20050913 Ver 3_COMPLETE FILE_20060508

\0?0? w H r?9Q
4G
? r
=1
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 8, 2006
DWQ Project # 2005-0913
Wake County
Mr. Joe Dye
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates, LP
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 114
Raleigh, NC, 27617
Subject Property: Parcel J at Brier Creek (Brier Creek Corporate Center)
ut Little Brier Creek 27-33-4-1, Class C NSW
APPROVAL of Neuse River Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0233) Authorization Certificate
Dear Mr. Dye:
You have our approval, in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and any conditions listed below, to
impact approximately 6,099 ft2 of Zone 1 and 6,099 fe of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers for the
purpose of constructing a bridged stream crossing at the subject property as described within your
application received by the Division on December 21, 2005, along with additional correspondence
received March 9, 2006, and April 10, 2006. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any
other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this authorization and approval letter and is thereby responsible
for complying with all conditions. This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Authorization are:
1.. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference
Buffers 12,198 (s uare ft. Page 7 of PCN form
a
lb"CCaro u
r401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Parcel J at Brier Creek
Page 2 of 2
May 8, 2006
2. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive
velocities through the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into
the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233(5).
3.. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within this authorization, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401
Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
4. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe
within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance
with 15A NCAC 2B .0233.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B. This Authorization Certificate shall
expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
This letter completes the review of the "No Practical Alternatives" determination under 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. If you have any questions or would like a copy of the buffer rules, please call [phone].
This letter does not authorize any impacts to either Waters of the United States or Waters of the State.
Please contact the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) if
any impacts are proposed to either of these waters.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cbk
Enclosures: Certificate of Completion
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin, S&EC, 110 10 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
Filename: 2005BrierCreekVersion3 (Wake)NBR
Nom" Carolina
Naturally
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
o(O", City Of 6Raleigh
-Worth Carolina
April 7, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtre: Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 - Brier Creek Parcel J Stream Impacts
Dear Ms. Karoly:

:iC ,F
Z
-il;r4[^
,"
This letter is in response to a request from Mr. Brandon Plunkett with the John R. McAdams
Company concerning the City's requirements for a proposed private street extending from the
proposed Arco Corporate Drive to the Brier Creek Shopping Center and to Brier Creek Parkway.
This roadway connection across Little Brier Creek is necessary from a traffic capacity standpoint
to support the level of density that is proposed for this development.
This portion of Brier Creek is designated in the Raleigh Comprehensive Plan for high-intensity
development with more urban character than we traditionally in a suburban environment.
Attached are the portions of our adopted land-use plans that apply to this particular property.
This land-use pattern will generally include multi-story buildings, structured parking, and a
pedestrian-friendly orientation of buildings to provide a less auto-dependent development. In
order to provide this level of density, a tighter grid of streets must be provided.
Based on the anticipated traffic demand, the density of the proposed development, and to
encourage pedestrian connectivity and orientation between the office and retail uses, the City is
requiring the construction of this roadway across Little Brier Creek. AAC is electing to pursue
this as a private street in lieu of a public street based on some setback issues for these future
multi-story buildings that a public right-of-way would conflict with.
This parcel of land is challenged for access. To the north, Arco Corporate Drive is a two-lane
roadway that connects back to Brier Creek Parkway with a limited-movement intersection. To
the south, Arco Corporate Drive will eventually be extended to Lumley Road as a four-lane
median-divided roadway. Due to the adjacency of I-540, no connections are available to the east.
This westward connection to Brier Creek Parkway provides a viable option for meeting the traffic
capacity needs of the development. The portion of this private street in the Brier Creek Shopping
Center has been designed with this connection in mind.
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Recycled Paper
s-
Ms. Cyndi Karoly - Brier Creek Parcel J Stream Impacts
April 7, 2006 - Page 2
In summary, this connection is required to support the level of density proposed for Parcel J. I
would be interested to see what kind of design options can be considered for the roadway
structure in order to minimize the impact to Little Brier Creek and to enhance its presence as an
amenity for the development.
If you need any other information or have any other questions about this project, please give me
a call at [phone] or email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Eric J. Lamb, PE
Manager, Transportation Services Division
Attachments
Cc: Mr. Brandon Plunkett, PE - John R. McAdams Co.
Mr. Kevin Martin - Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mr. Ben Brown, PE - Public Works Stormwater Division
Mr. Mitchell Silver, AICP - Planning Director
J..
Part 2 Triangle Regional Center Plan
Location
The Triangle Regional Center is located in the northwestern portion of the City of Raleigh's
jurisdiction. The Triangle Regional Center, with adjacent lands in Durham County, City of
Durham, Town of Cary, Town of Morrisville, Research Triangle Park and RDU Airport are
centrally located in the Research Triangle Region. Because of location, access and large tracts of
vacant land, growth potential in this area is very high. Recent infrastructure improvements,
particularly roads, water and sewer service, are opening the area for development.
Existing Land Use
The Triangle Regional Center contains little developed land. There are some scattered, highway
oriented nonresidential developments on U. S. 70, particularly between the Northern Wake
Expressway and Ebenezer Church Road. There is also a warehousing/distribution area north of
U. S. 70 on Triangle Drive. Several single family houses are scattered throughout the area.
Existing Zoning
The majority of the land within the regional center is zoned Thoroughfare District. This zoning
category allows most land uses, either as a general use, a conditional use or with a special use
permit. Several land tracts in this category have zoning conditions which limit uses to a further
extent than the general Thoroughfare District restrictions. Nonresidential development,
particularly industry, office and retail are common in this zoning district. Most of the remainder
of the land here is zoned Residential-4, for about four dwellings per acre. A relatively small
parcel of land is zoned Shopping Center and another for office, in the Dominion Park area. Lands
to the northeast of Raleigh Durham International Airport are within the Airport Overlay zoning
district. This district prohibits residential uses because of aircraft noise and controls building
heights in accord with the airspace regulations.
Urban Form
Within the regional center are several other urban form designations. A regional intensity area is
in the vicinity of the Northern Wake Expressway/Aviation Parkway interchange, at the
southwestern edge of the regional center. The Airport City Focus is located on U. S. 70 centered
near the T. W. Alexander Drive intersection. The Mount Herman Community Focus Area is
located at the intersection of Mount Herman and Leesville Roads. There is a retail area
designated on U. S. 70 at Angus Drive. Finally, there is a neighborhood focus area in the vicinity
of Andrews Chapel Road and the proposed Skyland Drive. Currently, none of these focus or
retail areas is developed. The Ebenezer Community Focus, at the intersection of U. S. 70 and
Ebenezer Church Road, is rapidly developing. There is a policy boundary line defining the
eastern edge of the regional center in the vicinity of the Dominion Park and Harrington Grove
neighborhoods
Airport Assemblage Property
This tract of land is south of U. S. 70, east of the Wake/Durham County line and northwest of
Raleigh Durham Airport. This is the largest tract of land under single ownership in the Raleigh
portion of the Triangle Regional Center, and its development will be crucial to the entire area.
Both the regional intensity area and city focus area are located on this land. It is zoned
Thoroughfare Conditional Use, with conditions that broadly define land uses permitted in
various areas within the property. There are several relatively small outparcels in individual
ownership within the Airport Assemblage. These properties are zoned R-4.
Water and Sewer Service
The area lies within two drainage basins: the Brier Creek basin, which contains Brier Creek and
Little Brier Creek and Sycamore Creek. The western edge of Briar Creek basin generally is the
7/01 Raleigh Comprehensive Plan Triangle Regional Center Plan 6-2.1

Page Road ridge, just inside of Durham County. The northern edge of both basins is the Leesville
Road ridge, portions of which are also in Durham County. These streams flow to the south, to
Crabtree Creek. These basins can have sewer service provided by the City of Raleigh. A sewage
lift station has been built to carry effluent from the Little Brier Creek basin, just west of the
airport, up to U. S. 70. Sewer lines also run north from U. S. 70 to the Leesville Road/ Dominion
Boulevard vicinity. Water service currently runs northwest up U. S. 70 to the vicinity of the
Northern Wake Expressway interchange. Water mains also run along Westgate and Leesville
Roads.
Road Network
Existing major roads:
•U. S. 70 (Glenwood Avenue) runs northwest from downtown Raleigh through the Triangle
Regional Center to Durham.
•Aviation Parkway accesses RDU Airport from U. S. 70 and Interstate 40 and continues
northward of U. S. 70 as Westgate Road.
.Near the Wake/Durham County line, T. W. Alexander Drive cuts westward from U. S. 70 to
Research Triangle Park.
eBrier Creek Parkway connects U. S. 70 to Lumley Road, Globe Road and Aviation Parkway.
.Page Road, just inside Durham County, runs roughly north and south, parallel to the county line.
.Ebenezer Church and Strickland Roads form portions of the regional center's eastern boundary.
.The Northern Wake Expressway (I-540) connects 1-40 to points north and east.
Planned roads:
•Aviation Parkway will be extended from Brier Creek Parkway northward along the county line
to U. S. 70.
• T. W. Alexander Drive will be extended eastward from U. S. 70 to Leesville Road.
.Brier Creek Parkway will extend north of U. S. 70 into Durham County, intersecting with the
future T. W. Alexander Drive extension.
.The Northern Durham Parkway (formerly Eno Drive) will extend from Aviation Parkway north
of U. S. 70 into Durham.

Triangle Regional Center Plan 6-2.2 Raleigh Comprehensive Plan 7/01

F_ MIXED USE: _
C EMPLOYMENT
MIXED USE- ??
EMPLOYMENT/ r
0
RESIDENTIAL ? I oc
MIXED USE:
EMPLOYMENT
gab ¦
23
•: ? ::::::::::::::::::::::::: 4 114
:-:::na:?.. V!FY
:: ............................... I::-::::':'':
:..
UMSTEAD:S'EA'T
Xi:
....... .. ........... ....... .......................
:.
...... .............
...... ........................
...............
.. ....... .. .....?:riir ...:
::`5:::?:: •. ..•.
.....................
Triangle Regional Center Plan
O NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL ® DURHAM SERVICE AREA
O COMMUNITY FOCUS MIXED USE OFFICE/
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDE ® RALEIGH SERVICE AREA

O NTIAL
Rrr.??1.R
CITY FOCUS UMSTEAD PARK

;

PLAN BOUNDARY

V RETAIL AREAS 9 RESIDENTIAL RETAIL LOW LOW DENSITY
POLICY BOUNDARY LINE m m m
MIXED USE
00000 TRANSIT CORRIDO
OR
0.4 0.2 0 0.4
Miles
1
10/02 Raleigh Comprehensive Plan Triangle Regional Center Plan 6-2.3
TIC JOHN R McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Ms. Cvndi Karol
NCDENR - Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Date: March 9, 2006
HAND DELIVER
Job No.: AAC-04030
am sending you the following item(s):
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 2/6/06 City of Raleigh Subdivision Approval Letter
1 Kimle Horn Traffic Stud

These are transmitted as checked below:
® As requested
? For approval
? For review and comment
® For your use

Remarks:
Copy to:
Signed:
-rrandon'G. Plunkett, PE
Senior Project Manager
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
? Copy Entire Document to File
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
PO Box 14005 • Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • [phone] • fax [phone]
www.johnrmcadams.com
Since 1979
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
MEMORANDUM
March 9, 2006
To: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
From: Brandon Plunke
RE: Brier Creek Corporate Center - AAC-04030
Ms. Karoly,
Please find attached the supporting documentation that you requested for your
review of the buffer impacts we wish to permit for the Brier Creek Corporate
Center project. Per your request, we have forwarded the additional
information that shows the City of Raleigh's desire to make this roadway
connection between the Brier Creek Commons and Corporate Center projects.
Attached is a copy of the subdivision approval letter which states in condition
number 36, that no certificate of occupancy will be issued until this
connection is made. As additional support, I've included a copy of the traffic
study that was prepared by Kimley Horn & Associates that supports this
condition.
I am working on obtaining a letter from the City of Raleigh that summarizes
the reasons they desire this connection. They have agreed to provide it, but I
have not received it yet. I will forward it as soon as possible. I would like to
set up a meeting with you to review this information at your earliest
convenience. Please feel free to give me or Kevin Martin a call to set this up.
Research Triangle Park, NC
Post Office Box 14005
Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27709
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
800-733-5646
919-361-5000
919-361-2269 Fax
Charlotte, NC
5311 Seventy-Seven Center Drive,
Suite 66
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
800-733-5646
704-527-0800
704-527-2003 Fax
Comprehensive Land Development Design Services
www,johnrmcadams.com We help ottr clients sa[cceed.
City of Raleigh, NC
Development Plans Review Center
P. O. Box 590, Raleigh, N. C. 27502
FE'Ll
Telephone: [phone] FAX: [phone] j?/? s
www.raleigh-nc.org/planning/plandprc.htm j r C'Y C'L
I.._I.? r ILl()I
OFFICIAL NOTICE -"
OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN DECISION
TO: Brier Creek Associates/ The John R. McAdams Company
PROJECT: Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision
FILE NUMBER: S-82-2005
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: Approval with Conditions
DATE OF ACTION: 12/22/05
REVISION DATE: 216/06
COORDINATING PLANNER: Stacy Barbour
DATE OF LETTER: 2/7/06
ACTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATION:
City Administration has found that this plan, with the following conditions being met, conforms to Code
requirements of Chapter 2, Part 10, Sections 10-2045, 10-2050 and 10-2059 Chapter 3, Part 10, Sections
10-3001-3059.
This REVISED plan has been approved according to a map drawn by The John R. McAdams Company,
dated January 5, 2006, owned by Brier Creek Associates, after the actions are taken in the attached sheets,
AA# 1025
LAND DISTURBANCE
No land disturbance activity may occur unless permits have been obtained. Please contact the Conservation
Engineer in the Central Engineering Department for grading permits and Zoning Plans Review Specialist in
the Inspections Department for tree removal permits.
SUNSET DATES:
If significant recording activity has not taken place on a project after preliminary subdivision approval, that
approval may "sunset" and be declared void, requiring re-approval by City Council before permits may be
issued. To avoid allowing this preliminary approval to "sunset", the following must take place by the
following dates:
3-Year Sunset Date: 12/22/2008
Record at least % of the land area approved.
5-Year Sunset Date: 12/22/2010
Record entire subdivision.
Please do not hesitate to call the planner coordinating the review of your project if you are unsure of how to
satisfy conditions, or if you have any other questions about this preliminary plan.
?1443?r_
David Betts, Assistant Planning Director
Development Plans Review Center
AA# 1025
Case File: 582-05
t OF
J`/ g
Raleigh
City

