20061135 Ver 1_Complete File_20060726

Y

- Eco stem ,

PROGRAM

INVOICE
August 7, 2006
DWQ#: 06-1135
COE#: n/a
Mr. George W. Krichbaum, Jr.
Oxford Park Associates
6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27615

Project: Oxford Park County: Granville
You have elected to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the Section 401/404 permit issued for the above reference
project through payment of a fee to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). In accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0500, your fee has been calculated as follows (Please note: payment of wetlands is calculated in increments of 0.25 acres). If you
have any questions concerning this payment, please call David Robinson at 919-715-2228.
Stream 293 linear feet x S 232.00 = S67,976.00
Total amount due $ 67,976.00

Please mail a check payable to NCEEP for the total amount to the address below, and enclose a copy of this invoice.
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Please note that a payment made to NCEEP is not reimbursable unless a request for reimbursement is received within 12 months of
the date of the receipt. Any such request must be accompanied by letters from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or
authorization have been rescinded. If the payment check's account name is not the same as the permit holder's name, please include a
signed statement that the check is being written on behalf of and with full knowledge of the permit holder.

YOU MUST BE IN POSSESSION OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT FROM NCEEP
PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY THE DEPARTMENT
OF ARMY 404 PERMIT AND/OR THE 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION.
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Eric Alsmeyer, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
Sean Clark, S&EC-Raleigh (fax)
File 1155 D
AUG 1 0 2006
DENR - WATER GuALi T }
h'E1U4ND3AND STOR AMTER BRANCH

RP~StDY
u-ty... Enha"... Prot" Our Stag ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

F MATE Michael F. Easley, Governor
`ot 9p' William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
C? r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
--I
p - Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 8, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1135
Granville County
Oxford Park Associates
Attn: Mr. George W. Krichbaum, Jr.
c/o 6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject Property: Oxford Park
UT to Coon Creek[030301, 28-11-5, C, NSW]
I
i
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Tar-Pamlico
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0259) with Additional Conditions
I
Dear Mr. Kirchbaum Jr.:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 293 linear feet of perennial streams, 27,765 square feet (ft) of Zone 1 of the
protected riparian buffers and 16,528 square feet (ft) of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers for the
purpose of residential subdivision at the subject property, as described within your application dated July
12, 2006 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on July 12, 2006. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued
by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization
Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0259. In addition, you should
obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead
with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This Approval and Authorization replaces the Approval and Authorization that was issued on July 27,
2006.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification arc:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Noy` Carolina
401 Oversight I Express Review Permitting Unit Nl`urallil
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone, 919-733-17861 FAX[phone] Internet: http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

t

Oxford Park Associates
Page 2 of 3
August 8, 2006

Amount A roved Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream 293 linear feet) Page e 4 of 9 of the PCN form
Buffers -Zone 1 27,765 (square ft. Pages 7 & 8 of the PCN form
Buffers - Zone 2 16,528 (square ft. Pages 7 & 8 of the PCN form

2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design,, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:

a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3, No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.

4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures within Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.

5. Certificate of Completion

Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
6. Culvert Installation
N i Carolina
titr~lly
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates
Page 3 of 3
August 8, 2006

Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please
send photographs upstream and downstream: of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion: form.

7. Construction Stormwater Permit.NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http://h2o.enr:state.nc.tislsulFornis Documtents.htm.

Mitigation:

8. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)

Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by
the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has
been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until
the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhanc Varolina
tttrnll~
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Ralcigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: h"p•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates
Page 4 of 3
August 8, 2006
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into a
restoration fund. You have until thirty days after the date of this approval and authorization to
make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes
payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory
mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation River and Sub-basin Number
Required
Stream 293 (linear feet) UT to Coon Creek (Tar-
Pamlico /030301

9 Deed Notifications

Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified
as appropriate to suit to this project.

Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 15013.

This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 213 .0259. If you

None Carolina
Naturally
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hitp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates
Page 5 of 3
August 8, 2006

have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721 or Amy Chapman at 919-7105-6823.

Sincerely,

f Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

AW Klcbk/asc
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion

cc: Sean Clark; S&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files

Filename: 0611350xfordPark(Granvil le)401+NB Rmod

NAoe Carollna
1V~tura!!~
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http•//h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwctlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

r
~QF W AT4 91 Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
00 r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
J ~
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 27, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1135
Granville County
Oxford Park Associates
Attn: Mr. George W. Krichbaum, Jr.
c/o 6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject Property: Oxford Park
UT to Coon Creek[030301, 28-11-5, C, NSW]

Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Tar-Pamlico
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0259) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Kirchbaum Jr.:

You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 293 linear feet of perennial streams, 27,765 square feet (ft) of Zone 1 of the
protected riparian buffers and 16,528 square feet (ft) of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers for the
purpose of residential subdivision at the subject property, as described within your application dated July
12, 2006 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on July 12, 2006. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued
by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization
Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0259. In addition, you should
obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead
with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved

The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:

NOne Carolina
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
I!!Ca!!!f
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / 1ntemethttp:1/h2o. en r. state. nc. us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates
Page 2 of 3
July 27, 2006
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Stream 293 linear feet) age e 4 of 9 of the PCN form
Buffers -Zone 1 27,765 (square Pa es 7 & 8 of the PCN form
Buffers - Zone 2 16,528 s warPages 7 & 8 of the PCN form

2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:

a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures within Wetlands or Waters

Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.

5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.

6. Culvert Installation
None Caro lina
~ttrrally
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc,us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50%Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates
Page 3 of 3
July 27, 2006
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.

Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please
send photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion form.
7. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000

Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.

Mitigation:

8. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by
the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has
been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until
the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhanc IC;arolina
titra!!~
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.na.us/ncwctlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recyclcd/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates ,
Page 4 of 3
July 27, 2006
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into a
restoration fund. You have until July 31, 2006 to make this payment. For accounting purposes,
this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund to
meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:

Compensatory Mitigation River and Sub-basin Number
Required
Stream 293 (linear feet) UT to Coon Creek (Tar-
Pamlico /030301

9 Deed Notifications

Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified
as appropriate to suit to this project.

Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 15013.

This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 213 .0259. If you

One
N )
f Carolina
~tur~rll~
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Oxford Park Associates
Page 5 of 3
July 27, 2006

have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721 or Amy Chapman at 919 7105-6823.
Si c rely

Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

AW K/cbk/asc
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion

cc: Sean Clark; S&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files

Filename: 0611350xfordPark(Granv it le)401+NB R

None Carolina
~ttrrall~
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
' www.SandEC.com
July 12, 2006
S&EC Project # 3845.w1

To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
From: Sean Clark > 0 i 3
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Oxford Park-Granville County, NC
On behalf of the owner, Oxford Park Associates, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the NC Division of Water Quality that the
activities proposed below may proceed under General Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact
me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information. In addition, written
authorization from the NC-DWQ is requested for activities proposed to impact Neuse River Buffers.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Oxford Park
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Oxford Park Associates
Count Granville
Nearest Town Oxford
Water Body Name UT to Coon Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Tar- Pamlico 03-03-01
Index Number 28-11-5
Class C; NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.033
Wetland Impact acres : 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): 0.033
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 293
Total Impact to Buffers (square feet): 44,293
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application • Phase Plan Map
Form Data Sheets
• Agent Authorization $475 Water Quality Certification Fee
• USGS Map [l t/'~I ts.
• Soil Survey Map
~ L
• DWQ Buffer Letter JJ~u] -3
• Impact Maps 1
• Overall Site Plan Maps JUL 2006
• EEP Acceptance Letter
• Copy of correspondence 13R'A , VVATER QUA!.ITY
• Impervious Calculations tiYGtl/ h'~;~'i1!BSTU'SN'1inL,,RAN-Git
Charlotte Oftce: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Office Use Only: Fonn Vcrsion March 05
2 0 0 6 1 1 3 5
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification

2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39

3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?

4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:

5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Are f
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), checM.XqrA W
5 a
II. Applicant Information 3UL 1 2 7,006

1. Owner/Applicant Information DEW . wpTt:il aqt a iTY Name: Oxford Park Associates itit?.~n~,ci1

Mailing Address: Attn: Georp-e W. Krichbaum, Jr.
c/o 6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh NC 27615

Telephone Number: 919-981-6577 Fax Number: 919-981-6579
E-mail Address:

2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614

Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: sclark(Qsandec.com

Page I of 9

III. Project Information

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.

1. Name of project: Oxford Park

2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a

3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1924-75-6101

4. Location
County: Granville Nearest Town: Oxford
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Oxford Park
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The property is located
off Horner Siding Road approximately 0.4 miles west of Salem Road, northeast of Oxford,
NC.

5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.3468 ON 78.5627 °W
6. Property size (acres): 565 acres

7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Coon Creek 28-11-5: C NSW

8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico (03-03-01)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site contains heavily wooded areas with residential
homes and an existing CP&L utility line.

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:

Page 2 of 9

The proposed project is for a residential subdivision with permanent impacts resulting from
the installation of roads these impacts are necessary for accessing the entire property. Heavy
equipment typically used for road construction will be employed for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
additional housing; for the area. Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas are needed in order
to gain access to the entire property.

IV. Prior Project History

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
In January & February, 22004, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation and Tar-Pamlico
River Buffer evaluation. On June 24, 2005, Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE conducted a site
visit to verify, jurisdictional wetlands (Action ID 200421139). On March 1, 2004, Ms. Debbie
Edwards of the NC-DWQ conducted a site visit to verify Tar-Pamlico River Buffers (NBRRO
04-0205).

V. Future Project Plans

Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Althouy,h the eastern portion of the project area indicates "Future Development", the details
of this area have not been desi ?g_Zed yet.

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.

Page 3 of 9

I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed permanent impacts
include 293 linear feet of perennial stream channel.

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.

Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Wetland Impact (acres) N/A
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 7 acres

4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent? Before Impact linear feet acres

Impact Area #3 UT to Coon Creek Road crossing- Important/ 4' -5' 138 0.013
culvert & dissipater Perennial
Impact Area #4 UT to Coon Creek Road crossing- Important/ 51-61 155 0.020
culvert & dissipater Perennial
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 293 0.033

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.

Open Water Impact Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number applicable) e) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma (if ap ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project.
Stream Impact acres : 0.033
Wetland Impact (acres): 0

Page 4 of 9

Open Water Impact (acres): 0

Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.033
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 293

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no proposed impacts to isolated wetlands onsite.

8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here -and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested S&EC to complete a detailed, wetland delineation on the entire site,
to aid in developing a site plan that would avoid & minimize impacts to the maximum extent
practicable. Impact #1 is a buffer impact only: a bridge will be constructed in order to minimize
the impact to the stream. This crossing is necessary to access a lame portion of this site. Impact
# 2 is also a buffer impact only; a bridge will also be used to cross this stream. . These two
bridge crossings have been placed in areas that will allow a great deal of access therefore only
needing two, standard stream crossings. Impact # 3 and # 4 are stream crossings, but will use
the standard culverts. Headwalls will be used to further minimize the culverted crossing. All
jurisdictional wetlands have been avoided.

