20170355 Ver 1_401 Application_20170317

Attachment I - Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
2 0 1 7 0 3 5 5 Office Use Only
Corps action ID no.
DWR project no.
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit I
rm A
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP)�n . u m6k- I* F, or General Permit (GP) nur i
I c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? QRet 7 2 017E
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
D T
E401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ONon-4= it
F-1401 Water Quality Certification - Express F]Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR
401 Certification:
OYes ENo
For the record only for Corps Permit:
E] Yes E No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of
impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program-
El Yes [ENo
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below.
ZYes E]No
I h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
[-]Yes ZNo
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Whiskey -Navajo Residential
2b. County:
New Hanover
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Wilmington
2d. Subdivision name:
NA
2e. NCDOT only, T-I.P. or state project no:
NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Bruce B Cameron Trustee and Dry Pond Partners, LLC (see Appendix A)
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Parcels I & 3 6012/0545 and Parcel 2 5903/0767
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable):
Mr. Bruce Cameron
3d. Street address:
PO Box 3649
3e. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28406
3f. Telephone no.:
910.520.4845
3g. Fax no.:
NA
3h. Email address:
bruce(a-),cameronco.com
1 (3/13/17)

Attachment I - Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) -
4a. Applicant is:
ZAgent E]Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Mr. Hill Rogers (see Appendix B)
4c. Business name (if applicable):
Whiskey -Navaho Development Partners, LLC
4d. Street address:
1201 Glen Meade Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28401
4f. Telephone no.:
910.512.3263
4g. Fax no.:
NA
4h. Email address:
hill6ii)cameronco.com
5. AgentfConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Dana Lutheran (see Appendix Q
5b. Business name (if applicable):
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi
5c. Street address:
5315 South College Road, Suite E
5d. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28412
5e. Telephone no.:
910.452.2711
5f. Fax no.:
910.452.2899
5g. Email address:
dlutheranksepi.us
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID).
(1) R07100-004-004-000 (2) R07100-004-002-000 & R07100-004-021-
000 (see Appendix A)
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.156249 *N Longitude: -77.881178 OW (Appendix H)
1 c. Property size:
133.45 ac.
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
hiskey Creek (see Appendix D)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SA;HQW
2c. River basin:
White Oak - 03030001
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is forested. General land use is residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.85 +/- ac.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2400 LF +/-
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is construct "Road All, which will serve future residents of the proposed multi -family subdivision,
located within the City of Wilmington, in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Please see Appendix E for details.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project will involve the permanent impact of a 127 linear feet of jurisdictional stream, which will facilitate the installation of
one (1) 761 by 1911" by 412" aluminum box culvert, buried 3.8" below existing grade, with headwalls, wingwalls and downstream
energy dissipater (51 LF). A rip -rap energy dissipater has been incorporated into the downstream end of the culvert, to ensure
erosion does not take place during extreme rain events (Please see Appendix E for details.). Heavy machinery, such as backhoes,
dump trucks, and bulldozers will be utilized during the installation of the culverts. Work will only take place during dry times
and will not take place within or after 24 hours of rain event that is forecasted to produce or produces more than '/2" of rain
within a 24 hour period. Water will be held back during the installation of the culvert. Once installed, the water will be released
at a non-erosive rate.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
2 (3/13/17)

Attachment 1 - Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
4a. Have jurisdictional welland or stream determinations
EYes [:]No
Ounknown
by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Elwetlands Nstreams - tributaries E]Buffers ElOpen waters E]Pond Construction
4c. Type of impact
this property / project (including all prior phases) in
Comments:
2a. Wetland impact number
Permanent (P) or Temporary M
the past?
2c. Type of wetland
2d.. orested
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,
ElPreliminary
EFinal
what type of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
4g. Comments:
Name (if known): David Scibetta
SEGi
NA
4d� If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and
attach documentation.
Mr. Kyle Dahl on 10/22/2015
3a. Stream Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
5. Project History
3c. Stream Name
3d. Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or
[:]Yes ENo
[:]Unknown
obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in
Fill / Road
Xing
Whiskey Creek
the past?
USACE
31
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
6. Future Project Plans
3i. Comments: Please see Appendix E for details. Temporary impacts are not anticipated with this project.
6a. Is this a phased project?
EYes [:]No
6b. If yes, explain.
This property is a multiphase, mixed use development.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S.
1. Impacts Summary
4a. Open water impact number
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Elwetlands Nstreams - tributaries E]Buffers ElOpen waters E]Pond Construction
4c. Type of impact
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
4e. Area of impact (acres)
2a. Wetland impact number
Permanent (P) or Temporary M
2b. Type of impact
2c. Type of wetland
2d.. orested
2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps
(404,10) or DWR (401, other)
2f. Area of impact (AC)
4f. Total open water impacts
NA
4g. Comments:
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impacts:
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
NA
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Stream Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
3b. Type of
Impact
3c. Stream Name
3d. Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
3e. Type of
Jurisdiction
3f. Average Stream
width (FT)
3g. Impact
Length (LF)
Road A (P)
Fill / Road
Xing
Whiskey Creek
PER
USACE
31
127
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
127
3i. Comments: Please see Appendix E for details. Temporary impacts are not anticipated with this project.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S.
then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. Open water impact number
4b. Name of water body
4c. Type of impact
4d. Water body type
4e. Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)
(if applicable)
01
4f. Total open water impacts
NA
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
3 (3/13/17)

