� � 70C DETAiL N0.06000.05 /, � � ��
- � a,
� �� � � � \ PROPOSED TEMPORARY RNL CROSSING
_ �I� s _ / �� C / � � '. �FOR CONS7RUCTION OF TUNNEL
\ � \
PARK Vl OR� � �`,, l . / \ \
h � C ,\
� �� — �P"�'�. '� RErnm� � �\ ;' PRQP �`� l8" iEMPORARY PIPE \
--�_ = SrSTE - �,r � a,> � �
_ __ _ _ � - +Picx ` \ I SEE DETA�L 7 fOR DITCH PLAN ��� �
F'.P - � \ � . ` � \ ENPORARY � � �- l8' T E.4�PORARY PIPE .
^; \ �\�.�' �� I ��� \���' � � � DITCHSION �\ p EX�SNNG�EE OETAIL�5
� EXC6 \ � TEMPORAR/
� � AECESS \
GATE
� IMPACT ZOOM—IN SITE 3(SCALE 1"-40')
� A APED II „, 7ENPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS/ � �
IL �� u\ IMPACT ZOOM—IN SITE 2(SCALE 1"=40') O
� � I �I � \� � BANCE l5'BACK BZ
� s�
� � om� II \\ O L/A TREES _
s III i L PE
� 1� � �� m�a� � � BZ 2
g X� � �
9 II I �wl� �
� n i�
�' PERMIT DRAWING �
3 SHEET 4 OF b �1� � ` I I �\ � �E _ — � QZ � — — — — — —
� �1 � \ � � - -
OENOTES PERMANENT IMPACTS 1` 1 � � /
p � IN SURFACE WATER \ `�I 1�µ ��E �
� � �, 1 � .._.._.._.._.
\ \ `\ I 1 `1 1 EA \ T �i � •�..�..�..�
\ \ � ^ - -
DDENOTES PERMANENT F-.t� 11I11 � II LT �/ � _ _ T ti� J\„_- _�_'_'._...�_.-.'�'_-.-_'� � � � � - _ - _ - _ -
D F F FILL IN WETLAND — 1� ` B,R�p 1 �� �; � '(� _ �
O - LT 1� ��a.CP_- -� — 1I � TBf_ _— TB
1
0
N
w
��
Z
� DENOTES TEMPORARY ��.. �. � I I 11 � ��� -` —TB — , " � ��,�1 TB�- "
� -- _ IS'RGP 1 1 \ _ �— TB i % -� �8 � L,�' ' ' - - 16-SP-077
� � 1 11 � 1 I TB � 8 _ / �(8 Y�� i SB I� HTE tt�. NIA
Y IMPACT IN WETLANO 1 11� d I� y I � � � ' � T� T8 / APPROVEDBYTHETOWNOFCHRY
^ 1' DEVeLOPMENT REV!EW COMMIT7EE
DtNOItS LIMIIS OF � � � � /� Q I_� �
DISTUR6EC Hf;EA \ � ` � L� , � `
PREPAREo iN rHE oFFicE aF:
� Kimle >>> Horn MULTI-USE TRAIL
o E�.No.: reE�soN: oArE: ore wN e7: � � PRELIMI�NARY�PLAN&
� Th�s doo�me�+,+oge+ha� w�+h +na oo��aP+s a�d des�gns P�esa�+a� he�e��,as a� �ns+��ma�t of s� AND DRAINAGE PLANS
� ��+e�ded o��y for +na sPe��f�� P�rPosa a�d ���e�+ for wn��n �+ w s PraParad. Ra�se af a�d �mProPare, �6
� rei�a�oe o� +nis aoo�men+ wi+no�+ wri++e� a�+noriza+�on a�a aaop+io� ey Kimiay-Horn a�a assoma+es,ina. 42 I FAYETTEVILLE STREET SUITE 600 - RALEIGH, NC 2760 I
M snauoe wi7no�t uaenir to KimiaY-Horr, ar,d assooiata6.ir,�. PHONEe (9 19) 6�7-2000 FAXe (9 19) 677-2050 PE No.F-oioz
Copyrlght Klmley-Horn and Assocldtes, Ino., 20 17
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNlESS ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETED PLANNER'. DATE:
PRo�Ecr:
WHITE OAK CREEK GREENWAY
