20111075 Ver 1_R-2583 (3)_20080730

Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Project Review Form

Project Number: 09-0027 County: Hertford Date Received: 07/25/2008

Due Date: 08/28/2008

Project Description: Proposed widening of US 158 to a multi-facility beginning at the intersection of the
Murfreesboro By-Pass and ending at US 13 in Hertford County - TIP No. R-2583

is rojec is emg reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville Air Soil & Water ? Marine Fisheries
Fayetteville ? Water y/ Coastal Management Water Resources

Mooresville Aquifer Protection Wildlife Environmental Health
Raleigh Land Quality Engineer ? Wildlife - DOT Solid Waste Mgmt
Washington ? Forest Resources Radiation Protection
Wilmington Land Resources Other

Winston-Salem Parks & Recreation
Water Quality
y/ Water Quality - DOT
Air Quality

Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:

Response (check all applicable)

No objection to project as proposed. No Comment
Insufficient information to complete review Other (specify or attach comments)

If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail]

JUG 8'
'008
*T46';
- +VA7f=R
~~~_ISr(1f?.M1~~UA1 4NCH

US 158
From the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton
Hertford County
WBS Element 35489
TIP PROJECT R-2583

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

STATE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

• p~~oE NORiH C,~qo!/

• v t

top TRANSeO

APPROVED:

Cv3o~
-Z. X4-171~
at (d regory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT

•
•

•
• US 158
• From the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton
• Hertford County
WBS Element 35489
TIP PROJECT R-2583

•

•
•
•

•
• State Finding of No Significant Impact
•
•

•
• June 2008
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
• Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
by:

• Ch rles R. Cox, P.E. " Ft rt'
. Project Engineer
r~° f F. O

•

• 4

•
•
•

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
•
•
US 158
• From the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton
Herford County
• WBS Element 35489

• TIP PROJECT R-2583
•
COMMITMENTS DEVELOPED THROUGH PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Division 1
A construction moratorium for all in-stream work will be in place between February
• 15 and June 15 to avoid impacts to anadromous fish:
•
• Division 1, Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
• The existing Potecasi Creek Bridge will be removed as mitigation. A portion of the
• existing US 158 roadbed may be removed east of the old Potecasi Creek crossing
• as mitigation, pending further investigation.
• The existing culvert on US 158 east of Mapleton will be removed (stream Site SD
. and wetland site WPP). A portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may also be
removed for mitigation purposes pending further investigation.
•
Proiect Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
• • A detailed archaeological data recovery will be conducted on Site 31 HF268 prior to
* construction.
• A new survey for the Red-cockaded woodpecker will be conducted along the
• preferred alternative. NCDOT will coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
regarding the Biological Conclusion.

Roadway Design Unit
• 3:1 side slopes are required in wetland areas.

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

R-2583 State Finding of No Significant Impact Page 1 of 1
• June 2008

•
•
•

•

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. TYPE OF ACTION ................................................................................................1
• II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................1
III. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ..............................................................................2
IV. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ....................................................................................2
V. ACTIONS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES ...................................................4
• VI. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS ...................................................................5
A. Circulation of the State Environmental Assessment (SEA) ...................................5
B. Comments Received on the SEA ..........................................................................5
1. Environmental Protection Agency ...................................................................................5
• 2. United States Fish & Wildlife Service .............................................................................7
3. NC Division of Forest Resources ....................................................................................8
4. NC Division of Marine Fisheries .....................................................................................9
S 5. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission ............................................................9
• 6. NC Division of Coastal Management ............................................................................10
• 7. NC Division of Water Quality .......................................................................................10
C. Public Involvement ..............................................................................................16
VII. REVISIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .........................................17
A. Revised Alternative Names .................................................................................17
• B. Wetland / Stream Impacts ...................................................................................17
C. Design Changes ..................................................................................................20
D. Forest Resource Impacts ....................................................................................20
E. Corrections to SEA ..............................................................................................21
• VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ............................................................................22
A. January 17, 2008 NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Meeting ..........................................22
B. Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................23
C. Air Quality - Mobile Source Air Toxics ................................................................24
IX. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE FINDING ..............................................25
• X. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ......................................26

TABLES

• Table 1: R-2583 Resources Impact Table ......................................................................3
Table 2: R-2583 Summary of Wetland Impacts ............................................................18
Table 3: R-2583 Summary of Stream Impacts ..............................................................19
Table 4: R-2583 Bridges and Culverts ..........................................................................20
. Table 5: R-2583 Forest Resource Impacts ...................................................................20

APPENDICES

• Appendix A Figures
• • Figure 1 Vicinity Map
• Figure 2 Alternative C2 (Preferred Alternative)

Appendix B Comments from Federal, State, and Local Agencies
• Appendix C NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Signatures Sheets

US 158
From the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton
Hertford County
• WBS Element 35489
TIP PROJECT R-2583

i FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Prepared by the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation

1. TYPE OF ACTION

This is a North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
administrative action, State Finding of No Significant Impact (SFONSI).

The NCDOT has determined this project will not have any significant
impact on the environment. This SFONSI is based on the State Environmental
Assessment (SEA), which has been independently evaluated by the NCDOT and
i determined to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and
impacts of the proposed project. The SEA provides sufficient evidence and
analysis for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
The NCDOT takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the
• EA.

II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION

i The NCDOT proposes to upgrade US 158 in Hertford County to a
multilane facility from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton. The
total length of the project is approximately at 8.1 miles. The project includes both
• widening and a new location section. Dual bridges (approximately 390 feet in
• length) will be constructed across Potecasi Creek.

According to the approved 2007-2013 and the Draft 2008-2015 TIP, right-
of-way acquisition for the project is scheduled to begin in state fiscal year 2010,
• with construction to begin in state fiscal year 2012. The current estimated total
cost is approximately $48,904,000.

• 1

R-2583 State FONSI

III. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Six alternatives were evaluated in the EA, which included: Alternatives A, •
B, C and "Mapleton Service Road Alternatives A2, B2, and C2. All six
alternatives were shown at the public hearing. Following the public hearing, a
NEPA/ 404 Merger meeting was held to gain concurrence on the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) for the project. •
Concurrence was gained on Alternative C2. Alternative C2 is therefore the
preferred alternative for the project.

IV. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS

Adverse impacts to the human and natural environments were minimized
for the proposed project through alternative selection and design shifts within the •
six design options. No adverse effect on the air quality of the surrounding area is
anticipated as a result of the project. The proposed project will not adversely
impact any historic structures eligible for or listed on the National Register of
Historic Places. The proposed project will impact one known archaeological site .
eligible for listing in the National Register. The project will relocate 19 residences
and 2 businesses, the proposed roadway was shifted farther south to avoid
impacting 15 additional homes within Mapleton that are located on the north side
of US 158. The project will impact approximately 4.8 acres of wetlands and •
1,890 linear feet of streams. No Environmental Justice issues were identified
once the Mapleton community was avoided. The Biological Conclusions for the
red-cockaded woodpecker is May Affect- Not Likely to Adversely Affect.
Table 2 gives a comprehensive list of resources and the impacts associated with •
each.

2

R-2583 State FONSI

Table 1: R-2583 Resources Impact Table
Alternative C2
Resource Impacted (Preferred Alternative)

Length 8.1 miles
• Length of Bypass 1.3 miles
• Railroad Crossings None
Residential Relocations 19
Business Relocations 2
Major Utility Crossings 3
• Historic Properties 3 - No Effect
Archaeological Sites 1 impacted; Data
Recovery Required
Cemeteries 1
Wetland Impacts 4.8 acres
• Stream Impacts 1890 feet
100-Year Floodplain Crossings 3
Water Supply Watershed Protected None
Areas
Hazardous Spill Basin Areas None
• Anadromous Fish Spawning Area 1
Impacted Noise Receptors None
Federally Protected Species within None
Corridor
• Forest Impacts 26 acres
• Prime, Unique, and Important 145 acres
Farmland
Low Income Population Impacts No
Minority Population Impacts No
• Construction Cost $40,100,000

• Right-of-Way Cost $8,200,000
Mitigation Cost $604,000
Total Project Cost $48,904,000
Note 1: The construction cost estimates includes dual bridges
(approximately 390-ft in length) at Potecasi Creek

3

R-2583 State FONSI

V. ACTIONS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES

An Individual Permit will be required from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers due to impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters.

A Water Quality Certification is required from the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality Section. .

A CAMA Major Development Permit will be required for this project due to
impacts to Public Trust Area and Public Trust Shoreline CAMA AECs.

4

R-2583 State FONSI

VI. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS

A. Circulation of the State Environmental Assessment (SEA)

The NCDOT approved the SEA on April 27, 2006. The approved SEA
• was circulated to the following federal, state, and local agencies for review and
comments. An asterisk indicates a written response was received from the
agency. Copies of the correspondence received are included in Appendix A of
this document. Responses to substantial comments are noted in Section B.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Regulatory Division
* U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
* U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
• N.C. Department of Cultural Resources - Division of Archives and History
N.C. Department of Public Instruction - School Planning
* N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of
Water Quality
. * N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Wildlife
Resources Commission
* N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of
Forest Resources
* N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of
• Marine Fisheries
State Clearinghouse
Mid-East Commission
Hertford County

In addition to the agencies listed above, the following organizations
submitted comments on the SEA:

B. Comments Received on the SEA

• 1. Environmental Protection Agency

COMMENT: "EPA notes the environmental (Green sheet) commitments
addressed on page 1 of 1 regarding in-stream moratorium for
anadromous fish, archaeological survey, wetlands mitigation
• potential at Potecasi Creek bridge, RCW coordination with FWS,
etc."

5

R-2583 State FONSI

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "The EA is very comprehensive and Table S-1 Summary of ,
Potential Impacts is an excellent example of highlighting the .
differences in the alternatives and the potential impacts to key
indicators/resources."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "EPA notes that wetland impacts range between 2.90 acres and
4.48 acres depending upon the alternative. Stream impacts
range between 917 linear feet and 1,271 linear feet. Are the .
estimated impacts based on the corridor width or the proposed
right of way width? The Merger team may need to discuss this
issue further at the next Concurrence meeting. Because this is
primarily a widening project, I am estimating that the impacts were .
developed on the proposed right of way width." .

RESPONSE: The wetland and stream impacts were updated prior to the
merger meeting held in January 2008. The impact numbers are
reflected in Section VII.B of this document in Tables 1, 2 and 3. •
The impacts are calculated from slope stake to slope stake plus
an additional 25 feet out of each limit as determined from the
current preliminary design plans.

COMMENT: "EPA notes that impacts to Prime, Unique and Important
Farmlands are between 126 and 137 acres. Most of the impacts
appear to be linear in nature and there may be little opportunity
for NCDOT to minimize these impacts. However, for Alternative A •
& C, NCDOT may need to examine the proposed roadway
alignment near Mt. Tabor Church Road and the large agricultural r
fields for possible avoidance/ minimization measures (e.g.,
Following property boundaries, examine farm equipment crossing •
locations, etc.)."

RESPONSE: NCDOT attempted to minimize the new location roadway
footprint; therefore these alignments are relatively straight.
Alternative B maintains a straight alignment that follows the •
existing power line closely. Alternative C was developed to
closely follow behind the Mt. Tabor Baptist Church property and
yet minimize impacts to both the historic property and also
adjacent wetlands. •

COMMENT: "EPA notes on Pages 63, 65, & 67 that exotic invasive plant
species are present in the project study area (Privet, Japanese
honeysuckle). EPA acknowledges that there is little that NCDOT •

6

R-2583 State FONSI

can specifically do about the spread of these weed species.
r However, Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) has been
positively identified in riparian/NCDOT ROW areas associated
. with R-2582/R-2584 north of Conway and Jackson. EPA plans to
investigate if any Japanese knotweed is located at the tributary to
Potecasi Creek, Potecasi Creek & Mill Branch. If positively
identified and one of the alternatives impacts one of the Japanese
• knotweed sites, EPA may be recommending that herbicide
eradication be conducted as an environmental commitment prior
to any construction activities. Japanese knotweed is almost
exclusively re-colonized to new riparian areas thru rhizome
• transport from such activities as clearing and grubbing. This
issue can be further discussed with the team at the next Merger
meeting. It may be a moot point for this project depending upon
EPA's survey at the proposed stream crossings."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "EPA will be seeking additional avoidance and minimization
measures for streams and wetlands as this project proceeds thru
• Merger. EPA notes that there are some very high quality
wetlands (e.g., WD, WP, WV100, WV300, etc.) in the project
study area (Pg. 71, Table 18)."

• RESPONSE: The merger team reviewed avoidance and minimization measures
during the January 2008 merger meeting. The list of measures
agreed to by the team is listed in VIILA of this document.

COMMENT: "EPA has not identified a preferred alternative at this time and
. wishes to hear the comments and concerns from the Merger team
agencies regarding the selection of a LEDPA."

RESPONSE: The merger team concurred with Alternative C2 at the January
• 2008 merger team meeting. EPA concurred with this alternative.

2. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

COMMENT: "There is only one federally protected species listed for Hertford
County - the red cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides
borealis). The SEA states that RCW surveys were conducted at
the project site on December 10 and 11, 2003. No RCWs or
cavity trees were observed. After the least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative is selected, a new RCW survey
should be conducted in suitable habitat within a half mile radius of
the project area. If no cavity trees are observed within a half mile

7

R-2583 State FONSI

radius, then the Service would support a "No effect" determination
for this species."

RESPONSE: A new RCW survey will be completed prior to construction. •

COMMENT: "Although the forested habitat types within the project study area
are described in the SEA, there is no quantification of the impacts
to each habitat type." •

RESPONSE: See section VII.D for the quantification of the impacts.

COMMENT: "Although the potential for wetland mitigation associated with •
removing the existing bridge over Potecasi Creek in Alternative C
is mentioned on the Project Commitments page ("Green Sheet'),
no description or quantification of the potential is given in the body
of the SEA. " •

RESPONSE: The existing bridge over Potecasi Creek and a portion of the
roadbed along US 158 may be removed pending further
investigation.

COMMENT: "The physical description of the red-cockaded woodpecker in
Appendix D needs correction. The bird is not 18-20 inches long,
but rather 8-9 inches long."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "After the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative
is selected, a new RCW survey should be conducted in suitable .
habitat within a half mile radius of the project area."

RESPONSE: A new RCW survey will be completed prior to construction.

