20050913 Ver 1_Complete File_20050615

Brier Creek J-1-A, Phase 2
Raleigh, NC
Rip Rap Apron Calculations
Kimle -Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: 7/812004
Prepared by: MAE
Checked by: JMD
All aprons sized using the New York DOT Dissipator Method as outlined by NCDENR (Erosion Control Manual, Section 8.06)

Description Pipe
Diameter
(in) 10-yr
Velocity Zone
(fps) (-) Apron
Length
(ft) Apron
Width
(ft) Stone Apron
Class Thickness
(-) (in)

Rip-Rap Appron
(Culvert) 48 12.45 3 32 12 1 24

RipRap-Culvert.xls 3/22/2005 Page 1 of 1
Vendor: NCWATER N CAROLINA DIV OF WATER OUALTY
Invoice Invoice Date Reference
08182005 08/18/2005
2008 CIP 1000.00
Brier Creek Corporate Center Totals
CHECK DATE: 08/19/2005 CHECK #: 10056
Amount Retention Discount Net Amount
1000.00 .00 .00 1000.00
---- ----------- -----------
1000.00 .00 .00 1000.00
091
Vendor: NCWATER N CAROLINA DIV OF WATER oUALTY CHECK DATE: 05/17/2005 CHECK #: 10045
Invoice Invoice Date Reference Amount Retention Discount Net Amount
051305 05/13/2005 3000.00 .00 .00 3000.00
2008 CIP 3000.00
Brier Creek Corporate Center Totals 3000.00 .00 .00 3000.00
-x-P -. 0 6 0913
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 13, 2005
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Fax #: [phone]
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Project Name: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Wake County
On May 13, 2005, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email request from Soil
& Environmental Consultants, PA regarding a project known as "Brier Creek Corporate Center" for acceptance
into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the Express
Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee bf $3,000.00 made payable to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 2) five complete and collated copies of the application and 3) five copies of all
additional information pertaining to this project. Thank you for your, attention to this matter.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application package
and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Cyndi Karoly at
919-733-9721 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerely,
OX4t QA U)XC
i,jj. attz? _ _
49? Ian W. Klimek, P.E., Director
AWK/cvdw
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin-S&EC
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enrstate.nc.us/ncwetlands
Filename: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr
None Carolina
Natura!!rff
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
0•o'/13/2005 11:50 FAX tgJ VU Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Midge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.sandEGxorn
FACSIMILE SHEET
FAX NO. (919) 8464467
DATE
Project Number
TO: NAME: kndwwt?p_ Co.
COMPANY:?L.) 0
rAX NUMBER:
FROM: SUBYECT: , a t n? Aa C'('t 11 14U xru
The following items are being faxed. Number of pages including transmittal sheet:
For Your Comments/Approval
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Discws
For Your Information
Per Your Request
Please Call
Please Handle
HARD COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight
Hand Delivery
No Hard Copy Sent

IF YOU HA ANY PROEELEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT AT [phone].
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICV
This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged and eoMfidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, distribut-oa or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. if you have received this
transmission in error, please notify w immediately by telephone •atid return the faxed documents to us at the above address
via the United States Foetal Service.
Greensboro 001 M-'
arLlt Office 3817.13 l,awndalc Drive
236 UPhillip Court, 5uita C Grrxnsboro. NC 27455
Concord, NC 28025 Phonc:: [phone]
MAY-13-2005 FRI 10:18 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
05/13/2005 11:50 FAT
0002
INITIAL INTEREST Bw PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAI4I
WITHIN TIIE 401 OVERSITE/EXPRESS PERMITTING UNIT
September 1, 2004
Version 3
Applicant Name: Brier Creek Corporate Center -
Applicant Address: c/o AAC Real_Ritate Services
3800 Arco CQ gate Drive Suite 200
Charlotte, NC '8273
Applicant's phone number: 70? 4)-29__ -4000 Fax number: ,[phone]
Applicant's email address: b'ames 4-ma eom
Consultant Name (if applicable): Soil 8t Environmental Consultants PA
Attr.: Mr. Kevin Martin
Consultant address (if applicable): 11,010 en Rid a Road
Ruleigh, NC 14
Consultant's phone number. (212)3-4,6-5900 Fax number: [phone]
Consultant's email address: lanarlC('?sandec corn
Type of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification
[] Isolated Wetland Permit
? Stream Origin Determination
# of Determinations Required
N Riparian Buffer Approval ? Intermittent/Perennial Determinations
# of Determinations Required
[J Mitigation Plan
? stream ? wetland ? buffers (check all appropriate)
Name of Project: Brier C k Co orate Center County: Wake
'T'otal project acreage: 1 110 (acres) Total built out impervious area: k5O_(acres)
Nearest named stream (from USGS tcpo map): Little Brier Cr
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
r aardin this project have beetl_
Access road to serve Pronosed co or,ite ce tq development. Meetings
conducted with Debbie Edwards, John Domev and Eric Kulz of DWO
Plcase attach a map of sitc location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey.
1
MAY-13-2005 FRI 10:18 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
05/13/2005 11:51 FAX
[x003
Location of project site - please incluc[e reference to the county, nearest name town and highway number:
South of Highway 70, West of L-L and North of Lumley Ro [ (SR l 45 in Raleigh Wake County, NC
Proposed impacts:
0.243
0
0
0
75.793 _-
Acres of 404 wetlands
Acres of isolated wetlands
Linear feet of streams
Linear feet of isolated streams
Square feet of protected stream buffers
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list
which ones. Yes. 10/31/2003 hJQYjZ.mon Center
Has any DWQ staff visited the site?Ye_s if yes, please provide DWQ staff name, Dann S Matt Flynn and date
of visit: November and Decemb?t l 917 and March 26.2001
Which other environmental permits from other agencies will be needed for this project? Please list the permits and
issuing agencies below:
14
Erosion Control 404 Nationwide PWWt
Does this project require approval unc,er the State Environmental Policy Act or National Environmental Policy Act?
No
Is this project an After-the-fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from D'W'Q?
No
Does this project require approval of F. Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission? No
Are you aware of any local controvert y concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any
measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
This form must be submitted via email (c% 401exp1essfz ai .net), faxed (919-733-6893) or hand- delivered to the
Parkview Building, 2321 Crabtree Llvd_, Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the
Express Review Program will be noth ied via email or fax within 2 days. Successful applicants will then be instructed
regarding detailed procedures for bull application (Please Note: Submittals of the review packages on Friday after
12:00 pm will be stamped as received on the next business day).
Please contact Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9502 if you have any questions regarding this form.
2
MAY-13-2085 FRI 10:18 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3
05/13/2005 11:51 FAI
X004

Projectir Scale:
973165 V m 2000'
Project Date:
Mgr.: JAB 4116101
Figure 1
Location Map
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Raleigh, Wake Cc., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SendEC.Corn
MAY-13-2005 FRI 10:19 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 4
' 1 1 05/13;2005 11:51 FAX
0005
I Proige g I Scak:
97.3165 1° =1320'
I mgr.: JAB 41%01
Figure 2 Wake Co.
Soil Survey Map
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Raleigh, Wake C )., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 2T614
[phone] ¦ [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
MAY-13-2005 FRI 18:19 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 5
05/13/2005 11:52 FAX
X lPrOlestsW+? ?? ? 0^?5? ?ti ?3D SMa.tlwp, =IIZ 5411.00 PM, W91fam4h 1:1
1 r 1

U006

,11
Y
I
4

S
II n
S
cn
n
tO THE JOIN R. McAAAMS
MAY-13-2005 FRI 10:20 TEL:[phone]? ?NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 6
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAY-13-2005 FRI 11:41
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES' : 2/2
START TIME : MAY-13 11:40
ELAPSED TIME : 00'22"
MODE ' : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
W
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water OuaAty Nlehdel F. Easley, Governor WPiam G. Ross, Jr.. Secretary
Nan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address:
Mailing Address:
Contact Information:
Fax To: Kevin Martin
AAC Real Estate Senics
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr.
Number of pages including cover she,
Notes or special instructions;
''321 Ciab'uee Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27664.2260
1650 Afail Senwii Center
Raleigh, NC 27699.1650
Phone B: 919-733-0203
Fax ft-. 919-733-6893
Fax 0: 846-9467
704-295-4059
Date: May 13.2005
:t: 2
The original will he sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wide at 919.715.3473.
'.B-•91. 8-2S nWn c,.a :499'6`0 J^e.
t-.. 910 -m70 eairn F"AS 919•ht9f9-Mtda?73akn.7BAmm?tmK c„?a„?.
p No hCarolina
Frye.
A, E'--pparym:N.'A!frxCm A .'Fr+F4yd-51;°.N !dd'IOt Peq C--P" atur i&
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAY-13-2005 FRI 11:43
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
i
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 2/2
START TIME : MAY-13 11:42
ELAPSED TIME : 00' 20"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
AA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural liesources
Wichael F. Ea:lef, Gove-r, Division of Water Oualily
Wi:Aanl G. Ross, .;r., Senxtary
Alan W. Klknek. P.E., muctor
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division or Water (Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Weflauds/401 Unit
Street Address: 2311 Crabu ee Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh. NC 27661-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 'Mad Scr"ce Cenlcr
.Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information; Phone It: 919.733-0203
Fax [phone]
Fax To: Kcvia Martin Fax #: &16-9467
MC Real sate Services 704-295-4059
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr. Date: May 13, 2005
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
The oagmal hill be sent in the mail. If you have questions phase call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
1050 •b? s.rnca ca,nr. win. Wm+C- z+53 'EV ne
:RI D.-3.-1, Sr. ua w.xn, 1r C- s:ro. ortilCarolIna
!Ta%.^19T,C+Tda: i?X T9l,PilWilrlenN.:ns.i.T.2e ?.r.v.s l(JirJ?CSl ?;5n05 ?X
?`????/.?
Ar Eq*OpW-V,?A]Y-A0-arAll "-a) xmy?*10%P6 Cmm+,a p? ` `J
?0? W A TE9Q
?O G
'; r
-i
W- fl, "26ACAP Z 12.01 ro
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 17, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates
C/o Mr. Barry James
3800 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Mr. James:
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
Wake County
On June 16, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your Water Quality Certification to construct the
proposed corporate center. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your project, you are required to notify this office in
writing by July 26, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in violation
of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Certifications issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, ((?? n
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit D LS U ?'
CBK/lem JUL 2 6 2006
cc: Mr. Kevin C. Martin, S&EC Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh NC 27614
USACE, Raleigh Office DENR - WATER QUAUTy
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office WETLANDSANDSTI)P!AWATERRANCH
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050913BrierCrCorpCntr(Wake)EXP+NOT
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Noy` Carolina
Nturally
An Finial f)nnnrhmity/Affirmative Action Fmnlnve.r- 500/,Renvn1ed/100/ Pnct ('nncnmrr Panrr
i
Since 1979
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
MEMORANDUM
July 26, 2006
To: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
From: Brandon G. Plunkett, PE
RE: Brier Creek Corporate Center - AAC-04030
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
In accordance with the approval conditions for the above referenced project, I
am writing to notify you that construction has begun on the Brier Creek
Corporate Center project. The majority of the impacts permitted with this
project will be in later phases that are not currently under construction. Please
feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Research Triangle Park, NC
Post Office Box 14005
Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27709
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
800-733-5646
919-361-5000
919-361-2269 Fax
Charlotte, NC
5311 Seventy-Seven Center Drive,
Suite 66
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
800-733-5646
704-527-0800
704-527-2003 Fax
Comprehensive Land Development Design Services
www.johnrmcadams.com We help our clients succeed.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Cyndi Karoly
Division Of Water Qualtiy
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
1
Re: Brier Creek Corporate Center
am sending you the following item(s):
Date: July 25, 2006
** HAND DELIVER **
Job No.: AAC-04030
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 7.17 Letter From DWQ Re: Notification of Construction
1 Memorandum Re: Notification

These are transmitted as checked below:
® As requested ? For your use
? For approval ?
? For review and comment ?
Remarks:
Copy to: Signed. YahdOV! IVM ve'
don G. Plu ett, PE
Senior Project M nager
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 0 (? ?16 ? IF9
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File l? D
? Copy Entire Document to File JUL 2 6 2006
OENR - WK-1 ER QUALITY
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING SURVEYING WETWJDSANDSTORMWATCRBR'ANCH
PO Box 14005 • Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • [phone] • fax [phone]
www.johnrmcadams.com
?0? W ArF?Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 17, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates
C/o Mr. Barry James
3800 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Mr. James:
On June 16, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your Water Quality Certification to construct the
proposed corporate center. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your project, you are required to notify this office in
writing by July 26, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in violation
of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Certifications issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Sin erely,
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/1em
cc: Mr. Kevin C. Martin, S&EC Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh NC 27614
USACE, Raleigh Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050913BrierCrCorpCntr(Wake)EXP+NOT
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httt)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Jarolina
Chima!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/l0% Post Consumer Paper
T
_ Tcov-1vem
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
F@190%q91
SEP 2 1 2005
September 12, 2005
DWQ #: 05-0913 DENR - WATER QUAUTy
COE #: 20052032 MO STORMWATER BRANCH
Joe Dye
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates,
3800 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Project: Brier Creek Corporate Center
County: Wake
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) has received checks in the amount of $130,834.08, check
number 10058, as payment for the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404
Permit issued for the above referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation
requirements for this project have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this certification and any
other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NC EEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NC EEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated in the table
below.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.50 0 0 0 0 0 86,253 37,245
03020200
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
illiam D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monty Matthews, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
kutor'tg... F ... Protec&Kg oar .fta te.'
MUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 91 9-71 5-0476 / www.nceep.net
W ATF
9o
?QF Michael F. Easley, Governor

r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

-? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #:
Fax #:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax To: Kevin Martin, S&EC
AAC Real Estate Svcs.
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr.
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: [phone]
704-295-4059
Date: August 17, 2005
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele @ 919-715-
3473.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
Noy` Carolina
?tululi'm
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
O?O? WA T 41-1RQG
co 7
> .?
o ?
August 17, 2005
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Fax #: [phone]
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Project Name: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Wake County
On August 16, 2005, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email request from
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA regarding a project known as "Brier Creek Corporate Center" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into:the
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1. The application fee of $1,000.00 made payable to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality;
2. Five (5) complete and collated copies of the application; and 3)
3. Five (5) copies of all additional information pertaining to this project, including documentation of the
requirement for the road alignment shift.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Cyndi Karoly at
919-733-9721 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerely,
'I L4
q, diz4?
W. Klimek, P.E., Director
AWK/cvdw V
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin-S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr MOD
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Intemet: http:/lh2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetiands
Noe
Carolina
)Vatura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
June 7, 2005
S&EC Project # 3165.wl
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight & Express Permitting Unit ??Q(v] D
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly p V
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Additional Information - Express Review Program WATER Q URA
Brier Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J) M? 8T0
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
Dear Ms. Karoly:
We have received your letter dated May 31, 2005 requesting additional information in order to process our client's
application revised and submitted to DWQ Express Review on May 24, 2005. S&EC, PA has worked with the
engineer. (John R. McAdams) to obtain the information that you have requested and has provided this information
within this letter and supplemental information. Please contact us if you require any additional information or
would like further clarification on the information provided.
Additional Information:
1. Clarification of stream and buffer impacts:
a. Please note that the map (see attached) associated with the buffer determination letter from Mr.
Danny Smith dated June 12, 1998 does not depict a stream in the upper reaches of drainage
containing Channel D. As such, we believe that any feature within this drainage and the
boundaries of the map approved by Mr. Smith in 1998 should,be considered exempt from the
Neuse Buffer Rule. However, we do concur that any intermittent or perennial stream south of the
map approved by Mr. Smith and identified within the area evaluated by Mr. Flynn would be
subject to' the Neuse Buffer Rule.
I evaluated the feature on June 7, 2005 and determined that the channel is an ephemeral stream
and should be exempt from the Neuse Buffer Rule. As such I intend to appeal Mr. Flynn's
determination. In the interim and as not to delay the approval of this application, we will assume
that the channel located south of Mr. Smith's 1998 determination is subject to the Neuse Buffer
Rule. However, the stream appears to be greater than 50 feet from the clearing limits associated
with the proposed road (see attached map depicting the location of the proposed road, Channel D
and associated buffers) and as such no impacts will occur to the buffers associated with this
stream.
b. Please refer to the attached memorandum from Jennifer Burdette, S&EC to Joel Smith,
Greenhorn & O'Mara dated February 22, 2001 (see attached and USGS map). This channel
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 Lephillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: (704)'720-9405 Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
June 7, 2005
S&EC Project #: 3165.wl
Page 2 of 2
was determined not to be a jurisdictional water by Amanda Jones of the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE has recently verified that she will abide
by the determinations previously made by Ms. Jones. This channel does not appear on either the
USGS map or soil survey and is therefore not subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule.
2. Required riparian buffer mitigation:
We found a mathematical error in determining the amount of mitigation required for Impact 1.
We assume that this is the calculation error that you are referring to. Please find attached a
corrected copy of Page 10 of the application.
3. Sidewalk requirements.
Please refer to the attached letter from the City of Raleigh dated June 3, 2005.
4. Stream crossings.
Please refer to the attached vertical cross sections from the engineer, John R. McAdams.
5. Diffuse flow requirements:
a. Please refer to the revised Level Spreader Worksheets.
b. Please note that no pre-treatment devices are proposed for level spreaders. The engineer has
chosen to use the pre-formed scour hole option described within the DWQ Draft Level
Spreader Design Options Version 1.0 document dated October 10, 2001.
c. Please find attached the requested operation & maintenance agreement.
Please call me if you need further explanation of the information provided.
Sincerely,
(? ? ??94 k
Kevin Martin, PWS, N.C.LSS
Executive Manager
Attachments: DWQ Request for More Information
Neuse Buffer Determination Map, Approved by DWQ in 1998
Channel D Map
February 22, 2001 Memo & USGS
Page 10 Revised
Raleigh Letter, June 3, 2005
Vertical Cross Sections (n=5)
Level Spreader Worksheets (n=6)
O&M Agreement

v _ cure CR[rx WETLANDS _ • Soil & Environmental Consultants,
max cRmc ? z
®a a swi xm r.,.:...s.?c?.
l?
r
v

fr;
o, z
L
o ? z v V

?? V7
S
I c? ? 0 C--- 'N- )'fl-
1
•?,? ? I V\ 1 `t ? t\
a
vvl ..al ryVy yy•..y rsas .y7iOV'fV VI l.AV l.LipL a4LAla .7w yyvy?vv
MRY-31-2005 15:41 FROM:DMII-W TLAhD6 9257Z35050 TO: 9170429S405$ P:2-*3
?CF WAN > F ??, ov?,r
Q
May3I, 2005
DWQ EXP No. 05-W13
wake Caaaty
CERTIIttEU MAM-- RETURN RECSIP'it RI?QtI STED
Baia Crcek Gxpomfe cemta
C?o AAC Real P.stata Services
3804 Arco Corpor4a Driver
ChadoUo. NC 28273
Subject Property: Bader Crwk Corporate Ceater
MUM FOR MORE DWORNL4,TION-EXPRESSMWmW,PROGX"
0A May A 20050 the Di ddm of Watcx Quality (DWQ) reedved yovar applicatioao dared April
23,,200S to impact 0.241 aarea of wdlaads and 65,777 op m fed ofp wWcbod ripaiaa buffer
to eo wh%=t the proposed Boor CM k Cmporaft Center pref ect The DWQ bss de:te:mined that
7Ot appticefion is mcoarplaw andlor provided=aa=aft i &=xadon acv discussed below The
DWQ wM regW= additional iuibnm In order to p mom your appHcu don to impact pmts W
wc?cari, ?trenros Bailor buffets oa the erect property. Tf>?Sose, unless wa rooaivo the
addidond ia£aemabon roque W below, we will have to move toward deaid of your appH=d n
as xegaaW by 15A NCAC 2H M06 and wM ybm this pr4ed an hDId as iaooanp lefe uatil we
roceive this addidwal fnformativm Please provide &e Wowieg Wfamnudon so that wo may
cooftue to rmea? yourprOO&
1. CledScadan of Stream Bad Buffer Impacts:
a. b&ft : - Within the submittel package therc, is a letter fwm DWQ dated
Marsh 28, 2001 fwm Matt Flynao. This is s bufPr.t detem9aadon Iowa and notes
that fratucvs A, A C, and D are ail asabjed tp ft Nemse BUffer Rxrlc9. Tbe only
labeled rnappmvidod is an S&EC map dated Septembaar 12, 2000 Tbaa amgw shows
cb>mnd D to be f v4Ag into d aund G Cam your paropOW mad indicated
on tha f npad maps to the S&BC map, it appom that the road wM run pox&W to
ebannel D. Please fact & them buf t impacts in your rewired PCX and iaipad
maps, or, provide any supporting doe uncagagae mat shows this WM not result in a
psraW imrpact. Pl ass van mitigation wM be ragvhvd for all xw d impacts other
em crosskip of ate and Odw surface wabpats subject to this Rulo. .
b. Strom Imvaata: WAh m the serbmhtal pookqa theses fs as S&EC map 4OAd
September 12, 2000. 'Tlria mW shows a non4yu ffmoa eharrnel Sowi us inn cbmwel
A just blow channel B. Yeas appUc anion indicates a proposal to cm a this eirarmd.
Moan Win& them sucam cb mel J=Paca in your revised PCN and Wpact neaps,
or, provide any sspperdag dncmna o4uan tbd dctcnmin es this is not a stream.
IaDra°r0iwiee:o`e,ee: rrae?+a aerwauso .
earl oabwee apAwea, qwt?, Nv?n e?ralns ?
ph= Wa9ansa IFAZnaraeeeara.n,ee

