20170495 Ver 1_B230196 Permit Application_042117_20170424

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVEItNOR
April I 1, 2017
Ms. Sazah E. Hair
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject:
Dear Ms. Hair:
Nationwide Permit #3
Replace Bridge No. 230196 over Big Branch on SR 1003
Columbus County, North Carolina
WBS No. 17BP.6.R.69
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No.
230196 over Big Branch on SR 1003 (Silver Spoon Road) in Columbus County. The structure is
to be replaced by a bridge at its existing location. The existing structure is a 36' long, reinforced
concrete floor bridge on I-beams. The proposed structure is a 100' long, 2 span cored slab
bridge. An off-site detour is proposed.
Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Lumber
River Basin. The existing bridge crosses Big Branch, a Class C; Sw water. Please find attached
the I.ow/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet, permit drawings, and associated stormwater
management plan. Proposed impacts to Big Branch include 36 lineaz feet of permanent impact
due to bank stabilization and 52 linear feet of temporary impact for construction access.
Proposed impacts to wedands include 0.04 acre of permanent iill and 0.02 acre of temporary
impact for erosion control, less than 0.01 acre of excavation, and 0.06 acre of hand clearing.
This project was reviewed for the presence of federally threatened and endangered species (see
Table 1 on page 2). Surveys will be performed in mid-June for rough-leaved loosestrife and
Cooley's meadowrue prior to construction based upon habitat found in the project area.
Mtu(irtg Address: Telephnne: (910) 4861493 Lorntion:
NC DEPARiMEM OF TRANSPORTATION F[ir: [phone] S58 GIUESPIE STREET
H�cxwnv Drns�oN 6 Cwtomer Service: 1-877-368-4968 Fnverrevi��, NC 28301
PO BOX ( I50 We6sife: www.ncdoGgov
PAYeTTEtmte, NC 28302

Replace Bridge No. 230196 over Big Branch on SR 1003 (Silver Spoon Road)
April 11, 2017
Table 1. Federall
eientifc Name
lligator mtssissippi
enidia extensa
ycteria americana
icoides borealis
ysimachia asperula
Thalictrum cooleyi
Columbus
Common Name
American
Waccamaw silverside
Wood stork
Red-cockaded woodneck
ived loosestrife
s meadowrue
Fiabitat
S/A) Yes
T No
T No
E No
E Yes
E Yes
Not Requirei
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
MA-NLAA
MA-NLAA
Note: E- Endangered; T- Threatened; T(S/A) - Threatened Due to Similariry of Appearance.
MA-NLAA - May Affect-Not Likely to Adversely Affect. May change to No Effect if no individuals are
found during survey.
Page 2
The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the USACE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eared
bat (NLEB) in eastern North Cazolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions
1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB
for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely AffecP'. The PBO provides
incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which
includes Columbus County, where this project is located. This level of incidental take is
authorized from the effective date of a final listing determinauon through Apri13Q 2020.
Cultural resource compliance work has been completed. No azchaeological resources or historic
properties fall with the Area of Potential Effect of this project.
This letter, permit drawings, and the Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet are our
notification for USACE and NCDWR 404/401 approval. If further information is required,
please let me know. Your review and consideration is greatly appreciated.
, incerely,
C�, ✓A�a ��cv�J"
� �
James J. Rerko
Division 6 Enviromnental Officer
Cc: Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Resources
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Greg Burns, PE, Division Engineer
Ken Murphy, Jr, PE, Division Maintenance Engineer
Keith Beverley, Division Roadside Environmental Engineer