C
Administrative Action a

Plaza
Center
Development PlansRe
ge Plaza
One Exchange
h
Preliminary Subdivision
y 219 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
[phone]
www.raleigh-nc.orglpla nni ngldprc
Case File! Name: S-82-051 Brier Creek Corporate Center (revised plan)
General Location: West side of 1-540 between Glenwood Avenue and Lumley Road
Planning District
! CAC: Umstead / Northwest
Nature of Case: Subdivision and recombination of a 108.67 acre site currently composed of 4
parcels zoned Thoroughfare CUD, Airport Overlay District, and SHOD-2 into 9
lots. This plan is divided into 4 phases. The purpose of this revision is to
amend the stormwater control plan to include shared detention facilities
among 5 parcels.
Contact: The John R. McAdams Company
Action: Approval with conditions
S-82-05 / Brier Creek Corporate Center - Location Map
2/6106 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision M 1
AA# 1025
Case File: S-82-05
r r r ? r
ri+? _ a'z •? Y r d / r
_7 A
? ? hm y? w.tr^''iv 7 r 4 •.'.
Airport !9 V rfr?` , p .:. '
Overlay
zoning
district
boundary 1jr SHOD-2
line } !' zoning
"i • /`' district
boundary
line ?n..4.
i 5-
• l ??`" ? . ??' ? •..,? Qo Jeer`
Shaded area is
.??:?•r%%?''>- area of
-? _ chemical
.? contamination
S-82-05 I Brier Creek Corporate Center - Existing Conditions
216/06 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 2
KM1 I U41)
Case File: S-82-05
!
... rW 1 Vi3ll _ { .._....-
- 7-7
1
BIC .S SrBL:110 PrM ID. It 11 tisucurts In mu OE
'EES M PERwr CO515
CLL 5 -'15 RX-G
?urxicv 1x rxmr.a,rs 1 I /•r .?, ,? .
MD rl IxrS 1. +h_ wq
CC rx ?. o?.O q ». »
ARCO CORPORATR Df(IVR
4w 1 .. ..
W ?.
S-82-051 Brier Creek Corporate Center - Subdivision Flan
2/6106 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 3
HH1t 1 u"
Case File: S-82-05
SUBJECT: 5-82-05 / Brier Creek Corporate Center
CROSS-
REFERENCE: Z-65-96
LOCATION: This site is located on the west side of 1-540, between Glenwood Avenue and
Lumley Road, inside the City Limits.
REQUEST: This request is to approve the subdivision and recombination of a 108.67 acre
site into 9 lots. Currently the site is composed of 4 parcels all zoned
Thoroughfare CUD and Airport Overlay District. A large portion of the site on the
east side is zoned SHOD-2. This plan is divided into 4 phases. Phase 1 includes
5 lots. Phase 2 and 4 include 1 lot in each and phase 3 includes 2 lots.
Approximately 24.7 acres of the site has been defined as an area of chemical
contamination by agreement of the US Environmental Protection Agency. This
area is shown within phases 2, 3, and 4 of the proposed plan. Given the extent of
chemical contamination on this site those phases will not be recorded nor will the
City of Raleigh accept dedication of any public easements or rights-of-way within
phases 2, 3, and 4 until such time as the applicant's Prospective Purchaser
Agreement has been transferred to the City of Raleigh by approval of the E.P.A.
The purpose of this revision is to amend the stormwater control plan to
include shared detention facilities among 5 parcels. Revised or additional
conditions of approval include: #2, #3, #26, #27, #28, #29, and #30.
Condition #31 also has been added to allow proposed lots 1, 2, and 4 to
construct the private roadway across the site (within the alignment of the
proposed Arco Corporate Drive) with rights of access across the adjoining
lots.
OFFICIAL ACTION: Approval with conditions
CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL: Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the site:
(1) That a tree protection plan is approved by the Site Review Specialist and
the Forestry Specialist in the Inspections Department, and that tree
protection measures are in place on site, for trees located in the greenway
reservation area, thoroughfare protective yards (and overlapping SHOD-2
protective yards), riparian buffers, and all other tree conservation areas as
shown on the approved tree conservation plan per condition number 11
below;
(2) That the Conservation Engineer in the Public Works Department approves
a final stormwater control plan for stormwater runoff control and nitrogen
reduction, including a stormwater operations and maintenance manual and
budget, showing compliance with Part 10 chapter 9 as well as the
standards of CR7107, including the designation of buffer areas and open
space areas for stormwater purposes prior to grading or the approval of
construction drawings, whichever event comes first;
r
216106 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 4
NHM I VL-J
Case File: S-82-05
(3) That as the developer has chosen to offset a portion of nitrogen export load
limitation by paying monies to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Fund (NCEEF); in accordance with Nitrogen reduction requirements of
Section 10-9022, this payment shall be made to NCEEF and verification of
the amount of payment shall be provided to the City of Raleigh
Conservation Engineer;
Prior to approval of construction drawings for public improvements:
(4) That a flood study be reviewed and approved by both F.E.M.A. and the
Conservation Engineer in the Public Works Department for street crossings
over areas of alluvial soils and in the 100 year floodplain;
(5) That approval be obtained from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality for proposed street crossings of all Neuse River Riparian buffers;
Prior to Planning Department authorization to record lots:
(6) That no recordation of lots or dedication of public access, transit, or utility
easements, or rights-of-way within phases 2, 3, or 4 of the subdivision may
be done until the applicant's Prospective Purchaser Agreement has been
transferred to the City of Raleigh by approval of the E.P.A (either in whole
or in part on a phased basis, or jointly held by the applicant and the City of
Raleigh). Construction of the extension of Arco Corporate Drive must be
completed prior to City acceptance of portions of it within phases 2, 3, or 4.
In addition the construction of the sanitary sewer line shown in phase 2
must be completed prior to City acceptance of that proposed sewer
easement;
(7) That construction plans for public improvements be approved by the Public
Works and Public Utilities Departments;
(8) That the final design, alignment and construction standards for the private
streets be in conformance with minimum public street standards [extension
of Arco Corporate Drive and the un-named street connecting to Brier Creek
Commons] which are to be located within the public access easements
thru this site be approved by the City Public Works Department;
(9) That the City Attorney approves public access easements for the two
private streets [extension of Arco Corporate Drive and the un-named street
connecting to Brier Creek Commons];
(10) That the City Attorney approves an option agreement for the City to accept
the future dedication of right-of-way and improvements for the section of
Arco Corporate Drive shown on the preliminary plan as a private street
within a public cross access easement;
(11) That a final tree conservation plan be approved by the Forestry Specialist
in the Inspections Department. The final tree conservation plan shall
include an inventory and documentation of existing trees for all proposed
tree conservation areas to verify compliance with the tree conservation
ordinance, Code Section 10-2082.14, as well as a metes and bounds
description of the tree conservation areas conforming to code
2/6/06 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA S
HN77 1 UL5
Case File: S-82-05
requirements. All tree conservation areas shall be shown with a metes and
bounds description and labeled on any plat for recording;
(12) That a property owners' association be established in accordance with
Code Section 10-3073 and Code Section 10-2082.14(e) for the purpose of
maintenance and protection of the designated tree conservation areas
referenced in condition number 10 above, as well as for the maintenance
and upkeep of the portion of Arco Corporate Drive located within a public
access easement until such time as the City of Raleigh accepts public
dedication of that section of roadway. The property owners' declaration
shall contain the following provisions: (a) The property owners' association
shall be empowered to plant, maintain and protect within tree conservation
areas shown on recorded plats of the development, and the future owners
of lots and their agents shall have the right to enter any of the tree
conservation areas shown on the recorded plats of the development with
the consent of the Association and the City of Raleigh Inspections
Department to perform active tree protection as defined in Chapter 2 Part
10 of the Raleigh City Code to remove trees, plant trees and to replant
replacement trees; (b) A statement that any tree disturbing activity as
defined in Chapter 2 Part 10 of the Raleigh City Code undertaken in any
tree conservation area shown on the recorded plats of the development
without the prior issuance of a permit from the City of Raleigh Inspections
Department is a violation of the Raleigh City Code and will result in
significant financial consequences; and, (c) The association shall have the
power to assess its members for the maintenance and upkeep of Arco
Corporate Drive and to levy a lien on the lots and foreclose on delinquent
lot owners and their lots. A recorded copy of these deeds must be
provided to the Planning Department within 14-days from authorization of
lot recording. If recorded copies of the of the deed are not provided to the
Planning Department within this 14-day period, further plat recordings and
building permit issuance may be withheld;
(13) That a fee in lieu of water main construction in the extension of Arco
Corporate Drive be paid in the Public Utilities Department;
(14) That fees in lieu of construction for half of a 41' back-to-back street and a
five foot sidewalk along on Lumley Road be paid in the Public Works
Department;
(15) That street names for this development be approved by the Raleigh
Planning Department and by Wake County;
(16) That riparian buffers, in accordance with the preliminary plan and the State
of North Carolina regulations, are shown on any plat for recording, and
that a note be placed on all recorded plats stating "These areas are subject
to grading and vegetation removal restrictions in accordance with State law
and, that the North Carolina Division of Water Quality must give approval
for disturbing the Neuse River Riparian buffers";
(17) That all 50' thoroughfare yards along Lumley Road and 1-540 as well as the
25' SHOD-2 yard along 1-540 be shown on all plats for recording;
(18) That a note be placed on any map for recording which states "Removal of
trees and vegetation without a permit from the City of Raleigh in
designated thoroughfare yards, SHOD-2 protective yards, and designated
216/06 5-62-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision M t)
MMff W40
Case File: S-82-05
tree conservation areas is a violation of the Raleigh City Code and will
result in significant financial consequences';
(19) That flood prone areas and wetlands as shown on the preliminary plan be
shown on any plat for recording;
(20) That the proposed greenways running thru the site be reserved for two
years from the date of preliminary approval (in accordance with zoning
conditions of Z-65-96), that this reservation be referred to Administrative
Services; that the greenway reservation area be shown on any plat for
recording, that the greenway reservation area be staked; and, that
vegetation in the greenway reservation area be preserved for two years;
(21) That prior to recording lots in phase 3, cross access agreements between
lots 1 and 2 for access to Arco Corporate Drive be recorded with the
County Register of Deeds, and that a recorded copy of these documents is
provided to the Planning Department within 14 days from authorization of
lot recording. If these easements are not provided to the Planning
Department within this 14-day period, further plat recording and building
permit issuance may be withheld;
(22) That prior to recording each phase of the subdivision, the proposed transit
easements shown on the preliminary plan (15'x20' size) are approved by
the City's Transit Technician, and that the City Attorney and the Transit
Technician approve transit easement deeds, including access over the
private street connection to Brier Creek Commons shopping center on the
west side of this site. The metes and bounds location of these easements
shall be shown on all plats for recording;
(23) That the City Attorney approve a restrictive covenant governing all parcels
in this subdivision for the allocation of acreage by land use in accordance
with Exhibit C-1 of zoning case Z-65-96; Ordinance No. (1996) 929 ZC
392; within Area C, 99.2 acres have already been developed as retail
under SP-53-00 Brier Creek Commons. This covenant shall be recorded
with the County Register of Deeds and a copy of these recorded
documents shall be provided to the Planning Department within 14 days
from authorization of lot recording. If recorded copies are not provided to
the Planning Department within this 14-day period, further recordings and
building permit issuance may be withheld;
(24) That the following note be placed on any plat for recording: "This property
is subject to conditions of zoning case Z-65-1996, Ordinance NO. (1996)
929 ZC 392 (Thoroughfare Conditional Use District-Area C) on file in the
City of Raleigh Planning Department";
(25) That the area of chemical contamination as defined by the Prospective
Purchasers Agreement (EPA Docket# 01-08-C) be shown and labeled on
all plats for recording;
(26) That all shared stormwater control measures and pipes conveying
stormwater to and from these stormwater control measures are shown
within private stormwater drainage easements on all plats for recording;
(27) That, as designated on the final stormwater and nitrogen control plan
approved per condition number 2 above, all permanently preserved
undisturbed open space used to meet the nitrogen reduction requirements
2/6/06 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 7
Case File: S-82-05
of Part 10 Chapter 9 shall be labeled on recording plats. These plats shall
include a note stating: "That within permanently preserved undisturbed
open space areas there must not be any land disturbing activity, any
placement of impervious surfaces, any tree removal, any new development
or expansion thereof, or new use, construction, or encroachment without
first obtaining the prior approval from the City of Raleigh". A copy of the
recorded plat shall be provided to the City of Raleigh Conservation
Engineer;
(28) That as this development contains stormwater control measures to be
owned by a property owners' association, legal documents shall be
prepared in accordance with Raleigh City Code sections 10-3071 to 10-
3073, which shall grant the Association the right to impose assessments to
pay any monies owed by the Association to the City pursuant to the
"Stormwater Replacement Protection Easement and Access Maintenance
Agreement and Replacement Contribution". Legal documents shall be
recorded with the local county register of deeds and a copy of the recorded
documents must be provided to the Planning Department and the
Inspections Department within 14 days from authorization of lot recording
or further plat recording, and building permit issuance, may be withheld;
(29) That as stormwater control facilities are to be owned and maintained by a
property owner's association, a "Stormwater Replacement Easement and
Access Maintenance Agreement and Replacement Contribution"
(Installment or Lump Sum payment version) form, as required by Section
10-9027(c), shall be completed between the developer, the property
owners' association and the City, recorded, and returned to the City. The
document shall be given to the Conservation Engineer in the Public Works
Department within (14) days of recording;
(30) That legal documents be prepared and recorded for the maintenance of
shared stormwater facilities including a Maintenance Covenant in
accordance with Section 10-9027 (b), amongst lots 5, 6, 7, 8,and 9 and/or
for the off-site facilities located on lots 5 and 6 as part of a drainage
easement shown on all plats for recording; and the attorney who prepared
this legal document shall certify, in writing, to the Raleigh City Attorney that
the Maintenance Covenant is in accordance with Raleigh City Code
requirements. A recorded copy of the Maintenance Covenant, shall be
given to the Conservation Engineer in the Public Works Department within
(14) days of recording the Maintenance Covenant. No building permit will
be issued for any lot affected by the maintenance covenant until a recorded
copy of the maintenance covenant is provided to the Inspections
department;
(31) That the City Attorney approve easements allowing proposed lots 1, 2, and
4 the rights to construct the private roadway across the site (within the
alignment of the proposed Arco Corporate Drive) with rights of cross
access for each across each of the adjoining lots;
Prior to issuance of building permits in the Inspections Department:
(32) That building permits be limited to a total maximum of 420,000 square feet
of office space and 280 hotel rooms within phase 1 prior to the completion
of the extension of Arco Corporate Drive to Lumley Road;
2/6/06 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA
t%mtt 1uLi
Case File: S-82-05
Signed:
Staff Coordinator:
(33) That prior to issuance of building permits within each phase of
development, a lighting plan for the public access easements thru the site
be approved by the Transportation Services Division to verify conformance
with minimum public street illumination levels;
(34) That a fire protection plan showing hydrant and FDC locations for each lot
accessed by the private streets within public access easements be
approved by the Fired Department;
(35) That all site plans show conformance with zoning conditions of Z-65-96;
Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy in the Inspections
Department:
(36) That no certificate of occupancy be issued for any building within phase 1
until construction is completed for the creek crossing and the private street
connecting with adjoining Brier Creek Commons shopping center and Brier
Creek Parkway on the west side of the site.
I hereby certify this administrative decision.
(Planning Dir.) i Date:
Stacy Barbour
SEE LAST PAGE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON THE NEXT STEP IN
THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS.
FINDINGS: City Administration finds that this request, with the above conditions of approval
being met, conforms to Chapter 2, Part 10, Sections 10-2045, 10-2050, 10-2059
and Chapter 3, Part 10, Sections 10-3001-3059. This approval is based on a
preliminary plan dated 1/5/06, owned by Brier Creek Associates, submitted by
The John R. McAdams Company.
ZONING:
ZONING
DISTRICTS: Thoroughfare Conditional Use District. Ordinance NO. (1996) 929 ZC 392; Z-65-
96; effective July 2, 1996. This site is within 'Area C' of zoning conditions
applicable to this site. The entire site is within the Airport Overlay zoning district.
A large portion of the site on the east side is also within the SHOD-2 zoning
district.
UNITY OF
DEVELOPMENT: not applicable to this plan.
216/06 S-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision M 9
WNff 1V43
Case File: S-82-05
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN:
GREENWAY: Little Brier Creek lies within this site, and a 75' greenway reservation, as
measured from the bank of the creek is shown on the preliminary plan in
accordance with standards of the Comprehensive Plan. The greenway
reservation shall be for a period of 2 years in accordance with zoning conditions
of Z-65-96. Tree protection measures will be required along the boundary of the
greenway reservation prior to issuance of a grading permit.
THOROUGHFARE
/ COLLECTOR
PLAN: Dedication of right-of-way and construction of the following streets are required
by the Thoroughfare and Collector Street Plan:
Street ROW Construct Slope Esmt.
Lumley Road n/a n/a n/a
Arco Corporate Drive 90' (optioned) 70' b-b n/a
Sufficient right-of-way exists along frontage on Lumley Road (a secondary
arterial). A fee-in-lieu of half of a 41' b-b street with curb, gutter, and sidewalk is
required for the portion of the site's frontage outside controlled access right-of-
way.
Arco Corporate Drive is a designated collector street thru the entire site.
This design is for a median divided roadway with sidewalk on both sides. Within
phase 1 of the plan half of the street is to be public and half is to be built as a
private street designed to public street standards within a public access
easement.
All of Arco Corporate Drive shown within phases 2, 3, and 4 of the plan either lies
within or crosses an area of chemical contamination as defined by the
Prospective Purchasers Agreement (EPA Docket # 01-08-C). All of Arco
Corporate Drive within phases 2, 3, and 4 is to be built as a private street
designed to public street standards. Those phases will not be recorded nor will
the City of Raleigh accept dedication of any public easements or rights-of-way
within phases 2, 3, and 4 until such time as the applicant's Prospective
Purchaser Agreement has been transferred to the City of Raleigh by approval of
the E.P.A. As part of this subdivision approval the property owner shall grant the
City an option for acceptance of the future dedication of the roadway and right-of-
way of Arco Corporate Drive at such time as the City desires (most probably after
both transfer of the Prospective Purchaser Agreement and the actual cleanup of
the area of chemical contamination).
This plan also includes within phase 1 a median divided private street connection
within a 60' width public access easement connecting Arco Corporate Drive to
the adjacent development to the west, Brier Creek Commons Shopping Center,
and Brier Creek Parkway.
This proposal includes a traffic analysis performed by Kimley-Horn and
Associates dated November 10, 2005. This analysis describes projected traffic
generation based on several development scenarios. No additional building
space may be occupied within this development without construction of the
private street connection from Arco Corporate Drive to Brier Creek Commons
Shopping Center and Brier Creek Parkway. In addition, a maximum of 420,000
square feet of office space and 280 hotel rooms may be constructed within phase
216106 5-62-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 10
AArr "I UZb
Case File: S-82-05
1 prior to the completion of the extension of Arco Corporate Drive to Lumley
Road.
TRANSIT: This site exists along the proposed CAT Route 70e (Brier Creek Express Route).
Transit easements (15'x20' size) are proposed along the extension of Arco
Corporate Drive as well as the private street connection to Brier Creek Commons
shopping center on the west side of this site.
URBAN FORM: This site is located in the Umstead Planning District within the Airport City Focus
Area of the Triangle Regional Center.
TREE
PRESERVATION: A preliminary tree conservation plan in accordance with code section 10-2082.14
is included with this proposal and has been approved by the Forestry Specialist
in the Inspections Department (10% or 10.8 acres tree conservation area
required, 10.9% or 11.86 acres provided). A final tree conservation plan with a
metes and bounds description of all tree conservation areas shall be shown and
labeled on any plat for recording.
SUBDIVISION
STANDARDS:
LOT LAYOUT: The minimum lot size in this zoning district is 5,000 square feet. The minimum
lot size proposed is 1.77 acres. The minimum lot depth in this zoning district is
70'. The minimum lot width in this zoning district is 45'. Lots in this development
conform to these minimum standards.
BLOCK LAYOUT: The proposed street layout conforms to City Code, providing for efficient
circulation of traffic within the entire neighborhood area. The maximum block
length in this development meets the 1500-foot standard as noted in the Streets,
Sidewalks and Driveway Access Handbook. No dead end street in this
development exceeds 800 feet in length.
PUBLIC UTILITIES: City water and sewer services are available. The subdivider is responsible for
installation of all lines necessary to provide service to this site. Note Phase 2
includes construction of a sanitary sewer line within the area of chemical
contamination on this site. The constructed sewer line and easement will not be
accepted by the City of Raleigh until the applicant's Prospective Purchaser
Agreement has been transferred to the City by approval of the E.P.A. A fee in
lieu of construction is required for the water line not being built at this time within
the private extension of Arco Corporate Drive.
SOLID WASTE: Refuse collection will be provided by means of a private contractor. Location and
design of collection facilities shall meet the standards in the Solid Waste Design
Manual.
CIRCULATION: Proposed street improvements shall conform to normal City construction
standards. A cross access easement between proposed lots 1 and 2 is required
for lot 1 to have access to Arco Corporate Drive. These two lots are in phase 3
and both have frontage on public streets, but will obtain access to Lumley Road
from Arco Corporate Drive [which will be a private street until such time as the
City accepts dedication of it]. This plan shows several creek crossings which
216/06 S-62-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 11
AA4 1 UZb
Case File: S-82-05
must be approved by state and federal agencies prior to construction plan
approval.
PEDESTRIAN: Proposed sidewalk locations conform to City regulations. A sidewalk is required
and shown along both sides of Arco Corporate Drive [both the public and private
portions] as well as the private street connection to Brier Creek Commons on the
west side of the site.
FLOOD HAZARD: Flood prone areas, as approved by the City Conservation Engineer, are shown
on the preliminary plan and shall be shown on the recorded plat.
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT: This site is subject to nitrogen reduction, runoff control, and stormwater
management requirements of Part 10 Chapter 9. This site is also subject to
stormwater management zoning conditions of Z-65-96 that require that runoff be
held to no more than that expected for R-4 development for the 2 and 10-year
storms. Shared retention /detention facilities among lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9
are shown on the revised plan. The plan indicates water quality compliance
is being achieved thru two constructed wetlands (one on proposed lot 5
and one on lot 6), use of permanently preserved undisturbed open space
and payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Fund. Water
quantity compliance is being achieved through use of the same two
constructed wetlands. Final stormwater control plans must be approved for
lots 9, 2, and 4 prior to grading permit issuance.
WETLANDS
/ RIPARIAN
BUFFERS: 50' riparian buffers are required on this site in accordance with State of NC
regulations, are shown on the preliminary plan, and shall be shown on any plat
for recording. Wetlands are also present and shown on the preliminary plan. No
disturbance is shown within the 50' riparian buffer or wetlands with the exception
of road and utility construction for which separate approval from the state and
federal government is required.
STREET NAMES: One new street name is required for this development for the private street
connecting with adjoining Brier Creek Commons shopping center to the west. A
street name application has not yet been approved. All proposed names must be
approved by the City and by Wake County prior to recording.
OTHER
REGULATIONS: Developer shall meet all City requirements, including underground utility service
(§10-3059), flood protection measures (Part 10, Chapter4), and the soil erosion
ordinance (Part 10, Chapter 5), unless specifically varied by this approval.
216/06 S-62-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 12
AAif' I UG5
Case File: S-82-05
SUNSET DATES: The sunset dates for this subdivision have not changed. If recordation of lots
has not taken place as specified below after preliminary subdivision approval,
that approval may "sunset" and be declared void, requiring re-approval before
permits may be issued or lots recorded. To avoid allowing this preliminary
approval to "sunset", the following must take place by the following dates:
3-Year Sunset Date: 12/22/08
Record at least Y2 of the land area approved.
WHAT NEXT?:
5-Year Sunset Date: 12/22/10
Record entire subdivision.
• MEET ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
• COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR ANY PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS Streets, Utility lines to be owned and maintained by the City.
and submit them to the Development Plans Review Center for approval.
• HAVE A REGISTERED SURVEYOR PREPARE FINAL PLATS FOR
RECORDING. These also must be submitted to the Development Plans Review
Center for authorization signature prior to recording with the Wake County
Register of Deeds.
® MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUNSET THRESHOLDS AS NOTED
ABOVE.
FACILITY FEES
REIMBURSEMENT: If oversized street construction takes place, or greenway or oversized public
street right-of-way is conveyed to the public, the owner is responsible for
application to the City for reimbursement allowed by Code. Reimbursement takes
place twice a year in January and July; a written request must be filed with the
Planning Department for greenway and street right-of-way; and in the
Engineering Department for street construction; by the first working day in
November and May each year.
216106 5-82-05 Brier Creek Corporate Center Revision AA 13
Kimley-Horn
EbJ IM F1 and Associates, Inc.
November 10, 2005
Mr. Eric Lamb, P.E.
City of Raleigh Transportation Department
One Exchange Plaza
219 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Brier Creek Corporate Center (BCCC) Analysis
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lamb:
Kimley-Horn and Associates has reviewed the proposed plan and traffic potential
for the Brier Creek Corporate Center (BCCC) within the Brier Creek
development. The project is to be phased and includes three access scenarios:
The first scenario includes the intersection of Brier Creek Parkway and Little
Brier Creek Lane/Arco Corporate Drive as an unsignalized intersection with left-
overs (to be constructed by NCDOT) on Brier Creek Parkway. The first scenario
also includes the signalized intersection of Brier Creek Parkway at Brier Leaf
Lane and the unsignalized intersection of Brier Creek Parkway at Inverness
Drive. This access scenario will serve the potential traffic generated by Phase 1
of the development (24,500 square feet of general retail and 192,000 square feet
of office space)
The second access scenario (which consists of Option A and Option B) includes
the proposed roadway connection through the shopping center between Arco
Corporate Drive and Brier Creek Parkway (at Inverness Drive) and a traffic
signal at the intersection of Brier Creek Parkway and the proposed
roadway/Inverness Drive. The second scenario will serve potential traffic
generated by Phases 1 and 2. Phase 2, Option A includes two hotels (280 rooms
total) and office buildings totaling 420,000 square feet that have not yet been
constructed. Phase 2, Option B includes two hotels (280 rooms total) and office
buildings totaling 550,000 square feet that have not yet been constructed.
The third access scenario includes the construction of Arco Corporate Drive to tie
into Lumley Road at the interchange with I-540. This new roadway will serve
Phase 3 of BCCC which includes an additional 1.3 million square feet of office
space for a projected total of approximately 2 million square feet.
a
P 0. Box 33068
Raleigh, Nodh Carolina
27636.3068
m
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Mr Eric Lamb, November 10, 2005, Page 2
As requested, the following analysis and recommendations have been provided to
address the anticipated roadway geometry and traffic control at those access
points under the three scenarios. The roadway geometry with the left-over's at
Little Brier Creek Lane/Arco Corporate Drive is shown in the attached Figure 1.
Trip Generation
The BCCC under Scenario 1 includes 192,000 square feet of general office and
24,500 square feet of general retail, all of which were under construction at the
time the counts were performed. Scenario 2, Option A includes the traffic
generated by the current development (Scenario 1) plus an additional 420,000
square feet of general office and two hotels (280 rooms total). Scenario 2,
Option B includes the traffic generated by the current development (Scenario 1)
plus an additional 550,000 square feet of general office (130,000 square feet
more than Option A) and two hotels (280 rooms total).
The traffic generation potential of the current and proposed development was
determined using the traffic generation rates published in the ITE Trip
Generation Handbook (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Seventh Edition,
2003) and is included in Table 1. Internal capture and pass-by rates were not
applied to BCCC traffic in order to provide a more conservative analysis.
Table 1
ITE Trip Generation for Brier Creek Cor orate Center BCCC
AM PM
Land Use Size ADT In Out in Aut
Scenario 1 (Current Development)
General Office 192,000 SF 2,205 278 38 50 244
General Retail 24,500 SF 2,722 41 26 119 128
Subtotal 4,927 319 64 169 372
Scenario 2 - Option A (Proposed Development)
General Office 420,000 SF 4,028 520 71 93 456
Hotel 280 Rooms 2,133 90 57 87 78
Subtotal - Option A 6,161 610 128 180 534
Total Trips - Option A 11,088 929 192 349 906
Scenario 2 - Option B (Proposed Development)
General Office 550,000 SF 4,957 646 88 118 577
Hotel 280 Rooms 2,133 90 57 87 78
Subtotal - Option B 7,090 736 145 205 655
Total Trips - Option B 12,017 1,055 209 374 1,027
law=n Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc
Mr. Erie Lamb, November 10, 2005, Pig 3
Scenario 3, with approximately 1.3 million square feet of additional office space,
has the potential to generate approximately 1,300 additional peak hour
directional trips during a typical weekday.
Site Access
Three (3) main access points are planned for the BCCC. On Brier Creek
Parkway, three existing driveways serving the existing Brier Creek Commons
Shopping Center will be utilized. The first access point, Little Brier Creek
Lane/Arco Corporate Drive, is an unsignalized intersection with left-overs on
Brier Creek Parkway. The second access point, Brier Leaf Lane, is currently
signalized. The third access point, Inverness Drive, remained unsignalized for
analysis purposes in Scenario 1 but was studied as a signalized intersection in
Scenario 2 with the proposed roadway connection. The third access point is not
expected to be utilized by BCCC until the proposed connection through the
existing shopping center to Inverness Drive is constructed. The roadway
connection to Lumley Road constructed in Scenario 3 will require a four-lane
cross-section in order to accommodate the projected directional peak hour traffic.
Background Traffic
Traffic counts were obtained at the intersection of Brier Creek Parkway at
Inverness Drive, Brier Creek Parkway at Brier Leaf Lane, and Brier Creek
Parkway at Little Brier Creek Lane on July 27-29, 2005. The attached Figure 2
shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. Figure 2 includes the shift in
outbound traffic volumes from Little Brier Creek Lane/Arco Corporate Drive to
Brier Leaf Lane due to the construction of the left-over at Little Brier Creek
Lane/Arco Corporate Drive. A growth factor was applied to the existing through
traffic on Brier Creek Parkway to account for future background growth.
Distribution and Assignment
The BCCC site trips were assigned to the network as follows:
65% to/from the north on Brier Creek Parkway
• 20% to/from the south on Brier Creek Parkway
• 5% to/from west on Brier Leaf Lane
• 10% remain in the Brier Creek commercial development
The site distribution is shown on Figure 3. BCCC traffic was assigned to the
network based on the distributions shown above and added to the background
traffic to obtain total traffic volumes. The attached Figures 4-9 show AM and
PM peak hour volumes for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively, at the three
access points.
OFIJEMPI Kimley-Horn
bb,j EM and Associates, Inc.
Levels of Service
Mr Eric Lamb, November 10, 2005, Page 4
The levels of service for the study intersections under Scenario 1 and Scenario 2
are shown in Table 2 and include the roadway improvements listed in the
recommendations section.. All capacity analyses were performed using Synchro
Version 5 software. Synchro and HCM intersection capacity analysis output
sheets are attached.
'fable 2
HCM Level-of-Service Summary
Condition AM Peak-Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay)
Brier Creek Parkway & .Little Brier Creek LAne/Arco Corporate Drive (Unsignalized)
Short delays for minor street Short delays for EB minor street
Scenario 1 Traffic approaches approach, long delays for WB
minor street approach
Scenario 2, Option A Short delays for minor street Short delays for EB minor street
approach, long delays for WB
Traffic approaches street approach
Scenario 2, Option B Short delays for minor street s for EB minor street
long delays for WB
rapproach,
Traffic approaches street approach
Brier Creek Par4ivay &Brier Leaf Lane (Signalized),
Scenario 1 Traffic B (11.4) C (33.1)
Scenario 2, Option A B (12.5) D (52.9)
Traffic
Scenario 2, Option B B (15.8) D (519)
Traffic
Brier Creek Parkway &Inverness Drive ([Tnsignalized & Signaljzed)
.......
Short delays for WB minor
Scenario 1 Traffic - street approach, moderate Long delays for minor street
Unsignalized delays for EB minor street approaches
approach
Scenario 2, Option A
Traffic - Signalized with B (103) C (28.9)
proposed roadway
connection
Scenario 2, Option B
Traffic - Signalized with B (10.3) D (35..7)
proposed roadway
connection
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Reco»r?aendations
Mr Eric Lamb, November 10, 2005, Page 5
Based on the capacity analyses presented herein, all of the study intersections
will operate at acceptable levels of service at project build-out with the
recommended roadway improvements, which are summarized below.
The following improvement is recommended for Scenario 1:
At the intersection of Brier Creek Parkway and Little Brier Creek
Lane/Arco Corporate Drive:
• Extend the southbound left turn lane to provide 400 feet of
storage
The following improvements are recommended for Scenario 2, Option A:
At the intersection of Brier Creek Parkway and Inverness Drive/proposed
roadway connection:
• Restripe the westbound approach to include an exclusive
right-turn lane and a shared through-left turn lane
• Install a traffic signal when warranted
The following improvements are recommended for Scenario 2, Option B:
At the intersection of Brier Creek Parkway and Inverness Drive/proposed
roadway connection:
• Restripe the westbound approach to include an exclusive
right-turn lane and a shared through-left turn lane
• Install a traffic signal when warranted
• Restripe the existing drive aisle to provide two lanes in each
direction through the shopping center
• Lengthen the southbound left-turn lane on Brier Creek
Parkway to provide 350 feet of storage
The following improvements are recommended for Scenario 3:
At the intersection of Lumley Road and the proposed four-lane roadway:
• Provide multiple turn lanes
• Install a traffic signal when warranted
If you have any further questions or comments please do not hesitate to call me at
677-2215.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, IT,jCel090'1'e/eoleP?
CAR 's
?// ?a00? 0 e•°esoee O? ,ISO
AP.?FESSJOA•?•p2? ?Re
r ems-
•; T, ° r
Robert A. Ross, P.E. e SEAL
Project Manager v 2$496 0 °
4
0
Cc: Joe Dye, AAC 9
f r 16•?hjGit+!?•t8t
$? °HIPM011606013-ARC0Repor1WRC0 Develo ?o°
11101111112101
Y
W Q
U Y
O'
W a
CC
m NOT TO SCALE
LITTLE BRIER CREEK ARCO CORPORATE
LANE ..? t t DRIVE

BRIER LEAF LANE
_
.
I t t?
t
r

° INVERNESS DRIVE
-' t t r*

0
U
n
o
LEGEND

o 0 EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CL ?--- EXISTING LANE
s
??? ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE SCENARIO I EXISTING LANEAGE FIGURE
Km(ey-HomandAssociates, Inc ANALYSIS (INCLUDES LEFT-OVER) 1
THIS DOCENT. TOGETHER MM THE CONCEPTS AND MWNS PRESENTED HERON. AS AN IHSIRUUEM OF SOMM M INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECUTC PURPOSE AND CUDIT FOR WdXH IT WAS PREPARED. A= OF AND M WEA
RnW4E ON M$ DOCUWM WTMOUT WRTM AUTHORIZATION AND AOWTATION BY MIYLEY-HORN MO ASSOCUTM INC. SWLL BE WITHOUT U?'HMM TO NM4E7-MORN AND ASSOCU. M MC.

TTLE BRIER CREEK

0 o to

n no CIO
1 ? Y
W¢
U Y
Of
LLJ

F.<
a-

11 (313)

T TO SCALE

ARCO CORPORATE
LANE (129) 46 -? DRIVE

DO .t Du
N iA N
_ N
rn Coad-
vv
Co
CO
v
QT .-.
.. TM o
M
DO v
* C i-32 (193)
4-21 ?32
?
70 42
BRIER LEAF LANE
(142) 87 J
(42) 18 -?
37 49 to o
M ?
to
to

to O
U7 v .-
N DO
?
n fq t
I -11 (125)
(
3
?

i j--3
(
13
3)
INVERNESS DRIVE

Di (15) 24 -!
3
(
) 2 ---?
(12) 37
i
o
-
v
Ln v
tD
r7 v
LEGEND
a
s XX AM PEAK HOUR
i
(XX) PM PEAK HOUR

CImm? ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE EXISTING VOLUMES WITH FIGURE
lGmieyHom and Associates, Inc ANALYSIS LEFT-OVER SHIFT 2
TH6 DOCUUDA. TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS NQ DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN. AS AN 067RUMDU CR SERYCE. IS W MDED ONLY FOR THE SPFLTFIC PURPOSE AND GUTM FOR RMR:H R TM PREPARED. RCUSE OF AND IMPROPER
MIX ON THIS DDCUUW WRNOUT WROTAT Auni= MON AND ADWTATION BY IONEEY-HORN AND ASSOGATES. OIC 9W .L BE WOHOUT LKOMM TO "AEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, WC.
x
w
U Q
?
W a
F
m NOT TO SCALE
US 70
65%
RETAIL HOTEL
LITTLE BRIER CREEK 14K 140 ROOMS
LANE RETAIL
10.5K
OFFICE
96K HOTEL
140 ROOMS
OFFICE
10% 96K
5%
OFFICE
140K
BRIER LEAF LANE a
w
Of
CL OFFICE
p 140K
U
O
U
Q
OFFICE
140K
3 INVERNESS DRIVE
?l
0
OFFICE
130K
0
LEGEND
20%
XX% SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
FIGURE
ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE
??? ANALYSIS SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 3
Kmley-Hom and Assoclates, Inc
THIS DOCUMEW. TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS NW DFSGNS PRESDrtm HCREIK AS AN PISIRWDR OF StRMCE. IS WENDED ONLY FOR 7HE SPECM PURPOSE AND CUENf FOR WHICH R WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND NPROP01
Rfl)ANCE ON T1uS W WWW WRNOUI WRRTEN AUNWRIIATION AND ADAPTATION BY KRRET-HORN 40 ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL IIE WRNOUI TIABIL0 TO KPALY-HORN AND ASSOCNT6, RK:

TTLE BRIER CREEK

D
Lr)
- 0) D
u,J ^
.. O
p O N
U
rnv0
.-
to CO Y
LLJ >-
U'S

Y
? Q
Q_

m

CO

T TO SCALE

ORPORATE
LANE [46] (0) 46 -? 1 DRIVE
1
(
NCN
st
v030
Co
w
N to Do
u 0 0
UU
m
-Q) f
uaj
r
Go
u
u
?
o°a
0) CD
-- 21 3) [24]
1 ? 4,70 13) [83]
BRIER LEAF LANE
[103] (16 87
(0) 18 --?
1
'4)
a
49 0 49 N to
n
N
M
O ^O
ve}v
O "t

(DD ti-A
u N
u
N
U)
C) T
n ? N
u N'1 v
v O
N v
v

L
rn N 1
0
) 1
1]
? (
[
;
;
13 (0) )
[13]
INVERNESS DRIVE

° [24] (0) 24
2 t
[
] (0) 2 -? I
[37] (0) 37 000
/
S _
L) __o
0 o LEGEND
M ?^
g o" XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
(XX) SITE TRAFFIC
a [XX] TOTAL TRAFFIC

s
CELT ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE SCENARIO I AM FIGURE
}Gurley-Homand Associates, Inc. ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4
THIS OOCUYDJf, TDGEfNTA YTTM THE {OMWrM ANO DESIGNS PRtWnW HMM. AS M 06MUUfM Of SDMCE IS WMED MY FOR 1NE SPMM PURPOSE AND CUCM FOR MOGN ft WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND RPRGM
RV!; C, ON THIS OOCU D WDNOUf WRM AfMORRAI W ARD ADMUTRM Uf IOUM-HORN AND ASSOMTM MC. SK L K WRNOUT LMAM TO KW LEY-NORM AND ASSDGNTES, WL

TTLE BRIER CREEK

r-.
EN j
0OLu
uu O^

0 o v
co 00 .-
2,0
000 N
1 (Y Y
cr-
U

?Q
W CL
Of
Da

313 (242) [555]

T TO SCALE

RCO CORPORATE
LANE [129] (0) 129-j, DRIVE
i 1 r
°f r 'd-
U-)

,? O..

u ^ 0:)
d'
Lo 0
^O O
u
co ,I?u
u
a o O
v v
co 0 M -193 (0) [193]

I ?--- 32 (19 [51]
?
? 42 (74
L1161
BRIER LEAF LANE +
[150] (8) 142--1
] (
0) 37 -o
[
I I
0
37 coo

?o

n .- N
u .?
r-1 r
r-t [p O u
N L-A
u ^.
? v 0
0 1-125 (0) [125]
N ? (
[
IL*
i 33
(0)
[33]
3 INVERNESS DRIVE

0 [1[3
(
0
1
? 4) t
]
(
)
3
o [12] (0) 12 to 00 00
co

o^a

n
M
M - LEGEND

o co
04
XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
00
(XX) SITE TRAFFIC
u [XX] TOTAL TRAFFIC

?mm" ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE SCENARIO 1 PM FIGURE
Wmiey-HomandAs deles,Inc. ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5
AND
DWY
THE
THS AS AN
OJEWt RMWXEMON T5S DOCULIEN7 WONDUE WAR77N AUTHOR?IWIDN AND PRESENTED 7HDON *H 6Y KUM-HURN AND SW?ASSOOA%SE,. P C. SHALL DE TIDND{R UABKM TD KMV-4 ORN AN A=V UnS, pCIJ NAS MIEVANED. REUSE Of AND IYiROPFA

TTLE BRIER CREEK

n
En u M

ov0
..
0rl
Co V
l y
w
LLJ >-
Q
U ?
Cr
W Q
Fr 0-
m

CO

T TO SCALE

CORPORATE
LANE [46] (0) 46 -? DRIVE
1
co O O

O
U r'7 O
n
N
R^ N-00
O
d
uu
a)
co
u?
OHO
CD Cn
rl Co
I 24 ?O? [
]
? r 83 0 83
BRIER LEAF LANE M'
[1 (0) 103
[18)
r
(o Is I
[79] (30 49 ? N
?t
ED ,-. o
v ? v
^
-
T
D
ifj
u?u
QT
d'
N Rn
to
u

`J O N
a 4-
N 11 (89 ) [100]
r- 0) ?-1 (0)
13 (26? ]
1 [39]
3 INVERNESS DRIVE

o [24] (0) 24
[2
0
0
] (
) 2 -?
[37] (0) .37 o to
0

?o C9

v
LEGEND
MT u
+-"t
o ° n XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC

(XX) SITE TRAFFIC
a [XX] TOTAL TRAFFIC

Dl:" ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE SCENARIO 2 A AM FIGURE
D
KmlepHomandAssociates,Inc ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6
THIS ODCUHEM. TDGETM WNH IRE EDNCOnS AND DESIGNS PRESMED HERON, AS AN ORSTRUUENT Oi SE MF. IS WENDED ONLY fM THE SPEE: M PURPOSE AND 0" FOR MOCH R WAS PREPARED. REUSE Of AND IMPROPER
REIM" ON MS OOCUL04 WMW WRRTEN AUDIDRI7ARON AND AD-PTATNNI By KWW-HORN AND ASSOCl IM PRC. SHALL BE WOHOUT UWUW TO "=-HORN AND ASSOCRATES RRC
Y
W
Ld Q
n v Y
00
o`-'n
?Lr
E
o y o m NOT TO SCALE
00 CD o
-' tT N
1
-443 (0) [44.3]
LITTLE BRIER CREEK ARCO CORPORATE
LANE [129] (0) 129--, t DRIVE

LO co co
o^o
o ? n
M
ALO
M
r-?
n o
N
"?
ru f0 ?
co
..M
u^ u
u
r
•- d
p v v
00 Ln ( 193 (0) [193]

1 ?--51 (0) [51)
116 (0)
116

i [
]
BRIER LEAF LANE
[150]
[42] (0) 150 --?
(0) 42 --? h
46 (9) 37 r no
.- N
O
C-4 N
v 'tO
vo-

0000 u
N
u
WG
N u
tD
u u
- N
O .-
p v ?
v^ N
?-237 (374) [611]
(0
N
I ?
(
)

i 33
[140]
(107
INVERNESS DRIVE

al +

o [12] (0) 12 M cc co

LEGEND
n ^
M r--, ?t
"?C'J XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
(XX) SITE TRAFFIC
a [XX] TOTAL TRAFFIC

c2mmll ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE
Kunl*Hom and Associates, Inc ANALYSIS
MIS OCCUMEM. MGEMCM WITH ME COWCEMS MCI DESIGNS PMESOM HEREIN. AS M WMMOa OF SEANCE. I
Rnl%KE ON MS P=U WE WMMUT WROIEN ARWONIAOOM AM AOYRAOOM 81 K09M-401H MO A5S0W= I
SCENARIO 2 A PM
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FIGURE
7
RLUSE OF MO WPROPFN

TTLE BRIER CREEK
N
"? n
r,' 'co

_ u
o °
v
to fl,
m d' (0
N co M
1 ? X
Q
V Y
w Q
?CL

0]

15.3 (0)

53]

CO

OT TO SCALE

ORPORATE
LANE [46] (0) 46 -? h t (? DRIVE
I 1 1
o co O

pT v
00
? v-
N - Eu
u

N C
? D1
uc 0 CO
.
O`?O
01 M
r co ?- 24 ?0} IF24
1
?-- 83 0) 83
BRIER LEAF LANE
[103] (0) 103 --?
[ 18
0
] (
18 --0,
?
I
[
51 (36
49 --,+ M co in
N

v d. v
to
I"'1 r?N

- tn
u
r
T
to M
C u
-u

? ?
ul N 11 (10 1) [112]
1 .--, (0)
? 1J
, j-,3 (29 [42J
INVERNESS DRIVE
[24] (0) 24
2
° [
] (0) 2 -?
o [37] (0) 37 - o 0 o
i ?
L)
0 It
o LEG END
-
0 ? a XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
(XX) SITE TRAFFIC
z
[XX]
TOTAL TRAFFIC
a
i

r1mm" ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE SCENARIO 2 B AM FIGURE
KimleyNomand A=lales,Inc. ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8
TARS DOCUUD , TDGE HER MM THE CCHCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESEMED HEROK AS AN PORUUM OF SERME. 6 OMDED ONLY FOR M SPEOFIC PLOPOSC AND CUM FOR WAtH 9 WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND OAPROPEA
RELA KE ON ORS DOCUUENt WRNOM WWnEN AUIHDRIEAMN AND ADAPTATION Df NWIEY-HORN AND ASSOMIM WC. SWU DE WaHOUE t.N80.RY TO KMV-fWRN AM ASTO ATM INC-
Ile

o w
Q
o U ?
-•'_- r,
u?•u LLJ Q
' a..
..2 M ..
o . o 0_
m
NOT TO SCALE
CO f- N
° tD to
m N
11 (
4
0. 443 (0) [443]
LITTLE BRIER CREEK ARCO CORPORATE
LANE [129] (0) 129- 1 DRIVE
r
m to to
Ln 0003

F -
o
v
v
?
r? to
m N

n
?LCID °^ °
EO
M u
.
.
u
^
.2 O
p vu
° M 4-193 (0) [193]

116 (0) [116]
BRIER LEAF LANE
[150] (0) 150
t
42 o
[48] (11 37 f?
?- N
_fO
? N O
O
4.J
7 1
7 r
u a'
M
u
- tD
-, to
N to ?
u^ u
?
? vv
..? °
N k-237 (459) [696]
tD N
I f- 1 (0) [1]
?
1 r33 (131) [164]
INVERNESS DRIVE
[15]
3 (0) 15 J
t
[
] (0) 3 -s I
[12] (0) 12 ?r N DO
M Co C0
o
_
-°? LEGEND

t2
Q M , O7
00
XX
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
(XX) SITE TRAFFIC
0
z
[XX]
TOTAL TRAFFIC
o

ARCO CORPORATE DRIVE SCENARIO 2 B PM FIGURE
Iamiey-HomandAssociates, Inc. ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9
Has DOG7 4 Dj70C[iHER WRH naE CONCEPTS AND DESICHS PAES8= HERON. AS AN DISTRUYFNT OF SERVICE Q INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECW C PURPOSE AND CLIEW FOR *OCR R WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IUPRDPEA
REIIwCE OH NK DOC V WIINOIR M7i1lfF1! AtTfHIM1UTIDN AND ADAPTATION Of 1UUlEY-MORN AHD ASSOCNTCS, PNC 51441 BE 1tfTIWUT LV11411Y 70 1IYtLY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. IIC.

us (14 M
L
O
O
L.
Ln?
? W T'I

a
NN
? Ln
41
U
l
IT
tD
L
.Z,

C: y
L
u

C* "

E
4.
W

1 Pl
0-
O 'a
j -W _ N
M to co
Q?
4-J 0 tnN n

aj ? CH NN ?•
L L
L
U v ALL:
C.7 vi vi
4.1 82-
L O
O Q
Q d ? a
O N ,,N
U

0

Q
v
V
F..