MY-31-20M 15s41 F'ROMMM-NOLMD5 9197330893
MMT P:3e3
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 2 d 2
May 31.2005
2. : On pane 10 of ft PCN, the "R ? .
cgtthod Mitigafion is
wt aalcwMad ? Y• Plcawt?G7lMas& Wd sft* a xvised sheet 10 to DWQ.
3. c
IIIIIIIIIIII
Mahmm for sidewalks on be& fides ? Pvposed Hof Raldglz verit?+in8 flubs
4. -QV=Inft!
a. You are p mpoatng to spas the att+eaau on ftds pro jcct is four (4) sepanu loaadons.
1'leaaa pavW& a verdeal mu secdon *a# alsaws tba widmill distance fmm mwh
Span to each stream bank, tike strrarn oross-secdon, &* hdgbt of the span above the
attam and the mistipmtm dianoe fi>mt tau edge of inch footer to each dmam bank
for eseh oft'he faw locations.
5. Dffmo Flow R 'rrM...+rQ•
a. You have spbm ttod loved spreader wakdwets and nuWod tbot the level slmeader
is & lead 13 ft. per cfs for this ground covet; yet you haw indicated N/A for level
providing level swaidm ? dff= f?owflow, ??? ?? rare not
ceder wadi mt. , you we not regalmd to complete ]cviei
b. Pleasa psovido':tome deWls regps+dmg yetw P acnt mz&o .
a Ph=* provide a signed z d nOWimed Operuion& UWaWanzwe AF mnemt for
plan rcspond within dum (3) clays of the date of WA long by wading $v0 (S) oOpios of this
infoanation in writing. The EEp = Review Pro pmcea9 got reqt4w am Patties to
?Ic 4We ba a t m y manse:: U ft DWQ fcds the Bap= Review Pw Is the hx=red
?l?m for y'o'urper, t h e n are = A y b s n to tdtust your appticidon and baw it
=vkwod through am regular 401 Water Quality Car ficatian Program.
This lahar OWbr addresses tins a VHMOM raview axed does seat mitho= any impacts to wdiaads,
crafts or PtvLee26od buif+ m please be a m. dut any hapaots nvquestod wIfUh your app cation
are swat aaftdzed (at this time) by the DWQ Please call Cyulhia Van Der Male at (919) 715-
3473 if you ham my gtusdoaa tcgatcinz or woald kiss to sot up a meeting to discuss this mans.
CAN rcaroly,
401 Ov NEapress ReWow Permitting tlx&
CWcvdw
cm Koviu Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge RLL Raleigh, NC 27614
USAGE Rolm& RGgula tmy Fuld Office
DWQ Raleigh Re*onsl Office
Pilo Copy '
ckaml Files

rlzl Z-
to
/
loo
l ?i l /

J
? r

MEMORANDUM
TO: JOEL SMITH - GREENHORNS & OWARA
FROM: JENNIFER BURDETTE - S&EC i
SUBJECT: PARCEL J WETLAND SURVEY & IMPACT MAP
DATE: 2/22/01
CC: CHUCK STRICKI.AND - AAC
I met Amanda Tones of the US Arm Corps of Fmgineers i(USACM on the Parcel site 2/16/01 to
review the wetland delineation. Ms. Jones agreed with S&EC that the following weR:m- are nl._4t
jurisdictional: 188-193, 194-198, 181-187, 300-302, 303-306, 307-315, 316-323. 14s. Jones also
determined the channel identified b 200-205 is also not jurisdictional Therefore, these areas need
to be eted from the Impact ps. Also, it is not necessary to survey the broken stream channel
on Channel C. It was also not jurisdictional.
Also, we need to generate a wetland survey map suitable to use for the USACE to sign. Attached is a
sheet of the Requirements for Wetland Maps. Please use this information as a summary of what
needs to be shown on the wetland survey map. Remember to delete the wetland areas that the
USACE determined were not jurisdictional. This should be a completely separate map from the
Impact Maps that) have already seen.
Listed below are the corrections required for time Impact Maps and other information required for
the permit application.
1. I need some information explaining the purpose of the road and the future development
plans for the property. (I really need Chuck Strickland to give me a call to discuss the overall
purpose especially the fourth stream crossing)
2. The buffer impacts at each crossing must be 0-ompiled separately. For example, Impact A
for the first crossing, Impact B for the impacts to Zone 2 between the crossings, Impact C
for the second stream crossing, and Impacts D and E for the two remaining crossings.
3. It will look dearer if you leave the buffer areas open, rather than hatching.
4. The buffer impact in Zone 1 should go from fill slope to fill slope, while the impact in Zone
2 should only encompass the impervious areas (road pavement + sidewalks & curbs).
5. The future SS alignment should not be shown if you do not want to permit it yet I
r understand from Kevin that; due to the PCB contamination on the site, the client must
avoid disturbing stream sediments. Does that mean that they are going to bore and jack the
sanitary sewer crossings? If so, then.there would be no impacts. Also, I don't understand
why we show impacts for the SS on sheet 3 but not the other sheets.
6. The buffer needs to be shown around the pond on sheet 3 and the SS impacts need to be
quantified if it needs to be permitted now.
1

0
Q
V
Q r
? g -i93
Soil & Environmental Consultants, inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
O Phone: [phone] Fa= )919) 846-9467
Project Brier Creek/S&EC Project li: 3165
Date: 9/12/00
Preliminary wetland Approa:tmation
S.A.ble br pteimera 7 rs-i.& Ony
S&EC R.et+rs the right b modify this map bred a mane seid.eet,
*--7ed d.U-bons and uV ether add,6-4 iotwmatiou.
App- b-were mapped umg bpognph. maps and g--d Yvthi
K these areas are t. be used, they must U- pp, .d and
pttmated by the Uys. Amp drys ar 6tg:teers
llli)1)il?????
JU
.307-
315 ,

Maps and'dotaboses are public information supplied
by various government agencies. The author and/or
seller of the software program are in no way
responsible or Gable for the information depicted
herein. Inquiries concerning the data should be
directed to the appropriate government agency.
0
' LEGEND
C a Wetlands (Must be confirmed by USAGE)
Marginal wetland area (S&EC does not believe these areas meet the
criteria for jurisdictional wetlands; however, these determinations
must be confirmed by USACE)
Stream channel subject to Neuse Ri Al ? and uudec USAGE
jurisdiction (Must be confirmed by
/ n
r Stream channel under USAGE jurisdiction but W subject to Neuse
/ River Buffer (Must be confirmed byNGDWQ
a- u
Ma VUE
0 167 334 501 668 15.39
i , I SEP 5, 2000
Scale in Feet' sm!FF T
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact 1
1 10,455 3 31,365
2 7,405 1.5 11,108
Total 17,860 42,473
Impact 2
1 9,148 3 27,444
2 9,583 1.5 14,375
Total 18,731 41,819
Impact 3
1 9,148 3 27,444
2 7,841 1.5 11,762
Total 16,989 39,206
Impact 4
1 6,970 3 0
2 5,227 1.5 0
Total 12,197 0
Overall Total 65,777 123,498
- cone t exienos out su Ieet perpenaicular trom near bank of channel; "Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain impervious acreage There are three lots
within Parcel J located outside of the floodplain area that are planned for commercial
development. Once developed, each lot is expected to consist of 70-75% impervious area
However, the impervious area of the entire Parcel is estimated to be 41% based on preliminary
Page 10 of 14
June 3, 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 - Arco Corporate Drive, Brier Creek Corporate Center
Dear Ms. Karoly:
This letter is in response to a request from Mr. Brandon Plunkett with the John R. McAdams
Company concerning the City's cross-section requirements for the proposed Arco Corporate
Drive, which is currently under design as part of the proposed Brier Creek Corporate Center.
The construction of this proposed roadway entails several stream crossings, which are subject to
Neuse River Riparian Buffer protection. I understand that in preliminary discussions with your
office that a request was made to relocate a proposed sidewalk from the north side to the south
side of the street. Your office was also interested in reducing the width of the remaining graded
shoulder in order to avoid and minimize a linear Zone 2 impact along one of the streams.
Based on the anticipated traffic demand, the density of the proposed development, and to
encourage pedestrian connectivity and orientation throughout the project, the City is requiring
sidewalk to be provided on both sides of Arco Corporate Drive. In order to avoid and minimize
any buffer impacts, we have recommended reducing the berm width behind the curbline to 7 feet
and installing a 6-foot sidewalk along the back of curb where necessary. The slopes as proposed
behind the berm are currently at 2:1; we would be amenable to further reducing the impacts by
allowing the limited use of steeper slopes (15:1) or retaining walls where necessary. .
If you need any other information or have any other questions, please give me a call at
[phone] or email me at [e-mail]. .
_.Sincerely,...__.._._........._.....__....._....
Eric J. Lamb, PE
Manager, Transportation Services Division
Cc: Mr. Brandon Plunkett, PE - John R. McAdams Co.
Mr. Kevin Martin - Soil & Environmental Consultants
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREE 7 - PO,.:',' OFFICE Sox 590 • RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27602
,-ECVC-E:, i?APER
340
330
320
y1
E
N
I
a
v
to I
Lo
0
0
n
m
340
330
320
d
M
0
v
310 310
N
U
l6
n
11+00 12+00 13+00
BRIDGE #1-TYPICAL SECTION
® mmr N MC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FnENAIM- MC04030-TS CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
In,
e SCAM- = CHANNEL SECTION
°
??. 1"=4' RESEARCH TMMLZ PART, NC
??' 06-03-OS RALEIGH. NORM CAROLINA P .O. BOX 14006 ZIP YT700-coos
[phone]
340
330
340
330
320 320
ri
to
0
0
M
t0
CO
310 310
N
U
co
CL
16+00 17+00
BRIDGE #2-TYPICAL 18+00
SECTION

peolscr NO-
MC-040-30
BRIER CREEK
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
MC04030-75 CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
n.,. :_
40
.
V., 1

CHANNEL SECTION

?`°?"r°'°?/s°n`a"°?
=
4

06-03-05 RAIMGIL NORTH CAROIiA P.O. WX 1400 zip
09-
M
[phone]
350 350
340 340
3
H
d
0
v
0
320
y
U
l0
Q
320
, 23+00 24+00 25+00
L BRIDGE #3-TYPICAL SECTION

P"mcr xo. MC-04030
P MC04030-T$ BRIER CREEK
CORPORATE CENTER THE JOHN R. McADAMS
MCOMPANY.M.
SCAM H: 1 -=40 CHANNEL SECTION ZNGUMW/PLANNM/3URM0RS
:_ ,
V. i C
P
DA?&
06-03-05 RAIMGII, N011H CAMIMA P.O. WX 14003
ZIP
Y7709-4M
[phone]
380 380
370 370
f9
E
a
co
M
r
M
M
O
O
N
M
lD
360 360
350 350
38+00 39+00 40+00
BRIDGE #4-TYPICAL SECTION
raascr xa MC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. McADAMs
?ac'o o -TS CORPORATE CENTER CoaH??, INC.
SCAM H: 1 = CHANNEL SECTION
RALEIGH, NOMH CAROLINA r o xoz i4 np?N4M
wrs
M
06-03-05
(019) set-aooo ,
340 340
330 330
320 320
co
N
CM
N
O
O
M
(O
O
M
O
U
310 310
N V
N
CL
E
51+00 52+00 53+00
?PETLAND CROSSING (IMPACT #5)-TYPICAL SECTION

a r Na. MC-04030
nACO4o3o-rs
aw'L BRIER CREEK
CORPORATE CENTER THE JOHN R. MCADAM5
COMPANY, INC.
0
SCAM : __ 40
l'4' WETLM CROSSING -,?",?og'
RtSEARCIE
DAM
06-03-05 1 RAIMGH, NORTH CAROIINA P.O. BOX 14003 ZIP rr/09-4005
(aio) 381-mm
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES1
Level Spreader Length WA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 0.65 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.60 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter StriplBuffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 4.36
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 4.36
Filter StripBuffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method WA
IL REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cis for thick ground cover or grass or 100 It per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
XW No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
----- ---- Woperau6ri an-ft-difften n agr erereYil7isaU ed afer6srorr rez trorrrepafi. ---- -- --------
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
erect Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES2
Level Spreader Length NIA (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 0.99 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.94 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope WA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 6.76
Max Discharge to Level Spreader 6.76
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method WA
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Aaolicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
re-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
------
e ---- -in -- --es- annua -u -----erosi o -5_15 nveg- -_v_e.- e a - on -- repai - - - - - -- - - ---
opera on an mamenanceagreemen u . _r
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES3
Level Spreader Length NIA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 131 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.23 (on-site and off site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter StriplBuffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 8.90
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 8.90
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method NIA
If. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
4-PNlittere-Form Scour Hles are on flat slopes only
sructures are kxated in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
--------- e?p?rati?rnairtte-rs?ano?agreem??ttt?dtUae?ann?al-er-?si -i?ar c?veg?u?uort?`e?at . ------ --------
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
_ Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES4
Level Spreader Length NIA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.46 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.37 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope WA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 9.92
Max Discharge to Level Spreader 9.92
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method NIA
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
eveI spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
WNoorm n flat slopes only
ructures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
- ------ ---- - ---
a-tron and=rrrarnten?rrce agreemenYi?cdi7-de??rsnval?osibrrar??vegetauon re?pai-_--- --------------------
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
_Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person:. Ryan Akers 919-361-5000
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES5
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.37 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.51 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 9.40 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N/A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 It. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
leaf litter.
OFNo Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
tru ctures are k>cated in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
e operation an maintenance agreement ink u es annual erosion an vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers 919-361-5000
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES6
Level Spreader Length WA (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.00 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.60 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max Discharge to Level Spreader 6.50 ds
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation WA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method WA
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per ds in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
WNO structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
_ Plan details for the by amass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area..
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader system is defined as the bypass junction box, the level spreading slotted
drain and associated pipe and the bypass outlet pipe.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. Every six months:
a. Inspect the level spreader system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash
accumulation, vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that the full length of the level
spreader functions as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover,
mow vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as
needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.)
quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the level spreader system semi-annually using
cleanout structures at the end of each length of level spreader. Removed sediment shall
be disposed of in an appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not
adversely impact water quality (i.e. stockpiling near a stream, pond, etc.).
5. All components of the level spreader system shall be maintained in good working order.
6. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down
gradient erosion must be repaired and/or replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of
the seven maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with
the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than
50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the
president.
Page 1 of 2
Print name: Mr. Paul Hemdon
Title: President
Address: 8211 Brier Creek Parkway Suite 103
t, , a Notary Public for the State of
County of I, "? , do hereby certify that
Qcf. ?.? ?. r?l h personally appeared before me this -Z_ day of
&fc_ _ -a-v:>5 , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing wet
[wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
MARY KEW
SEAL
My commission expires_ R a p*'
Page 2 of 2
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE AUG-17-2005 WED 09:20
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 2/2
START TIME : AUG-17 09:19
ELAPSED TIME : 00' 201'
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
o?pp w?arEAGG
?l_JW\A Y
o?<
M?c?arl F. P ,kY. G
Mii-G Rena h. ga ,y
hrM a.di.. txPNIrOCm Cr F hcmmml and \o!unl xnan,nns
a r„d,_Pr rh,a?,ot
DW„xo. M W.-Qn1P}
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh: NC 27604-2260
btailing Address: 1650 WiI Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone 4: 919-733.0203
Fax [phone]
Fax To: Kevin Martin, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
AAC Real Estate Svcs. 704-295-4059
Subject: Brier Creek Corporaoe Ctr. Date: August 17, 2005
Number or pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
"I'hc origaprl wtL M scn{, Lhe mil If You bare uestiojL% Aem call Cynthia Van Der Ride 0 919-715-
3473.
aC10-. e'I D-Aw P.m gUna;
tC:) Md C.MM CMW. N"h," C.m .a?FSe-13m
=I C tth .DW-M. Sd4 7:r). wAt . tkM C.mb. arew
+bv: 914x33 I'M f..M 9197a5e,3!?Nemr[M1, ://tioer.mi nc W7 417,wy
An ewW CPPmVVilAff-M Ac &M",- CC% RH.-rtle6M Pwi Cmwcar Paw,
,?yal 1j
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE AUG-17-2005 WED 09:18
NAME : DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]

PHONE = 98469467
PAGES : 2/2
START TIME : AUG-17 09:17
ELAPSED TIME = 00'21"
MODE ' : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
OF WA7F9 MxWe1F erak.. 0,-vmm
P'i1Mm?i. Pns 11.. Serdan
Flant 1W1-NP'm'^?nf Pr.Nnxm?tr?a Nawai R<wvrx+
? -{ A4 W. F.Ihnrl C.E. Dim'1!R
O ? ui.ui?xwart.l>e=dry
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree 13oulcvard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Ccntcr
Raleigh, NC 27699.1650
Contactlnformation: Phonc#: 919-733-0203
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Kevin Martin, S&EC Fax #: [phone]
AAC Real Estate Svcs. 704-295-4059
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr. Date: August 17, 2005
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
T'+e or.:nal mill be siw in_Oe mail. if you hav-o q?esuo?s plea a call Cmthia Van Aer ?Vlele It 919-715-

4 0,0.- IF?n1c5 R__P_"VM
Ina,*I $imv![e char, %It-, N.rt Camk'.a 27D911*0
=I Cmddvn Dml . SAe Im A."I, aM 6mla I-
FT+ePIPr 11*IFO919-Idsmi Mkma.NtC/.T1o,ca.pNC.ec,.1?1TC?Yerian{?5
n*: 4C- i-
"ItUM!y
An aqA'. ?RgY?mM(AfimI1?N AttM 6n?tba-SRK RrladOr''0»Pca rMW+^YI Para
08/16/2005 15:08 FAX
i
10 001
Environmental Consultants, PA.
Road • Raleigh, Notih Carolin5 27614 • Monk-; (919) M6-5cW • Fax: O)V).) ;t404467
DATE; C) rJ _
TO; NAME: ? ac
COMPANY: J)i 1) 1
FAX NUMBER: h33 -(9 q?
Project Number:_ .`3?to. ll? 1
CC:t f? Lf`?
FROM; 4Gpy10KkArv _ SUB.IEC'T: y. r±tG Z + arm
The following items are being fax !d. Number of pages including transinittal sheet: to
For Your Comments/Approval
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Discuss
HARID COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight
_ For Your Information
Per Your Request
Please Call
_?Please Handle
_ Hand Delivery
+/ No Hard Copy Sent
REMARKS:,_ 8 iEC" e-mf;A J .
IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEM, WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT 2dh AT [phone].
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This leanstnission is intended only for the use 4 the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may culitain information that is
privileged and confidential. If the reader of-thi.. message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby natifird that any disclosure,
disvibtltibn or copying ofthis information is su-ictly prohibited. Il'yuu have rct:eived this transmission in error, please notify us
immttdiately by telephone and return the faxed dxuments to us at the above address via the United States festal Service.
CJ.I.',LLv31s.,t?f,tsS.: Grrcnsawxcflll.jt,c;
1?h Lel'hillih Court_ Stiite C ISf 1.1'. L.:nentl:+ll^ I?riti?
G.wtord. NC.' Crcrn"b++m. N? .' 459
I'liptic: r'71}4) %'U•V»l 17 Ph. nr: f ?if,7 540-S3 ;4
AUG-16-2005 TUE 13:33 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
FACSIMILE SHEET
FAX NO. (9,9) 846-9-fis7
09/16/2005 15:08 FAA
U 002
INITIAL LNTEREST [N PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
WITHIN THE 401 OVERSIT)E/EXPRESS PERMMI G UNIT
September 1, 2004
Version 3
Applicant Namc: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Applicant Address: c/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Cor.oorate Drive Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Applicant's phone number: 704 2!?5-400o Fax num 704 295-4059
Applicant's email address: b'ames d aacres.com
Consultant Name (if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Attn.: Mr. Kevin Martin
Consultant address (if applicable): 11010 Raven Ridge Road
R.alei&h, NC 27614
Consultant's phone number: 919 846-5900 Fax numb 914 846-9467
Consultant's email address: kmartin asandecxom
Type of action requested under the E.-press Review Program (check all that apply)-
Z 401 Water Quality Certification !?/Ceo
? Isolated Wetland Permit
? Riparian Buffer Approval
? Mitigation Plan
? Stream Origin Determination
# of Determinations Required
? Intermittent/Perenmal Determinations
# of Determinations Required
? stream ? wetland ? buffers (check all appropriate)
Name of Project: Brier Creek Corporate Center County: Wake
Total project acreage: * 110 (acres; Total built out impervious area: :? 50 (acres)
Nearest named stream (from USGS toi>o map): Little Brier Creek
Please provide a brief description of th is project (attach site plan if available):
Access road to serve proposed corporate center development. Meetings regarding this proiect have been
conducted with Debbie Edwards, John Domey, and Eric Kulz of DWO. A--previous 401 and buffer approval were
issued for this proiect (DWO EXP#05-0913)_. However, the road has been shifted at Impact #5 and will result in 0.06
acres of wetland impact of the 0.7 acre iMpg t previously approved (see attached maps)
RUG-16-2005 TUE 13:33 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
08/16/2005 15:08 FAX 10003
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey.
Location of project site - please incl- tde reference to the county, nearest naive town and highway number:
South of Highway 70. West of I-54C, and North of Lumley Road (SR 1645) in Raleigh, Wake CountyLNG
Proposed impacts:
0.06
0
0
0
Acres of 404 wetlands
Acres of isolated wetlands
Linear feet of streams
Linear feet of isolated streams
Square feet of protected stream buffers
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list
which ones. Yes, 10/31/2003 McKimmon Center
Has any DWQ staff visited the site?l"es, if yes, please provide DWQ staff name, Danny Smith & Matt Flynn and date
of visit: November and December 1917, and March 26, 2001
Which other environmental permits fi-om other agencies will be needed for this project'? Please list the permits and
issuing; agencies below:
Erosion Control, 404 Nationwide; Pen nit 14 (both already issued
Does this project require approval unrer the State Environmental Policy Act or National Environmental Policy Act?
No
Is this project an After-the-fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from DWQ?
No
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission? No
Are you aware of any local controversy, concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any
measures that have been taken with re :pest to public involvement.
No
This form must be submitted via email (c% 401 express(@ncmail.net), faxed (919-733-6893) or hand-delivered to the
Parkview Building, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the
Express Review Program will be notified via email or fax within 2 days. Successful applicants will then be instructed
regarding detailed procedures for full application (Please Note: Submittals of the review packages on Friday after
12:00 pm will be stamped as received (,n the next business day).
Please contact Debbie Edwards at 919-133-9502 if you have any questions regarding this form_
2
AUG-16-2005 TUE 13:33 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3
06/16/2005 15:09 FIX
Project fi Scale:
973165 1" = 2O0'
Project Date:
Ngr.: JAB M01
Figure 1
Location Map
Brier Creek Corpomft- Center
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
L000a
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
AUG-16-2005 TUE 13:33 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 4
08/16/2005 15:09 FAX
lQ 005
N.Y,n.MG
191 - I AAC04030o5f?,4 BPUER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER I BCOMPANY. INC
AUG-16-2005 TUE 13:34 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 5
xwrgccww4C?MC-0?070k.?tl? u•k+ImpwrW?C0ava0srn7.dwp.W112005 8,36; dAMAMoms, 1:1
08/16/2005 15:10 FAX
10006
X:4AroJar?L4ACV AGGad.' l algtmam UT ]actBAAM4=0 8M7 dw0.0G0112D0507:25:G8 AM, aken, 1;7
CCC ? +7Ir J) 1)
'-"''--• Ala ? a 4 I /
00
oo
0
?"'r JV
a ?n pN7J
X S ?C? V
- c
a l7 ? n 2 o
Cq MRS V o
y in r m5
V 4 n O
n
w? `
v
AAC-040 M7 = THE JORNR.MCADAMS
ffi "'t"" AACt7wl0-SM4 E;RIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, zNc.
'?'•" t'?40' UVPACT FKYii cxDtxeew./M+KnuylYnmrORD
RAIMOR. NOrW1 CAUOLD A ,wcurca 'au"°?r ruY, .?
N WM O.D. !DY ..um nr n}praDW
Q;1-15-t73 rJ OF 6 aut eu-eoDa
AUG-16-2005 TUE 13:34 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 6
7V
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
June 16, 2005
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
UT to Little Brier Creek [27-33-4-1, C NSW]
DWQ EXP # 05-0913
Wake County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions-EXPRESS
REVIEW PROGRAM
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.24 acres of wetlands, 35,721 square feet Zone 1, and
30,056 square feet Zone 2 of protected riparian buffers to construct the infrastructure necessary
to support future commercial development at the above-referenced site, as described within your
application dated April 13, 2005 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
April 13, 2005 and all additional information submitted and received by the DWQ on June 8, 13,
and 16, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 (GC3404). The Certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This
letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply
with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
N?ooitnhcarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10°/u Post Consumer Paper
rA
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 2 of 5
June 16, 2005
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Neuse Buffer Zone 1 35,721 (square feet Impact Exhibit, Sheet 6
Neuse Buffer Zone 2 30,056 (square feet Impact Exhibit, Sheet 6
404/CAMA Wetlands 0.243 (acres) Impact Exhibit, Sheet 6
2. Buffer Mitigation (EEP)
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area
of mitigation to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 123,498 square
feet as required under this Authorization Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B .0242 (buffer
mitigation rule). We understand that you wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet
this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method
to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0242(7) (buffer
mitigation rule), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements
under 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10) (buffer protection rule). Until the EEP receives and clears
your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no
impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be
contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. You have one month from the date of this approval to
make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes
payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to compensate for 123,498 ft2 of
required riparian buffer mitigation for impacts to 65,777 ft of protected riparian
buffers; 03-04-02 subbasin and 27-33-4-1 river."
3. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
1? if
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 3 of 5
June 16, 2005
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects,' including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.,
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
4. Protective Fencing
The outside wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with GC 3402.
5. Diffuse Flow (DWQ Reviewed Plans)
All stormwater on this project shall be directed as'diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
through the protected stream buffers and will not r?,-concentrate before discharging into
the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233(5)
In an effort to comply with the diffuse flow provision of the Buffer Rule (15A NCAC
02B .0233 (5)), you have provided the DWQ with plunge pool designs dated April 13 and
June 7, 2005. The DWQ believes that if implemented, as per these plans, diffuse flow
will be achieved. However, if diffuse flow as per 15A NCAC 02B.0233(5) is not
achieved, then the DWQ shall be notified and corrective actions to restore diffuse flow
shall be taken if necessary to impede the formation of erosion gullies. At no time shall
stormwater from the proposed development be piped directly through the buffer without
prior DWQ written authorization.
The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage
patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater
practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
Stormwater easements shall be recorded for a distance of at least 10 feet on each side of
all stormwater conveyances and on all lots containing these structures including future
access for maintenance. The stormwater easements shall allow for the ability to maintain
the structures, perform corrective actions as described above and shall-provide protection
of the structures from potential alternations by future property owners.
6. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division
of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control
program, an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 4 of 5
June 16, 2005
automatically issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be
discharged during land disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the
permit. If your project is covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that
disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the
sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements
are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
7. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
8. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
9. Water Quality Certification(s)
The proposed project must comply with all the conditions of general Water Quality
Certification (GC) 3404.
10. No Impacts to Zone 1
No impacts shall occur to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers (except for uses and
activities designated as "exempt" within 15A NCAC 02B .0233), unless otherwise
approved by DWQ.
11. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 /Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Brier Creek Corporate Center
' Page 5 of 5
June 16, 2005
10. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Qyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721 or
Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473 in the Central"Office in Raleigh.
i
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cbk/cvdw
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
NCEEP Notification
cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, 110 10 Raven Ridge Rd., Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050913BrierCreekCorpCtr (Wake)EXP+401NBR
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE JUN-17-2005 FRI 08:40
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE; : 917042954059
PAGES : 6/6
START TIME : JUN-17 08:38
ELAPSED TIME : 01'16"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
' `
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Govornor William G Ross, Jr., Set:Warq
Flan W. KMneh, P.t.. Director
EXPRESS PFERNUT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department, of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Streel Addt-?ss; 2:321 Crahtrcc F.oulavard, Suits 250
Raleigh. NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Scrvicc Certer
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contacttufirnvati"n: Fhoncl:: 919-7330203
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Kevin Marto j Fax #: &36-9467
AAC Rcal Estate Services 704-295-4059
Subject: Britx Creels Corp I rate Or. Date: June 16.2005
Number of pages including cover sheet: 6
1
Notes or special iustructious
The oria nai „ill he sort in the inad. L yott have questions please call Cynthia Van Der W iele at 919.715.3473.
I ?
.n,v4.a?cn«.nrn^rMn
1 34-0sm co ca,¦.. aanrxT crave s; -4;157 tine
-z? u>'>i+• aeu.:.,a rfe z:o. nvesn er.?n ca;,tro 71A4 Notth ?.al'ol ins
1laturally
AnEY'?Df?+??"'r.'n'Anwvaae+FnW?n,-??s: nfnroe ?wr „m¢, v¢oer
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE JUN-17-2005 FRI 08:38
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]

