20170374 Ver 1_B-4770 Nationwide Johnston March 29 2017_20170330

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
March 29, 2017
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Ofiice
2407 West St'' Street
Washington, NC 27889
Attention: Mr. Tom Steffens
NCDOT Coordinator
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23 and Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Authorization for replacement of Bridge No. 32 over Hannah
Creek on SR 1185 (Joyner Bridge Road), Johnston County, Federal Aid Project
No. BRZ-1185(2), TIP No. B-4770.
Debit $240.00 from WBS Element No. 38542.1.1
Dear Sir,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge
No. 32. Bridge No. 32 is a 150-foot bridge to be replaced with a 165-foot bridge on existing
alignment. The new bridge will include two 10-foot lanes in each direction and 4-foot shoulders
on each side. Traffic will be detoured offsite.
Please find enclosed the Pre-Construction Notiiication (PCN) form, United States Fish and
Wildlife concurrence letter, North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services acceptance letter,
stormwater management plan, pernut drawings, and roadway design plans for the above
referenced project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project
on February 29, 2016, and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available at the
NCDOT website: https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/
The proposed let date for the project is August 15, 2017 with a review date of June 27, 2017.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Pernut: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that the project be authorized by a NW 23 for bridge construction.
MailingAddress: Telephone.• [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION Custamer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH, NC 27699
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1598 Website: www.ncdot.gov

Section 401 Pernut: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 4093 and a Neuse Riparian
Buffer Authorization will apply to this proj ect. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted at the NCDOT website at
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/. Should you have any questions regarding
this information, please contact Deanna Riffey at [phone] or [e-mail]
Sincerely,
�o� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M., Manager
Natural Environment Section
cc: NCDOT Pernut Application Standard Distribution List

���� W A T,E',��G
� �.
I I � �,
„�,, � �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 32 on SR 1185 (Joyner Bridge Road) over Hannah Creek
2b. County: Johnston
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Newton Grove
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4770
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Streetaddress:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.387319 Longitude: - 78.338661
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 4.73 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Hannah Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land use within the vicinity is agriculture and large timber tracts, interspersed with rural residences.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.3 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
250 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge 32 is considered structurally deficient and is functionally obsolete due to structure and substructure conditions.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacement of existing Bridge No. 32 , a 150 -foot bridge, with a 165-foot bridge. The new bridge
will have 10-foot travel lanes in each direction with 3-foot shoulders on each side. The new bridge will be placed on the
same alignment as the existing bridge. Traffic will be detoured offsite. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks,
dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: JD packages were sent to USACE in May and
July 2013
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Calyx (Mulkey)
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres)
Temporary (T)
Site 2/3 � P❑ T Fill Bottomland Hardwood Foresl � Yes � Corps 0.02
Site 2/3 � P ❑ T
Site1-4 �P❑T
Site 2/3 ❑ P � T
Site2 ❑P❑T
Site3 ❑P❑T
Site4 ❑P❑T
Site5 ❑P❑T
Site6 ❑P❑T
Site7 ❑P❑T
Excavation Bottomland Hardwood
Mechanized gottomland Hardwood
Clearing
Fill Bottomland Hardwood
Choose One
Choose One
Choose One
Choose One
Choose One
Choose One
❑ No
� Yes
❑ No
� Yes
❑ No
� Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
2g.
❑ DWQ
� Corps
❑ DWQ
� Corps
❑ DWQ
� Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Total wetland impacts
� ��
0.11
0.15 ac Perm
0.01 ac Temq
2h. Comments: There will be 0.15 ac of hand clearing and <0.01 ac of fill due to bents in wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, width
Temporary (T) (INT)? 10 (feet)
Site1 ❑P❑T
Site2 ❑P❑T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
3h. Tota
3i. Comments: There will be <0.01 ac of fill due to bents in surface waters
DWQ — non-
404, other)
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
I stream and trib�
itary impacts
0 ft Perm
0 ft Tema

