20170322 Ver 1_401 Application_20170317

69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Land Planning Permitting Environmental Consulting Construction Management""�A€k<e>;t�im
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date
Name: Dalton Cook
Company Name: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
From: RE: Cleveland Springs Phase 4
201603102
3/22/2017
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
Attached
Shop Drawings
Letters
Reports
SEI #:
Under Separate Cover via
Specifications
Change Order
Computer Disk
Invoices
Reproducibles
Samples
COPIES
DATE DESCRIPTION
$240 Check for Cleveland Springs Phase 4 401 Water Quality
Certification
1
3/22/2017
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For Approval Approved as Submitted
For Your Use Approved as Noted
As Requested Return for Corrections
For Review & Comment FOR BIDS DUE
SIGNED:
CC:
Resubmit Copies for Approval
Submit Copies for Distribution
Return Corrected Prints
Other
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 tel [phone] fax [phone]
1-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com

69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Land Planning Permitting Environmental Consulting Construction Management Expert Testimony
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL �y
Date: 17 -Mar -07
U 12
2 0 1 7 0 3 2 2
Name: Dalton Cooky 2 j ZD�I
Company Name: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
From: RE: Ellington Cove PCN Application
201603102
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
Attached
X Shop Drawings
X Letters
X Reports
SEI #:
Under Separate Cover via
Specifications
Change Order
Computer Disk
Invoices
Reproducibles
Samples
COPIES
DATE DESCRIPTION
4
Ellington Cove PCN Application and Supporting Documentation
3/17/2017
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
X For Approval Approved as Submitted
For Your Use Approved as Noted
As Requested Return for Corrections
For Review & Comment FOR BIDS DUE
SIGNED:
CC:
Resubmit Copies for Approval
Submit Copies for Distribution
Return Corrected Prints
Other
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 tel [phone] fax [phone]
1-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com

O�0f W A i RQG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
1.
Applicant Information
Processing 4t j
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
$"o 1 Permit /i ;1
❑X Section 404 Permit / U� 9n
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) numb
vAT-
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
El Yes Z No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Ellington Cove
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d. Subdivision name:
Ellington Cove
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Ms. Judith Louise Freeman
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deeds Book 11205 Page 2632
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
4902 NE 147th Avenue
3e.
City, state, zip:
Vancouver, Washington 98682
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Owner of Project
4b. Name:
Mr. Larry Witek
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
First Capital Investments, LLC
4d. Street address:
110 Lions Gate Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jim Spangler
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
4338 Bland Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e. Telephone no.:
919-875-4288
5f. Fax no.:
919-875-4287
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0742897241
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.75311 Longitude: -78.83599
1 c. Property size:
6.68 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Williams Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -III; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The subject property is currently vacant and partially developed. The majority of the property is wooded. There are utility easements running through
the property. Properties within the vicinity of the subject property are generally residential or undeveloped with some commercial use. Adjoining
to the west of the subject property is a railroad line.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0547
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 371
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct a gravity sewer line to an existing manhole for a residential subdivision on the subject property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Addenda for project description.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary E] Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