MACARTHUR TO DAVIS DRIVE
�oe NUMsea. C-560418 Ee, NUMeEF. �

�
J
INSTALL TEMPoRARY STREA.0 CROSSING
VSING 90 FW7 OF l@ 24"7EMPORARY PIPE lly57ALL TEMPORARY STREAtiI CROSSING
OR WOOD BRIDGE.NA7 USING 20 PCOT OF 2� 36"TEMPORARY PIPE
caossiNc WiorH = aPPRox iarMiNiMizei oR W000 eRiocEMar
cRossiNc eENcrH = see oEra� rMiNiMizEi cRass�Nc Wiorn = v�PRox iar�iNi�izEi
PIPE CWER = l2' MllyIMU�U CROSSING LENGTH = SEE OETAIL l.NINI�IZEJ
BACKf/LL = EARTH ,IIATERIAL PIPE COVER = l2"MlNIMUM �
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGA7E BACKFILL = EARTH MA7ERlAL Q
BANK STABILIZATION = CLA55 'B'RIPRM SURFACE STONE = COARSE .4�GREGA7E � �
OU7LET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP. BANK STABlUZA7/ON = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP � \, \
EST 7 70NS.EST l5 SY FF OUTLET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP,
�k SITE 3 SEE DETNL lN PLNVS EST l9 TONS.E57 42 SY FF \
O� ADJUS7 /NLET PR07ECTlON WHEN Sff DETNLIN PLANS /-/ �
P 2 PROP STRUCTURE l5 /NSTALLE� , �\., �.
s� Qi
L� �� INSTALL TEMPORARY STREA,U CROSSING /���
, \�� 5�� USING ZO FOOT OP l@ l5" 7E.UPORARY PIPE
V� JB �/ MH, TOC DETAIL '1\ OR WOOD BRIQiE.NAT SITE 6
�P,��Y� ��j� \\ \ � N0. 8000.05 \ CROSS/N6 WIDTH = APPROX ld(MIN�MIZEI PLACEEBEOFF30' RCP-IV
�� CROSS/NG LENGTH = SEE DETAIL (MlNIMIZEI
U\ � PIPE COVER = l2'MlNIMUM '�ITH CONC COLLAR
� � � BACKFILL = EARTH ,{IATERIAL
c+ 20'-36' SURFACE 570NE = COARSE AGGREGATE i6 �5' RCP-IV
Bc. � \ B.NyK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
"' F2S JB yy/ H, TOC DETA1 OUTLET PROTECTION = CLA55 'B' RIPRM, q�7,�pR,�p,rypy�Q7
A�/Y RELOCATION U5T lNLE7 PROTECTION WHEN N0.080�0.05 EST 3 70NS.E57 6 SY FF ��q�,� g7-g�� Rqp
TEMP PIPE DUE Tj4(�(E1k/!f&(y$E�M&Z11V.(.f'DASS B RIP RAP SEE DEiAIL lN PLAN$ EST. 8 TONS
o, STREAM RELOCATlO ~{ �o �ST. u TONS E57, 2i SY GF�
� lS lNCIDfNTAL `" � 3k.4eB &LF�/pFmRCED p
� 20'-36' `' SILT FENCE AT LOW o �
�m�� r `' POINTS ALDNG SILT �—! } C`
i m FENCE lTYPI SPEC�AI �ATERAL V D�TCH OO�
� 7EMPORARY SILT „ � SITE 5 � SEE DETAII B � �
� FENCE lTYPI '� I �
/ �
\ INSTALL SILT FENCE 3'FROtiI 'F E� � � j/
a `\,\ 70P OF BANK lTYPJ �
o `�' N gtiti ',a �_.�i
m -y��� �� P SI TE 4 /NSTACL CHECK DA�{I tl� .
��F
c_\ . PLACE REINFORCED TOC 57D,0?0�.�1? �
0 �, 16� SILi FENCE AT LOYY FES ����/- -�- �
� � N POINTS ALONG SILT C �. �
/
�e
U � N N '� ��, FENCE frYPl � �
�, �� � T T �a
o ` ez z ez a si 2.eE 'e F
� �/e
vi BZ 7 �'w- BZ Z 7 BZ 2 F � �/ F p e /ci /� �.