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑POT
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent
X Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Flo
Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surFace area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individuaily list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) required?
B1 � P❑ T Bridge Hannah � NoS 2,784 767
B2 � P❑ T Bridge Hannah � No 4,186 1,344
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts I 6,970 I 2,111
6i. Comments:
C.�

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Replace in place was incorporated to minimize water resources impacts along with lengthening the bridge. Roadway
drainage sheet flows over grassed slopes before entering wetlands. Other than no build the minimal effects to the
wetlands and stream on this project is unavoidable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be employed. Also, there will be an
Anadromous Fish Moratorium from February 15th to June 30tn
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain:
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: � warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.15 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and DifFuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. DifFuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from the bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
� Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS county list and NCNHP database along with field surveys.
Surveys last conducted for Michaux's sumac on October 19, 2016. Habitat is present, but no Michaux's sumac were
found during survey. Biological conclusion is No Effect. Habitat was not found in the study area for red-cockaded
woodpecker. Biological conclusion is No Effect. Habitat for dwarf wedgemussel and Tar spinymussel was found in study
area. Surveys were done October 4, 216, but no dwarf wedgemussels or Tar spinymussels were found. Biological
conclusion is May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect. See attached USFWS concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Digitally signed by Colin Mellor
C o I i n M e I I o r DN: cn=Colin Mellor, o=NCDOT, ou=NES,
Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. ema��=�me��°�@^�d°t.9°�,�=us 03/29/2017
s�o'� Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date:2017.03.2814:56:08-04�00� Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
11

Environmental
Quality
ROY COOPER
Goverrror
March 20, 2017
Mr. Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., CPM
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4770, Replace Bridge 32 over Hannah Creek on SR 11 S5, Johnston County
The purpose of this letter is ko notify you that the Division of Mitigarion Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory wetland initigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on March 17,
2017, the impacts are located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse 1Ziver basin in the Northern Inner Coastal Plain (NICP}
Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Neuse
03020201
NICP
Impacts (feet/acres)
Stream
Cold Cool Warm
0 0 0
Wetlands
Riparian Non- Coastal
Riparian Marsh
0.15 0 0
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Zone 1 � Zone 2
0
*Some of the stream and/or wetland impacts may be praposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit
application for details.
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mit�gation acceptance letter issued on December 2U,
2016. DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accardance with the In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will
no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be reyuired from DMS.
If yau have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harman at 919-707-8420.
cc: Mr. Tom Steffens, USACE — W
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
File: B-4770 Revised
��
B. Stanfill
Management Supervisor
Field Office
�Nothing Compares�
State of North Carolina Enviranmental Qualiry
217 West Jones Street I 1607 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27649-1601
979 707 8600

United States Department of �he Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ralei�h Field Office
Aost Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-372b
.r�,�y g, 2017
Philip S. Harris III, P.E, C.P.M
Narth Carolina Departrnent of Transportation
PDEA — Natural Envirorunent Section
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Nort� Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Harris:
Tfus letter is in response to your letter of December 20, 2016 which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Caralina Department of
Transportation (NCD4T) that the replacement of Br�dge No. 32 on SR I 185 over Hannah Creek
in Johnston County (TIP No. B-�770) may affect, but is not likely ta adversely afFect the
federa[ly endangered dwarf wedgemussel {Alasmidonta heterodon} and Tar River spinymusse[
{Elliptio steinstansana). In additian, NCDOT has determined that the project will have no effect
on the federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and Michaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii}. The following respanse is provided in accordance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to information provided, a mussei survey was conducted at the project site on October
4, 2016. The survey extended 100 meters upstream and 400 meters downstream of 5R 1185.
Neither of the federal[y listed mussel species was found, and habitat qua�ity for the twa species
was only marginally suitable. Only a single mussel specimen was observed during the survey, of
the common species Elliptio complanata.
Based on the mussel survey results and the lack of good habitat, the Service concurs with your
conclusion that the prapased bridge replacement may affect, but is not likely to adversely sffect
the dwarf wedgemussel and Taz River spinymussel. We also concur that the project will have no
effect on the red-cockaded woodpecker (due to lack of ha�itat) and Michaux's sumac (due to no
specimens being observed durang an October 19, 2016 survey. We believe that the requirements
of Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied. We remind you that abligations urider Section
7 consultation must be recansidered if: (1} new information reveals impacts of this identified
action that may affect listed species or critical �abitat in a manner not previously cansidered in
this review; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
review; or {3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be afFected by this
identified action.