Low/Minimal Impact Britlge Pro�ect Data Sheet
TIP NO
WBS 17BP.6.R.69
Coun Columbus
Brid eNumber 2307as
Descriptlon Brltlge Na. 290196 ovet Bg Brench on SR 10IXi
SINerS oonRo
Be3in Lumber
Clessification C; Sw
Stream SIN 154�2-2
T ¢ Bip Brench: Perennial
Size Big Brench: 3o tt. wltle
T B RFC Floor on I-Beams; TM for AbutmeM and Pier
EXisting Structure SiZB 36' L z 27.33' W
Suff. Ratin 2&.a�
ProposetlStPUCture e 18"CoredSlab&itlpe
5122(witll�culloaup 100'LX33'W(1(q130',2@35')
Stream USACEIrtI 2C�3 LF 381f}ofBaNcS�abilaa�ion;521�Temporary
Non 4041m ects LF No
USACE ImpacfS (AC) 0.04 ec. perm iill; 0.03 ac. temp impect; c0.07 ac.
WES18fld3 Bxcaveton' 0.08 aa hantl Clead
Non 4041m acts AC No
CAMAIm eCtS SF Na�Appllcable
NC DWR BuHers Im acts S Na apqicabia
BuNer A liCetiOn R8 uiretl >40 ft M Na AppkcaMe
State Stormxrater Permit Re uiretl Y/N No
American alFgffior � Ves
Baltl Eegle - Ves
FCW-No
Habttat(Y!N) WaccamawslNersitle-No
Wootl stork-No
Cooleys meadowrue - Ves
Rough-kaved IaosesirHe- Ves
American allige�or - N/A (No Survey Requiretl)
Baltl Eaple - No
FCW-No
T&E SpeCle9PfBsent Waccamawsilversitle-No
Woatl atork - No
Cooleys meatlowrue - Survey Raqulretl
RougRleaved IoosealrHe - Survey Required
Ame�icen alligator - Not Requiretl
Beltl Eagle - WA
RCW - No Eflect
BIOCOtICIu3iOn We,cramawsiNersitle-NOEtteci
Wootl Stofk - No EfleCt
Cooleys meadowrue - MA-NLAA•
Raug�-leaved bosestriFe - MA-NLAA'
MOfetoflum T e Nona
Detes None
Native/Hatche Nq Applicable
Trout Waters Trout S ecles Present NM AppliCaMe
TroW Condltlons Y/N NW Applicade
WflC ReViewer Nm Appl�able
CAMA AECS Nd Appliceble
Essential Fish Hebi�at YM No
Nav. Opening No
USCG Permlt No
Historic Pro erties No
Archaeolo Ical Resources nb
Tribal Lantls No
4 Resources No
61 LWC Resources No
WiIA and Scenic Rfver No
Forest Service Lentls r�o
NA Afee NW Applkable
FEMA Bu out No
FEMA Flood Stud ves
USTs Haz Mets No
Relocatees No
Locatlon �T 30.4292 N
LONG 78.7690 W
' MA-NLAA - May AryeCFNN Llkely t0 AdvBlsely
Aflect basetl upon habitai louM. Will chenge to No
Project Commenta Etfec� ii no intlivltluals ere fountl during June 2017
survay. Open Wete� (OW Mill POM) impect -<0.01
ac. ior bank stabil¢etlon
Com leted by: )
LeaE EnBlneBr �. �
Emironmenlal OMicer / / /
M10/2617

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
James Rerko, Divisional Environmental Officer, NC Department of Transportation
PO Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Silver Spoon Road over Big Branch in Columbus County.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Columbus City: Clarkton
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 34.4292 °N; Long. -78.7680 °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Branch
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
300 linear feet: 50-125 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: R2
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.77 acres.
Cowardin Class: PFO, PSS
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
� Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
� Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
a Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Vicinity Map
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: cnadbourn n,E�zo,3�,:zaK
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
� 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑`� Aeflal �Nal'T'1@ & DatG'�: 2013 NC Statewide Aerial PhotographyOr
� Other (Name & Date):
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
�

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
i�ture and �te of �
on requ�esting preliminary JD
=QUIRED, unless obtaining
signature is impracticable)

Bridge No. 230196 Aquatic Resources in review Area February 2017
Table 1. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Table
Cowardin Estimated Amount of Geographic authority to which
Site Name Latitude Longitude Classification Aquatic Resource in Review the aquatic resource "may be"
Area sub'ect
Streams (linear feet)
Big Branch 34.4292 -78.7680 R2 300 Section 404
Wetlands (acres)
WA 34.4296 -78.7678 PFO 0.28 Section 404
WB 34.4294 -78.7671 PFO 0.06 Section 404
WC 34.4295 -78.7690 PSS 0.02 Section 404
WD 34.4292 -78.�676 PFO 0.33 Section 404
WE 34.4290 -78.7682 PFO 0.08 Section 404

,pF NOFiN ..
1 c�9
I �
".9� Q�, I
.e,yoFrnnas°o,
February 2Q17
N � Study Area - Wetland
Feet �� perennial Stream
� 5� ���
Chadbourn NE (2013) USGS 1:24,000
Quadrangle Map
Replace Bridge No. 230196
over Big Branch
Columbus County
Figure 2: USGS Map

