20021722 Ver 1_Complete File_20030527

O?OF w H rF9QG
r
7 y
May 27, 2003
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project No. 02-1722
County: Wake
Page 1 of 2
Lawrence Haynes
1924 Torrey Pines Place
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject Property: Hampton Pointe SD, Hwy 401 (Louisburg Road), Rolesville, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 02-7049
Tom's Creek [03-04-02, 27-24, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Haynes:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 0.09 acres of wetlands and 4,078 square feet (ft) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of
constructing the proposed "Street C" and four (4) utility lines, as described within your application dated April 14, 2003.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3376 and 3402 (GC3376 & GC3402). The Certification (s) allows
you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 3 and 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall
also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before
you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge. Also,
this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General
Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and
protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms
shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this
Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
2. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
3. Sewer Systems
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Page 2 of 2
The project shall comply with 15A NCAC 2H .0219(i)(2)(G) and all other State, Federal and local sewer system
regulations.
4. Water Quality Certification(s)
The proposed project must comply with all of the conditions of General Water Quality Certification(s) (GC) 3376 &
3402.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
Ian W. Klimek, P.E.,
NC DWQ, Director
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3402 & GC 3376
Cc: Todd Preuninger, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 02-1722
Date: May 27, 2003
bz
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: 7
Date: ?f
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Haynes Tract Todd Reveiwing Storm H20) County Wake
Project Number 02 172 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 4/14/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type Residential NBR On-site Determination stream call
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39 OTHO Y O N F--F-27-24 F C NSW 30,402. 0.09 F ? ?-
3 - Stream O Y hI'??-? 30,402. r-7 I r__
_ r .+?.?.
NBR BuffersFT-0 N F__F_- r-F_ 30,402. 0.09 F_ ?-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
I T_ F_ F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
June 2, 2003
STORMWATER are the level spreaders designed to capture and flatten out the first flush? What
happens when they by pass and ultimately cause erosion?
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
late: Uc 03 Project Name: (rte CVM,2GO (- 'V,--c
DWQ#: 07
County:
To: ? ARO
? FRO
? MRO
??RRO
From:
Mike Parker
Ken Averitte
Alan4ehason
teve Mi
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Cyndi Karoly (Central Office)
Telephone : (919) X33-it+Z(o
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? MFer zati on/av ' ce issues
Rulico, Catawba, Randleman)
Pl
_..
? Mitigation Ratios ......
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
'ormments:
L eel cQ
,A-N
c o???
L -A
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
FILE COPY
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
217
WETLANDS /401 GROUP April 14, 2003 APR ? 4 M03
WATER QUALITY SECTION
RE: Nationwide Permits 3, Non-Reporting 39 (courtesy notification), and Buffer
Compliance
Hampton Pointe
Rolesville, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 02-7049
Dear Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of Lawrence B. Haynes (property owner), we hereby request authorization
from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to use Nationwide Permit 3 for the
subject project to cover maintenance to two dams on existing ponds on-site. We are also
providing a courtesy notification for impacts to wetlands (0.09 acres). In addition, we
request written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality that the
project complies with the Neuse Buffer Rules for impacts associated with proposed utility
lines. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an
agent authorization form.
S&EC evaluated the site for the presence of wetlands in May 2002 and submitted a
delineation map for USACE approval in March 2003. On August 6, 2002, S&EC
conducted a site meeting with Mr. Bob Zarzecki of the NC-DWQ. He determined that
the two ponds on-site are subject to the buffer rules. A copy of his letter is attached
(DWQ:02-1722). Mr. Kevin Martin of S&EC also met with Mr. Todd St. John of the
DWQ to discuss the proper design criteria for maintaining the ponds and complying with
the buffer rules.
The purpose of this project is to construct a residential subdivision that will meet the
demand for housing in this area. Impacts on-site consist of 0.09 acres of wetland
impacts, maintenance of existing dams, and 0.093 acres of impacts to Neuse Buffers.
The site is approximately 100 acres in size and is located on the north side of Louisburg
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
[ ( t
' April 14, 2003
S&EC Project #: 02-7049
Page 2 of 3
Road (Highway 401) at the intersection of Louisburg Road and Jonesville Road (SR
2226). Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS
topographic quadrangle.
Nationwide Permit 3
The applicant proposes to perform routine maintenance to dams on the existing farm
ponds on-site. Specifically, maintenance is needed on the emergency spillways for both
ponds and the lower pond requires the installation of a new riser and outlet (see letter
dated 2/21/03). The water level for the ponds will not be changed from present
conditions.
These activities should be covered under Nationwide Permit 3 (NWP 3). Specifically,
NWP 3 authorizes activities related to repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of any
serviceable structure in order to restore it to the condition as specified in the original
permit and comply with current design and safety criteria. However, at the time of
construction (over 30 years ago), no permit was required from the USACE. Although a
permit was not obtained (none was needed), maintenance of the structures is still
allowable under NWP 3. Proposed maintenance activities will comply with all of the
general conditions, regional, and water quality certification conditions, therefore, this
activity does not require written concurrence from the NC-DWQ or the USACE.
Impact 5 - Nationwide Permit 39 - Courtesy Notification
In order to access the northern portion of the property it will be necessary to impact 0.09
acres of headwater forest wetlands. In order to minimize impacts, headwalls will be
installed on either side of the proposed roadway. The applicant will employ appropriate
erosion and sedimentation controls during construction. This portion of the project will
comply with the general and regional conditions of NWP 39. Additionally, because
wetland impacts are below the threshold required for notification and because no stream
channels will be impacted by the proposed crossing, written concurrence from the NC-
DWQ or the USACE is not required.
Impacts 1-4- Buffer Compliance
The applicant proposes utility lines that will impact a total of 0.093 acres of Neuse
Buffers. A pre-application meeting was conducted with Mr. Todd St. John of the NC-
DWQ, the project engineer, and Mr. Kevin Martin of S&EC regarding the proposed
utility impacts. Mr. St. John agreed that the proposed activities are listed as allowable in
the table of uses in the Neuse Buffer Rules, and therefore, would be approved if designed
in accordance with criteria outlined in the meeting. Because there are no stream or
wetland impacts associated with the proposed utility lines, only Buffer Compliance is
? f
1
April 14, 2003
S&EC Project #: 02-7049
Page 3 of 3
required for this activity. Please note that the existing buffer surrounding the ponds is
comprised solely of herbaceous plants (i.e., not forested), which will be reseeded
following construction.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10 acre) or if a discharge causes the loss of any
open waters. The applicant requested a detailed delineation of wetlands present on the
site prior to construction in order to avoid wetland impacts. Because wetlands separate
the northern and southern portions of the property, impacts were unavoidable. However,
in an attempt to minimize impacts, the applicant proposes the use of headwalls and
because impacts are below 0.10 acres, S&EC does not believe compensatory mitigation
should be required by the USACE for this project.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project. There are only 0.09 acres of wetland
impacts and no stream impacts proposed, however, we require buffer compliance for the
project to cover 0.093 acres of impacts to Neuse Buffers. Because there are no impacts to
stream channels and only 0.09 acres of wetland impacts are proposed, we do not believe
that wetland nor stream mitigation should be required by NC-DWQ. Please also note
that following construction the site will contain less than 30% impervious surface.
Because this project does not require 401 certification and because impervious surface
will be less than 30%, we do not believe this project requires a pre-approved stormwater
plan. Details adequate to show that the Neuse Buffer rules are being complied with are
included.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Biologist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN ) notification form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure 1)
Site Location Map - Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Proposed Wetland Impact Maps (Overall & insets 1-3)
Agent Authorization Form
Stormwater calculations provided by project engineer

