20090056 Ver 1 - Greenbrier Creek_ 671_Closeout - 4/7/2017

CLOSEOUT R
GREENBRIER CREEK
DMS ID (671)
USACE ACTION ID # SAW -2009-02312
DWQ 401# 09-0056
Proiect Setting & Classifications
Site Coordinates: 35.84211°N, 79.48831°W
County
Alamance & Chatham
General Location
—8 miles north of Siler City
Basin:
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region:
Piedmont
Ecoregion:
Carolina Slate Belt
USGS Hydro Unit:
03030003070010
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-06-12
Wetland Classification
Riparian
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
2014
Source Agency:
NCDMS
Provider:
N/A
Designer:
Biohabitats
Monitoring Firm
Axiom Environmental
Plant remediation
Carolina Environmental
Contracting
Approved for Transfer to
Stewardship
Yes
Stewards
NC Stewardship
'ER PROJECT
Overall Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
5/17/2006
Restoration Plan
October 2008
Permitted 401
1/28/2009
Permitted 404
2/9/2010
Construction complete
1/25/2011
As -built construction drawings
April 2011
Year 1 Monitoring*
2012
Beaver Removal
May 2013
Year 2 Monitoring
2013
Year 3 Monitoring
2014
Beaver Removal
June & September 2014
Privet & Multiflora rose
2014
Year 4 Monitoring
2015
Privet & Multiflora rose
2015
Year 5 Monitoring
2016
Beaver Removal
December 2016
Closeout Submission
March 2017
*Note: After construction, SCO dropped monitoring services from all DMS
design contracts. Alternatively, DMS solicited post -construction monitoring
services. As a result, this project experienced one year with no stream or data
collection. In lieu of MYO/Baseline conditions, the MY1 data (collected in
September 2012) serves as the existing conditions when post construction
monitoring began.
Page 1 of 29

Greenbrier Creek Watershed Planning Summary
The Greenbrier Creek stream, wetland and buffer restoration project is located in HUC
03 003 0003 070010, the Rocky River Headwaters watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local
Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP). The project is also
located in Upper and Middle Rocky River Local Watershed Plan (LWP). Currently, DMS has a total of
two projects in this TLW/LWP (Greenbrier Creek and Mud Lick -Thomas Site).
Greenbrier Creek drains to the Rocky River approximately 3.5 miles downstream to a location that is
identified on the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) 2014 303d Impaired Waters list. This reach
has been listed since 2010 for Chlorophyll a. This watershed is also designated as a Water Supply
Watershed Area by NCDWR.
The 2009 Cape Fear RBRP indicates that impacts from cattle accessing streams, erosion and poor riparian
condition are of concern in this watershed particularly since this is a water supply watershed. The Upper
and Middle Rocky River LWP indicates that major stressors in this watershed include stream bank
erosion, lack of buffer, livestock access to streams and nutrient inputs. Goals of this LWP include: (1)
Enhanced protections for perennial and intermittent streams; (2) Erosion and sediment control guidance;
(3) Improved maps for streams and floodplains; and (4) Sites for Preservation, Restoration and BMP
installation.
The goals of the Greenbrier Creek project are consistent with DMS watershed planning goals. The project
eliminates livestock access, restores riparian buffer aiding in filtration/pollutant removal and improved
habitat, reduces erosion by stabilizing and vegetating the streambanks and further protects project
improvements by preserving upstream wetland and stream reaches.
Project Setting and Background Summary
The Greenbrier Stream Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") is located in Cape Fear River
Basin 03030003070010. Prior to Site implementation, the Site streams were impaired as the result poor
land management, stream dredging, upstream disturbances, and human impacts.
Enhancement I was achieved by changing the dimension & profile of the channelized stream. Dimension
was changed by increasing the width/depth ratio by laying back the banks. The design did not change the
overall slope, but instead changed the profile by raising the channel invert with riffle structures which also
resulted in the creation of deeper pools upstream above those riffles. This design approach resulted in
stable stream channels, with an improved bed form diversity where it was once lacking. Stable, vegetated
banks provide sediment reduction.
The removal of cattle with exclusion fencing reduces nutrient and fecal loading. Preservation of stream and
wetland complex traps sediment and runoff pollutants, and provides habitat for water fowl. Privet was
controlled throughout the 51 -acre easement, and the riparian buffer has been planted with diverse native,
woody vegetation.
Supplemental planting at the Site occurred on February 13 and 14, 2012, in response to the contractor's
vegetation warranty assessment. During this effort, 1952 bare root and 1 -gallon trees were planted at the
Site. Supplemental planting appears to have resulted in vegetative success across the majority of the Site.
Invasive vegetation, including Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and Japanese privet (Ligustrum
japonicum), were removed and intensively treated during construction throughout the entire conservation
easement. Additionally, privet and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were treated throughout the entire
Page 2 of 29

