Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140762 Ver 2_April sediment loss inspection_20170424Project Num: 20140762 Project Name: NCDOT- US 221 (R-2915C) County: Watauga Location: NCDOT- US 221 (R-2915C) Latitude: +35° 16' 05" SW Plan Location Site Owner Name NC DOT PDEA Inspection Date: 4/18/2017 Reason for Inspection Complaint Inspection Type: Site Inspection (DOT) Inspection Contact Person: On-Site Representative(s): Wetland Inspection Report Version: 2 Status: Issued Project Type: Road/Highway Widening Region: Central Title: Primary Inspector: Dave Wanucha Secondary Inspector(s): Facility Compliance Status: � Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Program Areas: Standards/Sediment Question Areas: � Unpermittable Activities Inspection Summary: Longitude: -81 ° 30' 10" Phone: Phone: 336-776-9703 I responded to a citizen complaint regarding sediment in a stream that flows right by her home (about 5 feet from her basement, of which floods on occassion). I walked the catchment and stream and observed a scant amount of sediment in stream, but is difficult to know if it was legacy or recent deposits. DOT just recently began clearing operations in this area. EC measures were in place. page: 1 Site Number: 20140762 Owner: Thorpe, Gregory Inspection Date: 4/18/2017 Inspection Type: Site Inspection (DOT) Reason for Visit: Complaint Unpermittable Activities # Note: This section should be completed only if the impact is unpermittable (eg. Sediment, draining wetlands, etc.). Is stream(s) free of unpermittable impacts? Is wetland(s) free of unpermittable impacts? Is open water(s) free of unpermittable impacts? Are other standards being met (turbidity, pH, etc.) in all surface waters onsite? Are surface waters on the site free of illegal discharges? Yes No NA NE � ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: A complaint from Janet Younq was called into the office concerninq sediment in the stream that flows next to her home. I investiqated the site and determined that there was a small portion of sediment in stream. It is possible that the source was related to recent tree clearinq activies or from around a house that was moved some time aqo, within the catchment, upstream of Ms. Younq's home, but it was difficult to know for sure. I met with the contractor and DOT inspector Dale Brown to review EC measures. All measures had recentiv been installed with some additional work that needed to be done. Hvdroseedinq was in process in manv areas. I made some suqqestions to beef-up a sediment basin near Site 1 and 2 within the catchment of Ms. Younq's home. Ms. Younq seemed satisfied that DOT was doinq all that was required. page: 2