20170348 Ver 1_401 Application_20170317

C'
,[)C.:Ign
cCondepts, PA
u',D
Transmittal [a (r-:� g � R '
Date: March 16,2017 OR 2 1 ZG17
Project Name: Hawthorne at Mills Gap
CDC Project: 11541 DE ER RES URC S
I G
-A w ir-FER p RMI
To:
NC Divison of Water Quality - WBSCP Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Via: Mail / Overnight Hand Delivered _ Pick up @ CDC Office
Co i Date Description
...... pies -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 03/16/2017 PCN - Signed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 03/16/2017 $240.00 Check - Application Fee
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 03/16/2017 Supporting Documents Package
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REMARKS:
Warren Sugg, I
CC: Hawthorric Residential Partners, 806 Green Valley Road, Suite 311, Greensboro, NC 27408
S:\ACAD\l 1541\docs\USACE\dwq\2017-02-09-Ti-ansiiiittal- DWQ.docx
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5432, Asheville, NC 28813
168 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 52 Walnut Street — Suite 9, Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

ot WA I- t9 %
2 0 1 7 0 3 4 8
Office Use Only;
Corps action ID no.
DWO profect no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Proce"ing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
I c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? 0 Yes J@ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
19 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Express Rparian Buffer Authorization
'MY
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
0 Yes C@ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
Yes 19 No
It Is payment into a mitigation bank or in4ieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of Impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in4ieu fee program.
Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties, If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No
Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Hawthorne at Mills Gap
Buncombe
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Asheville
2d. Subdivision name:
Hawthorne at Mills Gap
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mills Gap Apartments LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
5512/1436
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
806 Green Valley Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27408-7076 1 /;Fk r2n
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone] 1 1`9 L5 U V
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
U�-_W�ATR Rp��EYU�!R
SOUJ�C S
TT
L U P
L401 _ UFFE�RER ITTING�
.Q�Jff
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4� Applicant Informadon (if dIfferont from owner)
4a. Applicant Is:
Agent Other, specffy:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, AP:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. AgenUConsultant Infonnation (If applicable)
5a. Name:
Warren Sugg, P.E.
5b. Business name
(If applicable):
Civil Design Concepts, PA
5c Street address:
168 Patton Avenue
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
51. Fax no.:
(828) 252-5M5
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property Identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
19655-35-7074
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.499244 Longitude: -82.516122
1c. Property size:
15.25 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed prcdect
Dingle Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
C
2c. River basin:
French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use In the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing eft Is a defunct manufacturing building with a paved drive and parking, and a gravel parking lot A stream currently crosses a portion of
the property.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. Ust the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 609
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To install (1) 3ir HDIME Pipe along the sbwm (149 If of stream imped) In order for an access road to be built to the apartments.
3e. Describe the overall project In detail, Including the type of equipment to be used:
The project vAll Include appnmdmately 133 N of 36" HDPE pipe, headwalls at both ands, and an open throat catch basin.
Standard consWuollon equipment Including a back hoe vdil be used.
4. Jurlsdictloml Detenninations
4a. Have JurlsdictIonal wetiand or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
D Yes D9 No 0 Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated Me Jurisdictional areas?
Name (If known� N/A I
Agency/Consuttent Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or cerdficaflons been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) In the past?
0yes, No 1@ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to whelp file' Instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
0 Yes C@ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
Ia. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
El Wetlands 19 Streams —tributaries D Buffers El Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
2. Weiland Impacts
If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question fbr each wedand area Impacted.
2a.
Weiland Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary M
2b.
Type of Impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of Jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
WI -
Choose one
C*xxxw one
YesNo
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yesmo
W3 -
Choose am
Choose one
YO&No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
yeallo
W5
Choose am
Choose one
YGSIND
we
Choose one
Choose one
YesNo
2g. Total Weiland ImpaW_T
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream Impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of Impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
YAdth
(feet)
39.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S11 P
culvert
Unnamed Stream
PER
Corps
3
149
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose orm
S4 -
Choose one
SIS -
Choose one
so -
0wose one
3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts
149
31. Comments:
WA
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water Impacts below.
4s.
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary M
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of Impact
4d.
Waterbody
tYw
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Chooseone
Choose
4f. Total open water Impacts
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake con ction proposed, th complete the chart below.
58.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
6c.
Welland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated
Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1
Chooseone
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: NZA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
0 Yes J@ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
51. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
S. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then Individually list all buffer Impacts
below. If any Impacts require mitigation, n vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
Ga. Project Is In which protected basin?
[] Nauss E] Tar -Pamlico Catawba [] Randleman 0 Other
Ob.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T
ec.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
Of.
Zone I
Impact
(square
feet)
69.
Zone 2
Impact
(square
feet)
B1 P
CuWert Installatlon
Unnamed
No
9,135
B2
Yeaft
B3
YeslNo
B4
YOWWO
B5
YealNo
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
9,135
61. Comments: NZA
Page 5 of 10

0. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and MInImb:atIon
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing projecL
The proposed culvert Installation of the stream Is to help manage and maintain the storm drainage on the site. The now ston. drainage design will
more effectively manage the storm runoff.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques.
Slit fencing and best management practices will be used to prevent sediment hum Impacting the streem.
2. Compenextog Mkklatlon for Impacts to Watem of the U.S. or wawn; of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
0 Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation Is required by (check all that apply):
DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
projecO
[3 Mitigation bank
0 Payment to ln41eu fee program
0 Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Compleft If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
WA
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Paymient to In-Ileu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
El Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Bufflar mitigation requested (DWO only):
square feet
4e. Riparian weband mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-flparlan weland miligation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (11dal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: WA
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mftatlon Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DVVQ
6a. Will the project result In an Impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
yes Dg No
buffier mitigation?
Ob. If yes, then identify the square feet of Impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
OC.
ed.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Qrlawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
Og. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permitlee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
Oh. Comments: NiA
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Dftse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Dftse Fkm Plan
Ia. Does the projed include or Is It adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified
D yes No
within one of the NC PtIparlan Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then Is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
N/A
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What Is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
49%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
lRyes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why,
NIA
2d. If this project DOES require a Stommater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater wilection ow rs on-site muted tD on -aft stmn vaults and Is released in a oontnAled manner and is under City of Asheville stomrwater
review and apprmal.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Asheville
3. Cortifiled Local Government Storrnwateir Review
3a. In which local government's judsdk:tion is this project?
City of Asheville
N Phase 11
El NSW
3b. Which of the following locally4mplemented stDrmwater management programs
USMIR
apply (check all that apply):
H Water Supply Watershed
[] Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes ONo
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
OHOW
4a. Which of the fbilovAng state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSesslon Law 2006-246
[]Other
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes No
attached?
5. DWO 401 Unit Storrawater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
0 Yes E] No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 20D9

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
Ia. Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (fiaderal/state/local) funds or the
Yes No
use of public (federallstate) land?
1b. If you answered Oyesm to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
OYes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yesn to the above, has the document review been finallited by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes No
letter.)
Comments: NIA
2. Violations (DM4Q Requirement)
2a. Is the she In violation of DWO Wetland Rules (1 5A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Welland Rules (1 5A NCAC 2H .1300), DWO Surface Water or Weiland Standards,
[]Yes No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (1 5A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
OYes No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
WA
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future Impacts) result in
Oyes 1@ No
additional development which could Impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered wyesm to ft above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysls In accordance with the
most recent DV40 policy. If you answered "no,' provide a short narrative description.
WA
4. Sawnia Disposal (DWO Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project w1II top Into the existing MSD sewage system via a pipe that run a" Sweeten Crook Road.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El yes N No
habitat?
5b, Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes No
impacts?
6c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFVVS Endangered Species Program Website
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essenfial fish habl;t?T
[:] Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ZNo
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Site prmAously development - h1storictarcheological impact not applicable.
S. Flood Zorm Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 1 00 -year floodplain?
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
2010 FEMA Firm 370D965500J
�Jwmt4 \A. C
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applica Age �'i re
Date
r
8 ve *d horization
(Agenfs signature is ve Id an aut
letter from the applicant Is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
-- ., . A , - * OZ
MREET ADDRESS: 60 MiDs Gap Roa(L Asheae, NC
Please print:
A,operty owner. Hawthome ReddentW Pumers
Pmperty owner:
The unde*ned, registered property owners of ft above noW pmperty, do hereby auftrize
Warren fte, PX- of CW 2!!!e Concepts, PA
(ox*actx)r / Agent) (Narne of awwAN flrm)
to ad on my behalf and take all acoorts ry fbr the pmcessing, Issmnoe and aaxptance of
this peffnit or mriffication and any and all standard and special conditions attadied.
Property OwrWs Address (if diffeim i then property above):
806 Green VaUcy Ro*4 Suite 311. Greensboro. NC 27409
Telephone. (336) 553-i7oo
We hembY cWtIfY the above Information submttted In fts applimban is Um mW acawft tD the
best of our knowledge.
ALOwlied Slgn-a-b-jre '% 4**rb!ed Somdure
Date: I— V; - 1.0 Date:

MARCH 16,2017
#7z' �F= 11 �-- - �
'j 'j
FIMIA R 2 7 017
PCN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE
HAWTHORNE AT MILLS GAP
PREPARED FOR: HAWTHORNE RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS
806 GREEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 311
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
27408
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5432, Asheville, NC 28813
168 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 52 Walnut Street — Suite 9, Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

civil
il
Desi
CDCLr,..'.',-ptr., PA
Project Name: Hawthorne at Mills Gap
Project Location: City of Asheville
CDC Project No. 11541
Date: March 16, 2017
STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE
General
Hawthorne at Mills Gap is on a 15.25 acre parcel with an existing commercial building (PIN 9655-
35-7074). The subject project is located in Asheville, NC at 60 Mills Gap Road and currently
consists of wooded areas, lawns, a commercial building with asphalt parking, and a stream. The
proposed multi -family development consists of 272 residential units in 2 buildings, 7 garages,
clubhouse/leasing office, a pool, maintenance building, grilling pavilion and a dog park.
Storm Drainage
The proposed stormwater runoff is split into two separate stormwater collection systems which
have been designed to the 25 year storm event (per the City of Asheville stormwater
requirements). The majority of the site will be collected by an onsite storm drainage network and
be treated via underground detention StormTech systems for water quality treatment (first fiush)
and detention of the 2 & 10 year storm events. Please refer to the Drainage Runoff Summary
table for the pre and post development runoff data comparison.
Erosion Control
The proposed erosion control devices consist of two (2) construction entrances, three (3)
sediment basins, temporary diversion ditches, check dams, inlet protection, silt fence, and
concentration flow outlets. Runoff will flow to temporary diversion ditches and will be directed
to the sediment ponds and trap for treatment. Silt fence with concentration flow outlets will
wrap the lower part of the site to block any remaining runoff from impacting any undisturbed
areas.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5432, Asheville, NC 28813
168 Patton Avenue, Ashevifle, NC 28805 52 Walnut Street — Suite 9, Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

