The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170496 Ver 1_B230084 Permit Application_042117_20170424aNpev�. u Ya.1��$ � Uy� ',a' ..�+ s.: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR April 17, 2017 Ms. Sazah E. Hair U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Subject: Dear Ms. Hair: Nationwide Permit #3 Replace Bridge No. 230084 over Juniper Swamp on SR 1119 Columbus County, North Carolina WBS No. 17BP.6.R.68 JAMES H. TROGDON, III $ECRE7ARY The North Cazolina Depaztrnent of Transporta6on (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 230084 over Juniper Swamp on SR 1119 (Wright Road) in Columbus County. The structure is to be replaced by a bridge at its existing location. The existing structure is a 70' long, reinforced concrete floor bridge on I-beams. The proposed structure is a 90' long, 2 span cored slab bridge. An off-site detour is proposed. Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Lumber River Basin. The existing bridge crosses Juniper Swamp, a Class C; Sw water. Please find attached the Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet, permit drawings, and associated stormwater management plan. Proposed impacts to Juniper Swamp include 30 ]inear feet of temporary impact for construction access. Proposed impacts to wetlands include ]ess than 0.01 acre of permanent impact, 0.01 acre of temporary impact, 0.04 acre of hand clearing. This project was reviewed for the presence of federally threatened and endangered species (see Table 1 on page 2). It is anticipated that this project wil] not affect any of the listed species. MailingAddrrss: Telephone: (910)4861493 Locntim�: NC DEPARiMENT OF TRANSPORTATION F6C: (9L0) 486-19SH 558 GILLFSPIE STR28T H[cewnx Drnslorv 6 Cusromer Service: 1-877-368-0968 Fnv5�i5v�ue, NC 28301 POBOX I150 {f'ebsite: www.ncdot.gov Fnverrev�u.e, NC 28302 Replace Bridge No. 230084 over Juniper Swamp on SR 1119 (Wright Road) April 17, 2017 lVame � mississippiensis extensa americana borealis �d s ecies listed for Columbus Count . Common Name Federal Habitat Biological Status Present Conclusior American alligator T(S/A) Yes Not Require Waccamaw silverside T No No Effect Wood stork Red-cockaded woodnec� ystmac/2ta asperu[ae,jolia Rough-leaved loosestrife Thalictrum cooleyi Cooley's meadowrue Note: E- Endangered; T- Threatened; T(S/A) - Threatened Due T No No Effect E No No Effect E No No Effect E No No Effect to Similarity of Appearance. Page 2 The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the USACE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eued bat (NLEB) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for al] NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Columbus County, where this project is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a final listing determination through Apri130, 2020. Cultural resource compliance work has been completed. No archaeological resources or historic properties fall with the Area of Potential Effect of this project. This letter, permit drawings, and the L,ow/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet are our notificauon for USACE and NCDWR 404/401 approval. If further informa6on is required, please let me know. Your review and consideration is greatly appreciated. 'ncerely, � � �r✓5 James . Rerko Division 6 Environmental Officer Cc: Travis Wilson, NCWRC Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Resources Gary Jordan, USFWS Greg Burns, PE, Division Engineer Ken Murphy, Jr, PE, Division Maintenance Engineer Keith Beverley, Division Roadside Environmental Engineer Stream Existing Struc[ure Proposed Structure Stream Wetlantls Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project �ata Sheet ImpeCts (AC) I m.m acre or perm impacr, u.ui ac (IMern/MMrWnrl Baltl Eagle - Ves flCW - No utat(Y!N) Waccamawsilverside-No Wootl slork -No Codeys meadown.a - No Rough-leaved loosesirife - No hmerican alliga�or � N!A (M1b Survey ReqWred) Baltl Eagle - No FCW - No T&E SpeciesPresent waccamawsilverside-No Wootl atork - No Cooleys meatlaxue - No Rough-leevetl lOwesinfe - No Nmerban alllgator - Not Requi�etl Bald Eagle - WA RCW - No Eifect