Attachment I — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
5a. Pond ID Number
5b. Propos d use or
5c. Wetland Impacts (AC) 5d. Stream Impacts (FT) 5e. Upland (AC)
purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Pi
5f. Total:
NA
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
E]Yes ONo if yes, permit ID no: NA
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If
any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other:
6b. Buffer Impact number
6c. Reason for Impact
6d. Stream Name
6e. Buffer Mitigation
6f. Zone 1 Impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)
Required?
(SF)
(SF)
B 1
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
NA
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The development was designed to impact the least amount of wetlands and waters of the US as possible. Unfortunately, due to
the configuration of the stream feature, crossing the feature is unavoidable. Therefore, the road was positioned to cross
perpendicular to the feature and as far upstream as possible, to minimize the impact.
The Applicant also chose to utilize one 41 wide aluminum box culvert (ABC), rather than two smaller, concrete box culverts. The
ABC culvert will allow more sunlight to penetrate under the crossing and the bottom of the pipe to fill in more naturally, thus
diminishing habitat fragmentation and allow aquatic organism passage. Rip -rap was limited to the downstream end of the
culvert, to ensure head cutting does not occur, after the structure has been installed.
The use of a bottomless culvert was pursued, but was denied by the NC DOT, as the soils in the coastal plain are not sufficient
for these types of structures.
2b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The installation of the culverts will only take place during dry periods (i.e. not within 48 hours of a rain event that is anticipated
to and/or produces greater than '/2" of rain, within a 24 hour period). During the installation of the culverts, a temporary dike
will be installed until the pipe is installed, at which time, the water will then be released at a non-erosive rate. Additionally, silt
fence, as well as other best management practices, will be utilized during the construction process. This is necessary to ensure
sediment does not discharge into the wetiand and to mark the limits of authorized impact. Please see Appendix E for details.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
Between 1949 and 1956, a ditch was dug from the west side of Navaho Trail, thru wetlands, was connected to a larger ditch that
collected runoff from South College Road (see Appendix 1). These features serve as stormwater conveyances from development
along South College Road to Whiskey Creek.
While the feature to be impacted is considered a "stream" and classified as SA:HQW, by the Division of water Resources
(DWR), it is not denoted as a stream on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 -minute guadrangle mal)s (see Appendix
J) and is not regularly affected by tidal waters, as is evident by the lack of salt tolerant vegetation. Therefore, SEGi contacted
the DWR, Mr. Chad Coburn, who investigated the feature and determined it to be a perennial stream, with a water
classification of C (see Appendix L). Mr. Coburn estimated the limit of SA waters is north of Hedgerow Lane (see Appendix L)
and suggested a field visit with the USACE and Applicant to identify the actual limit.
Based on the DWR's water classification, SEGi performed a stream evaluation and utilized the NC Stream Assessment Method
(NCSAM) to determine the functional value of the system, at the proposed impact location. The results of SEGils evaluation and
the NCSAM revealed the feature is low, in overall value, but ranked high in areas such as water quality and stability (see
Appendix J). Based on the NC SAM functional ranking of the feature being low, the historical background of this feature, and
the minimal reduction in function, that is anticipated to take place as a result of installing the culvert and energy dissipater, the
Applicant proposes to offset the impact to 127 linear feet of warm water stream with payment to the Lower Cape Fear Umbrella
Mitigation Bank (LCFUMB), for 127 linear feet of warm water stream restoration credit (1:1 mitigation to impact ratio).
4 (3/13/17)

Attachment 1 - Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
[9Yes E]No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
[]DWR ECorps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
ZMitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
[]Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: LCFUMB
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Quantity: 127 LF
3c. Comments: A credit reservation letter will be provided upon approval the proposed mitigation plan.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
NA
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
NA
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
NA
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
NA
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
NA
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
NA
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
NA
4h. Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
�`­, If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
E]Yes ENo
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of
mitigation required.
Zone
6c. Reason for impact
6d. Total impact (SF)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation (SF)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
NA
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, pen-nittee
responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NA
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DEMLR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of
the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
FlYes CgNo
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project??
Unknown
2b. Does the project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
[DYes [:]No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
5 (3/13/17)

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
New Hanover County
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs apply (check
EPhase 11 E]NSW USMP
E]Water Supply Watershed
all that apply):
ElOther:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached?
I E]Yes ENo
4. DEMLR Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ZCoastal counties [-]HQW
[—]ORW E]SL 2006-246
(check all that apply):
E]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
E]Yes ENo
attached?
5. DWR 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
EYes [—]No
Application has been submitted to the DWR
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
E]Yes E]No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWR Requirement)
Ia. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
E]Yes ENo
public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
0Yes [:]No
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
E]Yes E]No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland
Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
E]Yes MNo
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact pennit application?
[-]Yes ENo
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts
(EYes (potentially) F1No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent
DWR policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The remainder of the undeveloped areas of the site, west of the subject proposed impact, is planned to be developed. It is
unclear what the development will consist of, at this time. Should additional impacts to waters of the US become apparent,
notification will be submitted to the USACE and DWR for review. Impacts will be treated cumulatively, should that be the case.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the
proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer services will be provided by CFPUA.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6 (3/13/17)

