20060214 Ver 1_Complete File_20081107

�0F W ATFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
`Q (� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cp North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O � Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
November 7, 2008
DWQ EXP No. 06-0214
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Glenwood Lane, LLC
Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property: Winchester Drive Extension
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Mr. Joshi:
On March 3, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your 401 Water Quality
Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules as
required to construct the extension to an existing road (Winchester Drive). Within the approval
letter that you received, there are conditions that read:
1. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of
construction.
2. Certificate of Completion
"Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Please send photographs upstream and downstream of each
culvert site to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion
form." Please return the attached Certificate of Completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during
construction and post construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your project or
have completed your project, you are required to notify this office in writing by January 1, 2009.
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httD://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
None Carolina
Naturally

Glenwood Lane, LLC
Page 2 of 2
November 7, 2008
If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in violation of the
Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of the conditions that are in the Water Quality
Certification issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott Gilleski at (919)
733-9502 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sinc ly,
Cyndi B. Karoly,
01 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/lmg
Enclosures: Certificate of Completion
cc: File Copy
Matt Matthews, DWQ Branch Manager
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 060214 W inchesterDrExt(Wake)EXP+NOT. doc

O?O? W AT ?RQG
'i
O `C
Cl)
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 3, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0214
Wake County
Glenwood Lane, LLC
Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property:
Winchester Drive Extension
UT to Turkey Creek [030402, 27-33-2, C NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Joshi:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 40 linear feet of stream as well as 1,178 SF of allowable impacts and 979 SF
of exempt impact to protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing the extension to an existing
road as described within your application dated February 17, 2006, and received by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) on February 21, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
these impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to
the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and,Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. This
approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in.
your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands//h2o.enr.statc.ncus/ncwctlands
Noe Carolina
?turu!!Y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 509o Recycled/109o Post Consumer Paper
Winchester Drive Extension
Page 2 of 4
March 3, 2006
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification are met. No other impacts are approved including incidental
impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 40 (linear feet) PCN page 5
Zone 1 Buffers 774 (SF) Road/Pi e Replace; PCN page 8
Zone 2 Buffers 404 (SF) Road/Pi e Replace; PCN page 8
Zone 2 Buffers 979 (SF) [Exempt]; PCN page 8
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statuies, or rules occur..
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
C. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor
within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC
2B .0233 and GC 3404.
5. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
Winchester Drive Extension
Page 3 of 4
March 3, 2006
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed
to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
6. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at httn://h2o.ennstate.ne.us/su/Fonns_Docunnents.hon.;
7. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing
at the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of construction.
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please
send photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion fonn.
Winchester Drive Extension
Page 4 of 4
March 3, 2006
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Water Quality Certification and Riparian Authorization
Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a
decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse Riparian Buffer Protection Rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you
have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
AWKlcvdly
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
/11r1 Al ' n W. Klimek, P.E.
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 060214WinchcsterDrExt(Wake)EXP+401 NBR
?0F WATF9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Koss Jr., Secretary
UJ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
- -=Z:;Ir Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Bob Zarzecki, S&EC
Cary Joshi, Glenwood Lane, LLC
Fax #: [phone]
645-9543
Subject: Winchester Drive Ext.
Number of pages including cover sheet: 5
Notes or special instructions:
Date: Ee , 1 DEs
-SNi aV- k 2-0060
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele_at
919-715-3473 or Amy Chapman at 919-733-9502.
One
North Carolina
401 OversighUExpress Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 500,6 Recycled/10.o Post Consumer Paper
4

Soil & Environmental (Consultants, IPA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
''G-3 0 ?
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Monte Matthews
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
February 17, 2006
S&EC Project # 9406.W1
N.C. Division of Water Quality (A
401 Oversight and Express Permits' Umt--, `: a I v! j
Attn: Cyndi Karoly L t.
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 FE 15 ) a
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 7??0
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Winchester Drive Extension, Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Nationwide Permit, General Water Quality Certification & Neuse Buffer Request
On behalf of the owner, Glenwood Lane, LLC, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede
under Nationwide Permit 14, General Water Quality Certification 3404 and Neuse River Buffer
Authorization Certificate. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Winchester Drive Extension
Project Type Road
Owner / Applicant Glenwood Lane, LLC
County Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT to Turkey Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-2
Class C NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.005
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.005
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 40
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form & Supplemental Information
$3,000 Express Review - Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lammdale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. i r {
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Glenwood Lane, LLC - Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
Mailing Address: 4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Bob Zatzecki
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: WINCHESTER DRIVE EXTENSION (City of Raleigh)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): (Portion of U-2823
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0777837906
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The proiect is located east of the existing Winchester Drive, west of Turkey Creek and south
of Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, Wake County, NC (see attached map, Mr. Joshi will only be
permitting the section on his property and west of Turkey Creek).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8774°N 78.7350°W (WGS84/NAD83)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (linear road construction proiect)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek (Stream Index # 27-33-2, C NSW)
8. River Basin: Upper Neuse (DWO 03-04-02: USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.cnr.state,nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing conditions on the site include vacant land
previously used as residential and nursery operations. The general land use in the vicinity of
the project includes residential to the south and commercial/retail business along the
Page 2 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
US70/Glenwood Avenue corridor. A townhome development adjacent to the proposed
Winchester Drive Extension is currently under various stages of development.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project involves the construction and extension of Winchester Drive and a connector road to
US70/Glenwood Avenue for the City of Raleigh. The project will not impact Turkey Creek
or it's associated Neuse River Buffers at this time, although a bridge is currently proposed for
the crossing some time in the future. The impacts proposed within this application are
associated with the replacement of an existing driveway pipe with a new stormwater bypass
pipe and grassed road shoulders. The new stormwater pipe will bypass off site drainage. All
on site runoff from the new road will be treated via grassed swales. We believe this approach
to be consistent with projects previously reviewed by the DWQ. Equipment to be used
include standard heavy equipment (excavators, etc.) typically used for such road
construction.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to complete
construction of the portion of Winchester Drive from the northern property line south to
Turkey Creek. The proposed road is currently located on Glenwood Lane, LLC's property
but will be transferred to the City once construction is complete and is part of their
thoroughfare plan (see attached letter from the City of Raleigh dated.lanyary 9. 2006). The
road will currently end12rior to crossing Turkey Creek or it's associated Neuse River Buffers.
The road alignment has been discussed with staff from your office and was tentatively
accepted pending any necessary 401 and buffer approvals with the understanding that when
the road does ultimately extend across Turkey Creek that a bridge will be used (.see attached
DWQ meeting report dated August 9. 2005).
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Please refer to the attached letter from the City of Raleigh dated January
9, 2006 and DWQ meeting report dated August 9, 2005. A townhome development (Glenwood
Station currently under various stages of development is located to the south of the Winchester
Drive Extension project proposed within this application. A drained pond existed on the
townhome property. The pond has been drained for many years as you can see on the attached
2004 aerial photo. A wetland existed within the pond bottom that was exempted from the buffer
rules by Mr. Danny Smith (DWQ) back in 1999 and was approved to be filled by the DWQ in
February 2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205) and USACE in August 2005 (AID # 200421396).
Payment was made to and received by the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to
mitigate for the impacts as a conditional requirement of the USACE approval. As stated within
Page 3 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
the City of Raleigh letter, Winchester Drive is an element of the US 70 Corridor Plan and
NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan (U-2823).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project or on the adjacent properties.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United Statcs/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts include
1,178 sf of buffer and 40 feet of intermittent stream for the replacement of an existing
drivewaynipe with a new stormwater bypass pipe and rock energy dissipater. Additional
buffer impacts include approximately 979 sf of "exempt" Zone 2 impacts associated with the
grassed road shoulder.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0*
(* 0.484 acres were previously approved on the adjacent townhome site as stated above.)
Page 4 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 (except Turkey Creek)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
EXB 1.01 UT to Turkey
Creek Fill
Rock Dissipater Intermittent 5 40 0.005

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 40 0.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
(if Name applicable) Waterbody
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact acres : 0.005
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres 0.005
Total Stream Impact linear feet : 40
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes
® No
Page 5 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
* The construction of a pond is not proposed for this project.
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The nronosed impacts are reauired for the construction of the Winchester Drive Extension. The
need for the proposed road and alignment were previously discussed with the DWO most
recently in a meeting conducted in July 2005 see attached DWO Meeting Report dated August
9, 2005). A detailed description as to the need for the proposed road is provided in the attached
letter from the City of Raleigh dated January 9, 2006. The proposed alignment was located to
the south so as to avoid impacts to the unnamed tributary stream (except for 40 feet associated
with a pipe replacement and new rock dissipater).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
Page 6 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands/strmnide.htm 1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The only impacts to surface waters proposed by this project are to 40 feet of an unnamed,
intermittent stream. S&EC personnel have evaluated the stream and do not believe that it
contains significant aquatic life or function typical of streams in which the USACE requires
mitigation. S&F,C does not anticipate that mitigation will be required for the 40 feet of
intermittent stream impacts and as such a mitigation plan has not been provided. The
a licant proposes payment into NCEEP to comply with this mitigation condition if
determined to be required by the USACE. S&EC will contact EEP to enter the pro rt? am if
the USACE determines that mitigation will be required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.st ite.nc.tis/wrp/index.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 7 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
X.
February 17, 2006
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Road - Pipe Replacement / Bypass Pipe & Rock Dissipater (Allowable)
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 774 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 404 1.5 0
Total 1,178 0
Grassed Road Shoulder (Exempt)
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
ation
1 0 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 979 1.5 0
Total 979 0
Page 8of10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
The impacts proposed within this application are associated with the replacement of an
existing driveway pipe with a new stormwater bypass pipe and grassed road shoulders as
required for the construction of the Winchester Drive Extension. The new stormwater nine
will bypass off site drainage. All on site runoff from the new road will be treated via grassed
swales prior to entering the pipe. We believe this approach to be consistent with projects
previously reviewed by the DWQ and is considered an "allowable" use within the Neuse
River Buffer Rule as a new stornnvater conveyance discharging from a stormwater
management facility that controls nitrogen and a road crossing less than 113 acre and 150
feet. S&EC believes that the Zone 2 impacts associated with the grassed road shoulders are
considered an "exempt" use within the Neuse River Buffer Rule as grading and revegetation
within Zone 2. As such, S&EC does not believe that buffer mitigation will be required for
the proposed impacts. If mitigation is determined to be required, the applicant proposes
payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by EEP.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The proposed project involves the construction of a linear transportation facility (Winchester
Drive Extension). As such while the project area (within the road right of way) most likely will
exceed 30% impervious cover, the DWQ has not typically required additional stormwater
management for such transportation projects beyond compliance with the diffuse flow provision
of the Neuse Buffer Rule). All stormwater runoff from this new road extension will be treated
via grassed swales designed in accordance with the latest NC DENR Stormwater BMP Manual
prior to discharging to the stream. Designs, worksheets and calculations are attached for you
review. The townhome development to the south of the project was previously reviewed and
approved by the DWQ in February 2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205). The adjacent properties will
comply with the City of Raleigh Neuse River Nutrient Removal and other stormwater
regulations.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Page 9 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The proposed project includes stormwater treatment via Grassed swales to protect downstream
water quality. In addition, the adjacent properties will be comply with all City of Raleigh
Nitrogen Removal and other stonnwater regulations. The townhome property south of the road
was reviewed and anproved by the DWO in Febmary 2005 (DWO Project # 05-0205).
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The proposed project is currently waiting on final approval from the City of Raleigh as a result
of obtaining DWO approval for the buffer and stream impacts.
?ptftc-i nlM endt `Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
Environmental Consultants, PA
t Rued • lta?ch& Pkz* Cuotias 27614 * F (919) 84b-59W # F= (919) $464457
Name: "l [?titywtriJt> V.j'tyaP . fY?
Add=: '7th «tIJ`It: .LOr••,?
Phonc
Projcct
D etc:

DT-
Thz Dcpaunent of tha Army
U.S. Army Corp of Engin=s.
P.O. Box 1890.
Wilmington. NC 28402
A=
Field Office:
wuminronD13t[id
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
Ta Whozn It May Concctrt:.
S= Proj cct a
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby dezignato and authorizo Soil & Eaviroumex w Consultants,.
PA to act in my behalf as my ageat in the processing of permit applications, to AmAsh upon rat suppicmc utal
information in support of applications, ctn. from this day fonvard. Tho day of This notification supersedes any previow correspondc= concerning ft al cnt for this project.