C011CIuSiO� WeccemawsiNarsitle-NOEHect Wootl stork � No Ettect Cooley's meaCowrue - No Etteci Rough-leavetl loosestrife - No Effect Moratarium Trout Waters No Location Comments arnzan I�� ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: James Rerko, Divisional Environmental Officer, NC Department of Transportation PO Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Wright Road over Juniper Creek in Columbus County. (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Columbus City: Tabor City Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.0716 °N; Long. -78.7958 °W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Juniper Swamp Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 210 linear feet: 40 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: R2 Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands: 1.05 acres. Cowardin Class: PFO Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: 1 E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): � Office (Desk) Determination. Date: � Field Determination. Date(s): SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): a Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Vicinity Map ❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. � Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: �oretown �Zo�a� �:24K ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: � 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑✓ Photographs: ❑`� Aeflal �Nal'T'1@ & DatG'�: 2013 NC Statewide Aerial PhotographyOr � Other (Name & Date): � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: � Other information (please specify): � 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) ignatu�e"arid date of erson�requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) r �r Bridge No. 230084 Aquatic Resources in Review Area Table 1. Site Name Streams Wetlands WA WB WC �ry Jurisdictional Determination Table Cowardin Estimated Amount of Latitude Longitude Aquatic Resource in Classification Review Area (linear feet) 34.0716 -78.7958 R2 210 (acres) 34.0710 -78.7952 PFO 0.27 34.0714 -78.7959 PFO 0.50 34.0719 -78.7962 PFO 0.28 February 2017 Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" Section 404 Section 404 Section 404 Section 404 ,.pF NOFTN .. v� C99 I � ".9� Q�, I .e,yoFrnnas°o, February 2Q17 Feet � 5� 1�� _�=__...' — � -!"F � � Study Area �i Perennial Sh-eam - Wetland Goretown (2014) USGS 1:24K Quadrangle Map Replace Bridge No. 230084 over Juniper Swamp Columbus County Figure 2: USGS Map � ]y�� f� ��i�) { ,�,,y �r,*: g.. �� s ��. r�. a��,i . a� •- � � r�,-,�,i. �y': �f U. � ' t - 1. � � .�� "'ti +e' ;•. "SiT � �v�y�,ay� .a ��it� a� 3��t jl.� � d�,��YiiA '� � ♦�a . % _ �- r�i� y .�#`' � ^" � .I' $ . � s � . :� � 1,.. � _� r ,� , . � � ; � � , �., w �a v � � , a ��•� ; w� '��% '� T�.m ,r, Y�•lt�+_.�„ ,s. !r r t,' y ? . �'�i �': -�j + �. Y`✓� :�' � - l�� .,`�' � �` ��•<�: ti � ��, , , !c �C ;� � y� �j'� 1 t � S`il �' l�' . �. �;. �.,� •�, �� ' z � �'�� '� � h � ' t., r . J� �,�^ 1� `�Y l�`�' �w�� F . . adlf; [ .r�d y;,r '� ' r�' . i�;, '�- �� 'j r ` � -�..��t �.,�+� �,� `�� 3. 4 ' y�. � 1 �' ��., y t '�p"�r9. � . x1 , �i� � i.k ��' e{s ',`�',�� ' '� ��CT :f #Y� , L 11.:�, .�KiP� , �_ �y� `; 3.�� T ��Y ��:'"' �l t T L ..7 . .y� � i j � j' �. r`� �w �r�l.�� . .,�. � �?� � � -.�+b � -3N �l �.,,i��*r'•, . , �� ' ��r� � � � � i'� � , '� k � u � "'. �� k � i x . ;��.'Y �,�,�'�'�^ 1� '�. ,r#llk+�`�..� �.,,� . ��' ta . ,Y' y .. f� '� . ��d'6'� �i�i�" � �: � 6 Z S �y. . T�i �v �4: _ 1 � IfT�� ,��`.,� � i s. �tiV �i w r ��. e1��1 �� .y' i �.��a r`Y� 3 �_�" - `�' - �.�(s,�. �r� �.� -�.�� .. � . �+ y�4•4�� . T� _ Y. �� • p ' ' � `� , , ; �'{`�� ,T` �?f*''Mt F .� . J6 � ` i �i�.S' \+ •t ` ~`� "� � � � f'� �'�' t r�.- "� � 1C3 �, R �^� �. ' „ � . ' �'� � ^� � . � � - � �' ^� * '"= � �' ,-- } ' '' �l` .{��< �'i �'J '. V `' � ..�' � . .�'�, .` y.j- 'Si ty . . • t " r�y� . �.;r�� 'tra � � �' J � " f � '�z � y t�� 1�y�p. �� ;� � . �y � , �,� -;�: {;' - > � -�C '� �" �'�, �Z'��` s"�� -'` 4 r- �'s�,i.� , .a;��'� � ,} .'�; � �� " � �� '..r ; . !' '- b�. � � f��,t _�< �� µ {��F ��'1., ��y;.�� ,. �' y f ! * "�1 � .-��' �I.„ , � f ,.