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
E]Yes NNo
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?
E]Yes [DNo
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
SEGi utilized the Natural Heritage Database to evaluate the site for Threatened and/or Endangered Species and Designated
Critical Habitat. Only the Northern Long Eared Bat is listed as an endangered species in New Hanover County. SEGi
performed a site evaluation on 3110 and did not observe any evidence of the bat, within the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
E]Yes ENo
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)?
The site is not located on 2 body of water that would support EFH (see Appendix F).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have
E]Yes [DNo
designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust
designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The N.C. State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service was reviewed to determine if there were any historic or
archeological resources within the boundaries of the property. Based on the results of SEGils investigation, there is no concern
for the existence of any historic or archeological resources within the project area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
E]Yes ONo
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project is not located in any FEMA designated flood zone.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The New Hanover County GIS Flood Map (see Appendix G).
Dana A. Lutheran (SEGi)
13 March 2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
7 (3/13/17)

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix A
New Hanover County GIS Tax Information
8 (3/13/17)

8/6/2015
PARID: R07100-004-004-000
CAMERON BRUCE 6 TRUSTEE
Parcel
Alt ID
Address
Unit
City
Zip Code
Neighborhood
Class
Land Use Code
Living Units
Acres
Zoning
Legal
New Hanover County
313519.60.3666.000
5601 S COLLEGE RD
VALMINGTON
B2C42
USE -Use Value
958 -Unused Land
125.52
R-1 5 -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
5601 COLLEGE RD S
Legal Description
( 136.00 ACRES) ADJ TANGLEWOOD
Tax District
FD
Owners
Owner
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE
City
\AALMINGTON
State
NC
Country
Zip
28406
THE DATA IS FROM 2015
http:lletax.nhcgov.comIDataletsIPrintDatalet.aspx?orr-RO7100-004-004-000&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2015&jLr=NH&owrr.eq=O&card--l&oll=RP&State--... 111

81612015 New Hanover Cmity
PARID: R07100-004-020-000
DRY POND PARTNERS ILLC
Parcel
Aft ID
313408.89.9951.000
Address
0 NAVAHO TRL
Unit
City
WILMINGTON
Zip Code
WILMINGTON
Neighborhood
B2C42
Class
RES -Residential
Land Use Code
958 -Unused Land
Living Units
Grantor
Acres
4.27
Zoning
R -15 -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Legal
0 NAVAHO TRIL
Legal Description
(4.00 ACRES) PT TRASK
Tax District
I'D
Owners
Owner
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
City
WILMINGTON
State
NC
Country
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
Zip
28411
Sale Details 1 of 5
Sale Date
09-JUL-1 5
THE DATA IS FROM 2015
517332
Sale Price
Sales
Grantee
DRY POND PARTNERS LLC
Grantor
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
Sale Date
Sale Price
Grantee
Grantor
Book
Page
Sale Key
09-JUL-15
$125,000
DRY POND PARTNERS LLC
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
5903
0767
517332
28 -FEB -97
$0
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
EASTWOOD PARTNERS
2146
0862
289431
17 -OCT -94
$0
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
EASTWOOD PARTNERS
1821
0264
289430
01 -MAR -87
$28,000
EASTWOOD PARTNERS
SANDERS ROLAND WHIRS
1366
0023
289429
01 -AUG -84
$0
SANDERS ROLAND W
* NOT IN SYSTEM *
0124
0567
289428
Sale Details 1 of 5
Sale Date
09-JUL-1 5
Sale Key
517332
Sale Price
$125,000.00
Grantee
DRY POND PARTNERS LLC
Grantor
SIMMONS RUSSELL D TRUSTEE
Sale Source
-
Book
5903
Page
0767
Sale Validity
-
Sale Type
IMPROVED
Sale Flag
STEB
Instrument #
Instrument Type
Mrranty Deed
Adj. Reason
Adj. Price
Adj. Amount
Values
Year
2015
Total Land
$87,300
Total Buildings
$0
Appraised Total
$87,300
MARKET VALUE SHOWN - EXEMPTIONS TO BE REFLECTED IN AUG BILLS
THE DATA IS FROM 2015
http://etax.nhcgov.com/Datalets/PrirtDatalet.aspx?pin= R07100-004-02D-000&gsp= PROF ILEALL&taxyear=201584 ur= NH&awnseq=O&card= 1&oll= RP&State=... 1/1

aA6/2015 New Hanover County
PARID: R07100-004-021-000
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE
Parcel
345 NAVAHO TRIL
Aft ID
313520.80.6159.000
Address
345 NAVAHO TRL
Unit
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE
City
WILMINGTON
Zip Code
NC
Neighborhood
B2G42
Class
USE -Use Value
Land Use Code
958 -Unused Land
Living Units
485351
Acres
3.669
Zoning
R -15 -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Legal
Legal Description
(359 ACRES) TRASK WALKER
Tax District
FD
Owners
Sales
Owner
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE
City
WILMINGTON
State
NC
Country
Page
Zip
28403
THE DATA IS FROM 2015
http://etax.nhcgov.com/Datalets/PrirtDatalet.aspx?pi rv= R071 OG-004-021-000&gsp= PR0F1LEALL&taxyear=2015&jur= N H&awnseq=0&card= I &roil= RP&State=... 1/1
THE DATA IS FROM 2015
Sales
Sale Date Sale Price
Grantee Grantor
Book
Page
Sale Key
09 -APR -1 3
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE CAMERON BRUCE 8 TRUSTEE
9904
0313
485351
02 -FEB -96 $25,000
CAMERON BRUCE 8 TRUSTEE HOLLIS ELIJAH W HIRS
1983
0775
289433
01-JUL-60 $0
HOLLIS ELIJAH W HIRS NOT IN SYSTEM
0638
0178
289432
Sale Details
1 of 3
Sale Date
09 -APR -13
Sale Key
485351
Sale Price
Grantee
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE
Grantor
CAMERON BRUCE B TRUSTEE
Sale Source
-
Book
9904
Page
0313
Sale Validity
-
Sale Type
IMPROVED
Sale Flag
STEB
Instrument #
Instrument Type
Death (ObRuary)
Adj. Reason
Adj. Price
Adj. Amount
Values
Year
2015
Total Land
$77,700
Total Buildings
$0
Appraised Total
$77,700
MARKET VALUE SHOWN - EXEMPTIONS TO BE REFLECTED IN AUG BILLS
THE DATA IS FROM 2015
http://etax.nhcgov.com/Datalets/PrirtDatalet.aspx?pi rv= R071 OG-004-021-000&gsp= PR0F1LEALL&taxyear=2015&jur= N H&awnseq=0&card= I &roil= RP&State=... 1/1

