20140912 Ver 2_NCDOT_Tran 106_NWP 14 Modification Request_20170327

Corps Submittal Covei• Sheet
Please provide tlie following uifo:
1. Pioject Nauie: Ret>lace Bridge No. 106 on SR 1502 (Kina Road) over Bovlstoii Creek
2. Nauie of Property Owiier/Applicaut _North Cacolina De�artment of Transpoitatio�i (NCDOT)
3. Name of Coi�sultant/Agent:
'Agent aulhorization needs to be attnched.
4. Related/Previous Action ]D number(s):_I�ifA 2 c/� " `� � '�� �'/`� —/� j/y
G f���0 :4c,%%Gu/� c
Site Address:
5. Subdivision Narne:
6. City: Pisgah Forest
7. Coimty: �Transylvania
8. Lat: 35310111 N Long. _-82.663104 W (Decunal Degrees Plense)
9. Quadrangle Name: PisQ�h Porest (35082-C6-TF-024)
10. R'atei�vay: Bovlston Creek (DWQ Class: C)
I1. Waterslied: Preuch Bro�d River (HCU: 06010105)
12. Requested Action:
_X_ Natiovwide Pertnit # 14 �l�fG t�/���fl j/p,ti/ %z� 4=}/i S%
Geiieral Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre-Applicltion Request
The follo�ving informatio�i will be coinpleted by Coips office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assigi� number in ORM
Audiorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ I�Tature of Activity/ Project Pmpose:
Site/Waters N�me:
Keywords:
Begin Date

ROY COOPER
GOVERTOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TIZANSPORTATION
March 25, 2017
Ms. Lori Beckwith, NCDOT Regulatory Project Mai�ager
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-2714
JAbtES H. TROGDON, II[
SECRETARY
Subject: Natiomvide 14 Permit Application — MODIFICATION REQiJEST
Replace Bridge No. 106 on SR 1502 (King Road) over Boylston Creek
Transylvania County
WBS Element No. 17BP.14.R.127
Dear Ms. Beckwith:
The North Carolina Depaitment of Transportation (NCDOT) requests modification of its pe�mit
(Action ID 2014-01668, NCDWR 2014-0912) to replace a functionally obsolete 18' W x 16.0' L
single span timber bridge. The modification involves our current proposal to use a 2 r�r 13' W x 6'
H x 40' L reu�forced concrete bos culvert (RCBC) on an 80 degree skew 0.5% slope instead of
the originally proposed 22.1' W x 6.5' H x 49' L prefabricated aluminum box culveM with
liead�valls. Sills and floodplain benclies will be installed with tlie RCBC to maintain stream
dimensions and provide aquatic life passage during periods of low flow. An off-site detour will
be used to wnvey traffic during constmction. The proposed design cl�ange will reduce tlie stream
impact for tlie culveit by 9 feet, but require an additional 25 feet of rip rap and floodplain bench
impact.
Enclosed are the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Fonn, EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter,
SHPO Concurrence Forms, vicinity map, USGS topographical map, Culve�t Survey Report, plan
sl�eets, and pliotograpl�s.
Tlie Noith Carolina Natural Heritage Database was checked for records of tlu•eatened and
endangered species. The database lists 47 species for Transylvania County that liave federal
status. The bog tuitle (Gl�ple�xys nn�h/enbergii) is listed as threatened due to similariry of
appearance to the listed northern bog turde. Eight species, Carolina northern flying squirrel
(Glnuconrys snbrinus colora�us), Appalachian elktoe (Alnsniidonln rm�enelirnra), mountain sweel
pitcher plant (Sm�racei�ia rubrn ssp. jouesii), small wl�orled pogonia (Isoh•ia medeoloides),
spreading avens (Geurn radini�rm), swamp pink (Helonins bulln(n), Virginia spiraea (Spirnen
i�irginim�n) and rock gnome lichen (G�+nmoderma linem�e), are listed as eitlier tl�reatened or
endangered. Transylvania County is within the kno�vn range of northetn long-eared bat (Mytosis
seplenh•ionnlis) as �vell.
,4/ailingAddre.rs:
NC DEPARTMENT OP TRANSPOBTATION
Division l4
253 WebsterRaad
Sylca, Nocth Carolina 28779
Telepl�one: (828)586-21d1
Far: (828)S86-0W3
Ciu'romer Sen�ice: I -87 7368-0968
1!'ebsile: m�mcncdo[.Eov
Lomtion:
NC DEPARTh1ENT O� 7RANSPORTATION
DiviSion l�!
2531Vebster Road
Syh�a, Nor1h Carolina Z&779

Bridge 106, Transylvania County Page 2 March 25, 2017
The Appalachian elktoe is found in well-oxygenated streams with moderate to fast flowing water
and requires stable relatively silt free substrate that is gravelly or rock. The Appalachian elktoe
records in the area ai�e fi•om relatively large streams, tlie Frencli Broad River, Little River and
Mills River. There are no records for the smaller tributaries of these streams. No Appalachian
elktoe were observed during the field scoping process and records indicate the nearest known
occun�ence is located approximately 22 river miles from the project area in tlie French Broad
River.
Carolina no�tliern flying squi�rel, rock gnome lichen, and spreading avens are species that require
habitat found at relatively higl� elevation. Although most rock gnome Iichen populations occur
near or above 5,000 feet elevation, it does occw• at lower elevations within deep river gorges.
The elevation at the site is approximately 2,200 feet and ve�tical rock substrate required by the
rock gnome lichen is lacking near the project site.
Small whorled pogonia generally occurs in open, dry, deciduous woods with acid soil according
to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. However, it is also known to occur in a variety of habitats
in North Carolina, including abng streams. The project site is maintained road right of way, with
some forest area consisting of deciduous trees. Tlie area is also heavily impacted by invasive
species that include Chinese privet, Japanese honeysuckle, multiflora rose and periwinkle. The
site has very Iow potential to suppod small whorled pogonia. Records indicate tlie neai�est known
occurrence of small whorled pogonia is approsimately 11 miles east of the project area.
Virginia spiraea occws along rocky, flood-scoured riverbanks in gorges or canyons. Gravel and
rock bars that provide habitat for Virginia spiraea are lacking at tlte p�roject site. S�vamp pink and
mountain s�veet pitcher plant are species that are found in saturated soils. The project vicinity is
higlily disturbed and �vetlands are not associated with the site.
Although Transylvania County is within the known range of nor[hern long-eared bats, there are
no known hibernacula or maternity roosts here. And, this project is several miles from the nearest
"red huc" for known l�ibernacula or maternity roosts. This project should require cutting about 12
large ti�ees. However, blasting and pile driving (percussive activities) are not planned. There are
no bats or signs of bat usage on this bridge.
The project is limited to tlie replacement of an existing spanning st�vchu•e �vith a box culvert.
Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be implemented to further minimize potential to
adversely affect aquatic liabitat. No Appalachian elktoe were observed during the field scoping
process and records are lacking for smaller tributaries of the French Broad River. Since the
nearest occupied habitat in tlie French Broad River is approsimately 12 miles upstream of the
conFluence of Boylston Creek, we recommend a"no effecN' detennination for the Appalachian
elktoe.
Terrestrial habitat has been highly disturbed at the project site due to road right of way and
residential development. The project is limited in scope and habitat appears to be lacking for
ten�estrial tiveatened and endangered species. For these reasons and tliose discussed above, we
reconnnend a"no effect" detennination for terrestrial threatened and endangered species.
This project was reviewed by NCDOT's Human Enviironment Unit in 2013 for potential affects to
historical architecture and archaeology. It was detenuined that no suivey was required for
historic arcliitectui�e. An archaeological survey was conducted on October 4, 2013, aud it was

Bridge 106, Transylvania Cowity Page 3 March 25, 2017
determined there would be no effect, and no fiuther archaeological investigations ��-ere necessary
for this projeet (see attaclied forms).
NCDOT best m�n�gement practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation �nd
erosion on this project The construction forem�n will revie�v all erosion and sedimentation
control measures daily to ensure erosion and sedimentation is being effectively controlled. iFthe
devices are uot funetionuig as u�tended, H�ey �vill be replaced immediately �vith better devices.
Iropacts to Wnfers of tl�e Uuited States
Boylston Creek (D WR Class C) is sho���n on the USGS topographic roap as a perennial stream.
The channel is well defined �vitli a substrate primarily composed of cobble, gravel nnd s�ud/silt
and is approsiinately I S feet in �vidth. Boylston Creek flotvs npproximately 10 miles to tlie
Freucli Bro�d River. The �rench Binad River meets Ihe definiliou of a Traditional Navigable
Water. For these rcasous, we believe Boylston Creek is a Relatively Permanent Water and is
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 6i order to consh'uct the projecf, it
will be necessary to impact �vaters of tlie United St�tes iu the Freucli Broad River Basin (HIIC
06010105). Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to replace Bridge No.106 with a RCBC. The
impacts are Iisted in the table belo�v.
Site ��isting Condifion Proposed Condition Net Impact
No.
�� � �++ �v ;. n �,> u�, n n+ i n � IHtH1HH��Bti
Site 18' W x 16' L E:r„�. �.".. �����.�..,���� 49'
I Timber Bridge 2� 13'j'V � 6' F7 x 40' L reinforced 40'
coucrete bo� culvert QiCBC)
Site Pree Plowing Stream Impervious Dike and Flow Diversion 100'
IA ExistingStre�mb�nks
Site Free Flowing Stream Install Floodplain Benches and Riprap �5'-
1B Existing StreambTnks B�nk Stabilizatiou 60'
�lbt�l Yerm�neut Sh•eam lmp�ct — l;ulvert 4Y' �7U'
Total Permauent Stream Impnct —Tloodplain Benches and Baulc Stabilizatiou 3�'- 60'
Totul Temporary Sh•enm Lnpacl — Impe��•ious Dike �nd P'low Diversion 100'
Permits Requested
NCDOT is liereby reqiresting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed
with the coustruction project outlined above. By copy of this letter to North Carolina Deparlment
oF Environment and Nahir�l Resources (DENR), Division of Water Resources (DWR), I am
requesting authorization iu�der Seetion 401 of the Clean V1'ater Act.
Also by copy of this letter, I am asking Ms. Marla Cli�mbers, �Vestern NCDOT Revietiv
Coordinator, ofthe Nor�h Caroliu� Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to comment
directly to you concerning the 404 Natiouwide Permit request.
h� �dditi�n, I am asking Ms. Chambers and Mr. Reid Whitehead, Roadside Environmental Field
Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to comment directly to me concernina this permit request.