-��jy.�'�Y�. x . qn . � d� .�: .. '� . � i � � �1 �'��' P� pi�. YF � hf� y�,'��'�, ' �'4 ?� �t ts` .11 ,. . . � { ._ ;�a i � :: ",� ,, ,.. '' .�., �� . y � � • 1 . �ek. ' r` �� ' ,,�, , „� ;�r;� , i ,� ., �� r� �,�',� � �� ,� � �r � ' �� ;,� f' �� 1 ` x. e � ' ..:� �� ` . .Ky ` ..{• ., - - p . "� ;.Y � � ��.7'�� 4' i'� � .�^- a�ty�l42 'y. � ,��' . � � �:.�� ,�' � �� ,�a't�, 1 �.�i2 ';�y P.: � .: � -sk r s` r •. t � F�� I 1. . �, , . �� . +� �� . 7ay �� +, y � . -, ` ,P,�, i. Tt `�'�- �., � : "� Y� "� . �. �[^.'�.. ' V �.. 1 i. Y . . -: t i C G_ � j` � r � � 7R � 't'7 �, v�jl� t �s�j .�f� � ,,�n K � tr" '� `- � � ,��{ ' +*�Y 1 1. � l�� f 'PI� ,, _ � .,, . I _ �. /,r Z�y..f q�N?'• ro ;c� � � � �� '' . � y.+. . � �� r `� � � � ,s� ` � -�:� �F�� - - 3 ' .'+ �y ` .. 1 �� , � x�'ne.� �_ tr � .T �,°., , � �..� W j � ' �.�i'�' �r�'� � IZ,;� �'�' '� � f r �Y� .�}'a � �. � `�� ., _ , ,'; , � � �� - , , � � '�� . t1�c- �� ` � . 1 � ��!�� '. ��y ` �Y' �4'Y' 4 C ,�.�}� � �a..' ��. f:� ��: '��y ' 4�1i"�l'�,V _f "' 6 0 f . � . . � '�Ir *a ' � ti't r- �� .�� :� � � �`` � E �j, .° �.� � r '�' � - l��j �,p, s � � 7 � �� ' ` ��' :� ,e%, , �` � � s;` x r, ;, .r '� 3� � �Jy/- �� 1` �.y�� s. � ,. � � '.a � _A :� , Y�f. ��w�'�' k�. . �.��y� � !""" h � f v ,� h? ��r 'aY. y'i` , .Tn� �. .J., � a � ��.%;. iii' .�y � ,� :�+� _ �� _� .�. ,� �Y`' ��: . � ` ' . �n ,�.. �,�,�. > �,r�-' , fa�--. r .'�i.; � _ � � ?' _ � `l'✓i' s�F .� �' . 7 A'a,1 " ,�'•; '- �a�� K� �� .�t Y:"¢`�'j �- '�k � M" s :�y�.bw ��'� �� ^� � � ' � � r +� i �� i ,V � �� ' �� d& '�lS'4� 1 � � P �� R � �,�^ . _ ', It{. �� * �' �µ e.� � � �� l�� r , � tc ��i ` � 1 • � t �, r�} ' y t �� s�l,� . � . �.�,'k �.. ; �s c .K� � . ' .; .:� c� � N� r,} +� . � � � ,� vW� � � , "1 •_,� �� ,` s i .�d� � f� � �''� .• � ", o � Yq$ �-� .;j :?� .�. `'� � �F l4 d r _-j y..f''� �� h r`�. ,� ,�,q..�'�, #,a�'r� ^Ay/i, •��.��, ;� .r ��-�,r'�'�,i;=,,�� °l .-��, �!J `; � ,,�['�,- 3� f9t y •+�'.� x� K i; S��-�?�_,rL t � 71' �� 1c . VF - t y� <.: � �, � ,. y`� -'" �' y i��^��,��n S 'M^ .. `t-�c '!S' � .�iF� �. � 3' � �J ` . • ty � �. � q . ,t rS � � t . $c r ryR!� . ' - � .� � r'S �t��'�? � Qr,:� rt�' �'a��.+-T � {r �i_ i� c'�f�F 'j-, � ,� t < . lI � j � �..._ �t/ �1',�.�i'�� f �- ,l"' �.iY,Lr^v �� ' � _ � '�� r F � I t,.; . '�r.'� �\�� •�. ,� � ��,. . ; F �` � t �' � i ¢,��,i:� � ��"�.� ��r� �� `' � f� -. � ' �.$��r' � ��' y' 33 i '.Y�- � y"�'�z S '` -� ��+ yf :�,* f f... �.�� .` �iY :.y ' 4 �� jf. �� . 1'� I�"I��ti. �S'1 �, ��.r � �.y .Jti'�i�{' Wy �_� ^M . A ' ✓�_ ��I�� {� $'9 � `d t�.,�Ky� 3J�.�(�� -i�' " �`�Ray,i+R�'�{ . '��i .w� T}L � .a.-a �•,.i.e * ''�� ' ' ?t y', �•';' , i 7� ` � �y �,'1 �� * :�R�' � �"S 4.r . � �.� ��g �,,�y ��'�+k �� h. . �n[ 4�S � ! �=Y�s .y�it f �a �2, � .r sd'�� .. ' }.�7 . . ,�► y� � �� 6�y�`� w . � , � Y�! ` "�' �`�f�'; �? '� �3�'� ' }''1 '� �' �� '�� h ;` � �i .�y, � . �fr^"�� r �;� i .'�'��y` " � ~� "�' � d'�%wt�. e �; ,�rsy' �� .. s. � , � r ' �r � r .. � ,'1*{� �' .h`' � •, a � � -� y a i y�.v - z' _ f � . y _ �: � , ` ��r-4 � � } � �� . �y't�� ?� j � ♦.r ��;{ -,,��` ��?{, ,�- ��`��, ��r�'�� ` �'Jc�i .+� "�ei: � 7�,�' ��#�` ,:`�� '�,� . � _ � *'� "7K � . .' � � i `e" � . °' � r � . � ��cc �,i � 'F' .,- �,r h y ��' h.v �r°i� �'�� ar .�a�� . � ��s'�i�i � , -�.r:�� `� F 1. �.� r.. �'��yr ,:�« .�,. : .�1 � � '� �r r � FxY,�' � .. � � '� r�` y «*' v'" " � r . '� � '` � ;��' � � 'c . ,�a ��Y,� � �� _ '�' �� ..� r ��-;� ��s, �Fi�'d�� - ; �j�r� +►��` .�F` .��K 3'(.'s '�� A . �y NY sy� � �.:�.� S�'�- �'.:. � c�t/ ; '� .� � �" :�` ; �� } .,` ,�" �w Y� r . �. ,t��,`�f' � � 4 �y�0. � r�' �h.�'�• Aj, M�.� f+i5 r.. � � a '� .•• Y �i�, ,.'++�1� '�' d�, � � �' ��i �� C T �'�'�a 4a� � t 'C '., 1� 1 � �� . {• '�.,�_ �-� '�C �. � t _ .'`7 �`d� � x �� 6. „�}^ -t � a' � �� _,_�.� �� ,,�K t '�, � �s, � 1 � �,�d ��;'�" _ �^,�" i i�'�Y�i £ '=r x .y� ,{Y �� S. .it ,� ,. �� .r� �,.�� .`��*4pPP��1 �'•� ,f"1P �'�' °` . t' �sj:�'�--,S�.,yr,' t;�i$�." �„}��,ii�4.� �� ,`'� � � .,�� . ��+ ;�' �- � �"; . ,� .f''�►�c - �4J s r+}q . rV�� - -'.l� ..:asr �- �P�' V� _ � �� 1 ,�,F � �,� . 1 1. . :as ' ; � �, f t l :i'�.-i - ,;i.. �ti.�.�..'!�:.a�. . . ' � .