0 Navaho Trail
August 6, 2015 1:8,000
0 Local Addresses
Real Property Owners
Dimensions Property
I Parcel Boundaries
0 0�05 0.1 0.2 m!
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km
New Hanover CoLrity W—
The information made avalaUe by this service originates fmm the county's
NFIC GI S Services
Nlew Harover Couty, W -

345 Navaho Trail
August 6, 2015 1:8,000
0 Local Addresses
Real Property Owners
Dimensions Property
F -I Parcel Boundaries
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km
Nlew Hanover Cotny NC
The informationmade available by this service originates from the county's
NHC GI S Services
New Hanover Couity, NC

AMIL7_
#
M7
4W
L
7111
AS
August 6, 2015
Real Property Owners
Dimensions Property
Parcel Boundaries
5601 College Road
"..4 .9okk li�
A�'
A
If 4
A
Ak
A,
JS —W
:4 7
'A
A4�
F
1:8,000
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km
Nlew Hamver Comty W-
NHC GIS Services
Ww Hamver Courdy. NC

Attachment I — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix B
North Carolina Secretary of State Corporations Search Page
9 (3/13/17)

North Carolina
4,
r
Elaine F Marshall DEPARTMENTOF THE
Secretary SECRETARYOFSTATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 [phone] Account
11%z - Login
Click Here To: Register
View Document Filings File an Annual Report Amend a Previous Annual Report
Pdnt a Pre -Populated Annual Report form
Corporate Names
Legal: Whiskey -Navajo Development Partners, L.L.C.
Limited Liability Company Information
Sosid:
1481956
Status:
Current -Active
Citizenship:
Domestic
Date Formed:
11/18/2015
Fiscal Month:
PO Box 3649
Registered Agent:
Rogers, Hill
Corporate Addresses
Principal Office:
1201 Glen Meade Road
Wilmington, NC 28401
Reg Office:
1201 Glen Meade Road
Wilmington, NC 28401
Reg Mailing:
PO Box 3649
Wilmington, NC 28406
Mailing:
PO Box 3649
Wilmington, NC 28406
Company Officials
All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 57D-3-20.

IkA
North Carolina
Elaine F Marshall DEPARTMENTOF THE
Secretary SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 [phone] Account
Login
Click Here To: Register
View Document Filings File an Annual Report Amend a Previous Annual Report
Print a Pre -Populated Annual Report form
Corporate Names
Legal: Dry Pond Partners, LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
Sosid:
Status:
Annual Report Status
Citizenship:
Date Formed:
Fiscal Month:
Registered Agent:
Corporate Addresses
1387928
Current -Active
Current
Domestic
7/1/2014
Sullivan, Scott Christopher
Principal Office:
1201 Glen Meade Road
Wilmington, NC 28401
Reg Office:
1201 Glen Meade Road
Wilmington, NC 28401
Reg Mailing:
P.O. Box 3649
Wilmington, NC 28406
Mailing:
P.O. Box 3649
Wilmington, NC 28406
Company Officials
All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 57D-3-20.
Managing Member: Bruce B Cameron , IV
P.O. Box 3649
Wimington NC 28406
Member: Jane C Sullivan Trust 4/3/13
P.O. Box 3649
WImington NC 28406
Member: Rachel Cameron Trust 4/3/13
P.O. Box 3649
WImington NC 28406

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix C
Agent Authorizations
10 (3/13/17)

5EC-3i
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ( 136.00 ACRES) ADJ TANGLEWOOD, (3.59 ACRES) TRASK WALKE&
(4.00 ACRES) YF TRASK
LOT NO. PLAN NO.--YARCELI.D. R07100-004-004-000,RO7100-004-021-000,RO7100-004-020-WO
STREET ADDRESS:- 5106 S. Qollggtjjud, 345 Navaho Trail. 0 Navaho Trail
Property Owner (please print): Bruce B. CaTneron Trustee, Dry Pond Partners, LLC clo Bruce Cameron, IV
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property, does hereby authorize
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi) to act on my behalf in matters regarding areas of
environmental concern.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
PO Box 3649
Wilmingon, NC 28406
Telephone:
910-762-2676
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.
Z/�, ."/ &..,
Property OwnerAuthorized Signature SEGi Authorized Signature
,6�lk
Print Name
Date
David Scibetta
Print Name
8/712015
Date

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix D
NC Division of Water Resources Water Classification Map
11 (3/13/17)

