The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170413 Ver 1_B-4943 Nationwide Durham April 6, 2017_20170406STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR Apri16, 2017 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 ATT'N: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer NCDOT Regulatory Coordinator JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13, 23, and 33, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 20 over Dial Creek (Lake Michie) on SR1616 (Bahama Road) in Durham County, North Carolina; TIP No. B-4943; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1616(10). Debit $270 from WBS 40110.1.1 Dear Sir: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 27-foot, single-span bridge No. 20 with an 89-foot, single-span bridge on a new alignment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction of the replacement structure. The replacement of Bridge No. 20 will result in 0.15 acre of fill in surface water, due predominately to the shift in the causeway. An additiona10.01 acre of fill and mechanized clearing in a wetland will be impacted due to the causeway realignment. There will be 57 linear feet of bank stabilization to the jurisdictional stream portion of Dial Creek for the bridge replacement. Impacts to Neuse River Riparian buffers will result in disturbance of 10,101 square feet in zone 1 and 4,836 square feet in zone 2. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings, stormwater management plan and design plans far the above referenced project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in Apri12016, and distributed shortly after. Additional copies are available at the NCDOT website: http://207.4.62.65/PDEA/EnvironmentalDocs/ This project calls for a letting date of July 18, 2017 and a review date of May 30, 2017. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: We anticipate that the bridge replacement, including all approach work will be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13, 23, and 33 in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification numbers 4087, 4093, and 4094 will apply to this project. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of MailingAddress: Telephone: (919) 707-6000 Location: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: (919) 212-5785 I O2O BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION CuStOrit¢Y SeYViCe: 1-H%%-36H-496H RALEIGH NC Z.%61O IS9g MAIL SERVICE CENTER Website.• www.ncdot.gov RALEIGH NC 2%699-1S9g Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources. NCDOT also requests the issuance of a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for this project. A copy of this pernut application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx, under QuickLinks > Permit Applications. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Jason Dilday at (919) 707-6111 or jldilday@ncdot.gov. Sincerely, � �o� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. Natural Environment Section Head cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List ��Y ,� � T�� Office Use Only: i � � F Corps action ID no. � DWQ project no. i�i�i � � � '` Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2Q08 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 23 33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 20 on SR 1616 (Bahama Rd.) over Dial Creek (Lake Michie) 2b. County: Durham 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bahama 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g�g43 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6111 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jldilday@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.1726 Longitude: -78.8584 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 3.0 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Dial Creek (Lake Michie) proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III; NSW, CA 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Land use is primarily residential development, forested land and lake front recreation areas. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.3 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 250 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing the existing single span, 27-foot bridge with a single span, 89-foot bridge on a slightly shifted alignment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction of the new structure. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary � Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT Name (if known): James Pflaum Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Action ID 2009-01510 issued August 13, 2009, expired August 13, 2014 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers � Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T Site 1� P❑ T Fill in Wetland Riparian ❑ Yes � Corps <0.01 � No ❑ DWQ Mechanized ❑ Yes � Corps Site 1� P❑ T Clearing Riparian � No � pWQ 0.01 Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.01 Permanent 0 Temporary 2h. Comments: See Wetland Permit Impact Summary sheet for details. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1� P❑ T Bank Dial Creek � PER � Corps 30 57 Stabilization ❑ INT � DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 57 If 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Permanent (<0.01 ac) 3i. Comments: The channelized portion of the lake where the existing causeway and bridge are located was determined to be the jurisdictional portion of Dial Creek, all other areas were deemed an open water feature. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Tem ora T 01 � P❑ T Dial Creek Fill in SurFace Water Lake <0.01 01 ❑ P� T Dial Creek Fill in SurFace Water Lake <0.01 01 � P❑ T Dial Creek Roadway embankment Lake 0.15 01 ❑ P� T Dial Creek Roadway embankment Lake 0.02 4f. Total open water impacts 0.15 ac. Permanent 0.02 ac. Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surFace area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. � Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? 61 � P❑ T Roadway embankment Dial Creek � Nos 7,321 4,465 61 � P❑ T Bridge Dial Creek � Nos 2,680 371 B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 10,101 4,836 6i. Comments: Impacts to wetlands in buffers total 612 sq ft. in zone 1 and 94 sq ft in zone 2. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. NCDOT Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be employed. See Stormwater Management Plans for additional measures. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The proposed bridge is 62 feet longer than the existing bridge; the replacement bridge will be a single span, so no bents in the water; the new bridge will have no deck drains or direct discharge to Dial Creek. Fill slopes of 1.5:1 will be utilized in most of the jurisdictional areas. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Compensatory mitigation is not proposed due to minimal 'urisdictional im acts. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: See attached permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Durham County, which includes smooth coneflower and Michaux's sumac. The species received a Biological Conclusions of "No Effect", however habitat was present. Surveys for the species were conducted on 5/27/15 resulted in no specimens being found. No nesting habitat for bald eagle is present in the vicinity of the project. A programmatic biological opinion (PBO) has been issued for the northern long-eared bat for North Carolina. The PBO covers projects in Divisions 1-8. The programmatic determination for NLEB for this project is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Digitally signed by Colin Mellor C o I i n M e I I o r DN: cn=Colin Mellor, o=NCDOT, ou=NES, email=cmellor@ncdot.gov, c=US Date:2017.04.0612:00:34-04�00� 04-06-2017 Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. s�o'� ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 1� Hi�;hWay North Carolina Department of Transportation � Stormw�ter M ,,,,,.,,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program �_� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.05; Released April 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 40110.1.1 TIP No.: B-4943 County(ies): Durham Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 40110.1.1 TIP Number: B-4943 Project Type: Brid e Replacement Date: 5/11/2016 NCDOT Contact: William Elam Contractor / Designer: Brandon Barham, PE - Ecological Engineerin Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Raleigh, NC 27610 Suite 101 Car , NC 27518 Phone: 919-707-6718 Phone: 919-557-0929 Email: belam@ncdot. ov Email: bbarham@ecolo icalen .com Cit /Town: Durham Count (ies : Durham River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet): 0.164 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Residential development, forested land and lake front recreational areas Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.7 ac. 0.5 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2- 11 ft lanes, with variable shoulders (minimum of 4 ft and 9 ft shoulders at guardrail 2- 12' ft lanes with 1' shoulders sections) Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 3585 Year: 2037 Existin : 2738 Year: 2017 General Project Narrative: State Project 8-4943 involves the replacement of existing NCDOT Bridge #310020 on SR 1616 over Dial Creek. Bridge #310020 consists of 1@25.7' timber floor on I-beams (Description of Minimization of Water with RC vertical abutments. The proposed bridge at #310020 will be 1@85' 33" box beam with 4'-0" caps and sloping abutments. The roadway will be realigned for the Quality Impacts) placement of the proposed bridge. The proposed bridge will provide more hydraulic opening that the existing bridge. One stormwater outfall is proposed with Rip Rap pad to dissipate energy. No deck drains are required for this bridge. Minimization and avoidance measures incorporated into the design include elimination of direct discharge, increased buffer treatment of discharges, retention of existing bridge abutments to minimize stream impacts and retain stability. Utilized open shoulder design for vegetative shoulder section to obtain water treatment. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Dial Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-3-6-(2) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply III (WS-III) Su iemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Other Stream Ciassification: CA Impairments: NA A uatic T&E S ecies? NA Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse Project Includes Bridge S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) �� d�� '�.� �� .,�'�� D URHAM CD U1�lTY LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 20 OVER DIAL CREEK 0111 SR 1616 (BAHAMA RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVI11lG, A11tD STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT � � � See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 9B For Conventlonal Symbols PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 10 NAPE�� RD � DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepared an tae o�,�es of� �nnauLres E�vcINEEx 2017 ADT = 2738 VPD LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.164 mi. ��f� � T � ��'>��' '°�� 50 25 0 50 100 2037 ADT = 3585 VPD E<�� ECOLOGICAL �� B°��p� K= 10% LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.016 mi. ��s3e�'";� �•��=��3 ENGINEERING �� `�� a PLANS p= 850�o TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.180 mi. zot2 sra.vo,axo srEcrFrcnrroNs yt :� � 50 25 0 50 100 T= b% 'k ANDY YOUNG. PE SlGNATURE: � � RlGHT OF WAY DATE: � � rao�Ecr exciNSEa ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER �, � V= 40 MPH DECEMBER 9. 2016 '� � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) �k (TTST 1% + DUAL 5%) MICHAEL BURNS, EI ��'.e��. ��:�� RURAL MINOR LETTING DATE: �Ro�scz nss,cx sxciNSEn �� p��s� 10 5 0 l0 2� FUNC. CLASS.= COLLECTOR GARY R. LOVERING, PE JULY 18, 2017 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER NcooT coxracr PE SIGNATURE: �- e, z 0 S 49' 29' 293' E —L—POC Sta.10+00.00 S 42' S2' 24.9" E ROCK PLATING—� FROM STA 70+50 TO STA 13 I- 00 RT � �o DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 TOE PROTECTION BANK STABILIZATION ( Not fo Scale� ( Nol io Scole) Q� 3 0'min. NniURN�L �"`'�� SLOPE 20' f� Nws cao d 4 GEOTFMILE d-2 ry, GEOTFXfILE Type o4 Lincr= CIASS B Rip-Rap c o(t�i�c.� C1A55 IIRIPRAP FROM STA. 15+16 TO STA.15+50 -L- RT STA 14+15 TO 14-50 L STA 14;-60 TO 14-90 L h � S I T E I gANK STABALIZATION GLASS II RIP RAP EST 700 TONS E5T 750 SY GEOTEXTILE SEE DETAIL 2 � �/ l� REMOVE BRIDGE AND RETAIN � \�� . E%ISTING CONC. ABUTMENTS AND CONC WING WALLS UP \ , TO ELEVATION 345.5' TO 346.0'. V LAY SLOPES BACK TO EXISTING �� ROAD AT 1.5:1. f SI T E I CLA55 B RIP RAP � LaKE MICHIE EST 3 TON EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE TOE PROTECTION SEE DETAIL 1 CLA55 B RIP RAP EST 20 TON EST 55 SV GEOTEXTILE �ROCK PLATING FROM STA 15+09 TO STA 18100 LT ROCK EMBANKMENT TO ELEVATION 341.3' +/- SEE DETAIL SHEET 2G-2 SITE I � ROCK PL4TING —' FROM STA 16+50 TO STA 18+00 RT O PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 10 F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND � * � * DENOTES MECHANIZED � � �� CLEARING PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4943 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER � -: L �� ; "'I I P'�ECOLOGICAL til-:I ��FNGINFERING DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER (POND) �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �o �N N � � �, z z —L—POT Sta.19t50A0 N 85 48' 43J" E ti 0� e� R P R � Y� � I C= G�U 350 � d��,��- 20' ------__� p r %-, O O _ N m o go- ro `a -- C � Z 2 i l��j! ��+�j LL7]�7 r F 'ATrI E sa rn�eR �� as.z9 LT.& RT. �B 35.64' S\ 6� \�\. \ � \� : O I w N � i '.P�� 1 i � O 5�� GRAPHIC SCALE x� —x— /� / / `te� �� $� .