The Service appreciates the opportuni�}+ to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at {919} 85�-4520 {Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
�- Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Electronic copy:
Deanna Riffey, NCDOT, RaIeigh, NC
Tom Steffens, USACE, Washing#on, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC

0 �j�����,��y North Carolina Department of Transportation
Sfi41"1134V�3tP1' , I�
„w,. �.,e� Highway Stormwater Program �-��
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ----
(Version 2.06; Reieased June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 38542.1.1 TIP No.: B-4770 Count ies : Johnston Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 38542.1.1 TIP Number. B-4770 Pro'ect T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 8/22/2016
NCDOT Contact: Paul Atkinson, PE Contractor I Designer: Erik Seiler
Address: NCDOT Address: NCDOT
1590 Mail Service Center 1590 Mail Service Center
Ralei h, NC 27699-1590 Ralei h, NC 27699-1590
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: patkinson ncdot.gov Email: epseiler ncdot. ov
Cit /Town: Count ies): Johnston
River Basin s: Neuse CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Descri tion
Pro'ect Length (lin. miles or feet : 0.195 miles Surrounding Land Use:
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-Upon Area (ac.) ac. ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: ROADWAY HAVING TWO 10' TRAVEL LANES IN EACH DIRECTION WITH A 4' ROADWAY HAVING TWO 10' TRAVEL LANES IN EACH DIRECTION WITH A
OUTSIDE GRASS SHOULDER. TOTAL PAVEMENT WIDTH IS 20'. VARIABLE (2'-6') OUTSIDE GRASS SHOULDER . TOTAL PAVEMENT WIDTH IS
20'.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (vehlhrlday): Desi n/Future: 618 Year: 2037 Existin : 436 Year: 2017
General Project Narrative: REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 32 OVER HANNAH CREEK. THE RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE IS 1@50' 21"CS, 1@65' 24"CS, 1@50' 21"CS, WITH 4' DEEP CAP. THIS
(�escription of Minimization of Water PROJECT HAS A STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COLLECTING BRIDGE DISCHARGE W HICH W ILL BE DISSIPATED BY A RIP RAP PAD AT THE PIPE OUTLET LOCATED
Quality Impacts) AT TOE OF FILL. ROADWAY DRAINAGE SHEET FLOWS OVER GRASSED SLOPES BEFORE ENTERING WETLANDS. THERE ARE NO DECK DRAINS ON THIS
BRIDGE.
Waterbod Information
Surface Water Body (1): Hannah Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-52-6
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Su lemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification: None
Im airments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justifcation in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