�'�, _� �' � . �o��°�r,-t�w,o Replace Bridge No. 230084 ��y� N � Study Area over Juniper Swamp i Fe�t �� Perennial Stream Columbus County �e�oF�AN�°°` � 0 50 100 Wetland Tigure 3: Jurisdictional February 2Q17 2013 NC Statewide Aerial Photography Features Map WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: %J . �/ �'i " /� � � � 3v��`� City/County: � n' i�Mn �p �n 5 Sampling Date: �/ -� y • , ��1:F�.i ApplicanUOwner. IJ G�d� State: n� L Sampling Point: Investigator(s): K-,l�foe.1�� d !`\� ��P.��l Section,Township,Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): . ' � � Local relief (concave, convex, none): %` ^'" �° Slope (%): �� ' Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T- � s3� Lat: �"1 , 1i�1 � Long: -�� ,�� Sa Datum: ��L Soil Map Unit Name: - '� I�R, � NWI classification: ��D Are climatic / hydrologic wnditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? I�1i� Are "Normai Circumstances" present? Yes V No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? N p (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No Hydric Soil Present? Yes �' No WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes �l� No Remarks: �n LI V�2S W� �,� lr1 G. HYDROLOGY Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes � No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that ao�lvl ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace (B8) High WaterTable (A2) Q1�f Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Pattems (B10) Saturation (A3) �u( Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (816) � Water Marks (61) !1��If Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) II Dry-Season Water Table (C2) �Sediment Deposits (B2) LJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) II Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) � Geomorphic Position (D2) a Iron Deposits (65) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3) a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5) a Water-Stained Leaves (89) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: -�/ SurFace Water Present? Yes No `✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): �� ,/ Saturation Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v No includes ca illa fin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers AUantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 F� .� VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. � Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: `3v ) % Cover S ecies? Status ,�� 1. ��.l�� ' ��- ' ,�'i �+e�%^. a �� - 2. ��r�! �,�;�t�, / J � � 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. � b = Total Cover 50% of total cover: �-� 20% of total cover: � Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �� ) 1. ��!'Y ' ' ��,. -. 2. �? �� . G,,':^ �r�.c,-.- �.� 3. /-,Ict_i � ;', 4. J'� - ,.,:�, / 5. 6. 7. �%� F�C.� '� � �Rua zo .� rn�_. � v � g. i � = Total Cover 50% of total wver: 30� . J� 20% of total cover. �_ Herb Stratum Plot size: c � � 1. %�%� �:� �r��>h � I �� %�„i ZS" ✓ r.�% 2. ��'<�"��-".'-� r�.C-PF7�o.�� ` � �)I�L 3. ��r,i�'vi GC/;, _ /� �� i � 4. .. ; � < ly.. . - ,� ,-� J 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. �_ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: �(� 20% of total cover: �� Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: s�� ) 1. "�', ; 5/, ,�,..,> L��': (D � �� z. =�,1�rr� ��J, 'a�� " �v ✓ F�[� 3. 4. 5. a = Total Cover I 50°/a of total cover. �_ 20% of total cover: _� morphological �.�� ' Sampling Point: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �(A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species q b That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � I �(A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = J� Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �2 - Dominance Test is >50% a 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, exGuding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 , /� ; ,,� ;� tir SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirtn the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Sinchesl Color (moistl °� Color (moist) % Tyae Loc Texture Remarks U- �S �fl �� 3/; :�o �. �� !