Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0024406_Ash Basin Discharge Relocation_198301171)"', Resources&Community D ee • ;• Jaries C Hunt, Jr., Governor• -• T�, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT January 17, 1983 U,JLA F Lt Mr. S. B. Hager, Chief Engineer Civil/Environmental Division Duke Power Company General Offices 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 RE: Belews Creek Steam Station Ash Basin Discharge Relocation Proposed Water Quality Monitoring Program NPDES Permit No. NCO024406 Dear Mr. Hager: The staff of the Water Quality Section of the Division have thoroughly reviewed and evaluated the proposed environmental monitoring program as submitted by Duke Power Company on December 20, 1982. As you are aware, this program will be an integral mechanism necessary to monitor and evaluate any possible changes of aquatic conditions that might result from the pro- posed relocation of the ash basin discharge. The most recent proposed monitoring plan was very comprehensive and encompassed most of the areas that will be essential to the project. A review of this plan does indicate the need for a few additional inclusions to ensure -that the data base for review is adequate. The comments and recommendations will be discussed by Phase I, II and III of the proposal. PHASE I: Phase I addresses baseline sampling prior to discharge of the ash basin to the river system. A) Sediments: The frequency of sampling is considered adequate at all sites. The current proposed plan requires that only selenium and arsenic be analyzed. Whereas, these are the most concerning elemental analysis, it is suggested thatcad` mom, copper, zinc_agd mercury be inc ISf.���'n6+ is phase of analysis. Previous evaluations accomplished by Duke �ram' a as in an increase in solubility of other elements unq� co i.tions bj acidification. In addition, the ash basin will be di rgiTtb9 di rent water environment than Belews Lake. To ensure that aNtio�l�a �dp1%r�ihwnts. P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, N. C. 27611-7687 d F..�.../ /l.. n.. .r,,..;r.. 4 d.-.;-.. F..... M.m• Mr. S. B. Hager - 2 - January 17, 1983 other than Se and As, are not potential problems in this phase of the plan. B) Water Chemistry: It is recommended that the frequency of sampling at sites 716.0&724'0.'0 be increased to bi-monthly (BM) to ensure an adequate baseline for comparison and evaluation purposes. As explained in the previous comments it is also recommended that the water chemistry parametric average be expanded to include cadmium, copper, zinc and mercury. Review of the literature states that Se and other elements exhibit an affinity for organic matter. Thus, it is also suggested that Total Organic Carbon (TOC) be in- cluded in this phase of the sampling program at all sites where water chemistry is currently proposed. (C) Benthos and Fish: The frequency and site locations appear adequate. Again., as for the reasons previously stated it is recommended that elemental analysis be expanded to include cadmium, copper, zinc and mercury. The current proposal does not indicate proper explanation as to what components of the fish are to be analyzed. It is suggested that body burden analysis be accomplished on viscera and muscle tissue separately rather than whole fish and that the results be expressed as dry weight. This will allow for com- parison to data collected previously from the Belews Lake area. This section of Phase I of the plan does not indicate what stages of the life cycles of the fish populations is to be sampled. It is recommended that various stages of life cycles be evaluated for the elemental analysis such as eggs, laval stage and adult. The benthos and fish section of this phase should be expanded to include phytoplankton and periphyton identification, enumeration and elemental analysis. In view of other situations within North Carolina in which coal fired power plants discharges have impacted the aquatic ecosytems, it will be necessary to evaluate and analyze. The frequency suggested would be Sp/S/F at all of the sites indicated for Benthos and Fish analysis. This section of the Phase I should also include evaluation of the zooplankton commilnity. Zooplankton has been indicated as a very efficient bio -accumulate of trace elements. Thus, data should be collected on identi- fication, enumeration and elemental analyses on this aspect of the aquatic food chain. D) Benthos & Fish (Qualitative data): This section of the plan appears adequate and no changes are recommended. Site Locations: The divisional staff as well as representatives -from the State of Virginia have expressed the need for an additional site in the Dan- ville area. Water chemistry and sediments should be analyzed at this site. Mr. M. R. Childrey (804-799-6695) of the Virginia State Health Department has indicated his cooperation to assist in this site location.® WK c — a�� 9 This will conclude our comments and recommendations� PhagCr 1 of proposed monitoring plU an. FILE copy + Mr. S. B. Hager - 3-- January 17, 1983 PHASE II: As Phase I is to establish baseline, Phase II should re- flect similar design for parametric coverage to begin assessing any possible impact after initiation of the discharge to the river. The recommendations as previously discussed should be incorporated into Phase II of the monitoring plan. PHASE III: The details and parametric coverage of Phase III will be dependent upon the results of Phases I and II. Therefore the plan as presented is adequate. Comment at this time would seem premature until the data from Phases I and II are thoroughly evaluated. Due to the important nature of this monitoring program we hope the cooperative effort shown previously will continue. We would like to express our appreciation for the efforts of your staff relating to this matter, especially those of Dr. Dave Anderson and Dr. Peter Cumbie whose insight has been most beneficial. If there are any comments or questions please feel free to contact Mr. Steve Tedder, Supervisor, Technical Services Unit at 919-733-5083. cc: Mr. J. R. Hendrick Dr. David Anderson Mr. Russel Radford Mr. Forrest Westall Mr. Bill Mills - Mr. Scott VanHorn Mr. -Steve Tedder Sincerely, (to. — W. Lee Fleming Chief Water Quality ection A N' ®C 1984 C�' Vt o� fir,