PCN Application
Ellington Cove
Addenda
3e. The project will include stream excavation to lay the 8" PVC sewer pipe. The stream bed and bank
will be returned to the existing contours. The form of construction will include anti -seep collars. No in -
stream fill or bank reinforcement is required. All worked will be performed with mechanical equipment
and using approved sediment and erosion control measures.
SPANCLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries X❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
---t—
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0-
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Excavation
Williams Creek
PER
Corps
20
20
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
20
3i. Comments:
Underground utility line crossing. The permanent cleared utility corridor will be maintained as 10 feet wide or less.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
o
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T
utility line installation
Williams Creek
No
1,200
800
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
1,200
800
6i. Comments: Permanent maintenance corridor will be 10 feet wide or less.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Connection of the gravity sewer to existing manhole precludes avoidance.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All appropriate BMPs will be deployed including sediment and erosion control devices.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
o
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Stormwater plan to be approved by the Town of Apex. All discharges are outside of buffers. See
Drainage Plan.
❑X Yes ❑ No
attached
Grading and
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
26.7
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater plan to be approved by the Town of Apex. All discharges are outside buffers. See attached Grading
and Drainage Plan.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Apex
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Town of Apex
❑ Phase II
❑x NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
E]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
F1 Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer will service the subject property.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes 0 No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program element occurrence data set.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
National Marine Fisheries Service essential fish habitat mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Natural Heritage Program
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes 0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Wake County iMaps (3-1-2017)
Jim Spangler
3-14-17
AppfieweVAgent's Printed Name
Date
App i ant/A ent's Signature
ent's s' at valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Image Provided By EDR USGS Topographic Maps
-. S, 19A7V
roc450
H s t
t s IRD
HOWELL RD 1 . r r41 N
Qj
0-
SALUCwRCH
a,
T C3
a� SDP
� 4
— � �'�✓ , �: A '•, a •+.,
f ! .
T,pLL4WAvDRI t.
1,
tu
w — 4C
�s
+'iNFDALE RD C
srnv
- e
D
.100 "
N St+L CN � ST
1
s v
Clabo �f
� u>f ne
_ F
Kno,11w d
0.
4�3
Y o..
2 C1t?G ` d l CNIMNtY
RfGH R�}
= QO
Y DR, Pinewood s twp
c
A
,
— 1 APAI:YI � �y \
Acres
! 2 Z
USGS SITE LOACTION MAP
ELLINGTON EXTENSION PHASE I ESA
0 Ramblewood Drive
Apex, North Carolina 27523
PREPARED FOR: First Capital Investments, LLC
SPANGLER PROJ. MGR: DATE: 4/1/2016
ENVIRONMENTAL INC.DRAWN BY: Adam Rieder PROJ. #: 201603100

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
April 1, 2016

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/main/soils/healthy and certain conservation and engineering applications. For
more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http://
offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
K

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call [phone]
(voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................7
SoilMap................................................................................................................8
Legend..................................................................................................................9
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................10
MapUnit Descriptions........................................................................................10
Wake County, North Carolina.........................................................................12
MfC—Mayodan sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes...................................12
MfD2—Mayodan sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................13
MgC2—Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded................................................................................14
WoA—Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded..................................................................................................15
References............................................................................................................17
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas
in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the
surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other
living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas
(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically
consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is
related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of
landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify
predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the

Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of
the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of
measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from
one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics
and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different
uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils
in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from
field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have
a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

N.L,S6 05£
b'
1s
yV
O
h7
WSJM NLT -c)z win :-n a6P3 48mm :sa7ea!p--uioJ -mow wm :uoq)aCoid dew I
00£ OOZ OOT OS 0
;aaY
OST OOT OS SZ 0 N
ssapw
aaays G,TT X,ss) �e4wd v � Paw!�d�! 006'T�T :aR�S dew
h
008569 09LS69 OZLS69 089569 069569 009569 095569 OZSS69
den pos f
j!oda�j aoanosa�j poS wolsno
N 1 Sb oSE
N.61 S6 oSC

i'� I_ll� �Cr]�►J �7
Area of Interest (AOI)
Spoil Area
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Stony Spot
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
®
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
v
Blowout
9
Borrow Pit
Wet Spot
Clay Spot
w
Closed Depression
Other
Gravel Pit
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
Lava Flow
Special Line Features
Marsh or swamp
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
V
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
s
Sandy Spot
fir.
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
0
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
Ig
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800.
Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
y
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
.-
Special Line Features
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
}_" Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
® Aerial Photography
9
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 30, 2015
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 27, 2014—May 6,
2014
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Wake County, North Carolina (NC183)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
- Acres In AOI
Percent of A01
MfC
Mayodan sandy loam, 6 to 10
0.1
1.0%
percent slopes
MfD2
Mayodan sandy loam, 10 to 15
3.0
44.9%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
MgC2
Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 6 2.4
36.3%
to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
WoA
Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2
1.2
17.9%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
6.7
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
MfC—Mayodan sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 4m1w
Elevation: 300 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Mayodan and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Mayodan
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mudstone and/or shale and siltstone
and/or sandstone
Typical profile
A - 0 to 9 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 9 to 35 inches: clay loam
H3 - 35 to 44 inches: clay loam
H4 - 44 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
H5 - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 7.0
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
MM—Mayodan sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 vfyr
Elevation: 300 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Mayodan, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Mayodan, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mudstone and/or shale and siltstone
and/or sandstone
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 4 to 35 inches: clay loam
H3 - 35 to 44 inches: clay loam
H4 - 44 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
H5 - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 7.0
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
191