3. NC Division of Forest Resources

COMMENT: "The NC Division of Forest Resources does not support the
project as proposed. The Environmental Assessment fails to .
address any of the concerns identified in our response to the
initial scoping letter. The NC Division of Forest Resources cannot
evaluate impacts to forest resources unless information previously
requested is provided." .

RESPONSE: Section VII.D of this document gives details of the forest resource
impacts.

8

R-2583 State FONSI

. 4. NC Division of Marine Fisheries

COMMENT: "The Division prefers Alternative A, which has the least amount of
wetland impacts (2.9 acres) and stream impacts (approx. 917
feet)."

RESPONSE: The Division of Marine Fisheries was part of the merger team that
determined that Alternative C2 was the least damaging
practicable alternative (LEDPA).

COMMENT: "This agency will request a moratorium from February 15 through
June 30. A turbidity curtain should be utilized and maintained
during any construction work in wetlands."

• RESPONSE: NCDOT has included the moratorium as a project commitment for
this project (February 15 through June 15 as per Wildlife
Resources Commission). The turbidity curtain will be used where
applicable.

i
5. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission

COMMENT: "Mill Branch, Potecasi, and their associated perennial tributaries
• impacted by this project are subject to an anadromous fisheries
moratorium of February 15 to June 15 due to the presence of
River herring in these systems. The document is an adequate
assessment of the environmental impacts associated with the
. alternative for this project. The NC Wildlife Resources
Commission does not have a preferred alternative at this time.
We will participate in the alternative selection for this project
during the Merger process. At this time, we concur with the EA
for this project."

RESPONSE: NCDOT has included the moratorium as a project commitment for
this project.

COMMENT: "Any environmental contamination (soil or groundwater)
discovered during right-of-way investigations shall be reported to
the Washington Regional Office."

• RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "Water supply wells located on any right-of-way property obtained
shall be properly abandoned."

9

R-2583 State FONSI i

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "Any Confined Animal Feeding Operation affected by the project
shall have its Animal Waste Utilization Plan modified to reflect site
changes."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

6. NC Division of Coastal Management •

COMMENT: "Please note that the following information on page 57 of the EA
is erroneous: "The county is under the jurisdiction of the North r
Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM); however, no
Areas of Environmental Concern, as defined by the Coastal Area •
Management Act (CAMA), are present within the study area." •
Likewise, the following statement on page 77 of the EA is also
erroneous: "Though there are no AECs within the study area,
DCM has determined that Potecasi Creek is a public trust water
within the study area. It is expected that NCDCM will require a .
CAMA permit for the project due to the proximity of the project to
the Chowan River." A CAMA permit is required for this project
due to direct impacts to the Public Trust Area and Public Trust
Shoreline CAMA AEC's, not due to proximity of the project to the •
Chowan River."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

7. NC Division of Water Quality r

COMMENT: "DWQ recommends that the most protective sediment and !
erosion control BMP's be implemented to reduce the risk of
sediment and nutrient runoff to Potecasi Creek. DWQ requests
that road design plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff
through best management practices as detailed in the most .
recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management
Practices."

RESPONSE: Comment noted. Best management practices are a standard •
procedure for NCDOT designs.

10

R-2583 State FONSI

COMMENT: "Although the Mapleton Service Road Option would result in
additional impacts of up to 0.82 acres of wetlands and 62 linear
feet of streams, DWQ feels that the additional impacts are
• appropriate to avoid potential environmental justice issues with
the Mapleton Community."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "NCDOT should contact the Washington Regional Office of DWQ
to obtain the appropriate permit for the storm water management
system for the proposed project."

RESPONSE: This will be addressed during the permit phase of this project.

COMMENT: "The environmental document should provide a detailed and
itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands and
• streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary
as required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0506(h), it is preferable to present a
conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental
documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior
• to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification."

RESPONSE: Comment noted. Figure 2 of this document shows the wetland
and streams sites. Tables 2 and 3 of this document show the
• impacts for each site. A detailed mitigation plan will be developed
during the permit coordination phase of this project.

S COMMENT: "Environmental assessment alternatives should consider design
• criteria that reduce the impacts to streams and wetlands from
storm water runoff. These alternatives should include road
designs that allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through
best management practices as detailed in the most recent version
of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as
grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention
basins, etc."

RESPONSE: As more detailed design is developed, NCDOT will be better
• suited to incorporate Best Management Practices into the design.

COMMENT: "After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an
issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the NCDOT is
• respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the
avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams)
to the maximum extent practical. In accordance with the
Environmental Management Commission's Rules {15A NCAC
• 21-1.0506 (h)), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater

11

R-2583 State FONSI

than 1 acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation is required,
the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost
functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program •
may be available for use as stream mitigation." •

RESPONSE: Comment noted. Through the Merger process, NCODT has
shown its efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and
streams.

COMMENT: "In accordance with the Environmental Management
Commission's Rules {15A NCAC 2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be i
required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single •
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is required, the
mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost
functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
may be available for use as stream mitigation." •

RESPONSE: If mitigation is required, NCDOT will coordinate with the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program for use as stream mitigation.

COMMENT: "Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality
Certification Application, should continue to include an itemized
listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with
corresponding mapping."
a
RESPONSE: This information will be included in the permit application.

COMMENT: "DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impact that
could result from this project. NC DOT should address these •
concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to
the aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would
reduce the impacts."

RESPONSE: Please see pages 60-62 of the SEA regarding NCDOT's Best
Management Practices (BMP).

COMMENT: "An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as •
a result of this project is required. The type and detail of analysis .
should conform to the NC Division of Water Quality Policy on the
assessment of secondary and cumulative impacts dated April 10,
2004."

RESPONSE: Pages 48-50 of the SEA gave a qualitative explanation of indirect
and cumulative impacts. More details will be submitted as part of
the permit application.

12

R-2583 State FONSI

COMMENT: "NC DOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts including but
not limited to, bridging, fill, excavation and clearing, to
jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need to be
. included in the final impact calculations. These impacts, in
addition to any construction impacts, temporary or otherwise, also
need to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Application."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

s? COMMENT: "Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges used
in lieu of culverts. However, we realize that economic
considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be
advised that culverts should be countersunk to allow unimpeded
passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover, in areas
where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge
may prove preferable. When applicable, DOT should not install
the bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent practicable."

RESPONSE: Comment noted. Dual bridges are proposed across Potecasi
Creek. Culverts will be extended at Mill Branch. The culvert at
S the Unnamed tributary to Potecasi Creek will be replaced.

COMMENT: "Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in
. wetlands or streams."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to
. specifically address the proposed methods for stormwater
management. More specifically, stormwater should not be
permitted to discharge directly into streams or surface waters."

RESPONSE: The application will indeed address the proposed methods for
stormwater management. Stormwater will not be permitted to
discharge directly into streams or surface waters.

• COMMENT: "Based on the information presented in the document, the
magnitude of impacts to wetlands and streams may require an
individual permit application to the Corps of Engineers and
corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification. Please be advised
• that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory
• protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards
are met and not wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit
authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by
the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ. Please

13

R-2583 State FONSI

be aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate
avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the
maximum extent practical, the development of an acceptable •
stormwater management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate •
mitigation plans where appropriate."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be
maintained to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and
stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete s
should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential .
for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site i
shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and elevations.
Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil
and appropriate native woody species should be planted. When
using temporary structures the area should be cleared but not .
grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs,
or other merchandized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact allows the area to revegetate naturally and i
minimizes soil disturbance." •

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, .
and wetlands shall be placed below the elevation of the
streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than
48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts
having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage
of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures
shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or .
upstream and downstream of the above structures. The applicant •
is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is
unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting features
encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for •
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a
permit modification will be required."

RESPONSE: All culverts will be buried appropriately. .

14

R-2583 State FONSI

COMMENT: "Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect
water resources must be implemented and maintained in
accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and
the most recent version of NCS000250."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a
dry work area. Approved BMP measures from the current version
• of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such
as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion
i structures should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than
in stream channels in order to minimize sedimentation and reduce
the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This
equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent
contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or
placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes aquatic life
. passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be
properly designed, sized and installed."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

COMMENT: "Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) should be
preserved to the maximum extent possible. Riparian vegetation
must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project
by the end of the growing season following completion of
• construction."

RESPONSE: Comment noted.

15

•
R-2583 State FONSI

•
•
C. Public Involvement

Following the circulation of the State Environmental Assessment, a formal •
Public Hearing was held on July 19, 2007 at the Roanoke-Chowan Community
College in Ahoskie, NC. Approximately 100 citizens were present for the •
hearing, and 17 NCDOT representatives. A transcript of the Public Hearing was
prepared. •

Four citizens spoke at the hearing and 41 written comments were received •
between the hearing and the Post Hearing Meeting. Based on the comments
received, Alternative C was favored by a majority of the respondents, who cited .
concerns about the impacts Alternatives A and B would have on Mt. Tabor
Baptist Church and the surrounding community. The Hertford County Board of •
Commissioners also endorsed Alternative C and the Service Road Alternative. •
This was the only comment received regarding the Service Road Alternative. No
comments were received that supported Alternative A or B. The remaining •
comments didn't indicate any specific support for an Alternative but expressed
concerns about issues like right of way acquisition, existing drainage problems,
flooding and impacts to parcels. •

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•

16 •
•
•

R-2583 State FONSI

VII. REVISIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

A. Revised Alternative Names

The SEA denoted the alternatives as Alternatives A, B, C, and the
Mapleton Service Road Option (with Alternatives A, B, C). The names of these
alternatives have changed slightly. The new names of the alternatives were
• shown during the Public Hearing and this SFONSI as follows:

'e! • Alternative A
• Alternative A2 (shifting of Alternative A to provide service road at
• Mapleton)
• Alternative B
Alternative B2 (shifting of Alternative B to provide service road at
Mapleton)
Alternative C
• Alternative C2 (shifting of Alternative C to provide service road at
. Mapleton)

All documentation in this SFONSI uses this newer denotation of the alternative
. names.

B. Wetland / Stream Impacts

The wetland and stream impacts were updated prior to the merger
• meeting held in January 2008. The impact numbers are reflected in Tables 2
and 3. The impacts are calculated from slope stake to slope stake plus an
additional 25 feet out of each limit as determined from the current functional
f design plans.

17

R-2583 State FONSI

Table 2: R-2583 Summary of Wetland Impacts
Wetland Wetland Alternative Wetland Impacts (in Acres)
ID Rating A A2 B B2 C C2

WSS 51 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
WTT 51 0.147 0.147 0.147 0.147 0.147 0.147
WRR NR 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018
WPP 68 0.615 1.392 0.615 1.392 0.615 1.392
WNN NR 0.017 0.016 0.017 0.016 0.017 0.016

WMM NR 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023
WILL NR 0.591 0.591 0.666 0.666 0.591 0.591
WKK NR 0.096 0.096 0.265 0.265 0.096 0.096 •
WHH NR 0.149 0.149 1.061 1.061 0.126 0.126
WJJ 67 0.140 0.140 0.085 0.085

WGG 21 0.022 0.022
WFF NR 0.036 0.036
WEE NR 0.187 0.187
WZ NR 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075
WCC 75 0.0 0.0 i

WV300 75 0.0 0.0 •
WY 59 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 #
WT NR 0.391 0.391 0.391 0.391 .
WS NR 0.094 0.094 0.094 0.094
WX NR 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.066 0.066 •

W M 57 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011
WK NR 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033
WE NR 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
WG 28 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140
WF NR 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004

WD 83 1.487 1.487 1.487 1.487 1.487 1.487
WC 50 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
WB NR 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 .
WA 25 0.563 0.563 0.563 0.563 0.563 0.563
Total Impact 4.6 5.4 5.9 6.7 4.1 4.8 •

Impacts in SEA 2.90 3.66 3.66 4.48 3.70 3.94 •
Note: The wetland impacts for Alternatives A, A2, B, and B2 are based on dual 200-foot
bridges at Potecasi Creek. Alternative C and C2 are based on dual 390-foot bridges at
Potecasi Creek.

18

•
• R-2583 State FONSI
•

Table 3: R-2583 Summary of Stream Impacts

Alternative Stream Impacts (in Feet)
Stream ID Al A2 131 B2 C1 C2
SS 13 13 13 13 13 13
• SD 173 208 173 208 173 208
• SF 63 63
SF Pot. Trib. 524 524
• UR
• SF Pot. Trib. 153 153
LR

• SQ 151 151 162 162 152 152
• Sc 244 244 231 231 212 212
SM 100 100
SL 319 319
Si 113 113 319 319 74 74
S N 38 38

SB 313 313 313 313 313 313
SA (Mill Br.) 140 140 140 140 140 140
SP 101 101 101 101 101 101
Total Impact 1311 1346 1909 1944 1855 1890

Impact in SEA 917.14 978.86 1172.58 1234.30 1208.92 1270.64
• Note: The stream impacts for Alternatives A, A2, B, and B2 are based on dual 200-foot bridges
. at Potecasi Creek. Alternatives C and C2 are based on dual 390-foot bridges at Potecasi Creek.
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•

• 19
•
•

R-2583 State FONSI

C. Design Changes

Bridges or culverts proposed for this project are shown in Table 4: •

Table 4: R-2583 Bridges and Culverts

Location Current Structure Proposed Structure
Tributary to Potecasi 2 @ 12-ft x 6-ft Remove old culverts and
Reinforced Concrete Box replace with same size
Creek (Site SD, WPP) Culverts (RCBC) upstream •
Potecasi Creek Dual bridges
(Site SB, WCC, WV300) None (approx 390-ft in length)
Mill Branch overflow 1 @ 6-ft by 3-ft RCBC Extend existing culvert
Site SA, WD)
Mill Branch main crossing 1 @ 10-ft by 4-ft RCBC Extend existing culvert
(Site SA, WD)
Mill Branch overflow 1 @ 9-ft by 5-ft RCBC Extend existing culvert
(Site SA, WD)
Mill Branch overflow 1 @ 6-ft by 3-ft RCBC Extend existing culvert
(Site SA, WD)

D. Forest Resource Impacts

Forest resource impacts were calculated along each alternative. The
results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: R-2583 Forest Resource Impacts

Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative •
A A2 B B2 C C2
Alternative Impacts (in Acres)
11 12 22 24 25 26

20
r

• R-2583 State FONSI

•
E. Corrections to SEA
•
The following information on page 57 of the SEA was in error: "The
county is under the jurisdiction of the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM); however, no Areas of Environmental Concern, as
defined by the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), are present within the
• study area." Likewise, the following statement on page 77 of the EA is also in
error: "Though there are no AECs within the study area, DCM has determined
• that Potecasi Creek is a public trust water within the study area. It is expected
that NCDCM will require a CAMA permit for the project due to the proximity of the
• project to the Chowan River." A CAMA permit is required for this project due to
• direct impacts to the Public Trust Area and Public Trust Shoreline CAMA AEC's,
not due to proximity of the project to the Chowan River."