Biidge 106, Transylvania County Page 4 March 25, 2017
If yon have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone] or
Mr. Josh Deyton, PE, at [phone]. Yonr early revie�v and consideration will be greatly
appreciated.
Si e re� ly,
�-�-w �/
Da e McHenry ������ Y
Division 14 Environmental Program Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of Water Resources — DENR, Raleigh
Mr. Kevin Barnett, Division of Water Resources — DENR, Asheville
Ms. Marella Buncick, Biologist, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville
Ms. Marla Chambers, Westem NCDOT Review Coordinator, NCWRC, Ablemarle
Mr. Joshua B. Deyton, PE, Division 14 Bridge Management Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Reid Whitehead, Roadside Enviromnental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT

,'�•.
O�QF N! ATE9�G
�
�
O ="��Y
��_�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ projecl no.
Fonn Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Constructiou Noti�cation (PCN) Forrn
A. Applicant Iuformation
1. Processing ��l��i�cr/ ;�o /l, ��47�,�s —
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Sectio �4 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Pennit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Qualily Certification – Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdiclional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Qualily Certification – Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for ihe record For lhe record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because wrilten approval is not required? Certificalion:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigalion bank or in-lieu
fee program. NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP)
1 g. Is lhe project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is lhe project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of projecC Replace Bridge No. 106 on SR 1502 Q<ing Road) over Boylston Creek
2b. County: Transylvania
2c. Nearest municipality ! town: Pisgah Forest
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or State 178P.14.R.127
Project No:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Pariy (for LLC if Dave McHenry, Division 14 Environinental Supervisor
applicable):
3d. Street address: 253 Webster Rd.
3e. City, state, zip: Sylva, NC 28779
3f. Telephone no.: 828-586-2141
3g. Fax no.: 828-586-4043
3h. Email address: damcnenrv�'a�ncdot.qov
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (If different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, spec(fy:
4b. Name: N/A
4c. Business name N/A
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: N/A
4e. City, state, zip: N/A
4f. Telephone no.: N/A
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: N/A
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name N/A
(if applicabte):
5c. Street address: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
5e. Telephone no.: N/A
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: N/A
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Lalitude 35.310111 Longitude: -82.663104
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to goylston Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Qualily Classifcation of nearest receiving water: DWR Class: C
2c. River basin: French Broad River (HUC 06010105)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the si[e and the general land use in the vicinity of the project a[ the time of this
application:
The general landscape cover is rural residential and agriculture, with some forest cover to the south of Bridge 106 and
open fields in the immediate vicinity of the bridge.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wellands on the property:
N/A
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete 18' W x 16.0' L single span timber bridge wilh a 2@13'W x 6'
H x 40' L RCBC.
3e. Describe the overall project in delail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Traffic will be detoured off-site. Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be installed. Water will be diverted
around the construction area. The old bridge will be removed. The new culvert will be constructed on lhe same location.
Track hoes, dump trucks, bulldozers, cranes, paving equipment, water pumps, sand bags, diversion pipe and various
hand tools will be used to accomplish the work.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional welland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo? this property / ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in lhe past.
Comments: N/A
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional detennination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary � Final
4c. If yes, who delineated lhe jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A
4d. If yes, lisl lhe dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including alI prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help f le" instructions. /
Action ID 2014-01668 and NCDWR 2014-0912 �'Ju9���icfJi�v.N K�S�v�ES j
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Ptans
6a. Is tfiis a phased project7 ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, �xplain.
N/A
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streains - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts �roposed on the site, then complete this queslion for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Pennanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, olher) (acres)
Tem ora
W1 ❑ P❑ T N/A NIA O Nas O pWQ N/A
W2 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland imp�icls N/A
2h. Comments: N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all slream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or inlermiltent DWQ — non-404, widlh (linear
Temporary (T) (IN'n9 other) (feeQ feet)
Aluminum Box � pER � Corps
S1 � P � T Culvert Boylston Creek � INT � DWQ 15 4940
RCBC
S1A ❑ P� T �mpervious Dike and goylston Creek � PER � Corps 15 100
Flow Diversion ❑ INT � DWQ
Floodplain Benches � pER � Corps
S1 B� P❑ T and Riprap Bank Boylston Creek � INT � DWQ 15 �560
Stabilization
S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Tot�l Permanent Stream and Tribulnry Impncts — Culvert 49'�!U'
Tutal Perroaneuf Stream lmpacls for rloodplain Benches �nd Riprnp Banle St�biliznlion 35'60'
'Pofal Temporary Sh'eam Impncts for Lnpervious Dilce and Tlow Diversion 100'
3i. Comments: N/A
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. lhen individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent(P)
or Tem ora
01 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A N!A N/A
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts N/A
4g. Comments: No open water impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Welland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 N/A N/A N/A N!A N/A N/A N/A N/A
P2
5f. Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N!A NIA
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required7
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: N/A
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): N/A
5k. Method of construction: N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a proiected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin7 ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 Impact
Permanent (P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Tem ora im act re uired?
B1 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A ❑ Nos N/A N/A
82 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buifer impacts N/A N/A
6i. Comments: NlA
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The minimum length culvert to meet secondary road standards was designed for this site. The culvert will be buried 1 foot
below lhe existing streambed elevation and sills will be installed. Floodplain benches will be installed at the inlet and outlet
ends of the culvert to help maintain channel dimensions and aquatic life passage especially during periods of low flow.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construclion techniques.
Erosion and sedimentation BMPs will be installed prior to construction. Water will be diverted around the work area during
culvert installation in order to prevent sedimentalion of downstream aquatic resources.
2, Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the Slate?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � COrps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation opiion will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program (NCEEP)
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigalion Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type N/A Quantity NIA
3a Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 49 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool �cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): N!A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4f. Non-riparian weUand mitigation requested: N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of lhe proposed mitigafion plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigalion?
6b. li yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 N/A N/A 3(2 for Catawba) N/A
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: N/A
6g. If buffer mitigalion is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permiltee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E, Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percenl imperviousness of this project? N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If lhis project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative descripiion of the plan:
Project is covered by individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000250
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Certified Local Government
NCDOT ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all ihat apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submiltal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 1 q 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federalfstateflocal) funds or the � yes ❑ No
use of public (federallstate) land?
1 b. If you answered'yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to lhe requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes' lo ihe above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, altach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violafion of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered °yes° to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanalion of the violalion(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered °yes° to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitaiive cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered °no,° provide a short narrative description.
This project is limited in scope and involves the replacement of an obsolete bridge with a culvert. The road infrastructure
is not being upgraded. The secondary and cumulative impacts from this routine maintenance project should be
insignificant.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with ihe USFWS conceming E�dangered Species Act � yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NoAh Carolina Natural Heritage Database and onsite investigation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habilat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essenlial Fish Habitat?
N/A-There are no marine or estuarine communities within the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project was reviewed by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit in 2013. It was determined that no survey was required
for historic arch(tecture. A survey was pertormed for archaeology and it was determined the project would have no effect
on archaeological resources (see attached documents).
8. F�ood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will lhis project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
� -- �
Dave McHemy, � � �/
Division 14 Environmental Supeivisor a,r,�,< �"Gu� 3 2��
i
ApplicanUAgenYs Signat Date
App6CanVAgenPs Printed Name (AgenCs signaWre is valid only'rf an authorizalion letter from the
appiicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

