NC0039578_Renewal (Application)_20170407

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretarn
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
April 7, 2017
Mr. Stan Bryon, Operations Supt.
Tuckaseigee Water & Sewer Authority
1246 West Main Street
Sylva, NC 28779
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO039578
Jackson County WWTP
Jackson County
Dear Mr. Bryon:
The Water Quality Permitting Section. acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting documentation received on April 6, 2017. The primary reviewer for this renewal
application is Teresa Rodriguez.
The primary reviewer will review your application, and she will contact you if additional
information is required to complete your permit renewal. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit
does not expire until permit decision on the application is made. Continuation of the current permit
is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit.
Please respond in a timely manner to requests for additional - information necessary to
complete the permit application. If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the
subject permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at 919-807-6387 or [e-mail].
cc: Central Files
NPDES
Asheville Regional Office
Sincerely,
?A" 07&q*n
Wren Thedford
Wastewater Branch
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-807-6300

a
L
— I
I .1
L
�
I e
z
i
I
n •i
.
•
f
•
o �
z
I
• .r f

TUCKASEIGEE WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY
SERVING JACKSON COUNTY
1246 West Main Street
Sylva, NC 28779
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
April 3, 2017
ATTN: Wren Thedford
NCDENR/DWR
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Subject: Permit Renewal, TWSA Plant #1
(NC0039578)
Tuckaseigee Water and Sewer Auth
Jackson County
Dear Ms Thedford,
�1 R
APR 0 b 2017
ywterQualitY
FermbngSeCjion
With this letter and completed application, the Tuckaseigee Water and Sewer Authority
requests renewal of our NPDES Permit # NC 0039578, for the TWSA Plant #1 facility.
I have attached the original and two copies of the Permit Renewal.
.Please contact me with any questions or comments. I can be reached directly at 828-586-
9318 or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Stan Bryson
Wastewater Plant Operations Supt.
Tuckaseigee Water and Sewer Auth.
xc: Mr. Dan Harbaugh, Executive Director,
Tuckaseigee Water and Sewer Authority

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
I WSA #1, NCO039578 Renewal Little Tennessee
FORM
2A NPDES FORiVI 2�► A;PPLI"W11PYR"IEW
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B'.1 through 13.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
. one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of, Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A -treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G' (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
I WSA ##1, NCO039578
Renewal
Little Tenliessee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name TWSA Plant # 1
Mailing Address 1246 West Main St.
SVlva NC 28779
Contact Person Stan Bryson
Title Wastewater Plant Operations Superintendent
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 1871 North River Rd.
(not P.O. Box) Sylya NC 28779 `
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Tuckaseioee Water & Sewer Authority
Mailing Address Same as above
Contact Person Same as above
Title
Telephone Number ( )
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
•X owner X operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility X applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC 0039578 PSD
UIC Other WO 0005763
RCRA Other Air Q 08420802
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Tuckaseigee Water & Sewer Auth. 13130 Seperate Municipal
Total population served 13130
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, NCO0395 8 Renewal Little Tennessee
.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes X No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows through)
Indian Country?
X Yes ❑ No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the average,
daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12 -month time period with the 121h
month of "this year' occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 3.5 mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 0.724 mgd(2014) 0.785 mad !2015) 0.937 mgd (20161
G. Maximum daily flow rate 1.230mad (1/16114) 1.641 mad (1213115) 2.570 mod (2125116)
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
X Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined stone and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
one
-0-
X No
❑ Yes
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works? ❑ Yes X No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
mgd
X No

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TVVSA #1, NCO039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( 1
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): ❑ Yes
X No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
I WSA #1, NC0039578 Renewal Little Tennessee
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.S. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location 1871 North River Rd., Svlva 28779
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County)
350 20'59"
(State)
830 14' 21"
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) n/a
ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) n/a
ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 0.788
mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes
X No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes
❑ No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Tuckaseeoee River
b. Name of watershed (if known) Lower Little Tennessee Sub Basin
United States Soil Conservation Service 14 -digit watershed code (if known): 0601023020010
C. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): Little Tennessee
United States Geological Survey 8 -digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): 06010203
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TtNSA #1, NCO039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
X Primary X Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 96 %
Design SS removal 96 %
Design P removal na %
Design N removal na %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? X Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? X Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QAIQC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart
Outfall number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.8
S.U.
pH (Maximum)
7.9
S.U.
Flow Rate
2.570
mgd
0.937
mad
366
Temperature (VVinter)
24.8
C
17.0
°C
100
Temperature (Summer)
26.6
°C
23.1
°C
149
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
MLIMDL
Number of
METHOD
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Uni;j
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
41.4
mg/I
5.6
mg/I
249
SM 181' 5210 B
1.0 mg/I
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
12400
cfu/100 ml
34
cf
245
S11018'h 9222D
efu/100 m
100
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
18.9
mg/I
< 2.8
mg/l
24.5
SM 181' 2540 D
1.0 mg/I
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TV ISA #1, NC 0030578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate > 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.I. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
< 35000 gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
On going maintainence program by iWSA collection system personnel
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within'/ mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored,' and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes X No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number. ( )
Responsibilities of Contractor.
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, NC 0039573
Renewal
Little Tennessee
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DDNYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational Level
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
ML/MDL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
Number of
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
32.8
mg/I
4.6
mg/I
249
USGS 13520-85
0.5 mg/I
CHLORINE (TOTAL
23
ug/1
< 20
ug/l
249
SfVi 181h 4500CI-G
20 ug/l
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
10.4
mg/I
7.6
mg/I
249
Sri 18th 4500 O -G
.1 mg/I
TOTAL KJELDAHL
29.0
mg/1
10.4
mg/i
4
EPA 351.2
.5 mg/I
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
9.4
mg/I
3.3
mg/I
4
EPA 353.2
.08 mg/I
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
7.9
mg/I
<6
mg/I
4
EPA1664A
5 mg/I
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
1.6
mg/I
1.1
mg/I
4
EPA 365.1
.06 mg/I
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
236
mg/I
191
mgll
4
SM 2540-C
20 mg/I
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, INC 0039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
X Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
X Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
X Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
❑ Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Stan Brvson. 1ANVTP Ooemti6ns Su t.
Signature �fd''��'f
Telephone number [phone]
�f
Date signed
' 0
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
TWSA #1, NIC 0039578
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal _
RIVER BASIN:
Little Tennessee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 .(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
< 5
ug/I
< .04
Ibs
< 5
ug/I
< .04
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 ug/I
ARSENIC
< 10
ugh
< .09
Ibs
<10
ug/I
< .07
Ibs
4
EPA 200.7
10 ug/I
BERYLLIUM
< 1
ug/I
< .009
lbs
< 1
ug/I
< .007
Ibs
4
EPA 200.7
1 ug/1
CADMIUM
< 1
ug/I
< .009
Ibs
< 1
ug/I
< .007
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
1 ugh
CHROMIUM
< 5
ug/1
< .04
lbs
< 5
ugh
< .04
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 ug/I
COPPER
< 5
ug/I
.04
Ibs
< 5
ug/I
< .04
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 ug/I
LEAD
< 5
ug/I
< .04
Ibs
< 5
ug/I
< .04
Ibs
4
EPA 200.7
5 ug/1
MERCURY
3.2
ng/1
<.001
Ibs
2.4
ng/I
<.001
Ibs
4
EPA 1631 E
.50 ng/I
NICKEL
<5
ug/I
<.04
Ibs
<5
ug/1
<.04
Ibs
4
EPA 200.7
5 ug/1
SELENIUM
<10
ug/I
.09
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.07
Ibs
4
EPA 200.7
10 ugh
SILVER
<5
ugh
<.04
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.04
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 ug/I
THALLIUM
<10
ug/I
.09
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.07
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
10 ug/I
ZINC
116
ug/I
0.85
Ibs
91.1
ug/I
0.68
Ibs
4
EPA 200.7
10 ug/1
CYANIDE
.0051
mg/I
.046
lbs
< .007
mg/I
< .052
lbs
4
SM 4500 -CNE
.0050 mg/I
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
0.16
mg/1
0.11
lbs
.010
mg/I
.07
lbs
4
EPA 420.4
.01 mg/1
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
.034
mg/I
.306
lbs
.035
mg/I
0.26
lbs
4
SM 2340 B
0.65 mg/I
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, NCO039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
ML/MDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
< 100
ug/I
< 0.89
lbs
< 29
ug/I
< 0.22
lbs
4
EPA 624
100 ug/I
ACRYLONITRILE
< 50
ug/I
< 0.45
lbs
< 50
ug/I
< 0.45
lbs
4
EPA 624
50 ug/I
BENZENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 ug/i
BROMOFORM
<5
ug/I
< .045
lbs
<3
ug/l
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 ug/I
CARBON
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 ug/I
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
<5
ua/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 ug/I
CHLORODIBROMO-
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 ug/I
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
<10
ug/I
<0.89
lbs
<4
ug/1
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 624
10 ug/1
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
<10
ug/I
<.089
lbs
< 7.5
ug/I
<.056
lbs
4
EPA 624
10 ug/I
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
9.7
ug/I
<.063
lbs
<6
ug/I
<.045
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
DICHLOROBROMO-
3.3
ug/1
.023
lbs
<3
ug/I
.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 mg/I
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
<.045
Ibs
<3
ug/i'
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I _
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
Ibs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
TRANS-I,2-DICHLOR0-
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/1
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
Ibs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
1,3-DICHLORO-
<5
ug/1
<.045
Ibs
<3
ug/I
<.022
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 ugll
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
Ibs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
METHYL BROMIDE
<10
ug/I
.089
lbs
<4
ug/I
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
METHYL CHLORIDE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/1
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
1,1,2,2 -TETRA-
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/l
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
Ibs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
TVVSA ##1, NG 0039578
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Little Tennessee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/1
< .045
lbs
<3
ug/l
< .022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
< .045
lbs
<3
ug/I
< .022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<5
ug/I
< .045
lbs
<3
ug/I
<.022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
VINYL CHLORIDE
<5
ug/I
< .045
lbs
<3
ug/I
< .022
lbs
4
EPA 624
2 ug/I
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P -CHLORO -M -CRESOL
<10
ug/I
< .089
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.036
!bs
4
EPA 625
10 ug/I
2 -CHLOROPHENOL
<5
ug/I
< .045
lbs
<5
ug/I
< .037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
< .037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
2,4 -DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10
ug/I
< .089
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ug/I
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
< 20
ug/I
< 0.18
lbs
< 20
ug/I
<.15
lbs
4
EPA 625
20 ug/I
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
< 50
ug/I
< 0.45
lbs
< 50
ug/I
< 0.37
lbs
4
EPA 625
50 ug/I
2-NITROPHENOL
<5
ug/I
< .045
lbs
<5
ug/l
< .037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
4-NITROPHENOL
< 50
ug/I
< 0.45
lbs
<5
ua/I
<.37
lbs
4
EPA 625
50 ug/l
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
< 25
ug/I
< 0.22
lbs
<14
ug/I
< 0.10
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ua/I
PHENOL
< 5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
< 5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<10
ug/I
<.089
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ugh
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
ANTHRACENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
BENZIDINE
< 50
ug/I
< 0.45
lbs
< 50
ug/I
< 0.37
lbs
4
EPA 625
50 ug/I
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ua/1
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
T\/VSA #1, NC 0039578
Renevtral
Little Tennessee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
ML/MDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
<5
ug/1
< .045
lbs
<5
ug/I
< .037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/i
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
BENZO(K)
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
<10
ug/l
<.089
lbs
<10
ugh
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ug/1
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)7
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
<5
ug/l
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/1
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
8.2
ug/f
<.07
lbs
<6
ug/I
<.044
lbs
4
EPA 625 "
5 ug/I
PHTHALATE
4-13ROMOPHENYL
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
PHTHALATE
2 -CHLORO-
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
<5
ug/l
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
ibs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
DI -N -BUTYL PHTHALATE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/1
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
DIBENZO(A,H)
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
ANTHRACENE
1,2 -DICHLOROBENZENE
<5
ug/l
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
1,3 -DICHLOROBENZENE "
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
1,4 -DICHLOROBENZENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
< 25
ug/I
<.22
lbs
< 25
Ug/I
< 0.19
lbs
4
EPA 625
25 ug/I
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/1
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<5
ugh
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ua/l
1,2 -DIPHENYL-
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
HYDRAZINE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TVVSA #1, NC 0039578
Renewal
Litt[e Tennessee
Outfall number. 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MUMDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
FLUORENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
HEXACHLORO-
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
<10
ug/1
<.089
lbs
<10
ug/l
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ug/I
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
<-045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
UG/1
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
<10
ug/I
<.089
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ug/I
NAPHTHALENE
<5
ug/l
< .045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
NITROBENZENE
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/1
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
N-NITROSODI-N-
<5
ug/1
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
<5
ug/l
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/I
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
<10
ug/1
<.089
lbs
<10
ug/I
<.036
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 ug/l
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
<5
ug/l
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
PYRENE
<5
ug/l
<.045
lbs
<5
ug/1
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/l
1,2,4
<5
ug/I
<.045
lbs
< 5.
ug/l
<.037
lbs
4
EPA 625
5 ug/I
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TVA/SA #1, NC 0039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12 -month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QAIQC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
26 chronic 4 acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. Test number. Test number.
a. Test information'. Copies of all analysis and pertinent sample information attached to renewal application.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24 -Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
TWSA #1, NCO039578
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Little Tennessee
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow-through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LC5o
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
TWSA #1, NCO039578
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN.
Little Tennessee
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DDNYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes X No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
-Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, NCO039578 I Renewal I Little Tennessee
SUPPLEMENTAL_APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
AIR treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete pan: F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
❑ Yes X No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 0
b. Number of CIUs. 0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address:
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SI U's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Raw material(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TVVSA #1, NC0039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes X No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) X No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
L
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, NIC0039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART,G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
13.1. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in GA or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
c. Locations of in-line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point
'G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City ortown, .if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
GA. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (❑ actual or ❑ approx.) .
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
TWSA #1, NCO039578
Renewal
Little Tennessee
C. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.S. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water.
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14 -digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State ManagemenURiver Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8 -digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS -
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
Aaaitionai mtormation, it proviaea, will appear on the tollowing pages.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