•

•
•

•

•
i
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
i
•

•
•

•
21
•

•

R-2583 State FONSI

VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. January 17, 2008 NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Meeting

NEPA/404 Merger is a process to streamline the project development and
permitting processes. To this effect, the Merger process provides a forum for •
appropriate agency representatives to discuss and reach consensus on ways to
facilitate meeting the regulatory requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act during the NEPA/SEPA decision-making phase of transportation projects.

The Merger process allows agency representatives to work more
efficiently (quicker and comprehensive evaluation and resolution of issues) by
providing a common forum for them to discuss and find ways to comply with key
elements of their agency's mission. The merger process helps to document how
competing agency mandates are balanced during a shared decision-making
process, which results in agency representatives reaching a "compromise based
decision" to the regulatory and individual agency mandates.

The NEPA/404 Merger Team for this project is comprised of the following
agencies: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service,
Environmental Protection Agency, National Marine Fisheries Service, N.C.
Division of Water Quality, N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, N.C. Division of
Coastal Management, N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries, N.C. State Historic •
Preservation Office, Peanut Belt RPO, and N.C. Department of Transportation.

A NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Meeting to reach Concurrence Point 2A, 3,
the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA), and
Concurrence Point 4A, Avoidance & Minimization, was held on February 11,
2008.

During this meeting, Concurrence Points 2A, 3, and 4A were reached.
Bridge and culvert recommendations were agreed to (see Table 4) and •
Alternative C2 was selected as the LEDPA. The following minimization efforts
were agreed to:

• At Mill Branch, the roadway was shifted south to reduce impacts to wetland •
Sites WD, WC, and WB.
• At the eastern terminus, the roadway was shifted north to minimize impacts to
wetland Site WA.
• The preferred alternative (C2) avoids impacts to the historic Mt. Tabor Baptist
Church and its cemetery. •
• The preferred alternative (C2) minimizes impacts to the minority community of
Mapleton, as well as the historic Britt Store.

22

R-2583 State FONSI
•

i • Dual 390-foot bridges are proposed across Potecasi Creek to minimize
• impacts to wetland adjacent to the creek (wetland Sites WCC and WV300)
• The existing Potecasi Creek bridge will be removed as mitigation. A portion
• of the existing US 158 roadbed may be removed east of the old Potecasi
Creek crossing as mitigation, pending further investigation.
• The existing culvert on US 158 east of Mapleton will be removed (stream Site
• SD and wetland site WPP) and a new culvert (same size) will be constructed
upstream. A portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may also be removed for
mitigation purposes pending further investigation.
• 3:1 side slopes in wetland areas.

• B. Cultural Resources

• The SEA identified two archaeological sites eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP):

• Site 31 HF268 (the remains of a farm complex)
Site 31 HF278 (Civil War-period earthworks)

i The preferred Alternative C2 impacts Site 31 HF268, but avoids site
. 31 HF278. A detailed archaeological data recovery will be conducted at Site
i 31 HF268 prior to construction.

i
•
•

•
•
•

•
i
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
23

R-2583 State FONSI

C. Air Quality - Mobile Source Air Toxics

Concerns for air toxics impacts are becoming more frequent on
transportation projects during the NEPA process. Transportation agencies are
increasingly expected by the public and other agencies to address MSAT
impacts in their environmental documents as the science emerges. Mobile
Source Air Toxics (MSATs) analysis is a continuing area of research where,
while much work has been done to asses the overall health risk of air toxics, •
many questions remain unanswered. In particular, the tools and techniques for
assessing project-specific health impacts from MSATs are limited. These
limitations impede FHWA's ability to evaluate how mobile source health risks
should factor into project-level decision-making under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). Also, EPA has not established regulatory concentration
targets for the six relevant MSAT pollutants appropriate for use in the project
development process. FHWA has several research projects underway to more
clearly define potential risks from MSAT emissions associated with transportation •
projects. While this research is ongoing, FHWA requires each NEPA document
to qualitatively address MSATs and their relationship to the specific highway
project through a tiered approach (as according to US DOT's Federal Highway
Administration memorandum, "Interim Guidance on Air Toxic Analysis in NEPA •
Documents," from February 3, 2006). The FHWA will continue to monitor the •
developing research in this emerging field. A qualitative analysis of MSATs for
this project appears in its entirety as an addendum to the project Air Quality 0
Analysis report.

40

48

0
0

0

24
r

•
R-2583 State FONSI
•

• IX. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE FINDING
•

Executive Order 11990, "Protection of Wetlands," established as a
• national policy to avoid, to the extent possible, adverse impacts on wetlands and
• to avoid direct or indirect support of new construction wherever there is a
practicable alternative.

NCDOT was unable to totally avoid wetlands because of the extent of
wetlands in the project area surrounded by wetlands. It was determined there is
• no practicable alternative to the proposed construction in wetlands and that the
proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to wetlands
which may result from such use. Minimization efforts include:
•
• At Mill Branch, the roadway was shifted south to reduce impacts to wetland
Sites WD, WC, and WB.
• • At the eastern terminus, the roadway was shifted north to minimize impacts to
wetland Site WA.
• • Dual bridges (approximately 390 feet) are proposed across Potecasi Creek to
minimize impacts to wetland adjacent to the creek (wetland Sites WCC and
• WV300)
• The existing Potecasi Creek bridge will be removed as mitigation. A portion
S of the existing US 158 roadbed may be removed east of the old Potecasi
Creek crossing as mitigation, pending further investigation.
• The existing culvert on US 158 east of Mapleton will be removed (stream Site
SD and wetland site WPP). A portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may
also be removed for mitigation purposes pending further investigation.
• • 3:1 side slopes in wetland areas.

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
25
•

R-2583 State FONSI

X. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project, as •
documented in the EA, and upon comments received from federal, state, local
agencies, and the general public, it is the finding of the NCDOT that this project
will not have a significant adverse impact upon the human or natural
environment. The project is not controversial from an environmental standpoint.
No significant impacts to natural, social, ecological, cultural, or scenic resources
are expected. The proposed project is consistent with local plans and will not
disrupt any communities. The project has been extensively coordinated with
federal, state, and local agencies. In view of the above evaluation, it has been .
determined that a FONSI is applicable for this project. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Impact Statement nor further environmental analysis is required.

The following person may be contacted for additional information
regarding this proposal:

Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Manager •
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 •
[phone]

CRC/cc
40

•

26

•

•
•
•
•

• R-2583

• Appendix A
•
• (Figures)
•
•

•
•
•

•
•

•

•
s
s

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•

cal I ~,i ~ , ~

K4~F~{

o
COM/
r
a
CCC
~e~ 1 a . ? fr i; 0
.sx.
@00m,91 OEM
mTm=mNm

73

MURFREESBOROt

Now PROJEM
}
158 ou fem. ~i
r' EC r> S 1

l

, ~ n ~ ~ • o tom. ~
C, 158 \
ALTERNATIVE C2 ,

(Preferred Alternative)r
ISM PRojwr
WINTON

13
s.
b Q')

• ® 0 0.5 1 2 r,.

• ~ Miles

• NonTH ~9 US 158 County: HERTFORD
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION FROM MURFREESBORO BYPASS
• Div: 1 TIP# R-2583 Figure
o DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS TO US 13 WEST OF WINTON
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND WBS: 35489.1.1
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH HERTFORD COUNTY
°`""TIP PROJECT R-2583
• BY: T.HOWELL Date: April 2008
•
•

} t

"'A q4~l.',y#jrl la'MtS'4,fga;~p lkg.
~lv
t~i 5 k,.
h l Ir 4f - f t 4 `~11N"l, / 1 lt4k,.
'to
! R ~i'':7! ;•I;°t s i .i ..Y't{ k r'a4„t& 9 w .ea ` 1T~yt~
VV;
1 4k,
IE ~1. II ~ t h y t 1 ~~tkt~ I~~ A i r p ~ y
W k
• z~, 'd'F ~~5.(~~~~° _a: 'V~:;. i k'~~~ , ~~,~+qs it p, Ar'~.. 'r !'~.~#,'~~`k. ~ ^ `~:y"
.x; Et ~l ~e",y~41kiS'I-t& 'y~l
/•i~ / '.n } t` & t ~}.'.w1 7 rt r~t l~rlRNiw 7"4~ 7~ ~r ~N H'~yF4
~ Q f c. lNy~~ . !'I ) ~ftp,~, ~ 1 t Y~ ~w~t~'i' " ~f.'~~j* Lt ti. ".a4 ~ ~ ~?!i + ~ +r ~ K i Z `
s '
r
T
• x Y wQQ
r
f
}Y - - _ Dg 158 n
P
ALTER
NATIVE C2 PREFERRED -
y
u a +rr5~k'vJp+i 3i vxan-. ua. t '
Am.
58 g lP P¢ ;
rk CD
BEGIN PROJECT R-2583 0
~
r ~ kkkBB6
C In a q• t 't _ ~L 4
I'J''idu F Jy {h' +sY~t`~+ r ~1 1 1 F+k
~'-}rd*1 v e ~y,r' qtr. ~r 'M,' ::n ~r «
e
Y t ` SCALE {IN FEET, # s? „r „s r r*
WE
500 LEGEND ' 1000 e
'fit _ 0
sx dr ! f
c I PROPOSED CENTERLINE
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY t
will
x ~k ; h EDGE OF PAVEMENT :x yR
` _ w 1
r
WETLANDSTREAM
" r +
•
r>a a.' e ~ zyt~
US 158 WIDENING
MURFREESBORO R-2583
BYPASS TO US 13 FIGURE 2
WEST OF WINTON SHEET 1 OF 4
HERTFORD COUNTY

•
•

g 4~
i`s [ * ! r r Sa a i iF ! t. Y > e 1
K , R
R , r t} 4. 6 : . r.•W. j1t, f. .S .-,~40
„i~.:. r,•,T o-: ^t'1' };:t tip,. ~r.e
AW4
• \ t ,..:,,.}rUl f, i u t, k.
-k, a

\ t'
'74
x y~ , t•s'. , { ,M a t`'' phi ap - - y4 - f; i
yy~~ ,
' ,s w f y}yp+. Y°., •.,~1. / , t.YC.. fY ,`A` ~!K ;,rK f 4 - , R: eif ;1~ ,Ni,'.~~ i.
44
• r . s Of .l"' A 4 a P'LEGENDM
r
SCALE (IN FEETI
PROPOSED CENTERLINE 500 0 500 1000
1'N.
* 1' + ~ ,b•, •j r;' ;PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY , ~ l~ Lt x
r r }
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
r a ~tyA P P' *i' ` a d s' f WETLAND /STREAM _l . klo 's g - c ! * wAi Ewa: 'i~
_ r. d' 'i '.r t \ •i? ' 4 F~'-^F1'rnT. `r.; t' 5•!:~
3 a HISTORIC PROPERTY Y fir. d,'
•
' i.. .'\0\.. ~ r F> , , f`L"~ ~ r * P r a, ray F_ jS ~\y,, ± ~ ` '~,M°`'. S+6v,•;~
~~JK
~'j° y.ft . i' ~W ` 'c •
N^ • yF" .s
_ t
5~~.. k. i °~t'iv',,.~i~$ .t~:w p fit. , ~,~a.
BRITT STORE kk, k ~ ~ ~ L'~,++< ~ y ! t ~ t t~Y f ,i i~ § % i, ax
Olt
;OR
,firs n~-F~ b CEOf f R~ ,^~+M
Pi ; '`a . ~ ~ t y4 k }i':` ' g } w ' j ~ ~ + - K •i~ ~ ~~~~s",~~~,,,i,
Y F i : tY°";ry t. :f
Y
• 9t , ~;±f gc,'t+~'i1~:w' 2^`"+ h Me f;{: +i,, ,,i. + tP- I~"cr
't "41 91~
MAPLETON
COMMUNITY
•
M 1TRIBUTARY TO ~%e 1 f4`, ,
• °e.~ n fL "4 gx, POTECASI CREEK " ~z~ k t `+xrt
IM .~"Jlll.
=s •
ALTERNATIVE C2 PREFERRED
MOUNT TABOR BAPTIST
't` P- a>k,i t 4 t CHURCH AND CEMETERY
; r ~ yt`k{` ~ Y
• P4
-
-lo
1;
w.rR'~+- 'T * i ! , _ k ` t ),'k "t'?a rt 'M `.-i X ? ro-„}..
• x'w@` xrdt ? .
' iT ; jt,
WAGI4
_oe Ilk I ey f
i'yy~~t,,
~
K _p
• . J ,bi iG "9. 1 , ~~.+sG\iJ r.~sv 'A. - t i.~'t,~ k ,~r. ' L~A
? 'iY CIF'
14
• ~5'F # „kt g,~ rhr;,TT, ti t,`r cx~r•.,,'= J' _ s .
"Ohm
4 ~.l ti
• {..~R "'S'^ 'k `d 51, at: gig' i •x
. t
,
Y
q r.
~ *d p ~ii~ k~4~;.d it "i ~ t~,";v-A~f '~~~n ~ ~ ~R-.l':b ~'i
yq ,
n
Z
•
,r
a
y
'i,0 X
lK,
3 d U s rF},C 4.,." `tit r ~.TE tifgk,.. !=I
~°Il~ s °,a ~ r;rN~y , n ,1~y3b ~{~,y ~ 'ek• * t>r t6 W?,~(9; u
• Mq.'i, - " L~'.-. ~.S'4 .E `~~J+~yS'~~. e, .fir r~' tri4~ S''~~~'° ~rv~. ~`fn"i~*°• ,~''s ~ I'I~I ro0
.