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to

Page 5 of 9

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.

If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The site proposes permanent stream impacts of 293 LF. Payment to the NC-EEP is
proposed to meet the stream mitigation requirement.

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
(919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 293
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0

Page 6 of 9

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)

1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No

2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?

3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.

1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Tar-Pamlico Yes ® No ?

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Road Crossing #1
Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 5,986 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,317 1.5 N/A
Total 10,303 N/A
Road Crossing #2
Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 6,891 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,374 1.5 N/A
Total 11,265 N/A

Page 7 of 9

Road Crossing #3

Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 6,658 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 3,420 1.5 N/A
Total 10,078 N/A
Road Crossing #4
Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 8,230 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,417 1.5 N/A
Total 12,647 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Buffer mitigation is not required because all proposed riparian buffer impacts are
considered "Allowable".
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)

Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The percent impervious for the project is expected to be approximately 18.5 An attached
spreadsheet shows actual impervious values for each lot size and road construction. In addition,
as per our meeting on 4/13/05 and the attached email, stormwater management will not be
required for the west side of Coon Creek however stormwater management will be required and
provided for the entire east side of Coon Creek. The stormwater management plan and
provisions for diffuse flow for the east side of Coon Creek will be designed and submitted to the
DWQ for review and approval at a later date. It would also be the applicant's request to receive
approval for the attached impacts and for the DWQ to incorporate a condition within the 401
Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer Authorization to allow the provisions for diffuse
flow to be submitted reviewed and approved at a later date before the proposed impacts take
place.

X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A sanitary sewer system will be utilized for the proposed subdivision.

Page 8 of 9

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)

Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No

Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)

Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr. state.ne.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Oxford Park does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. We anticipate that you will advise
us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A

n
jazz) ffil (14-(lu July 12, 2006
c'
Applicant/ ntl~ Signature Date
(Agent's signature i lid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 9 of 9

Apr 13 06 01:55p PCDI 919-981-6579 p.2

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina • Plane: [phone] • Far: [phone]
~ ' w~•rtivSanciEC.com

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner or Representative

Name: L bm' e6jeo l'~.4~ ~,w N G 0 w
AddreSS , ~Q1ANS-t

Phone: t 4 2 4
Proiect Name/Desaiptiorr y S&EC Project # ?~7

Date: 41-26
The Department of the Army
US. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1894
wr7nrington, NC n=
Attn: (----''t c_ S M s ,
Field Office: (e,
y
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and PerndWng
To Whom It May Cono=
I, the representative of the current prop" owners, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of f6 r i ? Or~2_ .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTT.CE: This authorization, for liability and professional eourtcey reasons, is valid only for government officials to enter
the property when accompanied by S&EC stafL You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the sit
Print Pro rty Owner's Representative's Name er's Sitxrre
CC.
Ms. Cyndi Karoly /7,0
do nvironmental Consultants, PA
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Darlotte OMU: GrcenslTro Office
236 LePhillip CL Suite C 3917-E LawadaleDrive
Concord. NC 29025 Grcemboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: (704)72D-9406 Fax: [phone]

) \ ( N

~ ~ L `:`~~.J/ 1 ~,~.I1I~f -J ~<9< ~ (j \.\,y~ ~'r1~~~_ p~~~_~~ r-~S~~~- ~ I

_ --fI " ( ~ it)) l /1~ , ~ ° ,
-~.j~ i~_ '`V u, ~ it t .p ..r! _l..r~.~ ffll~`~? 4~~-- .i9~ ~.r~ "~,wn_ n
-r i r~-, ~,1~ -l? (/F~`~ tit I r ! i I'1 -~'lt-4 Iry'/ ~ \ ~ ~ '_~~8yyy

j,,if{ ~ y C S Cam

51TE
1/ r~ (!,1 \(S, fs0 v'/~ 1. , 'yam.; C / ~7~,•'/1 t` ~

VN"\~ FCC

YO!

/ I ( :.If t 1~ \ t.,~ -J ti> 11~~'rt_ I J / / ,-u• ~L/ a:.?c?L

T j - er

" vr'-rte=

r 'y_ 1, 1 1 r,l~~~-•'/x~4~ ~y `}`I 1 , , `1 a. / (
.,1 t. a_, I l 7CCC•///?a t7 . 1 i T l`'i t~\ t y, c Et? \ 1 1 i ! f i L` _

Project Number: Map Title:
3845.W
Project Manager: FIGURE I -U5G5 Map
5C OXFORD PARK ; Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Granville County NC 11010RavenRidgeRd.•Raleigh, NC27614
Scale:
[phone] • [phone]
1 u _ 000' Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Date: Source:
07/1 1/07 Oxford Quadrangle
I

C ~ ~ t 1 t.r / ~ ~ 1
VOU
C, 13 V.in
1_nI3V IJ\
L n!; I
i r•A'" v ~l~ ~V.I ti/ t ilt3 ~E r`~ ` .
f _ C
i
Chl: ,G Vd13
Fw8 VaH
1
/ z
I tic
IN-C
_ 1 BBB I~ / .~iw/ y~: A V•+C
VaL3
to V,, ti ~ev ACuF,~ l - V J f v/
f WB
x.:130 / Hnt3 1/ t
t a ,c,
C f i '3
SITE - r - + tL , .c
Yv C c Csl3vi / If 'fl,Lt r ~a 1i~t, 4~~~ C 7 ~ /r ( I
r. 3/ 1
VaB
r~ ~L-
J ;'r (l
ChA C F. B)
13 j~ `:f
C., ri
V.H
rwn
11crr,Er ACis
rte as
,.tU
K.
I lid ~ ~ ~ _ ~ vr, ~ ~
'~1._-- X1.1.
Project Number: Map Title:
3845.W I
Project Manager: FIGURE 2 - 501L SURVEY
J- C OXFORD PARK Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
scale: Granville County, NC t 11010 Raven R dge Rd.- Raleigh, t1C 21614
C [phone] •(910)34ir9467
u _ 2,000l Web Page: w.vw.Sand EC.com
Date: Source:
07/1 1/07 Granville Co. Soil Survey

~0F W A I.~RQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
9 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
=f Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
j Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality

March 3, 2004
DWQ # 04-0205
Granville County
Page 1 of 2
Oxford Park Associates c/o
George Krichbaum MAR
6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject Property: Oxford Park
Coon Creek and tributaries
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0259), DWO Express Review Process
Dear Mr. Krichbaum:

On March 1, 2004, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review 13 stream features and 5 pond features
located on the subject property for applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0259). The features are
labeled as "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, M and N" and "ponds 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5" on the attached maps.`,
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the surface water labeled as, `A; B~ CpD,LE,`1=~G, H tI0J;
K, M and N " and "ponds 3 and 5" on the attached map are surface waters and are sUbjb6t'toIthd'Tor_;IPhmlido ._f
Buffer Rule (see chart below). These streams and ponds and their associated buffers should,,be 4dentified on.Unpfuture.
plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other releirant agdhdies) of_~this decision
in any future correspondences concerning this property. This on-site determination shall expire:.,fivd1(5) yearsIrom.the
date of this letter.
Feature Origin (identified as flag numbers)

A Start 232A through to Property Boundary PB , and drained
B Start S01-stop 123, start 136-stop 141 at PB
C Start 453 (perennial start 454 through to confluence of feature J
D Start 597 through to feature F
E Start at PB through to feature F
F Start at PB through to feature J (perennial)
G Start at PB through to feature J
H Start MW 132-sto MW 145, start MW 147-sto MW 155, start MW 157 though to feature J
I . Start D101-stop D100 no stream connection to feature J
J Start at PB through to feature K
K Subject throughout property Coon Creek
M Start at head of and through to feature F
N Start at 447 through to feature C
POND 1 Not subject
POND 2 Not subject
POND 3 Subject
POND 4 Has been drained, feature D flowing through and subject
POND 5 Subject
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwotlands/
ICI

Oxford Park Associates
Page 2 of 2
3/3/04

Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not
start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ
recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely
manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This determination is final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers. Nor
does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional
questions or require additional information please call Mr. John Dorney at [phone] or Debbie Edwards at (919)
733-9584.

Sin el

lime P.E.
WQ, Director

' - it';. i.''' it ~i~i -
cc: Sean Cla[k`&E~' i
Steve Mitchell, DWQ' Raleigh A0 iorial Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 04-0205

r; ~ o

s ~ s I p f '94 120

q J ~ 1~ c~
` 18 L.J' -r
J =A
94

qzz
\ •

y SIS d ~ t
y
fj \ •

F

e p M ~ .
G Y•

Y

Y •

N
Fs f

, ~ y r~l 'gyn.

3Projectwi No.
Figure 1 - USGS Map ;
Oxford Park a Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project Mgr.: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Oxford Park Associates
X.
Sc
Granville County, NC [phone] - [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
01/29/04 Oxford Quadrangle
Dated 1984

\ 189 rx~`Q
-6 \ yy

HASE 2

I 188
00

i I ' 164 \ 1/ - ~ w ~
3.1 FROM TOP OF
'A' K: TO FOOTING
I IMPiACT

ZONE 2: i /

/ ZONE

- ZONE l
ZONE 2

1-i-j 161

u PHASE 1D r

j ' j ~lf ~ 165 I ,I

E I ' - - - - -
L
-
PHASE 1C -
IMPACT TOTALS: i rF
ZONE 1 = 5986 SF
ZONE 2 = 4317 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 IO 60 120
u
C
1 inch = 60 ft.
0
0
0
CL
~ PROIEa ND. EWP-01010
LLf/j{`~•~ MCOMPANY, THE JOHN R. McADAMS 4 FILENAME:
IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWG INC.
i a SCALE: 1»=60. STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLINNERS/SURY670R5
a RESEARCH TRIANOIE PARK, NC
o (q DATE: 03-17-2006 Si'RrIAM CROSSING #1 P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
p`- - (010) al-5000
X
I

- 4411

E

PHASE 3
Co V) o

L713 V,)

70

Q \I

3.5 FROM-1f OP
0o OF BANK TO
FOOTING
IYPACT

r C\2
n (Z / ©I I \ \ \
WI W
~t .3 13
Cl)
°
o

E /
/ _ ~ _ PHASE 3

C
IMPACT TOTALS:
ZONE 1 = 6891 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
E2 ZONE 2 = 4374 SF i
60 0 30 60 120
co
1 inch = 60 R.
0
0
O
O
mlcomwmcmxagx~
[1 PROJECT NO.
EWP-01010 T, o
yam THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FlL6N.\Mf:: MCF0 COMPANY, INC.
Q IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWG
UJ : C7 SCALE; SAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
1"=60'
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
DATE: STREAM CROSSING #2 P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
0 03-17-2006 [phone]
a
I

- -446

2pNE / 400 ~ ~

N~! PHASE 3

\ \
SZR F R PUBLIC DRAINAGE m -
j ZONE ,gvF EASEMENT, . O .0 426
1 - - -
Zp ~ ~ ~ l s
NE;~~
cl\
I
V _
ZONE_ _ _ o
ONE s ' . Q ? \ ~ ~ ZONE-i - ~

PHASE 8 -ZONE 2

42 -

OAA
c
IMPACT TOTALS:
i
v ZONE 1 = 6,658 SF
ZONE 2 = 3,420 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
STREAM IMPACT = 138 LF 60 0 30 60 120 U
t
r
- 1 inch = 60 ft.
0
0
0
d
PROJECT NO.
LL EWP-01010 W®~
FlisxA o-; ARK L THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
P L
y IMPACT EXHIOITS.OWG COMPANY, INC.
t:l SCALE STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/FLANNERS/SLRVEYORS
a r 1^=60' RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
'p (q DATE: 03-10-2006 STREAM CROSSING #3 P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
O_ 1010) 901-5000
I
I

A~'' ! i'' PRASE =1• ~ _

GAO.

