20170343 Ver 1_Bridge 990259 Yancey Permit Application_20170324 (2)

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name:_Bridge 990259 SR I 115 Bakers Creek Road
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DOT
3. Name of Consultant/Agent:
*Agent authorizalion needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address: N/A
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: _Burnsville
8. County: Yancey
9. Lat: 35.89490 Long: -8233893 (Decimal Degrees Please )
10. Quadrangle Name: _Burnsville
11. Waterway: Bakers Creek
12. Watershed: French Broad River
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

`.aSTAT�w�O'.
4a:,
t�t �� 1 21
:�y����-
�. Y 1?i
STATG OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY Coorea
GOVERNOR
March 24, 2017
Ms. Lori Beckwith
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 2880]-5006
Subject: Nationwide Permit #14
Bridge 990259, SR 1115 Bakers Creek Road
State Project No. 17BP.13.R.90
Yancey County, NC
Dear Ms. Beckwith:
JAM6S H. TROGDON, III
Scca�Tnrzv
[ have enclosed a set of plans, a PCN application for NWP #14, and a vicinity map relative to the
proposed bridge replacement project on SR 1115 Bakers Creek Road, Yancey County, NC.
We propose to replace the existing 16' timber bridge with a double barrel box culvert
(2@7'x5'x46') with a low flow barrel. Stream slope at the site is 4.9%. Cross vanes will be
installed to maintain c6annel dimension and profile. Culvert installation will result in permanent
impact to 46 linear feet of Bakers Creek with an additional 90 linear feet of floodplain
bench/cross vanes. Temporary impacts to 155 linear feet of the stream are necessary for
dewatering/diversion during construction. The stream is approximately 5 feet wide with
predominately gravel and cobble substrate. Bakers Creek is classified as Class C, Trout.
Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstrcam of the culve�rt.
Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated wiYh the project.
Stormwater will be divetted through grass-lined ditclies or vegetated buffers prior to entering
streams.
This project may impact potentially suitable northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrtonalrs)
(NLEB) summer roosting habitat via tree clearing. Following the SLOPES from NWP Regional
Condition 3.13, the project is located inside a red HUC and a survey found no evidence of bat
presence/usage at the site. A total of 5 trees will be cleared for the project. No effect on the
remaining Yancey County list of federally protected species (threatened or endangered) or
designated critical habitat will occur. Marella Buncick of the USFWS is be copied on the
application since Yancey Cowity tributaries drain to Designated Critical Habitat stated in NWP
Regional Condition 2.1.
Mailing dddress:
NC DBPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNISION THIRI'F:EN
POS"I' OPFlCY: BOX 3279
ASFIBVILLE,NC 28802-3279
Telephorce.�[phone]
Fnx:[phone]
Cvstomer Semice: I -877-368-4968
IYebslle: www.ncdoLgov
aa�o�ro��:
SSORANGESTREET
ASHEVILLB,NC 28801-2340

Lori Beckwith
Page —2 Bridge 990259, Yancey County
March 24, 2017
As a part of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the DOT
Programmatic Agreement for Minor ProjecY as required by Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be affected.
These forms are attached for the Corps fle.
By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, Notth Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission Westeru Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning the
permiY request.
By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, to comment
on the above project. Bailey Branch is classified as Class C, Trout.. The project will not require
a trout buffer variance.
By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to Kristi
Lynn Carpenter, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Unit with cc to
Kevin Barnett, NC DWR Asheville Regional Office for review and comment. Please charge the
application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 17BP.13.R.90. Please forward comments directly
to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental O�cer.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any
questions or information needs, please contact me at (828) 25 L6171.
Sincerely,
�� n �,�—
Roger D. Bryan
Division 13 Environmental Officer
Enclosures
ca J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E.
Chris Medlin, P.E.
Reid Whitehead, P.E., CPESC
Kevin Barnett
Marla Chambers
Kristi Lymi Carpenter
Marella Buncick