O
to 0
io
L W
3
9 cwcw z
U

W t- ao
0
0
N
C
O
W
O
I
.a
E
0
0
a?
C
O
N
C
N
C7
CL
It
ARCO Corporate TIA
Scenario 1
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway Q ARCO Corporale Pktvy/Lit(le Brier Creek Ln
AM PEAK HOUR
aria Cs-k Pukwoy Oda Cack Puk"y Little aria Creek Lam ARCO Capm lc Pkxy
Northbound Snnthb-d sthnn Wrslhon
Oncrl uon Left Throunh Rigid Left Tldough Right Left Through R,FU 1.11 Throe Right
Observed 712812005 28 198 21 160 483 59 56 IS 46 Is IS III
E3lsung Condluotu
LtA.TurnReassigtmuil 56 .56 -IS •18 -IS
Total Existing Traffic (2005) 28 254 21 16D 483 S9 0 0 46 0 0 111
Growth factor - 75!: to Drier Creek Pkwy 17vweiss I.00 1.75 1100 1.00 117S 1.00 1.00 1.00 Loo 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 Background Traflle 21 303 21 160 835 59 0 0 46 0 0 111
Scenarle 1 - Clrrear Dnrlopmew
r,ojfti Traffic
Percent Auiprnem 0.007: D.oo,3 2500;: 65 O03: O00% 0.00: MOM 0.0m 0.00:: 0.00:: a0(r: 6500[:
Direction Unfout) O 0 Li in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oA
Project trips - ARCO Corporate 0 0 Lo 207 0 0 0 0
- D 0 0 42
ScenarioI Tout 28 403 108 367 145 $9 0 0 46 0 o Is3
PM PEAK HOUR
aria Creek Pukavy Oda Crak rukv%y Unit Orly Crcck Lane ARCO Corporate PLwy
Northhanad Snmhtmund .mlh Wnllwun
Dearrl Ilon Leff Through Right LeR Throe Rigid Left 77aou1h Right LeR Through RI d
Obl-ed 7/28/2003 59 780 44 261 490 108 108 28 129 16 6 313
Existing Condluans
Lcft-Tram Rcassiganctd 106 -101 -28 -16 .6
Total Eststlo2 TrafOe(3005) 39 818 44 261 490 108 0 0 129 0 0 313
Growth factor - 7572 to Ddcr Creek Pkvy Tldougles 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Loo 1100 1.00 1.00
ZOOS background TraRle 59 1473 44 261 856 108 0 0 129 0 0 311
S-rta I - Cw".1 Dnelapmrar
rrojeet Tramc
Percent Assigmnd D.007: 0.00;: 23.00;: 65 007: 0.00% 0.007: 0.007E 0.007: a00% 0.007: 0.005: 65 00'.:
Direction(inroat) 0 o in in o 0 o D 0 D 0 out
project trips - ARCO Corporate o 0 42 Ito 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 242
Scenario I Total 59 1473 86 375 858 108 0 0 129 0 0 555
k4ar1011 6 06 01.1 - ureolarra73s41/arca carpornae imm"don spmadskreu mnarlo 1 alrJfofrr errek @ arro I J141018.06 AM
ARCO Corporate TIA
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway ® Brier Leaf
AM PEAK HOUR
Drier Creek PuL-ir Orier Creek Parkway Drier Leaf Drier L.tar
nnhlrn»n Snmhlmand F.atthouml wnthoer,
Description Left Thmu h Ri hi Left Thr.0 R! Iu lift Tk-,h R! h1 Left 7hrouafi Ri IN

Obsmed 7-2842005 30 201 25 89 466 II 31 3 49 52 6 32
Ealstint Conditions
LcD-TmRms4mmn -13 56 Is II
Is
Taal Existing Traffic (2005) 30 201 25 89 446 11 87 Is 49 70 21 32
alomb Factor - 7576 to Date Creek Pkwy non ultin 1.00 L7s LDD 1.00 1.75 LOD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1100
2005 Background Trafac 30 352 23 69 798 I1 67 I8 49 70 21 32
Setearla 1 •Cumm Dnelopmni
Pro)ed Tral11e
Parent Assignment 0.0076 20.00': 0.M.4 0.00:: 0.0756 0.00:6 s ms 0.00:: 0.00`6 20.0756 $00-11. O.OO:L
Direction (Woum) 0 in 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 out out 0
Project rips-ARCO Corperme 0 64 0 0 0 t
D _
-
16 0 0 l3 3 0
Sce-mo 1 Total 30 416 25 89 798 11 ID3 I8 49 83 24 32
PM PEAK HOUR
a[L•way Dries Crab Pul-wy Baer Lear Baer Leaf
urel Soulltbon EA111)nn 1Vnllmu.4
Description Left Throats Ri t Left Tleou RI I Left Through Right

Observed 788/2005 7 5
F 70 310 355 is 34 14 37 26 26 193
Count Balancing
Existing Conditions
Left•Tum Reassi8otrcel -16 108 28 16 6
Total r-4isdng Tr.MC (2005) 117 633 70 310 339 18 142 42 37 42 32 193
Orowek Factor - 75'- to Brier Creek Pku7 Throulths 1.00 1.7s 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOG
200S Background Traffic 117 1108 70 310 605 !8 142 42 37 42 32 193
Seenatta I - Cunene Detrlopmtne
Project Traffic
Paced AssiBsmem 0.00% 20.00: 0.00!6 0.00:: 0.00:6 800:6 500:6 0.0076 0.00:5 20.00% S00:: 0.0076
Direction (lnncul) 0 in 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 out out 0
ProJteY trips -ARCO Corpmatt 0 34 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 74 19 0
Scenario) rout 117 1142 70 310 605 )e I50 42 37 116 51 193
G:lpn101160M.1 • orroNnal37kl/areo torpomte Interteerlon sp radjAccu neanrfo I jbIGrior nee! @ Grier kaf 111410S 8!06.4Al
ARCO Corporate TIA
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway Q Inverness Drive
AM PEAK HOUR
Drier C.A Pmkway aria Creck Pmkw y lm=m3 Drive imams Drive
rrrihha rn Snuthbnnm F..0-n w tbaun
Dm,i 0m Ldl 77rarah 0.I M Left T7vou Right Left T?,,.A RfaM Left Throe Ri A
Observed 7/28/2003 0 194 10 23 538 7 24 1 37 13 1 11
E4isdoc Coudltlom
Ltn.Torn Rmsigmrnl
TOW Eslsline TratOe(20M 0 194 10 23 S38 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
Growth Faaor- 75% . to Drier Creek PkwT Tl-&lu 1.00 1.75 1.00 1100 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 llaekgrooad Traffic o NO to 23 942 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
Scenario 1 . Currret Derclopmcm
Project Trsmt
Pacm Auigmcm 0.0D': NOV.. 0.00115 0.001". 20.00': 01005: 01001". 0.0M 0.00% 0.00% 0.00';: OA05:
Direction (iVwt) 0 in 0 0 ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project trips -ARCO Corporate 0 64 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sccoadol Tow 0 404 10 2.1 93S 7 24 2 37 13 1 II
PM PEAK HOUR
aria Creek Parkway Drier Creek Pmkway lmanas Drive limemer3 Drive
IVarihhound pumhbon A ruthounfl Nmhnun
D-i tim Left Thm h Right Len Tlvwah Rim Left Thou h Right Left Tlnon RIP,
Observed 7n8/2005 34 6S6 88 101 307 25 IS 3 12 33 1 125
Sremdo I - Esisan8 CondldOns
LeOamn Rauilparcm
TOW Esiming Tralilc(2005) 34 656 88 101 307 2S IS 3 12 33 1 12S
Gtowih Factor - 755: to Drier Creek Piwvy Tlnou5lu 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.75 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 O.ckgmo d Traltle 34 1146 88 101 537 25 15 3 12 33 1 125
Srm.do I -Currmr Dne/apmear
project TmMc
PacmlAssigmsnt 0.00;: 20.001,: 0.005: 0.00%. 20.00:: 0.005: 0.00". 0.005: 0.00% O.W". 0.00% 0.0DS:
Dirmtice(Iwwl) o m 0 0 an 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Projca trips - ARCO Corporate 0 34 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scenarto 1 Total 34 1182 88 101 611 25 IS 3 12 33 1 125
n.yarwud060A3 • aao4+aar3t/rtfarca Carporou laursecrloa *",IsAeru AT-1o t. Ijjbr(er Creek Q lamrnm !114105 6.06 AA(

L co
U
Ln
L
O
L

u
en N
rn
m

0
o
a
L

a
9 LLni n

L.
W
r, LLn 00
N
r-1
3
O

O o
Ln O

Q CL C
W L
na' ?

a
N
a,
12
fo
0 '
D
V gyp
CF O
V`N -
C
M
L
Q?

j. ! yy
:

?
L E LL
O
N
O a ?

V ~
.g

a
oo
0
°
°
C
„
Q c V'

Q
v
L
F

u m
C
L
IA
y

N
c .u

Q)
.%I W = z"
U
J O O

W i, m
M
O
N
C
O
w
O
c
C?
.q
w?
G
E
0
w
ce
c
0
a
v
c
4)
C7
O.
p
ARCO Corporate TIA
Scenario 2 A
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway @a ARCO Corporate Plnvy/Little Brier Creek Ln
AM PEAK HOUR
Brier Creek Parkway Brier Creek Pwb ny Little Drier week Lane ARCO Corporate Pkwy
Northbmmd Snulhbnun Fast6mm westh-ad
DISCN tlon LeR Thraouh Right Left 711M Riche Len Tluou Rfida Left Tlvwgh III &
Obsmv d 7171/2005 28 198 28 160 483 59 56 15 46 is 15 ill
Existing Conditions
LeR.Tum Raassigraretu 56 -56 -I5 -18 -15
Total Exlsting Tnme (2005) 28 234 2t 160 40 59 0 0 46 0 0 111
OravN Factor - 757: to Drier Crack Pkwy Thrwghs 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 lfaeltground Tnme 29 403 28 160 845 59 0 0 46 0 0 111
Srmmo 1 - Current DeidopmrN
Project Tnmc
Percent Assiytaeut 0.0051. 0.007: 2S owl'. 65007E 0.0071. MOO:. 0.0071. 0.00% 0.0011: 0.007: 0.0013 65 007.
Direction (idws) 0 0 in in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 out
Project trips -ARCO Cogrorate 0 0 t0 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
Scenario! Total 22 403 lot 367 845 59 0 0 46 0 0 153
Scenario 2-7Office Buildings. 211arelt
Project Tnme
P-M Assignnrnl 0.0051. 65.005: 0.007: 0.0051. 65005'. 0.005: 0.0071. MOM 0.005. ow". 0.0D'. Moo%
Direction (in ton) 0 out 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Projeet Trips - Three 0111ce Duildings, Twv Ilotels 0 13 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scrnareo 2 BulWout Told 23 496 108 367 1242 SP 0 0 46 0 0 157
PM PEAK HOUR
Orin Geek Parkway Drier Creek Parkway Lime Brier Crack Loot ARCO Ctnporaic Pkwy
Llnnhbonnd Snuthbwml - t nnn W"Ibmtn
Description Left Tlaw h st ht Len Through Right Len Through Riglo Left n- Rh Main
Otnmed MUMS 59 790 44 261 490 108 108 29 329 16 6 313
Ealsting Conditions
Lsft-Turn Rcassigonlmt 109 -108 -29 -16 -6
Total Existing Tramc(200S) 59 tat 44 261 490 108 0 0 129 0 0 311
Growth Factor - 757E to Brier Or& Pkwy Tltmaglrs Loo 135 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1005 8ac4r99ad Trimc 59 1473 44 261 858 108 0 0 129 0 0 313
Scenario 1 - Currrnr Dre&pmrni
Project Tralik
Percent Asslgmrnn 0.007: 30.007. 25 0051. 35.0051. 30.0053 0.005: 0.005: 0.007: O.W.. 0.007: 0.001: 35,001'
Diteclion(Wout) 0 wt in In in 0 0 0 0 0 0 one
Prsgm trips - ARCO Caeporate 0 112 42 59 51 0 0 0 a 0 0 130
Scenario I Total 59 1515 96 320 909 309 0 0 129 0 0 443
Scenario 2.3 Of ee Building, 211ards
Pmjed Tnme
Percent Assipatcm 0.001.3 65.0013 0.0071. O.M. 65007: 00053 0.0051. 0.0051. 0.0053 0.0053 G.M.I. 0.W.1.
Direction (Wwt) 0 not 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Trips- Three office Buildings, two notch 0 347 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Background Traffic Reassignmrnl -50 50
Scmar19213rdldow Total 59 1932 96 270 1076 lot 0 0 129 0 0 44]
4.•4ratp1160M.1 • arcalm+nlpslrl(arco lot sheen snnnrlo 2 %*A se drl-w)7a/sjhner creek @ area 111410J d.02 at
ARCO Corporate TIA
Scenario 2 A
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway ® Brier Leaf
AM PEAK HOUR
aria Creek Pukwvy Drier Crack Paskway Drier i nr Orin Lar
rinrlbhnond Snnib nun rm bmr r wes11to0nd
Daul Oon LeR Through Ri he LeR Throe R19M Left Through !. t LeR Throueh Rios

Observed 712812005 30 201 2S 89 466 11 31 3 49 52 6 32
Existing Conditions
Lcft-T= Ro2ali unem -11 56 IS 11 IS
Total Mting Tr*Mc(2005) 30 201 25 89 448 11 87 Is 49 70 21 32
GrOwlhrector -751% to ado, Creek Pkw7Tlooulim 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 105 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 Oukgmund Traffic 30 352 2s 19 798 11 57 11 49 70 21 32
Scenario I - Crtrrmr Dneloposrmt
Project Traffic
Percent Assigmr erd 0.001: 20.001% 0.00:: 0.00:: 0.001: 0.001% 5 001: 0.0011, O.W.I. 20.07.: S00,,. 0.00':
Djraction(Infout) 0 in 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 out out 0
Project trips - ARCO Corporate 0 64 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 13 3 0
ScenarioI Total 30 416 25 69 791 11 103 18 49 83 24 32
Scenario I.3 Office anildings. 2 thwele
Pmjecl TraMe
Pacan Assignncm SUM 63.001". 0.DD1G O.OO is 65.00111 0.00:% -0.00'% OAO.% 500'% 0.07.% 0100:% 0.00::
Direction(infout) our out 0 0 in 0 0 0 in 0 0 0
Ptojec%Trips - Thee Office OuUnge Two Nwcls 6 83 0 0 397 0 0 0 30 0 0 0
Sceaarto 2 ooOdout Total 36 499 ZS 89 1195 11 103 11 79 13 24 32
PM PEAK HOUR
Dda Creek Parkway aria Creek PwL-y Orla Lear aria Lar
orthhnum Snufhhmm Fut %Vathmrn
Description Left Thou Right Left Throe Witter LrR Tb w h RieM Left Thrau Richt

Obsmw( 72612003 117 SIS 70 310 355 11 34 14 37 26 26 193
Count Dalandag Its
Eahd.g ComltOom
Left•Tum Rassigr»cnr -16 101 28 16 6
Total Edtdng Traffic (2005) 117 633 70 310 339 IS 142 42 37 42 32 193
Growth Factor. 75% to Oria Creek Pkwy TMoughs 1.00 1.73 1.00 1.00 1.75 Loo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
zoos Dackgrauml Traffic 117 1106 70 310 60S IS 142 42 37 42 32 193
SetnadO I -Current Dnelopmenr
Projecd Traffic
Percent Assk-tread 0.001% SO.OO:G O.M 0.001% 30.00116 0.00:% 5001% 0.0014 0.00'1. 20.0013 3001: 0.00'%
Dirafios(Irlml) 0 in•ouf 0 0 in 0 in 0 0 Ow MA 0
Project trips -ARCO Corporate 0 145 0 0 51 0 1 0 0 74 19 0
Scenario I Total 117 1253 70 310 6% i8 150 42 37 lib 51 193
Seenulo 2 - 3 Office BoOding, 711o1eds
Project Traffic
Paccar Assipffam S 0014 65 D01% 0.0014 O001L 65 007% 0.001% 0.00/4 0.001. S 0011 0.001% 0.07.1. 0.0011.
Direetim(Iwout) out out 0 0 in 0 0 0 in 0 0 0
Project Trips- Thor Office DuiWings. Two Hotels 27 347 0 0 117 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
Daekgroumt Tmlrm Ratsigra cal SO
Sttmrio 2 DUDdow Total 144 1600 70 360 773 16 1S0 42 46 116 51 193
A: (nn10116060/3 - areelen4?TlJynec0 lni4Aerr1 secnarl0 2 %** K d/llew0)721sJ61kf deck L brier leof 1114403 IF 02 4Af
ARCO Corporate TIA
Scenario 2 A
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway © Inverness Drive
AM PEAK HOUR
Drier Cnck Parkway Drier Crock Pwlway hwaness Drive Inverness Drive
Northbmn Smgbl- E29M n wrsrbor
Description Lea Through Right Left Tkoa b Ricbl Len 71rou 0.k Left 7luouah Ri ht
Obsavd 712x/2005 0 194 to 23 S38 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
Existing Condtuoet
Left-Tans Reassitpuneni
Total Existing Traffic (2005) 0 194 10 23 538 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
Growth Factor - 751; to Brie Creek Pkwy Tluougla 1.00 1.75 1.00 i.oD 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00
2005 Dackgmund Traffic 0 340 10 23 942 7 24 2 37 13 1 it
Smuts I -Cm rent Derdopmenr
Project Tralne
Pacew Assigmwa ow; 20.0011% 0.00;: Ooo% 20.001". 0.001; 0,005% 0.00% 0.001% 0.001. 0.0011(,
Dii-d. (idout) 0 in 0 0 oul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project srlps -ARCO Corporate 0 64 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scenario 1 Total 0 404 10 23 955 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
Scenario 2 -l Office BulidlnFs, 2 /Imr/s
Project Trame
Percent; Assigtmtml 0.001% 0.001. 20.0016 70.00116 0.001: 0.001% 0.001: O.ODSG 0.0014 20.001: 0.0014 70001%
Direaiaa(irdout) 0 0 In in 0 0 0 O 0 out 0 out
Project Trips - Three Office Buildings. Two hotels 0 0 122 427 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 99
S"mr(a 2 Brdldad Total 0 401 132 450 955 7 24 2 37 39 1 100
PM PEAK HOUR
Drier Crock Paskmay Drier Cade Perkwly Im-crrrss Drive tavernest Drive
Lfertbb-4 Snwhbnun o thn Wsclbmrnd
Dacrf uoo Len Tkw Right Left Throualr RI k Left Tlvoueb !t!. Left Thread Riahi
Obsmrd 7110--OOS 34 656 86 lot 307 25 15 3 12 33 I 125
Scenario 1- Existing Conditions
Left Turn Reass(grwnn
Total Mang Trame(2005) 34 656 8x 101 307 2S IS 3 12 33 1 125
Gr th Factor - 751: to Drier Crock Pkwy nrarglo 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 DackwmwW Tra0c 34 1148 88 101 537 25 IS 3 12 33 1 125
Scenario I - Current Da'rlopmenr
Project Tranic
PemntAssignmoll 0.00% 20.0014 0.0016 30.0013 20.00;; 0.001; aoov. o.W:S 0.0014 0.001: 0.00.3 30.001;
Direction((tdow) o in o In M o 0 0 0 0 0 out
Project trips. ARCO Corporate 0 34 0 51 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 112
Scenario I Total 34 1182 It IS2 611 25 I5 1 12 33 1 237
Scenario 2 - 3 OB?m Bu0d1ray. 2 Hotels
Project Trame
Paccnl Assigm:em 0.001% 0001: 20.001; 70.001% Moir's 0.0011 00015 00014 0.001; 20.001% 0.0014 70.001;
Direction(idout) 0 o in in a 0 0 0 0 out 0 am
Project Trips - Thres Oifirc Ow'Wingt. Tw•o Mitts 0 0 36 126 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 374
Daclground rratfc Rcassignnrm
Scenada I Bufld ut Total 34 1122 124 278 611 25 IS 3 12 t40 1 611
hAp41011686013 - arroinnd)ttrt(arro larshceri sanarlo 2 with x ddrrxo)7alrJbNcr errek 0 Inverness 1114185 8:02 AM

U Ln
Ln
L r,
L
O
x
L
Y ? 0?0? N
N
a

a
M
F in Ln
tD -4 O
?

L ? co ifl ?