S ASO', N
NS I
AI
-11 S P
W I
Whiskey Creek (Purviance Creek) RINE
Index #: 18-87-28
SHOREWOO
(Description'. From source to Intracoastal Waterway) HICLS
Classification: SA;HQW MASON
TALL 7RE
Date classification was given: 08/09/1981
.WN66ROUG1
A N TA T 0 N
POIWIANCE
do
M�,
Tr,,i
eatures to show:
treams 1, Nltu
jk1b 4-

Attachment I — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix E
Whiskey -Navaho Residential Stream Impact & Erosion Control Plans
12 (3/13/17)

Mal,
mail
ONII

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix F
NC Division of Marine Fisheries Primary Nursery Area Map
13 (3/13/17)

c
if .0103 18
Mason boro- Myrtle Grove
Sound Area (west side)
er T -
Idle, ,Is
1 (1/20/17)

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix G
New Hanover County Flood Map
14 (3/13/17)

11mv (Y- 0
TALCI
wall
-- 0 r
6 ion iy"oq 4:�
jo"
MX4—t, M�n
Ick 4 4
P, 00
1hr
0
10
all, 0
0
to
I
ce
o6
0^5
04b C,
ok All
0,0 "1 C - I
iK
0� .�r>vo A ,�e b,
Ll cp
W-; cd q'o Q
f
.A.A
-1 . -.� (
1.0
0-0 -o -,o;.o I
0 5�y
10
Pod
0 *4r
.1010
----- .....
its
10'
10
Of
17
V
A i6 -1.
2 (1/20/17)

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix H
Vicinity Map
15 (3/13/17)

3 17th st
Vd. SM."'O'
sty. Rd
132 t'
4',
e. 8�
Rd
sbipl
t
St
arid
lid,
101,
-P
sbio-O
TO
De'jo 4
0— D,
01
S
-e
V 01
100
a L4
0
I's
ea
4,
49,
NO"'
6—Mot Z'
V010 L�
E
4' I�d'�Ymdo Rd
If,
V3"
SI
],ago of
b
t
a,:
8— R'n'
A�"
Al
Ice
d'
Fit",
3 17th st
Vd. SM."'O'
sty. Rd
132 t'
4',
e. 8�
Rd
ply
Cqtoed
101,
P"'
TO
OP
71,
01
shc"
W4,
100
a L4
0
I's
Lvl�" 0,
OP
49,
NO"'
6—Mot Z'
V010 L�
k, JW�. 0,
4' I�d'�Ymdo Rd
If,
V3"
'kihs
8— R'n'
A�"
Al
J bbu,(Uu �5'4uu t),-Iuu tD,buu Vicinity Map N
Feet of
1 inch = 3,333 feet 5601 South College Road W J141
, Z�-.
Wilmington, New Hanover Co., N.C.
Map Source: ESRI Street Maps 7/21/2015 013-020.01 IT
S 0(�)

Attachment 1 — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix I
Historical Aerials
16 (3/13/17)

AA##
IL
"Ar
Oki. .7.
M It'
-Ap

i. 47,.4M -i
4r 4w
ow,

Attachment I — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix J
United States Geological Survey 7.5 -Minute Quadrangle Map
17 (3/13/17)

1492
26
Fear
30
Ta
26
uj
4A
15
25
C-1
I IS,

Attachment I — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix K
NC Stream Assessment Method Form
18 (3/13/17)

user manuai Version Z. I
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): 5601 S College Road 2. Date of evaluation: 03/10/2017
3. Applicant/owner name: Cameron Company 4. Assessor name/organization: Lindsey Stone, SEGi
5. County: New Hanover 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Cape Fear on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Whiskey Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): N 34.156 W 77.882
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 f- Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? Yes (-- No
14. Feature type: (-- Perennial flow (- Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) r Inner Coastal Plain (1) 6- Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for t-- a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip C Size 1 (< 0.1 mi) 0- Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 Mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi) (- Size 4 (�! 5 Mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? 6- Yes (- No ff Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water r_ Classified Trout Waters F Water Supply Watershed ( (- I (- 11 (- III (- IV (- V)
F_ Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area rw High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F Publicly owned property r- NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r- Nutrient Sensitive Waters
F Anadromous fish r- 303(d) List r- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r- Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? 6- Yes �No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size I streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
6- A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction -assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes 2r ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
6- A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, ekisting damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutfing (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Strearnside Area Interaction - strearnside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (REI).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited strearnside area access, disruption of flood flows through strearnside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C 6- C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplainAntertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through strearnside area] ar too much floodplainlintertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplainfintertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstrearri divide
7. Water Quality Stressom -assessment reachfinterticial zone metric