conservation easement during MY3 and MY4. The invasive species observed onsite are minimal and do
not appear to pose a threat to Site success.
Beaver activity has been observed onsite throughout the monitoring period. Currently, one large, well-
established impoundment is located on the preservation reach consisting of three major beaver dams.
Beaver activity has been controlled on the enhancement reach throughout the monitoring period.
Goals and Obiectives
GOALS
• Improve water quality by reducing nutrient loading from a livestock operation in a water supply
watershed.
Reduce the high level of sediment loading to the stream from steep, eroding banks.
Improve both aquatic and terrestrial riparian buffer habitat.
OBJECTIVES
• Preservation and protection of important wetlands and stream channel reaches upstream of the
Matthews property.
• Improvement of water quality (reduction of nutrient and sediment inputs) by creating a vegetated
riparian buffer filter strip between the stream and livestock operations currently on the property.
• Reduction of high sediment loads in the stream through stabilization of eroding channel banks.
• Improvement of deteriorated aquatic habitat by reduction of nutrient and sediment loads in the
streams, providing more variable stream channel geometry and creating more opportunities for
carbon inputs from trees in the restored buffer zone.
• Improvement of terrestrial habitat through restoration of diverse native woody vegetation in the
riparian buffer zone and control of invasive Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Success Criteria
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Streams
14 permanent cross-sections (8 riffle and 6
• stable stream system based on
pool); pebble counts; 2 monitoring
Yes —Site streams are stable.
measurements of dimension, pattern,
reaches; and 5 permanent photo points
profile and visual assessments
10 out of 12 veg plots meet success
Vegetation
12 vegetation plots measured using the
criteria with an average of 482 planted
• Minimum of 260 stems/acre in year 5
CVS Level II protocol
stems/acre (excluding livestakes); 12
of 12 meet when considering
volunteers.
Hydrology
Yes — Success criteria were met
• documentation of two bankfull channel
Two crest gauges and photo
throughout the monitoring period with
events during separate monitoring years
documentation of bankfull events
a total of 10 documented bankfull
events.
Wetland Hydrology
• NA
NA
NA
Page 3 of 29

Greenbrier Creek Stream Restoration Site (DMS Project Number 671)
Mitigation Components
Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian Wetland
Type Restoration Restoration Equivalent Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
Totals 2974 596 --
1.400 WMU
Projects Components
Enhancement I
4463.03 --
Existing
-
Preservation
2982 6.930
--
-
Project
Restoration
Linear
Restoration
Mitigation
Mitigation
Notes/Comments
Component/ Reach
Station Range
Linear Footage/
Footage/
Level
Ratio
Credits
ID
Acreage
Acreage
Greenbrier Mainstem
1000+00-
659
EI
676 - 30 = 646
1.5:1
430.667
Less 30 -foot reserved crossing
Upstream of Bridge
106+76.67
Greenbrier Mainstem
200+00-
1966
EI
1965 — 30 = 1935
1.5:1
1,290
Less 30 -foot reserved crossing
Downstream of Bride
219+65
UT Upstream
300+15-
1180
EI
1185 — 60 = 1125
1.5:1
750
Less 60 -foot reserved crossing
of ford crossing
400+00
UT Downstream
400+00-
749
EI
757.03
1.5:1
504.687
of ford crossing
407+57.03
Greenbrier Mainstem
--
2982
P
2982
5:1
596.4
Wetland
--
6.930
P
1 6.930
5:1
1.380
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Streams Riparian Wetland (acres)
(linear feet) Riverine Non-Riverine
Non -riparian
Wetland (acres)
Restoration
-- --
--
--
Enhancement I
4463.03 --
--
-
Preservation
2982 6.930
--
-
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 3571.753
Riparian Riverine Wetland 1.380
Page 4 of 29

�xn bf.
FIGURE
axpmE-kmrrt
K��CL_F
ASSETMAP
.1
218 sbo P—ue
Rattrh. NC 27(03
(919) 21& 109({
GREENBRIER CREEK STREAM RESTORATION SITE k
DMS PROJECT NUMBER 571 Sept. 2018
Alamance and Chatham Counties, North Carolina —P. 2
✓boom
12-004.09

AN-
1�1 .7r,
5
4 -
IQ. 2
3 X 0
efF%
F;A
7
71
40
Legend -"7 5
C3 Emrnenl Boundary
Stream Enhancement I
sk'aam Preservabon
04
Drainages (No Credl)
in-strearn structures
Welland Preservation
Stream Monitoring Reach 12
Cross-secbons
%kvatation monkming plots
• qll PhAWpfqf �mD-
Crest Gauges A,-CGLAL 2014 LeoKW
-sthalmapry jprDWdad by NC One M3p)
FIDKed Stakin Photo Points.
Easement Crossings (exclude from credii: 0 125 250 500 750 1.000
I
Feet
FIGME
ASSET MAP
KRJX LF
Axiom ErMPNweerfal
218 Srd)W AMR&
GREENBRIER GREEK STREAM RESTORATION SITE
13131111 I&C 27E13
DMS PROJEGT NUMBER 671
SePL 2,016
OA
pig) 21 5-IM3
Ala nian oB and Chatham Counties, North CarolinaV..
12-OD4.00

Dam 3
I
1,000
= Feet
Legend
E3,senenL33oundary
C3
Stream Preservation
-P— Stream Recennrg No Credit
C8ftland PreservaLai
Beaver Dams
,E73 "ciundedArea
rl�3 Previously Impounded Area
Darr, 2
M62kc
Dam I
hVnzoor arJA.r3:yre, NC 311 5car.
KRUCLF
FrU9E
ASSET MAP
MW ErMMM1MZ1
218 snnw AYe*Lje
GREENBRIER CREEK STREAM RESTORATION SITE
D..
R*V% AC 27603
DMS PROJECT NUMBER 671
Sept 21115
2 B
Pi9) 215-1693
AV
Alamance and Chatham Counks, North Carolina
%I.-
—1 ---- 1-,:.
12-OMJN
P
Ornaim3pry :prov&-d Cy' 4O One
ID 125 250
5UG 750
Dam 3
I
1,000
= Feet
Legend
E3,senenL33oundary
C3
Stream Preservation
-P— Stream Recennrg No Credit
C8ftland PreservaLai
Beaver Dams
,E73 "ciundedArea
rl�3 Previously Impounded Area
Darr, 2
M62kc
Dam I
hVnzoor arJA.r3:yre, NC 311 5car.
KRUCLF
FrU9E
ASSET MAP
MW ErMMM1MZ1
218 snnw AYe*Lje
GREENBRIER CREEK STREAM RESTORATION SITE
D..
R*V% AC 27603
DMS PROJECT NUMBER 671
Sept 21115
2 B
Pi9) 215-1693
AV
Alamance and Chatham Counks, North Carolina
%I.-
—1 ---- 1-,:.
12-OMJN