�����
- - ..r.
�ICb�Ntt
North Carolina Department oi Environment and Natural Resources
Pat fvicCrory Michael Ellison, Direcfor
Governor Ecosystem Enhancement Program
August 6, 2014
Mr. Mark S. Davis
NCDOT Division 14 Environmental Supecvisor
North Carolina Deparlment of Transpottation
253 Websler 2oad
Sylva, North Carolina 28779
Dear Mr. Davis:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
R�CEli1��
AU6 0 6 1014
�I�JiSION 14
Division 14 Project, Replace Bridge I06 over Boy(ston Creek on SR 1502 (King Road),
Transylvania County; WBS Element 176P.14.R.127
The purpose of this letter is to notify you [hat the Ecosyslem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide Nie
compensa[ory slream mitigation for tlie subject projecL Based on the information received on August 4, 2014, the
impacls are located in CU 06010105 of the French Broad River basin in the Southem Mountains (SM) Eco-Region, and
are as follows:
French Broed Stream WeNands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
06010105 Non- Coastal
SM Cold Cool Wam� Riparian � arian Marsh Zone 1 Zone 2
Impacts (feeVacres) 49.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This impact and associated mitigalion need were under projected by the NCDOT in �he 2014 impact data. EEP
will commit to implement sufficient compensatory sfream mitigation eredits to offset ihe impacts associated with ihis
project as de�ertnined by ihe regulnlory agencies using die delivery timeline listed iu Section F3.c.iii of the N.C.
Department of Envirownenl and NaNral Resources' Ecosystem Enhancemenl Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument daled
July 28, 2010. If Ihe above referenced impact amounts are revised, then Ihis mitigation acceptance letter will no Ionger
be valid and a new mitigatio� acceptance letter will be required &om EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional infomiation, please wntact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
� ��--"^"„I��
V
Jam s . Stanfill
EEP Asset ManagemeN Supervisor
cc: Ms. Lori Beckx�ilh, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field O(fice
Mr. Josh Deyton, P.E., NCDOT—Division 14 Bridge Program Engineer
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA
File: SR 1502—Bridge ]06—Division 14
1fi52 M11ail Service Center, Raleiyti, Nudh Caio4na 27fi994652
Plrone: 319-707-897611nfernel:�rrcnvncdeni.c�ov
Fr,EV'�tJ�l�9uru:ylA�6nr�aLeof.�l�lr�6r,.G/et t.l�C;u4Uqbi�Cc�deO�:�Fer

�° � � �� `�3 f �.,z�� - �3so��a-c� - ,,�=�a-Y)

� . �4 _ � Av� . �tCJ,
' . � i..1.� o.
� �i
� y�
.� _ :. �:� i .� _ • • �y, �• .'.' .� � .���„,�����, i.�,
�r�h ��" SI (� ,� �.
�� / ' '�
� [t 4
t � !Z^i
� " � � � . i'J:.
J` (�l
`1
�` ' o!
�j c;
.7� i �
: , s �: J' o
i � _ - .� . j_.
♦ _ q _ "" . .. ; . . '. . _ ,+- . _ �m,
�f� . . �• �.� . r� �Ei
,t�. � . . � n ti.. t � �
,�R . ___ ,.w•+ XF`_ . _
:�
Y , r � � 0 1 L +s,. .. : �( . L:
N � .�4. f -.� . ,m�
L �� Y N
U � �;.w : � , �o %�
c '' m` "
o ` .y v\ " �.' o:
/ . C r.-i l' . .. . , .Y , �v �
O .� \ ,`�fi . r n ��,�[, � . . (U O Ll
CO O � . .,` � ...'�,. ��, .. ..�. . v N
g� � z
N � V ��i' �' - : ,o
OU � �I�` . 16
� �
� y � i� �'
-O p *�--. � - .� • ,{M . �
(6 y, r. '� �.� O
LA C ` ; :':�` : . a�.' '' •, ' �' <• r � . .i ' � ' �r . i z
c � � . " � .. - � A., Y�✓ . � o
iy U �+ . �� ���_ �. �'f' ,� j �c ,` �.-- . o
�y Y � �•�, .✓ �
o ca � >`�= ,� � , �r f ,,
� c�>a, -a + . } s � '�` '�� �� I �
(n C c. i _ a°` ._
O � / � �� _ . '•/ t�' . �; ♦ • , sp ,
�
� '. � � ��� ' -'`:, .
'7.�:,.
O�S � `_ '� " - ' O
� �.��Y� ':•e'
N �• '
LA �
'D ` ..
�
CD ceY { - �' � . . - � !✓� c . .
Y�
_ r • `, _ ` ' . . ' .
•w r��j 1� u,� ' . .
x �,� �< � � Q�� � . .� '-R
t
. '.� �` yd . .. � .Y'Z �i��
f-', - ; � �- �� ,y,. � . r."
� j' i
����1,r a 1..
/' • .' � �:. .'1 ..
1:
���y' I
�.✓.�►`i t .. . .
'r, _ .. ��c..,
, � ° ',f� � ,✓�� . _�:
z ��
1'

Bridge No. 106 on SR 1502 over Boylston Creek
Transyh�ani� Coiu�ty
�,o.-- .���
' °�_ g- .:'
�_��
'`�,.;<-
.���_
h.V
��L..
� �.
Looking East
- ,i, ;,;
3'-.
4: .
s
' � �yi .
4�:� � i
;x nL:'
:f 4 y��' -
�
'��,� ..
� r
�� �� V'
�_- 1�:
xi
,';:."�
�
I
� � E. _
. -�,`
_ � -�
Lookiug West

Bridge No. 10G on SR 1502 over Boylston Creek
Transylvania County
'� �
%��`�ti�`.'i��,4;:
,D� ; . �'` � � ;
•� ;�y .6�' �'`,�`"
,� � +A.� 1a
� � � j,i
. ;.� y�r.s.'1; �
� f �•��
:,. � 1
7�it�2 � r�.'� ;' .
�.,,_ � °-.• .; �I,� • �
/, , � J;;���,. ��
` r! � .
����h :
j't:.l: ;l. .� .
+ ' ; �'t,l 'y �. r
�' � �
��p"°'��k'`.;, ,e,���
.'�' i . ��, r
�� . ���
� Y�, rl
T�T I
�
i t t�.
r• �
Looking Upstream
� � � � � ,:
� �'" � � ��'j � �4� R'is ,�1� � '' �' ` �[1qF �
ti ��.�:,', '1 �� `` '�
A , , i j � � '.,I ,r�
� y� �'� ..
,��. ,,� ,
r.r � r'r. ,f +�, �'y''1
� � � ��.���,�;��`�,:A�{ai�,''��i
� '!� �' � '. � - q� �, 4lTL�✓ r�
p�,y� � '� � -.
'T �� fl�ta . .�,ii�I i ' � �` +i .
l// '��i��.r '� . qs{,• ��M.i'
� ' � �•�� �fy'«� � ii �r'i
i � {
r
' Y. f .v�
'r' � �� 4r�� ~1
, 1, '1� , 1
� , �
, �tr � ;�~ � i
- . '.i'(�yi(�� �i R f �'�r
., �
� !� I
. . ' .;.�� � ,,' ;
►: ,
�
Lookiug Downstream �

ATTACHMENTA
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): a-zs-zo»
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
NC Departmenl of Transportation, Dave McHenry, Division'14 Environmental Officer
253 Webster Road, Syiva, NC 28779
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Replace bridge 106 on SR 1502 (King Road) in Trensylvania County �
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC Coutlty/paflsh/bo�oUgh: Transy�vania CI{y: PisgahForest
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. asa�o»� °N; Long. -s2.ssa�oa °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: B�v�s�o� c�eek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
zoo linear feet: �5 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: R3uBi
Sf�88fT1 F�OW: Pertenial
Wetlands: �a acres.
Cowardin Class: Na
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: �a
Non-Tidal: �a
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
� Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 3-zs-zon
� Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Ncoor
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appl�i❑canbconsultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: � 24k P�Ssan Fo�eS�
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ StatelLocal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
� 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: �✓ Aerial (Name & Date): or
Q Other (Name & Date): Sne
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested ihis preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
3-25 ��
Signature and datefif
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
amount of
aquatic Class of
resource in aquatic
Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class review area resource
1 35.310111 -82.663104 R3U61 200 linear feet Non Section 10
— non-wetland

ProJect No:
WBS No.:
Fed. Arrl No:
Pmjaf TrnrkirvgNo. (/nfmmt Un)
13-08-0063
HISTORIC ARCHIT�CTUIi� AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURV�Y REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
17BP.14.R.127
N/A
INFORMATION
Coun[y: I Transylvania
Docunient MCC
State I I Federal
Federn! I� Yes U No I Perniie I NWP 14, 401 Cert., TVA
Permit(s): TyNe(s):
Proiect DescriulJon:
Replace Bridge No. 870106 over Boylston Creek on SR 1502 (King Road).
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE5
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on August 29, 2013. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 75' fi•om die centerline eacL way and 300' from each
end of tl�e bridge. There are three homes within the APE, hvo are imder fifty years of age based on
Transylvania County GIS/Tax information and one is over fifty years of age. 91 King Rd, built 1955, is a
one story frnme house norlhwest oFfhe bridge; it is unremarkable and not eligible for National Register
listing. Bridge No. 106 is a timber bridge bnilt 1955, it is not eligible for NR listing. Tliere are no
National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is i�equired. If design plans
change, additional review will be required.
W/�V il�e nvar/nb/e isfornmtios nrovides n rellnb/e bnsis for renswr�blv prer/iclinp tlrnl //rere
�re im nnide�rlirer/ sin�rircnnt &islorrc nrc/tlleclrrrnl or Inndscaue resnnrces in !!re nroiect
nren:
HPO quad maps and GIS infornialion recording NR, SL, LD, DG, and SS properlies for the Transylvania County
survey, Transylvania County GIS/I'ax infonnalion, and Google Maps are considered valid for Ihe purposes of
delermining Ihe likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no National Register listed or eligible
propetlies within tlie APE and no survey is required.
SUPPORT DOCUMCNTATION
�Map(s) ❑Previous Survey [nfo. �Photos �Conespondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAI. HISTORIAN
NCDOT Architectural Historian
NO SURVEY R�QUIRED
Date
HieroricArehOrca�re mxllaMrcopes NO SIlRVF.7 RfiQUIRIiDJam�/o�AliirorTrrvuportolla� ProJenrm ¢rdifinlin Ihr I007Ym�mnmmkAgreanenr.
Page 1 of 2