4- .0

Cl)
N ,

ix

LLI
$0

Cl)
\ 0
C) I
U V n d L
W . 1^ m
i---'----
1
E
E I
N ~ _ v
Z6 It PHASE r
d
o IMPACT TOTALS: It \
!N ,
ZONE 1 = 8,230 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
T ZONE 2 = 4417 SF
STREAM IMPACT = 155 LF 60 0 30 60 120
e
G
1 inch = 60 ft.
0
0
0
0
0_ PROJECT NO.
w . Ll EWP-01010 y~, PARK THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FILENAME: `t./NFORl.J 1 ARIL V°• COMPANY, INC.
n IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWG
ly, .>'ENGINEERS/PL4NNERS/SURVEYORS
_6 9 SCALE. 1°=so' STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
STREAM CROSSING #4 P.O.EDOXI{1400 ZIP 27 09-4005
o DATE: 03-10-2006
(DID) 3G1-5000
a
X

HEADY/ALL

i
1
l
E n.. M

°a-
00 ELEVATION
~ N
E
E
r
c
u
SUBMERGED PIPE DETAIL

i
t
o
0
0
rlwlecr No. EWP-01010 HCOMPANY, THE JOHN R. McADAMS
g rnENU1a: DETAIL 01 FA ORD PARK INC.
u . ENG=MS/PLANNEPS/SURVEYORS
SCAM= NTS STREAM IMPACT EXMIT RESEARCU TRIANCLS PARK. NC
A DETAM P.O. I3OX 14005 ZIP 27700-4005
Cj~ rn nets: 03-28-2006 (919) sat-6000
a`
v

TOP OF ROAD

BRIDGE SPAN

a

TOP OF DANK
V
V

Q
V

r FOUNDATION
u
R

u
v
c

ELEVATION
F
a
t

a

SPAN CROSSING DETAIL
u

0
0
0
Q
~ , ` rxorccr xa. EYrP-01010 0 THE JOHN R. bicADAMS
jRK
u ® DETAIL ® " COMPANY, INC.
u :PESUROXc'j NCUlsER3/PLAxxsRS/suRVexot
EC'~'gi NTS 1171r1~1i1 1J ~.7~ T=4GLE PARK. NC
o LDETAIL. .O. B14005 ZIP 27700-4005
0l0) 301-5000
a
Y

i
r'iM..~.r~nwarmw.w,an.rtwaas,aw.,M~~•rn~ucaowwwo-~r ~..r^r¦.1w.ws+ow waa Wrr.er

O ; a

\

{

N lo,

it - - ~ ~

I IF

XJ,

r

ro
a
0

oxx9R, RLCYIS1oxa, THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
1 a I OXFORD PARK OXFORD PARK OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPANY, INC.
A NORTH CAROLINA JOINT ADYCNME
d 0 S REAM IMPACT ANALYSIS !90 rufm oov COORSR ROAD CxCJNiiRa/Pt ANNLR9/SURVnOR7
1 CAROLMA CRAPSL RILL. NC 97514 RMARCH TRIANOIi PARK, NC
'n 3~~~i P.O. DOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
M ~t [phone]
ti OVERALL MUMM

III

i, COSI tem
l 1~~0ce ~~erif
` PROGRAM

April 19, 2006
Sean Clark
S&EC,PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Project: Oxford Park County: Granville

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will -be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres)
(Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Tar-Pamlico 0 0 0 0 0 293 0 0
03020201 _~_J I I I
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone]
Sincerely,

William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File

2zutov' E Protect' Oar Statue
~ NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 ! vmw.nceep.net

Page 1 of 2

Sean Clark

From: Finch, Brandon [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:00 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Sean Clark
Subject: Oxford Park - Stream Crossing Issues

Ms. Van Der Wiele,

First of all, I want to thank you for taking the time to meet with Sean and I this past Wednesday (4/13/05) to
discuss stream crossing permitting at Oxford Park. I am writing this email for two reasons: (1) To reiterate the
stormwater treatment options that we agreed would be required at Oxford Park in the event a 401 is applied for
at the 4 stream crossings we discussed; and (2) To briefly discuss the conversation I had with the developer
after our meeting.
Stornwater Treatment Qptions
As you know, we discussed two possible scenarios with regards to stormwater treatment as a condition of the
401 permit. The first option is to provide stormwater treatment (85% TSS removal) for the "higher-density"
areas (i.e. greater than 30% impervious) that you all identified with Sean Clark in an earlier meeting several
months ago. These areas were labeled 2, 3, & 4 and would be treated using the BMP's specified in DWQ's
Stormwater Manual (stormwater wetlands, bio-retention, or water quality ponds followed by vegetated filters).
If you will remember, Area 1 is under construction and will not be able to provide the necessary treatment,
although dry detention basins are being used, followed by level spreaders, that will provide diffuse flow into the
buffers. In order to provide stormwater treatment for the remaining three areas (2-4), a significant amount of
redesigning would be required and several lots would be lost as a result.
The second option we discussed was treating the entire east side of Coon Creek in lieu of providing treatment
for only the higher density areas (Areas 2-4) on the east and west side of Coon Creek. This option was
discussed since the vast majority of the west side of Coon Creek has been designed, though not constructed.
The east side, though it has gone through a significant planning effort, is more schematic at this point, which
will offer greater flexibility for stonnwater treatment.
As discussed during our meeting, one of these two options would be required if a 401-permit is required. A
copy of map denoting Areas 1-4 was left with you at the meeting.
Summary of Conversation with Develop
After our meeting last Wednesday, I had a chance to speak with the developer. He is willing to provide one of
the two options we discussed, though he is not ready, at this point, to commit to one or the other. Therefore, we
would like to propose that the 401 permit be crafted such that completion of one of the options is a condition of
the first permitted crossing on the east side of Oxford Park. Hopefully this is acceptable to you as it will
continue to accomplish the stormwater treatment goals for the 401 permit. Just so you know, it is our plan to
move forward with the express permitting route (per your recommendation) so that you will continue to be
involved in the review of this project.
Please let me know your thoughts with•regard to the proposed permit language. Also, please let me know if I
have stated something in this email that is different than your understanding of our meeting last week. Again,
thank you for taking the time to meet with us and we look forward to continuing to work with you as we move
forward in the pennitting process.

Brandon R. Finch, PE
Sr. Stormwater Project Manager
THE JOHN R. AIcADAAIS COMPANY, INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
4/25/2006

Page 2 of 2

919-361-5000 RTP, NC Office
704-527-0800 Charlotte, NC Office
919-210-2912 Mobile
fincl1 jglunnncadams.com
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. provides a unique collection of land development design services including land planning,
zoning administration and permitting, surveying, site engineering, contract administration, landscape architecture, stormwatcr
management, and traffic engineering. McAdams has offices in Durham and Charlotte, North Carolina. For more information, visit
w53v.iohnrmcadams.com.
AleADAAIS COMPANY: Assisting our clients to have successful projects for over 25 years.

4/25/2006

i

1
The John R. McAdams Company
Allocated Impervious Areas
Project Oxford Park Type "A" Lot 4,000 sf J
Project No EWP-01000 Type "13" Lot 3,500 sf
Date 19-Jan-05 Type "C" Lot 3,300 sf 1
Type "D" Lot 3,100 sf j
Type "E" Lot . 2,500 sf
Impervious Area
Description Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 8 Phase 8A Totals
Pavement 223,579 sf 195,829 sf 193,133 sf 116,523 sf 24,930 sf 63,722 sf 817,716 sf
Curb & Gutter 39,098 sf _ 39,318 sf 35,930 sf f6,658 _sf 5,103 sf 11 205 sf 150,712 sf
Sidewalk 77,495 sf 75,368 sf 72,650-s f 39,361 sf 9,543 sf 7 _15 061 sf 289,487 sf
Roundabout _ 1,288 sf
Lots 132 443,000 sf 154 - 518,100 if 152 504 700sf 66 - 226,200 sf 23 75,900 sf 26- 80,600 sf 553 - 112405,632 sf
6, 0r;0 S! { r w ,
17
,
- J - Jc
r - - - -
L ? t 3- !c n~ 3f 35 1 j SF << -
T C Lot of 5 - 174, 9,00 S(.._ 9.900 7 7 ^ 4 - - - -
---~yr !0, 2- '.,s 7 14575^s•^ G.. s X-0S! 26- 000 s.~
Total Impervious 783,172 sf 829,903 sf 8067422 sf 402,142 sf 115,476 sf 170,588 sf 2,664,835 sf
61 AC
Total Area 331 AC
% Impervious 18.5%
"Total Area calculated from all areas west of stream
,
i
i
i

OXFORD PARK
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS 03/21/2005

Total Impervious Total
Impervious Allocation per Impervious
Types of Total of Each Allocation per Zone per Type of Allocation per
Zone Lots Type Lot Type Lot Zone for Lots
1 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 0 3,300 0
D 26 3,100 80,600
E 30 2,500 75,000 155,600.00
2 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 0 3,300 0
D 43 3,100 133,300
E 29 2,500 72,500 205,800.00
3 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 12 3,300 39,600
D 0 3,100 0
E 53 2,500 132,500 172,100.00
4 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 4 3,300 13,200
D 35 3,100 108,500
E 0 2,500 0 121,700.00
Impervious Percent
Total Area Total Area Area Impervious Area Impervious Impervious
Zone (sf) (ac) Breakdown (sf) Area (ac) Area
1 464,806 10.67 Lots 155,600 3.57 33.48%
Streets 66,875 1.54 14.39%
Sidewalk 16,263 0.37 3.50%
Total 238,738 5.48 51.36%
2 667,363 1532 Lots 205,800 4.72 30.84%
Streets 100,203 2.30 15.01%
Sidewalk 25,403 0.58 3.81%
Total 331,406 7.61 49.66%
3 863,032 19.81 Lots 172,100 3.95 19.94%
Streets 99,074 2.27 11.48%
Sidewalk 16,496 0.38 1.91%
Total 287,670 6.60 33.33%
4 406,651 9.34 Lots 121,700 2.79 29.93%
Streets 49,674 1.14 12.22%
Sidewalk 7,435 0.17 1.83%
Total 178,809 4.10 43.97%

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Date: 3/9/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville County
Investigator: SC State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hardwood
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 100' NE from flag 244B
If needed, ex lain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Microste_gium vimineum Grass FAC+ 9.
2. Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- 10.
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua -Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Juniperus vir_giniana Herb FACU- 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 50%
Remarks: This vegetation meets the criteria (250% OBL, FACW or FAC) for hydrophytic vegetation.