�
U
W
�
�
�
�
S� �°�'1G fl� T'�'(�1P.'1['1T�[ L�'r� lf�'fl�.,l[1�7�
1D]I2y���[�fll�; ���' 1[�[I�C�I-�'�V a�`S'�S
JOH11lST0111 CO U11lTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE 1V0. 32 OVER HANIVAH CREEK
OIY SR 1185 (JOYNER BRIDGE RD)
� � �+��������� �
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRA7IYAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4770
-�- rvi SiA. iu+iu.uu
--- Jt 1 BtiiU :� h�r� `, � l;!`i�
= TO PEACH ORCHARD RD BEGIN BRIDGE
(SR 1148) —L— POT STA. 15+262
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
THIS PROIECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL 80UNDRIES.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
�11���
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
DESlGN DATA
ADT 2017 = 440
ADT 2037 = 620
K = 10 %
D = 60 %
T = 5 % '
V = 60 MPH
' TTST =2% DUAL=3%
FUNC CLA55 = LOCAL
SUB—REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
�
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROIECT B-4770 = 0.163 MI.
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-4770 = 0.032 MI.
TOTAL LENGTH OP TIP PROJECT B-4770 = 0.795 ML
END TIP PROJECT B-4770
-L- POT STA. 20+40.00 I
Pre�rep In rM p((Ice a/:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
�ana dr.d� le;de� m., tmt.��ee n'c, z�um
�uu snte��:wn srea��rcei«irvx
RfGHT OF W.9P DATE: GARY LOVERING, PE
AUGUST 25.2016 ��"""",�"""""
LETTING DATE: I KANCHANA NOLAND
AUGUST 75 2017 +'Ro�acrnssmrv cxcnarrs
���, B-4770
'38542.1.1 BRZo1185f21
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
20�,
�a�P
�p,0
TO DEVILS RACETRACK RD —
(SR 1009)
HY'DRr1 ULlCS ENGINEER
ROADKAY' DESIGN
ENGINEER
oocumexrxorcox
YNLE85 CLl SIGNGTVRES COMPLETEO