Page 8 of 29
V1.5amt Ron
• - - - yT- /S tel" V.;- �F' '' -
C~�J rte_ V
� �"-
�.
• � "i - • - �� i_ -._tea+ `�.J�
-_
y -
�
�`
I
�
-------r� - ---- - — - �- ---- -� -
F-
'*#+,�
P N
Legend
_
Site E asem ent
f
Site 6rainageAraa
Feet
Axiom Environmental
ow Ave
ARaleigh,
US.GS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPVVITH DRAINAGEAREA
GREEN BRI ER SITE
DIMS PROJECT NUMBER 671
KRJ
sept.2016
Raleigh, N�2T503
ig
Alamance and Chatham Counties, North Carolina=
.,.u••EWWIr WW.,M.
12-004.05
Page 8 of 29

DaB A.bG2 Ce Ce DdB NO
DcB VCB2
Dd C2 Me
1Na _ Ad B2
DcB
Cf
DaB2Ad B2 j DdB
Ad G2
i
Ad Ci' C, -B2 GCB2
AaB CCC2
DbG2 DdB Of
Vd
`'— I Soil Groups Intersecting Easements
Ce
GaG2
GbB3
Cr B2 Tb
I
DbB �� GaB — HdB
TAB2
DaB
Vde' I HdC2
AaB w f
aB2 HdC DbG
TaB C -
HdB2 GaB2 GaB2
Sb I GaG2
3aG2 Gac
Soil Map Unit
Soil Class
CnnB
Cid
ChA
Chswaclaand Vdehadadk&=
G&82
G&a &vill&
G9C2
Giqorgsvilks
G&C2
Geo &vill&
G&C2
Geo &vill&
NaC
Nanford-Bad in oom plgx
Cd
Chswacla
Cs
Colfax
Ad B2
Appling
DdC2
Durham
Ad C2
Appling
CCB2
C&Cil
CcC2
C&A
GaC
Gqorgsvilks
TbC3
Tarrus
HdB
Hsrndon
GaC2
Giqorgsvilks
HdC2
Hsrndon
Wd
Worsham
HdC
Hsrndon
GaC
Gqorgsvilks
GaC2
Geo &vill&
GaB
Gsa &villa
GaC2
Giqorgsvilks
GaC2
Geo &vill&
Gan
G&org&vilka
Ld
IL&calalluval
GaB HdB2
HdB GaG2 GaC2 AaB
GaB2 GaC e C9aB GaB2
AaB
GaB2 Hd B2
GaC2 Co
---^tet—�-----
GeB2--� GeB2 GaB Ge132
GaC
i
GeB2
GaG MaA
Vq IR. GaG2
GeB2
Gh.A
{ _S
N,
gf,/J-ap
NaC GeC2 GeB2
NaB
NaB
W NaB
Siler City approximately i miles
VS_421 approximately 3 miles NaB
Figure 3. Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map
Legend 99
Matthews Basement
Greenbrier Creek Stream Restoration
Alamance and Chatham Counties, North Carolina Q Murchison easement
9 259 WO 100 F-( stream
AP
TS!sleah+iralti
May 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LakelPond
Page 9 of 29

Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 1, Pool
------------
99
----B-kfn
----Flood Rene Area
MY -01 9112/12
MY -02 5116113
MY -03 315/14
—. 3116M
MY -05 2112116
---------------------------------------------------------
98
-MY-019/1D2012
97
W-02 5/16/13
----Flood Rove lura
----BanMull
96
--------------- ----------------------- --------------
AMY -05 2/12/16
MY -02 5/16/i3
0 10 20
---- F1..d W.-Asea
Station (feet)
w.o5
— my -0.4..2.12
95
MY -02 5/Ib/t3
94
�N[Y-03 3/5(14
—MY-043/]b.1s
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
- MY-0s2nzn6
93
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 2, Riffle
------------
102
----B-kfn
----Flood Rene Area
MY -01 9112/12
MY -02 5116113
MY -03 315/14
—. 3116M
MY -05 2112116
---------------------------------------------------------
101
-MY-019/1D2012
0 100
W-02 5/16/13
----Flood Rove lura
UAMY
-0F 9/12(12
AMY -05 2/12/16
MY -02 5/16/i3
0 10 20
99
Station (feet)
AMY -03 3/5!14
—MY -043/26/t5
AMY -05 2/32(16
98
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
102
101
100
e
c
99
y
98
97
107
106
t
0 105
a
W
104
103
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 3, Pool
---------- --------------------------
------------
------- ------------------------------
----B-kfn
----Flood Rene Area
MY -01 9112/12
MY -02 5116113
MY -03 315/14
—. 3116M
MY -05 2112116
----Fl,,d Rune Area
-MY-019/1D2012
W-02 5/16/13
-W-033/5
-
MY -04 3126/1
AMY -05 2/12/16
0 10 20
30 40
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 4, Pool
Page 10 of 29
------- ------------------------------
----B-kfn
----Flood Rene Area
MY -01 9112/12
MY -02 5116113
MY -03 315/14
—. 3116M
MY -05 2112116
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Page 10 of 29

Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 5, Riffle
106
104
---'Flo ad Rone Asea
105
--------------------------------------------------------
-MY-093/26/15
AMY -052Y12/16
103
_________________________________________________________
5 102
.....---------------------------------------- ----
104
----sawn
9
s;
0
_ _F7o od Rone Asea
101
�
100
101
AMY -019/1212
tl
AMY -019/12/12
- MY� snb/a3
103
1116/13
-.1116111
MY -03 3/5/39
99
100
�MY-093/26/k5
102
-
AMY -052/12/16
98
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 6, Riffle
104
104
---'Flo ad Rone Asea
103
-MY-093/26/15
AMY -052Y12/16
103
_________________________________________________________
5 102
.....---------------------------------------- ----
9
s;
0
101
�
100
101
________________
tl
AMY -019/12/12
1116/13
-.1116111
99
100
-
0000001"
98
AMY -05 2/12/16
97
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
99
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 8, Pool
104
---'Flo ad Rone Asea
MY -0t 9/12/t2
MY -02 5/16/13
AMY -03 3/S/t-0
-MY-093/26/15
AMY -052Y12/16
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 8, Pool
104
103
102
.....---------------------------------------- ----
9
---_saoxdl
101
�
100
----F7ood RoaeArea
tl
AMY -019/12/12
1116/13
-.1116111
99
�k1Y-03 VIA
iMY V26/15
98
AMY -05 2/12/16
97
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Page 11 of 29

Page 12 of 29
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 9, Riffle
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 10, Pool
105
104 -------------------------------------------------------------
105
105
---------------------------------------------------------
103
103
102
104 ------------------------------------------------------------
102
104
103
e
d99
---------------------------- - - - - - - -
____B.Ahu
101
98
103
r 102
W
97
96
— wrr-0z 5/wr13
h1Y-03 3/5!14
MY -09 3/2b/t5
101
___________
__________________________________
_ -_s.tt;,n
—W45 v12 16
100
0
____ F7ooa xosse mea
99
101
W99
---'Hn
�M[Y-019/12/12
0
98
MY -02 5/16/13
98
100
-nnr-03 3/5114
---'
—nrr-m vrt2nz
97
—e4ro43/26115
3126/IS
97
-
M A)5 2/12/16
96
—oar-oasltalt3
- kIY-05 2/12/16
98
96
0
10 20 30 40 50
60
40 50 60
Station (feet)
Station (feet)
Page 12 of 29
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 11, Riffle
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 10, Pool
105
104 -------------------------------------------------------------
105
104
---------------------------------------------------------
103
103
102
102
104
e
d99
---------------------------- - - - - - - -
____B.Ahu
101
98
103
W
97
96
— wrr-0z 5/wr13
h1Y-03 3/5!14
MY -09 3/2b/t5
102
.� 100 --
—W45 v12 16
-----
0
10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
99
101
---'Hn
0
98
Fl—a r�oae mea
a
100
---'
—nrr-m vrt2nz
—e4ro43/26115
99
97
-
M A)5 2/12/16
—oar-oasltalt3
98
96
0
97
40 50 60
\Ir -03 3/5/14
Station (feet)
96
—nn -0w 3rzcns
nor -o5 2n2n6
95
0
10 20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Page 12 of 29
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 11, Riffle
- 12-, Riffle
105
104 -------------------------------------------------------------
104
---------------------------------------------------------
103
103
102
102
101
5
100-
e
d99
---------------------------- - - - - - - -
____B.Ahu
101
98
---_e�oaa aaoea=ea
—n�-01v/1z/a2
W
97
96
— wrr-0z 5/wr13
h1Y-03 3/5!14
MY -09 3/2b/t5
95
94
.� 100 --
—W45 v12 16
-----
0
10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Page 12 of 29
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS
- 12-, Riffle
104
---------------------------------------------------------
103
102
101
.� 100 --
----------------------------------_______
-----
----Flood mane area
— mr-019nv1z
99
1000,
MY -025!16/13
98
— nnr-03 3!5!14
—e4ro43/26115
97
-
M A)5 2/12/16
96
0
10 20 30
40 50 60
Station (feet)
Page 12 of 29

Came Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 13, Pool
101
101
-
r�.
- W-01 9/12/12-
__________________________------------- ______________-------
- �m srasns
100
- nar-03 vena
- MY -04 3rzens
MY -05 21(2!16
99
sffijl
98
98
�y
---- ,3odo„er ea
— — — � Flood Rone 4rea
0
� 97
—R- I 9/12/12
97
NfY-02 5/16113
96
MY -03 3.�i/14
96
—nsir-043!2&15
AMY -052/(2116
95
95
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
94
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 14, Riffle
101
-
r�.
- W-01 9/12/12-
__________________________------------- ______________-------
- �m srasns
100
- nar-03 vena
- MY -04 3rzens
MY -05 21(2!16
Cape Fear River Basin, Greenbrier Creek, XS - 14, Riffle
101
__________________________------------- ______________-------
100
99
sffijl
98
�y
— — — � Flood Rone 4rea
—R- I 9/12/12
97
NfY-02 5/16113
MY -03 3.�i/14
96
—nsir-043!2&15
AMY -052/(2116
95
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Page 13 of 29

Greenbrier Year 5 (2016) Profile - Reach 00+00 to 10+00
lol
loo
9s
`r
e
sa
9]
96
ss
s4
93
0 106 20Q 300 -000 1. 600 706 800 900 90ti
Die a (feet,
-+-year lP—)eea +Yea121—)eee-w-veer 3 (201a)l.15) 5(2D1618ea -F rear slmis).-II--
Greenbrier Year 5 (2016) Profile -Reach 10+00 to 22+50
161
100
8
E
97
9E
95
44
43
1000 1200 1400 1fi0J 1800 2000 2200
Distance Iteetl
t near 112012 real y Year 2 j2013)6ed -t near 3 j2o1 Sed-H-veara j2o ) Sed-M-Yearsl2o161 eed wear s1o161-1-1ur -
Page 14 of 29