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_ Other _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
Remarks: There are sufficient field indicators to indicate wetland hydrology.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Plot ID: Up from flag 244B

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludult Confirm Mapped Type? - Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, ConcreUons,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14 A 2.5YR 5/4 Sand

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: There are insufficient indicators to indicate hydric soil.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes - No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No

Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks: This area is not a jurisdictional wetland.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Date: 3/9/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville County
Investigator: SC State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Flag 244B
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

-Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Glyceria striata Herb OBL 9.
2. Microste_gium vimineum Herb FAC+ 10,
3. _ Salix nigra -Sapling OBL 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks: This vegetation meets the criteria(z50% OBL, FACW or FAC) for hydrophytic vegetation.

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs x Inundated
_ Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. <2 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks: There are sufficient field indicators to indicate wetland hydrology.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Plot ID: Down from flag 2448

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): epic Kanhapludult Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 2.5Y 5/3 Sand Clay
8-12+ 10YR 5/2 Sand Clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This soil meets the criteria for a hydric soil.

L- - I
WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes - No x Yes No

Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks: This area is a jurisdictional wetland.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Oxford Park - 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W11 Date: 1/31/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville
Investigator: Sean Clark and Jason Payne State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Eulalla Viminea Herb FAC+ 9.
2. Lonicera X Bella Herb NI 10.
3. Liquidambar Styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Juniperus Vir_ginlana Herb FACU- 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 50%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
Remarks: Wetland data form completed during snowfall.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park - 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W1 Plot ID:

SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well drained
(Series and Phase): Pacolet sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No

Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14 A 2.5Y 5/4 sand

Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hyrdic Soils Absent

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Yes X No

Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

I

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Oxford Park- 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W1 Date: 1/31/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville
Investigator: Sean Clark and Jason Payne State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes . X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Glycerica Sp. Herb OBL 9.
2. Eulalia Viminea Herb FAC+ 10.
3. Salix Ni9ra -Sapling OBL 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present

i

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data Describe in Remarks):
( Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs X Inundated
i _ Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: <2 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test !
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: <2 (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park - 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W1 Plot ID:

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well drained
(Series and Phase): Pacolet sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profilo Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5Y 5/3 sand clay
8-12+ B 10YR 5/2 sand clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although soil is mapped as pacolet, the soils in this area more resemble wedowee.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No

Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No

Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: Oxford Park-500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W 1 Date: 2/6/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville
Investigator: Will Buetow State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar Styracillua Tree FAC+ g,
2. Boehmeria Cylindrica FACW+ 10.
3. Salix 11
4. Pinus 12
5. Lonicera 13
6. Dog(?) Fennel 14
7. Eulalia Viminea FAC+ 15.
8. Phytolacca 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY

_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park S&EC # 3845.W1 Plot ID:

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-3 A 10YR 4/4 silt clay loam
3-11 B 2.5Y 5/2 sand clay loam
1 1-14C 2.5y 5/2 sand loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric Soils Present

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes No

Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No

Remarks:

The John R. McAdams Company
AFocated Impervious Areas
Project Word Park Type "A' Lot 4,000 sf
Project No EWP-01000 Type '6' Lot 3,500 sf
Date 13Jun-06 Type "C' Lot 3,300 sf
Type "D' Lot 3,100 sf
Type "E' Lot 2,500 sf
Impetviota; Area
Description Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 2A Phase se Phase 4A Phase se Totals
Pavement 222,144 sf 185,684 sf 10,471 sf 193,134 sf 115,347 sf 64,309 sf 24,930 sf 63,722 sf 879,741 sf
Curb & Gutter 39,812 sf 38,059 sf 4,240 sf 35 940 sf 20,054 sf 12,608 sf 5,089 sf 11,199 sf 167,201 sf
Sidewalk 78,995 sf 72,210 sf 1,972 sf 73 604 sf 39,7G7 sf 3,508 sf 9,671 sf 15,154 sf 294,681 sf
Roundabout 0 sf
Lots 132- 440,500 sf 146- 486,100 sf 7- 28,000 sf 152- 504,700 sf 66- 226,200 sf 61- 226,700 sf 23- 75,900 sf 26- 80,600 sf 613- 1,628,332 sf
TIve A'Lot 13- 52,000 St 9- 36,000 s,' 7- 28000sf 39- f56.000sf 34• 136.000sf 102- 356,013sf
Type 'E"Lof 35- 122.500 sf 31- 129.500 sf 38- 133 000 sf 42- 147,000 sf 8- 28,000 sf 160- 437,535 sf
7ype-C'Lct 26- 92,4W-,:! 53- 174,900 sf 3- 9,900sf 24- 79.20 sf 19- 62,700sf 23- 75,900sf 150• 402.626sf
Type 7D 'Lo! 26• 80,600sf 41- 145,700sf 43- 133300sf 26- 60,600sf 142- 359,626sf
Type 'E' Lof 30 • 93,000 sf 29- 72.500 sf 59- 72,530 sf
Total Impervious 781,451 sf 782,053 sf 44,683 sf 807,378 sf 401,368 sf 307725 sf 115,590 sf 170,675 sf 2,970,155 sf
68 AC
Total Aroa 378 AC
%Impervious 18.0%
'"Total Area calculated from al areas west of stream ticluding the 14.3 AC out parcel area

o

° Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 12, 2006
S&EC Project # 3845.w1
To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
From: Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Oxford Park-Granville County, NC

On behalf of the owner, Oxford Park Associates, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the NC Division of Water Quality that the
activities proposed below may proceed under General Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact
me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information. In addition, written
authorization from the NC-DWQ is requested for activities proposed to impact Neuse River Buffers.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Oxford Park
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Oxford Park Associates
Count Granville
Nearest Town Oxford
Water Body Name UT to Coon Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Tar- Pamlico 03-03-01
Index Number 28-11-5
Class C; NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.033
Wetland Impact acres : 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): 0.033
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 293
Total Impact to Buffers (square feet): 44,293
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application • Phase Plan Map
Form Data Sheets
• Agent Authorization $475 Water Quality Certification Fee
• USGS Map
• Soil Survey Map
• DWQ Buffer Letter
• Impact Maps
• Overall Site Plan Maps JUL ZQQ~
• EEP Acceptance Letter
• Copy of correspondence
• Impervious Calculations DEtrR YJPTEt2 u..r.UTY
';^~4;t11;DS ~J;O STC,:`,t'i7TrR BR~J.GN
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Office Use Only: Fonn Vcrsion March 05

USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification

2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39

3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?

4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:

5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Mana t t Area of
Enviromnental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check h, rq.

II. Applicant Information: ~Q

1. Owner/Applicant Information` ~L-,
Name: Oxford Park Associates
Mailing Address: Attn: George W. Krichbaum, Jr.
c/o 6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh NC 27615

Telephone Number: 919-981-6577 Fax Number: 919-981-6579
E-mail Address:

2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614

Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: sclark a,sandec.com

Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.

1. Name of project: Oxford Park

2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a

3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1924-75-6101

4. Location
County: Granville Nearest Town: Oxford
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Oxford Park
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The property is located
off Horner Siding Road approximately 0.4 miles west of Salem Road northeast of Oxford-
.
NC
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.3468 ON 78.5627 °W

6. Property size (acres): 565 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Coon Creek 28-11-5: C NSW

8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico (03-03-01)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site contains heavily wooded areas with residential
homes and an existing CP&L utility line.

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:

Page 2 of 9

The proposed project is for a residential subdivision with permanent impacts resulting from
the installation of roads these impacts are necessary for accessing the entire property. Heavy
equipment typically used for road construction will be employed for this project.

11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
additional housing for the area. Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas are needed in order
to gain access to the entire property.

IV. Prior Project History

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
In January & February, 2004, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation and Tar-Pamlico
River Buffer evaluation. On June 24, 2005, Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE conducted a site
visit to verify jurisdictional wetlands (Action ID 200421139). On March 1, 2004, Ms. Debbie
Edwards of the NC-DWQ conducted a site visit to verify Tar-Pamlico River Buffers (NBRRO
04-0205).

V. Future Project Plans

Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Although the eastern portion of the project area indicates "Future Development", the details
of this area have not been designed yet.

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forns should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.

Page 3 of 9

I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed permanent impacts
include 293 linear feet of perennial stream channel.

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.

Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Wetland Impact (acres) N/A
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 7 acres

4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent. Perennial Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres

Impact Area #3 UT to Coon Creek Road crossing- Important/ 41-5' 138 0.013
culvert & dissipater Perennial
Impact Area #4 UT to Coon Creek Road crossing- Important/ 5' - 6' 155 0.020
culvert & dissipater Perennial
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 293 0.033

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.

Open Water Impact Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number applicable) e) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma (if ap ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project.
Stream Impact acres : 0.033
Wetland Impact (acres): 0

Page 4 of 9

Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.033
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 293

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no proposed impacts to isolated wetlands onsite.

8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested S&EC to complete a detailed, wetland delineation on the entire site,
to aid in developing a site plan that would avoid & minimize impacts to the maximum extent
practicable. Impact #1 is a buffer impact only; a bridge will be constructed in order to minimize
the impact to the stream. This crossing is necessary to access a large portion of this site. Impact
# 2 is also a buffer impact only; a bridge will also be used to cross this stream. These two
bridge crossings have been placed in areas that will allow great deal of access therefore only
needing two standard stream crossings. Impact # 3 and # 4 are stream crossings, but will use
the standard culverts. Headwalls will be used to further minimize the culverted crossing. All
jurisdictional wetlands have been avoided.

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to

Page 5 of 9

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.

If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strrngide.html.

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The site proposes permanent stream impacts of 293 LF PaMent to the NC-EEP is
proposed to meet the stream mitigation requirement.

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 293
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0

Page 6 of 9

i

i

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)

1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No

2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?

3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.

1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Tar-Pamlico Yes ® No ?

