20081362 Ver 1_401 Application_20080905

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610 _.919-212-1760 w' '''
?? - :.1
919-212-1707 Fax ?.:?
www.environmentalservicesine.com
WEIV,NDS AND
08 1362
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: DATE: September 4, 2008 JOB NO:
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
A I
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 *+ ` _
RE: Section 401 and Buffer Application for the City of Raleigh
WE ARE SENDING YOU
Attached Under separate cover via the following items
COPIES DATE . DESCRIPTION
7 PCN application with supporting documentation
1 Application fee {$240}
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval Approved as submitted
For your use Approved as noted
As requested Returned for corrections
For review and comment
For bids due 2008
Resubmit - copies for approval
Submit _ copies for distribution
Return _ signed copies
Prints returned after loan to use
REMARKS: Please contact Jeff Harbour at 212-1760 with any questions.
Copy to:
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".
A
I. Processing ?+
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 and WQC#3704
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Informations
Owner/Applicant Information

Name: City of Raleig-h-Public Works Department DE NN . A I LV; Q"-'4U I ?
Mailing Address: C/O Carl R. Dawson, Jr.
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Primary contact with City of Raleigh: Sylvester Percival
Telephone Number: 890-3030 Fax Number: 890-3832
E-mail Address: Sylvester.percival o,ci.raleigh.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jeff Harbour
Company Affiliation: ESI
Mailing Address: 524 S. New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone Number: 919-212-1760 Fax Number: 919-212-1707
E-mail Address: jharbour&a,esinc.cc
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fayetteville Street Widening; / Penmarc Drive-Water Works Street
Extension / Summit Avenue Improvements
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The Fayetteville Street widening begins at South Wilmington Street and ends at the southern
end of the bridge over Rocky Branch. The Penmarc Drive-Water Works Street Extension
begins at Fayetteville Street and extends westward to existing Penmarc Drive. Summit
Avenue is an existing gravel street that will be paved to residential street standards.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7577 ON 78.6453 °W
35.7570 °N 78.6409 °W
6. Property size (acres): The project study area for the Fayetteville Street widening is 0.74
mile by 70 feet wide (6.2 acres) and the Penmarc Drive Extension is 0.37 mile by 200 feet
(8.9 acres).
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Walnut Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse {HUC 03020201 }
Updated 11!1/2005
Page 6 of 13
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing site conditions include residential, industrial,
and commercial areas. The project will encroach into several small undeveloped areas
consisting of successional and forested land.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves widening of an existing street and the extension of another street on new
location Equipment to be used includes graders excavators dozers dump trucks etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to widen
Fayetteville Street from just north of South Wilmington Street to the bridge over Rocky
Branch. Penmarc Drive-Water Works Street will be extended on new location from existing
Penmarc Drive to Fayetteville Street. Summit Avenue will be paved to residential street
standards.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The project study area was delineated by ESI several years ago. USACE visited the site in the
summer of 2003 to review the stream importance determination results.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The applicant is not aware of any future project plans at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Construction of the project will impact
0.12 acre of wetlands resulting from the Penmarc Drive Extension. No wetlands or streams
will be affected by the Fayetteville Street widening or the Summit street improvements.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
W-1 fill PFO 150' 0.12