Table Ila. Monitoring Data - Dnnensioral Morphology Smmnary (Dhlrmioral Parameters - Cross Sections)
Floodprnne Width(fl)
Table 116. Monitoring Data- St—Reach Data Srmmary
r:racnhr Vrack MXTCP i—Na —6711
No Wat—V 1 llanngheldM®eurements.
Page 15 of 29
now
1
— — --
- — --
— — --
—
—
—
--
--
---
—
—
--
--
--
—
—
—
--
--
--
—
—
—
--
--
--
--
--
--
—
—
—
--
--
--
---
—
—
--
--
-
—
—
No Wat—V 1 llanngheldM®eurements.
Page 15 of 29

Table l la. Mouta ring Dais - Dimensional Morp hology Summary [D mrenswnal Parameters -Cross Sections) (continued)
f:men A— Creek MMC Prnieei Nnm hery fi711
Table l lb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Stunmary (continued)
f: w.nh.i.r C w.k lD MC P.n i.�i Nn.n h.r fi'll l
I
I
OEM
Table l lb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Stunmary (continued)
f: w.nh.i.r C w.k lD MC P.n i.�i Nn.n h.r fi'll l
Page 16 of 29
OEM
Elm
Profile- U—dTrllbutary(� No Waterin 1
--
--
--
--
---
---
---
---
—
—
—
----
---
----
---
—
—
—
--
--
--
--------
------
------
------
--
--
--
--
—
—
—
—
----
----
----
----
Page 16 of 29

Table 11a. Monitorire Data - DimemiorW Morphology Sumrmry (Dinwi&onal Pamneters- Cross Sections) (continued)
GTrPnhriar f irPk fDh7 S Prniwt Nimbprfi7l 1
Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Sumnw7 iDimensiozral Parameters - Cross Secdom) (continued)
r, -b, - r-1, fnwz Pmi-t N,n„horfi771
Cross Sections - UT
Crass Section 6
-TOT
C'russ Sector lA Maur Charuel
Parameter
Cross Section 7 - MamTr9hwary
Parameter
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Riff1E
D memiau MYO
MY1
MY2
Dimemnn MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY5+
1'v Y0 A.IY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY5+
BFWidh ft
I6.5
17.3
16.9
17.5
16.8
14.7
15.6
137
114
15.5
30.8
31.6
31.5
31.2
31.4
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
100.0
100.0
i00.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
IOO.O
100,0
100.0
BFMean D th it
.7
0.7
0.7
0.70.70-91.
13
1.9
2,0
1.6
1.5
1.5
2.
2.
BFMax Depth ft
2.
2.4
BFMaxD th ft
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
i.2
1.5
1.5
1,4
1.4
1.6
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.7
BF Cross Sectional Area ft
11.9
12.6
11.5
12.2
11.1
12.7
12.2
11.6
11.4
12.2
71.8
69.7
69.7
70.2
74.5
WictWevth Ratio
229
23.8
24.8
25.1 _
5A
17.0
199
16,2
114
197
13,4-143114,2_1
23.9
ErrtrenchmaitRatio
13.9
13.2
ErdratcimreatRatio
6.1
5.8
5,9
5.7
6.0
6.8
6,4
7.3
8.8
6.5
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3,2
BankHei tRatio
1.0
].D
1.D
f.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.D
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.D
1.0
d50 mm
58,6 1
461
47.7
43.1
379
50.0
1 39.6
51.4 1
33,9
339
8.3
7.4
1 11.7 1
9.4 1
6.9
Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Sumnw7 iDimensiozral Parameters - Cross Secdom) (continued)
r, -b, - r-1, fnwz Pmi-t N,n„horfi771
Page 17 of 29
Cress Section 12 - Main Climulel
Ctuss Section 1 - %I aur Charuel
C'russ Sector lA Maur Charuel
Parameter
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
D memiau MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
TVIY` tdlY5+ IAY0
MY I
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY5+ MYO
MYI
IuiY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY5+-
BFWidlh ft
37.1
32.1
38.3
39.0
38.1
31.5
311
30.8
30,3
30,2
36.7
37.1
37A
37.0
36.4
Floodprone Width(ft)(approx)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
BFMean D tit ft
1.9
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
13
1.9
2,0
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
BFMax Depth ft
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.7
3.4
3,5
3.3
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
BF Cross Sectional Area A
71.8
57.6
76.2
76.2
77.8
56.0
61.9
51.6
56.1
59.8
57.3
57.5
56,6
56.8
55.5
WidthiDepth Ratio
19.2
17.9
19.3
20.0
18.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
HA
23.5
23.9
24.2
24.1
23.9
ErrtrenchmaitRatio
2.7
3.1
3.6
2.6
2.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
27
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
BankHd tRatio
LO
1.0
1.0
V_0
1.0
1 NA
I NA
I NA
HA
NA I
1.0
1 10
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 r=
0.2
0.2'
0 3
0.3
0.3
46-
14.6
1.7
1-4
d
Page 17 of 29

Verification of Bankfull Events
Greenbrier Stream Restoration Site (DMS Project Number 671)
Date of Data
Date of
Photo (if
Method
Collection
Occurrence
available)
Visual observations of overbank event including
wrack lines and sediment deposition resulting from a
9/21/2012
9/18/2012
1.78 inch* rainfall event on September 18, 2012 that
1
occurred after numerous rainfall events, within the 3
weeks prior, that totaled 2.34 inches*.
Visual observations of overbank event including
7/16/2013
7/4/2013
c'r'ack lines and sediment deposition resulting from
2
5.87 inches** of rainfall between 6/26/2013 and
7/4/2013.
Visual observations of wrack and sediment
7/17/2014
5/15/2014
deposition as well as crest gauge data indicate an
overbank event resulting from 3.46 inches** of
rainfall on 5/15/2014.
9/16/2014
8/9/2014
Crest gauge data indicates an overbank event
resulting from 2.34 inches** of rainfall on 8/9/2014.
Visual observations of wrack and sediment
9/16/2014
9/4/2014
deposition as well as crest gauge data indicate an
3-4
overbank event resulting from 2.15 inches** of
rainfall on 9/4/2014.
Visual observations of wrack on the floodplain as
4/2/2015
12/24/2014
well as crest gauge data indicates an overbank event
5
resulting from 2.24 inches** of rainfall between
12/22/2014 and 12/24/2014.
Crest gauge data indicates an overbank event
4/20/2016
10/3/2015
resulting from 2.71 inches*** of rainfall between
---
10/2/2015 and 10/3/2015.
Visual observations of wrack on the floodplain as
4/20/2016
12/23/2015
well as crest gauge data indicates an overbank event
6
resulting from 3.30 inches*** of rainfall between
12/22/2015 and 12/23/2015.
Visual observations of wrack on the floodplain as
7/28/2016
7/4/2016
well as crest gauge data indicates an overbank event
7
resulting from 2.02 inches*** of rainfall between
7/3/2016 and 7/4/2016.
Visual observations of laid back vegetation in the
9/22/2016
9/19/2016
floodplain as well as crest gauge data indicates an
8
overbank event resulting from 2.53 inches*** of
rainfall on 9/19/2016.
* Reported at the Mount Vernon Springs, Siler City, NC weather station (Weather Underground 2012)
**Reported at the KNCCHAPEI3, Chapel Hill, NC weather station (Weather Underground 2014, Weather Underground 2015)
* * * Reported at the KBUY, Burlington, NC weather station (Weather Underground 2016)
Page 18 of 29

Page 19 of 29

Bankfull Event Photo 7 showing
evidence of a 2016 overbank event
Bankfull Event Photo 8 showing
evidence of a 2016 overbank event
Page 20 of 29

Total and Planted Stems per Acre by Plot and Year
Page 21 of 29
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
Plot
452
567
486
526
526
648
486
809
445
445
Plot
445
648
445
931
405
688
405
607
405
607
Plot
688
971
769
1133
769
1133
607
688
567
648
Plot
324
324
364
364
364
364
405
405
405
486
Plot
243
324
243
364
243
324
202
364
202
324
Plot
283
324
283
405
324
486
364
567
364
648
Plotz
364
688
364
526
324
486
283
405
243
1416
Plot
526
607
526
729
526
607
526
526
486
607
Plot
364
971
364
1093
405
1335
405
1012
364
931
Plot 10
445
445
648
648
688
688
688
769
688
769
Plot 11
688
688
769
850
769
769
769
809
728
769
Plot 12
769
850
850
931
850
931
850
890
890
971
Page 21 of 29

Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Specie5TYpe
Annual Means
CAY5 f 2 L61 MY4 {2015) MY3 (2014) MY2 {2013) MY1 {2012)
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
PnvLS P -all T
PnOLS Pall 7
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnvlS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red rnaple
Tree
-7
17
23
17
17
1
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
BaechamhalimifoM
eastern bacchans
Shrub
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
Carpinuscarol iniana
American hornbeam
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
.3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
carya
hickofy
Tree
21
2
3
3
3
3
31
3'
31
31
3
Cetus laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
CeIV5 occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2.
3
3
3
Carnus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
11
2
2
2
DIGspyras virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
4
4
{
5
4
4
4
4
7
7
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
G8
72
72
7
76
76
66
74
74
65
65
68Juglans
nigra
blade walnut
Tree
42
2
32
3
30
Liquidambar s yraeiflua
sweetgum
Tree
15
6
15
9
Lirladendron tuiipifera
tuIiptree
Tree
fi
6
6
b
6
6
6
5
5
5
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
?
1
?
Platanusaccidentalrs
American sycamore
Tree
10
10
10'
101
10
10
10
1t}
10
9
91
9
a
81
8
P°runus serotina
black cherry
Tree
4
4
b
4
4
5
6
6
a
3
a
B
8
8
8
Pyru5ealleryana
Call" pear
Exotic
2
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Robfnia p5eudoacacia
hIack Iocust
Tree
4
4
131
3
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
2
2
Z
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ulmus arneriicana
American elm
Tree
17
17
15
i5
15
14
14
14
13
13
13
12
12
12
Viburnum dentatum
Isouthern arrawwood
15hrub
6
6
7
71
7
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
Stem caun
size (ares
size (ACLS
Species court
StemsperA�CFtE
943
143 2iS
148
14A 193
1531
153 209
151
157 2
738
1.191783
12 12 12 12 12
0,30 030 4.3.0 0-.30 0-80
15 15 21 16 16 2 17 17 21 17 17 2 16 16 21
482.3 482.3 725.1 499.1 439.1 650.9 515r 5I6 704.9 509.2 509.2 704, 485.4 465.4 617.1
Page 22 of 29

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
DMS recommends that the Greenbrier Site be closed out as proposed to generate 2974
Stream Mitigation Units and 1.38 Riparian Riverine Wetland Mitigation Units.
The vegetation survey results indicated an average site density of 482 planted stems per acre
(excluding livestakes) surviving in year five (2016). In addition, each individual plot met success
criteria based on planted stems with the exception of plots 5 and 7, which were 2 stems and 1 stem
shy of success with 202 planted stems per acre and 242 planted stems per acre, respectively.
However, when including naturally recruited stems of black walnut (Juglans nigra) and black
locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) both plots 5 and 7 met success criteria.
No stream problem areas were observed during Year 5 (2016) monitoring. In addition, 10 bankfull
events were documented throughout the course of the monitoring period with at least one event
occurring in each monitoring year.
Contingencies
None.
Page 23 of 29

