20080868 Ver 2_Emails_20080822 (15)

Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
Subject: Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer variance info package
From: [e-mail]
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:03:06 -0400
To: Amy Chapman <amy. chapman@ncmail. net>
CC: [e-mail], John Dorney <[e-mail]>
Amy:
we called John and it appears that he reviewed the wrong documents. He did
not have access to the 08/20/08 documents that we provided via e-mail. We
have re-sent the 08/20/08 text to him for his review.
Ross
Amy Chapman
<amy.chapman@ncma
il.net>
[e-mail]
To
08/22/2008 11:39
AM
CC
[e-mail], John
Dorney <[e-mail]>
Subject
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements
for distribution of buffer variance
info package
per John Dorney:
Can the canal south of 33 tract be buffered?
Changes needed:
1. The report needs to be changed to reflect that a local advisory
committee will be created. You also need to include the language that the
committee will suggest sites and DWQ would approve them. YOu need to remove
the language that hte EMC will approve the methodology and change that to
the committe would review the methodolgy and upon EMC's delegation to DWQ
to approve it, that DWQ would approve the methodolgy.
2. You state in the report that you have exhausted your search for
alternatives in one short paragraph. You need to greatly expand on how much
you have searched and to the extent you have searched.
3. You need to commit to at least one urban BMP site.
4. In attachment 1 pg 4, "flow" needs to be changed to "surface flow"
5. Page 8 of that attachment: credit for research needs to be deleted.
6. In Attachment 1, add the committee will review sites
7. page 8 #10, Add that BMPs will be operated and maintained in perpetuity.
8. page 9, "other flexible options" can not include research.
If you have any questions about this email, you'll need to contact John
Dorney directly. He's in Vermont on vacation, and I'm not going to be in an
area where I can be reached very shortly. His direct # is: 919-522-6364.
Thanks.
-Amy
I of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
[e-mail] wrote:
Amy:
Thanks for the update. Please include Jeff on the distribution of
any
comments subsequent to your conversation with John (I will be out in
the
field from the time of your call with John until mid-afternoon).
Thanks.
Ross
Amy Chapman
<amy.chapman@ncma
il.net>
To
cc
Subject
requirements
variance
[e-mail]
Re: Clarification: PCS
for distribution of buffer
info package
Ross,
I just got off the phone with Dorney. He said he'll review the info
this
morning and I'm supposed to give him a call around 11:30 today to see
if
that's all we need. I'll give you a call right after I talk to him.
Thanks.
-Amy
[e-mail] wrote:
John/Amy:
I still need clarification of your statement, "we will require
you to
pull
these copies together", I need to make arrangements today for
allocation of
resources if PCS will be required to duplicate the information
packages and
transport them to Raleigh on Monday.
08/22/2008 09:11
AM
2 of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
I was away from the office yesterday, so if you have already
provided
this
information to Jeff, then please disregard this clarification
request.
Thanks.
Ross
----- Forwarded by Ross Smith/EnvA/Aurora/Phosphate/PCS on
08/22/2008
05:36
AM -----
Ross
Smith/EnvA/Aurora
/Phosphate/PCS
To
"Cyndi Karoly"
08/20/2008 03:42
<[e-mail]>,
Eric
PM Kulz
<[e-mail]>
cc
John Dorney
<[e-mail]>
Amy
Chapman
<[e-mail]>,
Jeff
info
Furness/EnvA/Aurora/Phosphate/PCS@P
Subject
needed
CS
Fw: PCS Buffer Variance
- PCS response
Cyndi/Eric:
I apologize for the oversight of not including your e-mail
addresses
on the
original transmission.
3 of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
Ross
----- Forwarded by Ross Smith/EnvA/Aurora/Phosphate/PCS on
08/20/2008
03:40
PM -----
Ross
Smith/EnvA/Aurora
/Phosphate/PCS
To
, Amy
08/20/2008 03:37
PM
<[e-mail]>
cc
[e-mail],
Kyle
<[e-mail]>
Subject
info
needed
link:
Ross
John Dorney
<[e-mail]>
Chapman
Barnes
Re: PCS Buffer Variance
- PCS response(Document
Smith)
John/Amy:
In response to your information request, please find the
following
narrative documents and attachments. The text includes the
following
information requested in DWQ's 08/07/08 letter:
1) additional information related to search for buffer
mitigation
sites
2) deletion of research component in flexible mitigation
description
3) addition of the stakeholder advisory group concept in the
flexible
mitigation description
(See attached file: PCS buffer variance request narrative
text.doc)
(See attached file: PCS buffer variance agenda title and
abstract.doc)
4 of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
Attachment 1: (See attached file: Attachment 1 - Composite Mine
Plan
Map -
Alt L.pdf)
Attachment 2: (See attached file: Attachment 2 - Alt L NCPC
Biotic
Communities.pdf)
Attachment 3: (See attached file: Attachment 3 - Alt L
Bonnerton
Biotic
Communities.pdf)
Attachment 4: (See attached file: Attachment 4 - Alt L S33
Biotic
Communities.pdf)
Attachment 5: (See attached file: Attachment 5 - FEIS
mitigation plan
Table
3.pdf)
Attachment 6: (See attached file: Attachment 6 - FEIS
mitigation plan
Table
4.pdf)
Please contact me if you have any questions or require
additional
information.
In addition, please clarify your statement, "we will require
you to
pull
these copies together", so that we (PCS-Beaufort County) will
understand
your expectations for meeting the deadline on Monday.
Thanks.
Ross
Amy Chapman
<amy.chapman@ncma
il.net>
To
[e-mail]
08/20/2008 02:56
cc
PM
Kyle
<[e-mail]>,
John Dorney
<[e-mail]>
Barnes
[e-mail]
5 of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
Subject
needed
PCS Buffer Variance info
Hi Jeff.
We need for PCS to respond to the variance issues noted in the
attached
letter by this Friday so we can review the response and then
have
time to
get back to you so that we can have 10 hard copies (one is for
our
files)
and 10 digital copies of the complete package to submit to the
Water
Quality Committee by noon this Monday. If we agree with the
additional info
you submit by this Friday, then we will require you to pull
these
copies
together and I will drop them off to the appropriate place.
Please submit your response to [e-mail] for
review.
Thanks.
-Amy
Amy Chapman
NC Division of Water Quality
401/wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
(See attached file: PCS Mining Expansion (12).pdf)
6 of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM
Re: Clarification: PCS requirements for distribution of buffer varianc...
Amy Chapman
NC Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Amy Chapman
NC Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
7 of 7 8/25/2008 9:46 AM