20170405 Ver 1_401 Application_20170405

=;+
E V
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service„
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F-1078
NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
April 3, 2017
North Carolina Division of Water Resources ��
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 2 0
1 T4405
Reference: Nationwide Permit 39, and Water Quality Certification 4092
SAW -2017-00299 Carvana, LLC/3631 South
3631 South Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2994-B D M
To Whom It May Concern:
K G 2017
On behalf of Carvana, LLC, ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) is submitting th f Ilowing request of
use of Nationwide Permit 39, and Water Quality Certification 4092, for h� s
proposed automotive sales center located at 3631 South Boulevard in aro
County, North Carolina. As part of the development, the client proposes to impact a total of
204.6 linear feet of intermittent stream, and proposes mitigation at a 0.5:1 ratio, obtained from
the Division of Mitigation Services (please see supplemental D. Impact Justification and
Mitigation, 3c: comments below). The construction of a retaining wall is proposed to minimize
additional impacts to the stream; wetland impacts have been avoided. Below is the
supplemental information for the PCN Application.
B. Project Information and Prior Project History:
The project area is an approximate 1.96 acres and identified by Mecklenburg County Parcel
Identification Numbers 14905451 and 14905452. The project area is currently undeveloped,
wooded land and a parking lot with foundation of a former drive-in restaurant in a relatively
commercial and residential area of Charlotte, North Carolina. The proposed project consists of
the development of an automotive sales center with associated parking, driveways, retaining
wall, and utilities installations.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, 1a:
Proposed impact S1 is a permanent stream impact to an un -named tributary of Little Hope
Creek (Permanent Impact A on the impact maps) for the addition of a grocery store and
associated parking area. The impact consists of approximately 166.1 linear feet. A 42" culvert is
being proposed to divert the stream from under the proposed parking area, where it will daylight
into a swale back into the original channel. A retaining wall is proposed to avoid and minimize
impacts to the maximum extent possible to the stream and abutting wetlands. Impact S2
(Permanent Impact B on impact maps) is a permanent stream impact to the same un -named
tributary of Little Hope Creek, and is a total of approximately 38.5 linear feet. The
aforementioned impacts are associated with roadway improvements required by the City of
Charlotte. The existing shoulder will be widened, curb and gutter installed, and a pedestrian
walkway will be installed. As a result, the shoulder will encroach into the stream bank. Fill
material placed will confine stream flow; however, it will not hinder aquatic passage or result in
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Flodda, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

Nationwide Permit 39 and Water Quality Certification 4092 Submittal
SAW -2017-00299
3631 South Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project 49-2994-B
increased flooding potential (please see Stream Impact Section A -A, Sheet 3/3). The total
amount of proposed stream impact is 204.6 linear feet. Based on the proposed impacts of
greater than 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation for the impacts is being
requested in the form of payment to the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in -lieu fee
program. The approval from DMS is attached.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, 3c:
Due to the impairment of the stream, a rating of "Low" on the North Carolina Stream
Assessment Method (NCSAM) Form, and consultation with the USACE, the client proposes a
mitigation ratio to offset function loss at the ratio of 0.5:1. DMS does not have available credits
within the projects watershed; therefore, the client will be required to obtain credits through the
use of the DMS 'Extended Service Area'. As a result, the client will double the amount of
mitigation purchased, resulting in a final mitigation ratio of 1:1.
F. Supplementary Information, 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat
(Corps Requirement), 5d:
ECS performed a habitat assessment to determine if potential habitat for threatened or
endangered species was present. Species listed for Mecklenburg County include the Bald
Eagle, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB), Carolina heelsplitter, Rusty -patched bumble bee,
Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's sunflower, and Smooth coneflower. Marginal habitat for the
sunflower was noted along the roadsides; however, no individuals of sunflower were identified.
With regards to the NLEB, clearing of vegetation will take place as part of construction activities.
The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land; however, the majority of the vegetation where
the development will take place, is early to mid -successional, resulting in low potential for
habitat disturbance. No known hibernation sites are on or within % mile to the project site.
According to the USFWS website
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_ review/NLEB—in WNC.html, Mecklenburg County is
not listed as a county containing confirmed hibernation and maternity sites for this species;
therefore, the project meets the 4(d) rule, and any associated exempt take. The project should
have no effect on the NLEB.
In addition to the reconnaissance, ECS obtained documentation from the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer and concurrence documentation from the NCNHP
dated 01/31/2017. NHP letter is attached.
F. Supplementary Information, 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps
Requirement), 7b:
ECS reviewed the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office's GIS website (HPOWEB
GIS Service). The western portion of the project study area is identified on the NCSHPO
website as MK17801 South 21 Drive -In, No. 1 Restaurant (Gone) 2001. ECS contacted Ms.
Renee Shearin with NCSHPO via telephone on January 31, 2017 in regards to the website's
listing. According to Ms. Shearin, since the structure was demolished, there are no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Additionally, ECS submitted a concurrence
letter to the NCSHPO on February 7, 2017 for review.
2