Greenbrier Creek
Preconstruction Photographs
Page 24 of 29

Page 25 of 29

Greenbrier Creek
Post Construction Photographs
Taken July 2016
Page 26 of 29

Appendix A: Property Ownership Information & Verification of Protection Mechanism
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/Mitigation Services/Document Management Library/Property/Property
Portfolio/671 GreenbriarCreek PD 2007.pdf
Total project conservation acres 50.48
Project Name
County
Grantor Name
Deed Info
Property Rights
Greenbrier Creek
Alamance
Jerrold L. Murchison
DB 2497, P 423
Conservation Easement
Greenbrier Creek
Alamance
Charles R. Cheek, et al
DB 2583, P 803
Conservation Easement
Greenbrier Creek
Alamance
Larry E. Matthews and wife, Dian F. Matthews
DB 1309, P 775
Conservation Easement
Greenbrier Creek
Chatham
Jerrold L. Murchison
DB 2497, P 423
lConservation Easement
Greenbrier Creek
Chatham
Charles R. Cheek, et al
DB 2583, P 803
Conservation Easement
Greenbrier Creek
IChathamFLarry
E. Matthews and wife, Dian F. Matthews
DB 1309, P 775
lConservation Easement
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

Appendix B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2009-02312 County: Alamance/Chatham USGS Quad:
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Attn: Ed Hainos
Address: 1625 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Telephone No.: 919-715-1953
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): 103 acres (approximately); The site is
located approximately 0.6 miles southwest of the Pleasant Hill Church Road (SR 2371), Anders Church Road (SR
1353) intersection in Chatham and Alamance Counties, North Carolina and is identified as the NCEEP Greenbriar
Creels Stream Restoration Project.
Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for discharge of clean till material associated with the
enhancement of 4,948 linear feet of jurisdictional stream to include 1) 2,625 linear feet of Greenbriar Creek; 2)
1,938 linear feet of the stream identified as UT (Tributary A and Tributary il); 3) 185 linear feet of the stream
identified as Is` UT; and 4) 200 linear feet of the stream identified as 2°`' UT. The project must be conducted in
accordance with the application submitted on December 18, 2009 and drawings and restoration plan submitted on
January 7, 2010, including revisions submitted on February 2, 2010.
"This verification is for the authorization of the proposed work in iurisdictional waters of the United States; it
does not confirm or deny the credit of the successful work for the purpose of future mitigation credits.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
n Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide pertnit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terns and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Andrew Williams at telephone number 919-554-4884 extension 26.
Corps Regulatory Official �r�=.a��= �- Date: February 9, 2010
Expiration Date of Verification: February 9, 2012
Page 1 of 3

Appendix B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://i-e�-),ulatory.usacesury com/ to complete the survey
online.
Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The streams are relatively permanent waters (RPWs) and an unnamed tributaries to
Greenbriar Creek, an RPW. Greenbriar Creek is a tributary of North Pron2, an RPW North Prong is a tributary to Rocky
Creek, an RPW, which is a tributary to the Deep River, a traditionally navigable water (TNW) The Deep River is a tributary
to the Cape Fear River, a navigable water of the United States The Ordinary High Water Marks (OHWMs) of the unnamed
tributaries and Greenbriar Creek were indicated by the following physical characteristics: clear natural line impressed on the
bank, shelving, and the destruction of terrestrial vegetation.
This im•isdictional determination is only for the waters proposed for impacts associated with this Nationwide Permit and does
not include anv other waters/wetlands that may be located on the properties
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Andrew Williams, Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by _April 9, 2010.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date February 9, 2010
Page 2 of 3
Expiration Date February 9, 2015

Appendix B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required Mitigation
Action ID
#
NWP / GP
#
Open Water (ac)
Wetland (ac)
Unim octant Stream (It)
Important Stream (10
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
SAW -2009-
02312
NWP
4,948
Impact Totals
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) 0
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (If) 0*
Required Wetland. Mitigation (ac)
Required Stream Mitigation (10
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions:
REMARKS: x4,948 linear feet of streams are being enhanced and will not result in a loss of waters of the U.S.
This verification is for the authorization of the proposed work in jurisdictional waters of the United States; it does
not confirm or deny the credit of the successful work for the purpose of future mitigation credits.
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Sue Homewood
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Ian McMillian
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Todd Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
11405 Falls of Neuse Road
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Page 3 of 3

Appendix B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
Action ID Number:SAW-2009-02312 County: Alamance/Chatham
Permittee: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Attn: Ed Hainos
Date Verification Issued: February 9, 2010
Project Manager: Andrew Williams
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
3331 HERITAGE TRADE DRIVE, SUITE 105
WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA 27587
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

Appendix B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
Applicant: North Carolina Ecosystem File Number: SAW -2009-02312 Date: February 9, 2010
Enhancement Program, Attn: Ed Hajnos
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Pen -nit or Letter of A
permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of pennission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section $ below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pennit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the pennit
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

Appendix B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliininary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUESTFOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional infonnation to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact:
may also contact:
Andrew Williams, Regulatory Project Manager
Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Andrew Williams, Project Manager, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801

Appendix C: Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project
Greenbrier Creek
DMS ID
671
River Basin
CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit
03030003
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 03/21/2017
o
0
o
d
o
_
oa
c
°
o
C
°o
c
mo
6
.
E
E
m
m
>
ci
ani
p
V
C
d
L
W
d
LjC
W
d
A
W
1
CN
W
L
N
A
N
L
m
3
7
d
A
E
°
_
a
-'
m
a
`
N
10
E
y
C
A
a
_
N
`c
o
Z
C
o
Z
Q
C
O
fl-
O
«
N
,�
O
N
O
O
U
«
N
N
m
1°
E
m
E
E
Z
Z
U
V
U
C
N
N
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
4,463.00
2,982.001
1
1
I 6.931
1
1
1
1
253,860.00
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
2,975.33
596.401
1
11.3861253,860.00
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit Nol
USACE Action IN Impact Project Name
2006-0331
2004-00340
3,733.10
2,982.00
6.33
Statewide ILF Credit Purchase
0.60
Riparian Buffer ILF Credit Purchase
253,860.00
Remaining Balance (feet / acres / square feet)
729.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
1
1 486.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 03/21/2017