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Road Crossing #1
Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 5,986 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,317 1.5 N/A
Total 10,303 N/A
Road Crossing #2
Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 6,891 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,374 1.5 N/A
Total 11,265 N/A

Page 7 of 9

Road Crossing #3

Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 6,658 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 3,420 1.5 N/A
Total 10,078 N/A
Road Crossing #4
Zone* Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 8,230 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,417 1.5 N/A
Total 12,647 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Buffer mitigation is not required because all proposed riparian buffer impacts are
considered "Allowable".
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)

Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The percent impervious for the project is expected to be approximately 18.5 An attached
spreadsheet shows actual impervious values for each lot size and road construction. In addition,
as per our meeting on 4/13/05 and the attached email, stormwater management will not be
required for the west side of Coon Creek however stormwater management will be required and
provided for the entire east side of Coon Creek. The stormwater management plan and
provisions for diffuse flow for the east side of Coon Creek will be designed and submitted to the
DWQ for review and approval at a later date. It would also be the applicant's request to receive
approval for the attached impacts and for the DWQ to incorporate a condition within the 401
Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer Authorization to allow the provisions for diffuse
flow to be submitted reviewed and approved at a later date before the proposed impacts take
place.

X1I. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A sanitary sewer system will be utilized for the proposed subdivision.

Page 8 of 9

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)

Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No

Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)

Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Oxford Park does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. We anticipate that you will advise
us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A

2W 61 C4 Jul 12 2006
Applicant/ g nt'~s ~gnature Date
(Agent's signature is ld'only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 9 of 9

Apr 13 06 01:55p PCD1 919.981-6579 p.2

9
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rood • Rakight North Carolina • Phone: [phone]- Fac [phone]
SandMcom

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Ltandowner or Representative

Address , ckq=i"~

Phor= % ct Y s Q O `I
Project Name/Dcscription: Q ~F~CiN 0. d~rK S&EC Project # c4~~ r J

Date: -41-~- /p f.
'Ilse Department of the Army
US. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
wdarington, NC 28.302
Attn F_ , c. t~ I s r
Field Office:ti e y L.
Re Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern
1, the representative of the current property owners, hereby designate and authotirc Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applic~a~ti "c- ons, to furnish upon request supple mental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 1 day of ~ r i• (i Zc C-
I
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This aullwrizati,on, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for govcnrwent officials to enter
the property when accompanied by SdcEC stafE Yott should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the sit
Print pro arty Owner's Representatives Name or y cc's Signature
cr. Ms. Cyndi Karoly cc: H& nvironmental Consultants, PA
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27641
Charlotte Office: Grccmboro Office
236 LePhillip Ck Suite C J817-E UwYx1jk Drive
Concord. NC 29025 Grcc=boro, NC 27455
Phone: (704)'720-9405 Phone: [phone]
Fu: (704)72D-9406 Fax: [phone]

~ ~ ~f i~ir ,~r ~~`"'r fir, ~ ~ ~ i

f
c
l r
~ t ~ ~ mo'o` r- ~c~`C-'-~ ~ i f i l •i

;

i-U
l S ! r~-- 1

rs r
I e-'

Project Number: Map Title:
3845.W I !
Project Manager: FIGURE I -USGS Map '
5C OXFORD PARK Soil & Environmental Consultants, ra
Granville County, NC 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
5cale: y, [phone] • [phone]
j 1 n = '000' Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Date: Source:
07/ 1 1 X07 Oxford Quadrangle
I

L: Vah
van
VaC- EnF J FicC\~ VaB
ChA '
- Itit ~ cQ Fie.l3
/
\ CI R
\ VtrC3/' \ ( Cali \ A
w% CaEi W
VaLl'i
I fib NIP, I Hell EnB 41
( ~ ~ VaP, Enft ~
~J9 Z~ WrC
> I(A;
VarC
V\e~ i'i~- V1rG ,.HeB f-_nC
ChA-
EnC~ c> / Va13 1 ieC3 \ VeB
EnD
I - Lori .`n• i" HeB -l,..•' ~
/ tr~8 S En(0Vn(
Val .
- \ H[
VaB
ll \ f.nC CaB
l~~ ' / i 1eCi ~ Haf3
`
.t A ' bB VaC3 ' \ Y \
_ ~C. 1 nR - m \ VaB J Hunt boro
VaBhA SC, V
`r; ' Fit a5J
! / ! FlPB It-B V.AB
j Ft. !
Hnt3 1
1 VaEI - Va B
~CeC1. HeB S
l-. ~ Q C <CeCi
(
API SITE _ Q2 °VaH 1 CIIA
ri` l eG t nI / I p(t~ 7~ I JfTI VaB y Qb I'97 _1 d
GciLS~Ct VaCI CaB P~ AlH
i
Czar C nFi _P Vali +1eEi
I
CIA
tlr t, ~~V
-o V
Fit B r3 l~
S_•. t. Chn Pat Ca C3 . - ---i Vati - i
l CeC2
° nPF! Vets lfoB
~I,Ci- \ JJf'ar °Vaf3
rart HeB
r~
CC
nPB _LJ r ~
13
cI,A'^HeH:-
w (
~ ~A I vaC ~ I
A
Ce g F F].?] VeR
APIj fi ° ChA Val? i CaH
~ nPB iu PaE ` m ~ \rni i ' , ~ I
Apf3 'A p C'
VnG t'aM~~ ~ -
10.3
1,51 va(3 APd
pe, - U'113
V He[i A Ci Ce.(2 S '97 C:.,13 V.R l } 1 ^
` e 'IF 'hA » Z- C~ f
a° H CaE3 y 0 y p( 1
\ lr,,
Vass ACS+`
Apr, eC2 Q VJelj
Lz L.aB APCi \t _t!2 CeC2
m W \ tali(\\\ (
Project Number: Map Title:
3845.W I
Project Manager: FIGURE 2 - 501L SURVEY
SC OXFORD PARK Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
scale: Granville County, NC 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC27614
[phone] • [phone]
I u = 2,000' Web Page: www.SandEC com
Date: Source:
07/11/07 Granville Co. Soil Survey
i

~0F W N / ~RQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
J `C Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality

March 3, 2004
DWQ # 04-0205
Granville County
Page 1 of 2
Oxford Park Associates c/o
George Krichbaum "JAR
6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject Property: Oxford Park
Coon Creek and tributaries
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0259), DWQ Express Review Process
Dear Mr. Krichbaum:

On March 1, 2004, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review 13 stream features and 5 pond features
located on the subject property for applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0259). The features are
labeled as "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, M and N" and "ponds 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5" on the attached maps.',,
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the surface water labeled as f`A,}B j CpD,tE,`$FS~G, H.I;+Uj,: !
K, M and N " and "ponds 3 and 5" on the attached map are surface waters and are sObject,tc:thd'Tar4iPomlido i.f
Buffer Rule (see chart below). These streams and ponds and their associated buffers shbuld,bcRdentified on:any~future.
plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant ag0hdies) of--this decision-a.-I.- .:e
in any future correspondences concerning this property. This on-site determination shall expire:.,fivd (5) years:from:the'
date of this letter.
Feature Origin (identified as flag numbers)

A Start 232A through to Property PB , and drained
B Start S01-stop 123, start 136-stop 141 at PB
C Start 453 (perennial start 454 through to confluence of feature J
D Start 597 through to feature F
E Start at PB through to feature F
F Start at PB through to feature J (perennial)
G Start at PB through to feature J
H Start MW 132-sto MW 145, start MW 147-sto MW 155, start MW 157 though to feature J
I . Start D101-stop D100 no stream connection to feature J
J Start at PB through to feature K
K Subject throughout property Coon Creek
M Start at head of and through to feature F
N Start at 447 through to feature C
POND 1 Not subject
POND 2 Not subject
POND 3 Subject
POND 4 Has been drained, feature D flowing through and subject
POND 5 Subject
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
I

Oxford Park Associates
Page 2 of 2
3/3/04

Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not
start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ
recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely
manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This determination is final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers. Nor
does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional
questions or require additional information please call Mr. John Dorney at [phone] or Debbie Edwards at (919)
733-9584.
Sin el

lime ; P.E.
WO, Director

cc: Sei~h Clark`&E i ;
Steve Mitchell; D1NQ`Raleigh`R0gioriaYOffice`
Fil© Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 04-0205

r' 1 0

5~ 6 1 b ~ ~ ~•g 9 l~l
°

p
I
p p +n
7 ' p..
V -7
494

_r . ~ ~ ~ r Cem

. ~ hey
• f
i •

i d s Y '1

j u° i1 l ? O \..s.e tl

Project a ~ -l
Ii, Az_
Figure 1 - USGS Map
3845 W No.
Oxford Park o Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project Mgr.: Oxford Park Associates `r 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
i
Sc
[phone] - [phone]
Granville County, NC
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
01/29/04 Oxford Quadrangle
Dated 1984

189

i

31 FROM TOP OF /
BANK TO FOOTING
1~ I IMPACT

ZONE 2: '

ZONE 1

,.1
S
.ZONE
11
..ZONE 2

" - f PRASE 1D]

j ' / t. 165 L

1 ~
PHASE 1C - - -

IMPACT TOTALS: i
ZONE 1 = 5986 SF I '
E ZONE 2 = 4317 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
z
60 0 30 60 120 ~
- 1 inch = 60 ft.
0
0
0
LC
~ rewEa no. EWP-01010
u THE JOHN R. McADAhiS
FILENAME.: NF®R-D PARK MCOMPANY, IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWG o INC.
11 u SCALE: 1n_60. STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/FUNNERS/SURVEYORS
N RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
o DATE: 03-17-2006 STRr,AM CROSSING #1 P.O. DGx 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
p`- [phone]
X I

,

~ 34
I V 111

PIIASE 3/ / m o / / .

06 CD L/),
L :y O
hbkry O
- f
N

0 3.5 FROM- OPt
N OF BANK TO ,
FOOTING L r !
lip,
I~PACT

~ ( . of ~ Q
lam, - z z
(D / 114 z
CD olo

%
C
/
. / _ PHASE 3
t4.

0 IMPACT TOTALS; I 30
o ,
ZONE 1 = 6891 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
E2 ZONE 2 = 4374 SF
= 60 0 30 60 120
c
I inch = 60 ft.
0
O
O
O
PROJECT NO. EWP-01010
THE
(L
®.XFoxuj PARS COMPANY, JOHN R. McADAMS
0. 0 F1LE IMP ° PANY, INC.
IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWC
N d SCALE: 1n=60. STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
E°y RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
Z Cn DATE; STREAM CROSSING 02 P.O. BOX 11005 ZIP 27709-4005
0 03-17-2006 (e19) a01-5000
a
II

446

ZpA,E 400 ~
,v
1 \ ~ ~ i PHASE ~ ~ , .