Nationwide Permit 39 and Water Quality Certification 4092 Submittal
SAW -2017-00299
3631 South Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project 49-2994-B
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this report regarding the permit
application submittal.
Sincerely,
ECS Southeast, LLP
td � T5,',,,1, f zP3
W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Principal
[e-mail]
704-525-1400
Attachments: Major Water Quality Application Fee ($570)
PCN Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figures (1-6)
Impact Maps (3)
DMS Acceptance Letter
NCSAM Form
Natural Heritage Program Correspondence
K

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Carvana, LLC Site
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NC CCT Holdings, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 31409/Page 501-504
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Peter Copsis
3d.
Street address:
4918 Hardwicke RD
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-575-2008
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ AgentX❑ Other, specify: Applicant
4b.
Name:
Ms. Vanessa MacDonald
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Carvana, LLC
4d.
Street address:
4020 East Indian School Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Phoenix Arizona 85018
4f.
Telephone no.:
480-620-6627
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
W. Brandon Fulton, PSW, LSS, PSC
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
ECS Southeast, LLP
5c.
Street address:
1812-D Center Park Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC
5e. Telephone no.:
704-525-5125
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
14905451 and 14905452
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.191757 Longitude: -80.87379
1 c.
Property size:
1.96 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Little Hope Creek (Sugar Creek Watershed)
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
I class C waters
2c.
River basin:
Catawba River Basin
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The western portion of the project study area consists of a parking lot with the foundation of a former drive-in restaurant. The eastern portion of the
project study area consists of undeveloped, wooded land with a stream. The vicinity of the project consists of a mix of commercial businesses and
residences.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.04
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 390
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is for the development of an automotive sales center. See supplemental letter attached.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Standard construction equipment will be utilized during this project.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including allriorhases in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Site verification visit with USACE 3/24117; awaitingJD.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): ECS Carolinas, LLP
Agency/Consultant Company: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site visit 3/24/17; awaiting JD. SAW -2017-00299
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No El Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0
2h. Comments:
No wetland impacts.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Little Hope Creek
INT
Corps
3.5
166.1
S2 P
Fill
UT to Little Hope Creek
INT
Corps
3.5
38.5
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
204.6
3i. Comments:
Stream impact A will involve placing a retaining wall and culvert to develop parking area. Stream impact B will include placing a small amount of fill
against the stream bank as a result of road widening/placement of curb and gutter per requirements of the City of Charlotte Department of
Transportation. Although fill will be placed in the stream, flow will not be interrupted.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: NO open water impacts.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: No buffer impacts.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Please see attached supplemental letter.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Standard construction practices and an erosion and sediment control plan will be utilized to minimize the impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Division of Mitigation Services
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 205
Quantity:
Quantity:
ease see supplemental le er for in orma ion regar ing mitigation ratio.
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
205 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
51.02%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
M Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The project does require a stormwater management plan that will be reviewed under the local permitting authority
(City of Charlotte). The stormwater
management plan is not included in this submittal.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Charlotte
0 Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
X❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
E] Yes
E] No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project willbe connected to the municipal water and sewer system through Charlotte Water (formerly known as Charlotte
-Mecklenburg
Utility
Department).
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5, Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer and concurrence documentation from the NCNHP dated 01/31/2017. NHP
letter is attached. The proposed project will not impact endangered species or designated critical habitat based on our site visit and desktop research.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Essential Fish Habitat was not identified on the site. Sources: NOAA Habitat Conservation - Habitat Protection, Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See Supplemental Letter attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Panels 3710454300L (dated September 2, 2015) and 3710454200K (dated February 19, 2014)
F,1h,,,
1Y-17
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