/
O L 0�� /�f/ / / /� Ob\ ,� , \��
m oZi� Fj �. / �' J.
� �
3 ci� QE --= � �`� � � / ,�t ,� � \ �� � \
m � - - -- ,=P-E., - - - v� �_ , � / .. /,.
'� e`— ie � � g�1 � JI
g' � —� E o_=�o—e ��� '� �� � °� � �e� ��,a,, � F � a� `R� '� � �� ���'��'
� h � � � � � �
O � . � E�� ----- �- -a� —M��-6 svl� ---- �.
\ � � � ,�_ �, � /
Z
� � � �. \ B 1 — PE - - a � � /�.:�� .
� �\ \ ez eZ E�� .
S7A(1 MPDRARY /,:��'' '
• C� � \ BZ 2 eZ � 3'FRDM T�OP OFNCE g2 P/REMOVER�X�S7 , �,:��� ,'/
c' � Z 2 BANK ?Y �5' CMP ANO f.�: /
W �\ BZ 2 PLACE 44'-�5' J '
gZ � ACE REINFORCED SILT
� � � � FENCE AT LOW POINTS RCP-IV � /.���� /
'F \ PLACE REINFOR ED SILi FENCE INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG SILT fENLE lTYPI ��:`` •�
� � AT LOW POINTS ALONG SILT 3'FROAI TOP OF �,-.� �
� � FENCE t7YP1 .
o \ � � ��`���� �
.� � / �
o � , r ' �' .
z, ��� S �. i o�.:��
�O CONCRE7'E TRUCK yyASNOUT � �:;'� /
\ � AREA AlyO 570CKPlLE -
o STAGING AREA �_�� �
a
3 � �pA _ '
m '� 1 � B .�m � ,_ /
�; �� .��.3 \ B�� re �, ��'. i
.,� `�� � !' •' �
� �� �r�_�ta �." �
v O� INSTALC iE PORARY SrRE CROSSING INSTALL 7EMPoRARY STRE.4dl CRO lNG /;�'� '
o ,� �.� USING 20 FIX17 OF l� 24'7EMPORARY PIPE �MPACT ZOOM—IN SITE 5 USING 20 FOOi OF Ie l5"TEMPOR Y PIPE � � /
O G OR WOOD BRILGEMAT (��� = 40�) OR w00D BRIOGEMA7 D a
� �MQP CROSSING WIOTH = APPROX IO'fMINI�NIZEI CROSSING INI�TH = APPROX l0'f.UINI. 7 ��`- �
CROSS/NG LENGTH = SEE DETAIL fMINI�IZE) CROSSING LENGTH = IySEE DETAIL !.IIINI ZE1 /_:'� �'
3 PERMIT DRAWING � -� BACKFCOVEREARTH�MA�ERIAL BACKFI�EREARTHMNA�ERIAC ��
' SHEET 5 OF b a' SURFAC£ STONE = COARSE AGGREGATE SURFACE STDNE = COARSE ArGREGATE ` �
� BANK STABqJZATION = CLASS 'B'R/PRAP BANK STABILlZA7/ON = CLA55 'B'R/PRAP �
�� oeNorES aeaMnNeNr iMancrs Otl7LET PRQiECTION = CLASS 'B'R/PRAP, OUTLET PR07ECTlON = CLASS 'B'R/PRAP. �-- -� INLET PROTECTION �TYP1
� iN sUaFnce wnTeR EST 7 TONS.EST l5 SY FF ES7 3 TONS.fST 6 SY FF
g SEE OETNL lN PLANS SEE DETAiL lN Pl.AP/S
0
3 — — m — — —"' — T-�� � /S"p0
p � DENOTES PERMANENT TB� �
20�,
'a
NP
/ !.
� '1
/ /.
�� :.:' � /y0 570CKPlLING AC7NlTlES
yvliHlN Sd OF STREA,1/
�, ;. .
:; �"
� �:
c �.'- �/
? /.� 7EMPORARY SILT
�` / FENCE liYPl
/.
q,� :� �
���
�
lNLE7 PROTECTION \
fTYPJ �..
.\ \
'E\ ..
� STOCKPILE STAGING AREA
PROTEC7 EXIST TRAIySFORMER -
AND CABCES
`-- iEMPORARY COIySTRUCTlOIy AGCE55/
CONCRf7f TRUCK CLEANOU7
\
�" t� ' b
/�g \� S���C
`� � oo�'aol
i G� ti`�
\�pP
� FILL IN WETLAND 78 — — �$��
Q M,IN S1TE 4 rirEa nIA
� . � . � �. �. � . � Z�O APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF CHRY
Y �IMpAC l�" : AO i DEVeLOPMENT REV!EW COMMIT7EE
DENOTES TEMPOftARY DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
IMPACT IN WETLAND IMPACT '00401N SITE fS UNlE55 ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETED PLANNER'. DATE:_
DENOTES LiMITS OF
DISTURBED AREA
PREPARED IN THE OFFlCE OF:
� Kimle >>> Horn MULTI-USE TRAIL
o E�.No.: reE�soN: oArE: ore wN e7: � � PRELIMI�NARY�PLAN&
� Th�s doo�me�+,+oge+ha� w�+h +na oo��aP+s a�d des�gns P�esa�+a� he�e��,as a� �ns+��ma�t of s� AND DRAINAGE PLANS
� ��+e�ded o��y for +na sPe��f�� P�rPosa a�d ���e�+ for wn��n �+ w s PraParad. Ra�se af a�d �mProPare, �6
� rei�a�oe o� +nis aoo�men+ wi+no�+ wri++e� a�+noriza+�on a�a aaop+io� ey Kimiay-Horn a�a assoma+es,ina. 42 I FAYETTEVILLE STREET SUITE 600 - RALEIGH, NC 2760 I
M snauoe wi7no�t uaenir to KimiaY-Horr, ar,d assooiata6.ir,�. PHONEe (9 19) 6�7-2000 FAXe (9 19) 677-2050 PE No.F-oioz
Copyrlght Klmley-Horn and Assocldtes, Ino., 20 17
PROJECT:
WHITE OAK CREEK GREENWAY
MACARTHUR TO DAVIS DRIVE
�oe NUMsea. C-560418 Ee, NUMeEF. 5

�
J
INSTALL TEMPoRARY STREA.0 CROSSING
VSING 90 FW7 OF l@ 24"7EMPORARY PIPE lly57ALL TEMPORARY STREAtiI CROSSING
OR WOOD BRIDGE.NA7 USING 20 PCOT OF 2� 36"TEMPORARY PIPE
caossiNc WiorH = aPPRox iarMiNiMizei oR W000 eRiocEMar
cRossiNc eENcrH = see oEra� rMiNiMizEi cRass�Nc Wiorn = v�PRox iar�iNi�izEi
PIPE CWER = l2' MllyIMU�U CROSSING LENGTH = SEE OETAIL l.NINI�IZEJ
BACKf/LL = EARTH ,IIATERIAL PIPE COVER = l2"MlNIMUM �
SURFACE STONE = COARSE AGGREGA7E BACKFILL = EARTH MA7ERlAL Q
BANK STABILIZATION = CLA55 'B'RIPRM SURFACE STONE = COARSE .4�GREGA7E � �
OU7LET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP. BANK STABlUZA7/ON = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP � \, \
EST 7 70NS.EST l5 SY FF OUTLET PROTECTION = CLASS 'B'RIPRAP,
�k SITE 3 SEE DETN[ lN PLANS EST i9 TONS.ESi 42 SY FF \
O� ADJUS7 /NLET PR07ECTlON WHEN Sff DETNLIN PLANS /-/ �
P 2 PROP STRUCTURE l5 /NSTALLE� , �\., �.