PHONE : [phone]
PAGES' : 6/6
START TIME : JUN-17 08:36
ELAPSED TIME : 01'23"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Ouality
M,;hwl F. Easley, Govemot Yri aem G. Hoss. Jr., Secretary
Wan W. Kfimek, PE, Dftc for
I
EXPRESS PERNIXT REVIEW PROGIL: Y[
Division of Water Quality
Department of En-,ironmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street 117-1: 2321 Crabirce Bonl;va:d. Suite `50
Raleigh. NC 27004-2 160
I
Mailing Arldi": 1650 Moml Service Ccn:er
Ralcigh, NC 27699-1650
i
Contact Information: Phone /r: 919-'33-0103
Fax 4: 919-733.6393
Fax To: Kevin Ntatiin Fax #: 84)-9467
AAC Real Fstato S?M=s '04-295-4059
Subject: Brier Creek Corjwrate Ctr. Date: Jute 16,1A05
Number of pages including ?cuver sheet: 6
f Notes or special instruction :
I
*Me oilginzA ufll be sent in tie m 1. If you have yuestio: s Pleme[ JI C;rothla Van Der Wiclz at 91u.11?.34J3
aCl vlole;r.Mm,MeJ1}rt
1!!J Nnl Frrt? 1%'?Y.?, R;,??S?, MR? f ,.?Ye 1*]F. IM1'O One
Nort>hCarroliina
oror:f'i:J11?K!F?k 9'4.11•ID9al?"Ymer ?!1t0.!A?Y•en._i•e.?. ?is.__J,•wl. ?V?{`LI[{I?`J
A• Eyel nrJVrA,?'itY•.ctl?v! 1? FnM[:w-Sb 9,.c?UeYl7n Fog :'XNm[• th(?
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #:
Fax #:
Fax To:
Subject:
Kevin Martin
AAC Real Estate Services
Brier Creek Corporate Ctr
Number of pages including cover sheet: 6
Notes or special instructions:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax #: [phone]
704-295-4059
Date: June 16, 2005
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone]! Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newet lands Natuna`/`//y
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmatroe Action Employer 50 /o Recycledll0 /o Post Consumer Paper
06/15/2005 16:45 F9.1 0 001
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
110 10 ka,,en F id;: Road - RaJeigh. North Carolina 27014 • Phone: [phone]?0) • Fax: (9191 X46-,).107
FACSIMILE SHEET
DATE; Project Number: W1
TO: NAME: :
?. e. cc:
w wN'.tiandLC.curn
i FAX NO. (.919) 846-9467
-T
COMPANY:0
r.) W LI?I?J
FAX NUXIBER: f .I ?
FRO ?.1? ??. r n SUBJECT-_1D
The following items are being faxc d_
For Your Comments/Approl-al
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Digcuhs
HARD COPY SEN".l':
US Regular Mail
Overnight
REMARKS:
Number of pages including transmittal sheet:
-?1?'or Your Information
Per Your Request
Please Call
Please Handle
Iland DeliVery
_ No Hard Copy Sent
IF YOU HAVE ANY R BLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT - IrA AT [phone].
*t:ONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This transmission is Intended only lbr the nse tf,tlle individual or entity t0 vvhich it is adch'essed and Inty COnfain inibi nratinn that is
privileged and confidential, lithe reader of thi6 message is nett the intended recipient, yotl are hereby nut'Ilied that any disclosure,
distribution or copying of this infortttation is srictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this transmission in error, }Tease rtutify us
i)urncdiately by t6ephone and return the taxed locuments to us at the shove address via the United States Pustal Service.
("IYnrlitnti: OIli?i?': (i!cciltiht?rri C111iCN;
1"t! 1XIIIillih COLItl, SUilC C' thl7 E L:al:nJ,tir 131iw
Cowtvi. NC ?\O'?] (;r<`ensht,rt't, Nl.' : 7.15.',
Pltt,nr: I7l4? 7,a)-'4'05 P
lav i'( !-1i''O_;)-0) Fax' i ±rt) 51U-NS_'.:5
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:12 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P
11 06/15/2005 16:45 FELT fa1002
Z5011 & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Plc ;e Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (9I9) 846-5900 • Fax: [phone]
www.5andEC.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cynthia Van Del" Wiele (DWQ)
FROM: Kevin Martin
RE: Brier Creek Corporate Center-S&EC Project #3165.W1
DWQ Exp No. 0--0913
The purpose of this brief memo is to respond to your 6/13/05 request for more
information. I will respond to your requests by the same numbering system in
your letter.
La. Q: Buffer Impacts. Please submit a revised PCN and impact maps.
A: The impa,,.t maps are the same as submitted in our 5/24/05
express s'.ibmittal. They were revised to reduce buffer impacts
from thos indicated in our 4/13/05 regular 401" submittal as
per DWQ requests during an office meeting. Also, as requested
by DWQ i1 a 5/31/05 letter, we revised page 10 of the PCN to
correct a: nath error and submitted it along with other
requested information to you on 617/05. Therefore, if page 10
of the 5/24/05 PCN submittal is replaced with the revised page
10 sent to you on 6/7/05, that PCN form and its attached
impact ex iibits should be current and accurate.
Lb. Q: Stream Impacts. Provide a signed jurisdictional determination
from the Corps regarding Andrea Wade's determination.
A: A signed j .>risdictional determination from the Corps is not
required f. or a 404 and 401 application and approval. However,
we have ray ceived approval of our 404 nationwide permit (copy
attached fond e-mailed to you on 6/14/05). This should be
adequate °-:vidence that the Corps concurs with our findings and
the information in our PCN,
Lhadoae O gg
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 38Qrocn3 17-$ QULQfkf_
ale Drive
Concord, 28025 Greeosboro, NC 27455
Pax: Phone: (704) (704) 7',220-094059406 PhOric: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:12 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
06/15/2005 16:45 FAX 11003
2. Q: Sidewalk requirements. It appears that buffer impacts can be
reduced.
A: The project engineer (Brandon Plunkett of The John R.
McAdams, Company, Inc.) has stated that he spoke with you
regarding this issue and has prepared the attached letter to
address.y.our question on this matter.
Hopefully you now have w.verything you need to issue this approval.
Attachments
Letter from The Jo'Zn R. McAdams Company, Inc.
USACE Nationwid+ - Permit Verification
JUN-15-2805 WED 15:12 TEL:[phone] HAME:DWD-WETLANDS P. 3
06/15/2005 16:45 FAY
vonxoicuua 14:35 r-AA 819 361 2239 JOAN R MCADAMS
U004
Q001/002
TIC .JOHN X McADANxS COMPANY, INC.
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
TO: Mr. Kevin Martin Fax No: 919 8a6-9467
TO, Fax No:
TO. Fax No:
TO: Fax No:
TO. FaX No:
FROM: Brandon G. Plunkett, PE
PROJECT: Brier Creek Corporate Center
JOB NO: AAC-04030
DATE: June 15.::005 NO. OF PAGES: 2
(I-Iusm cave) -~--
Hard Copy To Be Maile,j?. ? Yes I& No
REMARKS;
Kevin Please find the attached letter rrL arding the d1NQ submittal.
CC: _ Fax No:
CC: Fax No:
NOM If the following irn`ormation is not clear or if you do not receive all of the indicated
sheets, please notify our office immediately at [phone]. Thank you.
F[2
FOR INTERNAL USE ONL7:?=
Copy Facsimile Transmittal Only to File
Copy 9 its ire Document to File
] FAXING COMPLETE date: IniMAILINt- COMPLETE pate:__? IniCIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
PO BCX 14005 • RwAar0h TIUMgle Park, NC 27709 . (919) 361 • fax [phone]
wwwlo ldam&COm
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:12 TEL:[phone] NANE:DWQ-WETLAh4DS P. 4
06/15/2005 16:46 FAX
Vut -Luf zvva -Li-00 VILA Ulu Jul zzra JUHN R MCADAMS
Since 1979
TIE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
Research Triangle Pert(. NC
Post 0111ca Box 14005
Research Triangle Park.
NMI Cardirlp 27709
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durharn Will Ca-afin$ 27713
800.730-5646
919-361-5000
919-30-2269 Fax
Charlotte, NC
5311 Seventy-Seven untar Drive,
Guile M
Charioita Narth Carolina 2a217
flW7333.5646
704-5270800
704-57.7-2003 Fax
MEMORA 4DUM
June 15, 2005
To: Cy athia Van Der Wiele
From. Br-mdon Pimtk
RE: Brier Creek Corporate Center - AAC-04030
Cynthia,
10005
Q002/002
Per our discussion today, I am outlining the requirements set forth by the City
of Raleigh at tr meeting on May 17, 2004. In that meeting we discussed
reducing the typical section width for proposed Arco Corporate Drive to avoid
linear impacts ro the Neuse River stream buffers within the above referenced
development. Specifically, we requested that the City of Raleigh allow us to
relocate the sip lewalk from the north to the south side of proposed Arco
Corporate Drivs, and reduce the width of the graded shoulder remaining. This
would help eliminate the continuous impact to Zone 2 between impacts two
and three.
While meeting with City of Raleigh staff, we learned that due to the
anticipated dervity of development and the desire to encourage pedestrian
connectivity throughout the development, sidewalk is required on both sides
of the propose=d. road. The City is willing to eliminate the 3.5' utility strip
between the back of curb and the sidewalk in areas where it will help reduce
the impacts to vie stream buffers; however where the sidewalk is immediately
adjacent to the curb it will need to be 6' wide. The impact maps have been
revised to reflect these changes.
Please let me kiow if you have any further questions or need any additional
information regarding this issue.
Comprehensive Land Development Design services
www.johnrmcsdartu.tam We help our clients succeecl.
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:12 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
P. 5
I! 06/15/2005 16:46 FAL CJ446
- / L7 F1
y,U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WIMUNGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200520324 County: Wake USGS Quad: Southeast Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VtRIFIC,A.TION
Property Owner / Authorized i?gcnt: Mr. Barry James
Address: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates,LP
3800 Area Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone No.: 704-295-4000~
Size and location of property (Neater body, road name/number, town, etc.): The proiect Lite is located in
the northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and interstate 540, west of
Raleigh, Wake County, Nortib Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the placement of fill and the
installation of culverts associated with Brier Creek Corporate Center. See attached conditions for
mitigation requirements
Applicable Law: d Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USG 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number_
Nationwide Pei mit Number: 14
Your work is authorized by the :above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide and Special conditions, the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
conditions, and your submitted plane. Any violation of the attached conditions er deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the pcra-r ttee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain vat; d until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revokcad. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (is indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
.Management Act (CAMA), prior to b;ginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the ,Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding- this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulator-y program, please :ontactAndrea Wade at 919-876-8441 x30.
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:13 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 6
06/15/2005 16:46 FAX U007
Corps Regulatory Official Andrea Wade J'r?? Date: June 3, :005
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2007
-2-
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? Based on preliminary informs lion, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This }'preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appe al Process (Reference 33 CPR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not
to exceed five years from the cdatc of this notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 o:'the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USG § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notificatir n.
? The jurisdictional areas within he above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional letermination issued _. Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determinatic n: Areas on this site exhibit wetland criteria as described in the 1937 Coros
Wetland Delineation Manual and gi,- adjacent to Little Brier Creek. The property also contains stream channels that
exhibit an Ordinary High Water Mark as indicated by change$ in-,;oil cliaracter and absence or terrestrial vegetation
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date June 3,_2005
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELMAnON FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE ATTACHED TO TH,?s' FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Fumished:
S& Attn: Mr. Kevin Martin, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, ETC 27614
NCEEP, Attn: William A. Giltncre, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:13 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS F. 7
06/15' 12005 16:46 FAA
1. ,
L0008
Action ID: 200520324 County: Wake
SPECIAL PERNffT CONDITION
Recommended by the North C irolina. Wildlife Resources Commission:
1.. Permittee skull iuastall in-stream silt curtain weighted at the bottom, and stringent bank erosion
control. If tree removal i> required, stumps and roots should remain intact for bank stabilization.
2. Permittee shall initiate in- stream construction activities only during lore flow conditions that allow
for the effective deploym mt of the silt curtain,.
Permittee shall install silt fences and temporary check dams at all wetland and stream crossings to
be removed following co: npletion of the activity and proper stabilization of disturbed soils withiu
the work area.
4. Permittee shall seed wetland areas with wetland seed mixture only. Species selection shall be
subject to Corps approval,
Requiring on-site demarcation of wetland boundary:
Fenced boundaries
Permittee shall locate all wetland boundaries and identify them on site with the installation of temporary
;fencing (e.g., orange webbed trea-protection fencing). Markings on the boundary fmcin,g (or attached
flags) shall identify the demari;:ated area as a wetland. Demarcation of wetland areas shall be
accomplished prior to initiation of any impacts to jurisdictional areas (fill, mechanized landclearing,
culvert installation, etc.) authori2 ed by this permit. The fencing shall remain in place throughout the
duration of all construction actin ities associated with the project. The Corps of Engineers regulatory
project manager shall be contacted at least two weeks prior to removal of wetland botmdary fencing.
Requiring payment into the Ecc"ystem Enhancement Program:
You shall mitigate for 0.25-acre of riparian wetlands associated with this project by payment to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount necessary to perform restoration to 0.50-acre
of riparian wetlands in the Net se River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020200). Construction within
jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment with
certified check to the NCEEP, wJ the NCEEP has made written confmnation to the District Engineer,
that it agrees to accept responsibil.ty for the mitigation work required, pursuant to Paragraph N.D. of the
Memorandum of Understanding between the North. Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Coq,s of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4, 1998.
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:13 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 8
06/15/2005 16:46 FAX lao09
' Wcdands arc identified and delineated usi•ig the rrathods and critetia established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Mutual) (ix,,
occurcncc of hydrophytic vegetation, hydrie soils and wetland hydralcgy),
7ne tcrni "nijacent" means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring, Wetlands scpa-atcd from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikcss or
barriers, nahsal river berrns, beach dunes, ,md the like arc also adjacent

,APplicant: fames Brier Creek Corpoiate File Number: 200520324
Date: June 3, 2005
oil
Center Associates, LP
Attacbed is: See Section below
INITUL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
eimission
PROF'F'ERED PERMIT Staudarid. Permit or Letter of ermission $
PERMIT DENLA.L C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAI DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY RMISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
r
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT- You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT. If you received a Standard Pettit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a letter oi' Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Perwit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and condition,,, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You xnt ;t complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer- Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you vtrill forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your lettcr, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may. (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b;, modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the perirut
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section 8 below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT- You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and retulm it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of tare LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engincers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice-
C- PERMIT DEN)rA.L: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
JUN-15-2805 WED 15:13 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 9
06/15,,2005 16:47 FA.1
10010
APPROVED JURISDICTION.A L DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
vide new information.
F
AGCEPT: You do not need to notify t'te Corps to accept an approved JD_ Failure to notify the Corps vadiin 60 days of die date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: if you disagree with the approved JD, you may appe4 the appzoved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Sectiou, :Q of this form and sending the form to the division engiueer_ This form mast be received by
the division en. gi.neer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELLMINARY fURISDICTIO*TAL DETER MNATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Y reliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reaso:rs or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyse, to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Andrea Wade Mr. Michael Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road CESAD-ET-CO-R
Suite 120 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Raleigh, NC 27615 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
919-876-8441 x30 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
invest,, afions.
Date: Telephone number-:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
JUN-15-2005 WED 15:14 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 10
Subject: Re: Express Project 05-0913, Brier Creek Corporate Center
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:55:08 -0400
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <cynthia.vanderwiele @ ncmail.net>
CC: Debbie Edwards <debbie.edwards @ ncmail.net>
My vote is for S&EC to provide the signed JD, if I'm understanding the inquiry
correctly.
Cynthia Van Der Wiele wrote:
Thanks. I haven't found out from Cyndi if Jennifer Burdette's memo is
acceptable. I will write a 2nd "more info" letter. Been tied up with
stormwater bmp manual. C.
Debbie Edwards wrote:
Cynthia,
I have reviewed the additional information that was submitted June 8, 2005
for this Express project. I believe that they covered almost everything,
one question I have though (Cyndi, we need your advise here), do we want
to accept Jennifer Burdette's memorandum from when she was an S&EC
employee to Joel Smith, Greenhorne & O'Mara as verification that channel
200-205 is not jurisdictional. I would have to guess that S&EC has a
signed JD from the COE on this project from 2001, why can't Kevin submit
this? In the addendum for Express Review, Section VI, it is a check off
item, it clearly says "should be provided if available". I don't know if
you want to push this or not Cyndi, the only map we have that includes
jurisdictional calls is from S&EC (their preliminary map) and it includes
this as a jurisdictional channel but not subject to the buffer rule. The
only other issue I have is that the City of Raleigh's letter does imply
that the buffer impacts can be reduced, just not eliminated. We need
revised maps and PCN for these minimized impacts. Have a good weekend,
debbie
Subject: Express Project 05-0913, Brier Creek Corporate Center
From: Debbie Edwards <debbie.edwards @ ncmail. net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:24:25 -0400
To: "Cynthia.Vanderwiele° <[e-mail]>, Cyndi Karoly
<cyndi.karoly @ ncmail. net>
Cynthia,
I have reviewed the additional information that was submitted June 8, 2005 for
this Express project. I believe that they covered almost everything, one
question I have though (Cyndi, we need your advise here), do we want to accept
Jennifer Burdette's memorandum from when she was an S&EC employee to Joel
Smith, Greenhorne & O'Mara as verification that channel 200-205 is not
jurisdictional. I would have to guess that S&EC has a signed JD from the COE
on this project from 2001, why can't Kevin submit this? In the addendum for
Express Review, Section VI, it is a check off item, it clearly says "should be
provided if available". I don't know if you want to push this or not Cyndi,
the only map we have that includes jurisdictional calls is from S&EC (their
preliminary map) and it includes this as a jurisdictional channel but not
subject to the buffer rule. The only other issue I have is that the City of
Raleigh's letter does imply that the buffer impacts can be reduced, just not
eliminated. We need revised maps and PCN for these minimized impacts. Have a
good weekend,
debbie
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist III
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone]

O?0F W ATF9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q -? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 13, 2005
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
On June 8, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received the additional information
requested to supplement your application dated April 23, 2005 to impact 0.241 acres of wetlands
and 65,777 square feet of protected riparian buffers to construct the proposed Brier Creek
Corporate Center project. The DWQ has determined that this additional information is
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetland, streams
and/or buffers on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information:
1. Clarification of Stream and Buffer Impacts:
a. Buffer Impacts: Please submit a revised PCN and impact maps.
b. Stream Impacts: Please provide a signed jurisdictional determination from the
USACE regarding Ms. Andrea Wade's decision.
2. Sidewalk requirements: DWQ has received the letter from the City of Raleigh. It appears
that although these impacts cannot be eliminated altogether, the buffer impacts can be _
reduced.
Please respond within three (3) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) copies of this
information in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to
participate in a timely manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect
review program for your project, then we may have to return your application and have it
reviewed through our regular 401 Water Quality Certification Program.
401 Oversight/ E)press Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nye Caro ina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Acton Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
r

Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 2of2
June 13, 2005
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the-DWQ. Please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at (919) 715-
3473 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
C ?diKaroly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Rd., Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: \050913 BrierCreekCorporateCtr (Wake)EXP+ho1d2
Michael F. Easley, Governor
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #:
Fax #:
Fax To: Kevin Martin
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr.
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax #: [phone]
Date: June 13, 2005
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Natumlly

??MVY

? 200
JUN
June 3, 2005
( rl
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 - Arco Corporate Drive, Brier Creek Corporate Center
Dear Ms. Karoly:
This letter is in response to a request from Mr. Brandon Plunkett with the John R. McAdams
Company concerning the City's cross-section requirements for the proposed Arco Corporate
Drive, which is currently under design as part of the proposed Brier Creek Corporate Center.
The construction of this proposed roadway entails several stream crossings, which are subject to
Neuse River Riparian Buffer protection. I understand that in preliminary discussions with your
office that a request was made to relocate a proposed sidewalk from the north side to the south
side of the street. Your office was also interested in reducing the width of the remaining graded
shoulder in order to avoid and minimize a linear Zone 2 impact along one of the streams.
Based on the anticipated traffic demand, the density of the proposed development, and to
encourage pedestrian connectivity and orientation throughout the project, the City is requiring
sidewalk to be provided on both sides of Arco Corporate Drive. In order to avoid and minimize
any buffer impacts, we have recommended reducing the berm width behind the curbline to 7 feet
and installing a 6-foot sidewalk along the back of curb where necessary. The slopes as proposed
behind the berm are currently at 2:1; we would be amenable to further reducing the impacts by
allowing the limited use of steeper slopes (1.5:1) or retaining walls where necessary.
If you need any other information or have any other questions, please give me a call at
[phone] or email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,