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:NWP3, NWP 39 (courtesy)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Lawrence Haynes
Mailing Address: 1924 Torrey Pines Place
Raleigh NC 27615
Telephone Number: 919-787-8117 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninizer _
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh North Carolina 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: Preuningergsandec.com
Pagel of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hampton Pointe
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1758.01-36-4714, 1758.01-46-3113
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Rolesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Hampton Pointe (Phase
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is approximately
acres in size and is located on the north side of Louisburg Road (Highway 401) at the
intersection of Louisburg Road and Jonesville Road (SR 2226).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035° 54' 35" N, 078° 29' 03" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): approx 96 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Tom's Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is comprised of agricultural fields forested areas
Page 2 of 9
1
within the drainageways and an existing house and barn. The surrounding area consists of
mixed land use (i.e. urban/rural)
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
protect consists of the construction of a residential subdivision. Heavy machinery associated
with grading and clearing will be used on the site.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
housing for the growing population in the surrounding area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Detailed wetland delineation - May 2002, Submitted for USACE approval - March 2003
DWO site visit - June 5, 2002 and August 6 2002 - DWQ #:02-1722
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated by the current applicant
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed wetland impacts consist of
0.09 acres of fill for the purpose of a road that will provide access to the northern and
southern portions of the property. No stream channels will be impacted by the proposed
project As noted by the protect engineer see letter dated 2/21/03), the existing: farm ponds
will require routine maintenance however, the water level will not be changed from its
present level
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact I00-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma acres (es/no) linear feet)
1 Fill 0.09 no Approx. 500 Headwater forest
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at ham://www.fema.aov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.86 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact leases eci
NA NA NA NA NA NA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated riprap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozotie.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: NA
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
NA NA NA NA NA
Page 4 of 9
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):_ NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
- Because wetlands/ponds separate the northern and southern sections of the property, impacts
are unavoidable if access is to be provided to the two sections. However, in order to reduce
impacts the applicant crossed the wetlands in a perpendicular manner and utilized headwalls to
minimize impacts No stream channels will be impacted by the proposed project
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
Page 5 of 9
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because impacts are below the threshold required for mitigation, we do not believe that
mitigation will be required
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 6 of 9
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Impact 1: Temporary
Impact Required
Zone* (square feet) Multiplier Mitigation
1 599 3 NA
2 407 1.5 NA
Total 1006 NA
Impact 2: Temporary
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 652 3 NA
2 410 1.5 NA
Total 1062 NA
Impact 3: Temporary
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 594 3 NA
2 392 1.5 NA
Total 986 NA
Page 7 of9
Impact 4: Temporary
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 618 3 NA
2 406 1.5 NA
Total 1024 NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Because wetland impacts are below 0 1 acres (i.e. project does not require 401 certification) and
because impervious surface will be less than 30% we do not believe that this project requires a
ore-annroved stormwater plan. However, the engineer is providing calculations to show
compliance with the buffer rules.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary Sewer
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
0
Applican gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is v55d only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

U U
/ , Q Q
' -O
' 00
I '
f ' ci
` ? II II
r N
V W W
X00
N
W
Cn
z
n

U U
QQ
?O
00 ?
00
dd
(f) (S)
N
minor
N
W W
ON 0
O
1 '
LLB
_j- 0
?- o
/ m CD
Xb

O
T
O
O
I40

U
Q
n
11 0
UD
Q
C, C3
z (t)
Q?
E-- O
w
O
>,

X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X X X z

x x x x x
x x x x
x x x
x
I l0

O

N
I-D

m
co
? 1
W j
Z
4t
n(n
n0
N /
X00
Lf)
LL)

71?