' a ~ A AYi° Cq" i ; : f tt7 r t ` ~S°"• II I ~ I
*V wom"
k-`':~ Y' ay,' C 9..z' ~`S '3~°r 'i T f',• sR! ~ '{~ti a .~`i~le pt ~'nS,t; qii
w
{ ~i ^ T t .S t., k v y1 ! a y o,
4 A ` E ~ 5~'i'g -4,a~.) •h.• . i q ,f to ~ '3y~`'
• US 158 WIDENING
• MURFREESBORO R-2583
BYPASS TO US 13 FIGURE 2
• WEST OF WINTON SHEET 2 OF 4
HERTFORD COUNTY
•
•
•

F~ ~K;143,y. ~`';t #r. x ,c'•.a'°~dt '{s't a, 'w.
p
'e .i 'a
AA "
' p ..t ,r • . ,r.. a_..+a . , i d* 'r, r°}F,+:'i t~ ""'t' A:'~.
i. ? y.. rtS= i C~.y„r , i - `o .i : - i?'t~ 1 :A 1" q ? /y ° ''9
.P~' , +{5 3 ~,r, , uy ir~
+.l fa ' 4,:.n'.~-f .1 i °7 ~I i. S.;:. r i.e , ~~r', e: '~t srt, y:., R~~ .•,i#", ..i4
`a a r .nr; ~~11+ Yh } 1 r. t .v a' ;r , ,r's, ; X,• + .!!?c~ Y,, y„i} t rfn 14j:
i'Y
,e :,.y~'1` '"R r~:,." 7iQ 's • -'~P t , t rw:~: r 4,; r~:' .,4 {a:l i~'e ,.L 'si#.= ~i(. d t `Wxs,k
?.y~ y e 7 :t. t t :.ri .:'d t v '+a` -r?•... 1 ,,,"rj,y.i.` ' f ,.{.ti . a r.. 3 y•`-
N`
t` ~'t';tdr ~.t•, .yp
,~e '.+i ,~"R ~~"7 ,i4 ~;ih '.t~i~,... .d'.' Vii:, f~ •'Ir. . t"
r.,g t rr s~ 't ,.4, h~' ti c'f .;_i, a
g P.
t `s, ! • \s ,.t a_S 4 - ..;.y r;,. .1 ..t. , P; ,}'i.. ,4 a«
. yi "f 1
a,'@.:',.. L . it n 1 ,..31,,~ ;,t 5 p`rU ,,,rdn i r ~ r51;~.'4# i. t'' a Y q,~{ r ..t .c-r"
~j{pp , •~;~..',1 .."•.{a 1. a.~!~4 ,_.'.7,'. ,1.. ! ..y~,. a.; Y,.a; mot,. j~. i~.l `IF.~9 'r „•x'~y ~t 'w', 7kRti` ;Iw.s °Ai ~'C,r~ aS,y. p~
;=~~+4, '4 Y i.'r' t ,t.rf.T,. 1- r,';..,i?~ „1: n«~rY,'~;_ -x.<y1'i' pri i~:• pp ;M' t~' ~~•+Ptt~ }.C ria i'i , 1`,, .s ,.1... a. :+a t i ''Y : '4e'3';i~t`t{ 1a „r,,:.R ; ,R f
•
hf
r ''fr , -~:W.:-- b# ti°°` . 5 -'y, ~ . :iz " t ~ ,,t ~f,l_., ::#5~gy`,~Y Ix ri . f, '~".9f
pr' ,~^-+p l.l'i~.
- i!_ rki .riE i rtr'fPi~r" MT '.d ~.9' r'L~t 'oi "I:Y ,.tea'{ Lj :,I.l~^,A~!.~%.. ri~~
y, }
„y. t. e;IC: °::"t• tr t t• # :t, e !k+'3 a+. .r. 1 Il:.~'. -t_
el', Y~
« a '.rl.r
-'t {3 y~:;:.. ,D 'a' -A""y,' ~i~ •yi '1, a~`'d i
'p/~'i
• y f: _ it r r., e '.:::'i<. C?c'.. - F k, ali":n, a + i . C"3 y,'i''7 i J ,}'l;:d+f -,,ay
,xS jR'... ,il,' ; . a,;,}g•, ,t ,..,.,r- ' ':P., :1 ,.fa «.a,•
rr
y iea. k• S k i ~,y, r9~. ,'t Lb i1 b~ ° !4 feSl«: 8., ar A'r~
. S , f '•s"'"rS?• i " :'f„ ° 4r `^tr ~ 1•- C4.',+a., q' ~'a t, p 5h ~~`hi : #l !~1' -y ` r#« i " ~9: ~9 ~tg, y~~;~
`t t!rk'}' e'tk ',.d - +t i,° 7 S !t, a:
1, d A; { r t',, 5 •
l\ w a #qr t,l fx i 1 r:1C1,a1,'''~a, e4 t
e, +<s-+'. r«-4tr it `Fi fly?°~e r,+r'3 i r°.t,:"-,,n~ }:'t:''~; t, •Tx t`4,
.wi~l~S.,e.¢z,, ..ai ,i' ~~'tr, ~Y, .i:>t aiid:,y14,"e>'V x. y . :Y «I` r ;,,i;1i' ,.>•,.g,. ,4 a est r,
v
i._,.., , r,(71 p!, ,lk ,,.`I"".. r" ,,,t `a:. „ N¢a:r 'R, '''2f~'± _ .v ON
d. 1~, ~,p_. :~f '.#.r„ . ei. ldp 1.. ,•.oti, a ~~,'f r~..~ .,i`. ~.:}~~j.
MY #4 y L .a., i y, f~: l a TM!V F, e ,,r > t:f S:is t b.
"C, - .r. , , ; ' , • i , yi+,h '.5, e`,:..,i i ? , l C'~'', ~ .1 ~ "+La. t, r r h a }Y~,r ~a` S ~r:rr:.f{ ~ rj^y~ r
r,. c:..,t iv. }.tr. ,3 ! .4...,' s. r. .:,F,d Ft:, a ,'~1 1 ,:5 a' •~,'`..1 ~ 1Si .n.,i,~ c.
, :vl;.. ig. •~!f ~ ,e 1 ~ S w 1 •,`y} J., ~,>4 : iw4dt ,a'~i 1, k , t;; tl ~ At I+t+
_r,... - aYl 1 v v t , . r ;'U. a.•:!'.. "3, j,~'tM1t nr _
~R
N.
, '4,L.,~*" 4.'4 ti a :r :r} `@ X~ s?" 'f5,' •a
w .,,t :rc+.', >i{.. ' . ~ r .f .`a Y ~..a, ,i • i \'•x, f m~ ~ y s' , r
x a 0. 1, , Kt r, d ~~.iT,"y.. ,.x' '4f .p,.. ..x. '4i. wG."3~.: ~ e' ~•1
1
• } i h , , r a + a ~ L 1 J t kA' rF.t. b,.
-:i rTj . fd r. ,v, tis '4E4 ~'s ia'.P,',,, a„ :K' x r.:,,,, t2• i' ~t~' ,.,7.=i .P`
~~y yy
• ~ - f +y;. '~5..r ,r .,e~Ttl'... ,'ri : •~7., i~ _!'}::L,~" v.y.
-r < r ,W. a~d . ly~.i ..,,?.7f, -,S,.r., rfF'... r, •~r'"ia~.'. t,' r~,.r ro.a ~ `c =,x P, ~l~' ~3.
= r;A d.:j. ~ .Y .-h. ~ et•("?r>^,e. 'h ~!I s-, ,'~y r.- ~ n ---=s!~_..._s_ ~_u .a 7 ~,3.sT` fr
"tj,'- r'• , - ¢ - ,My f4 i>t<9?,`, t•~.4, , r: 'gf' f as dky"c'i?'" x . ' 1
„
, to
„

i, 1` '.:1,.. - q, n, ~ .4 s r t .r. 1 ' ~t-,,~ • , i .r, ,«i . ~ { t ~ ye f.-
'
f. ` ''.7 ~f ir#.y..{ r '},r. 4 r .f Y,/."~~. :_i5a .•'eC. W r.
ALTERNATIVE C2 PREFERRED w.'. r
r
~a .
fa
r .i~ k r y 'S 3 I.i
h 7~
.Y'+:-! 1"s ..,x Q F s g 4-_.Tk .Sx., - t~ .;ilia ~{i.r •:A i'~: tv
J~l
x Yla ,.p. T., ;4., r a-,,. r d i,,,• AeLx
CASI CREEK
POTE . fl ry
y+f s.- C4 3r t, 1 4 Y a ° a tt; 1' f.at' 1
t.., ,}•i l , 'K ..'..9..x..,
MOUNT TABOR BAPTIST ? : < aR f ± , x w
~ r. , W'4 CHURCH t
AND CEMETERYi l: l ' ~da,,~ + ,Yam -R,"~ ~F'' „s;''y.` ,Y. - '.Rm;
. ,
i '~k * '..,~,~n y~~•. Ei: F. r' Sf' w, hT; ',T *a' , ya,:.,
r` a, X44"~ 4 t~/ iy m } -L q ~i `r°` r iL 9 TOWN OF WINTON
at . x i ± u k, S~u` A : 2a~ iR WATER TREATMENT PLANT a q -z r4},, WILLI' AM H. KIFF
1W x
n
i
HOUSE
1.;:`M1 s • ;.''f fi,~ ~ ~t A •;'MK+,+jR•. 1 ~ ,ix .fir. ~•,~p t,I r.
¦ t._:. r- "`.r,_ :@,rk,. .p ar5il,s et°M''i>
` : ~ t' ei-:r, of s aw".•' 6„*~ - , r { l:-x
, °x',..~. - ,w `-,s •:•i.r ~:r,i::Y:t ~ t - ~ do-- f. x
x,
..s.~a . `2 •#e 7t!'.~'s' .,fit' p, ;y
7...577...,
'.y. fi3c~: r:Hn ~ ~e:~ t i;!<, ~•,~,'aiJ `.,r
T N,
'#,r.•ay'~~i ,r~, f 4 k-' a ~ d~R~Y, f~ > ~ r. 'fA: T. x `,'i.
1 , ..!a .'4L t a!i ~3,+j~,'e r ;1 ~''#d~ } ,r J L t ,g1b., a
s,
,'E - .:r,~ =a e. ~ .k~:~R pt;..,,- r'!. . i rr , : Cr++ P'
~u
a a. r ,...."li '`F. ;.k. - , t` ''R; , :,r , . d iL_. .fi ....r i " 1 w''7t
Y
,r .n , y~ ~1. , . . ii, 'S s5N K $ I d p, , k Y'.'y X Y'~r i1.,
• , v .1',~. a 0 d... 4 . ~ i j'.1.':r: ,t _fi . 'N. r'1
,:fir. ; ~ ,,c, ~ 5 ~ .
gg~~
r Y '9 If"w `tiF, t A
" ~r 1•• , ty f C l y , ; 1 s . ~ . n , t t" t >r r , :~c`
a
r, , 1. ,,;#e e e« ,S(ke ,•C•. i. IJtd ~i\
a, „,t . t , ;(I, •r -,,.~s., uf«r . 1~ • fs tk• a# '`2
1,1k 0
.f . , p. ...,,/~y~ y 'r . r- Q. s, , c~ d s •P ~ ' r,..- a t ~h., t CS' ~ G~:,~
# '
A
,S ~ , . +ys e..., ~'r4q 'f .a.. Fy. x r r :x - t -,a+, ,.'~~a ~rA,. ''"`fl' ,a `Z.~
All
• x r :•'i r3-~djg.'.nC 'C'C4 .Y.t*d; ~ r'',' + #s t - fd f'~ -s', F': 1~ s s•Y`yr y~
L~c al., F '(fa'~ r+ ,~'s *'>s e s F i 4
+
• } r ~'~+~r~t« i ~ H~,s. e. r 4,, a„-Q: r',~ 'j; ;i ~ , cj#t; I~,.,.:v' ~ t, ~ ,r ~~~osx wg1tA :w°4' ~~~~C
%
LEGEND r: y ~
t g ,g ;PROPOSED CENTERLINE
"4t_il 3"t + PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY - a t t 3eyd p
kY'w } 9
EDGE OF PAVEMENT SCALE (IN FEETi
s
S, T, 1 u
+h k 500 0 500 1000 l
i', t. r p 1
I I I
re
a ~ WEfLANMTREAM
F 1
k a 1 t y i -1'i`~
I
y ' Y
HISTORIC PROPERTY
- rt '
Ji_t?tQia;,
,
,
r, '4!
.
3
014
• US 158 WIDENING
MURFREESBORO R-2583
BYPASS TO US 13 FIGURE 2
WEST OF WINTON SHEET 3 OF 4
HERTFORD COUNTY

• ~ , ~ 4 ,i • ~sc y,~ I AMSrY~c : r e a ~ ~i~ ' ~?~;~j i 1~">w d +z
'i+°1' '.l3 t34 Rli ttt } rn;,e ' x 1 * ! r j°$ y np,;Y"~ F 1 ~~¢i, 1a
_ R A t sln -
1as ik1+ a t47 lk~,'J j-,7r^' Y' s ( t t
t k"
4, iz,
a."k-"'c , { xl ~ 7 s,wf ?rq ~ c it ~ :J;y~ r.. ~,@*, i-', ~^c, +'r ;a r~ - r - ~vs r''?~~!`,' ~ r/~yr
er- ~r c e . M ,e. s ri oy,:~ WCC RIVER ! ) : p, 1P@ rLw , a e', 1 r gar,' a $c~~ A !p !
r,r .S~WIti` ..,,,.i4.C'r:r.6` J , ,r.di .rr•z.4 1:;-:~ '"se`'a '1~.~t'. 9l'YY~~ "4 "+'n '~'ti'~ mot.
f` t it ti, 1 ,n. ti.r..,.v.. ! ra: ,17t d',y,, is ',et 'l, i_,fi •t
rai,r.,:X,,,,.~., 1} ~•.,d. CORRECTIONAL
x t. q~:.1k s - al t 14 r ~ A . R, r, ~'r,' ~ `~Yfi.~ ~ ~ ~ a ~F :y ,
.'1`'.'"l. 3F j,~•.~-r r.'~
'ry.•w'1 yr } t: :.lt i, f , ,''r,"~ •ri: h.: i t~.M1~.. r. 4+'. i fC`+. I»R
INSTITUTION
x r x
44,
! Y t J.t. uC, r 1 v w, h~ /~;~,,Y t, _xY. !a=~6 f: tJY.{ 1 Y, a. 1 °„~.q
,
y,. 1• s u 1 .1, 1 a.1'Yif. . t. ~ - <d,. 'e 1 y._ Y, „r, a"~r ~ X
~ ..1 r. .r: Ir y " ,2 , ^).~"k- F oil
!
. „r.; I ~t 1 '.,1~~ l..r ~ i,.,j,a~ a_ . , t` r..~n c...E. 4 , ,#f",t . V r. ~ . ~ J'•. r` °r ~ ' .-i.f
rl ,,li , 'Ir i 'f a;.., -4;141 k•: art., , k~:'~ 1 , r ,
Y .