Custom Soil Resource Report
MgC2—Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 1 vfyt
Elevation: 300 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Madison, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Madison, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bt - 6 to 37 inches: clay
BC - 37 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
WoA—Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. lvfz6
Elevation: 80 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 45 percent
Wehadkee, undrained, and similar soils: 45 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wehadkee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam
Bg - 8 to 43 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 43 to 72 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
Cgl - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2 - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
16

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nresl42p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://wAw.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 43041. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/detai I/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://www. n res. u sda.g ov/wps/portal/n res/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nresl42p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
18

Weather
n
- J
Wine Be(rrvRd
J 'N
Pinedlie
�2d �
v
a
LLI >
a�� V
U
i
t
AW t
coz
Ramblewood Dr
Fa
M
Ellington Cove N Disclaimer
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
A 0 220 440 880 ft the most current and accurate information possible.
a I I I I I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
1 inch = 400 feet and are NOT surveys. No warranties. expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

First Capital Investments, LLC
110 Lions Gate [hive I Cary, NC 27518 ( (p) 919-337-5558
March 14, 2017
To Whom It May Concern:
The letter serves to inform you that First Capital Investments, LLC, located at 110 Lions Gate
Drive, Cary, NC, as the buyer of record and under contract with the project owner, Judith
Louise Freeman, hereby authorizes Spangler Environmental, Inc. to act as our technical agent
for the purposes of environmental issues, including wetland and stream identification, permitting,
mitigation planning and regulatory agency coordination at the property known as Ellington
Cove subdivision. All site visits by regulatory personnel must be coordinated in advance with
our agent, Spangler Environmental, Inc. This letter supercedes all previous Agent -related
correspondence.
The following contact should be copied on all correspondence:
Agent:
James A. Spangler, CEI, A.M.ASCE
Spangler Environmental, Inc
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Sincerely,
First Capital Investments, LLC
Byx::A*-'��� 04�—
(Lawrence J. Witek)
Title: jam, W#A f =R..

Natural and
Cultural Resources
March 14, 2017
Dalton Cook
Spangler Environmental
4338 bland rd
raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Ellington Cove
Dear Dalton Cook:
ROY COOPER
(io+i wr
SUSI H. H_A.UILTON
&-1 y
NCNHDE-3118
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Matthew Hebb at matthew.hebbCcDncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
"`'"Nothing Compares.,,
State of North Carolina I Department of Natural and Cultural Resoairces I Natural Heritage Program
121 W. )ones Street I Raleigh, NC 27603
1651 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1651
www_northD-org 1 915707-81(37

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Ellington Cove
March 14, 2017
NCNHDE-3118
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
2004 -Pre
H?
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Reptile 35531 Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard
1979-09-13
H?
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G5
S2
Low
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
Wake County Open Space Easement Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at hUps://ncnhde.natureserve.ory/content/helo. Data query generated on March 14, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-3118: Ellington Cove
March 14, 2017
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:24,230
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources Esn. HERE. DeLorrne. Internw —einem P Cao. GEBCO, USGS,
FAO. NPS, NRCAN. GeoBase. IGN. Ka avw NL. Ordnance Survey. Esn Japan,
WTI. Esh China (Hong Kong), sw Wpo. Mapnylnia. 9 OpenStreeBAap
wnthbu s. and the GIS User C—ay