. ,. . � f �, -� .i.�.i 4 . ,,.,. � ,�:.
. + � n � }�
l � �f u��� V;; 1Y',.:_ j A�. ��`��y���`_
�_7�
� � t �i�Y t
�,;.'�� �t _ _ ' 'r °y� 'w_. '� l��� 1 e�� salL '� V b.Y�:.y '' R �A ,..
.�.� � . _ . - � . }•. )V, ' -4 : } �. .t � . , �j�y,,,'7� � � V
� ) � : t � �: . ' � '{r' ��� -
�.�✓V �, �' f, �-� .:�35. �� 4 .. 1 �y0t`��C" /�.. .
_ � �. .. L r `.
'A ' q � _ 'ly�'
F� . �'? "„� ' - " .Y,".�. ' . , �j�+a'\,� i'�`�{�� �l�
' . - �+�, � ' . �.rr t' 3F . � : \�' .'
'` ��_ { � . =„''
` �;,- �:- ,� � � �.: �i*� ,s�
�.�� � - , �� ?�� "o-"' J'�"� �a � .
;�r �. R'' � '+� R, .. i P
� �. . �,�- at �fi � � � a ��, - �— ';� �-'�;.
�� w :1 ' i .� .. . t.,-JT - q . \ � �,
V� s r:' ' . . . ' . � : tK. i ' �� J. . '
r ��� rr'y,��' � � 5 7� t:. - '^' .. P' ��.K � f�'+a � ` :� . : \ `� ���• l� �� . �5 ;~i
�ri_'�� , . � y_ a... . f.,, r f� v�
p .� �E" 4` �� �'3 p�.:y . i ,+5. ����� ,�y�r�i �.
{ � n . . � �o . ^ r � . � �� �� �1»' �,�' "'+ � I .��p i'� � X :
� ���-- rlwe � � �,�. �•. *n i�p �S M�'� . ^f �`� ,
t * f f % .,f•s �• � � A. � . j � ' � ' � �4�'�l� ` '�' y��`�� � �' xj� . � � -
� \. . ' � x � � �` ` � ' ., �4 i �" �` �.
"p` y " ���; -�� �: � �4�_ ��'g M'�'� � u�� . 'M._ "$'
• �� .l+�n.5.-� _ � .> � * y�
�> ti _ :',r ' "s - f z_ �� ' J s�,���`•. � , �a,e t
����R, µ� ..-.�e' #� �.� � .. z�w�l . sA � �-'� x z3'�' .�,
J � A Z� � �-�n..� � F
`� �,..; . . �y ���� t � f� i � �` �1 . �� .41.;��` . � �J' �
. , (��'2i���� - ��t �` .M�•�� � .��' {..��'� . �:i. � ��.'".
� �}._ . . , � 7 �.�� � �,� ���' �9�
` ` �} � ` ..�*µ�����.. ; �i�� 1"� ?. � � . . 4 A��_�
�. . ' � *�� � ° ..Q -.`�. ..l . . , . M`ty �
ry. e � � � � �S �r � �
� �. " ; i i�. 1' .{ '; � . . �" ���' � l. ~.,
��.�1r� 1 .� � � �y { -. • , ' "- ���� s_ � , .' ..t
� �j �� p�-iG."' „� �� . I ���y ,�`z
¢ r �:� �tY_ �i �` .- �r v � mIR, ;a - � �{��
..a. �-, . -- • �,��r i' �:1L� . �'1�. g� i ��- 't.
d;" j'.
)1' '� ': v ' �' :. '� _ � '� �+�
_ . . . 3 .+'.F � t '� . � �� .
� � -�r. � 'g ,r , �` �� _. �.�tt����i,b.
. . ry I _ I , � � � . � ��. �� �- �:.1� ^.
�
� _ r � R �� �'. ,.,� • :� { :�
�
o�'_' g ; �
'tc .'- �' ��A � � � f'�•�+"k �y�.'�„-„�1�.
�
` ���. • . . � , u �. - . . �` � ^ w �` ' �t p,.
�-�, � i-: .� � .
. � �: �, , , �,, �.. & M1 ,.� Y ;,{ r �. , , �
����� ..,�ti� .-4 - ... '.F. �.: ,� . . � ����
� : �� �.`—. � •� � �4r�C: �r��l �''y ��b - + � ��q
1 �x �„' � .. :. � .
'' . ♦ • t .� �( `i ' ,�`�}./
�. � '� ' • � �,`�, r,,�„fr' _ r� -
� � .� .. . t�` �y����R �� ��1��' MC
^,� - . - . . , � ' 5�.�'i. _ . . 'A '+�� '1,� , ���j
r' �
�� S��,."y`r �� �y� y. � � . .�► , w ti \k r��!•• + � :� - � , �� 1°� . � •:
�� "'t . ���9��� �"�'�7�� ��4 1 ��` \ ���'� 3� `� 'p� .'S-�
+� t i � 4( �S�! . . J ; ` -� `�4*.� . �«+ i '�.t� :.f.;[j
!� �!�' s.�Y>s " `' •.t�.� .F��` ry� �� :�4 �
��_ .i v. te�- � �-. �i
7 • `i'i. �'.. i *�7��. . - �3,�, � � � .N
� 5�:,��11`�t:. � a _� . • t � t . � � � .l��
�' :b. R � � Y 7 # �:;
� y� }
� �. � �.
_��.�`Z� �7� .� . .." `. �. �
. 'i�^��- �,�� + ��,- � I., �'G } �(�':t
_ . . �;�•�3 � ' �•.s � t {'.- _ .r._._At��yt.9_�
� . . ' . ����XN � ��.. - �ty f . 1 �� !•'- �.._'�K�.r `1��' s ��
. . . . � �"sr�• . ,�� .:*fi�. . � ,�` �h.`� �� . u
. :•L _ � � _ A . (� � i
��4 . �-r .r �r5`' � �
,. f . s' r � � 7 � �'e , �.��� >
- �y.. _ . �t «
r
' 4 � t.% �, �F �� ,�'�
� . - � ?r} s •�° �t�.
.' '.�.
,`,
y�}`�
i�. l
t o� �°�T� �who Replace Bridge No. 230196
;,, N � Study Area
over Big Branch
'� � Feet �� Perennial Stream Columbus County
� 9 G�
�e�oF�AN�°°`�� 0 50 ] 00 Wetland Tigure 3: Jurisdictional
February 2Q17 2013 NC Statewide Aerial Photography Features Map