Eric J. Lamb, PE
Manager, Transportation Services Division
Cc: Mr. Brandon Plunkett, PE - John R. McAdams Co.
Mr. Kevin Martin'- Soil & Environmental Consultants
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
RECYCLED PAPER
RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 - Brier Creek C...
Subject: RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 Brier Creek Corporate Center
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:43:12 -0400
To: "Cyndi Karoly \(DWQ\)" <[e-mail]>, "Debbie Edwards
\(DWQ\)"<[e-mail]>,
<[e-mail]>
CC: "Kevin Martin" <[e-mail]>, "Sean Clark"
<[e-mail]>
To All:
I spoke to Cynthia today. We will provide you a written response by
June
8th at the latest. Cynthia understands that it may be difficult to
get the
letter from the City by then, but we will provide as much
information as we
can.
- Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob zarzecki (mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:55 AM
To: Cyndi Karoly (DWQ); Debbie Edwards (DWQ);
[e-mail]
Cc: Kevin Martin; Sean Clark
Subject: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 - Brier Creek Corporate Center
Cynthia & Debbie,
We have received your letter requesting additional information
regarding
this project. We have forwarded your request to the engineer to
respond to
Items 3, 4 & 5. We anticipate that the letter from the City of
Raleigh will
take some time to get. Also, Kevin Martin is on vacation until next
week.
He is very familiar with the information requested in Items 1 & 2.
Given
these two issues, we do not anticipate that we will be able to
respond
within 3 days as requested within your letter. I spoke to Debbie
about this
and she felt that it shouldn't be a problem. We plan to respond by
next
Friday at the latest. Please let me know if this is not acceptable.
There
1 of 2 6/1/200512:22 PM
`RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913. Brier Creek C...
is no need to respond if it is acceptable. We appreciate your
consideration
in this matter and will respond as soon as possible to your request.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki
'Environmental Specialist
[phone] ext. 17
Fax [phone]
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is
intended only
for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential
information. This
electronic communication may not have passed through our standard
review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations
included
herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be
used for
final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the
consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee
,(s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication
is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in
error,
please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original
communication from your system. Thank you.
2 of 2 6/1/200312:22 PM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 31, 2005
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
On May 25, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April
23, 2005 to impact 0.241 acres of wetlands and 65,777 square feet of protected riparian buffers
to construct the proposed Brier Creek Corporate Center project. The DWQ has determined that
your application is incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The
DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected
wetland, streams and/or buffers on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application
as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may
continue to review your project.
Additional Information:
1. Clarification of Stream and Buffer Impacts:
a. Buffer Impacts: Within the submittal package there is a letter from DWQ dated
March 28, 2001 from Matt Flynn. This is a buffer determination letter and notes
that features A, B, C, and D are all subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The only
labeled map provided is an S&EC map dated September 12, 2000. This map shows
channel D to be flowing into channel C. Comparing your proposed road indicated
on the impact maps to the S&EC map, it appears that the road will run parallel to
channel D. Please include these buffer impacts in your revised PCN and impact
maps, or, provide any supporting documentation that shows this will not result in a
parallel impact. Please note: mitigation will be required for all road impacts other
than crossings of streams and other surface waters subject to this Rule.
b. Stream Impacts: Within the submittal package there is an S&EC map dated
September 12, 2000. This map shows a non-buffered channel flowing into channel
A just below channel B. Your application indicates a proposal to cross this channel.
Please include these stream channel impacts in your revised PCN and impact maps,
or, provide any supporting documentation that determines this is not a stream.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
?turally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Page 2 of 2
May 31, 2005
2. Required Riparian Buffer Mitigation: On page 10 of the PCN, the "Required Mitigation" is
not calculated correctly. Please re-calculate and submit a revised sheet 10 to DWQ.
3. Sidewalk requirements: Please provide a letter from the City of Raleigh verifying their
requirement for sidewalks on both sides of the proposed road.
4. Stream Crossings:
a. You are proposing to span the stream on this project in four (4) separate locations.
Please provide a vertical cross section that shows the minimum distande from each
span to each stream bank, the stream cross-section, the height of the span above the
stream and the minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank
for each of the four locations.
5. Diffuse Flow Requirements:
a. You have submitted level spreader worksheets and initialed that the level spreader
is at least 13 ft. per cfs for this ground cover, yet you have indicated N/A for level
spreader length. Please clarify your diffuse flow provisions. If you are not
providing level spreaders for diffuse flow, you are not required to complete level
spreader worksheets.
b. Please provide more details regarding your Pre-treatment method.
c. Please provide a signed and notarized Operation& Maintenance Agreement for
these facilities.
Please respond within three (3) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) copies of this
information in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to
participate in a timely manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect
review program for your project, then we may have to return your application and have it
reviewed through our regular 401 Water Quality Certification Program.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at (919) 715-
3473 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
A 9"
,_Ar- I tolt_6
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Rd., Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050913 BrierCreekCorporateCtr (Wake)EXP+hold
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAY-31-2005 TUE 15:41
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 3/3
START TIME : MAY-31 15:40
ELAPSED TIME : 00'37"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
klichmi F. Eas ey, Governor Wiliam G. Ross,.I:., Sxrntay
Alan W. KRrek. P.P.. Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
btailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699.1650
Contact Information: Phone [phone]
Fax N: 919-733-6393
Fax To: Kevin Martin Fax #: [phone]
9AC Rcal Estate Scti ices 70,4.295-4059
31
Subject: Brier Creek Cotporate Ctr. Date. May i$, 2005
Nutuber of pages including cover sheet: 7 3
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wicle at 919.715.3473.
rax uo? sr r;mx?. wohan. a?w cmin z: ,ESneso
Lim
250. r+a4t'.i"r-.1.2750, Nort7h?yCYIl/arollina
P!OM'91P'?Y!:SB/FA79tATi}fi9a31'M54?5L M!P:'?T n rn awv- LW -N?1aLly
An m?rf O'Jpt'MYy!AM;ni:Nn Amen Empbyw-x+. Payq,Nl(rb F-C?.Lmela- '
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAY-31-2005 TUE 15:39
NAME DWQ7-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 3/3
START TIME : MAY-31 15:38
ELAPSED TIME : 00'40"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
i
kv X_ WA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ras, J!., Secretary
Alan W. Orrek, P.E.. Dirwor
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Depsu'tment of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street.lddre= 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, State 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Addrrrs: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone 1,: 919-733-0203
Fax lr 919-733-6893
Fax To: Kevin Martin Fax tt: 846-9467
AAC Real Estate Services 704-295-4059
31
Subject: [trier Creek Corporate Ctr. Date: May y Z4t, 2005
Number of pages including cover sheet: -2 3
Notes or spedal instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
+vo-.M??s.'n„a+.,,wwnao.nc. ar 'GO one
2u,(:=3.4.a.,.G,; 23 P,a,,,N, W,?? -S. No Carolina
ore+e? a,a?-mn r cAZ e?arnrpm ? r,r-a??T?.xc?s„1;.r+ o ?ia.os /??uta //, ,
M Gael JVVOe»{'A?Irro'.tioHMn E*.kyr-5a'b RecpoAY '4 VCS: CenWmerVg [? Ui/
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #:
Fax #:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax To: Kevin Martin
AAC Real Estate Services
Subject: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr
Number of pages including cover sheet: -0 3
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: [phone]
704-295-4059
31
Date: May i$, 2005
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
vorthCarolina
Aawally
- .___._ ---- ------ _ -- - -- _ L. __ ..
vv\
t4

,

?IA

Pgr-A

`>JY ?
....Y 'l?
4;n)'M
>F
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200520324 County: Wake USGS Quad: Southeast Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFIC?k- ION - -------;
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. Barry James
Address: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates, LP - 8 2005
3800 Arco Corporate Drive ji
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273 Ij
Telephone No.: 704-295-4000
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The project site is located in
the northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540, west of
Raleigh, Wake Countv, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the placement of fill and the
installation of culverts associated with Brier Creek Corporate Center. See attached conditions for
mitigation requirements.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide and Special conditions, the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior, to, beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permiace of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrea Wade at 919-876-8441 x30.
Corps Regulatory Official Andrea Wade Date: June 3, 2005
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2007
-2-
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not
to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
? The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
i Please reference jurisdictional determination issued _. Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: Areas on this site exhibit wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corns
Wetland Delineation Manual and are adjacent to Little Brier Creek The property also contains stream channels that
exhibit an Ordinary High Water Mark as indicated by changes in soil character and absence or terrestrial veeetahon
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date June 3, 2005
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
j? S&Y.C Attn: Mr. Kevin Martin, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, N`C 27614
NCEEP, Attn: William D. Gilmore, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Action ID: 200520324 County: Wake
SPECIAL PERrvHT CONDITION
Recommended by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission:
1. ` Permittee shall install in-stream silt curtain weighted at the bottom, and stringent bank erosion
control. If tree removal is required, stumps and roots should remain intact for bank stabilization.
2. Permittee shall initiate in-stream construction activities only during low flow conditions that allow
for the effective deployment of the silt curtain.
3. Permittee shall install silt fences and temporary check dams at all wetland and stream crossings to
be removed following completion of the activity and proper stabilization of disturbed soils within
the work area.
4. Permittee shall seed wetland areas with wetland seed mixture only. Species selection shall be
subject to Corps approval.
I
Requiring on-site demarcation of wetland boundary:
Fenced boundaries
Permittee shall locate all wetland boundaries and identify them on site with the installation of temporary
fencing (e.g., orange webbed tree-protection fencing). Markings on the boundary fencing (or attached
flags) shall identify the demarcated area as a wetland. Demarcation of wetland areas shall be
accomplished prior to initiation of any impacts to jurisdictional areas (fill, mechanized landclearing,
culvert installation, etc.) authorized by this permit. The fencing shall remain in place throughout the
duration of all construction activities associated with the project. The Corps of Engineers regulatory
project manager shall be contacted at least two weeks prior to removal of wetland boundary fencing.
Requiring payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program:
You shall mitigate for 0.25-acre of riparian wetlands associated with this project by payment to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount necessary to perform restoration to 0.50-acre
of riparian wetlands in the Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020200). Construction within
jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment with
certified check to the NCEEP, and the NCEEP has made written confirmation to the District Engineer,
that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, pursuant to Paragraph IV.D. of the
Memorandum of Understanding between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4, 1998.
'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e.,
occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology).
2The term "adjacent" tneans bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or
barriers, natural river betr as, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.
r1iv? ? s-ry ?' ?
?r -t?,`?, ,_
tt O1'Il'<)I?? As?I)I'RC?C 1,??
?1'j'E
?Zt1? L?l ?I)tll?`ISTR ?TLVh'
N011FIC
{
,
t
,
??
? S f }i, ? f 1{ 1 - ? r
RPQ,t IF ST'FOK . ?E'PT-A
5
'f
Applicant: James Brier Creek Corporate File Number: 200520324 Dater June 3, 200
Center Associates, LP
See Section below
Attached is: A
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B

PERMIT DENIAL C
D
Y APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTl01?'l -The following tdeiitiEes yourrights alyd options rcgardiltg an administrative. appeal of the above
decision: Additional Iinforrilationmay befoundavhttpf/ltvvvw<ttsacc ariny"mil/inet/fu>TCtions/Gw/cecwolre? or
;
s.reaukAtions_ at 3; -fFRZ PArt 331.. . _ _ .
A- INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
Your signature
t the LOP and your work is authorized.
.
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accep
ndard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
St
h
e
a
on t
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
or you will forfeit your right to appeal
notice
f thi
d
h
f
,
s
ate o
t
e
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days o
the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
our letter
t of
recei
U
f
i
,
y
p
pon
uture.
n the
the permit
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
i
i
neer
ct eng
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the distr
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
and waive all rights to appeal the
it in its entirety
h
,
e perm
on'the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept t
dictional determinations associated with the permit.
i
d
jur
s
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approve
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
completing Section u of this form
ess b
l Pro
i
A
y
c
ve
ppea
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrat
form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
Thi
i
neer.
s
and sending the form to the division eng
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section Il of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.

i ?60 Forsyth Street-, Room 9M15
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and Nvaive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this fonn and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
TIOi?i II, REQUEST:-FOR APPEAL or OBJBC-IONS-TO AN INEFIALTROFFERED I ERMIT
.SEC
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
P0110OF.CONIACT.FOR. ? LIES IONS ORINFURMA?IOI`
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Andrea Wade Mr. Michael Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road CESAD-ET-CO-R
Suite 120 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Raleigh, NC 27615 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
919-876-8441 x30 Atlanta, Geor 'a 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations...,_
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
j
i.
f°'s""" is ."?
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Fri
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200520324 County: Wake USGS Quad: Southeast Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERMCA,-T-19N -
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. Barry James i !
Address: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates,LP
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone No.: 704-295-4000
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The project site is located in
the northern quadrant of the intersection of.Lumlev Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540, west of.
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the placement of fill and the
installation of culverts associated with Brier Creek Corporate Center. See attached conditions for
mitizTation requirements.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide and Special conditions, the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrea Wade at 919-876-8441 x30.

Corps Regulatory Official Andrea Wade --? Date: Junc 3, 2005
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2007
-2-
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not
to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
? The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued-. Action lD
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: Areas on this site exhibit wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps
_Wetland Delineation Manual and are adjacent to Little Brier Creek The property also contains stream channels that
exhibit an Ordinary High Water Mark as indicated by chanzes in soil character and absence or terrestrial vegetation
Corps Regulatory Official: ` Andre
Date June 3, 2005
I
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
t--SIE,C, Attn: Mr. Kevin Martin, 110 10 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
NCEEP, Attn: William D. Gilmore, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
i
1
r
Action ID: 200520324 County: Wake
SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITION
Recommended by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission:
1. Permittee shall install in-stream silt curtain weighted at the bottom, and stringent bank erosion
control. If tree removal is required, stumps and roots should remain intact for bank stabilization.
2. Permittee shall initiate in-stream construction activities only during low flow conditions that allow
for the effective deployment of the silt curtain.
3. Permittee shall install silt fences and temporary check dams at all wetland and stream crossings to
be removed following completion of the activity and proper stabilization of disturbed soils within
the work area.
4. Permittee shall seed wetland areas with wetland seed mixture only. Species selection shall be
subject to Corps approval.
Requiring on-site demarcation of wetland boundary:
Fenced boundaries
F
Permittee shall locate all wetland boundaries and identify them on site with the installation of temporary
fencing (e.g., orange webbed tree-protection fencing). Markings on the boundary fencing (or attached
flags) shall identify the demarcated area as a wetland. Demarcation of wetland areas shall be
accomplished prior to initiation of any impacts to jurisdictional areas" (fill, mechanized landelearing,
culvert installation, etc.) authorized by this permit. The fencing shall remain in place throughout the
duration of all construction activities associated with the project. The Corps of Engineers regulatory
project manager shall be contacted at least two weeks prior to removal of wetland boundary fencing.
Requiring payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program:
You shall mitigate for 0.25-acre of riparian wetlands associated with this project by payment to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount necessary to perform restoration to 0.50-acre
of riparian wetlands in the Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020200). Construction within
jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment with
certified check to the NCEEP, and the NCEEP has made written confirmation to the District Engineer,
that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, pursuant to Paragraph IV.D. of the
Memorandum of Understanding between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Axmy Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4, 1998.
,
'Wetlands arc identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e.,
occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology).
=The term "adjacent" means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or
barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.
# e ?i
NOI,fI I( 1?1IU CAE ?D?Ii ??S P1Z?11Vi ??l'I'L ?t Clt'i'1<)N? -??I) t'?ZQC F,Sti ?hU it w rn ?,?
REQI ?E S?CTCIIZ;PP[°aL '; "rt ?r { k
Applicant: James Brier Creek Corporate File Number: 200520324 Date: June 3, 2005
Center Associates, LP
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
ermission
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION'?',1 A fotto*v ng.identiftes your 60its at ?i dptfoi?s rc arding an administrative appeal,of the above
decision: Additiolial information maybe foi>nd-,at http //? Ww tisace army mil/inet/ functions/exx/ceewo/red or
Coi"'s:re??lalions at 33 CERPart,331:: ;. - ;;` ,
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B:' PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section H of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 davs of the date of this notice.

?????` ?60 Forsyth Street, Room 9NIL5
W APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DlJ•1h M11vA11V.N: T Ou rtlay ac ?cY? vi ayk.. µ..., err- -- -- --
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all sights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: if you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SEGTIQN II REQUEST. FOR,,, APPEAL or OBfE.CTIQNS T.Q AN-I.NiTI.AL PROFF$RED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has detennined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINTOF,CONTACTOR. UESTIONS'ORiNI4RIylATION
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Andrea Wade Mr. Michael Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road CESAD-ET-CO-R
Suite 120 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Raleigh, NC 27615 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
919-876-8441 x30 Atlanta, Geor 'a 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
RiLnature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
( 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
.. ...
/ ...
117
Rrar m n? nRadt aYC RM1O" : ' S d ;1
?t
- BRM CREDO WETLANDS - Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc a Y
t.
?-: UR+R.7
? CREEK PKASE 2
onneu +a ?Rn - noio R..w Rid,e ROd R?Iey?NN Cada:)611 n .ryigeadsom r..: ?oiv7tuo?e
v..a r.R ...s.dec® '

f.`.
:r l
11

J=tl
/ S
V , 11

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight & Express Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604 (?? M y
Re: Additional Information - Express Review Program D t9 ? v 1Il I
V
Brier Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J)
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina ;JUN g
DWQ EXP No. 05-0913
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Dear Ms. Karoly: WE"" AND 8TORmWATER BRANCH
We have received your letter dated May 31, 2005 requesting additional information in order to process our client's
application revised and submitted to DWQ Express Review on May 24, 2005. S&EC, PA has worked with the
engineer (John R. McAdams) to obtain the information that you have requested and has provided this information
within this letter and supplemental information. Please contact us if you require any additional information or
would like further clarification on the information provided.
Additional Information:
L' Clarification of stream and buffer impacts.
a. Please note that the map (see attached) associated with the buffer determination letter from Mr.
Danny Smith dated June 12, 1998 does not depict a stream in the upper reaches of drainage
containing Channel D. As such, we believe that any feature within this drainage and the
boundaries of the map approved by Mr. Smith in 1998 should be considered exempt from the
Neuse Buffer Rule. However, we do concur that any intermittent or perennial stream south of the
map approved by Mr. Smith and identified within the area evaluated by Mr. Flynn would be
subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule.
I evaluated the feature on June 7, 2005 and determined that the channel is an ephemeral stream
and should be exempt from the Neuse Buffer Rule. As such I intend to appeal Mr. Flynn's
determination. In the interim and as not to delay the approval of this application, we will assume
that the channel located south of Mr. Smith's 1998 determination is subject to the Neuse Buffer
Rule. However, the stream appears to be greater than 50 feet from the clearing limits associated
with the proposed road (see attached map depicting the location of the proposed road, Channel D
and associated buffers) and as such no impacts will occur to the buffers associated with this
stream.
b. Please refer to the attached memorandum from Jennifer Burdette, S&EC to Joel Smith,
Greenhorne & O'Mara dated February 22, 2001 (see attached and USGS map). This channel
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: -[phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
June 7, 2005
S&EC Project # 3165.wl
June 7, 2005
S&EC Project #: 3165.w1
Page 2 of 2
was determined not to be a jurisdictional water by Amanda Jones of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE has recently verified that she will abide
by the determinations previously made by Ms. Jones. This channel does not appear on either the
USGS map or soil survey and is therefore not subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule.
2. Required riparian buffer mitigation:
We found a mathematical error in determining the amount of mitigation required for Impact 1.
We assume that this is the calculation error that you are referring to. Please find attached a
corrected copy of Page 10 of the application.
3. Sidewalk requirements.
Please refer to the attached letter from the City of Raleigh dated June 3, 2005.
4. Stream crossings:
Please refer to the attached vertical cross sections from the engineer, John R McAdams.
5. Diffuse flow requirements:
a. Please refer to the revised Level Spreader Worksheets.
b. Please note that no pre-treatment devices are proposed for level spreaders. The engineer has
chosen to use the pre-formed scour hole option described within the DWQ Draft Level
Spreader Design Options Version 1.0 document dated October 10, 2001.
c. Please find attached the requested operation & maintenance agreement.
Please call me if you need further explanation of the information provided.
Sincerely,
Kevin Martin, PWS, N.C.LSS
Executive Manager
Attachments: DWQ Request for More Information
Neuse Buffer Determination Map, Approved by DWQ in 1998
Channel D Map
February 22, 2001 Memo & USGS
Page 10 Revised
Raleigh Letter, June 3, 2005
Vertical Cross Sections (n=5)
Level Spreader Worksheets (n=6)
O&M Agreement
08/01/2005 08:05 FAX [phone] AAC REAL ESTATE SvC qMuuJ/uV4
MY-31-^aM 15:41 FROM:MI-WETLANDS 919T3369?i TO:91 892964059 P: z'3
OP W r qo Bfidad F BUfty, OpvwW
WMhM
Sawsh"
arami??i"
AIMW. KIem*,P.L UMW
L1t?Lle.etvKgvQwtiy.
May'3l, 2005
DWQ R" No. 05-0913
Wake Comity
CERTIFIED MAIL: RZTURN RECRM R2DQUESTED
Bda Creek Corporate Centw
Clo AAC Red Services
3804 Arco Corporato Drive
Cbmlotte, NC 28273
Subject ?rgxrty: Arhw Greek Corpor'ste Center
MUM FOR MOI;M INFORM,ATION-BJIGPWMJUFi? W PROGR"
O» May 25, 2005, the DlvWon of Water Quality (DWQ) received your appbast m dated Apni
23, 2045 to impad 0.241 aces of wetlands and 65,777 agnate fed cf protected rip Ulan burl acs
to crostn ct the: proposed B= Creek Corporate Center prof ext. 78a DWQ has dateemmcd &d
YOM appbCatiam is inc=Vlon and/or provided i mmurats mftvxdm as discussed below The
DWQ will requdne additional iofonmatlan in order to proves ynvr appiicadou to impact protected
wrr d, streams and/or b of a-- = tbo PuMe d property. The=fts, unless we receive the
additional izilm naboa rcquQ W below, we will have to move toward dedd of yaw application
as raeltlIIcd by 1SA NCAC 2H M06 and wHI place this project on hold as incomplete tmrf we
receive tbis ¦ddid mal infor madam Please: provide the foHowb v iofom adan 8o tbtd wo may
toatlaue to MiCOV YOW psojaat.
1. Clatiilcation of Stream sod Boor Impacts:
a. : Vitbtn the submittal pwimp fhcre is a letter fivm DWQ dates
March 28, 2001 from Matt My= This is a buff= dct mural Icuw and notes
that featucns A, A C, and D area all subject to the Nmw l ea Rules. Tb,e OWY
labeled tarp provided is as S&EC rasp dated Sapbembsr 12, 2000 IUD maW ahowa
channel D tQ be flowing Into Channel C. Compaing Y= proposed =d 3ndlcated
on the impact maps to the s&BC map, it appom that do road will run parslkl to
chtmmoi D. Pleases. include then bak impacts in your remised PCN and impact
maps, or, provide any mqVmft doe on dW shows this will not result m a
punU.el impwL Pleesm mote: mitigaflou will be required for all rvad impacts allot
than crossings of streaans and otbe= xmfhce watpas subject t4 tb3s Rule .
b. %mm 1=: Within the mbndttel ywksw iffim is an S&EC asap dams
September 12, 2000. This map s'hom a nom ad channel flowuag into ehaane•1
A Jost bdow dba nd B. Yaw applia idoxx uAcaoes a propowd to cross figs chaimel.
Moan hugade them swcum Obaffiel impacts in your revised PC,N and umpsoc map,,
or • proms any 8 docwnuWxdann thA determinas Ibis is not a sl>no M
4ot napc.a. unx
iMMdit io OzW,EWd^ treaa?aso -
ettt t7abU?. saswe4 aeasw Rw?r, NwM CMft 9W4
PI+a+K itocZw?s=Ax 1k1KtMk
An 9wOppPknWAXweeieAaIc fi pbVw-w%tagm WQ%MI0, err W
UD/1!1/ZUU6 YO:Ua KA3 7Y4=8D4U*V Al1V.am" &OAAAD .7.v
MIRY-31-2505 15141 FRQMipM-NETI.FNDi 9197=6M
70:917042934M Pe3.13
Brier CrM* Corporate Cantor
Pgpe 2 012
MIN 81.2005 HIRWIn ' : Ch pass 10 Of dtp PCN, the " Requ bed Mitigsaw is
3. not caleulaw cotmctly. PleasstO-C9CWAte and subs* a xvisW sheet 10 to DWQ.
Please puovide a letter finml t2iie City Of Ralelgb vexitying tliebr
requiimYt,omt ft sidewane s on both sides of the proposed toad.
Stream Chadn&M.
IL YOM MMO proposing to span the stt+sam on this project in four (4) separate locations.
Pleaaa provide a vertk al croso sermon that shows the mirdazum diaduce fmin each
span to each sh bank the 11, P em an on, the heigbt of the spas above the
stream and the miidnum distazoe f = the Wip of each footer to each afream bank
for each oft'he four locations.
5. Dffma Flamm Kgnt eem
a. You have nbsnittod level spreader wodubeet: sad butislod that the Iwd spreads
is d least 13 & per efs for this groom cover, yet you have indicated N/A for levoi
spreader length. PI=w clm* your d ftm flow provisions. If you are not
providing lay eil spreadeda for diffim flaw, you are not required to complete 1avel
gnaadarwc*ftdL
b. Plessa provida more details repidnng yore PnAreaftwU madtod.
c. P a sigocd aMd aatadzed Operation& MaMtwance Ag=wart for
P+OWrespond withintht= (3) days of *a data of 93h letter byenadinS five (5) eopies of"
1010 action is wnt u i& The Raptesa Roview Prop= is a proam that xwqabea ail patties to
partidp82e la a timely manner. If the DWQ feats die Express Revie w Propwn is the iac nod
review Pa'oim for Y= Pmt then we =Ay Bove to r+a = your sppHadotn and bane it
wdmod through am regvlm 401 Water Quality Certificagon Program.
This letter oW y addresses *a sWioatioet review ad does not mnho= any hgmcts to wetlands,
wakes of PtOteaGod buffer Please be xrv= that any fiopoM requested witbla your applieaties
no nut a ftmized (at this time) by to DWQ. Please call Cyndda Van Der Wide at (919) 715-
3473 if you have wy questions rrgiud = or woald lie: to sat up a mating to discuss this waver.
Sinc
4rIA erely, '
Cytrdl. Karoly,
401 OvamISMEapress Rmiew PamAtting Unit
CMVcvdw
aC: Koviu Mactiu. SMq 11010 Raven Riudp Rd., Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Ralcgb Rregulatmy Field Office
DWQ Raiuigh RcSiomal Office
Fite: COpy
C ofral Files
1<ti? owns (WAkOVQ4"M
MEMORANDUM
TO: JOEL SMnH - GREENHORNS & OWARA
FROM: JENNIFER BURDETTE - S&EC
SUBJECT: PARCEL J WETLAND SURVEY & IMPACT MAP
DATE: 2/22/01
CC: CHUCK STRICKLAND - AAC
I met Amanda Tones of the US Army Corps of EnWineers (USACE) on the Parcel j site 2/16/01 to
review the wetland delineation M. Jones agreed with S&EC that the foll owing wetlan are nal
jurisdictional: 188-193, 194-198, 181-187, 300-302, 303-306, 307-315, 316-323. Ms. Tones also
deter-lined the channel identified by 200-205 is also not jurisdictional. Therefore, these areas need
to be deleted from the Impact Maps. Also, it is not necessary to survey the broken stream channel
on Channel C. It was also not jurisdictional.
Also, we need to generate a wetland survey map suitable to use for the USACE to sign. Attached is a
sheet of the Requirements for Wetland Maps. Please use this information as a summary of what
needs to be shown on the wetland survey map. Remember to delete the wetland areas that the
USACE determined were not jurisdictional. This should be a completely separate map from the
Impact Maps that I have already seen. 1
listed below are the corrections required for the Impact Maps and other information required for
the permit application.
1. I need some information explaining the purpose of the road and the future development
plans for the property. (I really need Chuck Strickland to give me a call to discuss the overall
purpose especially the fourth stream crossing.)
2. The buffer impacts at each crossing must be compiled separately. For example, Impact A
for the first crossing, Impact B for the impacts to Zone 2 between the crossings, Impact C
for the second stream crossing, and Impacts D and E for the two remaining crossings.
3. It will look clearer if you leave the buffer areas open, rather than hatching
4. The buffer impact in Zone 1 should go from fill slope to fill slope, while the impact in Zone
2 should only encompass the impervious areas (road pavement + sidewalks & curbs).
5. The future SS alignment should not be shown if you do not want to permit it yet. I
.,; understand from Kevin that, due to the PCB contamination on the site, the client must
avoid disturbing stream sediments. Does that mean that they are going to bore and jack the
sanitary sewer crossings? If so, then.there would be no impacts. Also, I don't understand
why we show impacts for the SS on sheet 3 but not the other sheets.
6. The buffer needs to be shown around the pond on sheet 3 and the SS impacts need to be
quantified if it needs to be pernritted now.
1