2013
Toxicity
Analysis

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 02/21/13
Facility: TWSA•PLANT #1 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: '001 County: JACKSON
�Signatur
oratory Performi g Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
X
o p a or in nsi e C arge
X
Sgnature:o •La oratory Supervisor * PASSED:' -0.36% Reduction
i.
Work Order: 921.47731 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carol iria Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.089
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2. 3 .a 5 6 -7 8 9 10'11 12. % Reduction = -0:36
#Young Produced II20I25I23I25I21I22I27I24I24I23I21I24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead IIL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL
Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
23.25
Control
Control
0.00
23.33
Treatment 2
Treatment 2
Effluent 3.5.%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.11 12 Control CV
8.6276 PASS FAIL
## Young Produced 21 20 27 21 27 26 25 21 21`23 24 24 % control orgs ECheck
producing 3rd.brood EOne
Idult (L) ive (D) eadu L L L L L L L L L L L L 100
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 02/13/13
Control 8:.00 8.21 8.16 8.48 8.14 8.06 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/11/13 Sample 2: 02/13/13
Treatment 2' 8.-09 8.13 8.01 8.38 8.21 7.95 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs .T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness (mg/1) 47 ..,..... . ......
Control 8.'00 7.28 7.56 7.49 7.21 7.08 .'..
Spec. Cond.(pmhos) 263 553 463
Treatment 2 7.'43 7.33 7.27 7.-15 7.66 7.48
Chlorine(mg/1) ........ <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt (°C) ........ 1. 0 0 . 7
(Mortality expressed as combining replicates)
Note• Please
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
�C50'= % Method of Determination
95% Con i ence Limits Moving Average Probit
-- % Spearman Karber _ Other
i Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
E I I Control
High
Conc.
PH D. 0.
%s
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
�C50'= % Method of Determination
95% Con i ence Limits Moving Average Probit
-- % Spearman Karber _ Other
i Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
E I I Control
High
Conc.
PH D. 0.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 05/23/13
Facility: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
Labor Perf Yining Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
X
oY_,Qperatoj__a-n Respons
X q. -TU -4m w w I
Signature. ot Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: -2.11. Reduction
Work Order: 9215-7936 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.500
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 . Reduction = -2.11
11 Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 28 30 32 42 41 39 39 35 36 37 33 35
0.00 35.58
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D) ead J�L L L IL JL IL L IL IL IL L L
"0.00 36.33
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent 3.50
TREATMENT�2 ORGANISMS 1 -2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
12.130. PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 11 36.36 37 36 37 32 33 41 34 3.5 3.7 42 . control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Checkone
Adult (L) ive (D) ead JIL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL L L IL L 100.
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
PH Test Start,Date: 05/15/13
Control 7.93 7.82 7.92 8.00 7.71 7.86 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/13/13 Sample 2: 05/15/13
Treatment 2 7.82 7.85 7.69 8.06 7.93 7.85 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
3. --sample t -iciLLIP9 2nd s am
D.O. Hardness (mg/1) 41 ;;: •• ••
......
Control7.23 7.13 7.33 7.20 7.76 7.62
Spec. Cond.(E.cmhos) 151 283.3 304.0
Treatment 2 7.47 7.29 7.87 7.45 7.56 7.32
Chlorine.(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute ToxicityTest o
Sample temp. at receipt(OC)
C) ...,•••• 1.6 0.6
C
(Mortality expressed as ., combining replicates)
Note: Please
Concentration Complete This C
Section Also t
Mortality
start/end start/end j
LC50 = . Method of Determination Control
95. Con i ence Limits Moving Average ProbitIF i
-- . Spearman Karber = Other - High
]Conc.
pH D.O.
i
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 08/29/13
Facility: TWSA PLANT 41 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
Laborat Perf ing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
R _ Comments:
ozyil re L` ape in xesponsinle
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order: 9216-9393
* PASSED: 0.82% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div, of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
I
Chronic Pass/Fail
Reproduction
Toxicity
Test
Chronic Test
Results
Calculated t
= 0.121
Tabular t
= 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1 Reduction
= 0.82
# Young Produced
29129132131
32137130132."27
24
32
30
1 Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
30.42
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
JIL IL
IL
IL
L
IL
IL
IL
L
L
L
L
Control
Control
0.00
30.17
Effluent - 3.50
Treatment 2
Treatment 2
TREATMENT�..
2 ORGANISMS
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Control CV
10.4401
PASS FAIL
# Young Produced
11 33135124132
36
35
30
32
18
37
31
19
1 control orgs
X
producing 3rd
_
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
JIL IL IL
L
L IL
L ;L
L
L
L ,L
brood 1001
Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either t
PH Test Start Date:
Control 7.57 7.89 [07.547.71 7.46 7.57 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 08/19/13 Sample 2: 08/21/13
Treatment 2 7.57 7.68 7.64 7.55 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D '1st P/F
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P p
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 40
Control 7.26 6.91 7.72 7.43 7.55 E
.29
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 117 305.0 272.1
Treatment 2 7.20 7.18 7.70 7.64 7.87 .33'
Chlorine (mg/1) ,,,,,,, <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) 1.6 2.8
(Mortality expressed as 1, combining replicates)
Note: Please
Concentration Complete This
Mortality Section Also
start/end start/end
LC50 = - Method of Determination
956 Confi�nce Limits Moving Average Probit
6 -- 1 Spearman Karber - Other
I
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
Control
H1
High
Conc.
pH D. 0.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 11/14/13
Facility: TWSA PLANT 41 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
Labora ry Perf ing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
X /.r --`-
rata e o_perator in Responsible Charge
X
Sign ture of La oratory Supervisor * PASSED: 4.22. Reduction
Work Order: 9217-8250 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced II22I27I27I25I28I22I28I28I22I26I25I28
Adult (L)ive (D)ead JAL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL
affluentc. 3.5.
CREATMENT2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.11 12 Control CV
9.592. PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 11 18 20 24 28 25 22 26 28 27 25.23 d29 . control orgs X_producing 3rdbrood Check One
Adult(L)ive (D)ead JIL L L L L L L L L L L 100.
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.899
Tabular t = 2.508
Reduction = 4.22
Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
25.67
Control
Control
0.00
24.58
Treatment 2
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 11/06/13
Control 7.57 7.88 7.80 7.77 7.91 7.77 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 11/04/13 Sample 2: 11/06/13
Treatment 2 7.75 7.95 7.97 8.10 7.82 7.89 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D- O•Control 7.06 7.02 _ Hardness(mg/1) 39
.......... ..........
7 66 7 18 7.79 7.66
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 142 377 381
Treatment 2 7.81 7.72 7.52 7.27 7.68 7.80
Chlorine (mg/1) <0 . 1 <0 . 1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C),,,,.,,, 2.6 0.7
(Mortality expressed as ., combining replicates)
Note: Please
'Concentration Complete This
Section Also
a % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = Method of DeterminationControl
-71
95. Con i'3ence Limits Moving Average Probit _
-- - Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)-

2014
Toxicity
Analysis

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 02/26/14
Facility: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: N00039578 Pipe##: 001 County: JACKSON
Laborato If Perform' g Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
e
X l / C'Orl l rQ'-yo
Sig ature of Laboratory Supervisor
r.
e
* PASSED: 6.88% Reduction *
Work Order: 9218-9921 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div, of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodanhnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced - II26I33I28I30I30I16I33I35I29I32I30I27
Adult (L)ive (D)ead IIL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL
3ffluent3.56
CREATMENT2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
16.8100
# Young Produced 11 2522 19 33 31 25 32 23 29 23 32 31 o control orgs
producing 3rd
Adult (L)ive (D)ead J�L L L L L L L L L L L L brood100-1.
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.014
Tabular t = 2.508
Reduction = 6.88
-*,Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
29.08
Control
Control
0.00
27.08
Treatment 2
Treatment 2
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
PH Test Start Date: 02/19/14
Control 7.46 7.73 7.79 7.71 7.53 7.53 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/17/14 Sample 2: 02/19/14
Treatment 2 .7.77 7..61 7.59 7.67 7.57 7.73 Sample Type/Duration -2nd
S. s s Grab Comp. Duration D 1st PIF
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P p
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample
D.O.
O Control 7.54 7.4a 7.91 7.62 7.33 E766
Hardness(mg/1) 40
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 145 496 698
Treatment 2 7.06 6.88 8.15 7.47 7.61
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) ,,,,,,,, 1.9 0.1
(Mortality expressed as combining replicates)
LC50 = o
95 o Con ire Limits
Note: Please
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
Method of Determination Control
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other - High
Conc. .
AH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
20pied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

,ffluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 05/15/14
acility: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NCO039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
Laborato Perform' g Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
% Comments:
X
Sicma ure o e t r in sponse e C arge
X u_r-L't V ) l�- v
Signature
ot Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: -12.00. Reduction
Work Order: 9220-0066 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
lv v Lut+aaii � u
Chronic ss
CONTROL
Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
4 Young Produced 1125125128133125124130131130136130133
Adult (L)ive (D)ead JIL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL
Effluent . 3.5.
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -2.095
Tabular t = 2.508
Reduction = -12.00
Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
29.17
Control
Control
0.00.
32.67
Treatment.2
Treatment 2
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
13.144.
# Young Produced 24132130132 36 40 33 27 32 37 35 34 . control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
Adult (L) ive (D) ead L L L L L L L L L L L L I
10011
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 05/07/14
Control 7.45 7.66 7.67 7.75 7.51 7.79 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/05/14 Sample 2: 05/07/14
Treatment 2 7.47 7.61 7.54 7.70 7.53 7.68 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness-(mg/1) 42
Control 8.33 7.83 8.09 7.98 8.09 7.70
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 129 282.4 300
Treatment 2 8.28 7.62 7.78 7.77 8.05 7.48
Chlorine(mg/1) ,.,,,,,, <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) ,,,..... 1.8 1.6
(Mortality expressed as ., combining replicates)
1
Note: P ease
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
'C50 = Method of Determination
95. Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
-- o Spearman Karber _ Other
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
Control
High
Conc.
uH D. 0.