NOTICE: Thts anthoriutloa, for 1isWtlty and pmfcssioarl courtesy rez=6 is mill only far government ofilctals t0
cater the property when aecompaaled by S&EC stag Yon should tail S&EC to anmago a e4€a meting prior to
vilting at site. /?
ae"DW Z--4-W-V4?'&C'
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Officials Nano
c:. Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR-DWQ
2321 Crsbtma Boulevard
ltul i%b. NC 27604
or
Sigaatum
cc: " Mr. Bob Zu=cki
Soil & Envier nW Consul svA PA
gb?tKaro Qtilr?
236 Suit: C 3117-H Lsaad * Dthv,
Concord.NC 29023 Om=d=%NC 27453
PAoa- (704) 720-NO Pbo= (336) 5404234
Fax: [phone] Pax: [phone]
AGENT AurBOR ZATION FORM
All lanlo To Be Filled In By no Cu rml I,r Tt&- -wr= or Municiyel Of dr-,l

¦
' e
•
•
J1-
pe - 1 he pond has been drained for many years is you
n easily see on the attached 2004 aerial photo. A
Aland existed within the pond bottom that was exempted
im the buffer rules by Danny Smith (DWQ) back in 1999
d was approved to be filled by the DWQ in February
105 (DWQ Project # 05-0205).
N
Scale:
Nrs gaYleaf Quadrangle
DOW:
12.06.05 USGS Topographic Map
Winchester Drive Extension
Raleigh, NC

¦
T 'c?.
C?Sf -
c??c2i

::.
?see {k • +
S
z k t i
Site The pond has boon (I lined for many years as you
can easily see on the attached 2004 aerial photo. A
wetland existed within the pond bottom that was exempted
from the buffer rules by Danny Smith (DWQ) back in 1999
and was approved to be filled by the DWQ in February
2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205).
N
Project S: Scale:
9406.w1 NTS
.i
4
Y*f
Proles Date: Wake County Soll Survey • Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: BZ 02.1746 Sheet No. 27
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
Winchester Drive Extension [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Raleigh, NC
Existing Winchester Drive
SITE
Existing Winchester Drive
N
the northwestern site boundary and extend southeast stopping
Turkey Creek and it's protected buffers.
Vt NTS Wake County GIS Map
A Dab: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
ez 12-05-05 Winchester Drive Extension 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.* Raleigh, NC 27614
Raleigh, NC (Web Page90www.Sa dEC.com
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE (D 2005 APCAgIS CAN. N,C
_ STRUCTURE DAtA 0OWUSTREM PIPE CATA
hU. Fix IKE S.E li fN VS E D? iIFiW I. AlL CnNS R rnj t SRk: BE IN A.COP,.YCC MIN ALL CITY
- - IY) (411 1Y N,rS: Of RALECH A'•G I-C T S?ttCAPCS zcE?rLllrni, M4^,
RIM Cd 15 2n 3`e e) ).. n.l Of'A1S
- - 2 M300 (B 15 10 155 13 351 fi0
I. LE CONTiA-,TCR SWL NAPE LP IO CA'E COPY OF Oh Or
10 3N 100 IP 51 55 35, A) 351 OO RkE1CH PUEJC IIEIti-, "A"606M CN V,
54 1?A ID
} I w 3. EbSC1+L CCN'UUFB 1R,4 f(PCfwA1I: SLP+(y P7,'u1,©
IIA JES00 A 18 79 1 !5350 35151
r 12 11200 JET 5. It1 30;5. 3110')
f
l (niC7
i ' J . Ek 10
13 .- 19 64 -3 ? -00- 3,2 10 N1? N5'o IE(I FIEuk u.0
XWI ERF,LM1l ARCA' S FEI
10
- ]1100 N O Z
1,2 ?O,j '1 y 59 J)r 5.1 i5 1 34 5, THE Nl?,ECTN
vS M E P1.6RK1301 70UEET 1c7, E4RN' E R (OC7
I L wP{nIY:E S vE?0
-1-150 It. R 1 w'Y ]ro p
]'H` n z l OSAR WIP
j SHALL CLEAR A`J
k, 2! OF 1 ' CAh^F AS NEC[SSnM
m
7d 0.9 B 0 P9 M kt ALC LE
J . 5n 3 S D)
20
ANO U MSC IvAA ME L.YA'C'I WHY Fl.
j 7. b1TN w 00 1C AJCI YGA'(JCCO ZONES C eE F k?OIIIG 810 LA 10 1 4
__ CE 1wW -S 10120E A 2? AYC 41CJLbE OF 810 U3T PUR- U@16x[D
WFaO 05/03/92
P111 1X1 0 9 - 1511 CG IS 71 3 8 kl gSIANG[S ARC h0
3 312 CP ;5 11 y CIS W QRN4'N CRCUN0 DISTANCES.
.. .... .. 121N CJA RP RIP ( - - - 3Ld 310 JET $ 1
31 A It, 1e1 85 9 SOME N 7 E NEUSt FNER BA-,N Mg
1-5 UI
I I - --- 1 5 lo. .A FILE Ir a A
S 16511
3. J25C C9 IS AT 3,111 PG,EAiS F µJFPcPcR MAY IAI ?6[ttSULBFC1 ff A Sro AV1B.E I NW1 IC 1lAi PR2RL1AE
5 1e5 SS to '-IS MIA
qP r
.O 11oW (A IS 7J 311 211 3a11N1 'UN FILE SEARCH NPAC CISCLO,C.
III I - - - - AI 31815 CB 15 92 31.5) 314 70
E2 31, 1C C 15 5' 1 15 11 314 p OELMC TOP MID CRADhC. ILL Mll BE PCAruIIEO It- 15
EATOP F B MK OF -9 15 Ce B 15 3U 3153 515 70 TH
CC BANX OF TRr.Er CREEK.
U 111
I 5,) J 550 CB 15 103 112291 111 IA
b3 3EJ 50 CB 15 160 116N 1178)
10 M3Oj ca 15 61 11881 1768f
11 3NIX1 CB 15 E1 1N 83 118 A!
PRELIMINARY- 00 NOT
9N 17-111 _ (B 951 3579,
9 CB 18 USE FOR CONSIAUCTION
93 CC 15 62 ?92 I.. 1 1X111 a 1]l f2 kV 5 1
91 3119, Q 15 121 111 I1 1 O/. 61 D7 1152'1
EXISTING BULDING
Ev uwLa a cEZLPP;cN
- • APPFJX N,EF- ELbArrx OF p4SnN5
51OP.4 CPMN PIPE AT CONNECTION PONT, N(YPIA4
1 r" Mu ELEv.
JB _ JUfllgN BOA
4 . STCR4 mNIgLF
C9 = CAtCH BAN /CURB NOE7 RTW
DeL-CB DL u-,[ CA'LH 8A.4
0 . OR-,p YAEI
• OF . FLARED BO
LDI LANCSCAPI CRY
PP[ WI BE PUFIC
u
1 1SEiLCIUP(i MINK NCGOI ..r-(j-NAY S4cL EE TO N:DCl SIANEATi ECI 11'lF
2. STR,KTUAES NOT -N PIC" W NAI PNcI
4Wl 61118 ALL BE 10 NCL01 $lA•(ARyS OR S'HL
s I ? ALL BE TO IOMA OF WRR SNLIC 5fA111NRDi
3
. yW S l . M 12 In f G1 4 w [ 0
1 ALL STORM PPES TO BE CUSS 1 0.07 OR TOPE NNIESS ORt1O613E NOTED.
n ,
S ? - CI .ASS A BIP RAP 1'AR ? 1INAIP RAP
? 1aA
C'
64µO4 M'H 20 4? \
LCEAI?,R
N IWrTr:11:N ?11I C FA [(7TH 90 Y 3Ul 4.1W, '
uJ Il 1. CUSS. AP PAP •,? . LF AOUS • 31 Q1[I E ^TrN 40
??-
' SHEET DBU
)
GLENWOOD STATION WEST
? WINCHESTER ROADWAY DESIGN
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
rte.; P '? 1 AIR 10 3 ARCADIS
/
4Y h j / 1 _.. CUSS A AP PM OE SLOPES DEPTH . 10 '
f - • 31
'
Mc`3S G&W bJ 1 fpp If xn1N C- 4,.
F Cmlrr o,< Lle xe
R-r. NO 276J7
C' 9 85. 1782 fo,. 111-B11-511,
YcYal .e can
x -i" , ro"3P CCNfP,A;7Ofl 10 NS'gL •?
11Ri.N1N,IY.ROI YA'[F' WPNN OPA 2O CD PUIW'4 BOTTOM 5.'RUCNIS E21 1 Ell SEAL UAL
VC01 13 YN Y E-4'7iCO N N jW' (x0 3 U 10 E.
,N
-
_ i - wauso x DID F 5-0.'051. 4OCH 364 DO ONCE I
PRaxECLEl[ LPILE
7A14EW WAS MACE TO NO EEP ON MARCH ,10 , 200$ IS COMPLETE GRADE
1 \ TO OF- TOWARDS
\ KIEi
sa ?
I r
Phl'CCI 4WN;[R CiPAR'WENT 4 ER
R. KIN, J 6ECK4a9
LEAD UESICN MCF.. CNEMD BY
z J BEa:o N. Arcs;
fr
` E \ T/1Dµ('hUYO[N OJA PL'CEk'iJ
CITY OF RALEIGH PRNE:I NL4 R MAIL N'JLR
43 ' 120 8D
SCALE IN FEET CASE NO.: S-54.2005 NC405028 EXI31.02
&W Vmdm: wMM M Tell o PM " Q i
yr : \L 4 sglzoWX rp Up" aD saeem
it sr.. sD+?
/ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ EXISTING
\\ \\ \ \ \
? / ? \\ \ \ \ \REPLACEr

1.361.
cup
71 -1
Ail
/
\ \ \ \ / 40 LF OF STPEAli I4"P/?CT
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ / OUTLET PROTECTION
\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ( / / 40' LONG X 14' Vi-ME ^X 24" THI
\ \ V A V A \ \? V CLASS 1 RIP RAP- A
LT!:',fTS OF-DISTURB.';"1CE ?-
`? \ ZONE 1 IMPACTS 17Q SF - - - - -- 1^ ?
`?\ \ \\ \ \ \ zoNE=? ?1VPt,CTS 74_-SF -
ZONE -2 IPA?GTS\4 4\'SF \ \ _ P -AS-PART-OFq?Y'Of \ \
\ \\\ \ \? ?- - =RALET?H -ROADWIAY DESIGN
P
& G6UE
\
0 20' 40' 60'

SCALE IN FEET
Fi Ct .k:tR UUMIMW 14 A F' lf/J OESt?t1 WiCF. QQVli7 L?
R L? R
ARCADI
LM LLC
GLEn= =.O
t
m f GUDM 00 STATION PEST pct KAW o rurmER
ft ft=
m ow
tf
mw^lcnw WINCHESTER DRIN'E DEW1 ICAO t1
003 1
01
® _ DWG St?t(1TAL .
DWQ Project No.
1. PROJECT INI
Project Name :
Contact Perspip:
Swale ID:
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Bb ft.
b ac.
ac.
7 fps
Z. fps
-3'A ratio
00 fvft
WtUZA
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used) Qp?LW G G Swu?czl0?l
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
A licants Initials
A Vegetation Plan provided on plans P4AOWhq Q? tGa
X The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
K Swale carries only stormwater flow
Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
K Plan details for the swale provided. SWPE-)W-Rc/?AWP-%I'tISkor SwF Pao\j?or-- - D
n Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
-e Check dams provided. QE-AN zrJT S4.i Ar',,,F-- st,&'E tFAc> nM''J 2-19
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
A The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please?omplete the
coo STA'f10N
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name :
Contact Person: 11)
Swale ID: tr 7
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
complete the following
Phone Number. NH ) Yh`i - tZ3Z
ft. (at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
.Silo ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
•5b ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
I . q (o fps (2 fps max.)
2 . a s fps
3 :1 ratio (3:1 min.)
0 ,O ft/ft (check dams maybe used) Oug-itj(, Oo?S?Lbc ao ^'
0A
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an oxp/ana6on of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A licant Initials
Mt- Vegetation Plan provided on plans RO ate/ &U,3 mv4G-':?o m
X The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
X Swale carries only stormwater flow
X Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
K Plan details for the swale provided. I?? S we s co PE pQ°`? `Oro
Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
ARA Check dams provided. Pit M?NF,Nr SwkLa ? Spa°? t,ezS Ili f ?^? Z/?
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
A The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
ECEIVE
JAN 17 2006
or. SA aEdrarM" SPA
City Of 6R-aleigh
January 9, 2006 -Worth 6rolina
Ms. Deborah Edwards
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609 j
Subject: Neuse River