'~1, M. g 'a: f., t. 1-t ~ r'f. x. :4, ,M a#..y' ~r«• / "K.:
, ( t'r:. 'l I..r:t"i 'll.;,.t r ~u ~ ~i el. 1' ~ ~ ~
-s r . ( .F .t4 ..f . •n: /.~.r: . !l , Al
p ~ A ;Cr n ;r~, .et9',,4. 'Y`_•'+r ~ / ~ r s ~ 3~;1
, 1:. i r>S". a .t,r ~4. ..b a~ ~~~a:~'e i~., •„'aT ~d; t..~'laJr.r'. ~t Q'. 6 Ai.l I' ~b i.
c.,.1} v
a
i6: A.,,-, i. -a,+,.r rh ,a, .r ,.r.'. , ;Sehi "~'d;.iM~'..' "'CN'k +.,'C. 1~[; ~ "~r~, i~','1 .irk.
,,t a~,t<tr!!. N., r. h,,, .r ,,.a,d f: ~~.y. ,,.,u~.~,~ +~`r,•,1. w~F:' k, #~"al,~.
fAp
yg t 4 J t" a :;d 0 a #~i t."a r r a Y4, :K+~ 1 fnN
:r- 1, .:4:a rrs t5:,'• r 4r r.,..r. yi --l: i, r~. f{. w #a t. r 1
tkar.
'1h ..b ,.1. r lw` , 5 1' t.A y'ifJ ?;S c•° j
pr,...
[4,
i xa vl+~),,.t ,.t~..;,.r. ~ ,,Y ~.1 r, ~i" kY a"' 4 th +
a c s
ALTER ATI E 2 PREFER
N V C ( RED)t
• rr ~r ~ ~ ~a
0 ski ~ ~ ;
I ,
s 'j'i'> '1' t ,!r t ' ~ S u' ~ ~f' ~ Y ! t r A yL!~. f a ~ ~ 't.,kr~Y1 s ~ b°' _ _ ~ ~ : • R n ~ c f ' >
c:l !'i .ch..! e } }nj~ X1 'F e~,. r, w ' Jx Lt 4+x :j:F 'S'",'~ °y'•I' ~a J , 1',
sJ , r r,. i{ '`~s r g+1:a a ::t4 l~ ' i 1:.-: < ? . r' d.,• tMY;~, :m~ p,i.
1,: } y~J, y r d' s1 «1.. s„la ,1 t t
$,k.`'
d t~,flfir ( , krr lir s~ ,o'~'.~ f1;,_ 1 it 4.
.5 _ " r- ~ p *r' r l / 1 4^. 4, , '?.i ~ r :t, ~ . 1 `.J 5, i n '}r "Ai;' 4 h
N p3h. .`w~' 'Asi dY;ai C' l~'~`r~': s 1 1 Y ?{'3!Y'i~~ ~1,; w ~>t.~~" l: sl s 3' is t"y7•~~ t ~.te ~J t„" az•:.`~i"
,x"kv. er' l.~`9 1'}`:,t s.~c ry}~-:~§Lt ~`h qqi Y yrk qq'A''cI+
Pr jt1:r `:P- 1. 1i k3
4 n.a .,.r8 .~iA, r'i',.. ; t 1 1~ ` . k ;i~ i 4 rtli ~ • oe .5 .z i,s f.~, .e , .5. `
'.f ryl .,a.. A.a;~',• tC'~ «.a ?ti '_`r`p J.,~,~ , n'•':.,1 ;~I ,ye ft 'i? 1f ! ,y.YT,y
a. r~a•'~, •a, h'~'. r! '9r' a,F:~ 1 ,Z~ dV ~,I,Y'.~`r e ai"'
;F.. ~'a;,~:• t R Tit 'p.:~~ x14 h v ~p..•..l ~ ~r~, ~ tr, a ~ e~Al A> t !
av,
rlr et>:f ,+My ;x y4q'~' 4.1, , 4+':r i f4 rV r~:~, ..E ~xb a-r Y ip •.R, -
~
c~ 1~;+'e~ t~ft,:-. li+r4~.: , ;t MN.c ti,d Is K;`~'•. ..a., 4~- lf4r
h
1 t
„ [r
i`• ;ir^+Sm~k.c. `.y.. r ,d~ 1. #.~'t? 1',. Fi '~4c~iw rt~ ]
y,` a r # ar,- ai ' w iit ,Ay n. `""a f'~ y, t yy
5 V.

"s:'a~ ~
f
t
.a -4i, 0 di
~':.fi's51•~- ~ ~ s _ ~ IL
.F:.^
s~
s
1 `
yw + ti ~ y At e LEND PROJECT R 2583k', ~1 a r
i I !
y it~r e Ada.. . O'i ~i,l , ft '~11?,
. E a,tlrES~q r:rMi((Y 4 e .#x ' f YI lAt p; r F.
Is V1.
R F
s:F
®r 'Ifs ci,I
a
r
gal • x
} - ~ x N it I
'Ar sy ~J ~ as Yc*-4 v i, y `
\Y fr, •7. i i,. ~.~r1 t'rk " lad ~ ~ w" .y, ' r ,b 1 4 ~ ~ 4

y Y s c i
SCALE LEGEND
IN FEET)
K
ti
500
r 0 500
1000
AN .p PROPOSED CENTERLINE h,-
' PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY - F "
t p EDGE OF PAVEMENT
° t y s t t i WETIA4D/STREAM a E a ~
US 158 WIDENING
• MURFREESBORO R-2583
BYPASS TO US 13 FIGURE 2
WEST OF WINTON SHEET 4 OF 4
HERTFORD COUNTY

•
•
•

•
•

• R-2583
•
• Appendix B

• (Comments from Federal, State, and
•
• Local Agencies)
•
•

•
•
•

i
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•

NT OF
United States Department of the Interior ~
H o FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ~Raleigh Field Office

Post Office Box 33726
MgACH 3 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726'~~~ `1 t
•
June 19. 2006

Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
North Carolina Department of Transportation
• 1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548

Dear Dr. Thorpe:

This letter is in response to your May 25, 2006 letter which requested comments from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the State Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the
widening of US 158 from Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of Winton, Hertford County,
North Carolina (TIP No. R-2583). These comments are provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).

According to the SEA, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
widen approximately 8.2 miles of US 158 from two lanes to a divided four-lane facility with a
grassed median. There are three alternatives - Alternative A: Widen on Existing, Alternative B:
Widen on Existing with Northern Bypass, and Alternative C: Widen on Existing with Southern
Bypass. In addition, each alternative has a Mapleton Service Road Option.

The Service has been actively providing input on this project through the combined NEPA404
Merger Process. At this time we do not have a preferred alternative, but will continue to provide
input during the Merger Process. There is only one federally protected species listed for
Hertford County - the red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW)(Picoides borealis). The SEA states
that RCW Surveys were conducted at the nrpJort cit,, on DecP:r-ber 10 °'_nd 1 1 2003No R,-W-
or cavity trees were observed. After the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative
is selected, a new RCW survey should be conducted in suitable habitat within a half mile radius
of the project area. If no cavity trees are observed within a half mile radius, then the Service
would support a "No effect" determination for this species.

Although the forested habitat types within the project study area are described in the SEA, there
is no quantification of the impacts to each habitat type. Although the potential for wetland
mitigation associated with removing the existing bridge over Potecasi Creek in Alternative C is
mentioned on the Project Commitments page ("Green Sheet"). no description or quantification of
the potential is given in the body of the SEA. Also, the physical description of the red-cockaded
woodpecker in Appendix D needs correction. The bird is not 18-20 inches long, but rather 8-9
inches long.

The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone], ext. 32.

S' cerw- }

Pete Bwamin
Ecological Services Supervisor

cc: Chris Militscher, USEP A, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC •
Bill Biddlecome, USAGE, Washington, NC
John Sullivan, FHwA, Raleigh, NC

(7 ~~R \%'ilham G. Ross Jr., Secretar):
\O?rQG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
C~ r- Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
• > - Division of Water Quality

• June 28, 2006

MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental
Affairs

• From: Brian L. Wrenn, Transportation Permitting Unit, NC DWQ"?'~~J

• Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Improvements to US 158 from Murfreesboro
Bypass to US 13 West of Winton in Hertford County, WBS Element 35489, TIP Project No. R-
2583, State Clearinghouse No. 06-0346

This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible
for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the
U.S., including wetlands. The Division of Water Quality offers the following comments:
Document Specific Comments:
s
1. Potecasi Creek is class C; NSW; 303(d) waters of the State. Potecasi Creek is on the 303(d) list
for impaired use for aquatic life due to low dissolved oxygen and standard violations for pH.
` DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
DWQ recommends that the most protective sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented
. to reduce the risk of sedimant and nutrient runoff to Potecasi Creek. DWQ requests that road
design plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as
detailed in the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices.
2. Although the Mapleton Service Road Option would result in additional impacts of up to 0.82
acres of wetlands and 62 linear feet of streams, DWQ feels that the additional impacts are
• appropriate to avoid potential environmental justice issues with the Mapleton Community.

3. Hertford County is one of the twenty coastal counties that require a state storm water permit for
land disturbances of one acre or more. NC DOT should contact the Washington Regional Office
of DWQ to obtain the appropriate permit for the storm water management system for the
proposed project.

General Comments:
1. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
• impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as
. required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized)
mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be
required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification.

• on
NorthCarolina
Transportation Permitting Unit ~1 aturally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
• 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet: http~//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
• An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
•

Page 2 of 5

2. Environmental assessment alternatives should consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives should include road designs
that allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed
in the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormtirater Best Management Practices, such as grassed
swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
3. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the
avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent
practical. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules 115A NCAC
2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the
event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate
lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as •
wetland mitigation.

4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules 115A NCAC
2H.0506(h) mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed
to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may
be available for use as stream mitigation.
5. Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, should
continue to include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with
corresponding mapping.

6. DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. •
NC DOT should address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the
aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.

7. An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project is required.
The type and detail of analysis should conform to the NC Division of Water Quality Policy on the
assessment of secondary and cumulative impacts dated April 10, 2004. •
8. NC DOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill,
excavation and clearing, to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need to be
included in the final impact calculations. These impacts, in addition to any construction impacts, •
temporary or otherwise, also need to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Application. S

9. Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However, •
we realize that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that
culverts should be countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms.
Moreover, in areas where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove •
preferable. When applicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the
maximum extent practicable.
10. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or streams.

-II _UM)
11 Page 3 of '5

11. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands
in borrow/waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could
precipitate compensatory mitigation.

12. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed
methods for stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to
discharge directly into streams or surface waters.

13. Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and
streams may require an individual permit application to the Corps of Engineers and
corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that water quality
• standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require
• the submittal of a formal application by the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ.
Please be aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization
of wetland and stream impacts to the maximum extent practical, the development of an
• acceptable stormwater management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where
appropriate.
• 14. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.

15. Whenever possible, the DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
• require work within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel
• realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges allow for human and
wildlife passage beneath the structure, do not block fish passage and do not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
• 16. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater should be directed
across the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed
scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current
• version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices.

17. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct
• contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured
concrete should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and
possible aquatic life and fish kills.
• 18. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
• appropriate native woody species should be planted. When using temporary structures the area
• should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or
other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re- i
vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.

• 19. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
• and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
• low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result

Pace 4 of 5 •

in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream
of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being •
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock •
or other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be
required.
20. If multiple pipes or barrels are required. they should be designed to mimic natural stream cross
section as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where •
appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the
inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition
that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage. •

21. If foundation test borings are necessary, it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work
is approved under General 401 Certification Number 3494/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey •
Activities.

22. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and •
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
23. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP •
measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities
manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures should be used
to prevent excavation in flowing water.

24. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of
Wetland Significance (NC-CREWS) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent
inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit •
approval.

25. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to •
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. •
This equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface
waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
26. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner
that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly
designed, sized and installed. •

27. Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) should be preserved to the maximum extent
0 possible. Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project •
by the end of the growing season following completion of construction. •
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Should you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact Brian Wrenn at 919-733-5715.

• Page 5 of 5

•
•

• cc: Bill Biddlecome, US ACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
• Travis Wilson, NC WRC
• Gary Jordan, USFWS
• Chris Militscher, USEPA
Garcy Ward, Washington Regional Office, NC DWQ
• Clarence Coleman, Federal Highway Administration
• File Copy
•
•

•
•

•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•

6 ~~G=

• X110
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•

ven:. r. C,ZG: Gi tnYlrO f,::; ii: nGu . _ . . _ •
tishlral Resources FOREST Di~i:;ion e[ Fores: Feseurces
SERVICE
A~~~~ Michael F. Easley, Governor StanFord Nil. Adams, Director
,`r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary N~ 1, •
2411 Old US 70 NVest
Clayton, NC 27520
June 9, 2006

INIEMORAI\D A

TO: Melba McGee, Office of Legislative Affairs ~ all

FROM: Bill Pickens, NC Division Forest Resources

SUBJECT: EA for the proposed US 158 Project from Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of
Winton, Hertford County •
PROJECT 06-0346 and TIP R-2583

The North Carolina Division of Forest Resources has reviewed the referenced Environmental Assessment
to evaluate impacts to forest resources as a result of the proposed construction. Comments on issues of
concern to the North Carolina Division of Forest Resources are listed.

• The NC Division of Forest Resources does not support the project as proposed. •
• The Environmental Assessment fails to address any of the concerns identified in our response to the
initial scoping letter.
• The NC Division of Forest Resources cannot evaluate impacts to forest resources unless information
prc% iously requested is provided.

I can be contacted at 919-553-6178 x 233 or by e-mail bill.pickens(4,ncmaiLnet.

cc: Barry New

C^.J

VA,
•

1616 hfall Ser.,k:e Center, Raleieh, North Carolina 27699-1601
I'honc: 919 - 733-2162 \ FAX: 919 - 733-0 1 3S \ lntcmet: ~~.~~,c((r sla'.c..r .t.is •
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIR\1'ATI`'E ACT10\ EMPLOYER - 501/, RECYCLED / 10`i: POST •
•

•

0
0

~
• ±9;1-
•
NCDENR,-.Ir,,
North Carolina Department of Environm i,f'~' I Resources
Y
00ichael F. Easley, Governor Division of Marin 4 lsh ~ ~ Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
er,lilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
CV YQT `i/,
CV GGlul ~._~j
• DO
MEMORANDUM:v% A

•
• TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator, Office of Legislative and
0 Intergovernmental Affairs

THROUGH: Mike Street, Chief Habitat Section
0
0 FROM: Sara E. Winslow, Northern District Manager

• SUBJECT: Project No. 06-0346 - NCDOT - Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of
Winton - TIP Project R-2583
DATE: June 14, 2006

0
0
• The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has reviewed the SEPA document

0 and submits the following comments pursuant to General Statute 113-131.