17BP.14.R.127 - Transylvania 106 - Vicinity Map
--- - - - --- — - _ - - - �sDV
� ��..,..�..
_ .�� � --
_ ^. - _ _ -
� ' _ ; _. ._ , -
- ,,- -
._ � -., e�-�� �� � ,
> ...�Ni �- w.
8ayue�
_ C.r�
• a CV/WN!"�CG�YLLSU ��' �JYS�ML�I'tfV1�M4fY�1 U�'ll'U
!~�n a
rF:
'- "„' �..
;..c _ ..
'. _ - ',s
� u,.yR
. :�.✓�t.�.c 3.�:. �v-'+�w 3'=�42c7� ¢L%a'.5u:...r.:._.,.�. �� GLJ�.. �.+.' 1ti.:� �Zff:,. 3..Y u:.�': 1m+A :.'u�A":, 3"J. :�Y�:1. 4�;�;.75:
-�"�crr..c 'U�1�.'
..p :` buc: �r. �]:`a �.� �ia�..9 �'7'�-
_ r='� . _. :�.T':'�6Y.�eGiu� "

HPO CIS.
�; ,�, .
A:
� �r,>
I3ing M�ps Birds Eye Vie�v.
Hieroric Arddlaalure nnAlmWrrnptv A'O SURI'f;Y RGQU!/HiD/an�/orl.fiuo� 7}ruupoNaiian74ale�le nr (luoli�eJin /he 100] Proginmmnlia ABrttu�rm.
Page 2 of 2

ProjeclTrackingNo.:
I 13-08-0063 J
l-
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
'o°�&�, �LIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ,�:,�'`���
�,`q• `�'�'' ° ' PRESENT OR AI'I'EC"I'�D FORM ,+� I = (�'�
; �fit3�ISf:�) 1 II
000,�,. �:_ ,_: ,�
o �,/ This fonn mily petlains to ARCHA�OLOGICAL RESOURCFS for Il�is projecL I� is not �\t,.,r u�J
�: �I valid for Hisroric Archilecture and Landscapes. You must consult separalely wilh ilie �� (S�
Histotic ArcLitecNre and Landscapes Group, �`
PROdECT INFORMATION
Yroject No:
,; ,,
Bridge 106
17BP.14.R.127
Connty:
Docunreitt.
Transylv�nie
MCS
rV�'�. �I
DEC 1 1 1013
F.A. No: nln Pwxling: � State ❑ Federal �'V�S'Uil ��
l�
Pederrd Peri�»� Regurred? � Yes ❑ No Pern:it Type.• NWP14-401 Cert-TVA
Projeel Desei'i/�fion: Tl�is yroject is nn intensive nrchneo%gien( survey n�id evnlunfion far Nie
repl�ce»ient ofBridge No, 106 o�i SRI502 (KLtg Rrl) aver Boylston Creek (Bridge 106; iVBS No.
I7BP.14.R.127; PA No. I3-08-0063) in Trn�tsylvnxia Corrnty, Norll� Cnroltrin. As specifrerl by (he
NCDOT, the su�wey nrers nnrlArea of Potentla/Effecls (APE) for archoeology �Ytends 300f1(91.44�n)
�tor!lteast nnr! 300ft (9I.94i�1) soulhtvest along SKI502 fram eilher end ofBrirlge No. 106. Tlte corridor
is npproximnlely 150ft (45.73�u) ivide extending 75feet (22.86in) on ei!{ier sirle ofSR1502 froui iis
present cenler.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The Norlk Caroliun Departureut of Ti•ansportalion (NCDOT) Archaeo%gy Gronp revierved
tlte subject project aful deterixined:
� There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES withiu the project's
area ofpotential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for tl�is project.
❑ Subsurface investigatia�s did not reveal die presence of any archaeologicll resources.
� Subsurface investig�tions did not reveal tlie presence of nny archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
❑ All identified archaeological sites loclted withiu tlie APE have been considered and all
compli�nce for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) l�as been completed for this project.
� Tliere is no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present or
affected by this project. (Attach any notes or docm�re�tts as rieedetn
"NO NAT/ONAL REGIS7ER ELlGlBL E OR LlSTCD ARCNA80LOC/GL S/ TES PRESFNT OR AFfECTED
foim forAllrtoi7Ynrupwlolfon /3ojttU m Q�ml�rAin (de 1007 Rogmrnnmflc Agrnmrn/.
1 of 3

ProJec! TrRckingNo.:
13-08-0063
B�iefdescrlptlon nfrevieiv nc!lvilfes, resttlls ofrevieiv, nnrl caic/pslons:
An archaeological survey and evaluation for replacement of Bridge No. 106 on SRI502 over Boylston
Creek in Transylvania Couuty was conducted on October 4, 2013, by Tasha Benyshek, Michael Nelson,
Belinda Cox, and Brenda Magouirk-Nelson of TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC). During the
course of lhe survey, one previously unidentified archaeological site (31 TV 1073) was located within the
project APE. The archaeological resource is recommended not eligible for the NRHP, and no further
archaeological investigations are needed for this project.
SUPPORT DOCUMCNTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
Other: Cultural Review
Signed
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
� Photos QCorrespondence
"A'O NA7/ONdL kF.'G/SI'h'H &!ffi/tlLti 0(7IJ.1T6'O AHL'HALn/.OG(G6 SlTL•ti PFISSNT OR AF'fll.'77iD
Jarx1/or Afina TYaupo�Mqon Pmlere m QwA�ed pr lhe 7007 Prog�aavnrtlk Agine�nrt
2of9

ProJ¢NTinckingNo.:
13-08-0063
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescripliox ofreview aclivilies, resnlls ojrevie�v, and ca�cle�sions:
TRC has cmiducted an inteusive archaeological survey and evaluation for the replacemenl of Bridge No.
106 on SR 1502 (King Road) over Boylsron Creek in Transylvania County, North Carolina (Figures 1
and 2). As speci}ied by the NCDOT, the survey area and Area of Potential Effecfs (APE) for archaeology
extends 300 feet (91.44 m) northeast and 300 feet (91.44 m) southwest along SR1502 from either end of
Bridge No. 106. The corridor is approximately I50 feet (45.73 m) wide extending 75 feet (22.86 m) on
either side of SRI502 frmn its present cenfer.
A map review and sile files search was conduc[ed by Belinda Cox of TRC at the Office of Slate
Archaeology (OSA) Western Branch on September 26, 2013, whicli supplemented a previous NCDOT
review. Eight sites are located wilhin a mile radius of the project area, including 31TV 102, which is
recorAed within or directly adjacent to the project APE. Holden (1966) initially recorded 31TV 102 and
found a Woodland triangular pp/k; the site was recorded as being nodh of Boylston Creek and jusl east of
Long Branch in a small sloping field. This description is consistent with conditions immediately to the
nodh of ihe current APE. Wetmore later revisited a Middle Woodland site she recorded as 31TV 102. The
site form indicates that the site was located in a fallow field that was to be developed, and includes ihe
descriplion `9ndustrial" on the site condition portion of �he form. The indusirial setting Wetmore
describes f ts ihe surrounding area to the west of fhe APE. Wehnore's map of shovel test locations shows
31"I'V IO2 west of Sutton/Long Branch (Wetmore 1993: t26), and based on this map is 180 m west of the
curreut APE, well outsiAe the current survey area.'1'he Holden and Wetmore 31TV 1021ocations are
likely different sites, and il is possible that Wetmorc revisited 31TV101 rather than 31TV102, as
31TV101 is located west of Sidton Creek. Regardless, Holdeds 31TVI02 is likely closer to nearby NC
280 ro ihe nodh of thc project area, within the agricultural fields in that direction. The nodhern portion of
ihe current APE consis�s of a residen�ial area, and ihe landforms are modified in this location. Only one
of the three residential structures wilhin the APE are depicted on the 19G5 USGS map (USGS I965)
(only 2 oF3 are on recent 1997 USGS map [USGS 1997]), however, so it is possible that 3lTV 102 was
located in what is now a developed arca. Site 3ITV 102 was not rediscavered during the current survey
Topographic maps, United States Department of Agricidture (USDA) soil survey maps, and hisroric maps
were examined for infonna�ion on natural or cul[ural variables that migh[ have aTfected site locations.
The Price and Strother map (1808) shows "Bouydstones" Creek and tribidaries, abng with a ro2d
crossing "Bouydstones" Creek, but no other detail in the area. The MacRae mnp (1833) depicts Boylstons
Creek, along with some of its tributaries, and a road t6rough fhe valley but no olher detail in the area. The
Kerr map (1882) also depicts Doylston Creek and a road in the area, bat no detnil in the project area
eilher. The 1906 Pisgah quadrangle wutains mucl� more detail and shows Boylston Creek, along with
Sutton Creek and Long Branch, allhough Long Branch is not labeled. NC 280 is shown in its approximate
current location, as is a road in the SRI502 location along wi�h �he creek crossing in or near its current
location. No shuctures are depicted wifhin the APE, although several aee shown Further to the southeast
(USGS 1906). Similarly, the 1935 and 1945 Pisgah Forest USGS quadrangles do not show any structures
within the APE (USGS 1935, 1945). As mentioned above, a single stnicture appears on tl�e 1965
quadrangle, in the northwes[em portion of the APE (USGS 1965). By fhe time the 1965 map was
photorevised, two houses are present, with tlie addition of one in the soutUwestern quedrant of the APE
(USGS 1978).
On-line soils data show two soil types within the project area (NRCS 2013). Most of the area is mapped
as Rosman fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded. These soils occur in floodplains. Most of
the residential area is classified as Braddock loam, 2-8% slopes and consist of stream terraces comprised
of olA alluvium (NRCS 2013).
'AO NA7/ONAL RIiGlS!!iR t.'/JG/0l.EOR /l5T SO Al1CHAFA!lXi1GL S!!FS Pl7L•'SliN70R AFFFC7&D
�onxJasAIDw�7Yaupo�MlionYinjerlrarQ�mlfrAO� Ihe7PD7Yrag�amnotlrAy,�ro�n/.
3 of9