Dear Ms. Edwards:
This letter is in response to a 'request for justification of stream impacts concerning a
proposed extension of Winchester Drive. This proposed roadway is an element of the US 70
Corridor Plan, which is an adopted transportation plan that was developed by NCDOT and the
City of Raleigh in 1991. This plan proposes a system of parallel collector streets along US 70.
These streets are intended to provide alternate means of access at such time that US 70 is
upgraded to an expressway facility. This expressway upgrade is anticipated in conjunction with
a funded NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program Project (U-7823), which will entail
widening the roadway and removing direct access.to many of the properties along the corridor.
These parallel collector streets will become the primary means of access for most of the properties
along the highway. The proposed construction of Winchester Drive will result in the immediate
restriction of access to US 70 by the adjacent properties.
There have beeirmany efforts to construct the extension of Winchester Drive since the
late 1990's. At one tiiAe this project was a fully-funded and permitted publiaprivate partnership
between the City and a developer, however that project did not move forward. There has also
been some discussion with your office as to a variety of alignment options for this roadway. It is
my understanding that your office has expressed tentative support for the alignment as currently
proposed; p fovided that the necessary crossing of Turkey Creek is facilitated by a bridge.
Regardless of the type of technology used to cross the creek, it is imperhtive that the City receives
eedTiac regaidittg IIie adegiiary` of Vie crossing-Iocafion in que-Z-6n`pnor 1b-approving -C'--
development pattern-that would preclude any other alternatives.
We remam:'c?ommitted to avoiding Neuse.River riparian buffer impacts whenever
possible, and to minimizing any impacts we cannot avoid.. We hope that our approval of this
development plan is in keeping with that philosophy. If you have any questions or need any
other information, please' give me a call at [phone] or email me at
eric.lamb®cisaleigh.ncus.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Lamb, PE
Manager, Transportation Services Division
Cc: Cary Joshi, Glenwood Lane, LLC
Bob Zarzecki, Soil & Environmental Consultants
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Recycled Paper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
August 9, 2005
S&EC #: 9406.wl
Situs, Inc.
Attn: Cary Joshi
7504 Orchard Crest Court
Apex, NC 27539
Re: Report of July 12, 2005 Meeting with DWQ
Dear Mr. Joshi:
On July 12, 2005, per your request a meeting was conducted with the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ). Ms. Deborah Edwards represented the .401 Oversight & Express
Pcimitting Unit of the DWQ and Mr. Eric K.ulz represented the Raleigh Regional Office of the
DWQ., Also present were Mr. Paul Kallan (City of Raleigh, Public Works Department,
Transportation Services Division), Ms. Bcth Trahos (Bolt York), Mr. Randy King (Areadis) and
myself.
We discussed the proposed road alignment as depicted on the attached drawing.. Ms.
Edwards said that the alignment looked ok as long as a bridge is used over Turkey, Creek and
Impact #I (the proposed impacts to the riparian buffers associated with the unaamed.tributary
stream) is avoided or 4t least minimized (e.g., no. impacts to Zone 1). Ms. Edwdrc)s stated that .
while the alignment looked ok she could not given formal approval without- the submittal of a
complete application and formal review by the DWQ.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our environmental services on this project. If
there art aq questions or comments.regardingrhereport, please contact us at 919-846-590,0.
V11 ;
Sincerely,
$ob Zanccki,
+ Environmental Specialist
Attaeprlients: ' Proposed Road Alignment
i
Charlotte Office: ! T. Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C DWQMect 8 vnLdale Drive
Concord, NC 29025 >? , NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

FFICE MEETING W/ DWQ - JULY 12,2005:
IPROPOSEDI
DEBORAH EDWARDS, DWQ (401 UNIT)
ERIC KULZ, DWQ (RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE)
BOB ZARZECKI, S&EC, PA
BETH TRAHOS, HOLT YORK
PAUL KALLAN, CITY OF RALEIGH, PUBLIC WORKS
RANDY KING, ARCADIS
MS. EDWARDS (DWQ) SAID THAT THE ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED BELOW LOOKS OK IF A BRIDGE IS USED
OVER TURKEY CREEK AND IF IMPACT #1 CAN BE
AVOIDED OR AT LEAST MINIMIZED (E.G., NO ZONE 1
IMPACTS). HOWEVER, A FORMAL DWQ APPROVAL
CAN NOT BE GIVEN UNTIL AN APPLICATION IS
SUBMITTED TO DWQ.
IGLENWOOD
AVE.
NEUSE RN
IMPACT /Z

IMPACT SUMMARY
LNEAFt FEET
&WAa t
WACT
LAKE ANNE
EXISTING
GRAPHIC SCALE
400 0 200 400 800
I inch - 400 ft.
GLENWOOD STATION WEST
COVER
WETLAND/CHANNEL IMPACTS
WITHERD & RAVENEL
ara?rsaaa ? rusraaa ? aarsasras
*3`t A
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil and Environmental consultants
244 West Millbrook Road
Ralcigh, NC 27609
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMUNT OF
EWRONMLNT AND NATURAL. R=OURCi3
RALmGH RzcuomAL OFPicz
July 12,1999- P?
AIL 15"
Subject: Ncuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
Bunch Site
NBRRO-99-142
Wake County
Dear Mr. Martin:
On April 8, 1999, I met with you at a proposed development along Hwy 70 in
Wake County. On that day, you requested that I both determined whether the circled
drainage feature, as indicated on the attachod map, would require compliance with the
Neuse River Buffer Rules and provide you with written conformation of that
dcterminadon.
As depicted on the attached map, this evaluation determined the pond footprint
did not house forest vegetation and was accordingly not subject to the NZuse Rip Tian
Buffer Rule. Downstream from the pond dam the determination was that the feature is a
stream and is subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule.
If you have any questions please call me at [phone].
Sincerely, `
04 n' 7x
. Danny Smith
Environmental Specialist
h:\ncubuff\bunch
cc: RRO - file copy
John Domey- Wetlands/401 Group
1000 OARRCYT ORIYR. BUMS 101. RAMON. NORTH CARC UTA 17000
?HOW981"71-4700 FAX81"71.1710
AN XQUAL OPPORTUNITY IA"IRNATIYI ACTON [NPLOYCR- 50% RLCYCLICV10% roar-COHs VHan PAItR
- i r., „, ?.. ,.
ows. C)
?:: _ aRF
55-
11 tile
76 l ,. r?? / ; -• . Lcc3v?le •': 7i i :?',?I '. - _ "? _ % /r
Ank
t \ x`,11 •'-• •~' - ^-'• •. ?.`? •,' • ??•i?•.. ?••`•
41.
t
?`v- ivy ..=.. ¦ a - _. ? ? / •`• 'h'? • • .''•. f"•• -':?'.? `_• ? • _ '
780000 L '/ ' ' ?' .. i` •? ::. • . - • ••`,?..
Anti ?? `- <?J?-1`
FEET-? , .. .... IIIJJJ •. '•., _ ' ?' .u 1 . • .,` . •. ?__. • • ? .: ? • _
-14 1
is ? . ,??\ ? - . ,li.: ,? •;, .. .? ,I? ??,• _ 1/
%
35.52'30". - - ?''
78"45' 2 o3b 000 FEET 3.e Mr. M, 11. C. so k3 2'30"
$14 rHIIC,r JS A41
p{Jy?. Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey a ? Hsu
\?ft Control by USGS. NOS/NOM, and North Carolina Geodetic Survey
eM1 iopograph? by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs ? ?? R
^
taken 1965. Field chocked 1967 VV •?
Polyconic projection. 10,000-loot grid ticks based on North Carolina 645'
coordinate system. 1000-m4ter Universal Transverse Mercator grid T1,6 krtif. it,u ,
1;f?+,u
ticks, zero 17, shown In blue. 1927 North American Datum
r- -1- M ika ,••a.1 i..•.I 161- .-.:. - . ..--

Michad F. Easley, Governor
William 0. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Depasfmcat of Fnvimnmcat and Natural Rcsow=
Nan W. Klimek, P.E. Diroctor
Division of Water Quality
February 10, 2006
Wake County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Glenwood Lane, LLC E C E I V E
Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
4112 Blue-Ridge Road. FEB 14 2006
Raleigh, NC 27612
?f: Soil 6 ?.? Ctsot;r. PA
Project Name: Winchester Drive Extension
_no-ir Mr Inchi,
On February :10, 2006, the 4,01 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality received an
email !request from. Bob Z.arzccki, S&EC, regarding a project known" as . "Winchester Drive Extension" for
acceptance into.the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project.will be accepted into the .
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1. The application fee of.$.3,000.00 [for the Riparian Buffer Approval and 401. Water.Quality Certification
services, made payable to the North.Carolina Division of Water Quality);
2. Five (5)-oomplete and collated copies.of the PCN Application;
3. One (1) copy of the Addendum; and
4. Five .(5) copies of all site plan -information pertaining to this project' (please refer to the. Addendum.
http://h2o.enr.stnte.ne.us/n cwetlandslappndd5.pd fl.
Thank you for your. gttention to ..this. matter: Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee arc received:: If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest. form and/or the services are different..you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any.4que ons or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502'or Cya VaaDer Wiela at 919-733-1.786. ;
Sincerely;
Cyndi Karoly, Manager.
401/Express ReviewOvcrsite Unit.
CB1C/asc
cc:. DWQ R{tleigh Regional;Office
File copy.
Central Filcs
Bob Zarzeeki, S<&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
401 Over Vd / E*mu Ravbw Pamttirtp lkA f/
1050 Mall Sarvlca Conn, RaWgh, North Carona 27U2-1050
2321 Crabtree 13WI vvr 4 See 250, R:ka h, North CaroW 27004
Phorta. 919-733.17&31 FAX 919-733-CAI MI IrP,ramet ht2jMo.cnr.stnte.nc.us/ncwctla,,ld3
An Equal Opportrat VIAPl MWO Adon Ea plopr - 50`x RocycWl0% Pan Cam Pcpor
I
,`
O 2- " 1 '?- - o Co
C. iJ
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 4.0
September 2, 2004
Email Address: [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications: Major (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
Riparian Buffer Approval: (exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
Isolated Wetland Permit: General $1,000.00
Wetland & Stream Mitigation Plan: Major w/buffers (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $4,000.00
Major w/o buffers (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $3,000.00
Minor/buffers only $2,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "N/A" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. There will soon be a web site specifically for the
express review program. Please note that it will be the applicant's or applicant's consultant's
responsibility to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted on our web site will be
considered to be the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
[e-mail]).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)/DWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares Q) are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION I. PROCESSING
1 & 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding "verified" or "verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested. i f 4 V,; /Attach the USACE Approval if you have it. i IV t dle'?
3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
M/ 4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as DWQ will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
Please note that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and
thresholds. (S-0
5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit.
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 15 NCAC 2H.502(o reads as follows: "Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
supporting documentation. Q ..?•-.C-,#-
Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2. If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization.
The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicant's name and
position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
or in sort thereof is true and correct to the best of his knowledge."
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps a7lans:
J/ The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (http://mac.usgs.gov/maplists/) to
verify the most recent version.
The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
/(http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/).
Y/ Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
/applicable road names or State Road numbers.
V/ The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.

1
1
Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaped, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers must be underlain on the site plan(s). The plans must show all
built-out structures and impervious cover. The plans must include the final grading
contours with elevations. The plans must indicate all utilities and easements. It is
likely that several versions of the final built-out site plans will be necessary. The
following is a list of layers:
Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
provided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
Plats - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
/ regulated buffers.
V/ Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
Wetland Impacts (on the site plan):
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
Flooding
Draining
Stream Impacts:
Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
V/ of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting:
f The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
7 possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and stream bed elevations should be indicated.
J Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
Y The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
f t'1 with pertinent elevations.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
0 shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
.1l provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
tt'` culvert and fill cross section.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
edge of each footer to each stream bank.
For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
J location of the spans and the stream banks.
For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
be adequately dissipated. .??
4 *.- I- VICA

5
Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
` Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
`J Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
stream bed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the stream bed can be indicated
on the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
a with the dam foot print, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
` stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations:
Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) - not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire flood prone area. The bankfull and flood prove area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should. be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
?. relevant to the stream bed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.
Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.
Other Information:
f 1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWQ # once it is provided.
2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
J 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neuse River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state "stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake".) Please provide the "stream
index number" of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-IV NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html.
J 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htmi.
6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
J 7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
will entail from the planning stage to final construction.
8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV - RIOR PROJECT HISTORY
Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION V - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI -PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
1. It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
ac rate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
? Please include all proposed temporary impacts.

1
/ 7
Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
2. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays.
3.
4.
Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, and similar factors, all are important for making that determination.
Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam foot-print. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam foot-print and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a check-list of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ S f often look for in applications.
Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
streams?
Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
crossing near the edges of the property?
Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
Is any single stream crossed more than once?
Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts?
Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts?

Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing?
Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impacts?
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical alternatives review.
SECTION VIII - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90%" level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. 1 t is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"new" stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the following options may be allowed:
You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at h!!

//h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.htm1. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
You may discharge the stormwater to an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater through the protected buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered to convey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The following checklist is intended to help insure that
your application will not be deemed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section XI):
All stormwater out-falls must be clearly shown and labeled on the site plan for projects in
Buffered watersheds. List each out-fall as labeled:
Option 1: Level spreading devices esig test-BWQ-Guidara:e,--and
devices that merely control velocity but do not provide diffuse flow such as rip rap
dissipators are not proposed. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan and provide a DWQ worksheet available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html:? Qa0-
Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards are
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
worksheet available at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html:
E XC 1 • 01
Option 3: The stormwater will be discharged to an existing man-made (not
including modified natural channels) conveyance that carries the stormwater
through the Buffer. The conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List each out-fall as labeled:
All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options above. (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the express review process.)
Site Plans:
All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must clearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water & Buffer Delineations:
Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule must be measured from the "top-of-
bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All streams must be surveyed or
located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:
Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site.