wG �-
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and-6ulf Coastal Plain Region
,_
Project/Site: _ ___� `�3a 1 � �L7 City/County: � t�, 'n,•_�• ✓��i,. 5 Sampling Date: ; ', � � ,'
Applicant/Owner: ��CD� � ,� State: � Sampling Point: �
InJestigator(s): �. �,Cn��1�t� �/"' �! ��'J � T �' �` t'SSection, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): �(a�r�.-�i a, ^� Local relief (concave, convex, none): C����<,�.' i-p- Slope (%): b-a
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - I 3A �at: 3H , ya°l5 Long: -�� _���� Datum: L�) L'
Soil Map Unit Name: � 13 - f��;��a��L nn�w��i �1 n4 , 5 NWI dassification: �SS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes .f No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? �'� � Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes� No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? -`'� (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophy[ic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
HYDROLOGY
Yes ✓ No
Yes � No
Yes� No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aaalvl ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
�❑f Surtace Water (A1) 1❑--� Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace (68)
�LJ�- High VVater Table fA2) I--I Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) 0 Drainage Patterns (610)
M Saturation (A3) �-I ydrogen Suifide Odor (C;1) �J Moss Trim Lines (Bi6j
� Water Marks (B1) �1�fxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) II Dry-Season WaterTable (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (82) 1L-J-� Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63) U Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II� /Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Thin Muck Surface (C7) �[ Veomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (65) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) �] ,Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ��FAGNeutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
SurFace Water Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No � Depth (inches): /
Saturation Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): �(� �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Ycs ✓ No
includes ca illa fin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Artny Corps of Engineers AUantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
� Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:1� ) °/a Cover S ecies? Status
' � � ��r"
�. Ua,,: l�mrw�%oJ 5:) u C^' Gi -�, ; t,�0�
2.�r21 ���.fww� ' � � F�A C,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
�Z = Total Cover
50% of total cover: I � 20% of total cover: �
Sa�lina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �`� � )
1. � S� ( vvw� � f�Ql� �jQ. �� �
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
0
�0 _ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: I� 20% of total cover: �
Herb Stratum (Plot size: � � )
�.� 1; ��. a�o.n ���r n�l � ✓
z. w�r.ti.� ��1,�^� � �- �
3.
4.
5.
6.
• 7.
,.4T,, .,�• 8.
�"' 9. �
• '
. -10.
11.
12.
�� = Total Cover
50°/a of total cover: �� 20% of total cover: �_
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: �v� )
,. �. ' � ✓ �.�
z. �aM�l�u ��o � a � c? � FAr"W
3.
4.
5. /-
� = Total Cover
50% of total wver. �� .� 20% of total cover: ��
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point:�
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: �_ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species Q/ I�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6•� b (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
II 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
II3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, exGuding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cmj or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WG ,r.�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�(inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
-� �l lt�Y�. �,/�� i� 5 L
. -�l 1b ��Y2 �)/� �,� �.SYQ ��/y ►5 L �z= 5L
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
� Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) � Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
"D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
,Q Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) D Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric SurFace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Minerai (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
�Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark SurFace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) �
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