>�pD (SR 16161 / :: �'D F�PBN=� �� /�� GRN�EL / N � \ � OS -�aAVE� & n � cRass \ �.� FOR -L- PROFILE,SEE SHEET 5 FOR STRIICfURE PUWS,SE£ SHEETS S-ITHRU S-? N Z � � �� J'---.. "'- J z_ S 49' 29' 293' E IP PROJECT B-4943,� �o Q� G��;� Q I I I I�II I��/� �� / i'i''I!I / 1jji li , � / � . / � Q��/ �r s� r �'j � a � � ,Q �./ .� 5� � 9TF� � �� _ � o�� / � � �� \ � / � `` i/ � � r � a2 , ��, —L—POC Sta.10+00.00 � F c � � �� ,_ , � �. � �` --�:��a„� �-_ � \�_.. \\�s �� \ \ � S 4Z 52' 24.9" E � \ \ ROCK PLATING—� FROM STA 70+50 \ �. TO STA 13 I- 00 RT � \ \, ``�� ... _ O �� \ \�, � \� � '� \`\ \ �. \ \\ l \ � \ \\ -....v��....._\ \\\� l _\ . ��REMOVE BRIDGE AND-'R€TAIN J . � E%ISTING CONC. ABUTMEIJTS � AND CONC. WING WALLS UP , TO ELEVATION 345.5' TO 346.0'. `LAY SLOPES BACK TO EXIS7ING ROAD AT 1.5:1. � SITE I � � `� LAKE MICHIE �, DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 TOE PROTECTION BANK STABILIZATION ( Not fo Scale� ( Nol io Scole) Q� 3 0'min. niURN�L �"`'�� SLOPE 20' f� NWS r �ao d SZ � GEOTFMILE d 2 ry GEOTFXfILE Type o{ �ine�= CLASS B Rip-Rap e of liner= CUSS II RIPRAP FROM $TA.15+16 TO STA.75+50 -L- RT STA 14+15 TO 14-50 L STA 14;-60 TO 14+90 L SITE ��/ \ CL455 B RIP�VRA� EST 3 TON EST 10 5Y GEOTEXTILE h BANK STABALIZATION CLA55 II RIP RAP EST 700 TONS E5T 750 SY GEOTEXTtLE SEE DETAIL 2 � �ROCK PLATING .. � FROM STA 15+09 TO STA 18 i 00 LT � l ROCK EMBANKMENT � \ TO ELEVATION 34).3' +/- \ $EE DETAIL $HEET 2G-2 SITE I �� \, � ,��, ��r� mti eti,� ��\\-�_`\ C �1� �.�—_'_'— , _ '�."�' TOE PROTECTION J SEE DETAIL 1 � CLA55 B RIP RAP EST 20 TON EST 55 SY GEOTEXTILE �,__ \ S\ ` ROCK PL4TING FROM STA 16+50 -� TO STA 18+00 RT � �� , �-.. . V ,_- r�; -,� � � �, � �� \ � � ��"'�� ) PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 10 F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND � * � * DENOTES MECHANIZED � � �� CLEARING �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER (POND) PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4943 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER "'I I P'�ECOLOGICAL S � LV� N I ��FNGINFFRING DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER II N � � �� ) � � � � � � II i � +I C`� !�'-, NI I I , / i�� i / / � � �,1�' I I —L—POT Sta.19t5pAp N 8E 48' 43J" E GRAU 350 \�" —�'�` . N:% --- F 0 '� s ��'_N� 'ATrI N I sa i ru-c� i LT.& RT. R� . I ��' I� � I�� \ 1 \ . �� \ ISBG',�D ,�� , ,�,��m , �- �,,. \\� �, � �� 4 „� � .\\\�� \\`l\ � � \\� �� , I H(:'d l f`yd..L'�N iOLLY, �� i � .hl3iIII�% r �� ,�� I � ��lil� � �� FOR -L- PROFILE,SEE SHEET 5 FOR STRIICfURE PUWS,SE£ SHEETS S-ITHRU S-? 6 c ....��....�....�....�....�....�....��....'....'�... . . . . . . .. .. ..�... .. . . . ...�.�, ..�... . . . . . . .�... .�. .. . . . . . ��. . . �. .. �, . . � . . . . �. . . . . ... _. . . ' � � �LPERMIT DRAWING � � �� I'- HEET. 4, O�F 10 , I_ .. . � �....I ...- . . . . . . . . . . I _ l . . .� . . . . . .... . . _- _II_L -'__- I '_'--_ �_-- . �._� .-. . I . . . ..... .. . ...... . � � ... . ...�. � .. ... .... . . .... .. .. .. . .. . .�: I�i ,. I I' II' . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . I li . . �I. . . . . . i �I . . . . . . . . .... ... .... .... .... ......... .... .... ......:. .. .. .. ... .. .i.11l ... .... �.... ...�. ......�... .... .... I II III ..IIII I I IIII III II .IIII II III .IIII I I IIII III II.. IIII II III ..IIII I I IIII III II IIII II III .IIII I I IIII III I ..�. ...�..I . I.. . i, i.. I I I L I..I. I I I ....!.I I ! I I.J...._LJ_I � J._..I 375 365 � 355 Z _ 0 � 345 335 325 � �� s T J, n. � w 3 � 2 � BEGIN GRADE _� _ �� ,��, , �� : � � �� -.-.- -. . . i . . . . I I i i . i1 I.-i-. �. � �. �. �. �. �. i: I �i i I I i i _. .. .. .. ��iJ I ...... _ �, �_ _� _ �;- � _ . . . . . . . . BM �51 . . . . . . . . _ _ . . . - -- --- -- — i� i .:.�. �. � �. N 882049 E 2D41501. . �Lil _II-_: . . . . . . ili_ _-_.. . _.__. I. I.- . 1 � . -.. . -L- STA: 10+85:00. 25' RT � ��. i i �. �. i � _ . . . . . . -... � '' .. . ELEV. 356JS �. _ ,_._ . _ _._.__ " . . . . . .... ,_ . __..._ _.._. ' . . . . R/R SPIKE IN 16" WHITE OAK . � . . . - . . _ . . . . . . �. �. �. �. . �. �. �. �. . �. �. �. �. �. .-.-_ .- .-.- _ _ . . . -_- _ ii _:. .. .. ... .. .. i .. . .-. ..... ... . . . .� __ . .. .. TBM-2.�. �. _ __-. . . _ . i . i , � -' �� i -� - N 881837 E 2042646 . ._... t Pl - 12+05A0 Pl - 13+50.00 �, -�- srn. io+oo.00 . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. .S 76'23'10.04" E Dlst 1221.91' '- EL = 35678' EL = 353.66' aM so '; E�Ev. se9.s9� !- P� _ ��-1-55.� . . . �. � VC = �� - I �. �. � � �. � :�C = �� . � � . �. �. N 881877 E 2041663 �. � o i �. �. P� _ %%%.30.� . �. . � 600 NAIL W TELEPHONE POLE -� _" EL - 358.98' K= 277 � i K= 63 �- SE�Ev�3soo ss�RT o EL = 35/50' VC = ll0' V= 35 MPH - _ I�' VC = 370' K- 29 - �� D � R/R SPIKE IN 18 GUM TREE � n o K=50 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4943 5 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ' IP'�ECOLOGICAL �� STEV�,,ti?� ,e,� o� �NNc�Nr:ERi[vc � DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED � i . �. �. . . . �. . �. . :-. -�. . �. :-I . . I__ __�� __. : END GRADE _ c-r n io�.Gn nn � Vo = 35 MPH J � I c� sra ra�e�.00 �- n � rl' Vo = 35 MPH � _ - -- . �. - . I�85'33"BOX BEAM�. �. �.. .. �. . . �. _ --_ �. /�i . . . . . . . � _ __ _ _ ____ i �. . �. . �. . �� W/4'-0' CAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . / i i . ,.. ,.. .,,. i .. .. . .. ... .. . . .. . ... _� . . ... ... . . . ��i i i . . // - ii i GP 353.00' ._�._. .-._ ... _ � .: �� i �., i BEGIN BRIDGE sKew 90° END BRIDGE ,- , �' f-JL46 , . , -L- STA/4t24.48 I _ _ 4 _ _ (+)2.300�% f-J1.96 ; SAG STA 15+73.66 -L- ---- �� (-J2✓SOpy _ EL = 352.47' � �� I � � � � � � �� -- � I �� - , gl/ - � � � � � _ 7�oei' (-1057 � � �' +�7 S _ �'� �'� ' � � � � � � � � � � � � � '� '� '� ____ ; --'-r ��700% ( ____ � � � �� , �� _�_� � �� ,� ,� -I I I i i�-I-I II i�_,- � �i�-i i �-� � �� ,� --- - _- - 1 ^ � � � � . i � I�� I�� I�� T i li �, . .�� ...-� . ... ', ..,.i ii i ii ii _L .. . �. . . . . . . . . . V / �. . �. �. . �. �. �. � i � i i i i �i II II III I I I II III II �li I ... .. ... . I I I!I I il I II il I .. .. . . . . .... ...� ��'� � � � .