10
? Projects that require a Minor, Major and/or "General" Variance will not be eligible for the
use of the Express Review Program.
Mitigation:
lt? As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
ariances:
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site. (acres)
The total built-out impervious acreage (acres)
The total area that will be disturbed (acres)
(?v If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
• density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
?C be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
If there are concentrated areas of.development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
Lj club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
/ Worksheets must be provided that are available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html.
SECTION XII - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
Response must be clear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
may be required other than those shown must be clearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION XIII
Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
review process.
SECTION XIV - SIGNATURE
The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part II.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.
3c0
?O
O N
00
N
zw
.o
a
u
W
Old
V)
0
O
U
a
a
Q
L7
C7 O
O cl
b U
O
Wz
?a
A ?
3a

? L
]
1
1 _
II

U
.a
a?
A
b
a?
b

.b
O
>

N
O
H
.c?
U
f?
?i
C

0
C)
O N
00
N
z?
?w
N
O
a
U
W
0
a
d
b
0 O
co
U
N r
? O
wz
0
A v
N
N O
a
3 a"

4-4
o a
? N
?A
b U
o -d
A o
a
o
°
w o
r ?
`? on
V Y a,'iq y
?? l.t?gi? •?
Y ? . rr

e?
a?

3
E
m?
v

\ \ \ ( r
/ N /yam
l?l Y ? ••j tl l / rI ' I l?' i ? ?'r•1\
\ Z - I` I ! f -?- 1 C:) p
00
Ld CD
-p LO
r ?t
a° xo 3 z
0
C5 f C-4
CL C,
LLJ
it
X3
0
17, )
Z ` ?,r f in ! I I I aIN1¢o i w
???' t i Q I?,al? w o?
(;=
c, C) oLm
I w'ww o
(? A l I z x '-? I r- i ,? 3 3 z
I? Z
vf V)
, X-
1
"
? }f
r4? --C ? d
I ° _ _ ti
Of?
Llj
i , j x ?. til?i _ ?NI 'IIY? SIOYJIIY 900E Q
118
s ,
w
r
uo
e ppp R
.K i YR9 3 L_ a3
b
Ey?y ??? py"y ??R[f ?? r ?Q` t?? ?i ,7". ? g ?5 ? ,Q SS^w 3 p
i E t
A 9 RiY } 9 'S 3 R E
Loo
64
I?i za x'a axxxi.,c. ????II.x?iExzxx: Rai,` a A.,c^?ua ® /? i,. 64
A GO,
S ffy R '?
y Rv AlR-3.t 0e?3_fl.1 R'ii :C,. t;-Y R:?Rf9'i1 RR 10::: a Y 9± „ - ? tii
f t
?a € ea .'?'r?"??„n•+b+.nn eereee a-a e?- eaoeen C? s t P e7 G d I kiL';??I
TUJ e0 cg a d 11I
a v? A '9 9RRR R 9 RA9RR? .R'S B. AAAR R^^ -R .,t t¦ = Q4? •???
N ?] g((?p1a}:} tap ! II ? ? ,
Y - _ !R:. ?'G?R x'aA; .01A i¢c -gq?77SGD e`? ? ?R ?" ? ?E I'1 I I p
L ?"a\ 11 p Q ? ?!
. i \ !tit ? _?( i?^• I i 'i 9
I
II I ? ? y7Pc
r " iA tttl,?
i ?` ? jI I I ?1 t R py
I
i
fit
lb
J II.
it
1 ?
1 II Y U I?
OUTLET PROTECTION NOTES:
1. ENSURE THAT THE SUBGRADE FOR THE FILTER AND RIPRAP FOLLOWS THE
REQUIRED LINES AND GRADES SHOWN IN THE PLAN. COMPACT ANY FILL REQUIRED
IN THE SUBGRADE TO THE DENSITY OF THE SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED MATERIAL.
LOW AREAS IN THE SUBGRADE ON UNDISTURBED SOIL MAY ALSO BE FILLED BY
INCREASING THE RIPRAP THICKNESS.
2. THE RIPRAP AND GRAVEL BEDDING MUST CONFORM TO THE SPECIFIED GRADING
LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
3. FILTER FABRIC MUST BE PROPERLY PROTECTED FROM PUNCHING OR TEARING
DURING INSTALLATION. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE BY REMOVING THE RIPRAP AND
PLACING ANOTHER PIECE OF FILTER CLOTH OVER THE DAMAGED AREA. ALL
CONNECTING JOINTS SHOULD OVERLAP A MINIMUM OF 1 FT. IF THE DAMAGE IS
EXTENSIVE, REPLACE THE ENTIRE FILTER CLOTH.
4. RIPRAP MAY BE PLACED BY EQUIPMENT, BUT TAKE CARE TO AVOID DAMAGING THE
FILTER.
5. THE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD BE 1.5 TIMES THE MAXIMUM
STONE DIA.
6. RIPRAP MAY BE FIELD STONE OR ROUGH QUARRY STONE. IT SHALL BE HARD,
ANGULAR, HIGHLY WEATHER-RESISTANT AND WELL GRADED.
7. CONSTRUCT THE APRON ON ZERO GRADE WITH NO OVERFALL AT THE END. MAKE
THE TOP OF THE RIPRAP AT THE DOWNSTREAM END LEVEL WITH THE RECEIVING
AREA OR SLIGHTLY BELOW IT.
8. ENSURE THAT THE APRON IS PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE RECEIVING STREAM
AND PREFERABLY STRAIGHT THROUGHOUT ITS LENGTH. IF A CURVE IS NEEDED TO
FIT SITE CONDITIONS, PLACE IT IN THE UPPER SECTION OF THE APRON.
9. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION, STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH
VEGETATION.
TYPE A
PIPE OUTLET TO FLAT AREA WITH NO DEFINED CHANNEL
La
7`? - FOR SIZE OF d
FOOTING - SEE NOTE
1
SECTION A-A
IF STONE DIA.? 8". PROVIDE GEOTEXTILE UNOERLINER 0
4" (MIN.) 457 WASHED STONE BEDDING MATERIAL.
NOTES:
(1) d = 1.5 TIMES THE MAXIMUM STONE
DIAMETER BUT NOT LESS THAN 6
INCHES.
(2) d t = 1' ABOVE MAXIMUM TAI L WATER
OR TOP OF CHANNEL BANK (WHICH-
EVER IS LESS).
(3) Lo =LENGTH OF RIPRAP APRON.
NOTES: FOOTING SIZE
TYPE B
PIPE OUTLET TO WELL- DEFINED CHANNEL
B
d
7HANNEL BOTTOM
Lo
C) o
O
SECTION B-B
IF STONE DIA.¢ 8". PROVIDE GEOTEXTILE UNDERLINE-R
4" (LAIN.) 457 WASHED STONE BEDDING MATERIAL
15" - 24" 8" 12
24" - 36" 12" 24
36" - 54" 18" 36"
PIPE SIZE WIDTH DEPTH
ARCADIS

-2
r r
0
Q ?nr ?.? q0 L x 140
2y ?? ?hc.K GcASS 1..
1CF-CAr`'rMEN4 5 r? X ?{ r W
1 Z h Ttittu?. c?rS?
Rtco?l ,?fl Z'L, xu'w
1$ -q" GL G,kss
rNt? p n41
15 , Pip
I ?, P, pa
// PAGE
DY^J DATE: Z9 k7
CHKD: DATE: SHEET
Sy +PMa?WC 0,,= 154,704 V.v - 11,9? fps
F om 1-irA 8.Ob.b. ?,+F W SEC t'(q.r,wv z7 fin` 3
Ft C, ?,0AO.b,2 L Aew j %- 'a Y. N Lz " 3x?
0 '14
Is" P) pa C2e?? ,0= 2.61 'k uro= S,os 4c
r,,, 8.o("b.2 ?PPPO• ' 1-1>,'D. (?> 3kDo
l.= (,J= S ("/j,) =3,-75
15, Pipz- (kp) ?tio= (o 3? r?s V?o= i 3,30 ?f
ba L x ?) o
? ('V),' -- 7, S'
LTD P94-vecvr s4Wa- N2A>J-ID lNt ?A
C-vk55 A, L= 3 qa Q7 33's,
cw?ss A L. t3-,0d --;, y,5

AGM Form 0012.01 0
Appendices
NEW YORK DOT DISSIPATOR METHOD
FOR USE IN DEFINED CHANNELS
(Source: "Bank and channel lining procedures", New York Department
of Transportation, Division of Design and Construction, 1971.)
Note: To use the following chart you must know:
(1) Q full capacity
(2) Qto
(3) V full
(4) Vlo
where Q = discharge in cfs and V = Velocity in FPS.
ESTIMATION OF STONE SIZE AND DIMENSIONS FOR
CULVERT APRONS
Step 1) Compute flow velocity Vo at culvert or paved channel outlet.
Step 2) For pipe culverts Do is diameter.
For pipe arch, arch and box culverts, and paved channel outlets,
Do=Ao, where A: cross-sectional area of flow at outlet.
For multiple culverts, use Do=1.25xDo of single culvert.
Step 3) For apron grades of 10% or steeper, use recommendations
For next higher zone. (Zones 1 through 6).
25
20 -
04
in 15-
6
w to-
5-
° I exx.V09
v 6
1
..
1
.

:
.;

.... ... ;;' „ ;; ;.; ..
.....
[lot
.....

.

.
.
.

.. ... .... .. .r. r.

'
'
2
3 4
r .r

r. .. .r.
..
....
........
.

Figure 8.06.b.1
10' 15' 20' 25'
DIAMETER (Ft.)
Rcv• 11193 8.06.5
0
0.3
o-q
D-Z
W

APRON NIAIERIAI CLA_
PRDTECT LFFT

L1
TO PREVENT SCOUR
HOLE USE L2 ALWAYS
L2
1 STONE FILLING (FINE) CL. A 3 x Do 4 x Do
2 STONE FILLING (LIGHT) CL. B 3 x Do 6 x Do
3 STONE FILLING (MEDIUM) CL 1 4 x Do 8 x Do
4 STONE FILLING (HEAVY) CL 1 4 x Do 8 x Do
5 STONE FILLING (HEAVY) CL 2 5 x Do 10 x Do
6 STONE FILLING (HEAVY) CL 2 6 x Do 10 x Do
7 SPECIAL STUDY REQUIRED (ENERGY DISSIPATORS, STILLING
BASIN OR LARGER SIZE STONE).
Fig. 8.06.b.2
Width = 3 timcs pipe dia. (min.)
DETERMINATION OF STONE SIXES FOR DUMPED STONE
CHANNEL LININGS AND REVETMENTS
Step 1) Use figure 8.06.b.3 to determine maximum stone size (e.g. for 12
Fps=20" or 5501bs.
Step 2) Use figure 8.06.b.4 to determine acceptable size range for stone
(for 12 FPS it is 125-500 lbs. for 75% of stone, and the maximum
and minimum range in weight should be 25-500 lbs.)
Note: In determining channel velocities for stone linings and revetment, use
the following coefficients of roughness:
Diameter
(inches) Mannin's Min. thickness
of fining (inches)
Fine 3 0.031 9 12
Light 6 0.035 12 18
MCdiUm 13 0.040 18 24
Heavy 23 0.044 30 36
(Channels) (Dissapaton)
8.06.6 Rcv. 1293
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Man-made ditches are riot rated; see discussions In manual
Hydrdogy rd Subtotal= s•?
t?rojcct Latitude:
D? ?& at;, ?Jt+..??ttffr.r
Evaluator $ ?Z•??e??i Site: UT 1.0 `ru, Longitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: t?k.ILG ©,g. Quad Name:
N a l9 or niat if t 30
Data: 1 3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = I`d• 5 ?Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel sttucture: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 •. 2 3
5. Acl.Wrolic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
. Braided channel 02 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ' 0 2 3
9" Natural levees . 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1 5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
• VSGS or NRCS map or other documented
evldencr?
No
Yes = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1
lJ 3
16. LeaBitter . 1.5 1 0. 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0. 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C- RI8I av fSuhtntal a ?•? 1

2 . Fibrous roots in channel
--
3 CD
1
0
21b. Rooted plants in channel' 3
-.7 t 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish - 0 0.5 , 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0. 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity end abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Ot era 0
'Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focaes on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: ?>r 4