~b C0
S~ EF R - PUBLIC DRAINAGE 000
ZOAe 0v EASEMENT.. .0 42

Y-/VZ ~ 1 i xe i

l ¢ ZONE

co u

ZONE

PHASE f3 , - /ZONE 2 .
c \
o°k h!C7iFLf+Lai

r
i
"A, .k1v / \ 424

IMPACT TOTALS:
4 i
F ZONE 1 = 6,658 SF
9 ZONE 2 = 3,420 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
STREAM IMPACT = 138 LF 60 0 30 60 120
C
- 1 inch = 60 ft.
0
0
0
CL
HOJECr No. EWP-01010 j:) T\ P THE JOHN R. McADAMS
u ~I IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWO ONF01 d L ` COMPANY, INC.
b SCAM STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
° v' °ATEc 03-10-2006 ~iTT2)?t1M CROSSING #3 P.o. eox Leoos ziP zwoo-+oos
a (oLO) aef-sooo
X
I

Fl j. PHASE . %y

1

V) 4+12
r ,l

A

w
E V

o
LIJ

1
16

a ~
~ ~ . PHASE ~ _r
O 1
~O
IMPACT TOTALS: h
ZONE 1 = 8,230 SF GRAPHIC SCALE
m ZONE 2 = 4417 SF
X STREAM IMPACT = 155 LF 60 0 30 60 120
W a
c
.O_I 1 inch = 60 ft.
6
0
0
0
a reaKCr no.
EWP-01010 ~
n~ THE JOHN R. McADAMS
FILENAWE: ,
W d.J~ PCOMPANY INC.
IMPACT EXHIBITS.DWG
W U SCALE: 1 »-60. S'1`+ AM IMPACT EXHIBIT` ENGINEERS/PI.4NNER5/SURVEYORS
.Fyn RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
o Ln DATE: 03-10-2006 STREAM CROSSING #4 P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
[phone]
a`
X

HEADWALL

s

f
inn)

~o
w
o CL .
a o ELEVATION
N
E
E
t
c
c
c
cc
c
c
U
SUBMERGED PIPE DETAIL
u.
4
t
:
o
0
0
d
U rRaECr No. EWP-01010 THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
DETAIL OXFORD R HCOMPANY, ~ INC.
u t7 SCAU: NTS STREAI~II 11V1PAC+ L' NMIT ENGINEERS/PIANNEPS/SUMMPS
i RESMCII TRUNGLE PARK. NC
N nsilt 03-28-2006 DETIi P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
1 (010) i
d
v

TOP OF ROAD

BRIDGE SPAN

0

TOP OF BANK

r
d
v

FOUNDATION
Rl

u
v

ELEVATION
_E
E
0
a
v`

SPAN CROSSING DETAIL
u.
4
c
0
0
0
0
a
PR07EC! EVIP-01010 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
u
< g PB.eRReIL4: DETAIL OXFORD PARK 99COMPANY, INC.
u ,CALF., STPEAM IMPACT EXHIBIT EtIGINSER3/PLdxxERS~SRTRVaY0R9
NTS RESEARCH TRWiGLS PARX. NC
o DARE DETAIL P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27700-4000
03-28-2006 (010) s°1-5000
a
Y

xv~h+,~Mma~aav...•ow~Tw,aaa.lo•w.,M..w•nurcaoa.warr.+~r,r.r. wslm, waa,w w~r.~

rr

1 h~rr 1 1/ ~ 1 • a

J t era t
ILI
lol,
111 ~ \ ' ~-/~D~ 1 / l

R Ste'

a
~A1
O
2
D
O
2
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
OXFORD YAR% OF NORTH CAROLL`IA L'.
OXFORD PARK ~'O RNSI COMPANY, INC.
i" • NORTH CAROLVA ICL'f7 AMMfMRa CYGMzRs/PLA.YNflt4/sURVZYORs
O 11 ; Q = T3 L90 Cs ~ ~ NC 27514 RZSWCH TRI1NOU PARR, NC STRr M $ (719) H'38116000 87709-1005
V] J ~~~111 O - M - y . r\ OVERALL wamr

,t 1--

cos stem Y

' PROGRAM

April 19, 2006
Sean Clark
S&EC,PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Project: Oxford Park County: Granville

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will -be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/LAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone l Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian. Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Tar-Pamlico 0 0 0 0 0 293 0 0
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone]

Sincerely,

William D. Gilmore, PE
Director ~
9
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit tp, VV
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh ZQQ6
File ~uL

OaI'' Stag 1~cTlF.f,DS fJ~O STG~.,,fJd, TtI~GRNiCH NCDENR
~Z.LStDY ~ ~ ~ PvDi`"'
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

Page 1 of 2

Sean Clark

From: Finch, Brandon [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:00 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Sean Clark
Subject: Oxford Park - Stream Crossing Issues

Ms. Van Der Wiele,

First of all, I want to thank you for taking the time to meet with Sean and I this past Wednesday (4/13/05) to
discuss stream crossing permitting at Oxford Park. I am writing this email for two reasons: (1) To reiterate the
stormwater treatment options that we agreed would be required at Oxford Park in the event a 401 is applied for
at the 4 stream crossings we discussed; and (2) To briefly discuss the conversation I had with the developer
after our meeting.
Stormwater Treatment Options
As you know, we discussed two possible scenarios with regards to stormwater treatment as a condition of the
401 permit. The first option is to provide stormwater treatment (85% TSS removal) for the "higher-density"
areas (i.e. greater than 30% impervious) that you all identified with Sean Clark in an earlier meeting several
months ago. These areas were labeled 2, 3, & 4 and would be treated using the BMP's specified in DWQ's
Stormwater Manual (stormwater wetlands, bio-retention, or water quality ponds followed by vegetated filters).
If you will remember, Area 1 is under construction and will not be able to provide the necessary treatment,
although dry detention basins are being used, followed by level spreaders, that will provide diffuse flow into the
buffers. In order to provide stormwater treatment for the remaining three areas (2-4), a significant amount of
redesigning would be required and several lots would be lost as a result.
The second option we discussed was treating the entire cast side of Coon Creek in lieu of providing treatment
for only the higher density areas (Areas 2-4) on the east and west side of Coon Creek. This option was
discussed since the vast majority of the west side of Coon Creek has been designed, though not constructed.
The east side, though it has gone through a significant planning effort, is more schematic at this point, which
will offer greater flexibility for stormwater treatment.
As discussed during our meeting, one of these two options would be required if a 401-permit is required. A
copy of map denoting Areas 1-4 was left with you at the meeting.
Summary of Conversation with Devclgp-cr
After our meeting last Wednesday, I had a chance to speak with the developer. He is willing to provide one of
the two options we discussed, though he is not ready, at this point, to commit to one or the other. Therefore, we
would like to propose that the 401 permit be crafted such that completion of one of the options is a condition of
the first permitted crossing on the east side of Oxford Park. Hopefully this is acceptable to you as it will
continue to accomplish the stormwater treatment goals for the 401 permit. Just so you know, it is our plan to
move forward with the express permitting route (per your recommendation) so that you will continue to be
involved in the review of this project.
Please let me know your thoughts with regard to the proposed permit language. Also, please let me know if I
have stated something in this email that is different than your understanding of our meeting last week. Again,
thank you for taking the time to meet with us and we look forward to continuing to work with you as we move
forward in the permitting process.

Brandon R. Finch, PE
Sr. Stormwater Project Manager
THE JOAN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713

4/25/2006

Page 2 of 2

919-361-5000 RTP, NC Office
704-527-0800 Charlotte, NC Office
919-210-2912 Mobile
fmch(q,jolmrtncadams.com
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. provides a unique collection of land development design services including land planning,
zoning administration and permitting, surveying, site engineering, contract administration, landscape architecture, stormwater
management, and traffic engineering. McAdams has offices in Durham and Charlotte, North Carolina. For more information, visit
www.johnrmcadams.com.
AleADAA1S COMPANY: Assisting our clients to have successful projects for over 25 years.

4/25/2006

i

The John R. McAdams Company
Allocated Impervious Areas
Project Oxford Park Type "A" Lot 4,000 sf
Project No EWP-01000 Type "8" Lot 3,500 sf
Date 19-Jan-05 Type "C" Lot 3,300s,
Type "D" Lot 3,100 sf
Type "E" Lot . 2,500 sf
Impervious Area
Deschption Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 8 hase 8A Totals
Pavement 223,579 sf 195,829 sf 193,133 sf 116,523 sf - 24,930 sf 63,722 sf 817,716 sf

Curb 8 Gutter 39,098 sf 39,318 sf 35,930 sf 20 058 sf 5 103 sf -11,205 sf 150,712 sf
Sidewalk 77,495 sf 75,368 sf 72,659 sf 39,361 sf 9,543 sf 15 061 sf 289,487 sf
Roundabout 1,288 sf .
Lots 132 - 443,000 sf 154 518,100 sf 152 504,700 sf 66- 226,200 sf 23 75 900 sf 26 80,600 sf 553- 112405,632 sf
? L.Ji ? - r t^ ? - f r q 0 Sf T GCO - -
~ J S
- -
r 8 LC r 1 - t~ r 500 „ 35>,iJJf sf <<__ Ia,;.. - r l
r n .
f SJJGs'
10 r v° ~C ~g 174.`) f C 900 _ ^w -
- rF ._01 2 <<r,: T
t u~ - - - - - - - - - fib j0 s Xn t` 600 s;
'2. 00 s
Total Impervious 783,172 sf 829,903 sf 806,422 sf 402,142 sf 115,476 sf 170,588 sf 2,664,835 sf
61 AC
Total Area 331 AC
% Impervious 18.5%
i
"Total Area calculated from all areas west of stream
i
I

OXFORD PARK
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS 03/21/2005

Total Impervious Total
Impervious Allocation per Impervious
Types of Total of Each Allocation per Zone per Type of Allocation per
Zone Lots Type Lot Type Lot Zone for Lots
1 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 0 3,300 0
D 26 3,100 80,600
E 30 2,500 75,000 155,600.00
2 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 3,300 0
D 413-- 3,100 133,300
E 22,500 72,500 205,800.00
3 0 4,000 0
0 3,500 0
PcEEP
12
3,300 39,600
D 0 3,100 0
E 53 2,500 132,500 172,100.00
4 A 0 4,000 0
B 0 3,500 0
C 4 3,300 13,200
D 35 3,100 108,500
E 0 2,500 0 121,700.00
Impervious Percent
Total Area Total Area Area Impervious Area Impervious Impervious
Zone (so (ac) Breakdown (so Area (ac) Area
1 464,II06 10.67 Lots 155,600 3.57 33.48%
Streets 66,875 1.54 14.39%
Sidewalk 16,263 0.37 3.50%
Total 238,738 5.48 51.36%
2 667,363 15.32 Lots 205,800 4.72 30.84%
Streets 100,203 2.30 15.01%
Sidewalk 25,403 0.58 3.81%
Total 331,406 7.61 49,66%
3 863,032 19.81 Lots 172,100 3.95 19.94%
Streets 99,074 2.27 11.48%
Sidewalk 16,496 0.38 1.91%
Total 287,670 6.60 33.33%
4 406,651 9.34 Lots 121,700 2.79 29.93%
Streets 49,674 1.14 12.22%
Sidewalk 7,435 0.17 1.83%
Total 178,809 4.10 43.97%

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W l Date: 3/9/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville County
Investigator: SC State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 100' NE from flap 2448
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. _ Microstegium vimineum Grass FAC+ 9.
2. _Lonicerajaponica Vine FAC- 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. _ Juniperus virginiana Herb FACU- 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 50%
Remarks: This vegetation meets the criteria (250% OBL, FACW or FAC) for hydrophytic vegetation.