� � ' „ '� ' ' � „ BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE _ 1400 CFS DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YR DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 3467 fT BASE DISCHARGE = 2000 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YR BASE HW ELEVATION = 348b7 FT OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 4349 CFS OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+ YR OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 3529/ fT DATE OF SURVEY = 6/2/20/5 WS. ELEVATION = 339.3 FT AT DATE OF SURVEY _ _ _ i �� — �-r FOR -L- PLAN VIEW,SEE SHEET 4 '-� FOR STRUCTURE PLANS,SEE S-ITHRU S-? ,� ; � � 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 I+I �- 375 365 355 345 335 325 6' � N Z � � K C'I in� n r�� ini n T�I� nrn►�� DRAWING rSOF�o PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4943 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER "'I I P'�ECOLOGICAL _ V� �til-: I ��FNGINFERING DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED 15' 0' 30' GRAPHIC SCALE F F � � � � � � � � � � � DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER (POND) DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �- e, z 0 � � �%r�%'�%;� F POND)CMPACTER S T E — TEMPO SURFA IMPAC F� RY WATER \ V�� ,�,�\��- \ ;' ` — � ��\\�� \�� t° � �\ �-_% \ � ,�- �- � , / �:� i �j� �\ / �% � ��, f , ~`�I �, �" i�'� �� y, �/ ,� , , \��, �� \ �� , TE�PO Y SUR�� CE ER IMPACY� �� y�� ROCK PLATING ,� �� o � FROM STA 15 + 09 �'� � � TO STA 18 + 00 LT ��'"'� ��"�_� � �� o, _ ROCK EMBANKMENT � TO ELEVATION 341.3' +/— SEE DETAIL SHEET 2G-2 � SURFACE 1�''/ �TER � ' ' � (POND) IMPACT` � CLASS B RIP ,RAP ;i , , EST 3� TON �� EST 10 SY , ��> j� ,� ; �,,� � ,�/� � ; GEOTEXTILE � � �� TOE PROTECTION — SEE DETAIL l GI TB F ,,\\\\\ C ,� z -��iT � � �_�� -= ---�� JS — --- � � _� . . _____ __ . / � `� � ; � Z �__ C JS-- � _ � - - _-� � . �j��—�� , � '� ' �.��`� ; % /, „�.;�� <_�� /�� . ��1�� I PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 6 OF 10 , �. PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4943 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER "'I I P'�ECOLOGICAL V� N I ��FNGINHERING DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED 15' 0' 30' GRAPHIC SCALE F F � � � � � � � � � � � i ' _� 1` �� 1 /�/ DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER (POND) DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER / \ \ TIP PROJECT B-4943 � � -L-POC Sto.10+00.00 � � ��G �,P �oGOPI, �G\� ��kh ��,� P. ROCK PLA7/NG AREA (SEE ROCK PLATING TABLE & DETAIL N0. l & 21 �G \ � Q�, \, � x � � Q��Gx � \ � �� P 5 I ROCK EMBANKMENTS AREA AT END BENT (SEE ROCK EMBANKMENiS TABLE & DETAIL N0.41 O� h �� _ '�,� 1 _ h Q �� x ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING LOCATIONS PLAN �� 2 �° m� FOR STRUCTURE DETAILS fSEE STRUCTURE PLANSI CLASS ll RlP RAP (SEE STRUCTURE PLANSI ROADWAY EMBANKMENT (COMMON BORROW) DRILLED PIERS lSEE STRUCTURE PLANSJ �(� U" FILL CLASS B& � B.O.0 ELEV. ��7�� o CLA55 A RIPRAP � lSEE STRUCTURE PLANSI �� ON TOP OF CLA55 Vll o�� l'THICK x57 STONE \ �'��'�ICOMMON BORROWJ �GEOTEXTILE OR � O Q� 00,� ROCK EMBANKMENTS TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS ELEV. 34/.3' +/- �. �oa o(�:------------------ --- ----- ---- ----------------- ,o� ��.� "57 STONE ' 1�l'TYP. � 2' 7YP. „��°°,'�r .��,. .��.9-�0� _ r,,�, .�„� o�.o�_—.��..�.�,.�,.� 1 N.W.S. ELEV.339.3' J� �1�� \�;,( �'A` n Oc�> C�o o\_� �7 al_,w�� O �� a ROCK EMBANKMENTS o0� � ICLASS VI/I O � �' -` o�o O � ��O�o �� o ��ngU � ��C7 ----- 4-�J-�L7�.Q� -- \— EXISTING GROUND NARIESJ ROCK EMBANKMENTS DETAIL NO. 4— TYPICAL SECTION ALONG —L— ROCK PLATING AREA (SEE ROCK PLATlN6 7ABLE & DE7AlL N0. l & 21 ROCK EMBANKMENTS AREA lSEE ROCK EMBANKMENTS TABLE & DErAIL N0.3J ROCK PLATlN6 AREA (SEE ROCK PLAilN6 TABLE & DETAIL N0. l, 2& 31 �� X ?� �� o 2x �o �� U ¢ Q � � wN �o 1� �1 � 2 Q I J \ �� U O o+ �� od W�n � -L-POT Sto. 19+50.00 N 86° 48' 43J" E 0 * O d � STEEL BEAM GUAR�RAIL FOR ROADWAY DETAILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPICALS) GUARDRAIL FACE4'-6" MIN �� T �`� 2I � � GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING —v �� EMBANKMENT �� ROCK PLATING l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINT (rOP OF SLOPEJ �l8" CLASS N SELEC7 MATERIAL (ABCI — SEE GEOTEXTILE 0 �o Q� OVERLAP DETAIL �� / F �� ( ��q�� s,� ,Plq� � L ��/�F�P �Li�P � SS. �ii,� Q�c�s��, l S _-9�� "�'�l)�%��(��<" / 2' TNICK RIPRAP (SEE NOTE 31 l0' MAX ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 1— TYPICAL SECTION FOR ROCK PLATIN�. SEE SECTION 275 OF THE STANDARD SPEGFICATIONS. USE ROCK PLATING AT FOLLOWING LOCATlONS: BEGINNlN6 APPROX. ENDING APPROX. LOCATION ROCK PLATING RIPRAP LINES SLOPE STAiION SLOPE STATION LT/RT DETAIL N0. CLASS� Sy l/2/3 //2/B —L— 2:l 10+50 L5:1 /1+25 RT I = eo —L— 1.5:1 /1+25 1.75:1 /2+75 RT 2 = a35 —L— 1.75:1 /2+75 2:l 13+00 R7 I • ss —L— 1.5d 15+09 1.5:1 /7+00 LT 3 • 445 —L— L5:1 /7+00 1.75:1 /7+75 LT 2 = ieo —L— I.75:� 17+75 2:l 18+00 LT l = so —L— 2:l 16+50 /.75:1 /7+25 RT I = as —L— 1.75:1 /7+25 2:l 18+00 RT 2 • zio USE CLASS l,2 OR B RIPRAP FOR ROCK PLATlN6 LOCATIONS. ESTIMATED TOTAL QUANTITY OF ROCK PLATING = 1.470 SY ROCK EMBANKMENTS l8" OVERLAP MIN (TYPJ SLOPE STAKE POINT AND CONSTRUCTION LlMlr (TOE OF SLOPEI GROUND LINE � STEEL BEAM GUARDRAIL FOR ROADWAY DETAILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPICALS) GUARDRAIL FACE4,_6" MlN �/ � 2 � GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING � �� EMBANKMENT � �� /� GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING (TYPJ rOP OF SLOPE i I % I I � I � � � � Ro�� wiorH � � I I I � 5'OVERLAP � � � MlN (TYPI � I — I I I I I I I TOE OF SLOPE GEOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETAIL (PLAN VIEW) '+ - TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS ELEV. 34/3 / FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS. SEE ROCK EMBANKMENTS SPECIAL PROVISION. 2� rrP. USE ROCK EMBANKMENTS AT FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: N.W.S. ELEV.339.3' \��JO — ��1� —UNE— APPROX. APPROX. LOCATION BEGINNING STATION ENDIN� STATION LT/RT —L— I4+92 +/— —L— 0+35 +/— —L— LEFT CONSTRUCT ROCK EMBANKMENTS TO THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL N0.3 AND DETAIL N0. 4 OR 2 FT.ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE AND ACCORDING TO THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS SPECIAL PROVISION. FILL VOIDS lN THE TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS WITN CLASS B AND CLASS A RlP RAP. PLACE "57 STONE (SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS VU UP TO l FT. ABOVE ROCK EMBANKMENTS AS SHOWN lN THIS PLAN. CONSTRUCT ROCK PLATING ABOVE ROCK EMBANKMENTS FROM ELEVATION SHOWN lN THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL N0.3 OR 2 FT.ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE TO TNE SHOULDER HINGE POINT AND ACCORDlN6 TO THE SECTION 275 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF N0. 57 STONE lN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARTICLE 270-3 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINr (TOP OF SLOPEJ l8" CLA55 /V SELECT MATERIAL (ABCI 2' THICK RIPRAP �SEE NOTE 3J SEE GEOTEXrILE OVERLAP DETAIL � �� 9T �S,. � ��c��' FG o �� , *�� l� �P � '�Q��o��'OF 3'-6" ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 2— TYPICAL SECTION l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINT (TOP OF SLOPE) l8"CLASS lV SELECT MATERIAL �ABCJ SEE GEOTEXTILE � � OVERLAP DErAIL 2' THICK RIPRAP � � lSEE NOTE 3J � ��`. a GUARDRAIL 4'-6" MINFACE /- STEEL BEAM GUARORAIL SLOPE STAKE POINT (TOE OF SLOPEJ CONSTRUCTION UMIT GROUND LINE - FOR ROADWAY DETAILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPlCALSI ;�z, �' � - GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING EMBANKMENT �/��j,� � pJ ��' � (COMMON BORROWJ �� , , , , � �� l' T HICK "57 SiONE i�� FILL CLA55 B & � CLA55 A RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE FOR �� ROCK EMBANKMENTS � ON TOP OF CLA55 VlI �' EXISTING EMBANKMENT i i - - - r.