I

0
Q
307
315,

icf
Soil & oven Environmental C Raleigh, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge e Road, , Raleigh, , North Carolina 27614
O Phone: [phone] Fat [phone]
Project Brier Creek/S&EC Proiect C 3165
Date: 9/12100
Prelimianry Wetland Approaiaiation
Suitabk for P,dminarr r--Uog 0n1y
S&= teaerres the right to s 14 this -p based b mwe fieM.?aric,
-led delineations and any other additiond mf-tbs
App-b- were mapped a.ig wpographk maps and g-" tn[hing. be -d. they O If u pcrmrtted- by the U Arse tarps Eb.i-- -4
4 g4
z, 17i t4I • (?i,
LEGEND J
Wetlaids (Must be confirmed by USAGE)
f 2 s Marginal wetland area (S&EC does not believe these areas meet the
nation s
t
d
ermi
e
criteria for jurisdictional wetlands however, these
must be confirmed by USAGE)
• ) and under USAGE
Stream channel subject to Neuse River B
?
, E
C
jurisdiction (Must be confirmed by
: subject to Neuse
Stream channel under USAGE jurisdiction but W1
r River Buffer (Must be confirmed by NGDWQ)
O
YAM

Maps and databases are public information supplied
by various government agencies. The author and/or
?
seller of the software program are in no way 0..? ?
responsible or liable for the information depicted
herein. Inquiries concerning the data should be 0 167 334 501
I ' 668 15.39

5, 2000
SEP
directed! to the appropriate government agency. Scale in Feet" f#if-E T
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact 1
1 10,455 3 31,365
2 7,405 1.5 11,108
Total 17,860 42,473
Impact 2
1 9,148 3 27,444
2 9,583 1.5 14,375
Total 18,731 41,819
Impact 3
1 9,148 3 27,444
2 7,841 1.5 11,762
Total 16,989 39,206
Impact 4
1 6,970 3 0
2 5,227 1.5 0
Total 12,197 0
Overall Total 65,777 123,498
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The site is currentlv-undeveloned and does not contain impervious acreage. There are three lots
within Parcel J located outside of the floodplain area that are planned for commercial
development. Once developed, each lot is expected to consist of 70-75% impervious area.
However, the impervious area of the entire Parcel is estimated to be 41% based on preliminary
Page 10 of 14
June 3, 2005 /'d
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: DWQ EXP No. 05-0913 - Arco Corporate Drive, Brier Creek Corporate Center
Dear Ms. Karoly:
This letter is in response to a request from Mr. Brandon Plunkett with the John R. McAdams
Company concerning the City's cross-section requirements for the proposed Arco Corporate
Drive, which is currently under design as part of the proposed Brier Creek Corporate Center.
The construction of this proposed roadway entails several stream crossings, which are subject to
Neuse River Riparian Buffer protection. I understand that in preliminary discussions with your
office that a request was made to relocate a proposed sidewalk from the north side to the south
side of the street. Your office was also interested in reducing the width of the remaining graded
shoulder in order to avoid and minimize a linear Zone 2 impact along one of the streams.
Based on the anticipated traffic demand, the density of the proposed development, and to
encourage pedestrian connectivity and orientation throughout the project, the City is requiring
sidewalk to be provided on both sides of Arco Corporate Drive. In order to avoid and minimize
any buffer impacts, we have recommended reducing the berm width behind the curbline to 7 feet
and installing a 6-foot sidewalk along the back of curb where necessary. The slopes as proposed
behind the berm are currently at 2:1; we would be amenable to further reducing the impacts by
allowing the limited use of steeper slopes (1.5:1) or retaining walls where necessary.
If you need any other information or have any other questions, please give me a call at
[phone] or email me at eric.lamb®ci.raleigh.nc.us.
..--Sincerely,

Eric J. Lamb, PE
Manager, Transportation Services Division
Cc: Mr. Brandon Plunkett, PE - John R. McAdams Co.
Mr. Kevin Martin - Soil & Environmental Consultants
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREF ?osT CFFICE Box 590 • RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLRaA 27602
340 340
330 330
P
310 310
11+00 12+00 13+00
BRIDGE #I-TYPICAL SECTION
N°. MC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. MCADAMs
Fnm.mg. MC04030-TS CORPORATE CEN'T'ER COMPANY, INC.
Cl .,. = CHANNEL SECTION ?n"`°'°R'
V: 1"=4' Rmnumm RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA P.O. WX 14MF VnDD-4 os
DATE: 06-03-05 (019) 561-5m
340
330
320
y
E
m
3:1
N
to
U,
O
O
N
M
?o
a
0
310
dl
U
co
Q
.E I
340
330
320
310
16+00 17+00 18+00
BRIDGE #2-TYPICAL SECTION
PROmT N0. MC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. McADAMS
nAC04030-TS CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
Scale. H: 1 ?--40 CHANNEL SECTION Z'MN-W/FLU`' =/SU-E1 FJ
RZSKU H TEW= PARL. NC
a?sa 06-03-05 RALEIGH, NOR1H CAROLM& (oio) BOX 14005M Z@ 27709-4M
350 350
340 340
320
320
23+00 24+00 25+00
BRIDGE #3-TYPICAL SECTION

pion= NO AAC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
FII?'?' AAC04030-T5 CORPORATE CENTER
I COMPANY, INC.

SCAIE : ; CHANNEL SECTION
_ , =10M
4 G? z
4

n?r? RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA rmo-
005
P.O BOX I
06-03-05 [phone]
380 380
370 370
360 360
E
M
M
O
O
N
M
f0
N
1-
350 350
38+00 39+00 40+00
BRIDGE #4-TYPICAL SECTION
mor'w°• AAC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. McanAMS
3: mm "' ' AAC04030-TS CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
SCALM: H: 1 -"40' CHANNEL SEC'T'ION 1M"WZW /°WMn
U TM RALEIGH. NORTH CAROUNA r$ o X 1 m EF rr?o -4m
06-03-05 (oiv) aei-aooo
340 340
51+00 52+00 53+00
WETLAND CROSSING (IMPACT #5)-TYPICAL SECTION
PRCIHC[ No. MC-04030 BRIER CREEK 11THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
INS Fn"AIal: MC04030-T5 CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
SCAM, H: I _ VARTLAN CROSSING ENCRm/Pu mm/sosmoRs
RESZU= TRLNCIS PARE. NC
DATE: 06-03-05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. X 14005 ZIP 2M9-4005
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES1
Level Spreader Length NIA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 0.65 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.60 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 4.36
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 4.36
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N/A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
- -- ---
- - - --- -- T46 opraub and maintenance agree?>fenCmcivdes annuafi iosi6ifanitvegetatrorirepar -"-- -
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES2
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 0.99 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.94 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 6.76
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 6.76
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N/A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
0 Level spreader is at least 13 fL per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
re-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
?`No structures are located in protected buffere
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
e opera on an mam enance ag-reemeh me u es annua erosion'- n and vege a on repaU.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES3
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.31 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.23 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 8.90
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 8.90
Filter StripBuffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N/A
ll. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 It per cfs in canopied forest
,14 with leaf litter.
re-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
"I erattorran ramfe ance a, raainenltrrc udes annoarerosYon an dvegetauornepai - ---
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES4
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.46 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.37 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 9.92
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 9.92
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method NIA
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
evel spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
eaf litter.
Eo orm our Holes are on flat slopes only
r uctures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
- - ---- tre operation and-in-arnterrance agr'?emeritincfudes-ainuateros'ion and-vegetauonYepa'i'.---The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers 919-361-5000
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES5
Level Spreader Length NIA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.37 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.51 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 9.40 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method WA
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
ith leaf litter.
WN[io e-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
he operation an maintenance agreement inudes annual erosion and vegetatwn-repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document: This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers 919-361-5000
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES6
Level Spreader Length NlA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.00 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.60 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6%u for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 6.50 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N/A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
WPO re-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion acid vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader system is defined as the bypass junction box, the level spreading slotted
drain and associated pipe and the bypass outlet pipe.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. Every six months:
a. Inspect the level spreader system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash
accumulation, vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that the full length of the level
spreader functions as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover,
mow vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as
needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.)
quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the level spreader system semi-annually using
cleanout structures at the end of each length of level spreader. Removed sediment shall
be disposed of in an appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not
adversely impact water quality (i.e. stockpiling near a stream, pond, etc.).
5. All components of the level spreader system shall be maintained in good working order.
6. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down
gradient erosion must be repaired and/or replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of
the seven maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with
the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name: Mr. Paul Herndon
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than
50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the
president.
Page 1 of 2
Title: President
Address: 8211 Brier Creek Parkway Suite 103
i
a Notary Public for the State of
County of to ?n A r < , do hereby certify that
Qcf. ?.\ L . ?1 C\ZtX personally appeared before me this -IL day of
AccIn 2005 , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing wet
[wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
NANCY WHOFjIW
NO" PUBLIO
CABARRUS .Ka
SEAL
My commission expires ql a1o°?
Page 2 of 2
05°0913
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846;500, • Y Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com z -+ o
RECEIVED
The proposed project will impact riparian buffers and 0.243 acre of wetlands. However,
there are no proposed impacts to stream channels. A check for $3000 made payable to
DWQ is enclosed.
April 13, 2005
Revised and submitted to DWQ Express Review on May 24, 2005 based on a pre-application
meeting with Ms. Debbie Edwards, Mr. John Dorney, and Mr. Eric Kulz of DWQ.
US Army Corps of Engineers NCDENR - DWQ
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Parkview Building
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade Attn: Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele
RE: Nationwide Permit 14 & Neuse River Buffer Complia*lce F eglest/401 Water Quality
Certification Notification
Brier Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J) p (r> ?? D
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina ,
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.W1
MAY 2 5 2005
Dear Ms. -Wade and Ms. Van Der Wiele: UENR - WATER QUALITY
WERMIDS AND STOROATER BRANCH
On behalf of Brier Creek Corporate Center, we request authorization from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) use Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 for the proposed project. to cover
permanent impacts to wetlands. We also request written concurrence from the NC Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) that the project complies with the Neuse River Basin (NRB) Buffer
Rules and the 401 Water Quality Certification required under NWP 14. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form. This
application has been revised in accordance with requests by DWQ to reduce buffer impacts
as much as possible. Please see the attached letter from John R. McAdams Company
explaining measures taken to reduce impacts while complying with the City of Raleigh's
requests.
The proposed project consists of installation of infrastructure necessary to support future
commercial development, such as an access road. The site is located in the northern quadrant of
the intersection of Lumley Road and Interstate 540. Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1)
for the location of the proposed project on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
April 13, 2005
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.W1
Page 2 of 3
The proposed access road will cross three wetlands, one perennial stream twice, and two
intermittent streams once each. Proposed road crossings will be constructed using bottomless
arch culverts or core slab bridges thereby avoiding impacts to the unnamed tributaries of Little
Brier Creek. The impact tables in the PCN itemize and provide a description of each proposed
impact to wetlands and riparian buffers. The total proposed impact to wetlands is 0.241 acre. As
previously stated, there will be no impacts to stream channels as a result of the project. Please
refer to the attached Wetland and NRB Impact Maps (6 sheets) for the location of each impact.
It is important to note that Brier Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J) has been determined to be
separate from the larger (1800 acres) project that is referred to as Brier Creek by the USACE.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and stream
channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation to offset
unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10
acre) or if a discharge causes the loss of any open waters. As mentioned above, utilizing
bottomless arch culverts at all three of the proposed road crossings of streams eliminated impacts
to the stream channels. These road crossings are necessary to provide adequate access to all
areas of the property. Please refer to the attached PCN and letter provided by Paul Herndon, of
the Brier Creek Corporate Center, for additional impactjustification and an explanation of the
road alignment, respectively. As'explained in the PCN, relocation of the stream to minimize the
number of crossings required by the tie-in constraints is not possible due to PCB contaminated
sediments present in the stream beds. Because the applicant has avoided stream channel impacts
through the use of bottomless arch culverts, plans to preserve the floodplain and remaining
wetlands as-open space, maintain the riparian buffers on all intermittent and perennial stream ;
channels on Parcel J'as required by the NRB riparian buffer rule, and comply with the City of
Raleigh's Local Stormwater Program for Nitrogen Control, S&EC believes that the only
mitigation required should be at a 1:1 ratio, via payment to the NCEEP for 0.25 acres of wetland
restoration.
NCDWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland impacts below 1 acre`and
stream, channel impacts below 150 linear feet per project. Because the permanent impacts to
wetlands (0.241 acre) are below the aforementioned threshold and stream channels will not be
impacted, S&EC believes that mitigation for the 401 is not required. The City of Raleigh
requires the applicant to prepare a, stormwater management plan to satisfy the Local Stormwater
Program for Nitrogen Control. In addition, stormwater plans for the road prepared by the John
R. McAdams Company are attached.
Two of the unnamed tributaries of Little Brier Creek that the proposed road will cross (Impacts 3
& 4) are subject to the NRB riparian buffer rule while one (Impact 5) is not.
Riparian buffer impacts from three of the five road crossings exceed 1/3 acre of riparian buffer
impact. -Please refer to the attached Wetland and-.NRB Impact map for a table of the riparian
buffer impacts associated with the project and the "no practical alternative" letter prepared by
Mr. Paul Herndon of Brier Creek Corporate Center, which explains the site constraints that
dictate the alignment of the proposed access road. As indicated in Mr. Herndon's letter, the
April 13, 2005
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.W1
Page 3 of 3
NCDOT fixed tie-in point on Lumley Road and the 100-foot tangent requirement necessitates the
first nonperpendicular crossing. The minimum curve radius prevents perpendicular crossings at
the next two crossings. Relocation of the stream to minimize the impacts is not possible due to
PCB contaminated sediments in the stream channel. It is important to note that Greenhorne &
O'Mara, Kevin Martin in the fall of 1999, and Jennifer Burdette on April 27, 2001 previously
discussed the aforementioned design constraints with Mr. John Dorney during a preapplication
meeting for this project, and incorporated his recommendations. Buffer Mitigation will be
required for three of the road crossings. The applicant proposes to satisfy the mitigation
requirements through payment to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. NC Wetland
Restoration Program (NC)VRP) has been requested to accept payment for the mitigation.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Ali,
Kevin Martin
President
Attachments:
- ---- (7. copies to DWQ and I 'to USACE)
Stormwater plan for the road (DWQ only)
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS.Site Location Map (Figure 1)
Wetland &NRB Impact Maps (6 Sheets)
Agent Authorization Form
Two Data Forms
Paul Herndon's "No Practical Alternative" letter
Previous DWQ letter in response to, 2001 Application
DWQ NBR letter for southern part of the tract
DWQ NBR letter for northern part of the tract
John R McAdams Company letter addressing City of Raleigh sidewalk
requirements
$3000 check (DWQ Only)
NC EEP Acceptance Letter
V@NV190
MAY 2 5 2005
Office Use Only: ??DS AND g70 WWApril 2001
®5'091;
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I ,11 ' , - '-' ; -i-
I. Processing F t,
t
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification ---- - - -
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates, LP Contact: Barrv James
Mailing Address: c/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704/295-4000 Fax Number: 704/295-4059
E-mail Address: biamesna aacres.com
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address:_ 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919/846-5900 Fax Number: 919/846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 3 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Brier Creek Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0768339630. 0768328974. 0768438432. &
0768328520
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Brier Creek Corporate Center
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project is located in the
northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): WL #1 35°53'59" N 78°47'15" W
WL #2 & #3 35°54'02" N 78°47'06" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Forested
7. Property size (acres): Parcel J is 48 acres in size. The entire Brier Creek project is
approximately 1800 acres in size The Corps (Andrea Wade,) has determined that Parcel J is
a se ap rate project from the rest of the Brier Creek project
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Little Brier Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
Page 4 of 14
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at ht!p://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The p_pr ose of the proposed project is to
install an access road necessary to develop the site commercially. Site plans for the
individual commercial lots have not been finalized.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Conventional heavy
equipment will be used to construct the road and install the sanitary sewer line
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The area across Lumley Road and
northeast of the site is forested. A retail center is located northwest and I-540 bounds the
site to the east.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. __-
S&EC delineated the wetlands on Parcel J in September of 2000 Ms Amanda Jones of the
USACE verified the wetland boundaries depicted on the Wetland Impact Map on February 16,
2001. Parcel J is a separate project from the overall Brier Creek assemblage, as per Andrea
Wade of the USACE. Buffers for Impacts 1 2 3 & 4 were verified by Matt Flynn of DWQ on
3/26/01 MRRO 01-105, copy attached). The lack of buffers at Impact 5 was verified by Danny
Smith of DWQ (NBR-RRO-20. copy attached).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 5 of 14
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Two data forms completed for the nroiect are attached
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
# 1 permanent filling 0.17 yes 32 bottomland hardwood
# 2 permanent filling 0.0005 yes 75 ephemeral wetland
# 5 permanent filling .07 no 250 ephemeral wetland

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total-acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: >-l-acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.241
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams***
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
NA

** * The proposed project will not impact stream channels. The proposed access road will be constructed using arch
culverts, and aerial crossings will be used for the sanitary sewer line.
List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.goy. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mgpguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 0
Page 6 of 14
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

acres
(if Name p Waterbody
applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
NA

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A fixed tie-in point and 100-foot tangent requirement at Lumley Road prevented avoidance
of the floodplain wetlands that will be impacted by the proposed access road Impacts to stream
channels were avoided by the use of bottomless arch culverts Please refer to the attached letter
by Mr. Paul Herndon of Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates which explains the site
limitations that require impacting riparian buffers Additionally, riparian buffers will be
maintained throughout the site as required by the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rule In
order to reduce buffer impacts John R McAdams met with the City of Raleigh to discuss what
would be acceptable (see attached letter from John R McAdams Company) The original
application had a total of 150,283 sq ft of buffer impacts the current application totals 120,906
sq. ft.
Page 7 of 14
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking -a-required- mitigation -plan- or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold -as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant proposes to make payment to the NCEEP for 25 acres of wetland impact
Because the applicant has avoided stream channel impacts through the use of bottomless
arch culverts, plans to preserve the floodplain and remaining wetlands as open space,
maintain the riparian buffers on all intermittent and perennial stream channels on Parcel J as
required by the NRB riparian buffer rule and comply with the City of Raleigh's Local
Stormwater Program for Nitrogen Control S&EC does not believe additional compensatory
mitigation should be required by the USACE for this project Because impacts to riparian
buffers on the site exceed the 150 linear feet and 0.33 acre of riparian buffer, buffer
mitigation will be required. The applicant proposes to make a payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund.
Page 8of14
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.ga/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 120,906
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
-If yes,-does-the--project-require-preparation-of-an environmental -document pursuant-to -the------
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9of14
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact 1
1 10,455 3 31,365
2 7,405 1.5 8,516
Total 17,860 39,881
Impact 2
1 9,148 3 27,444
2 9,583 1.5 14,375
Total 18,731 41,819
Impact 3
1 9,148 3 27,444
2 7,841 1.5 11,762
Total 16,989 39,206
Impact 4
1 6,970 3 0
2 5,227 1.5 0
Total 12,197 0
Overall Total 65,777 120,906
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain impervious acreage There are three lots
within Parcel J located outside of the floodplain area that are planned for commercial
development. Once developed each lot is expected to consist of 70-75% impervious area
However, the impervious area of the entire Parcel is estimated to be 41% based on preliminary
Page 10 of 14
plans. Riparian buffers, an undisturbed floodplain and compliance with the City of Raleigh's
Local Stormwater Program for Nitrogen Control are expected to protect surface waters and
wetlands downstream of the property. Since there is no current site plan for the lots, we propose
that DWQ condition the 401 to require stormwater plan approval prior to site grading.
Stormwater plans for the road by the John R McAdams Company are attached
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer system
XIIL Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
_XIV.- _-Other Circumstances (Optional)---------
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This project was previously very close to approval by the USACE and DWO Minimization and
avoidance were already accepted. Outstanding issues were mitigation and stormwater. See
attached DWQ correspondence for DWQ project # 01-0793.
(Agent's
Signature v Date
is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 14
TIC JOHN R.
MEMORANDUM
May 24, 2005
19-7(1
McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
To: Kevin Martin
From: Brandon Plunkett, PE
RE: Brier Creek Corporate Center
AAC-04030
Per the request of Deborah Edwards at NCDENR Division of Water Quality,
we met with the City of Raleigh on May 17, 2004 to discuss reducing the
typical section to avoid linear impacts to stream buffers. Specifically, Deborah
asked that we move the sidewalk from the north to the south side of proposed
Arco Corporate Drive, and reduce the width of the graded shoulder remaining.
This would help eliminate the continuous impact to Zone 2 between impacts
two and three.
While meetin$wit_h City f Raleigh staff
anticipated density of development and the desire to encourage pedestrian
connectivity throughout the development, sidewalk is required on both sides
of the proposed road. The City is willing to eliminate the 3.5' utility strip
between the back of curb and the sidewalk in areas where it will help reduce
the impacts-to the stream buffers; however where the sidewalk is immediately
adjacent to the curb it will need to be 6' wide. The impact maps have been
revised to reflect these changes.
Please let me know if you have any further questions regarding this issue.
Research Triangle Park, NC
Post Office Box 14005
Research Triangle Park
North Carolina 27709
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
800-733-5646
919-361.5000
919-361-2269 Fax
Charlotte, NC
5311 Seventy-Seven Center Drive.
Suite 66
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
800-733.5646
704-527.0800
704-527-2003 Fax
' Comprehensive Land Development Design Services
www.johnrmcadams.com ' We help ottr clients succeed.
Q OF W ATFRQG
C t7..
D ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Project Name: Brier Creek Corporate Center
Wake County
May 13, 2005
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Brier Creek Corporate Center
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Fax #: [phone]
? FF
MAY
Z 8 2005
Subject Property: Brier Creek Corporate Center
On May 13, 2005, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email request from Soil
& Environmental Consultants, PA regarding a project known as "Brier Creek Corporate Center" for acceptance
into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the Express
Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee df $3,000.00 made payable to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 2) five complete and collated copies, of the application and 3) five copies of all
additional information pertaining to this project. Thank you for youz, attention to this matter.
- --Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application package -
and required fee are received.
,If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Cyndi Karoly at
919-733-9721 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerely,
. V CA? W-dh
AWK/cvdw
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin-S&EC
4??ajn W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Filename: Brier Creek Corporate Ctr
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet httn://h2o.enrstate.nc.us/ncwetiands
`
No Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/109/6 Post Consumer Paper
s . vv a nia ?Ya a., ev.Va AA\i An'AL LaIALL D V41 l(/J UUL
Y
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina • Plane: [phone]- Fax,: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Pilled In By The Current Landowner
Name: l i=1R - Cv-j5EK. 6m-Pb J2,%- Zr IT?I
Address: 77zleo?7) A?S?A 'Dr-i.tJ?'-- 5- • 2??