0
0 The Division prefers Alternative A, which has the least amount of wetland
impacts (2.9 ac) and stream impacts (-917 ft). Potecasi Creek and its tributaries is a
documented anadromous spawning area for blueback herring and alewife. Resident
0 species, such as white perch, yellow perch, catfishes and other commercially and
0 recreationally important species also utilize the creek for spawning and nursery areas.
0 This agency will request a moratorium from February 15 through June 30. This

0 will ensure the environmental integrity of the area is protected during critical times of
0 usage by the previously mentioned species.
0

0 A turbidity curtain should be utilized and maintained during any construction
. work in wetlands. Any loss/impacts to wetlands should be adequately mitigated.
0 The Division appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments.
0

0
0
a
177
13b7 U S 17 South, Elizabeth City, r,lcr`h Carolina 91 9 NorthCm-olina
G~ 2 <o _ a r r r ,~lltlllll~~l/

•

t *V

rt

_9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission •

MEMORANDUM Richard B. Hamilwn, Execudve DirecTor •

•
TO: Melba McGee •
Office of Legislative and intergovernmental Affairs, DENR

FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
•
DATE: June 16, 2006 •

SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) State Environmental •
Assessment (EA) for the proposed improvements to US 158 from the
Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of Winton, Hertford County, North Carolina. •
TIP No. R-2583, SCH Project No. 06-0346 •

Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
EA and are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to •
assess project impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance •
with certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).

NCDOT proposes to widen US 158 to a multi-lane facility from the Murfreesboro Bypass to •
US 13 west of Winton. The three alternatives evaluated in the EA consist of a four-lane divided •
facility with paved shoulders and a 46 foot wide grass median. The total project length is
approximately 8.1-8.2 miles. Impacts to streams vary with alternatives, and are expected to total •
approximately 917 to 1270 linear feet of stream impact. Impacts to wetlands vary from 2.90 to •
4.48 acres. Furthermore, Mill Branch, Potecasi, and their associated perennial tributaries
impacted by this project are subject to an anadromous fisheries moratorium of February 15 to
June 15 due to the presence of River herring in rhese systems. •

The document is an adequate assessment of the environmental impacts associated with t11e •
alternatives for this project. The NC Wildlife Resources Commission does not have a prefer-Led
alternative at this time. We will participate in the alternative selection for this project during The •
Merger process. At this time, we concur with the EA for this project. Thank you for the
•
•
•

CO 39dd 6£868ZS6 6 LZ:OT ~ ?Z/9Z/90 •
•

•
•
Memo 2 June 16, 2006

•
• opportunity to eomrnent on this EA. If we can be o~-any further assistance please call me a,
• [phone].

cc: Gary Jordan, U.S. Nish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
• Brian Wrenn, DWQ, Raleigh
Bill Biddlecome, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

•
•
•

•

•

•
•
•

•
•
i

•
•
•
•

•
•
i

•
•
s ~t
• C3

•
•
•

•
•

•
•
• b0 ~rJl7d 698o8ZS6To LZ:BT Q777/9T/90

0
State of North Carolina Reviewing Office: •
NCDENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources 0
Project Number: 64 Due Date: v
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
After review of this project it has been determined that the DENR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project
to comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of this form..
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office. •
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Normal Process Time
(Statutory Time Limit)
? Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction
facilities, sewer system extensions & sewer systems contracts. On-site inspection. Post-application technical conference usual. 30 days
not discharging into state surface waters. (90 days)
? NPDES-permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection preapplication
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct wastewater treatment 90 -120 days
discharging into state surface waters. facility-granted after NPDES. Reply time, 30 days after receipt of plans or issue (N/A)
of NPDES permit-whichever is later.
? Water Use Permit Preapplication technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(N/A)
? Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7 days
installation of a well. (15 days)
Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner.
On-site inspection. Preapplication conference usuaL Filling may require Easement 55 days
to Fill from N.C. Department of Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit (90 days)
? Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC N/A 6,0 days
(2Q.0100, 2Q.0300, 2 H.0600) I
? Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
? Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be in compliance with
15 A NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) which requires notification N/A 60 days
and removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos (90 days)
Control Group 919-733.0820.
? I Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
2D.0800
? The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing actin. An erosion 6 sedimen .lion 20 days
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Reoional Office ('-.and Quality Seaicn'. a: leas: 30 (30 days)
days before beginning activity. A fee of $50 for the first acre or any part of an acre.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance. 30 days
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOTs approved program. Particular attention should be
given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable stormwater conveyances and outlets.
? Mining Permit On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed wilt DENFL Bond amount varies with
type mine and number of acres of affected land Any are mined greater than 30 days
one acre must be permitted. The appropriate bond must be received before (60 days)
the permit can be issued.
? North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division of Forest Resources if permit exceeds 4 days 1 day
(N/A)
? Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit-22 counties On-site inspection by N.C.Division of Forest Resources required Ymore than five 1 day
in coastal N.C.with organic soils. acres of ground clearing activities are involved Inspe: ions shout be requested (N'%A)
at least ten days before actual burn is planned.'
? Oil Refining Facilities N/A 90 i 20 days
(N/A)
•

PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS No.
? Dam Safety Permit (Stag
• y "permit required, application 60 days before begin construction- Applicant
must hire N.Cqualified engineer to: prepare plans, inspect construction, certay
• construction is according to DENR approved plans May also require permit under
mosquito control program, and a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers 30 days
• An inspection of site is necessary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum (60 days)
fee of 5200.00 must accompany the application. An additional processing fee
• based on a percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion.
• ? Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well
File surety bond of S5,ooo with DENR running to State of N.C conditional that any
well opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged according
• to OENR rules and regulations. 10 days
? Geophysical Exploration Permit (N/A)
• Application filed with DENR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit
by letter. No standard application form. ~pl'cannn 10 days
• ? State Lakes Construction Permit
(N/A)
Application fees based on structure size is charged. Must include descriptions 15 - 20 days
• & drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian property.
401
Water Quality Certification (N/A)
• N/A 55 days
? CAMA Permit for MAJOR development (130 days)
• 5250.00 fee must accompany application
? 60 days
CAMA Permit for MINOR development (130 days)
$50.00 fee must accompany application
22 days
• ? several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monument needs to be moved or destroyed, please nod (25 days)
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687 Raleigh, N.C. 27611 fy
• ? Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 15A Subchapter 2C.01 Do.
• ? Notification of the proper regional office is requested if 'orphan' underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any • excavation ooe
• ? Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. ration.
• 45 days
Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority) (N/A)
•
y}
• _ `r V2008
• ~rv V~
• Cb;
4i
1r7 1.~.
•
• REGIONAL OFFICES
• Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked belo
• ? Asheville Regional Office W
? Mooresville Regional Office ? Wilmington Regional Office
• 59 Woodfin Place 919 North Main Street
ksheville,N.C.28801 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
6208 .C. Mooresville, N.C.28115 Wilmington, N.C. 28405
(828) 251-N
[phone] [phone]
? Fayetteville Regional Office ? Raleigh Regional Office
• 225 Green Street, Suite 714 3800 Barrett Drive, P.O. Box 27687 ? Winston-Salem Regional Office
• Fayetteville, N.C.28301 585 Waughtov,-n Street
Raleigh, N.C, 27611 Winston-Sale,
• [phone] [phone] N.C.27107
(330) 771=1500
• ? Washington Regional Office
• 943 Washington Square Mall
• Washington, N.C.27889
[phone]
•
•

1V1~11a VA1~V a...i 1vA JlAlu `.uu. u.~.. •
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION •
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW

STATE NUMBER: 06-E-4220-0346 F02

DATE RECEIVED: 05/31/2006 •
AGENCY RESPONSE: -6/l6/2o0-9-D
REVIEW CLOSED: 06/21/2006 •
M REI:LE _E HT~ -E P _ •
C' 7 ARI'v„ USE '=RD
DE`_ OF '-'.'L RESOURCES •
ARCHIVES-HISTORY BLDG - MSC 461 •
RALEIGH NC •
R.E'jIED~ DISTRIBUTION I~ I~ i ~ •
CC&PS - DEM, NFIP •
n.
DEHNR - COASTAL MGT
DENP. LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRI'CULTL'RE iL`~G~
j r DC' 0%4
~E OF CL'L RESOURCES ~ ~ •
DEPT OF TRANSPOPTATION C-.\
MID EAST COMMISSION
PROJECT INFORMATIOIN
Z~ yI-CANT: I ~D T 1
TyI-. State- Fol_cy Acs ti~
ERD: Environmental Assessment
DESC: Propcsed wide-.ing of US 158 to a multi-_`aciiity beginning at the -r.te-,-sec' icn
the Nru_~_eesbc_~ -Pass and ending at US 11 in Winton.
CROSS-REF~EREI_~ BER. OC-E-4220-0134

Tne attac:r:ea cro~ect 1.as been submitted to the N. C. State Ciearin el.:se f:r
intergcvernmentai review. Please review and submit your response b,, `t.e abc•.re
::dicated date _0 Service Center, Raieigh NC 11699-1301.
~'me ,s needed, rlease _ ntact this efce at ;tiiG?C' -242.
•
•

-.S A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOL-OWING IS SUBMITTED:
?.;O COMMENT

CC'I]I^.ENTS AT7ACH7D •

I~-D BY:

DATE:

~f ~

•

• NCDENR
• North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
• Division of Coastal Management
• Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary

June 161'.2006 L

Ms. Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
f,, , J
41D) 06
Office of Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs, _
i~~
Oke
• N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 Mail Service Centers,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
• RE: SCH No. 06-0346. US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton,
Hertford County, TIP No. R-2583. Environmental Assessment dated 4/27/06.
Dear Ms. McGee:
•
The N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) appreciates the opportunity to comment on
the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the above referenced project. DCM received a copy of
• the EA for review through the State Clearinghouse on 6/5/06.
• This project is being carried through the NEPA/404 Merger Process, and DCM is a member of
• the NEPA/404 project team. A Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative
(LEDPA) has not yet been selected by the NEPA/404 project team.

The proposed project Nvill impact the following Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Areas
of Environmental Concern: Public Trust Area; and Public Trust Shoreline. Therefore, a CAMA
major permit will be required for the project. Please note that the following information on page
. 57 of the EA is erroneous: "The county is under the jurisdiction of the North Carolina Division
of Coastal Management (NCDCM); however, no Areas of Environmental Concern, as defined by
the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),are present within the study area." Likewise, the
following statement on page 77 of the EA is also erroneous: "Though there are no AECs within
the study area, DCM has determined that Potecasi Creek is a public trust water within the study
area. It is expected that NCDCM will require a CAMA permit for the project due to the
• proximity of the project to the Chowan River." A CAMA permit is required for this project due
to direct impacts to the Public Trust Area and Public Trust Shoreline CAMA AEC's, not due to
proximity of the project to the Chowan River.

• Except for the erroneous information as described above, it appears as though the information
contained within the EA is consistent with the information that has been provided to DCM. and
• upon which we have commented. through the NEPA/404 Merger Process.

•

•
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
• Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer- 50 Recycled 110%o Post Consumer Paper

•

0

•
o~
0
0
r S^ 0
•
•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA •
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0

MICHAEL F. EASLEY LANNY T. WILSON LYNDO TIPPETT 0
GOVERNOR BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION MEMBER SECRETARY •

•
April 8, 2008 0
0

The Honorable William M. Sue 0
Vice-Chairman, Brunswick County Commissioner 0
PO Box 249 •
Bolivia, North Carolina 28422-0249 •

0
Dear Mr. Sue: •

This is to acknowledge the receipt of the Brunswick County Commissioner's resolution 0
passed at their February 18, 2008 meeting. The resolution supported the Department's 0
recommended alternative for TIP Project R-3324, Brunswick County. 0

The proposed alternative of Long Beach Road (NC 133) would be a new connection •
between NC 211 to NC 87. This resolution reverses a previous resolution in support of a
private developer's alternative. The resolution will be forward to the appropriate 0
personnel within the Department for the record and assist in our efforts to improve this 40
areas traffic issues. S

Please let me know if you have any questions or need further information.
0
Sincerely, •

0
0
Lan, T. Wilson S

0
0
cc: H. Allen Pope, PE, Division Engineer 0
Charles Cox, Project Development Group Supervisor, Project Development and •
Environmental Analysis Unit
James Goodnight, PE, Project Engineer, Roadway Design Unit 0
0

•
1442 Quadrant Circle, Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Far: [phone] 0

AIN

• north Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
•
• Miichael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secreia '

MEMORANDUM /C t 06
. N~ 07

TO: Chrys Baggett old
State Clearinghouse

FROM: Melba McGee'
Environmental Review Coordinator
•
RE: 06-0346 EA for the Proposed US 158 Project from
• Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton in Hertford
County
•
. DATE: June 30, 2006
•
•
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has
• reviewed the proposed project.

Attached are comments made by our divisions in the course
of this review. We support continued coordination with the
Division of Forest Resources in identifying forestry information
• that will need to be evaluated in assessing the potential
• environmental impacts of this project. The comments provided by
the Division of Forest Resources should be addressed prior to the
• applicant circulating the FONSI.
• Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
•
•

• Attachments
•
•

•
•
•
• 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 l~®One
rthC~roliollna
• Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ Naturally
• An EQual 0PportunitY I Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 1 10 % Post Consumer Paper 0

MEMORANDUM

TO: Melba McGee - Environmental Coordinator - Office of Legislative &
Intergovernmental Affairs

FROM: David May - Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor - Nashington OL. i;y~ •

SUBJECT: US 158 - TIP Project R2583
Hertford County
Project No. 06-0346

DATE: June 6, 2006 •

The above referenced project was reviewed and the following comments are offered: .

1. Any environmental contamination (soil or groundwater) discovered during right-of-way
investigations shall be reported to the Washington Regional Office.

2. Water supply wells located on any right-of-way ht-of-v~a ro ert obtained shall be properly .
abandoned.

3. Any Confined Animal Feeding Operation affected by the project shall have its Animal
Waste Utilization Plan modified to reflect site changes.

Please contact me at 252-948-3939 should you have any questions regarding this matter.

1~ 3il>>
r
w9 }
,,5.: ~ 44~HL f , ~ •

l1lN~ r

~361 t)

•
•

•
State Project 6.079007T TIP#: R-2583 County: Hertford
•
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
l~ ~ "T~i/5 • SU ht7~ty ^Sv~.Fi?''~¢a/e 5 Tltaf"~
y~
• Project Description: Widen US 158 from Murfreesboro Bypass to,US 13 west of Winton
•
• On January 31, 2006 representatives of the

x North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
X North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
• ? Other
• Reviewed the subject project and agreed

? There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within
• the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.