U.S.DE ARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR -r..'o SKYLANDQUADRAN LE
T 1-111-A
U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY '57 ou op -1 IMES
k
-yl..d
IIET
*17
lip.
c� —k�
Pl.-Ali N—NAL
EIT
A- �k, -,e
+
'24
..N ......
c
T�
k
Y,
j
'21
c—
Is
N,
W'K
-17
PISGAH N�TIONAL
MREST
-55 ,s '57 A 59 a, 'W"E
'4
--c SCALE 1:24
SKYLAND,NC
2—

GERBER RD
GRID NORTH
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 6,000)
250 0 500 1000
I F—A 1---1 i --I I I FEET
PANEL 9655J
LU FIRM
W
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
z
W
1-- NORTH CAROLINA
Uj
W 0
-Z
V) PANEL 9655
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
_J] PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS,
COMMILIN CIDN(k e6ff.L SILIFFIX
ASHEVILLE CITY OF 370032 9655 1
OUNCOM13E COUNTY 370031 9655 j
C:)
0
0) 0
Notice to User The Map Nurnber Shown belm shouldbe umd
when p—ij mapordws the Community Wrilbiiir~
above mould be med on—unince applications forthe Subject
communly
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
JANUARY 6,2010 3700965500J
BF1 L A W1
State ofNorth Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
..........
r— — ?
1111001v?�IIVS17�-
SOUTHSIDE VI
Trim is an offIcial copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted Using F -MIT On-Une. 'This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product Information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. mac.fema.gov

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
Hawthorne at Mills Gap
November 18, 2016

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http-://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For
more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http://
offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
2

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call [phone]
(voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
3

Contents
Preface.................................................................................................................... 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made .................................................................................. 5
SoilMap .................................................................................................................. 7
SoilMap ................................................................................................................ 8
Legend.................................................................................................................. 9
MapUnit Legend ................................................................................................ 10
MapUnit Descriptions ........................................................................................ 10
Buncombe County, North Carolina ................................................................. 12
EvD2—Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................
12
EvE2—Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................
14
EwD—Evard-Cowee complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony ........
16
EwE—Evard-Cowee complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony .........
18
TaD—Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes ...................................................
20
TmC—Tate-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes ...........................
21
TmD—Tate-Urban land complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes .........................
22
Ud—Udorthents, loamy ............................................................................... 23
UhE—Udorthents-Urban land complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes ..................
24
Ux—Urban land ...........................................................................................
26
References............................................................................................................ 27
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas
mot in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the
surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other
living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas
(MLRAs). IVILRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically
consist of parts of one or more IVILRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is
related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of
landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify
predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the

Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of
the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of
measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from
one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics
and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different
uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils
in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from
field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have
a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

10,
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
7

35' 30'3" N
35- 29 4,r N
Custom Soil Resource Report
b Soil Map
362200 362300 362400 362500 362600
NUp Scarle: 1:4,280 fp&Tted on A landscape (11" x 8.57) sheeL
N 0 50 100 200
=Feel
0 200 400 800 1200
Map projecbm: VVeb Niercatx CoTw coordinates: VX3S84 Edge to: UrM Zone 17N VvGSM
8
35' 30! 3" N
IR
35* 29P 44N
362700 362800 362900 363000 363100
3.1