PmjealTm�kingNo.:
� 13-08-0063
The archaeological field survey included a systematic walkover of the APE to search for above-ground
features and Ihe excavation of 21 shovel tests (Table 1) in areas lacking standing water, wetland soils, or
signs of severe disturbance. All qundrants of the APE were found suilable for shovel testing. The shovel
tests measured 30 cm in diameter and were excavated ro subsoil or at least 75 cm below surface (cmbs);
all soils that were not obvious fill were dry-screened through %s-inch mesh. Limited augering was
conducted at the beses of select shovel tests to fudher assess the potential for buried sites and to find the
depth to basal gravels.
The westem portions of the APE are wiHiin a residential area, and landforms appeared largely modified
(Pigures 3 and 4), although STs 4 and 6 encountered intact alluvial soils nearest the creek. No artifacis
we��e recovered in that area. The eastern parl oFihe APE consists of agricultural tields that were planted in
corn at the time of survey (�igure 5). Surface visibility was approximately 50%. Na artifacts were
recovered from shovel tests to the south of SR1502, nor were any observed on the surface.
One very low density site was newly discovered (3ITV 1073) in the nor[heas[ern quadrant of the APE
(see Figures 2 and 5). Ten shovel lests were excavated in the site area. Soils all consisted of loamy
alluvium, but were variable, with some shovel tests (e.g., ST7) appearing to encounter swales while
others contained � more clear A over B soil sequence. Some shovel tests contained mottled, hydric soils
at the bases. Only thrce artifacis were recovered, consisting of a piece of quatlz debitage and hvo sherds.
The sherds are too sroall and eroded to allow component identification. No artifacts were observed on ihe
surface. The site may continue to the north outside of ihe APE, although a cursory look at ihe surface in
that direction did not i�veal any artifacts. The landfonn rises in ihat direction and ihat area may have been
more apractive for prehistoric occupation, as it would have been less frequently tlooded. Due to ihe very
low densily, sile 31TV 1073 is recommended not eligible within the survey area.
Based on the results of the backgromid research and field survey, there is no evidence ihat NRHP-eligible
archaeological resources are situaled within the Bridge l0G APE. Consequently, no addi[ional
archaeological investigatious are recommended for this project as currenlly defined.
Sincerely,
<;/�� /�,,,,ru(
Tasha Beiryshek
Senior ArchaeologisUAssistant Program Manager, Asheville
TRC Environmental Corporation
"h'ONA7/ONA/,!!d'GIST6RG/.Ki/BI &ORlJSlBDA/lCfU£O/A(iMA/,S/hSPRIStiN/'pRA/•7�lrT/!D
forn�/orAllirorT'mupoqnlionYroje�h niQ�m/lfird in lhe 1�] PioqmrnnlicAgn�qrsnl.
4 of9

PraJeclTmckingNo.:
13-08-0063
REFERENCES CIT�D
Hearn, Edward W., �ud G.M. MacNider
1906 SoilSenveyof'%rausylvaninConnty,No��thCnroliva.U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice,Washington,
D.C.
Kerr, W.C.
1882 Mnp ojNa7h Carolinn. On file, North Carolina State Arc6ives, Raleigh.
MecRne, lohn
1833 A New Map of fhe Slafe of Notlh Carolina. lohn MacRae, Fayetteville, and H.S. Tanner, Philadelphia.
National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
2013 Natural Resources Conservalion Service, United Stales Departmen[ oP Agricullure Web Soil Survey.
Available online al htlp://websoilsurvey.ures.usda.gov/ accessed September, 2013.
Price, ]on and John S�rother
1808 The �irsl Aclual Snrvey of the State of Nort6 Carolina. Plate IX in NoiYl� Carolinn ii+hlaps, edited by
W. P. Cumming, 196G. Stafe Department oPArchives and History, Raleigh.
u.s. ccological survey (usGs)
(90G Pisge6, N.C., ropogmp6ic map (1:25,000).
1935 Pisgah Forest, N.C, 7.5-mimrte topogrephic map (1:24,000).
1945 Pisgah Forest, N.C., 7.5-roinule topographic tnep (1.24,000).
19G5 Pisgah Forest, N.C., 7.5-minute topographie map (124,000).
1978 Pisgah Forest, N.C., 7.5-minute lopograpliic map Q:24,000).
1997 Pisgah Forest, N.C., 7.5•minute topographic map (124,000).
Tnble 1. ArcLaeolo�ical Sites Identilie�l in the Bridqe 106 Sw•ve
Shovel Tesla Arlifxcts
SihN Comnm�enl(e) Total' Prch. Ilisf. Lilhic Ceramic flisforic Tofql RecammenJalic
31TVI073 Unlmo�m Prehistoric 10 3 0 I 2 0 3 Not Cligible
' Inclndes aIl shovcl tesis wi0iin 30 m of positive lesls
Table 2. Site 31TV1073 Artifact
ST7 I 40-60 1 Debilage quariz
ST17 I 25-35 I Sherd eroded
ST20 I 0-37 1 Sherd redd�i�
"NO NA710NA/.WiG/S7F.'R fi/JGIN/.50H/J57L'DARCNAF.'OL(XllGl,S/]}.l'PfU:SF.'NfORAFF/X:T6D
fanx/orA/iiwr7Ywupo�Mtla� Pro/r�traaQiw/�edGt Ult 2007 P�agmuwmllcAgrrnxnrt
Sof9

Figure 1. Project �rea showing Bridge No. 106 APE.

. ^�'j�".4,�'
:�, , . �
��ir: ;�o �
.� w /
I
v
w
a
� v �
$ � o
�i V� p p a
N z w u a
i
° O C f� `
N lJ
__ ���� '� �I I
� \ V.;I
\
\ �� � � �� �,
��
\\ \\ � ���\\:
��. \ \r. �\ �
i ! \ �\
�) C"l� c.�C\ A
v��� \�
��
. �� tl_ ,. �, �
I b0
IC
��
v
�
I �'"
�v
v
1�
Y.
0
.°'.

Profeu Trnrking No.:
13-08-0063
- - - -----
--- --- -.�
i �
- f
' . . ' . _ . _ . . . . . � . , . i � ���.
� ' _ I�
Figure 3. Vie�v of the northwestern portion of thc I3ridge No. 10G APE mid extant structurc, view
noriheast.
. „ --_---.___--..__.... ,viewsoulh.
.•A'0 N.IT/ON.IL RI:TilST1eR /iL/G/H/ li O/f U.S]ED MCRdIiOLOG/CAL SITES p/Ui5@NTOIi APFL'C7lID
Jom�JrAlinmTrmup�mninnCi jrnrn�QuahleAiuiLr100]PiogsarnnnucA.4��•emou
8 of9

Projec! Trncking No.:
13-OS-0063 �
-LR'�-".�Y-� . rx.[.ct�n: . ..,.. s-Y
rigure 5. Vic�v of ihe esistern portion oP�he [3ridge No. 106 APL, Site 31TV I073 on righl, vicw
northwest
"RO N.V/ONAI. R/iG/ST/i2 /i/.IGID/,If ORlJS(GD ARC//AGOI.OGfCAL Sl7F.:SY'2llSF.NI'Ok N�PFC7/iD
fmrn fw h7nmr7rmn�mrmlinn /hojreu m{,)unl�rJ fn tlie 1007 Progiomnmric Agierrnoil
9 oC9