EFH Mapper
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/ef'hmapper/
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the
fishery management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases
mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report
should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive
evaluation of EFH at this location. A location -specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must
be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate regional
resources.
2
Sources: Esri, GESCO, NOAH, National Geographic,
DeLorrre, HERE, Geonames.org, anis other contributors
Query Results
Map Scale = 1:72,224
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 35045'18" N, Longitude = 79010'2" W
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 35.75, Longitude = -78.83
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and/or HAPCs for the following
species/management units.
EFH
No Essential Fish Habitats (EFH) were identified at the report location.
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report
location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.
1 of 1 3/14/2017 11:51 AM

AV
4
♦ # W E
f
r a » ay
a
4
e ..
A
4-4
y �
s Y�
� h
Af
�N
Legend
'A .. i
tY:
M
Ephemeral Stream
` w _:i
Perennial Stream
Linear Wetland
Wetland
3� = Approximate Property Boundary
Tax Parcels
125 250
Ellington Extension Due Diligence
0 Ramblewood Drive
Apex,Wake County, NC
April, 2016
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
500 750
Feet
Figure 1
Delineation Map
map source:
Wake County GIS

N M
vn
i'L O IN
N�$gg
�Mf=�
o<
SS OUTFALL
415
415
410
a
410
M^TR
i<a�*o
ygwe°�i
N O#`
�MMZ
405
\
<o
405
�
I
\
I
\
400 '°,
\
400
'T
�10�
�t01
�.
I
;
-
395 -
1
�' r
395
1
I
E%,
L
15'
390
, .: <
390
CENTERLINE
I
3000 Psi
CONCRETE
156.61 IF
8" RJ-DIP
(NOTE: NO BELL
JOINTS IN STREAM
385 ELEVATIONS
° 0.40%
BED)
385
N Orn
btNp
"IO
f m M N
M
N
N C
Oi
N
n
N rO pp�pp
ff fif ♦Y
ODi
�,�
app
fig �I�
cpV
Y,,f
tpV 88
ff
aC
n,�
rC
MSM
tG
�O hN
17 '..,M
N
�G •D
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00

TOWN & COUNTRY KENNELS
PIN: 074 891288
D& 05414 PG 0337
ZONING: Ll
NOTESTOWN OF APEX UTILITY
1. O SITE DEVELOPMENT BUT NOT# TO TESTING, CLEARING,
INSTALLATION OF S&E MEASURES, OR GRADING, SHALL OCCUR UNTIL REQUIRED
PROTECTION FENCING HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND INSPECTED. A PROTECTION FENCING
INSTALLATION PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR BY CALLING
..
—249-3426.
2. PROTECTION
A. AWAY FROM ANY SAVED TREE ONE FOOT FOR EACH INCH OF TREE CALIPER.
B. ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF ANY OTHER DESIGNATED RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA,
SUCH AS BUT NOT i HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, WETLANDS,
PONDS,BUFFERS AND
CALONG THE OUTSIDE LINE OF THE 100—YEAR FLOODPLAJN, AND THE OUTSIDE EDGE
OF ANY RIPARIAN *
\ ss \ \ EIP
\� \ ElP
THIS SITE IS IN THE PRIMARY
WATERSHED OVERLAY DISTRICT
NO FLOODPLAINS EXIST ON-SITE
I
m.
1
•
i
a,
04
1F
•
tow
0
•'
it
cq
WA
LL
•
i
3.1
a
•
•
tir
1
•
*... ,,..
r .....
..
rr
♦
cnu
r
TIM
cy r
cr_ IT Lu
sor
CL
* ■
OWN
Lu
.. All Ull
i4kyjAm:: ,RIFT,
\ ss \ \ EIP
\� \ ElP
THIS SITE IS IN THE PRIMARY
WATERSHED OVERLAY DISTRICT
NO FLOODPLAINS EXIST ON-SITE
I
m.
1
•
i
a,
1F
•
tow
0
e4
t�
LL
•
i
3.1
a
•
1
•
1
•
i
a,
0
•
tow
0
t�
LL
•
3.1
a