> ' - - ' - ^.ir � ..: ..: .�.:...'.. .t....�.tv.�..�.. .•...: .'... r. .:�.�:v'.C�.�.�.��.�.'.�.�:�.�:i.°��?.�:i�.:�:t�:�.�.i��: ��.�.�:�.�.°.�: �.:. «57 STONE::..::?`...`..:::t..:c::.t.:�:: ...:::`....:t:;`':.:..:.:.,;;;�:� rrrP. R_��___ — ._. � � - -- �� — � ---- � ,.. _..._. .: � .......... . O ROCK EMBANKMENTS � _ (CLASS VIIJ —: ° r EXISrING GROUND NARIESJ ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 3— TYPICAL SECTION ESTIMATED MATERIAL OUANTITIES FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS ROCK EMBANKMENTS (SELECT MATERIAL.CLASS VlIJ = 3,030 TONS RlP RAP CLASS A= 480 TONS RlP RAP CLASS B= 480 TONS "57 STONE (SELECT MATERIAL.CLA55 VlJ = 590 TONS GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS = 950 SY WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY Surtaceandwetiandaackage: WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Han Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (tt) (ft) 1 14+16 to 14+70 -L- Fill in Surface Water <0.01 <0.01 1 14+34 to 14+45 -L- RT Fill in Surface Water <0.01 <0.01 1 14+64 to 17+35 -L- Roadway Embankement <0.01 0.01 0.15 0.02 1 14+50 to 14+65 -L- Bank Stabalization <0.01 57 TOTALS: <0.01 0.01 0.15 0.02 57.0 Fe+ised 3/31/0.5 ., � V � 0 � � � � � • � � V � � O V See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 9B For Conventlonal Symbols �`��I°1� C�1F 1��1��II�� IIE��II�II1��'� ��'�1I��[�� '�1� lI��1�['�'�.�� D URHAM CD U1�lTY LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 20 OVER DIAL CREEK 0111 SR 1616 (BAHAMA RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVI11lG, A11tD STRUCTURE BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT -�- sra io+oo.00 BEGIN BRIDGE —L— STA/4+Q4.48 SITE <� END TlP PROJECT B-4943 —L— STA.19+50.00 END BRIDGE —L— STA/5+ � �;� ��,- -Y-� SR l6/6 (BAHAMA ROJ LAKE MICNIE BUFFER DRAWING' SHEET 1 OF 5 C APE�� RD � DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepared an tae o�,�es of� �nnauLres E�vcINEEx 2017 ADT = 2738 VPD LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.164 mi. ��f� � T � ��'>��' '°�� 50 25 0 50 100 2037 ADT = 3585 VPD E<�� ECOLOGICAL �� B°��p� K= 10% LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.016 mi. ��s3e�'";� �•��=��3 ENGINEERING �� `�� a PLANS p= 850�o TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.180 mi. zot2 sra.vo,axo srEcrFrcnrroNs yt :� � 50 25 0 50 100 T= b% 'k ANDY YOUNG. PE SlGNATURE: � � RlGHT OF WAY DATE: � � rao�Ecr exciNSEa ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER �, � V= 40 MPH DECEMBER 9. 2016 '� � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) �k (TTST 1% + DUAL 5%) MICHAEL BURNS, EI ��'.e��. ��:�� RURAL MINOR LETTING DATE: �Ro�scz nss,cx sxciNSEn �� p��s� 10 5 0 l0 2� FUNC. CLASS.= COLLECTOR GARY R. LOVERING, PE JULY 18, 2017 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER NcooT coxracr PE SIGNATURE: Z 0 5 0' 0' I 0 0' GRAPHIC SCALE i �� .., ,\�� /�QP / \ 6/ ; � \� I � � _ � 2y. : I/ �^�A a qc � z�\ �� \r. �� 2 \ �J S 49' 29' 293' E� —L—POC Sta.10+00.00 SITE I ROCK PLATING—� FROM STA 70+50 TO STA 13 I- 00 RT �o �>C\/\/\/\/\/ x�'\,'\,7'\,'\, ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 REMOVE BRIDGE AND RETAIN— / / / l E%ISTING CONC. ABUTMENTS AND CONC. WING WALLS UP TO ELEVATION 345.5' TO 346.0'. LAY SLOPES BACK TO EXISTING � ROAD AT 1.5:1. � �� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 �E M,�H,E � m � Y.. n� a / 6� C @ 0 � � � E � 0 � �., �� w � � i, / �,� � '�� ,' � k%�T{— ��/ DETAIL 1 ��C�\J /�/ eY TOE PROTECTION � No� ro s�aie� / / f�� s�oPF p� �// NA1 URNO � cao d // � / d_z F� �EorE��E /// / r�Pe or��,= cuss e a��-aaP /�/ � FROM STA.15+76 TO STA.15+50 -L- RT /� j � DETAIL 2 BANK $TA8ILIZATION � No� �o S�aii; 3.0 m n. l 0' NWS Q GEOTEXrILF ', � of �,��._ �as5 �� a�PRAP 6 3 sTn ia+is ro ia+so � g' RT ,�'� F STA 14+60 TO 14}90 L � � � O SITE I 1 � � � SITE I �� ( I / � BANK STABALIZATION \ GLA55 II RIP RAP EST 700 TONS ,, �S( E5T 750 SY GEOTEXTILE SEE DETAIL 2 � � � , �ROCK PLATING FROM STA 15+09 TO STA 18100 LT ROCK EMBANKMENT TO ELEVATION 341.3' +/- \ SEE DETAIL SHEET 2G-2 _i'� i��`T I � SITE I s � CLA55 B RIP RP.P ., � E5T 3 TON E5T 10 SY GEOTEXTILE TOE PROTECTION SEE DETAIL 1 CLA55 B RIP RAP EST 20 TON EST 55 SV GEOTEXTILE ROCK PL4TING —' FROM STA 16+50 TO STA 18+00 RT O SITE I BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 5 SITE I �D TlP PROJECT B-4943 —L—POT Sta.19t50A0 N 85 48' 43J" E *�2a GRqU 350 \� ��3"_ ------__ ;. %1`�%%',i'� � F 0 0 _ N m " o go; N "� =1�:17�10' i',U_� F� Z 2 C �A 'ATrI � sa rn�eR E *9629 LT.& RT. Im �B 35.64' s\ 6� \� SITE I � �'�` � w N � i � P�� : 1 i ; 0 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4943 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER "'I I P'�ECOLOGICAL S I �v� �til-: I ��FNGINFFRING DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED I n ci o � N � zz 3 0' 0' 6 0' GRAPHIC INSET SCALE N SITE I x� —X� '� //� / / `�\�� rt-�` o / �S/�� o o. _. ,�`( O\ �s �� ►' S I T E I FOR —L— PROFILE,SEE SHEET 5 FOR STRIICfURE PUWS,SE£ SHEETS S—ITHRU S—? / \ \ TIP PROJECT B-4943 � � -L-POC Sto.10+00.00 � � ��G �,P �oGOPI, �G\� ��kh ��,� P. ROCK PLA7/NG AREA (SEE ROCK PLATING TABLE & DETAIL N0. l & 21 �G \ � Q�, \, � x � � Q��Gx � \ � �� P 5 I ROCK EMBANKMENTS AREA AT END BENT (SEE ROCK EMBANKMENiS TABLE & DETAIL N0.41 O� h �� _ '�,� 1 _ h Q �� x ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING LOCATIONS PLAN �� 2 �° m� FOR STRUCTURE DETAILS fSEE STRUCTURE PLANSI CLASS ll RlP RAP (SEE STRUCTURE PLANSI ROADWAY EMBANKMENT (COMMON BORROW) DRILLED PIERS lSEE STRUCTURE PLANSJ �(� U" FILL CLASS B& � B.O.0 ELEV. ��7�� o CLA55 A RIPRAP � lSEE STRUCTURE PLANSI �� ON TOP OF CLA55 Vll o�� l'THICK x57 STONE \ �'��'�ICOMMON BORROWJ �GEOTEXTILE OR � O Q� 00,� ROCK EMBANKMENTS TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS ELEV. 34/.3' +/- �. �oa o(�:------------------ --- ----- ---- ----------------- ,o� ��.� "57 STONE ' 1�l'TYP. � 2' 7YP. „��°°,'�r .��,. .��.9-�0� _ r,,�, .�„� o�.o�_—.��..�.�,.�,.� 1 N.W.S. ELEV.339.3' J� �1�� \�;,( �'A` n Oc�> C�o o\_� �7 al_,w�� O �� a ROCK EMBANKMENTS o0� � ICLASS VI/I O � �' -` o�o O � ��O�o �� o ��ngU � ��C7 ----- 4-�J-�L7�.Q� -- \— EXISTING GROUND NARIESJ ROCK EMBANKMENTS DETAIL NO. 4— TYPICAL SECTION ALONG —L— ROCK PLATING AREA (SEE ROCK PLATlN6 7ABLE & DE7AlL N0. l & 21 ROCK EMBANKMENTS AREA lSEE ROCK EMBANKMENTS TABLE & DErAIL N0.3J ROCK PLATlN6 AREA (SEE ROCK PLAilN6 TABLE & DETAIL N0. l, 2& 31 �� X ?