1

? \ Ln m
0
0

N
0

/
O? / 2
Q-))
0
CV o 0
00
d ci
?}. o
V LO
w
U
?
Ln
U^ O
a
U
O
M,
01 II P
A? ll_ 11 ?. •n.i.. o

l V-
(Z)
? v a
o 0
350
0 n (l a
,y
1 C?
., L
9
n
t,l
Q C9
„ o
o ? o
o t? o ?35
22 'Cem ,
3
--? 8 e Q
,
.'• u• ,_ / •. rye, l\
Project f Scale:
02-7049 t" - 2OW Figure 1- USGS Quad
Project Date:
Mgr.: TP W102 Haynes Tract
Westbridge Development
Rolesville, Wake County, NC
d ,
U
7 ?<
7-
RQLESVILLE, NC
1993
NIMA 5355IV.NWSERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

< , s i fi
,`
>
GG _.
ti? •? ?.r" \UV [ '- ? "-~r ""' ,?# ?f
? ?'??aaYY
"
w
' ,gtlC
"t u ?.oC ?'
,
4
¢ j !. Me;
.?'1 DUB ,
\ ??>;?, t;rri.' ?
*r x
?.
C
< < ::?'? 4',? Wror Y
\mr, ? r
r
r 3? »st I7uC y? ? li?
t .
? ? '
''
h
?
? 11±? wmcr??? ?
? s?fi•
i:; j x ,,
r
` ?? ? ?:? ?
aQ Ap62 Cri ? cn-
?''?
' • j
`?•,'
? "
?
?
. .1 F `f
a
'`? ? i ? ? a
\f try
? LwC
,?
h
?•
Me j r ".< 4. ? a ?
t

fi0 p
Nfmtl
?
??' U y M 7 R- Lof3
?
v
t.,
Dug ? v .vs Ifs ? ,
V

a ?eG1
?
? Q
? ?
A
!_ ?,: n

> ,W F
c° W yy
q [
cn
V
Y A
ap f Y? we
?. ?r A-r
m

q
c ? t ?Q
? z? ^
nb'\
' i
nU
? ? j ?
?•
?
.
i .
\ 1:6C ,,? + .?.
rya Apl3 ;? '' ? i4'? tIF3 ; ?` O

I
Project M Scale:
02-7049 1" =1320'
Project Date: Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Mgr.: TP 5!1102 Haynes Tract
Westbridge Development
Rolesville, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
J&CE; Job#
Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC
106 West Chatham St. - P.O. Box 1062 F E B 2 4 ?- L s Date
Apex, North Carolina 27502
Office [phone] Fax # [phone] - -
E-mail adds Rrnom @nc.rr.com
To Kevin Martin/Sean Clark
Company: S&EC
Job Name: Ham on Pointe
Subject: Ponds
0228
21-Feb-03
Prints ( ) [ ] Per Your Request [ ] For Your Information [ X ]
Pick-Up [ ]
Mail [ ] Original(s) ( ) [ ] For Review [ ] For Approval [ ]
Contract(s) ( ) [ ] Permit(s) [ ] For Signature [ ]
Deliver [ X ]
Comments: The two on site ponds are existing farm ponds that require general maintenance. Each pond is
less than 15 feet in height so they do not require permitting under the Dams Safety Act. We
anticipate maintenance to consist of the followin :
Upper Pond The riser and outlet for the pond both appear to consist of 8" PVC pipe. The pipe
appears to be in relatively good condition so no maintenance is planned. The pond does appear
to need construction of an
We will perform routing analysis for the
but we do not foresee an si nificant maintenance requirement.
Lower Pond -The riser and outlet for the lower nd are not visible to determine their condition.
Additionally, the emergency spillway and water elevation are nearly the same according to the
survey provided to us. We antici to maintenance for this pond will requi installation of a new
riser and outlet as well as work to imp rove the emergency spillway.
Please note that the water level for each pond will not be changed from present conditions.
Si9ned A
m

ILI

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC
106 West Chatham St. - P.O. Box 1062
Apex, North Carolina 27502
Office [phone] Fax # [phone]
E-mail address ucnossen6nc.rr.com
R ; 2 , a&CE Job# 0228
t
Date 24-Mar-03
To Kevin Martin
Company: S&EC
Job Name: Hampton Pointe
Subject: First 1" Information
Pick-Up [ ] Prints () [ ] Per Your Request [ X ] For Your Information [ ]
Mail [ X ] Original(s) () [ ] For Review [ ] For Approval [ ]
Deliver [ ] Contract(s) ( ) [ ] Permit(s) [ ] For Signature [ ]
Comments: Kevin,
Attached is a plan view of the 6" outlet and level spreader required to discharge the first 1" storm
event outside the Neuse River Buffer. Level spreader detail is also attached. This detail is per the
State but I have noted that DW requirements for size.
Also attached are the supporting calculations. If there is anything else needed, please call.
Thanks.
Signed
24" FE5 (G'Q
IN25.7 (FI ERIFY)
121 x G'W x 22"D
CIA55 5 RIP-RAP APRON
. -0 u- " V, o = 8.2 fps \
\ d?
\ o° o?
1 3' LEVEL \ o o
5PEADER ° '
LF 24" RCP
- @ 1.2% /
/j 24"x24" • Ri5ER
..
/ G. R15EP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
/ ............................
/ .................................
/ .................................
..................................