\
� _- -
�
��\ � �I
�
J�4E5 QPMO�[S
Q�
_.. ____ . ��.. ...�`�- .- ' � ��e�B-4770�n �nec�No
..; � • �`�� �'`�� ''�.,-- xm sneerno
TLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT ) �� -' �' '`-�"'' � a�a�wA•�E���N ���������_
� . � .`.' � '��tt� �'i en�iHEea �cweerz
i ��. �� � i s: � � i �. �: i/ r 1 �l � Awavw wvnon �
� ( c
SfTE 2 � i� r� �/i�'�\�I � � , � +� �� - �
SITE 3' � i .
" _— hxuvnnoN — I�� � � �I� 7 � � /�� � �� � r` , � �_� � � !
�"w weru�os ' I S, �� 2 � �� l 9 ¢ �.`_ �
I
' . ,15+00 � {�� - � �� �� i � � noe[nrs� u� �i, �i ooucirs xtiu�1s � oouc�ws xcuua 1 "r"`� '��: 1
I r- �� " J ? —� �I � iN w�ruNos � I I ;?� . . � � •\ �ars-11� � �
I I'.. M WERARN�SLL �. �.. a ; � /+�+ /,�/ � I/ +I MEL H NNI�OI CtYI X!N /4'I' I. r p+� %,. '` ;5r.0 �..f, I r ic� �} 1 II :� DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDENEO FINAL
MECtiANIZED QEhRING
' IS i I
loo I h e I �i 0 I � _ ESS ALL SIGNA�URES COMPL
J r '� UNL ETED
�I � /I / ,,}
� FILL IN WETIANOS �7 � �/ L ETL4ND5 �� ��'Z� J. 1 �.. � 9.
.. \ CLEAR�{,` . .
\\ /Ilill I �� i � � �,:ss u. , � / . e. o� ,
r y � PERMIT DRAWING
��) P L � r �' � F, I.� � ''. ' I SHEET 3 OF 5
�, � , � . aiE aa �, F �. � e_ � t � �' .,I 1 � � .
�_ f � 1 . = 1 .-- � � , � .:- � (��''(,� . � � r ts > >.,�' � ` �� :--� „
� ^=� o�aa
� �-'g"' . "'_G�Sti.�c-Tro� — �,:.i v � ' T�� � � r �-�� �' - �� . �J'% I _ • .� s F.cyr chti�s� �r-oFc��� � _ -
�_�,r,_ - ^'P- �r _ . .a-"T _ - . .-: - ������ TJ,m= � � �I i M � i.i e
' -C I _.�` �" -'-'= '�-s � -ce.uin�-r+�Tr� ZT�'""�if—.a�^"3 I .n�iCnl- �B I � .' ; � —• L,� ..eeii�=3 =iv- _ i_,. � �.ac.,�= ��Y.- � _, ' - ,,:��y o� �_",..
_ .� �— x ..�. _
� F � \
� r —.__ - _' � -` �. . _��. � .� «- '' �9y°`�v. - .c.`\---- ��I'�A[r#���1 .��cA���azl�„ /� '��- I ��
� �r 7�C '^.: ;vom� ix.
� � `DENOTES FI,[� IN � _ 1�MecHnnrrzEu �� � rae � �_ . � ruE . "� � � �. � U, I � �.�A �M+ � -
F ., wETLANb �_ „o,x. ar.nwti� �� � Flit iN ViEilnHos � I� � ^-�r m +x� 4,L ,Q, �I � � �, I _
` _
� � , _ xMv ioh' � � . �I'� ao: � ,� c � i r� = U• � �,� � � — �
I` _ � \ TEMPORR�Y FlLLIN�WEIlANOS� I �� 5 . . , r � � I ST / �`�� �- �•G �
9
'� _ - _ _ }J"["i�IQTE�_If�J�P'Q�i�' .. •. �1ECNFNIZ� UFM1RING . –. • l S I I ��7 6 �//�
.T � . _ � �' a , � MECHANIZEO �� � A q•P� I � V� �� (� s�� .. _ _ _ - � Z� �
y-
�-FiLL IN WETLANDS \ ��
� T GIEAPING� � � � I - 1 - t➢ '
� �� SITE 1 `m �.,,� , ° , , ; � �� I � , -ro��t.� E3;� 5a. _ _ w ��i"
. :�... QE RIN`G . . .. �—..� x � 1 I . � .' i � y9-�.r--
�._ � pq5
i � �± � FE
I
� � � � • QE_N,OTF3�MECHJ±NIZF�LT � _ -. , �� � � 0� 1i�u II ��� eT�� � : ��.�� _- �� _ .
fq � — ' ;
_- — , _ i �
O 4A1�
, A � ✓� i C.iMooEs t�' I V � �� � � XNL}aRGMENT � 1/ ` � - �, � / � — _ .
J��S r �
> x
i,
\ �FJI11N WFSL4NDS � � _– I � � � . � � LE� NIY } � '�
'
�i?���� � � _ - � � �� �\� � � � �� � �n � _ � �; �-
C L'LLLL.L�1J �� DEt�OTES �H N�D � � L/ � � � �' �' : AA� �: `� aaA[ars �[���slNc + i � � � _' �� � (- � �� � �
CtEARW� . - � I�� r `� � �; � �A \ : � �Zr �� � �-i
i£MPORA@Y HlL r S
� --' � � �� �� � � iN wEruNos ;o,. ,� ��� � � m I `� � I l'i.,.y � � � , I�� � i �� % .� � ..� \
� i 1 . , � e \����`y5� ' i / r ':�,- �-� r
� � DENOTES EXCAVATJOI�'� � � _, ✓�,. � . MecnnNiZFo ..., � � � `�.��� � � / � � �ti - - � � I � �- .
IN WETLAND ( ENtAfi6(AENL c�enxwG ��- �� il�� II�; .� I I i I I� '� > �' / i
i
� \ � �-\ . (X21 � FlLL IN WF1I.ANDS . ' � � - I � S � . / - , .
1191�191�191�911a191a1111�1a1�191�IN�1
��G'ai6el�i�iBimi��r'm ' �1��m ' 1
���, �� •� -•�m �� • �
���!! �� ��� •s ����'!!! �
� �� �. �i ��� �
�m�'1 ���_ i
��1�9l�� 91�4�,���9�L-'G+�,*��111 �1
;� e �� �:�: r��� °
�'�� �u' 'ei ��u
a��E! �����,°����a,�����o��o
r�r�w�wr
���'s" �
�a: C�i�
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
r�r�muna�w�r�uurww�ruu r
a�� ��� � � a
��� �'s�� n� �. , i
��� ���� ��, r:�� B
ii� uw `i'�� : i B
IIAIRl�AI���111 1■ y � i
�
s��ni�a�imiai�
19
:
��
�u ������
20 21
r�wmrrwww�r��uuuru
��� ���'���
nCCTi 'sem� ni `e

PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEEf NO.
N
x-
m
i i i i
WET N AN SU FAC W ER I PA TS P RMIT Ps EIETDROWISG
00 O 00 O 06 00 O 06 O 8�
9
16+ 0.00
- ---
----
➢a o0 0 00 0 oe o0 0 00 0 00
a---- -- ----
- � I J4
� ��
�
15 + 0.00
�.�
o. zs o. 2s
LIMIT __ 9 e �__ LI ITS
�
� �
�
�
�
� �
_ • — —__
w� — --- -- — _ � — --
W�� -- -- -- 15+ 6.25 --�— --
�E
�»a
��_
.�
»�� — —
, , , ,

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
an Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac (ac) (ac) (ac (ac) (ac (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- STA 12+69 TO ROADWAY < 0.01
-L- STA 13+80
2 -L- STA 15+06 BRIDGE < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.07
-L- STA 16+14
3 -L- STA 16+07 TO BRIDGE 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.06 0.08
-L- STA 17+45
4 -L- STA 17+45 TO ROADWAY < 0.01
-L- STA 17+82
-L- STA 18+37 TO ROADWAY < 0.01
-L- STA 18+67
TOTALS': 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.11 0.15 0 0 0
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Bridge:
Permanent impacts due to bents in wetlands: 28 sf (<0.01 acres)

�
U
W
ai
�
�
�
S� �°�'1G fl� T'�'(�1P.'1['1T�[ L�'r� lf�'fl�.,l[1�7�
]D][�yl[��[��I�; ���' 1[�[I�GI-��V.1`I'�S
JOH11lST0111 CO U11lTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE 1V0. 32 OVER HANIVAH CREEK
OIY SR 1185 (JOYNER BRIDGE RD)
� � �+���������� �
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRA7IVAGE, PAVI�YG, AND STRUCTURE
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4770
-�- rvi SiA. iu+iu.uu
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
-/- i��tiJ�n Btii���_:- h�/_! _`/� /i!`i�
= TO PEACH ORCHARD RD BEGIN BRIDGE
�SR 1148) -L- POT STA. 15 +
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
THIS PROIECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL 80UNDRIES.
GRAPH7C SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
�11���
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
������ �
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
DESlGN D,9TA
ADT 2017 = 440
ADT 2037 = 620
K = 10 %
D = 60 %
T = 5 % '
V = 60 MPH
' TTST =2% DUAL=3%
FUNC CLA55 = LOCAL
SUB-REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROIECT B-4770 = 0.163 MI.
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-4770 = 0.032 MI.
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4770 = 0.195 MI.
END TIP PROJECT B-4770
-L- POT STA. 20+40.00 I
Pre�rep In rle pl(Ice a/:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
IOna dbd� Ridg� D.., Ro(rigG Nc, :lul0
lUlt J21.\b.iHD SPfCR(Cd1l0.93
RlGNT OF W.9Y DATE:I _ GARY. LOVERING, PE
AUGUST 25 2016 r,xr�ic�:�, i;.�r.,.�i.rx
LETTING DATE: I KANCHANA NOLAND
AUGUST 75 2017 +'Ro�ar.rnrsicx vvcnarx
���. B-4770
'38542.1V1 BRZo1185f21
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4
TO DEVILS RACETRACK RD —
(SR 1009)
FI}URAULICS ENGIVEER
RO�IDK'9]' DESIGN
ENGINEER
oocumexrxorcox
YNLESSGLl51GrypTYRE6tOMPLEfEO