�
110005
a000s
h3ENCHIJ�ARK w1: RAILROAD SPIhE IN 6ASE OF 3S'LOCUST 16.t32' I.T. OF -L- STA, 12+75.75 EL. 2224.-0'
oar vnROJ
HYORA�T i
80YLSTOR CREE��. /A
11TIL_TIV INFORI.IATIO�.SEE UiIlI7't
EL. 221�.7 �
��-��'EL 22R.6!
caanr: ev :. �'�A� �pi[ : OS/20I5
ctisceEo er : ��'R _ — ocre : OS/20I5
!1
F PROPOSED
OOIJBLE 13'-0"X 6'-0"RCBC
RBd04E 12"C�1P
L•1d�!
ol�
Pnv
.�
�z
80°-00'-00"
�TAN.To ��R,,E� �A
� GftEtiK
H�f�s ON /
� �� �
v _� \
I � �C`�� �o
RIP RAP
�a.ao -i- crrF�.� °
�"`/"OiiLH (ROADI'!AY PAY �
� ,� ITE1,1 Y. OEiA1L1(iYP.I
, � � � � �
� _ ���_ �//�� �
_y„-_— � o
2l`0� � 1 �
� � 40 -0" R7 _
�� C�LVE �
pLONG � �
-PROPOSEO Gt1Aft�RAIL 18"SPRUCE
� IROADV4AY PAY ITEId
& �EiAILI(iYP.)
� I
1
FCOT
6ftIDGE �._-
LOCATION SKETCH
ei000s
noTEs ccoNT o�
A 3 FOOT STRIP OF FILTER FABRIC SIIALL BE ATTACHEO TO THE FILL FACE
OF THL l4ING COVERIkG THE ENTIRE LE@GTH OF THF F_XPANSION JOI�VT.
Z6� NAiNE IAATERIA� CONSISTS OF IdATERIAL iHAT IS E%CAVATE� FRO`.1 7HE
STREA:1 �E� AI THE PROJECT SITE OLIRING Cl1LVERl CONSTRUCiION.NAiIVE
l.1ATERIAL IS Sl18JECT TO APPROVAL BV THE ENGINEER A�� l.1AY BE
SIIBJECI IO PEft1.11T CON�IiI0N5.
FL. 22R.7i J I EL 22P.8= J EL 22P.6'-
PROFILE ALONG � CULVERT
I NEREBY CFRTIFY THESE PLANS
ARE THE AS-HIJILT PLANS
TOTAL STRUCTURE DUANTITIES
«ass A �o�,�RErE
BARREL � 3.150 _�Y/FT 126A Gr.
��ii�ec erc. zi.e c.v.
sius zo c.v.
iOTAL �49�8 C.r.
REINFOACICG SiEEL
BARReL 10,223 L�S,
vIINGS ETC. 938 LBS.
iOTAL li.I61 LBS.
FIP RAP,CLASS I t2t i0"!S
GEOiEXi1LE F0�4 D.9aINCGE 192 SO.Y�]5.
C�LVEPT E%CAvnT10N W`.'P 5�!'
FOOi��AI IO:� COti0. �dAPL 80 T01�S
REV�VAS OF E%ISiiI:G STRIlCTl1RE W:'P Su:'.
NOTES
assurnEo �avE �ono= n�-9s oR a�rERuarE �oaoinc.
oEsrcN Fr�� = o.�a Ft.
iHE RESIDENT ENGINEER SHALL CHECR IRE LENGTH OF LULVERi BEFORE STAKI�G IT OUT
i0 IdARE CERiAI� THAT IT 1'lILL PROPERIY TAKE CARE OF THE FILL.
3"0 'iiEEP HOLES IN�ICATE� TO BE IN ACCORf)ANCE L'iITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL IdAiER1AL5 SHALL I.IEET THE REOIIIRBdENTS OF THE FCOOT SiAi1'OAR� SPECIFICAiI0R5
FOR ROADS AN� STRl1CTl1RE5 DATED JANl14RY 2012.
CORCRETE IN CIILV�RTS IO �E POURE� IN iHE FOLLOYiING ORDER:
7.t4IM1G FOOTI�`'GS A\D FLOOR SLAB IAlCWD1NG 4"OF ALL VERTICAL 1'IALIS.
2. THE RE1dAINI�G PORTIONS OF THE 'JALLS ANO 17iNGS Fl1LL HEIGHi FOLL01YE0 8Y fi00F
SLA� A��D HEAOYIALLS.
iHF RESIDENI ENGiNEER SHALL CHECK THE LEkGTH OF CULVER� BEFORE STARING IT OLIT
TO ldAKE CEFiiAIN iHAT IT YfILL PROPERLY TAKE CARE OF 1HE FILL.
DIIAENSIONS FOR V71NG LAYOt1T AS V7ELL AS AODITIONAL REINFORCING STEEL EId�E�DEO
IN BnRRF.L ARE SH01'IN ON YIING SHEEI.
SIEEL IN iHE BOTTOCI SLAB C1AY BE SPLICE� AI THE PERI.ff ITE� CONSTRUCIION JOiM
AT THE CCATRACIOR'S OPTION.E%TRA 19E:IGHT OF STEEL �11E TO THE SPLICES SHALL BE
Pnro FOR ar rnF coraTRacroR.
Ai iHE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION,HE IdAY SPLICE IHE VERT�CAL REINFORCING SiEEL IN iHE
1NTERIOR FACE OF E%TERIOR YIALL AN� BOTH FACES OF INTERIOR YiALLS ABOVE LOV7ER
'NALL CONSTftUCIIOPI JOINT.THE SPLICE LENGiH SHAIL. HE AS PROVIDE� IN THF SPLICE
IENGTH CHART SHOI�N ON THE PLANS.E%TRA IYEIGHi OF SiEEL Dl1E TO THE SPLICES SHALL
BE PAID F�R BY THE CO�TRACTOft.
AT THE CONiRACTOR'S OPTIO� HE IdAY SL1B'dII,TO THE ENGINEFF FOR APPRO`/JL,�ESiGfJ
AN� �ETA1L �RAi7Ii\GS FOR A Pf�ECASi REINFORCED CONCRF.IE BOX Cl1LVERl IN LIEII OF
iHE CAST-IN-PLACE Cl1LV�Rl SHOV7N ON IHE PLANS. il',E �[SIGN SHALL PROVIDE THE SA"fE
SIZE AND YU`J9ER OF BARRELS AS 115ED ON THE CASi�IN-PLACE DESIGN.FOR OPTIO\nL
PRECASi RFI�'FORCFp CONCRETE BO% Cl1LVERT,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
THt E%ISTING Siftl1CTURE CONS1SiING OF 1 SPAN (J l8'-3", II!19ER FL008 ON TIl,'DEF
JOISTS SHALL gt RE1,10VE�.THt EX15iING 9RI[)GE IS PRESENTLY POSTED FOR LOA� LIMIT.
SHOl1L� THE STRUCiURA� 1NIEGR1iV OF THF: BfiIDGE �ETERIORATE DLIRI�G CONSTRl1CTI0N
OF i11F PROPOSEO Cl1LVERT,A LOA� LI`.IiT IdAY 8E POSIE� Ai\'[J IdAY HF RE�LICED AS FOLIND
�ECESSARY �URiNG TFF. �IFE OF TFHE PROJECI.
R@AOVAL OF 7HE EXISTING BRIDGF. SWiLL BE PERFORIfEO 50 AS NOT TO ALL01'! �EBRIS IO
FALL INIO THE YfAIER.THE CONTRACTOR SHqLL REM.OVE THE E�RI�GE AN� Sl1BIdIT PLANS
PoR �E1.10LITION IN ACCOR�ARCE YIIiH ARTIQ.F 402-2 OF THE STAN�ARO SPECIFICAiIO�S.
TH L195TRLICIURE OF IY.E EXISTI�G BRI�GL IiA'DICATED OR THF. Pl.ANS IS FROM IHE BEST
F 5
IKfOR1.1ATI0k AVAT_�ABL6 SIkCE TH1S INFOR6!ATION IS SHOVN FOR iHE LONVFNIE�CE OP THE
COYTRACiOR,iHE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NO CLAIId 1lHATSOEVER AGAINST THE DEPART"ENi
OF TRARSPOftiATION PoR ANY �FLAYS OR A�DITIONAL COST I�'CURRED BASED ON �IFFF.Rf.NCES
BEiYIEEN IHE E%ISi1NG BRI�GE S11B57RIJCTl1RE SHO'dN ON THE PLANS AND iHE ACiUAL
CON�ITIDNS AT iHE Pf40JECi SITE.
F%CAVATE IFOOI �ELOY! Cl1LVERi A�'D FOOiINGS AND RF.PLACE 1'IITH PoW\OATIOk COi\'�ITIONING
�1ATERT_AL IN ACCOft�A\'CE YI1TH A4TICLE 914 OF iNE: SiANUARD SPECIFICATIONS.
THF. HO% Cl1LVERT HAY �E �ESIGM��J FOR A FACiORE� RES1SiAYCF. OF 11P i0 IS i5G A\'�
BEARI�G ON ALI.IIVIAL SOILS.CHECK FiFLD COitl0III0NS FOR iHE REOIIIREU N0.`.1INAL
�EARI�G RFSISiANCE OF 33 TSF JLIST BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE.
FOR EROSIO� CONTROL KEASlIRE5.Cl1LVERT DIVERSION �EIAILS AN� PAY liE1.1.SEE EftO510N
COkTROL PlANS.
FOR GROLIT FOR STRl1CTl1RES,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR CRAkE: SAFETY,SEE SPECIAL PRO`/ISIONS.
FOR Sl10CIliiAL OF V90RKI�G �RAI'II�GS,SEF SPECT_AL Pft0`/ISIONS.
FOR FALSEl90RK AN� FORIdl70RK. SEt SPECIAL PROVIS-0,�15.
iIIIS BRIDGE IS LOCATED IN SEISIAIC IDNE I.
FOR OiHER �k4GN �ATA AN� GENERAL NOiES,SEE SHEET SN.
THSS STRl1CTl1ftE SHALL BE OES7GNE� IN ACCORDd�YCE '71ITH THE AASHiO LRFO ORIOGE OESIGN
SPECIFT_CATIONS.
PROJECT N0. 17BP,14,R,127
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
sTaTION: 12+94,00 —L—
GRADE QATA
GRA�E POIkT ELEV.CJ
STA,12-9q,00 -L- = 2224.98
L�FO f:LEV. = 2210.62
ROADIiFY SLOPES = VARIES
HYDRAULIC DATA
OFSIGN DISCFARGE = 600 CFS
f'REOl1LnCv OF DESIGN FL00� = 10 YRS
�ESIGN H1GH 17AiEft ELEVATION = 2223.6
oaazNncE naEti = z.�� so.�nr
BASE OISC4ARGE (01001 = 1200 CFS
BASF IffGH VIAIEF E�EVATION = 2225.29
OVERTOFPING FLOOD DATA
OVERTOPPING �ISCHAFGE = 725 CPS
FREOUENCY OF OVERTOPPIilG FLOOD =]0 YRS'
ovEaTor°�°trac F�000 E�-vnTro��i = zzzaz
�•�H ti oi".,.
a•`a°�''issi';:+'o
�f O� ,
` SFAL �`
��`6�89i - i;,
_ .;.y„EE�•:4:
'e a..:.:.r' �c
�.,,qo;i eo::.��.
�^l`t)��rzms
RSaH
DEPARTPAENT OF TRANSPORTATION
9,.uc,
DOUBLE 13'-0" X 6'-0"
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
FOR BRIDGE OVER BOYLSTON
CREEK ON SR 1502 BET6'JEEN
NC 280 AND SR 1501
R.�.s,o,s sEcr
er: I o+re: �.aJ er� I enE. � G-I