Phone:

Project Name/Description 69..CD?Pbi2Ja`I?
Date: _411Noc?)
The Department of the Army
US. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
----
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Andrea Wade
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current ro er owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTICE: Ilds authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for goventment
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature
CC. Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Ct. Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
cc. Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Enviroinmenta) Consultants, PA
Greensboro Office
3817-E Lawndalc Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

400
? 1 ? 1` ? j Q .350 ? /??i ? ? a Q •, ta i r (? e
0 L-- ,SO
J ? 1 q Jo
_ s
Q` O
• It
II h0
P w
420
i
0
' 40p
--
O
O / it 46
1?,r 1 •? ? Project M. Scale:
97-3165 V = 2000'
Project Date: Figure 1 Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Mgr.: JAB 4116101 Location Map 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Brier Creek Corporate Center [phone] • [phone]
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
3
eos stem
PROGRAM
April 14, 2005
Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Project: Brier Creek Corporate Center County: Wake
APR 2 1 2005
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP. will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that will be mitigated are summarized in the following table.
RiverBasin - - --- - Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Ri arian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.25 0 0 0 0 37,026 26,635
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio. The magnitude of the compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401
Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum
of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
5 'ncerely,
iam
D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
R P.StDY .. Ekka"... PYD our Stag R ??-?
?' C-dENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
This Letter was submitted with the Original 2001 Application
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: `J' Street No Practical Alternative Letter
Brier Creek Development, Parcel J Office Park
Raleigh, North Carolina
This letter has been provided to explain why there is no practical alternative to the Brier
Creek Corporate Center Access Road (Parcel `J' Street) alignment. The purpose of the
Parcel J Street is to provide necessary road access to land parcels that have been
landlocked through the construction of I-540.
controlled. access tie-in point-at-Lumley Road that-was-dictated b NCDOT to lineup
--
with the I-540 on and off ramps necessitates the crossing of Little Brier Creek. We were
unable to align the crossing perpendicularly due to City of Raleigh's standards that
require a 100-foot straight section (100-foot tangent) from the intersection at Lumley
Road and the proximity of the stream to the tie-in point. Both the NCDOT controlled
access and the City of Raleigh's 100-foot tangent are required for traffic safety purposes.
The applicable portion of the City of Raleigh's road construction standards is attached for
your reference.
It is also very important to note that the stream channel could not be relocated to
minimize the impacts presented by the fixed tie-in point because its sediments are
contaminated with PCBs. Via an approved Prospective Purchaser Agreement,
coordination with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to prevent
significant disturbance of the contaminated sediments. In order to prevent direct impact
to the stream channels, all three crossings will be constructed using arch culverts. The
EPA has reviewed and approved this alignment as well as the work plan for the
construction of the Parcel J Street.
The two remaining crossings are necessary to provide access to areas of the property that
are separated by stream channels. Unfortunately, these crossing could not be designed
perpendicularly to the stream due to the City of Raleigh's minimum curve radius of 395
feet. A curve radius of 220 feet would be necessary to achieve a perpendicular crossing
at the second crossing of the unnamed tributary Little Brier Creek, and 150 feet would be
necessary to achieve a perpendicular crossing of the second unnamed tributary to Little
Brier Creek. The applicable portion of these standards is also attached.
Throughout the design process, our civil engineers have adapted the alignment of the
road to minimize its impacts. However, given the design restrictions stated above and the
space constraints presented by the property, they were unable to adjust the current design
to further minimize impacts to Neuse River Buffers. Therefore, we respectfully request
your approval of the proposed alignment and impacts. Please feel free to contact me with
any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Brier Creek Corporate CenterAssociates, L.P.
Paul Herndon
Vice President
Michael F. Easley
?- Governor
? "? a r William G. Ross, Jr. Secretary
a a -; Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
JUL I I ?001
July 10, 2001
DWQ # 01-0793
.. Wake County
4
MR. Barry James
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273 hr"
Dear Mr. James:
On May 24, 2001, the Division of Wate Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your applications regarding your
,.
plans to impact 0.16 acres of wetlands and 229 feet of streams for the purpose of constructing road crossings for the Brier
Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J) at Lumley ad and 1-540 in Raleigh in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required
to impact these wetlands and streams. Please provide seven copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ
number listed above in your reply. t-F
- 1. __-The amount of-buffer-mitigation is not calculated correctly.--You must account for all impacts to Zone 1 and
Zone 2 of the buffers in these calculations. Please discuss this matter with Bob Zarzecki if you have any
questions about these calculations.
2. As discussed in our earlier meeting in the office, please provide plans for sto rnwater management from each
of the parcels accessed by these roads. Either constructed wetlands or dryTasins with flow spr_ead-ing
C!?
devices to ensure sheet flow through the 50 foot buffer would be acceptable.; >
Please call Bob Zarzecki or me at 733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
procedural, materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The
processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you within three (3)
weeks of the receipt of this letter, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and will consider it
withdrawn.
t
Cc:
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
File copy
Central files
,,,,Jennifer Burdette, Soil and Environmental Consultants,
?•tCUEi`?{
Customer Service
1 EGO 633-7748
11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27659-1650 (919) 733-17 ce
I .
;DENR
B. HUNT JR.
NOR

June 12, 1998
Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, inc.
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
MGDEVRT'' ` ,
TART •rps2a`"..".a
Subject: Neuse River Basin Riparian Rules
=L:.> NBR-RRO-20
Wake County
Dear Mr. Zarzecki:
On several occasions during November and December of 1997 I met with personnel
from Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc. at the proposed development/project
known as Briar Creek in Wake County. At your request, an evaluation was performed
to-determine whether the site would require compliance with the Neuse River Buffer
i Requirements. There are streams and a pond on the property which is subject to the
Neuse Buffer Rule. The map you provided indicates the streams, and the pond that are
subject to the rule. (see attached map).
. If you have any questions please call me at (919) 5714700.

...{My W
i'sr..•w?.iw,
fh .?...wl•.I, .,1 d
.N .?•?M.1?' W
V
Tj

S' Ta re ly,
n/
Danny Sn
Specialist
cc: RRO - file copy
wetlands group-John Dorney
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101. RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 0% POST-CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resourc
Raleigh Regional Office
M
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
March 28, 2001
S & EC Consultants, Inc.
Brad Suther
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27614
4"Sc' DENR4010
ROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-105
Brier Creek Subdivision
Wake County
Dear Mr. Suther:
-The-site location map and other information-that-wasprovided, allowed a determination-tu be-made-
as to whether or not the site would require compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rule. This specific
project is referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 01-105.
Stream features A, B, C, and D are indicated on either the Wake County Soil Survey or the USGS
Southeast Durham Quadrangle (topographic). On March 26, 2001 I completed a site visit and
determined that features A, B, C, and D are subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian
Areas, Administrative Code 15A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233). This letter addresses only the
applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rule at this one specific site.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have
additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Matthew Flynn
Environmental Specialist
cc: RRO/John Dorney
C: buff1.105.doc
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Fnual nnnnrfi-ui, el.-m- AMinn Fmnhver rnoi racvclae9/1 n0 nnst-consumer Daper

' "/ ?1??/!! 7r?y1 i Soil & Environmental Consultants, lac.
11010 Raven Ridge Road. Raleigh. Worth Carolina 27614 -
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project: Brier Creek/S&EC Project #: 3165
Date: 9/12/00
preliminary Wetland; Approa3matlon J•'
S.U.M. r r P.eimin.ry rk-i a Oabr
d-tht If. .e.a;y.e:. r " 16-a ., v.r. 641.oh. -d ..y dw Wdbi.-W
t , Apprvmm.tior...?e+...vr d u.:,e Ovft rhk -F- -a ar.o.d *-tk? f.
P-iWd by U. O.S. A-W 0." -f IZIIW6+.
J
J r1 ?% j,.•
? X48 • lC?;/??f/?' //.??-----__:='' ?% ? ? < ? t ?9'?'' I i
r 1.
1
fir
JU
315
t
I
J
F )( L
i /
12 ! f

Maps and databases are public information supplied
by various government agencies. The author and/or
seller of the software program are in no way
responsible or liable for the information depicted
herein. Inquiries concerning the data should be 0
direrfed fn the nnnrnnrinfe nnver-nf nnanrv t
.Si
r r\4, t ? \ l
LEGEND
((_? = Wetlands (Must be confirmed by USACE)
Margina? wetland area (S&EC does not believe these areas mod the
criteria for jurisdictional wetlands; however, these determinations
must be confirmed by USAM?-
/
= Stream chw=1 subject to Neuse River Buffer and under USACE
/,• jurisdiction (Must be confirmed by USACE) i
/.•• y.
Stream channel under USACE jurisdiction but x?i subject to Neuse
River Buffer (Must be wnf m,,d by NGDWQ)
r
MaPVU E 6f, s-v-r , J (YV
167 334 501 668 r• \" ,%V" n SEP 5. 2000
:?
Scale in Feet
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Date: 5/24/01
Applicant/Owner: Brier Creek Corporate Center County: Wake
Investigator: J. Burdette State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hwd Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes x No Transect ID: Upland - Flag 114
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: Upland
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica TREE FACW 9.
2. Ulmus americana SAPLING FACW 10.
3. Carpinus caroliniana SAPLING FAC 11.
4. Boehmeria cylindrica HERB OBL 12.
5. Eulalia vimineum HERB FAC+ 13.
6. Vitis rotundifolia VINE FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
_X _No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) -water-stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Plot ID: Upland - Flag 114
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrochrept Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-9 Al 7.5YR4/4 Loam
9-16 A2 10YR5/4 7.5YR4/6 Many/prominent Sand loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Histic Epipedon - -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wr-ILAnua U
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? _X __Yes _No
Wetland Hydrology Present? _Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? _Yes x No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Date: 5/24/01
Applicant/Owner: Brier Creek Corporate Center County: Wake
Investigator: J. Burdette State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hwd Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes x No Transect ID: Wetland Flag 114
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes x No Plot ID: Wetland
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Betula nigra TREE FACW 9.
2. Ulmus americana TREE FACW 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua TREE FAC+ 11.
4. Fraxinus pennysylvanica SAPLING FACW 12.
5. Carpinus caroliniana SAPLING FAC 13.
6. Eulalia vimineum HERB FAC+ 14.
7. Vitis rotundifolia VINE FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-,Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs Inundated
-Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
_& Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. NA (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 7 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Plot ID: Wetland -Flag 114
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrochrept Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 Al 7.5YR4/4 Loam
6-13 A2 10YR4/2 10YR4/6 Many/prominent Sand loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? -K _Yes _No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes _No _& _Yes _No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:
LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS
(JOHN R. MCADAMS IMPACT #1-4)
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID:
FES1
Level Spreader Length N/A.
Drainage Area 0.65
Impervious Area 0.60
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A
grass
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 4.36
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 4.36
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
-_" - ED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES2
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 0.99 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.94 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Ship/Buffer Slope WA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 6.76
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 6.76
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A capAs- Inals
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
?WPO re-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID:
FES3
Level Spreader Length NIA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.31 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.23 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope NIA (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
8.90
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 8.90
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation NIA
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
l1:REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A lica s Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
Brier Creek, Parcel J-1-A Phase 2
Raleigh, North Carolina
Level Spreader Design
Kimle -Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: 9/8/2004
Prepared by: MAE
Checked by: JMD
Analysis Level Spreader Specifications
Point 10 yr Flow Entrance Width Depth End Width Length
(ds) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
FES-3 11.39 16 0.6 3 20
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES4
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.46 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.37 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 9.92
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 9.92
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
- -_ILREQUIREDITEMS CHECKLIST-
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A I' an Initials
CS;t?Level spreader is at least 13 fL per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM) (SEE NOTE)
FES OUTLET
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY) AN
FLOW
SQUARE PREFOR
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
SEED WITH NATIVE
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION.
PLAN VIEW
TALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
H NATURAL GROUND.
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER
FABRIC (SEE NOTES)
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP
-9" THICK
< S?OpF D1 WW
FLOW `''1 7 ' L3" NATURAL
GROUND
B TUCK
NOTES: SECTION A-A LINER: CLASS 'A' RIP RAP
9" THICK WITH FILTER
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN (NTS) FABRIC
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
0
c
0
N
E
a
v
c+i
IT
0
0
N
0
0
3
v
9
0
M
O
O
U
y
U
m
a
E
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
LEVEL SPREADER f SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
PROJECT NO. AAC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FILENAME: AACO4030-D CORPORATE CENTER ECOMPANY,INC.

a SC.11.E-
N
T
S LEVEL SPREADER DETAIL ?'G!P'"N"/S°""E"°`?
.
.
. RESEARCH TRIAxGE PARK
NC
DATE: RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA .
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
10-22-04 [phone]
Scenario: Base
XL

z:
Title: Arco Corporate Drive Project Engineer. Ryan C. Akers, El
x:\ ..Vand\stream impacts\aac04O3O 10-21-04.stm The John R. McAdams Company StormCAD v4.1.1 [4.2014]
03117/05 11:03:57 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1
\?\I Nl? ?\\
\ t
i I
i

m
? ,
1
t r s '.

m`dz
N N O
Y ? d
c v a
T'
"U
d
m
S
c
w
0
a
m
n
M
O
N

O
O
n
O
O
C
m
06 6
C
V a
a a;
E ?
A
v
? R
fY W
C y
L v
O N
"9 Y
® O
? O
m
O
C
N
O
L
9y
d
V
l0
d
l0
C
QQ,, C14 E
Ew?G H
0
N
O
O
M
O
b f0
y
0 m ?
d aQ
Eco
O M
O y
O 'O O
Q N O
r
J M
F- ii o
Scenario: Base
Level Spreader Sheet
Label Total
System
Flow
(cfs) Section
Size onstructe
Slope
(ft/ft) Ground
Elevation
(ft) Hydraulic
Grade
Line In
(ft) Hydraulic
Grade
Line Out
(ft)
CB3 4.15 329.57 327.47 327.41
P-1 4.15 15 in 0.006500 327.41 327.23
CB4 6.81 330.55 327.23 327.07
P-2 6.81 18 in 0.011910 327.07 325.83
FES 6.76 326.50 325.83 325.83
C61 2.32 329.63 327.28 327.24
P-3 2.32 15 in 0.067667 327.24 325.46
CB2 4.37 329.01 325.46 325.35
P-4 4.37 15 in 0.073529 325.35 322.45
FES1 4.36 323.25 322.45 322.45
C67 4.63 342.95 341.24 341.20
P-7 4.63 15 in 0.006984 341.20 340.88
CB8 9.26 342.51 340.88 340.57
P-8 9.26 15 in 0.027524 340.57 337.42
C139 9.95 339.52 333.55 333.47
P-9 9.95 18 in 0.083178 333.47 328.42
FES4 9.92 329.30 328.42 328.42
CB6 5.32 333.37 332.47 332.43
P-6 5.32 15 in 0.006173 332.43 332.15
CB5 6.81 334.31 332.15 331.87
P-5 6.81 15 in 0.006098 331.87 330.96
CB5 ---8:95 _ -334.52 -330.96 -330.60
P-11 8.95 18 in 0.006102 330.60 330.07
FES3 8.90 330.61 330.07 330.07
Title: Arco Corporate Drive Project Engineer. Ryan C. Akers, El
x:\...Uandtstream impactstaacO4030 10-21-04.stm The John R. McAdams Company StormCAD v4.1.1 [4.2014)
03/17/05 10:53:25 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1
Ill ? ?
O
Cl
-
Y M
r N
U n.

c
c U)
W
? m
C o
O a

N
W

0
0
0
C)

o

o CD
o O o o O O
e- O O QO t` 0 to d' M N
M c
i? M M M N M (N M (? O
M C o
r N

d
s
0
d
N
N
m -

Q L
a
C
d

N
V- ?

i i
?O(O 0
cl,
co
Q z0 d -.
.
E i I ?
i iM ter`
? (D

{RU)
;
a ,

-
- ----j- -
-_'-' C-?-
co
. -
- -- i
i 0
? N?
J05

i

Cl=! O
m LO j

i co1

Cl, M Ui?
I a Q
; U)IM i
L I M Nip

. I
-- . - -v? - ' -
V M
N
-CO
•Q
s? E
O
-9 d! cn

t
,
V

+ 0
O
c U
a
LO 0

V- 9
? d O
?
O r(D
O
A ?Y

!g ro o
`
V ( m
O M
U
C
N $
O

O a
r} m
O

o
o
?

O N
d
M
0
>`9
r?
m n?
E
m
in
0
? '
d
U

c 'O

F X o
d
N
d m ;
CL
C
``V^
V/
O
O
N
M
O O O
?- c0M? ?
(M M M

c
O
p
O
O
O
M
O O
1? (O
M M
?i? E
O
O
LO
M O
0
yQ 4)
0)
r f0
via
o>
c
C N
w
16
m
9
a
O c(00

a
n
c3
0
N

O
t O
r 8
C F-
U
?
E
U -2
m

0 da°
o ?

m
L
VJ
0
2
m

O n
C9

O c
q
a
0
S
d
v
O

N

O o
Cl)
+
O O
N
m
N
° R
a Q
N E o
o E o
r?
O U
?o

Quo

F X o
d
N
M
d m
- -- y= - 0-1-._
?L
a
C
d
V
""'
C
0
37
ca

CD
w
CD C) 0 0
O O O O p q O O O
? M M M M O
C7 c M c
? N N
M M M M M M M M M O

-
i

(
Iticl f I
M
ce)
i
M
E

I n c,4
??cn I i
i
j of
i MMI t j I
I MMi U i 1
C I 1
j i
Ii ;.. > >LO I I
I
?•-( s
a

4-! NI i
?
I r Oi
{u-)

I I ; I I I i ?
i
I 1
I NN

I c) LO
?I
C; 0;
)

-- i ? MN
MMI Uco I
i
to •C •C
a) W! to (0
I ;.. > O?
C C O
I ?
i I n QCco NO
I ?Ol..ltn(ni i
1 ? ( I I 1 I
i
fit` I
? I ' !
NN I i i
10
LO
---
i j
- - `
E I
S i ?
E
I i

I
i
cl-? ? I
! I

i

'
I I ( N
L ?
? M U

i
p ( i
{ >y? o
i C C O I

' ?
i i 1 M O
i
( i w L1J
M I
co
(D E .??
?
O
00
o
N -
v ?
m
via.
a>
d?
m€
c
C U
W
0
a
m
m
Lh
to
+5
(fl l
CV
t

O
It
0
+
?
cU
a

N
A

0
d0
e d
O+ C m
0
~ 2

Cl)
O S
00
O 0
0

v
O N
m
O =
A

+
O r
M
0
N
C
+
O C <
c; o. Q
R E co
O a
O U d
o
o

o '0 LO
c
<
m
X O

O
p
N

O O O O O O O O
p
M M
M ce) M
v
ti tr)
d
N O

m
d
..
----- G 0.

U
N
111 ;
C)
N o
m
N
r
pia
o>
U
?
c
.
_ o
0 C-) ?
O O w
m
M N/ O
?'
N a

N
0
CD
n
N
N +
Q
CO
D
co
0
mU
CL
E
v£
r ?
0
g
c
m
0 v
C ?Y
0 c o
~m
can
U
C
N
r
m
9
10
N
m
N
E
N
O
O
M
O
m
C N
aQ
l`0 E n
O ?
CIO
0096
?v'-
h
O Q?n
F- x0
LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS
(KIMLEY-HORN ASSOCIATES IMPACT #5)
v.. I__a_1 ..^A n An AAnnro1 .....J1 c.......... 1.,......#..1A A/^n A n9l1 OR AC A— AMn/7nnC 44•A R•1n AnA W; tit nme 9.1
z
\ v ?` 1\ \ a
co \ ; \ ,? d
r I
( S \\
\ u 00
l ???f,.? ?•. ? \ ?`-'\ 1.
m n
/? ? ?. ? ? ? : • •?a• ?''• .moo ? ? ?? ?
-u z
W \
ro.
o?c 2p. / ? J •\ \
_u _u
I E Zy I I J"0
All V)
1. / =off \ \\ \? ?\ \
F F \5
F \ \T , I
o '
o ,
^
X 4 0?