� �� o 2x �o �� U ¢ Q � � wN �o 1� �1 � 2 Q I J \ �� U O o+ �� od W�n � -L-POT Sto. 19+50.00 N 86° 48' 43J" E 0 * O d � STEEL BEAM GUAR�RAIL FOR ROADWAY DETAILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPICALS) GUARDRAIL FACE4'-6" MIN �� T �`� 2I � � GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING —v �� EMBANKMENT �� ROCK PLATING l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINT (rOP OF SLOPEJ �l8" CLASS N SELEC7 MATERIAL (ABCI — SEE GEOTEXTILE 0 �o Q� OVERLAP DETAIL �� / F �� ( ��q�� s,� ,Plq� � L ��/�F�P �Li�P � SS. �ii,� Q�c�s��, l S _-9�� "�'�l)�%��(��<" / 2' TNICK RIPRAP (SEE NOTE 31 l0' MAX ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 1— TYPICAL SECTION FOR ROCK PLATIN�. SEE SECTION 275 OF THE STANDARD SPEGFICATIONS. USE ROCK PLATING AT FOLLOWING LOCATlONS: BEGINNlN6 APPROX. ENDING APPROX. LOCATION ROCK PLATING RIPRAP LINES SLOPE STAiION SLOPE STATION LT/RT DETAIL N0. CLASS� Sy l/2/3 //2/B —L— 2:l 10+50 L5:1 /1+25 RT I = eo —L— 1.5:1 /1+25 1.75:1 /2+75 RT 2 = a35 —L— 1.75:1 /2+75 2:l 13+00 R7 I • ss —L— 1.5d 15+09 1.5:1 /7+00 LT 3 • 445 —L— L5:1 /7+00 1.75:1 /7+75 LT 2 = ieo —L— I.75:� 17+75 2:l 18+00 LT l = so —L— 2:l 16+50 /.75:1 /7+25 RT I = as —L— 1.75:1 /7+25 2:l 18+00 RT 2 • zio USE CLASS l,2 OR B RIPRAP FOR ROCK PLATlN6 LOCATIONS. ESTIMATED TOTAL QUANTITY OF ROCK PLATING = 1.470 SY ROCK EMBANKMENTS l8" OVERLAP MIN (TYPJ SLOPE STAKE POINT AND CONSTRUCTION LlMlr (TOE OF SLOPEI GROUND LINE � STEEL BEAM GUARDRAIL FOR ROADWAY DETAILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPICALS) GUARDRAIL FACE4,_6" MlN �/ � 2 � GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING � �� EMBANKMENT � �� /� GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING (TYPJ rOP OF SLOPE i I % I I � I � � � � Ro�� wiorH � � I I I � 5'OVERLAP � � � MlN (TYPI � I — I I I I I I I TOE OF SLOPE GEOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETAIL (PLAN VIEW) '+ - TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS ELEV. 34/3 / FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS. SEE ROCK EMBANKMENTS SPECIAL PROVISION. 2� rrP. USE ROCK EMBANKMENTS AT FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: N.W.S. ELEV.339.3' \��JO — ��1� —UNE— APPROX. APPROX. LOCATION BEGINNING STATION ENDIN� STATION LT/RT —L— I4+92 +/— —L— 0+35 +/— —L— LEFT CONSTRUCT ROCK EMBANKMENTS TO THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL N0.3 AND DETAIL N0. 4 OR 2 FT.ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE AND ACCORDING TO THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS SPECIAL PROVISION. FILL VOIDS lN THE TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS WITN CLASS B AND CLASS A RlP RAP. PLACE "57 STONE (SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS VU UP TO l FT. ABOVE ROCK EMBANKMENTS AS SHOWN lN THIS PLAN. CONSTRUCT ROCK PLATING ABOVE ROCK EMBANKMENTS FROM ELEVATION SHOWN lN THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL N0.3 OR 2 FT.ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE TO TNE SHOULDER HINGE POINT AND ACCORDlN6 TO THE SECTION 275 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF N0. 57 STONE lN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARTICLE 270-3 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINr (TOP OF SLOPEJ l8" CLA55 /V SELECT MATERIAL (ABCI 2' THICK RIPRAP �SEE NOTE 3J SEE GEOTEXrILE OVERLAP DETAIL � �� 9T �S,. � ��c��' FG o �� , *�� l� �P � '�Q��o��'OF 3'-6" ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 2— TYPICAL SECTION l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINT (TOP OF SLOPE) l8"CLASS lV SELECT MATERIAL �ABCJ SEE GEOTEXTILE � � OVERLAP DErAIL 2' THICK RIPRAP � � lSEE NOTE 3J � ��`. a GUARDRAIL 4'-6" MINFACE /- STEEL BEAM GUARORAIL SLOPE STAKE POINT (TOE OF SLOPEJ CONSTRUCTION UMIT GROUND LINE - FOR ROADWAY DETAILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPlCALSI ;�z, �' � - GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLATING EMBANKMENT �/��j,� � pJ ��' � (COMMON BORROWJ �� , , , , � �� l' T HICK "57 SiONE i�� FILL CLA55 B & � CLA55 A RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE FOR �� ROCK EMBANKMENTS � ON TOP OF CLA55 VlI �' EXISTING EMBANKMENT i i - - - r.> ' - - ' - ^.ir � ..: ..: .�.:...'.. .t....�.tv.�..�.. .•...: .'... r. .:�.�:v'.C�.�.�.��.�.'.�.�:�.�:i.°��?.�:i�.:�:t�:�.�.i��: ��.�.�:�.�.°.�: �.:. «57 STONE::..::?`...`..:::t..:c::.t.:�:: ...:::`....:t:;`':.:..:.:.,;;;�:� rrrP. R_��___ — ._. � � - -- �� — � ---- � ,.. _..._. .: � .......... . O ROCK EMBANKMENTS � _ (CLASS VIIJ —: ° r EXISrING GROUND NARIESJ ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 3— TYPICAL SECTION ESTIMATED MATERIAL OUANTITIES FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS ROCK EMBANKMENTS (SELECT MATERIAL.CLASS VlIJ = 3,030 TONS RlP RAP CLASS A= 480 TONS RlP RAP CLASS B= 480 TONS "57 STONE (SELECT MATERIAL.CLA55 VlJ = 590 TONS GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS = 950 SY BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT ROAD PARALLEL ZONE1 ZONE2 TOTAL ZONE1 ZONE2 TOTAL ZONE1 ZONE2 SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE / TYPE STATION (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) 1 ROADWAY EMBANKMENT 12+41 TO 14+12 -L- LT X 2037.0 3201.0 5238.0 1 1@85' 33" BOX BEAM W/ 4' CAPS 14+12 TO 14+56 -L- LT X 2340.0 371.0 2711.0 1 ROADWAY EMBANKMENT 16+80 TO 17+62 -L- LT X 765.0 535.0 1300.0 1 ROADWAY EMBANKMENT 17+07 TO 18+16 -L- RT X 1762.0 729.0 2491.0 1 ROADWAY EMBANKMENT 11+00 TO 12+84 -L- RT X 2757.0 0.0 2757.0 1 1@85' 33" BOX BEAM W/ 4' CAPS 14+06 TO 14+41 -L- RT X 440.0 0.0 440.0 TOTAL: 10101.0 4836.0 14937.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � • See Sheet � A For I ndex of Sheets See Sheet � B For Conventi onal Symbols �� .�_ �� _ �� C�� \ 1�� LOCA TI01�1: BRIDGE 1��. 20 O VER DIAL CREEI� 01� SR 1616 (BAHAMA RD. ) TYPE OF WORK: GRADII�G, DRAII�AGE, PA VI1�lG, A1�D STR UCTURE ,IJ��ir/ � 7 T��I�� S JS JS� i �. LAKE MICHIE 90% RET�IEW S UBMITTAL � 0 0 N N � N Z � � � Z E �� S � T� PE� RD� �NA DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED Prepared in the O�ces of: HYDRA ULICS E1VGI11lEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH 2 017 ADT — 2 73 8 VP D S T E V�IA R T � NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-1148 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4943 — 0.164 mi. ��s�sE��YParkW�y,s";re�o� Cary, NC 27518 (919)557-0929 50 25 0 50 l00 2037 ADT = 3585 VPD 4z�FAYEnE��EST,5TE400 FirmLicense# C-1051 0� �0a�%� ECOLOGICAL �' K= 10% LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.016 mi. _ RA�E=�H,NC27601 wwwstewartinc.com ENGINEERING Q�� g�o T 919.380.8750 PROJECT #:H15013.00 � PLANS p= 850�o TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4943 = 0.180 mi. 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS P.E. � �� 50 25 0 50 l00 T= b% * ANDY YOUNG PE SIGII�ATURE: rr� � = 4 0 M P H RIGHT OF WA Y DA TE: PROJECT ENGINEER R OAD WA Y DESIG11l E1VGIIVEER � � V � DECEMBER 9, 2016 � Q PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) *(TTST 1% + DUAL 5%) MICHAEL BURNS, EI ��, o�`� � PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER / 0/,� �� p��Q 10 5 0 l0 2� FUNC. CLASS. RURAL MINOR LETTI11lG DATE: — COLLECTOR JULY 18, 2017 GARY R. LOVERING, PE PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER NCDOT CONTACT P.E. SIGNATURE: BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line ----- ----- County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Corner � Property Monument 0 Parcel/Sequence Number �23 Existing Fence Line -x x x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence � Proposed Chain Link Fence � Proposed Barbed Wire Fence '� Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -W�B- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary W�B Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB Known Contamination Area: Soil -�•�� S •� - Potential Contamination Area: Soil -�� S �� - Known Contamination Area: Water J�' ,-W- �' - Potential Contamination Area: Water -� W �?� - Contaminated Site: Known or Potential �' � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE: Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° W Small Mine �' Foundation 0 Area Outline Cemetery fi Building School � Church -v Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � � Jurisdictional Stream �S - Buffer Zone 1 Bz � Buffer Zone 2 Bz 2 F I ow Arrow � --- --- Disappearing Stream � -- --- Spring �-��_--� Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � FCON False Sump r��a �� _'� �� 9 �Jd"� ��_ ,�' �� \ � ��i' Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering RAILROADS: Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF WAY.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite R1W Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C�A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement CSX TRANSPORTATION 0 MILEPOST 35 0 SWITCN � � � � Proposed Permanent Easement with Iron Pin and Cap Marker ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES: Existing Edge of Pavement - Existing Curb - � . W . W �\ � � W in� � '`�' �iI ,� c �� T �A, E E TDE PDE PUE TUE AUE � Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp �R Existing Metal Guardrail T T T Proposed Guardrail T T T T Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n Equality Symbol � Pavement Removal I�EGETATION.• Single Tree Single Shrub Hedge Woods Line � � Orchard Vi neya rd EXISTI11lG STRUCTURES.• MAJ O R: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole U/G Power Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Pedestal Telephone Cell Tower U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Conduit LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) � � � � Vineyard CONC J ��N� WW � }--- CONC HW � CB O s - -TC- - - TC - - - -T FO- - - - -T FO- - - T FO WATE R: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*) Above Ground Water Line TV: TV Ped esta I TV Towe r U/G TV Cable Hand Hole U/G TV Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G TV Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) GAS : Gas Valve Gas Meter U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout U/G Sanitary Sewer Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer SS Forced Main Line LOS 6(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. - A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records - End of Information -W-- W A/G Water - -TV- - - TV - - - -TV FO- - - - -TV FO- TV FO - —�— — �- A/G Gas � O ss A/G Sanitary Sewer - - - -FSS- - - - - - FSS - - F55 • � 0 a 7UTL 0 UST 0 � m AATU R E.O.I. x�0 �0 FOR STRUCTURE DETAILS l SEE ST RUCT URE PLANS) CLASS ll R/P RAP (SEE ST RUCT URE PLANSI B.O.0 ELEV. (SEE ST RUCT URE PLANSI 0 (COMMON BORROW I vv-" J TOP OF ROCK EMBANKMENTS ELEV. 34/.3' +/- o a��'� N. W. S. ELEV. 339.3' � 2' TYP. 0 ,, - o ------� o ,�, oo -- -- o- oc�°o o°oao°� � ao � �e °o #57 � STONE,�o a a�,� �ao 0 ��c��LJ� G o�� oOaC� �� e�� i iC 0 a000�000 0 o a � �a- 0 ov � O Jl '- a °�00 ��a°��a° °°�° �� a o � °' '� �j� o a � a�a [�o ROCK EMBANKMENTS o0 � �C �� a�� ' '0� � o�� O� � �CLASS VlIJ O �� C �o � a � �� o �� a � ��o--��a � �� , a �� a� a�aO��Q �----�� ° °p - �-� - �� /-�� \�� - ��%,�,�� i��\ � � � i� ��.� � �� i i __�__, - __1,- ROCK EMBANKMENTS DETAIL NO. 4 ROADW AY EMBANKMENT (COMMON BORROW l DR/LLED PIERS (SEE ST RUCT URE PLANS) F/LL CLASS B & CLASS A R/PRAP ON T OP OF CLASS V ll l' TH/CK #57 STONE GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS •e--- -a-,-- --,- ------------'o'.------o� �� oo��o°�� o�oa� �a�a � � o�o�o � � � a�aoa��o �Dao��o a� �° a� a � o°� �°�� a �a 0 o a O�a � o a 0 � a j� aa oo a� o�0� 0o a a0a �a� 0a �� a�o�a0 �� ° -- ❑0��0� ____��.�__ _ ��Q___. EXISTING GROUND fVARIES� - TYPICAL SECTION ALONG -L- m / 1 V li /\ / LI'"1 /// Y V I'"1/ 1 L I'"1 l SEE ROCK PLAT /NG T ABLE & DET AlL N0. l& 21 GUARDRA/L FACE4' -6" MlN ST EEL BEAM GUARDRAIL � E- FOR ROADW AY DET AILS (SEE ROADW AY T YP/CALS� o� �� o� �� o�oa oo � � -o�o� ��, ,�� o � o ��oy �� 2 � , � � � GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLAT/NG EMBANKMENT ROCK PLAT lNG l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINT fTOP OF SLOPE) l8" CLASS /V SELECT MATERIAL IABCJ � '� �� S � � , '� C �� ti �� , �� F'�-, q.o -, Fssq �j� � ��- / SEE GEOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETA/L �� >��''p �5°�� o�� nol��OF 2' T H/CK R/PRAP �SEE NOT E 3) I l0' MAX ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 1— TYPICAL SECTION FOR ROCK PLAT ING, SEE SECT lON 275 OF T HE ST ANDARD SPECIFICAT IONS< USE ROCK PLAT lNG AT FOLLOW lNG LOCAT /ONSe BE�/NN/NG APPROX. END/N� APPROX. LOCAiION ROCK PLATING R/PRAP LINES SLOPE STATION SLOPE STATION LT/RT �ErA/L N0. CLASSX SY l/2/3 //2/B -L- 2:l 10+50 /.5:1 /1+25 RT l = ao -L- 1.5:1 /1+25 /.75:1 /2+75 RT 2 x 435 -L- 1.75:1 /2+75 2:l 13+00 RT l = 35 -L- 1.5:1 /5+09 /.5:1 /7+00 LT 3 = 445 —L— 1.5:1 /7+00 /.75:1 /7+75 LT 2 = �so —L— 1.75:1 /7+75 2:l 18+00 LT l = so —L— 2:l 16+50 /.75:1 /7+25 RT l x es —L— 1.75:1 /7+25 2:l 18+00 RT 2 x 2�0 USE CLASS l, 2 OR B RIPRAP FOR ROCK PLAT lNG LOCAT IONSe EST IMAT ED T OT AL QUANT lT Y OF ROCK PLAT lNG = l, 470 SY ROCK EMBANKMENTS FOR ROCK EMBANKMENT S, SEE ROCK EMBANKMENT S SPEC/AL PROV/SION. USE ROCK EMBANKMENT S AT FOLLOW lNG LOCAT /ONSo -L/NE - APPROX. APPROX. � LOCAiION BEGINN/N� STATION END/NG SiATION LT/RT -L- 14f92 f/- -L- 17f35 f/- -L- LEFT ST EEL BEAM GUARDRAIL GUARDRAIL FACE4, _6" MlN FOR ROADW AY DET AILS l SEE ROADW AY T YPICALS) ��a�� o�� aog000� , o �, o�o r 2' � � � � GEOT EXT lLE FOR ROCK PLAT lNG - SLOPE ST AKE PO/NT AND CONST RUCT lON LlMIT lTOE OF SLOPE) GROUND LINE � I I I l8" OVERLAP I MlN (TYP) GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK PLAT/NG (TYP) TOP OF SLOPE I � � � ROLL W/DTH I j 5' OVERLAP � � MlN ITYP) � TOE OF SLOPE GEOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETAIL �P�,N vi Ew� EMBANKMENT l' CLEARANCE MlN �SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK POINT (TOP OF SLOPE) ��°°� l8" CLASS /V SELECT MAT ER/AL (ABC) �� o � 0 °o 00 �°�° �fl��oo 0��0�. 