Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170493 Ver 1_B-4978 Wilkes April 21 2017_20170421STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR Apri121, 2017 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Mr. Steven L. Kichefski NCDOT Coordinator JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge 82 on SR 1154 over South Prong Lewis Fork in Wilkes County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1154(6); TIP B-4978, Division 11; WBS Element 39897.1.1. Dear Sir: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge number 82 on SR 1154 (Mount Pleasant Road) over South Prong Lewis Creek in Wilkes County with a single span, 105 feet long box beam bridge on the existing alignment. An offsite detour will be utilized during construction. There will be 0.01 acres (341fl of temporary impacts to surface waters from two work pads to construct the new bridge. There will be no permanent impacts to surface waters resulting from this action; therefore, no mitigation will be acquired for this project. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Stormwater Management Plan, Permit Drawings, and Roadway Plansheets. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in February 2016 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. This project is located in a trout county; therefore comments from the NCWRC will be required prior to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC Review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application. This project calls for a letting date of November 21, 2017 and a review date of October 3, 2017. MailingAddress: Telephone: (919)707-6000 Location: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: (919) 212-5785 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE NATu[tAL ENVIRONMENT SEC770N Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH NC 27610 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RA[.E[Gx NC 27699-1598 Website: www.ncdot.gov A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Jeff Hemphill at (919) 707-6126. Sincerely, �i',��_ '/ . ,�or Philip S. Harris, P.E., Manager � Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �aF wArE9Q Office Use Only: � � o c Corps action ID no. ��. , � � Y DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 82 over South Prong Lewis Fork Creek on SR 1154 (Mount Pleasant Road) 2b. County: Wilkes 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Champion 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state B_4978 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6126 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jhemphill@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.15465 Longitude: - 81.32978 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.57 acre 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to South Prong Lewis Fork Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Yadkin 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Forested, rural residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 75 If 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a three span 91-foot timber deck & steel I beam bridge with a single span, 105-foot box beam bridge on the existing alignment. An offsite detour will be utilized for this project. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: NCDOT 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1❑ P� T Work pads South Prong � PER � Corps 34 Lewis Fork Creek ❑ INT � DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Olf Perm 341f temp . Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 01 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts Permanent Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 62 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No 63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. See Stormwater Management Plan. Grass shoulders are used on each side instead of paved shoulders to maximize vegetative conveyance and allow runoff to remain in a diffuse flow pattern to encourage passive stormwater treatment. Deck drains have been placed only over land and none over body of water to route runoff to natural areas and minimize direct discharge. Deck drain dissipator pads provided under deck drains and rip rap at pipe outlets provides energy dissipation and encourages a diffuse flow pattern. Design maintains existing flow patterns to minimize impacts. New bridge spans creek. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases of construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Zone 2 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes � No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Wilkes County. A bat survey report dated June 14, 2016 determined NCDOT is in compliance with the 4(d) rules for this project. The report was sent via email to USFWS on October 5, 2016. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? � Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps hillip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. ��'z �" Zd�7 ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 11 k 11�;11�� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation SL[?1'llitYcl�P! � Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.07; Released October 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 39897.1.1 TIP No.: B-4978 County(ies): Wilkes Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 39897.1.1 TIP Number: B-4978 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 12/7/2016 NCDOT Contact: W illiam S. Zerman, PE Contractor I Designer: Address: NC DOT Hydraulics Unit Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Ralei h, NC 27699 Phone: 919-707-6755 Phone: Email: bzerman ncdot. ov Email: Cit ITown: Fer uson Count ies): Wilkes River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.063 mi Surroundin Land Use: Rural Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.24 ac. 0.20 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10 ft. lanes with 3 ft to 7 ft shoulders Two 9 ft lanes with grassed shoulders Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 309 Year: 2037 Existin : 218 Year: 2017 General Project Narrative: The purpose of this project is to replace the structurally deficient bridge #082 over South Prong Lewis Fork Creek on SR 1154 (Mt. Pleasant Rd.) in Wilkes County with a new (Description of Minimization of Water bridge. Grass shoulders are used on each side instead of paved shoulders to maximize vegetative conveyance and allow runoff to remain in a diffuse flow pattern to encourage Quality Impacts) passive stormwater treatment. Deck drains have been placed only over land and none over body of water to route runoff to natural areas and minimize direct discharge. Deck drain dissipator pads provided under deck drains and rip rap at pipe outlets provides energy dissipation and encourages a diffuse flow pattern. Design maintains existing flow patterns to minimize impacts. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): South Prong Lewis Fork Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 12-31-2-(6) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: None Other Stream Classification: Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? no (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � � • � � V � � O V � r z Ser �heet iA r rr Index of Sheeis See Sheet 1 B For Conventlonal Symbols ����� �� ����� �������� —L— JIA I I �-tS.i.bZ THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. A DESIGN EXCEPTION IS REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (15 MPH) AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE. GRAPHIC SCALES 20 10 0 20 40 PLANS 50 25 0 50 700 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 10 5 0 10 20 PROFILE (VERTICAL) DESIGN DATA ADT 2017 = 218 ADT ADT 2037 = 309 ADT K = 10 % D = 60 % T = 5 % * V = 15 MPH * TTST =2% DUAL 3% FUNC CLASS = LOCAL SUB REGIONAL TIER PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.043 MI. LENGTH OF STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.020 MI. TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.063 MI. —L— JIA IL+t5tS.6Z Prepared in the Off/ce of: DIVIS7011i OF HIGHWAYS 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 20l2 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: GARY LOVERING, PE NOVEMBER 18 2016 j'ROJECT ENGINEER LETTING DATE: BRYAN KEY, PE NOVEMBER 21. 2017 I'ROJECT DES/GN ENGINEER iE STATE PROIECT REFeRENCe NO. �� B-4978 STATE PRQ1.N0. .w.PROJ.NO. 39897.1.1 BRZ-1154 6 39897.2.1 � D&9CRIpfION P.E. RM/. UTIL HYDRAULICS ENGIIVEER P.E. SIGNATURE: ROADWAY DESIGN ENGII�EER P.E. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED z � DETAIL A DECK ORAIN DISSIPATOR PAD l�o��o s�ai�l � �ISSIPATOR P^u v w � R PAD 'NOTE�. CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW OECI( DRAINS �aouHo p 60` � I /� GEOTf%TILf J �'�� L- 60' aa^ciirviFw Type a(Liner- IS TONS CL B R'ip-Rop Geo�exiile- 3a zy FROM STA.11+85 TO STA.12120 RTiI.T. 0 CAROL 5. TRIPLETT GRADE TO DRAIN � woo�s C I C I I J'� � /� � � \ ���Ews.we airv � �i�J� L � F �J` � � isos, � �/ ���'' �/N /�F . , Y Tp OLD � \ � F �(�'1� Y Q�I '/ i HW � % r i— F F (li �� -Y' PC Sf0. �+6/XI iW _ F+ ��'�(�'l - -Y- PoT 5/0. /0 5 60' 57' .3�¢ E 12./142016 qtnguyen R:\Hydraulics\CADD\PERMIT DRAWINGS\64978_Hyd_prm_wet.dgn \ v i as O CAROL 5. TRIPLETT w000s L- PoT Sfo.lO+QDDO O CAROL 5. TR�LETT -L- PC S�o.10+3366 CL B RIP RAP � GEOTEXTILE � 1 �� m 5� � � c- Pcc < � L- POC : -Y- POT / � N � PDE � � I I � � I� � � I � I J � � I �. � �Z I � �� � 1 � '�_ � ' � �, � ' �f I (� I 1 � I � L, � � � 1 I �' w000s ,� � RETAIN� �� P�, 2 � MARY LOlASE PARKER CHURCH� '1 � 1� � 1 � � � . -�- � �o ,2.�+.�3 � � 4 8 '� � � i � M I � 1�, `� I � ` XCAVA ION ���CY �� � � AVA E EO� I I WORK PAD J � E � ✓ATION 20 C \ � \ ��^� _:�n .i. �;R;c � ��' - �!�`��Il��°i!����� PADS �T — F oy./� o � ��WPDE—e�E � E �T `?'I ; '� 4l Y GRASS w00D5 W � I I BEGW SHOULDER BERM GUTTER -�� � I STA.11+65 TO BEGIN BRIDGE RT�LT. � " OMA7�Y LOUISE �PA�KER CMURCN� � WJ I x I� � 1 TON CL RIP RA i 5 SY GE T�XTILE �� � � �� J � r 2///� � � � � �� RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER 1[NC�A�ff�ILIE ]E ]PII.A\ZV� DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQUISIT[ON PERMIT JDRAWINGW SHEET 2 OF 4 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL �! UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �r O/��f 8 J�b� �� \ � ��� � . \ w � \ ���iNG kiW / `�� � �2 � ��i ' - RETAIN O 3p ,MF„ , � � " \ � � � I �'� � � I \�—_JS� / � / / � ,.�� � � � `'` /�� ��._i� / / `.�� � �� JONNUW�pdAES.DvERw�E. �� ti o`� cRnss / / / / / / / / / S� ry\_ � � � O A. WA ND KdTE ELLER wIFE, Woo�S -L- PT S1o. /5+/5J5 K71TE ELLER �_�ti, �-,�s�° L_��`�`' ��`�'�`'�—� `�_r�^�` r� WOODS �r 50' 0' 50' 100' 150' GRAPHIC SCALE TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE 0 � RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER 1[NC�A�ff�ILIE ]E ]PII.A\ZV� DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQUISIT[ON ETAI L A i � / � � � .� � d �� � � � � � C� I � � �� � � � / DEC�IG D IA7 DISSIPATpR P I , �II � 1 I�i � , -�°, � � � �� �;� �', !� � � � ,�o =o,a, � , ,� ;,��� �� I I ������� �� , .,, _,��._ _ _ , o�pir�6x vFw .� I � � � '.� � �� � , �� � I � i � � � � . I � ��� G %�o,E� ��,�Pao'�o��E�,�� a��ow aE��� oaA��s ���,� �,I� � � I �� � �' � ��, � ��� P E RM I T D RAW I N G GROUND� p .I� fib� � a� I � I I ���II . ' I I a I � Z � � �, � I.� � SHEET 3 OF 4 ;: / � I I� I I �I �� ' I I ^ ' I j � , � ' �� DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL GEorexiiie � , I , . ��. I �� ,,, ; � � � UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED II� i � ! �� �. ao� � � � . �� � , -J O� TPe (L ..'15 N�CLBR' R�p / .. � I � � II �I � � �, FROM STA.11+ 5 70-�STA.12+2qI RT,A.T � p�.��] � " I� �II FROM STA.1'�2+ 7 TO/ STA`12�92�RTYLT. �, 1' R I Nc P,\ I� � I WOODS I �I ,�� �II ' � � � / �� � i}, O/��f�8 1 � � �' '� ,\� � �� � ' � 1'I; ��'' � \1 � � ' 7� J��eti I � � \ �I � I� � -L- PoT Sfo. ro+o� '� � � I �� � � � � � s� � ��,� �, ... I � 1 T N CL B� RIP RAP ,� , � � ,� � RETAIN�. I \ ` � i 4 . � GEOTEXTILE I� � woo05 I HpPE i5 � � \, \� =:�1 . � �. II � ..� CAROL� LEYT �..����� II . I O . � _ � i� , � '`,`,1 \ � �, �`.,. \ . . . \ . . I�. t�\ . � I I I 11 \� 1 s ` g� c �� w � �' I � \ OI � , \ I�I�� � �I� � � .��s �� � ,`I � ;� A�Y LOlASE PARKER�HURCH� � 1. . \ �\ �'\ �\ \ � CAROL 5. TRI LETT �' ., �.: � � I I II ��� -L- f�C SlO.I0+3� , .�V '�' PCC S/ - .97 � . � . � � � �� I I I I ��� � � � � � � � � � � V '` � . � R � � � � -�- Poc Sr �rot�.�s � l � � � �� � �. I '� ��� A � 1 � \ � � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ �. � � � � � > GRADE �� � ��, `�� � -r- Por au � �i � 9 -c- Pc s�o.i2+s�.�3 � 4 \ � \ � A � f TO DRAW I � �, I } ' � � i > i� \' I � � � � � � � � � � � � / c \ 1 � \ � 8 7 � � �� `� \' \ ' } . 'woo�s �' � \ � i � �� �. �n, .. � . M I � � � " '� � �' . ` \ � � � � � \ �''.. � � � � � � � � � � � , 1 -t - PCC S�o. i3+6555 � � . , �I '�. i � ; � � �� E'XGAVA ION CY � , � i � ; � � \ � \ � � / I �.. � �PDE AVA E TO =1139 5'�I . . ' - �� � '� ���g �p J � E�— � , . � \ \ � ` . A. WARD R A . WiFE. _ / � , � ., � oELB E - a � . � � ' � . , .. ' � N. K'ATE ELLER , a � � TEl�'�P. WORK PAD > 9 ' � � � � � / � � �� '� �� F _I 6� �: ��I E � �� � � . � � � � . ,�5 � , � � � ` � � �� - -� _ r � anvnrioN � zo c ,_ � � � -c.� � V �� _ A ' � � �� A � � � / � C bi � ! \ �.. .. trre ni .._i. � E AVATE TO EL. 1 ��7.5' ���- �-_'-� . _ - - � \ ` � 1 � .. � � � �\ � � .. �. � .. \.. . P - � _ , � �� A _ � � � i � ' /i �� ---- I-. ' � ._ — ca.4a�s�or�z _� _ rs��cMa �TAI �� . �����. wonos� � � � �. p � �� � — � � __ � � ui � �- � � � `� � � � i �� a�� �e � � ' � — � � �I7' 28l � � A � � �.. -- J � 2 i i �i °� ,�-� . - - - � _. , _ ' ' � _ % � � / �� �� \ � �.� 3�0 -- �� - � � — � �� ��� � � �*L PT 510. /5+/575 - - - / � � - � ij � � / _ , ',. I � �.4 -- `� � `t-��^ \� -� � � �� � . .. i- % _ i _ .� II PADS TOR 1 . �,f,l I l 1�.; r ynr_� 1 . —'_ . Eri,ni�� k W . \ . . .. � y- J. - Tl'PE III' '. � sx�•m� aiw � ��.��� 3. ' °� _�„�� . C .�'I -(l-_. _ � �� � 5EE D TAIL 'A' �'" � I . F � ;� �V � � , i ( `� D � � � ...��` �� � s isos' � RETAIsi-� � �(�`'_- � � , �,. � � i ti � � � �`` � _ _ a __ R/ , J - CI o � QI � � � � , ��., .� - / / R/ J � � - r,�PDE—C�E ..��-`—E � .� ��l �_..'� �� RETAIN � � � exi\� \ � �� � D � � � om' � E � � BOW � � � . � Y �� �K�r � / p � , . —C I I � � � , � ��� � � ��t � � / � � / � As 0 0� ��� � _ � �." j • 7 -. � � H� � � / � � - � � W � �� F � � � ��� � � � �, � . , � S�� MF� c � i� f � � . � '� I / � � - � �� � $ �� p p � � � � �' '�� aea s � � � � �� V `��^F . . , � % , ' � i � � � �� ��� �� w � ��� � -Y- PC Sfa �+6UY1 w000s � �� r � I i � � � , � � I � / � � � �s � ` � � V ' � � \ � / i ,- � �^��"q`�� � BEGW SHOULDER BERM GUTTER � � � `r1� - � � � STA. 11 +65 TO BEGIN BRIDGE .RT�LT. � , ' I ,� � .- i ' � � � � / , / � � � � . � " _��� ... � � ; � �� ; . -� g��g � H. K71TE HLL � � � � O � 2 �E KgiTN Nup�N AN� wiFE �� f �� I I � �� / � � ���,�5 �I � � ARD R AF� MI�� � � � / � i � ��� . O AIA�Y LOUIS PAFiKER CMURCN i � -Y- POT 510./O+OO.fb � CAROL S.TRIPLETT � � � I �� - S GO�57'.3�4E �� 1 TON CL��� RIP RA � � I �� �� , • F',�/� JONN y� ��ER-AND W�E. �� �' � ,�-� ; ' . �/ / . DONN�,3.DrER�. �. ` � . 5 SY E,� XTILE $ � �� �� � � � Q . � ���� . . � ��/�� � , / � ' / �RAs� �_ :� — _ � , _ � . � � , � � , - �� — - _ � �i i� / _ � � �� /�� i f-�i � i / � �. � �� ,�, ,/ 7 i ��i � �� � � \ � �� �� � - — , / __i f ; > " �' � �A �\ �� , � - i i � � % �' � � � �� . � ' �� � , � \6Sir — — . � � � � � � � � ',.. , � r —_ c9 � ��I `/�^ .—�—_�_ �l � �` Hl � � � �ti , rr�'�-- '� � �` waoos � . �' � � � 50' 0' 50' 100' 150' � � �� � � � < z � � � GRAPHIC SCALE � � 12./142016 qtnguyen TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE R:\Hydraulics\CADD\PERMIT DRAWINGS\64978_Hyd_prm_wet.dgn WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 12+23 / 12+31 -L- TEMP. WORK PAD 0.01 34 12+57 / 12+62 -L- TOTALS*: 0.01 0 34 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: Revised 2013 10 24 • � See Sheet � A For I ndex of Sheets � �i �I � � � � �i �i � � �i �i � See Sheet � B For Conventi onal Symbols J�1 J 11 J� J� J�1 J I� J �1 VI C I N ITY MAP BEGIN TIP PROJECT -L- STA 10 +45.00 BEGI N -Y- STA CONST. 10 + 15.00 11/�� 1 ` • 1 � 1 �•� . . �`•�� 1 ��` 1 1 1 �� I,� 1 1 � � �\ ll ' � LOCATI01�1: BRIDGE TYPE O VER SO UTH PR01�lG LE WIS FORI� CREEI� WORI�: GRADIII tG, DRAI11 tA GE, PA VI1�G THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. A DESIGN EXCEPTION IS REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (15 MPH) AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE. STR UCTURES DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED Prepared In tl� Offlce of: HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11t DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH = 218 ADT DI VISI01� OF HIGHWA YS 20 10 0 20 40 ADT 2017 — LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.043 MI. 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 � p� �►Oapyy Q ADT 2 03 7 309 oADT 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ��?� g'�poQ PLANS K= 10 �o LENGTH OF STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.020 MI. P.E. °� � D = 6O % SIGNATURE: G-1v�i � 50 25 0 50 100 0 * q � T= 5 /o RI HT F W Y D TE: GARY LOVERING, PE � o V= 15 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.063 MI. NOVEMBER 18 2016 I'ROJECT ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIG11t � � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =2% DUAL 3% � E11tGI11tEER ��p ooQ�Q l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LETTI11lG DATE: BRYAN KEY, PE �� ��p��� N OVEM6 E R 21 , 2 O� 7 I'ROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER P�E� SIGNAT URE: BOU11lDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line ----- ----- County Line --- ---- Township Line -- -- City Line - - Reservation Line - - Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Corner � Property Monument 0 Parcel/Sequence Number �23 Existing Fence Line -X X X- Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -W�B- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary W�B Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB Known Contamination Area: Soil - �• •� Potential Contamination Area: Soil - ,��. � Known Contamination Area: Water - �' �' Potential Contamination Area: Water � � Contaminated Site: Known or Potential �' ? BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE: Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° w Small Mine �' Foundation 0 Area Outline Cemetery fi Building School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water --- --- Hydro, Pool or Reservoir �____� Jurisdictional Stream �S — Buffer Zone 1 Bz � BufFer Zone 2 Bz 2 F I ow Arrow � --- --- Disappearing Stream �--- --- Spring �'��-�_.-.� Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � FLOW False Sump � � " I' .,�� `I' I �:' (�)� I ���° .� (�) I'� " I' I'-I � �' . �� I'� (�) I ., I \ . ��. , II)� �i' I :�� I (�) \ (�) I .�" I'I � �� I'I ���i' . �� �'" � � � ' � ' : � �- � � �- � �� .„ , _ RAILROADS: Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF WAY.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite R1W Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C/A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement CSX TRANSPORTATION O MILEPOST 35 0 SWITCH ���� Proposed Permanent Easement with Iron Pin and Cap Marker ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES: Existing Edge of Pavement — Existing Curb — � 0 . W . W . �� � W in� � .. _. �� �c� �A, E E TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE O Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp cR Existing Metal Guardrail T T T Proposed Guardrail T T T T Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n Equality Symbol � Pavement Removal T�EGETATIDN.• Single Tree Single Shrub � � Hedge Woods Line � � � � � � Orchard Vi neya rd EXISTI11lG STRUCTURES.• MAJ O R: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole U/G Power Line LOS 6(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Pedestal Telephone Cell Tower U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Conduit LOS 6(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) � � � � Vineyord CONC J CONC WW I ` WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*) Above Ground Water Line TV: coNc Hw TV Pedestal TV Towe r �--------� U/G TV Cable Hand Hole ��B U/G TV Cable LOS 6(S.U.E.*) U/G TV Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) 0 U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) s U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) • • O ►1 � � -O- O a � HH GAS : Gas Valve Gas Meter U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout U/G Sanitary Sewer Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer SS Forced Main Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. - A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records - End of Information -W- - W A/G Water - -T�- - - TV - - - -TV FO- - - - -TV FO- TV FO 0 � — —�— — — —G— — —c— a�c cas � O 55 A/G Sanitary Sewer — — — —FSS— — — - — — F55 — — FSS • a � Os - 7UTL - 0 UST 0 � 0 AATU R E.O.I. VI C I N ITY I��IAP BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4978 -L- STA 10 +45.00 N = 883393.9610 E = 1312179.3846 NCDOT GPS STATION B� S UR VEY C01�lTROL SHEET 8-4978 POINT DESCo NORTH E�ST E�EV�TION � ST�TION PROJECT REFERENCE NO Location and Su OFFSET ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- B4�7g1 GPS B4�78-1 883�5307�7� 1312385081�6 11620�2 14+71052 1306� RT B4�7g2 GPS B4�78 - 2 883335 0 2�56 1 3121 48 0 2752 1 151 0 56 1 1+�4 0 45 15 0 72 RT B�3 B�-3 8836480 1842 13124480241� 114104� OUTSIDE PROJECT �IMITS N = 883335.2056 E = 1312148.2752 DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "b4978-2" WITH NAD 83/NA 2011 STATE PLANE GR[D COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 883335.2056(ft) EASTING: 1312148.2752(ft) ELEVATION: 1151.56(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.9999468806 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "b4978-2" TO -L- STATION 10+45.00 IS N 27°54'00" E 66.48' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERT[CAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 ���������������������������������������� BM1 E�EV�TION = 11440�6 N g833�� E 1312��4 � ST�TION 11+150�� 78 RIGHT g" SP I KE I N ROOT OF 2� " POP��R ���������***�����*����*���*�������*����� 64 9 7 8-2 �5R 13o N R�,,,, �� KETT T-��� 21 � H A � -- � NWY 4 __,-�� T � � �D ,_ ._ i� i� BEGIN CONST. -Y- STA 10 � 5 0.00 N E = 883366.2323 = 1312055.7613 __ NO TE: DRAWING NO T T O SCALE END TIP PROJECT B-4978 -L- STA 13 + 75.00 N = 883142.2432 E = 1312346.9487 MT P�Eq \ 'S'��T �� .� NCDOT GPS STATION 64978-1 N = 883053.7970 �s,� E = 1312385.8196 \ � /�S�J � � � , , � , , � JS� �-JS/... JS� O �� \ \ \ � � y� � � y � � � �� �2� � � � � � � � , �. � � � ..._�S\ � , , \ NOTES: �s. 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTPS.//CONNECT.NCDOT. GOU/RESO URCES/LOCATION/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B4978 LS_CONTROL.TXT SHEET NO. � ��� SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. , INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. SEE GPS CALIBRATION SHEET FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATE VALUES. N 0 N > w � � i�� FROM STA. 11 + 85 TO STA. 12 + 20 RT.�1..T. ��' � � O/�� FROM STA.12+67 TO STA.12+92 RT.iLT. �R IN �� W00DS �, � qo5' CONCo HW , � � � `� `� ' i J'� 06- BEGIN PROJECT B-4978 m, ; ,� SCALE +00000 - L- P O C STA 10 + 4 5. O O j�' -L - POT Sto. �o foo.00 EXo R/W � � I +33066 1 T N CL B RIP RAP ; RETAIN � q 5 S GEOTEXTILE woo�s H �_ EXo R/W 15 �PE _ +33066 `�'• �� 2 = = fi _ -� � o � i 25000' DOUGLAS KEITH TRIPLETT � ' EXo R/W J ti � D B 6 1 4 P G 0 6 6 �� C E C I L K E I T H C H U R C H A N D W I F E, � , q 3 1 0 0� � N � j D B 1 1 9 3 P G 2 5 6- 2 5 7 , I� I � � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � � � � _y _ _� _ B -4978 4 Z � � � ^ R�W SHEET NO. � a � � �, Y Pl Sto 11+03.50 Pl Sto 10+53.94 Pl Sto ll+ll.55 Pl Sto 13+25.08 Pl Sto 14+40.57 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS � �� , W p= 29 4/' 08.3" fLTI p= l5° 23' 5/.2" fLTJ 0= 68° 40' 46.2" fLT� �_ ll° 38' 02.9" fRTJ �_ l0° 42' Sl.l" fRTI ENGINEER ENGINEER �� � � D= 35° 48' 35.5" p= 38° ll' 49.9" D= l04° l0' 26.9" D= l4° l9' 26.2" D= 7° 09' 43.1„ � � ��� � � L_ 82.90 , L= 40.3/' , L= 65.93', L_ 8/.22 , L= 149.60� � , o T- 4 2. 4 0 T= 2 0. 2 8 T= 3 7. 5 7 T- 4 0. 7 5 T= 7 5. 0 2 � T R A N S I T I O N T O E X I S To 9 q,a 9 0 L T/ R T � � ; R= 1 6 0. 0 0' � 00' R= 4 0 0. 0 0' R= 8 0 0. 0 0' � �� -L- STAa IO+q5o00 TO STAo 11+39090 � �� SE = EXIST R=_�50.00 R= 5 5. , � � w o W SE SEE PLANS SE = SEE PLANS SE = SEE PLANS SE = EXIST � � �' � V, = 25mph V, _ l5mph Vo = 35mph � �� o � Q � � � Q � � �, � � � _ � I q o 5' T I E G U A R D R A I L � ^ DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL �� UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED � ;� CONCo TO EXISTo � l! � I O ; %, �MP � � H W 6. 0' 2 5' 5 0' 0 DOUGLAS KEITH TRIPLETT DB 614 PG 066 DB 1193 PG 256-257 G R A D E TO D RAI N , �, MARY LOUISE PARKER CHURCH , � � � -L - PC Sta.10+33.66 -L - PCC St . l0+ 3.97 DB 716 PG 89 � '� tn 1� �� 0 2 2� � � +73097 - L- P O C S t 1 0+ 9 . 7 9 �� '� TRANSITION TO EXISTo 60000' LT/RT s�`'� ��' � E � � 25000' -Y- POT o. ll+ l.11 -L- PC Sto. 12+84.33 �� �� - L- S T Ao 1 3+ 1 50 0 0 T O S T Ao 1 3+ 7 50 0 0 a2�� p � E 5 F a +3 90 � w � � X� / � C s � � 25e 0' +64000 � +84033 0 ', � ', � � � �� ��o o , � , � , o �� � � � �� w000s C� � z I �� pt� � LLAR� i N+OOa 0 25 00' 250 +13000 25 0' 39°00� +65a55 �� ', -L- PCC Sto.13+65.55 �� I � o � ,f, 30008' � 3900 ' EXCAVA ION 0 CY 25a00' �� '� � �s � j� p3 � � E PDE E CAVA E TO L.=1139.5' +20000 � +85000 A. WARD ELLER AND WIFE, � ��� � oELB W o404 o E 30a00' � / � � ,S, � __ � E ', ATE' _�_ 25000' �� DB 307 PGL567 C� R=55',. �` o�' � � � '�� F- - _ �" R R _X� , cAg�E EXoR/W ; �� �� � � � �-- -� PT .90 EX AVATION Zo cY w F W E �AgLE ; �, E N D PROJ ECT 6-49 78 �� % /�; 403 � TYpE-III EXCNVATE TO EL. =113 .5 F P ii -'_= T F� i66 2 0 �HORD �� ; ' �y _ � ; � � , ,� �, -L- POC STA 13 + 75.00 _ _ � i � . \ -_ ___ _ _ , Y +92000 � � ; � �` o`ti I � ,� _ - - �s _ �� _�5�� cMP �RET � woo�s , � GPS B-4978-2 Exo R/W ,�'�;='� � .o � ^ . � � BR�ocE I I - 0315�7'i�� o, �� o -�\� \k , . o o � ' � ��• o o c� 2 # 82 �, � S 4 3' 28.1" E � � � -_. X BEGIN CONSTRUCTION �-% F� �� io o57i' � � � i o o M �' �� - � �-L- PT Sto. l5+15.15 -Y- STA 10 + 15.00 �%�,.�� � �' `� "' r�a,u 350 TL-2 - � o � M � � %"".,U� v; + F� �`� �� -Y- T t l+ - - DISSIP TOR W�ll °P�E,qsq � EX,ST k 3 ' ' , ,, : --,�, F I 5 , g�, • � r' � � R �%3 ' - - �N_ _ S o. ' 3. V N PADS � � AT-� , - _ _ �r Ro �SR "� R�w \k s Bw E� ,Nc,_R ���' , , , � N � � �� �, � _Q � � � �' R -, SEE D TAI L A F R �� ��F IS � F � e ��54� � � �k � .o \ � F k� � � '�i,o � W -r� y� � ST r� F� ,� F��� i3o5%� RETAI.��'� %R E CHORD --� w � �'r 55 �/C �� \� `ti%�� k � -� F - =o R �SR � - - � F owr o o � � 2 � �� � J , + �, � , -� �, N �� , - ;� � � o � ��� , w 85000 � �� � � \ , -j F8 Tow/ � � - E ELBOW � �' � E E � � +66a30 �HORp � E� O � W , HP�KETT /� � ��j j PDE E E � S 56°I�'I�" E 24 92 � S 43°27' g�' T �� RETAIN EX R/W XS �� Ri�°� ��� _ � � � Y O �/ �=� +2�0 040 S 50° 2'05 E 46e00' T,,' �, � v oL� � � � N _ _ _ � �,;=- 0� 20028� 3�",CMP � , ; +65a55 \ ���i m T0 o R` � - F ;- � � � � I , So w HWY 42� o _ - - � ,,s` �=� _ 33088 � � ��2s3 , 25000 0 �S� , , z � --�' OLL � -Y +15000 +6qo00 +95000� N ; + � � sq ✓SS�O"E � �5g° E �' r �6�s� -- _ / F �� __ ,-- � � EXa R/W +30a00 25a00' 25000'. � �RAss 25e00 �i , �o�, s 52 2�� � o �,s y�./F v � � �-�,�TA 25000' woo�s 39a00' 39a00' � 36000 x,Gqr� I k �s 57vii� oo � � ygz� � �,sM ; _ = 40 -y - PC Sta. l0 +6/.l0 � � � �, � � � � ,W �&T � � z ; E���N� R' � R +39090 � � x 9, 9., ,; -� , BEGIN SHOULDER BERM GUTTER � �, +84°33 , k � �� �X�X� � � J 25000 � o , 25a00 '_ � x I �u STA. 11 + 65 TO BEGIN BRIDGE RT./LT. � ��,\/ \X � � 4 � ,' � � W N A. WA HD ALT ER AND WIFE, 2 CECIL KEITH CHURCH AND WIFE, W , � F�F � � . K E ELLER DOUGLAS KEITH TRIPLETT MARY LOpg 716 PGK 89 CHURCH i � _ �� � ,' 3 �° \ � o � `� � DB 307 PG 567 DB 614 PG 066 � � ' � N � � " ' � JOHN V. DYER AND WIFE, � s 41°s6�o6�� E DB ��93 PG 256-257 1 TON L RIP R� s , � �� ,' DONNA S. DYER � _�,,;� � 5 SY GE�JT XTILE �� � ,' �,� DB 1145 PG 50 -f- � � � °� a- o � � � �� -Y- POT Sto.10+00.00 S 60° 57' 38.4" E BEGIN APPR SLAB END APPR SLAB '� �� � ,°,� �RASS k S,�'�o,, � � -L- STA 11 + 72.62 -L- STA 12 + 99.62 z � ,' ,�� �k 9�%„ ,,` °� � � / F �9 S � \ `i _ 350 � �'�s� TYPE-III . TYPE III GRAU ' N TL-2 � � , -I- s . . . . � � 0 � 4��41 � � � -�- O � i k 34 � O � O � O � �,-,sM-��-,� � \ N O� �� �' -�'� �,�,� : � GRAU 350 TYPE-III `� TYPE-III qT_1 TL-2 c� BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE NOT TO SCALE -�- STA 11 + 83.62 -L- STA 12 + 88.62 RELATIONSHIP OF BRIDGE TO ROADWAY WOODS JLL JI ILLI J 1 VI\ -L- /"�1`IV -1- 1 1\VI ILL SEE SHEET S- TO S- FOR STRUCTURE PLAN ������������� �t ��� ���������� �� �� ���������= ���������������������������������������� ■■■��■r-----------------------------�■■■ ■����■i i■■■ ■■■■�■i � � - - . i■■■ ■■■■■■i i■■■ ■■■■■■L-----------------------------J■■■ ���������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������