�`��' ai� qn ��? �/,i �� c �'� � s� 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': � Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) � Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) � Black Histic (A3) 1.9 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) ,Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) �Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) �5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Daric Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks) ,Q Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 751) � Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and �Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506) �Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed�: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No Remarks: • US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region �ah<; Project/Site: � �'�'�� ` r� '�`'� `�� City/County:�.r��p��t�5 SamplingDate: 9�� ApplicanUOwner: f� C�_ State: N Ci Sampling Point; In�� n y Investigator(s): � r��.�� 4�"�• Section, Township, Range: �-; �':�',� Onc o z`��/O Landfortn (hil�slope, terrace, etc.): � Locai relief (concave, convex, none): � Slope (/o): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): �- �53 Lat: � i� Long: -�� .��S � Datum: �',S g"i Soil Map Unit Name: _� -/�na� 'c'i nft,, �KTY , Ib�lV� NWI classification: Are Gimatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantiy disturbed? �J � Are "Norrnai Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation , Soi� , or Hydrology naturally problematic? �'.; p(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soii Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? HYDROLOGY Yes � No Yes No � Yes No �� Is the Sampled Area � within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Seconda,r�r Indicators,�pinirr�um of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Q High Water Table (A2) Q Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) �, Drainage Patterns (610) � Saturation (A3) II�-t Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) � Moss Trim Lines (B16) � Water Marks (61) TL�Ji Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ru-� Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Crayfish Burrows (C8) II Drift Deposits (B3) I--I Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soiis (C6) � Saturation Visible on Aeriai Imagery (C9) a Aigal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) � Geomorphic Position (D2) Q Iron Deposits (65) � Other (Expiain in Remarks) ❑ Shaliow Aquitard (D3) a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5) a Water-Stained Leaves (69) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: ,/ Surface Water Present? Yes No V Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No � includes ca illa fin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring weli, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: U5 Army Corps of Engineers At!antic and Gutf Coastal Plain Regien - Version 2.0 V@GETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. � � Aosowte uommant inaicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3L' ) % Cover S ecies? Status 1. � ��i-' :� �� . ,: n l � -L- FA �, 2. f'rL�,�;�v'�< �-�Y�. :, /� � �.(��j, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: aa,� 20% of total cover: rJ Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: i� S ) � 1. �/�. ,Y, h �� s u � �^a -� - � .. 2�' � � 2. :/i�i':i'. l�� ' i' (z.�.. �� F� G 3. lf��ill ;/-�;t lrh-�n:..,i.� � � �n��Ll 4. �_ � K OO� «, � Fik(, 5. 6. 7. 8. 55 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: a�. s 20% of total cover: � �'T� Herb Stratum (Piot size: ) L l o�'i �� o, � '��, , � L�` � ��f.� 2. ?��Y � ^i � �-� tiJ-�-�, r _ � FA ( _ 3. _ - 4. 5. 6._ 7._ 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. � = Totai Cover � 50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover: Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3� � ) �/�p 1. �M� �Gt ,� /!�'ti'ir�-�' ` ti � � Yi'ClL 2. 3. 4. 