41
p
Q
Z
N
a R11 y 1('dl(* 370141 f NVbOI.s P� Q00'b (Z
N
N3 Oa-
�o �14 m c' — -� 8
]a 3j OCh�la:-A
c')
P6'i 6f >�
>p rk f8 --1 -ml-ml Mu 3 z" x" O> d-qxmo*2x
-A>KO -4 c -<5
A ;u .
x
0 Z;z zmmgRr>- q
x C24 r- , 2��
M -m OX N
zm-Z�60 11>5> omzm wm
-vw --40mo 0-0 z woox Cc: ;0, cz,
w X r' OMO
OZ
�z z A ul m K
m --A
-u z K, m 0 x
m cmm>K -Amocm0
2m
Of M Z z
I m 0 > TU=i xmoz> r
0 rr- se _0 cowmoz>w
-om w- M-3
0 > * :" * K r- X > x -V
ni �u > w OmmmFmx'o >x 0 M -< -4 rr-- 0 X
Az M C6 0 - x -0 m omq-=-<3!2
m;o
w 0 o c
m -0 w 10 > -q 0 TXOPAVZZ
><
cn > z 2 smmmom> 0 r
mm or -m— zr
X z mom X>m>oc:
:z ( W: z 6 LD z 2-u , -1, �� mo -0, z N 2 o
oz mooqc
mmN 9 6-Z>4xm 0 --j m zoo9pw E
m M ;D
m -o--Ii X2 m 7;u- >
0 (nq(nm
0
1�f Q� z
C/
omo 8xm*om
0 xf4 x mxOq 0 0 >
> (1)
> ;o F, 0 z om xF ;u
0 0 --j M r- r, O
> c -0 --I9:z
m, X >
m X c a: Z rn
m cn -I -Q mo > Q -ijo >>Or-
m;u m m r- -Tl
-U>00- 0> wmw -xc r -
x -n �b 2 w 0 :c;u m w o mg-< p m F mo co rr' ME:
m m r, Z m (n 0 En
m c 5) m > �)-<m- —Z mom- >2 mu)m
M ;u z ;u m m p -'4 T -;-Ul M7 zom z � (/) 11
m m a m 9: En C) M 0-
m > o -- cm xm 0
0 oom'N) Fn (n ED OMOM02M
ram m 0 — — 0 , R- g --4>005ow
V) oo:-=� I j> mmr- Woo- u Z E �'
0 m w oz"—(A mm OK2 M-immmom
M Z U)'b' c z M Oo_;u
m m 0 48--1-1oo w T, 0 > --n z
0 -< U, z co m m > C) --j
m m mzx-o c- cp(/)z T
C-Acm--i mo --j C Z -- waxZ
oxo-omo x: M (n z r-
0 m 40-4> 0 mm -0 �; 5 M
P 5 r- c::j �-' c (n M rn 28 z >,
z ca
> ED >
z -u
r- -u 0 z m m 0
0
m cm:> -<
:< (n x
x X-uz 0- m m -4
03-16063 PROGRESS RAB
SHEET JOB NO. DATE DRAWN BY BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
- - ----- -------------- -ING ENGINEERS
ELLINGT COVE GRADING & CONSUL"ll
C3.1
NO. DATDESCRIPTION J 6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD, SUITE 250, RALEIGH, NC 27607
DRAINAGE PLAN 1 11-04-16 PER TOA COMMENTS IP
0 RAMBLEWUo"%0D DRIVE
TELEPHONE: [phone] OR [phone] FAX: [phone]
E BY
CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: C BELS (C-01 10); NCBOLA (C-0267)
TOWN OF APEX, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE. 1 50' CHK BY: KRB REVISIONS