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.12
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Approximately
acre within the project study area.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.12
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.12
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NA
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13
A field delineation was conducted to identify and locate all jurisdictional areas prior to project
planning and design. The City has designed the proposed project to avoid and minimize the
impacts as much as practicable while still meeting the purpose and need of the project. No
stream impacts will result from the project.. Additional measures to minimize wetland impacts
include using t_he appropriate side slopes.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant is proposing to provide compensatory mitigation for the 0.12 acre of forested
wetland impacts through the in-lieu fee program administered by the NCEEP. NCEEP has
accepted this project into their program and a copy of the acceptance letter is attached.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.12
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA,final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* (s uare feet) Multiplier Mitig ton
1 2105 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 2010 1.5 0
Total 4115 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
The project does not require riparian buffer mitigation per the current regulations.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Please refer to the attached narrative that describes the nronosed stormwater management
methodology.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? . Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The project will ppgade Fayetteville Street to current city standards and offer an alternative
route to the existing residential street system by extending Penmarc Drive/Water Works Street to
Fayetteville Street providing improved circulation of local traffic within the project's general
location The project will also enhance the redevelopment potential of the area as well as offer
improved access to an existing City park by widening and paving Summit Avenue. This will not
serve as a driver of any significant secondary or cumulative impacts.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The applicant is not aware of any other circumstances that could impose limits on work
schedules.
1
S
-RQ
Applicant/Agent's Signathfe tat/
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13
Fayetteville Street Widening from Wilmington Street to Bragg Street
Penmarc Drive/Water Works Street Extension from Green Street to
Fayetteville Street
Summit Avenue Improvements from Gilbert Avenue to Proposed
Water Works Street
Purpose and Need
The project will upgrade Fayetteville Street to current city standards and offer an
alternative route to the existing residential street system by extending Penmarc
Drive/Water Works Street to Fayetteville Street, providing improved circulation of
local traffic within the project's general location. The project will also enhance the
redevelopment potential of the area as well as offer improved access to an existing
City park by widening and paving Summit Avenue.
General Description
Fayetteville Street exists as a two lane ribbon paved roadway. Its widening is
proposed from Wilmington Street to Bragg Street. The proposed road will have two
18 feet wide lanes with curb and gutter and sidewalk on one side to accommodate
commercial as well as pedestrian traffic from Wilmington Street to its proposed
intersection with Water Works Street. From proposed Water Works Street to Bragg
Street, the proposed road will have two 14 feet wide lanes with curb and gutter as
well as pedestrian accommodation on one side. Traffic calming measures will be
constructed along this section of Fayetteville Street.
Penmarc Drive exists as a commercial street having two 18 feet wide lanes with curb
and gutter. The road is proposed to be realigned from Green Street and extended as
Water Works Street to Fayetteville Street with curb and gutter as well as sidewalk on
one side.
Summit Avenue exists as a gravel roadway. The street is proposed to be paved to
residential street standards. It will have two 12 feet wide lanes with curb and gutter
as well as sidewalk on one side.
Erosion Control
Erosion Control during construction operations will be handled by sediment traps,
temporary diversion ditches, silt fences and inlet protection. All erosion control
measures are designed in accordance with criteria established by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources.
Storm Water Design Methodology
For each individual storm water inlet, a drainage area was measured. Each area's
impervious surface percentage was determined and a rational "C" factor was
calculated. The data was later used in the pipe sizing calculations.
The pipes were sized using Geopak Drainage. This program accepts the input data
from each inlet as well as the physical characteristics of the storm system to be
designed and calculates flow rates and pipe sizes throughout the system. For rainfall
data, the IDF (Intensity-Duration-Frequency) curve for the 10-year storm event
describing the Raleigh-Durham region was used. The final results of this program
showing the calculated pipe sizes and hydraulic grade lines are included in the report.
The minimum pipe diameter used for this project is 15 inches. The majority of the
pipes are RCP with the exception of one temporary culvert used across Penmarc
Drive/Water Works Street which is proposed to be a corrugated plastic pipe and will
be used to accommodate crossing a draw during construction.
Velocity dissipaters were designed for each outlet to prevent erosion and scour in
these areas. The dissipaters were designed to be NC DOT Class I or B rip rap
depending on the pipe size. The rip rap pad dimensions are based on NC DOT
standards for outlet protection. The velocity dissipaters are permanent features of the
storm drainage system.
1-
Ecosystem
c'..
PROGRAM
September 3, 2008
Sylvester Percival
City of Raleigh
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602 Expiration of Acceptance: June 3, 2008
Project: Fayetteville St. Widening/Penmarc Ext./Summit Ave. County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact thcse
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued.based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer 11
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Neuse 03020201 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0 0
Credits Neuse 03020201 0 0 0 0 0.24 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, lease contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE-Raleigh
Jeff Harbour, agent
File
Rutorikirg... E ... Prot-"' our Stag
?•'VA
MUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
ER0300BAocation.dwq
N _
CeG2 CeC2
` I
CeBti ' S CeC2
i
C;rn
;eU CeF ApB2 EnC2
CeC2 ii Ce82 ?) AfA \?.
? ? rrl L . \ /a ij r;
0 C nl y ,
{'PCB;. .AU
rr
I t ?? Ma MC2
Ce D I'
\ h1F
l ~ CFMETZERY ApB2 I V !
t /l ( Ce 2
Gf
°
C2.
rvle_ Ma
- s ?i - -
CeC2 l?
Ma
AP82
J UB2 (11a a ApI32'.
\ Wo
C.eC2 \ . i
A° Me .!? Wy
\.
A'p6
M a W
.'C M
Soil Map Units
c> ti Q Approximate Project
CeB2 Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded ! ` r! Study Area
CeC2 Cecil sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded . C2_ O
CeD Cecil sandy loam, 10-15% slopes /r ApR2 rt?? 0 300 660 Feet
CeF Cecil sandy loam, 15-45% slopes
Cm Chewacla soils 0 100 200 Meters
Gu Gullied land Source: USDA Soil Survey of 2
Ma Made land Wake County, NC, 1970
11 11-111- - .2 -1 . I
Soils Map Figure: 2
Envirorunental Fayetteville Street Widening/
Services, Inc. Penmarc Drive Extension Project: ER03008
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina Date: August 2003
-aPo'I sianf/800£0083
£OOZ 4-en6nd :a+DO OOZ = .1'GIDOS
800£083'4-0910-id OW"1'A8 Pe?>PGL40
4£ :ean613 L)l 'A9 UMDrIQ
c:
•oul 'sooss=aS
ivgaoniao:s,Laa
'
-, j SI(? +.,?
Y; I