5. S = Total Cover 50% of total cover: a• S 20% of total cover: �_ , list morphological adaptations below). �l-'=� �� Sampling Point: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: � (B) Percent of Dominant Species 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �(A/6) Total % Cover of: Multi�lv bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = � FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = � UPI. species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) {B) Prevalence Index = B/A = II Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation � - Dominance Test is >50% II 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and weUand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to documeot the indiaator or confirm the absence of indfcators.) Depth Matrix Redox Featurss (in�c �es Color (mqist� % Color Jmoist) % Tv�e Loc Texture Remarks -� lD �� ~i I l � .�.�. _ � _ � �'b ,' _`f '� �DD . _�___ _ �� 'T : C=Concentration, O=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all 4RRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': � Histosol (A1) ,Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) -r-7 Reduced Vertic {F18) (outside MLRA 750A,B) � Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) �Stra6fied Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soiis (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538) �5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark SurFace (F7) T❑1 Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) [] 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks) ,[� Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) [� Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 157) n Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, 7, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Minarai (S1) (LRR O, S) Deita Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4} Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) �Sandy Redox {S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soits (F19) (MIRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous I�right Lo�my Soils (F20) (MLF�A 9A9A, 153C, 9�3DE ,[� Dark $ur,`ac,� (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U{ Restrictive I.ey�r (if observed): Type: �/ I�epth (�nches): Hydric Soil PresentT Yes No °' Remarks: lJS Army Corps �f �ngineer� AYantie and Gulf Coastai Plain Region - Version 2•D W�, l� 6� 1n� C, WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version ProjectName��,�� a30�� NearestRoad SQ il;�l County ��nnM�,i�� Wetland area >a-� acres Wetland width �?p feet Name of evaluator �,(-� n,,� �� Date i� f� f a� i b Wetland location on pond or lake � on perennial stream _ on intermittent stream _ within interstream divide other: Soil series: _ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ,� predominantly mineral - non-sandy _ predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors _ steep topography ditched or channelized �total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland t�pe (select one)* �/ Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater forest Swamp forest Wet flat Pocosin _ Bog forest Adjacent land use (within '/Z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) ✓forested/natural vegetation �I 0 % ✓agriculture, urban/suburban s S % ✓impervious surface S % Dominant vegetation (1) 5 Wnvw�o �e� �� 2� � r,��.�,��e� (3) � ��r �. �n 3:e��v � ��`�_ Flooding and wetness semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ,� seasonally flooded or inundated _ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water _ no evidence of flooding or surface water Pine savanna Freshwater marsh Bog/fen _ Ephemeral wetland _ Carolina bay Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage �_ x 4.00 =� A Bank/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 =� wetland rating T Pollutant removal 3 `" x 5.00 = 1 S '-�4 ��T� . �x,� �,i+. � I Wildlife habitat �_ x 2.00 =� v`�j'( � • �..+T ,� Y ", N Aquatic life value 3 x 4.00 = I a �, � . . e�,'� ; G Recreation/Education a x 1.00 =� ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius � � •, � V � � O V See Sheet 1 A Fo� Index of Sheets See Sheet iB For Conventional Symbols See Sheet 9C For Survey Control Sl�et �� `Y �� V'V' � 1L � COL UMB US CO U1�TY LOCATIOIV: BRIDGE 1V0. 