I N rte'
Practice Standards and Specifications
6.40 KRATJ - e -
Definition A non-erosive outlet for concentrated runoff constructed to disperse flow
uniformly across a slope.
Purpose To convert concentrated flow to sheet flow and release it uniformly over a sta-
bilized area.
Conditions Where Where sediment-free storm runoff can be released in sheet flow down a stabi-
Practice Appiies lized slope without causing erosion.
Where a level lip can be constructed without filling.
Where the area below the spreader lip is uniform with the slope of 10% or less
and is stable for anticipated flow conditions, preferably well-vegetated.
Where the runoff water will not re-concentrate after release.
Where there will be no traffic over the spreader.
Planning The level spreader is a relatively low-cost structure to release small volumes of
Considerations concentrated flow where site conditions are suitable (Figure 6.40a). The outlet
area must be uniform and well-vegetated with slopes of 10% or less. Particular
care must be taken to construct the outlet lip completely level in a stable, undis-
turbed soil. Any depressions in the lip will concentrate the flow, resulting in
erosion. Evaluate the outlet system to be sure that flow does not concentrate
below the outlet (Figure 6.40b). The level spreader is most often used as an out-
let for temporary or permanent diversions and diversion dikes. Runoff water
containing high sediment loads must be treated in a sediment trapping device
before release in a level spreader.
Design Criteria Capacity-Determine the capacity of the spreader by estimating peak flow
from the 10-yr storm. Restrict the drainage area so that maximum flows into the
spreader will not exceed 30 cfs.
Spreader dimensions-When water enters the spreader from one end, as from
a diversion, select the appropriate length, width, and depth of the spreader from
Table 6.40a.
-* Table 6.40a
Minimum Dimensions for
Level Spreader
Construct a 20-ft transition section in the diversion channel so the width of the
diversion will smoothly meet the width of the spreader to ensure uniform
outflow.
Design Flow Entrance Width Depth End Width Length
cfs ---minimum dimension in feet---
0-10 10 0.5 3 10
10-20 16 0.6 3 20
20-30 24 0.7 3 30
fit'; i.l?.
6.40.1
a
Level Spreader (not to scale)
Vegetated
;',^ ,q? '?i'*°.?, \ ",..tl' „ '•' Transition
diversion ?• ?'?"?,"?N? ?•\ ''^"" to 0 grade
1_6`.•Ily1?°l , tit MP . J'i ` ` u' 11 `t y.
,pan ' t, tr ,,??:,\ .• r': a 1w? •"` k. N?' 11• 1.
?y^•l•?1•r• ?...yy'?i4. ltuu. ?' J' t?•4" v 1 ??1,• 1111.., '? \lt
•%FT? a`rl?''M' Ile '?..vAl•:'.`jr'.? ??.t'i4• ??' ?+- cdp ??,y'• J???I•,
• ??hf?1?•'",?t?, ?? )` ?' j? .?I Mai • w?1f`1.1.• ????IK?--'? \/ ? J,? ? l• ?, , `. ` ,1?`r'1 `„ ?U•' ?,, .
? ld'' ,'fit • ? . w?•••t'' U• ,1.•11`"F? ?N.. \ ?/ /? ?.. nY?J!' ?µ' '?? .I?.b. • ??
?•?wu,????;,a,??`???:?,?;?.?? ?'\ ?? / ?.? w?" ?`' ??A Stabilized
a \I?t? '?," ".' ,? `„ ?/ wa" vl. +M• \• slope
Stable r\.r• \r,,.\ 1?? / a"?1 `a`' ' III.. l, M,?\
undisturbed _.? v ..l"
outlet ??. fit, 1 r?l %I, u,. ??. Ir., ?tl1.
11111.. 1411 ?• 111 Iv ^' ' 1\III." ?1 +i,I4\ ? 1 ?? ? UM. 1.
? vl . ?` ?l?' til'• ?,, ? w?t. ,?1?1'll••1111lhul 1(ul? ?? ??'.1.`• •J•" \Y '?'.\r•
v", t / .
kl.. to KIM' ?Mf ?/
lrl N ?1' 11l .? 111 a"' wIP? Wlll? ?I. r'• )t'
11i„ AI,. 1rl.V, . w
?' 1' ? 1 • . 11 wl 1
rl.. ,,??• „??• ??,,? ••?? J,rl ,.( ?ll VIII 'Nit.
Figure 6.40a Level spreader is designed to disperse small volumes of concentrated flow across stable slopes.
Grade-The grade of the last 20 feet of the diversion channel should provide
a smooth transition from channel grade to level at the spreader. The grade of the
spreader should be 0%.
Spreader lip-Construct the level lip on undisturbed soil to uniform height and
zero grade over the length of the spreader. Protect it with an erosion-resistant
material, such as fiberglass matting, to prevent erosion and allow vegetation to
become established.
Outlet area-The outlet disposal area must be generally smooth and
well-vegetated with a maximum slope of 10%.
Vegetate all disturbed areas.
Construction 1. The matting should be a minimum of 4 ft wide extending 6 inches over the
Specifications hp and buried 6 inches deep in a vertical trench on the lower edge. The upper
edge should butt against smoothly cut sod and be securely held in place with
closely spaced heavy duty wire staples at least 12 inches long.
2. Ensure that the spreader lip is level for uniform spreading of storm runoff.
3. Construct the level spreader on undisturbed soil (not on fill).
4. Construct a 20-ft transition section from the diversion channel to blend
smoothly to the width and depth of the spreader.
6.40.2
Practice Standards and Specifications
Cross Section
Material
stapled in
place _
Variable
II?
Level lip NE
III II??II III?? III I I I? I
of spreader
I IIIII?_ ..-
Buried
1I11?I?I=I?I?
6,, min
Figure 6.40b Detail of level spreader cross section.
6 " I
min 1-
I?I
VIII--
5. Disperse runoff from the spreader across a properly stabilized slope not to
exceed 10%. Make sure the slope is sufficiently smooth to keep flow from con-
centrating.
6. Immediately after its construction, appropriately seed and mulch the entire
disturbed area of the spreader.
Maintenance Inspect level spreaders after every rainfall until vegetation is established, and
promptly make needed repairs. After the area has been stabilized, make peri-
odic inspections and keep vegetation in a healthy, vigorous condition.
References Surface Stabilization
6. 10, Temporary Seeding
6.11, Permanent Seeding
Runoff Control Measures
6.20, Temporary Diversions
6.2 1, Permanent Diversions
6.40.3
_._ - __
,-i
i
s
,;
- ----
,..
,?;
, ,
,: ?
., ?
--------
---? ?«--? a {- -- ------------ - ------------- ? ? ---
,.:
a,i
M
1
y O.JS -h - 0.009
-?$------- ----
a w
t

a ?
{ i
000 -'? - -
s
-6F-- _
{
3{
2
'; i L 2B

a?
;
i
i

z;
A
I
I'
I
;Iy
[1
It
s•?