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describo in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
Remarks: There are sufficient field indicators to indicate wetland hydrology.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Plot ID: Up from flag 244B

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field bbservations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludult Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14 A 2.5YR 5/4 Sand

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: There are insufficient indicators to indicate hydric soil.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Ve etation Present?
~ 9 x
_ Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No

Remarks: This area is not a jurisdictional wetland.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Date: 3/9/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville County
Investigator: SC State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Bottomland Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Flaq 244B
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Glyceria striata Herb OBL 9.
2. _Microstegium vimineum Herb FAC+ 10.
3. Salix nigra Sapling OBL 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks: This vegetation meets the criteria(a50% OBL, FACW or FAC) for hydrophytic vegetation.

HYDROLOGY

_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs x Inundated
_ Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: <2 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Freo Water in Pit: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks: There are sufficient field indicators to indicate wetland hydrology.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park/S&EC# 3845.W1 Plot ID: Down from flag 244B

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well Drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludult Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-8 2.5Y 5/3 Sand Clay
8-12+ 10YR 5/2 Sand Cla

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This soil meets the criteria for a hydric soil.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes _ No x Yes No

Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No

Remarks: This area is a jurisdictional wetland.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Oxford Park- 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W1 Date: 1/31/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville
Investigator: Sean Clark and Jason Payne State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: _ Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Eulalia Viminea Herb FAC+ 9.
2. Lonicera X Bella Herb NI 10.
3. Liquidambar Styracillua Sapling FAC+ 11.
4. Juniperus Virginiana Herb FACU- 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 50%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present

HYDROLOGY

- Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
- Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
Remarks: Wetland data form completed during snowfall.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park - 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W1 Plot ID:

SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well drained
(Series and Phase): Pacolet sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14 A 2.5Y 5/4 sand

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
- Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hyrdic Soils Absent

P J1
WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes - No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes - No Yes X No

Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Oxford Park - 500 Ac. SBEC # 3845.W1 Date: 1/31/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville
Investigator: Sean Clark and Jason Payne State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes , X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Glycerica Sp. Herb OBL 9,
2. Eulalia Viminea Herb FAC+ 10.
3. _Salix Nigra Sapling OBL 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
_ Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: <2 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: <2 (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park - 500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W1 Plot ID:

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well drained
(Series and Phase): Pacolet sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5Y 5/3 sand cla
8-12+ B 10YR 5/2 sand clay

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
- Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although soil is mapped as pacolet, the soils in this area more resemble wedowee.

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes - No X Yes No

Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No

Remarks:

i

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: Oxford Park-500 Ac. S&EC # 3845.W 1 Date: 2/6/04
Applicant/Owner: Oxford Park Associates County: Granville
Investigator: Will Buetow State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator _Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar Styracillua Tree FAC+ 9.
2. Boehmeria Cylindrica FACW+ 10.
3. Salix 11
4. Pinus 12
5. Lonicera 13
6. Dog(?) Fennel 14
7. Eulalia Viminea FAC+ 15.
8. Phyto/acca 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
- Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) - Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]

Project/Site: Oxford Park S&EC # 3845.W1 Plot ID:

SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-3 A 10YR 4/4 -silty clay loam
3-11 B 2.5Y 5/2 sand clay loam
11-14 C 2.5y 5/2 sand loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric Soils Present

WETLANDS DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes No

Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No

Remarks:

The John R. McAdams Company
AP.ocated Impervious Areas
Project Oxford Park Type 'X Lot 4,000 sf
Project No EWP-01000 Type 'B" Lot 3,500 sf
Date 13-Jun-06 Type 'C' Lot 3,300 sf
Type "D" Lot 3,100 sf
Type "E' Lot 2,500 sf
Impervious Area
escnpbon Phase Phase Phase 2A Phase 3 Phase Phase 4A Phase 6 Phase BA Totals
Pavement 222,144 sf 185,684 sf 10,471 sf 193,134 sf 115,347 sf 64,309 sf 24,930 sf 63,722 sf 879,741 sf
Curb & Gutter 39,812 sf 38,059 sf 4,240 sf 35 940 sf 20,054 sf 12,808 sf 5,089 sf 11,199 sf 167,201 sf
Sidewalk 78,995 sf 72,210 sf 1,972 sf 73 604 sf 39,767 sf 3,508 sf 9,671 sf 15,154 sf 294,881 sf
Roundabout 0 sf
Lots 132- 440,500 sf 146- 486,100 sf 7- 28.000 sf 152- 504,700 sf 66- 226,200 sf 61- 226,700 sf 23. 75,900 sf 26- 80,600 sf 613- 1,628,332 sf
Type A'Lof 13- 52,000sf 9- 35000sf 7- 28.000sf 39- 156.000sf 34- 136.000sf 102- 356,013sf
T e'8"Lot 35- f22.500sf 37- 129.500sf 33- 133000sf 42- 147000sf 8• 28,000sf 160- 437,535s[
Type 'C'Lot 26- 92,400sf 53- 174,90-sf 3- 9,900sf 24- 79.200sf 19- 62,700 e, 23- 75,900sf 150• 402.626sf
Type 'D"Loi 26- 50,600sf 47- 145,700sf 43- 133,300sf 26- 80,600sf 142- 359,626s1
Type E'Lof 30• 93,000sf 29- 72.500sf 59- 72,530sf
f
Total Impervious 781,451 sf 782,053 sf 44,683 sf 807,378 sf 401,368 sf 307,325 sf 115,590 sf 170,675 sf 2,970,155s
68 AC
Total Aroa 378 AC
% Impervious 18.0%
**Total Area calculated from all areas west of stream including the 14.3 AC out parcel area

SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
001299
NC Division of [Dater Quality Check Number: 1299
Date: 7/12/2006 Check Amt: $475.00
:ran 4 lnc.~icc Type Gate ReYerence Balance Discount Pay Amount
12076 07122006 Invoice 07/12/06 3845.691 Permit App. $475.00 $0.00 $475.00

A

U
~ ~
a a a v
U~ ~ za

a ~ ~
~ ~ ~ N
~ ~ f,l~r~ \ ~ a - a
1r+~~+ 11 1 ~N
*t i, ~ ~ ,'j1M~ti ~F ~ ~ ~ ~ a z
\ ~ a o W
a o ~
~ ~ a ~ i \ ~ ~ r
` w ~ a
1 ~ ~ a ~
1,.•:. ltTrlBt ~ ~ ~ d ? ~ C9 ~ ~ ps
ne+>lyor~rr ~ ~ x W ~ cry ~ ~ ~ w aa~..
; ~ ~ i , ~ ~ ~
- . , ~ ~ ~ off ~ ~
~~`fr~ ~ 1 ~ `
i~ ~`t ~ ?1 ~..:~i, ~ ~
/ ? . . ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~
~ `1
~ ~
It; r 1 100 Yl~AR
* 1.:!ir~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ . ? ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
` ? i'
/ r a i ? ~ ~

? , ,
rvro~ ti , r ~ ~ \ ~ 'l / \

~i~ ~ i • ~ ~ ~ ` ~ i . ~ ~ 1 \ ~
~ jj r x
,rrf ' ~ ~'l ~ r 1 ` , . VI
~ ~ :.:X~
. \ h i

~ ~ ~

i ~ ~ Via. M • ~ ~ ~ o
j ,yam ~ 1.'., 1:;.,
~ 1 ? ~ ~1 p~ W N
~ , .1 ~ . ~r ~ ~ 1

1 ~ it 1
. ~~r
1 ~ ~ \ d
Y
1 • ~ ~ ~ ~ iii a I j ~
~ d ~ ~
\ U
I:~: , ~ o
w ,r. ; 'y,~,~,,.~

ii J. i ~ X ` ` \ O
Q

1 l.. ~ Dom` I:::: . ~ ~ ~ ~~.1 ~ ~ j

~ f ~ r'' ~ / 1
1 , .;I:

1: 1 I ;:1 , ~ 1'-'
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~
:ar . ~ ~
~ 1 1 I , ',i~r ~ i I ~ , ~ ~ 1. 1\ ~ i
` , ~ ~ ~..J ~ ~ ' ~
~ , . e 1•• r t
1~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ l..' r ~ l r + i ` ~
r r ? ~ ~ i \ ~
~ ~~r: ` ~
i i i ~ ' . ~ 1
~ \ ' f ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O • r/ , ~ / 11\ a ~ 1 ~ .
t.;,'•;` iw ~
JAS, ~~:,~ti ti:..;~. . irk'. ~ ` 1 ~ _ \ ~ ~ N \
rr "r \ \
~ ~ \
`t . / ~ 1 4 - j ~ 1
• - ~ 0 C
•J . - ~ : . ~ r, r ~

1: ' ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ' ~
a f E ~ r,
a ~ 1:,:1 ~ r s; ' ~

~1 -
w ~S ~ 1 ~ _ ~ 1 ~ ~f ' ~ ~'i

o ~ two r ~ fl~l!¦ 111 ~1 III .1 ~ +111 n~n~'ira~~~ura rai ~i~ /~'~i' i ~w
a r i.s.r ~ •.'w.~.~ ~r.r~ R1' Vin,,;/ i s S~'
~ - 1~ "Q• EWP-Oi 000
ORTH
",r i~
r'~: r~s,.;,;..,,, nesara® JRA .4~' i
i,,.:Lb..~:::.: . r ~ JRA
~4 ~D GRAPHIC SCALE a~ 1 ~ = 300'
~ ° i50mo - soo n?re~ 05-12-06
N r
m I inch m 300 ft ~ no OF 1
XT W

MPRELIMINARY DRAINING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Q " F 1)

rt

.~,w ,

i
A
~
~ V
~ ~
O O
~ ~ ~ U d~ zl
~ •o

~ ~ a
~ ~~,,,~~II a ~ ~V ~ N ~
h+i
\~1~~ W OO
~b O
~\1 a ~~.i
~ ~ ~ ~1~ _ W ~ O 0~7
~i~ Qi
U ~C W z .
\~...ti~ 1 1 . ? w ~a a
~r 1 1~ 1
• •