230084 OVER JU11tIPER SWAMP ON SR 1119 (WRIGHT RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GRADIIVG, DRAI11lAGE, PAVI11lG �' STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT 'AT8 9TA'IS PROIHCI' REPEN6Nl8 NQ �� 17BP.6.R.68 41'AT8 PNQI.NQ P.AMIOI.NQ 176P.6.R.68 WA BRIDGE #230084 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II MODIFIED. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. 0 Hq0 8�Hq ?0�� PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT I:SE FOR Rf W ACQilISITIOV Prepaied �n �ne o��e f� ..- r.epa.ea r*: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ETHERILL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING DIVISION 6 ADT 2016 = 490 3� �$ � 3� 6� 1223 Jones Franklin Rd. Raleigh, N.0 27606 558 Gille,ple S�reee BlORp License No. F-0377 Fayerteville NC, 2830/ fy �� y C T = b % e Bus: 919.851.8077 Fax: 919.851.8107 � �B� PLANS 2012 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS �� e V= 55 MPH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.6.R.68 = 0.068 MILES p,g, 8 LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 176P.6.R.68 = 0.017 MILES RIGHT OF WAY DATE: EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE SIGNATURE: � � 3� �rJ � 30 6� PROJECT ENGINEER ro = * TTST = 3% DUAL = 3% MARCH 2O17 ROADWAY DESIGN �A a FUNC. CLASS = MINOR TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 17BP.6.R.68 = 0.085 MILES ENGINEER �°,� ,�� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) COLLECTOR RURAL LETTING DATE: GREG S. PURVIS, PE �'r � �m� 6 3 0 6 72 (SUBREGIONAL) SEPTEMBER 2017 Pxo��c� oEsrcN ExciNEEn F rwy�a� NCDOT CONTACT: BRICE BELL, PE PROFILE (VERTICAL) DIVIS70N 6 BRlDGE PROGRAM MANAGER PE SIGNAT[7RE: WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 -L- STA. 16+35 to 18+05 1@35', 1@55', 21" CORED SLAB < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 30 TOTALS*: < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 0 30 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: Permanent Fill in Wetlands (square feet) = 344 Excavation in Wetlands (square feet) = 189 Temp. Surface Water Impacts (square feet) = 227.5 2013 10 24 1-[if;hW�l�� North Carolina Department of Transportation %- StOYl114Vc1t�'Y Highway Stormwater Program � � � `, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.6.R.68 TIP No.: 230084 County ies : Columbus Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: TIP Number: 230084 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 3/6/2017 NCDOT Contact: James J. Rerko Contractor I Designer: Wetherill Engineering, Inc./ Harminder Singh, PE Address: Highway Division 6 Address: 1223 Jones Franklin Rd. 500 Transportation Dr. (PO Box 1150, 28302) Fayetteville, NC 28301 Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone: (910)437-0207 Phone: 919-851-8077 Email: lirerko c(�ncdot.qov Email: hsinqh c(Dwetherillenq.com CityITown: Tabor City, NC County(ies): Columbus River Basin(s): Lumber CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Project Description Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 0.09 Surrounding Land Use: Rural, Wooded, Agricultural Proposed Project Existing Site Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: (2) 11' lanes with grassed shoulders and up to 5.4' shoulders with guardrail. 4' shoulders (2) 10' lanes with grassed shoulders are variable width paved. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: Year: Existing: 490 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: Replace bridge no. 84 over Juniper Swamp on SR 1119 Wright Road. Use 1@35', 1@55' 21" Cored Slab. A TB 2GI will outlet on downstream side of the bridge with 15" CSP (Description of Minimization of Water with Class B rip rap is used to stabilize the outlet. No deck drains will discharge directly into channel. Quality Impacts) Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Juniper Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 15-17-1-11 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw) None Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Threatened/Endangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)