5� Al
L� �� INSTALL TEMPORARY STREA,U CROSSING /���
, \�� 5�� USING ZO FOOT OP l@ l5" 7E.UPORARY PIPE
V� JB �/ MH, TOC DETAIL '1\ OR WOOD BRIQiE.NAT SITE 6
�P,��Y� ��j� . \ � N0. 8000.05 � CROSS/NG LENGTH �EE DE�a l�MINIMIZEI PLACEEBEOFF30' RCP-IV
\ � PIPE COVER = l2' MlNIMUM
� � BACKFILL = EARTH ,{IATERIAL '�ITH CONC COLLAR
-�' c+ 20'-36' SURFACE 570NE = COARSE AGGREGATE i6 �5' RCP-IV
Bc. B.NyK STABILIZATION = CLASS 'B'f7/PRAP ������QT
yy QUTLET PROTECTION = CLA55 'B'RIPRM.
c "' S JB / H, TOC DETAi EST 3 70NS.E57 6 SY FF
o, A�/Y RELOCATION U5T lNLE7 PROTECTION WHEN N0.080�0.05 SEE DEiAIL lN PLANS ES�T. B�gON�� RAP
� TEMP PIPE DUE
c ,\- �U4(L�(�k/R&dSE�/&Z1NI.L��A55 B RIP RAP EST, 21 SY GF�
o STREAM RELOCATlO �� � ST.uTONS
� /S lNCIDfNTAL ` `" � 3k.4eB &LF�/pFmRCED G�
� 20'-36' `' SILT FENCE AT LOW }
���m r `' POINTS ALDNG SILT �—!
' m FENCE lTYPI SPEC�AI �ATERAL V D�TCH OO�
� 7EMPORARY SILT , � SITE 5 � SEE DETAII B � G
� FENCE lTYPI '� I �
�\ INSTALL SILT FENCE 3'FROtiI 'F ES � '�
a 70P OF BANK lTYPJ � �
O � \
� � N l STACL CHECK DAdI g�ry ,P ���.
� s�° P SITE 4 N
m �cF \ , PLACE REINFORCED TOC 57D,0?0�.�1? � ���e �� �
0 �, 1 6� SILi FENCE AT LOYY FES f� --�-
� � N POINTS ALONG SILT C
U � N N '�\\\ �, FENCE frYPl �
' a
1 T T �f
p 1 BZ 2 BZ a si 2.QE �e F
a� ��e
�i BZ 7 �Iw- BZ Z 7 BZ 2 � ' F R e�/ /`k / �.
/ \
O ----�v� _ L 0� � /�F� / � 0�'� ,� . \ �
� 6Z -- Fj � Q�. �
�
� � Q� — ' r- , �-' � ,� i , „�
� � _ - - - o---P�". a = -. �,� �,, - � � v�ti I /.
.� �� � n �`� � µ µ � �4
� � E �Ea ��-� " � � �a #' _ _ �� ��� � � � F � a� µ � � µ ,� � �i
O � . � E�—. - - - - - �- -a� —M��-6 e4! - - - - .
\
� Z� `h_
o � � �A B 1 �� PE � B I / .
�
� ez � �' lJ' ,'
� \ � BZ E� S7ALL .NPDRARY
• C� � \ BZ 2 eZ � 3'FRDM T�OP OFNCE g2 P/REMOVER�X�S7 , ���� /
c' n Z 2 BANK fTY IS' CMP AND :'� /
W �\ BZ 2 PlAC6 44'-i5' .�
gZ � ACE REINFORCED SILT :�. � ���
� � � � FENCE AT LOVI POINTS RCP-IV �
'F \ PLACE REINFOR ED 5/Li FENCE INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG SILT fENLE lTYPI ��:`` •�
� � AT LOW POINTS ALONG SILT 3' FROAI TOP Of �,-: � �
� � FENCE t7YP1 .
o \ � � ��`���� �
o � J/ i �-' /.: �'
2� S 5� � D/.�.