Orpp W AiF9OG
y C
>
O T
A. Applicant Information
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts7 If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's lwenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge 990259, SR 1115
2b. County: Yancey
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Burnsville
2d. Subdivision name: NIA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.13.R.90
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportatior
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A
3d. Street address: N/A
3e. City, state, zip: N/A
3f. Telephone no.: N/A
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes
X Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
X No
❑ No
X No
X No
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (If different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation
4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer
4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation
4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279
4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802
4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171
4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394
4h. Email address: rdbrvan(�Dncdot.gov
5. AgenHConsultant Informatlon (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name N/A
5c. Streetaddress: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
Se. Telephone no.: NIA
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: NIA
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 c. Property size:
2. Surtace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
N/A
Latitude: 35.89490° N
0.1 acres
Bakers Creek
C, Trout
French Broad
Longitude: - 82.33893° W
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in lhe vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing bridge on SR 1115 surrounded by low density residential area, farmland, and forest.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace the existing 16' timber bridge with a double barrel box culvert (2@7'x5'x46') with low and high flow barrels.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A permanent impact to 46 linear feet of Bakers Creek will be necessary for culvert installation with an additiona190
linear feet of impact for floodplain bench and cross vane activities. In addition, a temporary impact to 155 linear
feet will be necessary for an impervious dike/diversion to dewater the work area during construction. Equipment
used will include excavator, crane, and trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NC DOT
Name (if known) Roger Bryan Other: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
PJD completed by NC DOT on March 24, 2017 and submitted with this permit application.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
X No ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes X No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WZ � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WS ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3 a. 3 b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermiltent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)? other) (feet) feet)
X PER X Cor s
S1 ❑ P X T Dike/Dewatering Bakers Creek � INT ❑ DWQ 5 155
Floodplain Bench/ X PER X Corps 5 90
S1 X P❑ T Cross Vanes Bakers Creek � INT ❑ DWQ
X PER X Corps 5 46
S1 X P❑ T Box Culvert Bakers Creek � INT ❑ DWQ
S2 � P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 155
3i. Comments: 46 feet of permanent culvert impact, 90 feet of permanent floodplain bench/cross vanes, and 155 feet of
temporary impacts for dewatering. The total project footprint is 155 linear feet.
Page 4 of 10

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P�T
04 ❑POT
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
Sg. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
Sj. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
B1 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimized length of culvert and has low flow barrel to maintain natural stream channel width within the structure.
Floodplain bench and cross vanes will be constructed to maintain stream channel stability.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
N/A
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this X Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 46 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool X cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No.
000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
X Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
X Other: N/A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a shoA narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacily of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribution data. With regards to Northern long-eared bats, the
project is located inside a red HUC and the bridge was surveyed and no evidence of bat presence/usage were noted. A
total of 5 trees will be removed during construction. With regards to Appalachian elktoe, the project is located
approximately 2 miles upstream from the confluence of Bakers Creek and Cane River.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Current Maps/Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Current Maps/Database
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing
conditions
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps
Roger D. Bryan � 3/24/2017
�G�---
ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name pplicanUAge s Signature Date
(AgenPs signature s valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

figure 1. Bridge 990259, Bakers Creek above and below the site, Yancey County, NC.

. y aw_ � ���U,�^��wY°'�.�j'��;P�'�:\
� t. 1 ��� ��, :c �
". '= ; . � � ..
� �
4._�., ' :M:�:- :�, i �� � � _, ... .
::, i
' r�":" >'�dt�wa ms., ..,.-.._... .. .
M:rrr,r.., � .
. .. . �.. .:,:;.
Figure 2. Bridge 990259, Structure and roadway photographs, Bakers Creek, Yancey County, NC.
j

Environmenta!
Qua(ity
ROY COOPER
Covernor
Mr. Roger Rryan
NCDOT Division 13 F.nvironmental Supervisor
Nor[h Carolina Department of Transportatlon
Post Office Box 3279
Asheville, North Carolina 288D2
Dear Mtt Bryan:
March 20, 2017
Subject: Mitlgation Acceptance Letter:
Uivision 13 Project, Replace Bridge Number 990259 over Bakers Creek on SR 1115 (Bakers Creelt
Road), Yancey County; WBS Element 176P.13.R.90
The purpose of this letler is to notify you that the Nm•th Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -
Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ-DMS) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation far the subject
projecC Based on the information received from you on March 20, 2017, the impacts are located in CU 06010108 of
the French Broad River basin in the Sou[hern Mountains (SM) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
French Broad Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Pt.)
06010108 Non- Coastal
SM Cold Cool Warm Riparian Ri arian Marsh Zone 1 Zone 2
Impacts 46.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
feet acres
This impact and associa[ed mitigation need wem iroder projected by the NCDOT in the 2017 impact data.
NCDEQ-DMS witl commit to implement sufltcient compensatory stream mitigatlon credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section
F.3.c.iii of the ImLieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then
this midgation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will 6e required from
NCDEQ-DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
ti� �
B. Stanfill
Management Supervisor
cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE - Asheville Reg y�a[ory Field Office
Mr. Chris[opher D. Medlin, P.E., Division 13 Bridge Maintenance Manager
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT- PDEA
File: SR 1115 - Bridge 99D259 - Division 13
!'�'Nothing Compares�...
StateoMorthCarolina Enviromnen[alQuality
217WcstJonesStreet I IGOIMailServiceCenter I Raleigh.NorfhCarollna2 769 9-1 6 01
919 707 BL00