AS B � 3111%31039 19 �M19Y3 Ol �L 1':OYl 53:tiVA 3JOli+ � N�d - AS YL = 31LLX31b3J 19 NLL51%3 Ol PL wOY3 S3�vA 3dOtta ' . i
4:01 8S = dVi ditll SS�hJ"153 I � I .01 -.1 3lVJS E1L3n 51:01 [9 l fYE d�YI 5 J 19 � �
A O! = NO:LtlAtlJ%3153 NOLLtl X313N:tV11J � ,OS ' l31YJ541tlOH I rI� � -
1 �� noiu3s l � � �o �_ I � rv ir ou�3> I 1 m�£ I�
Ik3Nf1?10_OL'31.OYi0)N�V3'.'IAEI Cfldfd_OH191A1_ _.._.-_. _ I iN _._._.__ .-__ � - ' --
1J L9 I.O�LVA %3 153 HOLLtl YJ%3 l3NNV
I6 Ol Cf 0 OLCI 3111X3103D IIi3'YM.W ' 9 ... .� ' , 1 t` ' tLlVO> O Ot.3 1':O i 03 05V3' fl,Of MG �d i0 H19 i )�1-. . � y�
3l L03D I SII�YA 9�'JA I L�p I L ' ) � :' �)4 � I 0�1 FI Ct O1 ❑ I !I �jy
I y5y e I t I
I� C+' L L 1 f 5 OA / I 4 yi ��
. - _- _ _a : � _.._ . �33� VYitl15 . . - . ppp _ . _ I . _ - . . --� "_ _ 0391�Ml1S 4 - - _ _ __
� y �_. � li-.0\6fF3 6011H91J5I 9uLLSX3 �r t( � � 3101 53IfvA I31 3111 i�ONLL9 e g
�� �\ .�� ' �� �l J II � 4 T— I 4 ' �.� � It� �� .z��o N�
oi �5vrus� oae vmnis i .;.-- g _9s� _ - / d ^� 'u
I 51 -� 0350:Ov2 �• _ -_ - _ .... . I --.: � � .l ' g . N i 3 II% 9x� _ _ I . � �
j � i
� .H �' t_� I ..I .___ °� l
_.'- _-- , . . ._ ' ' I. i ._ :.
N ��
I vnvsoa I I I xx as �. Il ,.-� I �' r3\ i"� i 3i,:1 � J a I nva�ess ' F o° a°`" � 8
a�a3ui�es sv�mis ao aoi oii.z �axava e�ou ua,u nu �ve t=--""" � I r�, ���� i' a3soaard I .� s � .�$
runsaoorf i o-3e ��vanis
al � lantro9 /�oL mol ttBaJva'dr:ouvinf'IOJ aW NourNepp iN� ._ t�� gH��S�� o �
�nowam.a�or�n noueiiai�aesnu�>ve arrvivreaiv;�v.urr{aas ._ _.. _.___. - _r-_ � � . I�y f`> ��:,i_ _ ...I_.._ - . ;' �b� � . --
-__ . _ . . 1 . . . � I I
5131.10U;A8 03HJYll� dNY A131YlVd3> 15VJ'dQR\ I 38 O151115 I � � � p '� �"'-' � I�[�'' i
. "N1AOiSM13llIlOOWl31t1�i11f10�aNtl�l3ulllvlroL34� ��8 011�li2 'fl10Y 1-IJY sl � ), � � �a0 � � � p � ��o
_ � I— WV3tl4SN.504 9:L' � - 'E I � u'� . .
1 ' n51a3A1N :oa r` 1 �I' 60119 , O O � � �
i _ _. i aaunr�sNom � _ E� � 1 _,�, I� ���� _� _ _ _ __ _.__ - ___. o . i I � - +
� I� ��I� 9ui15� 3 - F �� �� �
-_ .. -- �
.
l3]2YV 13kLV0 � v�^�
O".L y ny `I ,
.0'.9 O � � TN '
t �ou H�iN n I ___.___I _ --.-___."__._.__ _-_-_?_ ____ ___.'��£9- �a£.
_-_ .____ _ ._ . . . - __
N.ov ei �
. .. oa n ci � . _ n o
�. � � 3xrn ro��v� sn oid u e I � �P� .. b __
� v I
�az s rmu�as-
i �>SIIL 0) V � � � II a � j I's
� _ _ . _- - [o9zxz i.n�ma >>ro> __— ._ _. ___. .. t� Z t. .. - - - __ ICZ _ __ _- -_ __- - _.. 1� —
. . 0([[R �»J��n �vJvr.a I �Fi'.IZ I�.. :\ II I Q C Z 4N�2 lo
.y��� 039 YlC3tl15 � 601 1f31 � r
60l H9^1 Oi:1151K3 � 9NLLSIY3 I � I
319tl1 3JNMkUOdN3d �,iy5�� L_ � - - - -
vW3i _-I- � _ � mou }'__T t'^ -�-___ _ o,
� --__ _- __-__ _ _ .. —. ._ . .
. . . _ ___ __ - oziz�
��' .:3oantes�ss3sainoiuio �'u e � I eoilu3� T_ I �I -� �_ _ � . � � _. .o. .
' I,
� dL'SL2L OSLR LpZZL 4ELLL O3SO:O�f ONIISIX3- j 1I I � r
� � . >0"SLLZ 9'SLZZ tHL2 L'ILZZ 9NLL503 I � I � 9 C�Zi L �35/.\ " 0£ZZ . �. I. - � 2 . .
- --------- � [b'VZLL 9>iR F'KLZ 9'fRL ���n� � � - - o �- � -
;�
" --_ _
'„cai '�'os �,qa '.,oi c�aiS� cw 'aa�oQ{iz:3sm . .�— g _- �'' �b'
I uinnb3ei nvi�'eo;ll �.� � i�a 1� . . � F N� g
3f015319V1GVA ,-�lZZ� 313T9 �i ��OL 0-11 . D
� 319Y1 3JNYMOfi3d . . I A3Ad'f�s io aira - 1 I
' lOOJN t- c0'�b 21 VIS �i . .0'61ZL = 13 S/! �.
11 U3Y09) > Jd 9'.£l c^ 2 _
�. -- - _ _-__ _. - -- '1tl1.001 'ttl'.OS '11AS '11IW1 - -_ -.-- _
� �
I t � .
- _ I _
_ - -� _ �_ I I �_. _I_ ( I � — - — - —� o 0 0 0 _
s,rE o�TA Pr�a
nownowu wFounnnou ,wo eaaxn�noius o�o;�� �, , v i!,sana: �,�a oeouw�o uws sr�u•uurs o; CULVERT SURVEY 8 HYORAULIC DESIGN REPORT
USGS 51¢ ]OM-5158 �PEGIOiJ ). 9WE 0.1DG�._...... ......... ...... ... Pbzr&�a:n f:EnCH EiOAo. ..... C� n,� FU>l,L ..._. -
-- ' ' ""' o_ N. G OEYARTInEM OF iFANSPORTAiION
. . . .. . ........... . �
DIAINAGF AFFA = 4J� SQ.IN. Strxam CksifmYon lSvcF m irw�. HIgF Chn�Y �la n, elal .. . ....... .--....-- ' DMSION OF HIGM'/AYS
._ .. ._ ._.. .__. ...... ._..
�; Hmnauucs uuR
O ]eg IOq� :EB R)�I('�' tW As Doln on E.:�leg SW<Nre I SPA 16 ].Rv'Ei ROOI ON RVQf41015i5 ......... �. RAIEIGH. N. C.
NebNrkeo-tb-eio: }'ii:...._. _._......._ o.
..._s, -e.:r . _. ..._.. ..... ..... z.
� ]93 (JN 39D p J 1 9S0 d� Ueh's Polz 1 L l�n. %__In�E e Hi9M1 �:
... rr ri. ...... .... ...-.- .. � pS�.KIYAiEOLVF.VAY.ISPN! G 11-d'CO\CA',UIRFNIS h: ID.I�o Sf_l10196..... PmtaUHu..__. N'HI11i1.._...... Pml Sbrvcn .. lE 9�C9
O. U9 NN 19 R]II IP]O ah Doto an 5'rvMrc� UV oM � n Aresn ._.. ......._..... ._.... ......_._.. Q • ..•....••..••
' . . -e+r ' t:i' ...- ..... ...... ...... .. a� J TPAVSIIVANA EOM1SIOrv CiEER 1�5