?iQ • ?? ?w I?G

J
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID#:'.. DWQ #
Y
t t
®a; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORI£SHEET
L tl
1. Ap?hcant's Name:__ "+? ?•>?++ 2. Evaluator's Name: ..?
`
3. Date of Evaluation: 4.• Time of Evaluation: Ott so NtA.
5. Narpe of Stream O "K irC -TZxrk4u.t 6. River.Basm.=.____
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 8, Stream Order- . V
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 10. County: l a Ja?C
4MyF,M4
11. Location of reach under evaluation (rnclttdc nearby roads and landmarks):
W ,_-f__G+r :?i
12. SiL Coordinates (if known):
13. Prdposed Channel Work (if any):• ?.6c: ?•3?ipoter ?:r?taeew....7?.
14. Recent Weather Conditions: N• r4.14 w/, ' 48 LNO' •s
15. Sitc-Conditions at time of visit: bvv?•S? .??a
16. Identify any spectat"waterwaq classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Tralt Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES; NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19, Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Esturjatcd Watershed Land Use: %Residenti al Y0. %o Commercial °t0 % Industrial _% Agricultural
o Forested v?d% Cleared / Logged _% Other
21. Bankfull Width: S 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank) .S
23. ChanAl slope down center of stream -Flat (0 to 2%) -XGentle (2 to 4%)? Moderate (4 to 10%0)' -Steep (> 10%)
24. Chang l Sinuosity: Straight Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander'' -'Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructivgs for completion of worksheet.(located on page 2):. Begin, by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, errain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic: within the range shown for the ecoregion.Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified "e worksheet. Scores. should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather cortditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and'provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (ag , tho'strean flows from a pasture,into a forest), the stream may "
be divided! nto smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a streaniftach must range between 0 and 100, With a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): .39 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ` Datc_
This changcl evaluation fo en ed a used only as a guide to assist landowners and vlron ental professionals. in
gatherinLPtlre data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Commcnt, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
'? <<tz??;t°??az> rat Fr 0R f'10N POilw'r R.?NGT
- t

_
--
r..n:??ial ?
l'u chnont
illount'liu ?
Icl?,
t )
i 1 I'i csenci of tlon / pi rskt6lt pools n? tilt c tru
_ ono tlo3v pl tiaturattVn 0: shoe}* 1]otir ]tia? pouus) 0 5 0 4;. 0
IdCni4'of pasC hunt In alter Irmo - "

.
_?iYtulsivc Ifhvolloh 0. 110,1lte ation 111;1.
luints
r )
0
G
Cf) •'S _
5

_
(tto butfct 0 court{ uotls,??u?ic bu(lu Tnt polnis) 0 o
0 1. 0 0

1 'Evidence of nutrie nt or'4'emic tt discli llt eti
' -
? -T
?.
"
. I .. (catonsiye.dlscharl'es t- 0. no dischar!.CS-. .' 11ax { " 50111..5)
-1 -- -' t 0 .. ?' A •
U `?

(nodischarge ? 0 spnil scep.'I ksellliids c,ic n
. t1${iiiulis)
t) 0 l 0 4
-

l
I'r conic of Idlamit llooilplain , 1 y
-
_ (nn ilocidplatn -0-cxlc,n iv( flocidpl un - nlak puult_;1

7
Enlrenr.hllent / flolodpl 1111 ace "'s --
(dul)ly cilti nched 0 fn quent )106(It [ wax 'points) 0 5 0 4 0 Z
f
l
Presence oradjacentwednlds --
-
I (110 wCilandS t) Mall L Idiace) 11 w4 tlailds T; 111aX pUlllt.',) iZ ^ e) n t :
(] 2
Channel srrltloslt}', - - --
t
(exicnsi c c.hanuc hiatiun 0 natural iucandcr Ina point) , U s
0 4 ^ 0 3'
U) Sednncnt Input, , - -
,
(cxtcltsiVe d eposltiOlllr t) little. or no Cd1177e,Ilt717aX 1)1)1110
U 4 0 4
0--5?
11 e c\ diversity of chsuln(i bed subslralc -
-- - - -

- 111", hotnoncllous _0 1 trLO 'divers( sire, max polnt:i)
- -- 0 5 .,
1) 1 srdcucc of channel incision of tlidulin[ - - --
_(deeply iticised "0; stable bed ct b.inks lax pulm;,). 0" 0" I 0-5
13 Presence, of rll ljor bank fadules - - - - - - -=
(mevcrc erosion 0 -no-erosion.- 't able banks max points)" Q 5 0 -5 0 5
l { Root dcjith and densily on banks -' -_
"
r - - (no visible roots 0,-dcmc touts thiou);hout IX nouns) - <) 0 ;
0 5 Z
1ti 11,111ctbs lltlcultur( of hvcsklc6produciwn - - `- ---- -
(,,"ulAfantl Tl uupact 0 no-cvidcue ma? Point)
t- 0 5 O ` 4 0 5 f
I(t Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool coulplrscs - --
(noriffle !11111 0I ools 0 well derelo >ud "tn tx 0 G Z
': 17 Iialnl tl (ompl(vi1" - - - 1.
' I littl( or no habitat 0, ticqucnt; varied habit tit 'nl:a l,oint,)
- 0 6 O G 0 G
p I h (,tulpy cu?cr r) c o e? strc;unbul

w (no shadlnl Beget Ttioli _ U eontiriuuu e tnOpy nt Ix pciut,;) • 0 '' 0 5
Ip Sub'str'atetmbedd(dness I -
?
(deeply embcdded 0 loos uuctute ma % ) lv'1 0 I
b 4
,p Prestnce of cttcattt mverlehr tteti_(uc, page 1)

vi- d
(II ev111 C-Ilse = 0 l.Omilll)? IIIIII r0u tyj)C max l)Oiii tS}? t) ?
7 I escucc of auiphrbi ins - - - -=
?
._ (uo widulce 0 C01111tton tnlincrou t {ie maa 1)01111,?)"
-- t) t
0 t p _ q
C ?? I'r(unci offish - -
_ tno evidence 0 Coll 111011 nluiicruus i}p tnax puulis)
-- T 0 }
0 t' 0'- 4 Q
)3 I vidviiee of wildllle use
.
- ---
- (no csld lice 0 abtImEnt cvidnce < Iu Ix joint.)
- OS
O G
0 - 5

Tot Il Points Possible - -
I'v) ]Ot) 100 '-
?

* I'O'1'AI, SCOIZ). (tISO c.tttC- tan Itrsi-pttt cs) - . __
Tllesc char acteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader is defined as an elongated, level threshold, designed to diffuse stormwater runoff.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After construction and until vegetation has been established, level spreader(s) shall be inspected after
every rainfall. Thereafter, level spreader(s) shall be inspected at least every month and more
frequently during the fall season and after heavy rainfall events:
a. Accumulated sediment, leaves, and trash shall be removed, and repairs made if required.
b. Inspect level spreader(s) for evidence of scour, undercutting, settlement of the structure, and
concentrated flows downhill from the level spreader(s).
c. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow-spreading structure at all times.
Repair or replace the level spreader if it is damaged.
d. Mow vegetative cover to a height of six (6) inches and prune plants if they cover over half of the
level spreader surface.
e. Repair eroded areas and replace/replant dead or damaged vegetation.
2. The contractor should avoid the placement of any material on and prevent construction traffic across
the structure. If the measure is damaged by construction traffic, it shall be repaired immediately.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (e.g., catch basins, pipes, swales, riprap) four (4) times a year
to maintain proper functioning.
acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance
procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to
the system or responsible party.
Print name: ?rTr `/ ??Z 5 fJ !
Title:- /L?11 IAl4c 4e , (/-7GE/?, 66 ?? LG
Address: `ill Z !Sc 61 /-' 0-'/ ><C ??7(?12
Phone:
Signature:
zoD
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, ) re. U 1-1 , MclC.r .5 , a Notary Public for the State of /y C
County of Wa ?K e- , do hereby certify that CarLf , J -o sh r ,
personally appeared before me this CV V'k day of F-r-- b, , ?00( , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
M YF
f JP
C? AR y-
-Zr
49
?V 2
U ?? .%
SEAL
My commission expires
Pasc I of 1
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader is defined as an elongated, level threshold, designed to diffuse stormwater runoff.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After construction and until vegetation has been established, level spreader(s) shall be inspected after
every rainfall. Thereafter, level spreader(s) shall be inspected at least every month and more
frequently during the fall season and after heavy rainfall events:
a. Accumulated sediment, leaves, and trash shall be removed, and repairs made if required.
b. Inspect level spreader(s) for evidence of scour, undercutting, settlement of the structure, and
concentrated flows downhill from the level spreader(s).
c. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow-spreading structure at all times.
Repair or replace the level spreader if it is damaged.
d. Mow vegetative cover to a height of six (6) inches and prune plants if they cover over half of the
level spreader surface.
e. Repair eroded areas and replace/replant dead or damaged vegetation.
2. The contractor should avoid the placement of any material on and prevent construction traffic across
the structure. If the measure is damaged by construction traffic, it shall be repaired immediately.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (e.g., catch basins, pipes, swales, riprap) four (4) times a year
to maintain proper functioning.
acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance
procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to
the system or responsible party.
Print name:
L?GEN;YaGG?? Lr?? ,LLB
Title:-- - ^61/ ,4cZ&(
Address: "W/ 1?; ?V,?_ 276/2-
Phone: r9/`1 ) 7d'? - 5
i
Signature:
b
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
J rc Uc-- ( I c.r-s _
1. , a Notary Public for the State of ? C
County of 606L , do hereby certify that a rLf f? . J1 o sh ?personally appeared before me this ?4-day of F-<-- A ,X00( , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
MY?RS
.?J OAR Y
_ 4t U
mac, z
`LgkF CQJ,.r
SEAL
C J?cr? ??,
My commission expires
Page 1 of I
LEVEL SPREADER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The level spreader is defined as an elongated, level threshold, designed to diffuse stormwater runoff.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After construction and until vegetation has been established, level spreader(s) shall be inspected after
every rainfall. Thereafter, level spreader(s) shall be inspected at least every month and more
frequently during the fall season and after heavy rainfall events:
a. Accumulated sediment, leaves, and trash shall be removed, and repairs made if required.
b. Inspect level spreader(s) for evidence of scour, undercutting, settlement of the structure, and
concentrated flows downhill from the level spreader(s).
c. A level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow-spreading structure at all times.
Repair or replace the level spreader if it is damaged.
d. Mow vegetative cover to a height of six (6) inches and prune plants if they cover over half of the
level spreader surface.
e. Repair eroded areas and replace/replant dead or damaged vegetation.
2. The contractor should avoid the placement of any material on and prevent construction traffic across
the structure. If the measure is damaged by construction traffic, it shall be repaired immediately.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (e.g., catch basins, pipes, swales, riprap) four (4) times a year
to maintain proper functioning.
acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance
procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to
the system or responsible party.
Print name: CA't y \105,41
Title: /''t'<rn??? tYC, (-?GEN,r?uG?? Lr'?UC=, 'Z,
Address: q76,"2-
Phone: Signature:

Date: ?7_ z 06
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
1, ) f-c Ua- 1 I , o2? G ?"S , a Notary Public for the State of /
/ v ` C
County of G06L K e- , do hereby certify that Ca. r' y A, J-0 SA
personally appeared before me this /-day of F-(- A , ;?OD(o , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
V\ MYFRS
?J OAR Y
?Cj 2
P tul5N ,
A7 0
SEAL
My commission expires
Page I of
1 OF WA TFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWI A
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 27, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 06-0214
Winchester Drive Extension
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Glenwood Lane, LLC
Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Joshi:
On February 21, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application to impact
approximately 40 linear feet of streams, as well as 1,178 square feet (ft2) of allowable impacts and 979
square ft (ft) of exempt impacts to,the riparian buffers at the above referenced site. The DWQ has
determined that the application will require additional information in order to review and provide an
approval to impact the above resources. Failure to provide this information may result in denial of your
application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506.
Please provide the following information:
1. Please provide specifications for the inlet and outlet protection including velocities;
2. Please label the stream more clearly on the plan sheets;
3. Please provide one original and two copies of an Operation & Maintenance agreement for all
structural stormwater BMPs on this project.
Please respond within three (3) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) sets of this information in
writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to participate in a timely
manner. This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please call Amy Chapman at [phone] or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at
[phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Cyn i Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK1asc%vdw
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Rd., Raleigh, NC 27614
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone]/ Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
NoWiCarolina
Aatimally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
DIVQ # EXP 06-0214 Winchester Drive Extension
Subject: DWQ # EXP 06-0214 Winchester Drive Extension
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:29:10 -0500
To: [e-mail], Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded
to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please
do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. The hard copy is
being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to
the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604
unless otherwise noted.
Content-Type: application/msword
060214WinchesterDrExt (Wake)EXP + HOLD.doc Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 2/27/2006 1:30 PM
FW: Glenwood Station
Subject: FW: Glenwood Station
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:33:41 -0500
To: "Amy Chapman" <amy. chapman@ncmail. net>
CC: "Beard, Justin" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Amy:
Attached is the level spreader worksheet and revised plan for the outlet
at the end of the road. They had increase it from 20 feet to 32 feet.
Feel free to contact Justin Beard directly if you have any explicit
questions. Also, below is the calculated velocities (2yr & 10 yr
storms) from the main pipe.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks.
Bob Zarzecki
Raleigh Branch Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----original Message-----
From: Beard, Justin [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:22 PM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Glenwood Station
Bob,
As discussed, the worksheet is attached and the velocities are as
follows:
•V-2yr = 11.53 fps
V-10yr = 11.97 fps
ARCADIS G&M
Justin R. Beard PE
801 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
mbl: 919.291.5136
Content-Description: Level Spreader Wrksht.pdf
Level Spreader Wrksht.pdf Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1
2/22/2006 7:40 AM

DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORM TION (please complete the following in
Project Name S wl;-S;
Contact Person: TuST) N eAW
Level Spreader ID:,
Level Spreader Length 32- ft.
Drainage Area •3 ac.
Impervious Area O,3 ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 13.3
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
2,LH cfs
,Z , yq- cfs
-rvvloc Cov?z
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
is
Phone Number. (q IL)) &5Y - I Ze 2-
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
Fv 10yR -5mfu
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached: If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
3-e,& Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
S No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
`Levels readers in series can be used on slopes of u to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of u to 25% in area:
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft-Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
I `zt
9,9
00 C3-) ?° C,
i I? LC) Lc)?
i
1
1
ff
?I.