2' T HICK RIPRAP �SEE NOTE 3) SEE GEOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETAIL .�� s/� �� '�' ,��,`°�i �> �� i�� O,�' D��'��,� s� , ��o �,o�, 3' -6„ ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 2— TYPICAL SECTION l' CLEARANCE MlN SHOULDER OR BERM BREAK PO/NT (TOP OF SLOPE) � l8" CLASS /V SELECT MATERIAL IABC) �� o�°o �� _ �oo SEE �EOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETA/L 2' T H/CK RIPRAP f SEE NOT E 3� � ��,�: � P �� P �-,-' � P , �� c�5 GUARDRAIL 4' -6" MINFACE ST EEL BEAM GUARDRAIL FOR ROADW AY DET AILS (SEE ROADWAY TYPICALS) � �� 2' � , , - GEOT EXT /LE FOR ROCK PLAT /NG (COMMON BORROW � SLOPE ST AKE POINT (TOE OF SLOPE) CONST RUCT lON LlMIT �ROUND LINE - ; EMBANKMENT ,� ��ao�a C�� o �� , , , _ � _ � F�,P� � � ODO�- �� —' � �� l' TH/CK #57 STONE � � �J �� 0��(�� F/LL CLASS B& �� \�� 0�,� CLASS A RIPRAP �EOTEXT/LE FOR �� ON TOP OF CLASS Vll ROCK EMBANKMENTS �� EXISTING EMBANKMENT T P F R K A K T 4/ '+/ — � � �� 0 0 OC EMB N MEN S ELEV. 3.3 a�D��CQo—o___o__o_oo_o____ ____________e_o___oo_o_o_o___ o___o__o_oo__o_oa_0__e___o__a__o__a____ Oo —�,�� a�a � oo�o°o°oa�4# ��' , O� a o 0 o a o 57 STONE o 0 0 0 o a ��o� l TYP. a oa000 ooe o00 o�e voe voe ov, °oe o00 , o o�� a o 0 0 0 0 0 � �o��o�� 2 TYP. �o �� °�°�� o�a�j ��o�a o o a o� o. o 0 000 �oo ,°�°a� oo ��°� o 0 00o e o Qoo 0 o a o 00 �oo a o e o�o o � o o � a o� �o� �� a� ° o °. �a ° o o° o� o� �� °a° o�a �o °�� o� � �ao��a� �°o�� ° ��oo�o o��a �°a a��n o�oa a�� N.W.S. ELEV. 339.3 �. o oo� a0o[�Ga��Do �000 � � � 0 � Q o � �° a � � o a o o � a 0 � a o a° ° o a o 0° a a a O a � o � � o � � � o �a \• a 0 CI D ROCK EMBANKMENT S �o� �a o a o O a ODo � O o � o �� a�O�oa � � 0�00 O� O° O o� O�aao �� a a� �� «�Ass v�� ,� 0 o Do � � a �o� ao o� � �� U � �� O � �� EXISTING GROUND (VARIES) a a �� o aa � �a a a �� ° a° � °Oo �o�°a Oa� ao��O�Oa � �� aoo �____ __ a o0 ��Q ----------��i�%��;%��\;,- �� , ---------��T�-�,�„-��, �\�� ;', ,� ; i ;�� \ : , �/�; ,� :`�; <�� ;\,. CONSTRUCT ROCK EMBANKMENTS TO THE ELEVATION SHOWN lN THE ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLAT lNG DET AlL N0. 3 AND DET AlL N0. 4 OR 2 FT o ABOV E T HE NORMAL W AT ER SURFACE AND ACCORDING T 0 T HE ROCK EMBANKMENT S SPECIAL PROV lSIONo F/LL V 0/DS lN T HE T OP OF ROCK EMBANKMENT S W lT H CLASS B AND CLASS A RlP RAPo PLACE #57 ST ONE (SELECT MAT ERIAL, CLASS V l) UP T 0/ FT e ABOV E ROCK EMBANKMENT S AS SHOW N lN T HlS PLANe CONST RUCT ROCK PLAT lNG ABOV E ROCK EMBANKMENT S FROM ELEV AT lON SHOW N lN T HE ROCK EMBANKMENT S& ROCK PLAT lNG DET AlL NOa 3 OR 2 FT o ABOV E T HE NORMAL W AT ER SURFACE T 0 T HE SHOULDER HINGE POINT AND ACCORDING T 0 T HE SECT lON 275 OF T HE ST ANDARD SPECIFICAT /ONS.e INST ALL GEOT EXT /LE ON T OP OF NOa 57 ST ONE /N ACCORDANCE W lT H T HE ART ICLE 270 —3 OF T HE ST ANDARD SPECIFICAT IONSa ROCK EMBANKMENTS & ROCK PLATING DETAIL NO. 3- TYPICAL SECTION EST IMAT ED MAT ERIAL QUANT lT lES FOR ROCK EMBANKMENT S ROCK EMBANKMENT S(SELECT MAT ERIAL, CLASS V ll) = 3, 030 T ONS RlP RAP CLASS A= 480 TONS RlP RAP CLASS B= 480 TONS #57 STONE (SELECT MATERIAL,CLASS Vl) = 590 TONS GEOTEXTILE FOR ROCK EMBANKMENTS = 950 SY N 0 N � w � BL-100 Fi o S 49° 29' 29.3" E BEGIN T lP PROJECT B-4943 -L -POC Sto. l0 +00.00 & 50' RT �� & 65� �r �� P � �� -��-� \ � � �� F� �oo \ x�0 g26L= � F : �� L � , :�\ \ %�:� .�„ \ � BM 51 � N 882049 E 2041501 -L- STA, 10+85,00, 25' RIGHT �. ELEV, 356,15' R/R SPIKE IN 16" WHITE OAK S 42° 52' 24.9" E ROCK PLATING � FROM STA 10 + 50 TO STA 13 + 00 RT � CITY OF DURHAM DB NO DEED REF.FOUND PG �0 k�% Pl Sto 9 +37.40 0= 6° 40' 35.9" (RT l D = 8° 56' 13.8" L = 74.7/' T = 37.40' R = 64/.l0' �'� �� \ \ � +50.00 r� � ��. � � 55' LT � z 0� 8i �'f'y� �� , �, + � o0 0� ��. X1h��- \ m 6 r,� �' O 2 t�' '�R 0�' c'p �` \ \ �. �r 1 �� F < { �. � � `,1_'�i Cr;� , \ �.1� / �� !� � ��,,' `'�� tC ` �`� �, � � C � \ F' , � �� +00.00 EXIST R/W & 65� Rr BM 50 N 881877 E 2041663 -L- STAo 13+15e00, 38' RT ELEVa 351065' R/R SPIKE IN 18" GUM TREE \ flJ�.�� Exisr Riw & 90' RT REMOVE BRIDGE AND RETAIN EXISTING CONC ABUT ENTS 02 x Pl Sto l0 +37.2/ �= 6` 37' 04.4" l RT ) D = 6° 50' 03.9" L = 96.83' T = 48.47' R = 838.34' Runoff = Ex1st. DETAIL 1 TOE PROTECTION ( Not to Scale) �� FILL NATURAL ��,'�� SLOPE GROUND d GEOTEXTILE d = 2 Ft. Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rap FROM STA. 15 + 16 TO STA. 15 + 50 -L- RT M �F � AND CONC. WING WALLS UP TO ELEVATION 345.5' TO 346.0'. LAY SLOPES BACK TO EXISTING ROAD AT 1.5:1. +05.00 EXIST R/W & 95' RT CLASS B RIP RAP EST 3 TON EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE F � � CITY OF DURHAM DB NO DEED REF.FOUND PG BANK STABALIZATION CLASS II RIP RAP EST 700 TONS EST 750 SY GEOTEXTILE SEE DETAIL 2 +75.00 �5� cr +75.0 5 L5 Pl Sto l5 +20.36 � = 50° l8' S2.0" (LT � D = 7° 38' 22.0" L = 658.6/' T = 352.24' R = 750.00' Runof f = 80' Se = 4% DETAIL 2 BANK STABILIZATION ( Not to Scale) 3.0'min. 2.0� NWS � GEOTEXTILE � Type of Liner= CLASS II RIPRAP STA 14+15 TO 14+50 L STA 14+60 TO 14+90 L �� t� ROCK PLATING J FROM STA 15 + 09 TO STA 18 + 00 LT �,; ROCK EMBANKMENT � �.�',`:� TO ELEVATION 341.3' +/- i SEE DETAIL SHEET 2G-2 � F TB 2G1 �� +26.i � 1 55' L ;-�t ,, �, • � m �S!�';�%i, �Cn��; � r' TOE PROTECTION � SEE DETAIL 1 CLASS B RIP RAP EST 20 TON EST 55 SY GEOTEXTILE F E� +50.00 EXIST R/W ROCK PLATING � FROM STA 16+50 TO STA 18 + 00 RT 1 CITY OF DURHAM DB NO DEED REF.FOUND PG E 2 BARTFAY, SELMA I. TRUSTEE OF THE BARTFAY FAMILY TRUST DEED 2121 PAGE 539 END T lP PROJECT B-4943 -L -POT Stoe l9 +50.00 N 86° 48' 43.1" E +5n_nn , �� ,v � .. � ■ � _ �� _■ •�� . . �� -�� . �—\ �� — —��, ! � '� '�� . ' � .• +75.00 50' RT �� _ � r � n -i m � i0' TAPEh LT. & RT. s '�' `�S° �, s� '�-� °�� % � � F` ` `'�� , a- _ N � N � o � N N o - �� 3 r IROBERTS, LISA G. H ROBERTS. JEANETTE K. ti MILLER. BETSY R, � DEED 6665 PAGE 063 � N PROJECT REFERENCE NO B —4943 ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. 4 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER Firm License No. CQO51 421 Fayet[eville St, I� NC FIRM LICF.NSF. No: F-1148 . Suite 400 ' � J 1151 SG Cary Parkway, Suite 101 Raleigh, NC 27601 Cary, NC 27518 T 919.380.8750 �� 919) 557-0929 wwwstewartinc.mm � ECOLOGICAL S T E WA R T I�ENGINEERING DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED 0 c�Y' O 00 N � � ZZ TBM-2 N 881837 E 2042646 -L- STAo 10+00,00 S 76°23'IOo04" E Dist 1221091' ELEV, 399,89' 60D NAIL IN TELEPHONE POLE / � �. � _ ��Q � / _ ExisTi�� Riw / • - ,_ _ o �Q =-- � / UNDEFINA LE _ � �� -. F�JAD �� 1616) � n r �l a�' � 5 ��A�' - � \ -� � �' � EXIS GNTI R�W � � i �zy,' , , i �i . � i OS +50.00 =�AVEi _� � � , n ��'� EXIST R/W c�� - � � & 40'RT --'�� , � 4 MARY RUTH TILLEY LIFE ESTATE MILDRED TILLEY WALKER & ROBERT ALLEN TILLY DB 6671- PG 794 � EMBANKMENT EXCAVATION FOR -L - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 5 FOR STRUCTURE PLANS,SEE SHEETS S-ITHRU S-?