0�.. 515 (OT� 5J5 �L]1� I]M d PE0.�OL501N� ] Fl. �S.SF8I019B 1 SM\5J0'-b RVbEi FIOOY ON Rl'fA %NSIi �� Cw t _ 54e�m.._. .. ...._ 51 t�e.... __..
. .. . .. ....... .. .......
....� � ..�•�: ....� �........ ....... . Sala N �A P �.Od eIRePo�ds � A -, On Ii5h ) St ISOE. . P.�-1.. C ]EO.. w+] SP-159i ...........
O� )i� l�N ]91 jl NI ILOJ As iFNA IW 1tW 65 �A 18 SO. A'� �'°9" ...... ..-. .--... .....In. '
__ ._.._. ...... ......... .___. -__ ' 4C 1]'%6'f&PoRC(DCO:K4FiEE0%CUYf4I(LVFJFOII
/Wt Drsaev9e ^A -. ......c(.s �le !!T .... .... f�t9uPM' N� ...... . Fawn`m[MN Slrv[N�a . ....
I ....... ........ . ... ........
............. . . . ............. ... _..._. ............. _...................... ....... . .... ^i
... . . ......_ ... ... ..__. ...........
IN6 fi0)FQ C0.1PlIE5 \'(IIM LOCAL FWODPWN M1UNAGFA�FNT ItEGU1A110HS H�510IiCOI FI00(I I�(O/TOIiOn Sf£ A901110`uL NO1.NVpy R'D [OVVIR�ONS
P � 1 ' ft<cmr'•Med \YM�M1 of R! � 3Y.0' SYWt�.R rt i0 HIXIIDfR R y��� EU
� . . ..........
� Ix _�}_ EI - it ..REsf F 9.� .)'. Sw a�.6 fllklA SiEnvS K d9c�0 _..)rs . IOCAl10N
.._.._ ...... ...... ..._. _.... .._. .... . P«cennen3ad lam�wn s�A A.nl lreum hom 6�wM C ssM lASmG
P od f _._ ._.._...
h0 SIAUCIU[ES VILL BE ADVE0.5LLY AiffQED BY 1HF 1YSEL5 f0.0:A THIS Pi0)ECi. W a._..._ fl. ._...N.Es1 Freq ..._. �v Smrw u SN:ee
... ..... .•..• . ........ __. ])I�)'EC.p10Y3E1P5559) ..-__. .__.Nn [dJe..._Y��a. daii.�❑ RoS�'+�'vlit� ❑ Su1R:9iemlitt B
.. .... ._ _..__. _ . Rlv..ubleM/ Flec.._.._(�:COOi/tOUfy..__. _.......F. NormolV/aL•rhNawFk� ]3190..._p. o B:n�Allarku lM:I:FAy.REtl PASEOi]YlOCU5f.�08lRTq' LSIA]5.]5]5
...__. _....... .__._.. .___.. ___.__ . _.. . ..__.. ..... .... ..._........_....
NqprM1WiFAUTAN�BAIXFlLLSiKIFlUiION 1'nvdng'sn:leNO.B.00501 pq��05-qq53FgF10.B.00i0.1 pyo.mdFe<n��ASRIDY ! '�.
. . .... .... .. . ........ ................ ........... _.........
...... .... e.: EI r 11i� 30' ..II. OaNm IUYJ 19¢8
! .wu�� nl � ..... ....... ..... . . .. . . ...........
NA➢VE 1.'TLFft�AL CO`ISISiS OF IMTE0.AL 1HAi IS IXGVATEO iRON TME SIPW l CED Ai iHE, Flaad Sludy/5 �'A flS A 1441IF� �EiA�IW SNOY E 1 kfiF.edl �S a O�l�rtF on011i
GEOIER SiE �V0.4iG NLVEB[CONSTRUCiION ONLT IlAfAAL LHA� IS E%UVAiE� Fx011 iHE Rzd SIT Y��� +�� ���, �'��h � �'. T�Tfo ry C�ofl rg .._ ._..... ...._ _ ....
..... d/ICOICUUM1OR� 11G0 .cls.:WSf� Flm3..vlxIIa59...h. RocEwl 1R1)0_fl. ..........
. .. ... . .. . . . �.
SihEA'A BEO IlAY 6E O$E� TO II�E iHE l0,\V,,,RO I COLYE,A,L,B,AFiFL RP PAP IIAY BE UjfD C�*«Slefion5559] C�, ______ �
... .. DESIGN DATA i ' �!- i 1• ��
i0 SUGREI�fNi lHE !U! VF AUIFAI.LL IN 1HE HIGH Fl0'i/ NLVERT_BA¢iFl If RIP MP, 6 .... qn{�a py:�ol Al M d VSGS AR ]Wi 5 58 fEG'.ON 3 6 V pWF) Y ^. ' �k
USfD 10 p[IE_THf HIGn FLO1V_ NLYEAi B4FRH,NAIIVE NA1EWh,L $HOUID gE ttA4[O QN iOP M�drwlc 0 g IblM1ad �EGVAS VEA41 f OI.IL.Vf i BI�IM [OnSID RFFR SPIS4t : iN4� I,� ���•� �+
i0 F��L YOIDQ MO FSOyiDE [._MT SUUACE fOR_N�h� PAS$q{�E,BA[KFlLL hIP PP➢ N __ pp gA 1 A NA NA �� �, ��
p.:igniol .�� . f Q b O� ...M1d�� ...b-:On _.N. 'o .Fc� �
Fl9pD%N�f_4FAGrvFS O� SMANfi�.l'+iRovEuENlS v�1H NAIMs.NAIFR�µ ip Fll yp�o;,tu�NE � .
MA*Ea�µ is SVB�FC* iQ fTiaOYM 9Y THL E�GI�EfR �N� �'AY RF.;Va�[R TO PEW1J� SOWI119+�s- 4 �� _ ��,o q^ �� �='�" � �� �e + �� �
!rse6i��: IcLil Ke M\O Ial � MI
lS Z L� ,.�
._ ... .... �... _._ .. ' e " e �: � � r 1' �
SEE HEC-RAS MODEL a: , � ,. �y �
Yt 1115�OLCAL INFO Al5 SPFPAS HAS SEfN RIE ROAp OVFRTOP NlKF IN 10 . YFAfS _ Zo ;� �.�_. . . RO�
� i .
....... ___. _-_._ __..._. .._ _._ _ ; `.
WSIII�G BUOGE Y/ALEA\VAY OiFnING IS II SQ.fT. .._.. __ Is o ihnCnvl Fent.an Ne4'�� di n.0e 1TI...... .. . N � ,J:- { �-..._ `'...`:I�. _. ..�,:�.1
_
' iiOFO5E0 NLVERi OGENiI.G IS IV SQ R ��
� .. _.. _. .._. ...... . .. O�Ve�Ve!«�I h') ....._...50 Jps_ N t I CFannel V looil N�) ... 58 . (p. , i - ._
..... ..__ _.. Y.Ma.<d Pnk Pm m;on _ nt w .. � Fc ol� '�'' ��4.'.
N 0
._ ... __ . ...._. ...__... ........ ...._ Z. D:tkrcd� _...._ ____ ._..... 0}]615 IkVESf/O.'A`
.-. ... ... .. . -.. .... MFORALATION TO BE SHOWN ON GIANS O 5� ...... �me ......._ �J .
Ass N 6
__. . .. . _ ._. ... ._ \Y' EL T 1 P S SSSW �: ... .... . ... € f0]Y9J6 � �i;'?�
Dee'9n- � F 9.__._.6W . C. FN o/ �Q > EI . P;]l6 ._.A O; h[l04Y v 0.G.._ ..._ ... ��� FL FE�`
.. .. .... .... ..... Ih 4 �
� _. . e,.�eana o n a .�t9e �.. r a Mr - Ica _n e.. vzzszP ._r g P:.:<.ee, °A�.Rte .. ��FMa s��9a�-
. .._. _...... .... ._... .... ._.. jJ
j o.n�av�a o n � .775 . �. � c�r )V_ -a [ a2141 . n � /�%fJ+--.� 9��5 ._..
j ExiSIING LEVFL OF SERvI<E IS BEiNG I.WNiNNFO $AG SG Ai IJ+Ib.]9 Elc� 21i139