O
Lo
r4-)

r.

A
EXPRESS REVIEW
Date: Project Name: W? nG 5 ems' D" \M
DWq#: O( 00)
County: W 01-e-,
DUE DATE: Jq AP
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
_?K RRO Eric Kulz
From: Amy Chapman Telephone : [phone]H
Email: [e-mail]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your review.
If you would like your comments to be considered, please use
FileMaker Pro for comments before Due Date.
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rulekj? Buse Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Stream length impacted
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
Lees _ ? ?,-e? ? ?a
? S 0 Gc-e -'e- )
asp

f

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
February 17, 2006
S&EC Project # 9406.W1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Monte Matthews
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly i f
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 !
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 , r I
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. 1 ' l;'r'
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Winchester Drive Extension, Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Nationwide Permit, General Water Quality Certification & Neuse Buffer Request
On behalf of the owner, Glenwood Lane, LLC, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede
under Nationwide Permit 14, General Water Quality Certification 3404 and Neuse River Buffer
Authorization Certificate. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROIFC'T ql 1MMARY
Project Name Winchester Drive Extension
Project Type Road
Owner / Applicant Glenwood Lane LLC
Count Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT to Turkey Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-2
Class C NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.005
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.005
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 40
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form & Supplemental Inforniation
$3,000 Express Review - Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E La),vndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
w

i '
Winchester Dirve Extension
NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer
February 17, 2006
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Glenwood Lane, LLC - Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
Mailing Address: 4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Bob Zarzecki
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
III.
Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: WINCHESTER DRIVE EXTENSION (City of Raleigh)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): (Portion of U-2823)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0777837906
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The project is located east of the existing Winchester Drive, west of Turkey Creek and south
of Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, Wake County NC (see attached map, Mr. Joshi will only be
permitting the section on his property and west of Turkey Creek).
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8774°N 78.7350°W (WGS84/NAD83)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (linear road construction project)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek (Stream Index # 27-33-2, C NSW)
8. River Basin: Upper Neuse (DWQ 03-04-02: USGS Catalog Unit 03020201)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing conditions on the site include vacant land
previously used as residential and nursery operations. The general land use in the vicinity of
the project includes residential to the south and commercial/retail business along the
Page 2 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
US70/Glenwood Avenue corridor. A townhome development adjacent to the proposed
Winchester Drive Extension is currently under various stages of development.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project involves the construction and extension of Winchester Drive and a connector road to
US70/Glenvood Avenue for the City of Raleigh. The project will not impact Turkey Creek
or it's associated Neuse River Buffers at this time although a bridge is currently proposed for
the crossing some time in the future. The impacts proposed within this application are
associated with the replacement of an existing driveway pipe with a new stormwater bypass
pipe and grassed road shoulders The new stormwater pipe will bypass off site drainage. All
on site runoff from the new road will be treated via grassed swales. We believe this approach
to be consistent with projects previously reviewed by the DWQ. Equipment to be used
include standard heavy equipment (excavators, etc.) typically used for such road
construction.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to complete
construction of the portion of Winchester Drive from the northern property line south to
Turkey Creek. The proposed road is currently located on Glenwood Lane, LLC's property
but will be transferred to the City once construction is complete and is part of their
thoroughfare plan (see attached letter from 1he City n Raleigh dated January 9, 2006). The
road will currently end prior to crossing Turkey Creek or it's associated Neuse River Buffers.
The road alignment has been discussed with staff from your office and was tentatively
accepted pending any necessary 401 and buffer approvals with the understanding that when
the road does ultimately extend across Turkey Creek that a bridge will be used (see attached
DWO meeting report dated Aufiust 9. 2005).
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Please refer to the attached letter from the City of Raleigh dated January
9 2006 and DWQ meeting report dated August 9, 2005. A townhome development (Glenwood
Station) currently under various stages of development is located to the south of the Winchester
Drive Extension project proposed within this application. A drained pond existed on the
townhome property. The pond has been drained for many years as you can see on the attached
2004 aerial photo. A wetland existed within the pond bottom that was exempted from the buffer
rules by Mr. Danny Smith DWQ) back in 1999 and was approved to be filled by the DWQ in
February 2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205) and USACE in August 2005 (AID # 200421396).
Payment was made to and received by the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP to
mitigate for the impacts as a conditional requirement of the USACE approval. As stated within
Page 3 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
the City of Raleigh letter, Winchester Drive is an element of the US 70 Corridor Plan and
NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan (U-2823).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project or on the adjacent properties.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts include
1,178 sf of buffer and 40 feet of intermittent stream for the replacement of an existing
driveway pipe with a new stormwater bypass pipe and rock energy dissipater. Additional
buffer impacts include approximately 979 sf of "exempt" Zone 2 impacts associated with the
grassed road shoulder.
Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0*
(* 0.484 acres were previously approved on the adjacent townhome site as stated above.)
Page 4 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension
NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 (except Turkey Creek)
February 17, 2006
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial t?
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
EXB 1.01 UT to Turkey
Creek Fill
Rock Dissipater Intermittent 5 40 0.005

F
EE
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
40
0.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name Waterbody
if applicable) )
( ap
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean etc. Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact acres : 0.005
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres 0.005
Total Stream Impact linear feet : 40
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes
® No
Page 5 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
* The construction of a pond is not proposed for this project.
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The Dronosed imnacts are reauired for the construction of the Winchester Drive Extension. The
need for the proposed road and alignment were previously discussed with the DWQ most
recently in a meeting conducted in July 2005 (see attached DWQ Meeting Report dated August
9, 2005). A detailed description as to the need for the proposed road is provided in the attached
letter from the City of Raleigh dated January 9, 2006. The proposed alignment was located to
the south so as to avoid impacts to the unnamed tributary stream except for 40 feet associated
with a pipe replacement and new rock dissipater).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
Page 6 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littn:Hli2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The only impacts to surface waters proposed by this project are to 40 feet of an unnamed,
intermittent stream. S&EC personnel have evaluated the stream and do not believe that it
contains significant aquatic life or function typical of streams in which the USACE requires
mitigation. S&EC does not anticipate that mitigation will be required for the 40 feet of
intermittent stream impacts and as such a mitigation plan has not been provided. The
applicant proposes payment into NCEEP to comply with this mitigation condition_ if
determined to be required by the USACE. S&EC will contact EEP to enter the program if
the USACE determines that mitiuation will be reauired.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 7 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
February 17, 2006
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Road - Pipe Replacement / Bypass Pipe & Rock Dissipater (Allowable)
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 774 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 404 1.5 0
Total 1,178 0
Grassed Road Shoulder (Exemntl
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 979 1.5 0
Total 979 0
Page 8 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
The impacts proposed within this application are associated with the replacement of an
existing driveway pipe with a new stormwater bypass pipe and grassed road shoulders as
required for the construction of the Winchester Drive Extension. The new stormwater pipe
will bypass off site drainage. All on site runoff from the new road will be treated via grassed
swales prior to entering the pipe We believe this approach to be consistent with projects
previously reviewed by the DWQ and is considered an "allowable" use within the Neuse
River Buffer Rule as a new stornnvater conveyance discharging from a stornnvater
management facility that controls nitrogen and a road crossing less than 113 acre and 150
feet. S&EC believes that the Zone 2 impacts associated with the grassed road shoulders are
considered an "exempt" use within the Neuse River Buffer Rule as grading and revegetation
within Zone 2. As such S&EC does not believe that buffer mitigation will be required for
the proposed impacts. If mitigation is determined to be required, the applicant proposes
payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by EEP.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The proposed project involves the construction of a linear transportation facility (Winchester
Drive Extension). As such while the project area (within the road right of way) most likely will
exceed 30% impervious cover, the DWQ has not typically required additional stormwater
management for such transportation projects (beyond compliance with the diffuse flow provision
of the Neuse Buffer Rule). All stormwater runoff from this new road extension will be treated
via grassed swales designed in accordance with the latest NC DENR Stormwater BMP Manual
prior to discharging to the stream. Designs, worksheets and calculations are attached for your
review. The townhome development to the south of the project was previously reviewed and
approved by the DWQ in February 2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205). The adjacent properties will
comply with the City of Raleigh Neuse River Nutrient Removal and other stormwater
regulations.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Page 9 of 10
Winchester Dirve Extension NWP14, GC3404 & Buffer February 17, 2006
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes El No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The proposed project includes stormwater treatment via grassed swales to protect downstream
water quality. In addition, the adjacent properties will be comply with all City of Raleigh
Nitrogen Removal and other stormwater regulations. The townhome property south of the road
was reviewed and approved by the DWQ in February 2005 (DW Project # 05-0205).
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The proposed project is currently waiting on final approval from the City of Raleigh as a result
of obtaining DWQ approval for the buffer and stream impacts.
,W eau ' Sign`nfure Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rood • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (9l9) 846.9467
www.SaadEC.com
Name:
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner or Municipal Official
W
Address: _ &C-0 ??? l1 nGle OA-r,>
C, ti M-- 2-76 ( Z,
Phone:
Project Name/Description: _ _
Date: / Z d T
. e
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
S&EC Project #
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to Furnish upon rc5lpt supplemental
information in support of applications, ctc. from this day forward. The _ day of :1A VZz,*A /
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for IlabWty and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to
visiting the site. / 1
C,),C"JWUV `?, GLt?
Print Property Owner's or hiunieipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Owner's or Municipal Official's Signature
cc: - Mr. Bob Zarzccki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suitc C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phonc: [phone] Phonc: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
i
i
r -? R

.
V
?i_ ; _ ? ? .?• ? -fig-; '°`?? ?? ,'??
ti
y Site - The pond has been drained for many years as you
-- \ j 4
can easily see on the attached 2004 aerial photo. A f r ;+ti
wetland existed within the pond bottom that was exempted
from the buffer rules by Danny Smith (DWQ) back in 1999
and was approved to be filled by the DWQ in February
2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205).
A t- J j 1
N
Project Scale:
9406.w1 NTS Bayleaf Quadrangle
Project Date: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: ez 12.06.05 USGS Topographic Map 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Winchester Drive Extension Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Raleigh, NC
(' [ ??,.?. ?A' w ' ?'. < ?1 CSC ?F °".?? C,? t • ?? ? ?
A C? -r r' Ct h?
Site The pond has been drained for many years as you
can easily see on the attached 2004 aerial photo. A wl ' mm7,
wetland existed within the pond bottom that was exempted SA k;Y ` wkE,
from the buffer rules b Dann Smith DWQ back in 1999'\?}+ `
and was approved to be filled by the DWQ in February w"'r
2005 (DWQ Project # 05-0205). _GJl
0, r
Sit
N
Project N: Scale:
940ti.w1 NTS
Project Date: Wake County Soil Survey Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: BZ 02.17-M Sheet No. 27 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
Winchester Drive Extension [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC,com
Raleigh, NC
1 Y f-
Existing Winchester Drive

N
Project N: Scale:
W6.w1 NTS Wake County GIS Map
Project Date:
Mgr.: BZ 12-OH5
Winchester Drive Extension
Raleigh, NC
Soil & Environmenta
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.-
[phone] • (9
Web Page: www.;
PA 1