°a 0
°
b
°
cl)

o 0 d
o
? ?
a ? d
•

0
0
°

PROJECT "° AAC-04030

E
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
l
F=NAME: AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
Cl SCALE: 1n_40. IMPACT E-=,IT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
N HATE: 03-17-05 1 OF 6 RALEIGH. NORTH CEIROUNA P.O. 13OX 154005 000 ZIP 27702-4005

X:\Projects\AAC\AAC-04030\Land\Streain Impacts\AAC04030-SM6.dwg, 5/20/200511:48:18 AM, Willlams, 1:1
< S200
0 0 1 \
m ° o??
Imo
bo •?
nO
m
/ ?\ \ om
oo-u ? ?x1 dt?? ? \
mom 0-4
\\ \ ) al i \ o I V/ 131 I
9
?\ d
F wti /\ •.• ode
o.
„? LJ ;11 :?:'\ f u o0 a u
A-)
-0 z
01>
Lf) -n co ol
m o En J \ ?\
?? -1 m a
8? c \ \ U
0 "o
D?? FI ` \ G
a -u
1 ? I
..m I /
\ to
o l
IN,
0) Ci
\ o I gA 00
\ \ O W I >? ?_ \ I \\
cm,
°
?I ll_I ?I I ?? 1?\
/ m
N W
L4 cnl I
AZCH E_S H
EE F l J--- --O
OCA
?co
+
0 04_
1 \ \ -u I n d
/oQ
CO
L0
® PROJECT No. AAC-04030 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FILENAME: AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER ® COMPANY, INC.
0 IMPACT EXHIBIT R ESEARRRS/PLANNERS ARK. NC
d SCALE:
IMPACT
14008 0 P 09N4005
?' DATE: 03-17-05 2 OF 6 RALEIGH. NORM CAROLINA P 0E (flit) 381-6000
X:\Projects\AAC\AAC-04030\Land\Stream impacts\AAC04030-SM6.dwg, 5/20/2005 11:48:05 AM, Williams, 1:1
m C)
MATC-ILI SEE i \ 7
/ ET 6 I --?
\ I ? ? l I-
/ Z
i I 0 --
\ \ I m v 9 Mr to
-T1 I'd
O d?
\ b w I \ ?.
°°II
\ o40 ??, ? I I w IIII
v 1 1. A
ern a 00
\ \ n I ti ?? J o n n
?
? o) ' I
I ?? •. I
I 1 I l
N I l I
1 / / I
f M I 1
rri
1 t/ 1
co) 33 ;mu I / x l
0 I r I I
I I ZPj-0 :\. °0 W
O ' owl l
/ ;a ? o l / `O OH b ??z
/
CO N l l
/ om cZ
I0vv
/K M
\0? \ o`" \
I
\? 1 I Z I / \
., o , ` 1 I I
® PROJECT No. AAC-04030 THE JOHN R. McADAMS'
9 FILENAME: AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.
C SCALE: .x.._40. IMPACT EIIBIT ENCINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
wT ?t? wT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
In DATE: 03-15-055 3 OF 6 RALEIGH, NOIMi CGAROUNA (010)H38118000 ZIP 27700-4005
X:\Projects\AAC\AAC-04030\Land\Stream impacWAAC04030-SM6.dwg, 5/20/200511:47:45 AM, Williams, 1:1
% 7N
00
t"I -I
00
?\ \ 0
"X n
oo
i"a
C) 0
\ \ \ \ o
\ o
Z A6
/ ?Ix?.
I °?? I e
I I0mo /Z
I ' m m°
'a? ArR,
rr,
Q' 2
n
I \ o?? 1 z
?_ /
10
\ to I I /
;u C
Iz?
22
I I 2p, j? \ I --
I
I I Z - \ l
II 1 ? ? ? /
1 I I I ,? z, N I I j
(1I I I / ? ??i lo- \
I I /?, ? .? I I / \A?x
III I ?? gym
I I / o \ \
o ? .
O ?
^
C° 4 O
o
O ,b
F, o b O

n '" d
0 L J
? x n d
II
0
o o?
0 ?
0
? o
o
PROJECT 140. AAC-04030
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
'E"A"E' AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER COMPANY, INC.

SCALE: ?"=40, IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
RESEARCH TRIANGIZ PARK, NC
4
W DATE: 03-15-05 4 OF 6 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA P.O.
(919)R3 116000 ZIP 27709-4005

X:\Projects\AAC\AAC-04030\Land\Stream impacts\lmpact exhibit (support for KH)1AAC04030-SM5.dwg, 5/2012005 11:54:30 AM, Williams, 1:1
:0
?- \ \ \ 1 °n N co ?mm
1A L4
?. \ \ log ?? F
0?
\
Imr-
g 0) rr: 0-2?'
POO ;'v 00 k
I 0 I
Mc? /
/ lw
(?
\ C) i /
;40/
o1 /
(o
? (l l? l/ l I i cf) /
J I I I I ZE
// l I I ? ?? --_ 11 ? l
.. Ao 0
x
11 o n
of
C]
o
DLO)
0
PROJECT N0. AAC-04030
THE JOHN R.
cADAMS
„"y„ FILENAME:
AAC04030-SM4
BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER
i
s C
OMPANY, NC.

C SCALE:
1°=40:
IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
y RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
cn DATE: 03
15
05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
5 OF 6 P.O. BOX 34
003 ZIP 27709-4003
-
- (919) 083-0
600
PROJECT N0. AAC-04030 THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
® r1IENAxE: AAC04030-SM4 BRIER CREEK CORPORATE CENTER im COMPANY, INC.
04 U SOALE. 1"=400' IMPACT EXHIBIT ENOINEERSTPIERS/ -4005 RESEaCII SURVEYORS
0TRIANGLE P 7709
/J DATE: 03-15-05 C OF G RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 1 [phone]
X:1Projects\AAC\AAC-04030%Land\Stream Impacts\AAC04030-SM6.dwg, 5/20/2005 11:49:10 AM, Williams, 1:1
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR CALCULATIONS
(KIMLEY-HORN ASSOCIATES IMPACT #5)

•
LA--)

PeT

_
Ntw R!

jy?
Y9

1

! ? 1
. M

i ,

,

I

!

I

?

S
PA

-- ?
W

1
"

;

,

-

I

--1

I

-- I

-

;

-

1 I
I ? ?1= ( 0 9 0 ? ?s I

v.
i I
j
4 L? , & I N 5! ?. q

I ` f
'
t

1 -Is
f '
I !

s ,
1113.
- A u

1
1
I I

.I I ? I l

I

-

-"

x-f
i
CIV

005

IA E

4

NGI

s

-
I
EEg

r

--
I
IN

iangi

Lm

•

arI

M40

yLAN

?-NC
ud
tl

PL

77
.cada

ANN

W-
6&m -

ING

-193
m- -

S
i
6t°5
. --------- -- -
I

Ru
!
000-

EY
4--99

NG
-3

6
-

(
T

I
;
?

-
!
Worksheet
Worksheet for Circular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet FES5 Pipe Sizing Calcu
Flow Element Circular Channel
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 025000 ft/ft
Diameter 18 in
Discharge 9.40 cfs
Results
Depth 0.81 ft
Flow Area 1.0 ft=
Wetted Perime 2.47 ft
Top Width 1.50 ft
Critical Depth 1.18 ft
Percent Full 53.9 %
Critical Slope 0.008598 ft/ft
Velocity 9.69 ft/s
Velocity Head 1.46 ft
Specific Energ! 2.27 ft
Froude Numbe 2.12
Maximum Disc 17.87 cfs -
Discharge Full 16.61 cfs
Slope Full 0.008009 ft/ft
Flow Type supercritical
Project Engineer. JRM Employee
C\docume-l\akers\desktop\khasup-1.fm2 The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. FlowMaster v6.0 lei 4b]
05/12/05 01:32:43 PM 0 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers 919-361-5000
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES5
Level Spreader Length N/A (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.37 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.51 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 9.40 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf lifter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
-- II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 It per dfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
EN structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
Worksheet
Worksheet for Circular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet FES6 Pipe Sizing Calcu
Flow Element Circular Channel
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coetfic 0.013
Slope 025000 ft/ft
Diameter 15 in
Discharge 6.50 cfs
Results
Depth 0.72 ft
Flow Area 0.7 ft=
Wetted Perime 2.16 ft
Top Width 1.23 ft
Critical Depth 1.03 ft
Percent Full 57.9 %
Critical Slope 0.010080 ft/ft
Velocity 8.82 ft/s
Velocity Head 1.21 ft
Specific Energ, 1.93 ft
Froude Numbe 2.01
- Maximum Disc 10.99 cfs
Discharge Full 10.21 cfs
Slope Full 0.010126 fttft
Flow Type iupercriticai
Project Engineer. JRM Employee
cldocume-llakersldesktop\khasup-1.fm2 The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. FlowMaster v6.0 [614b]
05112/05 01:32:53 PM O Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Ryan Akers 919-361-5000
Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID: FES6
Level Spreader Length WA. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.00 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.60 ac (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max Discharge to Level Spreader 6.50 ds
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
ApNicards Initials
*Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
th leaf litter.
e-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
__No are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
(? ?
r ? stet '•?
CEi'D -®-50629
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
AL www.SandEC.com
The proposed project will impact riparian buffers and 0.243 acre of wetlands. However,
there are no proposed impacts to stream channels. Therefore a check for $200 made
payable to DWQ is enclosed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
April 13, 2005 APR 3 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STOWMATER BRANCH
NCDENR - DWQ
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
RE: Nationwide Permit 14 & Neuse River Buffer Compliance Request/401 Water Quality
Certification Notification
Brier Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J)
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.W1
Dear Ms. Wade and Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of Brier Creek Corporate Center, we request authorization from the US Army Corps of
.Engineers (USAGE) use Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 for the proposed project to cover
permanent impacts to wetlands. We also request written concurrence from the NC Division of
Water Quality (NCD.WQ) that the project complies with the. Neuse River Basin (NRB) Buffer
Rules and the 4,01 Water Quality Certification required under NWP 14. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form.
The proposed project consists of installation of infrastructure necessary to support future
commercial development, such as an access road. The site is located in the northern quadrant of
the intersection of Lumley Road and Interstate 540. Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1)
for the location of the proposed project on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
The proposed access road will cross three wetlands, one perennial stream twice, and two
intermittent streams once each. Proposed road crossings will be constructed using bottomless
arch culverts or core slab bridges thereby avoiding impacts to the unnamed tributaries of Little
Brier Creek. The impact tables in the PCN itemize and provide a description of each proposed
impact to wetlands and riparian buffers. The total proposed impact to wetlands is 0.243 acre. As
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
April 13, 2005
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.W 1
Page 2 of 4,
previously stated, there will be no impacts to stream channels as a result of the project. Please
refer to the attached Wetland and NRB Impact Maps (6 sheets) for the location of each impact.
It is important to note that Brier Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J) has been determined to be
separate from the larger (1800 acres) project that is referred to as Brier Creek.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and stream
channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation to offset
unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10
acre) or if a discharge causes the loss of any open waters. As mentioned above, utilizing
bottomless arch culverts at all three of the proposed road crossings of streams eliminated impacts
to-the stream channels. These road crossings are necessary to provide, adequate access to all
areas of the property. Please refer to the attached PCN and letter provided by Paul Herndon, of
the Brier Creek Corporate Center, for additional impact justification and an explanation of the
road alignment, respectively. As explained in the PCN, relocation of the stream to minimize the
number of crossings required by the tie-in constraints is not possible due to PCB contaminated
sediments present in the stream beds. Because the applicant has avoided stream channel impacts
through the use of bottomless arch culverts, plans to preserve the floodplain and remaining_
wetlands as open space, maintain the riparian buffers on all intermittent and perennial stream
channels on Parcel J as required by the NRB riparian buffer rule, and comply with the City of
Raleigh's Local Stormwater Program for Nitrogen Control, S&EC believes that the only.
mitigation. required should beat a 11 ratio, via payment to the NCEEP for 0.25 acres of wetland
restoration.
NCDWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland impacts below 1 acre and
stream channel impacts below 150 linear feet per project. Because the permanent impacts to
wetlands (0.243 acre) are below the aforementioned threshold and stream channels will not be
impacted, S&EC believes that mitigation for the 401 is not required. The City of Raleigh
requires the applicant to prepare a stormwater management, plan to satisfy the Local Stormwater
Program for Nitrogen Control. In addition, stonmwater plans for the road prepared by the John
R. McAdams Company are attached.
Two of the unnamed tributaries of Little Brier Creek that the proposed road will cross (Impacts '3
& 4) are subject to the NRB riparian buffer rule while one (Impact 5) is not.
Riparian buffer impacts from three of the five road crossings exceed 1/3 acre of riparian buffer,
impact. Please refer to the attached Wetland and NRB Impact map for a table of the riparian
buffer impacts associated with the project and the "no practical alternative" letter prepared by
Mr. Paul Herndon of Brier Creek Corporate Center, which explains the site constraints that
dictate the alignment of the proposed access road. As indicated in Mr. Herndon's letter, the
NCDOT fixed tie-in point on Lumley Road and the 100-foot tangent requirement necessitates the
first nonperpendicular crossing. The minimum curve radius prevents perpendicular crossings at
the next two crossings. Relocation of the stream to minimize the impacts is not possible due to
PCB contaminated sediments in the stream channel It is important to note that Greenhorne &
O'Mara, Kevin Martin in the fall of 1999, and Jennifer Burdette on April 27, 2001 previously-

April 13, 2005.
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.W1
Page 3 of 4
discussed the Aforementioned design constraints with Mr. John Dorney during a preapplication
meeting for this project, and incorporated his recommendations. Buffer Mitigation will be
required for three of the road crossings. The applicant proposes to satisfy the mitigation
requirements through payment to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. NC Wetland
Restoration Program (NCWRP) has been requested to accept payment for the mitigation.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Kevin Martin
President
Attachments:
(7 copies to DWQ and 1 to USACE)
Stormwater plan for the road (DWQ only)
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS Site Location Map (Figure 1)
Wetland & NRB Impact Maps (6 Sheets)
Agent Authorization Form
Two Data Forms
Paul Herndon's "No Practical `Alternative" letter
Previous DWQ letter in response to 2001 Application
DWQ NBR letter for southern part of the tract
DWQ NBR letter for northern part of the tract
w APR 1 3 2009 9
PA 11viLENT
RECEIVED
DENR -WATER DUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. .0 *5 aszs
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name:_ _ Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates LP Contact: Barry James
Mailing Address: c/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704/295-4000 Fax Number: 704/295-4059
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919/846-5900 Fax Number: 919/846-9467
E-mail Address: KMartin(iDsandec.com
Page 3 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Brier Creek Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0768339630, 0768328974, 0768438432, &
0768328520
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Brier Creek Corporate Center
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The projectr is located in the
northern quadrant of the intersection of Lumley Road (SR 1645) and Interstate 540.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): WL #13 505359" N 78047'l 5" W
WL #2 & #3 35°54'02" N 78°47'06" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Forested
7. Property size (acres): Parcel J is 48 acres in size. The entire Brier Creek project is
approximately 1800 acres in size. The Corps (Andrea Wade) has determined that Parcel J is
a separate project from the rest of the Brier Creek project.
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Little Brier Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
Page 4 of 14
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htip://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work:The purpose of the proposed project is to
install an access road necessary to develop the site commercially. Site plans for the
individual commercial lots have not been finalized.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Conventional heave
equipment will be used to construct the road and install the sanitary sewer line
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The area across Lumley Road and
northeast of the site is forested. A retail center is located northwest and I-540 bounds the
site to the east.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC delineated the wetlands on Parcel J in September of 2000 Ms Amanda Jones of the
USACE verified the wetland boundaries depicted on the Wetland Impact Map on February 16
2001. Parcel J is a separate project from the overall Brier Creek assemblage as per Andrea
Wade of the USACE. Buffers for Impacts 1 2 3 & 4 were verified by Matt Flynn of DWO on
3/26/01 (NBRRO 01-105, copy attached). The lack of buffers at Impact 5 was verified by Danny
Smith of DWQ (NBR-RRO-20 copy attached)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 5 of 14
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Two data forms com leted for the project are attached
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
# 1 permanent filling 0.17 yes 32 bottomland hardwood
# 2 permanent filling 0.003 yes 75 ephemeral wetland
# 5 permanent filling .07 no 250 ephemeral wetland

i ist each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://www.fema.gov
.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: > 1 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.243
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams***
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
NA

*** The proposed project will not impact stream channels. The proposed access road will be constructed using arch
culverts, and aerial crossings will be used for the sanitary sewer line.
*
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: NA
Page 6 of 14
i
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

acres
Name Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
NA

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A fixed tie-in point and 100-foot tangent reauirement at Lumlev Road prevented avoidance
of the floodplain wetlands that will be impacted by the proposed access road Impacts to stream
channels were avoided by the use of bottomless arch culverts. Please refer to the attached letter
by Mr. Paul Herndon of Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates which explains the site
limitations that require impacting riparian buffers. Additionally, riparian buffers will be
maintained throughout the site as required by the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rule
Page 7 of 14
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
bftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strrnp,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant proposes to make payment to the NCEEP for 25 acres of wetland impact
Because the applicant has avoided stream channel impacts through the use of bottomless
arch culverts, plans to preserve the floodplain and remaining wetlands as open space
maintain the riparian buffers on all intermittent and perennial stream channels on Parcel J as
required by the NRB riparian buffer rule and comply with the City of Raleigh's Local
Stormwater Prop-ram for Nitrogen Control S&EC does not believe additional compens4im
mitigation should be required by the USACE for this project Because impacts to riparian
buffers on the site exceed the 150 linear feet and 0.33 acre of riparian buffer, buffer
mitigation will be required The applicant proposes to make a payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund.
Page 8 of 14
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/mip/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 150.283
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify, )9
Page 9 of 14
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact 1
1 13,939 3 41,818
2 7905 1.5 11,108
Total 21,344 52,926
Impact 2
1 12,197 3 36,590
2 10,454 1.5 15,682
Total 22,651 52,272
Impact 3
1 10,890 3 32,670
2 8,276 1.5 12,415
Total 19,166 45,085
Impact 4
1 7,405 3. 0
2 5,227 1.5 0
Total 12,632 0
Overall Total 75,793 150,283
Lone 1 extends out 3U teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain impervious acreage There are three lots
within Parcel J located outside of the floodplain area that are planned for commercial
development. Once developed each lot is expected to consist of 70-75% impervious area
However, the impervious area of the entire Parcel is estimated to be 41 % based on preliminary
Page 10 of 14
plans. Riparian buffers an undisturbed floodplain and compliance with the City of Raleigh's
Local Stormwater Program for Nitrogen Control are expected to protect surface waters and
wetlands downstream of the property Since there is no current site plan for the lots we propose
that DWQ condition the 401 to require stormwater plan ap roval prior to site rg ading
Stormwater plans for the road by the John R McAdams Company are attached
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer system
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This project was previously very close to approval by the USACE and DWQ Minimization and
avoidance were already accepted Outstanding issues were mitigation and stormwater. See
attached DWQ correspondence for DWQ project # 01-0793
r
Date
(Agent's si ure is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 14
i -V L ,, . VV r ZLA ! u Y G if U ?} V a 21 AAI, KWIL L'' a'1'A'i'L"' a V (i WJ U U Z
1
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh North Carolina - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: ?LG1C_ QYL QIb`t'L:. ,1l`?E. L_-P
Address: 12peoj?-) Ay4ty C A-rr-- 'DW-LI

Phone:
Project Name/Description: vo -LOE
Date:/ l N??
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Andrea Wade
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current ro er owner, hexeby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for goverxunent
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
'FA? 47,QWm"")
Print Property Owner's Name
CC. Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhiWp Ct. Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone- [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Property Owner's SIgnature
cc: Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Greensboro Office
3817-E Lawndalc Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
97.3165 1° = 2000' Figure 1
Project Date:
Mgr.: JAB CUM Location Map
Brier Creek Corporate Center
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page. www.SandEC.com
97.3165 1" =1320'
Project Date: Figure 2 Wake Co. Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Mgr.: JAB 4116101 Soil Survey Map 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Brier Creek Corporate Center [phone] • [phone]
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC 13 Web Page: www.SandEC.com
This Letter was submitted with the Original 2001 Application
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: `J' Street No Practical Alternative Letter
Brier Creek Development, Parcel J Office Park
Raleigh, North Carolina
This letter has been provided to explain why there is no practical alternative to the Brier
Creek Corporate Center Access Road (Parcel `J' Street) alignment. The purpose of the
Parcel J Street is to provide necessary road access to land parcels that have been
landlocked through the construction of I-540.
A controlled access tie-in point at Lumley Road that was dictated by NCDOT to line up
with the I-540 on and off ramps necessitates the crossing of Little Brier Creek. We were
unable to align the crossing perpendicularly due to City of Raleigh's standards that
require a 100-foot straight section (100-foot tangent) from the intersection at Lumley
Road and the proximity of the stream to the tie-in point. Both the NCDOT controlled
access and the City of Raleigh's 100-foot tangent are required for traffic safety purposes.
The applicable portion of the City of Raleigh's road construction standards is attached for
your reference.
It is also very important to note that the stream channel could not be relocated to
minimize the impacts presented by the fixed tie-in point because its sediments are
contaminated with PCBs. Via an approved Prospective Purchaser Agreement,
coordination with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to prevent
significant disturbance of the contaminated sediments. In order to prevent direct impact
to the stream channels, all three crossings will be constructed using arch culverts. The
EPA has reviewed and approved this alignment as well as the work plan for the
construction of the Parcel J Street.
The two remaining crossings are necessary to provide access to areas of the property that
are separated by stream channels. Unfortunately, these crossing could not be designed
perpendicularly to the stream due to the City of Raleigh's minimum curve radius of 395
feet. A curve radius of 220 feet would be necessary to achieve a perpendicular crossing
at the second crossing of the unnamed tributary Little Brier Creek, and 150 feet would be
necessary to achieve a perpendicular crossing of the second unnamed tributary to Little
Brier Creek. The applicable portion of these standards is also attached.
Throughout the design process, our civil engineers have adapted the alignment of the
road to minimize its impacts. However, given the design restrictions stated above and the
space constraints presented by the property, they were unable to adjust the current design
to further minimize impacts to Neuse River Buffers. Therefore, we respectfully request
your approval of the proposed alignment and impacts. Please feel free to contact me with
any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Brier Creek Corporate CenterAssociates, L.P.
Paul Herndon
Vice President
''•r:
~? r
w1
i,-
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MR. Barry James
Brier Creek Corporate Center Associates
C/o AAC Real Estate Services
3800 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28273

July 10, 2001
DWQ # 01-0793
Wake County
Dear Mr. James: I
On May 24, 2001, the Division of Wate Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your applications regarding your
plans to impact 0.16 acres of wetlands and 229 feet of streams for the purpose of constructing road crossings for the Brier
Creek Corporate Center (Parcel J) at Lumley Road and 1-540 in Raleigh in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required
to impact these wetlands and streams. Please provide seven copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ r. 1
number listed above in your reply. e
1. The amount of buffer mitigation is not calculated correctly. You must account for all impacts to Zone 1 and
Zone 2 of the buffers in these calculations. Please discuss this matter with Bob Zarzecki if you have any
questions about these calculations.
2. As discussed in our earlier meeting in the office, please provide plans for stormw_ater management from each
of the parcels accessed by these roads. Either constructed wetlands or dri-basins with ffowspreading
devices to ensure sheet flow through the 50 foot buffer would be acceptable. +: -f >
Please call Bob Zarzecki or me at 733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
procedural. materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The
processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you within three (3)
weeks of the receipt of this letter, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and will consider it
withdrawn.