f
MAPLEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
71 Area of interest (AOI)
Solis
I
Custom Soil Resource Report
#� Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
4-1-4 Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
LocalRoads
Background
W Aerial Photography
E
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey LIRL: hftp:/twebsoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the LISDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Buncombe County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Sep 19, 2016
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 15, 201 1—Dec 9,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
13
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Qo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
j:�
Slide or Slip
jr
Sodic Spot
I
Custom Soil Resource Report
#� Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
4-1-4 Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
LocalRoads
Background
W Aerial Photography
E
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey LIRL: hftp:/twebsoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the LISDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Buncombe County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Sep 19, 2016
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 15, 201 1—Dec 9,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Buncombe County, North Carolina (NCO21)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in A01
Percent of A01
EvD2
Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30
3.1
6.2%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
8.0%
EvE2
Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50
4.0
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
EwD
Evard-Cowee complex, basin,
9.4
18.4%
15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
EwE
Evard-Cowee complex, basin,
8.5
16.8%
30 to 50 percent slopes, stony
TaD
Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent
7.4
14.7%
slopes
TmC
Tate -Urban land complex, 8 to
0.2
0.4%
15 percent slopes
TmD
Tate -Urban land complex, 15 to
2.4
4.7%
30 percent slopes
Ud
Udorthents, loamy
0.3
0.6%
UhE
Udorthents-Urban land complex,
10.9
21.5%
2 to 50 percent slopes
Ux
Urban land
4.5
8.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
60.7
100.0%
a* Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
classthere are precisely defined limitsforthe properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Buncombe County, North Carolina
EvD2—Evard-Cowee complex, IS to 30 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vOy7
Elevation: 1,640 to 3,980 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 51 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period. 159 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Evard, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 55 percent
Cowee, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Evard, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,
crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: clay loam
Bt - 5 to 29 inches: sandy clay loam
SC - 29 to 37 inches: sandy loam
C - 37 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Cowee, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,
crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material., Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: clay loam
Bt - 5 to 27 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Cr - 27 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Chestnut, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit., 3 percent
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Tate
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
da Landform: Toes on coves
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
Down-slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
Edneyville, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
13
Summit, backslope
� Mountaintop, mountainflank, crest, side
Footslope
. Mountainbase, base slope

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, mountainflank, crest, side
slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Clifton, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit.- 2 percent
Landform: Ridges, hillslopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
EvE2—Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vOy8
Elevation: 1,580 to 3,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 62 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period. 151 to 174 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Evard, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 55 percent
Cowee, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Evard, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,
crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: clay loam
Bt - 5 to 29 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 29 to 37 inches: sandy loam
C - 37 to 80 inches: sandy loam
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (honirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Cowee, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,
crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material. Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: clay loam
Bt - 5 to 27 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Cr - 27 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirTigated): 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Tate
Percent of map unit., 4 percent
Landform: Toes on coves
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down-slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
Edneyville, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Chestnut, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional):
slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Summit, backslope
. Mountaintop, mountainflank, crest, side
Summit, backslope
Mountaintop, mountainflank, crest, side
EwD—Evard-Cowee complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2vx2d
Elevation: 1,480 to 4,070 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 54 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 159 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Evard, basin, stony, and similar soils: 60 percent
Cowee, basin, stony, and similar soils: 30 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Evard, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional):
crest, side slope
16
Summit, backslope
Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material., Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: loam
Bt - 5 to 32 inches: clay loam
BC - 32 to 45 inches: loam
C - 45 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0. 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Cowee, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,
crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 5 to 38 inches: gravelly clay loam
Cr - 38 to 80 inches: bedrock
do Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0. 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in proffle: Low (about 5.2 inches)
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirTigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Clifton
Percent of map unit.- 7 percent
Landform: Ridges, hillslopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional):
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Tate
Percent of map unit.- 3 percent
Landform: Toes on coves
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional):
Down-slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
Summit, backslope
Interfluve, side slope
Footslope
Mountainbase, base slope
EwE—Evard-Cowee complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2vx29
Elevation: 1,320 to 4,540 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 56 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free penod.- 124 to 205 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
it, Evard, basin, stony, and similar soils: 55 percent
Cowee, basin, stony, and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Evard, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform, position (three-dimensional)
crest, side slope
18
Summit, backslope
� Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Affected by soil creep in the upper solum over residuum weathered
from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: loam
Bt - 5 to 32 inches: clay loam
BC - 32 to 45 inches: loam
C - 45 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0. 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (noniffigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Cowee, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, upper third of mountainflank,
crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Affected by soil creep in the upper solum over residuum weathered
from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 5 to 38 inches: gravelly clay loam
Cr - 38 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0. 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
an
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in proffle: Low (about 5.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Clifton, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Ridges, hillslopes
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Tate
Percent of map unit.- 4 percent
Landform: Toes on coves
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
Down-slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit., 0 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Summit, backslope
- Interfluve, side slope
Footslope
Mountainbase, base slope
TaD—Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 t3y9
Elevation: 2,050 to 3,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Tate and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Q(

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Tate
Setting
Landform: Coves, drainageways, fans
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bt - 7 to 46 inches: clay loam
C - 46 to 80 inches: cobbly loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irnfgated): None specified
Land capability classification (noniffigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
TmC—Tate-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 t3yg
Elevation: 2,050 to 2,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tate and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 40 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tate
Setting
Landform: Benches, fans, stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope, toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, tread
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bt - 7 to 46 inches: clay loam
C - 46 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Streets, parking lots, buildings, and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
TmD—Tate-U rban land complex, IS to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 t3yd
Elevation: 2,050 to 2,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tate and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 40 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Tate
Setting
Landform: Benches, fans, stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, riser
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bt - 7 to 46 inches: clay loam
C - 46 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (noniffigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Streets, parking lots, buildings, and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irfigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Ud-1,11dorthents, loamy
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 t3yy
Mean annual precipitation: 48 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents, loamy, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Udorthents, Loamy
Setting
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parentmaterial: Loamy and stony mine spoil or earthy fill derived from metamorphic
rock
Typical profile
C - 0 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0. 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to very
high (0.06 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Urbanland
Percent of map unit: 9 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Rubble land
Percent of map unit., 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
1.11hE—ILIdorthents-Urban land complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 t3zO
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 1,090 to 3,830 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 64 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period., 124 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents and similar soils: 55 percent
Urban land: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Udorthents
Setting
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope, toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material., Loamy to skeletal cut and fill
Typical profile
C - 0 to 80 inches: cobbly sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0. 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to very high
(0.00 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material., Streets, parking lots, buildings, and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rubble land
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit: 0 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Ux—Urban land
Map Unit Composition
Urban land: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material. Streets, parking lots, buildings, and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirTigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
26