O
x
' tDC, to
tQ Oi
m W
N 4
b' r,
11
? .-r
co
f
l -4 co
ca
U0 p fn
rn
m .
-i a

? L

.?
C `3 ; E
q
?j
L /V * u
= 2
Q
..
LO ~
_
O
O
O
in N
O M th

Q
u
L

u
? C
G1
?
H 0 }
?
? ? x
taJ

t0 8 2 Z
U
J O O

LU nM
M
O
N
C
O
W
n
Z3
C
.Q
rl
E
O
w
C
O
N
C
N
C7
a.
p
ARCO Corporate TIA
Scenario 2 B
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway @ ARCO Corporate Pkwy/Littie Brier Creek Ln
AM PEAK HOUR
Drkr Crock Parkway Srier C-L* Pml xy kink Brio Crak Low ARCO Cor)wnte Pkwy
Nnrthtreuma South f WrslbMOd
Desert lion left 7hrou M1 Ridu uft inm6 Ruda Len Throu h Rida Left Tbraoeh Ri la
Obsmxd 7082003 28 198 28 160 483 59 56 IS 46 18 IS III
Existing Conditions
Ulk-Turn Reassigunrul 56 -56 -15 -18 -15
ToW Existing Truffle(2005) 28 254 28 160 483 59 0 O 46 0 0 III
Gm%lh Foam-75% to Brie Crock Pkwy nl gbs 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 Loo I.W 1.00 1.00 1.00
ZOOS Dockgeound TrM1e 28 403 28 160 845 59 0 0 46 0 0 Ill
«mrio I - Cnm+u Dndopmid
ProJed Traft
Pereen Assigwma 0.W, 0.00% 25.W% 65.00% 0.00% Q00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00'Ir 0.00%, 6300:
Di-don (inloat) 0 0 in in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wl
r;+ OP. - ARCO Cor,wral. 0 0 88 207 0 0 B 0 0 B 0 42
SceMUlo I Total 28 403 log 367 843 59 0 0 46 0 0 153
SeentWo 2.4 OJfrre Buildings, 211ofels
Pmjen Truffle
Fmcat AsrigttmrM 0.00% 6500% 0.00-1 o.00':r 63 QD% 0.001• O.W'IF O.OD% 0.00% O.W% 0.00% 0.00%
Di-lim (in/ou0 0 "1 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PrnjrdTrips .Four OikeBuildings. TwoHotels, 0 94 0 0 478 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scanrdo 2 BuOdoul total 28 497 log 367 1323 59 0 0 46 0 D 153
PM PEAK HOUR
OrW Cmk Pwk..y Driu Creek Pmkway Litlk Orin Creek Ume ARCO Corporate Pkwy
Nnrthlmnml SOUIhIwnrM1 Fmilmand WrslhmlM
7Mcri alon Left Tluourh Ri a Len Throuoh Rieht Uft Tlwrr Rirhl left TM1rou Rida
Obxnrd 7282005 59 780 44 261 490 IDS 108 28 129 16 6 11)
ExlsOng Conditions
Left-Two Ren:igr mns 108 -148 -28 -16 -6
TOW Existing Trsdnc(M) 59 888 44 261 490 108 0 0 129 0 0 313
crowshFacmr-7$%toBriacr kPkwy171 0 n 1.00 1.73 Loo 1.00 1.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ZOOS Orckground Trunk 39 1473 i4 261 858 108 0 0 129 0 0 313
Seennrio 1- Current Derelopncol
Project Tmmc
P-em AssigMrrd 0.00% 30.00% 25.00% 30.00% 3500% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% a00'k 0.00% 0.01)% 35.00%
Dincti.ii 0W.m) 0 -1 in in In 0 0 0 0 0 0 ow
Project trips - ARCO Corporate 0 112 42 51 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 130
Seenur)0 I TOW 59 1583 86 312 917 108 0 0 129 0 0 443
S«rmdo 2.4 OBIce Building. 2 Holds
Project Trrdnr
PctccNAssigtomra 0.00% 6500% 0.00% Dar: 6500; D.DD% o.oD% 0.00% 0.00% aW% 0.00% O.OD%
Nmtlon(inloull 0 oul 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 O 0 0
Pro Trips - Four Omce Ouihllnc6 Two notes 0 426 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Background Tn4fic R-ignmia -50 30
5censrie 2 Bundoul Total 39 2011 86 262 1100 108 0 0 139 0 0 447
h..VxN)iIfd.Y'013--n -.lids .-Nshcassrrnwhs2withsrdriveways330Lo)Trr.ilsjbrierlark0arr0 I111fN1512:11ft1
ARCO Corporate TIA
Scenario 2 B
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway Q Brier Leaf
AM PEAK HOUR
Bria Creek Porkway Brim Creck Partway Brier Lar Brier Lear
nrtlfton SowhImInd rota w thatmt
22a1 lion Left Through Rion Lefi Throe h (lion Left Tt- Right Len Throe Is Rialr
Obsmed 71291200S 30 201 23 89 466 11 31 3 49 12 6 32
Existing Coadldom
Len-Tarn RassiBm-d •19 56 iS IB IS
Total Ealtlkg Traffic (2005) 30 201 25 89 448 It 87 IB 49 70 21 32
Gromth Factor- 7556 to Brier Creck Ptwy TIW04t 1.00 1.73 1.00 1.00 1.75 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 Background Traffic 30 352 25 89 798 11 87 16 49 70 21 32
Scenario 1 • Crrmm DwelopmeN
Prof ecl Traffic
Pcrcrnt Assignncrct 007% 20.07. 0.001': 0.00'.: 0.00% 007. S.W516 0.0716 0.00!16 20.00:16 500:: 0.00::
Direction(idow) 0 11 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 oul oul 0
Project trips . ARCO Corporate 0 64 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 13 3 0
ScenarioI Total 30 416 25 89 798 31 103 Is 49 91 24 32
Scenario 2 -J Of ee, Bulldla);s. 211orrls
Project Traffic
I'mcem Assilnencnl S 00!16 61600:: 0.0011: O.Ow. 650D.. 00011: 0.0716 0.07. 3001. 0.00!: 0.07: 0.00516
Direction(G?oul) out oW B 0 m 6 0 0 in 0 0 0
Project Trips - row Ogee Duildinlp. Tv flotels 7 94 0 0 478 0 0 0 36 0 0 0
Scenario 2 Bulidout Total 37 311 25 89 1276 11 103 l/ as 13 24 32
PM PEAK HOUR
Brim Creek Parkway Brim Creek Paku y Dries Lar Drier tear
Kruthbnund Snuthhnnnd Eaabaund Wrsibnun
Desert lian Left Throe Itiak Left T rota k Rick Len Thmu Right Len Threw k Rill"
Observed 72812005 117 SIB 70 310 355 to 34 14 37 26 26 193
Count Balancing 115
Eahting Conditions
1.01-Turn Rasslanncnt .16 108 28 16 6
Total Existing Tra@e (2005) 117 633 70 310 339 i8 142 42 37 42 32 193
Gromh Fade • 755. io Brim Creek PLv7 Tkouovs 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1175 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LDO 1.00 1.00
2005 Bsckgrountl Traffic 117 1108 70 310 605 IB 142 42 31 42 32 193
Scenario I - Current Derelopmrnl
Pro)td Traf le
Percent Asripr cot 0001% 50.00:: 0.0056 0.07: 3S.O7. 0DD% S 071 0.07. 0.0716 20.07E S 0716 0 W.4
Directire(idoul) 0 in+-1 O 0 in 0 in O 0 out cad O
Project trips -ARCO Corporaie 0 14S 0 0 39 0 8 0 0 74 19 0
Scetsarla 1701.1 117 1253 70 310 664 is ISO 42 37 116 51 193
Scenario 2 - J Offlee Drildl.r, 211arrls
project TraMc
Percent A3sipntw 5.005: 6507: 0076 0.00516 65076 0.00!1 00716 00056 307. 0.00!: 0.0054 0.07.
birection(inloun) out oul 0 0 in 0 0 0 in 0 0 0
Project Trips - Four Olrus Buildings. Tura Holds 33 426 0 0 133 0 0 0 11 0 0 0
Background Traffim Remsigmner SO
Scenario 2 Btdldout Total 150 1679 70 310 847 Ill- ISO 42 49 116 SI 193
k:(nni011606013-nreabr 671,11aree1nlsheen scenario2kO6scdriscuo)yJSOAoQIre-elslM7ercreel@Mlrrleaf 11110/0512.09AW
ARCO Corporate TIA
Seen2FfO 2 B
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Brier Creek Parkway ® Inverness Drive
AM PEAK HOUR
Drier Creek Park ay Drier Creek Pukxay Irrverocss Drive I.-Drive
Wrlbbnund Snutbbamed East nun lV hnum
Oeseri tlon Left Throuuh Ri hl Left Tioougb Riyld Left Tlumuh Riulu Left Through Right
observed 72B12DDS 0 194 10 23 538 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
Edatwz C4.11U.M
Left-Turn
Total Existing Traffic (2005) 0 194 10 23 $38 7 24 2 37 13 1 11
GrovibFactor -755:toBrierCreek PkxyThrou& 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1,7S LDO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOD
2005 Darlcgrsund Traffic 0 340 10 23 942 7 - 24 2 37 13 1 11
Scenario 1 - Cunene Aerdnpmens
Proj«t hatOc
Patent AnignmeN 000': 20.005: 0.0M1. 0.00:1. 20.00^: 0X01: 0007: DOD% 0.0cri 0100): 0.0051. 0.007:
Dirersion(itdaul) 0 in 0 0 out 0 O 0 0 0 O 0
Project trips • ARCO Ccq-la 0 W 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scenario3 Total 0 404 10 23 95S 7 24 2 37 13 1 it
Stem do 2 - 4 Office Buildings, 2 IIud i
Project TraMc
Percent A V=xnl 0,005: a00116 20,001: 70.001E 0.0015 0.005: 0.001: 0X07: 0.00;: 2000!; 00014 70.001:
Direction(k+ow) 0 0 in in 0 D 0 0 0 out 0 out
Project Trips. Four O(rice Buildings Wallotels 0 0 147 515 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 101
Scmdo 2 owwoul total 0 404 1ST 538 953 7 24 2 77 42 1 112
PM PEAK HOUR
Drier Cied Pulcmy Brier deck Parkway Inverness Drive kwerncts Drive
nrlhbnm,l Smilbbnnn F.mthnun Wnibnund
Description LcR Tloou Ri Le0 pac,, h w Left Tlnou h Right LcR TFuou h Rigid
observed 7281200S 37 656 88 101 307 25 IS 3 12 33 1 125
Scenario I - Existing Conditions '
Ult TurnIttusignsa-1
Total Existing Tra1Rc (2005) 34 656 88 101 307 2S IS 3 12 33 1 125
Graxlh Factor • 751: to Wier Creek Pkwy Tluoughs 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 Loo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2005 Background Trsnk 34 1148 88 101 537 25 15 3 12 33 1 125
Scetart01 - Curren! Denlapmen!
Project home
percentAxsi16•nrmd D.DD1: 20.001: 0.001; 3sD07: 20.001: o10051. 0.001; Co". 0.0051. 0.00% 0.001; 30.Dm;
Dircaion(irvwi) o in 0 la out 0 D 0 0 0 0 0.1
Project nips -ARCO Corporate 0 34 0 59 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 112
Scenario 1 Total 34 1182 88 160 611 25 IS 3 12 33 1 237
Scenario 2 - J Ofpre Butidlnr, 2 Horr4
Project Trutt
Percent Assigrorsnt 0.001; D.Da: 20.00;: 70.00/: a001; 0.001: 0.001; 0.007: 0.001; Mom 0.001; 70.0(r,'
Di'mion (idout) 0 o O o 0 0 0 out 0 out
Project Trips - Fact Office Duft'nge. Two Hote4 0 0 41 144 0 0 0 0 0 l31 0 459
Dadgrwnd Tralrm Rcassigrom s 50
Scenario 2 litdidool Total 34 1182 1.9 354 611 2$ i5 3 12 164 I 496
h:Ipnl011 Q06013 • ormWnalJ•strt(nno Im sheru secnario 2 kith sc drivexoys JJOk of/Irealsilwer creek @ lnsrmal 1 HlW05 12.•00 pll
ul rn rn
L
0
L.
X a
C
M
CL uj P
7
Q.
x

a
Q M
M
F C1I N
n
µ? N N
L
.7
0

M
W E
LU 00 co

?
M 4
O 0 0
'L G O O
(U N N
C
Q
u 0
•? U3 t.0
M
o
? ? 0 F+ M
H M
?
-1

V' LL
O
CL :
L ,
L
U F- o
0
o C, 6 CD,
C.
ni
<t

u
E
rcl
F-
a? m
E
0
a O

C c:

U
J
r-!
!Y I?

O
N
C
0
W
O
v
.4.
w?
G
E
2
P
e
0
w
C7
O.
it
ARCO Development Current Development AM
1: ARCO Corporate Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/4/2005

,?`NBTf `NBR?.~ SBL
Lane Configurations ' tt r
Sign Control:::. < Stop. Stop Free : Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 0 . 0
46

0

.`. 0

.153

'.28

` 403 .

. 108

'%.367

845

:.59
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly;flow rate (vehlh) 0 0 51 0. 0 170 . 31 448: :120.. `.:408.:- ::939 66
Pedestrians
Lane: W idth. ,.(ft) .: .:: .
Walking Speed (ft/s)._ .....
. ............ ........... . .
.
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median, type Norie None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal {ft}
.:
:971
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, confl?ctingvolume, 2211 2384 :. . 469. 46. :`233
0
224
1004.
'
`568 ,
:
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol : :.:: .
vCu, unblocked vol 2211 2384 469 1846 2330 224 1004 568
__:.
7.5.
.:6,5 :..
..':6.9
7.5
6.5
.:.. 6.9 `
-- 4.1
:.` ..:
. 4..1
tC 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 :4.0:.: ,.-.:3.3.: 3.5 . . 4.0 3.3. 2.2 :. .... 2.2 .. .. .
p0 queue free % 100 100 91 100 100 78 95 59
cM.ca aci, veh/h
_....P. ty:{ . )
i13'..
:...1.9:
::. 540.
28
21
779
685 ..
:...
1000 ...
... , ,
..
_irec on' Lane. 4, -tbl,
Volume Total 51 170 31 224. :'224 ..120 - 408: :':469: ` .469 ' . 66..`
Volume Left 0 0 31 0 0 0 408 0 0 0
..
Volume.._Rigtit
51 170

'0

0

0

120

..:0 ;. .0.. 0.,..

66
cSH 540 779 685 1700 1700 1700 1000 1700 1700 1700
"
Volume to Capacity 0,09 0.22: .. 0.05.:*' :'*' 0:13 0.13'::.: '0 07 0.41 0.28. `.0.28. 0.04:
Queue Length (ft) 8 21 4 0 0 0 50 0 0 0
Control Delay: (s) 12.4 10.9: . 10.5 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 11.1 ` 10.0 0.0 . 0.0
Lane LOS B B B B
Approach Delay (s) .: 12.4 , 0.9.: : 0.5 : ... . , . ..::. 3.2
Approach LOS B B
)ntersection:Summary -
Average Delay 3.3

Intersection Capacity,ll
tiliiation ..43.30/o 'IC U Level of Service A
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development AM.sy6
kimieylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development AM
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/4/2005
P ___ -__ --EBL EBT EBR 1 vi7SL W6.T ^1NBR "-NBL
Lane Configurations Fi I tT r ? tT If
I4eal.Flow (vptipi) '19P0. :1900 1900: : 1900.. 1900 ` A900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900. 1900
Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 150 150 150 150
Storage Lanes <.:
... :.1 . .. 0 '.:. 1 0 . ....::1 .:.:: .: 1 .. 1 ..: 1
.
Total Lost Time {s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leading Detector (ft).:: >50 50 : 50
,,50
-.:;50
'50
::50
50.
...,:.50
50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 9 15 15 9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Fri 0.850 0.850
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
S. Ffaw (prot) a 1770 1660:: ' 0 : 1770 1703 , 0. -::1770.. .3539. 11583 :1770. 3539 1583
Flt Permitted 6.716 0.709 0.321 0.357
Said Flow (perm) 1334 1660 - 0 . ` 1321. 1703 `0. 598 3539 1583 665 . `3539 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
86td ;Flow (RTOR).` :`. . :.: 54 36 28 -12
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Unk Speed (mph) 25 25 30 3,0
Link Distance (ft) 747 627 1035 971
Trave! Time (S) .. 20.4 :17.1 . ` ` 23.5 ..... .. ....:..: . 22.1. .. ..
Volume (vph) 103 18 49 83 24 32 30 416 25 89 798 11
Peak NourFactor A 90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90:.: 0.90 0.90 . .0..90 . .:`0.90 0.90. : 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 114 20 54 92 27 36 33 462 28 99 887 12
Lane Group Flow (vph)
w 114
74 0 92 63 0 33 462 28 99 . ` 887: .. 12
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases
.
. 4 2 6 .. .
...
.
.
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
2
6
6
Detector Phases 4 4 8 .: 8 2
...2
2
. 1
6
6
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0
Minimum.Splt.:(s) `:'.. .,'?;.1.6.0.: ° ;16.0::. :.;` ' 16.0 .; 16.0 21.0. 21.0: _21.0 16.0: 20.0 J .'20.0
Total Split (s) 43.0 43.0 0.0 43.0 43.0 0.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 34,0 82.0 82.0
Total, Sp11E (%) 34%.. : 34%. :0% :. 34%. `34% Q% 38%. : 38% ' 38% 27%. 66% :: 66%
Maximum Green (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 39.3 39.3 39.3 25.5 74.0 74.0
Yellow:'fime (s) 5.0
5.0.
.....
5.0
5.0
5.0
6.'0-
%-:'1'5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
All-Red Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.0 3,0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag ` :Lag Lead
..
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle,Extension
(.s),
.
3,0
3.0
3.0
::.:3.0.;
!.'- '.
:
3.0:
::3
.0

:3.0

3.0 .

. 3.0

..`:.3.0
.._ _.
....
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min None Min Min
Act Effct Green (s) :.. 16,7 16.7 : 16.7 .:16.7 .311.9 31.9 . 31.9 '.47.3 47.6 47.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.63 0.66 0.66
v/6 Ratio 0.39 0.18 31.: 0.16 0.12 0.29 :.0,04 `Q.16 0.38 ` `0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 24.6 6.2 24.2 9..8 12.3 13.4 0.0 4.6 5.8 0.0
Delay 18.4 8.0 18.2 .. _ 10.0. 17.1 15.1 7.1: .:6.0 6.6 :: 3.5
LOS B A B B B B A A A A
Approach Delay -14.3 ... .. 14.9 :: :: 14.8 6.5
Approach LOS B B B A
Queue Length'50th {ft) 31 = 5 24 7 ... 8 64 : ..0 . ` 13 ' 77 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 79 34 66 34 31 120 16 37 143 6
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development AM
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 111412005
--* -• -,,* f- '- 4-- t `? 1 .?
bane=Grow EBL _. EB.T_ EBR . VVBL 11NBT WBR NBL _ °°;fijB T 'TfiJBR . :SBL SBT. _:SBR
Splits and Phases: 2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway
01 02 "}" 04

34 S ?'?rO ;t Cam.` .,<t;'

48s,. _rf _ ..
-
?
46 "
.k4mss-?
%- NO
4 06 08
?a
MNSP-m-
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARC01SynchrolScenario 1 - Current DevelopmentlCurrent Development AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development AM
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 1114/2005
Lane Configurations I ft F I tt F
Ideal. Flow (vphpl}
1900
`:1900 .
;..1900
:.1901)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
:1900
1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 510 5.0 5.0 8..0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
LanetiL Facfon;.:::: .00 .`_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1A0 0.95 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.91 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85
Fit Protected 0.95.. : ,1.00 0.95 1.00 . : 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1659 1770 1703 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.72 1A0 0.71 1.00 0.32 :. 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00. ` 1.00
Said. Flow (perm) 1334 1659 1320 1703 597 3539 1583 745 3539 1583
Volume (vph) _' 103 18 49 83 . ` 24 32 % 30.:.-: .416. .. 25. 89 798. ' ` 11
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Add Flow (vpti) 114 20 54 92 : 27.: 36 33 462 ` 28..° 99 887 ":12
Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 74 0 92 63 0 33 462 28 99 887 12
Tum Type Perrri: Perm Perm Perm pm+pt . :. . Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 1? 6
P

ermitted Phases

4

: 6.

. .:..

2
W 0.
2

6.

6
Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 27.3 27.3 27.3 43.9 43.9 43.9
Effective Green,'g (s); 15.0 15.0: :: < ': ` .15.0 ' :.15.0. ..... 31:0. 31.0 31.0. 46.9 46.9 46.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.65 0.65 0.65
Clearance Time (s) 9,0
8.7 ..
8.7
$.7
8.5
8.0.
..:8.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Capvph} ,278 346 ,' 275 .:. 355: 257:: 1526. ''x683. ;:641 : ':2308 . `1033
v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.02 c0.25
-
v/s Rafi.o Perm:. ...
c0 t)9 ..

0.07.

. ..

0.06 ..

, .

0.02

0.08 :

.:

0.01
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.21 0.33 0.18 0.13 0.30 0.04 0.15 0.38 0.01
Uniform Delay; d1 24:6 23:6 ` ..: .:. 24.2 ' 3.4 12.3 13.4 1 i.8 4.9. : 5.8 . :. 4.4
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, 0.7. .. 0.2 . .: : 0 2 0.1 0.0 . 0.1 0.1 . OA
Delay (s) 25.6 23.9 24.9 23.6 12.5 13.5 11.9 5.0 5.9 4.4

Level.of Service
C .
.
::C
C..
: .: C .

B
B .B.. .. A ':A A
Approach Delay (s) _
24.9 24.4 13.3 5.8
Approach t_OS . C C ... ... ... 8 ..: A .. .
6tersect16 n°Summary
HCM Average ControI Delay.;' 11.4 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39
Actuated Cycfe Length {s) 71.9. Sum of loaf time (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.0% ICU Level of Service B
c Critical Lane Group
BLW H:IPN1011606013 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development AM sy6
kimleylv17-ff51

ARCO Development Current Development AM
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/4/2005
--* --s "`t - r-- 4- -,\
7 :EBL . =EBT TEBR :CLITBL: V1!!3T 1NBR. '.NBL._ NBT NBR -?SBL SBT
Lane Configurations tt r Vi tT r
Sign Co
`ntr61
Stop
S

Free

Free
Grade .
0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume" (vehlh) 24 2 37. ` ". 73 1 11 0 404 10 . 23 955 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hou>iy"flow raie (vehlh) 27
2
<.41
14
1
12

0 ::

.449:

11.:

"'.26

1061 " .
8
Pedestrians
1_ane Widfh. (ft) `" ,'" . .
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage -
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) .. 1035
pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
yC conflictmg;yolume
.
. 1349 1572 `.::531 1073 "."1569. 224 " 1069 460
_
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vG2, stage 2:c6r?f vol :::.. . - .
vCu, unblocked vol 1328 1558 483 1043 1555 224 1039 460
tC, single (s) 7.5.. " . 6.5 .: 6.9
7.5
6.5
... 6.9
: 4.1 :
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
3.5: .:.:.4.0. .: 3.3 2.2, ":...::' .": ..". . . ..22 ... ".:
p0 queue free % 75 98 92 91 99 98 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 105 105 513
58.-
106.
779
644.
:.. .
1097'
`.': .
Direction, arie # - EB;- .. WB:i1. ', 1N8`Q= :NB"-1 (VB 2 N6,3 .= NB.-4 :'SB 1 SB 2: :SB 3 SB 4:? `:
Volume Total 70 14, 13
224
224
11
26.
:531
531
8 .
: .:.
Volume Left 27 14 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0
Volume Right:':: 41 0,
. 8
cSH 197 158 509 1700 1700 1700 1700 1097 1700 1700 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.36 0.09 1).03 0.00 .0.13 : 0.13 0.01 0.02 ' "_ 0.3.1. 0.31: 0,00
Queue Length (ft) 38 7 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Control, De1aY{s) 3310 30.0 12.3 0.0 " : 0.0. " "" 0.0 8.4." OA 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS D D B A
Approach 13elaY (s) ..:. :33.0 21.5. :;: " 0.0
Approach LOS D C

:..
Itit"R 66 6-65- mary 77
,
Average Delay i:9
intersection:CapacctY Utilization: `42.5% ICU Level of Service A
BLW H:1PN101 1606013 - ARCO1Synchro%Scenario 1 - Current Development%Current Development AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development PM
1: ARCO Corporate Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/4/2005

Movement EBL ' EBT EBR.. WBL
Lane Configurations . . TT I tt
Sign Control Stop :::. : ..: 'Stop .
Free :.. Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (vehlti) 0.: :. , . 0 129 . 0 ,0 555. `59 1473 86 -.371 ` . 858: 108
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate (vetV h) 0 0 143. 0 0 617-. %-::66 1637 ' 96 412 953 120
Pedestrians
Lane UVidth? (ft) .
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage,:. .
Right turn flare (veh)
Medlan None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) :. , 971 .
A platoon unblocked
vC, confhctmg_volume 3344 3641 477 `3212 3666 818 ,1073 ° . 1732. . ...
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf.vol ' _..`
vCu, unblocked vol 3344 3641 477 3212 3666 818 1073 1732
tC, single (s}' 7.5 ':6.5 ::':.::6.9 4.1
tC 2 stage (s)

tF.:(s) :...
3.5
.

4.0 :3.
3

'

.5 .:

.
4.0

3.3

2.2
p0 queue free % 0 0 73 0 0 0 90 0
'
cM capacity (veh/b)..:` ?. ` 0
535
0
.:; 0-
'.319.
.. 1645
360 .
:.
..
Volume Left 0 0 66 0 0
Volume Right : 143 617 0 0
cSH 535 319 645 1700 1700
Volume to Gapactty .: ': 0.27 1.93 - 0.10 6.48 ` 0.48
Queue Length (ft) 27 1666 8 0 0
Control, Delay. (s) ... 14.2 458'7 . . 11.2 0.0 . 0.0
Lane LOS B F B
Approach Delay (s) 14.2 458.7
Approach LOS B F
v0 41.2
96 0
1700 360
0.06 1.15
0 403
0.0 : 126.5
F
35.1
4r1 41 c.;. :.:iw ....:..-:..::
0 0 0
0 . .120
1700 1700 1700
0.28 `0.28 0.07. ` ..:.. : .
0 0 0
O.O+ 0.0
. .
-:.0.0
fntersecffon?Summary ? _ _ - - :Rr;
Average Delay 83.5
Intersection Capacity:Utilization 9.1.8% ICU Level of Service E
BLW H:1PN101 1606013 - ARCO1SynchrolScenario 1 - Current DevelopmentlCurrent Development PM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development PM
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/4/2005
Lane Configurations tt r Vi tt if
Ide4,Fl__ (vphpi) 1900 .:1900 1900 1900 1900. . 1900 ° 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 150 150 150 150
Storage Lanes ;';1 - .:: 0 1 0. 1 1 1 1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leadug Detector (ff} ;' 50 :50 . ': -50 _50 ; 50. 50. 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turning Speed {mph}: 15 :... 9 ::` 9 ... 15 9 15 . 9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.930 ...:.: 0.882 0.850 .. , .. 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd Flow jprot) 1770 1732.:: , .... 0 . 770, 1643. 0 . :,1770. 3539 :1583 1770 3539 .1583
Flt Permitted 0.415 0.700 0.396 0.074
Satd Flow (perm)
773
173
1304
1643
0
738
._3539
1583
138
3539
1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR} 152 39. :
.
20
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lank Speed {mph) 25

wq,
25..
.:::.: ...
30
30
Link Distance (ft) 747 627 1035 971
Travel Time. (s)' 20.4 17.1 . 23.5 22.1
Volume (vph) 150 42 37 116 51 193 117 1142 70 310 605 18
PeakHour Factor
90
0'... 90 0.90 0 90 : .: 0.90. ;. 0 . 90 . 0.90.1 ::.0.90. . .::Oao. 0.90 : :: 0.90. :0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 167 7 41 129 57 214 130 1269 78 344 672 20
Lane Group Flow (vpti) 167 88 " : 0 : 129 .271 0. .130. .:1269 . 78 344 672 20
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
......
6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
Detector:Phases .: 4 4:. `..: 8. 8 2 2
2 1 6 6
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0

Minimum Split (s) -
16.0
16,0.
16.0
16.0.
21.0-
:-21..0
21A
16.0
20.0 -
20.0
Total Split (s) 41.0 41.0 0.0 41.0 41.0 0.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 30.0 84.0 84.0
Total Split (/o) 33%0 .33% 0% ^ 33% ':::83%. - - `; 0% : 43% : 43% 43% - 24% : 67% 67%
Maximum Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 45.3 45.3 45.3 21.5 76.0 76.0
Yellow Time s) 5:0 5.0 5.0 ; 5.0 5 0 5.0 . : ".5.0 5.0 ... 5.0 5.0
All-Red Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.0 3.0
Lead/L ag :' .:Lag Lag Lag
.
'Lead
:....: :
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle. Extension. (s) .3,0 . 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ". 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min None Min Min

Act _E - t Green (s)
30.4., .
. 30.4
30.4
30.4
45.9
45.9
45.9
73.8
73.8
*
..73.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0..27 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.64 .64
0.64 0.64

lc Ratio
0 81 0
.18

0.49 .

:...

0.44.

0.$9.

.. 0.12

.83 .

:0.29

.02
Uniform Delay, dl 39.1 19.1 34.0 14.6 24.5 31.5 10.3 30.1 8.8 0.0
Delay 48.8 21.8 ".: 35..8 16.0.. 28,4 37.4 13.9 38.9 9.6
LOS D C D B C D B D A A
Approach Delay 39.5 22.4.:. 35.3. 19.2
Approach LOS D C D B

Queue,;Length-50th (ft)
123
32 :
83 .
75
77
506:
19 :
215
121
0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #238 74 141 158 141 #647 53 #370 153 9
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development PM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51

ARCO Development Current Development PM
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/412005
4,\ t /0 lip.
Lane Group EBL- EBT >EBR INBL, :-WB?-T - I?VBR - NB1_ P NBT , ?NBR ; -SBL' SB r ,,: SBt
lntemal LiWDist (ft) 667 547 955 891
50th Up Block Time {%)
95th Up Block Time (%)
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 lob 150 150 150 150
5()th Bay Block Tim %0 17% 43% 22%
95th Bay Block Time % 45% 24% 26% 1 % 47% 49% 4%
Queuing Penalty (veh) 27 32 17 _ - 58 118 6

Other ;
1th:125 -
.ycl.e Length - 14
Natural Cycle: 70
Control, Type `Actuafe. ncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89
Intersection Signal Delay 28:7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service E
# 95th percent?le!volume exceeds: capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway
10 " 4
01 02 04
3as; 4 54,sN: x i y 41tsE '? _
Z.?
1-7
0
6
v 08
134.yS ? ??;, 0. "'irk
BLW HAPN1011606013 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development PM,sy6
kim IeyIvI7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development PM
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/4/2005

--- - -----WV____ _...
ol?i"-vemenf - -- - EBT. _ _
,. " EBR
/IJBL
V1TBT.:1NBR NBL-
NBT NBR _ ?
:: SBL _
$BT,
?.SBR
Lane Configurations Vi Vi tt tt if
Ideal. Flowvphpl)::::::: ; 1900. 1900, '1900 . 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lane:aJtl. Factor 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1 AO 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95. 1.00
Frt 1.
00 0.93 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected ` _
:.0-95 1;00 0.95 00 0.95 1.00. .:1.00 . 0.95 1.00. :.:1.0.0.
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1733 1770 1642 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 15
Fit Permitted
% 0:40 1`.00 0.70 1.00 0.40 ` `!.00. '-'1.b0 0.08 1.00 . ` 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 746 1733 1304 1642 738 3539 1583 146 3539 1583
Volume (vph) 150 42 37 °116 51 X93 117.. 1142 :30-: :...310.- :1.605 18
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Ad) Flow (v ph) 167 47 41 129 : ?57 214. 130 1269.: .. 78 . . 344 672. ::: 20
Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 88 0 129 271 0 130 1269 78 344 672 20
Turn Type Per Perm :Perm. ° Perm pm±pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4
' 8. 2 . .. 2 6 :6
Actuated Green, G (s) 26.3 26.3 26.3 263 42.4 424 42.4 70.6 70.6 70.6
Effective Green, g (s) 30.3 30.3 30.3 `_.30.3: 46.1 46.1 46.1.. 73.6: 73.6 73.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.65 0.65 0.65
Clearance Time (s) 9A 9,0 9.0. ... ?9.0 - . `:. 8.7 : 8.7. . ` 8.7 8.5 6.0 8.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Gap (vph) 198 461 ;347. _ . `437 ` ... 299 `:1432 64i ' `2287. 1023
v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.17 c0.36 cO.16 0.19
1//s Ratio Perm c0.22 O. i 0.. : '. ..: 0,18. 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.84 0.19 037 0.62 0.43 0.89 0.12 0.83 0.29 0.02
Uniform Delay,d1 39.6: ..32.3 3.4.0 - ' 36.7; 24.5 ::31.5 : 21.2 33.1 8.8 7.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay,`d2 26.6 0.2 ' " 0.7 2.7 1.0 7A ,0.1 12.8 01. 0.0
Delay (s) 66.0 32.5 34.7 39.5 25.5 38.4 21.3 45.9 8.9 7.2
Level of Service
.64

C

D

C.

D

A

.....: A
Approach Delay (s) 54.5 37.9 36..4 21.1
Approach LOS D D ..: _ .:: D . C . ....:

Inte? sec't!on:Summary

7

77
--
-71
HCM Average Control,Delay..: 33.1 . : .'. HCM Level of Service C.
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86
.
..
.
.