'��6^4770�� ^�4rvV
; � BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT - � , �_. ' � �` R"� `�E"��
- �w.: ROAOWAr OESIGN XYOAAULICS
';�' � � GLI � � : � -� �� E����E� ����E�
I I `�1 �� � � .Y' c. AUDOLPN R�YNOF
� �� � ZQ�iE � � . �� ��� � !� • . �.1 �
r ��� Ii ALLOWABLE „ �� � > � � " �_`�_ � �.
1 i ` I,
lQi�(� ��,�ry �� 7 f5+� J, i �� qOg[Ri5 6 WElLONS iNC OWGL�S Wk�i1M5 WIICl15 MlLiWS =� �
l, Y �,:' �.uEs cO.�oocs '?I � 1 It � I ZONE 1 - • � ��� �� t:.
��: S „�S �� / � �t� r` r 1 I DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDEREU FINAL
i�OO� O� �OO� � �� / � I ALLOWABLE � � 1 / YH UNLESSALLSIGNATURESCOMPLETEO
�'� ZONE 2 " � i ��' " I
; � ALLOWABLEUe -. my ��,0, � �� ' — /y� .: m i ALLO�MABLE a'-� „.:� sEE _E,.,,�� ��:,
� , CALE +, �_< � ° . �� �,nR �y�M�����, o��:�� o � - �. �.
� �A RAPHIC S � l � ` t� �.'� BUFf-ER DRAWING
� � . �.,r +� �- � �r
� { , w Np�a� E i �, P P I=I '�� � SHEET 2 OF 4
, G
i � ". - E v��C E� .:�il>F` ,��� C i�
?
.�:t� i � — . — v.i��� .—.�;- -`—`�_ ....�t _ �t�l� /r ��' �.~ \ I i � 1 {,'.;. — �- �. -,E _ — _ � , F — �� ���W—�t I�'� sxEcini �uE xni��v oncn
— �— �} i. :rn �.re�i _ _ _— _ — — qi 1 L--�-- , ., s.,.
-� � 95T I - N G R' l H'i
—��. ^ —T FVT v i
�y . _� .'.�� �
i
l . .._ .� — " ,F� �.—�h �_. F � �F_ _ L _� C1- _ . , t—C 1 J
�. . ,_.. . � _
_ .�E.. . — ���-E�.y�.�... . � ,� ` � � � ,� � � r� - Z'E—��t,�x�'�(, i �_�-�I w�^'F i�.-�' F,� r � , � , ,
Y :.. -
� + PUE � PUE � i� pr� � ' � � I � .,
��'
. . ( � ° L[ � ... � � .�,5� . ..
o:� �
� wlaUs u. �� � � .. � .... �_ x n[-`' :� ,,,, ej,,�� � ��� . �� � � '�"' � � I
l
... � F IDE , . / � �
a �,�f� I
-- � - -- - - .,�- - � ^ . ALLOWABLE . � � �'ZONE 2 _ , r � � � � �� �� 9 � �
,/./,/,/,/,/ �, ,� �, �z ALLOWABLE � c� 1 qC, � i i` m�,� ��f!�
"\"\"\"\"\"\ fe �.... I I O�.4ET LIFE ESiNOP SR,I /�COv
A L L O W A B L E I M P A C T S Z O N E 1 O �--.� �. � rc o� wu.u� u s I _` �� _ N
� . � o
1 � `. �
� � a� � � id . 3n. 1 � �
�.�s �.��Es �'. • ,�ITE 2 > j �__�
SITE 1 � � �,� �a, � � '� � � � I �
\\\\\\ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 � .� '\ �-� ���� �` �a�s e weuons at. `E ".r a
\ �� �� ' ' r
��� ��a �'' ��<:`. �1� k��� - - �.' �. Il,,:
- \. \
� \ r,a�
. � l ��� �� . . �� � �
�:���s�:���:a:�s���i ae� ���m�.� e+e���s�:��e�e:m �a:l�9°..'°.�J!'.�@e�:■ ���§,�.�:e:a:��s�:��e�s:� s��:�9��:�a�e