D
ECS CAROLINAS LLQ g c
zein the Standard for Senlice"
Geotechnical Construction Materials Environmental - Facilities
Agent Authorization
Property/Site: CARVANA - CHARLOTTE (S. BLVD.)
Address of Site: 3531 SOUTH BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28211
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): .149-054-52;149-054-51
Owner Information: NC CCT Holdings, LLC (BK 31409 PG501 and PGS 504)
s
Name: NICK C. COPSIS & ANT HOU A COPSIS
*T -u ty P. Tasso oos an wife Maria C. Tassopoulos and
Address: 4918 HAKDVVICKE RD Peter N. Copsis and wife Pamela L. Copsis are
heirs and Nick C. Copsis and Managers
CHARLOTTE, NC 28211
9426 Hathwyck Court. Matthews, NC 28015
Telephone Number: 704-575-2008
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: -Pete.Cops:Ls@carol:Lnashealthcare.com
Property Owner Certification:
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property
herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal/State jurisdiction under
Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899. 1 also authorize ECS to act in my behalf in the processing of this request and to furnish
supplemental information in support of this request, including stream/wetland matters in
coordination with the USACE and the NCDWRfield verification and permit application:
17 & O _. _
Property Owner Signature: ,
Peter -N. Co is an Pamela L. Copsis M ger',Heirs:
Date: 12/12/2016
Anthnula Copsis/Manager;;
K.S Cnpit i.:�_rrr_.;., PLL . • L" S a.utcaa. LLP -1:.> :Er I:.. ?1 L:. - � rh•:aa. t!.i. • —KO .'Id :=:fa U_. LLC. > lC::'r tict;,&v LLC. ECS Tc -.= . Lip

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials - Environmental • Facilities 1K Registered Engi :egging t u i r. ��72
P!G P.cgisle,ed Gemogfst'. Flint G-4013
V- RIgNiered Enginexnnt} Firrn 3:39
Agent Authorization
Property/Site: CARVANA - CHARLOTTE (S. BLVD.)
Address of Site: 3631 SOUTH. BLVD,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28211
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 149-054-52;149-054-51
Owner Information: NC CCT Holdings, LLC (BK 31409 PG501 and Ptd 504)
Name: *NICK C.COPSIS & ANTHOULA COPSIS
*Tii othyyP. Tas opo os an a Maria C. Tassopoulas and
I
Address: RD Peter N. Copsls and wife Pahela L. Cops:Ls are
heirs,4 Nick C. Copsis and Managers
CHARLOTTE, NC 28211 01-
9426 Hathwyck Court, Matthews, NC 28105
Telephone Number. 704-575-2008
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Property Owner Certification:
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properfies identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property
herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
detennination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal/State jurisdiction under
Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and//or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.1 also authorize ECS to act in my behalf in the processing of this request and to furnish
supplemental information in support of this request including stream/wetland matters in
coordination with the USACE and the NCDWR field verificion and permit application:
Property Owner Signature-
0
thv P. Tassop tilos/Manager/Heir
Date: 12/12/2016 �Lf °112 :- 0--
MaPa. C. Tas
ECS Capitd Services, PUC- ECSCardinas, LLP • ECS Central, PLLC - ECS Florida. LLC --ECS Mid-P3laniiG LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECSSoulheast LLC • ECS Texas, LLP
www.eeslimited.com

Legend
Approximate Site Boundary
ft
Q
■
Red Clay Ciderworks
■
Master Auto Collision
and Service Center
Hollis House Apartments
■
is
Greer. Light Tattoo
A
Scalevbark Station
© Aut
® Pizza Hutto gle
Charlotte Mecklenburg
Client:
SELWIN PROPERTY
GROUP
Project:
CARVANA
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
SITE LOCATION MAP
GOOGLE STREET
MAP
DATED 2016
Y
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA
Drawn By: Checked By:
KJV WBF
Approved By: Date:
WBF 010/14/2016
ECS Project No:
49-2994B
FIGURE 1

rc
C_
O
"ZI
I
4
S"