Actuated C cle Len th s
y. 9
.:..
O
..
113.9.
Sum of lost time
s
(. )
15.0 :.
.
:
.
.
.
.
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2%o ICU Level of Service E
c Critical Lane Group
BLW HAPN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development PM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Current Development PM
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 1114/2005

iNoverent EBL EBT EBR 7 ,:W[3L _:WBT WBR' NBL NBT :_.Nl3R. `SBL $BT SBi
Lane Configurations Tt r tt r
Sign:Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veti%h) ?. _.
3
12
33
1
125..
:....34
1182
88
101
611
25
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0..90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate,(veh/h} 17 3. .:13 37 1.' .:139 :.: '38 .::1313 : :..: 98 : 112 679. .:.28
Pedestrians
Lane Width ft >.. ,
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blocka e
Flight turn flare (veh)
Median type None None :
.. -
Median storage veh) .
Upstream sign ,I -(ft) 1035
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, con _ Ictir)g :volume 1775 : :2390-1-. :.-339 1968 2320. 657: .707. 1411
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2'sta e;2 cOnf:vol . :'.;:: _` .:: ..:;'; ; :' ::::.:..... ....:. .. :: .... .
vCu, unblocked vol 1775 2390 339 1968 2320 657 707 1411
6.9 . ... 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 . .:.. . '
tC, 2 stage (s)

tF(s)
.
1
,35
40.. 3:3
3.5
4:0. .,3.3,-: 2.2 2 : .
..
1 p0 que
ue free % 37 86 98 0 96 66 96 77
44-
apacity (veh/h) ;'
27
25 .
. 656:
..:26 :
.;: 27
:408
888..
Volume Total 33 37 ..: 140 .. `38 657 '' B57.: ` 98 112 339: 339 28
Volume Left 17 37 0 38 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0
Volume Right 0. Q 0 28 ..
cSH 43 26 367 888 1700 1700 1700 479 1700 1700 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.78 1.40. .,.:0.38, . 0.04. 0.39 0.39. 0.06 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.02
Queue Length (ft) 75 111 44 3 0 0 0 22 0 0 0
Control Delay (s) 220.3 540.5 20.7: ' 9.2 . .::0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 0.0 : 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS F F C A B
Approach_Delay. (s) . 220.3 128.6 0.2 . .. 2.0
Approach LOS F F
intersectjwSummat-y-y !
Average Delay 12.9
Intersection Capacity Utilizatiori ` 83.70/co ICU Level of Service B
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 1 - Current Development\Current Development PM.sy6
kimleylv17-ff51 ,
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
1: ARCO Corporate Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 1113/2005
-a? { r- 4.\ t /1*
"
Movement . :_ EBl - EBT WK 1N,BL 1NBT :,- , BR... .
-NBL NBT : NBR :SBI. SBT . 881
Lane Configurations r Vi tt Vi tt r
Sign Control -Stop .. Stop Free .. Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume
(veh/h) A 0 : : ' 46 0 0 153 28 : 486 ::108:: :-:367 1242 :59
.
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow-rate. (veh/h) ;0 0 51 0
0
.170
31
540
120 :
408.
:,1380. 66
Pedestrians
Lane Width
(ft).
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare {veh) _
Mediari.,type '` =: None..: :: None.-- .
Median storage veh)
Upstrgam ignal {ft) 971 : . .
pX, platoon unblocked
vC,`conflicfmgvolume: 2698 2918`. .: 690 2863. 270 1446. .::: 660
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
NC,: stage 2 conf vol.:
vCu, unblocked vol 2698 2918 690 2159 2863 270 1446 660
tC, single (s) 7.5 ,6.5.: 6.9 7.5 6.5 6,.9 4.1 4,1 :
tC, 2 stage (s)
3:3
3.3 `
2 2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 87 100 100 77 93 56
cM capacity (vehlh) ...: 5 5.. . 388. ...`.14: 9 728 : . 465 924. :.: ;.:
volume Total q:ru s1 : ..Zfu: : Zfu. .:Izu . :. 4u0 . .:.:oau .. .,,oau: ...:ov ,..:.
Volume Left 0 0 31 0 0 0 408 0 0 0
Volume
g. 51 170 0 0. . 120 0 6. 0 66
cSH 388 728 465 1700 1700 1700 924 1700 1700 1700
Volume to Capacity -; 0 13 0.07 `0.16. ...0.16 0.07. 0.44 " 0.41: :0.41. 0,04 .
Queue Length (ft) 11 23 5 0 0 0 57 0 0 0

Control. Delay (s)
(5.7
1.1.4:
.13.3: .
: ' 0.0
0.0
`: 0.0
11.9
0.0
0.0.:
0.0
Lane LOS C B B B
Approach Delay (s)
9 5.7
11.4
0,6 .
2.6
Approach LOS C B
lot rsWjdb!Surhn1a y: _
Average Delay 2.9
intersection Capacity:Utilizatiori: 49.8% ICU Level of Service A
BLW H:1PN\011606013 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenerio 2 - BuildoutlBuildout AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development
Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

Cane`G:Loup EBL EBT : EBR .. WBC : l?1lBT WBR .. : N13L . NB _ 'NBR . _.SBL " SBT .'S13 ,,.
Lane Configurations T* tt r Vi tT r
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 . 1900: 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900. 1900
Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 150 150 150 150
Storage Lanes :1 .: .. 0 1 -. 0 .
1
'1
1
1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leading Detector (ft) : 50 50 50 . 50 ;50 ::50 50 , .. 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 6 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tummg Speed (mph) 15
Lane Util Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt . 0:878 0.914. 0.850. . 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd Flow(prot}
1770... 635 0; :V70.: _.' .1703.: -
0
::1770
3539
:1583
1770:
39:
::::1583
Fit Permitted 0.716 0.672 0.206 0.339
Satd Flow,(perm) 1334 1635 1252 ::1703:: . ;.0 384 3539 1.583.. .631 3539 .:1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Safd. Flow (RTOR) 74
36
28
11
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Speed (mph) 25 .
; , 25 :. 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 747 .
. 627 1035 971
Travel Time (s) " 2t).4 17.1 23.5 22.1
Volume (vph) 103 18 79 83 24 32 36 499 25 89 1195 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 "O .N0 0.90 :0.90 0:90 0.90 0.90. 0.90 : + 0.90. 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 114 20 88 92 27 36 40 554
.. 28
.. 99
.. 1328 12
Lane Group Flow:(vph) .
1
14 1
08 92 . ...
63 : .. 0 . .
..:. 40 554: . 28 . 99 . ` 1328 . :.. 12
Turn Type .
Perm .
. Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm

Protected Phases
4 .
. .
.:. ` :
:.:..:.:.
2
:
6
.
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
Detector Phases 4 4 8 8. .` ... 2 :.: 2. 2 . 1 6 . .. ::6
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.6 7.0 12.0 12.0
Minimum Spli#.{s) 16.0 16.0
lb: 16.0 16.0 21.0. 21.0 21 0 16.0 20.0 20.0
Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 56.0 56.0 56..0 28.0 84.0 84.0
Total Split (%) ` 30%a 30% 0°/a 30% : 30% U% : 47% 47% ::47% 23% 70% ' P%.
Maximum Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 47.3 473 47.3 19.5 76.0 76.0
Yellow`Time;(s} 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0. 5.0: .:.:5.0 5.0. 5.0 5.0 5.0
All-Red Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.0 3.0
Lead/Lag Lag . .:Lag Lag. Lead .
Lead Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension
(S) 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ': - 3.0 3.0 3.0
___
'
Recall Mode None None None None Coord Coord Coord None Coord Coord
s)
Act Effct Gr
en l9,1 19.1 19.1 19.1.. :.: J4.8 . 74 8 74.8 91.0. .91.0 9.1.0
e
(
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.76 0.76 0.76
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.34 0.46 0.21 0.17 0,25 0.03 0.17 .` 6.50 ,`. 0,01
..,. .
Uniform belay, dl
46.4
13.6
45.8
18.5
9.5
10.1
0.0
3.7
5.6
0.3
Delay ; 45.4
. 15.9 44.7 :21 1.. 6.0 `.6.5 1.1 '4.5 6.2 " 2.5
_
LOS _
.
D B D C A A A A A A
Approach Delay 31;1 35,1 6 2 .. : 6.1 -
.
Approach LOS , C D A A
(ft)
Length 50th
Queue 82 23 66 18 15 . 117 7. 17 178. 0
..
.
Queue Length 95th (ft) 135 71 113 56 12 31 0 39 279 6
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO1SynchrolScenarlo 2 - BuildoutlBuildout AM_sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

_- ;EBL _EB;.
ane_Group_ T . EBR VII¢L .: WBT__ . ,B, ":. . `,? .. _
_
Internal Unk bist {ft) 667 547 955 891,
50th Up Block Time
95th ,Up Block.Time (%).

100
Turn Bay Length (ft)
100 150 150 150
150
50thsay Block Time %. 7%
95th Bay Block Time % 24 13% 2% 16%
Queuing Penalty (veh) ".. 13 4 11
'
-
Area:Type`. Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:N BTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle..85
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v!c`Ratio 0:54 _
Intersection Signal Delay: 10.2 Intersection LOS: B
(ntersection.Capaciiy Utilization 72.2% ICU,.Levei ofService.C .
Splits and Phases: 2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway
01 02 o4

06 oB

BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 111312005
--* -,, --t ir *- 4-- 4\ It. 1 41
Movemera: ESL EBT EBR VI(;6L, WBT WBR .° `NBL .: NBT ` .NBR:., ; SBL V 'SBT SBR
Lane Configurations tT r
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 :19A0 1.900 1900 1900 ::1900 1900 .1900 1900 1900 `1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lane UbI Factor 1.00 1.00. 1.00. 1.00 1.00 ` 0.95. ` .100 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
FIt Protected 0 95 1:00 0,95. 1.00
0.95
1..00
. 9.00
:0.95.
1.00.
Satd.-Flow (prot) 1770 1635 1770 1703 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt_Permitted 0.72 1,Ot} 0.64 1.00 0.21. :1.00 . 1 00 ` 0.40. .: 1.00 ` 1.00
S6td. Flow (perm) 1334 1635 1184 1703 384 3539 1583 737 3539 1583
Volume.` v h 103 18 79 83 ;:24 x:32 36 `499 `25 89 . `1195 . - 11
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 6.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj
Flow{vph) 114 20.- 88
92
2
7

36

40

554

%
:`28

99

.1328

`:12
.._
. .
Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 108 0 92 63 0 40 554 28 99 1328 12
Turn Type ." Perm Perm . .. Perm' .. Perm pm+pt .....: .: Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 . : 2 2 .. . 6 ' 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 71.0 71.0 71.0 87.9 87.9 87.9
Effective Green, g (s) ; 19, l 99,1 19.1 `19.1 74.7 ..:74.7 . 74.7. :90.9 90.9 90.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.76 0.76 0.76
Clearance Time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.Z : `. 8.7. .'; 8.7 : . 8.5 8.0' '.. 8.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Capyph} 21.2 260 188
271
239
:2203
. ' :985.
:' 655
.`:2681.
.`1199
v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.04 0.16 0.01 c0.38
yJs Ratio Perm.: c0.09:: . 0.10:. ....: .0.02: 0.10 0.01
v/c Ratio` 0.54 0.42 0.49 0.23 0.17 0.25 0.03 0.15 0.50 0.01
Urnform Delay; d1 ` 46,4 45.4 46.0 44.0 .:. 9.5 . 10.1 8.7. 4.1 5.6 3.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.60 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental;Delay, d.2 2. 1.1 2.0 0.4.. 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 . : 0.7 0.0
Delay (s) 49.0 46.5 48.0 44.5 6.2 6.3 2.5 4.2 6.3 3.6

Level of Service
D
D
D .
D :
..::
q
.. ~ ,A ::A A A A
Approach Delay (s) 47.8 46.6 6.1 6.1
Approach LOS A
HCM Avera66
p troL;Delay 12.5 HCM,LeveLof Service B -
.
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0
Sum of lost.time (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.2% ICU Level of Service C
c Critical Lahe Group .::. ......
BLW HAPN101 160601 3 - ARCOISynchrolScenario 2 - BuildoutlBuildout AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

Cane .Group. EBL 'EBT . 'EBR 1NBL 1f B.T - UUBR NBL , NBT T:NBR .. . SBL. ,SBT SBR
Lane Configurations , r Vi Tt r tT r
Ideal,F19w.(vphpl 1900:: . 1900. 1900 `1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 90 1900 190
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 100 150 150 250 150
Storage Lanes.: 0. . :.:. 0 1 1 1 1 9
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leaden Detec#or ft 50 50. .::450 50 50. 50 . ' SQ . 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turning Speed (mPh) : 15 t9
: 1
6 9 9 15 ... r9
Lane Util. Factor 1,00 ...
1.00 .
.
1.00 .
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.921 0.860. .: 0.850 :0.860
Flt Protected 0.981 0.953 0.950
8-6 a Flow (prot) :0 1683 . :1775 ; 15133 .1863 ` 3539 . ..1583 1770. 3539 . 1583
Fit Permitted 0.881 0.758 0.322
Satd Flow (perm) :.... 0 1511, : 0 :0 : . 1412 _ .1583 11863 ..3539.. . 1583 600 :3639 _ 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd ;Flow (RTOR} °41 111 .. ° 147 8
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Speed (mPh) 30 , .. 30 ..
' :.: ; 30 30.
Link Distance (ft) 58' 575 916 1035

Travei Times
{...).. . . ..
93:2
20.8

:

°.
23.5
Volume (vph) 24 2 37 39 1 100 0 404 132 450 955 7
Peak Nour Factor 0,90 0.90 0.90 .0.90. '.' 0.90 : : 0.90 0.90 ;:.0.90 0.90. :.0.90 0.90 .:0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 27 2 41 43 1 111 0 449 147 500 1061 8
Lane pp. flow 0 70 0 . , ..0. . 44 111 49 500 :1061. .: 8
.
Turn Type Perm Perm m+ov Perm Perm m+ t Perm
$ ....:.:. . 2 ....`: ". :::1 . 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Detector Phases 4 6
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0
Minimum $Plit(s) 14.0 1.4:0 14.0 14.0. ::14.0 19.0 :.19.0 .:99.0 ` 14.0 19.0 . 19.0
._
Total Split (s)
27.0
27.0
0.0
27.0
27.0
55.0
38.0
38.0
38.0
55.0
910
93,0
Total SpI It 23% 23% 0°I0 23% ` - 23% 46% ..:32% ' .;32% 32% ' 46% 78% 713%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 31.0 31,0 31.0 48.0 86.0 86.0
Yelow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 .5.0. 5.0 6.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lead/Lag Lead .`Lag Lag Lag . .Lead .
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle, Extension(s)- 3.0 3:0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0. 3.0 . 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None None Coord Coord Coord None Coord Coord
Act Effct Green (s) <' _ . 11 3 11.3 : :::36.0 74.1 74.1 ,: 101.5 102.5 .:1,02.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.30 0,62 0.62 0.85 0.85 0.85
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.33 .. ` 0.20 ....: ' 0.21. :0.14 Q.69 0.35 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 21.3 52.1 0.0 10.7 0.0 2.3 2..4 0.0
Delay.. ; 24.8 50.2 3.5 13.2 3.0 ':10.6 2.8 2.0
LOS C D A B A B A A
Approach Delay 24.8 ; . '... 16.8 .:10.7 5.3
Approach LOS C B B A
Queue:Length,50th:(ft). 21 33
0
' 77
0
: 121.
`74
... 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 69 30 155 38 300 158 m2
BLW HAPN1011606013 - ARC01Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005
.* -• --* r 4- *-- -*\ t ?? 1
lJ II IGI.
the 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 99 (83%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Natural. Cycle; 55
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c.Ratio 9
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.9 Intersection LOS: A
Iritersechon Capacity tJt.lization 58.4% ICtJ.Level of'SerYice'A.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Splits and Phases: 3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway
1?
01
1- 02 {
-404
????Xa"Yv - ro :v:
W,r?" 3 u' m''_.._ _
J{}•a ' Tfi ~.e. cla" .:._a.: . - ?] B(.? J?R%
27°s ?'?-'?`"? ,.
' 06 ~ 08
p.?
93W MA
z w- 4h.'':.,3?'?,?._ !
24 $4xfv"+ W,.. -.
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO1SynchrolScenario 2 - BuildoutlBuildout AM.sy6
k1mleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2 A
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005
M `R\ 1w

ovemerlt MEL EBT -99R -:VIfBLr:W,BT WBR ..NBL NBT- :. BR' SBL: SBT.- S6
Lane Configurations a' r Vi tt tt if
Ideal Flow {vphpl)
. 1900. 1900 ` 1900: .1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
.
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0
Lane.tJttl Factor 1.00 :1.00 . :1.00 0.95 '1:00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Fri 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 085 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected
0,98
.1.00
1.00
.::0.95
1;00:
1.00
Said. Flow (prof) 1683 1776 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583

Flt Permitted .
0.85
0.67,
1.00
1:00 ; 1.00 0.45: -1.00 1.00
Said. Flow (perm) 1466 1256 1583 3539 1583 833 3539 1583
Volume
{'lRh) 24 2 37: . 39 1 100 : 0. ..:404 132 ' 1450 955 :..:.7
.
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.9o 0.90 0..90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Ad1 Flow (vph) 27 2 41 : :.. 43 1 :111 .0 449, :::'147 : 500.: 1061: 8
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 70 0 0 44 111 0 449 147 500 1061 8
Turn Type ;Perm, Perm pm+ov. Perm Perm pm+pt .. Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 1 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 7.9 28.4 70.6 70.6 98.1 98_1 98.1
Effective Green, g;{s): ' ; .9.9 9.9 32.4. 72.6 :72.6 . 100.1: -100.1 100.1
.
Actuated /C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.27 0.60 0.60 0.83 0.83
. 0.83
....
Cleararice Time (s) !.: :. 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 To 7.0 7.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 121 _ 104 493. 2141 .$71 `:2952 ':1320
vls Ratio Prot 0.04 0.13 c0.11 0.30
v/s Ratio Perm. : c0.05 0.09 C037,
0.01
v/c Ratio 0.58 0.42 0.23 0.21 0.15 0.57 0.36 0.01
Undorm Delay; d1 53.0 .. < 52.3 `34.0 10.7 10.3 2.8 2.4 1.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.10 1.09 1.46
mentat Delay, d2
*06 6.6 2.8 . 0 2 0.2 ' . 0.3 0.8 0.3. 0.0
Delay (s) 59.6 55.1 34.3 10.9 10.7 9.4 2.9 2.4
Level of Service . E :... ...: E C B .... B A A A
Approach Delay (s) 59.6 40.2 10.9 5.0
Approach LOS E D .. B :A
.
lnters t i0n.umm
HCM Average Control Delay 10.3 HCM Level of Service. B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57
Actuated`Cycletength (s) 120.0 . Sum of lost time (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service A
c ;,.:Crlticai:Lbrie. roup
BLW H:1PN\011606013 - ARCOISynchro\Scenario 2 - BuildoutlBuildout AM sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buiidout PM - Scenario 2 A
1: ARCO Corporate Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

Lane Configurations ?? r tt r
Sign Control . :Stop ` Stop ::..::: ..Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (vehlh) 0
0
129
0
0
X443
'.: 59
86
:::270 .
.:1076 - .108
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate (veh%h) 0 0 143 0 0 ;492 66 2147 96 300. 1196..120
Pedestrians
Lane 1Nidth:(ft}
>
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent_Blockage .-
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type. None None.: :. ...
..
Median storage veh)
Upstreamsignal:(ft)
::::'' `; .:: : : :. .... :: ..... 971 : `.: ..
.
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflictirigvolume 3492 41fi9 . ..:598: 3619. 4193 1073 1.316 -2242 -
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2 'sta e 2 con.. vol
vCu, unblocked vol 3492 4169 598 3619 4193 1073 1316 2242
tC, single {s) 7i5 6,5 6.9 ::.7,5 6.5 . ' . 6.9
41
tC, 2 stage (s)
...'3:3 .: ;.:.3.5 4:0 :::3 3 -; 2 2 .2.2 .
p0 queue free % 0 0 68 0 0 0 87 0
cM capacity (veh/h) 0 ;:0 446 0 0: :216
Direction„Lane :NB 37NB_4 56.1 56 2, SB 3 SB 4
Volume Total 143 ' 49.2.. 66:, ,1073 1073 300. 598 :.598: ::;-
Volume Left 0 0 66 0 0 0 300 0 0 0
Volume Rtgh# 943 492 ;:0 - 0 0 .. :..: 96 . ` 0 120
cSH 446 216 521 1700 1700 1700 227 1700 1700 1700
Volume'to Capacity.. , 0 32 2.28 0.13 0.63 ` O.fi3 : 0.06 1.32 0.35: ' 0.35 0.07..
Queue Length (ft) 34 982 11 0 0 0 402 0 0 0
Control Delay {s) 16.9. 6263 12.9 .. 0.0 0.0 .0.0 :214 0 0.0.. .:.: 0.0 0.0 . :
Lane LOS C F B F

Approach LOS C F

)ntersectlonrSumma,.ry - "' :
Average Delay 82.5
Intersection Ca aci Utilization
.... P.. tY. : ` '' 98.20/c "ICU Level of Service E
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARC01Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout PM.sy6
kimleylv17-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2 A
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 111/3/2005

Cane;Group - --
EBB EBT ,EBB
-.WBL
WBT . WBR NBL -
,NBT:, NBR . i,SBL -
.: $BT SB. R
Lane Configurations T+ Vi tT r I ft r
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 _ 1.900 1900: 1900 .:.1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 150 150 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 0. : ...:.1. 0 1 .. 1 1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leading Detector (ft) ;: 50 50 - 50. ` ° : 50 50 50 50 5.0 50 . ::50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Turning Speed (mph)
;.15
_ .9
.::..15

9
15 ...... . .
9
.::.,15.
.... ;
9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt -. ?. o2-?: 0.882 0.850 :0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1712 0 1770: 1643 0 1770 3539 ...1583 .1770 : 3539. .:1583
Flt Permitted 0.321 0.694 0.330 0.077
Satd Flow'(perm) 598 0. '.1293
.3 1643 0.: :: Fi15 3539. ..1583 143. :,'8539. -,:.:1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd Flow (RTOR) .49 .: 169 40 ` 20
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Speed (mph).:.`. 25 25. .: 30. : .. 30
Link Distance (ft) 747 627 1035 971
_' .........-.._...... ....... -..,.,...
Travel Time:{s) ...,:;.::::. ' .....:...... .. ..
20.4. .
17.1 :
. _
23.5
Volume (vph) 150 42 46 116 51 193 144 1600 70 360 773 18
066"6 ur ,Factor 0.00 0.90 0.90. 0.90. :0.90 0.90 0.90 .:: 0.90 0,9(7 0.90 :0.90: .::0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 167 47 51 129 57 214 160 1778 78 400 859 20
Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 98 0 129: 271 0 : 160: 17.78 78 : . :400.. : ,:859 . ,; 20
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases :. 4 .... 8.: ::... . . ::. 2. :::. 1.: 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
2 1
.
..:..
6
- 6
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0
Mmlmu. m SpLt (s) 16.0 16;0 ;. 16,0 .; .16.0 . " 21,0. : '21.0 .` 21.0. `..16.0 .20.0 -20.0
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 0.0 26.0 25.0 0.0 52.0 52.0 62.0 23.0 75.0 75.0
Total it (% 25% 25% . 250Q_--
: '25%-+ 0%
. 52% . 52% -.:52% . ': 23% 75% 75%
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 43.3 43.3 43.3 14.5 67.0 67.0
Yelfow.;T.mes} 5;0 5.0 ., 5.0 6.0
: ': 5 0
.
5.0
5.0 .
5 0
5.0
All-Red Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3,5 3.0 3.0
Lead/Lag
_.::_ .. Lag Lag .. Lag . Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
V_ I'd- (s) 3.0 3,0 . :3.0 3.0 3.0 . 3.0 : 3.0 3.0 3.0 . 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Coord Coord Coord None Coord Coord
Act
Effct Greeri (s)
. 20.0 20:0 20.0 `20.0 . 47.0 .::47 0 .`.47 0 : ZO 0. . 70.0 70,0
,
,
Actuated /C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.70 0,70 0.70
v/c Ratio 1.39 0:26 0.50 0.58. 0.55 : 1.07 0.10. : 1.02 . 0.35. .0.02
Uniform Delay, d1 40.0 16.5 35.5 12.9 19.0 26.5 7.0 28.7
' 5.9 0.0
Delay ` 176:8 18.8..: : ;` :.. .36.5 14.3 11.5 54.1. :.; 3.7 .8.
67 ..:.6.0 6.0 1.9
LOS F B D B B D A E A A
Approach_DeIay 1.18 3
21.4
::48.8
25.3
Approach LOS F C D C

Queue:Lengtfi
50th,(ft)
143 26. 74.. 56 39 :.674 5
-213
99

0
,
Queue Length 95th (ft) #275 70 134 140 m45 #790 m7 #407 128 7
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout PM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2 A
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

EBL DEBT :EBR..,INBL -1NBT -WBR ' NBL ' NBT : NBR .':SBL SBT : SBR

(). 6117 547
mal Link,Dist ft
We

55 .: ; . . 891:
50th Up Block Time (%}
ww 61.
95th:Up Block;Time,{%).. :
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 150 150 150 150
50th:BayBlock Time 9/c 350y, ` .. 380/c : , 23%
95th Bay Block Time % 67% 25% 24% 53% 62%
Quewng Penalty (veh) 50 33 .15 73 183 ..
intersection Summary , ? - - - - - - ?
Area 2 e: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Gycle_Len the 100
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
NaturaLCycle :100 ..... .
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio i.39 "
Intersection Signal Dela : 43.1 Intersection LOS: D
lntersection'Capacity Utilization 113.4% ICU Level of Service G
Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maxmum after-two cycles
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after fwi cycles
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Splits and Phases: 2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway
\,. 01 ?a o2 "
4 o4

'J r-. - G
23.ss.:?..
t _ y?.R2.t .4r1`t w ]Ts

2
06 7 08
5rs !r
25:'
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout PM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2 A
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005
AI I
Lane Configurations 11 tt r I TT r
Ideal Flovr (yphpl) ;_ 1900 1900.:. :1900. .:1900. `1900 _ 1900 .` 1.900 1900 ' 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lane:tJti! Factor 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00. : 0.95 1.00 _1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 5 :1.00 1.00.
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1717 1770 1642 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt Permitted -0 32 1 00 0,69
100
0.33
1,00:
1.00
..0.08
1.00
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 597 1717 1292 1642 614 3539 1583 143 3539 1583
Volume (vp .150 .42 :46 :116 51 :.193 . :144-. .1600 70 :': 360 _ ` 773 18
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 090 0.90
Add Flow (vph) ; 1.67: : 7:. .: 51 ` . 129. :' 67 214_ :. 160 _ 1778 1 78 :400 859 `20
Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 98 0 129 271 0 160 1778 78 400 859 20
Tum Type
::: Perm Perm : Perm Perm pm±pt Perm
.
.
Protected Phases 4 8 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 43.3 43.3 43.3 67A 67.0 67.0
Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0. : 20,0 47.0 47.0 47.0 ' .70.0 70.0 70.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.70 0.70 0.70
Clearance Time (s} 9,0 9 0 .. ::':.. 9.Q ' ` ` 9.0 8.7.: 8.7. 8.7 8 5 . ' • 8.0 8.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane p C:vp 9 343 258 ;. : `328 289 ':: 1663 : :T44.: .:::'.393.:: .'2477: 1108
v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.17 0.50 WAS 0.24
v/s Ratio Perm.. 0.10 . . .:.' .:. 0.26 0.05. .0 53
0.01
We Ratio 1.40 0.29 0.50 0.83 0.55 1.07 0.10 1.02 0.35 0.02
(Jrnform Delay;.d1 40.0 33,9 35.6 38.3 19.0 -:26.5 14.8 43.2 5.9 4.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.64 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2; 224 37.7 0.1 : 5Q0 0.4 0.0
Delay (s) 264.1 34.4 37.1 53.8 14-2 54.8 6.7 93.2 6.3 4.6
Level :of Service F B .:: . D. ' ..: A F. : :. A A
Approach Delay (s) 179.2 48.4 49.7 33.5
roOWL S

40 F D
Cw
.
ntersfrctionSummary=
HCM Average.Control:,Delay::;: "53,0 HCM Level of,Service .: D
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08
Actuated Cycle L... th (s) , : :.100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.4% ICU Level of Service G
c :..;, :Critical Lane: Group
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO%SynchrolScenario 2 - Buildoutl8uildout PM sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51

ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2 A
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005
--* -. -v r 'ti 110. 1 .?
Larle:Group - .EBL - EBT EBR 11VBL U-71 BT ,WBR NBL....NBT :N BR ?SBL SBT : SBR
Lane Configurations , TT if tt r
ideal F,- -ow (vphpl) 1900 1900 - ; 1900 ; :1900 1900 - 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ] 900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 100 150 150 250 150
Storage L apes _; 0 0 0 1 1 ;:. 1 1 1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5..0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5..0 5.0
_
ector
Leading Det (fE) ::
50
50 50 50 ...: .:: 50 50 50
50
.. :, 50
50
. : 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.

1-uming .peed.,mph) ` ...

15

.9:.

....:15

9

15

9

:..:..:15
9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
_

Frt
11 -
.
0947

a

0.850

:..:

0.850
Fit Protected 0.975 0.953 0.950 0.950
84td. Flow (6rot) 0 . 1720 0 0 1544 .1583. 1770 ` 3539. : ' 1583: , 1770 . 3539. . 1583
Fit Permitted 0.773 0.703 0.393 0.087
Satd 'Flow (perm) ? 0 1364
0 .
:. _ ..0
1139
:1583
732
.3539
1583
162
:3539
::1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd >Flow (RTOR)_ .?. 13 - 14 85 28
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
Link Speed m h 30 . 25 30 . `.:: 30 '...:..
Link Distance (ft) 581 384 916 1035
Travel _Time..(s) 131 : , .. .1 1 :..` 10,5 .20.8 :.... ... .:.... 23.5.
Volume (vph) 15 3 12 140 1 611 34 1182 124 278 611 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0...9..0 . :0.90 0.90 . .,0.9Q 0.90. V 0.90 . 090: .:--0.90 .-...0.90 : ;0.90
Parking (#/hr) 6
AdJ Flow (vpti} 17 13 156: 1 679% :.- 38 1313 .:.138.. : _ 309 679 26
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 33 0 0 157 679 38 1313 138 309 679 28
Turn Type . Perm . Perm . . pm±ov . ,.P:erm. .. Perm : pm+pt : Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 1 2 1 6

Permt#ed'Phases
2 ........ .......
?
6
6
Detector Phases 4 4 8 8 1 2 2 2 1 6 6
Minimum Initial (s) `:` •°`; ;, ; :7..0.; :.;:';7.0:'.:. 7.0 . .'..:7.0 % . 7.0 12.0 12.0 . .12.0 7.0. 12.0 12.0
Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 14.0 19..0 19.0

Total:SpUt (s) .
20.0.: ..
.::20.0.,.
:::..0.0-
-'-'20.,0
20.0
. 34.0
...46.0
'-'46,0
46.0
34.0
80.0
80.0
Total Split (%) 20% 20% 0% 20% 20% 34% 46% 46% 46% 34% 80% 80%
Maximum Green.{s) 93:0 13:0 13.0 13.0 27.0 `39.- .:39.0 ::39.Q 27.0 73.0 73.0
Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Ail Red;Time'(s) _ 20 20 :2.0 2.0. :..:'2 0 2.0 2.0 . :.. 2.0 2.0. :.. 2.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead Lag_Optimize? _ ', .
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3..0
Recall Mode None None . ;. None None . None , Coord. Coord Coord !None .Coord Coord
Act Effct Green (s) 1'5- 1 47.4 42.6 42.6 42.6 75.0 75.0 75.0
Actuated 0.15 ' 0.47 0.43 0.43 .:0,43 0.75. 0.75 0.75
v/c Ratio 0.15 0.92 0.90 0.12 0.87 0.19 0.55 0.26 0..02
Uniform Delay, d1 22.2 41.9 23.5 17.4 26.2 6.6 ` 16.6 3.9 0.0
Delay 26,4 78.7 28.6 19.0 30.8 8.2 21.6 3.2 0.8
E C B C :. A .; c A . A
Approach Delay 26.4 38.0 28.4 8.7
Approach L05 C:: ~. .: D A ...
Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 100 363 15 404 20 123 47 0
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout PM.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff5]
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2 A
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

ane Grou BBL , -EBT EBR, ,- . BL -WBT ;WBh _ BBL -NBT4__NBR SBT ; SBR
Queue.:'Length 95th
(4) <39 . "` #224 #598. 3T .#546: 58.; ., _ 215 61 :m4
.
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 304 836 955
50tha)p BlockTime:(%} _. i3% .....
95th Up Block Time (%) 32%
Turn'BayLerjg'tt(ff) 100 ,150 .150 250 :.:. ;150.
60th Bay Block Time % 6% 38% 38%
95th Bay Block . 55% 45% 44% : .
Queuing Penalty (veh) 205 219 16
Intersection Summary- -
Area Type: Other
Cycle:Length..:.100. - -
Actuated Cycle Length: 100
Offset: 83 (83%Referenced to phase 2:NBTL:and 6:813TL, Start of Green -'
Natural Cycle: 75
Control,Type„ Actuated Caordma'ted
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92
Intersection Signal Delay 248 ntersec ion LOS:-.C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.7% ICU Level of Serv ice E
95th percentile volume exceeds, capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
M 1/olume, for 95fh:pe?cenfile.queue is metered by upstream signal.
Wits and Phases: 3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway
a1 02 04
3, 4 3-1 'T 11 25FT7,
?
' 7
'
06 09
y
.:,

?,,?:rrgG!.s
20
BLW H:1PN10 11606013 - ARC01Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout PM_sy6
kimleylv17-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2 A
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
1900
1900
.:1900..'1000
... 1900
.1900 -
.1900
1900.
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lane 0til Factor 1 00 . 1:00. 1.00 1.00 0.95. ;1.00) 1.00 0.95. - 1.00
Frt 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1..00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
..
Flt Protected
0.97:
...
;.0.95
. 1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
Satd. Flow (prof) 1719 1544 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt `Permittetl O.Z7 0.70 1.00. 0.39. 1.00 1.00 0.08 1 A0 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1363 1140 1583 733 3539 1583 157 3539 1583
Volume (vPh):::
.,5 . .... ;3
12
140 1..
: 611..'
..:34
1182..'
:A24 '
278.
611
25
.
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Add flow (vph). 17, 3 13 - 156 1 679. :38.:. : 1313.: ' 138: 309 079 . 28
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 33 0 0 157 679 38 1313 138 309 679 28
Parking . (#/tir).-
Turn Type Perm Perm pm+ov Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
Pro#ected Phases ;;: 4 : 8 1.: .... 2 1 ..:.:. '6 ::....
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G .(s) 13.0 13.0 .: ` 38.4 40.6 : 40.6:-, - 40.6 73.0 .::73.0 . : '73.0
Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 42.4 42.6 42.6 42.6 75.0 75.0 75.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0 15 0.15 0.42 ` 0.43 . 0.43 . 0.43. .0 .75 : :0.75.. 0.75
Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Vehicle:Extension (s). 3.0 3.0 3.0 : 3.0 3.0 . . 3.0 • ; 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 204 171 750 312 1508 674 560 2654 1187
v/s Ratio. Prot
c0.25
c0,37
0.15.
' 0.19:
.::..: .
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.14 0.18 0.05 0.09 026 0.02
y/c Ratio 0:16. 0.92 : .0.91 :. .0.12 :. 0.87. ` 0.20 0.55. : `0.26 :0.02
Uniform Delay, d1 37.0 41.9 26.9 17.4 26.2 18.0 21.4 3.9 3.2
Progression Factor 1 OD 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :.1.30 0.82 0.68
Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 45.3 14.4 0.8 7.2 0.7 1.1 0..2 0.0
Delay(s) 37.4 87.2 .: 4.1.3 98.2 ` . 33.3:-. ::18..7 29.0 '3.4 2.2
Level of Service D F D B C B C A A
Approach Delay (s) 37:4
Approach LOS D D C B
- - - T
InteKSec ion Summary-
/ - - ` '`:i
HCM Average Control Delay 30.0 HCM Level of Se rvice C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89. ...:
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity.tjtilization 96.7% ICU Level of Service E
c Critical Lane Group
BLW W M011606013 - ARCO1SynchrolScenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout PM sy6
kimleylv17-ff51

ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
1: ARCO Corporate Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005
t -> ? ? ? -4\ t /0-
EBL • E67 EBR : W..BL _ \NBT WBR? `NBL : -NBT = _ NBR : SBL ;-SBT SB.R
Lane Configurations tT tt

9 Sto
p.
:..... _ Sto
p Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (vehlh) 0 0 46.` .' , ` 0 0 153 28 497. 108 -:367 -1323 59
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
__ _._
Hourly flow rate (veh/ti)
.

0

0

51..

0

0
170

31

.:552 :.

::120

.408

470,::.66
..
Pedestrians

Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blocka e
g
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None one
Median storage veh)
0-0 i. aiiij I (ft)..:.; . ..., : 971
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, confl1 cting:v6 lume. 2794 30,20 735 - 2216 -2966 : :276 ' 1536 672 .
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage;2 conf vo1,' .. ,
vCu, unblocked vol 2794 3020 735 2216 2966 276 1536 672
ngle (s) ` . 7.5 6.5 6.9..': ..:7.5 6.9:: .4.1 : . 4.1 :.,.:., :. .. ;
tC, 2 stage (s)
t? (s)
_ _
.
3.5
4:0
3,3
3
.5
4
0
,

::'33

':,
.
p0 queue free % 100 100 86 100 0
10 76 93 55
cM capacity (veh/h) 4 7 `'362 i3 7 721.: :.429 914 :::..:. . ,
Direct on, Ealha0 # - ,• EC3' 1 WB 1
: NB1 ? NB 2 'N83 '-' B.?1,'SB 1 .
S6.2 :;
$B 3
.a$B?4 _
. >.
Volume, Total :170 31 276 276 120 . '408 735 735 66.
Volume Left 0 0 31 0 0 0 408 0 0 0
Volume. Right `- 51:,' ;:'.-:-.--,170-: -.
0
0
0
120:
0
66
.. °.:...
cSH 362 721 429 1700 1700 1700 914 1700 1700 1700
Volto;Capacity 0.14 D.24. 0.07 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.45. 0.43 0.43 : 0.04.
Queue Length (ft) 12 23 6 0 0 0 58 0 0 0
Control l]elays) 16.6 11.5 14.0 0.0 :0.0 .. ..0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS C B B B
Approach Delay (s), 16;6 11..5 O.ti
:
24
...::
'.
Approach LOS C B
nter?ection?Summary
Average Delay 2.8
Intersection `Capacity Ut?hzation , ..: 52.3% 1CU Level of Service A
BLW H:\PNO 11606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM with 550 K.sy6
kimleyivl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 111312005

-
ane Group.T- - -
EBL
BT
EBR :_WBL
_ 13
WBR .NBt..,. ,. BT
NBR
=SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow {vphPl) 1900 1000 1900 :1.900 . ;:1goo..* . 1900 `1900.. , 1900 :1900. :1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 150 150 150 15
0
Storage Lanes` 1.. ; : 0
:.1

0

1.

.

1

1. .

1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5..0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leading Detector, (ft) : 50 50. 50 50 .50: 50 50 50 `. 50. 50.
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turnng
Speedmph) : 15 9 15 9 15 : g
,
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.95 1:,00 1.00 0,95 1.00
Frt 0.876 0.850 : 0,850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0-956 0.950
So Flow (prot) 1770 1632 0 -1.1.70 .. ` 1703 0. :1770: 3539 1583 1770 :3539 :1583.
Flt Permitted 0,716 0.663 0.188 0.332
Satd Flow (perm) ,. ; 1334 1ti32 0 :1235 . , ;1703 0 350 : 3539 :1583 618. ::3539 ' 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd Flow {RTOR) 59 :: ': : 36 28 10
Headway Factor 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00
Lmk'Speed (mph} 25 - ;:. .. 25. 30 .:.. ... %30
Link Distance (ft) 747 627 '1038 971
Travel ;Tme (s) 20:4 17.1 :.. : 23.5 . .:.:... 22.1 :
Volume (vph) 103 18 85 83 24 32 37 510 25 89 1276 11
Peak'Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 ` 0 90 0;90 0.90:: : 0,90 0.90 0.90. .0.90. :..0,90. :. 0,90. 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 114 20 94 92 27 36 41 567 28 99 1418 12

Lane Group flow (vph)
114
114
0
92
63
0
41.... .
567
28 :
...99
..1418
12
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases : 4 ; . 8
2
1
6
.'
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
Detector Phases .:..
;: 4 4 8 . 8 . . , : - 2 ...
2
:. 2
.:1
6
. 6
.
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0
Mm?mum Splif;(s) 16..0 16.0 16.0
'. "'A 6.0 > .:
21.0- ` 21.0.. .' 21.0 16.0 :'20.0 _ . ` 20,0
Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 0.0 37.0 37.0 0.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 27..0 83.0 83.0
Total Split (%)> 31% 31.% 31% . 31%:. 0% 47,% 47°l0 23% 69% 69%
Maximum Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 47.3 47.3 47.3 18.5 75.0 75.0
Yellow'fime(s) 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 '5,0 5.0 5.0 .: 5.0 5,0 5.0
All-Red Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.0 3.0
LeadlLag . : .Lag `. ag Lag ..Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?

.Extension (s)
Vehicle _ 3.0. 3.0 3.p :.:.< . 3,0 3.0 `: 3.0 3.0 .: 3.0
.
Recall Mode None None None None Coord Coord Coord None Coord Coord
Act Effct Green (s) 10,0 19.0 19.0. 19.0 74.9. 74 9 74 9 `: 91.0 : 91.0.
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.62 0.62 0,62 0.76 0.76 0.76
v/c Ratio 054 0.37 047 0.21 0,19..: :0.26 0.0 17 ` 0.53 :. 0.01
Uniform Delay, di 46.5 21.2 45.9 18.5 9.6 10.1 0.0 3.7 5.8 0.6
Delay - 45.5 21,8 44.8. 212 22.9 20.2: : 11.7 4.4 ::: 6.5 ` 2.7
LOS D C D C C C B A A A
Approach
0elay 33.7 35.2 20.0. .... 6.3 ..
.
Approach LOS C D B A
QueueLength_50th (fit).. t32 38 66. . ,..18 .. . '23 7 17 198 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 135 88 113 56 62 246 30 39 309 6
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM with 550 K.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

Lane;Group -___ -ESL ?BT ? EBR. °WBL WBT V.V.BR ,?NBL ;NBT `?NBR _; ?SBL ,-SBT..,:SB:,
Internal LI Dist (ft) 667 , . 547 955 891
50th Up Block Time (%)
-
-
-
95th 0 ' Blo
k,
c
Time..(%)
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 150 150 150 150
50th $ay N6c Time %0 12% 9%
95th Bay Block Time % 24% 13% 26% 17"%
qi)* Penalty (veh) 13 4 8 13
fitersectmn;Summary. ,; _
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
- -
_
Actuated Cycle Lengtf 12Q >;
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum y/c.:Ratio: 0..54
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.9 Intersection LOS: B
1ntersection Capacity.Utilizati.ori 747%: .'. ICU Leye1 of:Service.C
and Phases: 2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek
o4

BLW H-\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM with 550 K.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/312005

_ `EBT %EBT. ;EBR WBL -WBT :WBRBL__;NBT :'NBR
Lane Configurations r Vi tt if
Ideal l=1ow (vphpl). 190.0 . :1900 :.1900 .:1900 1900. 1900 -1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lane;:Util Factor..
, 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1 .00 1.00.. .. 0.95 1.00 ..1:00 0.95 1.00
._. ....
___.: _.._...__..._v..
Frt
1.00
0.88
1.00
0.91
1.00
1..00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.85
Fit protected
1 0 95 1 00 1.00 0.95. 1.00 1.00 0.95. 1.00 .:1.00
1 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1632 1770 1703 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
'
Flt permdted 0,72 1.00 0.62 ° 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.39 ':A.00. : 1.00
:
Said. Flow (perm) 1334 1632 1151 1703 351 3539 1583 726 3539 1583
Volume v h).:
(.P.
. 03.: 18 85 `83 .24 .
.32.::-:.....37
510
25.
89
1276
11
.
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0190 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj E[ow (Vph) i 14 20 ,.94 92 .:. '27. :..: 36 41 567 28 ...99 1418 : 12
Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 114 0 92 63 0 41 567 28 99 1418 12
Turn Type. 1?erin : .. Perm .. Perm . Perm :pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 2 : 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 71.1 71.1 71.1 88.0 88.0 88.0
Effective Green, g (s) ; 19.0 19.0 19.0 . .190 .. 74 8. . 74.8 74.8 < 91.0 91.0 91.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.76 0.76 0.76
Clearance Tim. a (s) 9.0 90 9.0 9.0 8.7 8.7.; . 8.7.: :::8. 5 8.0. 8.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane'Grp Cap!(vph);; 21.1 258 =:182 270 219. ::2206 - "•:.987 648 ;2684 '1200
v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0,04 0.16 0.01 c0.40
.0.08:. ... 0.12 0.02 0.10 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.44 0.51 0.23 0.19 0.26 0.03 0.15 0.53 0.01
Uniform Delay;;di;:::::?.:.:; < ::45.7. :' 46.2 ' 44.1 9.6 10.1 8.7 4.1 5.8 3.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.85 1.85 2.93 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2 8.: 2.2 1.9 :0.3 0.1 0.1 03 _ 0.0
Delay (s) 49.3 46.9 48.4 44.6 19.7 19.0 255 4.2 6.6 3.5
Level of Service D : . D D .
B
-A
Approach Delay (s) 48.1 46.9 19.3 6.4
Approach LOS D D ...:...
B
A
)ntersec i6n Summary. - - ' i
HCM Average'Controi Delay ' 15.8 . .:: HCM Level of Service.: B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53

Actuated Cycle Lengtli.
(s)
120.0 Sum of lost time
. (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity U tilization 74.7% IC U Level of Service C
c; ' CriticaLLarie: Group
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARC 01SynchrolScenado 2 - BuildoutlBuildout AM with 550 K.sy6
klmleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005
-.4 -0- -Ir r `'" '-- '\ ? !? 10. l -4/
Lane Gioup .. EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT -WBR 1. EU NB7. ''N.BR ,_:SBL . ;SBT SBR
Lane Configurations I tT r tt r
ideal Flow (vphp)) 1900 1900 11900 1900. 1900 1900 : 1900 . ' 1900 :.-190.0.: ,1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 100 150 150 250 150
Storage Lanes: 0 0 1 1 1 1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0
1_eadui Detector ft 50 50 : 50 .50 ; 50 50 .50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9
i 5
9
15
`::.'
9
15.
9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 DO
Frt_ _ _
0.921 . ..... _
0.850
0.850
0.850
Fit Protected 0.981 0.953 0.950
Satd Flow rot ,,.,

)
(p 0 1683, 0
44
0..

.1775

1583

.1863:

3539

: 1583.

1770,

3539.

1583
_
_ ..._._....
Flt Permitted 0.879 0.744 0.322
Satd Flow (perm) 0 1508 0 : 0 :1386. 1583 `1.863. 3539 . ::1583. .. 600 . ;3539 . 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Said. Eiow (RTOR) . 41 124.. . 174. t3
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00
Llnk Speed (mph) 30 30 . 30 30 :: .
Link Distance (ft) 581 575 916 1035
Travel Time;{s).:. 13.2 13.1 :: 20.8. `:.`23.5 ; . .
Volume (vph) 24 2 37 42 1 112 0 404 157 538 955 7
Peak Hour`Factor 0 90 '`.:0.90 0,90 0.90 D.,90:-':. ::.0.90 . :.0.90 0.90 : 0.90 ` 0.90. ' 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 27 2 41 47 1 124 0 449 174 598 1061 8
Lane Group'Flow (yph) 0 70
? 0 48: .:.124 0 449 174 1. 598. 1061 .' t3
_..
Turn Type
Perm .
Perm
p
m+ov
Perm
Perm pm+pt
Perm

Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Detector Phases 4 4 ;. ` 8. 8 1 2 2 : 2 1 6 6
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0
Mirnmum Split;(s) 4.0 14.0. ....:: i4.0 14.0 14.0. ' 0.0'.: :19.0 14.0 .'19.0 19.0
Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 0.0 27.0 27.0 55.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 55.0 93.0 93.0
Total Split (%) 23% 23% .0%.` .1.23% 23% ; `46% 32% ; 32% .:32% . ' 46% ..78% ` 7$%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 48.0 86.0 86.0
Yellow.Time. (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 : 5.0 ? 5.0 . 5.0 . 5.0 5A. ` 5.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2..0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lead/La

... _.:_ __?9

-. .

. .... Lead .

Lag

Lag
Lag
:Lead
.
Lead-Lag Optimize?
vehicle Extension (s} 3,A 3,0 3.0
3.0
3.0 :
.:.. 3.0
.: 3.0.
:.::3.0. -.
. , 3.0
.:.3.0
. ' :3.0
Recall Mode None None None None None Coord Coord Coord None Coord Coord
Act Effct Green (s) 11:7 11.7 40.5 69.6 69.6 _ :101.1 102.1 102.1.
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.34 0.58 0.58 0.84 0.85 0.85
vic Ratio 0 38 0.36 0.20 0.18. 0.78. _ 0.35 0.01
Uniform Delay, dl 21.2 51.9 010 12.8 0.0 2.6 2.4 OD
Delay 50:0 : 3,0 .15.6. -= . 3.1 ` 5.5 4.1 1.3
LOS C D A B A A A A
AD% Delay 246 :16.1..: .:.:: : 12.1 : 4.6
Approach LOS C B B A
Queuel_ength 50th-(ft) 21 :.. 35 Q 90 'O. : 205 182 .
Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 73 30 163 43 315 182 m1
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM with 550 K. sy6
klmleylv17-01
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

)_ane3G?oup:- EBL EBT ^,EBR 1NBL V1!BT 11UBR?t3L (VBT NBR, ;SBL.; SBT SB.)
Internal L?nk Dist.(ft) „.501 495" : 8.36 955
50th Up Block Time (%)
95th. Up Block.. ime: (%) _
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 150 250 150
50th `Bay_B{ock Time % .
95th Bay Block Time % 7% 7% 2%
Queuing Penalty (veh) 17

hter6ectf6h'_Summary.' ...
Area Tvpe" Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120 =
Offset: 65 (54%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle X60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum ylc:Ratio 0.78 ;
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.8 Intersection LOS A
Intersection Capacity.;Utilization.63.9%0 ICU.Level-.. Service B
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal
Splits and Phases: 3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway

01
="o2? 4..
-?" o4

•; .

06
4=
-r oB
sT? ..- ..- .{s $St -`' sue. ?.'r"lei i.G.-Sid `i,{. "?^7s d'.• _. f.,.;.... k
BLW H:1PN101 1 6060 13 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Buildout AM with 550 K.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout AM - Scenario 2B
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/3/2005

Movement : EBL =, EBT EBR WBL ;tNBT 1NBR ._ NBLRTBT . TNBR, :SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations *T r
Ideal .Flow. (vphpl) . , : : ;.::190.0. 900:'. ;1900 :: -A goo: *1 goo ' 1900 ` 190Q ` 1900 ` 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0
Cali _0 l Factor 1..00 1.00 1.00 0.95. 1.00. .:1.00 0.95 ` 1.00
Frt 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1..00 0.85
FIt Protected 0 98 0.95 1.00 1.00 `1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Said. Flow (prot) 1683 1776 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt Permitted r 0,85 0.66 .::1.00 : : . 1.00 .:1.00.. , 0.44 1.00. 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1463 1258 1583 3539 1583 819 3539 1583
Volume. (vph) 24
s .1.
2 37.. 42 : :....1 112 0 °::404' -157 : 538 955 7
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Add Flowvp
h) 47. ..:: , .1 124::' t'.':'+ ..: 0 . ..:: 449 174 . 598. 1061 8
_
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 70 0 0 48 124 0 449 174 598 1061 8
Tum,Type Perm erm, t o pm±ov : Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 1 2 1 6
Permitted Phase`s 4 8 8 . 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 8..3 32.9 66.1 66.1 971 97.7 97.7
Effective Green, g (s) 10,3 10.3 . 36.9 68.1 68.1 99.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.31 0.57 0,57 0.83 0.83 0.83
Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 .:; 7.0 . : 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane,Grp Cap;(vph) 126 108. > 553:
Now 2008: : 898. .891 : :2940 . 1315
v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.13 c0.15 0.30
v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.04. 0.03 0.11 . c;0.41 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.44 0.22 6.22 0.19 0.67 0.36 0.01
Undorm DelaY,.:d1.. : 52:7 52.1 :.''30.9 12.9 12.6 ' 3.3 2.5. .: 1.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.53 0.89
Incremental Delay, 0.5 0.3 . ' 0.0
Delay (s} 57.9 55.0 31.1 13.1 13.1 4.9 4.0 1.5
Level of Service E . .:' ::.:. .: ;E :..: C :. ... : 8 B A ;: :. ,A A
Approach Delay (s) 57.9 37.8 13.1 4.3
Approach LOS: E B A
Intersection Summary
HCM Ayera9e..Control_.DelaY:: 10.3: HCM Level,of Service .. B
HCM Volume to capacity ratio 0.65
Actuated Cycle Length:(s) :.
10.0
120,0 Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.9% ICU Level of Service B
c Critical Lane Group ::
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildoutl6uildout AM with 550 K.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
1: ARCO Corporate Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/10/2005

MoverCient? : _. Et3L _ .EBT EBR` ' WBt_ ' :WBT< WBR NBL--<-t`7BT...:NBR . <SBL SBTT PSBR
Lane Configurations I ft` r ft r
Srgn Control Stop.; Stop . ...:; Free_ : Free
Grade 061. 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h} 0 0 129 0 0 . :443 59 . ::2011.: .'. 86: .'262. 1100.: 108
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rafe (veh/h) 0 0 143 ". Q 0 492 66. 223 96 291. 1222. .120
Pedestrians
Lane W?dth:(ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent 8t6cka9e
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft} 971 ..
pX, platoon unblocked
*
vC: conflicting volume, 3545 4266 6.11 :': 3702 4290.. 1117 1342.. 23*:
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf xol .
d vol
vCu, unblock 3545 4266 611 3702 4290 1117 1342 2330
e
tC, single (S) Z 5 6.6 $.9 6.5.. :.6.9 4.1 : 4.1 . . .
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) - _. _ 3 5 40 3,3. 3.6. . 4.0 3 3
p0 queue free % 0 0 67 0 0
- 0 87 0
cM capacity;{veh/h) 0.. 0 437 .:.
0 .: .202 609
)Irection ane ## _. , `:: :_EB':1 .W8;1 .. NB1 NB;2 N8.3, aJS 4 B..1 ; S? 2 'SB 3. ,SB 4

VolumeTotai
143;
492
66
`1,117.
..1117 96
,. 291 61 1 61.1
i20

Volume Left .
0
0
66
0
0
0
291
0
0
0
Volume Right::: 143 492. 0 ;:0 0 96 . 0 . .... 0 . 0 1.20. .. :...:
cSH 437 202 509 1700 1700 1700 210 1700 1700 1700
Volume to Capacity 0 33 2:44 -0.13 0.66 0:66 0.06 1.,39 0.36. .0.36 .' 0.07. ' . .

ength (ft)
Queue Length'
35
1021
11
0
0
.
0
418
0
0
0
Co _ ntrol Del :
a s
YO
17:2 .
700.5
13.1
:0.0 ..
0 0
0 0
245.1.
Lane LOS C F B F
.
Approach De1aY (s):.. _ 17:2 700.5 0,4 43.7. :_ .
Approach LOS C F
?'ntersection":?ummary - l
Average Delay 89.9
Intersection Capacity ,U tifization .::1. 00.6 /o ICU Level of Service F
.r
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buildout PM With 550.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/10/2005
t ---I. --v f- '- 4-- 4\ T 41
Lane G uor p '_?- EBL ? EBT" EBR :WBL .1NBT' :W_BR ". BL
Lane Configurations '? '? ?? '? ? ??
Ideal Flow (vpljpl) 190.0 1900 :1900. .1900. ' 1900 1.900 1900 1900 ;1900 1900 1900 1900
.
Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 150 150 160 .150
Storage lanes' 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leading Detector {ft) 50 50 50 50 :: 50 50 50. 50 50 ,'S0
'trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tummg Speed (mph)'_ 15 " 9 1.5 ,.:. 9.
0:
15
F,
9
15
9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Fr#.. 0 920 0.882 " : _ ; 0.850. : >. 0.850
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1714 0 ;1770 .:1643.: .0 1770 : '3539.: A583. .1770 35.39 .1583
Fit Permitted 0.301 0.692 0.304 0.074
Satd Flow (perm} 561 1714 0 1289 1643 , :. 3539. 1563.: 138. :3539 . 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd Flow (RTOR) 50 167 39 :.:,20
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
{mph)'
LinkSpeed .;25... :. 25 ? :. x.30 30 ,
,
Link Distance (ft) 747 627 1035 971
Travel Time (s) 20,4 .: .: 17.1 23.5. 22.1
Volume (vph) 150 42 48 116 51 193 150 1679 70 310 847 18
Peak Hour'Factor. 0.90 0 90 0.90 0,90 : ` `.0.90 - .F0.90. ' 0.90 0.90. 0.90 0.90. p.90
.
Adj. Flow (vph) 167 47 53 "
129 57 214 167 1866 78 344 941 20
LaneGroupflow(yph) 167 100 0. :129; ::271.. 0. :..:.1.67: 1866 .;7$ :344. 941. .:" . 20
turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt
._
- Perm
ProtectedtPhases 8 ... .
:
1
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
Detector Phases
. 4 .
4 2 . 1 6 6
.
..
Minimum Initial (s) ......
7.0 .
.
7.0 . 7.0 7.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 7.0 12.0 12.0
Minimum Spilt (s) 16.0 1.6A: ...16.0 21.0.. :.21.0. :21,0. 16.0 20.0
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 0.0 24.0 24.0 0.0 54.0 54.0 54,0 22.0 76.0 76.0
Total Spilt (%) 24% 209 0%
... 24% 0% '. 54% 54% -.54% 22% 76%1 ::.76%
Maximum Green (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 45.3 45.3 45.3 13.5 68.0 68.0
Yellow Time (5) 5.0
50
: 50 5.0.. .:.5 '...5.0
All-Red Time (s) .
4.0 ..
4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 17 3.7 3.5 3.0 3.0
Lead/L.ag _
Lag Lag .. Lag .. Lead.
Lead-Lag Optimize?
'
Vehicle Extension'(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0. . .3.0. :.: 3.0 3.0.;
. : .3.0
Recail Mode None None None None Coord Coord Coord None Coord Coord
Act Effct Green (s) 19A 19:0 1.9.0 19.0.: .. 49.0. .: - : 49.0 71.0 71,0 :,71:0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.71 0.71 0.71
v/c;Rati0 1 56 0.27 0.53: . .0.61 ::1.08. 0.10 0.92 0.37 0.02
Uniform Delay, d1 40.5 16.9 36.4 13.5 18.4 25.5 6.7 26.8 5.7 0.0
Delay 208;1 192 37 4.9. ".:... 11.4: ` 53.9 3.7 46.7 .:. 5.8 1,8
LOS ..
F .:
B D B B D A D A A
Approach Delay 137:3. : 22.1 48.7 16.5
Approach LOS F C D B
Queue:>Length 50tt?.(ft) 152 : 27 75 58 43.. ?-703 6 . .164 108. 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #284 73 136 143 m47 m#766 m6 #333 137 6
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buildout PM With 550.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/10/2005

aneGroup, EBL , EBT ': EBR ` wBl ,W BR N. BL .: <,NBT .>:NBR, _ ._SBL . SBT . SBR
lnterr?al Link'Dist (ft) '' 667 547 955 891
50th Up Block Time (%°)
95th UP Block Timer%)
turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 150 150 150 150
506'Bay Block Time % 39°/° 38% 11 %°
95th Bay Block Time % 68%o 26% 25% 46% 54% 3%
Queuing Penalty (veh} 53 35 16.: ::. 70...: 150. .,
-•- -
lnter coon`Sumniarjr , - - - -
...
AreaTYPe: Other .:. -°.
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated;Cycle.Length.100::
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
Natural:Cycle, Aid
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c ;Ratio 1.56:'
Intersection Signal DelaY 41.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity. UUlization 112.7% ICU Level of Service:G
Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically Infinite.
_..:. _..__.._ ._ ... ..... _._.._..._
Queue shown,;is maximum.after two cycles °:.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after. cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Cntitc nnri Phncow 9- Rriar I Pnf 1 ane & Rrier Creek Parkwav
\o. G4
22_'s 24_s

08
I i #Y? P4 Cs1 F ?Yk}up. s?
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buiidout PM With 550 sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
2: Brier Leaf Lane & Brier Creek Parkway 11/10/2005

L B"f : EBR WBL WB. WBR.L, `Nl3L BT NBR ::$BL S 13T
EB
Lane Configurations T+ if
Idea
: ?vphpl)
Flow 1900:. 1900 :. 1900 :
19 1900 1900 .: 1900, 1900 `1900 1900 1900 1900
.'
l
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 1.
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Utii Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0..95 1..00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 : `0.95 : .1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prof) 1770 1715 1770 1642 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Fit Permitted 0.30 1 00 0.69 0.30. 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00. 1,00
Said. Flow (perm) 560 1715 1290 1642 566 3539 1583 138 3539 1583
{vp
Volume. :150
42
:48
116
' 51
:.193
150
1679
70
310
847 "
A8
.
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj _F !M (vph) 167 47 53 1,29 57 214 167 .. 6. 78 : 344 941 ` 20
Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 100 0 129 271 0 167 1866 78 344 941 20
Turn Type' Perm Perm Perm : :.. Perm. pm±pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 6 2 1 6
Perms#tetl Phases 4 8 2 2 . . 6 .6
Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 45.3 45.3 45.3 68.0 68.0 68.0
M
Effective Green, g (s), 19..0 19,0. 19,0 19.0 49.0 49.0 .49.0 : 71.0 :71.0 71.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.71 0.71 0.71
Clearance Tmie (s) 9,0 - ..9.0 : 9.0 9.0 8.7 :. 8.7 8.7 8.5 ` 8.0 8.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
:.;
Lane Grp Capl(vph} 1.06 326 245 312 277.. :1734 776 ' - 375.: 2513: '.'1124
'
v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.17 c0.53 c0.16 0.27
:
v/s Ratio Perm . c0.30 . . : 0.10: 0.30 0.05 ` 0.49 :0.01
.
v/c Ratio 1.58 0.31 0.53 0.87 0..60 1.08 0.10 0.92 0.37 0.02
Un?fo?m Delay; d1 40.5.'. 34.8 `. :36.5 39.3 18.5 25.5 13.7 . 42.8. 5.7 4.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.61 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 299 2 0.5. 2.0 21.7. 1. 38.8 ` 0.1. ' 26.6 0.4 0.0
Delay (s) 339.7 35.4 38.5 60.9 13.8 54.4 6.5 69.3 6.2 43
Levelof Service F
..:0
:.. A.
...E
A
.. .:A
Approach Delay (s) 225.7 53.7 49.4 22.8
0 C .
HCM Level o Service:
!IPM. Ayerage;Controi Delay 52.9
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.16
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 1OO.a Sum of lost. time (s).
Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.7% ICU Level of Service
c .r IcalLane Group
D
15.0 . .
G
BLW H:1PN1011606013 - ARCO1Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buildout PM With 550.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11110/2005

ane:Gcoup

. EB7. s BR- `W0 \11?6`f -W NBL' NBT
EI3L
-7- 7

NBR YSBL '.