.
A
..
4W,'
_. --

waie

Av-
511
?
e?„. b ?';` ?
r tVI R?, #• i N ya ? ib`5?;? 4 If
?
f ?I?!' t , llf'1G! 1?
M1' ???
„
,.i?4yy?
`L
•
r
1" ltr";?vaa'": *- try y.} ?,y'?,4;tp
'?rv MVn+??,a? ''??f",•?? ??.. i? 1.'-? !H
'
?l
+FA' !` ? •k
.•rt;
w"yi's?a
. :1
V; ?
" fM
' piv
{
1 q Mp.
w?y?,y? 2? f:. o c s
t ^F;.°
A
Wit

Yi. w ,tp 0 r f,:
f I v.t .::a
N
Y ' T y?
? ?„ hk, i Y+h , n?' ! 7i :l Y. hi??.p?Al
.
w
is
:,,y.yn t l? u

4ys„?;k F t,
"t
to
?. M. ?? f•? - A i 7

:
?
?
I r- h 5
?
g.
p
?aP'
>91ee•..,?kn.
;:
4?
?
?
'

't.
'
ii.,. 'q
3'?qy? y`W,4?(+
yy
.,?^ y
.?,yr F
7A: N y??jk.'?Y P M IVAT '., ,.
q
g .. a4?
'
! A
rxWx
,rr
. }}.
p 9
q ,
r
t.? ffi•
9f {• J* yyd ..
..a
n? a
M
!
iYW...

a,
m
C
Awo

1 #
44

f
J: ' M
y.
? k` LY,? O
7 O
?h.. ,ate 'i'Fr

x
;.t M° v, „ 6
? ? H? •?"?' .
E??
fir, .
r ? +?? ??+'' ? ?
T
? 8
L ?

v
?,

a
? O.C

m
¢
'
re"
rq w 5 {

V? J ?. ik
?1d

'

N

v
C

z

K

da'

