NC0060534_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20170413

.a
�3
+� } o! e
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 13, 2017
Mr. Jim Fatland
Interim City Manager
City of Brevard
95 West Main Street
Brevard, NC 28712
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Brevard WWTP
Permit No: NCO060534
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Fatland:
-ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
RECEIVEDINCUE-01D R
APK M Z01P
80*9
Enclosed please find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection conducted on April 13, 2017. The
pretreatment program was found to be in compliance with permit NCO060534 and applicable pretreatment
regulations.
The attached North Carolina Division of Water Resources Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI)
Report lists additional items of importance noted during the inspection:
The assistance provided by Tom Williams during the inspection was greatly appreciated. Please refer to
the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any
questions, please call me at 828-296-4500 or Sarah Bass at [phone] [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Tim Heim, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
Enc.
cc: Tom Williams, Pretreatment Coordinator
MSC 1617 -Central Files -Basement
Asheville Files
Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
G:\WR\WQ\Transylvania\Wastewater\Municipal\Brevard WWTP 60534\Pretreatment\2017 PCI Inspection\PCI letter 04-12-2017.doc
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
828 296 4500

4
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)l
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: _ City of Brevard
2. Control Authority Representative(s): _ Tom Williams, WWTP Lab Manager, Pretreatment Coordinator
3. Title(s): WWTP Lab Manager, Pretreatment Coordinator; City Engineer, Brown Consultants
4. Last Inspection Date: June 4, 2015_ Inspection Type (Check One): ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO,
Order Type, Number, Parameters: NA Are Milestone Dates Being Met? F1YES ElNO
*Many potential changes to the program are being postponed until the 2017 due to the large number of changes at the plant and
the SIU. The PTC is coordinating regularly with PERCS staff about this.
ICIS CODING
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
NIC101-01610151314 J 141121171
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1 1
8. Number of SIUs With No RTP, or With an Expired IUP?
0
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
1
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
11. Number. of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual
Periods?
0
12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
0
13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
0
14. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
0
15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
0**
16. Number of CIUs in SNC?
0
**PTC reports that the IU (Oscar Blues) may be approaching CIU status due to BOD mass loading. The two parties are communicating
closely on this and will update ARO and PERCs.
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SRTs in SNC) Not Put
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
® YES ❑ NO
Compliant since end of 2015
❑ YES ® NO
Limit :0
Reporting:0
Ilished:0
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22.. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
T.TO MUD U, a+,f,+ n+ Pmmn1;­P TnenPi,tinn CP(T) Fnrm TTnrintPrl TiP.f.P.TTI}1P.r M16 Pave 1

25. All LTMP/STMT effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO Division 'Inspector, please verify
yourself! The LTMP will begin data collection on 4/13/2017 and this data will be included in the DAP,
26. If NO to 23- 26, list violations
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMT? ❑ YES ® NO.
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: NA Added: NA
W T)WR Pretreatment Cmmnlisnre Tn.enentinn (P(.T) Fnrm Unrlatari T)Prrmher, 2(11 F Paaa 9

*The only item of significance noted was during the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, the POTW did not complete its sampling as required
by IUP, including flow? This oversight occurred during a change of personnel at both the city engineer/management level and WWTP,
concurrent with major construction projects ongoing at the WWTP and associated collection system. The IU did perform sampling as
required during this time. The new Pretreatment Coordinator understands the importance of the sampling requirement and will perform
it in the future.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING:
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
N IC 10 J0. 16 10 15 13 14 14 112 117 f
Industry Inspected:_Oscar Blue Brewery
2. Industry Address:_342 Mountain Industrial Drive, Brevard, NC, 28712
3. Type of Industry/Product:—Craft Beer.
4. Industry Contact:–Brian Spotts Title:—General Manager
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ® YES ❑ NO
C: Pretreatment Tour ® YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ® YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ® YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
Full and thorough inspection, plant staff demonstrated excellent understanding of their production process
and all components of the pretreatment system.
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: Pretreatment Coordinator and IU GM maintain frequent and open communication about any changes to the production
process.
Requirements:
Recommendations: Monitor production rates as potential to reach BOD mass loading for CAT status may exist in the future.
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory X Marginal UnSatisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: / � 1 1-I 41 P%DATE: 4/12/2017
W. T)WR PTAtrP.AtmP.nt (.mmnTianeP Tncnectinn (P(' Fnrm T1nrintPrl T)Prrmher 7M F, Paan d

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element
in their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program. Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file If Applicable
Ileadworks Analysis (HWA)
10/10/2013
® Yes ❑ No
6/24/2014
® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Waste Survey IWS)
4/11/2016
® Yes ❑ No
7/6/2016
® Yes ❑ No
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
11/21/2013
® Yes ❑ No
12/13/2013
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan RP
4/7/2014
® Yes ❑ No
6/25/2014
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
6/17/2014
® Yes ❑ No
6/24/2014
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name 11
1. Oscar Blues
2. NA
3. NA
30. IUP Number
I S-001-14
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No 11
❑ Yes ❑ NoI
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
8/31/2019
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
®Yes ElNo
❑ Yes ❑ No1
❑Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No 11
a. ❑Yes ❑No
il
a. ❑Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes []No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
❑Yes❑NoON/A❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
11
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ®Yes [IN o
a. ❑Yes ❑No
a. ❑Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
El Yes ®No
❑Yes ❑ No
1:1 Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
®NA El No
❑Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
RYesDNo❑ 71
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑No®N/AF
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
®NA ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
All Reportinu Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑YesONo❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A 11
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49.' Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A 11
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
Eb.ciYesoNooN/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑Yes ®No
El ❑ No
❑Yes [:1 No
Requested Information For You?
][
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
NT(' MITT? (P('T% R- TT-A.+.A n -- l— IM 4 Pone 1

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 6-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN I 2 I5 I 3 I N00060534 I11 12 17/04/12 17
I 19 I G I 201
18 LP]
211111 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I-I I I I I II I I I I I f6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA
-- —Reserved------
671 70 I I 71 I I 72 I N I
L—I LJ
73 174 751 III I I I 180
1
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:OOAM 17/04/12
12/10/01
Brevard WWTP
3226 Wilson Rd
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Pisgah Forest NC 28768
12:OOPM 17/04/12
15/09/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)lritles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Emory Gaine Owen/ORC/8288�-883-84611 /' /J
W1�' 1 ''v' d rcl �ro;v
t�
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
(r
r'yvi,� int Contacted
--dam, Akdehnstea 95 W Main St Brevard NC 28712//828-884-2770/8288842358
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Pretreatment ® Other
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
Timothy H Heim ARO WQ#828-2964665/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.)
31 Nco06os34 I1 12 17/04/12 17 18 p
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Tim Heim of the Asheville Regional Office performed a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection on April
12th, 2017. Tom Williams (Brevard Pretreatment Coordinator) assisted with the.inspection and with
records and sampling results review. An inspection of Industrial User Oscar Blue Brewery (IUP #
S-001-14) was performed as part of the inspection.
Although new, the pretreatment program appeared well organized and. managed, and record keeping
was complete and detailed at the time of the inspection.
See attached NC DEQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection form for details.
Page#

#a6ed
3N VN ON 90A
-uuo j uoi}oa sub aoueilwok }uawleeila.id ?AAA(] ON Payoe}le aouaJaJa9 :IuewwOO
J041O
eoue!!dwoo luaw;ear 9Jd :edA.L uolpedsul LWZ/A/t 0 :a;e(3 uopedsu!
dl/M PJenaJg �3!1!oed -.1aumo VES0900ON :)!Uuad