i

'1
a
Peter D. Cnossen Page 1 2/24/2003
228 2/24/2003
Hampton Pointe Pond Routing -10-year Storm

Peak Flow = 269.3 Drawdown Orifice - 6"
Time to Peak = 10 Riser Size = 24"

Time (min)
0 Inflow (cfs)
0.0 Storage (cf)
0 Stage (ft )
0 Outflow (cfs)
0
0
1 6.5 0 0 0
388
2 25.6 388 0.00 0.0
1532
3 56.6 1920 0.01 0.1
3387
4 94.3 5307 0.03 0.2
5645
5 134.7 10952 0.07 0.2
8064
6 175.0 19016 0.12 0.3
10483
7 212.7 29500 0.18 0.4
12741
8 242.4 42240 0.26 0.5
14513
g 263.9 56754 0.35 0.6
15801
10 269.3 72555 0.44 0.6
16120
11 263.9 88675 0.54 0.7
15793
12 242.4 104468 0.63 0.9
14489
13 228.9 118957 0.72 1.8
13628
14 199.3 132585 0.80 2.9
11780
15 172.4 144365 0.87 4.2
10091
16 148.1 154456 0.92 5.3
8567
17 129.3 163024 0.97 6.4
7372
18 113.1 170396 1.01 7.4
6345
19 96.9 176741 1.05 8.2
5323
20 83.5 182063 1.08 9.0
4470
21 72.7 186533 1.11 9.6
0228-10.RTG Page 1
Peter D. Cnossen Page 2 2/24/2003
3784
22 64.6 190318 1.13 10.2
3266
23 53.9 193584 1.15 10.7
2590
24 48.5 196174 1.16 _ 11.1
2243
25 40.4 198417 1.17 11.4
1738
26 35.0 200155 1.29 14.8
0228-10.RTG Page 2
Peter D. Cnossen Page 1 2/24/2003
228 2124/2003
Hampton Point e Pond Routing -100-yea r Storm

Peak Flow = 368.0 Em. Spillway = 1.5'
Time to Peak = 10 Riser Size 24"

Time (min)
0 Infl ow (cfs)
0.0 Storage (co
0 Stage (ft)
0 Outflow (cfs)
0
0
1 8.8 0 0 0
530
2 35.0 530 0.00 0.1
2094
3 77.3 2624 0.02 0.1
4630
4 128.8 7254 0.04 0.2
7716
5 184.0 14970 0.09 0.3
11023
6 239.2 25993 0.16 0.4
14329
7 290.7 40322 0.25 0.5
17415
8 331.2 57737 0.35 0.6
19838
9 360.6 77575 0.47 0.7
21599
10 368.0 99174 0.60 0.7
22036
11 360.6 121210 0.73 2.0
21521
12 331.2 142731 0.86 4.0
19631
13 312.8 162362 0.97 6.4
18386
14 272.3 180748 1.08 8.9
15807
15 235.5 196555 1.17 11.2
13457
16 202.4 210012 1.24 13.4
11341
17 176.6 221353 1.30 15.3
9682
18 154.6 231035 1.36 17.0
8252
19 132.5 239287 1.40 18.6
6833
20 114.1 246120 1.44 19.9
5649 _
21 99.4 251769 1.47 21.1
0228-100.RTG Page 1
Peter D. Cnossen Page 2 2/24/2003
4698
22 88.3 256467 1.50 22.0
3978
23 73.6 260445 1.52 22.8
3046
24 66.2 263491 1.54 23.5
2566
25 55.2 266057 1.55 24.0
1871
26 47.8 267928 1.70 30.0
0228-100.RTG Page 2
„,02/20/2003 12:14 9197878117 RUSTY PAGE 02
Name:
1010 Raven A-W oa
www.Sm'0C.cona
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In B Be Cunent L andowner
;oil & Environmental Consultants, FA
D -A . Raloigh North Cm:olina 27614 - Phone. [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Address:
Phone:
Project Nme/Description:
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
F.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC MM
J"1 -
Attn: Wof
c4
field Office: ``
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
PA, to
1, the current ro owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil do Environ?atlental consultants,
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of pM3At applications, to furnish upon request day of
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project. and professional covAesy reasOns, is vafi(l only for
NOTICE: ntt This authorization, for officials to enter the Pproperty when accompanied by s EC staff. You should call S&EC
to mange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. Todd Preuninger
Soil & Environment Consultants, PA
blAr& agent aut)?f0Wk-d0C
mrlotte affirms: Greensboro if L=
L=h 710710 Boston ad
236 Le-Phillip Court. Suite C 3817-8 om, NC 277455 455 ?ylorsvJUe, NC 28681
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC )hone [phone]
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax:• [phone] Fax: [phone]
,o?,< W ArF,?QG

o `?? ?
-,z F
October 24, 2002
DWQ # 02-1722
Wake County
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Todd Preuninger
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject Property: Haynes Tract, Rolesville Road (Hwy 401), Rolesville, NC
Parcel Number: 1758364714
Toms Creek (Mill Creek) [03-04-02, 27-24, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0233)
Dear Mr. Preuninger:
On August 6, 2002, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review several streams and ponds on the
subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). DWQ Staff from the Raleigh Regional
Office (RRO) had previously conducted an on-site determination of the streams and ponds located on the subject
property. You requested an appeal of their determination as provided within 15A NCAC 02B.0233(3)(a). At your request,
I conducted an appeal of their determination as stated above. Based on my review, the DWQ has decided that the
determinations previously made by the RRO are correct. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other
relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers. Nor
does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. Wetlands or other Waters
of the U.S. may exist on the property. You should contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to ensure compliance with
wetland regulations. If you have any additional questions or require additional information please call me at (919) 733-
9726.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki, ESIII
Wetlands / 401 Unit, DWQ
Cc: Lawrence B. Haynes (owner), 1924 Torrey Pines Place, Raleigh, NC 27615
Deborah Edwards, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Michael F. Easley
Governor
NQ William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
A&4 .f 2
IT
NCDENFZ
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONTACFT ;6:t16'N:4 Uf;AL",REsouRCES
Division of Water Quality i l
August 26, 2002
SEP - 6
Todd Prueninger
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 02-175
Haynes Tract
S&EC #02-7049
Rolesville, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Prueninger:
This letter will serve as confirmation of the buffer determination made by S&EC at the
subject property referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 02-175.
On June 5, 2002, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above referenced
project as identified on the attached figures 1 and 2. It was determined that the features shown
on the Wake County Soil Survey and on the USGS Rolesville, NC Quad map could potentially
be subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:
0213.0233 (NCAC .0233). Feature A becomes subject at flag 1000. Feature B is subject from
flag 104 to the confluence of feature A (beaver impoundment subject from edge of water).
Feature C is not subject.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information
relevant to wetlands and other impacts, please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Ike L
Deborah Edwards