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http-://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcsl42p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http,://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcsl42p2-053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11 th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http-://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/n rcs/d eta i I/n ational/soi Is/?cid = n rcs 142 p2_0 535 80
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcsl 42p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1 043084
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 43041. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcsl42p2—O54242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http-//www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcsl42p2—O53624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
28

Dage 1 of 4
There are no delinquent taxes that are a lien
the parcel(s) described in the deed which the
Buncombe County Tax Collector is charged
with collecting '
01-20-2017
Date Deputy Tax Collector
Excise Tax
Tax Lot No.
Verified by.
QUITCLAIM DEED
be Co.
Type: CONSOLIDATED REAL PROPERTY
Recorded: 1/20/2017 9:27:34 AM
Fee Amt: $26.00 Page 1 of 4
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Buncombe County, NC
Drew Reisinger Register of Deeds
BK 5512 PG 1436 - 1439
Book and
- Parcel Identifier No. 9655-35-7074-00000 (Buncombe County)
County on the _ day of , 2017, by
This instrument was prepared
by-a—adzma--iiwaea aaaa=hn@4@;
Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.
605 Chestnut Street, Suite 1700
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37450
Nfichael J. Stewart, Esq.
Pi,+ttrn -W *. First American Title Insurance Co. 201 S College Street, Suite 1440 Charlotte, NC 28244
.Brief description for the Index 60 Mills GaR RoacL Asheville, North Carolina
TfUS DEED made this -T9 day of January, 2017, by and between -711 1537,5A)C
GRANTOR
PULL][AM SWEETEN CREEK, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company,
2 Walden Ridge Drive, Suite 70
Asheville, NC 28803
GRANTEE
MULLS GAP APARTMENTS, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company,
c/o Hawthorne Residential Partners, LLC
806 Green Valley Road, Suite 3 11
Greensboro, NC 27408
Submitted electronically by "Wyatt Early Harris wheeler LLP"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordab-le doc
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Buncombe Cffi0DAX1kX114rPffgWe1436 Seq: I

2age 2 of 4
That said Grantor, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00), the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has remised and released and by these presents does remise, release,
convey, and forever quitclaim unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, all right, title, claim
and interest of the Grantor in and to that certain lot or parcel of land lying and being in
Buncombe County, North Carolina and more particularly described in EXHIBIT A which is
attached hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in
Book Page in the Buncombe County North Carolina Register of Deeds
Office.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges
thereunto belonging to it, the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple, fi-ee and
discharged from all right, title, claim or interest of the Grantor.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, ma culine, feminine or neuter as
required by context.
[Execution Page to Follow]
Book: 5512 Page: 1436 Seq: 2

Page 3 of 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Quitclaim Deed to be executed this
,L2 -&y of January, 2017.
GRANTOR:
PULLL4M SWEETEN CREW LLC, a
North Carolina limi ility company
By:
Name: Winston W. Piahm, Jr.
Tide: Manager
STATEOF MOM OAROLIMA,
COUNTY OF BOW-OMBE
1, the undersigned Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that Winston
W. Pulliam, Jr. personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he is the Manager of
Pulliam Sweeten Creek, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, and that by authority
duly given and as the act of such entity, s/he signed the foregoing instrument in its name on its
behalf as its art and deed.
I -jig
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the 'Lvday of January, 2017.
�, "".11, 4 f -- -7 7
w
My Commission Expires: .. -
Y&ZO/j
The foregoing Certificate of is certified to be correct This instrument and
this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first
page hereof.
REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR COUNTY
By Deputy/Assistant-Register of Deeds

$age 4 of 4
EXJMIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Being a certain tract or parcel of land in Buncombe County, North Carolina, within the
municipal limits of Asheville, and described as follows:
Beginning on a five-eights(5/8)-inch rebar with Ed Holmes & Associates cap set flush with the
adjacent grade, said rebar having NC Grid NAD 1983(2011) coordinates of Northing: 655486.85
feet and Easting: 953342.59 feet and being located North 69*00'53" East, a grid distance of
479.04 feet from NCGS Monument "BUN 23", having NC Grid NAD 83(2011) coordinates of
Northing: 655315.29 feet and Easting: 952895.32 feet and also being located South 86*20'12"
East, a distance of 30.00 feet from an unmarked point in the centerline of Sweeten Creek Road —
U. S. Highway 25A, said point being the terminus of the seventh call in Deed Book 5172 at Page
835 recorded in the Buncombe County Registry; thence from the Point of Beginning thus
established a line with a bearing of South 86*20'12" East, a distance of 949.22 feet to a one(l)-
inch open iron pipe found flush with the adjacent grade; thence a line with a bearing of South
22*29'33" West, a distance of 622.44 feet to a one(l)-inch pinch top iron pipe found 0.4' above
the adjacent grade; thence on a line with a bearing of South 20'12'5 1 " West a total distance of
347.48 feet to an unmarked point, passing a one -and -a -half (1-1/2) inch open iron pipe found
flush with the adjacent grade at 327.97 feet, said unmarked point being at the terminus of the
tenth call of Deed Book 5172 at Page 835 and in the old center line of Mills Gap Road; thence
with the old center line of Mills Gap Road (crisscrossing the present-day center line of Mills Gap
Road — NC Secondary Road 315 0) the following four (4) calls: 1. North 70' 1511" West, a
distance of 96.67 feet to a railroad spike found, 2. North 60* 12'47" West, a distance of 172.55
feet to an unmarked point; 3. North 54* 12'47" West, a distance of 213.25 feet to an unmarked
point and 4. North 62*47'37" West; a distance of 351.27 feet to an unmarked point in the
intersection of Mills Gap and Sweeten Creek Roads; thence with the center line of Sweeten
Creek Road the following seven(7) calls: 1. North 20*30'04" East, a distance of 24.67 feet to an
unmarked point; 2. North 17*59'04" East, a distance of 100.00' to an unmarked point; 3. North
15'04'04" East, a distance of 100.00' to an unmarked point; 4. North I 1'16'04" East, a distance
of 100.00' to an unmarked point; 5. North 07*5 1'04" FAs% a distance of 100.00' to an unmarked
point; 6. North 04* 16'04�' East, a distance of 100. 00' to an unmarked point and 7. North
0 1 *07'04" East, a distance of 48.41 feet to an unmarked point; thence leaving Sweeten Creek
Road South 86*20'12" East, a distance of 3 0.00' to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 15.251 +/- Acres and being the same property as described in Deed Book 5172 at
Page 835 recorded in the Buncombe County Registry.
All distances are horizontal ground distances in U.S. survey feet, unless otherwise noted, and all
bearings are oriented to N.C. Grid NAD 83(2011).
Book: 5512 Page: 1436 Seq: 4

N
w 0
z Z
z
0
C lzu
r. Ro
Lu S
CC W
z
-N
a
X 0
w 0
Z
Z
PROPOSED IMPACT AREA
WITHIN STREAM BUFFE
SB
0.
4-
10
0
Q
0
Z 4) 0
:2
PROPOSED OPEN THROAT
CATCH BASIN
41
Co,
6
S&
S& SB
0
ss
SB
I
0
Isl>s,
/,(Z,
XZ
z
Lu
z
PROPOSED RETAINI NG
WALL (TYP)
S19
2�
Cl)
gs
es
PROPOSED HEADWALL
23()5
PROPOSED 20'X36"
HDPE PIPE
SUMMARY
BUFFER IMPACT AREA 9135 SF
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT 149 LF
40
PROPOSED 108'X36"
HDPE PIPE
0
w
v -
0
41
U
L0
0 15 30 60
mt
LLJ
LLJ
C)
0-
1 inch 30 ft.
_j
D
0

0 a
=r 0
CD
-Z
CULVERT PROFILE BULLETIN FOR: 03/16/17
I HAWTHORNE AT MILLS GAP
IN PATTON
ASHEVILLE, I
PHONE (SM 252-6388
FAX (828) 252,WS5
160wagul 52 WALNUT STREET SUITE 9
Conce�t—s, FAM WAYNESVILLE, N -C W786
PHONE(M)452-"10
CDC PROJECT #11541 NCBELS LICENSE #: C-2184 www.cMkiesigneoncepts.com FAX (8W) 455-5455
m;o
00
-0
0
V)
0 rn
;o
>
C) 0)
M>
J6
a)
C
> c:
;o
=:I
0
m
x
U)
--I
z
0
rQ
rl)
N) K) m
C)
;o
>
C14
00
0
0
rn
10+00
T
T
0 OD
0 vr----,
z
FTI
PROP. C2 -
STA: 11+10.OT7LINE C)
TOP: 2299.46±
0
v
11+00
INV. IN: 2290.84.(C3—C2)
0
V)
INV. OUT:'2290.84 (C2—Cl)
PROP. C,3
C)
STA:- ll -+32.36
TOP: 2295.29±
>
0
rn
11+39
I
OUT:i-- 2291.4T
(C3—q2)—
J)
m 0
0 �, I
—
po
C,
0
rri
-q
4
C14 C4
CD
0
co
0
0
0
01
L—:–j
N)
0 0
-0.
I
c: 0 -0
n rn ;o
M -Do
-0
0
> -n W
En m
0
> Ci
M
Jo
c
> C
;D
=1 -<
0
0 a
=r 0
CD
-Z
CULVERT PROFILE BULLETIN FOR: 03/16/17
I HAWTHORNE AT MILLS GAP
IN PATTON
ASHEVILLE, I
PHONE (SM 252-6388
FAX (828) 252,WS5
160wagul 52 WALNUT STREET SUITE 9
Conce�t—s, FAM WAYNESVILLE, N -C W786
PHONE(M)452-"10
CDC PROJECT #11541 NCBELS LICENSE #: C-2184 www.cMkiesigneoncepts.com FAX (8W) 455-5455