• ® There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
• the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.

? There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
• the reverse.

• There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
• project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
• reverse.
Signed:

Representative, NCDOT Date

•

FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date

Representative, HPO Date

•
. tate Historic Preservation Officer Date
•

•
•
•

•

•

•
State Project 6.079007T TIP#: R-2583 County: Hertford •

Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is •
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).

Piv vl ozb ',v e5 ~ C ~ N~ o~dY CkurcA (I~ (Pry 8~ •
ip A.

r CPS age •

•

•
•

Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.

41~t - 7,_~~ 61~ CAI;)

/ro~ 14 laces rn aa/in
ptJXi'vr i~- ~ o hur&A C~pne_' Qr a.lfeYi~ e 5E 7,v1 of •
/ cev? xe+e. 0 55 Ia~d (e s e a l
C'. bv~f-Fer O.,Y'Q-P~ d ~-y~e y al f r ` •
ra-v e s o~na s •
o v, i y~ d iv i d v otA
•
•
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
•

•

•
•
•

•
•
•

Initialed: NCDOT FHWA HPO i~ •
•

•

•
•
•

•

•
STA7Z

• STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

• MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
. GOVERNOR SECRETARY
• May 21, 2008
• Mr. Peter Sandbeck, Administrator
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
• Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617

Mr. Sandbeck,
• Re: Preferred Corridor for the US 158 Murfreesboro Bypass Wining Project, Hertford County,
North Carolina, TIP No. R-2583, State Project No. 6.079007T, ER 02-10781.

• Thank you for your memorandum dated 19 Jul 2005, concurring with the steps proposed by the North
• Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to evaluate any adverse effects to the extant cultural
resources located either within or adjacent to the project. Since a "Preferred" Alternative has now been
chosen for this project, a meeting was held on Thursday, 15 May 2008, between representatives of the
• NCDOT Archaeology Group and the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) to discuss the need for additional
work for Site 31HF268** (a turn-of-the-century farmstead), Site 31HF272** (the Hollman Family
• Cemetery), and Site 31HF278** (a Civil War-era earthwork). At the conclusion of this meeting, it was
. determined that:
1) If Site 3IHF268**, which has been recommended as eligible for the National Register of
• Historic Places (NRHP) per Criterion D, can not be avoided by the proposed design, then an
archaeological data recovery investigation would be appropriate in order to mitigate adverse
• impacts to the site brought about by the proposed project. In anticipation, a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) between the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE). the State Historic
• Preservation Office (SHPO), and the NCDOT would be prepared.
• 2) Site 31HF272** can not be avoided by the proposed design. Recommended as not eligible for
the NRHP, the Hollman Family Cemetery (see Tippett 2004:100 [OSA Biblio#5351]), consisting
of one (1) marked grave and four (4) unmarked depressions, will be impacted by the project. We
• request that the Office of State Archaeology make the determination as to how the removal and
relocation of the gravesite(s) be treated, i.e. by following either NC General Statute 70, Article 3
• or NC General Statute 65. If treated under GS 65, removal and relocation will be handled by the
NCDOT Right-of-Wav Office. If treated under GS 70, Article 3, removal and relocation will be
• handled by the NCDOT Archaeology Group in consultation with the Right-of-Way Office, next-
of-kin (if found), and the Office of State Archaeology.
3) Additional work at Site 31HF278**, which has been recommended as eligible for the NRHP
• per Criteria A, C, and D, should first consist of a site visitation in order to determine the presence
of additional trench lines, which may or may not extend south from the known earthwork into the
corridor for the Preferred Alternative. If additional trench lines are located, an overlav of said
. trench lines and the Preferred Alternative will then be prepared. If an overlap of these two items
. occurs, then the steps outlined in our 13 Jun 2005 memo shall be followed in conjunction with
those proposed in the survey report (Tippett 2004:109 [OSA Biblio#5351 (i.e. synopsis of
• personal accounts and a systematic metal detector and/or remote sensing survey to locate potential
. artifact concentrations and features. If no overlap of these two items occurs, then no additional
work will be required for Site 31HF278**.
•
• MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE [phone] LOCATION:
• NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX'. 919-715-1522 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD, SUITE 168
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT UNIT. RALEIGH, NC 27604
. 1583 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT ORG
RALEIGH NC 27699-1583
•

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in this matter. Should you have any questions •
concerning this project. please contact me at [phone] or Mr. Paul J. Mohler, NCDOT
Archaeologist. at [phone].

Regards, •

Matt Wilkerson
Archaeology Supervisor •
Human Environment Unit
MTW/pjm •
0
cc: Charles Cox, PDEA PRAfr •
Jeffrey Teague, Roadway Design
Paul J. Mohler, Archaeology Group 0
Susan Myers, OSA •
John Mintz, OSA
Bill Biddlecome, COE .
0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
•
0

•
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0

• M~".C4

• JUL r

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources..
. State Historic Preservation Office - - - -
Peter 13. Sandbeck, Administrator
'S9ichacl I- I aslev, Govcmor Office of Archives and HistonJsbc th C. F;vans, Secretan Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey 11. Crou, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
•
•
• MEMORANDUM

• TO: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Division of Highways
• Department of Transportation

FROM: Peter Sandbeck F- ?
• v
• RE: Proposed Corridor for the US 158 Murfreesboro Bypass Widening Project, R-2583, Hertford
• County, ER 02-10781

DATE: July 19, 2005
•

Thank you for your letter of June 13, 2005, transmitting the additional information concerning this project.
We believe that the steps proposed by the North Carolina Department of Transportation to evaluate any
adverse effects to the extant cultural resources located either within or adjacent to the project adequately
• addresses our concerns.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
• Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
• Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and considerations. If you have any questions concerning the above
• comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all
• future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.

•
•
•
•

•
•
•
• Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 511' N. Mount Street, Raleigh NC 4677 Mad Service Ccntcr, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 ")19)711 4763 733-9653
RESTORATION 575 N. BI-ot Street. Raleigh NC 4617 Mad Service Ccntcr, Raleigh NC 27699-461 - 1919)73) 6547 '715 4901
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N 131ount Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mid Service Center, Raleigh uC 2769) 461 (9191'31-6545'715-49n1
•
•

AM SV.7[ •

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA .
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT •
GOVERNOR SECRETARY •
June 13, 2005
Mr. Peter Sandbeck, Administrator .
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617 •

Dear Mr. Sandbeck, .
Re: Proposed Corridor for the U.S. 158 Murfreesboro Bypass Widening Project, Hertford County,
North Carolina, TIP No. R-2583, State Project No. 6.079007T, Division 1, ER 02-10781. •

Three, instead of two, alternatives for this road improvement project now currently exist: 1) widening on
existing, 2) a northern bypass near Mt. Tabor Baptist Church, and 3) a southern bypass near Mt. Tabor •
Baptist Church. The previous archaeological survey (Tippett 2004), prepared by our archaeology
consultants, covered the first two alternatives, but not the third. On July 9, 2004, S14PO concurred with the
findings of this report. The southern bypass route was an alternative that the NCDOT had previously •
dropped prior to ordering environmental studies, but recently reintroduced to the agencies during the most
recent merger meeting (May 19, 2005). NCDOT had eliminated this particular alternative from •
consideration since it involves a new crossing of Potecasi Creek in a new location. •
However, now that the agencies have approved this third alternative (even though it was previously •
eliminated from consideration), a request was made for supplemental input regarding cultural resources that
may be located within the new location section only of the southern bypass alternative (extending south of
Mt. Tabor Baptist Church). In addition, the Archaeology Section has been asked that the boundaries of Site
31 HF278 be verified in order to confirm its coordinates represent the extent of the site or if an additional
buffer should be added. Representing a Civil War-period earthwork, Site 31HF278 was recommended as •
eligible for the NRHP per Criteria A, C, and D. It was previously recommended that if this site were to be •
impacted by the proposed project, mitigation efforts would be implemented. At this time, it is believed that
the first two alternatives will have no impact to the Civil War earthwork; however, based on its design and •
orientation, it is believed that the third alternative will impact Site 31HF278. .
Even though the limits of the Civil War earthworks are unknown at this time, preliminary background •
research has revealed that a line of Confederate trenches extended south from Site 31HF278 to a small
unnamed tributary of Potecasi Creek. Overlooking Hill's Bridge from atop two bluffs, this line of trenches
defended the old road between Winton and Murfreesboro. •
On June 8, 2005, a discussion was held with Lee Tippett (Berger) who conducted the archaeology survey of •
the project corridor on behalf of the NCDOT Archaeology Section. Based on the information presented, •
the area west of Potecasi Creek that would be included within the expansion of the Area of Potential
Effects (APE) for the third alternative is believed to have a low potential for containing intact .
archaeological remains aside from Site 31HF278, whose limits may extend into the expanded APE. The •
low potential is based on the fact that much of the terrain in this area has already been surveyed, slopes into
the unnamed tributary mentioned above, and shows numerous signs of previous timbering and bulldozing •
activities. The area east of Potecasi Creek that would be included within the expansion of the APE is also
believed to have a low potential for containing intact archaeological remains. This low potential is based
on the fact that much of the terrain in this area has already been surveyed or can be categorized as almost
hydric, with a very high water table.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION: •
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING .
OFFICE OF HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD, SUITE 168
1583 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT ORG RALEIGH. NC 27604 •
RALEIGH NC 27699-1583
•

Based on a brief meeting with Dolores Hall (OSA) and John Mintz (OSA) on June 10, 2005, the NCDOT
Archaeology Section recommends that additional work should be conducted only if this third alternative is
chosen as the preferred for the proposed project. Such work would then be focused on Site 31HF278
consisting of, but not limited to, a site visitation to determine the presence of additional trench lines and a
. synopsis of personal accounts, some of which have already been located at the State Library, Southern
Historical Collection (UNC-CH), and Special Collections (Duke). References from the Official Record may
also be compiled. In addition, the NCDOT Archaeology Section also irecommends that if one of the previous
• two alternatives is chosen as the preferred, design plans will be reviewed in order to determine if the
proposed activity will impact Site 31 HF278. A site visitation may also be required for such a determination.
• We look forward to receiving your comments. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you
have any questions concerning this project, please contact me at [phone] or Mr. Paul J. Mohler,
NCDOT Archaeologist, at [phone].
Regards,

Matt Wilkerson
Archaeology Supervisor
Office of Human Environment

• MTW/pjm
• cc: Dolores Hall, OSA
Beth Smyre, PDEA
. Paul J. Mohler, Human Environment Unit
• Lee Tippett, Berger

i
e „a SL'tTF' o~ •

•

i
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources •
State Historic Preservation Office
Michael F. Easle}, Governor Office of Archives and Histon, •
Lisheth C. Evans- Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow- Deputy, Secretary
David Brook, Director •
•
July 9, 2004 •
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: Gregory J. Thorpe, Manager •
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation

FROM: David Brook Mf~ - •
SUBJECT: Proposed Corridor for the US 158 Murfreesboro Bypass Widening Project, Hertford County,
R-2583, ER02-10781 •

Thank you for your letter of June 3, 2004, transmitting the archaeological survey report by The Louis Berger •
Group, Inc., for the above project. .

For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the
following property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under criterion D:
31HF268, and that archaeological site 31HF278 is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic •
Places under criterion A, C and D. These two sites have the potential to yield new information about the •
historic archaeology of the Coastal Plain, specifically archaeological site 31HF268 a farmstead occupied for
the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century and archaeological site 31HF278 a Civil War period earth
work.
•
The following properties are determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places: •
31HF260, 31HF261, 31HF262, 31HF263, 31HF264, 31HF265, 31HF266, 31HF267, 31HF269, 31HF270,
31HF271, 31HF272, 311117273, 31HF274, 31HF275, 31HF276, 31HF277, 31HF279. These properties do not •
retain the level of integrity nor do they possess the potential to yield significant new information pertaining to
the prehistory of North Carolina. •

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the •
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
•
•

•
Location Mailing Address TelephoneNai •
ADMmISTRATION 507 N Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mad Sen'ice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-767 7 (919)7_3- 763,733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 2 7699-46 1 7 X919)73313547/715-4801
SURVEY & PLAPNNLNG 515 N Blount Street, Raleigh. NC 4617 Mail Serwce Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 9141 3= 545 715. 14 01
•
•

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earle-, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4163. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.

cc: Louis Berger, Raleigh

• bc: --(~lagget/'vtintz
Counts-

0

0
•
0

0
0
•
0

r

0

0
0
0

0

SGVF.

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator •
Michael F. Easlev, Governor Division of Historical Resources •
Lisbeth C. Evans. Secretary David J. Olson, Director
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary .
November 23, 2002

MEMORANDUM

TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager
NCDOT Division of Highways

FROM: David Brooke El`,f1 1,_<EI

SUBJECT: Scoping US 158 Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of Winston, R-2583,
Hertford County, ER02-10781 •

Thank you for your memorandum of October 22, 2002, concerning the above project. Please
replace this memorandum for the one incorrectly dated September 16, 2002.

Because the architectural survey for the area of potential effect is more than 20 years old, we •
recommend that a Department of Transportation architectural historian identify and evaluate any
structures over 50 years old and report the findings to us.

In terms of archaeological resources, this area of the state is extremely rich in prehistoric occupation
sites. Several different types of archaeological sites have been recorded within the area, ranging
from temporary hunting camps, to larger base camps, to more sedentary occupation sites. Several
archaeological sites of the historic period are also recorded within the study area. We, therefore, •
recommend that a comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted on the project area. •

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800. •
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above .
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number. •

DB:doc

cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT •
vMatt Wilkerson, NCDOT

Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax •
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
Restoration 15 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone] .715-4801
0
?lount~A. Raieieh, `!C '611; `Jaii S(°r;icc+_,nter, aiegh =751/11-4613 191"%3 X763 %15-x801

•
•
•

•
•
0 R-2583

•
• Appendix C

• (NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Signature
•
• Sheets)
•
•

•

•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

0

Section 404/NEPA Interagency Agreement

Concurrence Point No. 2A: Bridging and Alignment Review

Project Title: Widening of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West
of Winton, Hertford County; WBS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.