SBT

SBR
Lane Configurations
Ide6l,FloW {vphpl) 1,900 1900 1900 1900': .: 1900 : `.1.900. ...1900 - 1900 : 1900 1900 1900. :1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 150 150 250 150
Storage Lanes: 0 ,0. .
.
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5..0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 . 50 ..50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turning Speed: {mPh) 15 . ` 9 15 9 15 , ...:.. -9 15. 9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
1=rt'.. _
0,947
0.850
0.850
Flt Protected 0.975 0.953 0.950 0.950
Said. Elow (prot) p 1720 : ..::.0 ., : 0 : 1544 1583 ;1770. ..: :353. 15 ;1770 3539 _: 1583
Fit Permitted 0.815 0.703 0.393 0.091
Satd `Flow (perm) ; b ,1438 °1139 .' 1583 732 3539 :..1583 170 .`' 3539. ..1583
.
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd Fiow (RTOR) 13 :: 11 - 135. 28
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00
LmkSpeed(mph)
: 30 - 25 ....,, 30 .. 30
.
...
Link Distance (ft) 581 384 916 1035
__ _
Travel:Time.(s) 132 10.5 .: 20.8 23.5
Volume (vph) 15 3 12 164 1 696 34 1182 129 354 611 25
Peak.Hour Factor Q 90 ` 0,90 . 0.90 : ...0.90 0.90 .. .0.90 .0.90 ::.0.90 : 0.90 . 0,90 ;:0.90. _ 0.90
Parking (#/hr) 6
Adj Flow (vph) 1? 3 13 18.2 .°773 38 1313 :.:-143- :'393 679, 28
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 33 0 0 183 773 38 1313 143 393 679 28
Turn Type Perm Perm pm±ov : .`Perm erm pmtpt . ..:::: Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 1 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 ; 8 8. 2 ; ... 2 6 . :. 6
Detector Phases 4 4 8 8 1 2 2 2 1 6 6
Mmi mum Irntlal (s) 7:0 7.0 ,7.0 7.0 7.A 12.0 12.0 ` 12.0. ..

7.0
%

12,0

12.0
Minimum Split (s) 14.0. 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 14.0 19.0 19.0
Total Spit (s} '::. 25:0 25.0
0.0
25.0
25.0
:::'31.0
44.0
' 44.0
44.0
° 31,0 `
75.0
75.0
Total Split (%) 25% 25% 0% 25% 25% 31% 44% 44% 44% 31% 75% 75%
Green (s)
Maximum 18..0 18.0 18,0. 18.0 24.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 . 24.0. `68.0 68.0
..
Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
All-Red :limo' (r ... :::2.0 2.0 2.0 .2.0 _ 2.0 .: 2.0 2..0 2.0- ::- ` 2.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
...._-
Lead La O timize? ::
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recal(Mode one .one
.o None None .. None. :Coord Coord Coord None Coord. :Coord_
Act Effct Green (s) -
19.1 19.1 50.1 39.9 39.9 39.9 70.9 70.9 70.9
Actuated g/G'.Ratio 0 19 0.19 0.50 0.40 0.40 -:040: ' 0.71 0 71. :0.71
WcYRatio 0.12 4.84 0.97 0.13 0.93 0.21 0.73 0.27 0.02
Uniforrrm Delay, d1 , 20.1
:.:
39.0
. :.23 8
`.:.19.0
28.7
7.6
,..21.6
5.2
0.0.
Delay 23.3 51.4 39.3 20.3 38.2 9.1 27.7 4.5 1.2
LOS C D . :D ..`C :.:`D A. C A A
Approach Delay 23.3 41..6 35.0 12.7
oach LOS
APP..r D . C B
.
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 112 444 15 419 23 187 61 0
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buildout PM With 550.sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/10/2005
i r
? --* j- '- *-_ 4\ t rI- \. ? V
-7--'-
ane:toup EBC EBTEBR _ -
.W?BL- . WBT. BR NBL
;".;NBT :_, B
-
Queue Len.,gth„95th (ft) 37 #228 :#714 :39 .:'#571 '63 297 78 m5
Infernal Link Dist (ft) 501 304 836 955
50th Jp Block lime.,.(%°) 19%
95th U Block Time % 40%
Turn Bay Length (ft) .. 150 150 250. ., 150.
50th Bay Block Time % 40%
95th Bay Block. Time % 1.90
Queuing Penalty (veh) 229 16 31
.n tersectionSUrrmmary
Area Type: Other
Cycle,Length ,100
Actuated Cycle Length: 100
Offset ::87 (87%),`Reference..d to phase 2:N TL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type Actuated Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97
Intersection S1gnal.Delay 29.8 IntersecionLOS C. _
Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.5% ICU Level of Service F
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m.; Volume for 95th percentile.:queue.is metered by.upstream signal.
Splits and Phases: 3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway
01
31 s?? o2
44's1°u} P;# -4 o4
25s_s" ;
06 08
05" 251
i
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buildout PM With 550.sy6
kimleyivl7-ff51
ARCO Development Buildout PM - Scenario 2B
3: Inverness Drive & Brier Creek Parkway 11/10/2005

-_--
tnent° EBL EBT EB. _ ;Bh .
B. . _ ;BR
. NBL . r
: NBT ._
BR ,
<;.SB .'.S .. '
s
Lane Configurations 4 +' r Vi tt if
T?
Ideal Flow (vphp}) 1900 1900 :1.900..1900 ' 1900 1900. 1900 ` 1900 1900 1900 1900
1900
Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
l.ane,Util Facactor 1.00 1,.00 ;1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00. 1.00.: -0.b5 0.95 1.00
,. ..
Frt
0.95
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.85
FIt Rrotected 0.97 0.95 1 A0 : '::0.95: -1.00
1,00
0.95.
1.00
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1544 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.81 0.70 1,00 :0.39 .. -1.00 :1.00: 0.09 1 AO : . 1.00
Sa-td. Flow (perm) 1430 1139 1583 733 3539 1583 166 3539 1583
Volume;(vph) 15 3 12
;1.64
;1
'696
`:`:34
1182 '
..129.
:.354
.::611
"::25
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0..90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Add Flow (vph) 17 .. 3 13 182
. 1 773 38 :, 1313. `143. 393 679. . 28
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 33 0 0 183 773 38 1313 143 393 679 28
Parking (#/hr)
6
Turn Type Perm Perm pm+ov Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases a 8: 1 : 2 `.:1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G; (s) 17:1 :.. 1 Z.1 41.1 37.9 . 37.9 ? . 37.9 68.0 .` 68.9: 68.9
Effective Green, g (s) 19.1 19.1 45-1 39,9 39.9 39.9 70.9 70.9 70.9
A'g/C Ratio 0.19 t)a 9 0,45. 0.40 0.40. < 0.40 0.71 _ 0.71 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7,0
Vehicle Extension {s):. 3.0 3.0 ` 3.0. 3.0 3.0 . ': 3.0 .' 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 273 218 793 292 1412
* 632 535 2509 1122
v/s Ratio Prot 37..
c0 ::. '.:. 0.19 . 0.19 . ... :
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.16 0.23 0.05 0.09 0.33 0.02
0.84 : 0.97 0.13 0.93. ::0.23 .0.73 0.27 6.02
Uniform Del2y, d1 33.5 39.0 26.9 19.0 28.7 19.9 25.5 5.2 4.3
Progression Factor 1..00 , ?1.00:. 1 00 . : 1.00. 1.00 1.20 '.:0.83 0.72
Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 23.7 25.6 0.9 12.2 0.8 4.9 0.2 0.0
Delay(s) 33:7 62.6. :.52.5 ; 20.0.: : 40.9 : 20.7 35.5. ;4.6 3.1
-
Level of Service C E D B D C D A A
Approach Delay
(S) 33.7 54.5 :. ...... .. 38.4. .. ..... : 15..6
.
Approach LOS C D D B
ri
ntersectlon Saimniary
HCM Average Control Delay 35.7 HCM Leval of Service D
HCM' Volume: to Capacity ratio 0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization . 102,5% ICU Level of Service F
c Critical Lane Group
BLW H:\PN\011606013 - ARCO\Synchro\Scenario 2 - Buildout\Two Thru Lanes Buildout PM With 550 sy6
kimleylvl7-ff51
3
? .? ear,. ?? o S - ??a ? 3
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
December 21, 2005
S&EC Project # 3165.W1
To: NC Division of Water Quality
-
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 J ~
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Kevin Martin 05
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA ,
11010 Raven Ridge Road c v" s r.:U z '
Raleigh, NC 27614 " l rtl
Re: Parcel J at Brier Creek (Brier Creek Corporate Center)
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
On behalf of the owners, Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates (Attn: Joe Dye), please find attached a complete application
and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ)
that the activities proposed below are in compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rules. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information. Since this is only a buffer approval request, an application fee is not
enclosed.
PR01F(T Si 1MMARY
Project Name Brier Creek Corporate Center
Project Type Commercial Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates
County Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT Little Brier Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03020201
Index Number 27-334-1
Class C, NSW

Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form ' Level Spreader Worksheet
Agent Authorization O & M Agreement
USGS Vicinity Map Comments from the City of Raleigh
Detailed Impact Maps and Overall Site Plan Maps" Previous Corps and DWQ approvals
Soil Survey Vicinity Map
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Buffer Impact Zone 1 6,099
Buffer impact Zone 2
6099
,
Total Buffer impact 12,198
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Brier Creek Coprorate Center Associates. LP Contact: Joe Dve
Mailing Address: c/o AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 114
Raleigh, NC 27617
Telephone Number: 919-821-2700 Fax Number: 919-755-2200
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919/846-5900 Fax Number: 919/846-9467
E-mail Address: KMartinna,sandec.com
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Brier Creek Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0768339630, 0768328974, 0768438432, &
0768328520
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Brier Creek Corporate Center
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project is located in the
northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley oad (SR 1645) and Interstate 540.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°54'02" N 78°47'06" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Forested to the east of the crossing, existing retail development to the west.
7. Property size (acres):_ Parcel J is 48 acres in size. The entire Brier Creek project is
approximately 1800 acres in size. The Corps (Andrea Wade) has determined that Parcel J is
a separate project from the rest of the Brier Creek project.
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Little Brier Creek
9. River Basin:
Page 2 of 8
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
install an access road necessary to provide pedestrian and vehicle access to an adjacent area
of shops such that access is via a much shorter route than by Lumley or the US 70 Service
Road. The City of Raleigh has required this connection as part of their approval process.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Conventional heavy
equipment will be used to construct the road and install the sanitary sewer line.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The area across Lumley Road and
northeast of the site is forested. A retail center is located northwest and I-540 bounds the
site to the east.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC delineated the wetlands on Parcel J in September of 2000. Ms. Amanda Jones of the
USACE verified the wetland boundaries depicted on the Wetland Impact Map on February 16,
2001. Parcel J is a separate project from the overall Brier Creek assemblage, as per Andrea
Wade of the USACE. Buffers were verified bey Smith of DWQ (NBR-RRO-20). In
addition DWQ and the Corps have issued approvals for a north/south road (see attached Sheet 1
of 2). Action ID #200520324, DWQ EXP #05-0913.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
Page 3 of 8
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Two data forms completed for the project are attached.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htip://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: > 1 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: None
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams***
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
NA

*** The proposed project will not impact stream channels. The proposed access road will be constructed using a bridge.
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us2s.2ov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mgpquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: None
Page 4 of 8
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
NA

I
i I i
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
To avoid stream impacts the client is proposinR to construct a bridge. The crossing is beiniz
required by the City of Raleigh (see attached comments from the city).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnugide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation should be required since there are no wetland or stream impacts and buffer
impacts are below DWQ mitigation thresholds.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP` must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htip:Hh.o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes El No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact 1
1 6,099 3 0
2 6,099 1.5 0
Total 12,198 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Not required.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
A level spreader worksheet and executed O & M agreement are attached. DWQ previously made
stormwater treatment a condition of the 401 Water Quality that was approved for the project,
therefore, only the level spreader information for this crossing is attached with this request.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer system
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applican ?gent?ignature . Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

Environmental Consultants, P.Q
,idge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina - Phone: [phone] - Fax: (919) SW9467
AGENT AL TI-IOMZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In Ex The Current Landowner
Name: VI
Address: 312Z? D f -J
Phone:
Project Name/Description: A?
Date: _A/ l oc?)
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
- - - --
- A. BOX 1$9tj
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Andrea Wade
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
L the current RIO REM owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in sty
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for fibs project
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
Officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature
cc: Nis. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Ct. Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
cc. Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Greensboro Office
3817-E Lawndalc Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
97-3165 1° = 2000'
Project Date: Figure 1
Mgr.: JAB 4116101 Location Map
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
': ?rC2 r? >'4 1 ? '• S5 <, Cr? ? r `? j ?,¢? ,? f C? >? ? ? Cr
•' ? t s- ` ? w f.`[$?' -?r ?. Gti .Cr62 .L"rClr"
CrC2
yh t' ?s,xx ? i ,l' K 1 ... `A ? ?? tt 'tr M C2 'fr MfBi
' 4 'x. fvlf \ M(B2
w ?. CrC2r _ "' ^ r mac' E ' CrC2 - Cr62 Crfi . PkF t
CrE.'. 1 S c
y
Cr i a ` r ?4ID2 X 11 ' l (Cr 2/.
= ?rC2 •?CrE f r82 r? " x
is F
r C ° O CrC 7* C
C,Bi
rich
L ` MtB ,? ?-'t
2 CrC2 A 4h Cr62- ` r ? ? L? ? ,.?-?
raB2 rn? CrC2 ' CfC

CrC2
\ l1
y e:. Mf02 Cm t
7
,
2 ? •1
.r \ Y r
- e
k
Cr82 3 \
s
ti

CaBy 4
°
lCrr,
"
`
Cr82 E? r ? r ??._

i
v

\
r pk? ? t?fD2-

!.. we

fCwB
- -
CrB2
?
?`. `-war., r, , ? ? ? Q,?.. .
v:, , ?• t f
° ? iB ? "?- ' 1..
t ° h
Grp CrB2 ?? r t q

3 ?'? CT
f
;' f82 Cr '
.? 2 Cr62 ..
'CIC2 ?, r

Project #:
97.3165 Scale:
1° =1320'

Fi
2 W
Project
Mgr.: JAB Date:
4116101 gure
ake Co.
Soil Survey Map
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Village Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES30A
Level Spreader Length NIA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 5.94 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 2.38 ac., (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 31.59 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 5.64 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Bypass
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
NIA Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thibk.ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures.are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
Brier Creek Corporate Center (AGAIN!!!) 20050913 Wake County
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Center (AGAINM) 20050913 Wake County
From: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:16:07 -0500
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
CC: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
Ian:
This is a 48-acre site which has five previously-approved crossings. The crossings
are bridged, so that is good. However, they are now asking for another (bridged)
crossing. That would make three crossings over an approx. 2,000-foot length of the
same stream (perennial UT to Little Brier Creek). The first five crossings were
needed to provide access to the various parts of the property. This one is being
required by the City of Raleigh to provide "interconnectivity" to the commrcial
center on the west side of the stream. Do we have to approve this?????? Six
crossings is a lot on one 48-acre property. However, due to the layout of the
property relative to the streams, Lumley Road, and I-540, there is currently only one
access into the site (the previously permitted road). John Dorney posed this
question as well on the triage sheet.
My comments are on BIMS.
Eric
Eric Kulz <Eric.Kulz(a,ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist III
Surface Water Protection
NC Division of Water Quality

1 of 1 2/21/2006 9:48 AM
X:1Projects\AACIAAC-040301Land\Stream Impacts\Brler Creak Commons Cross1ng\AAC04030-SM2.dwg, 11/23/20051:13:09 PM, Wllllams, 1:1
:;?;; ? ?•. ;?:,:.?;. ,? BEER ______ _
CRE
EK PTV-__
o
?, "?/ 11 `l?, f, 1, • :2 wv`,-. w
x,411 \ , ,?\, ' • ,?? ? `-. •'„`;-`;/\ 0
r"i i?ti.?t' .?1 `; jj f ?:•? 1 Wit"` t4'
-..j tt ? ? . •y `, t a I7 :yam, ? ?':•';?;+, t \ ??` ?,., S; , ti-.. ^?
-?\ .'\^r ` '• ,?,r??e i'`?,??'(I r r ` --1`\?\ J ? j_._ -/ ?i ?,C'?`"i ,` `1 }L`?'?_-'_ _.. ',i . .. ":?i,' :?I?l
If''!/?
Cn 10
?:"`' -a ?' 1\ till }11111,, '%;i: 'i, si;? t-- '?%--- `? 1•t f I?'1rj i
?•-? Y 1 tea, ? l .a 1 / f ?\1 \I i - /', ; ! / ?? ?: _ ? y? `? ,, t l . ? ? , ,?; ; \
`?.1 i ? , rll? ;r r , \ , t s?Ji t _/', :'' ''% %%;z ?i'(I<.>•'
? 7 , ?11 ?J=?="-.111 `1
i ?l tl v 1 ,11' „.??..?L.`:•J l? 1ji 1 ?,\ ;? ?;1?`\ `?\- )n '/
I `tt // /r rv ? i'?? 11 r 11 ?1 ' /-,-•?? ? ?\`\._?jl 1 I' ? : (, '_\ti%°^ ~` `1\ t l J t<,?/"??; ',, ,., .
-`
^> i / }? ?y , 1 i : ?: =; r--- i 1(jjl11{t jJ(J J J Y )1J' (i,1??''I'!"t ? ii I !? f 1 r,
11 ! r.I ? ??
:?_..,??\?`•?j?!/'f/)? 4:,7, 6 tfi( j
G ? , •::.;?. ` f \, . ?-r 1 I . IZ?,,,' J 1 1 , ,`1? li',,P art 1
••?\ l ?;?1 / ,? ?;,;, ,? ?` _ 1 `/;;
1J'><(fa + , Y \??\1,1` i?' _vf ,?\l??.rr?,i-^•\ `\\??t?lt`?`t ^1J( _'?/f???{???,`- //? ???='+r ??„r?-t?;?
O 1'/',1K' / ` ?:, 11\ , _,_.J _1 ....?.,t? 1'? 1?'?l'44?t?t':/L/ .-\ {?/ il7J'I j ( /% /1 v5"•_
\?
-71
,? ( ?a / ` l,?v'?\v1 I,? f. )? y{?j)Is?•??x"?s1 ttt ? ? ?? ?, ji% ?? ? i
A
O
O M
M/??•?
C,
n O b
v x
0 W
s* o
CO
0
0
rRO,ecr No. AAC-04030 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
p"B"""E' AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER is COMPANY, INC.
U SCALE: IMPACT ?IT ENGMER9/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
1"-400' RESEARCH TRIANGLE PAM NC
a
n"re: 11-23-05 1 OF 2 RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27708-4005
[phone]
?I
X`1ProjectslAAC1AAC-040301I.andlSlream impactsWer Creek Commons CrossinglAAC04030-SM2.dwg, 11/23/2005 12:19:17 PM, Plunkett, 1:1
i 11

\ ? I
-o -0
/
Zrrg00f
C) ;U 0 \ \
v o r \-\ / /
cu C) (n
;U ;U
co M
a -U
?(n
o
z
??\ \ _•?`: \ / it----
oti -/ /
\ \ / /? ?\\\` //i \ \
al ()I
0 -n
K -n
rm V?
z?
C -U
=cn z 1
°?? J
C o ?
c M
-U M ? CsJ
\ \ - - C1bd y
en d ?-? ?.,

\
r o?
?• x
II ` . No CZ
U2
o n
? o
?d ?
-?--- w
0
dcp _ 0?
A' 00 oon
A
?
r 10>
>0
o
tV4
v
!i LO
NM%
exaECr No. AAC-04030 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
P"B"Al1E: AAC04030-SM1 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER ® COMPANY, INC.
y SCALE: 1.x_40. IMPACT EXHIBIT BNGINSSRS/PLANK%R3/SUAVBYOR3
RESEARCH TRLNCLS PARK, NC
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. SOX 14005 ZIP 27702-4005
?' DATE` 11-23-05 2 OF 2 [phone]
Triage Check List
Date: i D Project Name:
D WQ#: o 5-- 09/` C
County:
To: ? - ARO
? FRO
? MRO
-RRO
From: -f 0
Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Mike Horan
Telephone : (919)
The file attached. is being forwardedV'o. ottr for your evaluation.
'Please call if you nee&k? ' Lance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface'.waters on USFW topo maps
Muumization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, *Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?,
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: 1-), 4

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
TO: Cyndi Karoly (DWQ, Wetlands Group)
Eric Kulz (DWQ, Raleigh Regional Office)
FROM: Kevin Martin (S&EC, PA);^?O,,-
RE: Your 1/3/06 letter regarding Brier Creek Corporate Center
(DWQ# 05-0913, ver. 3)
The, purpose of this memo is to address the two questions raised
by your letter. The previously submitted impact map has been relabeled
to clarify the issues you raised.
1. The location of the level spreader is labeled.
2. The sewer line has been labeled "aerial sewer" which would not
require USACE approval.
I believe this should address the information needed in order for you
to complete' the processing of this request and approve it.
r
JAN l '? 200n
n

Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
MEMORANDUM
O?QF W AT?9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-0913, Ver. 3
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Joe Dye
AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 114
Raleigh, NC 27617
Subject Property: Briar Creek Corporate Center
Ut to Little Briar Creek [030402, 27-33-4-1, C, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Dye:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 6,099 square feet of Zone 1 protected Neuse River basin riparian
buffer and 6,099 square feet of Zone 2 protected Neuse River basin riparian buffer to construct
an access road and install a sanitary sewer line at the subject property. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore,
unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward
denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on
hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please include the location of the level spreader on your the plan sheet.
2. Please be advised that you should consult the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
installation of the sanitary sewer (as discussed on page 3 of 8 of the PCN, Roman
numeral III - Project Information, item 11.) regarding potential permits required for this
activity.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
No One
Carolina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit Ntmally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
X:\Projects\AACIAAC-04030\Land\Stream impacts\Brier Creek Commons Crossing\AAC04030-SM3.dwg, 1/5/2006 2:25:37 PM, gugliotta, 1:1
/ I
1
mAm n'v -a
M O D
K ? D OZMO ;u X
a 2,7) Lo mN? \ \
mph Co ON - \ \\\
co
O ?m?
\ \
m0 n m Tn. N
\ m m -? /-
z
? \ 1
i
ti
Aj c cn?
0-n CD--
0 -n \ \ 74- /
.? ? m Z
z
M N m ;I
O:v 0Mm
co R: M /
ZD rrl 00 ?N M ;70<
C> C^l
>m
° D
=NZ O \ ` I / \
o m
0 C4
Co ?m i
^ m
I r /
t7l
OC1[C7C7[
'3,
?o cl)
?.d ? II ??dd \
0
\ z jn1 d cn
? ? II (•) it II
N • CO
o O O C?
Ut r n
II 00
9 O
7
b ?
o ,C
? x Om ? v
ii NO
O _ 0 1: h•.4 VV VV
.7
o
C.D -)
Z
l?
O

PROJECT No. AAC-04030
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
' F,LENAME:
AAC04030-SM3 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER ® COMPANY, INC.