Environmental Specialist I
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Wake County
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

L)
/ --- - ,yam': ._" \\\.???
e,c e
! \ "
Maps and databases are public information supplied `U E
,I r
by various government agencies. The author and/or Ma p V
seller of the softwore program are in no way
responsible or liable for the information depicted
herein. Inquiries concerning the data should be 0 288 576 865 1153 13:54
_ l -- - I MAR 25, 2002
directed to the appropriate government agency. -___ --
Scale in Peet
O
O
LO
W O
J LO
Q N
U O
Co N
U 11
2
J 0-
<
o
?T
•oA2 i ? ? F O
s /
y> )ii!
d:°ic a .t ,? o
l12 S r 3 1n
?1. ? ?. GG,y ? • h U Pl
Q &o.
.:.:.::•:,::::...y ....O,O..::. a ? 7
T (Y)
O R O v $ s? O ???? ,? O
O O O s
f -- O O
i u
C
a n - O
O 0
i. O i S'I s? u
O O _ '/ ?? QC 4? - n O
' O b O
\`1\ 1 j t¢ ee O
O ® 99 ?? O
\ 1 ?I
O T -
O O ' O
O 0 z
?+ .
N r _c\l n O w S,e
?sN
v2p
a ee O
------- ED
sib ; !
r // / ' I 4 0
/
92
z pp
I?1` ?~ \1 1 ??R 2 h
1 -? 1
1 ?
N \? / ® O

I
•
?O
do
xa?
?o

F)?
WA
??9Q
co r
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 24, 2002
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Todd Preuninger
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject Property: Haynes Tract, Rolesville Road (Hwy 401), Rolesville, NC
Parcel Number: 1758364714
Toms Creek (Mill Creek) [03-04-02, 27-24, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
DWQ # 02-1722
Wake County
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0233)
Dear Mr. Preuninger:
On August 6, 2002, at your request I conducted an on-site determination to review several streams and ponds on the
subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). DWQ Staff from the Raleigh Regional
Office (RRO) had previously conducted an on-site determination of the streams and ponds located on the subject
property. You requested an appeal of their determination as provided within 15A NCAC 02B .0233(3)(a). At your request,
I conducted an appeal of their determination as stated above. Based on my review, the DWQ has decided that the
determinations previously made by the RRO are correct. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other
relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers. Nor
does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. Wetlands or other Waters
of the U.S. may exist on the property. You should contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to ensure compliance with
wetland regulations. If you have any additional questions or require additional information please call me at (919) 733-
9726.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki, ESIII
Wetlands/ 401 Unit, DWQ
Cc: Lawrence B. Haynes (owner), 1924 Torrey Pines Place, Raleigh, NC 27615
Deborah Edwards, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Wake County Multi Access Parcel System wysiwyg://341/http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us...ight=249&UFolio=1758364714&Mode=topos
NAPS
Multi Access Parcel System
ti
r
R

1 of 2

I
r i (
i(
f
( 1
1
t
ij
j
.
1 t
I(Y
I a?
.4/02 3:17 PM
Wake County Multi Access Parcel System
wysiwyg://341 /http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us...ight=249&UFolio=1758364.714&Mode=toposc
OWNER1 HAYNES, LAWRENCE B
ADDR1 1924 TORREY PINES PL