NOTES
1. ALL SITEWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE NTH ALL LOCAL
STATE. AND NATIONAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND ALL
REQUIREMENTS IN THE PROECT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
2- SINGLE-PHASE CONSTRUCTION.
ALL WORK MUST BE PERFORMED BY A NORTH CAROLINA LICENSED
CONTRACTOR
4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND VERIFYING THE
EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION FOR ALL UTILITIES PRIOR To
CONSTRUCTION; AND TO NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR
DISCREPANCIES. THE LOCATION OF SOME UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
PLANS HAVE ENEEN APPROMATED. ALL BURIED UTLFnE5 HAVE
NOT BEEN S14OWN ON THE PLANS AND IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSMILITY 70 DETERMINE THEIR LOCATION PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (SHOWN
TO REMAIN) AND NEWLY COMPLETED WORK DURING
CONSTRUCTION. ANY DAMAGE INCURRED DURING OR RESULTING
FROM CONSTR C71ON ACTIVITY IS THIE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR AND TO BE REPAIRED IN ACCDRDAN NTH
APPLICABLE 7ANDARDS OF APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AT
LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS TO BEGIN.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ULOCO AT 1-800-632-4949 OR
811. 72 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.
7. SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ORDER TO PRO
POSITIVE DRAINA AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES A MAXIMUM
OF 5X SIDEWAUK/CROSSWAUK LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS PERMITTED.
A MAU" OF 1/4- PER FOOT SDEWAJLK/CRMWAUK CROM
SLOP' IS PERMITTED. ANY SIDIEWALK/CRCSSWAUK INSTALLED
NTH A STEE R SLOPES SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT
CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.
& ALL RADII U ARE FROM FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED. ALL PARKING LOT RADII ARE &5' UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
9. ALL ROAD/PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS. STRIPING AND SIGNAGE
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST MANUAL ON
UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE (MUTCD). CONTRACTOR MAY
USE A PANT SUITABLE FOR ASPHALT APPLIC TION IN LIEU OF
THERMOPLASTIC WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.
10. CURB END TREATMENT TO BE APPLIED TO ALL CURB ENDS. REFER
TO CURB END TREATMENT DETAIL
11. PROPOSED ROADS TO BE PRIVATE CITY OF ASHEMILLE IS NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR MY ROAD MAINTENANCE -
=ANPS1r=X NTH
EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ��
PROPOSED
(SEE GETAKDO NOT ENTER SIGN
EXIS
30' STREAM BUFFER
(FROM TOP OF BANK)
r�� a*
__T16
2
POG�_P�AM(
125* CORNER LOT SETBACK
EXISTING TREE -SAVE AREA
PROPOSED REETAINING WALL
WITH DECORATIVE FACE
CONTACT-.
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)
MILES GAP
(3M) 553-1700
ZMWOOR
O IMPROVEMENTS
CIVIL DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
PROPOSED STRIPING
165 PATTON AVENUE
PROPOSED 111" CURB GUTTER
ASHEVILLE. NORTH CAROU A 215501
CONTACT:
(TYPXSEE DETAIL)
=ANPS1r=X NTH
EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ��
PROPOSED
(SEE GETAKDO NOT ENTER SIGN
EXIS
30' STREAM BUFFER
(FROM TOP OF BANK)
r�� a*
__T16
2
POG�_P�AM(
LEGEND
UGHT DUTY PAVDAENT
HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT
101
IN 01116
VIE �vv
PROPOSED COMPACTOR
PROPOSED MAINTENANCE SHED
EXISTING PROPERTY UWE (TYP)
PROPOSED
el
-E,
J6
PROPMD RETAINING WALL
(DESIGN BY OTHERSXTYP)
F
FORM
ZONING CITY: IND
X SEE r
_�"CK
. V-')
FMPOSED
ING SPACES
OMOWUNT (TYP)
PROPOSED RE7AWINIGAULS
07H DECORATIVE
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)
14:)Uny
SEE SHEET C202 FOR MILES GAP &
SWEETEN CREEK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