�O CONCRE7'E TRUCK yyASNOUT � �:;'� /
\ � AREA AlyO 570CKPlLE -
o STAGING AREA �_�� �
� ` "
3 �� Ap\ _ � , / /,
m '� 1 � B .�m !r - � � .
c� `� �(F.3 \ B�— r8 �, �'. i
.,� `�� � !' •' �
� �� �r�_�ta �." �
v O� INSTALC iE PORARY SrRE CROSSING INSTALL 7EMPoRARY STRE.4dl CRO lNG /;�'� '
o ,� �.� USING 20 FIX17 OF l� 24'7EMPORARY PIPE �MPACT ZOOM—IN SITE 5 USING 20 FOOi OF Ie l5"TEMPOR Y PIPE � � /
O G OR WOOD BRILGEMAT (��� = 40�) OR w00D BRIOGEMA7 D a
� �MQP CROSSING WIOTH = APPROX IO'fMINI�NIZEI CROSSING INI�TH = APPROX l0'f.UINI. 7 ��`- �
CROSS/NG LENGTH = SEE DETAIL fMINI�IZE) CROSSING LENGTH = IySEE DETAIL !.IIINI ZE1 /_:'� �'
3 PERMIT DRAWING � -� BACKFCOVEREARTH�MA�ERIAL BACKFI�EREARTHMNA�ERIAC ��
' SHEET 6 OF b a' SURFAC£ STONE = COARSE AGGREGATE SURFACE STDNE = COARSE ArGREGATE ` �
� BANK STABqJZATION = CLASS 'B'R/PRAP BANK STABILlZA7/ON = CLA55 'B'R/PRAP �
�� oeNorES aeaMnNeNr iMancrs Od7LET PRQiECTION = CLASS 'B'R/PRAP, OUTLET PR07ECTlON = CLASS 'B'R/PRAP. �-- —� INLET PROTECTION �TYP1
� iN sUaFnce wnTeR EST 7 TONS.EST l5 SY FF ES7 3 TONS.fST 6 SY FF
g SEE OETNL lN PLANS SEE DETAiL lN Pl.AP/S
0
3 -- —� — ._ TB :� �Sx�
p � DENOTES PERMANENT TB� �
20�,
'a
NP
/ !.
� '1
/ /: /y
� �` � WR N�50'OF STREA,1/ �ES
�, ;.. /.
; �"
� �:
c �.'- �/
? /.� 7EMPORARY SILT
��- / FENCE liYPl
; � �.
4j� �/ / \
i
����
�
iN�er PRorEcnoN \
fTYPJ �..
.\ \
'E\ ..
� STOCKPILE STAGING AREA
PROTEC7 EXIST TRAIySFORMER -
AND CABCES
`-- iEMPORARY COIySTRUCTlOIy AGCE55/
CONCRf7f TRUCK CLEANOU7
\
�" t� ' b
/�g \� S���C
`� � oo�'aol
i G� ti`�
\�pP
� FILL IN WETLAND 7B ��_I 16-SP-077
Q M,IN S1TE 4 rirEa nIA
� . � . � �. �. � . � ZDO APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF CHRY
Y �IMpAC l�" : AO i DEVeLOPMENT REV!EW COMMIT7EE
DENOTES TEMPOftARY DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
IMPACT IN WETLAND IMPACT '00401N SITE fS UNlE55 ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETED PLANNER'. DATE:_
DENOTES LiMITS OF
DISTURBED AREA
PREPARED IN THE OFFlCE OF:
� Kimle >>> Horn MULTI-USE TRAIL
o E�.No.: reE�soN: oArE: ore wN e7: � � PRELIMI�NARY�PLAN&
� Th�s doo�me�+,+oge+ha� w�+h +na oo��aP+s a�d des�gns P�esa�+a� he�e��,as a� �ns+��ma�t of s� AND DRAINAGE PLANS
� ��+e�ded o��y for +na sPe��f�� P�rPosa a�d ���e�+ for wn��n �+ w s PraParad. Ra�se af a�d �mProPare, �6
� rei�a�oe o� +nis aoo�men+ wi+no�+ wri++e� a�+noriza+�on a�a aaop+io� ey Kimiay-Horn a�a assoma+es,ina. 42 I FAYETTEVILLE STREET SUITE 600 - RALEIGH, NC 2760 I
M snauoe wi7no�t uaenir to KimiaY-Horr, ar,d assooiata6.ir,�. PHONEe (9 19) 6�7-2000 FAXe (9 19) 677-2050 PE No.F-oioz
Copyrlght Klmley-Horn and Assocldtes, Ino., 20 17
PROJECT:
WHITE OAK CREEK GREENWAY
MACARTHUR TO DAVIS DRIVE
�oe NUMsea. C-560418 Ee, NUMeEF. 5