Check all that apply.
F_ A Discolored water in stream or intertical zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen. stream foam)
F_ B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intedical zone)
F_ C Noticeable evidence Of Pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F D Odor mot including natural sulfide odors)
f_ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Note s/Sketch"
section,
I`_ F Livestock with access to strearn or intertual zone
f— G Excessive algae in stream or interlical zone
I— H Degradt�d marsh vegetation in the interlical zone (removal, burning, regular mowing. destruction. etc.)
f— I Other iexplain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
177 J Uft lo no stressors
8. Recent Wealher - watershed metric
For Size I or2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
C- A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding I inch within the last 48 hours
r B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding I inch within the last 48 hours
0 C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
(- Yes (*- No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Strearnside Area Ground Surface Condition).
lo. Nahwall in-ellit"m Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. r Yes (- No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentahon, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Miultiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w F F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
E
(Mclude liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
We B 11illultiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent to a
H Low -fide refugia (pools)
vegetation 0 Sand bottom
F C Mluftiple snags and logs (including lap trees) 124
to F J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r- D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r- E Little or no habitat
'�­---REMAJNING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS -
11. Bedform and Substrate - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
iia. r Yes 0 No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
111b. Bedforim evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
F A Riffle -run section (evaluate I I c)
rB Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
F., C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c In riffles sections. check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent Rare (R) = present but 5 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) 40-70%. Predominant (P) 70%. Cumulative
percentages Should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 - 4096 min)
Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
Gravel (2 - 64 mrn)
Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (� 0.062 mm)
Detritus
C, Artificial (rip -rap, concrete. etc.)
11d (-Yes (- No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. M Yes (' No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
if No. select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. (- No Water (- Other:
12b. ro Yes (- No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r- F Adult frogs
F r- Aquatic reptiles
r- r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r- r_ Beetles (including water pennies)
F_ W Cadclisffy larvae (Trichoptera M)
r- r- Asian clam (Corbicula)
F r- Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r- r- Damselfily and dragonfly larvae
17- r- Dipterans (true flies)
r 71 F Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [EI)
F F_ Megaloptera (alderfty, fishfty, dobsonfty larvae)
F F Midges/mosquito larvae
F r.-, Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r- r- Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)

F_ Other fish
r_ Salamanders/tadpoles
r- Snails
r- Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r_ Tipulid larvae
17- Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
RB
LB
RB
(-- A
A
(- A
Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the strearnside area
B
r B
Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the strearnside area
6- C
&- C
Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
D D From 10 to � 30 -feet wide
(- E
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - strearnside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the strearnside area.
LB RB
C A C A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 2t 6 inches deep
(- B (- B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
t- C t-- C Majority of strearnside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetiand Presence - strearnside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
(- Y C Y Are wetlands present in the strearnside area?
6- N 6- N
16. Baseflow, Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F, A Streams andlor springs ijurisdictional discharges)
F B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
F D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment K present)
F F None of the above
17. Baseflow, Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
r- A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for Pump installation)
F B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
r- C Urban stream (� 24% impervious surface for watershed)
r_ D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
1770 F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - strearnside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB
RB
LB RB
(- A
(-- A
A A a 100-feetwide orextends to the edge ofthewatershed
6- B
C B
B B From 50 to < 1 00 -feet wide
(- C
C
C C From 30 to < 50 -feet wide
C' D
D
D D From 10 to � 30 -feet wide
(- E
C E
E E < I 0 -feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer
Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
(- D
A
(- A
Mature forest
B
t-- B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
(- D
Maintained shrubs
C E
C E
Little or no vegetation
Buffer Stressors - strearnside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (3D-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: F,
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB
Row crops
Maintained turf
Pasture (no live stock)/corn rn ercial horticulture
Pasture (active livestock use)
RB
LB
RB
LB
RB
A
— A
(- A
(- A
r A
r A
B
(-8
r- B
r B
(- B
r 8
r C
r C
r C
C
r C
(- C
(- D
C D
r D
D
(- D
r D

22. Stem Density - strearnside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C
C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity ofVegetated Buffer- strearnside area metric (skip forTidal Marsh Streams)
Considerwhether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 -feet wide.
LB RB
a A C- A The total length of buffer breaks is , 25 percent.
B t- B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of strearnside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contnbutes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B 6- B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing 2r
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C
r C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity- assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. t- Yes r No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. C No Water r Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
(- A �46 t- 8 46 to � 67 (- C 67 to < 79 (- D 79 to < 230 C E > 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name 5601 S College Road
Stream Category Oa2
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Evaluation 03/10/2017
Assessor Name/Organization Lindsey Stone, SEGi
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Strearnside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
NA
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Strearnside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
Overall
LOW

Attachment I — Whiskey -Navaho Stream Crossing
Appendix L
DWR - SA Waters Limit Email with Aerial Photo
19 (3/13/17)

RE whiskey - Navaho site
From: Coburn, Chad [[e-mail]]
sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:37 Pm
TO: Dana Lutheran
cc: Dahl, Kyle I SAW ([e-mail])
subject: RE: whiskey - Navaho site
Attachments: SA origin.kmz
Dana,
This is my best guess at where the "origin/source" of whiskey creek is in this area.
meaning that the
SA classification would begin here and the stream portion "upstream" of this point
would be classified
as "C". This point is subject to field verification of course, hopefully with the
corps involved for a site
Visit. Let me know if this helps.
Chad
From: Dana Lutheran [mailto:[e-mail]]
sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 2:56 Pm
TO: Coburn, Chad <[e-mail]>
subject: RE: whiskey - Navaho site
Dana A. Lutheran
southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
office 910.452.2711
mobile [phone]
From: Dana Lutheran Emailto:dlutheran@segius]
sent: Tuesday March 14, 2017 2:52 Pm
TO: 'Coburn, �had'
subject: whiskey - Navaho site
Dana A. Lutheran
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South college Road, suite E
Wilmington, Nc 28412
office 910.452.2711
mobile [phone]
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
software.
www.avast.com
Page 1

f
Lan'sdowne So6th
C�
rX,
00
4b
C111
Purvian e'
SA origin CI)
OW�4',7
4 1k, f
Approximate Location of Stream
40
11cla
A I 'Ce, ra,l
Oh aWk-: 1
"a, 4
1P Ser?7 ir7o/,
'mage �:'1016 D�q 1 —2 , T 0
all ear
7"
Imagery Date: ioilof2016 lat 34.1656W Ion -77.8831611-elev 28 ft eye alt 6235 ft