RALEIGH NC 27615
IIII-

DEED_BOOK 0378
DEEDTAGE i

DEED_DATE 2/6/97
DEEDACRES 94.46

BLDG_VAL 88145
LANDVAL •i
BILLING-CLASS 2
DESCRIPTION BAILEY LAND

ST_NAME LOUISBURG

DIR_PREFIX -

ST-NUM 1616
MAP-NAME
N
M
I 175801
1758364714
U
P
N
PIN EXT -
TOWNSHIP
YEAR BUILT 19
1976
SALEPRICE 100000
SALEDATE

TYPE-USE 01
DESIGN
STYLE A
-
UNITS 0
LAND
CLASS F
-
PLAN JURIS RO
THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT.
DISCLAIMER: The COUNTY OF WAKE or the CITY OF RALEIGH shall assume no liability for any
errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided regardless of how caused; or any decision
made or action taken or not taken by user in reliance upon any information or data furnished hereunder.
The user knowingly waives any and all claims for damages against any and all of the entities comprising
WAPS that may arise from the mapping data.
THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT.
Thu Oct 24 15:17:24 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) 2002
2 of 2 10/24/02 3:17 PM
M 1) 11 (_) Ml'l'alll 1:1:ISS111Callon 11(11'111
I'1-III , I N'lili, o"'j, Iti\(•I 19asln. K)cw Q_ ('t,llnll': ujz4LQ- F\ llmlltlr 6Z
I I\1'(•11'11 X11 , 1 H u1111 ,t'1 NralCSl N;unctl Sit ranl: ;1111ut1c: Sil:n;uulr: R-12111
C
v
I );11r 0/ v- 1 IS( iS (fl I/\I): I.cul) iluClC: h1cnliunel )llccliuns
'1:1'1,F'A NF N( )•1 1':: 1/ (if, it titid hrmlowit r a,gIt'(' that Mt, frcntirc' is a Ia(fit -aU1dr din'II, I/it'/tit ev of IIIie /toIIII is till/ ti( cI \ml1'.
11,1l, it ul dw he \! /1'1ICS\in11al im/gC'ulrnl a/ Ilw crnltialar, Ike' Jrtilure is a man-made, elilrh titre/ ual ti Illadi/ic'd rwlurrrl"\11ceim -(Iris
lerrill: %P11,111 ,holdel rlnl be llwd'I*
Primal. ' Field 111(licatOrs: (r i,ll/ r?/I, NI,I,IrIr, I',I /ill,
I. (?CUliicirhl)ulugl' ----- ---- -AI?. 'I?(
-- Weak N11?Ilcralc
I) I, rill l . \ Itilllc I'( t,l SCC1u .ncr'' U I ? i
? I Ir, 111c 11.11 )•\ l c\lulc In Sl-rallibcd
I )1111:ICIII I Itllll .?llllt lllitllll? 'I•Cllalll? I ? 1
.O .\1(• N;11111.11 I I'1\•u•Ill•) _
1
)
- i
.11 1', I LI. O
('l1,II111C1 .`iIIllUlll?? 1 2 - .. ;
?I k I I cl t.' \II ,'lll\c (()I Rd w)
_.-
I Itltlllltlanl l' c'\rnl' O
b) 11 1 Ill' ( Il,11111'l 1i1;llllctl? ) ) }
7) AIC I?:•, CHI /\1111\I;II 101u,s11S PICti IW.' ) _i
til I • I IIr1.' .\ li;ull.ll111 11rnrIl I'lrst•1117 I ? {
')I 1, \ ('tln1llmi'll. Hctl fi It;lnl, PicsCnt'' n
I -\0ll' l/ l11'il ?l III I'1k ( 1111"II 81' illll' ll/ltg';lllrl I11/lll)1)1 SI/11111,rl111('/1 ?\e-I/l('
- -()1)
1111 Is ;\ '??I OIIICI (?I (II t'al.I ( 11;1111 lt.tl (/\ti Illllll'a Il'll
'
( In I
lunl n1,11,,1„(/,'Ur In I•irlCl) I'lcsc(II'? _ _ c? 1
PRIP
1 /i )' GF1IOIlI'HOLOGf INI)I ATOK N ' S:
.
. -
L, It dl(dog) - -- - - -- - AI?scIII _ Weak Nlodera(c Slroll"
-
'
-
I) ). IIIr1t' \':irlnlilJ'.\;IlW'I •
----------------
-------
I 'It'',', l)1,.'ILIIPC 1'(1'`.1'111? O ( )

PR/ 11.1K)' ll )•1)R0/l OGYMD/ CA TOR POINTS:____ -
III.ISillle?gp /SI?scnl Weak Moderate
. :\I1. 1 111101IN 1R' "I" P11"WIll III i1ICanlln•CI? 3 . .
,\IC K(nllrtl I'I;I;us PIC,Cn1 In NIIC;IIIlh d.'
3 / k I'c'111111Y1MI I'ic'u•rll? 1 2
t; \IC Ilr\;11\c, I'Icx•n1) - 1 2
l'nlltl,t r;) ljlOLO(r )' 1AIMC,1TOR POIN•r,S?: -
SCCMId,111'1' 11 iV1(1 11l(11Ci11O1'S: (('m1t r)nrNNunbrv Pci Idly)
-,
S i t
C?ug--
i
I. (;cun?i?rLil?I(?by 111?s'nl NVc, Model
alc Shun
- - -- -----------
I, fIIC'1C :\ IlcaCl ('111 11c,cnl Ill ('llalln(cl? ( .5 I 1.5
?) k I IICIC .\ (;eakl(('unuul 1'unll In (Ilanncl? O .5 1 IJ
i) 1 )ttc s 1 (Ipll!Idplly Intlic;l(c /\
l\,11'11;11 1 )1,111 ;WL- \\';1)'7 O 'y\ 1
'4:r OAP, i RYGI,.'03 MRPHOLOGYMPICA FOR POINT,
S
II_ lf?clri?lugt - -- _ -- -- Absent -11le.?k Moderate tilrun>;---- ---------
-------------- -----------------
I) I , I lu , 1 c,u' , IOI I I Callillcr
1'r: a nl In SI!(.mIIh,•J I - ?/ .5 11
I k:WLlllll,n1 011 Pltlll'.s (Or 14+1 is) I'lctirnl_'' O 5 I 15
11 r\IC \\'1ack I in(,s Pic.." tit) S I ' S
0 I• \\I;rt I In ( •Ilannrl A/lI :..18 Ills, SIIICC U' S
I ;ul /VICIU'/I lZ;llll 1 'w/t, l/ /tin 11 hgllf ati d /a 119 11boi .441/1 ll/ic _}7r/I litrl_HS lfr(nn")
51 1, 1 111'Io \V;Ucl In ('11millCl 1 )nfin11 1)I \' U ?81l-1 15..
0vu
1 (lnt111i1,11:; Or In (ilrl\vi.I?t Sr;uun)'?
of AIc I I)1111;' •`imk PIc>cnl In Siclcs OI Chillincl (()r In Ilc allcu_ I'crs. / 5 Nn (i
SF( ONP, I K )' l1) l)K01.0(I )" /N1)1C/1 FOR PO1N1'S: Q_-
II-LBiology-_- Al •cnl Weak Nlul(cra(c - -__'ilrlln?-_-----
1) Aw I isle I'Ic,,rlll' U .5 I I
_') /\1c /\1nll ilhlil s PICSCM? .5 I 1.5
11 :\IC ,\tln011C,' I (1111(, PICSC111? ( .. ,5_ _ I - 1. 1i
11AIr('I;I)IIs III'lc'x111' ; - 5
I /\11. nl;,('1tll,rnlnu. I'11:sr111? 1l I I :?
61 \1C 11th O\itliinl, li;lcl?r ?/I 1111cL1ti I'r scnt? _ k 5 - 1 I i -
71 I,; I il;l;llcnl(rlls /\I I,IC: I'Irscnl'?
ti, \,t \\•(•11;11111 I'I,uu . In Snr;11n1)"ll.) 1\lusllq OIII. Nlusl \1' NIuslly I/ 1C 111ns11) F;\('ll \111.11) 1 I'I.
\-flll': l/ 1, •:,ll.Ih rw l1l lil l'irulh hr SUrrull%'I'Il 1 .15 .5 11 (1
POINTS:-
FOLI L OIN ,) l 1uNCll i ,Se'e'elNClur ' ! 'i-cah'r'//(till Or Is'c nrll Fit 19 I uitlls Fhc'.I(IC rrlll h At 1,1 701 1111r1'INlIll'
T
1
® P?