+

V
Lo
C L
Of
(D
L

C

t
"'MU
,yy,?, F"
""?U?? A" ^'e ,x arl ?L Y3, .4
y?
"F
flf
r N

'? a) U)

H k
(D Q)

? CL 3 V / Z LL.
O V 4 •. 1
r. w
M ?? .?w ?.??n..?•y : +? ».-t: > wi."IEa 3iy,9'Fi" d ,yYU.
? w awnea"°? ? ?,d '? 9Z?,T,?", •" k .?.'?'? ?+ a a = .?fi`?`^?
_ ? ,
•?
F _ nr
rr

aPD'ZSlan f /8002Od3
8o0Z lsn6ny:a;oo OOZ - „l :aloOS
SOON 13 :lOafOad Hf :As Paioayo
of :aan6ld M3 :A9 umoi0
ou!loao3 u1-JON 'A}unoo ajoM 'y6!alo?j
anuany I!wwnS/uo!su@IX3 GAU(j aJowuad
/bu!uap!M 4aaaIS all!naIIaAo3
sl oodwl louoijolpsiinr
a?
.'\CI-)

N
1
I .D
i O
I p
1 ;
1 T
I ?
?Zwm
? JN
Z?
,rte
y,

zt,
I
s

3
-aAV I!tmwns
•Oul •i70[A1YS
lv;uau.uoa!sua
r_
1+'
i
in
® N O
u000
Ot?O
N¦N
cn CV (D
C
oo
C N
O
L-M
_-JJa :)aOuuuad
?l
.I
?11
I{
r
Iil l -
f

J: L
?'
'
U
CT O
N
O Q
U ?
o000
O.Q
?N ¦
•- ¦ N
m
N N
c
• NO
C N
O
^ N
w
UV
OO
CL
EN
`7
e-Q
a?
a?
N
N
M
a
:tf
E
N
O
in
O
Q
_O
N
O
.w+
O
_U
O
V
o ;
1 N ro .u9
L ZI d V O J
D °UO,rO
N ? o a,c?$c
? ? G naa3u°
`?Yj w our o•
Q Ln c° c°c° 6a
pl' C N
.17 + ao oo' 00
p L E Ot a°°
= n a d
p .y o a u ° •g •- Z
Z
to o V o 0 _a V o
TO E a?
d U U ° _°o°paro
U O
_ to -ar d 4 'p n 4 q a,
0- (!l Z L, (n z o 5.6
? I • I ' E E•-•s•
N OO?uC
0 ca
S1- a.
u6P•s-Podw!'ob 6!f/900£OOU3
8002 }snbny :a?.DO '00Z - "t :aIDaS
800CO83 -3aa(oJd Hf .A8 pamoa40
qt, -.ajn61 j M3 :A8 uMDJQ
V Q
N O (n
N 00 00 i
000.4 Lo,
O
?- N
C
N O N
CN C
O O
N N

Ou'10a00 ulJON `Alunoo a?oM `y6iajo?j
anuany IiwwnS/uoisua}x3 aniJo oJOwuad
/6uiuap!M JaaJjS ajjina jjaAC) j
s}oodwi louoiloipsijnr
"IS all,naaaaAod
n
a?
U
O.
In
O
a

•OUI •fOO[A.IOs
jv;UauvUoaisU2j
i
1
1

1? 1 v
1 0
7 1 0
/ 1 ?

cn
a
0 (D-
Q ?J_CM
a U)

_o
vim- ? 9 oauc?O
?

N

7
m Q
Q
;
R ° v
Q L J o o°coa`>.
®
2

_0 c
v -0
E 61.0
4m
0 D w $ vo °°a• c
o
?
cn a- Z O n = oou°?

E Q) cn
Y
EN
?
°
U
N
U
0
Q)
fn %-
D
.r
Q

C?
y
°
°
°OM
o 22v
w?
-
d 'S (n Z li (n N ° °
d O N C
I ® I ° OO N C
?I
uop-s4.DDow!-qy U:tiauuk.uaJ