Appendix C: Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project Greenbrier Creek (Wetland Purchase)
DMS ID 671
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030003
Comment: This ledger shows the debits for the amount of mitigation that the Statewide ILF Program purchased from the NCDOT ILF Program.
The beginning balance represents the amount purchased and not the total mitigation credits available on the site.
1.1 1.51 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 03/21/2017
w
o
c
o
o
m
o
°
o
aci
E
0
4c
>
m
E
E
-
%m
-
c
o
E
v
3
m
d
v
c
d
O
U
O
d
C
d
d
U
t
d
V
C
w
c
a
"
w
z
Ew
a
E
'�
w`
c
m
a
m
m
m
`m
N
R
O
Z
Z
C
0
m
C
O
U
w
p
o
Z
Z
U
U
U
Beginning Balance (feet / acres)
0.60
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
0.12
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permits USACE Action IN Impact Project Name
2003-1554 2009-02319 Riverdale Landfill
0.60
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 03/21/2017

Miti ation Project Name Greenbrier Creek (Buffer Purchase)
Appendix OivDebit Ledger 671
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030003
Comment: This ledger shows the debits for the amount of mitigation that the Riparian Buffer ILF Program purchased from the NCDOT ILF Program.
The beginning balance represents the amount purchased and not the total mitigation credits available on the site
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 3:1 19.163 297.541
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 03/21/2017
c
�
c
o
m
E
v
w_
`o
c
m`o
z
c
�
N
0
t
W
O _A
O
m
o
t
w
>
>
m m
p
a
E
m
zo
Z
z
E
N
.
Vl
�
�
m
Beginning Balance (square feet)
253,860.00
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
253,860.00
DMS Debits (credits):
DWR Permits Impact Project Name
2006-0138 Hornaday Road Improvements
34,933.48
2008-0499 Project Hermes
175,833.00
NCDOT TIP B-4128 - Bridge 73 over
2007-1009 Bull Run Creek
24,977.00
NCDOT TIP R-0609 / R-2606 - High
2006-0331 Point East Beltway/1-73/74
18,116.52
Remaining Balance (square feet)
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 03/21/2017

NC DMS Closeout Report
Project Type: Buffer
2017
Project Name
Greenbrier Creek
DMS Project ID
671
Full Delivery Contract #
DBB
Institution/Contract Date
5/17/2006
Basin
Cape Fear
8 -digit CU
03030003
County
Alamance & Chatham
Applicable Buffer Rule (s)
15A NCAC 026.0250
Non -Diffuse Flow Area Removed:
Memo or W.S. calculation
NA
Date Planted
2/8/2011
Date of Supplemental Plant
2/14/2012
Construction Warranty Planting
Protection mechanism
Active link to PDF portfolio
Easement Acreage
50.48
Stewards
NC SPO
Encroachments & Resolution
Y — Minor encroachment by cattle access,
notice of violation sent,
Accepted for transfer to
stewardship
Y

Asset Table
Project
Applicable
Credit
Buffer Width
Buffer
Resulting
Notes
Component
Rule
Eligible
Adjustment
Mitigation
Mitigation
• 5 plots/transects
standard
buffer
Credits
Credit Ratio
Units
P
6.93
5:01
(sq. ft.)
All buffer 50
E=2
(BMUs)
P(NS,U)=3
P(S,U)=3
P(NS,R)=5
P(S,R)=10
Tributary -
15A NCAC
56,656.827
NA
1
56,656.827
Upstream of
026.0250
crossing
Buffer R
Tributary -
15A NCAC
72,976.046
NA
1
72,976.046
Downstream
026.0250
of crossing
Buffer R
Mainstem —
15A NCAC
40,240.407
NA
1
40,240.407
Upstream of
0213.0250
Bridge
Buffer R
Mainstem —
15A NCAC
83,987.470
NA
1
83,987.470
Downstream
0213.0250
of Bridge
Buffer R
Totals
253,860.751
253,860.751
Success Criterion
Existing
Restoration
Success Criteria per
Success Criteria Met
Project
(Acres)
Restoration Level
(Acres)
Mitigation
Mitigation
Component
• 5 plots/transects
standard
Ratio
Credits
Wetland
6.93
P
6.93
5:01
1.38
Success Criterion
Project Component
Success Criteria per
Success Criteria Met
Approved Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer
320 stems per acre
Yes — 9 out of 11 plots met
• 5 plots/transects
standard

GREENBRIER CREED Asset Map
rlrte
main
preservation
trill
Butter Restoration
Top_ot Bank
CVS Plot
Wetlanrts delineate€t AsBuil
channel
easernent
World Imaoery
I
14

Vegetation Data:
*Plots located in buffer restoration areas.
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
Plot 1*
452
567
486
526
526
648
486
809
445
445
Plot
445
648
445
931
405
688
405
607
405
607
Plot 3*
688
971
769
1133
769
1133
607
688
567
648
Plot 4*
324
324
364
364
364
364
405
405
405
486
Plot 5*
243
324
243
364
243
324
202
364
202
324
Plot 6*
283
324
283
405
324
486
364
567
364
648
Plot 7*
364
688
364
526
324
486
283
405
243
1416
Plot 8*
526
607
526
729
526
607
526
526
486
607
Plot 9*
364
971
364
1093
405
1335
405
1012
364
931
Plot 10*
445
445
648
648
688
688
688
769
688
769
Plot 11*
688
688
769
850
769
769
769
809
728
769
Plot 12*
769
850
850
931
850
931
850
890
890
971
Species
Count
16
21
17
24
17
21
16
21
15
21
*Plots located in buffer restoration areas.