The project team has concurred with the following bridging t`ecommendations:

Site Location Stream Bridging Recommendation
• Alt A, B, C: Retain & Extend Existing 2 a,, 12-
1 Between SR 1305 & Trib to Potecasi Creek ft x 6ft RCBC
SR 1167 (SD) • Alt A2, B2, C2: Construct the same on new
location
2 Just east of SR 1334 potecasi Creek (SB) • Alt A, B: Replace with dual 200-ft bridges

2a South of Site 2 on potecasi Creek (SB) • Alt C: New dual bridges @ y -ft
New Location
Between SR 1174
11 Mill Branch (overflow) • Retain & Extent 1 @ 8.5-ft x 3-ft RCBC
3 and SR R
1175 T
4 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (SA, main 0 Retain & Extent 1 @ 10-ft x 4-ft RCBC
and SR 1175 crossing)
5 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (overflow) • Retain & Extent 1 @ 9-ft x 5-ft RCBC
and SR 1175
6 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (overflow) . Retain & Extent 1 C& 6-ft x 3-ft RCBC
and SR 1175
S
NAME AGENCY DATE
. NCDOT !'1 D8
USAGE

USEPA 1 f 1 7 ~z,

• USFWS

a NMFS

NCDWQ

NCDCM i 71C
J
NCWRC

NCDMF

NCSHPO

0

Section 404/NEPA Interagency Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 2A: Bridging and Alignment Review

Proiect Title: Wideni iig of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West
of Winton, Hertford County; WBS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.

The project team has concurred with the following bridging remninendations:

Site Location Stream Bridging Recommendation
• Alt A, B, C, Retain & Extend Existing 2 C 12- •
1 Between SR 13C5 & Trib to Potecasi Creek ft x 6fl RCBC
SR 1167 (SD) • Alt A2, 132, C2: Construct the same on new
location east •

2 Just
Potecasi Creek (SB) • Alt A, B: Replace with dual 200-ft bridges .
SR 1334 of
2a South of Site 2 on New Location Potecasi Creek (SD) • Alt C: New dr.al bridges @ ~qo_-fl lAffoy'
3 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (overflow) • Retain & Extent l @ 8.5-ft x 341 RCBC
and SR 1175 , • •
4 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (SA, main • Retain & Extent 1 @ 10-ft x 4-ft RCBC
and SR 1175 crossing)
5 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch
and SR 1175 (overflow) Retain & Extent 1 (a; 9-ft x 5-f3 RCBC
Between SR 1174
) Retain 8z Extent 1 @ 6-ft x 3=ft RCBC
$ and SR 1175 Mill Branch (overflow) 0
i
MOTE AGENCY DATE 0
NCDOT l7 dS 0
USACE •
YY~w f
` y USEPA t f t I,~eo$ 0
USFWS J. •
i7 / Zook ~
NMFS 0

NCDWQ S
~7 6 0
NCDCM '
~7 .
NCWRC ~~-ate
NCDMF

0
NCSHPO •

.
0

0

• _ ~c~nw g ?s Y(: DCT FDE 28^

•

•
• Section 404,'NtPA Interagency Agreement
• Concurrence Point No. 2A: Bridging and Alignment Review

• Project Title: Widening of US 159 from the MurTTeesboro Bypass to US 3 West
• of `Vinton, Hertford. County; W13S No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.
•
• 'Phe project tcain has cottctai-red with the following bridging recommendations:

• Site Location Stream Brid;_Ging Recommendation
• * Alt A, 13, C: Retain & Extend ]existing 2 @ 12-
• 1 Between Sit 1305 & Trib to Potecosi Creek ft x b'ft, RCBC
SR 1167 (SD) > Alt A2, B2, C2: Construct the same on new
location
• .lust east of Potecssi Creek (S.B) • Alt A. B; Replace with dual 200-f4 bridges
SR 1334
Sotuh of Site 2 on ?
Patecasi Creek (SD) • Alt C' New dual landges @p -ft r~
• New Location
}Between SR 11 74
• 3 and SK 1 175 Mill Branch (overflow) • Retain & Extent 1 (c. 8.5-ft x 3-11 12C13C
• 4 Betwcen SR 1174 Mill Brant h (SA, main * Rctain & Extent 1 @ 1.0-ft x 4-ft RC73C: l
and SR 117 crossiri
• ~ F3en 1174
Mill Branch (overflow) • Rerain & Extent 1 @ 4-ft x 5-fl. RCBC
<Lndmd SR 1 1175 5
G Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (overflow) • Retain & Fxteni 1 ( 6-ft x 3-ft RCSC
and SR 1175
•
• N AKE AGENCY DATE
• NCDQT 17
USACE
• ,0 ~ USEPA E / f1 1 -r s Qa $
• USEWS 1 l-7 /:k-60?

• % NMFS a r

• NC17WQ 7/6
~
• j NCDCM I D

NCWRC
NC>)3v1F

• NcsHPO

•
•
•

•

•
•

Section 4041NhPA Interagency Agreement •
Concurrence Point No. 2A: Bridging and Alignment Review •
•
Praiert Trite: Widening of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West •
of Winton, Hertford County; WIGS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583. •

The project team has concurred with the following bridging r0commendations: •

Bridging Recommendation
Sete Lncatinn Stream
• Alt A, B, C; Rctain & Cxtend Existing 2 @ 12- •
1 Bcrween SR 1305 & Trib to Potecasi Creek ft x 5ft RCBC •
SR 1167 (SD) • Alt A2; B2, C2. Construct the Fame on new •
looation
Just east of
2 poter~?gi Crock (0) • Alt A, B: Replace with dual 240-fl bridges
SR 1334
South of Site 2 on poteetrcasi Creek (SB) • Alt C. , New duaJ bridgeS g 3qq -ft •
ca New Location
3 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (overflow) • Retain & Extent l @ 8.5-ft x 341 RC13C
and SR 1175 •
4 Bexw n SR 1174 Mill HranZh (SA, main 6 Rctain & Extent 1 @ l0-1R x 4-ft RCBC
a.rtd SR 1175 crassv1 ` •
5 Between SR 1174 Mill Branch (overflow) • Rctain & Extent 1 G 9-ft x 5-ft RCBC I
and SR 1175
6 Between SR 11'74 Mill Branch (overflow) + Retain & Extent ; 6- fl x 3-ft RC13C •
and SR 1175
NAME AGENCY DATE •
NCDQT j /y7 •
USACE R •
i •
USEPA
USFWS ) )7 ~aa$ •

NM.FS ! •
•
NCDWQ ' •

D i
NCDCM 17
NCWRC I- •

NCDMr- •
•
NCSHPO as-o 8 •
•
•

•
•

•
•

• Section 404/NEPA Interagency Agreement
• Concurrence Point No. 3: Least Environmentally Damaging Practical
Alternative (LEDPA)/ Preferred Alternative
•
Project Title: Widening of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West
• of Winton, Hertford County; "S No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.

•
The project team has concurred that the Alternative U- is the LEDPA for Project R-2583.

•
•
NAME AGENCY DATE

• NCDOT

• USACE '

• C~ l ~1~~ USEPA
• tiJ ,
USFWS -7 61013

• NMFS
•
NCDWQ

, L 'M?v~ NCDCM 'I 7,

NCWRC

• NCDMF
•
• NCSHPO
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

i
•
•

•
•
•

•

•

Section 444/N~'EPA. Interagency Agreement •
Concurrence Point No. 3: Least Environmentally Damaging Practical •
Alternative (LEDPA)/ Preferred Alternative •
•
_Project Title: Widening of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West ~
of Minton, Hertford Cour.g., W13S No. 35489, TIP Project R-2-583. •

•
The project team has concurred that the Alternative L- is the LEDPA. for Project R-25$3. •
•

NAME AGENCY DATE
1 ~
•
NCDOT '774A R
USACC + 7 1
•
f) iJSEPA f{ 2'OCa •

USFWS '1 00 r3 •
•
~ ~ NMFS
NCw'VQ f ag •

NCDCM

NCWRC
I iz
NCDMF •

j NCSHPO •

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•

i
•
Section 404/NEPA Interagency Agreement

i Concurrence Point No. 3: Least Environmentally Damaging Practical
i Alternative (LEDPA)/ Preferred Alternative

Project Title: Wid.enbig of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West
of Winton, Hertford County; WBS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.

The project team has concurred that the Alternative is the LEDPA for Pro'ect R-2583.

i NAME AGENCY DATE

i NCDOT t /7 d~
i
i USACE

LJSEPA d r
i 71~ao8
i USFWS

i NMFS
•
' NCDWQ
l1 6
NCDCM 17

i NCWRC

NCDMF

i NCSHPO

i

i
•
•

•

•

i

•

Section 404/NEPA Interagency Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 4A: Avoidance and Minimization

Project Title: Widening of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West
of Winton, Hertford County; WBS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.

The project team has concurred with the following avoidance/ minimization techniques:

• • Mill Branch - shift roadway south to reduce impacts to wetlands WD, WC, and WB.
• East terminus - shift roadway north to minimize impacts to wetland WA.
• Alternatives B and C - added to avoid impacts to the Historic Mount Tabor Baptist Church
and its cemetery.
0 Alternatives A2, B2, and C2 - added to minimize impacts to the minority community of
Mapleton, as well as the historic Britt Store.
• • Construct longer bridge across Potecasi Creek in order to minimize impacts to wetland WV
300 (approximately 390 feet).
0 A portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may be removed east of the old Potecasi Creek
crossing as mitigation, pending further investigation.
• Include the removal of the existing culvert just east of Mapleton (Site SD and WPP). A
• portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may also be removed as mitigation pending further
investigation.
• 3:1 side slopes in wetland areas.

NAME AGENCY DATE

2 Z~~ NCDOT D$

jg& USACE /Dg

' USEPA I -7 o,

USFWS
I• NMFS

NCDWQ

n
NCDCM l 17
NCWRC I_ ~7 Zcc

NCDMF

NCSHPO

•
•

Section 4041NEPA Interagency Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 4A: Avoidance and Minimization
•
Project Title: Widening of L''S 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West •
of Winton, Hertford County; WBS No. 35489, TCP Project R-2583. •

•
The project team has concurred with the following avoidance/ minimization techniques:

•
• Mill Branch - shift roadway south to reduce impacts to wetlands WD, WC, and WB. •
• East terminus - shift roadway north to minimize impacts to wetland WA. .
• Alternatives B and C - added to avoid imparts to the Historic Mount Tabor Baptist Churc'a •
and its cemetery.
• Alternatives A2, B2, and C2 - added to minimize impacts to the minority community of
Mapleton, as well as the historic Brits Store. •
• Construct longer bridge across Potecasi Creek in order to minimize impacts to wetland R'V
300 (approximately 390 feet). •
• A portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may be removed east of the old Potecasi Creek •
crossing as mitigation, pending further investigation. •
• Include the removal of the existing culvert just east of Mapleton (Site SD and WPP). A •
portion of the existing US 158 roadbed May also be removed as mitigation pending further
investigation.
• 3:1 side slopes in wetland areas. •

TAME AGENCY DATE •

NCDOT / iy d s

tall USACE ? jD8 •
USEPA ~ ~ ! r a ~ •
•
USFWS
-7 /2069 •
L
•
NMFS •
NCDWQ
/7 G •
NCDCM l 17)0
•
NCWRC zco •

NCSHPO •

•

•
•
•

•

D~4
~y: IDJ- PDE'=- ~'12Sc72CB ~8 1. 475
i

Section 404fNEPA Interagency Agreement
Coneurrence Point No. 4A: Avoidance and Minimization

• Proiect Title: Widening of US 158 from the MurhFesboro Bypass to US ] 3 Vest

of Winton.. Hertford County; VMS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.
s
• nie project team has concurred with the following avoidance/ minimization tcelmiques.

w Mill Branch shift roadway south to reduce impacts to wetlands WD, WC, and WB.
e East terminus - shift roadway north to miai.tnize impacts to wetland WA.
Ah mntives B and C -added to avoid impacts to the Historic Mount Tabor Baptist Church
• and its cemetery.
ARL-matives A2, 132, and C2 added to minimize impacts to,thc minority comnataruty of
Mapleton, as well as the historic Britt Store.
• Construct longer bridge across Potecasi Creek in order to minimize impacts to wetland
• 300 (approximatety 390 feet),
« A portion of the existing US 153 roadbed may be removed east of the old Potecasi Creek
crossing as mitigation, pending further investigation.
* Include the rernoval of the existing culvezt.1tist east of Mapleton (Site SD and WPP). A
portion of the existing US 158 roadbed may also be removed as mitigation pending fi.trther
investigation.
i « 3:1 side slopes in wetland areas.

• NAME AGENCY DATE
J, I NCDOT /-7 A

USAC,E
r
USEPA J l 7 ,

n USFWS -7 069

NMFS

NCDWQ

• NCDCAI l 1 j

' NC w7tC l 17- ago ~r
• NCDMI F

NICS14PO j ~

•

Section 404/NEPA Interagency Agreement •
Concurrence Point No. 4A: Avoidance and Minimization •
•

Project Title: Widening of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West •
•
of Winton, Hertford County; WBS No. 35489, TIP Project R-2583.

The project team has conctu-red with the following avoidance/ minimization techniques: •

• NCII Branch - shift roadway south to reduce impacts to wetlands WD, TAW C, and WB. •
• Fast terminus - shift roadway north to minimize impacts io wetland •
• Alternatives B and C - added to avoid unpacts to the Histonc Mount Tabor Baptist Church •
and its cemetery.
is Alternatives A2, B2, w.nd C2 - added to minimize impacts to the minotity community of •
Mapleton, as well as the historic Britt Store.
Construct longer bridge across Potecasi Creek in order to minimize impacts to wetland WV •
3C0 (approximately 390 feet).
A portion of the exisnng US 158 roadbed may he removed east of the old Potecasi Creek •
crossing as nutigation, pending f irther investigation. •
• lnclade the removal of the existing culvert just east of Mapleton (Site SD and WPP). A •
portion of the existing US 159 roadbed may also be removed as mitigation pending further •
investigation. •
8 3:I side slopes in wetland areas.
I •
•
NAME AGENCY BATE
/J NCDOT / /7 ~4 i •
USACE

J t1SEPA r+ 17 o •

USFWS ( 7 zAD~ •
•
NMFS •
i •
NCUWQ e •
NCDCM ' 7 S •

NCWRC I7 z~5 •

NCBMF •

NCS14PO 1' •
' r
•

•
•
•

•
N[i I LHiI,~~=;~~d 1 dpl'-, I H 31H1' :9 T =,t=~t=t= c =