Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150053 Ver 1_Email_20061017Re R-2409C Subject: Re R-2409C From: Joel Setzer <jsetzer@dot state nc us> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13 43 46 -0400 To: Brian Wrenn <bnan wrenn@ncmail net> CC: david.k baker@usace army mil, markdavis@dot state nc us, Michael Turchy <maturchy@dot state nc us>, John Hennessy <John Hennessy@ncmail net>, "Jamie Wilson, PE" <jwilson@dot state nc us>, Greg Thorpe <gthorpe@dot state nc us> Thank you for this thought I do not mind having a meeting to discuss the matter The meeting could be a conference call or occur in Sylva This is the information I will be presenting at the meeting to express why the project should not go through the Merger Process Division 14 has a handful of projects in the Merger Process These projects are terribly behind schedule. Each meeting appears to become a posturing for agencies to achieve the outcome they want It has taken up to three years to achieve concurrence point number one. The average time on a statewide basis to complete the Merger Process is eight years. This project is an old commitment by NCDOT to Transylvania County It has been delayed numerous times It is now designated as a high priority in the Federal Transportation Act and is funded with High Priority Funds I do not believe this project can stay on schedule (construction in FY 2009) and go through Merger I support the concepts of Merger, it just has never delivered a project for this Division on schedule I fact, Division 14 has never gotten a project through Merger. Although I cannot recommend the project for Merger, I fully intend and expect we will work with all agencies to avoid and minimize. After your meeting, we have determined Alternative 2 (the one that went through the Small Whorled Pogoma) is not worth further consideration We have asked the consultant to look at two new alternatives that are variations of Alternative 3. We also noted that Alternative 1 as shown at the meeting does not account for extra widening in the curves It will have greater impacts and these need to be considered I believe we can accomplish a high quality project for all and not go through the cumbersome process Merger has shown to be in Division 14. If after considering this information you would like to have the meeting to discuss Merger for this project, please contact me and let me know if we need to have a meeting or if a conference call will work 1 of 2 10/19/2006 2 58 PM Re R-2409C Brian Wrenn wrote Joel, Based on a field meeting last week for the R-2409C project, I think this project should go through the Merger Process This is a federally funded project involving threatened and endangered species, State Park lands, and proposed alternatives with a wide range of impacts I think a scopmg meeting should be arranged to make a determination on whether the Merger process is appropriate for this project If you would like to discuss this further, please contact me at 919-733-5715 Thanks Brian Brian L Wrenn Environmental Specialist III Transportation Permitting Unit Division of Water Quality 2321 Crabtree Blvd , Ste 250 Raleigh, NC 27604 919-733-5715 -phone 919-733-5893 - fax 2 of 2 10/19/2006 2 58 PM