Cc:
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
File copy
Central files
Jennifer Burdette, Soil and Environmental Consultants, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
E? V.
3dC€]?i?;?i
Customer Service
1 600 623-774S
Michael F.-Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr. Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
1 ??,? • ';
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
;D E1 IN' R
June 12, 1998
B. HUNTJR.
NOR Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, inc.
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
: MCDEVIrr "
TAXY
• : `may •is?4:•.:
Subject: Neuse River Basin Riparian Rules
NBR-RRO-20
Wake County
Dear Mr. Zarzecki:
45ski',
•:.;1, .-::ri On several occasions during November and December of 1997 I met with personnel
from Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc. at the proposed development/project
known as Briar Creek in Wake County. At your request , an evaluation was performed
to determine whether the site would require compliance with the Neuse River Buffer
Requirements. There are streams and a pond on the property which is subject to the
Neuse Buffer Rule. The map you provided indicates the streams, and the pond that are
subject to the rule. (see attached map).
If you have any questions please call me at (919) 5714700.
cerely,
Danny Smi
Environ ental Specialist
cc: RRO -file copy
wetlands group-John Dorney
V
r%
null'
x.
3800 13ARREYT ORIVE, 5UITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
'.-:;. ? F., ?•'•.1:,:=+ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% AECYCLEO/1 0% POST-CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resourc -
4
Raleigh Regional Office D='
Michael F. Easley, Governor Mir
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
March 28, 2001
S & EC Consultants, Inc.
Brad Suther
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27614
IWAk
• ?,
CDENFt
rH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
JMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-105
Brier Creek Subdivision
Wake County
Dear Mr. Suther:
The site location map and other information that was provided, allowed a determination to be made
as to whether or not the site would require compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rule. This specific
project is referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 01-105.
Stream features A, B, C, and D are indicated on either the Wake County Soil Survey or the USGS
Southeast Durham Quadrangle (topographic). On March 26, 2001 I completed a site visit and
determined that features A, B, C, and D are subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian
Areas, Administrative Code 15A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233). This letter addresses only the
applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rule at this one specific site.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have
additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Matthew Flynn
Environmental Specialist
cc: RRO/John Domey
C: buffl.105.doc
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Fnt-i A.,.....?...,:a., wK -.. a:... A.s:.... enoi .,.......I. AMno% -#_... -imar nanar
?rC31
(1( 1,
Q
fwhl bs Environmental Consultants, Inc. J J
i I O l0 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh. North Carolina 27614
?j f ? ^ Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project. Brier Creek/S&F,C Pro' t ti: 3165
Daft: 9112/00
!i i J Prefiminu7 Wetland Approximation
?f / r ! SW"). for PrtGmiuq ru-i a Ottly ?---
f F ?( t I Sa,eC - d.,*M t. -Miry W. map b-d w me 6ddee.k.
ao..eyed deii.eet- and -y edt ddak W inte-mn ?
( J , AppnW-ti-- -pp d acing bpeanpkk maps -d X-AI-tAina.
it awe .e lee A -d, thy -A V .1" ee -pp- d •na - /-
L: Pet-heed d ley We V.S.S. Atnq Cbtps .1 Pininec.n.

r98

du
307
315,
.<<
kl-

-? LEGEND
= Wetlands (must be confitatrd by USACE)
\_
`?? ?g = Marginal wetland area (SEcEC does not believe these areas tteet the
i
na
criteria for jurisdictional wetlands however, these delerm
USACE)
d b
f
y
ume
rrnut be eon

, and undo USACE
= Strearn channel subject to Neuse River
• E
jurisdiction (Must be confirmed by USAC
i . ; ",- / •• = Stream channel under USACE jurisdiction but D9 sub*t to Neuse
}
River Buller (Must be confirmed by NGDWQ)

Maps and databases are public information supplied (?lt?
by various government agencies. The author and/or A ?? h ?` ?)? r `? tv?Frt
seller of the software program are in no way (? t 'P t1 \ ' ?'
r ,•
responsible or liable for the information depicted
herein, Inquiries concerning the data should be 0 167 334 501 668~ r-V" SEP S. 000
directed to the appropriate government agency.
' Scale in Feet cJ
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Date: 5/24/01
Applicant/Owner: Brier Creek Corporate Center County: Wake
Investigator: J. Burdette State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes _No Community ID: Bottomland Hwd Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes x No Transect ID: Upland - Flan 114
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: Upland
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica TREE FACW 9.
2. Ulmus americana SAPLING FACW 10.
3. Carpinus caroliniana SAPLING FAC 11.
4. Boehmeria cylinddca HERB OBL 12.
5. Eulalia vimineum HERB FAC+ 13.
6. Vitis rotundifolia VINE FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
excludin FAC- : 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
-Other -
-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. NA (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
Proiect/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Plot ID: Upland - Flag 114
SOILS
rMap Unit Name Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
eries and Phase): Chewacla Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaauentic Dystrochrept Confirm Mapped Type? - Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-9 Al 7.5YR4/4 Loam
9-16 A2 10YR5/4 7.5YR4/6 Many/prominent Sand loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? -Yes x No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
-Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A Date: 5/24/01
Applicant/Owner: Brier Creek Corporate Center County: Wake
Investigator: J. Burdette State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hwd Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? -Yes x No Transect ID: Wetland Flag 114
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: Wetland
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Betula nigra TREE FACW 9.
2. Ulmus americana TREE FACW 10.
3. Liquidambar styracitlua TREE FAC+ 11.
4. Fraxinus pennysylvanica SAPLING FACW 12.
5. Carpinus caroliniana SAPLING FAC 13.
6. Eulalia vimineum HERB FAC+ 14.
7. Vitis rotundifolia VINE FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
-Other _& Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_& Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. NA (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 7 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: Brier Creek-Parcel J / S&EC#: 3165A
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: -somewhat poorly

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaguentic Dystrochrept Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions

(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) ,
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 Al 7.5YR4/4 Loam
6-13 A2 10YR4/2 10YR4/6 Many/prominent Sand loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
i
Plot ID: Wetland - Flag 114
Ut I LKMINA
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
-x -_Yes _No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
-& --Yes _No
-2i-Yes _No
-L _Yes _No
Remarks:
T
0 .50,62,9
LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS
(JOHN R. MCADAMS IMPACT #1-4)
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES4
Level Spreader Length N/A. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 1.46 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 1.37 (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8%u for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
9.92
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 9.92
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A i an Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with sear utter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
*Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25%u in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES3
_ Level Spreader Length N/A.
Drainage Area 1.31
Impervious Area 1.23
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
8.90
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 8.90
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A lican s Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES2
Level Spreader Length N/A.
Drainage Area 0.99
Impervious Area 0.94
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 6.76
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 6.76
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A c Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
?WNO structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
?t
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Brier Creek Corporate Center
Contact Person: Brandon Plunkett [phone]
Phone Number:
Level Spreader ID: FES1
Level Spreader Length N/A.
Drainage Area 0.65
Impervious Area 0.60
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope N/A
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 4.36
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 4.36
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation N/A
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Pre-Treatment
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a
complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and
specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation
and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information and
will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A licants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest
with leaf litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of
up to 25% in areas with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option
Document. This potentially requires a minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader
cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCE ENT
MATTING (PSRM) (SEE NOTE)
FES OUTLET
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
FLOW
SQUARE PREFORMED
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
SEED WITH NATIVE
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION.
PLAN VIEW
TALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
-H NATURAL GROUND.
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER
FABRIC (SEE NOTES)
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP
-9" THICK
I
S??AF 2f Dl
FLOW 1 _L3" _ NATURAL
"-" GROUND
B TUCK
NOTES: SECTION A-A
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN (NTS)
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2-PERMANENT PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
LEVEL SPREADER /SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
LINER: CLASS 'A' RIP RAP
9" THICK WITH FILTER
FABRIC
PROJECT no. AAC-04030 BRIER CREEK THE JOHN R. McADAMS
AAC04030-D CORPORATE CENTER
COMPANY
INC
,
.
c SCALE: N
T
S LEVEL SPREADER DETAIL ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
.
.
. RESEARCH BO
0
G
P
?
g
N

s DATE:
10-22-04 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. X 14
ZIP
Z
77
09
4005
05
[phone]
DZ
d
A
d
U
J-. °
? z
W O Uw
`N
F1 to W
Z
wtl??no
?y Fi 0 0
xi0j
E-+U o
® G
z w°3
w x149. 91
W
U
E?
?W?
Q?'jz
U?
U
0
°U) N
d 1 b O
° oo
C) It a o
a Q o
a
z
F 41
U
W z 41
a ? u <
0. F. N q
9 McADAMS
?E r /
IMP . #? ?I WALK E/
NE ISTURB ?? i- 3 CUR' J
ZON 0. / GUTTE (TYP)
'SANE 2,f d
/ TOTAL NE
fifE?N
BUFFER DI J/ /
- f -?
NGTH NO -?(TtPI?
PROPOSED ARCO
CORPORATE DRIVE
`? ... ° . (90' PUBLIC R/W)
/ FONCCRE7 SED SIMPLESPA TOP OF BANK ST COR?DECK? (TYP.) BRIDGE
l
Dst?,R Y,
__TOP-6F BANK ?N . • \ /
x (TYP.) % .... ...
.C82
J '.
\ 1 ,„ 50' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER (TYP., MEASURED 5
FROM TOP OF BANK, EACH
WETLANDS y W /? ?? \ y
\ \ \ (TYP.)
1?1 q,
??yy1
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 BO
/ n _ i o r 7/ \ ?? \ Y r \\ \ / 1 inch = 40 ft.
A
?U
za
xz?N
m a
?dz?N
00
xC)
E U W ow
w a
® z W
w xd?
w r; x
W u.
U
W(7on
00
0?z
v ? Cx7
M
W
U
W ?
W O
o N
I o
p 0 0? I
II n
a 0
a a 0
o Q
c
H w
u ?
w ?
z ? w
tG ? U <
0. W V! O
McADAMS
N
E
m
a
Co
lIq
ro
v
N
O
O
N
N
ro
o,
3
v
C)
m
O
a
0
ca
n
E
DbiCT AREA #2
--NEUSE BUFFER DISTURBANCE: I I /?
/ ZONE 1 DISTURBED AREA = 0.28 AC. I? J \ 1 J I ?/ ?J / z
/ ZONE 2 DISTURBED AREA = 0.24 AC. ) \ ^ J / / z u h
TOTAL NEUSE BASIN RIPARIAN x z a as
BUFFER DISTURBANCE - 0.52 AC. ?POPOSED ARC4? ° a WN
LENGTH OF EWPACTED CHANNEL = 0 LF ??RPORA DRIVE
1 WETLAND M)ACT = 63 SF n I x o P. ao
AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH = 21 FT. PROX. 90' PUBLIC R ?"
?os
TOP OF BANK
/ ten-----
PROPOSED SIMPLESPAN I/ I x? 1 / - - ?r 1 (TYP.Y
\ III W
PRECAST COREDECK ?\ - - ,.(I - ( U
CONCRETE BRIDGE R
/? / /? ?/ ? / / \ / ? TLE B CRgE < / / 3 005\ W
5' CONCRETE QUALITY ?
... SIDEWALK 1,cTU.'DSRiDSTOfti.,".
r. ?. ............ - -? _ 30" CURB & O O
?. ..............
N GUTTER (TYP)
...'.'.'.'.'.' ' ..... ?. ......... - - -
:: +00 ti . ................ O T `i
• • ••,? '.\ . , . . , .. ? , • • / 18" MEDIAN a O
.. . ? ? ..... ...... • • `? _ _ CURB (TYP) W W r..?
?. '.'.'.' .'.'... ` CB6 W
.......
.......
y /
y
....... .......
\
3o f r / Cr
WETLANDS i -
ES3 U N
o / 1 aV o
50' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN o o °
BUFFER (P., MEASURED 50'
Q o i
FROM TO OF BANK, EACH a Q o
\ v WETLANDS SIDE} \ \ ZRAPHIC ?CALE z Q
I F--
\ (TYP•) \0 0 20 40 80
/ 0. M VUi A
i inch 40 ft.
[-]McADAIIS
/ /? ACT AREA/#3
USE B FE DI ANCE: \ \
NE 1 ISTURB ?= 0.25 AC. - _ \
NE I ?D AREA =4.19-AC.
AL ?S BASIN RIPARIAN x z ° z
P4 -1
DI 7 ANCE = 0.44 AC. CB88 N
LENG F` IMPACTED CHANNEL = 0 LF J
\ \ - ()Z' a as
z L,
I AVERA E STEAM WIDTH ? 1 FT. (APPt x) 1 / \ w o
G
E- U
I / c \
Wog
/ z a
J I \ I / \ 1 z woo
J w xd°
L - - I? _ - . ? FES4 x
\ CB9
??--
T P 0l-BANK 1 - - - -
( P) \ \
_ ....... ol[Rp W
.E R CREEK / ?,... V
\ APR 1 3 2005 W
5' CONCRETE .. aX p?IgR ti RQUAt1
- - - - SIDEWALK / ^ c-+?T v TERCH
0 U oz
_-
W n CB6 / 18 EDIAN J ry° ?i
CC) R
C) + PROPOSED SIMPLESPAN W
N CB5 PRECAST COREDECK
N - - _ / CONCREE BRIDGE
W CB 30" CURB \ \
/ GUTTER (TYP) \ \
/ 50' NEUSE RIVE RIPARIAN - t
BUF--FER- TYPF MEASUR
FROM TO O
BANK, EACH n/
cr) ° SIDE) ?•fl
? W
?- ES3
U ( 1 / PROPOSED ARCO 0
rL 340
- - H eORPORATE DRIVE- - co
l \ \ / ?/
_ \ (90 PUBLIC O ii L0
fl) V)
C \ \ / / / / . ~ \ / 0 O O O
co O -'t
In
GRAI?C SC?CL / o Q °
0 20" ao so w
1 ?- - - / W
q L p. N q
U
v
DfcADAAfS
\ IWACT APEA #4 1 \ 30" CURB & / U
NEUSE BUFFER DIOURBAN1?.- 1 1 --,,GUTTER (TYP) / U a
ENE 1 DIST WED AFEA O.1
NE ZIST[IRBED - 012 C.
ITAL NEUSE B / \ \ \ `1 B° MEDIAN / ?x° J / O d x
BUFFER DIS?U grNC - 0.?3 A. . Cb m (TYP) a z , f'I 1 w zoo
LENGTIIOF MIPAC3fED L = 0 L-F / / x o F.
E- U
W VYm
f
AVERA? STREEA'A? AtjA 'T = Fr/ ( 'PROS) \ SIDgANLK E \ / / ? ?q
\ / j / / \ \ \ \ ? / W YW?
? rl
PROPOSED ARCO V
CORPORATE DRIVE
........ - -4 ^ - (90' PUBLIC R/V)
' \\ 1
a
?/ \ \
E .... ... P OF BANK \\\\? ?\ \ \ ????tJ? W
( P) \ \1 D O z
APR ? 3 2005 x
DENR-1NATERQUAUTY
o // - - - \ ,? \ ,TI DSkE?STOFt? titiER E' .r-4
N .. \\\ / ?1
/ / \? \ \!a, ?? U
PROPOSED SIMPL SPAN
/ T PRECAST C6f?EDECK _ ?? \ \ r
Co
----,CONCRETE BRIDGE
` \ \ \ r l
5Q' Ali'GSE RIVER RIPARIAN
O
BUFFER VUSURED 50a E x°° AFRO TOP OF BANK, EACH
\ \ ^
E SIDES - ? ? - ? ? -
PI) V)
o
II M
/ ? '/ 1 0 c
Cl)
U GRAPHIC SCALE o Q °
40 0 20 40 80 H w
l1 ti z ? w
Q ? F
d ? ? A
g . ?? ? / / / j _ / ` \ I inch _ 40 ft
nMcADAb[S
\ \ \ \ 5 CONCRETE\ \ U
_SIDEWALK-----_. \ \ \ \ ? ? \ ?p, U ?
\ \ Qr'z zI
\ \ \ \ \30" CURB & \ \ \ > \ Z ?, ] xg
\ GU]IER (TYp)\ \\? ?_ x Z y "
\ w? ? boo
\ \ E- U
V\.OCITY DISSIPATOR \ \ \ \ \ \\Qa
1O'LxI Nx24'THK \ \ \ \ \ \ C w a
` CLASS ' 1-RIPRAP APRON \ \
/ L SP ON FILTER FABRj
LEVEL DER \ \ \ ?B5
SEGMENT L BBL CK?tEA \ \ - \ W
RETAINING WALL \ \ \ \
W=364.0± \ \ \ \ \ / \ L? !? 1J
\ \ \ \ PROPOSE : ARCCY \ w
FES3 CB4 \CORPOO' DRAT. APR 1 3 2005
\ i \ r 1
DENR • WATER QUALITY r .
W V.11R,103A DSTQTrYATERMMI?0
\
E(T D r1
HW1 `?\ I \ \ \ ?''?
O?0
E \
?w
Q U;04
a /
--VE60S4TY?S PATS ?? \ \ U
o 32'Lxl2'Wx24 T+? -- - \ \
04
/ mss-T" -RiPRA?APRBN? -
C) / ON FILTER -FABRIC
- ` ? _ / ? r ? ?-+
C) _ HW2 \ W
N
Cl)
M \
N \ / / / \? \ \ /\ I
14ACT # \? \I \
NACT}?07-\ \ \ \ -J\ 5 CULVERT \ WETLAND
cr)
o _ _ \\ x
CD
\ \ \ \ W
Co 0
In
\ \ / I / / \- \ \ - ?\ \\\
Lr)
-q if)
/ I ?\ _-?_\ c a I
Cl)
C) L)
q \ \ / I I ~ ?' / /? ?\ \ ?\ GRAPHIC SCALE a a °
a
40 0 20 40 80 z
1 1 J I ., z
q „ o ? r
g J I / I f \ \??? 1 inch 40 ft.
V-
NICADAMS
.9
Scenario: Base
"rl- '?L
Title: Arco Corporate Drive Project Engineer: Ryan C. Akers, El
x:X..Vand\stream impacts\aaC04030 10-21-04.stm The John R. McAdams Company StormCAD v4.1.1 [4.2014]
03/17/05 11:03:57 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1
Scenario: Base __
,i
PESt Fye
17 ... ! S?lp ?/y/? ..
..

Title: Arco Corporate Drive Project Engineer: Ryan C. Akers, El
x:\...Vand\stream impacts\aac04030 10-21-04.stm The John R. McAdams Company StorrnCAD v4.1.1 [4.2014]
03117/05 11:05:33 AM ®Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

Scenario: Base
Level Spreader Sheet
Label Total
System
Flow
(cfs) Section
Size onstructe
Slope
(ft/ft) Ground
Elevation
(ft) Hydraulic
Grade
Line In
(ft) Hydraulic
Grade
Line Out
(ft)
CB3 4.15 329.57 327.47 327.41
P-1 4.15 15 inc 0.006500 327.41 327.23
CB4 6.81 330.55 327.23 327.07
P-2 6.81 18 inc 0.011910 327.07 325.83
FES2 6.76 326.50 325.83 325.83
CB1 2.32 329.63 327.28 327.24
P-3 2.32 15 inch 0.067667 327.24 325.46
CB2 4.37 329.01 325.46 325.35
P-4 4.37 15 inc 0.073529 325.35 322.45
FES1 4.36 323.25 322.45 322.45
CB7 4.63 342.95 341.24 341.20
P-7 4.63 15 inc 0.006984 341.20 340.88
CB8 9.26 342.51 340.88 340.57
P-8 9.26 15 inch 0.027524 340.57 337.42
C69 9.95 339.52 333.55 333.47
P-9 9.95 18 inch 0.083178 333.47 328.42
FES4 9.92 329.30 328.42 328.42
C66 5.32 333.37 332.47 332.43
P-6 5.32 15 inch 0.006173 332.43 332.15
CB5 6.81 334.31 332.15 331.87
P-5 6.81 15 inch 0.006098 331.87 330.96
CB5 8.95 334.52 330.96 330.60
P-11 8.95 18 inc 0.006102 330.60 330.07
FES3 8.90 330.61 330.07 330.07
Title: Arco Corporate Drive Project Engineer. Ryan C. Akers, El
x:\...\Iand\stream impacts\aac04030 10-21-04.stm The John R. McAdams Company StormCAD v4.1.1 [4.2014]
03/17105 10:53:25 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1
O
O
M

dm
O •°
L L
a ?
c
d
V
N

O O O
O rn 06
2 M ccyq)
iE?
C
O
a)
L1J
O
O
ti
M
O
O
co
m
O
O
U)
M
wa-
`o
? N r
v m
M
d a.
cv
m >
U
mU
m
S o
c
w
m
0
a`
t
N
O
O
c g
mU
O ar
U) 0
V cv- ?o
} .? d w
O = oa
O 0 Y
m o
M (A F. m`
f ~
0
c
04 S
O 0

v
O a
r m
O

U 0!
O
O
T4
+
O
LL C-4 (y)
M
O

m?
c
om?
m aQ
mE?

0
Sa
o
mP

a%in
P X o
?
O O O
to
M M
M O o
tV

d
Rf
? m
O C.
CL c
d
C3
N
i
C
O
a
N
Ul
O O O O O O O O
N crMy- cOM? O G6 fl- (D LO
M M M M M M M M O
E

0
QO
t
r
O
9
O
O
0
O
O
W a ?
N 0
r
?t N
a
m
LU
N
c o
wN
0
CL`
co
th
N
n
ch
0
N
r
t
Q
N
D
O
O
O
c F-
m U
E
U ?
v
d?°
e m
r
7 N
0
m
M
0
c
N
.ti.
d
l0
N
d
N
N
a
0
0
m
0
.c
am Q
L°Eoo
0
o c10i v
VQ ? o
U c b
c
n
m
F- X O
d
N
m
d m
0 O
L L
CL
d
V

C
0
:p
m

a?
w
O
O O O O O O O O
(O U') 'I7 M N O Oi co
M M M M cr)
C M M M Pi
O
r---- ---------- ------ --r------ -; - - - -- --? O+
I 1 N
E C
-:3
EU)
O
co
r-
O
CD
r
O
r
O
N
+
r
O Z
O C
?+ 0
p
U)
O
co
+
O
O
+
O
O
+
O
O
N
0
O
O
O
W 7 -
N 0
-
vin.
o>
L:
m€
c
c to
w
d
'o
a
m
m
Lb
0
0
N
r
t
Q
N
co
0
e
E
V ?
m
0
d0
C m
t ?
7 O 14
Y
m O
co
FM
U
C
N
L
m
l0
N
N
l0
N
d
0
M
0
m
>`S
c
m aQ
w E v
`O
o N a
L) 0
O N
Q?n
P ii o
?LO
aa?
LL
.. wa•-
w

tv
o
O
_I 0
o,
d

t0 .- R
r a
a

L:U
m
S o
O O O O O O O O O O cN
0 O 0 0 O O O O O to
dd r ? 9 M O o0 04
m
M M c? M M Cf) lM M M
O
a
.F
i ! ! N

?T-
Uf M

m TY)
d
C C ? Q

(L
d
V
co
U.) T'
10) L 1
I00
,MM
li N N tC}
V-
V-
cv- N
V MOM
_A
cCf) M L
42 ,e, c
a a? a? 4?- Ln
O

N
to

O n
,
- --
j Q
t
N r
Q

I co
0
f,
co

i C?
C
1
I
! ! .
R
a

i U
i
i

0
C
G
LL 0
i m

I i ?
I
!
i
c
- N-j- - +
r v
o
MM
O
?
4. a) m : co co

N
U?
_ 0oj
i O
?
y
O
I
Cl)
I
R
m
C
0 R Z>
« Q Q
m
it
o
'-- - - -- --- ---' T U ` O
O ?Rp
m
F- x0
LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS
(KIMLEY-HORN ASSOCIATES IMPACT #5)
Brier Creek, Parcel J-1-A Phase 2
Raleigh, North Carolina
Level Spreader Design
Kimle -Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: 9/8/2004
Prepared by: MAE
Checked by: JMD
Analysis Level Spreader Specifications
Point 10 yr Flow Entrance Width Depth End Width Length
(cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
FES-3 11.39 16 0.6 3 20
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR CALCULATIONS
(KIMLEY-HORN ASSOCIATES IMPACT #5)
Brier Creek J-1-A, Phase 2
Raleigh, NC
Rip Rap Apron Calculations
Kimle -Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: 7/18/2004
Prepared by: MAE
Checked b : JMD
All aprons sized using the New York DOT Dissipator Method as outlined by NCDENR (Erosion Control Manual, Section 8.06)

Description Pipe
Diameter
(in) 10-yr
Velocity Zone
(fps) -) Apron
Length
(ft) Apron
Width
(ft) Stone Apron
Class Thickness
- (in)

..Rip-Rap A ron FES-3 15 15.28 3 10 4 1 24

RipRap-Storm Sewers.xls 3/22/2005 Page 1 of 1