ufimga��* �
STREET TREE IN PLAZA, TYP. STREET TREE IN PLAZA, TYP.
SITE DATA TABULATION LEGEND: j Ltz 1�
50'RIGHT OF WA�-� 45'RIGH f OF WAY (DUPLEX RD)
DRY POND PARTNERS, LLC 60'RIGHT OF WAY 16
OWNER (�T - -_ L�
PROJECT ADDRESS: PO BOX 3649
CFE- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 13' 34'G -G 13' 12' 26'G -G 12' 81
WILMINGTON, NC 28406 8' 18' 26' 18'
TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION R07100-004-004-000
SIDEWA
sIDEwALK
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
BURIED TELEPHONE LINE 5' 1/2" E FT Sl 1 FT il ll FT LK STALL MAIN DRIVE 90' PARKING STA _L
S 111 k 5 -
TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 133.45 AC I.
RECORDED DEED BOOK- DB 5373 PIS 1557 BURIED GAS LINE SIDEWALK T 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1112" E 90'P7 2%
CURRENT ZONING: R-1 5 . . . . . . . ..... ­�
1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT
PROPOSED ZONING: R-15 (PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL) BURIED TV CABLE
AQUIFER RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA AND 2':-SF9.5A SURFACE SLOPES= 3 1-j 2"-SF9.5A SURFACE SLOPES=3
SLOPES= 11 6" STONE 6" -CABG 6-1325.013 BASE
BURIED FIBER OPTIC SURFACE
CAMA LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: 71
t B" -CABG SLOPES=31 �rURN!OWNCURB 2 SF9"5A E
WATERSHED RESOURCE PROTECTION UNDER CURBING MODIFIED VALLEY CURB 6" STONE AT SIDEWALK 6"-CABC
WATER LINE UNDER CURBING
EXISTING LAND USE: UNUSED LANDx'r MODiFIED VALLEY CURB
PROPOSED LAND USE RESIDENTIAL FORCEMAIN LINE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED TYPICAL PUBLIC ROW ROAD CROSS SECT10N FOR TYPICAL PUBLIC ROW CROSS SECTION FOR TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE RLAA �� �.SECT�10N
ss ss SANITARY SEWER LINE
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR ROAD LOCAL RESIDENTIAL ROAD NOTTO SCALL
DIMENSION STANDARDS
STORM D(NAGE LINE NOT TO SCAI .E NOT TO SCALE
RA
NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
59.1.1-2.1 BUILDINGS ON THE PERIPHERY OF A PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL SETBACK WET-- WET- WETLAND DELINEATION
NO LESS THAN TWENTY (20) FEET FROM THE ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE. (6/16/86) x x CHAINLINK FENCE DENSITY DATA
TOTAL OVERALL SITE ACREAGE: ± 13145 AC
59.1.1-2.2 IN NO CASE SHALL ANY PART OF A DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT BE LOCATED CLO SEREXISTING CONTOUR TOTAL PARENT PARCEL TO REMAIN: ± 61.96 AC
THAN TEN (10) FEET TO ANY PART OF ANY OTHER DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING; AND IN NO TOTAL PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL R-15 TRACT ACREAGE: ± 71.49 AC
CASE SHALL ANY PART OF A MULTIPLE DWELLING UNIT BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN TWENTY (20) RIGHT OF WAY/BOUNDARY
FEET TO ANY PART OF ANOTHER DWELLING UNIT. (6/1/92) BOUNDARY LINE DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
GROSS PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL R-15 TRACT ACREAGE: ± 71.49 AC ±2.17 AC AMENITY AREA WITH
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PROVIDED LOT LINES LESS - APPROXIMATE WETLAND AREA: ± 3.12 AC POOL AND CLUBHOUSE WITH 20'BOUNDARY BUFFER OFFSET FROM
156 LOTS x 0.03 AC/UNIT 4,68 AC 5.89 AC
LESS -APPROXIMATE STREAM AREA: ± 0.28 AC 10'X70' SITE TRIANGLE MAILBOXES USED AS OPEN NAVAHO TRAIL GREENWAY EASEMENT
SIDEWALK TOTAL AREA SUBTRACTED: ± 3.40 AC
. .. .. . . ....... . .... SPACE
NET TRACT ACREAGE: ± 68.09 AC -01gy
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE 3,21 AC (54%) ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 2.68+ AC s 0 PROJECT
BUILDING UNITS (PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL ALLOWS 2.5 UNITS /AgRE
5.89 AC ENTRANCE #2
BUFFERYARD WITH STOP SIGN
BUFFER AGAINST RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IS EQUAL TO 50% OF REQUIRED SETBACK PER LIDO SECTION STREET TREE OPTIONS ALLOWED UNITS: 170 UNITS (2.5 x 67.95) AND STOP BAR