®_ 6- tjlt h
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOB %AR%IsCKI - NC-DWQ
FROM: '1'OllD 1'RI?UNINGI?It - SOIL, & 1',NV'IRONNII?NI'.A], CONSUI.'rANTS, IIA
SUBJECT: BUI I I.R CAI,I,- RO1J?S\'II,1,1? -- f L\YNI;S'fR,\CI'
DATE: 09/27/02
CC:
I left a voice mail regarding this project on July 15, 2002. I would like to request that we re-examine
the feature located below the pond in the northwest corner of the Haynes "Tract. Ms. Debbie
Edwards conducted a site visit and determined that this feature is subject to the buffer rules.
However, upon further investigation, I believe that the area located below the pond is a vegetated
wetland and therefore, should not be subject to the buffer rules. Although a number of drainage
patterns were observed within the wetland, we did not feel that a distinct channel was present in this
area. Please let me know when you will be available to conduct a site meeting and feel free to call if
you have questions. I'll put the location maps in the snail. 't'hanks in advance.
Project M Scale:
02-7049 V =1320'
Mgr.: TP 1 517102
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Haynes Tract
Westbridge Development
Rolesville, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Re: Haynes Tract
Subject: Re: Haynes Tract
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:33:56 -0400
From: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki @ncmail.net>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: Preuninger <[e-mail]>

All tie`
Todd:
7:30 am, next Weds., July 24th
meet me at the corner of Lonnie Drive & 401 (Louisburg Rd.)
I've got another meeting at 9am so I will only be able to give you 45 minutes.
Next available date is August 6th before 9 or after 3.
- Bob
Preuninger wrote:
> see attached memo.
> Todd Preuninger
> Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
> [phone]
> ---------------------- ------------------------
> Name: bufferappeal.doc
> bufferappeal.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> Encoding: base64
> Download Status: Not downloaded with message
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
10f 1 7/19/02 9:34 AN
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOB Z'AIZZF'(',KI - NCA)W(>
FROM: "1'01)1)PRI?UNINGI?R - 5011, & I?NVIRONMI-.N'1'iAI, C0NSU1;1',AN'l'S, PA
SUBJECT: BIJI'FI'T ('.I\H, - ROI,I?SVILLB - IL\YNVS 7'IZ,V T
DATE: 07/19/02
CC:
1 left a voice mail regarding this project on July 15, 2002. 1 would like to request that we re-examine
the feature located below the pond in the northwest corner of the I Jaynes "Tract. Ms. Debbie
Edwards conducted a site visit and determined that this feature is subject to the buffer rules.
However, upon further investigation, 1 believe that the area located below the pond is a vegetated
wetland and therefore, should not be subject to the buffer rules. Although a number of drainage
patterns were observed within the wetland, we did not feel that a distinct channel was present in this
area. Please let me know when you will be available to conduct a site meeting and feel free to call if
you have questions. I'll put the location maps in the mail. 't'hanks in advance.
07/15'/2002 11:13 9198469467 S&EC PAGE 01
Sail & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Midge Road r Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 r Phone: [phone] • P'ax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
FACSIMILE SHEET
FAX NO. [phone]
DA'Z'E: : {1W *a
V
Project Number: Wqd
TO: Nt7„lw : 2Lat _7`r
CC:
COMPANY: ' %ag-L--S
PAX NUMBER:
k'Zt.OM_ 1 '?: SUBJECT: %M,,- 0
-NIU \1_J
The following items are being faxed. Number of pages including transmittal sheet:
For Your Comments/Approval
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Discuss
L_-15or Your Information
_ Per Your Request
_ Please Call
Please Handle
HARD COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight
MNtARKS:
Hand Delivery
No Hard Copy Sent
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUES'T'IONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THIS 'T'RA,NSNUSSION,
PLEASE CONTACT AT [phone].
*CONFIAEI`T')<`L81M NOTICE*
This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to %% tick it is addressed and may contain ir?tbrmation
that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this tnesaage is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, distribution or copying of thus information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this trans mission. in error,
please notify us in=ediately by telephone and return the faxed documents to us at the above address via.the United States
Postal Service
Qadotte Office-. Greensboro Office' Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 710 Boston Road
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

•'07/15/2002 11:13
9198469467
S&EC
PAGE 02
CZ706 1h
Figure 1- USGS Quad
NOW Doti W
??.: ra amo2 Haynes Tract ? So?U. 8z Environmental Consultants, PA
Westbridge Development 11010 Raven Ridge Rd,- Raleigh, NO 27614
Rolesvllla Wake County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Web Page www.SvMEC,com
ROMVILLE, NC
.x993
M14A SIBS IV-NW-S[RtES V842
'07/15/2002 11:13 9198469467 S&EC PAGE 03