STANDARD PARKING SPAM 9XI TW
W
SIGN
F(".E DETAI 7)
1O`x7O` NCDOYSIGHI4 TRIANGLE (TYP)
is
MEDIAN TH 9' CURB
42' WCDOT ROW
I'M",
VICINITY MAP
N.T­ -1
DEVELOPMENT DATA
EXISTING TREE -SAVE AREA
HAWTHORNE RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS
We GREEN VALLEY ROAD. SUITE 311
GREENSBORO, NO 27408
CONTACT-.
PHILIP M, P YONK
PROPOSED SMS NTH RAILING
(TYPXSEE DETAIL)
(3M) 553-1700
CIVIL ENGINEER:
CIVIL DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
165 PATTON AVENUE
PROPOSED 111" CURB GUTTER
ASHEVILLE. NORTH CAROU A 215501
CONTACT:
(TYPXSEE DETAIL)
(828) 252 -ON
ARCHITECT-.
PLANWORX ARCH TECTURE
PROPOSED
2 9`x18* HANDICAP PARKING SPACE (TYP)
RALEIGH, MC 276M
1 W WIDE VAN -ACCESSIBLE LOADING AISLE
2 PROPOSED HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS
J
KENBRASWELL
2 WHEEL STOP
SURVEYOR
ED HOLMES & ASSOCIATES
I STANDARD WHEELCH RAMP
200 RIDGEFIELD COUR STE. 215
(TYP) (SEE DETAILS)
CONTACM
MARTY BARNES. P"S
-HC SYMBOLS TO NOT BE STRIPED
[phone]
PIN:
9655-35-707
ADDRESS.
ED MILES GAP ROAD
DEED BOOK/PAGE.
LEGEND
UGHT DUTY PAVDAENT
HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT
101
IN 01116
VIE �vv
PROPOSED COMPACTOR
PROPOSED MAINTENANCE SHED
EXISTING PROPERTY UWE (TYP)
PROPOSED
el
-E,
J6
PROPMD RETAINING WALL
(DESIGN BY OTHERSXTYP)
F
FORM
ZONING CITY: IND
X SEE r
_�"CK
. V-')
FMPOSED
ING SPACES
OMOWUNT (TYP)
PROPOSED RE7AWINIGAULS
07H DECORATIVE
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)
14:)Uny
SEE SHEET C202 FOR MILES GAP &
SWEETEN CREEK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
STANDARD PARKING SPAM 9XI TW
W
SIGN
F(".E DETAI 7)
1O`x7O` NCDOYSIGHI4 TRIANGLE (TYP)
is
MEDIAN TH 9' CURB
42' WCDOT ROW
I'M",
VICINITY MAP
N.T­ -1
DEVELOPMENT DATA
OVWR/DEVELOPER-
HAWTHORNE RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS
We GREEN VALLEY ROAD. SUITE 311
GREENSBORO, NO 27408
CONTACT-.
PHILIP M, P YONK
(3M) 553-1700
CIVIL ENGINEER:
CIVIL DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
165 PATTON AVENUE
ASHEVILLE. NORTH CAROU A 215501
CONTACT:
WARREN M. SUGG, P.r
(828) 252 -ON
ARCHITECT-.
PLANWORX ARCH TECTURE
5711 SIX FORKS ROAD. STE too
RALEIGH, MC 276M
CONTACT'.
KENBRASWELL
[phone]
SURVEYOR
ED HOLMES & ASSOCIATES
200 RIDGEFIELD COUR STE. 215
A94EVLLF MC 2"06
CONTACM
MARTY BARNES. P"S
[phone]
PIN:
9655-35-707
ADDRESS.
ED MILES GAP ROAD
DEED BOOK/PAGE.
51 72/0&N5
PROJECT ACREAGE.
15,25* ACRES
ZOMM.
CURRENT - IND
PROPOSED - HB -CZ
DEVELOPMENT DATA
SE70AM
FRONT:
35 , (FROM MILES GAP)
Sam.
6
REA&
10,
CORNM
25- (FROM US 25A)
Dls7uRBm AREA.
CIA AIIQNSL
1195 AC
mmum MAXIMM
136 I-INEDROOMS (I PER I UNIT) 136 272
1202 -BEDROOMS (I PER I UNIT) 120 240
16
m 48
SPACES REQUIRED, 397 672
SPACES PROVIDM 407-
-(hdudw the 10 ADA Noose, arx! the 21 garage bay spots)
HANDICAPPED SPACES,
SPACES REQUIRED: 9
SPACES PROVIDED: 10
BICYCEL
MINIMUM REOUIRED, 20
1112.01111JIM&
AMOUNT PROVIDED: 20
WALOW
HEIGHT
BUILDING I 4 -STORY RESIDENTIAL 44.5 150,900 SF
BUILDING 2 �STORY RESIDENTIAL 44.5, 159.900 SF
CLUBHOUSE CLUBHOUSE
IMPERVICIJS CALCULATK*&
25* 4.579 SF
WERMOM
PERVIOUS
PRE-OEVELOPMENT. 4�1
ACRES 10.9 ACRES((72%)
POST­DEVELOPMENT-. 7 4
SPACE
((2811)
ACRES 49* 7.0 ACRES 51%)
OPEN CALQUILKTIONS-,
REQUIRED: 23 AC (15311)
PROVIDED. 2.3 AC (153L)
CALCULATIONS,,
:A
AC (302)
PROVIDED: 4.5 AC (3OX)
DIDWRITY CALCULATIONS, -
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY - HB:
35/ACRE
MAXIMUM UNITS ALLOWED,
533 UNITS
UNITS PROPOSED'
272 LIMITS
(TWO 136 UNIT BUILDINGS)
d
U)
_j
LLI
z
L
Know what's be[OW.
Call before you dig. NORTH
SITE PLAN DRAeN BY: IJAD
CDC PROJECT tJ0 11541
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET
sa Ka
same
C201
I inch - 50 In,
t:
,o
&
d
U)
_j
LLI
z
L
Know what's be[OW.
Call before you dig. NORTH
SITE PLAN DRAeN BY: IJAD
CDC PROJECT tJ0 11541
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET
sa Ka
same
C201
I inch - 50 In,