Portion of Winchester Drive proposed to be constructed will begin at
the northwestern site boundary and extend southeast stopping prior to
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE 0?- ?•?s?sv.
STRUCTURE DATA II DOWNSTREAM PIPE DATA
n Iv? '.n 1 ^; M AI
1 ;1+A\f%= V-' A's CY
S
2 II 15 ;? s. t0
_ -
c
1-k
V?4Vi-
7-1
_ 4- Y l
t
CCM1 A W 0.L C !M A
I'M
' IIP' D' C1 I 4E
%A GA'rL01' C.Y Al AN' I' A' F10 A P A?
A?D P!7II 1/' 1112
372
.] Ca I Al .,1 Al 9. l CS'AN'FS A. jWk C % C-WED
_
p??a ? N p 1
An A,AMe ?ue? V^(, ??.-I a s..u c. r-a esr v e rv. nv
'S ff 1,
EXISTING BULDING
12 A
I
T I
r r 71 n a.
1 i ] AY M t
I I ? ,,?? a ,. o
t
.
..
PRELIMINARY • 00 ROT
I -y °,-;=
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
I a] 1 's 11 S 5 'il
!71 F_
15 12
1 `.] 4 5 6
14
I5 ?-
{. ? j SAM I L AT i_MML_LM
I t -1
LIE
L • I tET 1,1
A,
III
f
A M L F A III 'A I L 3. A, R S, L
%
I k? ) V t AI lC \ A
} ALL M IT [D ,'I r.E r,A S III F 'P CF C 5 CS V TI.
r ^ A FAt ?A fA,
11 1 r..1? / 1hnc?
Eat A't Va';,,N•:Y. -
S I V *[M
j'J F Y L-L
Jill,
GLENWOOD STATION WEST
I a WINCHESTER ROADWAY DESIGN
- = i Wtls_ , - STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
- ARCADIS
10'
C -111 C C yC
/? ?• 9 r . A `AA3
A 1] ;'iilJ ? _u
'ILI
1 'Ja AL 2 N'A4 CA1 CCA7 F'.I,- F; CA9 1
AIRI 1 Y{ 1 ENV 5(7 L`,A A C( M
l;%J. d I5 M iJ C 4 I
!_X1111
WIT x MA ( A V V M] 2_5 C'.VaC
',)'.IN ..i.., <
1
L
9 ! „ E': ?.VI
J

E•c: -D IT
M_ s[riR7 a. rrJg
?IAAI T,1

CITY OF RALEIGH

CASE NO: S•54.2005 ` M1'°` R
NC405028 `-
EXB 1.01
Acad Versgn : R16.0s (LNS Tech) pot,\T,- : Non, 06 Feb 2006 - 7:15pm Current Rols,4e PvCoia
User Name : (Lewd Polh\Nam, : O.\LNR\405028\LNR\0w0 SUBMITTAL\CWS-Ex8101.d.q Layout Toe: STORN CONTROL Dw0 MuiTTK
?,V
l--
\ 401F OF STREAM IMPACT f "
r OUTLET PROTECTION /
r ?`' v y 40' LONG X 14' WIDE _X 24" THIN
CLASS 1 RIP RAP"
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ,'
\\
f ;
EXISTING 24" CMP' Tay TBE ;
,.
T?
REPLACED '-
VAT H H 54/..RCP +
LIMIT OF
STURBANCE
\ \' ` ZONE 1 IMPACTS 170 SF
ON 604 ! F
i IJ TS,
\
IMPACTS 79
ZONE-2 9 SF
X11 \~ \ //' %I ZONE \2 IMPACTS 404 SF\, - (EXEMPT AS- PART OF CITY OF "
RALEIGH ROADWAY DESIGN)
rnr,
Z_ Z 'it
.. '"•,!; %/1'...._..=,:=-:----?'l?r! i'%t,'?'llih !;aj?j+,??1?%!!`
59 , E,tf-,
f T,
CURB. & GUTTER
0 20' 40' 60'
1 17-1
?? - v\ v
11=-, F77ml,
SCALE IN FEET
PROJECT MANAGER I DEPARTMENT MANAGER LEAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED BY
r - J. BECKMAN R. KING J. BEARD R. KING
SHEET TITLE TFSK/PHASE NUMBER DRA'8N BY
GLENWOOD LANE, LLC 0000.00000 B. HARRIS
?' ?M udHO'ARCADIS
GLENWOOD STATION WEST PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER
Ra1 cap_b? 607
g wkv, r 4.1=2 91M54." WINCHESTER DRIVE DESIGN
:? ° °` EXB 1.01
DWG SUBMITTAL NC405028
DWQ Project No.
1. PROJECT INI
Project Name:
Contact Person:
Swale ID: #r \
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
18b ft.
1.1to ac.
D ac.
q'7--.. fps
Z, fps
-3"1 ratio
00 ft/ft
??DA
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams maybe used) Wv _WL CZW S1%MCAt o?J
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been mot, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
PIA Vegetati on Plan provided on plans RoAW" bPJSf,,0 ?TR`C^'r-' TD SF-F-c" ' Q,w:?oP?
JC The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
'C Swale carries only stormwater flow
Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
K_ Plan details for the swale provided. St,op&) B6i i cAA P? r Sk Q= 5w P?? L-?
X Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
-A Check dams provided. Po_-wrJr-_ rT Sw kx-- 5L DPE Lt;BS v" -? Z9
f1 The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
A The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please?omplete the following it
Cntj STA-no s_i or-pA -
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION {please complete the following information):
Project Name : C-1 6 -?k'JC%A' ?-?
Contact Person: SUS Phone Number. j
Swale ID: *-7-
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
(01 ft.
mo ac.
5b ac.
1.9(o fps
-7-.057 fps
3.1 ratio
O'CA fuft
op,
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off site drainage to the Swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams maybe used) 13u9-4aC. CoaS-,vLbc-'u "'
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A licant Initials
I-D
Vegetation Plan provided on plans W, m V ^t RA-VV4 eA-t;0
7c The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
X Swale carries only stormwater flow
X Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
K Plan details for the swale provided.'APE, bMDMwkZ, ?`? GtO scO FRo?`OVA
Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
AYA Check dams provided. P?.M?tUC Swa LA' Supt L e'5<' T)+ 4 '-J 7-19
!1 The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
A The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
ECEIVE D
? D
JAN 17 2006
Or SJ S &;ft >entd Ca=91mt& PA
City Of 6Raleigh
January 9, 2006 -Worth GJarolina
Ms. Deborah Edwards
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject: Neuse River Buffer Impacts - Winchester Drive Extension
Dear Ms. Edwards:
This letter is in response to a Irequest for justification of stream impacts concerning a
proposed extension of Winchester Drive. This proposed roadway is an element of the US 70
Corridor Plan, which is an adopted transportation plan that was developed by NCDOT and the
City of Raleigh in 1991. This plan proposes a system of parallel collector streets along US 70.
These streets are intended to provide alternate means of access at such time that US 70 is
upgraded to an expressway facility. This expressway upgrade is anticipated in conjunction with
a funded NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program Project (U-2823), which will entail
widening the roadway and removing direct access to many of the properties along the corridor.
These parallel collector streets will become the primary means of access for most of the properties
along the highway. The proposed construction of Winchester Drive will result in the immediate
restriction of access to US 70 by the adjacent properties.
There have been many efforts to construct the extension of Winchester Drive since the
late 1990's. At one time this project was a fully-funded and permitted public-private partnership
between the City and a developer, however that project did not move forward. There has also
been some discussion with your office as to a variety of alignment options for this roadway. It is
my understanding that your office has expressed tentative support for the alignment as currently
proposed, pkovided that the necessary crossing of Turkey Creek is facilitated by a bridge.
Regardless of the type of technology used to cross the creek, it is imperative that the City receives
feedback regarding the adequacy ' of the crossingIocatf6n in queStMn pilb to approving T'
development pattern that would preclude any other alternatives.
We remain committed to avoiding Neuse River riparian buffer impacts whenever
possible, and to minimizing any impacts we cannot avoid. We hope that our approval of this
development plan is in keeping with that philosophy. If you have any questions or need any
other information, please' give me a call at [phone] or email me at
eric.lamb®ci.ralcigh.nc.us.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Lamb, PE
Manager, Transportation Services Division
Cc: Cary Joshi, Glenwood Lane, LLC
Bob Zarzecki, Soil & Environmental Consultants
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Recycled Paper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
August 9, 2005
S&EC #: 9406.wl
Situs, Inc.
Attn: Cary Joshi r
7504 Orchard Crest Court
Apex, NC 27539
Re: Report of July 12, 2005 Meeting with DNVQ
Dear Mr. Joshi:
On July 12, 2005, per your request a meeting was conducted with the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ). Ms. Deborah Edwards represented the 401 Oversight & Express
Permitting Unit of the DWQ and Mr. Eric Kulz represented the Raleigh Regional Office of the
DWQ. Also present were Mr. Paul Kallan (City of Raleigh, Public Works Department,
Transportation Services Division), Ms. Beth Trahos (Holt York), Mr. Randy King (Areadis) and
myself.
We discussed the proposed road alignment as depicted on the attached drawing. Ms.
Edwards said that the alignment looked ok as long as a bridge is used over Turkey, Creek and
Impact #I (the proposed impacts to the riparian buffers associated with the unnamed 4ributary
stream) is avoided or at ieastminimized (e.g., no impacts to Zone 1). Ms. Edwards stated that
while the alignment looked ok she could not give .a formal approval without the submittal of a
complete application and formal review by the DWQ.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our environmental services on this project. If
there ar6 an} ,questions or comments regarding the report, please contact us at 919-846-5900.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist .
Attachments: ' Proposed Road Alignment
Charlotte Office: J, Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C DW M 381 E I?wndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Q d&;cn%'?ioro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

9-
OFFICE MEETING W/ DWQ - JULY 12, 2005:
DEBORAH EDWARDS, DWQ (401 UNIT)
ERIC KULZ, DWQ (RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE)
BOB ZARZECKI, S&EC, PA
BETH TRAHOS, HOLT YORK
PAUL KALLAN, CITY OF RALEIGH, PUBLIC WORKS
RANDY KING, ARCADIS
MS. EDWARDS (DWQ) SAID THAT THE ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED BELOW LOOKS OK IF A BRIDGE IS USED
OVER TURKEY CREEK AND IF IMPACT #1 CAN BE
AVOIDED OR AT LEAST MINIMIZED (E.G., NO ZONE 1
IMPACTS). HOWEVER, A FORMAL DWQ APPROVAL
CAN NOT BE GIVEN UNTIL AN APPLICATION IS
SUBMITTED TO DWQ.
EXISTING
LDJ
GLENWOOE
AVE.
j
e
NEUS IVER
IMPA T 1
NEUSE RIVER
IMPACT #2
PROPOSED
IMPACT SUMMARY
ZONE 1
(SF) ZONE 2
(SF)
LINEAR FEET
IMPACT 11 444 1999 0
IMPACT /2 6040 6348 220
'lease note that Glenwood Lane, LLC is only responsible for constructing the
lortion of Winchester Drive from their northwestem property line southeast
topping Just prior to Turkey Crock and it's associated buffers. (BZ021700)
LAKE ANNE
IPINECREST RD.I
EXISTING
GRAPHIC SCALE
400 0 200 400 800
1 inch a 400 ft.
GLENWOOD STATION WEST COVER WITHERS RAVENEL
-
WETLAND/CHANNEL IMPACTS ..?.-ENGINEERS ---;••`? .11.1 1 SURVEYORS
*3-L A
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil and Environmental consultants
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT o1F
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
July 12, 1999-- rr; (ez, U U
j
u 15M9
Subject: Ncusc River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
Bunch Site
NBRRO-99-142
Wake County
Dear Mr. Martin:
On April 8, 1999, I met with you at a proposed development along Hwy 70 in
Wake County. On that day, you requested that I both determined whether the circled
drainage feature, as indicated on the attached map, would require compliance with the
Neuse River Buffer Rules and provide you with written conformation of that
determination.
As depicted on the attached map, this evaluation determined the pond footprint
did not house forest vegetation and was accordingly not subject to the Neuse Riparian
Buffer Rule. Downstream from the pond dam the determination was that the feature is a
stream and is subject to the Ncuse Riparian Buffer Rule.
If you have any questions please call me at [phone].
h:\ncubufl\bunch
cc: RRO - file copy
John Domey- Wetlands/401 Grou]
Sincerely,
Qa r1 ,1/
Danny Smith
Environmental Specialist
3600 SARRSTT DRIV[. SUIT[ 101. RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27600
PNON<010-571-4700 FAXSIS•971-4716
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIY[ ACTION EMPLOYSR - SO% R[CYCL[O/I O% POST-CON/VMER PAPER
;4#1
Oit
- /? Tun.ri`.'3:}T ?•? '?;?1 ?? ^ 1J ?J '•.\ / 1 ?j.``>?'?? J?1_•••il?.?l?'? ?,i.,1 '`?? /$/?/
3977
55,
\ r
577.
sis
1-4
AAM
J ter , -~ •- '•' 1
row
?. .. • ? ink l•.??. ?• v
?_••.i •1 \i, .ii,,.? All
n75 ism
`" -• * .•?'• ?:? • ice'
13
a; IIIII IF
780000-1Itr ?0raoy
FEET-d/Y'i ??t ?. fi ?' ?,?` •• .'•._''?t?• • _,Cf-,`
as ?\ ??1 '.?•.? •?a;,? .i /?' 1??.. t`^_? 1 • :• 1
t, -.`• , ?,.r, ' ?• ,111' •V•• ?? • I I _
loc.
41
?73.1?%?!? ?,? •,far ?`y`\_,? Ctrs=.? .//^. _ _ _•.
35.52'30.'. •`
78•45' 704 2 FEET 3.a M/. r? tic. 30 706 02'30-
S1.4, rh r,ro..'. J9 M/ A
qL Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey rj(V/,-,/,a /Lv?( 0?
Control by USGS, NOS/NOAH, and North Carolina Geodetic Survey
4 KN 1000
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs 1 ;cN/Q R Q ??
e
taken 1965. Field checked 1967 /r(J V 7 F'
Polyconic projection. 10,000-foot grid ticks based on North Carolina bK• G
coordinate system. 1000-meter universal Transverse Mercator grid Ti"a Lili3, . 1•n'
I; 24MI6
ticks, tone 17, shown in blue. 1927 North American Datum
„ I N1A1Michael F. Easley, Governor
I \?C? QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gj r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-i
0 .? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 10, 2006
Wake County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER /a
Y E
Glenwood Lane, LLC E C E' 1'
Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi FEB 14 2006 L
.
4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Or. Sol 6 En*=nmW Coztlnrf. PA
Project Name: Winchester Drive Extension
On February 10, 2006, the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality received an
email request from Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, regarding a project known as "Winchester Drive Extension" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1. The application fee of $3,000.00 (for the Riparian Buffer Approval and 401 Water Quality Certification
services, made payable to the North.Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2. Five (5) complete and collated copies,of the PCN Application;
3. One (1) copy of the Addendum; and
4. Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.tis/ncwetlands/appadd5.t)df).
Thank you for your attention to this. matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest'form and/or the services are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to, call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502 or Cy>4thia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-1.786.