�
;
W C �,��
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region �
ProjecUSite: �� City/County: �n � t,v�n �J l� s Sampling Date: � b���
ApplicanUOwner. lS�� �� State: N� Sampling Point: �� ���
Investigator(s): �. �-< n � �� �f � , r ��a�v ,� `Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): F{ i Il�in �C� Local relief (concave, convex, none): �� o� Slope (%): �c- �°/.
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - Lat: 3"� ��`c��� �ong: -� �.�6 q L� Datum: �:,� 2 G�
Soil Map Unit Name: - � NWI Gassification: —
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significanUy disturbed? Na Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? nl �(If needed, explain any answers in Remarics.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
No Is the Sampled Area
No �� Within a Wetland?
No ��
Yes No �
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of rivo reauiredl
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoplv) II Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) 1❑--f Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) lL---1� Marl Deposits (B15) !I.RR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ,
� Saturation (A3) tIJ--� Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
� Water Marks (B1) 1L--1f Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) II Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
� Sediment Deposits (B2) 1L--fI Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Thin Muck Surtace (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II FAGNeutral Test (D5)
a WatervStained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
SurFace Water Present? Yes No �Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No �%Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No � Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No �
inGudes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Artny. Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: .� ) % Cover Snecies? Status
1. %
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
� 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �� )
�. Zl�� op�,C� � � F��
2.-L�_�,�s-�a,r� .�w�se. �s' �
3. ��,, _
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 a• 5 20% of total cover: �j
Herb Stratum (Plot size: � ) � � r�
1. I'
2. Ttn�o i�e� o�� �_ F� r,u
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
� (% = Total Cover I
50°/a of total cover: �� 20% of total cover: ��o
�
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: -�,C J )
1.
2.
3.
r ��
4. �r
' 5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
observed, list morphological adaptations
/ . l
Sampling Point: = �` �. '
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant "�
Species Across All Strata: J (B)
Percent of Dominant Species p
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��i% (A/g)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
�1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
II 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
De£nitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Trea - �Voody plants, exciuding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, exGuding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: �"V �/1 �
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirtn the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�nchesl Color moist % Color (moistl % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
�-3 io1� �s �ov �_
3- ib ��V� �/3 �S `l.sy� Sl� � � ,+� � c_
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surtace (SS) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
� Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 750A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark SurFace (F6) (MLRA 1536)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) T❑� Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
,Q 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) D Marl (F10) (LRR U� D Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) n Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
,Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2) D Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric SurFace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F1E) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
�Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Brieht Loamv Soiis (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WL
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Pr�ject Name '��, c',�� 23 c71� (o Nearest Road �'��� �.�� �;��� �
County ��,��}��g Wetiandarea <D� 1 acres Wetland�vidth a�feet
Name of evaluatar �, ('s �,,,��1,��( Date ►��t�. � R b 1!O
Wetland location
on pond or lake
�on perennial stream
_ on intermittent stream
_ within interstream divide
other:
Soil series•
_ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
,� predominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predorninantty sandy
Hydraulic factars
_ steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland �vidth > 100 feet
Wetland t_yp�fselect one)*
Jottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocasin
' Bog forest
Adjacent land use
(within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
.�forested/natural vegetation �►s%
✓�griculture, urban/suburban Sj�%
,/impervious surface �%
Dominaat vegetation
(�) C��- a�- �.,�
(2> Svaee3—
(3) � Jown.� / -, ��„ � i?O'�
Floading and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
s sonal.ly flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding ar surface water
Pinesavanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
_ Carolina bay
_ Other:
' The rating system ea��uot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or sn•earn channels
R Water storage �_ x 4.00 =�
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization �_ x 4.00 =� Wetland
ratang
T Pollutant removal �_ *` x 5.00 = 0 `"� ;y ��
I Wildlife ha�itat � x 2A0 = !� � ��� �`
���.
N Aquatic life value �_ x 4.00 = I a ���' �`��
�� �� . ���t A���,
G Recreation/Education �_ x l.00 = 0
** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within %z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Piain Region
ProjectlSite: � ' Ln (Q o �
�� City/County: `�r-�v�M�C Sampiing Date: r ��-�i�2`�''�'
AppiicanUOwner: _ State: [�C- 5ampiing Point: 4�I�D�
Investigator(sj: • Mv�.;S' 2• Crow}a,.�,- � M• cica.. � Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hiilslope, terrace, etc.): FI�'��0� h Local relief (concave, convex. none): (�o'�.�/-ek Slope (%}: �-�0��
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T- I� 3 Q Lat: ?j� , �� `�a � Long: �� g.�(� $� Datum: �` ��'��
Soii Map Unit Name: - NWI ciassification: �F�
,l�re ciimatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical far this time of year? Yes iVo (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soii , or Nydrology significantly disturbed? j1� d Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation : Soii , or Hydrology naturaliy probiematic? �(if needed, expiain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soii Present? Yes � No
Wetland Hydroiogy Present? Yes � No
t2emarks:
�n(itn�Y.S Wf� � w� � � W-�
HYDRO�C?GY
Is the &ampied Area 1/
within a Wetland? Yes " Na
Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primarv Endicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apolv) II Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
�❑y Surface Water (A1) 1❑--r Aquatic Fauna (613) � Sparsety Vegetated Concave SurFace (B8)
�L� igh Water Table (A2) TL�J Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U} ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
L'J Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Suiflde Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Q Water Marks (61) Q1� Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) II Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits {82) LJ Presence of Reduced Iron {C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Depasits (B3) Q Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) � turation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) �eomorphic Position {D2)
Q, Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Expiain in Remarks) �hailow Aquitard (D3)
Q inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7} FAC-Neutrai Test {D5)
�Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Fieid Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): ��
Saturation Present? Yes � No Depth (inches�: � S�� r�v Wetiand Hydrotogy Present? Yes � No
includes ca illa frin e) -
Oescribe Recorded Data (sYream gauge, monitoring well, aeriai photos, previous inspections), if availabie:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atiantic and Gulf Coastai Plain Region — Version 2.0