65'� I I it
0
C<-
E
w
' WALL (TR)
CD
�---
1
�I I I II ��I� r _'- ,
Pill 7AL JU 1 1 t184 SO
SURIECT T A FICAT '-
I\ ♦` `\\\ I I 1 D
7
I
It
4020EINDIAN SCHOOL ROAD ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
CONTACT: VANESSA 5018 ALD NCBELS P-1132
VANESSA.MACD0) 62 �CARVANA COM 1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
-0 620 6 27 PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
CAD ID
I
r
�
Iclot
1`
I II I,
-4
I
r
NIC
ANTHOUZA
j
I
�
i
4020EINDIAN SCHOOL ROAD ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
CONTACT: VANESSA 5018 ALD NCBELS P-1132
VANESSA.MACD0) 62 �CARVANA COM 1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
-0 620 6 27 PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
CAD ID
I
r
�
Iclot
I II I,
I
r
I
`
I I �
I
f
I------ ----------- - - _--__-
I /
T /
CARVANA - SOUTH BLVD.
3631 S. BLVD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28209
ETLANDS IMPACT MAP- EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 113 1 SCALE: DATE:
1"=30'
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
� I
�2S
LEGEND
— STREAM CENTERLINE
k k k WETLANDS AREA (UNDISTURBED)
I
�
i
4020EINDIAN SCHOOL ROAD ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
CONTACT: VANESSA 5018 ALD NCBELS P-1132
VANESSA.MACD0) 62 �CARVANA COM 1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
-0 620 6 27 PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
CAD ID
ROJECT NUMBER:
I j
�
I
r
I
I
I
I
� I
�2S
LEGEND
— STREAM CENTERLINE
k k k WETLANDS AREA (UNDISTURBED)
0 15 30
1 "= 30'
irn
CARVANA BOHLER
4020EINDIAN SCHOOL ROAD ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
CONTACT: VANESSA 5018 ALD NCBELS P-1132
VANESSA.MACD0) 62 �CARVANA COM 1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
-0 620 6 27 PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
CAD ID
ROJECT NUMBER:
0 15 30
1 "= 30'

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
Vanessa MacDonald
Carvana, LLC
4020 E. Indian School Road
Phoenix, AZ 85018
Project: Carvana LLC Charlotte
ROY COOPER
COA771w
MICHAEL S. REGAN
s u erar
March 31, 2017
Expiration of Acceptance: September 30, 2017
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/LAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
River
Basin
CU Location
(8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Bu ffer I Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Ri avian
Non-Ri avian
Coastal Marsh
Catawba
03050103*
0
0
205
0
0
0
0 0
Impact
*DMS proposes use of the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area for this impact
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Brandon Fulton, agent
Sincerely,
Ja es B Stanfill
Asse anagement Supervisor
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street; Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name Carvana, LLC Date of Evaluation
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization ECS Southeast, LLP
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

January 31, 2017
Alexandra Perillo
ECS Southeast, LLP
6714 Netherlands Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: 49-2994-13; Carvana, LLC site
Dear Alexandra Perillo:
PAT NIcCRORY
Gmrneor
SUSAN KLU TTZ
-&—atmy
NCNHDE-2863
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Suzanne Mason at [e-mail] or 919.707.8637.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
-�5-'-^Nothing Compares_,-,
State of?-Jort'n Craotina i Department of Xahgal and Cmhuzal Remsce3
109 East kn__S"net I raleifgh,NC27601
919-807-7300

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
49-2994-B
Project No. Carvana, LLC site
January 31, 2017
NCNHDE-2863
.ement Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
ixonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
roup Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
ascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi? 5-Very --- Endangered G3
Low
c) Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
anaged Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
anaged Area Name Owner Owner Type
ecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
�finitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserye,ora/content/help. Data query generated on January 31, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2016. Please resubi
ur information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-2863: 49-2994-B
Vgw..d
N Ashbt—k
ClAivii.1,
V i I I a RI
P,
77,
r7
January 31, 2017
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
0 Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:20,995
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esn, HERE. DeLon,ne, InWonip, increment P Corp.. GEBCO, LISGS,
FAO. PS. NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL. Ordnance Sunray, Esn Japan,
MET] Eiid China (Hong Kong), sviiintopo, Mapinyindia. 0 OpenStreetMap
wntn6ubrs, and the GIS User Coinnxinky
A—,
z
7
4
7%
CRqhI J,
Palk
F
W.wmd
Con*,
mc,
. ...
.
Purr
R.1
Clanton
P
Roland-
Sedgefield
lork Road
Colonial
Village
y.",
To.
C.:. a
S'.
ch-ewll
.0
Vgw..d
N Ashbt—k
ClAivii.1,
V i I I a RI
P,
77,
r7
January 31, 2017
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
0 Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:20,995
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esn, HERE. DeLon,ne, InWonip, increment P Corp.. GEBCO, LISGS,
FAO. PS. NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL. Ordnance Sunray, Esn Japan,
MET] Eiid China (Hong Kong), sviiintopo, Mapinyindia. 0 OpenStreetMap
wntn6ubrs, and the GIS User Coinnxinky