CBK/asc
cc:. DWQ Raleigh Regional,Ofl'ice
File copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
Sincerely,
.
/.
Cyndi Karoly, Manager
401/Express Review Oversite Unit
401 Gvorsight I F)press Rovlew Permra g Unit
16M Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/FAX 919.733{993 / Intamet: hap://h2o.enr.statanc,us/ncwctland3
D?` l.,aro 'na
422
t
An Equal opportun y/AftirmaWe Action Employer - 5TIs Recycledt10% Post Consumer Paper

4
J
O?O? W AT ?9QG
Cl)
February 10, 2006
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Glenwood Lane, LLC
Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi
4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Project Name: Winchester Drive Extension
Dear Mr. Joshi,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Wake County
On February 10, 2006, the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality received an
email request from Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, regarding a project known as "Winchester Drive Extension" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1. The application fee of $3,000.00 [for the Riparian Buffer Approval and 401 Water Quality Certification
services, made payable to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2. Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application;
3. One (1) copy of the Addendum; and
4. Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
http://li2o.enr.state.ne.tis/ncwetlands/appa(ld5.pdf).
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received. If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest form and/or the services are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Manager
401/Express Review Oversite Unit
CBK/asc
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road; Raleigh, NC 27614
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: ham://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
None Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
U,
L1 00
INITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
WITHIN THE 401 OVERSITE/EXPRESS PERMITTING UNIT
September 1, 2004 ?GC?G0WR D
Version 3
FEB 9 2006
Applicant Name: Glenwood Lane, LLC - Attn: Mr. Cary Joshi IhEDENRM-MWASTTER QUALITY
Applicant Address: 4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Applicant's phone number: [phone]
Fax number: [phone]
Applicant's email address: [e-mail]
Consultant Name (if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) - Attn: Bob Zarzecki
Consultant address (if applicable): 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Consultant's phone number: [phone]
Fax number: [phone]
Consultant's email address: [e-mail]
Type of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Isolated Wetland Permit
? Stream Origin Determination
# of Determinations Requested
® Riparian Buffer Approval ? Intermittent/Perennial Determination
? Stormwater Management Plan # of Determinations Requested
? Mitigation Plan
? Stream ? Wetland ? Buffers (check all appropriate)
Name of Project: Winchester Drive Extension (City of Raleigh) County: Wake
Total project acreage: n/a Road Proiect (acres) Total built out impervious area:n/a Road Proiect (acres)
Nearest named stream (from USGS topo map): Turkey Creek (03-04-02, 27-33-2. C NSW)
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
The proiect involves the construction and extension of Winchester Drive and a connector road to US70/Glenwood
Avenue for the City of Raleigh. The proposed road is currently located on Mr. Joshi's property but will be transferred
to the City once construction is complete and is part of their thoroughfare plan The road will currently end prior to
crossing Turkey Creek. The road alignment has been discussed with staff from your office and was tentatively
accepted pending any necessary 401 and buffer approvals with the understanding that when the road does ultimately
extend across Turkey Creek that a bridge will be used. The application will include a justification letter from the City of
Raleigh and a report of previous meetings that have been conducted with your office
1
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey. (see attached)
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway number:
The protect is located east of the existing Winchester Drive, west of Turkey Creek and south of Glenwood Avenue,
Raleigh, Wake County, NC (see attached map: Mr. Joshi will only be permitting the section on his property and west
of Turkey Creek).
Proposed impacts:
Acres of 404 wetlands: 0_(0.484 acres previously approved on property: DWQ Proiect # 05-0205)
Acres of isolated wetlands: 0
Linear feet of streams: 40 (intermittent)
Linear feet of isolated streams: 0
Square feet of protected stream buffers: 1,753 sf
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list
which ones. Yes (assisted as a presenter while with the DWQ)
Has any DWQ staff visited the site? Yes, if yes, please provide DWQ staff name, Danny Smith and
date of visit: April 8, 1999 0 also visited the site in 2000 (not sure of the date) while working with the DWQ to review a
previous alignment of Winchester Drive that proposed culverts and relocation of Turkey Creek This previous plan
has since been dropped.)
Which other environmental permits from other agencies will be needed for this project? Please list the permits and
issuing agencies below:
NWP 39 for the 40 feet of stream impact
Does this project require approval under the State Environmental Policy Act or National Environmental Policy Act?
No
Is this project an After-the-fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from DWQ?
No
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission?
No
Are you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any
measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
I am not aware of any local controversy.
This form must be submitted via email (Go 401 express(cilncmail.net), faxed (919-733-6893) or hand-delivered to the Parkview Building, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the Express Review Program will be notified via email or fax
within 2 days. Successful applicants will then be instructed regarding detailed procedures for full application (Please Note: Submittals of the review
packages on Friday after 12:00 pm will be stamped as received on the next business day).
Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473 if you have any questions regarding this form.
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Situs, Inc.
Attn: Cary Joshi
7504 Orchard Crest Court
Apex, NC 27539
Re: Report of July 12, 2005 Meeting with DWQ
Dear Mr. Joshi:
August 9, 2005
S&EC #: 9406.wl
On July 12, 2005, per your request a meeting was conducted with the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ). Ms. Deborah Edwards represented the 401 Oversight & Express
Permitting Unit of the DWQ and Mr. Eric Kulz represented the Raleigh Regional Office of the
DWQ: Also present were Mr. Paul Kallan (City of Raleigh, Public Works Department,
Transportation Services Division), Ms. Beth Trahos (Holt York), Mr. Randy King (Arcadis) and
myself.
We discussed the proposed road alignment as depicted on the attached drawing. Ms.
Edwards said that the alignment looked ok as long as a bridge is used over Turkey,, Creek and
Impact #1 (the proposed impacts to the riparian buffers associated with the unnamed, fributary
stream) is avoided or at ieastmit imized (e.g., no impacts to Zone 1). Ms. Edwd* stated that
while the alignment looked ok she could not give a formal approval without the submittal of a
complete application and formal review by the DWQ.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our environmental services on this project. If
there arb an} ,questions or comments regarding the report, please contact us at 919-846-5900.
,... Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
lit,
Attachments: Proposed Road Alignment

Charlotte Office:
Greensboro Office*
236 UPhillip Court, Suite C DW M 381 E 1&wndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Q Grt?:enoro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax:
[phone]

TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map
Page 1 of 1
ttooaone
\1V1 17• `` fN

N, pa

"14i
0T INN
I 4 _6

lizz

PI,
r.
dT

get
r S ? \ .),? ??) ,? ?`?? ? ?ll? I ,} \`'?\ 3 {I i?f ti , ?y `? • ? `mar/ ? ? (`(

?? i? it ij?l ? ? I r ?
"''
?
??
??? ?I1
???-?l
?????
?I? ??? ??
?? ?? I ? "1 ?
l • ? ? ?I??1 i
:
v. ?
?
.
! i\
? ?
.
t C
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Map center is UTM 17 704484E 3972716N (WGS84/NAD83)
Bayleaf quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=39727
r'I m
G ?
M=-8.813
G=1.328
9&s... 2/9/2006
i

WAKE

'

M??
? t
?I
rv
COUNTY n Ic n1
u s
Parcel Number: 0777837906
Map created on 2/9/2006 3:38:01 PM.
Copyright 2003. City of Raleigh, Wake County.
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.
J 40,11
0 250 ft
Page 1 of 1
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
August 9, 2005
S&EC #: 9406.wl
Situs, Inc.
Attn: Cary Joshi
7504 Orchard Crest Court
Apex, NC 27539
Re: Report of July 12, 2005 Meeting with DWQ
Dear Mr. Joshi:
On July 12, 2005, per your request a meeting was conducted with the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ). Ms. Deborah Edwards represented the 401 Oversight & Express
Permitting Unit of the DWQ and Mr. Eric Kulz represented the Raleigh Regional Office of the
DWQ: Also present were Mr. Paul Kallan (City of Raleigh, Public Works Department,
Transportation Services Division), Ms. Beth Trahos (Holt York), Mr. Randy King (Arcadis) and
myself.
We discussed the proposed road alignment as depicted on the attached drawing. Ms.
Edwards said that the alignment looked ok as long as a bridge is used over Turkey,, Creek and
Impact #1 (the proposed impacts to the riparian buffers associated with the unnamed tributary
stream) is avoided or at icasf minimized (e.g., no impacts to Zone 1). Ms. Edwards stated that
while the alignment looked ok she could not give a formal approval without the submittal of a
complete application and formal review by the DWQ.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our environmental services on this project. If
there ar6 anquestions or comments regarding the report, please contact us at 919-846-5900.
t ,I ,. .
. Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki,
:. ..Environmental Specialist .
Attachments: ' Proposed Road Alignment
Charlotte Office: 1 Greensboro Office:
236 LtPhillip Court, Suite C 38V -E 1 wndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 DWQMcct?p c?p rte
li?tcnSb., NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

U
Z
J
W
Z
W
06
Q
C.
O
Cl)
N
00
Lr)
O
O
N
IMPACT SUMMARY
ZONE 1
(SF) ZONE 2
(SF)
UNEAR FEET
IMPACT 1 44-4 1999
IMPACT #2 6040 6348 220
a
iz:
GRAPHIC SCALE
400 0 200 400 800
1 inch - 400 ft.
GLENWOOD STATION WEST COVER WITHERS & RAVENEL
WETLAND/CHANNEL IMPACTS 1? -+?`iN INCn. 1-u LLL 1 LurnoLS_
IMPACT SUMMARY
ZONE 1
(SF) ZONE 2
(SF) LINEAR FEET
IMPACT #1 444 1999 0
IMPACT #2 6040 6348 220
GRAPHIC SCALE
400 0 200 400 800
1 inch - 400 ft.
GLENWOOD STATION WEST COVER WITHERS & RAVENEL
WETLAND/CHANNEL IMPACTS Y 9N6IN99'LfN1 PLANNERS 1 IU!V!rORS
1? - _
Page 1
Parcel Number: 0777837906
Map created on 2/9/2006 3:38:01 PM.
Copyright 2003. City of Raleigh. Wake County.
0 ? 250 ft
I
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imapslprintmap.asp?pin=077783 7906&pinext=&minX=2076830... 2/9/2006
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map
Page 1
W PMN
r1 A ,//
. .
_ 0

Cb Jr

-1-141 1
1 ti

i

????? '! ?;'?',' > `'? ,?.;_'? ?_? -•r[?\ to c --?;

0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Map center is UTM 17 704484E 3972716N (WGS84/NAD83)
Bayleaf quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
M*
G
M=-8.813
G=1.328
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=3972715.99987804&e=704484.000045419&s...
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
???_ ?? : I,?I,i?l,„i?ii„Ii??„i??f„?ai?,i,i,ii,,,,(I,Ii,i,li,,•,,li.(
Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
III Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece,
or on the front If space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Glend Lane LLC
Attn: Mr. Gary Joshi
4112 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh,NC 27612
DWQ# 06-0214-Wake
!. A
0
1A Fnrn..,...
A. Signature
y 7 ? Agent
X " `v? ? Addressef
B. RecEfl 4 y (PAntertlveme) ' JC. Date of Deliver
D. Is?delivery address different from hem 1? ? Yes
If YES, er1?r;daliv@cy afidogelow: ? No

3. Service @ (? < i ,
ttcertlfled Mai .' ' EXpress mail
? Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mall ? C.O.D.
A 0--M t-d naliverv? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
i ngaor.nq.ne_1 re