�
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum {Plot size: � ) °!„ Cover St�ecies? Status
1. _`�� ` c�1 4�' �f��n�nMY� _�'� '� Qg�i
2. Ek�� �v b�.,,� �� ✓ FA�
3.
i 4.
5.
6.
7.
&.
�� = Total Co�er
� 50°/a of total cover: ,?� _ 20% of total cover: �
Sapiin�/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: _ �� 5- )
1. _ �i►-2cBfN lTNr1 �`�� i c. �V\ nnnn � ✓ y_��L
2. ;'�; a��wi .,n �'rh'�:�nSC_ �� __� F�t("
3. ��
4.
5. �
6.
7.
g .
�_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: I d 20°!0 of total cover: �'
Herb 5tratuni iPtot size: i 5 )
1. • 'Uf�,�O(3�'l.l�A�,cJ��A o.r.G �,g .) C� � � �
2. �;`�hIY1Qa'i N. � tiGJ �,�n, ��Uh ___��___ E8�_
� T � r,�„' , r
3. �rn na ti¢r S ('a�v1SiC � r�w.
4. � - �-
5. „-,!�" !c .�i��'�r�ir.P�rM �1(1�f1�11�G11Kr. -� •� _�
s. C a U.�f V�tJ� � C`� rr��2u5 �a OBL.
7.
8:
9.
10.
11.
12.
� S� = Totai Cover
50% of total cover: �� 20°fo of total cover: 3 �
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: �� �:'� )
1. �� m Nv�n/�Trr/\� -�� � �4-
2. �_
3.
4.
5.
•a.
(If observed, list
( b = Totai Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: �-
� � �� �� �
Sampiing Point:
workshest:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: �_ (A)
Totai iVumber of Dominant �
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
� (/{Jgj�
Prevalence Index worksheet: ''"�' `
Totai % Cover of: Muitioiv by: :�,_
OSL species x 1 = �,""
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =�
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totais: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = �
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
II 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3- Prevalence Index is s3.0`
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Expfain)
'Indicators of hydric soii and wetiand hydrology must
be present, uniess disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapiing/Shrub - Woody plants, exciuding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
Herb-All herbaceous (non-waody} piants, regardiess
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
' US Army Corps of.Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastai Plain Region - Version 2.Q

soi�
Samplinq Point: ��� � I �J�
Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document_ he indicatar or conFrm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix ftedox Features
linches) Color (moist) °Jo Colar (moistl__ % Tvpe; Loc _ 7exture __ Remarks
�4i" (o ;!n Z l l 1 D�> 5 L.
.� .:l/� a/ I ! l� �.�'���i�. `� Ilp 5 C `f; �1 —"_SL�--
�-�{�_1_ � li �-7----•
� <<] �� � a� �— T �L.
,-�
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letian, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators: {Appiicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis':
� Histoso! (A1 j � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, UE ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR Oj
� Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) �LRR S}
� Black Histic {A3} � Loamy Mucky Mineral {F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) {outside MLRA 150A,B}
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ,Q Loamy Gieyed Matrix {F2) �T-1 Piedmant Floodpiain Soils {F19) (LRR P, S, T)
�Stratified Layers (A5) � Deple#ed Matrix (F3) IJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies {A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B}
�5 cm Mucky Minera! (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) T❑� Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (R8) (LRR U} Redox Depressions (F8) u Very 5hailow Qark Surtace (TF12)
,Q 1 cm Muck (A9} (LRR P, T} � Marl {F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11} � Depieted Ochric {F11} (MLRA 151f
,Q Thick Darlc Surface (Al2) � iron-Manganese Masses (F12) {LRR O, P, T) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�Coast Prairie Redox (A16} (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) {LRR P, T, U} wetland hydrology must be presenf,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1} jIRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151} unless disturbed or problematic.
,Q Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MIRA 150A, 150B)
�Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Fioodplain Soiis (F19) (MLRA 149A}
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils {F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soii Present? Yes " No
i2emarks:
. .,3�" - - -�-`- - -
; � �
.
�
US Artny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
r;. ; �ti?.::;:
. . � :ei � ,._;
. �.
J yl .
�'�(q�r�S
�� • � {
1
g

WETIr4ND DETERMINATI�N DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastai Plain Region ���' V� '
ProjecUSite: �"�"�l.'�1�Ca CiiyiCoi�nty: CO I 11YYi hUS Sampling Date: ��� i (te
' Applicant/Owner. ��QT State: �G Sampiing Point: � �!
Inuestigator(s): �� .�'f�� !� C���:)�{�-►r� �i N�.o. r�`: Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hiilslope, terrace, etc.): �er,rc.�C� tocai relief (concave, convex, none): Cc��J2.� Siope (%}: oZ�, !o
Subregion {LRR or MLRA): T- IS3 F\ Lat: .� � Long: ��b ���c�3 �atum: WGS r6�{'
Soii Map Unit Name: k� NWI ciassification: �
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expiain in Rernarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soii , or Hydroiogy significantly disturbed?ND Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation , Soii , or Hydrofogy naturaliy prnblematic? nfU ilf needed, expiain any answers in Remarks.}
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampting point iocations, transec#s, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soii Present? Yes
Wetland Nydrotogy Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
No � I Is the Sampied Area
No i within a Wetiand? Yes No �
No �
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary indicators (minimum of one is required� check ail that applv) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ,S
❑ Surface Water (A1) 1❑--� Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace (68�
�p� Nigh Water Tabie (A2) IIJ--r Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
�L{! Saturation (A3) 1u--� Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1} ❑ Moss Trim Lines {B16)
LJ Water Marks (61) 1L�I Oxidized Rhizospheres along L+ving Roots (C3) � Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits {B2) 1L-J-� Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh 8urrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visibie an Aeria{ Imagery (C9)
Q Algai Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) II Geomorphic Position {D2)
Q iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks} � Shailow Aquitard (d3}
Q inundation Visible on Aeriai Imagery (B7) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9} � ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) {LRR T, U}
Field Observations:
Surtace 1Nater Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No � Depth (inches): /
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes Na�
inciudes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data {stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers AUantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
H4soiu�e uominant inaicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �j� ) % Cover S ecies? Status
1. �',�PiY '�'�j iJ/�utidC� � � _ c
2.
3.
�
Sampiing Point: V\�V �
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species �
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant �
Species Across Aii 5trata: {B)
Percent of Dominant Species p
�' - That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �(A/S)
6.
7.
8.
___ o,�
�ll = Tota! Cover
50°/a of tota� cover: �U 20°Io of totai cover: ��
SaplinqlShrub Stratum (Piot size: � )
1." Li Yr% ��/1�Ft � F�c"
2. � _r� 3� -� �_
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_� = Totai Cover
50 fo of total cover: � � 20% of total cover: J a
Herb Stratum {Piot size: C )
1. ���g�r.n Sj "�'�r`�� �-
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Muitiaiv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalance Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
II 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence tndex is <_3.0'
a Probiematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' {Expiain)
✓ ' Indicators of hydric soii and wetiand hydrology must
� be present, uniess disturbed or problematic.
_______ Deflnitions of Four Veaetatian Strata:
7.
8:-
9.
10.
11.
12.
n �__��`! = Totai Cover
50% of total fover: �lJ 24% of total cover: _�
Woodv Vine Stratum. (Plot size: �l� y
,.����a m� id- q �� ✓ F��
z. - .e�c� ' .�'ca � _� Fac
3.
4.
Tree - Woody piants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm} or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) taii.
Herb - Ail herbaceous (non-woody) piants, regardiess
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5.
Hydrophytic
� = Total Cover Vegetation � /
50% of totai cover: I . S 20% of total co�er: �
Present? Yes v No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphologicai adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atiantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

i
��I�- �:,, Sampling Point: �_
Profile Des,pbription: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.}
Depth � Matrix Redox Features
(inches} Color (moistl % Color fmoist) °/a Type, Loc Texture Remarks
Q-� % �S�%� 2-� 1 ) �� �,..r
�i�_ _��p.y_.., ,� ► id� _� ��. s�
. �� i � � � �_ �o.,,�.
i* .. 1
�. �
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Linin . M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators: {Applicable to ali LRRs, uniess otherwise noted.} Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Q Histosoi (Ai ) � Poiyvalue Below Su�face (S8) (lRR S, T, lf} TTT❑��� i cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) rj Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S}
Q Black Histic {A3) �� Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
,Q Hydrogen Suifide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils {F19) (LRR P, S, T)
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies {A8} (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark SurFace (F6) (MLRA 153B}
�5 cm Mucky Minerai (A7) {LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark SurFace (F7) ❑ Red Parent Materiai (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8} (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) � Very Shailow Dark Surface {TF12}
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LR(2 U) D Other (Explain in i2emarks)
� Qepleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ,Q Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
,Q Thick park Surface (Al2) D lron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Ai6) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface {F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be prssent,
Sendy Mucky Minerai {S1} (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (�17) (MLRA 151j uniess disturbed or problematic.
,Q Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150�)
�Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F2t}) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) {lRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer {if observed):
Type: /
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Rresent? Yes No �
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atiantic and Guif Coastai Plain Region — Version 2.0

hlA � WrS , �aD,1�J �
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name ����r�.o,Q o���l �(O Nearest Road ';',lv{,� S�oon�
County �� �„nMn��� S Wetland area �acres Wetland tividth 3f� feet
Name of evaluator '� , C�o,,���.P.� Date ►r� ���.� �(�_
Wetland location
on pond or lake
,�on perennial stream
_ on iniermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series:
_ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
�eat
redominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predominantly san.dy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
ditched or channelized
�total wetland tividth > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
✓�ottomland hardwood forest
� Headwater forest
Swa.mp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
_ Bog forest
Adjacent land use
(within t/Z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
�/ forested/natural vegetation L1�%
✓agriculture, urban/suburban S�t� %
� impervious surface �'" %
Dominant vegetation
(l)_�,ald� �cv SS
{2) � ) {�
(3} � l�% l�.e�5p , ��`� v�.?
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded or
�undated
asonally flooded or inundated
_ iatermittenily flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
_ Carolina bay
_ Other:
x The rating system cannot be apptied to salt or brackisl� marshes or stream channels
R Water storage � x 4.00 =�
A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization �_ x 4.pQ = �a
Wetland
rahng
T Pollutant removal a ** x 5.00 =� �
.���
� ;�� �,
I Wildlife habitat �_ x 2.00 =� ��� ��`�:
sz
�� �
N Aquatic life value � x 4,00 = ( ��.���, ���,� �
� ��� e , _.,.: ..: �::
G Recreation/Education a x 1.00 =�
*'� Add 1 po'rnt if in sensitive lvatershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within %2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius

�
�
•�
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9A For .Index of Sheets
See Sheet 16 For Conventlonal Symbols
See Sheet 9C For Survey Control Sheet
� ll d 11�� \l/ � � V �� ll 111LL `lJ ������1 VYd 11
�������� �� ���������
COL UMB US CO U1�TY
LOCATION: BRIDGE 1V0.230196 OVER BIG BRANCH ON
SR I003 (SILVER SP0011t RD.)
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11tG, DRAI11lAGE, PAVING £� STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMI�
ST.fTE STATE PROJECT REPERENCE NO.
���� 17BP.6.R.69
�w� Paw.Ho. � Pao,.� .
176P.b.R.b9 WA
SHE�ET I SOTAL
HEF.TS
i
� �
PE
RM/ /UTIL.
BRIDGE #230196
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
ADT 2016 = 350
30 15 0 30 60
T = b % *
PLANS **V = 55 MPH
30 75 0 30 60 *�ST = 3% DUAL = 3
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC. CLASS =
RURAL LOCAL
6 3 0 6 72 (SUBREGIONAL)
**DESIGN EXCEPTION NEEDED
PROFILE (VERTICAL) S OPINGTSIGHT DISTANDIES &
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 176P.6.R.69 = 0.100 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 176P.6.R.69 = 0.019 MILES
• Y cLL ••• •• L V ETHERILL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ENGINEERING DIVISION 6
1223 Jones Franklin Rd. Raleigh, N.0 27606 558 Gille,ple S�reee
License No. F-0377 Fayerteville NC, 2830/
Bus: 919.851.8077 Fax: 9Y9.851.8107
20l2 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE
PROJECT ENG7NEER
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BP.6.R.69 = 0.119 MILES I LETTING DATE:
JUNE 20, 2017
NCDOT CONTACT:
GREG S. PURVIS, PE
PXOJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
CHRISTY W. HUFF, PE
DIVIS70N 6 BRlDGE PROGRAM MANAGER
HI'DRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
P.E.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- STA. 14+15 to 16+35 1@30', 2@35' 18" CORED SLAB 0.04 0.02 < 0.01 0.06 < 0.01 52
1 -L- STA. 12+60 to 13+25 Bank Stabilization (Pond) < 0.01
1 -L- STA. 13+75 to 14+15 Bank Stabilization (Channel) < 0.01 36
TOTALS*: 0.04 0.02 < 0.01 0.06 0.01 < 0.01 36 52 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Bank Stabilization (Pond) Permanent SW Impacts (square feet) = 395 square ft
Bank Stabilization (Channel) Permanent SW Impacts (square feet) = 137 square ft
Excavation in Wetlands Impact (square feet) = 275 square ft
2013 10 24

����� ���,4�y North Carolina Department of Transportation
SG[�Y�11W2tPr . I
�
,,.,.,,.,, Highway Stormwater Program ��.�
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.6.R.69 TIP No.: 230196 County(ies): Columbus Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 17BP.6.R.69 TIP Number: 230196 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 3/2/2017
NCDOT Contact: James J. Rerko Contractor I Designer: Wetherill Engineering, Inc. / Harminder Singh, PE
Address: Highway Division 6 Address: 1223 Jones Franklin Rd.
500 Transportation Dr. (PO Box 1150, 28302)
Fa etteville, NC 28301 Ralei h, NC 27606
Phone: [phone] Phone:[phone]
Email: "rerko ncdot. ov Email: hsin h wetherillen .com
Cit ITown: Whiteville, NC Count ies): Columbus
River Basin s: Lumber CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th fin. miles or feet : 0.07 mi Surroundin Land Use: Rural, Wooded, Agricultural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.2 ac. 0.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: (2) 10' lanes with grassed shoulders and up to 4' shoulders with guardrail. Up to 7' (2) 9' lanes with grassed shoulders
shoulders are variable width paved with grassed shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: Year: Existin : 350 Year: 2016
General Project Narrative: Replace bridge no. 196 over Big Branch on SR 1003 Silver Spoon Road. Use 1@30', 2@35' 18" Cored Slab. A TB 2G1 will outlet on upstream side of the bridge with 15" CSP
(Description of Minimization of Water with Class B rip rap is used to stabilize the outlet. No deck drains will discharge directly into channel.
Quality Impacts)
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Big Branch NCDWR Stream Index No.: 15-4-2-2
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw) None
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
ThreatenedlEndangered Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)