u�"mm�06i���ie9�6'imml G�� il ��mii� i�i6mr'mi6i�miGe"" C'i�'mi"�i�im �I�iili'�esi�m�06i�miGG9"' G'immi�i�im6
ii�m�i���oi� ' m� i ��i oiem'mi�m� " I P'um�i%�mi 'oim�i�mm mi
� ��o 00 � _ �o a� • �v �o� i �v� • • • • �v m • �
��N�s�:���!!:� � �:� . �e _ i�!�����:� �:�:�9 �� '�� E@��N�a�������:� ��:�9������
110l��I�i�l9l�li11�01lIl�1 �� - !I� ��e�` �i���eea�ie�e eie�� �� ��iweinn�ie'��ie�e e�e��ei�ea�an�
������mi,�,���o;��;i'�,��� .�.�.� � , ������������l�'.��l� � �a;��. � I�� , i�;���oi�m�� . ��;���°!��m�
�m �,-� F,: � mmm�.� m �mve� o fim m��E . m�mm9g�.m�m �°..a �mm �e�,�a m
��I��I:p€���' �1119��EI19EIE3i'I� �� ��E;ii9E3BE3e�1��I�1�01�E�9E� 39019EIE;���h�ii�l6�1� I��� e01,EBCI�i�01�E�fiE� �9,19EIC3�13�i�1
� � Ea�7���' �'�'�� � i��� �� � s� '� �'�� �! ' '�� ���e� � � � �
J �6 • ��p • Y • $g • • Y • • •
� � � � � �ia�G'e ����� � s � B� B • �i �� ���
�������� d�,�,''�� �� i�l� �� �i�iiii�i��'mi%i��i �Di�i I �� � ; ISI� I ���i i�G
�' ^�°°-- — :..a�:.i�i. i�,
..�Ylr��iGiY�'siaG::F�i�.��Yr.-f� i I��o7�a��
TiSi�iYSGii"'�iCi�'Li� Ci Z�'i'�C�O'���li �$i'� ir��ir ���+..-� ..
����l�� ..�� �� � �,�j I; !� v ��� ^m�� �—�� ,.� �� �,: • mm
IE9l9l�6��!lill��illll�l��"ti9�� ��W:i��l�lall91�10l�I�6PY ..4,��N1l.9•�I�l64l191m�e 91911AI�1101�
s����aa���a� �m , ..�, �li��l����ei���� _ . � ,,, � , ..�� . E . �� � ���i����e
��_.._.�....��....���� � �� � � �: : � � - � ..-
mm �� ue g I . � � � m
���ll��������I�� ►� II�II � I�■ � ���-I�■ � �� � ��i7 •i7� ���I��I�!
���ia�����a@��'� � o: ' _E . . ����� .v ��E�! �. ;� . � ;,�, 41� _ e�����e
����IO����11����� �� � ���■�1���9���■� ���91 I� � � �� �� #�
, . ,.. , • � : ��p �e�6 � 1 1916
��� . � .� � ���� �� ��������m ._ ��E� � � � ���° .. � ,� '"� �� �i� ��E�� ��
�� � ■ i ��o i ■ �o�e � o �
�������������� .��� ���i������� ����—���i�i �,. � .�.,��������� �:�i����
���■i�l��■119����1 ■I� ■��lii■i,l��■i��l� ���I I■ �n�uu�m�mmmuum�w�� - ■��I I�1
nGew��iisim� mii�Gieiee'wi'ai'ai�ai���Ga���aiGir'e'��iisi��di�a�Gae'aiewiGi'ai�aia�'�i'�'ai 'P'sew��iisianwi�a�Gwemewi6'i'ai�aias'e

..
. �
. -. �. -• � ����������
- -�-���_----
a : - . . • �e���������
� �����������
� � �����������
a : - . . . , . �e���������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� �����������
� ��� �� , , , , , , ��

Rev.Jan 2009