C7 SCALE. ???= 4d IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
?' °"TE: 01-05-06 2 OF 2 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 5 ZIP 27708-4005
P.O. BOX 14
(gig) 361-
00

? r

TO: Cyndi Karoly (DWQ, Wetlands Group) D
Eric Kulz (DWQ, Raleigh Regional Office) JAN 171 2006
FROM: Kevin Martin (S&EC, PA) WAku k DENR - ViIAT R CIUALi 1'v
WE-1 I AlaD3 h HD S70R?,TWAT Eft 5RkXH
RE: Your 1 / 3 / 06 letter regarding Brier Creek Corporate Center
(DWQ# 05-0913, ver. 3)
The. purpose of this memo is to address the two questions raised
by your letter. The previously submitted impact map has been relabeled
to clarify the issues you raised.
1. The location of the level spreader is labeled.
2. The sewer line has been labeled "aerial sewer" which would not
require USACE approval.
I believe this should address the information needed in order for you
to complete the processing of this request and approve it.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
,A
MEMORANDUM
WAr?9pG Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O -C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-0913, Ver. 3
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Joe Dye
AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 114
Raleigh, NC 27617
Subject Property: Briar Creek Corporate Center
Ut to Little Bri ar Creek [030402, 27-33-4-1, C, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Dye:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 6,099 square feet of Zone 1 protected Neuse River basin riparian
buffer and 6,099 square feet of Zone 2 protected Neuse River basin riparian buffer to construct
an access road and install a sanitary sewer line at the subject property. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussedbe ow. a will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore,
unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward
denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0506 and will place this project on
hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please include the location of the level spreader on your the plan sheet.
2. Please be advised that you should consult the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
installation of the sanitary sewer (as discussed on page 3 of 8 of the PCN, Roman
numeral III - Project Information, item 11.) regarding potential permits required for this
activity.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
No One
Carolina
AW(Mili,
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
0?0? W A TF9P Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 7 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
t- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O 'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-0913, Ver. 3
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Joe Dye
AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 114
Raleigh, NC 27617
Subject Property: Briar Creek Corporate Center
Ut to Little Briar Creek [030402, 27-33-4-1, C, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Dye:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 6,099 square feet of Zone 1 protected Neuse River basin riparian
buffer and 6,099 square feet of Zone 2 protected Neuse River basin riparian buffer to construct
an access road and install a sanitary sewer line at the subject property. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore,
unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward
denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on
hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please include the location of the level spreader on your the plan sheet.
2. Please be advised that you should consult the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
installation of the sanitary sewer (as discussed on page 3 of 8 of the PCN, Roman
numeral III - Project Information, item 11.) regarding potential permits required for this
activity.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
Npf` Carolina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit mally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper
ACC Real Estate Services'
Page 2 of 2
January 3, 2006
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
A
Cyn i Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
Enclosures: DWQ's Indirect and Cumulative Impact Policy.
cc: Kevin Martin, Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 2761
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050913 Ver3BriarCreekCorporateCenter(Wake)On_Hold
With Attachment - DWQ 05-0913 Ver 3 Briar Creek Corporate Center
V - , ?
Subject: With Attachment - DWQ 05-0913 Ver 3 Briar Creek Corporate Center
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:05:46 -0500
To: Kevin Martin <[e-mail]>
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related
to your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you
electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send
your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. The hard copy is being sent via US
Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and
Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
05O9l3Ver3BriarCreckCor orateCenter _ Content-Type: application/msword
p (Wake)On Hold.doc
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 1/5/2006 7:13 AM
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader system is defined as the bypass junction box, the level spreading slotted
drain and associated pipe and the bypass outlet pipe.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. Every six months:
a. Inspect the level spreader system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash
accumulation, vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that the full length of the level
spreader functions as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover,
mow vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as
needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.)
quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the level spreader system semi-annually using
cleanout structures at the end of each length of level spreader. Removed sediment shall
be disposed of in an appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not
adversely impact water quality (i.e. stockpiling near a stream, pond, etc.).
5. All components of the level spreader system shall be maintained in good working order.
6. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down
gradient erosion must be repaired and/or replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of
the seven maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with
the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name: Mr. Paul Herndon
Title: President
Address: 8211 Brier Creek Parkway Suite 103
Signatur v
Date: !l?23?eS
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than
50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the
president.
Page 1 of 2
I, mkoneAtt' &Y-nWrCL , a Notary Public for the State of
rip Y'kl% C%&y V"4k--, County of ?• .?+b"' , do hereby certify that
Tam. L.- k?-PirrncIOY\ personally appeared before me thisdI3 day of
Y OI&Y'Abaf , "100:, and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing wet
[wetland] deire?j?ton basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
i
2
w=
?COO
: 'v y
4 .
616
?'''o.CgTAWBPC;?•
SEAL
My commission expires
Page 2 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200520324 County: Wake USGS Quad: Southeast Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. Barry James
Address: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates LP
'i1J
3800 Arco Corporate Drive - -
Suite 200
_Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone No.: 704-295-4000
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The proiect site is located in
the northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540, west of.
Raleigh, Wake County North Carolina
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the placement of fill and the
installation of culverts associated with Brier Creek Corporate Center. See attached conditions for
mitigation requirements.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide and Special conditions, the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrea Wade at 919-876-8441 x30.
W AT QG
r
0 lii? -q?
June 16, 2005
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
UT to Little Brier Creek [27-33-4-1, C NSW]
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ EXP # 05-0913
Wake County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions-EXPRESS
REVIEW PROGRAM
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.24 acres of wetland's, 35,721 square feet Zone 1, and
30,056 square feet Zone 2 of protected riparian buffers to c9nstruct the infrastructure necessary
to support future commercial development at the above-referenced site, as described within your
application dated April 13, 2005 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
April 13, 2005 and all additional information submitted and received by the DWQ on June 8, 13,
and 16, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 (GC3404). The Certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This
letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply
with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Rev. 11/21/01 Q A q
City of Raleigh, NC
Development Plans Review Center
S
P. O. Box 590, Raleigh, N. C. 27602 ?Q C ? 'r-
Telephone: [phone] FAX: [phone] rJ?
www.raleigh-nc.org/planning/plandprc.htm
b? S?aC Qa??qu
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
TO: Brandon Plunkett- The John R. McAdams Company [phone]
(Fax) [phone] email address [e-mail]
2905 Meridian Dr. Durham, NC 27713
PROJECT NAME: Brier Creek Corp. Center Parcel J Lots 1-15
CASE NUMBER: S-63-2004
INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 8/18/04
PLAN REVIEW COMMENT CYCLE: 2nd
DATE COMMENTS SENT: 6/8/05
PLANNER COORDINATING REVIEW: Stacy Barbour
ATTACHMENTS: Wake County School Form
WHEN YOU RESPOND, PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS:
1. A narrative responding to each of the comments from the City, referencing the
comment number and the revised map sheet. (4 copies please)
2. A description of any changes made to plan maps that are not noted in the
comments from the City.
3. Four sets of revised plans, plus one (1) 8 I/2" x 11" reduction. If this is the
final revision, please include a digital copy of the site plan in PowerPoint
format on disk.
Please return revisions as soon as possible. The anticipated staff review time for
first submissions is 11-15 days, and for subsequent submissions, 10 days,
depending on the complexity and completeness of the submission. If the plan
requires a hearing, you will already have been notified of the target date to return
confirmation that you have notified adjacent property owners.
When you return revised plans, please bring them to the Planning Department,
Development Plans Review Center, 4th Floor of the Raleigh Municipal Building.
Plans are opened and logged-in each day at 3:00 pm, distributed to review staff
and discussed each Monday afternoon.
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
Plan Review Coordinator (Stacy Barbour) 890-3679,
stacy.barbou&ci. rale igh. nc. us
First Review Comments (9/2/04):
1. Please submit an existing conditions sheet showing all existing parcels and
the zoning district boundaries across this site. Part of this site is zoned
Airport Overlay district and part is zoned SHOD-2. If these parcels have been
recombined please provide a copy of the recorded map.
2. Please accurately depict existing and proposed lots on the north side and
show ownership. I am aware of recent approvals of S-65-03 and you need to
distinguish the R/ W approved with that versus what's proposed with this
plan.
3. Note the applicable Thoroughfare conditional use zoning case on cover sheet
[Z-65-96] and copy the zoning conditions onto the plan sheet. Note which area
-this site is within on plans fArea ?`?
4. This plan needs to show a street connection to Brier Creek Commons as
-planned with that site plan [SP-53-00].
5. Has NC DWQ reviewe t is proposal?
6. I don't understand the phasing plan and I can't distinguish many of the
proposed property lines from other lines on the plan. Please provide another
sheet that just shows existing and proposed lot lines and R/W and phase
lines for overall site. You can call it a "lotting plan" if you wish.
7. Since this plan is so confusing further review is required. Hopefully the
requested information will clarify the proposal and resolve some issues.
8. Your property is affected by the Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy Rules. This could require the preservation of riparian
buffers along watercourses on this property. These rules are enforced by the
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. Please contact the
Division of Water Quality at 571-4700.
9. A review of the National Wetlands Inventory maps prepared by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service has shown that your property may contain wetlands.
Filling and other construction in designated wetlands is regulated by the US
Army Corps of Engineers. Only a field inspection by Corps personnel can
determine if wetlands actually exist on your property. The City of Raleigh will
issue no flood permits until this determination has been made and the
appropriate permit has been issued by the Corps of Engineers. For field
inspections contact the US Army Corps of Engineers at 876-8441. Any
questions on City of Raleigh land disturbing permits should be directed to the
Conservation Engineers at 890-3500.
10. If construction plans for public and private streets or utilities shown on
this plan are required, they must be approved by the Central Engineering
Department prior to issuance of permits or recording of any plat for this
development. Contact Steve Lockwood @ 890-3030 for construction plan
submittal.
Second Review Comments (6/6/05)
1. Please clarify on plans whether all of Arco Corporate Drive on the north side of
this site has already been dedicated as R/W and this represents an
abandonment and change in alignment, or if this just represents a change in
alignment from the previously approved preliminary plan for S-65-03. If the
R/W has already been platted then a request for city abandonment will
se arate Council ac
2. Show a 60' minimum width public access easement along the private street
extending across this tract to and thru the shaping center. ?.
3. Provide a typical section for the private street including sidewalk on both
sides. This should be designed to collector street standards, much like this
developer's private street connection thru the Brierdale shopping center. The
creek crossing can be accommodated per our previous discussions, but do
provide details.
4. The plans indicate Ward Ventures owns a substantial portion of the proposed
subdivision, but the application does not include any signatures from them or
evidence of their willingness to be a part of the project. Please forward
appropriate documentation.
5. Your cover letter does not include any comments regarding what I presume to
be a request for application of the new tree conservation ordinance to this
development as a whole, rather than on a lot by lot basis later. I did not see
sheet C6 until today and have just forwarded the plans to Andy Gilliam so no
comments are included with this review cycle. If you have any explanation of
the request to provide to him, please forward that with the next submittal.
Third Review Comments (Date)
1. Comment
2. Comment
PUBLIC WORKS
David Thompson, 890-3800 email: david.thompson(a),ci.raleigh.nc.us,
First Review Comments (9/1/04)
1. Label and dimension everything along Lumley Road. Lumley Rd. is a
secondary arterial. Your widening typ. section does not address this street
section. Please widen accordingly.
13
-A) ex, t o5 - oq 13
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Parcel J at Brier Creek (Brier Creek Corporate Center)
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
December 21, 2005
S&EC Project # 3165.W 1
17
On behalf of the owners, Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates (Attn: Joe Dye), please find attached a complete application
and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ)
that the activities proposed below are in compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rules. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information. Since this is only a buffer approval request, an application fee is not
enclosed.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Brier Creek Corporate Center
Project Type Commercial Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates
County Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT Little Brier Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03020201
Index Number 27-33-4-1
Class C NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Buffer Impact Zone 1 6,099
Buffer Impact Zone 2 6,099
Total Buffer Impact 12,198
Attachments:
Pre-constriction Notification (PCN) Application Form Level Spreader Worksheet
Agent Authorization O & M Agreement
USGS Vicinity Map Comments from the City of Raleigh
Detailed Impact Maps and Overall Site Plan Maps Previous Corps and DWQ approvals
Soil Survey Vicinity Map
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates, LP Contact: Joe Dye
Mailing Address: c/o AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 114
Raleigh NC 27617
Telephone Number: 919-821-2700 Fax Number: 919-755-2200
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919/846-5900 Fax Number: 919/846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Pagel of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:_ Brier Creek Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0768339630, 0768328974, 0768438432, &
0768328520
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Brier Creek Corporate Center
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project is located in the
northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°54'02" N 78°47'06" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Forested to the east of the crossing, existing retail development to the west.
7. Property size (acres): Parcel J is 48 acres in size. The entire Brier Creek project is
approximately 1800 acres in size. The Corps (Andrea Wade) has determined that Parcel J is
a separate project from the rest of the Brier Creek project.
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Little Brier Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
Page 2 of 8
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
install an access road necessary to provide pedestrian and vehicle access to an adjacent area
of shops such that access is via a much shorter route than by Lumley or the US 70 Service
Road. The City of Raleigh has required this connection as part of their approval process.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Conventional heavy
equipment will be used to construct the road and install the sanitary sewer line.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The area across Lumley Road and
northeast of the site is forested. A retail center is located northwest, and I-540 bounds the
site to the east.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC delineated the wetlands on Parcel J in September of 2000. Ms. Amanda Jones of the
USACE verified the wetland boundaries depicted on the Wetland Impact Map on February 16,
2001. Parcel J is a separate project from the overall Brier Creek assemblage, as per Andrea
Wade of the USACE. Buffers were verified by Danny Smith of DWQ(NBR-RRO-20). In
addition DWQ and the Corps have issued approvals for a north/south road (see attached Sheet 1
of 2). Action ID #200520324, DWQ EXP #05-0913.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
Page 3 of 8
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Wetland Impacts
Two data forms completed for the project are attached.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: > 1 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: None
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams***
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
NA

*** The proposed project will not impact stream channels. The proposed access road will be constructed using a bridge.
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mal2quest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: None
Page 4 of 8
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if
applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
To avoid stream impacts the client is vronosinlz to construct a bridge. The crossing is being
required by the City of Raleigh (see attached comments from the city).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
bttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation should be required since there are no wetland or stream impacts and buffer
impacts are below DWQ mitigation thresholds.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htip://hio.enr.state.nc.us/vap/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify. )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact 1
1 6,099 3 0
2 6,099 1.5 0
Total 12,198 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
Not required.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
A level spreader worksheet and executed O & M agreement are attached. DWQ previously made
stormwater treatment a condition of the 401 Water Quality that was approved for the project,
therefore, only the level spreader information for this crossing is attached with this request.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer system
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 8 of 8
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
-'-- ??? ? ???? •uav awaiu uAllLilu .J1V JVVL
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A,
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Camlina - Phone: (919)846-$900- Fax: (919)844r,--9467
www_SandEC_com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In ByThe Current Landowner
Name: 6myog&-M ,tS1,?7CE L-1-1,
Address: 7 Amtk92(,O` 1;?A-i-- t..Ji2-(l g Si-- 12JQ,?>
CI?? ?''- Kk-, 7BZH-
Phone: -4o4 / Z=(S / 44000
Project Name/Description: VR--lL'qa
Date:/
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: -Andrea Wade
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
L the current ro owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil d; Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for tins project
NOTXCE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for governmeut
officials to enter the propezty when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Ct. Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
cc. Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Greensboro Office
3817-E Lawadalc Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

t
CfC2 L- CrC n * ! •y
R t..
P « CrC2 z
d
'C1.4
fs?
CrC2
?CrEy f ? ? i
?•.. v1y
2 h1f02 Cm
tr ?;
r E'.
CO N
cz f l ?? ~
2
t
All f?k? • A?f62 • ??
? r+rB2 F ?•_
Mf
CrC2 - CrC2
E o CrB2 CM
t CrE'` +
N. S 4r' (D2
C11 CrE C
Y ;
Gu SP ..
Af r?
Cr62 /3 Mf
Fa62 r J r
L - '?'..?..E l Cry- ?
M,
MfB2 /
?Cr I
?b z CI
g s ? •p v ?r ?
F ? ? t
x C{B
r
e.
_q1 1% V\
• --a.

Project 0:
97-3165 Scale:
1" = 1320'

Fi
2
Project

Pro
Mgr.: JAB Date:

4116101
gure
Wake Co.
Soil Survey Map
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd." Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] " [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Village Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES30A
Level Spreader Length WA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 5.94 ac. (on-site and off site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 2.38 ac. * (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Ship/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 31.59 cfs
Max Discharge to Level Spreader 5.64 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Bypass
It. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial In the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. if a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
WA Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick-ground cover or grass or 100 It per cis in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Porn Scour Holes are on flat slope* only
No structures.are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader system is defined as the bypass junction box, the level spreading slotted
drain and associated pipe and the bypass outlet pipe.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. Every six months:
a. Inspect the level spreader system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash
accumulation, vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that the full length of the level
spreader functions as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover,
mow vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as
needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.)
quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the level spreader system semi-annually using
cleanout structures at the end of each length of level spreader. Removed sediment shall
be disposed of in an appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not
adversely impact water quality (i.e. stockpiling near a stream, pond, etc.).
5. All components of the level spreader system shall be maintained in good working order.
6. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down
gradient erosion must be repaired and/or replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of
the seven maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with
the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name: Mr. Paul Herndon
Title: President
Address: 8211 Brier Creek Parkway Suite 103
Phone: [phone]
Signatur Q
Date: 1l?23?eS
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than
50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the
president.
Page 1 of 2
I, m?C AAeAke, T ? P"v nwrd- , a Notary Public for the State of
?p Y' tl'h C4vo county of CAA-A,W b"' , do hereby certify that OQ
T( O.yj . L, k-?env,dcy-' personally appeared before me this-13 day of
VA ow-'YArt 00 - 'UoS-, and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing wet
[wetland] dgtgntion basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
4 ?.-- 0* 4.r ui
w Z
O :
• =?
'•.??gTAWBP.••?
SEAL
My commission expires M0-C4, PSI -;tad?
Page 2 of 2
Tur
U.S.
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200520324 County: Wake USGS Quad: Southeast Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. Barry James
Address: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates LP
3800 Arco Corporate Drive -
Suite 200
_Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone No.: 704-2954000
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The project site is located in
the northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540, west of
Raleigh, Wake Countv. North Carolina
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the placement of fill and the
installation of culverts associated with Brier Creek Corporate Center. See attached conditions for
mitigation requirements.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide and Special conditions, the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the pemiittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrea Wade at 919-876-8441 x30.
O?O? V 4A
T ?9QG
> -?
O `<
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 16, 2005
DWQ EXP # 05-0913
Wake County
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
UT to Little Brier Creek [27-334-1, C NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions EXPRESS
REVIEW PROGRAM
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.24 acres of wetlands, 35,721 square feet Zone 1, and
30,056 square feet Zone 2 of protected riparian buffers to construct the infrastructure necessary
to support future commercial development at the above-refe> enced site, as described within your
application dated April 13, 2005 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
April 13, 2005 and all additional information submitted and received by the DWQ on June 8, 13,
and 16, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 (GC3404). The Certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This
letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply
with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversght / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mal Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands
Now Carolina
Vatura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
CNI,
Rev. 11/21/01 ?. j?
Cr e- c_? *-4 _`
City of Raleigh, NC -?
Development Plans Review Center
P. O. Box 590, Raleigh, N. C. 27602 C <-- ?. r
Telephone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
www.raleigh-nc.org/planning/plandprc.htm
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
7
TO: Brandon Plunkett- The John R. McAdams Company [phone]
(Fax) [phone] email address [e-mail]
2905 Meridian Dr. Durham, NC 27713
PROJECT NAME: Brier Creek Corp. Center Parcel J Lots 1-15
CASE NUMBER: S-63-2004
INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 8/18/04
PLAN REVIEW COMMENT CYCLE: 2nd
DATE COMMENTS SENT: 6/8/05
PLANNER COORDINATING REVIEW: Stacy Barbour
ATTACHMENTS: Wake County School Form
WHEN YOU RESPOND, PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS:
1. A narrative responding to each of the comments from the City, referencing the
comment number and the revised map sheet. (4 copies please)
2. A description of any changes made to plan maps that are not noted in the
comments from the City.
3. Four sets of revised plans, plus one (1) 8 1/2" x 11" reduction. If this is the
final revision, please include a digital copy of the site plan in PowerPoint
format on disk.
Please return revisions as soon as possible. The anticipated staff review time for
first submissions is 11-15 days, and for subsequent submissions, 10 days,
depending on the complexity and completeness of the submission. If the plan
requires a hearing, you will already have been notified of the target date to return
confirmation that you have notified adjacent property owners.
When you return revised plans, please bring them to the Planning Department,
Development Plans Review Center, 4th Floor of the Raleigh Municipal Building.
Plans are opened and logged-in each day at 3:00 pm, distributed to review staff
and discussed each Monday afternoon.
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
Plan Review Coordinator (Stacy Barbour) 890-3679,
stacy.barbour(a,ci. raleigh. nc.us
First Review Comments (9/2/04):
1. Please submit an existing conditions sheet showing all existing parcels and
the zoning district boundaries across this site. Part of this site is zoned
Airport Overlay district and part is zoned SHOD-2. If these parcels have been
recombined please provide a copy of the recorded map.
2. Please accurately depict existing and proposed lots on the north side and
show ownership. I am aware of recent approvals of S-65-03 and you need to
distinguish the R/W approved with that versus what's proposed with this
plan.
3. Note the applicable Thoroughfare conditional use zoning case on cover sheet
[Z-65-96] and copy the zoning conditions onto the plan sheet. Note which area
this site is within on plans [Area C
4. This plan needs to show a street connection to Brier Creek Commons as
planned with that site plan [SP-53-00].
5. Has NC DWQ reviewed-Mis proposal?
6. I don't understand the phasing plan and I can't distinguish many of the
proposed property lines from other lines on the plan. Please provide another
sheet that just shows existing and proposed lot lines and R/W and phase
lines for overall site. You can call it a "lotting plan" if you wish.
7. Since this plan is so confusing further review is required. Hopefully the
requested information will clarify the proposal and resolve some issues.
8. Your property is affected by the Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy Rules. This could require the preservation of riparian
buffers along watercourses on this property. These rules are enforced by the
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. Please contact the
Division of Water Quality at 571-4700.
9. A review of the National Wetlands Inventory maps prepared by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service has shown that your property may contain wetlands.
Filling and other construction in designated wetlands is regulated by the US
Army Corps of Engineers. Only a field inspection by Corps personnel can
determine if wetlands actually exist on your property. The City of Raleigh will
issue no flood permits until this determination has been made and the
appropriate permit has been issued by the Corps of Engineers. For field
inspections contact the US Army Corps of Engineers at 876-8441. Any
questions on City of Raleigh land disturbing permits should be directed to the
Conservation Engineers at 890-3500.
VArf._L...._1" A-A 11 - n"n9n\1 .....J1 C......... :..?.__.....10.:... /^??. ,. ?. /^..?-___ _.""/•. n d n n n 1.11 J...- ?/L lnnnn n.nGns n.1 c_u_ ...
/ I
\ / I
2 O? i>2 D OZ ;mu O OA? \
?
El Ln r c7 0 •p
p Z m O
?- _
0 moo
o mO? woN \ \?\ / ?- _
\ a ??
D ? C C O m
0 -u
o m
m ;K
z -` --? %
i
\ oti
E5 "i c o--
0-1 74
?.. cn r p -- - ?-
0 -0
m K m 0 _ ?-
m p cn ?u
cn ?o°< _ Z
n C7 y = ? .J \
Z
C 0 C4 rTl \
O o
r O /
rrl
m ?-
,l rn --_ -? ? r bd N N zz ?-?
cc) L71

0
,-. 0
x
II No (?
o
?. a
0
0p o In \
N? pNp ooC?
if >>
9
00
O
O ?V
PROJECT No. AAC-04030 THE JOHN R.
cADAMS
FILENAI, E:
AAC04030-SM3
BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER
I
m
COMP
ANY, INC.
°
'r SCALE:
1 =401
IMPACT EXHIBIT
ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
NC
?' °"rE: 01-05-06 2 OF 2 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA .
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
[phone]

X:\Projocts\AAC\AAC-04030\Land\Stroom ImpactsTflor Crook Commons Crossing\AAC04030-SM2.dwg, 11/23/20051:13:09 PM, W1111ams,1:1
:?; , • , t `'?'?';,. DER ____?-_
1. 1„A ?.
.-
n 0
CA 0
` a l Q ?.1
???\ ?, 1 111 ti / ?j i- \'=:? ??_• r? {' -
?' /f?ra i \ r /- \?- `?:•, \A fc' ;/1,l Yom,
1 t 1 y 1
cl)
1? l; •??': -1 ,• , ('-'.,?? , i / .;; :?? Ili !?; - ?-'"r- - :-_: • 1 • 1 1 '? -, '
r ly I ca ? ? 1 / \ \ ? 1 r ? ?'l/ r r / ? 1 1 i?)+r Ir ?1
W ?1?'t\ J •,, _?+? `\ ;}1 I\ ! r "?) I i r `° i ' ,I,l?tl1?1
1 ? ?I ? , ( ijfl , 1 , , \ ? r 1 ?/i .??'•f' ?i-??/ ??i? /?i?l ?SI? ?!
I ?\ r / N Ifi? ? ; t( ?/ ?' r S?\\? `•. 1 ? 1/ I J'• ;r,Jr ?:;';"I-=;r(?(: ??
Ifs `\ .\'V
1?i; / I• l f? ,; !I` ??`` -? ,l ?; 111 ; ,? 1?'??r/t 1? ;' !;? %;,? ?:
1 •; ??+ / ? qtr'. - I ?'1na:_`\:•,\?: ; ; ; ; I r 'r+t;
c! J 1,} 3 1 ??_ _?_ `I l , r (?//•'•l? ,_ • \'tl •\,\??• tC f?t s
k.r 131
kN 11
1?:1 !? `?\1`11 • \ti`? ?(`--" /? ?i r % rr ,,,? n -
,w ?.r.IT? I ??? U 1?.?1 ?? ? ? ?, •>?? ?"/ ? ? ?f/ :i/ 1 J• w? X17! i ?
•A
O
O
M?
W
0
r sy]r+
O
n
0?
co
0 H
9
0
0
PROJECT No' AAC-04030 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
g AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER L COMPANY, INC.
7' PIIJiNA1(E:
n SNCWHER9/PLWttSRS/3URVEYON3
scgxE 1"=400' EWP _CT MaMrf RESELECH TRIANGLE PARK. IBC
j? RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 zir 27707-4005
? DATE: 11-23-05 1 Olj 2 (710) 30 9a1-0000 6000

XdProlects\AAC1AAC-040301Land\Stream impactsWer Creek Commons Crossing\AAC04030-SM2.dwg, 11/23/2005 12:19:17 PM, Plunkett, 1:1
Zmo?
rtl
O O
MON
0 C) -U
Z ?-
i
?0 -n
z
rti
co fr
Z?? r
C D \?/ ?. \
rm,
_° z r-n --r
0 L4
-?
;:U?.-
` ? ? ? W ";
z
1-4
?- - to
a
O
\ d co
- - - Il n p II II /?
N• ap 000
r>
00
0
0
it o
W
o n
o
-OD
PROJECT No. AAC-04030 ji THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FILENAME: AAC04030-SM1 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CE=R COMPANY? INC.
n ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
9 SCAM 1 "=40• HVIP C 1 1.JL7.1MT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
>- F?1I.EIGH. NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14000 ZIP 27709-4005
?' DATE: 11-23-05 2 OF 2 [phone]
10. If construction plans for public and private streets or utilities shown on
this plan are required, they must be approved by the Central Engineering
Department prior to issuance of permits or recording of any plat for this
development. Contact Steve Lockwood @ 890-3030 for construction plan
submittal.
Second Review Comments (6/6/05)
1. Please clarify on plans whether all of Arco Corporate Drive on the north side of
this site has already been dedicated as R/ W and this represents an
abandonment and change in alignment, or if this just represents a change in
alignment from the previously approved preliminary plan for S-65-03. If the
R/W has already been platted then a request for city abandonment will
u' se arate Council act'
2. Show a 60' minimum width public access easement along the private street
extendiniz across this tract to [and thrul the shonniniz center.
3. Provide a typical section for the private street including sidewalk on both
sides. This should be designed to collector street standards, much like this
developer's private street connection thru the Brierdale shopping center. The
creek crossing can be accommodated per our previous discussions, but do
provide details.
4. The plans indicate Ward Ventures owns a substantial portion of the proposed
subdivision, but the application does not include any signatures from them or
evidence of their willingness to be a part of the project. Please forward
appropriate documentation.
5. Your cover letter does not include any comments regarding what I presume to
be a request for application of the new tree conservation ordinance to this
development as a whole, rather than on a lot by lot basis later. I did not see
sheet C6 until today and have just forwarded the plans to Andy Gilliam so no
comments are included with this review cycle. If you have any explanation of
the request to provide to him, please forward that with the next submittal.
Third Review Comments (Date)
1. Comment
2. Comment
PUBLIC WORKS
David Thompson, 890-3800 email: david.thompson(i,ci.raleigh.nc.us,
First Review Comments (9/1/04)
1. Label and dimension everything along Lumley Road. Lumley Rd. is a
secondary arterial. Your widening typ. section does not address this street
section. Please widen accordingly.
O?O? W A ??9PG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
February 24, 2006
DWQ#: 05-0913
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates, LP
c/o AAC Real Estate Services
Attn: Mr. Joe Dye
8010 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 114
Raleigh, NC 27617
Subject: Denial of Request for Neuse Riparian Buffer Approval
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Wake County
Dear Mr. Dye:
Your application for a Neuse Riparian Buffer Approval under 15A NCAC 2B .0233, was received on
December 22, 2005, with more information received on January 17, 2006. The activity for which the
Approval is requested is impact 6,099 square feet of Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffer system and
6,099 square feet of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffer system to construct a bridged access road and
install a sanitary sewer line at the subject property.
After a thorough review of your submittal to bridge the stream to impact the protected riparian buffer
system and your previously approved submittal to bridge the same stream in two places and impact 250
linear feet of wetlands, our staff has determined that this requested impact would leave an inadequate
amount of the protected riparian buffer system, and would cause a degradation of the unnamed tributary
of Little Brier Creek. As provided by 15A NCAC 2H.0506, our review must determine whether a
proposed project will remove or degrade the existing uses of a surface water. In accordance with these
rules, the Division has determined that the third crossing will degrade existing surface water and is
therefore not an approvable project under 15A NCAC 2H .0506. This conclusion is based on our
determination that you have failed to demonstrate sufficient purpose and need for this third crossing.
Therefore, I am hereby notifying you that in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e), your application
for a Neuse Buffer Authorization is hereby denied.
If you wish to appeal this decision, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within sixty (60) days of your receipt of this denial. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
onne?e nnCarolina
dvaturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 2 of 2
February 24, 2006
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This denial is final and binding unless you ask for
a hearing.
Should you have information that you believe may alter our decision, we are available to discuss this
matter further. Please direct such information, or questions regarding this denial, to Mr. Ian McMillan at
919-715-4631, Ms. Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721, or Mr. Eric Kulz at our Raleigh Regional Office at
919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWKIasc
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ, RRO
US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
File copy
Central files
Kevin Martin, S&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
Rebecca Fox, US Environmental Protection Agency - Region IV
N e
o hCarolina
Nturally
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
A. Signa r
?, /k103 Agent
X
0j) -
_ Cl Addressat
B. Receiv (Prfn C. Date of Deliven
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
Mr. Joe Dye '
AAC Real Estate Services
8010 Arco Corporate Drive Ste. 114
Raleigh,NC 27617 3. Service Type
A Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
DWQ#05-0913-Wake E3 Registered fiff-14etumReceiptfor Merchandist
0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) p Yes
t. Article Number 7005 1160 0000 9954 8300
(Transfer from service ?abeO
30 c...... QQ1 i e ti.. . , nnnA
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USES
Permit No. G-10
GOO-1 i.llfllfl I I h al lffl 1 1 lf/iflififliflfllf/ I l lffl l flfiff/lttl ail
DWQ# ??5 1 Date Who Reviewed: ` 1py2 y.? ,
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
JV Vv I Z
C o /Z-C 7
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing via email to [e-mail] and CD.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.