62.1-4 PROPOSED UNITS: 156 UNITS
POSSIBLE STREET TREE SELECTIONS TOTAL TOWNHOMES.- 26 UNITS (PHASE 2A)-
OR
FLOOD NOTE ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE TOTAL DUPLEX.- 56 UNITS (PHASE 1, 2A, 3) AA!,4110 TRAIL (��R 1516)
THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X (AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE QUERCUS L.'DARLINGTONIA'/ DARLINGTON OAK TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: 74 TOTAL LOTS 60 RIGHT OF WAY (PUBL[C)
FLOODPLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 3720312900J WITH A DATE OF APRIL QUERCUS NUTTALL11 / NUTTALL OAK Uj L 234x511'
c_
t R 1320.43'
3, 2006. SEE MAP FOR PRELIMINARY FLOOD DATA QUERCUS SHUMARDII I SHUMARD RED OAK
QUERCUS VIRGINIANA I SOUTHERN LIVE OAK �0' co
ASSOCIATION MAINTENANCE IMPERVIOUS ALLOCATION -
ALL BUFFERS, DRAINAGE AREAS AND PASSIVE ACTIVE OPEN SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE ULMUS R 'LACEBARK ELM'/ CHINESE ELM TREE cv)
_0j AC PAS I E
4- 552
c, 12 J
E 7,
z '�, V 7(i
HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION Is (��
17
25'TRANS MISSION POLE AREA: MAX. BUILT -UPON AREA (SF) 8 58,00"
PROJECT ROADS LOTS 1 - 18 6400 SF 19
CLEARANCES
LOTS 19 - 46 3200 SF
• PROPOSED PUBLIC ROADS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BUILT TO NCDOT STANDARDS r.
LOTS 47 - 116 6400 SF
• THERE SHALL BE NO ENCUMBRANCES WITHIN THE NCDOT RIGHT OF WAY
® ONLY NCDOT APPROVED MATERIALS ARE TO BE USED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY q) ±12L64 AD PASSIVE
TOTALLOTIMPERV. 652,800 SF If
OPEN SPACE
,
STREETS 218,200 SF
• ALL STEEL AND IRON PRODUCTS WHICH ARE PERMANENTLY INCORPORATED INTO THIS PROJECT SHALL
p,
SIDEWALKS 78,000 SF X
BE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES- EXISTING TOP AND k/1Y
14' FUTURE AREA 223,500 SF
TOE OF STREAM 10
(TOWNHOMES, AMENITY CENTER, ETC.) A "
STREET LIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET LIGHT MODELS AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY DUKE ENERGY.
J {A
TOTAL PERMITTED: 1,549,940 SF
tg, JbA
00,
1 A2, AD PASSIVE
24 A
ria OPEN SPACE
j
k4� 25
" J0
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
10 t�N�l
f 22 21
(�2 O�
Z
CO
�0
0'<,- It
FUTURE PROPOSED ROADWAY
CONNECTION TO COLLEGE RD.
PROPOSED 64 0 Lij co
PUBLIC ROAD SHALLnti SIGN A cl 0"
PROPERTY 59
TERMINATE PER PROFILE PLANS
T� BTY
BOUNDARY
A
27
7
k,,v 606
25' GUY WIRE AND 20' BOUNDARY SETBACK
4 JS
0--
28 z
J Q
TRANSMISSION POLE 5
D in
LK
CLEARANCES
X 5OWDUK R TRU S0�68
V Q�TA
(SE I K§$2) Ali
71
X1.70 AC WITHIN
33 41 PRELIMINARY 100 -YEAR
n� J J? -If ±0.07 AC ACTIVE 7,
OPEN SPACE W/ 32
AE ZONE
MAIL KIOSK 8 30
10
96.90a S OP SIGN AND 69
0DE Transmi74
DE'230kV T OHE-__�� 'p 78A ST P BARS 75 NIFICANT TREE
c,)HE- 'E TREE PLAN)
(�3
37
r7
ADA CURB RAMPS AND
�V DE Nstr:butOn se efit OW CROSSWALKS, TYP, EASTERN
BOUNDARY
FOLLOWS
R30`
5- Y
8 CENTER
7- 7— OF STREAM
I I . 46
6130 AC FIVE,
OPEN SPACE. (84�48 ORE .ACE 71\
Kz // - I - L 52)
(T7) P49
18 o
ooh 129 uj (9 (S)o
_)o
co
10 (05
�0)0
nl UTILITY 11`f A EMEND 10 A, I�2
ENT At �1 98JURISDICTIONAL
_J�4 STREAM
93 97
Z10 25 COD SETBACK
(SWAMP FOREST
10
WETLANDS)
1) 1 If _ic) SEE SH ET C-6.20
126 51j!:;, ±O�62 AC ACTI
VE
118
OPEN SPACE W/ EAM
T /000 ARBOR -BENCHES —FOR S
125
POND VIEWS
CROS
10 110
�z)4
STORMWATER POND
m
xv\
Ln
0� c:
8,ft, M
17-
122
10
KP 1�4
b
-ZM= VEGETATED BUFFER
/`4J -
2T98_MT
N 74'45'23" W
EXISTING TREE, TYP..
WOODED AREAS TO BE
REFER TO SHEET C-2.1 FOR
LEFT IN NATURAL. STATE
TREE EXHIBIT ROAD CONNECTION TO ADJACENT PARCEL
(TO GREATEST EXTENT (26-W G -G, TAPERS TO 3UW AT CONNECTION)
POSSIBLE) WITH
— 20'BOUNDARY SETBACK,
SELECTIVE CLEARING OF A-
1-*— 5 -FT SIDEWALK, TYP.
4,8 Mohican TYP, TO BE KEPT AS HOA 502 Mohican
INVASIVE PLANT MAINTAINED BUFFER
MATERIAL 26' EXISTING 60'R.O.W.
8
Fn179
502 MOHICAN 418 MOHICAN
STOP SIGN AND IL TRAIL
30, j_0
!70L SaE GRAPHIC SCALE
13A -R-- 0 50 100 200 400
- ------------ -
I N ThIAIT
601t'� H
7, OFWA(-p;Iue
R
lc)
SCALE: 1"=IOU