NC0024406_Waste Load Allocation_19920309

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCoo ,% YO4
FACILITY NAME: _A, -e ?00 er / &I ewS Geek
Facility Status: ® PROPOSED
(circle one)
Permit Status: AL MODWI'.ATM UNPEkmnTED NEW
(circle ons)
Major ✓ Mlnor�
Pipe No: DOR
Design. Capacity (MGD): b,01
Domestic (% of Flow): / 0.0
Industrial(Xof Flow):
,^//__
Comments: do L4 �-Sf, kja5fe— 4reof/*
RECEIVING STREAM:-
Class: C
Sub -Basin: —d/
Reference USGS Quad: 13/Y. SE (please attach)
County: e- -5
Regional Office: - :As Fa Mo. Ra Wa Wi
jcircle one)
Requested By: I`OSM45 56LE0h4 Date: ' 9�
Prepared By: �LT11��� � Date: 't ,Z3 1 �
Reviewed By: l- • &) Date: 111124151 a-
-30t�, L35 .
Modeler Date Rec.
<j -
Drainage Area (mit) Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) —Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC —%
In.stream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
(circle one) Acute / Chronic.
Effluent-
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BODS (ma/u.
3D
34
NHa N (mg/0
7"DY
►r9?z r
D.O. (mg/0
—
TSS (mg/1)
136
3d
F. Col. (/100ml)
a00
aDC�
pH (SU)-km
p ek odwi .
f U'Lf DY
01&14' old
��9Nti�V
env
Comments:

90m,14i Um rs _
�h'rcl
Cem
OUTFALL 005
I/^\\ 1
800
9o�F
r Poweront •. 1� Ii111 1
j E
OUTFALL 003
r OUTFALL 002—
S, c"
S,c" 778'
r6 Cel �J
r-
_ SPA SM -1 Af4a�km,.,j� - -- --
F
-STQXF0
EP/4 =D:g /`ICCJVZ,�AYOG T0P.SYXH :.CO
UcY6S 144P
Ch
�. -
qj
LECOS KE - NC
...-OeATION OF 61UTFI�LLs
�r s;S$23 i-- " 15 5
+;;r,.•:. '' ,. 83 (BELEWS CREEK) 585 5$6 2'30"
-T=- • _ ..�'f 4956 11 NE
41,
SCALE 1:24000
tr .:-'.• . i 0 1 MILE

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Duke Power--Belews Lake --pipe 002
NCO024406
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
West Belews CreekBelews Lake
C
03-02-01
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
j 1:1 L 0 6 092
680(�'Vins on -Salem
Regional � afice
Stokes Stream Characteristic:
Winston-Salem Regional Office
USGS # Lake
Rosanne Barona
Date:
3/9/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
B 18SE
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
c
a„
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC
P_
CEJ'
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility has requested and SOC for implimentation of a spray irrigation system leading to cease
discharge of this pipe.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin
Reviewers:
c)J`A A, Date: S `� z--
/3-0A Lry
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
SD ` p!R
/.7 2-
JUL
JUL 3 0 1992

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/l):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature
Copper (µg/1):
Zinc (µg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature
Copper (µg/1):
Zinc (µg/1):
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
0.01
0.01
30
30
monitor
monitor
30
30
200
200
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.01 0.01
30 30
monitor
30
200
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
30
200
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
EL
EL
EL
EL
Parameter(s) Affected
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
M
X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameterscannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No.
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
�✓�'�-?t`
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.