~ ~ it / / 1 1 1 r 1

~i' (l ~~.....f s' 1 1 j ~ ~1 ~~..,__,,,J 1 1 / 1
~ ~ ~ tl ~
~
1~ 1 1 ! J ~ ~ ~
v
r 1 / 1 1 1 1 w. s rr ~ ~
, 1 1 , , / 1 , 1 a• 111 / ~ ~
1. 1 / 1 / I - 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~
II ~ 0 1 1 1 / - • 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~
~(r-..~ 1 1 Il 1 1 1 1 ~ ; i , 1 0 4 P 2 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
d, r, / ~ / ~ ~ ~ •
~ r// l~ ~ ` ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1~ P ~ 1 1? 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ r ~ ~ 1 1 . ~ It 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~
/ ~ ~ / e ~ 1 • 1 ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ Q
ii' / 1 1 1 . i~ t/ ~ 1 ~ ~ .1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ti P I / 1 _ ~ ~.1
~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
- / ~ / 1 1 / 1 1 ~ ~ ~ z
1 1 1 ' / 1 ~
1 1 / ~ / • ~ 1 / 1 ~ ~ 1 • ~ xa~ . ! ~ ~ o
~ 1 / ~ 1 b 1 1 1 1 1 1 • ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~
1 / 1 1 1 1 1 I
~ 1 1 1 1 / / 1 1 _ 1 p 1 ' 1 / 1 / , 1 1 1 1 I , A
1 1 1 1 • / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x y
1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 ~s~~~.~.~ ~ o~a~
/ • 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ / o~ ~ ~ / ~C
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / ~ i oz
1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ Gz,
~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ , 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ Q x
/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1
~ ` / ~ 1 1 1 1 • • ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
/ 1 1 • 1 ` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ • ` O
1 1 1 1 1~ 1 1~\ 1 1 - 1 1 11 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \4 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ I ~
- 1 / / . 1 1 ~ 1 1 1• 1 ~ ~ ~
1 1 1 / 11 / / , / 1
/ ` 1 1 1 1 1 ~ / 1 ` 1 / . 1 U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~
\ / 1 1 , ~ ~
11 1 1 / 1
1 1 / ~ 1 / I 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` "mss

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1
~ / / 1 1 1. 1 1~ • 1 1 1111
1 1 . 1 1 1~ 1 1 1
\ 1 1 1 ~ .
\ / 1• / /
~ 1 1 / ~
a ' 1 ~ y 1 1

~ .
E~
P • 0
w
r
M
m~ Q

U
m5A
4 b 7

b

O Pi01N,T Ip. ~-Q~Q'O
N t m G1;APH[C SCALE ~ Aso aoo ~twous u~?
eoo ne®m~ ~ AMM
J i inoh •300 it aaux AMM

S O 1'=300' -
Q ~ 06-14- 06
mer No,

g7 0
PRELDdINARY DRAWING -NOT RELEASED FOR C MCADAMS ~NSfiZUCTION
is

A
\ I
~ I U
U ~
~ • o o°
~ ~ U d~ z~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .a

~ ~ ~ a
Q a W ~1 w r7 N
nn ~ W
W OO
\ ~M Y7 O
~~l L a ~ ~ C"''
W ~O~
~ ~ ~t
. ~ ~ ~ ~O~ z ~ .
/ 1 i ~ w a
1 i~ 1
1
~ ~
~ ~ 11 ~ / i 1 i ~ l~ ( ~ i ~
~ 1 ` L._ ~ 1 1 i _ _ ~ P ~ i r e l l~ 1 1 1
j j ~1 i 1 •
i ( 1 1 ~ ? / . •
i ~ i r 1 1 ~ 1 / 1 • 1 \ . • ~ ~
i' i / 1 ~ ~ ~ 11 ? 1 1 ~ ,f l\l ~ i 1 1' 1 ~ ~ 1 / ~
~ i 1 l i ~ 1 / v v
i ~ \ . 1 i 1 ``a 1 $ (r 1 1 1 11 1
i 1 1 i ~ / i ~ / r1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1
1 ' ~ i 1 1 i 1 i I i ~ • 1 /
1 II ~ Q 1 1 1 • 1 11 ~ 1 • 1 1
~ 11~ 1 1 ~ 1 i tD 0 P 2 1 • 1 • • • 1
1~~ f ~ / ~ 1 1 ~11 1 • / f 1 / 1 1 t 1 1 • 1 1 1 \
t ~ . \ / / 1 1 1 1 r ~ , ~ , 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1
1 ` i ~ P ~ / 11 ~l l ~ 1 ~ / ~ 1 ? i ~ 1 1 • 1
r) l 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ / . 1 1 / • 1 z / / • ~ o
1 ~ _ ~ . 1 1 m 1 • 1
/ice- ~ ~ I _ 1 i f ~ ~ i 1 / 1 1 1 • '
1 1 1 ~ ~L„~y. ~ i 1 1 1 1
1 p r f i 1 1 .1 1 1 1
i % ~ E I li / 1 •.1 1 I ~ ~ w
1 i i fp ~ ~ 1 l ~ ~
fj~ 1 i 1 i i 1 1 ~ ~ - z
Air i i i 1 1 1 • i ~ ~ 1 1 I i ~
f i i / ~ ~ i i 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~a~ 1 \ O
i • i i 1 i 1~ i 1 1 1 Q'r ~ ~ • ~ ~ / ~
1 1 ~ • ~ 1 ~ ~ p, ~ o
i / / ~ 1 1 i I - ~ < ~ ~ q
~ ' / 1 1 1 1 1 a i~ i i i / e ~ ~ ` ~ N' x ! 1 Fo
i~ 1 1 ~ • - / W/ 1 i i 1 i ~ i i rt+.~_~~~
1 i i i i J I i 1 i 1 / ~ ~ /
1 1 I i i • i i ~ / ~ Oz
1 / i \ 1 / / _ 1 ~ i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 1 / 1 ` 1
1 i • i \ 1 1 i i 1` • 1 i Ii ~ 1 1 • ~ • ~ ~ ~ 1 / • O Z
` ~ 1 i 1 i i i 1 1 I i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • eA • a ~ 1 I 1 • 1• w
\ I 1 1 1 i i ` 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 • 1 1 • \
1 1 i / 1 1 I i \ ~ i i i 1 i~ 1 1 ~ 1 i 1 1 / 1 • • O 1 • ~ ~
1 1 / 1 1 1 1 ~ • • ~ • • •
i i ii . ~ 1 ~ i 1 1 1 1 1 1 • / 1 1 / ~ ~ i 1 1 1 1 • 1• • • ~
i 1 1 1 i i I i 1 i Ii i / ~1 1 •
~ i 1` i i . i 11 i 1j i i 1 1 1• I I i l ~ / ~ 11 • 1 1 1 1 1~ ~
~ 1 i 1 1 1 1 /
• 1 _ 1 1 1 ~ i i (1 / . _
11 i 1 ~ i 1 1 1 1 1
~ 1 i • i 1 1 1
i 1 1 i 1 1` 1 1 1
1 i` . i i 1 1 1 1 1
/ 1 ~ I i i 1 1 1 i
i ~ , ~ i i i
1~ 1 i
~ 1 i
1 1 1 1 i ~ .V
1 /
~L~W ~ ~ ~ M C
•
Sd Q O
W w
A M
D O

a

a~ W

h N t "0' EWP-01010
m GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ~ u Aso aoo eoo WPERMOUS AF~'A
J
3 2 ~ AMM 1 inch •900 ft c~nr Ix: AMM
g 0
4 'G"` 1'=300'
~ 06-14-06
ever Mo.
~J
m
X PRELIMINARY DRAydING -NOT RELEASED FOR CON McADAMS STRUCTION

A

c~

a a
p U~
x 1
a ~o
/ 1 ~ ~ y~~'~Ir,~ \ ~ ~ ~
14~,~s ~ ~ a~
,,i ?ti*' ~ a o
~N ~ ~
. a z No
a a W a
i,~ti' ~ ~ ~ i
% ~ ~ ` ~ N~
~ ~ W ~km w ao~
~ ~ r.`' i ~ ~ ~ ~x,... ~ w
~ ~a~
~ ~ -i w ` ~ xa~.
~ \
~ . ~f ~ ~
1~/ i~ , . ~ ~
' 0~ ~ :tit, !f1 ~ ~ ~
1~`` 1.1 +i ~ ;~1,` ~r.~.~~~ ~
ti r / ' ~ !)ISM,. ~ ~ ~ 1
~i ~ \
~
1 \ 100 YEAB
•~i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~t/ ~ j / ~ti1 ` I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v' l
~,f i` ,
~ :',i ~t..'~ ~ / \ ~
M D846fit1PM~NT • ~
• ~ . ~

'ti TIT101CR 1
~ +
t
\1111/ ~ 1%
r ~ ~ z
. . ~ 1

~ y 1:;11. , Faroe ~ r ~
(1111 ~1;~~, . 1 ~ `'i~~ 1 :'y.

11 '~4r~ 1 ~ i;`. ~ \ 1 b ,
::l ~ _ z 1. ,r. ` \ ~.t ~ 4.
, ~ ..+.y. ? tit ~ p; d~ ' ' ~ \ 1 ~ p U A ~
~ ' i ::••i r ? -i~~ ~ ~ 1 w N
~Nr ~ ~ 1 1 ~ • ..'1
1 y 1 . *

•`1~ I ~ •V'. 1.4. ~ 1 1~' ~ ^y •a \ ~ ~ x ' ~ ~ ~ a ;~x
i / • ••1',:...11 ~ , ;1
x w ~ r 1Ct • ~ \ Qi ~ :L•.. ~
.1 ~ ~ 11
1 ti 11 w~ , 'mss- +

C ti I
~r i . % fir. 'I ~ i ~ 1 "l..c,.
4~ ~ O
is , ,r ~ ~
ti.; is ~ +
4
\ i \
• i ~ ~ ~ ~ r
a - ~ ~ \ti
.r•: ; i l..,~ ~ `
~ j

1 1 ~ ~ \ / ~ ~
, ~ ~ 1 ~ Icy ~ 1 ~ \ ~ 1 1 ( \ \ ~

~ ~i ~ , / \ - 1, J l ~ ti ti ' ~ J~ ~ w
ti ~ ~ ~ \ . ~ I \

8 ~ ~ ~ ; , ~ t ~ ~ ~ 1
.•t1.,, i
_1~_..l--L - . ~ r~ . w i ~ 1
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ i - _ i/ ~ l
1':,•11 ~ M~ ~ ~~~1 1 1 Y
;1'~ 1 If \ 11 1 ~ ~ 1 1
/ * / 1 r 1 ~
1 \
.,.u 1 1
u ' 1 1
•r1 i 1 , E
a \ \ 1:,.:1~.. ~ , , ~
¢ . . 1 j ~1 1~~
\ ~ \ , , ~1 / ~ '
N / ~ , 1
, .y~
r• ,ll r~ 0 (1'•''1 , 1 S 1 ~,ir~ j ,r r
m ~ ~ R ~vI r l it 1 t
~ ~ Ilri!¦ I~11 n~u~~i~u..n
...1 ~rr~ ,ir.~ . - - .A' ~
~'r t~~w
.i. ad
r ORTH Ewe-oiooo
EWP1000-EX1
4~ ~ p f :L':r;:;.'. O .4~' / ~ ~iGti® H'F: JRA
N N
r m JRA
GRAPHIC SCAIT
is 300 0 150 300 600 = Jw
DAM 05-12-06
1 inch 300 ft BMW No. OF 1

4

McADAMS PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION