20050931 Ver 1_Complete File_20050707

O?O? W AT ?RQG
Cb
> a).
Mr. Bobby G. Earnhardt, Jr.,
Earnhardt Builders, Inc.
1825 Mountain Meadow Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
?D
JU D
Z 2 2005
DEER
{iZII,?W,jA!'pSTQEr?r+QU,,,L ??rCH
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 8, 2005
DWQ# 05-0931
Randolph County
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Earnhardt:
Earnhardt Builders, Inc. has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in
0.19 acre of riparian wetlands, and to place temporary fill in 40 linear feet of perennial stream in order to
construct Phases 8 and 9 of the Bradford Downs residential subdivision located off of Wood Avenue in
Archdale, Randolph County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on May 27, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when
it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other applicable federal,
state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those required by
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval
will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this project (now or
in the future) exceeds one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as
well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 40 linear feet Unnamed tributary to Muddy Creek as depicted
on Detail `B' of the Wetland Delineation Map for
Bradford Downs Future Phase 9, Archdale,
Randolph Count

No One
Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet http// h2o enr.state nc.us/ncwetlands
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
I
Mr. Bobby G. Earnhardt, Jr.
Page 2,
July 8, 2005
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Wetlands 0.19 acre Non-riparian wetlands as depicted on Detail
`A' of the Wetland Delineation Map for
Bradford Downs Future Phase 9, Archdale,
Randolph Count

2. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NC EEP) in order to compensate for the impacts to non-riparian wetlands. In accordance with
15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory
mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the NC
EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program), stream and wetland impacts (including fill) shall not occur at this site. Ms. Carol Shaw
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the permanent fill of 0.19
acre of non-riparian wetlands in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030003.
3. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources at NCDENR
regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed, installed and
maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality standards
that are applicable to Class C, NSW waters as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0211 Fresh Surface Water
Quality Standards For Class C Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. These
measures must be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including contractor owned and leased borrow pits, which are associated with this project.
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control measures in wetlands or waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the project is
completed or, if applicable, within six months of the date that the project is released by the North
Carolina Division of Land Resources.
5. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control "Best
Management Practices" shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
6. Where riprap is required for energy dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum
dimensions specified by appropriate engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the
normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be
maintained. Riprap placed in the stream bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth
sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream
bottom must not be increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in
destabilization of the streambed or banks upstream or downstream.
Mr. Bobby G. Earnhardt, Jr.
Page 3,
July 8, 2005
7. Energy dissipation and sheet flow must be provided for all discharges of stormwater before such
discharges reach stream channels or wetlands.
8. The proposed project must comply with the local water supply and stormwater management ordinances
of the City of Archdale as approved by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
9. All construction activities associated with this project shall minimize built-upon surface area, direct
stormwater runoff away from surface waters, and incorporate best management practices to minimize
water quality impacts. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall not be allowed to come in
contact with surface waters until it has cured. If any stormwater must be collected for discharge into a
stream channel, it shall not enter the stream as a point source, but shall be slowed and discharged as
sheet flow prior to entering the riparian buffer on either side of the stream.
10. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
finished. This certificate should be sent to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality
at the address listed on the form.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-
4600, extension 293.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Mr. Kevin Martin, President, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh,
NC 27614
W AT ?RQG
r
ti? -T Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 8, 2005
DWQ# 05-0931
Randolph County
Mr. Bobby G. Earnhardt, Jr.,
Earnhardt Builders, Inc.
1825 Mountain Meadow Drive
Asheboro, NC 27205
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Earnhardt:
Earnhardt Builders, Inc. has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in
0.19 acre of riparian wetlands, and to place temporary fill in 40 linear feet of perennial stream in order to
construct Phases 8 and 9 of the Bradford Downs residential subdivision located off of Wood Avenue in
Archdale, Randolph County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on May 27, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when
it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other applicable federal,
state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those required by
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval
will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this project (now or
in the future) exceeds one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as
well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 40 linear feet Unnamed tributary to Muddy Creek as depicted
on Detail `B' of the Wetland Delineation Map for
Bradford Downs Future Phase 9, Archdale,
Randolph Count

One
NorthCarolina
11lalura!!il
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh. NC 276(13-2260 Internet http//:h2o.enr.state.nc.us/navetlands
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50°o Recycled/10°b Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Bobby G. Earnhardt, Jr.
Page 2,
July 8, 2005
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Wetlands 0.19 acre Non-riparian wetlands as depicted on Detail
`A' of the Wetland Delineation Map for
Bradford Downs Future Phase 9, Archdale,
Randolph Count

2. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NC EEP) in order to compensate for the impacts to non-riparian wetlands. In accordance with
15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 213 .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory
mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 213 .0233(10). Until the NC
EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program), stream and wetland impacts (including fill) shall not occur at this site. Ms. Carol Shaw
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the permanent fill of 0.19
acre of non-riparian wetlands in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030003.
3. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources at NCDENR
regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed, installed and
maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality standards
that are applicable to Class C, NSW waters as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0211 Fresh Surface Water
Quality Standards For Class C Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. These
measures must be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including contractor owned and leased borrow pits, which are associated with this project.
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control measures in wetlands or waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the project is
completed or, if applicable, within six months of the date that the project is released by the North
Carolina Division of Land Resources.
5. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control "Best
Management Practices" shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
6. Where riprap is required for energy dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum
dimensions specified by appropriate engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the
normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be
maintained. Riprap placed in the stream bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth
sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream
bottom must not be increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in
destabilization of the streambed or banks upstream or downstream.
Mr. Bobby G. Earnhardt, Jr.
Page 3,
July 8, 2005
7. Energy dissipation and sheet flow must be provided for all discharges of stormwater before such
discharges reach stream channels or wetlands.
8. The proposed project must comply with the local water supply and stormwater management ordinances
of the City of Archdale as approved by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
9. All construction activities associated with this project shall minimize built-upon surface area, direct
stormwater runoff away from surface waters, and incorporate best management practices to minimize
water quality impacts. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall not be allowed to come in
contact with surface waters until it has cured. If any stormwater must be collected for discharge into a
stream channel, it shall not enter the stream as a point source, but shall be slowed and discharged as
sheet flow prior to entering the riparian buffer on either side of the stream.
10. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
finished. This certificate should be sent to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality
at the address listed on the form.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-
4600, extension 293.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Mr. Kevin Martin, President, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh,
NC 27614
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
May 26, 2005
S&EC Project #9044.W1
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Request for Nationwide Permit 39 / 401 Water Quality Certification
Bradford Downs Residential Subdivision (Phases 8 & 9) U (? V D
Near Archdale, Randolph County, North Carolina IS
tAAY . 2 7 2005
Dear Ms. Karoly and Ms. Wade: V;EWDSANDSTO :MATERIBRA11CH
On behalf of Earnhardt Builders Inc., we request authorization from the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) for the use of Nationwide Permit 39 for construction of this
proposed residential community. We also request written concurrence from the NC
Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the 401 Water
Quality Certification associated with Nationwide Permit 39. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, as well as an agent authorization form. The
Town of Archdale considers this project exempt from the Randleman Buffer rules (see
attached letter from the Town of Archdale and emails from various DWQ staff).
Location
The project site is located in the headwaters of Muddy Creek in Randolph County. The
site is north of Hwy 311 and east of Archdale. Figure 1 depicts the site on the applicable
USGS topographic quadrangle.
Project History
S&EC delineated the jurisdictional waters on-site in November of 2004, wetlands in a
drained pond and a perennial stream were flagged. Several permits have previously been
issued for this project site, the Action ID numbers are listed in Section IV of the PCN
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
May 26, 2005
S&EC Project 9044.W1
Page 2
form. An office meeting with Andrea Wade of the USACE was conducted in the Fall of
2004 to discuss the handling of this project.
Impacts
Existing impacts include 40'of temporary stream channel impacts associated with the
construction of one sewer crossing and 0.0096'acres of wetland impact associated with a
road crossing. Proposed wetland impacts total 0.1787 acres for lot fill. The proposed
impacts are depicted on the attached site plans and are enumerated and described in the
attached PCN form. The lot fill impacts are to wetlands within a drained farm pond.
Avoidance
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10 acre) of wetlands or if a discharge causes the
loss of any open waters. The sewer line was constructed perpendicular to the channel and
the road was placed along the dam of an old farm pond to minimize impacts. The high
quality wetlands and riparian areas further down stream have been completely avoided
and placed in to a restricted open space area.
Mitigation
Since previous project wetland impacts equal 0.29 acres, the client proposes to pay into
the NCEEP at a 1:1 ratio for the non-riparian wetland impacts within the drained pond
(0.1883 acres).
Sincerely,
Kevin Martin
President
Attachments:
(7 copies to DWQ, 1 to the Corps)
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wetland Impact Maps
$200 check for DWQ application fee
Wetland and Upland Data Forms
Overall Subdivision Plan
Lctter from Town of Archdale
Emails from DWQ
NC EEP Request Form
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details),
2 -, MMV
hU Do
II. Applicant Information MAY 2 7 2005
1. Owner/Applicant Information
DENR -WATER QUALITY
Name: Earnhardt Builders Inc 1'rETIAND A1DST0^r?'!"TER F,2dJE?1
Mailing Address: 1825 Mountain Meadow Drive
Asheboro. NC 27205
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: S&EC
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Ralcip,h NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: kmartin2sandcc.coin
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bradford Downs
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 7728147590, 7728149486, 7728240771,
7728148499. 7728240672, 7728241818
4. Location
County:- Randolph Nearest Town: Archdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Bradford Downs Phases 8 & 9
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): North of Hwy 311 on SR
1914 (Wood Ave.) then left on Bradford Lane right on Shady Oak Lane and left on Twisted
Oak Lane (see attached USGS)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9019 ON 79.9393 °W
6. Property size (acres): 35 acres (Phases 8&9), 116 acres total project
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT of Muddy Creek
8. River Basin: Cane Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Partially complete residential subdivision surrounded by
existiniz residential subdivisions.
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Residential subdivision includin.R access roads and utilities
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Allow utilization of uplands for a residential
subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. _A nationwide 26 was issued in March of 2000 (Action ID # 200020594)
for 185' of stream impact for roads and 0.17 acres of wetland for earlier phases of the project
There was also a May 1999 request to the Corps but the client could not locate that approval It
requested 0.12 acre of wetland and 145' of unimportant channel At that time these impacts
would have been below notification thresholds. There was also a NW 12 in the 1999 request for
temporary impacts.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts are to a drained pond for a
road crossing, and lot fill. There is also a temporary impact for one sewer line crossing of a
stream.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodina.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
Lot 241 & 242 Fill Drained pond No 200' 0.1342
Lot 243 Fill Drained pond No 200' 0.0445
Lot 245 & Road Fill Drained pond No < 50' .0096

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.1883
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Unknown
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiDIv leneth X width. then divide by 43.560_
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
Lot 247-248
Property Line UT Muddy Creek Excavation
(Sewer) Perennial
3 40' 0.0027

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary 40' 0.0027
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8 of 13
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name
(if applicable) Watee)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc. Area of
Impact

acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the oroiect:
Stream Im act (acres): 0.0027
Wetland Impact acres): 0.1883
Open Water Impact acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.191
Total Stream Impact (linear feet : 40'
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary &
pennancnt
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The road crossing was placed
over an existing pond dam, the sewer line crossed vemendicular to the channel. The subdivision
was desiened to avoid impacts to wetlands and riparian areas down stream of the drained pond
(See open space on overall site plan).
Page 9 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The client proposes to pay into NCEEP at a 1:1 ratio for wetland impacts to satisfy Corps
requirements. No wetland mitigation should be required by DWQ since impacts for the entire
subdivision fall below the I acre threshold.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 10 of 13
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes E] No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify, )? Yes ? No ® (See attached letter from Town of
Archdale and attached DWQ staff emails.)
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* I Impact Required
Zone f-1- F .% I Multiplier I
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
Page 11 of 13
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Total project = 116 ac., Roadway = 8.51 ac., Lots
avg. 3000 sq. ft./lot x 254 lots = 17.498 ac. Total impervious = 26.0 ac. So percent impervious =
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ? (The sewer line and road
impact have already occurred. The lot impacts have not.)
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Page 12 of 13
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Kevin Martin of S&EC has met with Andrea Wade of the USACE to discuss this project at
length and has prepared this application based on her input. If authorized the total project
impacts including past applications will be 0.4783 of permanent wetland impacts 185' of
important channel impacts, 145' of unimportant stream channel impacts
Applicant
(Agent's signature

S ??Z ?os
Signature Date
only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
05/22/2005 22:40-? 8611589
Phone:
a
11
EARNHARDT BUILDERS
E.nvi>ronmetital
Road • Meim North C°mlins-I27614 1
t>rww_Sat?dEC.cotn
PAGE 01
VJ uux
Consultants, PA
'hone: [phone] - F= [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATTOI; FORM

Project Name/Descriptio
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Carps of Engineers, WAmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: AaJ
Field Office: e,c D
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the cu.zrent Rrap ty owner, hemby designate and authorize Soil L Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the. processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supppplemental information iri support of applications, etc. frorm4his day forward. The day of
./t?? , -a-.O o Q
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence conderning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
gover=ent officials to enter the property when accoippanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&'EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
YAA 1)
Print Pr6perty Owner's Name . Proper wne s Signature
cc: Ms. Cynd.i Karoly cc: Mr. Kevin C. Martin
NCDENR - DWQ- Soil & Environurental'Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604 ?.....?- -?
Chndg!ae Office rrrci+.Mfp Offlca:
236 I. FWWp Court. Suite C 3817-E LawnUe Drive
Concord. NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Mae: [phone]
.-,nA. ",in aAru fw [phone]
Address: 4a yI
J
0= ,Jaa1
#?_`(? J•1 i I / -. C ni ?\?I, ?i ??i l?`J j?i? o _ -/ (i?'I ?/ ??? `??/y. ??fl
N{ejnlaay , ?i? `?` \Y •Il ?`?I. `I oo?%'' I?? j / ? ` ` ,1:\?t
i park j?3I? j 1 r _Ljo i
v ??
_ / Up iii !/jj/ ?jON i ??? ??' "•t
III/
H) 1, ? •?_ }3akertown .`.? j y- - _',. ?Y? ??o ,? ?II , '1 ?, j ??/ \?-?? j j ? ?? lI ? ?( ?? , ?,?,. ?`
,? J i.. _ ' e ' : •v C / } \_? _Y - a ((E _ y ,_1 ne?j tovJC
j% ?(
yj-` ?? ??? v1 i ar_?°' :????-1 %?j\?/ jct S?? 1 l??ll J !li ?? 1 _.`,? ?` 7_.
/ jvv ?I
?,?J' 1(n-J'' '?? `' •? ? ?``d D-_-????=-J'`( I .S? ?-'l..\Si• (? ,../. ?J ?' y o\' ."??
? - ? `? : ? /' •? -`? r, _ ? - . x- ?i J n' 1, \ - - I;
?• •? ,?lM I B ?- ? \ ?• •\ 1 0• ?-1 ? I? ?/ -. I 1 ?' , , 1 r ? j??'Ll?-IDj' ;, l
"???`?-_j .i ,J?j?\? tf•• r a I ??' lj (/-' I°I 1?/?\? i) r ?-_-?.?\..?1,?+ ',?`?j??/ '-? azs• •;?\ ?-•'
?Ic ale a• ,I ? ?,` ? J` ? , }, J\I ; L, ?= "\ ?J'' t{ ?J ? I ?' / J?
? ??n •` r ?: •? ???' ?" ? :? ? I d ?v ? ?? l i ?-'?/ ? ? ? m ? •? ? i j 1161
BM. 846
? J ?t ? •?j j iii ? ?%? .II ?? -'? ???1? J? jj _ I , li ? j i o - .J1
?\ ? ??- tl '? ?; ? .l. ?? 1 ? ?`? , ?'?\v 9Y2? ' _ ? ?= j'am' ? •: ?? ? ??/? ;; .
77
/. g
I
t l I 51\
jj 1. • ???. j? -??j? t-' ?j i -? I?
j./f'a ) If??.) j '? \\? /;jjj; ?l •? j? ?r `•- ?? ?• SI o:\ j? l / i B
0
v y? /( I t i --J W,
Dike er j: / • (• it , / ` \`? c / \\
-mil f ? • ??• { I L?? t\. , ? J ?? Q\-i\ ?\j??/??? '`?__ j-?\. j ,I .r- ?-% I!T /
I ( ???`
°?"? ?? j e?__%? ??? ?? ??_•? ?? jj???Jl ?? I ?? ?s0j
C j??-•%r .'t ? OC jj?j\'? j J?`? ? , •/ ? ? h?? j?l, i -.\\\`/ -? li ,/?o? //I ,?? \;?\
o- ?• l;
16
jj ji? J/ C ? u ? J ?_ jlj ??I? jjl j:. ./1?r.? •w,l\ '??•' ???J?\ ?,?,?i\J _ ? ?+? j" { ? ?
19
99
/. •• /`?-mil ?' ?, ,^ ?' , v 'k , ?? _ 19V 1 ?j'?-' ??- ( I,
:j ,\v ?7. ,. jj ?.,,? ? ,Ili//q??? , ••k,1,i.;, 5?, r?j?-?. ?•. ??•? \?/? ?' j ?_ „ `"
_i-?? j.p j _ j? I"J?'h• ??/./? ? - \t`i ??r ?, ?:?J , ?,?\ • ,A i j?????-"?? •-?-_ A_
' •? ? ? .? ?j??? ? i / I l i 'i • !? ? ^) ?? r ? " y"- ti . 1918 /.
:? q'< ,"I. j-` ? I •?\\t. `mi j? ?? ar _".` ?;".Ii(Gl1l J I ?? - t gip` `?{ ??-?-?
`1°01' I \?\1` ;j /%/ •i \ $/61'-'?'_' \`?`p/? j° 4 .L-,?YI 13j M .? •j\'??/$ jt?- •• 38?:\???.?/^i v?
?rogr - I /•???_.?:, j/ ORfOt ?•'??1 `?\?:- ??'1
82? _ " ? ?+.J} ?"" •,? ??'?- ? `?9• \• I.1 .? I /? `?j - ~ j i
//I I j ?I //?o? co i?/)/ ? ? jj?? j ji ? jp\\ /\ \ \` \ r 1 \ r ? ` ?? j ?? ?• ? `??"?\j?? ? '
?;,h

CFM
?tt-o.a
ON. SeS
--
?.? 71
i X 1 1 I I
lir®'e A e A 6 g \' ( I I I I 1I
_ _ II
I ? / _ _ e a e e ? ® ? -t I
Cl
l - ,I - "JJ--
??/? y I Cy `'1 I 1 6j ,1??/\ r-j B 8 ® I - a- J -j - -
_ III' y f? ? ? F? Ilf?_ rt - ? E" I ? I ?y / 1 cry ?/?/// ? \ e I ® ° I i d
?II (Zg ry 11? -_-.T.-= 1= I_ ry/ r" 1 /%-? I - I e ??-1 1-e
III I-t-T- rr=--mac
III ?? ? I I ?li( _/ ???i/ a ee I I
II = _- tll? ? I ?? I ti III( `" I y ?'??? _ I'I'' ry ^? ? I ® -1 I-
lilt k
x-11
=I=- I IIII C
61
I ti Imo, ???II ??
1 I I Gy ? i /?r?? ti
Gg ry-1?I?-cy S/??5 Icylil? 1y\ ???'a° G) GJ c- u?rajlC?)I??IC-7 I`jtr
'T I
C-i
ry r-j
) ??i ?? G G? IIIII fJ GJ I ?J I _ I J I
I fzj j?rl?(yIr"Ir, `\\y l% ???\??\(?? ( I?? al
G (t?
rj\\
y r
?., R,« (?: IIII c, r., o p
° e IM ? n
LJ_1_L_LJI (? r
r _
Q%s
I I I I I
Q? !`S licoo?
EXHIBIT A ,
BRADFORD DOWNS
OVER-ALL SITE
1" = 400'
09/01/2004 17:34 8611589 EARNHARDT BUILDERS PAGE 02
-- -? •. v vi walGl WUa11Ly 66011190,340 T-011 P002/002 U-035
Jul 1S 04 12:00P CITY OF ARCHDRLE 3364312130 P.
ARcHDALE PLANNING/ZONING DEPARTMENT
3D7 Balfour Drive
P. O. Box 14068
Archdale, NC 27263
Jeffrey D. Wells, Planning Director
July 14, 2004
NCDU-,NR
Attn: Jenrty.Prceman
595 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC. 27107
Re: Bradford Downs Subdivision approval prior to Randleman Watershed
enactinent.
Dear Ms Frectnan,
Please be advised that the City approved the development of the Bradford frowns
subdivision back in 1998 as a phased single family residential development. Being drat the
project was approved prior to the enactment of the Randleman Lak.c watershed
restriction. in January 2000, each phase of the development has adhered Lo Our rules and
regulations in efTect at the time oHnitial approval in 1998.
lfyou have any yue.,tions, please contact me at 336-431-6807.
ll
l
y ctfu
n ells
Plannin,eg )irector
p,...
Phone #: [phone]
Email: jwellsCa)archdale-nc.gov
Page 1 of 2
Kevin Martin
From: Scott Carpenter [[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 9:48 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Steve Tedder; Boyd Devane; Jeff Manning; John Dorney; Kevin Martin (S&EC/EMC)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Recommendation to EMC concerning Randleman Rule]]
I agree with Darryl's comments and Bob's understanding of the locals approach.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
To All,
I believe that the WSRO's understanding below is correct. I have provided a summary of
my notes from the August 30th meeting. Also, Kevin gave me a copy of a letter from the
Archdale Planning & Zoning Department for Bradford Downs S/D It appears that they are
exempting a phased residential development within their jurisdiction because the City
approved the development in 1998 or to the Randleman Rule). It is a one paragraph
letter. I have quoted the letter below for your review. My understanding is that if the locals
exempt the development (and because it's not a DOT project) we do not implement the Rule
(at least_not until the Rule chap es). (I'm not sure how Land Quality will review it if
required to do so.) Does everyone agree?
- Bob
Archdale Letter (July 14, 2004), Jeffrey D. Wells (Planning Director - 336-431-6807)
"Please be advised that the City approved the development of the Bradford Downs
subdivision back in 1998 as a phased single family development. Being that the project was
approved prior to the enactment of the Randleman Lake watershed restrictions in January
2000, each phase of the development has adhered to our rules and regulations in effect at
the time of initial approval in 1998."
Bob's Notes from August 30, 2004 Meeting -
Declaratory Ruling on parallel utilities w/n Zone I
o D1VQ lVSRO & Central as well as Land Quality believes that it's currently not
allowed, however Scott doesn't see where the Rule it specifically prevents it
o Scott will review local ordinances
o Dorney will write draft
o Boyd will present to IVQC Oct. '04 (obviously this will need to be moved to
Dec. '04)
Rule Changes
o not clear if D jVQ implements the Rule for projects exempt under local
ordinance
o currently D jVQ implements Rule for DOT projects but not public projects
0 only solution is to change the Rule
o need to consult Frank Crawley (AGs) on advise on what actions need to be
taken if EMC approved ordinances not as strict as the Rule (not clear who was
to do this)
5/24/2005
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Date: 10/5/05
Applicant/Owner: Earnhardt Builders, Inc. County: Guilford
Investigator: W. Overby State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Oak hickory forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: upland
If needed, explain on reverse.) 1 -11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carya tomentosa T FACU 9.
2. Quercus phellos T FACW- 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua T FAC+ 11.
4. Juniperus vir_giniana T FAC- 12.
5. Cornus florida. S FACU 13.
6. Lonicera japonica V FAC- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 33
Remarks:
11
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: _
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks: No indicators of wetland hydrology present
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Plot ID: upland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: well
(Series and Phase): Wilkes Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-3 A 2.5Y 3/2 Sand loam
3-12 Bw 2.5Y 5/4 Loam
12+ C multicolored Loam sa rolite
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils in pond bottom not representative of native soil series'
L--
, I
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Date: 10/5/05
Applicant/Owner: Earnhardt Builders, Inc. County: Guilford
Investigator: W. Overby State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Drained pond
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Flags 1-23
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effuses H FACW 9.
2. Salix nigra S OBL 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua T FAC+ 11.
4. Platanus occidentalis T FACW- 12.
5. Carex sp. H FACW 13.
6. Rubus H NI 14.
7. Alnus serrulata S FACW 15.
8. Typha sp. H OBL 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: >12 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.)
Remarks: Delineation performed in dry period
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Plot ID: wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: poorly
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Endoaquult Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes x No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-2 A 2.5Y 5/6 Sand loam
2-15 Bw Gley 1-5/10Y 5YR 5/6 Few/distinct Sand clay loam
15+ C multicolored Sand loam sa rolite
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils in pond bottom not representative of native soil series'
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Complete this form, print and sign, and either mail to NCEEP, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1619, or fax to 919-733-5321. Attachments are acceptable to clarify information on the form.
1. Name of Applicant or Agent
Kevin Martin
2. Name of Business * S&EC
3. Street Address * 11010 Raven Ridge Road
4. City, State, Zip *
Raleigh, NC 27614
5. Telephone * [phone]
6. Fax [phone]
7. E-mail [e-mail]
8. Project Name * Bradford Downs Phases 8 & 9
9. Project Location * See attached USGS, North of Hwy 311 East of Archdale
10. Lat-Long Coordinates Lat 35.9019° N Long 79.9393"W
11. River Basin * Cape Fear
12. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) *** 03030003
13. Project County * Randolph
14. Riparian Wetland Impact * 0 acres
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact * 01883 acres
16. Coastal Marsh Impact * 0 acres
17. Stream-Cold Impact * 0 feet
18. Stream-Cool Impact * 0 feet
19. Stream-Warm Impact * 0 feet
20. ** Buffer-Zone 1 Impact * 0 square feet
21. ** Buffer-Zone 2 Impact * 0 square feet
22. ** Buffer-Total (Zone 1 + Zone 2) * 0 square feet
Date: S % Signature of Applicant or gent:
Attachments? [Z ]Yes No ?
Required information; zero answers in 14-22 should be indicated with "0" or "N/A", not left blank.
** Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba River Basins
and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed.
*** Go to EPA "Surf Your Watershed" http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm for CU determination
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205 or carol.shaw(@ncmail.net
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
. Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Bradford Downs c/o Earnhardt Builders County Randolph
Project Number 05 0931 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 5/27/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type Residential S/D
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
NNV39 OTH W770 N [__ 17-9-(2) wsIv CA* 30,608. 0.19
F - - Stream O YO N F- 17-9-(2) F-F-30,608. F- 40.00
F-1 P770-
Y O N [__F_F_F__F_F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Bradford Downs c/o Barnhardt Builders
Project Number 05 0931
Recvd From APP
Received Date 5/27/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type Residential S/D
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
NW39 FO- O Y O N ? 17-9-(2) wSCV CA* 30,608. 0.19
Stream O Y O N F - 17-9 (2) r-r- 30,608. F- 4 -
?- O Y _0N F__F__F_F_F_F__
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? QQ Y Q N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355407 Longitude (ddmmss) 795607
Comments:
County Randolph
County2
Region Winston-Salem
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: 6/9/05 Project Name: Bradford Downs
c/o Earnhardt Builders
DWQ#: 05-0931
County: Randolph
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
To:
60-day processing time: 5/27/05 7/25/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
May 26, 2005
S&EC Project #9044.W1
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Park-view Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Request for Nationwide Permit 39 / 401 Water Quality Certification p r ? ???
Bradford Downs Residential Subdivision (Phases 8 & 9) Q D
D
Near Archdale, Randolph County, North Carolina
MAY 2 7 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
S i'EMOS AND S T OntAIYATER BRANCH
Dear Ms. Karoly and Ms. Wade:
On behalf of Earnhardt Builders Inc., we request authorization from the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) for the use of Nationwide Permit 39 for construction of this
proposed residential community. We also request written concurrence from the NC
Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the 401 Water
Quality Certification associated with Nationwide Permit 39. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, as well as an agent authorization form. The
Town of Archdale considers this project exempt from the Randleman Buffer rules (see
attached letter from the Town of Archdale and emails from various DWQ staff).
Location
The project site is located in the headwaters of Muddy Creek in Randolph County. The
site is north of Hwy 311 and east of Archdale. Figure 1 depicts the site on the applicable
USGS topographic quadrangle.
Proicet History
S&EC delineated the jurisdictional waters on-site in November of 2004, wetlands in a
drained pond and a perennial stream were flagged. Several permits have previously been
issued for this project site, the Action ID numbers are listed in Section IV of the PCN
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E La%vndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
May 26, 2005
S&EC Project 9044.W1
Page 2
form. An office meeting with Andrea Wade of the USACE was conducted in the Fall of
2004 to discuss the handling of this project.
Impacts
Existing impacts include 40'of temporary stream channel impacts associated with the
construction of one sewer crossing and 0.0096 acres of wetland impact associated with a
road crossing. Proposed wetland impacts total 0.1787 acres for lot fill. The proposed
impacts are depicted on the attached site plans and are enumerated and described in the
attached PCN form. The lot fill impacts are to wetlands within a drained farm pond.
Avoidance
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10 acre) of wetlands or if a discharge causes the
loss of any open waters. The sewer line was constructed perpendicular to the channel and
the road was placed along the dam of an old farm pond to minimize impacts. The high
quality wetlands and riparian areas further down stream have been completely avoided
and placed in to a restricted open space area.
Mitigation
Since previous project wetland impacts equal 0.29 acres, the client proposes to pay into
the NCEEP at a 1:1 ratio for the non-riparian wetland impacts within the drained pond
(0.1883 acres).
Sincerely,
Kevin Martin
President
Attachments:
(7 copies to DWQ, 1 to the Corps)
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wetland Impact Maps
$200 check for DWQ application fee
Wetland and Upland Data Forms
Overall Subdivision Plan
Letter from Town of Archdale
Emails from DWQ
NC EEP Request Form
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information 219@ 2 0 ! J LS
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information MAY 2 7 2005
Name: Earnhardt Builders Inc. DFLIR -I .,
Mailing Address: 1825 Mountain Meadow Drive itT1A1OAN0 TGRUNArrR , rsi
Asheboro. NC 27205
Telephone Number:_ [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: S&EC
Mailing Address:l 1010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bradford Downs
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 7728147590, 7728149486, 7728240771,
7728148499, 7728240672, 7728241818
4. Location
County: Randolph Nearest Town: Archdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Bradford Downs Phases 8 & 9
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): North of Hwy 311 on SR
1914 (Wood Ave.) then left on Bradford Lane right on Shady Oak Lane and left on Twisted
Oak Lane (see attached USGS)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9019 ON 79.9393 °W
6. Property size (acres): 35 acres (Phases 8&9), 116 acres total project
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT of Muddy Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:_ Partially complete residential subdivision surrounded by
existin,R residential subdivisions.
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Residential subdivision includiniz access roads and utilities.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Allow utilization of uplands for a residential
subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. _A nationwide 26 was issued in March of 2000 (Action ID # 200020594)
for 185' of stream impact for roads and 0.17 acres of wetland for earlier phases of the project
There was also a May 1999 request to the Corps but the client could not locate that approval It
requested 0.12 acre of wetland and 145' of unimportant channel At that time these impacts
would have been below notification thresholds. There was also a NW 12 in the 1999 request for
temporary impacts.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts are to a drained pond for a
road crossing and lot fill. There is also a temporary impact for one sewer line crossing of a
stream.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
Lot 241 & 242 Fill Drained pond No 200' 0.1342
Lot 243 Fill Drained pond No 200' 0.0445
Lot 245 & Road Fill Drained pond No < 50' .0096

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.1883
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Unknown
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiDIv leneth X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
Lot 247-248
Property Line UT Muddy Creek Excavation
(Sewer) Perennial
3 40' 0.0027

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary 40' 0.0027
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8 of 13
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name Waterbody
(if applicable) e)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0027
Wetland Impact acres): 0.1883
Open Water Impact acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres 0.191
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 40'
Temporary
Pemmanent
Temporary &
permanent
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The road crossing was placed
over an existing pond dam, the sewer line crossed nemendicular to the channel. The subdivision
was designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and riparian areas down stream of the drained pond
See open space on overall site plan).
Page 9 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwctlands/strmgide.btml.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The client proposes to nay into NCEEP at a 1.1 ratio for wetland impacts to satisfy Corps
requirements. No wetland mitigation should be required by DWQ since impacts for the entire
subdivision fall below the 1 acre threshold.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/wip/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 10 of 13
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify. )? Yes ? No ® (See attached letter from Town of
Archdale and attached DWQ staff emails.)
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
I I Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitieation
3 (2 for Catawba)
2 I I 1.5
Total
Page 11 of 13
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Total project = 116 ac., Roadway = 8.51 ac., Lots
avg. 3000 sq. ft./lot x 254 lots = 17.498 ac. Total impervious = 26.0 ac. So percent impervious =
22.4%
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ? (The sewer line and road
impact have already occurred. The lot impacts have not.)
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes El No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr. state. nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
Page 12 of 13
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Kevin Martin of S&EC has met with Andrea Wade of the USACE to discuss this project at
length and has prepared this application based on her input. If authorized the total project
impacts including past applications will be 0.4783 of pennanent wetland impacts 185' of
important channel impacts, 145' of unimportant stream channel impacts.

Applicant/ gentl Signature Date
(Agent's signature i id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
05/2/2005 22:40 8611589 EARNHARDT BUILDERS PAGE 01
E.n vironmet.tal Consultants, PA
RavA Raleigh, North Carolina' 27614 Mims; [phone] • F= (919) 846.W7
wwiv_S.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
D
Phone: I 'f o
Project Name/Delscnptio
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wgadngton District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 25402
Attn: N ?J
I:i;eld Office: :a tc n
Re. Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting .
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current pzopertI owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
su leunental information in support of applications, etc. from:fl-is day forward. The day of
4 v z.0 o fi
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence conderning the agent for this project
NOTICE: This authorization, foi liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accorvpanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Pr perty Owner's Name Proper wne s Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly cc: Mr. Kevin C Martin
NCDENR - DWQ' Soil & Environnnental'Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, C 27604 , .- ^...?-
Chn sire Office: G?rcnaF?n Dffi
236 LePnUp Court. Suite C 3317-E Lawndale Drive
Concord. NC 28025 urunsboro, NC 27455
Phont: [phone] phone: [phone]
nne? "'IA nArK fax: [phone]
Address: ??a?" /`????L /7VW1?4? ?/'?
?J9cksoii.o is
1 ?•//' 1 i? I ?') l?/? ;?C`?(?7.
ji,Ql C j. ?' ,?' ` (?? ?? 90,
80,
Allen day ??.i
1J
1'? i -Park iF? /?j? •A?,i,1 A J /i ?1,? :, _?
1
??'•'?r?;\```y•?-,i ¢ I T"/ IY_ ;?? y" / 'J ??j? ?( ?' \??--?? "?? V1 ? ,o. • ? I roa???? ? ? I (?,'? • \
1 +""\ \"1 i• ;'S' j i! ?\ i?S1; ?1 ?/ ? ? ? % ? \, , ! ? \Ji /"`? . ? 8!8 - ` I I / ? / / i/ Irn(I/? ??\? ? / 4? •? I / ? •'\
akCPO?ViI?T.?,? h; •L ?t 300 "/I ?/ a. / l? 11 j S mow. Al1;: ?? e
WA,
??la(i 6 ( )? k ?•OOA.-`•
i?? :.?? l `? ;1?V? t7- ?? ? ? / ? ?? ? ??I ? (? o al ?. ?. j ? li??l 1??{ y• j? ?V ?? ? '?• 7_' _
ravidene
TUh
/, i? i' t ?.p II , ? ? I' ? ..1.;? 1? ? : / 1° ?> // ; 1154, ?- . It ? :•''? ??
610 / - ?i`?? -; •` .N -r?r _ T ,_ ,?.:,{?/ ,,? ,?• nli t?? ,r?
.? 1??? ,/
1, ? `-\oa?\? i,l ? ?\??' -'I,` (?.I //`` ? ICI I? `/?1.?? -l? ? ? o•\I ?i J?( 1 ? fsr•
~\l?'?_r_?r { 1 :??r? b2? ?,; ??r 5?' ): ??J I ?Ji J\ I?;°I ,f?\? Jr? ( "?. ?\ ??' ? ? ?`. ? ;_+ • ezs• ..?
"?-\ ?? ,• ?I t ? ?a "?? Tf ,I 1 I 1 ? ?r?lJ ? / ? j\ ? io ? 1161 ? ?I
6-l j? it _ \' 7 •! l? \\ J
?? ? F3a1y_.J
'
:ice,''
%
v,?( :. -.:-? 1•,,, .•? !/ •?' `U il\ 1 A --?? , • jam- ?i? ,? % ??'? - o
j
311
? a ?/ / :1jJ1 ti?I\v/' 1 ?% fa j '7? II?I•
o ?? ?' 9Jh_ U .%
j ..\ 7 t da i / % ? I ? r
h'ter
y ?' ` ???? e`-J? % j °o Q`• ya4? ????\? I Ipso ?1
o? o
13 _ ii
99
? ? ?• i/ P, . )j ? ? (r? / ?? ?,' J!?',• Y ???? "?• ??• y ---? 1917 { f? II a, %
826
7.6
•`';?~V:\`;II?J ?1 ?I\ffJ'I FIIil?(1
n _?? , j-<$ ??? v 1. I lJ /.i ??v / •1 U, oVA ??
_ •I
6 t.
?_?• ?\ \ \ ?? ?1?,?-? o is - ?(6r 1.. ?-? ` ,??ri '?° ?.*'1J fJ BM'`/? ?? 7g0 ,??? ?-"/I ? \
?i ' ? ?? ? = C-? ? ?rogres3 ? •,82 ?.;? ._ - ??t? 1 ?` 1 ? ? ?'?
jfOL
?\\\? .:? ?.? ?// / .c?1/ (/,,'I I I I r?//rf ' ??? i' 11 5b11\\ •?\\' 11 i ?' P\ \ . \ - ?. " I \?\?? f I ?I?I /1`?\\??{ ? ??' o'

.... .... I i - ?.
r .a rc fr I i l ) I- ?Tr T- T - -
- r
j--1
w;?" I t l I I i I I I I
r- _- a ee ® e-®-a®_ee®eeea e?\\? ® ® ? 'ii
11 1 ?? ?? -l ? j ? ? ? ?h 1 ry r:y ? - 9 6 /L ®? ? ® - e? I
c
JJ--
!--
- 'III I-1-1- 7-r= -?1 /?y/cy cy ~?/ G?? I ® J L
I ? - ? III ?? I c? I ? IIIf ??? ? ? /
- = tll? I ?? I ti 11!(5 I-
?? cy ?? I c? IIIt 1 _ t
J?J-?; ltit-__ `'?/mar ?-If ti\y \\ \I i ?- =a=f __ ?I
rl ti Ic I III /?I'? y c' / /? y I y \ !,?= _ I v ?? rs? -L--
-1?
II f99 _ - 61
i? ti II ??? ry I ±fl I I I i I I
= -Al
rj (f r-j C9 y 62) 6-j ? %? \ , ?? I I I I I r? 1 I F r., I ? 9
y ?( I
1 Gj ? I ?y I ? ? (\? r., n,
G
y \ ?? ry C-) \\\ r, rJ Il li r J _ aJ
ru. rc r« _ ° e r,-j
o ? u
r 9 ,
) I I I i I
a? ?`? - EXHIBIT "A'
BRADFORD DOWNS
OVER-ALL SITE
Y' = 400'
09/01/2004 17:34 8611589 EARNHARDT BUILDERS PAGE 02
?„..,.. --A .Av vi WULUI WUd11Ly 06011 14bju T-011 P002/002 U-035
Jul 15 04 12:00p CITY OF ARCHDRLC 3364312130 P.i?-
ARC14DALE PLANNING/zONlNO DEPART MEN'r
307 Balrour Drive
P. O. Box 1,4068
Archdale, NC 27763
Jeffrey D. Wells, Planning Director
July 14, 2001
NCDUNR
Attn: Jeany Freeman
595 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC. 27107
Re: Bradford Downs Subdivision approval prior to Randleman Watershed
etnactinent.
Dear Ms Freeman,
Please be advised that the City approved the development of the Bradford Downs
subdivision (Zack in 1998 as a phased single family residential development. Being that the
project wes approved prior to the enactment of the Randleman: hake watcrshui
restrictions in January 2000, each pltasc of the development has adhered ti) our rules and
rc-ulations in etlect at the time of initial approval in '1998.
11'you have any yuertions, please contact me at 336-431-6807,.
It
y Resp ctti)
1) ells
Planning )irector
Phone #: [phone]
Email: jwellsralarchdale-nC.gdv
Page 1 of 2
Kevin Martin
From: Scott Carpenter [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 9:48 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Steve Tedder; Boyd Devane; Jeff Manning; John Dorney; Kevin Martin (S&EC/EMC)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Recommendation to EMC concerning Randleman Rule]]
I agree with Darryl's comments and Bob's understanding of the locals approach.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
To All,
I believe that the WSRO's understanding below is correct. I have provided a summary of
my notes from the August 30th meeting. Also, Kevin gave me a copy of a letter from the
Arc in & Zoning De artment for Bradford Downs S/D. It appears that they are
exempting a phased residential development within their jurisdiction because the City
approved the development in 1998 (prior to the Randleman Rule). It is a one paragraph
letter. I have quoted the letter below for your review. My understanding is that if the locals
exempt the development (and because it's not a DOT project) we do not implement the Rule
(at least not until the Rule changes). (I'm not sure how Land Quality will review it if
required to do so.) Does everyone agree?
- Bob
Archdale Letter (July 14, 2004), Jeffrey D. Wells (Planning Director - 336-431-6807)
"Please be advised that the City approved the development of the Bradford Downs
subdivision back in 1998 as a phased single fancily development. Being that the project was
approved prior to the enactment of the Randleman Lake watershed restrictions in January
2000, each phase of the development has adhered to our rules and regulations in effect at
the time of initial approval in 1998. "
Bob's Notes from August 30, 2004 Meeting -
Declaratory Ruling on parallel utilities tiv/n Zone I
o DJVQ if'SRO & Central as well as Land Quality believes that it's currently not
allowed, however Scott doesn't sec where the Rule it specifically prevents it
o Scott will review local ordinances
o Dorney will write draft
o Boyd will present to IVQC Oct. '04 (obviously this will need to be moved to
Dec. '04)
Rule Changes
o not clear ifD{VQ implements the Rule for projects exempt under local
ordinance
o currently D IVQ implements Rule for DOT projects but not public projects
0 only solution is to change the Rule
o need to consult Frank Crawley (AGs) on advise on what actions need to be
taken if EMC approved ordinances not as strict as the Rule (not clear who was
to do this)
5/24/2005
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Date: 10/5/05
Applicant/Owner: Earnhardt Builders, Inc. County: Guilford
Investigator: _ W. Overby State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Oak hickory forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: upland
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
_Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carya tomentosa T FACU 9.
2. Quercus phellos T FACW- 10.
3. Liquidambar styracillua T FAC+ 11.
4. Juniperus yirginiana T FAC- 12.
5. Cornus florida. S FACU 13.
6. Lonicera japonica V FAC- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 33
Remarks:
IL-
I
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks: No indicators of wetland hydrology present
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Plot ID: upland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: well
(Series and Phase): Wilkes Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-3 A 2.5Y 3/2 Sand loam
3-12 Bw 2.5Y 514 Loam
12+ C multicolored Loam sa rolite
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils in pond bottom not representative of native soil series'
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Date: 10/5/05
Applicant/Owner: Earnhardt Builders, Inc. County: Guilford
Investigator: W. Overby State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Drained pond
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Flags 1-23
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effuses H FACW 9.
2. Saliix nigra S OBL 10.
3. Liquidambar styracif/ua T FAC+ 11.
4. Platanus occidentalis T FACW- 12.
5. Carex sp. H FACW 13.
6. Rubus H NI 14.
7. Anus serrulata S FACW 15.
8. Typha sp. H OBL 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: >12 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) _
x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.)
Remarks: Delineation performed in dry period
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Bradford Downs Plot ID: wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: poorl y
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Endoaquult Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes x No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-2 A 2.5Y 5/6 Sand loam
2-15 Bw Gley 1-5/10Y 5YR 5/6 Few/distinct Sand clay loam
15+ C multicolored Sand loam sa rolite
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils in pond bottom not representative of native soil series'
IL-
I
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Complete this form, print and sign, and either mail to NCEEP, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1619, or fax to 919-733-5321. Attachments are acceptable to clarify information on the form.
1. Name of Applicant or Agent *
Kevin Martin
2. Name of Business *
S&EC
3. Street Address *
11010 Raven Ridge Road
4. City, State, Zip *
Raleigh, NC 27614
5. Telephone *
[phone]
6. Fax
[phone]
7. E-mail [e-mail]
8. Project Name *
Bradford Downs Phases 8 & 9
9. Project Location * See attached USGS, North of Hwy 311 East of Archdale
10. Lat-Long Coordinates
Lat 35.9019* N Long 79.9393*W
11. River Basin * Cape Fear
12. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) *** 03030003
13. Project County * Randolph
14. Riparian Wetland Impact * 0 acres
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact * 0.1883 acres
16. Coastal Marsh Impact * 0 acres
17. Stream-Cold Impact * 0 feet
18. Stream-Cool Impact * 0 feet
19. Stream-Warm Impact * 0 feet
20. ** Buffer-Zone 1 Impact * 0 square feet
21. ** Buffer-Zone 2 Impact * 0 square feet
22. ** Buffer-Total (Zone 1 + Zone 2) * 0 square feet
Date: e Signature of Applicant or

Attachments?[ Yes [--]No ,,2
Required information; zero answers in 14-22 should be indicated with "0" or "N/A", not left blank.
** Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba River Basins
and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed.
*** Go to EPA "Surf Your Watershed" http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm for CU determination
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205 or carol. shaw(a)ncmail.net

oo' O
Z
o ?
n
0
[J G-
J

Z

G

208673834.001
NTC
? N
e o° .00 -D Eo
o
0
O C
r'?5O
..!!? W
arnNmlo
I, JAMES B. STEPHENS certify that this is not a boundary survey, that boundary information shown hereon is from a L38 q?23 TIES 1 9 4
ALLAN H. HILL DB,zasPC,34D map prepared by this office titled "SURVEY OF BRADFO Gj~ + +
DOWNS FUTURE PHASE 8 & 9" dated 22 MAY 2003; ~ Q ~s + + l~9 HUFF ROAD SR.1915 ~ + +
that the fla in gq g delineating wetlands as marked ~ ~ J.6. Htt1 HEIRS b SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA ~ Q + + + ~Z2 20' 0 20' 40'
CONTRO TRACT 3 y ~ \r/ CORNERL DB a2a PC 507 was field located and plotted hereon. ~ Gj Gj + + A RIDGE LANE ti''~ + (A~
PB 57-34 P.B. 74-10 0 Witness my hand and seal this day of Q' ~'200~ - - 3+ +
NOR7H S7AlE 1EIEPXQ[ ~ Vl ~3 + SCALE: 1" = 20' W + W
ACCESS FASFLEAT ~ V D.B. IS%-1866 CONTROL O P + + + ~y/ 3 O w
CORNER ~ , 0 ~ P.B. 74-10 ~ ->v + + + 20 O ~m Um ~
sT"~ 254 tF1FP1lONE EASF?FIiT DOPE MEA Profes ib and Sur J 06. ~s96-~e66 255 ws suBDIHyoN N + + + + ~j, W ~ O + + + + + + ps O~ O~ ON
PB 5 PG 66 ( J
call H. aoaMS ~ ~ Line Bearrn Dlst ~ ~ 9 DB 1363 PG 1350 ing ,Distance ~4+ + + + + ~~9~ o O ~ ~ w ~ Z o, o SITE a
- \ egia'tr ' ber L1 S 3'-04 -45 E 1 Q \ L2 S 55'-12'-54" W )4-45 E 124.15 ~ R• a z ~ 12'-54" W 50.00' + + + + + + s+ F w a o
\J \S L3 S 71'-31'-08" W N P ft'-08" W 82.42' J + + + + + + + + s ,g = ~ ~
y o CONTROL Q~ l4 S 5'-53'-18" W EIP y CORNER L5 N 84'-0T-32" W i3'-18" W 50.00' + + + + + + + + ~ ~ a w )7'-32" W 97.69' + + + + + + + + Z Q Q ~
Ey r P.B. 74-t t ~ ~ ~ L6 S T-15'-29" W + + + + + + + + s a,~ 5'-29" W 38.08' 0 + + + + + + + + + ° N
ro Z 91 92 93 m F L7 N 89'-03'-06" W )3'-06" W 100.50' ~h + + + + + + + + + + ~ '6'-40" W 119.20' 9 + + + + + + + + + + +
w 90 ~ 94 w w L8 S T-16'-40" W ' 88 W 89 ~ 95 ~ 96 L9 N 40'-28'-13" W 28'-13" W 29.22' + + + + + + + + + + + ~ N
W ~ s' w 1 97 98 L10 N 2'-35'-30" E 35'-30" E 14.41' + + + + + + + + ~~s WOOD AVENUE
~ F ~ gg L11 N 5'-16'-16" W = w too lot l12 N 84'-43'-44" E 6'-16" W 76.50' lA + + + + + + + + ~ w SR.1914 13'-44" E 65.61' 9 + + + + + + + a
Z n 0 toz W O L13 S 63 -44'-17" E f4'-17" E 13.55' ^+,'I + + + + + + + + + + S0~ ~ ~ o c
~ _ LANE PU$ a Li4 N 2T-17'-50" E ~ BRADFORD LIC 50' R L15 N 5'-10'-26" W 7'-50" E 50.00' ' + + + + + + + + + ??ls T,y o o Z z ~ w 0 -26 W 90.00 b J ~ Q
Q ~W Lib S 39'-34'-51" E O _ l + + + + + ~ + + + ti1y S ~ ~ ~ f4 51 E 45.65 AcP + + + + + + + y,j~T'~F ~
L17 N 65'-44'-47" E BRADFORD DOWNS L18 N 59'-52'-18" E t4'-47" E 8.4T 'C~ < 7 FT + + + +S+y + + + ~ i2'-18" E 13.51' + + + 1cp + + N
~ a' PHAS 6 L19 N 52'-13'-51" E ^0 13'-51" E 16.59' + + + T? + + +
N 121 LAT BOOK 7 ,PAGE 10 BR L20 N 18'-06'-32" E ADFORD LAI L21 N 3•-03'-22" w 12o h )6'-32" E 15.47' r + + + + + )3'-22" W 13.85' + + + + ~ + +
119 w w - L22 N 61'-29'-28" E 29'-28" E 10.18' rn° ~ ~
PIEDMON 118 117 ~ ~ L23 N 74'-37'-48" E n 133 D.B. 114 T NA URgL G 116 ~ , L24 S 55'-45'-30" W 3T-48" E 15.71' ,o~ ; + + + ~ .d + 45'-30" W 12.80' + + + ~ + + + + ~
8 858 AS OMPgNy ~ ~ ns BRADFORD DOWNS L25 S 51'-23'-21" E 3 a O - t3'-21" E 22.06' s- + + + + + + + ~
50' R/W w 11a P ASE 7 S EET 1 OF 2 L26 S 24'-24'-O6" E 3gg•07, 113 LAT BOOK 7 ,PAGE 11 L27 S 45'-24'-04" E Z4'-06" E 5.81' + + + + + + + + o•
,I ~ N g~-21'- " o. t1z L28 S 34'-1T-11" W _ the E , 24'-04" E 6.46' ~ + + + + + + + + .N ~ 1T-11" W 14.97 49 + + + + + + + +N.
~ N Curve • s Chord 16Barin a d Distance Ar n Z tto L29 S 61'_32'_28" W I Le th 32'-28" W 16.94' + + + + + + + + + ~
9 g Do PIEDMO tos L30 S 52' 00' 39" W ~ v; D B T NATURAL L31 N 43'-40'-50" E )0'-39" W 5.16' + + + + + + + + 40'-50" E 15.45' I < + + + + + + + + J
C1 412.00' N 1'-20'-23" 56.49' 56.54' , a 105 1148-g58 OAS COMPq L32 N 2'-12'-49" E Z C2132 325.00' S'-49'-59" E 10.23' 10.23' rn a N g•~ ,g•21' S0' R W Y L33 N 48'-40'-15" W 12'-49" E 11.35' + + + + + + + + alb
0 ~ 2, _ / 17o J o 173 1457. ,14" E > L34 N 42'-4T-50" E 40'-15" W 16.37' + + + + + + + + ~I ARO~ TH C R A NO AR HD L-E W ~ 47'-50" E 21.39' + + + + + + +
nz ~ O 28 TO L35 N 53'-05'-17" E O na AL )5'-17" E 13.95'
L m 17s L36 N 6'-51'-38" W ~ 8 ~ BRADF 17s L37 N 57'-02'-23" E 31'-38" W 17.72' ON~V ~ ~g + + + + + +o _ ' 0 PH ~ ~ RA _ TY W NP ~l T N TR )2'-23" E 21.81' ~1N~ 32 ~ + + + + + ~
RD O r 167 C2 PLAT B DOWNS RASE 177 L38 N 3'-05'-39" W OOK 8 O )5'-39" W 11.24' ~ q • r + + + ~ o
~ ,7, 91, P GE 6p 17s L39 N 46'-01'-02" E O )1'-02" E 17.40' ~ 21 X69 1`~ + + + +'I )1'-44" E 17.24' + + + ~
~ EDITH P. HOLT ~ ~ 17s L40 N 31'_01'_44" E O L41 N 34'-38'-18" E o D.B. 1219-49 J o 0o t6D L42 N 64' 48' 38" E 38'-18" E 17.96' cep ~ + + _
p i 181 L43 N 52'-04'-37" E 4$'-3$" E 23.00' ~ + + REVISED APRIL 21, 2005
,ss taz L44 S 74'-27'-29" E 0 , )4'-37" E 11.47 o°' sir., + + T15 MAR. 27, 2005 ?T-29" E 11.08' ~ + +
L6 W L45 S 46'-28'-16" W zs'-1s" w 21.18' + + +1~~ R - 98130 + + JOB NUMBE
n CONTROL N L46 S 30'-13'-32" W ~ CORNER m L47 S 62'-30'-39" W 13'-32" W 16.73' 2a 2t ,1A 30'-39" W 19.15' y ~ + 1
~ ~ P.B. 57-34 1ss v BR DFORO p0 L48 S 52'-16'-13" W 16'-13" w 19.62' ti~ A~ + 100' S0' 0 100' 200' ~
~ „ PAT BOOK g S PHASE 8 L49 S 48'-09'-05" W mz 217 J ro z1e 219 1 PAGE 60 L50 N 40'-11'-11" W )9'-05" W 17.72' ^~h I1'-11" W 12.04' n~
o~ O - - ~ .m ro ~ 2zo L51 N 75' 00' 46" W )0'-46" W 15.21' ~6h + a SCALE: ~ = 100
~ < z1s p, zz1 L52 S 73'-11'-03" W I1'-03" W 20.30' b + + + + ~6 w o 10'-49" W 17.19' £~i S °
~ ~ m o 222 L53 S 30'-10'-49" W o cn ~ a L54 S 52' 03' 41" W )3'-a1" w 15.9x' + + + + + + + + + + ^za JAMESTOWN ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. "
a' ~ 0 1sa 223 L55 N 14'-25'-17" E S ~ 24 D O L56 N 89'-15'-55" E ?5'-17" E 10.05' + + + + + tS5 nZ0 15'-55" E 19.34' + + + + + CONSULTING ENGINEERS o
24a 5'-40'- -m ~ 39.83' 08 E ~ 286.65' zzs L57 N 55'-56'-26" E 93.41' Totol) 13),8g' zee L58 S 30'-30'-48" E 36'-26" E 19.64' + + + + + + W a
- 95.8 ' N O zz7 - 1 57.6 ' 11'-18'_ °t01) O L59 S 34'-40'-04" W 30'-48" E 5.08' E~i; + + + + + + 117 EAST MAIN STREET o ~ t0'-04" W 24.17' + + ~ + + r L P.O. BOX 365 m o
J 0 44.13, l E ~ 60 '-4 „ .W ?9'-42" W 19.66' +1 + ~ + + + rn r inC. JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 ~ m
N g3 75, L S 55 -29 2 W ~ v- I L61 S 40'-32'-52" W f2'-52" w 19.25' ~ Tele hone [phone] W i9'-48" W 17.13' + ~j + + , p m
d. ~ ^ 163 z3e z3a z37 L62 S 69'-59'-48" W 0 n ~ z36 W L63 S 69'-31'-42" W 31'-42" W 13.28' , + + ~ ~ + + + ~ u
~ w ~ 235 ~ z2e L64 N 24'-00'-39" W O , )0'-39" W 14.30' 9' 1, N,
TEN ~ a z34 ,oh,~ l65 N 31 -33'-21" E DS L o N ~ _ f3'-21" E 22.50' N \ ~ 1 ,n 15'-36" W 10.00' 0~~~ + C + ;sue "This certifies that this lat accurate) de icts the boundar of the
'PUB ANE w r; Z - _ ~ L66 N 35'-15 36 W LIC R/W ~ ~ Q ~ r z33 v O P Y P Y ~~t~~'~ti0 + + + + jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water act as oeterminetl
a o 16z ~ ~ z3z o O •y^~ ~9 ~ + + + + by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the
a m° ~ 6 ~ qD zzs 0] Q (q FORD 231 •b6' a~' .w ~ + + law or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404 ~ s ' rv, jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
a 45' 4 y' r e0 DO vw years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the
Ok9 SP ~ ~ 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." PROPERTY + + + ru' W,
v o ' Pq y'~SF ts1 z13 ~ o ~f 6D 8 < z z z11 0 . CORNER + + + + ~ o w„ + + +N..~. (Name)
S 5'-49'-4,i" ~ h o a l~ + + ~
17 W 210 z3o 3.98' 2~ h O ~'T-- zoe 9+ + (Title) + + J
a (Date) ~ N o!
UTTj pj..~ .`~o 20' UTILITY ESMT. v R~ 1 11 IJE ti CENTERED N PIPE E TAIL "A" 207 0 „7h~ ,o I ~y~_ ; i ; + n
134 ~ n o 0 9 qD ' YJ
W ~ 135 136 ~ .i h zos (q FORO 0 r ~ 1 ~ 7 2„ ~m ~ BD oD N + ~ :l ~ ~~r,r.
rn Dk 1 S p ~ _ if ~ ,r
.--I 20' L4 z41 ~ 2as • P HgSE <S 0 G W ~ SANITARY 5'-53-18' W F 60 APPROXIM TE LOCATION ~ ~ L'F"+~ . ~ WE:r~~,f~~t~ wA: frt i~?„ F BASE OF OLD DAM o ti ,d°,
25z SEWER ESMT. 17p,0 ' O 204 U] 10' 10 215 O N O AND LN. ~ ~ Lor 215 2r,
Lic x ~ WETL ND A A 1 25 4 ' /19 ~ CQU , ~ BRADFORD DOWN # 203 3 ~ O Z
RTLA 0 ND 5Q PHASE 4 -MAP 2 q LANE ~ + 20'~ ~ ~ ?sti ^ v ~
(Y, P T BOOK 70, PAG 5 ~ zsa zoe O / T-~- UBLIC R `';::<.~i:•: 242 ¢ 2D, j: ~2~ " r 20' 0 20' 40'
BR DFORD DO S o- ~ ~ 20 UTILITY ES I s ~ 22 ~ v
~p PHASE 4 ML ~ n ~o PLAT OOK 62, PA E 29 ~A ^ ~ o~ ~ Z SCALE: 1 = 20
138 ~ ~ ~ ~ ro (~9 y ~ ~
160 tae 1 S 9 ~A; ~ ti ~ ti y ~
158 157 Z z43 H 0 N 20 ~
0 z4s ~y w +rt' oZ~ o`~ ~ m ~ IMPACTED ETLAND ~ X20 N 4'-11'-33" E ~ o ~ ~ ~
I 139 ~ WETLA AEA ~ 420 S.F. is o 'off + L21 36.85' ~ Stio a r
SEE ETAIL "B" M• r ~ Esc, 5~ ~ +
0 CONTROL U 245 ~ RPO1A~~016 " I O 1N~ 13 _ AN ~U ? ~ + + x + ~ + + +39,x' ~ r30 EX. SEWS M HOLE
P.BCOS NE34 26' n W A RE #3 ~ ps X31 ~ ROpO O 126 F_F I r 247 ELEVp~ PpN Pt Nt1 ~ C J~ O ^ O00 t)Nt A6 oti + + ~ + o + + + + + + ~ ~0 L.F. ± STREAM IMPACTED BY a° < + R~+'+ ~ o` EWER LINE INSTALLATION //100 S.F.
~ A ~ 156 25' 140 ~ ~ F. S zoe ~ ~pRS OOM ON ~71 ~ ti+ ~ + 19' m + S l )
vD fTt Oro ~6 (/~F I. 44', s ~ H ~ ~ to µp~ ~,E~ ~Ot 1 + + + Q' s ~ g•-19 < N ,V ek ~ s~ ~ ti ru a CV < S T~ W 2 N ~
U z 50 ~ 9 N~ ih ~ T ~ ~ l£ IOOp~FEMp , P REpR \ ~ rT1 o R W .~R ~ h s 0%1µp SON 13 pp013g i ~ ~ N 1g~ .5b D ~ B QM `9 , S pPPR EVp~ON~}jp2 pNO L~ + w •.o cn d`0~~ + 6 D WETLAND AREA ~ N 2•-33' a2" E °
WD o ~ `l e IR~Ngs i0 X. ^ fROµN PpN~ e F. ~ ~,2 ~3 ~8 ~ ~ A 1 116 5
~ 125 20' ~ ~~6Oq M/O ~ p 3~ ~ 155 SANITARY n r~ /f y~F ~ q Ft. p STREAM s5.1 '
~ o ESMT. ~ ~9~ ( U 8~~ 98 ~ off- To Y~ L~a w ~ ae Pa
vt M p ?0' ~ fir' S ~ N~, z~----___ ~ Gn(7r 141 < L a~ LIMITS OF WATER QUALITY
o N a PS ~ ?s. ~ ~ o MZ ~ 142 ~ 16 CONSERVATION EASEMENT (W.Q.C.E.) m
o 1~ ~ 4 fop. 8 0
o a 124 ~ BRAD RD DOWNS 1 3 ~ 6~ V w zy 154 ~ a s o° ~ G~ v~ HASE 4 •S• z ~ ~ EX. SEWER MANHOLE
m ~ ~ AT O ~ A m ti ~ L OOK 62, PAGE 29 144 W ~ W \ 2 ' J -
Q ~ T~ o "t ~A N
~ ' l' Q ~ W Q ~ 20' ~ C D 2 O ~ SANITARY ~ 20' SANITARY LANE 4 W ~ ^ r s 'F
123 ESMT. n ~ 150 5Q P1T13 SEWER ESMT. O O ~ o L ~Q~ 3 s~, l'2 20' sgNr ~A ~
153 m ~ ~ . 10 10' rzd ~ ?q~Y SE s, o'L
~LCy 'P,~SO, n UQ i ` weR EAS o~~
n Q ~ W 7 r,1 149 40' UTILITY ~ o ~ eMeNr
EX. SEWER MANHOLE (TYPICAL)
122 148 ESMT. CENTERED ~ ~ \ 152 1~1 147 ON PIPE 25' UTILITY ESMT. Z ~ PROPERTY
145 CENTERED ON PROPERTY LINE \ ~ CORNER
146
,
i
N/F DAVID R. FRAZIER ESP TONE MH
D.B.1126 Pg.241 C N ETE M NU ENT
H
16 ~ JOB NUMBER - 98130
050931

I, JAMES B. STEPHENS certify that this is not a boundary L38 ??23 TIES 1
ALVIH H. Hlu survey; that boundary information shown hereon is from a oB,zaa Pc,3ao map prepared by this office titled "SURVEY OF BRADFO Gj+ J~C 9 9 + +
DOWNS FUTURE PHASE 8 & 9" dated 22 MAY 2003; ~ Q ~s + + ~u9 HUFF ROAD SR.1915 ~ + +
that the fla in delineatin wetlands as ~ ae. ttiu Heas 99 9 9 marked O rRACr 3 by SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA ~ ~Q + + + 2Z 20' 0 20' 40'
CONTROL DB 428 PG SD7 ~ \O was field located and plotted hereon. ~ G~ Gj CORNER + + A RIDGE LANE
P.e. 7a-ta ~ PB 57-34 Witness my hand and seal this day of Q' Q~'200Y~0 - 4 Z~v + ~ + + (g~ 3+ +
f °P \~rr na+TM su>E mlaxaxe O vJ ~3 + SCALE: 1" = 20' + w w J
Acass uswo-+r ~ oe lss6-lase CONTROL + + + CAI ~ U ~ w
t CORNER JP ~ P.B. 74-10 + + + 20 O ~ rn ~ ~ ~
xatTM srA¢ 254 tul~an[ LASCUO+T 255 ~ suewHSloH Profes I and Sur O.B. IS%-1866 MfAD I,{ \ N + + + + 1. w ~ p•'
~ 5 PG 66 `V`i l v G ~ G s• ~ Ul + + + + + + A + + + + + ~p j m m
GAIL H. ADAMS O ~ ~ O OB 1363 PG 1350 O Q Line Bearing Bearing Distance ~ + + + + + 9\ ~ o x ~ m
\ egis~tr u ber Ll S 3'-04'-45" E ~ \ L2 S 55'-12'-54" W }9+++++~o ~ o SITE ~ Q w 3'-04'-45" E 124.15' ~ x•. Q z ~ 55'-12'-54" W 50.00' + + + + + + S+ w o_ ~
~ \J ~ L3 S 71'-31'--08" W N P 71'-31'--08" W 82.42' J + + + + + + + + ~ ,9 = ~ w
~ ~ ~ CONTROL Q L4 S 5;-53'-18" W CORNER G L5 N 84 -07'-32" W 5'-53'-18" W 50.00' 1 Q aw
w c P.B. 74-t t p ~ 92 L6 S T-15'-29" W 84'-07'-32" W 97.69' , + + + + + + + + 2 ~ a ~ 7'-15'-29" W 38.08' p + + + + + + + + + o N
~ ~ 90 91 m 93 94 m w L7 N 89'_03'_06" W 89'-03'-O6" W 100.50' + + + + + + + + + + ~
gg ~ ~ 95 w ~ LS S T-16' -40" W w 89 ~ 96 L9 N 40' 28' 13" W 7'-16'-40" W 119.20' 9 + + + + + + + + + + +N N, 40'-28'-13" W 29.22' + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~
~i z ~ 5' a ' 97 L10 N 2'-35'-30" E 2'-35'-30" E 14.41' + + + + + + + + aE`-; w00D AVENUE
~ t` 98 99 L11 N 5'-16'-16" W Z ~ a w 100 101 L12 N 84'-4 '-44" 5'-16'-16" W 76.50' CF + + + + + + + + ~ w SR.1914 84'-43'-44" E 65.61' 9 + + + + + + + S Q ~ o
" O 1oz 3 E W - ~ 0 1 L 3 S 63'-44 -17 E 63'-44'-17" E 13.55' + + + + + + + + + + OAT ~ ~ o w Q
~ LANE PjJ a L14 N 2T-1T-50" E BRADFORD BLIC q ~ 50' Raw L15 N 5'_10'_26" W 2T-1T-50" E 50.00' + + + + + + + + + . ,is ~y M o o w z ~ z 5'-10'-26" W 90.00' + + + + + ~ + + + + S q~ ~ ~ _ Q
~ L16 S 39' 34' 51" E 4'- 1" + + + + ~ + + + yGGNS ~ ~ 39 3 5 E 45.65 A ~ y T w p
~ ~ BRADFORD DOWNS L17 N 65'-44'-47" E 65'-44'-47" E 8.47' d' + + + + + + + `~jARFFT v 59'-52'-18" E 13.51' + + + +cS+ ~ + + +
~ PHAS 6 L18 N 59'-52'-18" E ~ LAT BOOK 7 ,PAGE 10 L19 N 52'-13'-51" E 52'-13'-51" E 16.59'
N 121 BRADFORD Leo N 18'-06'-32" E 120 LAI L21 N 3'-03'-22" W 18'-06'-32" E 15.47' r 3'-03'-22" W 13.85'
119 F 61'-29'-28" E 10.18' rno ~ ~ G'
Pl 118 ~ L22 N 61'-29'-28" E n 133 EDMONT NA 117 w ~ L23 N 74'-3T-48" E O D.B. 114 - URgL G 116 u, I L24 S 55'-45'-30" W 74'-37'-48" E 15.71' + + + + ~ ~ + + a~ , + + + ~ +'y+ ~j +
3 8 858 AS 01+1PANY ~ n 11s BRADFORD DOWNS L25 S 51'-23'-21" E O _ 55'-45'-30" W 12.80' .o + + + + + + + + ~ 51'-23'-21" E 22.06' s- + + + + + + + ~
• 50' RAW w „a P ASE 7 S EET 1 OF 2 L26 S 24'-24'-06" E ~ 398.07• 113 LAT BOOK 7 ,PAGE it 7 4 ' 24'_24'_06" E 5.81' + + + + + + + + ~~°o•
~ N O L2 S 5 24 -04 E .1 ~ 169 g -21'_ ~ a "z L28 S 34'-1 T-11" W 45' 24' 04" E 6.46' ~ + + + + + + + + .N ~ 34'-17'-11" W 14.97' ?9 + + + + + + + +N.
168 O E > 11t 0 ~ N Curve ' s Chord aring a d Distance Ar Length Z tto L29 S 61'-32 -28 W 61'-32'-28" W 16.94' + + + + + + + + + ~
o0 1'IEDMO T ws L30 S 52'-00'-39" W a; NATUR L31 N 43'-40'-50" E ~ C1 412.00' N i'-20'-23" 56.49' 56.54' i D.B. 1148- AL GAS CO 52'-00'-39" W 5.16' + + + + + + + + J 43'-40'-50" E 15.45' < + + + + + + + +
z C2132 325.00' 5'-49'-59" E 10.23 10.23 rn ° N 1059,21' 858 50 MPq Y L32 N 2'-12 -49 E 2'-12'-49" E 11.35' + + + + + + + + ,?lb
O a g'- ~ R L33 N 48'-40'-15" W no ~ 1 21 -14" E ~W O ' 0 t73 45) . > L34 N 42'-47 -50 E 48'-40'-15" W 16.37' + + + + + + + + R INA _ _ TH A 0~ I~ 0 R qR H ASE 42' 47' S0" E 21.39' + + + + + + w
nz o ~ O 28 TO O na AL L35 N 53'-05'-17" E 0 53'-05'-17" E 13.95'
L8 m 175 L36 N 6'-51'-38" W ~ v BRADF Rp D Its L37 N 5T-02'-23" E 6'-51'-38" W 17.72' p~~'( ~ ~g~+ + + + + PH CO. + ANDO~ R TRIM T WTI H P TY S 0 5T-02'-23" E 21.81' ~ ~1NE,~2 + + + + +1n n
167 C2 PLgT OWNS HAS m L38 N 3'-05'-39" W BOOK g E 8 O 3'-05'-39" W 11.24' j~ 3a 4 ~ + + + o
~ ,71 1' P GE 60 tla L39 N 46'-O1'-02" E ~ EDITH P. HOLT ~ Z 179 L40 N 31'-01'-44" E 46'-01'-02" E 17.40' N 2~ ~ q6g `tiv + + + 31'-01'-44" E 17.24' s~• + + + ~
o D.B. 1219-49 0 180 L41 N 34'-38'-18" E 34'-38'-18" E 17.96' c~A~,•+ + +N
J ° ~ tat L42 N 64'-48'-38" E t 0 L43 N 52'-04'-37" E 64'-48'-38" E 23.00' .o n + + REV~SEO APR 2~, 2005 52'-04'-37" E 11.47 o' s~.• + + ?t5 MAR. 2~ 2005
,66 lez L44 S 74'-27'-29" E 74'-2T-29" E 11.08' ~ + + ~ '
L6 L45 S 46'-28'-16" W 4s•-28'-1s" w 21.1x' + + JOB NUMBER - 98130
o coNTROL L46 S 30'-13'-32" W ~ coRNER m B L47 S 62'-30'-39" W ~ ~ P.B. 57-34 ts5 v R DFORD p L48 S 52'-16'-13" W 30'-13'-32" W 16.73' 2a 2`~ + + ~n1a 62'-30'-39" W 19.15' +
O OW ~A + 100' S0' 0 100' 200' 52'-16'-13" W 19.62' ,~ti ~ ~
•aD , N PAT BOOK g S PHASE 8 L49 S 48'-09'-05" W c~z zn J N zle 219 1 PAGE 60 L50 N 40'-it'-11" W 0 0~ 48'-09'-05" W 17.72' ~h 40'-11'-11" W 12.04'
0 m ~-m ro ~ zzo L51 N 75'-00'-46" W 75'-OO'-as" w 15.21' ~6a + SCALE: 1 " = 100'
D < z,s zzt L52 S 73'-11'-03" W ~ to O ~ ~ o zzz L53 S 30'_10'-49" W 73'_11'_03" W 20.30' yE,, + + + + ~6S w o 30' 10' 49" W 17.19' c~ + + + + +
o L54 S 52' 03'-41" W a, ro o I6a zz3 L55 N 14'-25'-17" E 52'-03'-41" W 15.96' + + + + ^2° JAMESTOWN ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
= O D 224 14'-25'-17" E 10.05 w + + + + + 1S5 ~2 3 J 89'-15'-55" 19.34' + + + + + + CONSULTING ENGINEERS o
zao 5'-40'-08'• E > zzs L56 N 89'_15'_55" rn ~ 39.83' 286.65' T O L57 N 55' 56' 26" t. 93.41' otol) 13/.88, zzs L58 S 30'-30'-48" E 55'-56'-26" t: 19.64' + + + + + w a
= 95.81' N (o O zzl • 57.60' 11'_18,_ „rot) O L59 S 34'-40'-04° 1! 30'-30'-48" E 5.08' ~Ci; + + + + + + 117 EAST MAIN STREET ~ Q 34'-40'-04" 24.1T + + ~ + + ~ L P.O. BOX 365 m W
N 44.13. 1 E ~ L60 S 55'-29'-42" 55'-29'-42" 19.66' y + + + m r inc. JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 W s
cNO v~ 93.)5. L61 S 40'-32'-52" W v ~ 163 z3e 23a z37 L62 S 69'-59'-48" W 0 -32 -52 W 19.25 ~ ~ Tele hone 336 886-5523 W 69'-59'-48" W 17.13' + ~j + + P ~ ~ ~
0 n v O ~ z3s ~ L63 S 69'-31'-42" W + + J 69'_31' _42" W 13.28' + ~ ~ ~
I N W I 235 _ 'v O zza L64 N 24'-00' a9" W 3 0 24' 00' a9" W 14.30' 1,
IENDS I,A ~ oNa ~ z34 ,oh ~ L65 N 31'-33'-21" E NE ° z O 'PUBLIC RAW N L66 N 35'-15'-36" W 31'-33'-?.1" E 22.50' ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . - - ~ ~ \ ~i +'9+ ~ ~ 35' 15' 36" W 10.00' p~: ~ + ~ ~ + +s~ "This certifies that this lat accurotel de icts the boundar of the
. ~ O 2 Y / ~ 23J ti~ + + + + P Y P Y ~ Jurisdiction of Se!'tion 4na of the Glenn u~.,t,,, o-~
j p Q O 162 ~ ~ 232 0 0 Q Qt ~ •y'b ~9 v + + + + by the undersigned on this dote. Unless there is a change in the
m ~ ~ e qpF zzs Q ,b6' a'b' ,w + + + law or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404 ~ -row jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five `60, ~w years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the
(q OR p zit a 45.49- Teo po
N Ok9 Sp v o ' pq HgSE ` ~ 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." PROPERTY + + + ~ cn,
z,3 o GE 6 8 < S „ zlz o , 0 CORNER + + + + ~ o (Name)
5'-49'-43 W zn z,o ~ o 173 ~l ' O o + + ~
8 zos h ~ z3o 208 9+ + (Title) + + J
20' UTILITY [tiMT. ;~o UTURE PH SE 9 ° a (Date) o N
CENTERED N PIPE E TAIL "A 207 0 ~h~ ~ ~0 1;.;" " t r+
o_ ,/o 134 135 136 ~ ~ ~ ° 6 qpF
W d' ~ .7 h zos ( ORp 137 a O qT ~ ~ ~ ~ ao po ti I !~j
~ ~ ok ~ S p .-i 20' L4 2at zo5 p Hq to ~~u~j' ~ ~ ~ f.~ij~
< S ~ O S 5 0 ~ F W (yy ~ SANITARY 53'-18" W GF 6 APPROXIM TE LOCATION ° ~ r F BASE OF OLD DAM c)try}i
U~ R-_-__- 10,1 ,SEWER ESMT. 170.00' 25z 2oa ~ AND ~1 ~ ~ 215 N O LN. Q, „-L--_~~ LOT 215 ?1• n^~rZO ~ 9 9 INET~(;~p}U~iR~1~iYv:~4 `~;~'..',~;,1TY
LIC RAW ~ ~r------- ~ BRADFORD DOWN WETL ND A A 1 z5t ~4 C ~ U gin:.::, R TLA _ 2D3 "`kf~~ ~ Ir.R BR
ND 50 PHASE 4 MAP 2 O q LANE ~ + 20~ N ~ 26^, n
~ PUB T BOOK 70, PAG 5 zso zoz O LIC zaz O O tot / ...0 ~2', ~ 20' 0 20' 40' J6 W ~ + ~ o
~ BR DFORD DO S "t ~ 3542' ~ ~ 20' U11lITY E I ~ ~ c0 PHASE 4 sMr, to ~ p $ s ~ 22 ~ v
PLAT OOK 6 PA ^ o i 2, E 29 A ~~~,2° ~ a _ , ~A o~ ~ z SCALE: 1 20
138 ' ti ~ o ~ ~ ~'o ~ ~ ~
160 159 za9 158 157 z za3 H ~rz ~ o ti~ to O
• 0 0 N 0 y 'p ~ ~ ~ + fit ~ M~ lP
zas ° 0 ~ 120 ~ N 11 3 o rn -c IMPACTED ETLAND
I 139 ~ WETLA AEA ~ < w g + L21 ~ 36.85' E> ~ Z r 420 S.F. o0 0 + + + + ~ ~ ~S i
SEE ETAIL "B" o' CONTROL T----__ ~ 245 ~ pOt.P~`010 ~ • ~ cX + r, + + + _ 6'-38'-+5 + + + ~ ~ EK~S~~ r ~ 9 E >
CORNER ~ O 1ER } 2s W A RE #3 ~ ON P51N~j1011ROp0 n P.B. 57-34 + + x + ~ + + +39.gq' a '50 EX. SEWS MANHOLE
~ ~ 126 F-F I r 2a LEVPS QNNE~ t HUB C ~ O ~ E W~ 46 P ow + + of ~ + o + + + + + + ~ WO L.F. f STREAM IMPACTED BY a° ~ + ~ o` WER LINE INSTALLATION 100 S.F.
~ 156 25' 140 ~ ~ s tae ~pR Ft.~DµM~ ~ 1 v r- rrt 6 Orp ~ 441 tS. H 7 ~ 1DOD MFpS ~LENA~p #52.
~ Z~~ 50' • .0 9 ~ ~ , FR ~ ~ i „)w ~pn Ma ADO fupODEpR of S + + + Q' x a 9'-19 ~ N ,V ek~s~t ti t° ~ w < S .Z~ W~ W 2 N ~ 0 + + +
~ "t o R>IW •~d1 1 ~ ,~N Nh Ty S 7 ;t1Mp~ 5 ~ 13 pp0188 AS i O R 9 A 1~ B ~M ~i9 s PPPRD VPn~ 3j0~ PND ~ U ~ 'j 1 ~ r~0 ~e ~ qS St. >t 61.f PNEt' ~ 0~~~~ + n ) ~i~0 0 d~ + z6 ~ WETLAND AF~EA 3 N 2•-33' 4r' E
~ ~ L~ 1~~°NO M/ ~aPNO P n F. 20' ~ 125 155 SANITARY ~ ~ 26\q kCyq ~y ( 1, z8 ~ A 1,116 S
~ o ESMT. ~ leg FC Ll ,~1~ 6 q Ft. STREAM s5.1 '
~ 2 28 019 Z-~_ o ~Ti<i 141 ~ S ~ ° off' To c~~ w ~ ~e P° 0
3 c TY ~ < S oNa FSMj ?s, 8'- ' a LIMITS OF WATER QUALITY
wr; ~,At ~ 142 c ~ ~ CONSERVATION EASEMENT (W. Q.C. E.) 0°
° vt ut ~ V` rho- 681 , o aY 124 ~ BRAD RD DOWNS 143 % 6~ ~ ~ A 0
u z 154 ~ lj r ~1 ~ ° a o ~ ~ ~ ~ HASE 4 •S• ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ `7 0~ N X. SEWER MANHOLE
m ti ~ LAT OOK 62, PAGE 29 44 w ~ W \ a ~ ~ ~ 1 2
~ hr ~ o ~ ~ Q ~ ~ rn A N 20' 0 ~ W Q I
~ / ti ~ o ~ SANITARY • LAN ' 20' SANITARY 123 ESM1. ~ 150 ~ 5~ a U ~ ~ ~ r s 'F
~ PUBL SEWER ESMT. o ~ , ti ~T ~Q^ 153 >fJ RAW ' ~ S~ (~'L 20' SgNI F
i 0 ~ ~ +n ip lgRY S s. 02
~ n~ 'p SO n U~~ EWER E s°~~- gSEMENT
n ~ W v ~ \ n 149 \ I ~ ~
" 20' UTILITY z o A 122 148 ESMT. CENTERED ~ ~ A EX. SEWER MANHOLE (TYPICAL)
152 147 ON PIPE 25' UTILITY ESMT. ~ ~ 151 145 CENTERED ON PROPERTY LINE ~ ~ PROPERTY
146 \ CORNER
~
~
i
MH
N/F DAVID R. FRAZIER ESP ONE C N ETE
D.B.1126 Pg.241 M NU ENT
H
16 JOB NUMBER - 98130
050931