,_;xicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 08/14/14
,Y: TW6A PLANT 4#1 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
_,aoraVry Perfoy9ing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
X Comments: e�ntr�f c ;� 11 hire«1�_
S nat re o Uperator in Responsible Charge
X
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor I * PASSED: -12.04-'. Reduction
Work Order: 9221-2001 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.237
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tabular t= 2.518
Reduction = -12.04
# Young Produced 16 17 17 19 13 15 16 12 14 15 M 17 Mortality Avg.Reprod.
0.00 15.55
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L Control Control
0.00 17,42
Effluent 3.5o Treatment 2 Treatment 2
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 .6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control Cv
12.9820 PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 17 12 15 22 17 23 17 18 25 9 14 20 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L brood ICheck One
90.90
H
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/06/14
Control 7.81 7.80 M7.547.72 Mj
Collection (Start)Date
i"reatment 2 7.71 7.83 Sample le 1: 08/04/14 Sample 2: 08/06/14
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
s s 1st P/F
s Grab Comp. !24
ation D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X hrs L A
r d r d r d A
t t t U M M
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Sample 2 X hrs T p p
L.O. Hardness(mg/1) 39
Control 7.83 7.65 7.76 7.81 8.20 7.96 "......•
:eatment 2 7.36 746 8.08 7.68 8.07 7.53. Spec. Cond.()umhos) 140 322 334
���� <<_� Chlorine (mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
.uC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) 1.0 1.8
w1ortality expressed as combining replicates)
I - Note: Please
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortalit
Y
C50 =
95o Con T
3 i ence Limits
start/end • start/end
Method of Determination. Control
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber = Other — High
Conc.
PH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
-P L=U LLUm Lwu corm AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
.:y: TWSA PLANT #1
,00ra4ory Per
X
Si at re
X_ . 1:: Vl
Work Order: 9222-4uii
Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Div: of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
forth Carolina Ceriodaphnia 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test - Chronic Test Results
ONTROL ORGANISMS Calculated t = -0.623
1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 Tabular t= 2.508
Reduction = -4.10
# Young Produced 25 20 16 22 21 1826 17 24 22 18 15 Mortality Av
� g.Reprod.
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L 0.00 20.33
L L L L L L L L Control Control
Effluents: 3.5; 0.00 21.17
2ATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1Treatment 2 Treatment 2
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Control CV
# d 17.712° PASS FAIL
Young Produce
18 26 20 20 21 16 20 26 23 20 22 22
o control orgs X
kdult (L)ive (D)ead LL IL L Producing 3rd El
L L L L L L L L brood 91.70 Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
Complete This For Either Test
Control gumm
Test Start Date: 11/05/14
Collection7eatment 2 SamSample T• 11/03/14 Date
/ / Sample 2: 11/05/14
P Type/Duration
s s s 2nd
t e t e t e Grab Comp. Duration D 1st P/F
r d t d r d Sample 1 X 24 hrs L S A
A
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Sample 2 II M M
J. X 24 hrs T p P
Control go
Hardness(mg/1) 38
tment 2 7.61 7.78 MOMEM Spec. Cond. ..........
7.58 7.50 (/.mhos) 127 400 447
Chlorine(mg/1)
b0/Acute Toxicity Test <0.1 <0.1
Sample tem
rtality expressed as o, combiningP P at receipt(OC) .., ••.. 2 7 0
replicates) 7
ConcentrationNote: Please
Complete This
Mortality Section Also
start/end start/end
Con i� ea nce Limits Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit HTHigh
ontrol
Spearman Karber — Other
Conc.
PH D.O.
TAnism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration( . hrs):
----------------
Date -
NPDES#: NCO039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
PACE
Test: ANALYTICAL
or
oratory Supervisor
Comments:
* PASSED: -4-10--- Reduction-*
u zrom DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41

2015
Toxicity
Analysis

(L
X
X
fluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/10/15
acility: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
aboratory Performing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
erator
Signature ol-�Labmta�,6ry Supervisor
S}SLlTi�a � R'�'SS1@�41
Work Order: .92238622 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div% of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 3.978
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 33.47
Mortality Avg.Reprod.
[#-Young Produced 17 ]28E22 22 19 20 18 21 22 150.00 19.67
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L IL
0.00 13.08
Effluent .: 3.50
[Treatment 2 Treatment 2
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
20.492. PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 4 18 11 12 12 13 14 16 19 13 16 9 . control orgs X
producing 3rd
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L brood100. Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
�H Test Start Date: 02/25/15
Control 7.71 7.69 7.60 7.84 7.62 7.65 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/23/15 Sample 2: 02/26/15
'reatment 2 7.97.7.79 7.69.7.93 7.59 7.70 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e, t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t- Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
O' Hardness(mg/1) 49
Control 7.19 8.20 7.33 7.50 8.08 E8.08
95 '"""" "'""'
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 274 328 374
'T'reatment 2 9.00 8.20 8.00 8.18 7.73
Chlorine (mg/1) <0. 1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) 0.5 1.4
Kortality expressed as ., combining replicates)
Note: Please
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
M
Tics 0 =
95. Con Hence Limits
ortality
start/end start/end
Method of Determination Control
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other - High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
,opied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Zluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 04/02/15
.cility: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NCO039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
LaboratPerfor ing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
X Comments: 1.2(n- (�S.-Yr;, - CST �jk �
Sig tur Pi e�rc.Ttor in Response e C arge��
X / a-D—
Signature f La otory Supervisor
PASSED: 0.660 Reduction
Work Order: 92242547 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div, of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.120
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tabular t= 2.518
o Reduction = 0.66
# Young Produced 31 38 32 34 38 42 40 25 36 29 35 34 Mortality Ayg.Reprod.
0.00 34.50
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L Control Control
0.00 34.27
Effluent 3.50 Treatment 2 Treatment 2
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
13.9010 PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 32 29 35 25 39 37 33 38 38 36 35 0 o control orgs Fil producing 3rd
i Adult (L)ive (D)ead L I, L L L L L L L L L* brood 100% Check One
L 1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
H Test Start Date: 03/25/15
Control M7.8O7.G3
7.83 7.86 M7.857.82
Collection (Start) Date
reatment 2 7.81 7.88 Sample T 03/23/15 Sample 2: 03/25/15
P ype/Duration 2nd
ss s Grab Comp. Duration D lst PIF
t e t e t e
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 I S S
r • d r d r d hrs L A A
U M M
t t
t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T p p
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
Hardness(mg/1) 44 ••
Control 7.87 6.83 7 76 7 ......••••
.03 7.43 8.62 .......... ..........
,-eatment 2 7.84 5.99 7,61 7,27 7 74 8 02 Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 232 302.0 355.0
=C=Q==z=2= Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
ICSO/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp, at receipt(OC) 2.1 1.0
..........
""ortality expressed as combining replicates)
Note: Please
' Concentration Complete This
Settion Also
' Mortality .
start/end start/end'
-"50 = Method of Determination
95o Confi ence Limits Moving Average Probit Control
-- Spearman Karber _ Other — High
1EE Conc.
pH D.O.
>rganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
7
'pied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
(Facility TWSA NPDES#: NC 0039578 Pipe# 001 County_ ackson
Laboratory Performing Test Pace Analytical Services, Inc - Raleigh Comments WO# 92244917
X
Signature of O.R.
NA
#Young 35 39 30 26 33 31 28 28 34 25 30.9
of Lab,,Supervisor
Sample Information
Sample 1 Sam 1e.2
Control
Collection Start Date
03/23/15 03/25/15
f 1
Grab
y
Composite
(Duration)
24 24
7.78
Hardness(mg/I
7.75
44
7.66
7.42 7.03 7.87 6.98 7.43
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/c
Chlorine(mg/I
25.3
25.1 26.0 25.3 24.1 25.9
24.9
24.3 25.0 25.7 24.1 25.5
L
L
302
Sample temp. at receip
Test Start Date End Date Start Time End Time
Information* 03/25/15 04/01/15 1:06p 10:40a
Start Renewl Renew2 Start Renew1 Renew2
% 0/1
Treatment 9 9
�r
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
'emp.lnitial
'emp. Final
y
9 control control control
7.78
7.81 7.84 7.83 7.83 7.82
7.75
d.:
7.66
7.42 7.03 7.87 6.98 7.43
_-t
7.11 8.45 7.41 7.34 8.55
25.3
25.1 26.0 25.3 24.1 25.9
24.9
24.3 25.0 25.7 24.1 25.5
L
L
302
355
231.7
L
L
s
L
L
u .k
L
L
L
2.1 °c
1.0 °c
'�
xi A
Organism# Chronic Test Results
1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean Final Control Mortality °)
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
'emp.lnitial
'emp. Final
9 control control control
7.78
7.81 7.84 7.83 7.83 7.82
7.75
7.89 7.84 7.83 7.88 7.79
7.66
7.42 7.03 7.87 6.98 7.43
5.88
7.11 8.45 7.41 7.34 8.55
25.3
25.1 26.0 25.3 24.1 25.9
24.9
24.3 25.0 25.7 24.1 25.5
0
Control
X
Control 3rd Broo 100
Control Repro G 14.185
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean 0 Of 10 0 Of 10
Effluent% #Young 32 33 30 28 31 38 32 33 28 38 1 32.3 9 � [E]ON � � I
Si nificant�
Adult /N %Red Final Mortality Significant
�• 8 (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L -4.53
or No Conc.
Mean
Effluent% #Young 37 25 34 33,22 36 41 33135 129 32.5 Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= s %; NOEC= 5.5
Adult %Red Method: Dunnetts Test
2.6 (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L IL L Normal Distrib? yes Method: Kolmogorov
Mean statistic: 0.41631 Critic 1-.
#Young
30
32
28
29
26
30
29
27
31
19
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
Adult
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
'�
Control 3rd Broo 100
Control Repro G 14.185
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean 0 Of 10 0 Of 10
Effluent% #Young 32 33 30 28 31 38 32 33 28 38 1 32.3 9 � [E]ON � � I
Si nificant�
Adult /N %Red Final Mortality Significant
�• 8 (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L -4.53
or No Conc.
Mean
Effluent% #Young 37 25 34 33,22 36 41 33135 129 32.5 Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= s %; NOEC= 5.5
Adult %Red Method: Dunnetts Test
2.6 (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L IL L Normal Distrib? yes Method: Kolmogorov
Mean statistic: 0.41631 Critic 1-.
Effluent%
3.5Adult
Effluent%
5.5
#Young 36 37 33 34 39 132 32 31 38 128 n34
#Young
30
32
28
29
26
30
29
27
31
19
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
/,o.o3
1.035
Effluent%
3.5Adult
Effluent%
5.5
#Young 36 37 33 34 39 132 32 31 38 128 n34
Equal Variances? yes Method: Bartlett
#Young
30
32
28
29
26
30
29
27
31
19
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
/,o.o3
Equal Variances? yes Method: Bartlett
#Young
30
32
28
29
26
30
29
27
31
19
2s.1
(L)ive (Djead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
9.06 ed
s
Statistic: 3.75138 Critical: 15.0863
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
1 z 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Effluent% 20129122 26 31 24 30123127 25 H25.7Overallnalysis:#YoungResult or
AdultTest LOEC= 9%; NOEC= 5.5(L)ive (D)ead LLLLLLL Chronic Value= 7.03562
`Should use highest test concentration or
MAIL ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/1
Div. of Water Quality
TO:
N.C. DENR f% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Facility TWSA
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
NPDES#: NC 0039578 - Pipe# 001 County Jackson
Pace Analytical Services, Inc - Raleigh Comments WO# 92246339
X
Signature of O.R.C.,r Siga2'ture of Lala Supervisor
Sample Informatio
Collection Start Datt
Gral
Compositf
(Duration;
Hardness(mg/
Spec. Cond.(pmhos/cr
Chlorine(mg/
Sample temp. at receip
t Sample 1 Sample 2 Control
04/20/15 04/22/15 Y
24 24 -
err . -
i
"w 46
251.4 286.7 256.2
vip1.6 .
'C:
Test Start DateEnd Date Start Time End Tit
Information!. 04/22/15 04/29/15 2:30p 9:59a
Start I Ren ewl Renew2 Start IRP.nPw1IRPnP
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
emp. Initial
emp. Final
9.0
9.0
9.0
control control
Control
7.73 7.67 7.69 7.63 8.06
7.71
7.72 7.64 7.66 7.63 7.59
7.23
5.86 7.26 7.03 6.22 7.13
7.59
7.17 7.16 6.97 7.34 6.28
7.32
25.4 24.1 26.0 25.2 24.0
25.0
25.6 25.9 25.0 24.2 26.0
25.2
Effluent%
3.5
# Young
27
26 24 1 26
26
Organism#
30
1 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Control
# Young
24
24
27
25
26
28
24
24
28F3O
L
LL
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead]z
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
1 .2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Effluent%
# Young
27
24
29
29
2625
27
25
29
25
1 8Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
I L
IL V�
Mean
Effluent%
# Young
30
29
24125
29
29
22
25
28
26F-
26.71
2.6
(L) ived(D)ead
L
L
L IL
L
L
L
L
L
L
z s9d
Effluent%
3.5
Effluent%
# Young
27
26 24 1 26
26
129
30
1 28
Control Repro C 8.309
48 Hour MortalitMeay
# Young
26
28 28
30 +2825
L
28
23
26
29
27.1Adult
(D)ead
L
LL
L
L
L
L
L
%Red(L)ive
4.z3
Effluent%
# Young
27
26 24 1 26
26
129
30
1 28
Control Repro C 8.309
48 Hour MortalitMeay
(D)ead
L
L L L
L
L
L
L
A2827.4(L)iVe
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= >9 %; NOEC= 9
Method: Dunnetts
Normal Distrib?yeS Method: Kolmogorov
Statistic: 0.78221 Critical: 1.035
Equal Variances? yes Method: Bartletts
Statistic: 1.34626 Critical: 15.0863
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
I Z 3 4 b 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Effluent% # Young 29 25 29 22 28 29 27 28 28 1 27 27.2 Overall Analysis:
Result= Pass or
Adult %Red Test LOEC= >9.0 %; NOEC= 9.0-%
9 0 (-)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L 4.6z Chronic Value= >9.0 %
'Should use highest test concentration or
MAIL ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/1
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
TO 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95
-.nronfc i est results
12 Mean
Final Control Mortality ° 0
26
% Control 3rd Broo 100
Control Repro C 8.309
48 Hour MortalitMeay
Control IWC
12.n
-0
10.
26.6
-of
Significant?El 10 M1
Redj
-2.31
Final Mortality Si niftcant CcD
or No Conc.
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= >9 %; NOEC= 9
Method: Dunnetts
Normal Distrib?yeS Method: Kolmogorov
Statistic: 0.78221 Critical: 1.035
Equal Variances? yes Method: Bartletts
Statistic: 1.34626 Critical: 15.0863
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
I Z 3 4 b 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Effluent% # Young 29 25 29 22 28 29 27 28 28 1 27 27.2 Overall Analysis:
Result= Pass or
Adult %Red Test LOEC= >9.0 %; NOEC= 9.0-%
9 0 (-)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L 4.6z Chronic Value= >9.0 %
'Should use highest test concentration or
MAIL ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/1
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
TO 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 05/28/15
TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NCO039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
,poratoxy Perform' g Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
�,� „ Comments:
of OperAtor rn
X
Signat r o L or tory Supervisor
PASSED: 6.150 Reduction
Work Order: 92249392 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.980
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tabular t= 2.508
Reduction = 6.15
# Young Produced 20 32 23 30 33 30 36 35 27 38 27 27 Mortality Avg.Reprod.
0.00 29.83
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L Control Control
0.00 28-00
Effluent .: 3.5. Treatment 2 Treatment 2
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
17.899. PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 23 33 27 27 28 27 24 36 29 30 25 27 . control orgs X
producing 3rd
-Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L brood Check One
�
PH
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test Control Test Start Date: 05/13/15
7.62 7.59 7.66 7.79 7.57 7.60 Collection (Start) Date
Treatment 2 7.72 7.66 7.81 Sam7.87 8.33 7.77
Sample le 05/11/15 Sample 2: 05/13/15
Type/Duration 2nd
s s s 1st P/F
t e Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e I S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X S
24
r d r d hrs L A A
r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample P P
Control 7.86 7.13 6.29 7.32 Hardness(mg/1) 42
6.23 8.52
reatment 2 8.00 7.22 7.04 7.75 5.71 7.46 Spec. Cond.(,mhos) '.212 296 302
3J=zUM=== Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Sample temp. at receipt(OC) ,,,,,,,, 2.2 0.4
..........
'Mortality expressed as ., combining replicates)
- Note: Please
' Concentration Complete This
- - o
Mortalit Section Also
95. Confi ence Limits
Y
start/end start/end
Method of Determination Control
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other - High
Conc.
PH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Opied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

luent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 08/28/15
.Ality: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
,(,aborat.$)ry Perfo g Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
S rra ur-e -o If OperatOr in Responsibie Charge
,-,1! t ti
Signature -Jo La Qfatory Supervisor
..ork Order: 92262775 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div.,of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Drth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 4.384
Tabular t = 2.508
-)NTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 25.43
i
i # Young Produced 16 23 23 26 25 26 24 24 22 28 27 27
Adult (L) ive (D) ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
__fluent 3.50
--EATMENT�2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
13.1730
# Young Produced 17 15 17 21 16117110 22 20 18 20 24 % control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
Adult (L)ive (D)ead 1jj ,L L L L IL D L L L L D 1000
o Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
24.25
Control
Control
16.67
18.08
Treatment 2
Treatment 2
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/12/15
Control 8.88 7.74 7.73 7.42 7.86 7.87 Collection (Start)'Date
Sample 1: 08/10/15 Sample 2: 08/12/15
eatment 2 7.79 7.67 7.71 7.68 7.60 8.01 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D. Hardness (mg/1) 48
Control 7.89 7.42 7.59 7.61 7.53 8.00
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 259 330 329
-:atment 2 7.77 7.89 7.57 7.30 7.33 8.02
Chlorine(mg/1) .... <0.1 <0.1
:50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) 3.0 1.2
)rtality expressed as combining replicates)
Note: Please
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
750 = Method of Determination Control
iso Con i e�imits Moving Average Probit
-- o Spearman Karber _- Other - High
Conc.
off D.O.
irganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
espied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
Facility TWSA NPDES#: NC 0039578 Pipe#001 County Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test Pace Analytical Services. Inc - Raleigh
J Comments WO# 92267676
Signature of O.R.C. Signature -of Lab Supervisor
Sample Information
Collection Start Date
G rat
Composite
(Duration)
Hardness(mg/
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/cn
Chlorine(mg/
Sample temp: at receip
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
09/23/15
End Date
`r=
09/14/15
09/16/15
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initiall
D.O. Final
- emp.Initial
emp. Final
Start
Renew1 Renew2 Stag IRenewIlRenew,
9 %
9 9 Control Control control
8.02
7.98 7.89 7.90 7.76 7.93
7.97
7.89 7.69 8.04 7.97 7.79
7.56
24
24
6.25 7.76 6.52 6.41 6.77
24.6
25.0 24.9 24.3 24.8 24.9
r} ry>
24.5 25.5 24.6 24.4. 25.6
27
42
24.1
331
363
243.9
<0.1
<0.1
x
,..
Test
Information*
Start Date
09/16/15
09/23/15
End Date
Start
3:02p
Time
End -Time
10:46a
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initiall
D.O. Final
- emp.Initial
emp. Final
Start
Renew1 Renew2 Stag IRenewIlRenew,
9 %
9 9 Control Control control
8.02
7.98 7.89 7.90 7.76 7.93
7.97
7.89 7.69 8.04 7.97 7.79
7.56
6.99 6.48 7.24 6.75 6.87
6.64
6.25 7.76 6.52 6.41 6.77
24.6
25.0 24.9 24.3 24.8 24.9
24.5
24.5 25.5 24.6 24.4. 25.6
I L 3 4 5 b / b 9 10 Mean
Effluent% # Young 25 30 24 28 29 25 31 26 28 29H27.5 overall Analysis:
Result = Pass or
Adult L L L L L L L L L L Test LOEC= >9 %; NOEC= 9
(L)ive (D)ead Chronic Value= >9.0 %
'Should use highest test concentration or
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
MAIL
Div. of Water Quality
f %Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
TO: N.C. D E N R
1621 Mail Service Center -
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95
9
Organism#
Chronic Test Results
5.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Final Control Mortality °i 0
Control
# Young
27
30
24
21
2472321
L
L
27
22122
24.1
%Control 3rd Broo 90
Control Repro C 12.440
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
IL
L
L
L
L
Mortality
K:
ContBrolour
lWC
1
2
3
4
5 6 7 8
9
10
11
12 Mean
Effluent%
#Young
26
25
28
22
23
24
33
29
28
24
26.2
significant?OY N�0✓
8
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
cant
%Red ' Final Mortality tNo
871
oronc.
Mean
Effluent%
# Young
24125
27
126126
123128
25129130
Reproduction Analysis:
Adult
Repro. LOEC= >9 %; NOEC= 9 %
Method: Dunnetts
J213
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Normal Distrib? yes Method: kolmogorov
Mean
Statistic: 0.78036 Cfitical: 0.895
Effluent%
# Young
25
30
29n3l27
24
M4226.8
Equal Variances? yes Method: Bartletts
Statistic: 1.98692 Critical: 15.0863(L)ive
Adult
(D)ead
L
L
L JL
L
L
',;20
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Method:
Mean
Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
Effluent%
# Youn
25
31
26
27
31
26
21
28
25
28
26.8
I L 3 4 5 b / b 9 10 Mean
Effluent% # Young 25 30 24 28 29 25 31 26 28 29H27.5 overall Analysis:
Result = Pass or
Adult L L L L L L L L L L Test LOEC= >9 %; NOEC= 9
(L)ive (D)ead Chronic Value= >9.0 %
'Should use highest test concentration or
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
MAIL
Div. of Water Quality
f %Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
TO: N.C. D E N R
1621 Mail Service Center -
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95
9
5.5
(L)ive (Djead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
ed
R20
I L 3 4 5 b / b 9 10 Mean
Effluent% # Young 25 30 24 28 29 25 31 26 28 29H27.5 overall Analysis:
Result = Pass or
Adult L L L L L L L L L L Test LOEC= >9 %; NOEC= 9
(L)ive (D)ead Chronic Value= >9.0 %
'Should use highest test concentration or
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
MAIL
Div. of Water Quality
f %Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
TO: N.C. D E N R
1621 Mail Service Center -
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
Facility TWSA NPDES#: NC 0039578 Pipe#001 County Jackson
LaboratoryPerforming Test Pace Analytical Services, Inc - Raleigh Comments WO 92272585
Signature of O.R.C.' Signature of,'Lab Supervisor
I
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
10/19/15
10/21/15
End Date
6
Start Time
1706
End Time
1405
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
Start
Renews
Renew2
Start RenewiRenew,
9 %
24
24
n? Jewx
.s�.F
7.73
7.72
6.99
l F,z
r
50
6.98
7.60 7.86 7.82
7.71
11 318
344
236
<0.1
<0.1
7.11
7.31 7.21 7.10
24.5
�'r
24.0
24.5 24.2 24.3
25.6
0.8 'C
0.4 *C
t; Y
L
L
L
Organism# Chronic Test Results
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean Final Control Mortality 0/3 0
Test
Information*
Start Date
10/21/15
3
25
10/28/15
End Date
6
Start Time
1706
End Time
1405
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
Start
Renews
Renew2
Start RenewiRenew,
9 %
9 a7
9
Control Control Control
7.73
7.72
6.99
7.86 7.73 7.81
7.74
7.84
6.98
7.60 7.86 7.82
7.71
7.55
7.85
7.79 7.53 7.57
7.48
7.17
7.11
7.31 7.21 7.10
24.5
25.1
24.0
24.5 24.2 24.3
25.6
24.8 1
24.4 1
24.9 1 25.0 24.3
Organism# Chronic Test Results
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean Final Control Mortality 0/3 0
Effluent%
1
# Young 30
2
26
3
25
4
25
5
29125
6
7
26
8
22
9
27
10 11
27Nl////
0 of 10
12 Mean 0 of 1011
26.2 Significant?❑Y [E] N1 E
8
(L)ive (D)ead
L L L L L L L L L LAdult T'N
Mean
87ed Final Mortality Significant
Or No Conc.
Control
# Young
P26
29
28
29
24
27
29
26
2227
27
25
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= > 9 %; NOEC= 9 %
Method: Dunnetts
Normal Distrib? Y Method: Koimogorov
(L)ive (D)ead
% Control 3rd Broo 100
L
Control Repro C 8.658
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
1
2
d6.
I
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
Effluent%
1
# Young 30
2
26
3
25
4
25
5
29125
6
7
26
8
22
9
27
10 11
27Nl////
0 of 10
12 Mean 0 of 1011
26.2 Significant?❑Y [E] N1 E
8
(L)ive (D)ead
L L L L L L L L L LAdult T'N
Mean
87ed Final Mortality Significant
Or No Conc.
Effluent%
2.6Adult
# Young28
L
21
21
23
28
24
26
28
24
27
25
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= > 9 %; NOEC= 9 %
Method: Dunnetts
Normal Distrib? Y Method: Koimogorov
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Red
6.37
Statistic: 0.66943 Critical: 1.035 '
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
in Mean
Effluent%
3.5
#Young
25
26
23
27
25
27
25
23
25
22
24.8
Equal Variances? Y Method: Bartletts
Statistic: 9.32469 Critical: 15.0863
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
(L)ive (Djead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
� Red
Method:
Effluent%
5.5
Mean Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL
Div. of Water Quality
TO: N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
*Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Effluent%
# Young
26
24
23
31
33
24
27
# Young
25
25
24
25
24
28
28
22
124
12525
L
Adult
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
IL
IL
(L)ive (D)ead
6.37ed
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL
Div. of Water Quality
TO: N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
*Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Effluent%
# Young
26
24
23
31
33
24
27
25
32
33
27.8
Overall Analysis:
Result= Pass or
9
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
% Red
_4.12
Test LOEC= > 9 %; NOEC= 9 %
Chronic Value= %
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL
Div. of Water Quality
TO: N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
*Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

eluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/03/15
,cility: TWSA PLANT 41 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
Laboratory Performing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
�, Comments:
Signature o sera or i Responsi=e Charge
Xft
J4
Signature o L� orato upervisor * PASSED: -5.29% Reduction
Work Order: 92276425 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N. C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.089
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -5.29
Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 25 27 25 27 27 31 31 32 34 24 26 31
0.00 28.33
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D) ead L L L IL L L IL L .L L L L
0.00 29.83
affluent 3.50
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
;REATMENT�2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
11.5920 PASS FAIL
i
# Young Produced 28 30 25 35 27 31 29 27 31K35 o control orgsproducing 3rd
broodAdult (L) ive (D) ead L L L L L L L L L 100-1.
lst sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
rH Test Start Date: 11/18/15
Control 7.79 7.76 7.82 7.99 8.65 7.97 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 11/16/15 Sample 2: 11/18/15
reatment 2 7:88 7.96 7.97 7.93 7.97 7.93 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st PIF
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n. a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
_ 1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
.0. Control 7.65 7.03 7.99 7.78 8,14 Hardness(mg/1) 49 1. ........ .........
..........
_ 7 52
Spec. Cond.(gmhos) 265 302 327
_-eatment 2 7.20 7.18 7.90 7.44 7.30 7.54
Chlorine (mg/1) ........ <0.1 <0.1
'IC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt (°C) 1.5 0 . 6
"tortality expressed as combining replicates)
i Note: Please
' Concentration Complete This
i Section Also
' Mortality
_C50 =
95% Con i ecT n�imits
start/end start/end
Method of Determination Control
Moving Average ProbitI E
Spearman Karber _ Other - High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Drganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Dpied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

2016/17
Ceriodaphnia Toxicity
Analysis

,At Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 02/25./16
.:ty: TWSA PLANT #1 NPDES#: NC0039578 Pipe#: 001 County: JACKSON
_;oratofy Perfo- ing Test: PACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
o= vper for in xesponsibie
X- /; �/ JL 1 '`, h '�L4;L
Signature ot La o�ra-tory Supervisor * PASSED: -2.40. Reduction
Work Order: 92285856 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div.. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test FC,a
ronic Test Results
culated t = -0.400
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Reduction = -2.40
11 ality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 22 25 20 22 23 17 14 21 23 22 18 23
0.00 20.83
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D) ead 11 L L L L L IL L L L L L L
0.00 21.33
s'ffluent -
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
fREATMENT�. 3.5. 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
I 14.877. PASS FAIL
11
# Young Produced 19 19 24t1818F21 25 21 20 22 21 28 . control orgs X
producing 3rd
11 brood Check One
I Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L 91.6.
lst sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For.Either Test
PH Test Start Date: 02/10/16
Control 7.79 7.75 7.87 8.04 7.86 7.81 Collection (Start) Date
Sample l: 02/08/16 Sample 2: 02/10/16
reatment 2 7.72 7.71 7.73 8.07 8.01 7.99 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
.0. Hardness(mg/1) 45.. .
.......... ..........
Control7.96 7.91 7.78 7.44 7.88 7.70
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 239 432 263.5
,reatment 2 7.81 7.80 7.82 7.37 7.40 7.31
Chlorine (mg/1) <0 . 1 <0.1
,C50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) 0.4 0.3
Iortality expressed as ., combining replicates)
Note: Please
' - Concentration Complete This
Mortality Section Also
' - -
LC50 =
95. Confidence Limits
start/end start/end
Method of Determination Control
Moving Average ProbitE 71
Spearman Karber _ Other - High
Conc.
pH D.O.
irganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Dpied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
":.) Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. '
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia ditbia Date: May 27, 2016
Facility: Tuckaseegee WSA NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing So)utions, Inc„Continents:
Signature of Operator- in Responsible Charge: Cit /y
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor. / . p�� / Project: 11455
Samples: 160510.16, 160512.04
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 05-11-16 1 05-18-16 1 1445 1 1015
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive- (D)E
.Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
'7 26
27126128 30 281.261 28 1 29 1 2826
. - - - - 27.4
Effluent Percentage 3.5%
Treatment 2 Oran nicmc 1 n c I
Start
e21630,30
I Rcnnt,al2
Stat
I Rcnc 1 I
Renneal2
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
Control
Control
Control
R
7.34
6.99
7.17
7.26
42,40
7.28
7.03
150. 155. 154
7.58
7.06
7.39
8.0
8.0
8.0
.Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
'7 26
27126128 30 281.261 28 1 29 1 2826
. - - - - 27.4
Effluent Percentage 3.5%
Treatment 2 Oran nicmc 1 n c I
Start
Rcneoal I
I Rcnnt,al2
Stat
I Rcnc 1 I
Renneal2
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
Control
Control
Control
6.92
7.34
6.99
7.17
7.26
6.93
7.28
7.03
7.33
7.58
7.06
7.39
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.8
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.9
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.8
25.1
25.0
25.1
24.9
25.0
24.8
Number of Young Produced
-
1271291 27 25 29 30 127
J 1 V
28 28 1 31
11 1L Mcan
27 28 28.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L L L L L L L
L L L
L L -2.1
i Kcauenon
Effluent Percentage
reatment3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
%Rcduciin
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 11 12 Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Rcdnnlo
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcan
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (Mend
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Rcduct
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >3.5% NOEC: 3.5% ChV: >3.5%
DWO fornt AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC: >3.5%
Reproduction NOEL: 3.5%
Overall Method: Homoscedastic
Normal Distribution: Yes
Statistic:
0.966
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.480
Critical Valtte:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sun
3.5

environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
.effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceri.odewhnia dubia
PU Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: August 19, 2016
Facility: Tuckaseegee WSA NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. _ Corrunents:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: T
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: J Project: 11649
Samples: 160802.12, 160804.10
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 08-03-16 08-10-16 1433 0647
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cin):
Total residual chlorine (mg(L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
Control Orizanisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcan
Start
R --ll
Rcn-l2
Sinn
It- ... Il
R --l2
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
Control
Control
Control
7.58
7.37
7.55
7.61
7.65
7.72
7.62
7.71
7.43
7.63
7.74
7.37
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.7
8.1
7.9
7.8
7.9 1
7.8
24.8
24.8
24.6
24.7
24.8
24.6
25.1
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.6
24.8
Number of Young Produced
28
28
28
29
128 30 27
129 25 131 28 27
28
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
L
L
L
I L L L
I L L I L L L
28
Effluent Percentage 3.5%
Trentment 2 nroanisms . 1 2 3 4 5 F 7 2 9 in 11 17 tir.
Number of Young Produced
27
28
27 127
132
27 29
29 30 27
28
27 28.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
L
L I L
I L
L L
L L L
L
I L 1 0.0
% Keductlon
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Rcducuan
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Menn
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Rcduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcan
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Rcduuion
Effluent Percentage=
1reaLmenL O VI-ganISmS r e J °+ 0 6 7 IV 11 rL Mean
Nurnber of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
.� Rcduclian
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >3.5% NOEC: 3.5% ChV: >3.5%
DWOfor>nAT--3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%): 1
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.4
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
Yes
Method:
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No concentrat on
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>3.5%
Reproduction NOEC:
3.5%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.914
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1,078
Critical Value:
5.320
Nan -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
3.5%

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodavhizia dubia
YU box -/-)bJ
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: November 16, 2016
Facility: Tuckaseegee WSA NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testin Solutions, c. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 11872
Samples: 161101.08, 161103.17
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 11-02-16 11-09-16 1240 0733
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO,):
Conductivity (pmllos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp, at Receipt (°C):
Samplel
Sample2
Control
10-31-16
11-02-16
R-12
3.5%
3.5%
24-h
24-h
Control
-
32, 30, 32
. _ > --
43.44, 40
432
452
161.161.150
c0.10
<0.10
7A0
03
1.9
7.34
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
ControlOrt=anisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 blew
Scut
RrncnzlI
R--12
Suri
R -1I
R-12
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
Control
Control
Control
7.67
7.68
7.48
7.33
7.44
7.57
7.67
7.56
7A0
7.67
7.58
7.34
7.9
8.0
7.9
7.9
8.1
8.0
7.9
8.0
7.9
8.0
7.8
8.0 -.
24.8
25.0
25.0
24.7
24.9
24.8
25.0
25,0 1
24.9
24.9
24.7
25.0
Number of Young Produced
130
1 28
27
27 1 26
1 29
1 26
1 29[27 2.7
1 29
1 30
3Z
Adult Sur -viva]: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
I L
I L
I L I L
I L
I L
I L I L L
L
L
27.9
Effluent Percentage 3.5%
Treatment 2 Oronnicmc 1 2 i 4 5 6 7 R 9 In 11 17
Number of Young Produced
31
34
29
30
29
30 27 31
30
28
28
3Z
29.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L I L I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
1 -7.2
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ttm
Ntnnber of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Acluni°°
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M�
Number of Young Produced I j I I I I I I I I I
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
ie KcducU°
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mega
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
• % Rcducvon
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ni -
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Rcductiuc
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >3-5% NOEC: 3.5% ChV: >3.5%
DGYOfornzAT--3 (6191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
52
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?'
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No concentration
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>3.5%
Reproduction NOEC:
3.5%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastie
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Wlk's
Statistic:
0.952
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.785
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
3.5%

r'_
PO Box 7565
j 1 Asheville NC 28802
l Y" ' IPhone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia duhia Date: February 22, 2017
Facility: Tuckaseegee YVSA NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test: Envirorrrnental Testing Solutions, Inc Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: ' a
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 12111
Samples: 170207.12, 170209.17
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 02-08-17 02-15-17 1255 0638
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (lunhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (eC):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. ('C):
Final Temp. (aC):
Organism Number
Control Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced 29 28 29 27 28 2R J9 7R 77 28 26 29
Adult Survival: (L)ive_ (blend I T. I T. I T I T I r I r I r I r _ 27.9
Effluent Percentage 3.5%
r•eatment 2 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
lumber of Young Produced 30 32 33 25 34 31 31 27 30 28 30 31 30.2
rdult Survival: (L)ive,(D)eadl L I L L L- L L L L L L L L -8.1
sin
Renewal I
Renewal 1
Sian
Renewal I
Rcnena12
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
Control
Control
Control
7.63
7.43
7.24
7.14
7.51
7.50
7.44
7.40
7.50
7.50
7.38
7.39
7.9
8.1
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.9
7.9
24.9
24.6
24.7
24.7
24.8
24.8
24.8 1
25.1 1
25.0 1
25.1
25.0
25.1
7. KedUcUcn
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Rcduclion
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reductio
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
7. Keftem,
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >3.5% NOEC: 3.5% ChV: >3.5%
D bf10 form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC: >3.5%
Reproduction NOEL: 3.5%
,Overall Method: Heteroscedatic t
Normal Distribution: Yes
Statistic:
0.926
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
No
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
7.813
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Stun
Critical Sum
3.5%

2016/17
Chronic Fathead Minnow Toxicity
Analysis

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions Inc
vy
Date: November 18, 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Tuckaseegee WSA WNA'TP NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing.Splutions, I)aU. ECmn-m.ents:Signature of Operator inResponsible Cha oe:JSignature of Laboratory Supervisor: 63
31.01, 161102.29, 161104.20
114ail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
11-01-16
11-03-16
_
>14%
>14%
>14%
1621 Mail Service Center
24-h
24-h
24-h
-0.402
Startdate: End date: Start tune: End time:
120
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
30-32
30
30
30
11-01-16 11-08-16 0922 1 0830
448
444
Replicate
number
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
2.9
1
2
3
4
Test Organisms
Control
Surviving number of larvad 10
1 10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Outside supplier:
Organisms
10riginal number of larvae 10
10
10
10
Average wt (mg)
LM89 I
In-house Culture
Weight/original(mg/lar4ae) 0.620
0.542
0.631
0.561
Average wt/
0.589
surviving(mg)
Begin hatch:
10-3]-]6 1610
% Effluent
Surviving number oflarvae 10
10
109
End hatch:
11-01-16 0600
0.875 %
Original number of larvae 10
10
10
10
1
Survival
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae) 0.610
0.629
0.662
0.575
Average wt (mg)
1 0.619
%Effluent ISurvivingnumberoflarvae 10 10 10 10
Original number of larvae 10 10 10 10 Survival (%) 100.0
Weight/original (mg/larvae) 1 0.573 1 0.618 1 0.633 1 0.548 Average wt (mg) 1 0.593
%Effluent Survivingnumberoflarvae 10 10 1 10 10
3.5 % Original number of larvae 10 10 1 10 10 1 Survival
Weight/original (mg/larvae) 0.595 0.654 1 0.577 1 0.615 1 Average wt (mg) 1 0.610
%Effluent Surviving number of larvae 10 10 10 10
7.0 % Original number of larvae 10 1 10 10 10 Survival (%) 100.0
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae) 1 0.576 1 0.562 0.681 0.586 Average wt (mg) 1 0.601
%Effluent Isurviving number of larvae 10 10 10 10
14'% Original number of larvae 10 10 10 10 Survival (%) 100.0
Weightloriginal (tng/larvae) 1 0.600 1 0.581 0.531 0.669 1 Average wt (mg)
Water Quality Data
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
727 7.27 7.33 7.24 7.19 6.91 7.44 7.10 7.31 6.95 7.52 7.12 7.57 6.96
7.8 7.8 7.9 7.8 8.0 7.2 8.1 7.6 7.8 6.4 8.0 7.0 8.0 6.1
24.8 24.2 24.7 242 24.6 24.7 24.7 24.3 24.6 24.4 24.6 24.5 24.7 24.5
High Concentration
PH (SU): 7.29 728 7.41 7.33 7.39 7.18 7.38 7.21 7.35 7.26 7.53 7.29 7.54 7.05
DO (tng(L): 8.0 7.9 8.0 7.9 8.2 7.2 8.1 7.6 7.9 7.0 8.1 7.4 7.9 6.4
Temp. (°C): 25.0 24.6 24.9 24.2 24.7 24:5 24.6 242 24.8 24.3 24.8 24.5 24.7 24.4
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µtnhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
10-31-16
11-01-16
11-03-16
_
>14%
>14%
>14%
Visuallnsp.
24-h
24-h
24-h
-0.402
100
120
120
30-32
30
30
30
40-44
448
444
479
150-164
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
2.9
1.9
2.6
Analyses
Normal:
Horn. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >14% NOEC: 14% ChV: >14%
Survival Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
14%
14%
>14%
>14%
>14%
>14%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnett's
Survival Growth
Critical Calculated
Critical
Calculated
T
2.410
-0.962
2.410
-0.142
3.5%
2.410
-0.686
7.0%
2.410
-0.402
14%
2.410
-0.213
D f1�O forn: AT -5 (8/03)
U

r,
I
PU Cos7565
As1w'itle, NC' 2 .SL"'02
Phonc: (S -7S) ,50-9364
Pi]s: (828) 3-50-93611"
1= -Mail: limra.,mliclah.com
EnvlronmentalTestingSolutlons Inc
Datc: AuLpust 26. 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic f=athead Minnow (Multi -Concentration Test
faciligc 'fucLascc> cc WS:i iywT'1' NPDLS r: NC- 0030578 Pipc r: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Perlemline Test: Environmental Testin_ $_elutions. Inti., Comments:
Signature ow
in Responsihlc Cbaroe- \
Sianature of Labornlonv Supervisor. /
Smnples: 160501.01. 1600.3.22. 160805.11
11451 Original To: North Carolina Department of Cnvironnlenl and Natural Resources
Sun•i,-uremmmberoflar'ac
DWQ1 Gnvironn]cmal Scieuees
Branch
10
9
'; cs
1631 Mail Service Center
NOEL
Oncinalnumbcroflamac
Slan dale: End dole; Slan lime: End lurk:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
10
IU
os -G2-16 us•o9.16
os4o oi4'
Wcichlionginal Gnc+lan•ac)
Replicate number
i
IJunuctlS
1
3
•1
°6lifllucr1 Cn;

` PO Box 7565
t ( Asheville, NC 28802
I. Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow " Date; May 27, 2016.
Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Tuckaseegee WSA V1ryVTP NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing S,Qlutions, Inept 2;EZ1605Ej11
Signature of Operator in Responsible
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Control
Replicate number
Control
ISurviving number of larvae
1
10
2
10
3
4
Organisms
Original number of larvae
10
10
�O.506
High Concentration
=0.471�
ival (%)
Weight/onginal (mg/Iarvae)
0.475
DO (mg/L):
8.0
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
0.875 % Original number of larvae
10
10
10
1 O
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.451
0.459
1 0.427
0.434
%Effluent
Surviving
0
9
Original nu10
����O
�8O
10
Weighvori51
.519
%Effluent
Surviving number oflarvae
10
10
10
10
3.5 %
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.477
0.503
0.443
0.516
%Effluent
ISurviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
7.0'%
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
WeighVoriginal (mg/larvae)
0.445
0.546
0.453
0.491
%Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/onginal (mg/larvae) 1
0.4920.481
0.564
0.515
Water Quality Data
Control
PH (SU):
7.18 6.70 7.17
DO (mg/L):
<0.10
<0.10
307
<0.10
Temp. (°C):
24.7
24.6
High Concentration
ival (%)
PH (SU):
7.07 6.68
DO (mg/L):
8.0
8.1
0.443
Temp. (°C):
25.0
24.5
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
0 fora: AT S (8/03)
24.8
6.78
8.0
24.9
24.s
05-08-16 I 05-10-I6 I 05
-12-16
24-11 24-h 24_h
30 55 44
36 40 38
316 317
Sart date; End date: Start time: End time:
OS -10-16 05
<0.10
<0.10
307
<0.10
2.4
2.9
1 3
-17-16 1120 1024
Test Organisms
Survival (%) 100.0 Outside supplier:
Average wt (mg) 0.453 In-house Culture
Average wt/ 0.453
surviving (mg) Begin hatch: OS -09-16 ] 615
End hatch: 05-10-16 0615
Surv
Survival (%) 97.E
Average w
ival (%)
100.0
Average wt (mg)
0.443
t (mg) 0.484
Surv
ival (/) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.485
Surv
ival (%) 100.0
Average Hrt (mg) 0.484
Survival (/) 100.0
Average wt(mg)
7.04 7?6 7.02
7.6 7.9 7.6
24.2 24.7 24.4
7.08 7.30 7 nx
0.13
i.t r o79 6.93 ' 6.92
7.6 8.0 7..8 7.8 7.7
24.5 24,8 24.4 24.5 24.6
6.62 7.11 6.72 1
6.96 6.96
7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 7.9
1 sw.a 1 25.0 I 24.5 1 25.0 1 24.6 1 24.9
Control Analyses Survival Growth
Nonnal� Yes Yes
Horn
V. Yes
Yes Yes
,30-32 LOEC: >14% >14%.
40-42 ChV: >14% >14%
147-155 Method: Visuallnsp. Dunnett's
` Survival Growth
Effluent Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
O.S75% 2.410 0.345
1.75% 2.410 -1.073
3.5% 2.410 -1.104
Overall. Analysis: 7.0% 2.410 -1.070
W!; 2.410 -2.079
Result: PASS LOEC: >14% NOEC: 14% ChV: >14%
D 6Y

Asheville, NU Z66U/
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
22, 2017
Environmental Testing solutions, Inc. Date: February
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Tuckaseegee WSA WWTP NPDES #: NC- 0039578 Pipe #: 001 County: Jackson
Laboratory Perfonning Test: Envirolune11ta1 Testing Solutions Inc.
Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: ' _1- project: 12097
Sib lature of Laboratory Supervisor: Samples: 170206.01, 170208.43, 170210.30
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 02-07-17 02-14-17 0830 0740
%Effluent
Survivingnulnberoflarvae
Replicate number
7.14'
10
10
10
0.875 %
1
10
2 3
10 10
4
9
Survival (%)
97.5
Control
Surviving number of larvae
10
10 10
10
e
Averagwt (mg)
0.650
Organisms
Original number of larvae
0.627
0.663 0.663
0.645
Average wt/
0.667
10
Weighdoriginal (mg/laryae)
10
surviving (Ing)
0.530
%Effluent
Survivingnulnberoflarvae
1010
7.14'
10
10
10
0.875 %
Or ginal number of larvae
10
0.607 1
I0
0.541
10
1 0.590
0.559'
DO (mg/W1.
Weight/original(tngAarvae)
7.6
7.7
24.6
7.4
24.2
7.8
24.6
%Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
IO
10
10
1.75 %
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.530
0.550
1 0.628
0.613
%Effluent
Survivingnurnberoflarvae
10
10
1 10
10
10
3.5 %
Original number of larvae
10
0.620
10
0.554
10
1 0.524
0.635
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Weight/original (mgflarvae)
7.6
7.9
7.6
8.0
%Effluent
Surviving numberoflarvae
10-1
10
1 10
10
10
7.0 %
Original number oflarvae
IO
10
10
24.7
24.5
Weight/original (Ing/larvae)
0.554
1 0.561
0.600
0.602
%Effluent
Survivingnurnberoflarvae
10
10
10
10
10
14 %
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
Weight/original (rng/larvae)
0.546
0.598
1 0.486
0.672
Water Quality Data
n
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.574
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (Ina) 1 0.580
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (Ing) 1 0.583
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.579
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.576
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
In-house Culture
Begin hatch: 02-06-17 1530
End hatch: 1 02-07-17 0615
Control
pH (SU):
7740
7.05
7.14'
7.16
7.28
7.14
7.51
7.19
7.49
7.1
7.53
7.8
DO (mg/W1.
7.9
7.6
7.7
24.6
7.4
24.2
7.8
24.6
7.5 -
24.6
8.0
24.7
7.2
24.6
7.8
24.7
24.4
4 7
Tem C :
24.7
24.5
High Concentration
7.13
7.26
7.16
7.37
6.98
7.53
7.13
7.52
7.18
7.51
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
7.32
8.0
7.6
7.9
7.6
8.0
7 2
7.9
7.4
24.4
7.9
24.9
4 5
4 8
Temp. (°C):
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.6
24.7
24.5
24.6
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (1119/1, CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Overall Analysis:
24.6
Surviva] Growth
Growth
Analyses
Survival
0.875%
Normal:
Yes
Yes
Hom. Var.
Yes
Yes
NOEC:
14%
14%
LOEC:
>14%
>14%
ChV:
>14%
>14%
Method:
Visual Insp.
Dunnet's
24.6
Surviva] Growth
%Effluent
Critical Calculated Critical
Calculated
0.875%
2.410
2.276
1.75%
2.410
2.094
3.5./
2.410
2.004
TO
2.410
2.125
14%
2.410
2.238
Result: PASS LOEC: >14% NOEC: 14% ChV: >14%
D H/0 form AT -S (8/03)

TWSA #1 Residuals
Operation flan

IVAlf_1
Operation and Maintenance Plan
For
Residual Operations
The residual operations at TWSA consist of the following main processes.
(a) Aerobic Digestion
When sludge is wasted from the sbrs it is routed to one of the two aerobic digestors. The upper digestor
(digestor #1) has a capacity of 285,000 gals. The lower digestor (digestor #2) has a capacity of 345,000
gals. The operator can route sludge flow to the digestors from the waste sludge pumps in the sbrs by
using the valves on the waste sludge line. The valves and associated sludge piping are shown on Sheet
C5 of the record drawings by McGill Assoc. dated 10/12/2012.
(b) Sludge Pump
The sludge pump for the belt press is a progressive cavity pump (type BN 52-6Ls/A1-C1-C6-F0-SA-X)
manufactured by Seepex Inc and rated for a pump rate of 100 gpm. The pump is located in the
basement of the sludge pump/reusewater pump building. The location of this building on the site is
shown on Sheet C3 of the record drawings by McGill Assoc. dated 10/12/2012. The details of the piping
are shown on Sheet M21 of the record drawings by McGill Assoc. dated 10/12/2012. All lubrication and
operation and maintenance of this equipment should adhere to the schedules set by Seepex Inc. These
procedures are documented in the operation and maintenance manual supplied to TWSA by Seepex and
dated September 2010.
(c) Belt Press
The belt press is a 1.0 meter capacity (model #GRS-1 Series III ) as manufactured by Komline-Sanderson.
The press is located in the bottom of the Lab/Dryer building. All lubrication and operation and
maintenance of this equipment should adhere to the schedules set by Komline-Sanderson. These
procedures are documented in the operation and maintenance manual supplied to TWSA by Komline-
Sanderson.
(d) Polymer System
The polymer system is a DynaBLEND model # L4S-1200-3 P-1 3-3 (Disc) supplied by Fluid Dynamics. The
pump is located in a corner of the dryer/press building adjacent to the belt press. All lubrication and
operation and maintenance of this equipment should adhere to the schedules set by Fluid Dynamics.
These procedures are documented in the operation and maintenance manual supplied to TWSA by Fluid
Dynamics.
(e) Sludge Conveyors
Information on screw conveyors and components can be found in the Fenton Operation and
Maintenance Manual.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

(f) Sludge Storage Hopper
The sludge storage hopper is located between the belt press and the sludge dryer and is used for storing
dewatered sludge in preparation for batching to the dryer.
(g) Burner
The thermal fluid heater is manufactured by Fulton and is located adjacent to the dryer in the
dryer/press building. Complete technical specifications and operation and maintenance information can
be found in Volume 4 of the owner manuals supplied by Fenton to TWSA.
(h) Dryer
The dryer is a Fenix 48/10 manufactured by Fenton Environmental Technologies and is located in the
dryer/press building. Complete operation and maintenance information can be found in the four (4)
volume set supplied to TWSA by Fenton Environmental Technologies.
(i) Silo and Baghouse system
The Silo and Baghouse were manufactured and supplied to Fenton Environmental by GMD
Environmental Technologies of Fort Worth, Texas. Complete operation and maintenance information
can be found in volume three (3) of the four (4) volume set supplied to TWSA by Fenton Environmental
Technologies.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

Belt Press Operations
• The belt press augers should be turned on and allowed to run. Controls for these augers are
accessed through the Allen Bradley Panel View Plus 1000 touch screen dryer panel.
• Turn control power on at the belt press panel. After a delay the alarm will sound. Hit reset
button to silence the alarm. Pull on -the washwater pump, hydraulic pump and belt run switch in
that order. Confirm that all equipment is operating properly.
• Turn polymer pump on at the DynaFlow pump control panel. Speed of the pump will be
adjusted based upon observations made at the press.
• Turn sludge pump on by pulling the sludge pump button on the belt filter control panel. Pump
feed rate is adjusted at the SPACP 550 panel located on the concrete column adjacent to the
belt press. When the polymer begins to form a good floc in the sludge, close valve on mixing
tank and write flow reading down on flow meter. Polymer feed rate and sludge feed rate should
be adjusted to contain all of the product in the pressure zone of the belt and to produce the
driest cake possible and still "turn loose" from the belt at the scraper above the auger.
• At the end of the shift or days run, reverse the start up procedure to shut down the press. The
daily log sheet has spaces for recording the hours operated and gallons of sludge dewatered.
Care should betaken to properly fill out all information so operations can be properly tracked.
• Polymer is purchased in totes. At the start of each day of press run, mark the level of polymer in
the tote. At the end of press run mark the level of polymer left in the tote. Measure between
these two marks to find how much polymer was used during the belt press run. Report this
measurement to the nearest 1/81h of an inch on the daily belt press record. This information is
used to calculate dewatering costs.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

Dryer Operation
Dryer controls are all contained in the Allen Bradley Panel View Plus 1000 panel. Each day the dryer is
operated a Dryer Operations Daily Record should be completed. Dryer operations should be conducted
as follows:
• Dryer should be set to auto on touch panel screen. Record start time. Burner will activate and
start building temperature. When a pre -determined temperature is reached fill cycle will start.
c Record fill cycle start time.
• After the timed fill cycle is complete, dry cycle will start. Record dry cycle start time.
• Dry cycle timer will be on zero at dry cycle start time. Record temperatures as outlined on Daily
Record at 50 min intervals until end of dry cycle. (Approx. 200 mins)
© At the end of the dry cycle, the discharge cycle will start. Discharge cycle will last approx. 10 min
and a new fill cycle will start.
• When the last batch of sludge to be dried for the day is in the dryer, set control mode to
Automatic Cool Down. This will prevent another batch from being loaded to the dryer and at the
end of the cycle the dryer will go into cool down mode in preparation of shutting down.
Silo and Baghouse Operation
The controls of the baghouse should be set to auto on the panel adjacent to the silo. When the dryer
discharges a batch to the silo the baghouse blower will automatically come on and keep dust from being
discharged to the atmosphere. Periodic cleaning of the dust bin on the baghouse is required, this is
accomplished by placing the backhoe bucket under the chute and opening the slide gate to allow dust to
slide into the bucket. Some tapping on the side of the hopper with a rubber mallet may be required to
loosen the accumulated dust. An annual inspection of the silo and baghouse should be performed and
any required maintenance or -repairs completed.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

Sampling Procedures
Daily sampling should be conducted in various points throughout the process to track and to verify
compliance with permitted values. Plant operators shall be responsible for taking samples at the proper
times and at the designated locations.
Daily
• One sample per day of the raw sludge feed to the belt press should be taken. This sample
should be a composite of several samples taken at different times during the day. This sample
should be obtained from the sample port at the intake to the raw sludge pump in the basement
of the reuse water/sludge pump building. This sample should be kept in a container with an air
tight lid until analyzed to prevent evaporation.
• At least once per day a sample of the dewatered sludge cake should be taken from the belt filter
press. This sample should be a composite of several samples taken at different times during the
day. This sample should be kept in a container with an airtight lid until analyzed to prevent
evaporation.
o Each batch of sludge discharged from the dryer should be sampled. This sample can be
obtained after the discharge of each batch from the sampling port on the side of the discharge
auger. This sample is hot when first obtained from the auger and should be allowed to cool
before being bagged.
• All of the above samples should be weighed and dried overnight in order to obtain total % solids
values. Reference should be made to the laboratory SOP manual for proper procedures for
analysis for total % solids. Operators will be provided training in the proper procedures for
sampling, storage and analysis of samples before they are expected to conduct analysis.
• If the average %solids of any one (1) days production of residuals does not meet 90% the
residuals should be considered non-compliant and should be disposed of in a landfill.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

Quarterly
Quarterly sampling should be conducted on a representative sample of the dried residuals. This sample
analysis is contracted with Pace Analytical of Asheville NC, and should be sampled, preserved and
delivered to them within their required parameters. The following analysis should be conducted on this
sample.
Aluminum (Al) Mercury (Hg)
Arsenic (Ar) Molybdenum (Mo)
Cadmium (Cd) Nickel (Ni)
total solids
Corrosivity
Fecal Coliform mpn/g/solid* Ignitability
Total Nitrogen (N) Reactivity
Calcium (Ca) ph Total Phosphorous (P)
Chromium (Cr) Potassium (K)Ammonia Nitrogen (Nh3-N)
Copper (Cu) Sodium (Na) Plant available Nitrogen(PAN) (surface applied)
Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Calculated Sodium Adsorption Rate (SAR)
Magnesium (Mg) Zinc (Zn)
• A total of at least seven (7) coliform samples should be analyzed annually.
Annually
Annually, a TCLP(toxicity characteristic leaching procedure) should be conducted on a representative
sample of the dried residual. This sample analysis is conducted by Pace Analytical.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

Truck Loading Operations
Trucks to be loaded with residual should pull through under the silo. Drivers will be responsible for
positioning of their trucks and plant operators will be responsible for loading operations. The storage
silo control panel is located at the top of the stairs on the silo. This should be switched to the on position
to enable the dust collector blower and chute controls to work. The valve on the green air piping to the
rotary valve dispenser on the silo should be in the open position during truck loading operations. The
operator should lower the end of the chute to the bed of the truck and then switch on the rotary valve
dispenser. The shorter distance residuals have to fall from the end of the chute to the bed of the truck
dramatically lessens the amount of dust escaping during the loading process.
Paperwork
o All users of the bioresiduals must sign and date a Utilization Agreement before taking or
possessing the product. This agreement between TWSA and the end user must be signed and
dated within one year by both parties.
o The hauler or transporter should be given a copy of the signed shipping manifest. The manifest
should include an estimated tonnage and should list contact info for the generator and the user
along with contact info on the trucking company with places for the generator, hauler and end
user to sign. Info as to the proper procedures and safeguards should an accident or spill occur
are included on the back of the manifest.
Last revision date -8/27/2015

`ily�i` •�\ Via: i;�1 �%'t' = v. :\'
`\` _\,� .a�iA z � = �.Sewa&ki/,`+'`r � ! �..--- , .. •`� ��_ � i Y + �pL�.1 'a _-?-7_ l l' • � '
r 7 j�l g�°�, v' mr ' ras r 1�'�Lf�f.—�",�%%'� 4 °_ :•. �, q °�/��
_j
'�'� � �- ---nil � (,J /: , r. tie,.—^-... �r--�� •1 - � 1 lea9
°�/ `L 1
` _�= , Rim.. 5�:r7" \� r 1,,.• /. �' is i / Gf r 11`"f{4k'1
i c� 'Z ��Co•\..' , 2ia illt .`� L - b�,J' G °c 'A°• .°yl `r ��i!
VV
I _ _ 1. � ' 1 �, ����� ��_ -; ,, �r�, ":�''��'�:� ' R•�(�_'1� �,�har �'
v✓
x'1!
1
Fin i4 c�,.'i (� \ r •. Ctil'1 -K.
a •'I^� % i� '.�� �`1,��\U i�`z.1� r'l '���
%-
j"'.,f
i • I �..y' �rIj)1\/� �JorR /i�' ���\ OCL'\'"��./
.+ '
J� 'F ���fi )•�1�ir�� �I (22`119'
��%1,--i.iY4�.r��r
' -�. } • I �f�F• � �{ ti'1 `ri2 ��f,�;_`_r�j ..i Jam',,• ti� � � j f_ _ 5 �,} , u _�_> .�
��%i � � .'. � �_�//� !-..z'�7 i 1 ill���i�� G7�-.-•err/r_� � �j��r•-1��� \r'� a , ��,��. \ ��-
Outfall 001
Wetia'
pyo/ � l n•
TuckaSe.igee Water & Sewer
TINSA WWTP #1
"ate Grid/Quad: F6SW/Sylva South, NC Receiving Stream:TuckasegeeRiver
--ititude: 35° 20' 59" N Stream Class: . C -Trout
n itude: 83°14'21" W 8-DiaitHUC: 06010203
ainage Basin: Little Tennessee River Basin
b -Basin: 04-04-02
`4 3 . sk� 111
. � . �'� :>��j it c�+. �ti �✓;:r .�����,�irizl. r(.-��fti�l, �.;,.�
Facility
�' x'� �,'•
-
Location
not to scale
`s
�6
NOY'tr6
F"DES Permit No. NC0039578
Jackson Count

-
ae ado
-�m - - �a 19. >o
N9
Ise
iii'
—3:—�---'iii. xc.f E-.`_'T.s, : -r Y _ 1'
�"`-gra_-e n-• -"-` � ��__-' )% ___ �.: ti_a-- E =T� j"tltt 'E�j-----��m .yv
�mm }♦ 1 i G: '•: M146. Y'-- --_ Yu T_' _ tT-i>,cn \
�iAll
a _ _ "__�k"� �,- \ �" •,_ _
- - n,.r �t l _____ }' %/ �-�'= � ♦-s�F ` �. � ` Ja==i- _ �D / ,r � ` 1. '^ - � �� _— _____ —
.�a �` 1e ��' �a �'"�C�\�`^` ♦leg' i ,/' � _--�„�'; _ = ------^- ��''
Fi
-n - .T _ I•/t` .+�'i--°i; _ T". �- ' ``�', i'y �i _iii"'7'i - i�� '------
__ -- �/\�' eF ---__ - „ t, j I . - �• ^ •i _ =---
-:
I- - __ -_ "_ ,, iz'\\�P��i♦ ;mid -° p'a?3�.5� `\. _ '_U-rz'j / _1 !/': is _ - _
- :aa ���`" _. cam_--_�>�'.��^�, a: ,:t\ �c_.,�- 'y��a-^' '�I ^,;11;�11;n�o�'^•', __- -_ \`,`,.
� _ � �= neo _ — ` `� _ _ �`V )'�Y�� � `�'-. .s 3i L'/ '?-fc•�FZ,`'„\ 9Cy
__=`-=gym =:_,` ♦\• ,`fit\.�'. - n:'c --' •a: K� '` // - \`.
_.,_ `�'' t♦:%res ;'L`,;c \"
�`---�_ � ' ' "•;: \' ��::: �♦ \� \ rte:=;r., , �.
�� ::`:'♦ °•9i's�\ ♦'�: \,.• `}�;•�%a�5��`<..+``iyg" I ,l�G --: a'�'``:`�\`\`\9s nho '' ''
�_ \\�`\\\`'pa v\♦.`♦.. �`r:.�```i'•�S :/-�7 e V �.'{'''`y,'111\ 9f - _ of
•/ i 11'. `� '--" ` \`♦`♦ ♦.\'; :'♦`♦� ,`♦� •'::: .v` a.+ \:'`Szi '\`a\ __ - �i,•��,m_6> 1' ': i I i - .��i
lz
°'� .,:� `;j' 11�: /moo •• j,
m ;�jy/-��� Y' ` �' -_•:''�':;��;�;,, _ '' I 1111; T��%r+
_� `\�' �"� `a3�`•:` ` ` :�; •rtt sem- I I�'I' I I j I I � 4/
��✓�--�. _T-- _ Ilil, 1�,1:1�iila
, is rrlr
A.
o
n %6 1111'I i ' ,Tma I' /:-!'/- i •I� _ `•%'
,.yk. ,111, Illi'', '11i`� �m1`i�/�•�'' ` '\� _ --
_ :F�. :�.`ft.,>_, �., �C _ :\`. .,•\`,` ,1 I1i1't I11�;�yN1i �ilYr ~ ♦`
�S Ri il �'i {1'i'I,'1' 'liil ll`,���a ti'Ari' \�,♦`♦ _ _ _� _ _ _ -_ =\moi
11\fill, ' 1_ ___
°a .1.1',•:1'•„':�1i1� BiIiIII11i'14'�oo�il�ii'lii'', ,i\\ /- I 1
_� �m � Fc 3 - _ ��1�'I i`'1 `: I \ i 1',iil �1i 'I' '1�.'•i7 Llf:,..�lij�1\,, 1 � �_\1 I
..1 ', I,.. ii ', 1 ril lit`♦�`•._
sF Z �'i
�S� i ' I I i II hili 1 Yii r,i;'�ii'I it♦' `I I , I ��'_���
-= - -
F F
14 —-_ ��'�-``` ``\\\♦\
JCB xYOt)Js r..,•
o s _ xEm WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT N0. t IMPROVEMENTS
t �xom �I� 4:.' RESTORATION OF79:''. � � 1 � 1 ljMcG_M���SURFACES PSN C9 r». A'ND SEWER AUTHOR TY A S S O C i AT HS
-'ENGINEERING•PLANNING•FI NAN CE
JACXSCN COUtf Y• NCRTH CARCUNA "'"y.U.al ss mown mea •= nc rx. to �ss> 7t

T.W. 2002.00
fff H.W.1. MUD
5/
• `/ MECHANICAL SCREEN
nOft 3.5 MCD
PF: 673 MGD c RM9fl EL 1D67.15
VORTEX
GRIT
SYSTEM
TRIPLEX PUMP
SYSTEM
NOTE: H.W.L HIGH WATER LEVELS
AT PEAK FLOW OF 8.75 MGD
Im ON m -
A.S S 0ICIA.'Z'E1S
ENGINEER ING•PLANNING•FINA NCE
55 BROAD STREET ASHEVILLE, NC PH. [phone]
I-
T.U. 2027.40 oUDBi
=11,1Y,.1-_200.46 lRMI5FF71
SLUDGE HOLDING
TANK NO. 2
342,500 GAL.
200-&00
DECANTER
SBR BASIN R'1 L
1,700,000 GAL
STUDOE
PLOAPS
2055.00
DECANTER
SBR BASIN Y2
1,700,000 C'AI_.
SMD -.7
FUMPS
' TAY.
1Y. 2D77.6M1�
n
'CFII_ORIN
-CONTACT
�f1.W.L M1
TW.
- MUD
� 145,000 GAL
SLUDGE HOLDING
T1Y. 20JM1,0q POSTAERATION
FLOW
TANK NO.1
284,660 GAL.
E oit.s5
_
BASIN
MEASUREMENT
T.W. 2010.50
PARSHALL FLUME
POST EQ. BASIN
• -2067.1;0
OTM EL 2010.64
462,000 GAL.
-=
OUTFALLTO
TUCI(ASEGEE
RIVER
SLUDGE
PUMP
STATION
H"T"Dim"AUILIC PROFILE
SLUDGE
DRYER
_
BELT
FILTER I-'-:�.-._..:� CLASS A
PRESS SIOSOLIDS
WASTEWATI=R TREATMENT PLANT NO.1 IMPROVEMENTS
TUC KASEl 1© WATER.
JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA