20120748 Ver 1_Mitigation Plan_2013_20170224

FINAL
MITIGATION PLAN
Junes Branch
Jackson County, North Carolina
Project No. 95027
Little Tennessee River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06010203
Prepared for:
vl-",P—
i,41
E iowstem
antemem
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
April 2013
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

FINAL
MITIGATION PLAN
Junes Branch
Jackson County, North Carolina
Project No. 95027
Little Tennessee River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06010203
Prepared for:
,,-.Ecosystem
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared By:
r
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
And:
W©If Crag
NGINEEPIN
Wolf Creek Engineering, PLLC
7 Florida Avenue
Weaverville, NC 28787
[phone]
April 20 13
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013
MERTTYrrym

IRT PROCESS SUMMARY
The NCIRT Review comments and the USACE Approval letter dated August 24, 2012 are included in
the following pages to document the IRT Review process for this project. The following is a list of
revisions that have been made to the Mitigation Plan in response to these comments:
1. Revised permanent seed mix: Appendix D, Sheet P-1, Permanent Seeding Table
2. Revised Performance Standards:
• Page 31, Paragraph 1, revised first sentence to reference USAGE Stream Mitigation Guidelines
(2003).
• Page 31, Paragraph 2, Deleted reference to Entrenchment Ratio requirements.
• Page 31, Paragraph 6, Added statement that bankfull events must happen during separate
monitoring years.
3. Revised Doris Branch alignment to provide more than 30' buffer: Appendix D, Sheet 10.
4. Added statement that wetland areas will be protected by fence during construction: Page 26,
Paragraph 6.
5. Revised background aerial image to remove barn that no longer exists:
• Appendix D, Sheet IA
• Page 29, Figure 7

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF: August 24, 2012
Regulatory Division
Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the Junes Branch Mitigation Plan (SAW 2012-01101)
Ms. Suzanne Klimek
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Ms. Klimek:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT)
during the 30 -day comment period for the Junes Branch Mitigation Plan, which closed on August 8,
2012. These comments are attached for your review.
Based on our review of these comments, we have determined that no major concerns have been
identified with the Draft Mitigation Plan. However, the minor issues with the Draft and discussed in the
attached comments, must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan.
The Final Mitigation Plan is to be submitted with the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for Nationwide
permit approval of the project along with a copy of this letter. Issues identified above must be addressed
in the Final Mitigation Plan. Please be sure that all updates to the Mitigation Plan are specifically
identified in a table at the front of the Mitigation Plan. This helps expedite our review of the Final
Mitigation Plan and issuance of the Nationwide Permit. If it is determined that the project does not
require a Department of the Army permit, you must still provide a copy of the Final Mitigation Plan,
along with a copy of this letter, to the appropriate USACE field office at least 30 days in advance of
beginning construction of the project. Please note that this approval does not preclude the inclusion of
permit conditions in the permit authorization for the project, particularly if issues mentioned above are
not satisfactorily addressed. Additionally, this letter provides initial approval for the Mitigation Plan,
but this does not guarantee that the project will generate the requested amount of mitigation credit. As
you are aware, unforeseen issues may arise during construction or monitoring of the project that may
require maintenance or reconstruction that may lead to reduced credit.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and if you have any questions regarding this
letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please call me at
919-846-2564.
Sincerely,
Tyler Crumbley
Regulatory Specialist
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List
CESAW-RG-A/Brown
Jeff Jurek, NCEEP
Paul Wiesner, NCEEP

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
CESAW-RG/Crumbley August 8, 2012
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: NCIRT Comments During 30 -day Mitigation Plan Review
Purpose: The comments and responses listed below were posted to the NCEEP Mitigation Plan
Review Portal during the 30 -day comment period in accordance with Section 332.8(g) of the
2008 Mitigation Rule.
NCEEP Project Name: Junes Branch Mitigation Project, Jackson County, NC
[%61V[4*1110 il&VAINJ6Zi3itiIgil11111111
30 -Day Comment Deadline: August 8, 2012
1. Eric Kulz, NCDWQ, J my 24, 2012:
• 1 have questions regarding the rationale and explanation for P1 restoration of
Bumgarner Branch Reach 1a. The designer states that due to livestock and herbaceous
vegetation on the banks the stream bed is narrow. It is not excessively incised and has
connection to its floodplain. I have not been able to find the bank height ratio in the
report. It says that the channel will widen and become unstable and overwiden once
cattle are excluded and woody vegetation replaces herbaceous vegetation. This appears
contrary to generally -accepted stream assessment and restoration principles.
• The permanent seed mix consists of white clover, orchard grass, creeping red fescue,
Korean lespedeza, and birdsfoot trefoil. All but red fescue are exotic and are not listed
as noxious, but the USDA plants database says they all have the potential to become
weedy or invasive. DWQ recommends using a native riparian seed mix, a number of
which are available through native plant nurseries.
NCEEP Response, August 1, 2012:
The following is a response from the project designer (Wolf Creek Eng.) to DWQ's
7/24/12 comments:
• The reviewer states that he is unable to find the bank -height -ratios, however, the bank -
height -ratios are stated in Section 2.2.6 of the narrative. Specifically for the reach in
question in paragraph 4 under the "Bumgarner Branch" subsection of 2.2.6, the report
states that the bank -height -ratios range from 1.1 to 1.5. Additionally, the field data

collected for this project can be found in Appendix C4. Specifically, the table titled "Site
Assessment Calculations" has data collected on the upstream end of Bumgarner Branch
(Section Numbers 6, 7 and 16 and designated in the "Reach" and "Location" rows as
"Bumgarner-U/s of road", "Bumgarner-mid horse pasture" and "Bumgarner-u/s end")
indicates bank -height -ratios of 1.5, 1.1 and 1.5. The reviewer states that the report
claims the channel will "over -widen once the cattle are excluded" and that this is
"contrary to generally accepted stream assessment and restoration principles." First,
there is no claim in the report that the channel will "over -widen," simply that the width
of the bed of the channel will increase from its present excessively narrow width of
approximately 3 ft. to a more geomorphically stable width of at least 8 ft. As stated in
the report, this projected dimension is based on data collected on reference and
naturalized streams in the surrounding watersheds and in the mountain region. Data on
more than 30 locations were collected for this project and is depicted in the graphs in
Appendix C1. The concept that a stream will widen from an unsustainably narrow
condition to a more appropriate width is neither novel or contrary to generally accepted
stream principles. Perhaps what is an encumbrance is the idea that exclusion of
livestock will facilitate this process or that the presence of livestock perpetuates the
existing condition. However, experience and observation suggest that the presence of
livestock can prevent the natural succession from herbaceous vegetation to woody
vegetation and without the presence of woody vegetation the herbaceous vegetation
will provide a denser ground cover. In some cases, as in the present situation, this
denser ground cover can temporarily retard soil erosion. As stated paragraph 3 of
Section 7.2.1 of the report, this is demonstrated immediately upstream of the site
where livestock access is restricted, woody vegetation in the form of privet and alder
have become established, and the channel bed has widened to 6 ft. with every
indication that it will widen further.
• The reviewer states that the permanent seed mix contains exotic species. The seed mix
included in this project is not the standard native mix that we have used in the past. This
seed mix was directed by EEP on our last EEP project (Middle South Muddy Creek).
There were no unusual soil conditions on that project so my understanding was that this
was the preferred seed mix by EEP and was therefore carried over to this project. If this
is not the case we would recommend a permanent seed mix containing Broom Sedge,
Deer Tongue, Switch Grass, Indian Grass, Eastern Gama Grass and Joe-Pye-Weed.
Eric Kulz, NCDWQ, August 7, 2012:
• 1 had a productive and interesting discussion with Grant Ginn regarding Bumgarner
Branch. The design dimension for this reach is supported by the regional curves, and
the proposed design is supported by DWQ. DWQ maintains the recommendation that
the permanent seeding mix consist of native riparian species, and not the list proposed
in the draft plan.
2. Todd Tuewell. USACE. June 25. 2012:
• The performance standards included in Section 9.0 of the Draft Mitigation Plan are
generally more specific than required by the 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines (SMGs).

Additional standards have been included that may result in situations determined to be
unacceptable during review of the monitoring reports or at project closeout, such as the
standard that the Entrenchment Ration remain below 1.3. Another example is included
under "Surface Water Hydrology" where it states that the surface water gauge must
achieve bankfull or greater elevations at least twice, but it does not indicate that these
events must occur in separate years, as required by the SMGs. Please note that the
project will be held to the currently accepted performance standards as stated in the
2003 SMGs, and the project should state so in Section 9.0.
• Forested buffer widths along the channel appear to be less than 30 feet in some areas
(see Sta 111+50 on Doris Branch), and just over 30 feet for much of the rest of the
project. Be verify that buffer widths are wide enough to meet the minimum standard
for mountain counties (30 feet minimum) after project construction and anticipated
channel adjustments have occurred.
• Based on a review of Figure 7 and Preliminary Construction Plans (Site Plan aerial
image), there appears to be a structure that extends into the proposed Conservation
Easement area. Please verify whether this structure is located in the proposed
easement and revise the plan if necessary.
• Wetland areas located within the project boundary should be protected from impact by
construction traffic by fencing. If impacts to wetland are anticipated, be sure that all
impacts are avoided where possible and minimized where unavoidable. The
Preconstruction Notification (PCN) application must account for all temporary and
permanent impacts to wetlands.
• Please note that due to the location of this project, additional information regarding
potential impacts to resources protected under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, beyond what is listed in the Categorical Exclusion Checklist included in
Appendix A, will be required during the permit review. This information should be
included in the PCN application, but does not have to be included in the Final Mitigation
Plan.
NCEEP Response, August 1, 2012:
The following is a response from the project designer (Wolf Creek Eng.) to USACE's
7/25/12 comments:
• We will revise the performance standards to be consistent with the 2003 SMG and
include a statement in the narrative to indicate the intended compliance. All buffer
widths have been checked to be 30 ft. or greater. We can revise the alignment at the
lower end of Doris Branch to provide slightly more than 30 ft. if required, however,
given the small size of this stream it is unlikely that channel pattern adjustments will
occur following construction. The structure that appears in Figure 7 to be inside of the
easement no longer exists. This is simply an outdated aerial image. If necessary we can
photoshop this structure out of the image. There is no need for the construction
activities to impact the wetlands. We will add a statement to the report narrative,
Section 7.2.2, indicating that the wetlands will be protected from construction activities
and final construction plans will indicate locations for protective fencing around these
sensitive areas.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Environmental Banc & Exchange (EBX) proposes to restore and enhance four unstable stream reaches in
central Jackson County. The Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site is located approximately 2 miles east
of Sylva, North Carolina at the latitude 35.357378° N and longitude 83.191391° W. The Site
encompasses approximately 5.8 acres of agricultural land and consists of four unstable streams:
Bumgarner Branch, Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch. This mitigation plan describes the
details, methods and protocols proposed to generate approximately 3,093 stream mitigation credits,
which includes approximately 3,061 linear feet of stream restoration through Priority I restoration.
General Site Conditions
Historic land use at the Site has consisted primarily of agriculture and livestock grazing. Additional land
use practices, including the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocating, dredging,
and straightening of on-site streams have contributed to unstable channel characteristics and degraded
water quality. Spoil piles have been observed on-site indicating that historic wetlands were likely drained
in order to maximize agricultural production.
Current stream conditions at the Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site contain incised channels with
unstable banks and a riparian buffer dominated by invasive exotic plants. Bumgarner Branch east of
Fairview Road flows through an active pasture with livestock access to the stream. The riparian buffer is
dominated by invasive exotic plants and the channel exhibits eroding stream banks contributing fine
sediment to the channel substrate. The downstream portion of Bumgarner Branch west of Fairview Road
is incised with actively eroding stream banks. Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch contain
abundant invasive exotic plants within the riparian buffer and are also comprised of incised channels with
eroding stream banks. The adjacent land use along Junes Branch and the downstream portion of
Bumgarner is no longer active pasture and currently consists of fallow fields and hay production fields.
Restoration Concept
Restoration and enhancement practices proposed for this project have been designed with the intent to
minimize unnecessary disturbance to adjacent land. Professional judgment has been used to determine
which channel reaches could potentially benefit most from preservation or enhancement over full
restoration. Where restoration was determined to be warranted, consideration was given to which reaches
could best be served by maintaining as much of the existing channel pattern as possible.
Proposed Bumgarner Branch, Junes Branch, Higdon Branch and Doris branch are designed as Type B4
streams. These channel configurations provide a stable and natural form in the Type II colluvial valleys
in which the existing streams are found. The proposed channel dimensions, patterns, and profiles are
based on hydraulic relationships and morphologic dimensionless ratios of the reference reaches.
The installation of brush, rock, and wood structures will be utilized throughout the restored reaches of the
Site. Brush toe structures will be installed on selected meander bends to provide bank stability and
aquatic habitat. Boulder structures will be used for grade control to prevent headcut formation and to
provide step -pool bed form on steeper channel reaches. Log vanes with rootwads will be installed in
meander bends to direct the flow away from the outside of the bend and provide toe and bank protection.
On-site material including brush, boulders, logs, and bed material will be used to the maximum extent
possible and in -stream structures will be designed to improve aquatic habitat.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register
Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8
paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(14).
• NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated
July 28, 2010
These documents govern NCEEP operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

Table of Contents
1.0 RESTORATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES....................................................................................1
2.0 SITE SELECTION..................................................................................................................................................2
2.1 Directions to Site.......................................................................................................................................2
2.2 Site Selection.............................................................................................................................................2
2.3 Project Site Maps......................................................................................................................................7
2.4 Site Photographs......................................................................................................................................12
3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT..................................................................................................................17
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION...............................................................................................................................19
4.1 Project Information..................................................................................................................................19
4.2 Reach Summary Information..................................................................................................................19
4.3 Wetland Summary Information...............................................................................................................19
4.4 Regulatory Considerations......................................................................................................................19
5.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS.......................................................................................................................20
6.0 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE.........................................................................................................................21
7.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN...............................................................................................................................23
7.1 Description of Target Stream and Vegetation Communities...................................................................23
7.2 Design Narrative.....................................................................................................................................24
8.0 MAINTENANCE PLAN.......................................................................................................................................30
9.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.........................................................................................................................31
10.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS....................................................................................................................33
11.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN.............................................................................................................34
12.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN................................................................................................................35
13.0- FINANCIAL ASSURANCES............................................................................................................................35
14.0 OTHER INFORMATION...................................................................................................................................36
14.1 Definitions.............................................................................................................................................36
14.2 References.............................................................................................................................................36
FIGURES
Figure1- Site Vicinity Map.............................................................................................................................7
Figure2- Watershed Map................................................................................................................................8
Figure3- Soils Map.........................................................................................................................................9
Figure 4 -Existing Hydrologic Features Map.................................................................................................10
Figure5- Historic Conditions Map................................................................................................................
11
Figure 6- Site Protection Instrument Figure..................................................................................................18
Figure 7- Proposed Hydrologic Features Map..............................................................................................29
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Site Protection Instruments
Appendix B. Baseline Information Data
Appendix C. Mitigation Work Plan Data and Analyses
Appendix D. Project Plan Sheets
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 iii

June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

1.0 RESTORATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
EEP develops River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) to guide its restoration activities within each of
the state's 54 cataloging units. RBRPs delineate specific watersheds that exhibit both the need and
opportunity for wetland, stream and riparian buffer restoration. These watersheds are called Targeted
Local Watersheds (TLWs) and receive priority for EEP planning and restoration project funds.
The 2008 Little Tennessee River Basin RBRP identified HUC 06010203020010 as a Targeted Local
Watershed http://www.nceep.net/services/lwps/Little_Tennessee/RBRP_LTN 2008.pdf. Only 44% of the
stream length within this watershed has adequate buffers.
The 2008 Little Tennessee River Basin RBRP identified fecal coliform and turbidity as major stressors
within this TLW. The Junes Branch Project was identified as a stream restoration opportunity to improve
water quality and habitat within the TLW.
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses
through:
o reducing turbidity by stabilizing existing stream banks and altering stream channel
dimension, pattern and profile
o reducing nutrient loads and fecal coliform bacteria from adjacent agricultural fields
by fencing the riparian area to keep livestock out of the stream and restoring a
wooded riparian buffer
Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and
their vicinity through:
o reducing water temperatures by planting native vegetation in the riparian zone and
creating shade
o improving habitat complexity by restoring the stream profile to stable riffle/pool
complex and step/pool complexes
o improving terrestrial habitat by excluding livestock and creating a native riparian
buffer
o improving aquatic habitat by establishing tree canopy to provide organic material
such as woody debris and leaf packs to stream
o removing invasive exotic species and planting native vegetation in the riparian buffer
Improve flood flow attenuation on-site and downstream through:
o raising the bed or creating bankfull benches to allow for overbank flows every 1-2
years and will improve the connection to the active floodplain
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Restore stable channel morphology and proper sediment transport capacity.
• Create and improve stream bed form and improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate habitat.
• Reconnect the stream to the historic floodplain or construct a floodplain bench that is accessible
at the proposed bankfull channel elevation.
• Improve channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in -stream structures and native bank
vegetation.
• Provide riparian buffer restoration by establishing a native forested and herbaceous riparian
buffer plant community with a minimum width of 30 feet from the edge of the restored channels.
This new community will be established in conjunction with the eradication of any existing exotic
or undesirable plant species.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

2.0 SITE SELECTION
2.1 Directions to Site
The Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site (the Site) is located in central Jackson County approximately 2
miles east of Sylva, NC. From Asheville, take I-40 West for approximately 18 miles. Take exit 27 onto
US -74 toward US-19/Clyde/US-23/Waynesville. Take exit 107 toward Jones Cove Road and merge onto
US -23 South/US-74 West. After approximately 20 miles, take exit 85 toward NC-107/Cullowhee. Keep
right at the fork in the ramp and continue onto US-23/Asheville Highway. Make a slight left onto NC-
107/East Main Street for approximately 2 miles before turning left onto Fairview Road (SR 1724). The
Site begins at latitude 35.355166° N and longitude 83.192067° W.
2.2 Site Selection
2.2.1 Description
The Site encompasses approximately 5.8 acres of predominately agricultural land and includes a portion
of Bumgarner Branch, and three unnamed tributaries that for the purposes of this project are called
Junes Branch, Higdon Branch and Doris Branch. (See Figure 4).
Historic land use at the Site has consisted primarily of agriculture and livestock grazing. Additional land
use practices, including the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocating, dredging,
and straightening of on-site streams have contributed to unstable channel characteristics and degraded
water quality. Spoil piles have also been observed on-site which indicates that historic wetlands were
likely drained in order to maximize agricultural production.
2.2.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
The Junes Branch Site is located within the Little Tennessee River Basin, United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010203020010, and the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) sub basin 04-04-02. Bumgarner Branch has been assigned the Stream Index Number
2-79-35-1 by NCDWQ and is designated as Class C surface water. Tributaries to Bumgarner Branch
have not been indexed, but are also designated as Class C surface waters.
Class C waters are protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption,
aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.
Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water
where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner (NCDWQ).
Bumgarner Branch flows into Mill Creek approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the Site which is also
assigned Class C use support designation. Mill Creek drains into the Tuckasegee River another 1.5 miles
downstream. This section of the Tuckasegee River has been assigned Class B; Tr. Class B waters are
protected for primary recreation activities such as swimming, skin diving, water skiing and similar uses
involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an organized manner or on a
frequent basis (NCDWQ). These waters are also protected for Class C uses. The designation Tr (Trout
Waters) includes areas protected for natural trout propagation and survival of stocked trout.
2.2.3 Watershed Characterization
The Site watershed is characteristic of the Blue Ridge region with moderate rainfall with annual
precipitation averaging 52.9 inches. Elevations within the Site range from 2,200 ft. at the northwestern
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

extent to 2,150 ft. along Junes Branch. The Site encompasses approximately 3,061 linear feet of streams
including Bumgarner Branch, Junes Branch, Higdon Branch and Doris Branch.
The drainage area of Bumgarner Branch at the downstream end of the Site is 1.03 mit (668 acres). Land
use within the watershed consists of 68% forest, 21% low-density residential and 11% agricultural land.
Impervious area covers less than 1% of the total watershed. Land use changes are not anticipated within
the watershed and developmental pressure is relatively low although evidence of new home construction
was identified on two lots in the watershed.
2.2.4 Physiography, Geology, and Soils
The Site lies within the Southern Crystalline Ridges and Mountains sub -region of the Blue Ridge
ecoregion. This sub -region occurs primarily on Precambrian igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks,
which are mostly gneiss and schist, covered by well -drained, acidic, loamy soils. The local lithology is
mapped as biotite gneiss.
The valleys associated with Bumgarner Branch and its tributaries within the project extents are Type II
colluvial valleys (Rosgen). The valleys present a wash -slope morphology with cross -slopes ranging from
3% to 22% and a longitudinal slope approximately 3%.
Soils found on site include the Cullowhee fine sandy loam and Whiteside-Tuckasegee complex, which
consists of a fine sandy loam in the upper horizon and a cobbly sandy clay loam in the lower horizon.
None of the soils found on the site are considered hydric (See Table 4.2).
2.2.5 Historical Land Use and Development Trends
The Junes Branch Site encompasses approximately 5.8 acres of pastureland for horses, hay production,
and some forest stands. Grazing livestock have historically had access to most stream reaches and
adjacent terraces. The lack of deep-rooted vegetation and unstable channel characteristics appear to have
contributed to the degradation of stream banks.
Historic land use at the Site has consisted primarily of agriculture and livestock grazing. Additional land
use practices, including the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocating, dredging,
and straightening of on-site streams have contributed to unstable channel characteristics and degraded
water quality. Historic wetlands were likely drained in order to maximize agricultural production.
2.2.6 Existing Site Conditions
In order to assess existing geomorphic conditions, cross section measurements were taken at seventeen
(17) locations within the site. These measurements were used to evaluate existing width -depth ratios,
bank -height ratios, entrenchment ratios and stream classification (See Appendix Q. Additionally, a bed
width index and a maximum depth index were calculated to assess departure from reference conditions.
Data collected from naturalized streams in the surrounding watersheds, the reference reach surveys and
the regional curve sites were used to develop regional hydraulic geometry relationships for reference
channel bed width and reference maximum bankfull.
The bed width index (BWI) was calculated by dividing the channel bed width measurements taken from
the site by the reference bed width and the max depth index (MDI) was calculated by dividing the
measured maximum bankfull depth by the reference maximum bankfull depth. BWI values less than 1.0
indicate that the bed is narrower than the natural bed width and there will be a tendency for the channel to
widen resulting in scour at the toe of bank. MDI values greater than 1.0 indicate that the channel depth is
greater than the natural channel depth and that the resulting increase in shear stress may cause scour in the
bed.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

Vertical and lateral stability were further evaluated by mapping existing erosional and depositional
features throughout the site and calculating bank erosion hazard index (BEHI) and near -bank stress (NBS)
rating (Appendix C4).
Bumgarner Branch
The majority of Bumgarner Branch classifies as a Type G stream with low width -depth ratios typically
ranging from 5 to 9 and entrenchment ratios typically ranging from 1.5 to 2.2. The bank -height ratios on
Bumgarner are typically within the range of 1.5 to 4.6. Additionally, the BWI values range for 0.5 to 0.7
while the MDI values range from 0.3 to 1.3 and the bankfull width of the existing channel is
approximately 65% of the reference width. This suggests that future adjustments of the channel will occur
in the form of widening of the bed width resulting in additional bank erosion.
Visual inspection of the soil horizons exposed along the banks of Bumgarner Branch reveal no evidence
of a gravel layer or stream bed layer occurring above the present stream bed elevation. Three (3) test pits
were excavated with a track -hoe on lower Bumgarner. One test pit exposed thin gravel layers (0.1ft - 0.2
ft thick) at depths of 2 ft and 4 ft below existing grade. The other two pits revealed no gravel layers above
the existing stream bed. However, both contained a buried `A' horizon at a depth of 2 ft and a substantial
gravel layer at a depth of 3 ft. It is possible that rapid aggradation of the valley and subsequent incision of
the channel have returned the stream to a former vertical position. It should be noted that where riffles
appear stable the bed is difficult to probe and larger bed material is present. Since the bed material does
not generally present as a cobble bed it is possible that the channel incision has exposed a historic cobble
bed, supporting the theory of rapid aggradation and subsequent incision of the channel.
The pipe culvert under Fairview Road on Bumgarner Branch is perched above the channel invert on the
downstream side, indicating that the channel bed has incised since the installation of the pipe. On the
upstream side the pipe has acted as a grade control and prevented the channel from down cutting. The
presence of the pipe may be contributing to deposition of the suspended material on the floodplain.
The reach of Bumgarner Branch upstream of Fairview Road is distinctive from the rest of Bumgarner
Branch in that it classifies as a Type E stream due to the higher entrenchment ratios of 5 to 6. Through
this reach bank -height ratios range from 1.1 to 1.5 and the MDI values range from 0.9 to 1.3 suggesting
that there may be some level of departure from reference conditions but that vertical stress on the bed is
probably not excessive. However, the BWI values through this reach range from 0.3 to 0.6 indicating a
high potential for the channel bed to widen to two or three times its present width. It is likely that the
continued impacts by livestock are perpetuating a state whereby a thalweg-sized channel is formed inside
of a larger channel that is partially stabilized with herbaceous cover.
Junes Branch
The majority of Junes Branch classifies as a Type G stream with low width -depth ratios typically ranging
from 5 to 9 and entrenchment ratios typically ranging from 1.8 to 2.2. The bank -height ratio on Junes
Branch ranges from 1.9 to 3.3. Additionally, the BWI values range from 0.4 to 0.7 while the MDI values
typically range from 1.2 to 1.7. These values suggest that there is considerable stress on the bed of the
channel that will likely result in future widening and down cutting.
The Junes Branch channel has the appearance of a narrow thalweg cut into a former ditch bed. There is
evidence, particularly along the reach upstream of the driveway crossing, that the channel has been
dredged and relocated. This evidence consists of re -graded topography and a lower central valley position
that is offset from the present channel location. There were no instances of a exposed gravel layer or sand
layer in the banks that would indicate the stream previously occupied a higher elevation.
Five test pits were excavated on Junes Branch. Two of the pits contained a buried `A' horizon underlain
by a gravel layer 6 inches thick. One test pit revealed no gravel layer and the remaining two contained a 1
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 4

ft thick gravel layer 2 to 3 ft below the terrace. It is unclear whether the gravel layer represents an early or
late Holocene deposit.
The bed of Junes Branch is composed primarily of sand that probes easily to a depth of 0.3 ft to 1.0 ft. In
many instances a dense gravel layer is encountered below the sand bed. There are a few short reaches
where the bed is composed of a significant fraction of large gravel and cobble. It appears that depositional
reaches are locally positioned downstream of headcutting reaches which are identified with the exposed
gravel and cobble bed sections. The present sediment loads are being routed by the incised channel
without significant accumulation of depositional material and the overall profile trend is degradational.
Higdon Branch
Higdon Branch is a small stream that has formed in the bottom of a larger dredged channel. The larger
dredged channel has a base width of approximately 12 feet with a spoil pile on the left bank that is 2 to 4
feet high and approximately 10 feet wide. The bed of the dredged channel and the bed of Higdon Branch
consists primarily of unconsolidated silt and sand indicating that the channel was probably originally
dredged deeper and has subsequently aggraded. Although erosion and stability are not major concerns on
this stream, the dredging has resulted in a stream that is completely isolated from the historic floodplain
and valley.
Doris Branch
Doris Branch is a headwater seep that forms into an intermittent channel. The existing intermittent
channel was apparently frequently excavated to drain the adjacent floodplain and wetlands. A distinctive
spoil berm approximately 2 feet above the natural ground extends along the entire length of this channel
on the right bank. This spoil berm separates the wetlands and Doris Branch from the Bumgarner Branch
floodplain.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013

North Carolina Counties
Addi
I
X707
I W"tie
C�
Fem Mtn
Chestnut
Sugarloaf Min Woffpere
Gap
1709 = r Soapstone _Gap
Gap
Black
I
JACKSON COUNTY
CARVIFR MTN.
N, "
f •
DIRECTIONS TO SITE FROM RALEIGH &
0
t
~ ■
107
ASHEVILLE:
SYLVA1
►
The June's Branch Stream Restoration Site is located in
i
POP. 2,333 ■
central Jackson County approximately 2 miles south of
Sylva, NC. From Asheville, take 1-40 West for
i
►
18 Take 27 US
L
itBRANCH
I JUN S
SITE r
approximately miles. exit onto -74
toward US-19/Clyde/US-23/Waynesville. Take exit 107
►� ►t` f
_
toward Jones Cove Road and merge onto US -23
., .. ..
1
South/US-74 West. After approximately 20 miles, take
► I
+ fa ■ �� 1
FAIRVIEW ROAD
1
`
exit 85 toward NC-107/Cullowhee. Keep right at the
fork in the ramp and continue onto US-23/Asheville
1
►
I
Highway. Make a slight left onto NC-107/East Main
►
—
Street for approximately 2 miles before turning left onto
►
i
I� t
J
Fairview Road (SR 1724). The Site begins at latitude
■
+
35.355166' N and longitude 83.192067 W.
WEg$rER `
iJ = I
PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
VICINITY MAP
f
-6;�oIT Cie
1 0 1
2
JUNE'S BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE IN MIU3
r,,. Ctil
FIGURE 1

�)l
ILI
IL
•` t " •JUNE'S BRANCH
�+ " s•� RESTORATION SITE
thleti
=-moi\` � 'a ,t .+ •/• 1 l,i ' �a;i .f� S �. 1
,
�l DRAINAGE AREA ,9
1i� •\• 40 - 1.03 SQ. MI
0. ��!���1
00
;a _�. 1J LEGEND
• ! Io •�� <,`? ���'�• r` �� ` SITE BOUNDARY
220
WATERSHED
f % r/ —� ' ' rf `�= BOUNDARY
11 • ,' ` �• , l /r�"'
4
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
WATERSHED MAP
.,- 1500 0 1500 4500
�l Cipm JUNE'S BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
Sts Ii]-6W4olT tm SCALE IN �r JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Fm-vFIGURE 2

f
;...,: WtB
_ r'r
I
�
� rt
1,0110,* of `
N
,Y R - �.
GP
�.. a guM
CWA .�
LEGEND
HIGDON BRANCH
PERENNIAL
STREAMS
gRpNpN \ INTERMITTENT
STREAMS
PARCEL
BOUNDARIES
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
c` WtB WHITESIDE
4ALitTUCKASEEGEE
CwA CULLOWHEE
~tj EXISTING
WETLANDS
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
SOIL MAP
250 0 250 750
�1 C JUNE'S BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
�WVOITc tm SME IN FEEr JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 3

Photo No. 1
June's Branch facing upstream @ Sta 207+00
Photo No. 2
1/2/2012
Upstream of Culvert on June's Branch @ Sta 213+00 1/2/2012
12
w
�
4
,
1{[4 k ry
June's Branch facing upstream @ Sta 207+00
Photo No. 2
1/2/2012
Upstream of Culvert on June's Branch @ Sta 213+00 1/2/2012
12
1{[4 k ry
June's Branch facing upstream @ Sta 207+00
Photo No. 2
1/2/2012
Upstream of Culvert on June's Branch @ Sta 213+00 1/2/2012
12

Photo No. 3
Culvert on June's Branch facing upstream @ Sta 213+00 1/2/2012
Photo No. 4
Bumgarner Branch in horse pasture facing upstream 1/2/2012
13

Photo No. 5
Bumgarner Branch facing dowmstream 1/2/2012
Photo No. 6
Bumgarner Branch facing downstream 2/14/2012
14

Photo No. 7
Bumgarner Branch facing upstream 2/14/2012
Photo No. 8
Bank erosion on lower Bumgarner Branch 2/14/2012
15

Photo No. 9
Higdon Branch facing upstream 1/2/201
16

3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project
includes portions of the following parcels. A copy of the land protection instrument(s) is included in
Appendix A.
When available, the recorded document(s) will be provided. If the recorded document(s) are not
available, the template documents will be provided.
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State prior to
any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved
by the State.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 17
Landowner
PIN
County
Site
Deed Book
Acreage
Protection
and Page
protected
Instrument
Number
Parcel A
Doris Higdon and
Jackson
Conservation
491/622
0.65
Renee Coward
7651-02-4182
Easement
Parcel B
Doris Higdon and
Jackson
Conservation
491/622
0.93
Dana Sarti
7651-01-4620
Easement
Parcel C
Doris Higdon
7651-01-3188
Jackson
Conservation
491/622
2.3
Easement
Parcel D
Doris Higdon
7651-00-2682
Jackson
Conservation
491/622
1.15
Easement
Parcel E
Doris and Debbie
Jackson
Conservation
514/533
0.79
Higdon
7651-10-0888
Easement
When available, the recorded document(s) will be provided. If the recorded document(s) are not
available, the template documents will be provided.
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State prior to
any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved
by the State.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 17

. r
PARCEL A-1
DORIS HIGDON AND
RENEE COWARD
7651-02-4182
y
PARCEL B
DORIS HIGDON AND
DANA SARTI
7651-01-4620
PARCEL C
DORIS HIGDON
7651-01-3188
PARCEL
DORIS HI(
7651 -00 -
F -0
f�
solo,- -.16.
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
half
PARCEL E
DORIS HIGDON AND
DEBBIE HIGDON
7651-10-0888
250 0 250 750
SCALE IN FEET
2010 AERIAL PHOTO
I
LEGEND
PERENNIAL
\ STREAMS
PARCEL
BOUNDARIES
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
EXISTING
WETLANDS
SITE PROTECTION
INSTRUMENT FIGURE
JUNE'S BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 6

4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 19
4.1 Project Information
Project Name
Junes Branch
County
Jackson County
Project Area (acres)
5.8 ac.
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.357378° N and longitude 83.191391° W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
Little Tennessee
USGS Hydrologic Unit
8 -digit
06010203
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
06010203020010
DWQ Sub -basin
04-04-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
668
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
<5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
2.01.03 Hay and Pasture Land
4.2 Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Bum arner Br. 1
Bum arner Br. 2 Junes Br.
Higdon Br.
Doris Br.
Length of reach (linear feet)
610
550 1311
530
260
Valley classification (Rosgen)
II
II II
II
II
Drainage area
0.93
1.03 0.23
0.08
0.01
NCDWQ stream identification score
40
40 38
38
29.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C
C -
-
-
Morphological Description stream type) Ros en)
E
G G
E
G
Evolution trend (Ros en)
C
F F
E
G
Underlying mapped soils
CwA, WtB
CwA, WtB WtB
CwA
CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly
Drained- Mod. Well
Drained
Somewhat Poorly Mod. Well
Drained- Mod. Well Drained
Drained
Somewhat Poorly
Drained
Somewhat
Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Sloe
2.2%
2.2% 2.3%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural
Agricultural Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
30%
30% 30%
40%
40%
4.3 Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.03
0.13
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or
riparian non-riverine)
Riparian
Non-Riverine
Riparian
Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CwA
CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Seep
See
Hydrologic Im airment
None
Dredging/Ditching
Native vegetation community
Scrub -Shrub
Forested
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
2%
42%
4.4 Regulatory
Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
To Be Permitted
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
To Be Permitted
Endangered Species Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 19

5.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Mitigation credits presented in these tables are projections based upon site design. Upon completion of
site construction the project components and credits data will be revised to be consistent with the as -built
condition.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 20
Junes Branch, Jackson County
EEP Project Number 003979
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
3093
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach ID
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage/Acreage
Approach
(P/, P11 etc.)
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
Bumgarner Branch 1
100+37-107+27
610
PI
R
594
1:1
Bumgarner Branch 2
107+27-112+50
550
PI
R
476
1:1
June's Branch
200+97-215+15
1311
PI
R
1319
1:1
Higdon Branch
300+46-304+08
530
PI
R
422
1:1
Doris Branch
400+00-402+37
260
PI
R
282
1:1
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non -riparian Wetland
(acres)
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
3093
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
FB
Entire Site
Protect Stream
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration
= Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond;
Area; FB = Forested Buffer
FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 20

6.0 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built survey of the
mitigation site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided
written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of the
mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules
below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released
depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending
on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of project
credits will be subject to the criteria described as follows:
Forested Wetlands Credits
Monitoring
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements above
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
40%
standards are being met
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
50%
standards are being met
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
60%
standards are being met
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
70%
standards are being met
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
80%
standards are being met; Provided that all performance standards are met, the IRT may allow
the NCEEP to discontinue hydrologic monitoring after the fifth year, but vegetation monitoring
must continue for an additional two years after the fifth year for a total of seven years.
6
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
90%
standards are being met
7
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
100%
standards are being met, and project has received closeout
a roval
Non -forested Wetlands Credits
Monitoring
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements above
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
40%
standards are being met
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
15%
55%
standards are being met
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
20%
75%
standards are being met
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
85%
standards are being met
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
15%
100%
standards are being met and project has received closeout approval
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 21

Stream Credits
Monitoring
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements above
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
40%
standards are being met
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
50%
standards are being met
(65%*)
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
60%
standards are being met
(75%*)
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
70%
standards are being met
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
15%
100%
standards are being met and project has received closeout approval
Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the NCEEP
without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
b. Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property
c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; Per the NCEEP Instrument, construction means
that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built
report has been produced. As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project
closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits.
d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA
permit issuance is not required.
Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects a reserve of
15% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after two bank -full events have occurred, in separate
years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event that less
than two bank -full events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits shall be at
the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones associated with credit release, the NCEEP will
submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation substantiating achievement of
criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included with the annual monitoring
report.
June's Branch WEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 22

051111m,11I MAVIII:7IIA, KWI
7.1 Description of Target Stream and Vegetation Communities
Reference reaches were sought to provide a target for design of the proposed streams. Searches were
conducted first upstream and downstream of the Site and then into surrounding watersheds to find
suitable references that contained comparable slope, bed material, and valley type. A Type B4 reference
was located on Cold Springs Creek, a tributary to the Pigeon River in Haywood County. The reference
vegetation community data was also collected at the Cold Springs reference site.
7. LI Reference Reach
The reference reach was selected to represent the probable configurations for the proposed stream
restoration. Detailed geomorphic survey and Level Il Rosgen classifications were conducted on three
reaches of Cold Springs for a total of 1000 LF or 44 times bankfull width (See Appendix Q.
Cold Springs Reference
The Cold Springs Creek reference reach is located in the Blue Ridge hydrophysiographic region of North
Carolina. The Cold Springs watershed has many characteristics in common with the Junes Branch
watershed including average annual rainfall, elevation changes and valley type. The reference watershed
is located in the Harmon Den Wildlife Management area of the Great Smokey Mountains National Park
and is predominantly forested. The drainage area for the Cold Springs Creek reference is 2.63 miz.
The Cold Springs reach is representative of a B4 channel in a moderately sloped valley with a narrow,
constrained floodplain. Bed material, channel slope and valley form of this stream are consistent with the
Site and provide reasonable analogues for the potential channel forms that can be expected at the Site.
The Cold Springs reference reaches have a range of D50 of 20 mm to 46 mm, D84 of 84 mm to 168 mm,
channel slope of 2.3% to 3.2 %, width/depth ratio of 16 to 21 and sinuosity of 1.05 to 1.10.
Discharge and Bankfull Verification
Bankfull was readily identified on Cold Springs as it exhibited consistent indicators throughout the reach.
Verification of bankfull was accomplished by plotting the bankfull cross sectional area against the
regional curve data (Appendix Q. The graph indicates that the bankfull identified in the surveyed reach
is slightly lower than the line of the regional curve but consistent with the range of data collected in the
regional curve study.
After verification of bankfull cross sectional area, bankfull discharge was calculated for the surveyed
reach using a single -section analysis. Manning's `n' was estimated from relative roughness calculations
of the bed material and from observation of the channel form and vegetation conditions. Water surface
slope was assumed to be consistent with the slope of the bed profile. Discharge was then compared to the
regional curve data which indicated that the calculated bankfull discharges were consistent with the
regional curve data.
Channel Stability Assessment
A detailed channel stability assessment was not performed for these reaches since the bank and bed
stability was apparent from observation. Subsequent review of the surveyed dimensions confirmed that
width -depth ratios and bank -height ratios were within the appropriate range for stable, self -maintaining
streams. Additional observations included significant upstream and downstream reconnaissance to
identify any past, present, or future signs or sources of degradation.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 23

Limited Reach References
Through the course of conducting the reference reach searches, several streams were identified as
possessing qualities of stability and natural form. However, these reaches were determined not to be
suitable references for the project due to incompatible stream type, valley form, or insufficient reach
length. In these locations morphological measurements were taken to supplement the data acquired from
the reference reach sites. Measurements on nine individual reaches included bankfull width, bed width,
depth of bankfull, toe depth, and width of thalweg.
7.1.2 Reference Vegetation Community
A plant community survey was performed at Cold Spring Creek on November 9, 2007. This small stream
plant community, common to the Appalachian Mountains, is located within a mesic hardwood forest
cove. The riparian plant community most closely resembles a Montane Alluvial Forest as described by
Schafale and Weakley (1990). Canopy species observed included American beech (Fag -us grandifolia),
black birch (Betula lenta), Eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), red oak (Quercus rubra), sugar maple
(Acer saccharum), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Subcanopy species included American
holly (Ilex opaca), iron wood (Carpinus caroliniana), and rosebay rhododendron (Rhododendron
maximum). Herbaceous species included American alumroot (Heuchera americana), Aster sp., Christmas
fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), dog hobble (Leucothoe fontanesiana), golden ragwort (Senecio
aureus), lady fern (Athyrium asplenioides), sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp.), woodland stonecrop
(Sedum ternatum), and Viola spp.
7.2 Design Narrative
7.2.1 Restoration Approach
Bumgarner Branch
Bumgarner Branch is divided into two main reaches; Reach 1 is located upstream of the confluence with
Junes Branch and Reach 2 is located downstream of the confluence with Junes Branch. Reach 1 is further
subdivided into Reach la, which is located upstream of Fairview Road and Reach lb, which is
downstream of Fairview Road.
Reach la is proposed for Priority I restoration as a Type B4 stream with moderate sinuosity and an
average channel slope of 2.4%. Consideration was given to improving Reach la using a minimally
invasive approach such as enhancement and stabilization or simply excluding livestock and allowing
natural recovery of the stream. These considerations stem from the observations that this section of stream
is not excessively incised and maintains a functional connection with its floodplain. Additionally the
presence of herbaceous cover provides some degree of stability for the soils outside of the channel banks.
The overriding concern with an enhancement or "livestock exclusion only" approach is the nature of the
anticipated channel adjustments. Since the existing channel bed width is only 3 feet, it is expected that
stable channel forms will not develop until the channel bed has widened to at least 8 feet. Channel
widening will accelerate as successional woody vegetation replaces the existing herbaceous vegetation.
This is demonstrated immediately upstream of the Site where the channel has widened to approximately 6
feet in response to the absence of livestock impacts and shading from alders and privet. Even with a bed
width of 6 feet, the channel had not reached a stable cross section and exhibits evidence of bank scour. If
this progression in channel form is permitted to occur through Reach la, it is estimated that
approximately 2,500 ft3 of soil (150 tons) will be eroded from the banks and transported to the
downstream reaches. Additionally, a temporal loss in ecological recovery will be associated with this
scenario since it can be expected that this process with likely take years if not decades.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 24

The recommended approach is for complete reconstruction of a Type B4 stream. This will provide for
construction of the proper cross sectional geometry that will reduce stress on the banks and eliminate
bank scour. Additionally, reconstruction will provide the opportunity to harvest the cobble bed material
that is buried under the finer sediments and utilize it to construct proper, functional riffles. Riffles
constructed from native gravel and cobble material along with step -pool structures will provide
immediate habitat features and a dramatic functional lift.
The case for restoration on Reach lb is more obvious since the channel is more incised and the extent of
bank erosion is more apparent. Additionally, the incision of the channel bed has resulted in a "hanging
invert" at the downstream end of the pipe culvert under Fairview Road. Restoration efforts will raise the
channel bed to reconnect the channel to the floodplain and restore connectivity for passage of aquatic life
through the culvert.
Reach 2 is proposed for Priority I restoration as a Type B4c stream with an average channel slope of
1.5%. Priority I and Priority II approaches were both considered on this reach. The primary factor for
considering the use of a Priority II approach was the presence of suitable bed material and bed form in
several locations. Appropriate bank features and vegetation were generally absent along this reach and
therefore did not provide an additional incentive for this approach. Disincentives for pursuing a Priority II
approach included extensive excavation required to construct the proper channel and floodplain bench
dimensions, concerns associated with establishing vegetation on excavated soil horizons, and loss of
connectivity with the historic floodplain. Although generation of wetland credits is not a stated goal of
this project, a Priority I approach does provide the opportunity to enhance existing wetland and floodplain
groundwater hydrology.
Junes Branch
Junes Branch is proposed for restoration as a Type B4 stream with moderate sinuosity and an average
channel slope of 2.5%. Full reconstruction is required to address the degraded conditions of severe
channel incision, unstable banks and improper channel dimensions which are negatively affecting stream
functions. A Priority I approach is the goal for the entire reach of Junes Branch, however, a Priority II
approach is required in a few locations due to topographic constraints.
Higdon Branch
Higdon Branch is proposed for restoration as a Type B4 and B4c stream. The case for restoration on
Higdon Branch is not made on the basis of channel stability, although there are several instances of
channel bed nick points and bank erosion. Most of these occurrences are relatively minor and could be
stabilized with local treatments. The overriding issue affecting ecological function on this reach is
extreme topographic separation of Higdon Branch from the adjacent floodplains caused by the
agricultural ditching of the stream. This separation is further exaggerated by the adjacent spoil berm. In
order to reconnect Higdon to the adjacent natural terrain, improve floodplain groundwater hydrology and
assist in wetland recovery, a Priority I approach is recommended for Higdon Branch. A Priority II
approach will be required of the upstream end of this reach in order to tie the profile into the existing pipe
at Fairview Road.
Doris Branch
Doris Branch is proposed for restoration as a Type B4 stream. The case for restoration of Doris Branch is
based solely on the potential to improve ecological conditions. Raising the bed of Doris Branch will
improve groundwater hydrology in the adjacent wetlands and removal of the adjacent spoil berm will
reconnect Doris Branch and the wetlands to the Bumgamer Branch floodplain.
7.2.2 Restoration Methods
Restoration of Type B4 and B4c streams will consist of constructing a low to moderate sinuosity (1.05-
1.10) stream with a moderate width -depth ratio (13-17) that accesses the floodplain at greater -than -
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 25

bankfull flows. For streams with average channel slopes from 1.5% to 4% the bed profile form is in a
range that is transitioning from riffle -pool morphology at the lower slopes to step -pool morphology at the
steeper slopes. The profile is therefore a combination of riffles, rapids, and step -pool features.
Exploration for buried bed material will be conducted in proximity of the channel work to harvest
available bed material for reuse in the constructed channel. Where the quantity of existing bed material is
insufficient it will be supplemented with off-site material of appropriate size.
In some locations topographic constraints prevent Priority I restoration and it will be necessary to
construct a bankfull bench. Along these reaches, topsoil will be removed prior to excavation and
stockpiled. After completion of grading operations, topsoil will be redistributed across the floodplain
bench to facilitate vegetation success.
Boulder and log structures will be used to provide vertical stability to the channel, assist in maintaining
riffle, run and pool features and to provide habitat features. Run structures will generally be placed at the
tail -of -riffle location to support the upstream riffle grade. Run structures will be composed of a series of
small steps and pools which will transition into the main downstream pool. Log sills will be used in a
similar fashion on smaller streams or on flatter grade reaches. Log J -hooks will be used to shift the flow
away from the outside banks on selected meander bends. Brush -toe structures will be installed on the
outside of certain meander bends to provide bank stability, increase bank roughness, and provide aquatic
habitat.
Trees with diameters in the range of 12" to 24" will be harvested from the site or nearby property for use
as in -stream structures. Small diameter (less than 6") woody plants suitable for transplanting will be
harvested on-site where available.
Earthwork activities will include excavation of the proposed channels, partial or complete backfilling of
existing channels and removal of existing spoil berms. Grading work is designed to restore or mimic
natural contours. During construction, all wetland areas will be protected from construction activities by
fence.
Cross pipes will be oversized so that the pipe diameter will be comparable to the channel bed width where
practical. The invert of the pipe will be buried below the bed of the channel to allow bed material to pass
through the pipe. A boulder grade control structure will be placed downstream of the pipe to hold the low
water surface just above the outlet and allow for aquatic life passage. Smaller diameter pipes will be
placed on either side of the primary pipe to provide additional floodplain flow conveyance.
All disturbed areas will be stabilized with temporary and permanent seed and covered with straw or
mulch. Live stakes will be installed on the stream banks in accordance with the planting plan in Appendix
D. The entire conservation easement area will be planted with bare root seedlings in accordance with the
planting plan in Appendix D.
7.2.3 Data Analysis
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Analysis
The proposed channel sections were evaluated for their ability to convey the bankfull flows and the flood
flows of the watershed by performing a hydraulic analysis. Flood flow hydrology was based on USGS
Regional Regression equations for the Blue Ridge -Piedmont hydrologic area. Bankfull discharge was
based on the NRCS revised regional curves for the North Carolina Mountain and Piedmont hydrologic
area. The analysis consisted of first modeling the existing conditions with the HEC -RAS water surface
profile model. Cross sections were taken through the channel and the adjacent valley at representative
locations throughout the project reach. Existing hydraulic conditions were evaluated and the model
calibrated based on available site data.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 26

The ability to accurately verify bankfull discharge within the site is limited by the degraded channel
conditions and the lack of clear bankfull indicators. On a coarse scale, the existing HEC-RAS model does
indicate bankfull water surface elevations within the channel banks where the channel is incised and
above inner berm features where present. Additional bankfull verification is provided through the
hydraulic geometry curves assembled from locations on site, immediately adjacent to the site, within the
watershed and the neighboring watersheds (See Appendix C 1).
Proposed conditions were analyzed by revising the existing sections based on the proposed channel
geometry and by revising the model to reflect proposed pattern conditions and anticipated future
roughness coefficients. Comparison of the existing and proposed HEC-RAS models provided assistance
in the analysis of the sediment transport, bankfull flow capacity and confirmation that there will be no
hydraulic trespass onto adjacent properties.
Sediment Competence Analysis
Data collection for sediment competence analysis included riffle and reach pebble counts and bulk
samples on Junes Branch and Bumgarner Branch. The bed material consists of a mix of sand, gravel and
cobble with a large constituent being composed of sand (40%-60%). Using the raw data from the Site for
competence calculations provides essentially meaningless results since the high sand content skews the
size of the D50 to sand sized particles. Even using the raw data collected from the upstream off-site
reaches which both have a D50 of 18 mm provides dubious results. In this case the predicted stable
channel slopes would be 1.2% and 0.8% on Bumgarner and Junes respectively, while the valley slopes are
2.3% and 2.8%. This would suggest that the stable channel slopes and the existing valley slopes are
incompatible.
There are several possible explanations for the incongruence of Site data and the Site topography. The
first attempt to reconcile the data was to recognize the large sand content as wash load and remove it from
the bed load calculations. The adjusted data provides a D50 in the range of 37 mm to 46 mm on
Bumgarner and 16 mm on Junes Branch. Using the adjusted D50 as the representative particle in the
competence calculations improves the results but does not completely resolve the incongruence with the
valley slopes.
In order to better understand the relationship between the bed material, the channel slope and the valley
slope a detailed assessment was conducted of the reference reach competence. Critical dimensionless
shear (Tc*) was calculated using the Andrew's equation (1984), the slope based Lamb equation (2008),
and the range of standard values available in the scientific literature. Shear stress was used to predict
stable channel slopes for the rifle pebble count, reach pebble count and bulk sample D50, D84, D95 and
Dm,,x particle sizes. The combination that provided the best agreement with the existing channel slopes
was the standard critical shear value of 0.047 with the D84 representing the threshold particle size. This
result is consistent with field observations of the channel as a relatively low sediment supply stream that
is at least partially self-armored.
Although the present condition of Bumgarner and Junes Branch is not a low sediment supply system it is
reasonable to consider the gravel and cobble fraction of the bed material to be in low supply. Given that
condition, the stable configuration of these streams would be a partially armored bed of gravel and cobble
that permits the transport of the sand wash load through the system. Shear stress calculations were
performed using a critical dimensionless shear value of 0.04 and a threshold particle size of 73 mm on
Bumgarner and 56 mm on Junes Branch. The critical dimensionless shear value was selected to be
slightly less than the reference reach value to account for potentially higher mobility associated with the
disturbed nature of the post construction bed conditions. The threshold particle sizes were taken from the
average of the two largest particles in the bulk samples from upstream of the Site. These particle sizes
were consistent with the D84 sizes from the adjusted data sets and are representative of what may actually
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 27

be supplied by the watershed. The shear stress calculations were used to predict stable channel slopes of
approximately 2.0% which is more consistent with the overall valley slopes.
Sediment Capacity Analysis
In order to assist in evaluating the sediment capacity, a set of consecutive pit traps were installed in the
stream bed at the downstream end of Bumgarner Branch. Three samples were collected from the pit traps
following rainfall events. These samples were sieved and weighed. The last sample collected from the pit
trap was following a rainfall event that registered 0.85 ft. on the crest gauge. From this sample it was
estimated that the total bed load was between 0.3 to 0.6 tons for this less-than-bankfull event.
A flow duration hydrograph was constructed to simulate the third sampling event in order to model
sediment transport using the quasi -unsteady flow routine in HEC -RAS. Seven sediment transport
functions were evaluated for consistency with sediment data collected in the pit traps. The Wilcock
transport function provided results that fit best with the data. The Wilcock function predicted 0.8 to 2.7
tons of cumulative sediment output at the downstream end of Bumgarner while the other sediment
transport function predicted sediment output values more than two orders of magnitude greater than the
estimated load. Based on this correlation, the Wilcock function was used to evaluate sediment capacity
under existing and proposed conditions.
Two quasi -unsteady simulations were run in HEC -RAS to qualitatively to evaluate the sediment transport
capacity. The modeling consisted of running the bankfull discharge and the 10 -year discharge for a
constant 24 hour simulation on a one hour computational increment cycle. Existing and proposed models
were compared for differences in channel bed elevation and cumulative sediment output.
With respect to changes in the channel invert elevation, Bumgarner and Junes Branch perform similarly
under existing and proposed conditions. Bed invert changes are generally between 0.1 ft. and 0.2 ft. for
the bankfull flow and between 0.2 ft. and 0.3 ft. for the 10 -year flow. One exception is that the existing
model predicts approximately 1 ft. of aggradation at the downstream end of Junes Branch in the bankfull
flow and 1 ft. of scour in the 10 -year flow while the proposed model predicts less than 0.2 ft. of bed
change.
With respect to cumulative mass output the model predicts an approximate average reduction of 40% in
the sediment output. This is primarily in response to the proposed reconfiguration of the bed material
composition which will reduce the percentage of sand from 50% to 20% of the total. Given the limited
predicted change in proposed channel invert elevation this can be interpreted as not resulting in
aggradation.
The design configuration was also evaluated for sediment transport capacity by assessing continuity and
magnitude of stream power. Generally the proposed conditions model show a significant decrease in
stream power in the higher frequency events with comparable or somewhat higher stream power in the
lower frequency events. The decrease in stream power in the higher frequency events is to be expected
due to the proposed increase in channel width/depth ratio. However, this is not troubling since the actual
stream power values are sufficiently high to transport the sand particles which constitute the main wash
load component.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 28

04 1
�.
Ilk -
a
PROPOSED PERMANENT
STREAM CROSSING PIPE CH Y a?
PRNER `
,a - „% PROPOSED PERMANENT
+ STREAM CROSSING
{s^, (PIPE)
01.
i .
HIG 0 BRANCHC
IML
LEGEND
D®RAS $
PROPOSED
STREAM
ALIGNMENT
_ PARCEL
BOUNDARIES
2
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
r i,�;• = ® EXISTING
WETLANDS
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: PROPOSED HYDROLOGIC
FEATURES MAP
250 0 250 750
�1 C JUNE'S BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
��VVOIT tm SCUE IN FEEr JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1'A'()'�YAlII FIGURE 7

8.0 MAINTENANCE PLAN
EBX will monitor the site on a regular basis and shall conduct a physical inspection of the site a minimum
of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until performance standards are met.
These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance.
Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction and
may include the following:
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include
chinking of in -stream structures to prevent piping, securing of loose
coir matting, and supplemental installations of live stakes and other
target vegetation along the channel. Areas where storm water and
floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require
maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -cutting.
Wetland
Routine wetland maintenance and repair activities may include
securing of loose coir matting and supplemental installations of live
stakes and other target vegetation within the wetland. Areas where
storm water and floodplain flows intercept the wetland may also
require maintenance to prevent scour.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the
targeted plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and
repair activities may include supplemental planting, pruning,
mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species shall be
controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation
control requiring herbicide application will be performed in
accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and
regulations.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear
distinction between the mitigation site and adjacent properties.
Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -
blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or
conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or
destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis.
Utility Right -of -Way
Utility rights-of-way within the site may be maintained only as
allowed by Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed
restrictions, rights of way, or corridor agreements.
Ford Crossing
Ford crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed
by Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions,
rights of way, or corridor agreements.
Road Crossing
Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed
by Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions,
rights of way, or corridor agreements.
Storm water Management Device
Storm water management devices will be monitored and maintained
per the protocols and procedures defined by the NC Division of
Water Quality Storm Water Best Management Practices Manual.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 30

Morphologic Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams shall be in compliance with the standards set forth in the USACE 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines and should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change, but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable
patterns of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several
months that follow construction and some change/variation subsequent to that is also to be expected.
However, the observed change should not be unidirectional such that it represents a robust trend. If some
trend is evident, it should be very modest or indicate migration to a stable form.
Dimension
Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross-sections. If changes do
occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are associated with increased stability
or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable condition
Pattern and Profile
Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little deviation from as -built conditions
and established morphological ranges for the restored stream type. Pool depths may vary from year to
year, but the majority should maintain depths sufficient to be observed as distinct features in the profile.
The pools should maintain their depth with flatter water surface slopes, while the riffles should remain
shallower and steeper. Pattern measurements will not be collected unless conditions seem to indicate that
a detectable change appears to have occurred based on profile and/or dimension measurements.
Substrate
Calculated D50 and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed materials in riffles and
finer size class distribution in pools. The majority of riffle pebble counts should indicate maintenance or
coarsening of substrate distributions. Generally, it is anticipated that the bed material will coarsen over
time.
Sediment Transport
Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is effectively managing its sediment
load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should develop without excessive encroachment of the
channel. Isolated development of robust (i.e. comprised of coarse material and/or vegetated actively
diverting flow) mid -channel or lateral bars will be acceptable. Likewise, development of a higher number
of mid -channel or lateral bars that are minor in terms of their permanency such that profile measurements
do not indicate systemic aggradation will be acceptable, but trends in the development of robust mid -
channel or alternating bar features will be considered a destabilizing condition and may require
intervention or have success implications.
Surface Water Hydrology
Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of bankfull flow on average every 1
to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the surface water stage should achieve
bankfull or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring
years.
Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of seven years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum survival
of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems per acre at
the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival rate is not being met or the
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 31

development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive species, diseased vegetation), appropriate corrective
actions will be developed and implemented.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 32

10.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the EEP monitoring template. The monitoring report shall
provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends,
population of EEP databases for analysis, research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding
project close-out.
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
As per April 2003
USACE Wilmington
District Stream
NO
Pattern
Mitigation Guidelines
annual
As per April 2003
USACE Wilmington
District Stream
YES
Dimension
Mitigation Guidelines
annual
As per April 2003
USAGE Wilmington
District Stream
YES
Profile
Mitigation Guidelines
annual
As per April 2003
USACE Wilmington
District Stream
YES
Substrate
Mitigation Guidelines
annual
As per April 2003
A Crest Gauge will be installed on site; the
USACE Wilmington
device will be inspected on a semi-annual
Surface Water
District Stream
basis to document the occurrence of
YES
Hydrology
Mitigation Guidelines
annual
bankfull events on the project
Quantity and location
Groundwater monitoring gauges with data
of gauges will be
recording devices will be installed on site;
Groundwater
determined in
the data will be downloaded on a monthly
NO
Hydrology
consultation with EEP
annual
basis during the growing season
Quantity and location
of vegetation plots
Vegetation will be monitored using the
will be determined in
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS)
YES
Vegetation
consultation with EEP
I annual
protocols
Exotic and
Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation
nuisance
and the occurrence of beaver dams and
vegetation and
approximate inundation limits will be
YES
Beaver
annual
ma ed
Locations of fence damage, vegetation
Semi-
damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will
YES
Project boundary
annual
be mapped
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 33

1 17 ] Ma 1019 LVA iu /\►`U" 015_I 01018 2 WROi
Upon approval for close-out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) the site will be transferred to the
State of North Carolina. This party shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that
restrictions required in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld.
Endowment funds required to uphold easement and deed restrictions shall be negotiated prior to site
transfer to the responsible party.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 34

12.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of site construction EBX will implement the post -construction monitoring protocols
previously defined in this document. Project maintenance will be performed as described previously in
this document. If, during the course of annual monitoring it is determined the site's ability to achieve site
performance standards are jeopardized, EBX will notify the NCEEP of the need to develop a Plan of
Corrective Action. The Plan of Corrective Action will be prepared by an engineering consultant. Once
the Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized EBX will:
1. Notify the NCEEP.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring
requirements as necessary and/or required by the NCEEP.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
5. Provide the NCEEP a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall
depict the extent and nature of the work performed.
13.0- FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund
projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This commitment provides financial
assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the program.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 35

14.0 OTHER INFORMATION
14.1 DEFINITIONS
Morphological description — the stream type; stream type is determined by quantifying channel
entrenchment, dimension, pattern, profile, and boundary materials; as described in Rosgen, D. (1996),
Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition
Native vegetation community — a distinct and reoccurring assemblage of populations of plants, animals,
bacteria and fungi naturally associated with each other and their population; as described in Schafale,
M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation
Project Area - includes all protected lands associated with the mitigation project
14.2 REFERENCES
Andrews, E.D. (19 84) Bed -material entrainment and hydraulic geometry of gravel -bed rivers in Colorado.
Geological Society ofAmerica Bulletin, 95, 371-378.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. 2011. EDR Radius Map Report.
Faber-Langendoen, D., Rocchio, J., Schafale, M., Nordman, C., Pyne, M., Teague, J., Foti, T., Comer, P.
(2006), Ecological Integrity Assessment and Performance Measures for Wetland Mitigation.
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
Lamb, Michael P., Dietrich, W.E., Venditti, J. G., (2008) Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, 1-20.
Lindenmayer, D.B., and J.F. Franklin. (2002), Conserving forest biodiversity: A comprehensive
multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. Floodplain Mapping Information System.
http://floodmaps.nc.gov/FMIS/Default.aspx Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Geological Survey,1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina. North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development, Raleigh, NC.
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T. S., and White, P. S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Pope, B.F., Tasker, G.D. 1999, Estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods in rural basins of North
Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4114. U.S. Geological
Survey, Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 36

Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
Young, T.F. and Sanzone, S. (editors). (2002), A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological
condition. Ecological Reporting Panel, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee. EPA Science
Advisory Board. Washington, DC.
June's Branch NCEEP Mitigation Plan April 2013 37

APPENDIX A
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT(S)

L8
N 86 15 38
W
98.33
L24
N
80 23 16
W
224.58
L9
S 24'53 40
PLAT CABINET:_(.SLIDE:9k_
LINE
BEARING
N
DISTANCE
LINE
BEARING
430:66'
DISTANCE
ELDRIDGE PAINTER &
BETTY JO PAINTER
PIN: 7651-03-2003
DB: 1492 PG: 439
�'�� +�...� �~
EXSTiNC GRAIEL DRIVE ry' NLF
R/W PER DB: 474 PG;
/ ��
_. '�_
/ ,~ -
� �, O a
/ p N
00,00
I
�I n►
h m h
46,60
COORDINATE TABLETOTAL
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT AREA .= 5.82 ACRES
22'09'21"
L1 N 15'32'56" W 145.02 L17- N 72.45'55" W 99.32'
CORNER NORTHING FASTING
L2 N 44'0211 E 23.20 L18 A 72.45'55' W• 85.92
1 610449.334 750214.110
L3 S 80'12'10" E, .152.57 L19 S 79'32'55" W 91.93'
2 610589.047 750175.242
L4 S 11'13 32 W , 78.43 L20 S 04'59'27" E 39.08'
3 610605.720 750191.364
THIS PLAT DOES NOT CREATE A SUBDIVISION
OF PROPERTY IN JACKSON COUNTY. THE
PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS: TO IDENTIFY THE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREAS ONLY. NO
L5 S 73'11 04 E 136.15 L21 S 17.36'22" E 50.82'
4 610776.826 750356.809
L6 S 30'5210 W 44.84 L22 S 45'18'51" W 145,66'
5 610856,324 750484.829
L7 5 37"4821 W 32.54 L23 . S 04'17'54" W 59.37'
„ ,
6 611016.199
750558.590
7 610990 )37
750708 933
L8
N 86 15 38
W
98.33
L24
N
80 23 16
W
224.58
L9
S 24'53 40
W
37.57
L25
N
80'23'16"
W
85.61'
430:66'
L10
S 24'53 40
W
46,60
L26
N
22'09'21"
W
94.26'
11'50'40" E
L11
S 44'36 55
W
23.05
L27
S 53'24'19"
W
57,73'
L12
N 41.07'39"
W .
104.76'
L28
S
22.09'21"
E
94.97'
N
L13
N 8012'10"
W
152.39'
L29
N
11.13'32"
E
85.17'
L14
N 79'32'55"
E
.103.32'
L30
N
11 "28'29"
E
40.02'
L15
S 60'53'54"
E
64,55'
L31
N
11'54'25"
E
64.88'
L16
S 11'13'32"
W
58.75'
L32 I
N
82'31'51"
E
1 31.01'
8 610913.310 750693.665 TRANSFER OF PROPERTY IS TAKING PLACE.
I r_ 9 610832.078 750586.060 CERIJFISATE OF SURVEY AND ACCURACY:
10 610745.726 750525.131
(sEE NorE #1z) p ' "1 p 11 610706,338 750655.463
�O 12 610642.138 750612.508 I, -PHILLIP B. KEE CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT :WAS,
13 610648.551 750514.389 DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY,: -
U ` 14 610572.201 750478.957 MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN
15 610527.736 750291.467 DB: 491 PG: -52Z DB: 514 PG: _533. PB: _12 ..
N 78°52'15" E , 45' PG: 455 ); THAT DASHED LINES INDICATE LINES NOT
41.49' (30) 16 610465.744 750230.301 SURVEYED; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED
11 NLF 17 611055.416 750566.551 DOES NOT EXCEED 1:10.000 AND THAT THIS PLAT WAS
PLAT REVISED 11/16/12 TO ADD. -PROPOSED WELL AND WATERING STATIONS N 17°30'48" E (29) J 18 611225,619 75C583.337 PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED.
155.57' :.o. DG j 19 611561.708 750682.420
N+I 20 611720.584 750666.997 I ALSO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS OF ONE OF THE
21 611739.326 750768.601 FOLLOWING: GS 47-30 F(11) D; THAT -THE SURVEY IS OF
ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF
I" IR This property Is not located within a public 0.65 EACRES G I} 22 611559.140 750771.590 EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT-ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER
` a0. END SPECIAL R/W 23 611118.506 750671.754 EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
• water supply watershed and can a reC00ded In `mh �` CONDITICN PER
4 611087.109 750728.159
the Register -of Deeds I • lO DB: 1124. PG: 615 WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, -REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND
a, s 25 611029.484 750716.722
- I " IP/CAP o� SEAL THIS __l6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER A.D., 2012.
55.50' 26 611784,065 750680.383
SET' N 53°34'57" E c2e) y 27 611928.377 750697.094 `\\ll�ll l 11111/j
Date Waters a Administrator 138'75' 1 NLF 28 612010.746 750608.745 ♦♦♦'�H CAROB /oi, THIS DOCUMENT IS, NOT VALID
SPRING 29 612159.104 750855.560 ��♦ Off•' ESS;'••®� UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED
42� MEAD "9 �. 30 612167.112 750896.266 2••OF ®�fi•�
ND�"� 4521 l 31 612079.735• 750915.039 SEe4L ter:
N ao-23, „ (27) PROPOSED CE 32 611962.375• 750878.794
<4 �6 71 N ()6°3620" E 233 ••f L-4647
ill/ 0 Acc£ss PATH 33 611859.943 750775•
oh .22' 54.50' �� (SEE NOTE #11) 34 611800.741 7507. � :9i� �•
71J.7.84
�N �5' C7 Ut „ - 35 611030.431 750778.080�` S1�1�'`•
`` 36 611085,133 750928.07.9 �� �' ' • • •'.. • �� ♦, -
Q� GATE - , / 0 ♦ PHILLIP B. K , PLS . NC -4647
N 06°36'20" E - 7, � - /
Zry ry� 90.78' s 37 610997.173 750963.896 //r1l IlI�I1� 11\\\�♦
(33) L24 NLF 38 610958.215 7508'52.920
AREA B-1 ''� 39 610946.891 750761.-5100
{ s (94) `s� 40 611089.164',. 750958.829 5URVi=Y0R'5 NCTf-5:.
0,15 ACRES '*��^^f 0w�rOV �� 41 611113.401 7511437694 1. ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND MEASUREMENTS IN US
42 611060.971.. 751200.'361 SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
GO' CROSSING -=j M O � Cr42� 43 611026.554 ' 751154.609 2: AREAS CALCULATED BY THE COORDINATE METHOD.
�w u f PROPOSED CE
• AXLE W L14 (21) ACCESS PATH ^O Q<u 44 611001.865 ' . 750994..377- i3. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF
(SEE NOTE On) (V ROAD CALLS •• •, 1jWAYS AND RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE RECORDED,
' JOEL A. SARTI �- (20)" cn ` UNRECORDED, WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN,
& DANA SARTI 551' R/W PER c a LINE BEARING DISTANCE 4, JACKSON COUNTY GIS WEBSITE USED TO IDENTIFY
DB: 1479 PG: 449
PIN. 7651-01-2647 N R1 N 58'40'53" E 124:J9' PROPERTY OWNERS
DB: 1202 PG: 7 65 /
/ PC: 12 PG: 455
�L l
Nis°25'3a" E \ R9 N 02"37'39" W 5002' APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE 0.2% ANNUAL
.
\ CHANCE FLOODPLAIN (ZONE X) AS DETERMINED BY THE
179,95' 4 I " IF
S,8 R10 N 19'16'05" E 41:24' F.E.M.A. MAP#3700765100J DATED APRIL 19, 2010.
`! �r AREA (B-2)� °O 0 R11 N 21'08'14" E 109.94'
3/411• 0.78 ACRES - _ 3 1 2 I .00` 3 R12 N 18'26'57" E 35.76' 7 COORDINATES
AGESY
INGS WERE DERIVED
,�s0 \ FROM MOBALPOSITIONING
STEM OBSERVATIONS
THAT WERE OBSERVED ON (12/1,9/11) AND WERE
RBR N 7�° \ PERFORMED TO THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING
4.4Ss$" 4. DEBRA HIGDON I IP ACCURACY STANDARDS (CLASSA HORIZONTAL AND
w 37y PIN:7651-01-9384 {D15Turz�eD) CLASS C VERTICAL); AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL
CO `D DB: 1122 PG: 77O USING GPS L1 STATIC OBSERVATIONS WITH MAGELLAN
L7j'•'• I N 22'17'49" E PROMARK3 RECEIVERS. r,
94.39' 8, UTILITIES WERE LOCATED BASED ON VISIBLE ABOVE
L78 NLF GROUND STRUCTURES, THEREFORE THE LOCATION OF
24" POST OAK GROUND
RAY FRANKLIN & UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE OR MAY BE
N 16°25'34" E - PRESENT AND NOT SHOWN HEREON, CALL
170,44 CL4RA FRANKLIN 1-800-632-4949 BEFORE DIGGING.
c PIN' 7651 - 1 -3T 76
@ I 0 9. ALL EXISTING FENCES WITHIN THE CONSERVATION
�. @ / DB: 604 PG 297 EASEMENT AREAS ARE TO BE REMOVED.
10. BOUNDARY LINES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS
3/4"
RBR •
z
un.
N 07 0202 E DASHED LINES AND WERE DERIVED FROM A SURVEY
0.88 ACRES 40 161.77' (TIE ONLY) FOR "DORIS HIGDON", PREPARED BY DAVENPORT &
�� , r
xh o NLF + ' ANGLF ASSOC., INC., DATED 09/09/03, BEING RECORDED IN
c,RQ`0 IRON PB: 12 PG: 455 IN THE JACKSON COUNTY REGISTRY.
S 47°31'28" E 11, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA RESERVES THE RIGHT
BARN 53,32 TO USE A 12' WIDE NON EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR
N 05°37'57" E BARN • S 47°31'28" E THE PURPOSE OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND REGRESS
171.03' (23) S 00.23'56" E (41) 77,64' FROM PATHS AND ROADS, WHICH ARE SHOWN HEREON
476 148.89' (TIE) ® E 188.45' IN APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS, FOR ACCESS TO ,
(24) w82°31'51" 1 I/2" IP FOUND
L32 • CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREAS.: ACCESS IS ALSO
>1t141Ntf1!! N 20' WIDE ACCESS I ® �5g6B (40). 2.5' WEST OF LINE
PERMITTED BETWEEN ALL STREAM- CROSSINGS. SEE
���ti �brjr� c7� EASEMENT PER {I7) Fp°� (36) ( ) @ 101 .92' SECTION IIIA IN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
`,��.�, �+srFRo,,,,� a? DB: 1202 PC: 155 L13• ^r 6g°5q'S �j �• 42 AGREEMENT,
:�� �� • c�'� cE acc£s (25)' 12, THE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH REQUIRED FOR OVERHEAD
<C/ ' • - ��' CROSSING -s~ -- S ROAD (35) F,
DISTRIBUTION POWER LINES OF ANY VOLTAGE 15
'• •'O -o. v (6) ( iv'�rr 17 • I . W� -- x (43)� s X NORMALLY A 30 --FOOT CORRIDOR (15 FEET ON EACH
,0E =�_� o N24°46'01"E _L3' :, (37)' ) 581°1A'12 k 3i� SIDE) PER DUKE ENERGY., SEE DB:1041 PG: 641.
HAMILTON r '��. 176.07' . .:. . 7). _. . ;(5'a). .' W (44 162. J e,
U� ( 10886 kJ CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP•,ANf�,,,�FDICA11ON:
"'r AREA C-2 . � ti
�i �,� "•• ( ) „3 30 CRO551NG AREA (E-2) O�' 1121 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE
,,�� S •...,.....♦`� �' 1.42 ACRES<a`-t... ��._ IF
7irr ON COV i`�p o ,o,, g`L PROPERTY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON. l
r7ur►lltu(1�ti��� �,� ->. ��:�,. _ � p• �� ® 0.41 ACRES
,= {
♦'�`•� (a) �3 �. • ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT AND ADOPT THIS RECORD PLAT
o�y S 82°56'20" W AREA {E-1) AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT WITH MY FREE
92.12' 0.38 ACRES CONSENT AND DEDICATED ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF
SPO i^1LE: 50-A5 1d ; X52 WAYS A D ACCESS ROADS TO PUBLIC iMN /OR
SPO FILE: 50 -AT PR 5E P.� NOTED ON S I PLAT.
DORIS HIGDON q • • (�) OLD BLOCK PROPOSED CE
PIN: 7651--00--2682 'A�j7 FOUNDATION ACCESS PATH DORIS HIGDON & GwD NORTH
DB: 491 PG: 622 AREA (D-1) 7 _ f' {sEE "OTE fin) D GD� DATE
(LOT D) PC: 12 PG: 455 1.15 ACRES y' DEBBIE HIGDON NAD 83
(4)
S 35°1273" W I/4" R, @ PIN: 7651-10-0888
105.68' 14.64' DB: 514 PG: 533
a r (lo) • RE EE 0 A D DATE Y
C$ ,j GRAVEL DRIVE 111 "`!!!
JACKSON COUNTY 7 (I a s�, x. �;.x`e�_6 z-_
BOARD OF EDUCATION ° °' .. 74 '4,F ^• 88'0 s° E � � Co R0, JR. /DATE
iO I i /2" N 88°03'2
PIN: 7641-90-4562 ^^wry `F IP 15'75'3' IP�2' +`,
DB: 360 PG: 579 �'s u3);----
A,
�` �� JO L SARTI DATE
' � .� CLAUDE C. RIDLEY JR
.. . a, Le (I 2) &SHARON RIDLEY - -- �` - - l,Z E,
PIN: 7651-10-3397 DANA H. SARTI DAIS '
o � DB: 460 PG: 418
APPROVED FOR RECORDING Q-: . . v Cj G�. , ,• __�N�__ _ _-- f 1
=ICT17-
1PLA%iPIINGOFFICC'` CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DE Y HIGDON DATE `
C� (14)
l;idll�- � 763g3G W 18269 C1 459.76' 106.64' '106.40' N 53'30'48" E - -�-1 -) - � �� j
s Dare ''' {Is) S O(1 C2 408.38' 119,46' 119.03' N 40'56'10" E� DATE
G� ^ C3 296,47' 100.62' 100.14' N:'22'S1'08" r "
• L1 t,�•- - � $ 44°36'55" W C� G NAIL '- �
' 87.10' �� e,y, SET C4 1270,99' 116.83' 116.79' N 14:58'29" E ,�- DIA�E r�-
• (I G) AFP R NOP -0 CCESSEPATH GJ�'�p� y�O C5 896.17 192.16' 191.78' - N 23 47 32 E DEBBIE HIGDON., 1. -�- - - (SEE NOTE #11) ��� Or' C6 690.89' 100.04' 99.96' N 34'07'28" E
KEE GPS (I) ur�L71 �yd`Q FINAL PLATT
C7 611.62' 119.25' 119,07 N 10'28'34" WCONTROFA
U
�
MONUMENT ?p ya��`5 G!'� C8 366.67' , 15.43' 114.96' N 10'14'57" E A CONSERVATION EASEMENT 5URVEY FOfZ:
N: 610238.49' IRBR�,� �Csi`� REGISTERED THIS THE..nn ,, DAY OF 1 I - _ _ REVIEW OFFICER FOR
E: 750040.12' F-♦ �� 201Q, AT M��r1AND RECORDED IN ACKSON COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR PLAT THE STATE OF=NORTH .CAROLINA,
(23.46')` /� TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED, MEETS ALL
PLAT CABINET -_ SLIDE Ul. t_ BY: STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING. NC D E PARTM E N;T- O F AD M 1 N I STRATI O N ,
GR'° ITE, ev DEPu ---- --- -- --- ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT��PROGRAM,
4584.69' '
r 45557x', (GROUND) _ �v� END 60' R/W PER ' --Zf --- /Z 1-2J JUNES BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
♦-` colrtelNEp FACTOR. ~ N 65'42'13" E NCDOT DIVISION 14 ---------- -- ----- REVIEW OFFICER D E
_ l 226.78' (TIE) REGIS R F DEEDS SPO FILE NUMBER: 050 -AM, .050 -AR, 050 -AZ, 050 -AS, & 050 -AT
� 4 0,99977539
v 0' 130' 240' 360' LEGEND: EEP PROJECT ID# -95027 CONTRACT # 003979
NGS STATION "PEI R° _ CURRjE'NT OWNERS LISTED AS:
• CALCULATED POINT (NOT SET) �.... BOUNDARY LINE` DORIS HIGDON, RENEE H.. COWARD, -
NAD 83(2007) SAC'S: ,LK.- L'DLY.9RD, JR., JOEL A. SARTI,
I IN01 = 120 FEET QQ EXISTING IRON PIN (AS NOTED) BOUNDARY LINE NOT SURVEYED
EPOCH DATE: 2fl02 O ______ DANA H. SARTI; DENNY HIGDON, &DEBBIE HIGDON
N:609480.59 FEET CONSERVATION EASEMENT CORNER -------- TIE LINE ONLY
E: 745518.51 FEET (#5 REBAR WITH EEP CAP SET) - ADJOINING DEED LINES PARCEC-IDENTIFICATION NUMBER'S:
Z: 2156.33 FEET VICINITY MAP ;' �i NGS MONUMENT - ' - RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) 7651-02-4182 (LOT A), 7q, 7;=07-4620 (LOT B), 7651-01-3188 (LOT C),
EXISTING NAIL X FENCE LINE
{NOT TO SCALE} W -ow 7651-00-•2.682 (LOT D) & 7657-10-0888
OVERHEAD WIRE
CONSERVATION EA5I=MENT C UTILITY POLE REFERENCES: 518:497 PG:622, DB:574 PG. -533 & PC,:72 PG:455
EXISTING STREAM
CORNER (TYPICAL} NOT TO NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE
® FIBER OPTIC (NTS)
SYLVA TOWNSHIP, JACKSON COUNT
RISER 0 CONSERVATION EASEMENT (CE) AREA Y,
SITE IP IRON PIPE GRAVEL SURVEY BY. • NH,MM,PBK DRAWN BY: PBK SCALE.' I- 120'
A IRON ROD / SURVEY DATES: 12119111-09127/12 REV. 11/16/12 JOB #111192 -CE
NLF NAIL FOUND SOIL ROADBED/ACCESS PATH ( )
' - RBR REBAR ® PROPOSED WATERING STATION N
w 10 CNR CORNER P.O. Box 25GG
�0NGS NATIONAL
a 49 _• '95' 5'•P DB: DEED BOOK ® PROPOSED WELL i
y�� ��'�> PG: PAGE N,A D. NORTH AMERICAN TIDATUM V1983 EY ASheVIIIe, NG_ 28802
° ; e\�s\ PC: PLAT CABINET SPC STATE PLANE COORDINATES (828) G45-8275
CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE POB POINT OF BEGINNING www.keemap.com
SR STATE ROAD 0/S OFFSET
__.___-_.-_....___..... .. PL PROPERTY LINE CC CONTROL CORNER ! _ ! License # C-3039
•
V`'� ��
R2
N
59'31'18" E ,:
148.92'
5, THE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO
4
R3
N
12"44'31" E
40.11:'
INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR
R4
N
11"13'32"E
430:66'
•� �
• CO � �
EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, ENCUMBRANCES,
�
o
.'
Q'` 1z,
[, ` p�
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, CORRECT OWNERSHIP
OR ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND
R5 N 11'27'55" E 158.05'
N
11'50'40" E
119.73'
Ii�R6
CURRENT TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE, A NO LICENSED
ATTORNEY SHOULD BE CONSULTED.
R7 N 04.53'25" W 56.41'
419)
(22)
RS
N
0648'33" W
131 41'
6. BY GRAPHIC DETERMINATION THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
Nis°25'3a" E \ R9 N 02"37'39" W 5002' APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE 0.2% ANNUAL
.
\ CHANCE FLOODPLAIN (ZONE X) AS DETERMINED BY THE
179,95' 4 I " IF
S,8 R10 N 19'16'05" E 41:24' F.E.M.A. MAP#3700765100J DATED APRIL 19, 2010.
`! �r AREA (B-2)� °O 0 R11 N 21'08'14" E 109.94'
3/411• 0.78 ACRES - _ 3 1 2 I .00` 3 R12 N 18'26'57" E 35.76' 7 COORDINATES
AGESY
INGS WERE DERIVED
,�s0 \ FROM MOBALPOSITIONING
STEM OBSERVATIONS
THAT WERE OBSERVED ON (12/1,9/11) AND WERE
RBR N 7�° \ PERFORMED TO THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING
4.4Ss$" 4. DEBRA HIGDON I IP ACCURACY STANDARDS (CLASSA HORIZONTAL AND
w 37y PIN:7651-01-9384 {D15Turz�eD) CLASS C VERTICAL); AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL
CO `D DB: 1122 PG: 77O USING GPS L1 STATIC OBSERVATIONS WITH MAGELLAN
L7j'•'• I N 22'17'49" E PROMARK3 RECEIVERS. r,
94.39' 8, UTILITIES WERE LOCATED BASED ON VISIBLE ABOVE
L78 NLF GROUND STRUCTURES, THEREFORE THE LOCATION OF
24" POST OAK GROUND
RAY FRANKLIN & UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE OR MAY BE
N 16°25'34" E - PRESENT AND NOT SHOWN HEREON, CALL
170,44 CL4RA FRANKLIN 1-800-632-4949 BEFORE DIGGING.
c PIN' 7651 - 1 -3T 76
@ I 0 9. ALL EXISTING FENCES WITHIN THE CONSERVATION
�. @ / DB: 604 PG 297 EASEMENT AREAS ARE TO BE REMOVED.
10. BOUNDARY LINES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS
3/4"
RBR •
z
un.
N 07 0202 E DASHED LINES AND WERE DERIVED FROM A SURVEY
0.88 ACRES 40 161.77' (TIE ONLY) FOR "DORIS HIGDON", PREPARED BY DAVENPORT &
�� , r
xh o NLF + ' ANGLF ASSOC., INC., DATED 09/09/03, BEING RECORDED IN
c,RQ`0 IRON PB: 12 PG: 455 IN THE JACKSON COUNTY REGISTRY.
S 47°31'28" E 11, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA RESERVES THE RIGHT
BARN 53,32 TO USE A 12' WIDE NON EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR
N 05°37'57" E BARN • S 47°31'28" E THE PURPOSE OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND REGRESS
171.03' (23) S 00.23'56" E (41) 77,64' FROM PATHS AND ROADS, WHICH ARE SHOWN HEREON
476 148.89' (TIE) ® E 188.45' IN APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS, FOR ACCESS TO ,
(24) w82°31'51" 1 I/2" IP FOUND
L32 • CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREAS.: ACCESS IS ALSO
>1t141Ntf1!! N 20' WIDE ACCESS I ® �5g6B (40). 2.5' WEST OF LINE
PERMITTED BETWEEN ALL STREAM- CROSSINGS. SEE
���ti �brjr� c7� EASEMENT PER {I7) Fp°� (36) ( ) @ 101 .92' SECTION IIIA IN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
`,��.�, �+srFRo,,,,� a? DB: 1202 PC: 155 L13• ^r 6g°5q'S �j �• 42 AGREEMENT,
:�� �� • c�'� cE acc£s (25)' 12, THE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH REQUIRED FOR OVERHEAD
<C/ ' • - ��' CROSSING -s~ -- S ROAD (35) F,
DISTRIBUTION POWER LINES OF ANY VOLTAGE 15
'• •'O -o. v (6) ( iv'�rr 17 • I . W� -- x (43)� s X NORMALLY A 30 --FOOT CORRIDOR (15 FEET ON EACH
,0E =�_� o N24°46'01"E _L3' :, (37)' ) 581°1A'12 k 3i� SIDE) PER DUKE ENERGY., SEE DB:1041 PG: 641.
HAMILTON r '��. 176.07' . .:. . 7). _. . ;(5'a). .' W (44 162. J e,
U� ( 10886 kJ CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP•,ANf�,,,�FDICA11ON:
"'r AREA C-2 . � ti
�i �,� "•• ( ) „3 30 CRO551NG AREA (E-2) O�' 1121 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE
,,�� S •...,.....♦`� �' 1.42 ACRES<a`-t... ��._ IF
7irr ON COV i`�p o ,o,, g`L PROPERTY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON. l
r7ur►lltu(1�ti��� �,� ->. ��:�,. _ � p• �� ® 0.41 ACRES
,= {
♦'�`•� (a) �3 �. • ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT AND ADOPT THIS RECORD PLAT
o�y S 82°56'20" W AREA {E-1) AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT WITH MY FREE
92.12' 0.38 ACRES CONSENT AND DEDICATED ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF
SPO i^1LE: 50-A5 1d ; X52 WAYS A D ACCESS ROADS TO PUBLIC iMN /OR
SPO FILE: 50 -AT PR 5E P.� NOTED ON S I PLAT.
DORIS HIGDON q • • (�) OLD BLOCK PROPOSED CE
PIN: 7651--00--2682 'A�j7 FOUNDATION ACCESS PATH DORIS HIGDON & GwD NORTH
DB: 491 PG: 622 AREA (D-1) 7 _ f' {sEE "OTE fin) D GD� DATE
(LOT D) PC: 12 PG: 455 1.15 ACRES y' DEBBIE HIGDON NAD 83
(4)
S 35°1273" W I/4" R, @ PIN: 7651-10-0888
105.68' 14.64' DB: 514 PG: 533
a r (lo) • RE EE 0 A D DATE Y
C$ ,j GRAVEL DRIVE 111 "`!!!
JACKSON COUNTY 7 (I a s�, x. �;.x`e�_6 z-_
BOARD OF EDUCATION ° °' .. 74 '4,F ^• 88'0 s° E � � Co R0, JR. /DATE
iO I i /2" N 88°03'2
PIN: 7641-90-4562 ^^wry `F IP 15'75'3' IP�2' +`,
DB: 360 PG: 579 �'s u3);----
A,
�` �� JO L SARTI DATE
' � .� CLAUDE C. RIDLEY JR
.. . a, Le (I 2) &SHARON RIDLEY - -- �` - - l,Z E,
PIN: 7651-10-3397 DANA H. SARTI DAIS '
o � DB: 460 PG: 418
APPROVED FOR RECORDING Q-: . . v Cj G�. , ,• __�N�__ _ _-- f 1
=ICT17-
1PLA%iPIINGOFFICC'` CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DE Y HIGDON DATE `
C� (14)
l;idll�- � 763g3G W 18269 C1 459.76' 106.64' '106.40' N 53'30'48" E - -�-1 -) - � �� j
s Dare ''' {Is) S O(1 C2 408.38' 119,46' 119.03' N 40'56'10" E� DATE
G� ^ C3 296,47' 100.62' 100.14' N:'22'S1'08" r "
• L1 t,�•- - � $ 44°36'55" W C� G NAIL '- �
' 87.10' �� e,y, SET C4 1270,99' 116.83' 116.79' N 14:58'29" E ,�- DIA�E r�-
• (I G) AFP R NOP -0 CCESSEPATH GJ�'�p� y�O C5 896.17 192.16' 191.78' - N 23 47 32 E DEBBIE HIGDON., 1. -�- - - (SEE NOTE #11) ��� Or' C6 690.89' 100.04' 99.96' N 34'07'28" E
KEE GPS (I) ur�L71 �yd`Q FINAL PLATT
C7 611.62' 119.25' 119,07 N 10'28'34" WCONTROFA
U
�
MONUMENT ?p ya��`5 G!'� C8 366.67' , 15.43' 114.96' N 10'14'57" E A CONSERVATION EASEMENT 5URVEY FOfZ:
N: 610238.49' IRBR�,� �Csi`� REGISTERED THIS THE..nn ,, DAY OF 1 I - _ _ REVIEW OFFICER FOR
E: 750040.12' F-♦ �� 201Q, AT M��r1AND RECORDED IN ACKSON COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR PLAT THE STATE OF=NORTH .CAROLINA,
(23.46')` /� TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED, MEETS ALL
PLAT CABINET -_ SLIDE Ul. t_ BY: STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING. NC D E PARTM E N;T- O F AD M 1 N I STRATI O N ,
GR'° ITE, ev DEPu ---- --- -- --- ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT��PROGRAM,
4584.69' '
r 45557x', (GROUND) _ �v� END 60' R/W PER ' --Zf --- /Z 1-2J JUNES BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
♦-` colrtelNEp FACTOR. ~ N 65'42'13" E NCDOT DIVISION 14 ---------- -- ----- REVIEW OFFICER D E
_ l 226.78' (TIE) REGIS R F DEEDS SPO FILE NUMBER: 050 -AM, .050 -AR, 050 -AZ, 050 -AS, & 050 -AT
� 4 0,99977539
v 0' 130' 240' 360' LEGEND: EEP PROJECT ID# -95027 CONTRACT # 003979
NGS STATION "PEI R° _ CURRjE'NT OWNERS LISTED AS:
• CALCULATED POINT (NOT SET) �.... BOUNDARY LINE` DORIS HIGDON, RENEE H.. COWARD, -
NAD 83(2007) SAC'S: ,LK.- L'DLY.9RD, JR., JOEL A. SARTI,
I IN01 = 120 FEET QQ EXISTING IRON PIN (AS NOTED) BOUNDARY LINE NOT SURVEYED
EPOCH DATE: 2fl02 O ______ DANA H. SARTI; DENNY HIGDON, &DEBBIE HIGDON
N:609480.59 FEET CONSERVATION EASEMENT CORNER -------- TIE LINE ONLY
E: 745518.51 FEET (#5 REBAR WITH EEP CAP SET) - ADJOINING DEED LINES PARCEC-IDENTIFICATION NUMBER'S:
Z: 2156.33 FEET VICINITY MAP ;' �i NGS MONUMENT - ' - RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) 7651-02-4182 (LOT A), 7q, 7;=07-4620 (LOT B), 7651-01-3188 (LOT C),
EXISTING NAIL X FENCE LINE
{NOT TO SCALE} W -ow 7651-00-•2.682 (LOT D) & 7657-10-0888
OVERHEAD WIRE
CONSERVATION EA5I=MENT C UTILITY POLE REFERENCES: 518:497 PG:622, DB:574 PG. -533 & PC,:72 PG:455
EXISTING STREAM
CORNER (TYPICAL} NOT TO NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE
® FIBER OPTIC (NTS)
SYLVA TOWNSHIP, JACKSON COUNT
RISER 0 CONSERVATION EASEMENT (CE) AREA Y,
SITE IP IRON PIPE GRAVEL SURVEY BY. • NH,MM,PBK DRAWN BY: PBK SCALE.' I- 120'
A IRON ROD / SURVEY DATES: 12119111-09127/12 REV. 11/16/12 JOB #111192 -CE
NLF NAIL FOUND SOIL ROADBED/ACCESS PATH ( )
' - RBR REBAR ® PROPOSED WATERING STATION N
w 10 CNR CORNER P.O. Box 25GG
�0NGS NATIONAL
a 49 _• '95' 5'•P DB: DEED BOOK ® PROPOSED WELL i
y�� ��'�> PG: PAGE N,A D. NORTH AMERICAN TIDATUM V1983 EY ASheVIIIe, NG_ 28802
° ; e\�s\ PC: PLAT CABINET SPC STATE PLANE COORDINATES (828) G45-8275
CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE POB POINT OF BEGINNING www.keemap.com
SR STATE ROAD 0/S OFFSET
__.___-_.-_....___..... .. PL PROPERTY LINE CC CONTROL CORNER ! _ ! License # C-3039

APPENDIX B
BASELINE INFORMATION DATA

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: June's Branch Stream Restoration
Count Name: Jackson County
EEP Number: 003979
Project Sponsor: NCEEP
Project Contact Name: Paul Wiesner
Project Contact Address: 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102, Asheville, NC 28801
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
EEP Pro'ect Mana er: I Paul Wiesner
Project Description
Stream restoration activities will restore approximately 2,662 feet of stream and enhance 206
feet of stream along Bumgarner Branch, June's Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch by
restoring natural channel morphology and proper sediment transport capacity, improving bed
form diversity, constructing a floodplain bench, improving channel and stream bank
stabilization, establishing a forested and herbaceous riparian buffer plant community.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
/.113 / ;?o //
—
Date EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
II-ZI-II
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
6 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 2: All Projects
Response
Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
❑
Yes
✓
No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
❑
Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑
No
N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
❑
Yes
❑
No
❑✓
N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
Yes
Program?
❑
No
❑✓
N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERCLA
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project?
❑✓
Yes
❑
No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
❑
Yes
designated as commercial or industrial?
❑✓
No
❑
N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
❑
Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑✓
No
❑
N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
✓❑
No
❑
N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
Yes
waste sites within the project area?
❑
No
✓
NIA
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
❑
Yes
❑
No
❑✓
N/A
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
❑
Yes
Historic Places in the project area?
✓
No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur?
❑
Yes
❑
No
❑✓
N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
❑
Yes
❑
No
❑✓
N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Ac uisition Policies Act Uniform
Act
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project?
✓
Yes
❑
No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
❑✓
Yes
❑
No
❑
N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑
Yes
✓❑
No
❑
N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
✓
Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
El
No
what the fair market value is believed to be?
N/A
7 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 3: Ground -Disturbing
Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act AIRFA
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of
❑✓ Yes
Cherokee Indians?
❑ No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
❑ Yes
Places?
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Antiquities Act AA
1. Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑
Yes
❑✓
No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
❑
Yes
of antiquity?
❑✓
No
❑
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑
Yes.
❑
No
✓❑
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑
Yes
❑
No
✓❑
N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act ARPA
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Endanciered Species Act ESA
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
✓ Yes
listed for the county?
❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
Yes
❑✓ No
N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
❑ Yes
Habitat?
j] No
El N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect' the species and/or "likely to adversely modify'
❑ Yes
Designated Critical Habitat?✓❑
No
N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
Q
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓ N/A
8 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
❑ Yes
by the EBCI?
❑✓ No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
❑ Yes
project?
❑ No
✓ N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
❑ Yes
sites?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA
1. Will real estate be acquired?
0 Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
0 Yes
important farmland?
❑ No
NIA
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWCA
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
❑✓ Yes
water body?
❑ No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
❑ Yes
outdoor recreation?
0 No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish
Habitat
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
El No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species?
❑ Yes
❑ No
j] N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
❑ Yes
project on EFH?
❑ No
0 N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
El N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred?
El Yes
❑ No
FZI N/A
MigratorV Bird Treat Act MBTA
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
❑ Yes
[Z] No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[D N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area?
❑ Yes
[D No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
❑ Yes
federal agency?
❑ No
0 N/A
9 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

NC DWO Stream Identification form Version 4.11
Date: 1 ry 5 t nr l
r
Project/Site:
Latitude: 3 5,1 W�3
Evaluator: Ncir Mtr 4l
County: fac4
Longitude: -rb 1qCl
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other t r
� `��
y 0
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name: )y V
if 3 19 or perennial if ? 30'
»
3
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
ia. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
»
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
Q
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
70�=
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Other =
3
9. Grade control
0
i
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No T 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = I I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
LJ
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
Q 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1. 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 i
11.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes = 3
1
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 110
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
QJ
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
a
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0'
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

XTr. ira ..4:F; .i -I -. V 17a A 1 I
Date:I 1 j 211
ProjectlSite; jun�s gr, UTt
Latitude: 5 3
Evaluator: M,la„► 1C , r/� ,}tk,< 14
County: �ark�H
Longitude:
Total Points:
is feast intermittent 5
Stream Determination (circle one
Other L
'a 7pw4jr�
Stream at 2
Ephemeral Intermittent erenn�a
e.g Quad Name:
rf> 99 or perennial ifz 30"
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = lot )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a_ Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
01
,
v
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
i 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =W)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = `i )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
_T__2
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75, 08L = 1.5 Other Q
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: G, D 'L((V,c4 7(( -.t -4 -
Sketch;

Nr T)WO fitrenm Trtentifiention Form Version 4.11
Date: 15 20l j
Project/Site:,SGS Qt U l
Latitude:
Evaluator: ('�Z��vn r i,(, M 4 �y b(
County:
Longitude:. tq 10 3
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if 2:30*
No = 0
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
11' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
No = 0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
C)
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 $
2
3
5. Activelrelict Floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 1
0.5
Cl)1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R I.. e4rnlnQ"kFn+rnI = 11 . e) 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
0 1
2
2
3
14. Leaf litter
51
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
00.5
1
1
1.5
5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =t3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
r` Rinlnrnr lQ11M +al = 11 • 5 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
0
1
1
3
3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
0.
1
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
0.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL
1
= 1.5 Other = (7
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: .ri s<I •+ ..n
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11,, s_
Date: i r'a`Jj�i)II
Project/Site: SU�sg (+�, �
Latitude: 35.3SS16
Evaluator: 1'�`��L�t`� fv1t�}aw
County: �6`(lltSs�y
Longitude:
0
1
2
'dotal Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ��,
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral(intermittent) Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: s"Ilvk CA -'Vin
if> 19 or perennial if? 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
G)
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Ft_ Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1D 5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 Q .5 1
1 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 1
Yes =(D
C Biology (Subtotal = 'F )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2)
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
i
3
22. f=ish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1 5
25. Algae
0.5}
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProfecgSite: )v^te iii.- Ciry/County: �•LL�^ Sampling Date: i019111
Applicent/OJrtrer. &Bg State: HC Sampling Point: `API
Investigator(s): K. M'..dvg S rA,.l — Section, Township, Range:
Landform(hillslope, terrace, etc.): Ter..a Local relief(concsve, convex, none): C•-.4. Slope 1%):0
9_
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): I -V-4. 14 Lat 35, 1S65b Long: 83•i"1124 Datum: NA991
Soil Map Unit Name: Lv11owy . wles NWlclassification: '30ASixot
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes m No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly clammed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes —0 No 13Isthe Sampled Area
Hydra Soil Present? Yes INo 13® No 13Welland gCII Hydrology Present? Yes v. No 'within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary Indicators minimum of we is mourned,
check all t
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Q Surface Water (Al)
_❑ WaterStained Leaves (B9)
13 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Sit)
I{'q� High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
LI Saturation (A3)
P Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
13 Mass Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bl)
Hydrogen Sulgde Odor (CI)
j] Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Crayfish Bunovea (CS)
Drift Deposits (83)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Q Iran Deposits (135)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (06)
LJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (02)
LJ Shallow Aquimld (D3)
Q inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
® Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ® No
0 Depth( r o "V"
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes Q No ❑
(includes capillary tinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
pl.l, e.,er
f t V ` Jw4.we w«a
1"t 3. SeilS
US Army Cams of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Interim Version

VEGETATION - Use scientific names af plants.
Sampling Point: �F i
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1O2A'T.1 )
7. 541. A3..
$o%�T•�
eu, i
Absolute
%Cover
9�_
Dominant Indicator
Sys? Status
El 05t-
Dominance Test warkshat:
Number 066. inert Spades
That Are OBL, FAC W, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Spades Across All Strata: 5 (B)
of DominantSpecies
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (AIB)
2. lifer nbru•., SRo 0
3. 0
4. 0
-Percent
5. 13That
6. 1
7.
_
0
Prevalence Index workslladc
Total %Cover of Multiply by,
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 1544 L..
1.
)
35
Total Cover
1_
OBL spades is x l = H5
FACW species 1 x2= 5 A
FAC species 'i x 3 = 91
FACU species x4= 0
UPLspecies 0 x5= 'D
Column Totals: (A) 11 (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA= I . b6
2. M
B 0
4. [3
5, 13
6. 13
7 1 -
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: I Ssq. 1• )
1. A\.es uv.l6
5o•b.6
9c :e.b
- =Total Cover
109a ® l:Wf
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
]S Dominance Test is X50%
Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrephytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
2, fv,,,. wme•.,w•,. ®FFlcwi
3. 0
_
4, Q
5. O -
6.
1
Definitions of Vegetation Strafe:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
ITS an) or larger in diameter at breast height (OBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding wady vines,
approximately 20 It(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. t7.6 cm) DBH.
shrub- Woody plants, excluding wetly vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous(non-rmody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes many
plants, except mody vines, less than approximately
3 it(I m) in height.
Woody vine- All woody vines, regardless of height.
_
7' 13
50 : I6 3 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: (mak ) 4.: 6
1' O
2, Sr,,ro s cx14o•,4 (G.•..., W.Illv,0 16 fe ® oSu
3. h -e, 1("-+ 1e9. ® FA,,t
4. K145 -,.•-. se bre.•, Via- E3 `L
5. Ny 1'."d Ve..,dw rwr.Eofc<rwi.h 11< 13 FAcr
6. 5.-P4s W,.d 19. 0 Fal t
7. P,„Y. rpt GW L.WI. c.rdu•..L•. 0 ;A: r
8. Q
g 0
10. E3
11. 13
12. 13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
)
30
Total Cover
E3
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Vas ® No 13
2. 0
-
3. 0
-
4. 0
5. O -
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: W P I
PmMa Description: (Doecribe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inched Color (moist)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Twe L
Texture Remarks
0-S Ibyr-sly Ido
.-a6-
5-lA IOva5la loo
5 I
"T : C --Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix C9Cuwred or Coaled Santo Grains. 'Location: PLE's Linin , M=Matrix.
Brie Soil Indicators:
Hislosol (Al)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Shcs
OPolyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T. U) J] 1 an Muck (A9) (LRR O)
-01hin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 43 an Muck (A10) (LRR 5)
Loamy Mucky Mineal (F1) (LRR O) [3 Reduced Veto (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
f3Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FIS)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
�JDepleted Matri (F3)
❑❑Redox Dark Surface (FB)
130epleted Dark Surface (F7)
13 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MCRA 1538)
j] Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
LJ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)�n4Mad
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8) T❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
(F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
TTL J11 Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
non -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (MLRA 150A)
h��rlF Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
L Umbric Surface (Fi 3) (LRR P, T, U) "land hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (51LRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
�D-tReduced Vedic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Shipped Matrix (56)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MCRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Restdctiw Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? yes ® No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Interim Version

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
PmjeWSite: 1•,„e. ii J,. City/Gounty: �aekw. Sampling Dale: Ibl41e
AppIxzmJOvmer: Eox State: HC Sampling Pant: w? A
Invaidgator(s): K. N•4.6111 S. Molt.,,• Section, Tovmship, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): R%s1„ yr Local relief (concave, convex, none): C•...,. Slope (%): 19 -
Subregion (URR
,Subregion(LRR or MLRA): cR9.N Let: 55.35666 Long:'83.1%q'a Datum: NAD 43
Soil Map Unit Name: Cvl1...W. NWI classification: M.,..4Pj D<.1..
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No 13 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation R Soil Q or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances” present? Yes ® No 13
Are Vegetation Q Sail E, or Hydrology E3 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 13 No 0
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _ ® within a Watland? Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
Remarks: Fl�� 6.s uNlaut ac n,annyafA ps,yswa �• 30'6 yvNS,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
larmary Indicators n
Q Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
heauned
&a& all h a l
T1Water-Stained Leaves (139)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Marl Deposits SI S) (LRR U)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of hm reouiied)
❑ Surface Soil Ch cks (B6)
0iir Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Mass Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
[] Dry -Season Water Table (G2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
o Crayfish Burrows (C6)
Drift Deposits (133)
e
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust Suit
Q Iron Deposits (135)
Q Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
��l Thin Muck Surface (C7)
LJ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
T�1 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAGNeuVal Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
E3 No ® Depth (inches):
No®t!!!II Depth(inches):
O No�rDepih (inches):
�eI
Weaantl Hydrology Present? Yes 11 No Kv
includescapillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aedal photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Interim Version
CKeY [j4l nt<
6" P" hlcl.nNsv_y G,......•R�IIi.1L

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Vol? 9,
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_)
1.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%Cover Species? Status
❑
DominanceTestworksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ 'D (AIB)
2. ❑-
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. 13-
6. 13
7
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of MuMioly by,
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
_=Total Cover
❑
OBL species x1-
1-1.
FACWspecies x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index=B/A=
2. ❑
_
3. ❑
4, ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
Shrub Stratum (Plotsae: )
1
= Total Cover
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ Dominance Testis>50%
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
_
2. ❑
3. ❑
_
4. ❑
5 ❑
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tme- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 If (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
ITS cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. ITS crn) DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 S (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb herbaceous
vibes, reg rdless(nDncreme.lancludes mod
herbacexcept eodyvines,less size. approximately woody
plants, except wpotly vines, less than approximately
3fl(1 m)in height.
Woody vine -Ail vroody vines, regardless of height.
7. ❑ -
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot sae: 9 s`. (rci)
1. V"', ax 13Sapling-Woody
2. [3
-
3. ❑
4. ❑
-
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
S ❑
9 ❑-
10. ❑
11. o -
12. ❑
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
L
1100 Total Cover
)
❑
Hydrophyfic
Vegetation
Present? yea ❑ No
2. ❑
3. ❑
_
4. ❑
5. ❑
-
=Total Cover
Remarks: (6 observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: WN,
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of lnlloatons)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color(meat) %
Redox Features
Color fmdst) % To L
Texture Remarks
o- 1a 1OV& 51e loot.
CLIA I—
'T e: C=Concentration D=De Iebon RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pan Linin M=Makix.
IN�vdric Soil Indicators:
`-' Hlstosol (A1)
Q Histic Epipeden (A2)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Indicators for Problematic Hytlric Soils :
OPolyvalue Below Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ t cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface(S9) (LRR S, T, U) Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI) (LRR O) Q Reduced Vedic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (AR)
Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2)
t3Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
DDepleted Dark Surface (F7)
fl Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 1538)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
I�yI Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
LJ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Q Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_oRedox Depressions (F8) To1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
]Mad (F10) (LRR U) y Other (Explain in Remarks)
_�❑-tIDepleted Ochric(FI 1)(MLRA 151)
J.yIron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicalors of hydrophylic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (MLRA 150A)
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR O, S)
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
L81.1mbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
T-DReduced Vedic (FIB) (MLRA 160A,15013)
J -(Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Snipped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yea 13 No IM
US Amry Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecYSite: ).Ke 6.....1_ City/County: )-di.. Sampling Date: Ib14H1
Applicant/Owner: G6X State: tlL Sampling Point: W? 1 w
Investigator(s): K. h',+Jw11 15. Anj1' Section, Township, Range:
Landfmn(hillslope, terrace, etc.): T, Local relief (concave. convex, none): C*,r r. Slope(%): O'I
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRSCN Let: 35.35531 Long: 'S3.19pap Datum: HN5)t
Soil Map Unit Name: C-11mrw,. NWI classification: Fa.wkd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation O, Soil O, or Hydrology 13 ignifcantly disturbed? Am" Normal Cirwmstances'present? Yes ©No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil 0, or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes © No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sol Present? Yes -1 No� within a Wetland? Yes ® No 0
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ N,
Remarks: y+tA4.A b...tWf aP 16''16
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology IndIcatom:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one's reunited cherh all that aoolvl
Q Surface Water (Al) 0 Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
High Water Table (A2) -0 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Saturation (A3) 10 Marl Deposits (BI 5) (LRR U)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two moulded)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
IL�.If Water Marks(B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
l,l Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (83)
LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Uving Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
10_1 Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
1Iron Deposits (135)
3
4•tnInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (W)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
LJT1 Thin Muck Surface (C])
U3 Other (Explain in Remarks)
[T]1 Geomoow ryhic Position (D2)
13 ShallAquita d (D3)
13 FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
Saturation Present? Yes ® No
includes capillary Erin e
0 Depth (inches):
© Depih(inches):
0 Depth (inches): 11'..
Wetlantl Hydrology Present? Yes ypPl No 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Interim Version

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: V`P 14
Tree Stralum (Plot size: 4o.. ' )
1. d,.r
5o, uc.S Absolute Dominant Indicator
qo c t4 %Cover Species? Status
Sor. IS FAc
Dominance Test worksheet
Number Dominant Species
O
Thai BL, FACW, or FAG (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: Ll (B)
of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: tori (AIB)
2. 51. ❑ 66t-
3. ❑
4.1313Percent
5.
-
6. ❑
7
❑
Prevaeics Index vorkshast:
Total % Cover of. Multiply by
Saolino Stratum (Plot size:
1.
)
�ds9• =Total Cover
❑
OBL species 5 It 1 = 5
FACW species 50 x2= lob
FAC species 170 x3= 10
FACU species .0 x4=0
UPL species a x5= t0
Column Totals: 1'41 (A) H15' (B)
Prevalence Ind. =B/A= 11,8
2. ❑
3, ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑ _
6. ❑
7, 13
50:15
Shrub Stratum (Plat size: 15ey_ty' ) Le to
1. Prt<ce (cw•-4 �.ylrv,,. Stn. Y-r1�_
=Total Corer
® FAC.
HydroPhytic Vegetation Indicators:
X- Dominance Test is>50%
�(. Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless cleansed or problematic.
2. Coy,,. 109. ® fFcwf
3. ❑
4, ❑
5. ❑
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
This, - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
ITS cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 31n. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 S (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, Including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
except woody vines, less than approximately
3 I (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All vroody vines, regardless of height.
7. ❑
-
Total Cnver
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 554- 6..-t ) ,b ,g 4
1 404. ® FALp./
2. fn.1v.N... I -.s. +.+1.: F6.„ 5 [3VPL
Vie_
3. ❑
4. ❑
-
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
6. ❑plants,
9 13-
10. ❑
_
11. ❑
12. ❑
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
)
=Total Cover
❑
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? yes ® No 13
2. ❑
3. ❑
_
4. O
5_ ❑
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: 'WP W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) _%
Redox Features
Color inn at) ,may_ TV Low
Texture Remarks
% IOY0. 51S loayo
5"1 1-
S-19, Mit 315 too
'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion RM=Reduced Matrix, CS --Covered or Coated Send Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lini MIX.
chic Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrae Soilas:
OPolyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T. U) ❑ 1 an Muck (AS) (LRR O)
-QThin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A70) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O) C3 Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (LRR P, S. T)
Stratified Layers (AS)Depleted
Organic Bodias (AS) (LRR P. T. U)
_ 5 an Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)]Mad
Matrix (F3)
-flRedox Dark Surface (F6)
DDepleted Dark Surface (FT)
,-QRedox Depressions (F8)
(F10) (LRR U)
R-T�lepleted
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 1538)
[] Red Parent Material (TF2)
o� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) (LRR T, U)
yI Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
y.lIron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T) rindiralors of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 1SOA)
Sandy Mulley Mineral (Si)(LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Seedy Redox (S5)
L Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) vretlardl hydrology must be present,
Delta Ouhnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_�oIReduced VeNc (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15UB)
y4Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 149A)
:o
Stripped Matrix (86)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Presets? Yes ® N.__9
US Army Coms of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Sim: Sano 6r.µ, City/County: 11,toi.. Sampling Dale: IDIH111
Applicant/Ovaec EDY, State: r_ Sampling Point: W k5
Investigator(s): I<S. MAr Section, Toweship, Range:
Landform (hlllslope, teoece, etc.): W&L, Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (b): LI 90
Subregion(LRRor MLRA): Let: 35.355.4 Long: -tlAels>6 Datum: sera 2Z
Soil Map Unit Name: C.k%_k. NWl classification: ;,W
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Q, Soil Q, or Hydrology Q significantly disturbed? Are°Normal Circumstances° present? Yes ® No 0
Are Vegetation p Soil 13, or Hydrology Q naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes r®t�t No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Ye 12
No � wghina Wetland? Yes Q NoP3
Welland Hydrology Present? Yea No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Pdamry ndica s is handrail
Q Sudace Water (Al)
I�'a'IF High Water Table (A2)
LJ Saturation (A3)
cbeck, all that apply)
Q Water-Stamed Leaves (B9)
Q Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Mad Deposits (815) (LRR U)
Secondaw Indicators (minimum of two required)
Q Surface Soil Cracks (N)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks(131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor( Cl)
[]Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
o Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Iron Deposits (135)
Q Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Recent Ion Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
r�I Thin Muck Surface (C7)
LJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomoryhic Position (132)
13 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAG -Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No
Water Table Present? Yes Q Ns
Saturation Present? Yale No
® Depth' no
m Depth (inche:):
® Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes__q No__g
includes capillary hinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring weti, aerial photos, previous inspections), H available:
US Any Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Interim Version

VEGETATION - Useseientifietlemes of plants.
Sampling Point: M15
Tree Stratum (Plot size: '�p Ls )
1. (L., r.6-
50:50
U, 10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%Cover S°xies? Status-
9 S9" ® FAL
Dominance Teat worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Tofal Nu Across Dominant C
Species Across All Stmle: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ $0`ie (Ag)
2. wuw ❑ FAcu
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑-
6. 13
7
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet;
Total%Coverot MultiON by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: IS �.�. f .r
1, A,,, 14-
50-5
) _ a
We, =Total Cover
Im
1.9. FAC.
OBL species 0 x 1 = O
FACWspecies o x2= O
FAC species 131 x3= 3q3
FACU species x4= 28
UPL species x5=
Column Totals(A) WJt (B)
Prevalencelndex =BIA= 3.A5
2. ❑
3. ❑
4.
_❑
S. ❑
6. ❑
-
7 ❑
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )11sg. G..i )
1. Q.'w.h (L --x) Llsays9r., c;w.„s6
50"D V
fps y
10 = Total Cover
01 ® FAL
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is>50%
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Inclicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. ❑
3. ❑
_
4_ ❑
5, ❑
6.
13
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 8 (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 an) or larger in diameter at breast height (OBH).
gapiing - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. ITS cm) DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 S (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
S (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
7. ❑
-
5o: 4 90% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 561. "A ) y, � I b
1. (4:..A L'c,vsi...._ i;,_o 54,
2. Div, 'u, q. 19. FA,
113
m
3. Q n,., 9o,m.. a1. �r FOL 11
4. ❑
-
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
-
9. 133
10. ❑_
11. ❑
12. ❑
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
)
= ToWl Cover
❑
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ❑
Present? yes ® No
2. ❑
_
3. ❑
_
4. ❑
5. ❑
-
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Ifobserved, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: NP 15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix
Onches) Calor (moist) °
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Typ
Texture Remarks
1)-1'1 1041 516 to.%
061 6.
'Type: C --Concentration, D=De lelion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covemd or Coated Sark! Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Union, M=Mabix.
hri�,rhdric Soil indicators:
" Histosol (Al)
Q Hishic Epipedon (A2)
Q Black Histic(A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
OPolyualue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
-OThin Dark Surface (Sg) (LRR S, T, U)
Ml-oamy Muoky Mineral (F1)(LRR O)
J31-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sops':
n 1 an Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Q 2 an Muck (A10) (LRR S)
QReduced VeNc(F18)(outside MCRA 150A,B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 ao Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
hs.Tp Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
LJ 1 ao Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)]Mad
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils (F20)
LJRedox Dark Surface (FB) (MCRA 153B)
MDepleted Dark Surface (F7) j] Red Parent Material (TF2)
j3Redox Depressions (FB) ❑t Very Shallow Dade Surface (TF12) (LRR It, U)
(F10) (LRR U) y Other (Explain In Remarks)
�R1epleted Ochric (FH) (MLRA 151)
yHlom-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 2ln licamrs of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Red. (S5)
I Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be presets,
-EiDelta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
��-O�-tReduced Vedic (Fl 8) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
yHPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Shipped Mains (SS)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MCRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrietiw Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches);
Hydrfe Soil Presort? Vas O No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Verelon

r�
AaVement
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain
Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all EEP projects.
The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during the design phase
of the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain Administrator
with three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. State NFIP Engineer), NC Floodplain Mapping
Unit (arm. State NFIP Coordinator) and NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Project Location
Name of project:
Junes Branch Restoration
Name if stream or feature:
Bumgamer Branch
County:
Jackson County, NC
Name of river basin:
Little Tennessee
Is project urban or rural?
Rural
Name of Jurisdictional
municipality/county:
Jackson County
DFIRM panel number for
entire site:
3700765100J
Consultant name:
Wolf Creek Engineering, pllc
Phone number:
[phone]
Address:
7 Florida Avenue
Weaverville, NC 28787
FEMA _Floodplain _Checklist4-23-12 Page 1 of

Design Information
Environmental Banc & Exchange (EBX) proposes to restore and enhance four unstable stream
reaches in central Jackson County. The Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site is located
approximately 2 miles east of Sylva, North Carolina at the latitude 35.3573780 N and longitude
83.1913910 W. The Site encompasses approximately 5.7 acres of agricultural land and consists
of four unstable streams: Bumgamer Branch, Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch.
Reach
LenELh
Priority
Bum arner Branch
1170
One (Restoration)
Junes Branch
1269
One (Restoration)
Higdon Branch
331
One (Restoration)
Doris Branch
237
One Restoration
Floodplain Information
Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)?
r Yes r. No
If project is located in a SFHA, check how it was determined:
f Redelmeatan
r Detailed Study
r United Detail Study
r Approximate Study
r Don't know
List flood zone designation:
Check if applies:
r AE Zone
r Floodway,
r Non-Facroachment
r Noce
r A Zone
r Local Setbacks Required
r No Local Setbacks Required
If local setbacks are required, list how many feet: N/A
FEMA_Floodplain_Checklist4-23-12 Page 2 of 3

Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway/non-
encroachment/setbacks?
r Yes r No
Land Acquisition (Check)
r' State owned (fee siMle)
r' Conservation easment (Design Bid Brukl)
r Conservation Easement (Full Delivery Project)
Note: if the project property is state-owned, then all requirements should be addressed to
the Department of Administration, State Construction Office (atm: Herbert Neily,
919 807-4101)
Is community/county participating in the NFIP program?
r Yes r No
Note: if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed. to
NFIP arm: Stats NFIP Engineer, [phone]
Name of Local Floodplain Administrator: Tony Elders, CFM
Phone Number: 828-631-2161
Floodplain Requirements
This section to be filled by designer/applicant following verification with the LFPA
r No Action
F No Rise
F Letter of Map Revision
r Conditional Letter of Map Revision
F Other Requirements
Name:
FEMA
Grant Ginn
Signature: �V
0
Title:
President/Wolf Creek Enoineerina,
ollc Date:
2
5 - S — (I—
FEMAFloodplain_ Checklist423-12 Page 3 of

APPENDIX C
MITIGATION WORK PLAN DATA and ANALYSES
C1 Hydraulic Geometry
• Design Curves
• Morphology Curves
C2 Design Calculations
• Conceptual Design Calculations
• Sediment Regime
• Design Section Calculations
• Morphologic Tables
• Competence Calculations
• Capacity Calculations
• Bed Material Calculations
Q Hydraulic Modeling
• Existing HEC -RAS Output
• Proposed HEC -RAS Output
• HEC -RAS Sediment Transport
C4 Assessment Data
• BEHI/NBS Calculations
• Existing Morphology
• Sediment Data
• Morphologic Site Map
C5 Reference Reach Data
• Cold Springs Reach 1
• Cold Springs Reach 2
• Cold Springs Reach 3

APPENDIX C 1
Hydraulic Geometry

June's Branch
Bankfull Width
100 TFFF
• On -Site Quick Sections (G)
♦ Off -Site Quick Sections
a
. )K Primary Reference (B)
10 • Secondary Reference (B)
+ Secondary Reference (C)
A
m - Regional Curve
Power (Design Line)
Power (Regional Curve)
--- Power (Watershed)
1
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
Drainage Area
Coefficient Exponent
Design Line
Regional Curve
Watershed Curve
Design Line
15.0 0.37
X Y
X Y
X Y
Regional Curve
17.4 0.37
0.02
E50
3.528
0.02
4.094
0.02
3.066
Watershed Curve 13.0 0.37
11.5 0.70
63.784
50
73.617
50
55.128
50
177.818
June's Branch
Cross Sectional Area
1000
a
100
m
• On -Site Quick Sections (G)
♦ Off -Site Quick Sections
c Primary Reference (B)
10 A • Secondary Reference (B)
w+ Secondary Reference (C)
w
o - Regional Curve
V
- Power (Design Line)
- Power (Regional Curve)
1 --- Power (Watershed Curve)
0.1
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
Drainage Area
Coefficient Exponent
Design Line
Regional Curve
Watershed Curve
Design Line
13.0 0.66
X Y
X Y
X Y
Regional Curve
18.6 0.66
0.02
0.983
0.02
1.395
0.02
0.744
Watershed Curve
11.5 0.70
50
171.895
50
246.941
50
177.818

June's Branch
Bed Width Design
100
f'
•
• _ • On -Site Quick Sections (G)
Off -Site Quick Sections
r
9 '� )K Primary Reference (B)
10 • Secondary Reference (B)
d + Secondary Reference (C)
CIO
- Regional Curve
- Power (Design Line)
• ---- Power (Watershed Curve)
- Power (Regional Curve)
1
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
Drainage Area
Coefficient Exponent
Design Line
Regional Curve
Watershed Curve
Design Line
10.0 0.45
X Y
X Y
X Y
Regional Curve
12.0 0.45
j
0.02
1.720
0.02
2.064
0.02
1.548
Watershed Curvel 9.0 1 0.4!
1.3 0.24
1 50
1 58.148 1
50
1 69.778 1
50
1 52.333
50
3.324
June's Branch
Max Depth
10
• On -Site Quick Secitons (G)
® Off -Site Quick Sections
s * Primary Reference (B)
d A • Secondary Reference (B)
D 1
X ` * Secondary Reference (C)
2 - Regional Curve
Watershed Curve
Power (Design Line)
Power (Regional Curve)
--- Power (Watershed Curve)
0.1
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
Drainage Area
Coefficient Exponent
Design Line
Regional Curve
Watershed Curve
Design Line
1.20 0.24
X Y
X Y
X Y
Regional Curve
1.5 0.27
0.02
0.469
0.02
0.522
0.02
0.508
Watershed Curve
1.3 0.24
50
3.069
50
4.313
50
3.324

10
9
8
7
m
0 5
0
a
O
0
a 4
3
2
1
Type B Channels
Pool Spacing Ratio vs. Channel Slope
/ Ra n kfifll1
•
•
• ♦ e
. • y = -54.029x + 5.1474
•
• y = -2.5919x + 2.0078
0
0.00%
2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00%
Channel Slope
B Channels < 6%
Y -int Slooe
Trendline Coefficients
Design Range (+/-)
Upper Boundary Line
Lower Boundary Line
5.1 -54.0
1.0
6.1 -54.0
4.1 -54.0
B Channels > 6%
Y -int Slone
Trendline Coefficients
Design Range (+/-)
Upper Boundary Line
Lower Boundary Line
2.0 -2.6
0.5
2.5 -2.6
1.5 -2.6
10.00% 12.00% 14.00%
Upper Boundary Line Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
0%
6.1
0%
4.1
6%
2.86
6%
0.86
Upper Boundary Line Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
6%
2.344
6%
1.344
12%
2.188
12%
1.188

12
10
[]
0
R
0 6
0
0-
-L
0
CL
4
2
Type B Channels
Pool Spacing Ratio vs. Channel Slope
IMMAI
•
•
•
y = -61.072x + 6.2637
•
•
0-
0.00%
2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00%
Channel Slope
B Channels < 6%
Y -int Slooe
Trendline Coefficients
Design Range (+/-)
Upper Boundary Line
Lower Boundary Line
6.2 -61.0
1.0
7.2 -61.0
5.2 -61.0
B Channels > 6%
Y -int Slone
Trendline Coefficients
Design Range (+/-)
Upper Boundary Line
Lower Boundary Line
2.5 -5.8
0.5
3.0 -5.8
2.0 -5.8
10.00% 12.00% 14.00%
Upper Boundary Line Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
0%
7.2
0%
5.2
6%
3.54
6%
1.54
Upper Boundary Line Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
6%
2.652
6%
1.652
12%
2.304
12%
1.304

8
7
6
5
0
N4
3
v
m
3
2
1
0
0.00%
All Channels
Radius of Curvature Ratio vs. Channel Slope
IRnn kfiilll
12
10
8
0
m
N 6
7
m
4
2
0.50% 1,00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50%
Channel Slope
All Channels
Y -int Slope
Trendline Coefficients 2.0 0.0
Design Range (+/-) 0.5
Upper Boundary Line 2.5 0.0
Lower Boundary Line 1.5 0.0
Upper Boundary Line Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
0 % 2.5 0% 1.5
3% 2.5 3% 1.5
Radius of Curvature Ratio vs. Channel Slope
IRedl
0 P
0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50%
Channel Slope
All Channels
Y -int Slope
Trendline Coefficients 3.0 0.0
Design Range (+/-) 1.0
Upper Boundary Line 4.0 0.0
Lower Boundary Line 2.0 0.0
Upper Boundary Line Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
0% 4 0% 2
3% 4 3% 2

8
7
6
5
0
tr
N4
3
v
m
3
2
1
0
0.00%
Radius of Curvature Ratio vs. Channel Slope
IRankfulll
12
10
8
0
m
rY
N 6
=a
m
rx
4
2
0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50%
Channel Slope
B Channels
Y -int Slope
Trendline Coefficients 2.7 0.0
Design Range (+/-) 1.0
Upper Boundary Line 3.7 0.0
Lower Boundary Line 1.7 0.0
Upper BoundaryLine Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
0% 3.7 0% 1.7
3% 1 3.7 1 3% 1.7
Radius of Curvature Ratio vs. Channel Slope
IRPdI
B Channels
Y -int Slope
Trendline Coefficients 3.0 0.0
Design Range (+/-) 1.0
Upper Boundary Line 4.0 0.0
Lower Boundary Line 2.0 0.0
Upper BoundaryLine Lower Boundary Line
X Y X Y
0% 4 0% 2
3% 4 3% 2

APPENDIX C2
Design Calculations

Project:
Project No.:
Client:
Contract No.:
County/State:
Hyd-Physio Provence:
Conceptual Design
Estimated Channel Values from Regional Curves
Junes Branch
1053 -JUNE
EBX
IPO NC -02-2011
Jackson County, NC
NC Mountains
Regional Curve
Province Code: NCMT
Dimension Coefficient Exponent
WBKF
ABKF
dMEAN
QBKF
WBED
dMAX
17.36
0.3693
18.559
0.6616
1.1771
0.2697
55.425
0.7874
12
0.45
1.5
0.27
Approximate WBED : 14.53 1 0.388
Approximate dMAX : 1.65 1 0.270
Feature Dimensions
Pool-Pool/WBKF Ratio: 5
Rc / WBKF Ratio: 2
Tan Len/WBKF Ratio: 2
Use Approximate WBED (Yes/No): No
Use Approximate dMAX (Yes/No): No
P: � 1 053-JUNE� Design �2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012
Estimated Dimensions from Regional Curve Data
Reach
Drainage
Area
(mi)
WBKF
(ft)
ABKF
(ft)
dMEAN
(ft)
WBED
(ft)
dMAX
(ft)
Pool
Spacing
(ft)
Rc
(ft)
Tangent
Length
(ft)
Bumgarner Reach 1
0.69
15.1
14.5
1.1
10.2
1.4
76
30
30
Bumgarner Reach 2
1.05
17.7
19.2
1.2
12.3
1.5
88
35
35
June's Branch
0.24
10.2
7.2
0.8
6.3
1.0
51
20
20
Higdon Branch
0.08
6.8
3.5
0.6
3.9
0.8
34
14
14
Doris Branch
0.01
3.2
0.9
0.3
1.5
0.4
16
6
6
P: � 1 053-JUNE� Design �2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Sediment Regime
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Bed Material Nature
Depth of Bed Probe (ft)
Matrix Bonding
Parent Material Exposure
Well Graded
0.1-0.2
0.1-0.4
0.2-1.3
Upstream
Upstream
Upstream
0.1
0.1
Moderate Moderate Loose Moderate Moderate Moderate Dense
Dense
None None None None None None None
None
Adjacent
Extended
Adjacent
Reference
Reference
Reach
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
None
None
None
Moderate
Minimal
None
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
June's
Forecast
Forecast
Forecast
Reach Cold
Reach Cold
2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Branch
(Bumgrnr)
Reach
(June's)
Springs
Springs
Bed Material Nature
Depth of Bed Probe (ft)
Matrix Bonding
Parent Material Exposure
Well Graded
0.1-0.2
0.1-0.4
0.2-1.3
0.2
0.2
0.2-0.4
0.1
0.1
Moderate Moderate Loose Moderate Moderate Moderate Dense
Dense
None None None None None None None
None
No No No No No No Yes
Yes
Depositional Patterns (None -Minimal -Moderate -Extensive)
Point Bars
Mid -channel Bars
Side -channel Bars
Diagonal Bars
Bar Length/WEED
Dune Presentation of Bars
Channel Branching
Tributary Deltas
Dune Length/Height (FT)
Ripple Length/Height (FT)
Minimal
Moderate
Minimal
Minimal
Mininal
None
Minimal
Minimal
Moderate
Moderate
Minimal
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Minimal
Minimal
Extensive
Extensive
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
None
None
None
Moderate
Minimal
None
None
None
Minimal
Minimal
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Moderate
None
N/a
N/a
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
N/a
N/a
None
0.4/0.10
0.2/0.05
None
None
None
N/a
N/a
Sediment Measurements
38%
39%
Riffle - Pebble Count
10%
0.7
% Sand
0.2
39
D5o
80
49
DS4
D95
Reach - Pebble Count
% Sand
D5o
D84
D95
Bar (Pavement)
% Sand
D5o
D84
D95
DMAX
Bar (Sub -Pavement)
43%
38%
39%
14%
10%
0.7
0.7
0.2
39
45
80
49
6
120
130
150
85
97
210
190
60%
55%
39%
11%
9%
0.4
0.4
0.2
46
31
50
47
6
160
120
110
83
97
270
170
26%
45%
30%
6%
36
18
18
67
79
65
69
37
120
99
79
82
54
140
110
86
89
64
154
110
Sediment Regime (Low - Mod. Low - Moderate - Mod. High - High)
Sediment Load Moderate I Moderate Mod. Low Moderate Moderate Mod. Low Low Low
Sediment Mobility Moderate Moderate Mod. High Moderate Moderate Mod. High Mod. Low Mod. Low
P: X1053-1UNE�Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Design Section 1
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Regional Curve
(Yes/No)
Coef
Exp
11
18.56NO.450
ABKF
6
30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0
1111 -Regional Curve ..... Reference/Watershed ....-Qu ick Section ..... Detailed Section -Design Section
Regional Curve
(Yes/No)
Coef
Exp
A.,
18.56NO.450
ABKF
WeKF
17.36
WBKF
WBED
12.00
WEED
d..
1.50
d..
dMEAN
1.18
F/p-Bench Width
5
F/p-Bench Width
F/p-Bench Slope
7
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratiol 0.30
Toe Depth RatloF 0.80
Reference/Watershed
(Yes/No)
Curve
X
Coef
Exp
ABKF
11.50
0.70
WBKF
13.00
0.37
WEED
9.00
0.450
d..
1.30
0.240
dMEAN
8.5-
5
F/p-Bench Width
2
6
F/p-Bench Slope
0
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratio 1 0.30
Toe Depth RatloF 0.80
Existing Quick Section
F/p-Bench Width 0
F/p-Bench Slope 7 (H:1)
WeKF 17.7 WBKF 13.2 WeKFM11
WBED 12.3 WBED 9.2 WBED
WTHL 3.7 WTHL 2.8 WTHL
d.. 1.5 J.. 1.3 dmm
cITOE 1.2 cITOE 1.1 cITOE
Plot Section yes
(Yes/No)
Point No.
X
Y
Center
50
10
1
36.2
10.71429
2
41.2
10.0
3
43.9
8.8-
4
48.2
8.5-
5
51.8
8.5-
6
56.1
8.8-
7
58.8
10.0
8
63.8 1
10.71429
Plot Section
Point No.
yes (Yes/No)
X Y
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50
10
41.4
10
43.4
10.0
45.4
8.9
48.6
8.7
51.4
8.7
54.6
8.9
56.6
10.0
58.6
30
Plot Section
Point No.
Regional
Curve
Section Comparisons
Ref/
Wtrshed
Quick
Section
Detailed
Section
Design
Section
ABKF
19.211.9
10.0
11.2
8.3
13.9
Difference
73%
117%
124% 1
168%
55.4
10
Bench Width Ratio
0.5
(Bench/Bankfull)
Bench Slope
10
dMEAN 1
1.08
1 0.90::1.05
0.8
0.92
Difference
85%
103%
88% 1
114%
1.2
cl-
1.0
STOE F 14.7
dMEAN
0.92
P 1
18.22
1 13.77 1
11.59 1
14.1
115.47
Hydr. R
1.050.86
0.97
0.6
0.90
Difference
85%
104%
93% 1
154%
W/d Ratiol
16.3
1 14.7 1
10.2 1
12.6
116.4
Plot Section
Point No.
yes (Yes/No)
X Y
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50
30
44.7
10
44.7
10.0
45.8
8.9
49.3
50.8
8.8
8.8
54.2
8.9
55.4
10.0
55.4
10
Existing Detailed Section
Point No.
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Design Section
Drainage Area 1.05 (sq. mi.)
Center of Cha(Offset)
BankBank,." Elevationtion 2140.5
Plot Section yes (Yes/No)
Point No.
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
X_ Y
50 10
38.1 10.58
39.4 10.0i-
40.5 9.28
41.4 8.70
43.6 8.56
44.8 8.49
45.3 8.27
45.7 7.96
45.9 7.91
47.2 7.76
48.5 7.77
50.2 7.78
51.7 7.70
51.9 7.69
53.3 7.79
53.9 7.89
54.5 7.90
56.2 10.63
57.5 10.92
62.6 11.16
Plot Section
Point No.
Coef
Exp
Wee.
10.00 0.450
34.9
J..
1.20
0.240
44.9
Bank Slope
2.5
(1-1:1)
Thalweg Ratio
0.30
(Thalweg/Bed Width)
Toe Depth Ratio
0.80
(Toe/Max Depth)
Bench Width Ratio
0.5
(Bench/Bankfull)
Bench Slope
10
(H:1)
WBKF
15.1
WBED
10.2
WTHL
3.1
d MAx
1.2
cl-
1.0
STOE F 14.7
dMEAN
0.92
WRENCH
7.5
Center of Cha(Offset)
BankBank,." Elevationtion 2140.5
Plot Section yes (Yes/No)
Point No.
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
X_ Y
50 10
38.1 10.58
39.4 10.0i-
40.5 9.28
41.4 8.70
43.6 8.56
44.8 8.49
45.3 8.27
45.7 7.96
45.9 7.91
47.2 7.76
48.5 7.77
50.2 7.78
51.7 7.70
51.9 7.69
53.3 7.79
53.9 7.89
54.5 7.90
56.2 10.63
57.5 10.92
62.6 11.16
Plot Section
Point No.
yes (Yes/No)
X Y
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50
30
34.9
10.8
42.5
10.0
44.9
9.0
48.5
8.8
51.5
8.8
55.1
9.0
57.5
10.0
65.1
10.8
P: 'l1053-JUNE'l,Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Design Section 2
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Regional
Curve
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Coef
Exp
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.66
ABKF
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
17.36
0.37
Regional
Curve
Curve
Coef
Exp
18.56
0.66
ABKF
WBKF
17.36
0.37
WBeo
12.00
0.450
dMAK
1.50
0.270
d.-
1.18
0.27
F/p-Bench Width
5
2
F/p-BenchSlope
7
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratio
0.30
83%
Toe Depth Ratio
0.80
3.1
WBKF
17.7
13.2
W.E.
12.3
9.2
WrHB
3.7
2.8
dMAK
1.5
1.3
droe
1.2
1.1
Reference/Watershed
Regional
Curve
Curve
Quick Detailed
Section Section
Coef
Exp
11.50
0.70
ABKF
WBKF
13.00
0.37
WBeo
9.00
0.450
1.30
0.240
dMAK
dMEAN
Bench Width Ratio
d_ 1
F/p-Bench Width
2
7 (1-1:1)
F/p-BenchSlope*10
Difference
(H:1)
Thalweg RatioToe
83%
8.05179
Depth Ratio
3.1
55.5
WBKF
13.2
P
WBED
9.2
11.59
W-
2.8
10.37509
dMAK
1.3
65.1
droe
1.1
0.86
Existing Quick Section
F/p-Bench Width 0
F/p-Bench Slope 7 (11:1)
WBKF 10.7
WBt. 8.4
WrHB 1.5
dMAK 1.3
droll 1.1
Plot Section yes (Yes/No) Plot Section yes (Yes/No) Plot Sectior
Point No. X Y Point No. X Y Point No.
Center 50 10 Center 50 10 Center
1 36.2 10.71429 1 41.4 10 1
2 41.2 10.0 2 43.4 10.0 2
3 43.9 8.8 3 45.4 8.9 3
4 48.2 8.5 4 48.6 8.7 4
5 51.8 8.5 5 51.4 8.7 5
6 56.1 8.8 6 54.6 8.9 6
7 58.8 10.0 7 56.6 10.0 7
8 63.8 10.71429 8 58.6 30 8
Existine Detailed Section
Point No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Design Section
Drainage Area 1.05 (sq. mi.)
Regional
Curve
Section Comparisons
Ref/
Wtrshed
Quick Detailed
Section Section
Design
Section
Aa
19.2
1 11.9
11.5
14.4
Difference
75%
121%
125%
0.30
(Thalweg/Bed Width)
Toe Depth Ratio
0.80
(Toe/Max Depth)
Bench Width Ratio
d_ 1
1.08
1 0.901.07
7 (1-1:1)
0.90
Difference
83%
100%
83%
8.05179
WrHB
3.1
55.5
dMAK
1.21
P
18.22
13.77 1
11.59
16.38
0.90
10.37509
W -e H
8.0
65.1
Hydr. R
1.05
0.86
0.99
0.88
Difference
83%
102%
88%
W/d Ratiol
16.3
1 14.7 1
10.0 1
117.9
Existine Detailed Section
Point No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Design Section
Drainage Area 1.05 (sq. mi.)
Centerll
Bankfull
Point No.
Coef
Exp
WBeo
10.00 0.450
dMAK
1.20
0.240
30
Bank Slope
3
(1-1:1)
Thalweg Ratio
0.30
(Thalweg/Bed Width)
Toe Depth Ratio
0.80
(Toe/Max Depth)
Bench Width Ratio
0.5
(Bench/Bankfull)
Bench Slope
7 (1-1:1)
WBKF
16.0
52.4
WBeo
10.2
8.05179
WrHB
3.1
55.5
dMAK
1.21
8.26738
droe
0.97
Stoe F 14.1
dM-
0.90
10.37509
W -e H
8.0
65.1
Centerll
Bankfull
Point No.
Elennelvation
ElevationPlot Section(Yes/No)
X
(Offset)
Y
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
50
30
6.3
9.82713
16.8
10.07417
38.6
10.49612
40.6
9.21246
41.4
8.93552
43.9
9.16222
44.2
8.70566
45.1
7.97557
52.4
8.04129
55.0
8.05179
55.3
8.04785
55.5
8.0502
55.9
8.26738
59.3
9.85587
61.1
10.23168
61.8
10.37509
62.0
10.47547
65.1
11.80406
66.7
12.44686
87.7
14.63542
Point No.
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
P: 'l1053-JUNE�Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Design Section 3
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Regional Curve
(Yes/No)
Coef
Exp
ABKF
18.56
0.66
rr
Regional Curve
(Yes/No)
Coef
Exp
ABKF
18.56
0.66
WeKF
17.36
0.37
WBED
12.00
50
d..
1.50
0.0.4270
dMEAN
1.18
0.27
F/p-Bench Width
5
F/p-Bench Width
F/p-Bench Slope
7
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratiol 0.30
Toe Depth Ratl.F 0.80
Reference/Watershed
(Yes/No)
Curve
X
Coef
Exp
A—
11.50
0.70
WeKr
13.00
0.37
WBED
9.00
0.450
dM.
1.30
0.240
dMEAN
8.5
5
F/p-Bench Width
2
6
F/p-Bench Slope
0
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratio 0.30
Toe Depth RatloF 0.80
Existing Quick Section
F/p-Bench widthF---0-7
F/p-Bench Slope 7 (H:1)
WeKF 17.7 WeKF 13.2 WeKF 10.7
WBED 12.3 WBED 9.2 WBED 8.4
WTHL 3.7 WTHL 2.8 WTHL 1.5
d.. 1.5 d.. 1.3 dMgx 1.3
dTOE 1.2 droE 1.1 cl- 1.1
Plot Section yes
(Yes/No)
Point No.
X
Y
Center
50
10
1
36.2
10.71429
2
41.2
10.0
3
43.9
8.8
4
48.2
8.5
5
51.8
8.5
6
56.1
8.8-
7
58.8
10.0
8
63.8
10.71429
Plot Section
Point No.
yes (Yes/No)
X Y
Center
1
2
3
448.6
5
6
7
8
50
10
41.4
10
43.4
10.0
45.4
8.9
80%
8.7
51.4
8.7
54.6
8.9
56.6
10.0
58.6
30
Plot Section
Point No.
Regional
Curve
Section Comparisons
Ref/
Wtrshed
Quick Detailed
Section Section
Design
Section
AeKE19.2
10
11.9
11.5
35.3
Difference
80%
129% 1
133%
8.7
54.2
8.9
55.4
10.0
55.4
dMEAN
1.08
0.90
1.07
0.85
Difference
78%
95%
79%
WTHL
3.1
dm.
1.2
P 1
18.22
1 13.77 1
11.59 1
118.25
WRENCH
9.0
Hydr. R
1.050.86
0.99
0.84
Difference
80%
97%
85%
W/d Ratiol
16.3
1 14.7 1
10.0 1
121.1
Plot Section
Point No.
Yes (Yes/No)
X Y
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50
10
44.7
10
44.7
10.0
45.8
8.9
49.3
8.7
50.8
8.7
54.2
8.9
55.4
10.0
55.4
10
Existing Detailed Section
Point No.
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Design Section
Drainage Area 1.05 (sq. mi.)
Center of Channel100 (Offset)
Bankfull Elevation 99
Plot Section no (Yes/No)
Point No.
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
X_ Y
50 10
72.0 -2031.5
82.0 -2032.5
92.0 -2032.5
102.0 -2035.5
112.0 -2031.5
122.0 -2031.5
132.0 -2031.5
142.0 -2031.5
144.0 -2033.5
145.0 -2034
146.0 -2034.5
158.0 -2034.5
159.0 -2033.5
160.0 -2032.5
161.0 -2032
167.0 -2035.5
232.0 -2030.5
242.0 -2030.5
252.0 -2030.5
Plot Section
Point No.
Coef
Exp
WBED
10.00 0.450
32.0
d..
1.20
0.240
44.9
Bank Slope
4
(1-1:1)
Thalweg Ratio
0.30
(Thalweg/Bed Width)
Toe Depth Ratio
0.80
(Toe/Max Depth)
Bench Width Ratio
0.5
(Bench/Bankfull)
Bench Slope 7 (H:1)
W
18.0
WBED
10.2
WTHL
3.1
dm.
1.2
dTOE
1.0
SroE F 14.7
dMEAN
0.85
WRENCH
9.0
Center of Channel100 (Offset)
Bankfull Elevation 99
Plot Section no (Yes/No)
Point No.
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
X_ Y
50 10
72.0 -2031.5
82.0 -2032.5
92.0 -2032.5
102.0 -2035.5
112.0 -2031.5
122.0 -2031.5
132.0 -2031.5
142.0 -2031.5
144.0 -2033.5
145.0 -2034
146.0 -2034.5
158.0 -2034.5
159.0 -2033.5
160.0 -2032.5
161.0 -2032
167.0 -2035.5
232.0 -2030.5
242.0 -2030.5
252.0 -2030.5
Plot Section
Point No.
yes (Yes/No)
X Y
Center
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50
10
32.0
11.3
41.0
10.0
44.9
9.0
48.5
8.8
51.5
8.8
55.1
9.0
59.0
10.0
68.0
11.3
P: 'l1053-JUNE'l,Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Drainage Design
Area Section
Reach (mi)
Typical Section Dimensions
Bank
Slope
WBKF WBED WTHAL WBENCH dMAX dTOE (H:1)
Bumgarner Reach 1
0.69
1
12.9
8.5
2.5
6
1.10
0.88
2.5
Bumgarner Reach 2
1.05
1
15.1
10.2
3.1
8
1.21
0.97
2.5
June's Branch
0.24
1
8.7
5.3
1.6
4
0.85
0.68
2.5
Higdon Branch
0.08
2
6.4
3.2
1.0
3
0.65
0.52
3.0
Doris Branch
0.01
3
3.8
1.3
0.4
2
0.40
0.32
4.0
Design Section 1
Design Section 2
Design Section 3
Design Section 4
Reach
PWIDTH dvoo✓dMAX Pool Spacing/Bed
Ratio Ratio min max
1.1
1.5
4
7
1.1
1.5
4
7
1.1
1.5
4
7
1.1
1.5
5
8
ABKF PWET RHVD dMFAN W/D
Bumgarner Reach 1
10.6
13.2
0.80
0.82
15.6
Bumgarner Reach 2
13.9
15.5
0.90
0.92
16.4
June's Branch
5.3
8.9
0.60
0.61
14.1
Higdon Branch
2.8
6.5
0.42
0.44
14.5
Doris Branch
0.9
3.9
0.22
0.23
16.6
Pool Dimensions
WIN WOUT dPOOI
7.7
6.4
1.65
9.0
7.5
1.82
5.2
4.3
1.28
3.8
3.2
0.98
2.3
1.9
0.60
P: X1053-JUNE�Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Plan/Profile Measurements
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
SVALLEY Entrench Sinuosity
Elev Channel Meander
Reach SAVG Length Change F/p Width Val Length Length Width
Bumgarner Reach 1
0.024
653
15
83
653
703
23
Bumgarner Reach 2
0.015
473
7
80
473
523
37
June's Branch
0.025
1266
35
30
1266
1367
16
Higdon Branch
0.016
275
6
20
275
299
11
Doris Branch
0.019
224
5
20
224
237
6.6
P:1053-JUNEIDesign �2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Morphologic Design Table
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Drainage
Stream Area WR F
Reach Type (miz) (ft)
ARICF dMEAN duu SAV.G SUicv
(ftZ) (ft) (ft) (ft/tf) (ft/tf)
Bumgarner Reach 1
B4
0.690
12.9
10.6
0.8
1.1
0.024
0.023
Bumgarner Reach 2
B4
1.050
15.1
13.9
0.9
1.2
0.015
0.015
June's Branch
B4
0.240
8.7
5.3
0.6
0.9
0.025
0.028
Higdon Branch
B4
0.080
6.4
2.8
0.4
0.7
0.016
0.022
Doris Branch
B4
0.010
3.8
0.9
0.2
0.4
0.019
0.022
Entrench Meander Pool Spacing (ft) PqDArP/WRWP
Reach W D Ratio Ratio Sinuositv Width Ratio (min) (max) (min) (max)
Bumgarner Reach 1
15.6
6.5
1.08
1.8
33.8
59.2
2.6
4.6
Bumgarner Reach 2
16.4
5.3
1.11
2.5
40.9
71.6
2.7
4.7
June's Branch
14.1
3.5
1.08
1.8
21.0
36.8
2.4
4.2
Higdon Branch
14.5
3.1
1.09
1.7
12.8
22.5
2.0
3.5
Doris Branch
16.6
5.3
1.06
1.7
5.0
8.8
1.3
2.3
P: X1053-JUNE�Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Structure Dimensions
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Arm Length Ratio
1.6
X WEED
Throat Width
1/3
X WBKF
Buried Length
1/3
X LARM
Minimum Buried Length
3
(ft)
Maximum Buried Length
8
(ft)
Reach
WBKF
WEED
Arm Length
(L)
Throat Buried
Width (W) Length (X)
Total Log
Length (ft)
Bumgarner Reach 1
12.9
8.5
14
4 5
24
Bumgarner Reach 2
15.1
10.2
16
5 5
26
June's Branch
8.7
5.3
8
3 3
14
Higdon Branch
6.4
3.2
S 1
2 3
11
Doris Branch
3.8
1.3
2
1 3
8
June's Branch
0.96
0.5
5
3.0
3.5
2.5
2.5
1.5
1
Higdon Branch
0.44
1
5
2.5
4.0
2.5
2.5
1.5
1
Doris Branch
0.27
1
5
2.5
3.5
2.5
2.5
1.5
1
P: X1053-JUNE�Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012
Boulder Size Based on:
Recommended Boulder Size
Reach
t
Structure
Drop
Structure
Length
Bed Shear
Structure
Shear
Bed Width
Length
Width
Depth
Bumgarner Reach 1
1.23
0.4
35
3.5
2.5
3.0
3
2
1.5
Bumgarner Reach 2
0.86
0.5
5
3.0
4.0
3.0
2.5
1.5
1
June's Branch
0.96
0.5
5
3.0
3.5
2.5
2.5
1.5
1
Higdon Branch
0.44
1
5
2.5
4.0
2.5
2.5
1.5
1
Doris Branch
0.27
1
5
2.5
3.5
2.5
2.5
1.5
1
P: X1053-JUNE�Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Competence Calculations
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Maximum Particle Critical Dimensionless Shear
D50
DA50
DMAX
DMAX
YS
40
Riffle Bed Material D50 (mm)
Bar Sample D50 (mm)
Largest Particle from Bar Sample (mm)
Largest Particle from Bar Sample (ft)
Submerged Specific Wt. of Sediment
36
86
0.28
1.65
D50/DA50 1.1 No (In range: 3-7)
r* 0.076
DMAx/D50 2.2 Yes (In range: 1.3-3.0)
r* 0.019
r* 0.019 Dimensionless Shear for Max Particle
D50 18 Riffle Bed Material D50 (mm)
DA50 18 Bar Sample D50 (mm)
DMAX 49 Largest Particle from Bar Sample (mm)
DMAX 0.16 Largest Particle from Bar Sample (ft)
YS 1 1.65 ISubmerged Specific Wt. of Sediment
D50/DA50 1.0 No (In range: 3-7)
r* 0.083
DMAx/D50 2.7 Yes (In range: 1.3-3.0)
r* 0.016
T* 0.016 Dimensionless Shear for Max Particle
Bed Material Regime 1
Ruvn
Representative Particle Critical Dimensionless Shear
Representative
Particle Critical Dimensionless Shear
D50
73
Bed Material D50 (mm)
DS4
73
Sub -pavement D84 (mm)
D50
0.24
Bed Material D50 (ft)
D84
0.24
Sub -pavement D84 (ft)
YS
1.65
Submerged Specific Wt. of Sediment
S
0.018
Estimated Channel Slope
1* 0.04 Typical Shield's Curve Value
1* 0.055 Slope based Lamb Equation
1* 0.04 Range: 0.03 - 0.06
Bed Material Regime 2
Ruvn
Representative Particle Critical Dimensionless Shear
D50
56 Bed Material D50 (mm)
D51
0.18 Bed Material D50 (ft)
YS
1.65 Submerged Specific Wt. of Sediment
S
0.013 Estimated Channel Slope
T* 0.04 Typical Shield's Curve Value
1* 0.051 Slope based Lamb Equation
1* 0.04 Range: 0.03 - 0.06
Reach
Ruvn
Bed
Regime
1*
Largest Particle Calculations
YS DMAX S
Representative Particle Calculations
r* YS D50 S
Bumgarner Reach 1
0.80
1
0.019
1.65
0.28
0.0111
0.04
1.65
0.240
1 0.0198
Bumgarner Reach 2
0.90
1
0.019
1.65
0.28
0.0098
0.04
1.65
0.240
0.0176
June's Branch
0.60
2
0.016
1.65
0.16
0.0071
0.04
1.65
0.184
0.0204
Higdon Branch
0.42
2
0.016
1.65
0.16
0.0100
0.04
1.65
0.184
0.0286
Doris Branch
0.22
2
0.016
1.65
0.16
0.0190
0.04
1.65
0.184
0.0543
P: X1053-JUNEI Design 12012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Transition Reach Design
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
Ys: 1.65
r* : 0.04
Reach
Transition
Slope (ft/ft)
dMAx
Twice
Max
Depth
Ys
t* Dso (ft)
T
Armor
Stone (in)
Armor Stone
Size
Bumgarner Reach 1
0.011
1.10
2.20
1.65
0.04 0.3's --
6 in Stone
Bumgarner Reach 2
0.011
1.21
2.43
1.65
0.04 0.40 1.67
5
6 in Stone
June's Branch
0.007
0.85
1.70
1.65
0.04 0.18 0.74
2
6 in Stone
Higdon Branch
Doris Branch
P: � 1 053-JUNE� Design �2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

Supplemental Bed Material Design
Project: Junes Branch
Project No.: 1053 -JUNE
Client: EBX
Contract No.: IPO NC -02-2011
County/State: Jackson County, NC
P:�1053-1UNE�Design �2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012
Material Gradation
Percentage of Total by Weight
Material
Size Sand/Clay
ABC(M)
1/2" Stone 3/4" Stone 2" Stone
(No. 57) (No. 5) (Surge)
6" Stone
NCDOT
Class A
( )
12" Stone
NCDOT
(Class B)
18" Stone
NCDOT
(Class I)
Sand 100
#16
12
#10
9
2
#8
9
3
#4
16
12 2
3/8"
16
25 3
1/2"
13
48 32
3/4"
12
7 58
1"1
13
3 5
1.5"
19
2"
19
3"
19
4"
19
19
13
5"
19
19
13
6"
5
19
14
8"
19
14
9"
19
14
10"
5
13
12"
14
14"
5
16"
18"
24"
Total % 100
100
100 100 100
100
100
100
P:�1053-1UNE�Design �2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

P: X 1 053-JUNE� Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012
Design Size Distribution (mm)
Material Composition
Reach
Sand/Clay
1/2" Stone
ABC(M) (No. 57)
3/4" Stone
(No. 5)
2" Stone
(Surge)
6" Stone 12" Stone 18" Stone
NCDOT NCDOT NCDOT
(Class A) (Class B) (Class 1)
Bumgarner Reach 1
20%
20%
30%
30%
Bumgarner Reach 2
20%
20%
30%
30%
June's Branch
20%
40%
40%
Higdon Branch
Higdon Branch
20%
40%
40%
Doris Branch
Doris Branch
20%
40%
40%
P: X 1 053-JUNE� Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012
Design Size Distribution (mm)
Reach
D16 D35 D50
D65
D84
D95
Bumgarner Reach 1
<1 17 41
50
72
Bumgarner Reach 2
<1 17 41
50
72
112
June's Branch
<1 13 17
41
56
70
Higdon Branch
<1 13 17
41
56
70
Doris Branch
<1 13 17
41
56
70
P: X 1 053-JUNE� Design X2012-03-08 JUNE Channel Design.xlsx 3/9/2012

APPENDIX C3
Hydraulic Modeling

HEC -RAS OUTPUT EXISTING CONDITIONS
River
Reach
River Sta
Profile
QTota I
(cfs)
Min Ch
EI(ft)
W.S. Elev
(ft)
E.G. Elev
(ft)
Froude # Chl
Vel Chnl
(ft/s)
Shear
Chan(lb/sq
ft)
Power
Chan(lb/ft s)
Power Total
(Ib/ft s)
Junes Br
June
8.1
BKF
18.02
2174.6
2175.7
2175.89
0.69
3.53
0.79
2.78
2.78
Junes Br
June
8.1
2 yr
49.57
2174.6
2176.55
2176.85
0.66
4.35
1.03
4.47
4.47
Junes Br
June
8.1
Syr
92.09
2174.6
2177.27
2177.66
0.68
5.05
1.28
6.47
6.47
Junes Br
June
8.1
10yr
129.85
2174.6
2177.76
2178.22
0.68
5.46
1.43
7.8
7.8
Junes Br
June
8.1
100 yr
305.34
2174.6
2179.64
2179.9
0.54
4.13
0.82
3.38
3.32
Junes Br
June
8
BKF
18.02
2173.7
2174.96
2175.35
1
5.02
1.7
8.52
8.52
Junes Br
June
8
2 yr
49.57
2173.7
2175.74
2176.37
1.01
6.36
2.35
14.95
14.95
Junes Br
June
8
Syr
92.09
2173.7
2176.77
2177.3
0.8
5.89
1.8
10.61
10.61
Junes Br
June
8
10yr
129.85
2173.7
2177.2
2177.86
0.83
6.52
2.13
13.87
13.73
Junes Br
June
8
100 yr
305.34
2173.7
2178.61
2179.6
0.81
8.21
2.82
23.17
9.65
Junes Br
June
7
BKF
18.02
2163.86
2165.24
2165.4
0.64
3.23
0.67
2.16
2.16
Junes Br
June
7
2 yr
49.57
2163.86
2165.93
2166.22
0.71
4.34
1.06
4.61
4.61
Junes Br
June
7
Syr
92.09
2163.86
2166.18
2166.86
1.01
6.61
2.37
15.63
15.63
Junes Br
June
7
10yr
129.85
2163.86
2166.56
2167.35
1.01
7.17
2.65
19
19
Junes Br
June
7
100 yr
305.34
2163.86
2167.84
2169.01
1
8.69
3.43
29.8
29.58
Junes Br
June
6
BKF
18.02
2154.04
2155.08
2155.4
1.01
4.56
1.43
6.55
6.55
Junes Br
June
6
2 yr
49.57
2154.04
2155.74
2156.26
1.01
5.76
1.97
11.32
11.32
Junes Br
June
6
Syr
92.09
2154.04
2156.59
2156.97
0.71
5.04
1.3
6.55
1.38
Junes Br
June
6
10yr
129.85
2154.04
2156.87
2157.19
0.66
5.08
1.25
6.35
1.27
Junes Br
June
6
100 yr
305.34
2154.04
2157.37
2157.82
0.78
6.8
2.07
14.06
2.93
Junes Br
June
5.2
BKF
18.02
2145.83
2148.14
2148.15
0.12
0.51
0.02
0.01
0.01
Junes Br
June
5.2
2 yr
49.57
2145.83
2150.25
2150.25
0.03
0.2
0
0
0
Junes Br
June
5.2
Syr
92.09
2145.83
2154.01
2154.01
0.01
0.11
0
0
0
Junes Br
June
5.2
10yr
129.85
2145.83
2154.01
2154.01
0.01
0.16
0
0
0
Junes Br
June
5.2
100yr
305.34
2145.83
2154.01
2154.01
0.03
0.36
0
0
0
Junes Br
June
5.12
Culvert
Junes Br
June
5.1
BKF
18.02
2144.52
2145.7
2145.9
0.71
3.62
0.83
3.01
2.45
Junes Br
June
5.1
2 yr
49.57
2144.52
2146.6
2146.8
0.57
3.8
0.78
2.96
1.98
Junes Br
June
5.1
Syr
92.09
2144.52
2147.05
2147.4
0.68
5.06
1.29
6.51
3.96
Junes Br
June
5.1
10yr
129.85
2144.52
2147.13
2147.75
0.9
6.8
2.3
15.64
8.95
Junes Br
June
5.1
100 yr
305.34
2144.52
2148.4
2148.85
0.68
6.72
1.89
12.71
2.12
Junes Br
June
5
BKF
18.02
2144.1
2145.49
2145.6
0.44
2.67
0.42
1.12
1.12
Junes Br
June
5
2 yr
49.57
2144.1
2146.2
2146.5
0.6
4.37
1.02
4.43
3.04
Junes Br
June
5
Syr
92.09
2144.1
2146.35
2146.91
0.85
6.43
2.14
13.79
4.83
Junes Br
June
5
10yr
129.85
2144.1
2146.82
2147.2
0.69
5.83
1.63
9.51
2.22
Junes Br
June
5
100 yr
305.34
2144.1
2147.48
2147.92
0.75
7.22
2.3
16.6
3.52
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
BKF
41.38
2157.99
2159.87
2160.12
0.75
4.02
0.99
3.98
3.98
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
2 yr
104.04
2157.99
2160.37
2160.94
0.98
6.06
2.04
12,36
9.84
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
Syr
188.24
2157.99
2160.98
2161.67
0.9
6.83
2.26
15.45
8.32
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
10yr
261.26
2157.99
2161.42
2162.14
0.85
7.18
2.32
16.62
6.95
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
100 yr
590.8
2157.99
2162.71
2163.3
0.71
7.52
2.19
16.47
3.18
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
BKF
41.38
2151.95
2153.44
2153.89
0.94
5.4
1.71
9.23
6.5
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.3
2 yr
104.04
2151.95
2154.44
2154.71
0.61
4.91
1.13
5.53
0.77
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
Syr
188.24
2151.95
2154.93
2155.11
0.53
4.77
0.99
4.72
0.82
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
10yr
261.26
2151.95
2155.07
2155.32
0.62
5.71
1.39
7.96
1.44
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
100 yr
590.8
2151.95
2155.58
2156.02
0.83
8.38
2.83
23.69
4.38
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
BKF
41.38
2148
2150.4
2150.45
0.25
1.85
0.17
0.32
0.32
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
2 yr
104.04
2148
2152.58
2152.59
0.08
0.85
0.03
0.02
0.01
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
Syr
188.24
2148
2155.03
2155.03
0.04
0.53
0.01
0.01
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
10yr
261.26
2148
2155.21
2155.21
0.05
0.7
0.02
0.01
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
100yr
590.8
2148
2155.78
2155.79
0.09
1.31
0.05
0.07
0.02
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.12
Culvert

River
Bumgarner Branch
Reach
Bumf
RiverSta
4.1
Profile
BKF
QTota I
(cfs)
41.38
Min Ch
EI(ft)
2146.19
W.S. Elev
(ft)
2147.69
E.G. Elev
(ft)
2147.89
Froucle#Chl
0.58
Vel Chnl
(ft/s)
3.58
Shear
Chan(lb/sq
ft)
0.72
PowerPower
Chan(lb/ft s)
2.57
Total
(Ib/ft s)
2.57
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
2 yr
104.04
2146.19
2148.79
2149.04
0.6
4
0.84
3.37
3.37
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.1
Syr
188.24
2146.19
2149.58
2149.89
0.56
4.46
0.93
4.17
4.06
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
10yr
261.26
2146.19
2149.25
2150.11
1
7.42
2.72
20.15
20.15
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.1
100 yr
590.8
2146.19
2150.55
2151.88
0.97
9.32
3.63
33.84
29.41
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
BKF
41.38
2145.71
2146.98
2147.46
1
5.61
1.91
10.72
10.72
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
2yr
104.04
2145.71
2147.9
2148.61
1
6.8
2.48
16.86
16.38
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4
Syr
188.24
2145.71
2148.75
2149.57
0.86
7.38
2.51
18.5
8.69
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
10yr
261.26
2145.71
2149.42
2149.58
0.43
4.23
0.76
3.19
0.75
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
100 yr
590.8
2145.71
2149.66
2150.2
0.79
8.03
2.65
21.31
4.97
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
BKF
41.38
2142.92
2144.58
2144.78
0.55
3.58
0.71
2.55
2.55
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
2 y
104.04
2142.92
2145.43
2145.85
0.67
5.22
1.36
7.1
7
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
Syr
188.24
2142.92
2145.72
2146.51
0.9
7.49
2.69
20.13
7.1
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
10yr
261.26
2142.92
2146.25
2146.58
0.62
5.71
1.46
8.32
1.41
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
3
100 yr
590.8
2142.92
2146.77
2147.24
0.76
7.74
2.52
19.51
3.9
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
BKF
57.6
2138.19
2139.43
2139.78
0.9
4.76
1.39
6.6
6.6
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
2 y
139.7
2138.19
2140.22
2140.75
0.84
5.87
1.77
10.39
10.39
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
Syr
250.13
2138.19
2140.95
2141.37
0.7
5.72
1.54
8.79
3.52
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
10yr
344.96
2138.19
2141.39
2141.81
0.67
5.91
1.55
9.16
2.24
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
100 yr
768.07
2138.19
2142.37
2142.75
0.61
6.44
1.64
10.59
3.32
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
BKF
57.6
2134.3
2136.31
2136.46
0.46
3.1
0.5
1.56
1.56
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
2 y
139.7
2134.3
2137.36
2137.62
0.5
4.04
0.75
3.05
2.22
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
Syr
250.13
2134.3
2137.96
2138.39
0.58
5.4
1.24
6.68
3.08
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
10yr
344.96
2134.3
2138.34
2138.88
0.63
6.17
1.55
9.58
3.19
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
100 yr
768.07
2134.3
2139.52
2140.19
0.66
7.66
2.14
16.36
4.38
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
BKF
57.6
2133.41
2134.91
2135.26
0.8
4.77
1.29
6.16
6.16
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
2 yr
139.7
2133.41
2135.77
2136.37
0.84
6.23
1.92
11.99 j
11.99
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
Syr
250.13
2133.41
2136.56
2137.09
0.78
6.25
1.83
11.47
4.51
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
10yr
344.96
2133.41
2136.83
2137.45
0.83
7
2.22
15.54
6.71
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
100 yr
768.07
2133.41
2137.74 1
2138.67
0.92
9.07
3.38
30.67
16.08

HEC -RAS OUTPUT PROPOSED CONDITIONS
River
Reach
River Sta
Profile
QTota I
(cfs)
Min Ch
EI(ft)
W.S. Elev
(ft)
E.G. Elev
(ft)
Froude # Chl
Vel Chnl
(ft/s)
Shear
Chan(lb/sq
ft)
Power
Chan(lb/ft s)
Power Total
(Ib/ft s)
Junes Br
June
8.1
BKF
18.02
2174.6
2176.97
2176.99
0.17
1.18
0.07
0.09
0.09
Junes Br
June
8.1
2 yr
49.57
2174.6
2177.63
2177.71
0.28
2.22
0.24
0.53
0.53
Junes Br
June
8.1
Syr
92.09
2174.6
2178.21
2178.37
0.37
3.12
0.45
1.41
1.41
Junes Br
June
8.1
10yr
129.85
2174.6
2178.74
2178.89
0.47
3.11
0.51
1.6
1.6
Junes Br
June
8.1
100 yr
305.34
2174.6
2180
2180.18
0.42
3.4
0.54
1.82
1.76
Junes Br
June
8
BKF
18.02
2175.95
2176.7
2176.92
0.9
3.78
1.01
3.8
3.41
Junes Br
June
8
2 yr
49.57
2175.95
2177.23
2177.58
0.83
4.87
1.33
6.5
4.05
Junes Br
June
8
Syr
92.09
2175.95
2177.59
2178.17
0.95
6.47
2.14
13.84
8.62
Junes Br
June
8
10yr
129.85
2175.95
2177.88
2178.61
0.98
7.31
2.57
18.78
11.56
Junes Br
June
8
100 yr
305.34
2175.95
2179.12
2179.96
0.87
8.5
2.89
24.59
7.41
Junes Br
June
7
BKF
18.02
2166.45
2167.3
2167.45
0.76
3.11
0.69
2.14
2.14
Junes Br
June
7
2 yr
49.57
2166.45
2167.64
2167.99
0.99
4.75
1.45
6.9
5.74
Junes Br
June
7
Syr
92.09
2166.45
2168.04
2168.46
0.9
5.35
1.59
8.54
4.34
Junes Br
June
7
10yr
129.85
2166.45
2168.3
2168.76
0.86
5.72
1.7
9.71
4.11
Junes Br
June
7
100 yr
305.34
2166.45
2169.03
2169.63
0.87
7.15
2.3
16.44
5.69
Junes Br
June
6
BKF
18.02
2155.11
2155.83
2156.09
1
4.12
1.21
5
4.84
Junes Br
June
6
2 yr
49.57
2155.11
2156.43
2156.76
0.8
4.82
1.29
6.21
1.86
Junes Br
June
6
Syr
92.09
2155.11
2156.82
2157.14
0.75
5.23
1.37
7.18
1.43
Junes Br
June
6
10yr
129.85
2155.11
2157.01
2157.35
0.77
5.73
1.59
9.08
1.7
Junes Br
June
6
100 yr
305.34
2155.11
2157.59
2157.95
0.8
6.83
2.04
13.95
2.57
Junes Br
June
5.2
BKF
18.02
2145.76
2147.25
2147.27
0.21
1.21
0.08
0.1
0.08
Junes Br
June
5.2
2 yr
49.57
2145.76
2148.32
2148.34
0.15
1.27
0.07
0.09
0.02
Junes Br
June
5.2
Syr
92.09
2145.76
2149.48
2149.49
0.09
0.95
0.04
0.03
0.01
Junes Br
June
5.2
10yr
129.85
2145.76
2150.92
2150.93
0.06
0.68
0.02
0.01
0
Junes Br
June
5.2
100yr
305.34
2145.76
2154.11
2154.11
0.04
0.65
0.01
0.01
0
Junes Br
June
5.12
Culvert
Junes Br
June
5.1
BKF
18.02
2145.23
2146.39
2146.45
0.37
2.06
0.25
0.51
0.3
Junes Br
June
5.1
2 yr
49.57
2145.23
2146.75
2146.95
0.58
3.78
0.75
2.84
1.27
Junes Br
June
5.1
Syr
92.09
2145.23
2147.05
2147.42
0.74
5.33
1.4
7.44
2.9
Junes Br
June
5.1
10yr
129.85
2145.23
2147.22
2147.75
0.86
6.51
2.02
13.13
4.81
Junes Br
June
5.1
100 yr
305.34
2145.23
2148.41
2148.86
0.7
6.89
1.9
13.07
1.89
Junes Br
June
5
BKF
18.02
2145.23
2145.94
2146.2
1
4.06
1.19
4.82
4.54
Junes Br
June
5
2 yr
49.57
2145.23
2146.32
2146.59
0.89
4.75
1.35
6.43
2.33
Junes Br
June
5
Syr
92.09
2145.23
2146.65
2146.97
0.87
5.49
1.62
8.9
2.42
Junes Br
June
5
10yr
129.85
2145.23
2146.87
2147.19
0.84
5.74
1.68
9.68
2.49
Junes Br
June
5
100 yr
305.34
2145.23
2147.4
2147.86
0.96
7.61
2.66
20.27
5.06
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
BKF
41.38
2157.99
2159.91
2160.14
0.71
3.84
0.9
3.47
3.47
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
2 yr
104.04
2157.99
2160.38
2160.94
0.97
6
1.99
11,95
9.42
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
Syr
188.24
2157.99
2160.98
2161.67
0.9
6.83
2.26
15.45
8.32
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
10yr
261.26
2157.99
2161.42
2162.14
0.85
7.18
2.32
16.62
6.95
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
100 yr
590.8
2157.99
2162.7
2163.3
0.71
7.53
2.19
16.52
3.19
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
BKF
41.38
2152.52
2153.46
2153.82
1.01
4.82
1.5
7.25
7.25
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.3
2 yr
104.04
2152.52
2154.24
2154.58
0.82
4.7
1.26
5.94
2
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
Syr
188.24
2152.52
2154.98
2155.11
0.45
3.41
0.56
1.89
0.61
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
10yr
261.26
2152.52
2155.19
2155.35
0.49
3.91
0.7
2.76
0.86
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
100 yr
590.8
2152.52
2155.78
2156.08
0.64
5.76
1.4
8.07
2.3
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
BKF
41.38
2148.16
2150.42
2150.45
0.18
1.46
0.1
0.14
0.07
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
2 yr
104.04
2148.16
2152.58
2152.59
0.08
0.92
0.03
0.03
0.01
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
Syr
188.24
2148.16
2155.05
2155.05
0.04
0.64
0.01
0.01
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
10yr
261.26
2148.16
2155.27
2155.28
0.06
0.83
0.02
0.02
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
100yr
590.8
2148.16
2155.89
2155.91
0.1
1.59
0.07
0.12
0.03
Bumgarner Branch
Bumll
4.12
Culvert

River
Bumgarner Branch
Bumgarner Branch
Bumgarner Branch
Reach
Bumf
Bumf
Buml
River Sta
4.1
4.1
4.1
Profile
BKF
2 yr
Syr
QTota I
(cfs)
41.38
104.04
188.24
Min Ch
EI(ft)
2146.19
2146.19
2146.19
W.S. Elev
(ft)
2147.87
2148.66
2149.37
E.G. Elev
(ft)
2147.94
2148.81
2149.6
Froude#Chl
0.33
0.39
0.43
Vel Chnl
(ft/s)
2.23
3.29
4.2
Shear
Chan(lb/sq
ft)
0.26
0.48
0.71
Power
Chan(Ib/ft s)
0.58
1.59
2.99
Power Total
(Ib/ft s)
0.37
0.91
1.59
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
10yr
261.26
2146.19
2149.75
2150.07
0.48
4.97
0.96
4.76
2.46
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.1
100 yr
590.8
2146.19
2150.04
2151.34
0.94
10.12
3.87
39.22
19.74
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
BKF
41.38
2146.47
2147.53
2147.79
0.8
4.08
1.04
4.23
4.23
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
2yr
104.04
2146.47
2148.05
2148.61
0.93
6.05
1.93
11.69
7.87
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4
Syr
188.24
2146.47
2148.57
2149.37
0.97
7.44
2.62
19.5
11
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
10yr
261.26
2146.47
2149.11
2149.86
0.85
7.43
2.4
17.81
6.29
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
100 yr
590.8
2146.47
2149.58
2150.14
0.84
8.02
2.62
21.02
4.89
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
BKF
41.38
2144.07
2145.02
2145.37
0.99
4.76
1.46
6.94
6.94
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
2 y
104.04
2144.07
2145.66
2146.21
0.92
6
1.9
11.4
7.63
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
Syr
188.24
2144.07
2146.18
2146.48
0.69
5.33
1.34
7.17
1.19
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
10yr
261.26
2144.07
2146.35
2146.68
0.73
5.87
1.58
9.27
1.65
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
3
100 yr
590.8
2144.07
2146.88
2147.33
0.85
7.69
2.5
19.25
3.9
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
BKF
57.6
2139.62
2140.66
2140.73
0.46
2.33
0.34
0.78
0.79
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
2 y
139.7
2139.62
2141.24
2141.39
0.58
3.8
0.76
2.89
1.07
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
Syr
250.13
2139.62
2141.7
2141.87
0.58
4.37
0.91
3.98
1.13
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
10yr
344.96
2139.62
2141.94
2142.13
0.59
4.76
1.03
4.91
1.5
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
100 yr
768.07
2139.62
2142.8
2143.05
0.6
5.81
1.37
7.94
2.91
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
BKF
57.6
2135.83
2137.02
2137.3
0.78
4.23
1.07
4.51
4.51
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
2 y
139.7
2135.83
2137.73
2138.19
0.77
5.55
1.52
8.43
4.7
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
Syr
250.13
2135.83
2138.32
2138.94
0.79
6.65
1.96
13.03
3.98
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
10yr
344.96
2135.83
2138.71
2139.33
0.77
7.02
2.07
14.54
3.86
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
100 yr
768.07
2135.83
2139.66
2140.39
0.8
8.53
2.76
23.52
6.39
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
BKF
57.6
2133.41
2134.91
2135.26
0.8
4.77
1.29
6.16
6.16
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
2 yr
139.7
2133.41
2135.77
2136.37
0.84
6.23
1.93
12
12
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
Syr
250.13
2133.41
2136.58
2137.09
0.77
6.17
1.79
11.03
4.36
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
10yr
344.96
2133.41
2136.83
2137.45
0.83
7
2.22
15.54
6.71
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
100yr
768.07
2133.41
2137.74 1
2138.67
0.92
9.07
3.38
30.67
16.08

HEC -RAS OUTPUT COMPARISON
River
Reach
River Sta I
Profile I
WSEL
Diff
Power ch
Diff
Power ch
% Diff
Power
Tot Diff
Power Tot %
Diff
Junes Br
June
8.1
BKF 1
1.27
-2.69
-0.96763
-2.69
-0.9676259
Junes Br
June
8.1
2 yr
1.08
-3.94
-0.88143
-3.94
-0.88143177
Junes Br
June
8.1
Syr
0.94
-5.06
-0.78207
-5.06
-0.7820711
Junes Br
June
8.1
10yr
0.98
-6.2
-0.79487
-6.2
-0.79487179
Junes Br
June
8.1
100 yr
0.36
-1.56
-0.46154
-1.56
-0.46987952
Junes Br
June
8
BKF
1.74
-4.72
-0.55399
-5.11
-0.59976526
Junes Br
June
8
2 yr
1.49
-8.45
-0.56522
-10.9
-0.72909699
Junes Br
June
8
Syr
0.82
3.23
0.30443
-1.99
-0.18755891
Junes Br
June
8
10yr
0.68
4.91
0.354001
-2.17
-0.15804807
Junes Br
June
8
100 yr
0.51
1.42
0.061286
-2.24
-0.23212435
Junes Br
June
7
BKF
2.06
-0.02
-0.00926
-0.02
-0.00925926
Junes Br
June
7
2 yr
1.71
2.29
0.496746
1.13
0.245119306
Junes Br
June
7
Syr
1.86
-7.09
-0.45361
-11.29
-0.72232885
Junes Br
June
7
10yr
1.74
-9.29
-0.48895
-14.89
-0.78368421
Junes Br
June
7
100 yr
1.19
-13.36
-0.44832
-23.89
-0.8076403
Junes Br
June
6
BKF
0.75
-1.55
-0.23664
-1.71
-0.2610687
Junes Br
June
6
2 yr
0.69
-5.11
-0.45141
-9.46
-0.83568905
Junes Br
June
6
5yr
0.23
0.63
0.096183
0.05
0.036231884
Junes Br
June
6
10yr
0.14
2.73
0.429921
0.43
0.338582677
Junes Br
June
6
100 yr
0.22
-0.11
-0.00782
-0.36
-0.12286689
Junes Br
June
5.2
BKF
-0.89
0.09
9
0.07
7
Junes Br
June
5.2
2 yr
-1.93
0.09
NA
0.02
NA
Junes Br
June
5.2
5yr
-4.53
0.03
NA
0.01
NA
Junes Br
June
5.2
10yr
-3.09
0.01
NA
0
NA
Junes Br
June
5.2
100 yr
0.1
0.01
NA
0
NA
Junes Br
June
5.12
0
0
NA
0
NA
Junes Br
June
5.1
BKF
0.69
-2.5
-0.83056
-2.15
-0.87755102
Junes Br
June
5.1
2 yr
0.15
-0.12
-0.04054
-0.71
-0.35858586
Junes Br
June
5.1
Syr
0
0.93
0.142857
-1.06
-0.26767677
Junes Br
June
5.1
10yr
0.09
-2.51
-0.16049
-4.14
-0.46256983
Junes Br
June
5.1
100 yr
0.01
0.36
0.028324
-0.23
-0.10849057
Junes Br
June
5
BKF
0.45
3.7
3.303571
3.42
3.053571429
Junes Br
June
5
2 yr
0.12
2
0.451467
-0.71
-0.23355263
Junes Br
June
5
Syr
0.3
-4.89
-0.3546
-2.41
-0,4989648
Junes Br
June
5
10yr
0.05
0.17
0.017876
0.27
0.121621622
Junes Br
June
5
100 yr
-0.08
3.67
0.221084
1.54
0.4375
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
BKF
0.04
-0.51
-0.12814
-0.51
-0.1281407
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
2 yr
0.01
-0.41
-0.03317
-0.42
-0.04268293
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
Syr
0
0
0
0
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
10yr
0
0
0
0
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
100 yr
-0.01
0.05
0.003036
0.01
0.003144654
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.3
BKF
0.02
-1.98
-0.21452
0.75
0.115384615
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
2 yr
-0.2
0.41
0.074141
1.23
1.597402597
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.3
5yr
0.05
-2.83
-0.59958
-0.21
-0.25609756
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
10yr
0.12
-5.2
-0.65327
-0.58
-0.40277778
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
100 yr
0.2
-15.62
-0.65935
-2.08
-0.47488584
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.2
BKF
0.02
-0.18
-0.5625
-0.25
-0.78125
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
2 y
0
0.01
0.5
0
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
Syr
0.02
0
0
0
NA
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
10yr
0.06
0.01
1
0
NA
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
100 yr
0.11
0.05
0.714286
0.01
0.5
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.12
0
0
NA
0
NA
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
BKF
0.18
-1.99
-0.77432
-2.2
-0.85603113

River
Reach
River Sta
Profile
WSEL
Diff
Power ch
Diff
Power ch
% Diff
Power
Tot Diff
Power Tot %
Diff
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
2 yr
0.13
1.78
0.52819
2.46
0.72997033
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
5yr
-0.21
-1.18
-0.28297
-2.47
-0.60837438
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
10yr
0.5
-15.39
-0.76377
-17.69
-0.87791563
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4.1
100 yr
-0.51
5.38
0.158983
-9.67
-0.32879973
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4
BKF
0.55
-6.49
-0.60541
-6.49
-0.60541045
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
2 yr
0.15
-5.17
-0.30664
-8.51
-0.51953602
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
5yr
-0.18
1
0.054054
2.31
0.265822785
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
10yr
-0.31
14.62
4.583072
5.54
7.386666667
Bumgarner Branch
Buml
4
100 yr
-0.08
-0.29
-0.01361
-0.08
-0.01609658
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
BKF
0.44
4.39
1.721569
4.39
1.721568627
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
2 yr
0.23
4.3
0.605634
0.63
0.09
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
5yr
0.46
-12.96
-0.64382
-5.91
-0.83239437
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
10yr
0.1
0.95
0.114183
0.24
0.170212766
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
100 yr
0.11
-0.26
-0.01333
0
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
BKF
1.23
-5.82
-0.88182
-5.81
-0.88030303
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
2 yr
1.02
-7.5
-0.72185
-9.32
-0.89701636
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
5yr
0.75
-4.81
-0.54721
-2.39
-0.67897727
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
10yr
0.55
-4.25
-0.46397
-0.74
-0.33035714
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
100 yr
0.43
-2.65
-0.25024
-0.41
-0.12349398
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
BKF
0.71
2.95
1.891026
2.95
1.891025641
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
2yr
0.37
5.38
1.763934
2.48
1.117117117
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
5yr
0.36
6.35
0.950599
0.9
0.292207792
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
10yr
0.37
4.96
0.517745
0.67
0.210031348
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
100 yr
0.14
7.16
0.437653
2.01
0.45890411
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
BKF
0
0
0
0
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
2 yr
0
0.01
0.000834
0.01
0.000834028
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
5yr
0.02
-0.44
-0.03836
-0.15
-0.03325942
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
10yr
0
0
0
0
0
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
100 yr
0
0
0
0

HEC -RAS Sediment Data- Existing Bankfull
River
Reach
RS
Ch Dist
Invert
Change
(ft)
Mass Out
Cum: All
(tons)
Mass In
Cum: All
(tons)
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
262
0.02
17
17
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
215
-0.05
22
17
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
53
0.02
20
22
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
22
0.15
18
20
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
100.47
-0.42
26
18
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
291.27
0.10
24
26
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
289.5
0.18
50
60
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
289.5
-0.07
35
30
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
116
0.14
22
35
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
0
0.09
19
19
Junes Br
June
8.1
20
0.03
41
41
Junes Br
June
8.1
20
0.03
9
9
Junes Br
June
8
398.5
-0.22
19
9
Junes Br
June
7
431.7
0.02
17
19
Junes Br
June
6
391
0.00
17
17
Junes Br
June
5.2
43
0.00
18
17
Junes Br
June
5.1
25
1.13
8
18
Junes Br
June
5
95.64
0.54
6
8
HEC -RAS Sediment Data - Existing 10yr
River
Reach
RS
Ch Dist
Invert
Change
(ft)
Mass Out
Cum: All
(tons)
Mass In
Cum: All
(tons)
Bumgarner Branch
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
Bumf
4.4
4.3
262
215
0.00
0.51
77
36
77
77
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
53
0.27
14
36
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
22
-1.00
32
14
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
100.47
0.13
30
32
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
291.27
0.30
23
30
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
289.5
0.18
50
60
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
116
-0.28
73
50
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
0
0.04
102
102
Junes Br
June
8.1
20
0.03
41
41
Junes Br
June
8
398.5
-1.00
92
41
Junes Br
June
7
431.7
0.18
78
92
Junes Br
June
6
391
0.21
58
78
Junes Br
June
5.2
43
0.81
24
58
Junes Br
June
5.1
25
-0.97
32
24
Junes Br
June
5
95.64
1 -1.00
36
32

HEC -RAS Sediment Data -Proposed Bnkfull
River
Reach
RS
Ch Dist
Invert
Change
(ft)
Mass Out
Cum: All
(tons)
Mass In
Cum: All
(tons)
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.4
262
0.00
16
16
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.3
162.69
-0.14
28
16
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
74.74
0.04
26
28
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
20.68
0.22
2
26
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
91.73
-0.26
8
2
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
88.35
-0.27
13
8
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
266.8
0.24
17
44
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
266.8
0.19
2
14
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
103.16
-0.12
13
2
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
0
0.12
22
22
Junes Br
June
8.1
20
0.03
11
11
Junes Br
June
8.1
20
0.02
0
0
Junes Br
June
8
375.93
-0.20
10
0
Junes Br
June
7
405.26
-0.03
12
10
Junes Br
June
6
352.22
-0.02
15
12
Junes Br
June
5.2
46.28
0.02
14
15
Junes Br
June
5.1
24.66
0.17
1
14
Junes Br
June
5
128.74
-0.20
1
1
HEC -RAS Sediment Data -Proposed 10yr
River
Reach
RS
Ch Dist
Invert
Change
(ft)
Mass Out
Cum: All
(tons)
Mass In
Cum: All
(tons)
Bumgarner Branch
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
Bumf
4.4
4.3
262
162.69
0.00
0.22
78
28
78
78
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.2
74.74
0.22
8
28
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4.1
20.68
-0.05
10
8
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
4
91.73
-0.27
16
10
Bumgarner Branch
Bumf
3
88.35
-0.27
21
16
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
2
266.8
0.24
17
44
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
1
103.16
-0.25
40
17
Bumgarner Branch
Bum2
0.1
0
0.06
94
94
Junes Br
June
8.1
20
0.03
11
11
Junes Br
June
8
375.93
-0.20
21
11
Junes Br
June
7
405.26
-0.18
38
21
Junes Br
June
6
352.22
0.04
32
38
Junes Br
June
5.2
46.28
0.17
21
32
Junes Br
June
5.1
24.66
-0.14
22
21
Junes Br
June
5
128.74
-0.19
23
22

APPENDIX C4
Assessment Data

Project: 1053-JUNE
Stream: Bumgarner Branch/Higdon
Reach/Description: 1,2
Erosion Rate Calculations
Date: 11/7/2011
Crew:
Page: 1 Of:
4
Feature Units
Reach Name
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
HIGDON
HIGDON
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
Station/Location
1-Lower
1-Lower
Higdon Br
Higdon Br.
2-Lower
2-Lower
Photo No.
Reach Length ft
74 74 341 341 168
168
Bank RT-LT-Both
RT
LT
RT
LT
RT
LT
Bank Height ft
4 1.1 0.7 0.9 5
1.1
Bankfull Height ft
1.1 1.1 0.7 0.7 1.1
1.1
Root Depth ft
0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5
0.3
Root Density %
10%
20%
20%
20%
5%
20%
Bank Angle Degrees
70 40 30 30 80
30
Surface Protection %
70% 40% 70% 70% 70%
70%
Bank Material C-G-S-SC
SC SC SC SC SC
SC
Stratification N-M-E
N N N N N
N
Thalweg Position C-OC-Toe
OC C C C C
C
DTOE/DMEAN <1 or>1
>1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1
Local Slope > Avg Yes-No
NO NO NO NO NO
NO
BEHI Calculation
Bnk Ht / Bkf Ht
3.64
1.00
1.00
1.29
4.55
1.00
BEHI Score
10.00 1.00 1.00 4.11 10.00
1.00
Root Depth / Bnk Ht
0.10 0.09 0.43 0.33 0.10
0.27
BEHI Score
8.80 8.91 4.86 6.00 8.80
6.73
Weighted Root Density
1.0% 1.8% 8.6% 6.7% 0.5%
5.5%
BEHI Score
9.87 9.76 8.86 9.11 9.93
9.27
Bank Angle
70
40
30
30
80
30
BEHI Score
5.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 6.00
2.50
Surface Protection
70% 40% 70% 70% 70%
70%
BEHI Score
2.57 5.14 2.57 2.57 2.57
2.57
Bank Material Adjustment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Stratification Adjustment
0 0 0 0 0
0
Total BEHI Score
36.24 27.81 19.78 24.30 37.30
22.07
Rating
High Moderate Moderate Moderate High
Moderate
NBS Calculation
Thalweg Position Score
1.5
1
1
1
1
1
Toe Depth Ratio Score
1 0 0 0 0
0
Local Slope Score
0 0 0 0 0
0
Total NBS Rating
2.5 1 1 1 1
1
WARSS NBS Rating
4 1 1 1 1
1
Rating
High Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low
Very Low
Erosion Rate Prediction
NC or CO
NC
Erosion Rate (ft/yr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0 Sheet Total
Erosion Total (ft3/yr)
36
1
4
5
79
3 129

Project: 1053 -JUNE
Stream: Bumgarner Branch
Reach/Description: 3,4,5
Erosion Rate Calculations
Date: 11/7/2011
Crew:
Page: 2 Of:
4
Feature Units
Reach Name
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
Bumgarner
Station/Location
3 -Middle
3 -Middle
4 -Middle
4 -Middle
5- Upper
5 -Upper
Photo No.
Reach Length ft
350
350
119
119
427
427
Bank RT -LT -Both
RT
LT
RT
LT
RT
LT
Bank Height ft
3.5
1.5
3
1.5
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Height ft
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1
1
Root Depth ft
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.5
Root Density %
5%
30%
15%
30%
50%
50%
Bank Angle Degrees
90
30
90
30
80
80
Surface Protection %
30%
80%
45%
80%
80%
80%
Bank Material C -G -S -SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
Stratification N -M -E
N
N
N
N
N
N
Thalweg Position C -OC -Toe
TOE
OC
TOE
OC
OC
OC
DTOE/DMEAN <1 or>1
>1
<1
>1
<1
>1
>1
Local Slope > Avg Yes -No
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
BEHI Calculation
Bnk Ht / Bkf Ht
2.33
1.00
1.88
0.94
1.60
1.60
BEHI Score
8.53
1.00
7.24
1.00
5.78
5.78
Root Depth / Bnk Ht
0.14
0.20
0.17
0.20
0.31
0.31
BEHI Score
8.29
7.60
8.00
7.60
6.25
6.25
Weighted Root Density
0.7%
6.0%
2.5%
6.0%
15.6%
15.6%
BEHI Score
9.90
9.20
9.67
9.20
7.92
7.92
Bank Angle
90
30
90
30
80
80
BEHI Score
8.00
2.50
8.00
2.50
6.00
6.00
Surface Protection
30%
80%
45%
80%
80%
80%
BEHI Score
6.00
1.71
4.71
1.71
1.71
1.71
Bank Material Adjustment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Stratification Adjustment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total BEHI Score
40.72
22.01
37.62
22.01
27.66
27.66
Rating
Very High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
NBS Calculation
Thalweg Position Score
2
1.5
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
Toe Depth Ratio Score
1
0
1
0
1
1
Local Slope Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total NBS Rating
3
1.5
3
1.5
2.5
2.5
WARSS NBS Rating
5
2
5
2
4
4
Rating
Very High
Low
Very High
Low
High
High
Erosion Rate Prediction
NC or CO
NC
Erosion Rate (fl/yr)
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1 Sheet Total
Erosion Total (ft?/yr)
1225
17
46
6
77
77 1448

Project: 1053 -JUNE
Stream: Junes Branch
Reach/Description: 6,7,9
Erosion Rate Calculations
Date: 11/7/2011
Crew:
Page: 3 Of:
4
Feature Units
Reach Name
Junes
Junes
Junes
Junes
Junes
Junes
Station/Location
6- Lower
6 -Lower
7 -Middle
7 -Middle
9 -Upper
9 -Upper
Photo No.
Reach Length ft
300
300
478
478
447
447
Bank RT -LT -Both
RT
LT
RT
LT
RT
LT
Bank Height ft
2
2
7
3
4
2
Bankfull Height ft
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Root Depth ft
0.3
0.3
4.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Root Density %
10%
5%
20%
10%
40%
5%
Bank Angle Degrees
75
75
90
90
70
85
Surface Protection %
75%
70%
60%
60%
60%
60%
Bank Material C -G -S -SC
Sc
Sc
Sc
Sc
Sc
Sc
Stratification N -M -E
N
N
N
N
N
N
Thalweg Position C -OC -Toe
OC
OC
C
C
OC
TOE
DTOE/DMEAN <1 or>1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
Local Slope > Avg Yes -No
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
BEHI Calculation
Bnk Ht / Bkf Ht
1.43
1.43
5.83
2.50
3.33
1.67
BEHI Score
4.87
4.87
10.00
8.80
10.00
6.13
Root Depth / Bnk Ht
0.15
0.15
0.64
0.17
0.13
0.25
BEHI Score
8.20
8.20
3.29
8.00
8.50
7.00
Weighted Root Density
1.5%
0.8%
12.9%
1.7%
5.0%
1.3%
BEHI Score
9.80
9.90
8.29
9.78
9.33
9.83
Bank Angle
75
75
90
90
70
85
BEHI Score
5.50
5.50
8.00
8.00
5.00
7.00
Surface Protection
75%
70%
60%
60%
60%
60%
BEHI Score
2.14
2.57
3.43
3.43
3.43
3.43
Bank Material Adjustment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Stratification Adjustment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total BEHI Score
30.51
31.04
33.00
38.01
36.26
33.39
Rating
High
High
High
High
High
High
NBS Calculation
Thalweg Position Score
1.5
1.5
1
1
1.5
2
Toe Depth Ratio Score
0
0
0
0
0
FALSE
Local Slope Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total NBS Rating
1.5
1.5
1
1
1.5
2
WARSS NBS Rating
2
2
1
1
2
3
Rating
Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Erosion Rate Prediction
NC or CO
NC
Erosion Rate (fl/yr)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1 Sheet Total
Erosion Total (ft?/yr)
61
61
316
135
183
99 855

Project: 1053 -JUNE
Stream: Junes Branch
Reach/Description: 8
Feature Units
Erosion Rate Calculations
Date: 11/7/2011
Crew:
Page: 4 Of: 4
Reach Name
Junes
Junes
Station/Location
8 - Upper
8 -Upper
Photo No.
Reach Length ft
100
100
Bank RT -LT -Both
RT
LT
Bank Height ft
1
5
Bankfull Height ft
1
1
Root Depth ft
0.3
0.3
Root Density %
5%
10%
Bank Angle Degrees
20
80
Surface Protection %
20%
60%
Bank Material C -G -S -SC
SC
SC
Stratification N -M -E
N
N
Thalweg Position C -OC -Toe
OC
oc
DTOE/DMEAN <1 or>1
<1
<1
Local Slope > Avg Yes -No
NO
NO
BEHI Calculation
Bnk Ht / Bkf Ht
1.00
5.00
BEHI Score
1.00
10.00
Root Depth / Bnk Ht
0.30
0.06
BEHI Score
6.40
9.28
Weighted Root Density
1.5%
0.6%
BEHI Score
9.80
9.92
Bank Angle
20
80
BEHI Score
2.00
6.00
Surface Protection
20%
60%
BEHI Score
7.33
3.43
Bank Material Adjustment
0
0
Stratification Adjustment
0
0
Total BEHI Score
26.53
38.63
Rating
Moderate
High
NBS Calculation
Thalweg Position Score
1.5
1.5
Toe Depth Ratio Score
0
0
Local Slope Score
0
0
Total NBS Rating
1.5
1.5 0 0 0 0
WARSS NBS Rating
2
2
Rating
Low
Low
Erosion Rate Prediction
NC or CO
NC
Erosion Rate (ft/yr)
0.0
0.1
Sheet Total
Erosion Total (ft?/yr)
3
51
54

Site Assessment Calculations
Project: 1053-JUNE Date: 2/21/2012
Stream: All Crew:
Reach/Description: All Page: 1 Of: 3
Feature Units
Section Number 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reach Name Bumgarner Higdon Bumgarner Bumgarner Bumgarner Bumgarner
Location d/s end mid u/s of u/s erding u/s june u/s road
higdon bnk confluence
DA
square miles
1.03
0.08
0.93
0.9
0.9
0.75
W BKF
ft
9
4.5
1 12
12
9
7.5
WBED
ft
5.7
1.5
8.5
8.5
7.5
2.8
DBKF
ft
1.1
0.7
1.1
1.5
1.6
1
DTOE LT
ft
-0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
0
0
DTOE RT
ft
-0.1
0.1
0
0
0.1
0
Field DTHAL
ft
0.35
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.3
WTHAL
ft
2
1
3
2.5
2.5
1.5
Bank Height
ft
4
3
5.5
3.5
2.2
2
Flood Prone Width
ft
17
15
18
18
18
40
Quick XST Calculation
DMAx
1.45
0.85
1.35
1.75
1.85
1.30
Average DTOE
1.00
0.75
1.05
1.40
1.65
1.00
DTHAL
0.45
0.10
0.30
0.35
0.20
0.30
ABKF
10.8
2.5
14.2
18.2
15.6
6.4
DMEAN
1.20
0.56
1.18
1.52
1 1.73
0.86
W/D ratio
7.5
8.1
10.1
7.9
5.2
8.7
Bank Height Ratio
2.8
3.5
4.1
2.0
1.2
1.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
3.3
1.5
1.5
2.0
5.3
Index Calculations
Ref Bed Width Coef 12 12 12 12 12 lc
Ref Bed Width Exp
0.45
0.45 0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Ref Max Depth Coef
1.50
1.5 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Ref Max Depth Exp
0.27
0.27 0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
Reference Bed Width
12.2
3.9 11.6
11.4
11.4
10.5
Bed Width Index (BWI)
0.5
0.4 0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
Reference DMAx
1.5
0.8 1.5
1.5
1.5
Max Depth Index (MDI)
1.0
1.1 0.9
1.2
1.3
0.9
Stream Type (Rosgen)
Stream Type G E G G G E

Site Assessment Calculations
Project: 1053-JUNE Date: 2/21/2012
Stream: All Crew:
Reach/Description: All Page: 2 Of: 3
Feature
Units
Section Number
7
8
9
10
11
12
Reach Name
Bumgarner
Junes
Junes
Junes
Junes
Bumgarner
Location
mid horse
pasture
u/s drive
moving u/s
canyon
u/s wetland
at pit traps
DA
square miles
0.71
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.2
1.03
W BKF
ft
8.5
7
8.5
8
5
8.1
WBED
ft
3
3
4.5
3
2.5
5.7
DBKF
ft
1.5
1.4
1.05
1.2
1.2
0.9
DTOE LT
ft
0
0.1
0.1
0
0
0.1
DTOE RT
ft
0.2
0.3
0
0.15
0.2
0
Field DTHAL
ft
0.3
0.35
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.3
WTHAL
ft
1.5
1.5
2
2
1.5
1.5
Bank Height
ft
2
2
2.6
3
2.5
5
Flood Prone Width
ft
50
22
15.5
15
11
18
Quick XST Calculation
DMAX
1.80
1.75
1.20
1.35
1.35
1.20
Average DTOE
1.60
1.60
1.10
1.28
1.30
0.95
DTHAL
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.08
0.05
0.25
ABKF
9.7
8.3
7.5
7.2
5.0
7.5
DMEAN
1.14
1.19
0.88
0.90
1.00
0.92
W/D ratio
7.5
5.9
9.7
8.9
5.0
8.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.1
1.1
2.2
2.2
1.9
4.2
Entrenchment Ratio
5.9
3.1
1.8
1.9
2.2
2.2
Index Calculations
Ref Bed Width Coef
12
12 12
12
12
12
Ref Bed Width Exp
0.45
0.45 0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Ref Max Depth Coef
1.50
1.5 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Ref Max Depth Exp
0.27
0.27 0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
Reference Bed Width
10.3
6.2 6.2
6.2
5.8
12.2
Bed Width Index (BWI)
0.3
0.5 0.7
0.5
0.4
0.5
Reference DMAX
1.4
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
Max Depth Index (MDI)
1.3
1.7 1.2
1.3
1.4
0.8
Stream Type (Rosgen)
Stream Type
E
E
G
G
G
G

Site Assessment Calculations
Project: 1053-JUNE Date: 2/21/2012
Stream: All Crew:
Reach/Description: All Page: 3 Of: 3
Feature Units
Section Number 13 14 15 16 17
Reach Name Bumgarner Junes Junes Bumgarner Bumgarner
u/s conf w d/s of u/s Junes u/s end 15' d/s of
Location
higdon wetland bumgarner P16
DA
square miles
0.93
0.23
0.19
0.69
0.93
W BKF
ft
10.7
5.8
5
9
13.5
WBED
ft
8.4
4.2
2.8
6.5
8
DBKF
ft
1
0.75
0.6
1.1
0.95
DTOE LT
ft
-0.1
0
0
0
0.1
DTOE RT
ft
-0.1
0
0
-0.1
0
Field DTHAL
ft
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.2
0.25
WTHAL
ft
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
3
Bank Height
ft
5.5
3
2.5
2
5.5
Flood Prone Width
ft
18
20
11
20
18
Quick XST Calculation
DMAx
1.25
0.95
0.75
1.30
1.20
Average DTOE
0.90
0.75
0.60
1.05
1.00
DTHAL
0.35
0.20
0.15
0.25
0.20
ABKF
12.1
4.7
2.8
10.1
13.0
DMEAN
1.13
0.81
0.57
1.13
1.96
W/D ratio
9.5
7.2
8.8
8.0
14.1
Bank Height Ratio
4.4
3.2
3.3
1.5
4.6
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
3.4
2.2
2.2
1.3
Index Calculations
Ref Bed Width Coef 12 12 12 12 12
Ref Bed Width Exp
0.45
0.45 0.45
0.45
0.45
Ref Max Depth Coef
1.50
1.5 1.5
1.5
1.5
Ref Max Depth Exp
0.27
0.27 0.27
0.27
0.27
Reference Bed Width
11.6
6.2 5.7
10.2
11.6
Bed Width Index (BWI)
0.7
0.7 0.5
0.6
0.7
Reference DMAx
1.5
1.0 1.0
1.4
1.5
Max Depth Index (MDI)
0.8
0.9 0.8
1.0
0.8
Stream Type (Rosgen)
Stream Type G G G G G

weighted percent of particles in range
0
L�
CV 0 0 M LO CO e- CO O— Ch 00 I1- CO
O (O M M
U)
O
O 0 0 0
0
m
.O
o
0
It N
0 0 0 0 0
O C) 0 0�
U
O LO
CO N
O LO O
N
LO
O O
3
Q
y
O
O
O
O
..
..
CNO
N Ln
V CO CO
7
7
O
O
N lO r (fl N N Ln V
O N CO LO
(0 N 0 0 0
O
Ic
m
0
O O O N CO CO �- N M CO
m N
CO LO �- N V
0 0 0 0
'
S
N 00 O N T O
CL (D
q O CO O
(0 N N -t 00
>� O
O
(O N N 0 N M S
O
O
LO (0 N
p)
p)
N
O
C) O
N CO t O O O
•O
N
m C
O
N
-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 N N N N N N N O N
N N N N
>
U U CO O 7
O CYj N �O
I0
1
>>>>>>>>>����
m m m m m 2 2 m m m m m m m
-o -o -o -o a
v O n. o
-0
0
N O U a
_
m u, v, N
mmmmmCTrnrn rn0
O O 0 0
0 3 m m m=
0 0 0 0 0
T
m
m
y
m m m m
C 7 E E N N N
U U U
E N N
.O .0
CO m m w
Q m
d g
cc C C C fO/L)
o co co cu
t0 m
m m m rn
75 0
Q
N O O O �+ N N 0 0 0 0
E
N 'C O m
N
E E Lp m
` 0
O
> C E E U U U U
E
C
O
�
m
E
N
o
�Iyr
> m a)
> >
>
>
E
E
I
N
C
CO CO
O
O
N
o
j N CO O
O
r
U
O
O
C-
❑ m O
r
ITj
N_ E C
(n Q Y
N
i
O N
LO
S
r
O
O.
C
7
0
U
O
M
r
I-O
O
C
0
0 0 0 LO r
r -
Q �'
U
E
CD
(0 LO O LO 't LO
a�
N ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
in
L
_rn
m
O
o o 0
o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
j
j
o O
0
O� CD O
O
O
Ty
O O 000
O L0() t CO
N
ueyt aeuif tueoaed
0
L�
CV 0 0 M LO CO e- CO O— Ch 00 I1- CO
O (O M M
O O O O O
O 0 0 0
0
m
.O
LO
� V CJ N— O N— O N N
It N
0 0 0 0 0
O C) 0 0�
3
y
0) E
..
..
CNO
N Ln
V CO CO
7
7
O
O
N lO r (fl N N Ln V
O N CO LO
(0 N 0 0 0
O
O
m
0
O O O N CO CO �- N M CO
m N
CO LO �- N V
'
S
N Ln LO LO N� (D CO O N N LO
q O CO O
(0 N N -t 00
>� O
O
(O N N 0 N M S
(O 0) N 00
LO (0 N
p)
p)
N
C) O
N CO t O O O
•O
N
O
N
-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 N N N N N N N O N
N N N N
O Q) N N N
O CYj N �O
0
>>>>>>>>>����
m m m m m 2 2 m m m m m m m
-o -o -o -o a
v O n. o
-0
0
d '�
_
m u, v, N
mmmmmCTrnrn rn0
O O 0 0
0 3 m m m=
0 0 0 0 0
-`o 3 L
m
m
y
m m m m
C 7 E E N N N
U U U
E N N
.O .0
CO m m w
Q m
d g
cc C C C fO/L)
o co co cu
t0 m
m m m rn
75 0
Q
N O O O �+ N N 0 0 0 0
E
N 'C O m
N
E E Lp m
` 0
-77
> C E E U U U U
E
to N 6—
a� >
m
E
N
o
t
O)
> m a)
> >
>
>
Z

CD
number of particles
r
O
d
M CO V N
O O
O
p
I
O
�
0
co
M �_ o
O
O
m
O
O
CL V N N
7
OU
O
M
C)
�
v
O N 00 Ln
O �- N
CO O O
M IO r N V
T O O N
75
m
a)
r
i 00
r i r i i i i i r
N V CO M O N N LO
i i i r
V CO O
r r i i i
CO N N � DD
� 75
O U )
a3
O
U
� � N MT
N
CO a1 N 00
O
�
N
O
O 7
N M I n O O
Q
O E
p 00 00 M
V
N
� N CO O
N
.0
�Z
> > > > > > > > >
2 2 2 2
-0 Q Q -0
N
U
u) C
❑ O
C a)
N m t
N
mmm mm
O, i) iT i) O,
Qaaaaa
0 0 0 0
Q
O a) 3
(n 1= a
a) N a) a)
O) O O
a a
C COU) -c
C C i E
a) a) a) E E a) a) a) N
`m
O N
cz
E m
m
'c
O
O
M O O {
CO
- `~ — j5 -5 cm ca m
E , `m 20
m � � °�
N
CD Q C)
a) U U
Z' a) a) O O O U
(0 N--
N E m
N CO M LOO CSO 00 M
r
(n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
i
a)
O
O
-81
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
\ O
0
>
> >
O O O O O O O O O O
C
O
rr,O
O O � O l!') � M N �
ueyj aaul;;uawad
73
o
U
co
co
7
OU
(NO
O
N
N In
V 00 CO
O
7
OU
O
M
C)
0 0 0 N
(0 N N CO d'
CO 00 N M V CO
O N 00 Ln
O �- N
CO O O
M IO r N V
N
m
a)
r
r r i i
CV In In
r i r i i i i i r
N V CO M O N N LO
i i i r
V CO O
r r i i i
CO N N � DD
U
a3
O
N
CO N N O
� � N MT
N
CO a1 N 00
LO CO N V
�
N
O 7
N M I n O O
Q
mCCCCC�������
�Z
> > > > > > > > >
2 2 2 2
-0 Q Q -0
a) N O m a)
o C)Mo2
mmmmmmcom
O
mmm mm
O, i) iT i) O,
Qaaaaa
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
oao )
a) N a) a)
O) O O
a a
C COU) -c
C C i E
a) a) a) E E a) a) a) N
`m
O N
cz
E m
m
'c
o o
- `~ — j5 -5 cm ca m
E , `m 20
m � � °�
N
cU
OO
a) U U
Z' a) a) O O O U
(0 N--
N E m
U
N
> N
> T
a)
O
N
>
> >
>
>
Z

�
O
U
E
number of particles
M
N
U
(2 1 N O
00 O It N
O O
O
d
O
O
rn
M
I
(NO
O
N LO
N Ln
o 0
V CO CO
0
7
O
M
0
o C C 0
Q M 00 M O
CO N N LO V'
(O M N M V (0
O N 00 LO
O �- N
CD
�
U
o
'
N LO LO LO
N V (O CO O N N LO
H
(O N N -t CO
U
_N
N
> � O N
@
N CO 't
(0 O N M
--
In CO N It
N M LO O O
7E N > :2
7
(�
0 0
0' ('
E
N
Q
M �°
7
U
N N N N N N
N N O N
a)� N N
p CYj C N
CO (U (U M (U
> > > > > > > > >
N (` (6 (U (6 N (U US (U
O
O
'O "O 'O "6 'O
+� N O 'U
O Q O
-FDp
M
M M M M M
N N N N
O 0 0 0 0 CM 0) 0)
0 0 0 0
U U U U
7 7 7 7 0
O O O O O
a d a
'O -O ?i
O
N
V N N
C_ C E, i i
N N O E E N N N N
O
(V
6
7 O � O
N
4
N (U (U
y E
O
N C C M
E
V
E E
U
❑ M O M
O N ;5 C
> ill
E
=
CO
N E 3
N
>
O N
>
ani
>
Z
M y
O
a
O
N CO V 'IT 00 ('0
0 0 0 0 M
E
Q� CO LO O LO d' In
N CO LO CO 00 O
Un❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑
'
o
0C
CD 0 0 O 0
07 O O O O
LO
ueyf caul; juawed
�
O
U
E
rn
M
rn
M
O
(NO
O
N LO
N Ln
V CO CO
0
7
O
M
0
0 0 0 N�
CO N N LO V'
(O M N M V (0
O N 00 LO
O �- N
(D 0 0
M M �- N V
U
'
N LO LO LO
N V (O CO O N N LO
� O CO O
(O N N -t CO
U
_N
N
O
(fl N N
O 17 6 O
N CO 't
(0 O N M
--
In CO N It
N M LO O O
CO
(�
0 0
N
Q
N N N N N N
N N O N
a)� N N
p CYj C N
CO (U (U M (U
> > > > > > > > >
N (` (6 (U (6 N (U US (U
-0 -0 -0 Q
-0 - � Q
'O "O 'O "6 'O
+� N O 'U
O Q O
M
M M M M M
N N N N
O 0 0 0 0 CM 0) 0)
0 0 0 0
U U U U
7 7 7 7 0
O O O O O
a d a
'O -O ?i
O
N
C_ C E, i i
N N O E E N N N N
0 ID
.O
Q t j 0
O U
N N O O cu cu cu V
N (U (U
y E
E
V
E E
�
> ill
E
=
>
j j
>
ani
>
Z
O
O
a

weight of particles
O O O O O O O
I- (D Ln V CO N O O
O
O
C
C
O N
C
(6
O
O co O
O
U
O N
r
M O CO
E
O N
O co O
U
r
N
o.
E
N n o
N_
N
(o LO O
co LO
O
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O m W On (00 LO V M N O O
ueya jaug;uaaad
0 0 o o 0 0
my tooF—
rn
>
.Nc >
a Ln
o 00 000
I Ln (D CD (o
0 0 0 0 o o 0
Ln O �: W �2
"O N N O
N >
C N
W (n
N
X O OV Co
Ol N (O Co S I- O
V V LO M (O
1
oda) L
> C 'O
a> >O
U
> O)
N N
i5

c
�
C
U
a
number of particles
U_
CO
CO
O 00 CO 'IT N O
O
N — — — — — 00 CO V N
O 00
�$
I
O
O
rn
rn
0
j
N
O
0 0 0 0
C
C
O
�
N W OMO M O S
7
0
CD
O
Q
O
�
(fl N N V) 't
CO 00 N CO It CO
�
CO — 0 0
M LO � N
H
M
'
'0 N
a3
CO
N I- CO CC) O N N Cn
i1U
CO N N V CO
U
-E
�O
) U O C
O
O
1
N M V
CO C� N CO
U') CO N V
N U
O
N CM Cf) 0 0
Q
O
O O
O
M
N O N N O N O) O O
N N N N
N a) N M a)
2 Y C 'O N
U
U
C C C C C
M M M M M w
E
E
4
"O .a "O 'O 'a
O M O U
O- O
O
N
.N
C u) V
O
O)
V L) 0 V
0 00 O O O
N
N
O
to
N N a) C)
U_
-0
-
C 7 i i
Com -
O
Q
N C C N
O
.0 .0 .0
E O O
� L �
N
i
N E �
.,FC- S .� 7 7
0
=o
(6 (4
T_
U) Y
a) N U V OU U
(6 M
w
E E
U
> E T
N
a)
C
7
Q
E
U
a)>
>
a,
>
E
>
a)
> >
a)
O
N
d
O O O CT V 00
E O
a)
U
CD M 00 LO
N O M
LO CO 0O
0 0 cc cc
CO
p
a)
O
O 0) 000 O� C09 LO V O N O
O
ueyt join; tuawad
c
�
C
U
rn
M
rn
rn
E
N
O
C
C
a)
�
N L
0
O
0)
O
(7 C� O N
(fl N N V) 't
CO 00 N CO It CO
O N O U)
M N
CO — 0 0
M LO � N
U
M
'
i .
a3
N M Ln Cf) �-
N I- CO CC) O N N Cn
't O 00 O
CO N N V CO
U
-E
�O
' N
O
CO N N C,
N M V
CO C� N CO
U') CO N V
M
O
N CM Cf) 0 0
Q
U)
O O
M
N O N N O N O) O O
N N N N
N a) N M a)
2 Y C 'O N
U
U
C C C C C
M M M M M w
E
> > > > > > > > >
N N (L N M M M M M
4
"O .a "O 'O 'a
O M O U
O- O
(n
O)
V L) 0 V
0 00 O O O
N
to
N N a) C)
M M
fR iq M
-
C 7 i i
Com -
a) a) a) E E a) a) a) a)
i E E i
a) a)
,
.0 .0 .0
E O O
� L �
M M
O
.,FC- S .� 7 7
0
=o
(6 (4
T_
a) N U V OU U
(6 M
w
E E
m
> E T
N
a)
N N
E E
E
a)>
>
a,
>
E
>
z
> >
K

weighted percent of particles in range
�
L
V
O O CO �- O m N CO 0) (O �- M W
W M 0 0
O
O O O O O
o
m
CO
O N N r-- O LO M N M (0
O M 0 0
0 0 O O O
O O O O
O
O
G
O LO
O LO O
o
0
y
Q
CO N
N
LO
O O
O
O
R
(N0
N LO
O
V 00 CO
7
7
O
O
N LO r (O N N LO V
O N 00 LO
O N O O O
O
O
0)O
OO O- N O00 �- -NM'T OO)-
- N
MLC) �-N V
a7
E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E
E E E E E
O
a)
Ic
N LO LO LO - N (O 00 (O N N LO
q O 00 O
M N N -t 00
0 0 0 0
O
(0 N N 0 N M S
(0 O) N 00
LO (0 N
p)
p)
N
C) O
(1)00 LLONO0 O
CL U')
N CO LOO O
•O
a)
_
O O
O
O
O
N
-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 N N N N a) N N O N
N N N 0
a) Q) N N N
N (Yj N -O
G
>>>>>>>>>����
O O O O O 2 2 O m m O O m CO
-0 -0-0
-O -O -O -O a
O
0
)'�
_,
O O O O
LTrnrn0)0)(M rnG
o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
L6 C
Cu
O
0 0 0 0
LC 7 E 2 E E N N N N
0 G G
E a) a)
= _Q .E a)
CO 0 as 0 CO
Q
.0
0
> �
G CO O CO O 7
4C-- C C C
"6 LC w
7
I�
1
.O
Q
N O O O �+ N N 0 0 0 0
E
N •O (B O
a)
O O G a
T
E
O O Q)
a) >
m
E
N
0
t
O)
> m a)
> >
>
>
Z
O
O
`-
c
�I}
E
I
N
CCD
O
O LO
X) O
O
r
U
O
0
�j
E
c
O-
❑ (6 O
r
N_ E C
ITj
�
_L Y
N
N
i
O
LO
S
r
O
O.
C
7
O
U
O
Cl)
r
0
CO 00 M T co
C
C7 C7 0 7 00
m
U
E
.Q
CL
CL
m
0 (0 LO O M 't LO
o
N CO LO CD CO m
in ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
CD
a�
++
L
I
L
_rn
ZD
O
o 0 0
o 0 0
0 0 o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
j
j
o O
0
O� O
O
O
Ty
O O 000
O LOO � CO
N
ueyt aeuif tueoaed
�
L
V
O O CO �- O m N CO 0) (O �- M W
W M 0 0
0 0 O O O
O O O O O
o
m
CO
O N N r-- O LO M N M (0
O M 0 0
0 0 O O O
O O O O
O
O
3
y
R
(N0
N LO
V 00 CO
7
7
O
O-
N LO r (O N N LO V
O N 00 LO
O N O O O
O
O
0)O
OO O- N O00 �- -NM'T OO)-
- N
MLC) �-N V
a7
E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E
E E E E E
O
a)
=
N LO LO LO - N (O 00 (O N N LO
q O 00 O
M N N -t 00
>� O
O
(0 N N 0 N M S
(0 O) N 00
LO (0 N
p)
p)
N
C) O
N CO LOO O
•O
a)
_
O O
O
N
-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 N N N N a) N N O N
N N N 0
a) Q) N N N
N (Yj N -O
G
>>>>>>>>>����
O O O O O 2 2 O m m O O m CO
-0 -0-0
-O -O -O -O a
U O p, O
-0
0
)'�
_,
O O O O
LTrnrn0)0)(M rnG
o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
-a 3 L.
Cu
O
0 0 0 0
LC 7 E 2 E E N N N N
0 G G
E a) a)
= _Q .E a)
CO 0 as 0 CO
Q
.0
0
4C-- C C C
"6 LC w
7
CO M O) a
.O
Q
N O O O �+ N N 0 0 0 0
E
N •O (B O
a)
E
> O E E 0 0 0 O
E
O O Q)
a) >
m
E
N
0
t
O)
> m a)
> >
>
>
Z

CD
number of particles
r
CL
00 � (O In V CO N
O O
—
O
—
p
*k
I
O
�
0
j
CO
CO
o 0 0 0 0
CO
CO
c
:3
OU
M O
(6
O
O
Q M
�
E
O
0)
0
T
H
v
O N 00 Ln
O �- N
(O O O
M I!� r N V
> O O N
75
a5
r
i 00
r i r i i i i i r
N V (O M M N N Cf)
i i i r
V O W O
r r i i i
CO N N � DD
U 75
O U
a3
O
U .0
N CO
O 01 N 00
Cn O N V
N
N
O
O
O
N M In O O
N
Q
(n
0 C)
O
p M Cn d
�
C,
M
a) a) a) FD a) N N N N
> > > > > > > > >
N 22 N
Q Q �
N
N
.0
� O
U
❑ O U
M Co as CO m m m m m
a, o, iT `o,
Q
O O O O
o 0 0 0 0
C a)
N a3 t
N
�—�
Q
O a) 3
(n 1 Q )
0) o, 0) 0)
a a
c
C C� i E
a) a) 0 E E a> a) O N
U N
� @
� o o---
m m m m
E� m m
O
O) O
NN
Cn 0000
��
O O O O O U
N --
N
N� N
!_
N CO M LO� 00 M
r
coo ❑ ❑
i
O
>
> >
\
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
\ O
0
Z
O O O O O O O O O O
C
O
nrlO
O CY1 I- O l!') � CO N �
ueyj aaul;;uawad
7
O
U
�
—
—
—
CO
CO
CO
CO
c
:3
OU
CNO
O
N L
N In
V 00 CO
O
c
7
OU
O
0)
0
0 0 O N
(fl N N Cn �
t (O 00 — N M V (O
O N 00 Ln
O �- N
(O O O
M I!� r N V
N
a5
r
r r i i
CV In CC)
r i r i i i i i r
N V (O M M N N Cf)
i i i r
V O W O
r r i i i
CO N N � DD
U
a3
O
N
CO N N O
N CO
O 01 N 00
Cn O N V
N
N
O
N M In O O
N
Q
(n
0 C)
a5
C C C C�
a) a) a) FD a) N N N N
> > > > > > > > >
N 22 N
Q Q �
O N O m a)
a a s a s
O U CU O 2
as a3 Co co Co
M Co as CO m m m m m
a, o, iT `o,
Q
O O O O
o 0 0 0 0
o a o
�—�
0) o, 0) 0)
a a
c
C C� i E
a) a) 0 E E a> a) O N
U N
� @
� o o---
m m m m
E� m m
c° m� o��
m
CO
U 1,
O O O O O U
N --
N
N� N
U
>
> >
>
>
Z

O
U
E
number of particles
ai
V
O N h (O LO It CO N
O O
^
^
C)
o
N
c
7
O
CL
(NU
O
N LO
N Ln
o
V W (0
0
O
M
0
0 0 0 N�
CD N N LO V'
M M N M V (U
O N W LO
O �- N
O 0 0
M M �- N V
'
I
N V (O CO M N N LO
� O 00 O
(O N N M
U
o 0
0 0 0 0 0
N
O
O N N
O 7 6 O
O
O O N M
Q � LO O O
N
(�
�
0 0
o
N
CZ
H
C C C C C
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
75
p U C 'O N
> � a) Q)
CO7
L�6
f6 (6 N M 03
> > > > > > > > >
N L` (6 (0 (6 N (6 N LO
4 Q
Q
'O "O 'O "6 'O
+� N O 'U
O Q O
O
N N N N
U
E
7 7 7 7 0
O O O O O
a d a
-O ?i
O
m M
N
7
U
N N O E E N N N N
.� C 7 7 E i e i
O N
m
.Q
E
Q t j Q
O
O
O U
L� w N N O O U
7
N Q) (0 CO
f6 M a Q7
y
CO
U
E E
p M V O
a)>
O
(V
CD
j O N 0
>
N
4
ani
>
Z
O
O
N C C to
U
❑ N O to
CO
O N ;n C
N E
a
N 3
N y
------------------
O
N M
00
6 6 0 0 O
E
Q� CO LO O LO d' LO
N CO LO CO 00 O
<)❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑
'
o
d
oo o m o o� 0
0 0
M
ueyf caul; juawed
O
U
E
^
^
N
c
7
O
N
c
�
O
(NU
O
N LO
N Ln
V W (0
0
O
M
0
0 0 0 N�
CD N N LO V'
M M N M V (U
O N W LO
O �- N
O 0 0
M M �- N V
'
N LO LO LO
N V (O CO M N N LO
� O 00 O
(O N N M
U
_N
N
O
O N N
O 7 6 O
N M�
O O N M
In CO N�
N M LOO O
N
(�
0 0
N
CZ
C C C C C
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
75
p U C 'O N
L�6
f6 (6 N M 03
> > > > > > > > >
N L` (6 (0 (6 N (6 N LO
4 Q
Q
'O "O 'O "6 'O
+� N O 'U
O Q O
O
N N N N
O 0 0 0 0 a7 0
0 0 0 0
U U U U
7 7 7 7 0
O O O O O
a d a
-O ?i
O
N
C_ Q, i i
la m m
N N O E E N N N N
.� C 7 7 E i e i
O N
m
.Q
E
Q t j Q
O U
L� w N N O O U
7
N Q) (0 CO
f6 M a Q7
y
CO
U
E E
a)>
E
=
>
j j
>
ani
>
Z
O
O
a

O
U
E
number of particles
m
U
r
CO
LO CO N
O O
N
O
(No
O
N LO
N Ln
�
V 00 (O
0
I
O
M
0
0 0 0 N�
(o N N LO V'
(O M N M V (o
O N 00 LO
O �- N
( 0 0
M M �- N V
'
N LO LO LO
N V Co 00 M N N LO
� O 00 O
(o N N -t w
U
N
0
0 0
� �
o
(O N N
O 17 6 O
N M T
O
In O N It
N M LO O O
o 0 0
N O� CD V O
(�
O
>
Q
O
7
N N O N
a) a) N N
75
p (Yj C N
75
CO C 4%
O
E
N (6 N M (6
> > > > > > > > >
N (` (6 (0 (6 (6 (B (B (0
-0 -0 -0 Q
_a - Q
'O "O 'O "6 'O
75 M>
U
O
qJ tp V) tp M
N N N N
O 0 0 0 0 M O)CF)
N O) OU O
7 7 7 0 0
O O O O O
a O d a
'a -O ?i
O
N
C_ C E, i i
N N O E E N N N N
O N
Q t j 0
O U
w N N O O U
N (B (0
y N (6
O
U
E E
U
O
> 21,
E
1=
>
> >
>
E
C
N
C
7
N
O
4
U_
C
�
❑ N O y
N E N
� O- N
r
(o N N O
M to O T
O
0 0 0 0
E
CU
Q� (o LO O LO d' LO
N M LO (0 00 M
�
o
0
0D
0) 00 O (0 LO 07 O O O O
uey} jaul} }uawad
O
U
E
^
^
N
N
c
7
O
(No
O
N LO
N Ln
V 00 (O
0
c
7
O
O
M
0
0 0 0 N�
(o N N LO V'
(O M N M V (o
O N 00 LO
O �- N
( 0 0
M M �- N V
'
N LO LO LO
N V Co 00 M N N LO
� O 00 O
(o N N -t w
U
N
0
N
O
(O N N
O 17 6 O
N M T
O M N M
In O N It
N M LO O O
N
(�
0 0
N
Q
N N N N N N
N N O N
a) a) N N
75
p (Yj C N
N (6 N M (6
> > > > > > > > >
N (` (6 (0 (6 (6 (B (B (0
-0 -0 -0 Q
_a - Q
'O "O 'O "6 'O
+� N O 'U
O Q O
O
qJ tp V) tp M
N N N N
O 0 0 0 0 M O)CF)
0 0 0 0
U U U U
7 7 7 0 0
O O O O O
a O d a
'a -O ?i
O
N
C_ C E, i i
N N O E E N N N N
O N
Q t j 0
O U
w N N O O U
N (B (0
y N (6
U
E E
U
> 21,
E
>
> >
>
>
C
7

�
U
number of particles
U)
(D
U
r-
CO LO CO N 00
O
O
O
CL
rn
7
O
rn
7
O
O
N LO
N Ln
O�
V 00 CO
0
O
M
0
0 0 0 N
CO N N LO V'
CO M N M V CO
O N M LO
M �- N
O 0 0
M LO
'
I
N V CO 00 O N N LO
� O 00 O
CO N N 00
:�
o 0 0
N
O
CO N N
O 7 � O
N CO S
(0 0) N 00
N i j � N CO
0
(�
o
CL 7 M
�
N
CZ
�
H
(6
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
75
p U C 'O N
>1 -0 O T
CO C > Q
7
L�6
CO C6 N M C6
> > > > > > > > >
N L` (6 (0 (B 2 (6 N LO
4 Q
��� Q
7C N N
+� N O 'U
O Q O
O
y N N N N
N N N N
O 3
8, U 9
7
U
7 7 7 7 0
O O O O O
a d a
-O ?i
(V
N
C_ Q i i
0 0) O E E 0) N N N
O N
.Q
Q t j Q
O U
O
N� (0 CO
C7) Cn
y E N (6
N U
E E
1=
a)>
E
O
N
O M M
CO
>
> >
N4
N O
Z
U
y C C n
(B
❑ N O y
O N i C
N E N
d N
r
N y
-Q n
i
N
C7
O
Cj
N
C708 LO
U CO LO O LO v LO
N M LO (O 00 M
O
\
0
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
uey; aaull juawad
�
U
rn
7
O
rn
7
O
CNO
O
N LO
N Ln
V 00 CO
0
O
M
0
0 0 0 N
CO N N LO V'
CO M N M V CO
O N M LO
M �- N
O 0 0
M LO
'
N LO LO Ln
N V CO 00 O N N LO
� O 00 O
CO N N 00
:�
0
N
O
CO N N
O 7 � O
N CO S
(0 0) N 00
LO CO N�
N M LO O O
(�
0 0
N
CZ
C C C C C
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
75
p U C 'O N
L�6
CO C6 N M C6
> > > > > > > > >
N L` (6 (0 (B 2 (6 N LO
4 Q
��� Q
'O "O 'O "6 'O
+� N O 'U
O Q O
O
y N N N N
N N N N
O 0 0 0 0 M i) 0
0 0 0 0
U U U U
7 7 7 7 0
O O O O O
a d a
-O ?i
(V
N
C_ Q i i
0 0) O E E 0) N N N
O N
.Q
Q t j Q
O U
w N
O O U
N� (0 CO
C7) Cn
y E N (6
N U
E E
a)>
E
E ai
>
> >
>
>
Z

weight of particles
0 0 0 0 oO O O O
11�r o 000 (00 at N O
O
E
J
O N
LD Ln
W
LO m
U
r
LO
a
E
�Lq(D(D
U
Lo — co
N_
N
to LO O
M Lo
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O m W On W LO V M N O O
ueya jaug;uaaad
0 00 0 0 0
NLo 7NO
N CO V 00
m
N
'yC >
0 0 0 0 0 0
rn �
M
0 0 0 0 o 0 0
O
- co W O
N M
(D >
C N
m U)
N C
O I- 00 m 00 O V
LO I-- 700
t V N M r
oda) L
'
> C O
N MNN
iT) U
> m
U N
i5

N
7
O
C)
O
U
4)
(0
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
a I
c I
m I
N
I
I I
I I
� I I
� I I
N I I
C
U
a
number of particles
U_
CO
CO
LO o
Ln
o LO o Ln o
0
V V
CO
CO N N LO
O 00
0
0
�$
I
O
O
N
O
0
C
C
N
�
N L
j
ct 00 CD
0
O
�
O
o 0 0
CD N N V) 't
CD 00 N CO It CD
O N O U)
M N
CD — 0 0
M LO � N
U
O
CD
'
o 0
Q V M r I- O
i .
C6
N M Cf) LO �-
N I- CD CC) CD N N LO
�
CD N N V CC)
U
-E
�O
�
O
H
N M V
CD C� N CO
U') CD N V
CU
O
N CM Lf) O O
Q
U)
U CO O C
1
(0
N O U
N O) N N O N N O O
N C) C) N
C) O N O C)
26 Y C 'O N
U
U
-0
> > > > > > > > >
N N (L (6 (6 (0 (6 (6 N
4
-p -O -O -O -O
O O O U
O f2 O ._
O
(n
V O O V
O O 0 0 0
'C
O
to
N N C) C)
M M
(D
C 7 i i
N C) C) E E O C) N C)
;n E In i
0) N.0.0
N
.0
E m m
L
E
m oz
O
.9 .� � �
w
, CM
=o
m cts
>
O
N
N
C O
C) O C
0 N U V OU U
(6 N
w
E E
O
m
N
j O N 0
N
C)
N N
�
E E
E
CU
O
Q
N C C N
O
>
E
>
z
) N a)
i
N E �
> >
K
U) Y
i
�
� U
C
7
Q
U
m
�
U
C)
� N m v
O O (V CD
d
E 0 0 0 C)
N
E
U
LO
N O M LO CD 000 W
cn C) 0 0 0 0
CO
p
N
O
O 0)
000
O- COD LO V O N O
O
ueyt join; tuawad
N
7
O
C)
O
U
4)
(0
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
a I
c I
m I
N
I
I I
I I
� I I
� I I
N I I
C
U
0
0
0
0
E
N
O
C
C
N
�
N L
ct 00 CD
0
O
�
O
O O O N
CD N N V) 't
CD 00 N CO It CD
O N O U)
M N
CD — 0 0
M LO � N
U
'
i .
C6
N M Cf) LO �-
N I- CD CC) CD N N LO
't O 00 O
CD N N V CC)
U
-E
�O
' N
O
CD N N C,
N M V
CD C� N CO
U') CD N V
CU
O
N CM Lf) O O
Q
U)
O O
(0
N O) N N O N N O O
N C) C) N
C) O N O C)
26 Y C 'O N
U
U
C C C C C
C) M 0) C, CS w
E
> > > > > > > > >
N N (L (6 (6 (0 (6 (6 N
4
-p -O -O -O -O
O O O U
O f2 O ._
(n
V O O V
O O 0 0 0
'C
to
N N C) C)
M M
(D
C 7 i i
N C) C) E E O C) N C)
;n E In i
0) N.0.0
N
.0
E m m
L
m oz
O
.9 .� � �
w
, CM
=o
m cts
>
0 N U V OU U
(6 N
w
E E
O
m
> E T
N
C)
N N
�
E E
E
a)>
>
>
E
>
z
> >
K

weight of particles
O O O
CD N O O O O O
O (O V N O O
O
O
0 0 0 0 o 0
O
C
�2 O "t O
O NLO
C
(6
O
O
O
W (n
V
NCO M M
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O m W On (00 LO V M N O O
ueya jaug;uaaad
0 0 0 0 0
r N V � O
01
C N
y )
m
0 U)
0 0 0 0 0
M O 7
N M N
0 0 0 0 o 0
�2 O "t O
O NLO
00 m
O
W (n
U
MN M 00
r
O
'-'
00 N 00 'C7,O
M V (O CO
f0
a
E
N_
O U) O
CO (()
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O m W On (00 LO V M N O O
ueya jaug;uaaad
0 0 0 0 0
r N V � O
01
C N
y )
m
0 U)
0 0 0 0 0
M O 7
N M N
oda) L
'
> C O
0) MN
iT) U
0) L
> m
_N N
i5
0 0 0 0 o 0
�2 O "t O
p
N >
N M N
W (n
N
O
MN M 00
O
'-'
00 N 00 'C7,O
M V (O CO
oda) L
'
> C O
0) MN
iT) U
0) L
> m
_N N
i5

Nix �s�o}t�-4
I X
/*
UNIX
I T
`INS
,;AWA SN (d=nU
my 2GO044 4
L�i
`79P12 `i 1J
Qciv!p
1 I
dna NT ;:Ma(jo
Nouvm �aww— awa
1) o n o
ID m n 10
OID
cl) o LO 0
o .2
c\j
c�PPa
ac
V1 S
Nix �s�o}t�-4
I X
/*
UNIX
I T
`INS
,;AWA SN (d=nU
my 2GO044 4
L�i
`79P12 `i 1J
Qciv!p
1 I
dna NT ;:Ma(jo
Nouvm �aww— awa
1) o n o
ID m n 10
OID
cl) o LO 0
o .2
c\j

S 3
i
o ,
z �
,;e 1
4tvy�1M-lantr��
NOtltr�mmf � � � i
f }}
O 1jum
�.. �W j4avS. stzrsa4
`f
v •• �W3dm3
- �Yii�3'13�VNE7kPJ 1CVyNW321---�-� • •,
a 9 r!r
htollitd�lW 21�ilidHaW ' n C13$ N1 43N7s;
hWn11A(4MQQ-`A t9tilaQA3 119M) 9krAVj LL
SMVSSI2h 4�'7dIAlin W -A w •d�g4
V�Y�,�1iN�[1� 411«1
hit/LtrQ19�p {
3�IY301i3NQJ { v
MQ19� IYQ(11sAd�Q gyy0,
�V9 7lifvafllso�cl
Ax
\ t7'.
OD
m o LO o In Y
n er v m W
5
z <
Q
- 1,t
Qf�
�Q
u
cr
o- - m
co,
it tt\
ad
,, 11 tt „
w
o
�..i Cty lt? 1ST 'I
C,
f?
q o t11 j1z...�
M
a
E@
w
t w
G
�
-id
w z
�
I
N N
ate..
It
w
y`
phiP���(j}�
S 3
i
o ,
z �
,;e 1
4tvy�1M-lantr��
NOtltr�mmf � � � i
f }}
O 1jum
�.. �W j4avS. stzrsa4
`f
v •• �W3dm3
- �Yii�3'13�VNE7kPJ 1CVyNW321---�-� • •,
a 9 r!r
htollitd�lW 21�ilidHaW ' n C13$ N1 43N7s;
hWn11A(4MQQ-`A t9tilaQA3 119M) 9krAVj LL
SMVSSI2h 4�'7dIAlin W -A w •d�g4
V�Y�,�1iN�[1� 411«1
hit/LtrQ19�p {
3�IY301i3NQJ { v
MQ19� IYQ(11sAd�Q gyy0,
�V9 7lifvafllso�cl
Ax
\ t7'.
OD
m o LO o In Y
n er v m W
m a LO a
u7 In v a
N N N N
U
s
5
z <
Q
- 1,t
Qf�
�Q
u
cr
o- - m
co,
it tt\
ad
,, 11 tt „
to �' LU
�..i Cty lt? 1ST 'I
C,
f?
q o t11 j1z...�
M
o' ESO
O n +IN
I _
it t i�
ISI
i II
�
I
N N
ate..
It
it Q it
?tl , o
phiP���(j}�
I
I
,
,
I
i
I I
m a LO a
u7 In v a
N N N N
U
s

w IldN01_u-,0daq�L /
g
S
M acus
'Yds �tSVId0713
�4_LV)0'1dvaL10
'\ I
?IH*s 1bN4U1s�Ad
i
1 l
71N� �Nlaoal�,--
' � � Yi�392�NN1
MATCHLINE STA 110•+00
Y
O LiJ
N N N N Lj
L,J
4
Q
m
ti I
tt �
m w
z o z
w w w m i p
-
1 1 9
I I
u
I II
z
oo
1 T'
I
N
J
I
t O
I II
i
w
� i J
I
i � 7
I 4
V
H
1f �
O
o II
i4
Li
is I �< <�� 14`•,.. 11
it � W.... U„ � p� �... $ �S �4•}. �'
cfl � r• s:l W a
L-
o
N
I o
� I
I
o
II _ u � � . J t, It
I
I
i I o
+
0
v lo �_ m o
N N N N N
v
y
�
N
O
U
c4
G
rl
-
w IldN01_u-,0daq�L /
g
S
M acus
'Yds �tSVId0713
�4_LV)0'1dvaL10
'\ I
?IH*s 1bN4U1s�Ad
i
1 l
71N� �Nlaoal�,--
' � � Yi�392�NN1
MATCHLINE STA 110•+00
Y
O LiJ
N N N N Lj
L,J
4
Q
m
ti I
tt �
m w
z o z
w w w m i p
-
1 1 9
I I
u
I II
z
oo
1 T'
I
N
J
I
t O
I II
i
w
� i J
I
i � 7
I 4
V
H
1f �
O
o II
i4
Li
is I �< <�� 14`•,.. 11
it � W.... U„ � p� �... $ �S �4•}. �'
cfl � r• s:l W a
L-
o
N
I o
� I
I
o
II _ u � � . J t, It
I
I
i I o
+
0
v lo �_ m o
N N N N N

ho -Ki
-IVNQI.Llsqjgd
-Ave
f9s NI
INg
No 1 s9z
e
-ANQ -1TATZ2A I
vc <
Og
15- J
OSQ NI
od -A,)AIR
ca
FA Er
-At(s LlNdm
LO 0
O
O
O
10
moo,
o
ho -Ki
-IVNQI.Llsqjgd
-Ave
f9s NI
INg
No 1 s9z
e
-ANQ -1TATZ2A I
vc <
Og
15- J
OSQ NI
od -A,)AIR
ca
FA Er
-At(s LlNdm
LO 0
O
O
O
10

00+O1Z d1S 3NIIHJ� � -----
��
I
Wbisrz,�l�a-r+aws � ,
� � I
T T
Q2�d 1d1 a�yJdX� � r � .1
H]1�d UAYa105t
I {
CjNH5.3C41� �
rte''
*4 %? 1
�1
t �
1
��•°Z lmaaanan /,
-7,rd9 �INI4Qa�--•--- / f
i
i
tN`d �circla�� % av�1gNNW) 6M
r
i l
I 1 j
i
3�yp7 SIN N3NLlh9 \, `�
-sNauv�a� •nes amid � � �"
{P
205+00
Lo Lo Ir
U
i
a
0
0
+
g
V�
x
as
00+O1Z d1S 3NIIHJ� � -----
��
I
Wbisrz,�l�a-r+aws � ,
� � I
T T
Q2�d 1d1 a�yJdX� � r � .1
H]1�d UAYa105t
I {
CjNH5.3C41� �
rte''
*4 %? 1
�1
t �
1
��•°Z lmaaanan /,
-7,rd9 �INI4Qa�--•--- / f
i
i
tN`d �circla�� % av�1gNNW) 6M
r
i l
I 1 j
i
3�yp7 SIN N3NLlh9 \, `�
-sNauv�a� •nes amid � � �"
{P
205+00
Lo Lo Ir
U
i
a
0
0
+

----�__g M O LO O �o I
P
co,
I,
O1 �I C y I
i
�1� I
z m
o
0 ED
-11V m
r �
o
i
---- ice....__..._ ------ --"— '----`---
I I
,
I O
i
� � N
I
... 9 I
I,
I
X I -
w
II x
� r I til ill �
j ( I
�% 1`�asaw ha�7aA oiH� ( 5
75 iHNQ1115Ud Gd
43(VNH4i7G11W o
�-
,/
j�� 1liNOt1!€�dga— i :�t i. A 3: �'
I
S A zoo
--` MATCHLINE
I II
I_... -. o
Lo 0
O V V M N
N N N N N

s
0
z V
�
x
I
� z
�
0
it
�
~O
f
I
I
I
Il
O
z
\
+ 0
s
O
`
I
W
s tI�W 9 Skki INi
It
a
\`
h C? it fl n d~ a i
�1i1S7Cdi�M N�a�sltys i
Z1sX�71Yt�T
P_ C-5, t is
syr
o
-AN,9 1110 t /
+ -
1Qd5 d0 Std41CbJ7Q
o J
i k t
{.
r
I
4
O
--
z
i
N
I
A
OW�4
f
� (
I
I
I
1
I
�
9
N
N N N
N

APPENDIX C5
Reference Reach Data

Stream:
Cold Springs Reach 1
Watershed:
Forested
Location:
Harmon Den
Latitude:
35.76472
Longitude:
82.97333
State:
North Carolina
County:
Haywood
Date:
November 2, 2011
Observers:
Grant Ginn,
Chris Engle,
Megan Mailloux
Channel type:
B4
Drainage area (sq.mi.):
2.63
notes:
---
Dimension
bankfull channel
typical
min
max
floodplain: width flood prone area (ft)
30.0
27.0
55.0
low bank height (ft)
1.8
1.4
2.1
riffle -run: x -area bankfull (sq.ft.)
22.0
20.7
23.9
width bankfull (ft)
20.4
19.9
21.8
mean depth (ft)
1.08
1.0
1.2
max depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.6
hydraulic radius (ft)
1.0
pool: x -area pool (sq.ft.)
22.0
20.0
28.1
width pool (ft)
18.0
15.4
18.0
max depth pool (ft)
2.1
1.8
2.6
hydraulic radius (ft)
1.2
dimensionless ratios:
typical
min
max
width depth ratio
18.9
16.8
21.0
entrenchment ratio
1.5
1.3
2.7
riffle max depth ratio
1.4
1.3
1.5
bank height ratio
1.2
1.0
1.4
pool area ratio
1.0
0.9
1.3
pool width ratio
0.9
0.8
0.9
pool max depth ratiol
1.9
1.7
2.4
hydraulics:
typical
min
max
discharge rate (cfs)l
119.0
118.6
130.4
channel slope (%)
3.2
riffle -run
min
max
pool
velocity (ft/s)
5.4
5.5
5.8
5.4
Froude number
0.95
0.91
1.04
0.76
shear stress (lbs/sq.ft.)
1.997
1.764
1.937
2.396
shear velocity (fUs)
1.015
0.954
1.000
1.112
stream power (Ib/s)
237.6
236.9
260.4
unit stream power (Ib/ft/s)
11.648
10.621
11.502
relative roughness
11.3
---
---
friction factor uV
5.3
6.0
6.2
threshold grain size (t"=0.06) (mm)
95.2
86.7
95.2
Shield's parameter
0.203

Pattern
typical
min
max
meander length (ft)
---
---
---
belt width (ft)
40.0
---
---
amplitude (ft)
---
---
---
radius (ft)
83.0
83.0
156.0
arc angle (degrees)
---
---
---
stream length (ft)
105.0
valley length (ft)
100.0
1.05
Sinuosity
Meander Length Ratio
---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
2.0
---
---
Radius Ratio
4.1
4.1
7.6
Profile
typical
min
max
pool -pool spacing (ft)
82.0
61.0
98.0
riffle length (ft)
31.0
20.0
45.0
pool length (ft)
21.0
5.0
23.0
run length (ft)
18.0
12.0
27.0
glide length (ft)
10.0
7.0
14.0
3.2
channel slope (%)
riffle slope (%)
2.5
1.22
3.89
pool slope (%)
0.3
0
0.5
run slope (%)
6.05
4.47
6.29
glide slope (%)
0.3
0.24
0.3
3
measured valley slope (%)
valley slope from sinuosity (%)
3.4
Riffle Length Ratio
1.5
1
2.2
Pool Length Ratio
1
0.2
1.1
Run Length Ratio
0.9
0.6
1.3
Glide Length Ratio
0.5
0.3
0.7
Riffle Slope Ratio
0.8
0.4
1.2
Pool Slope Ratio
0.1
0
0.2
Run Slope Ratio
1.9
1.4
2
Glide Slope Ratio
0.1
0.1
0.1
Pool Spacing Ratio
4
3
4.8
Channel Materials
Riffle
Sub
BkF
Surface
Pavement
Channel
D16 (mm)
1.5
---
7.2
1
D35 (mm)
17
---
32
10
D50 (mm)
29
---
50
20
D65 (mm)
51
---
70
40
D84 (mm)
97
---
92
84
D95 (mm)
210
---
110
180
mean (mm)
12.1
9.2
dispersion
11.3
12.1
skewness
-0.3
-0.2
Shape Factor
---
% Silt/Clay
0%
---
0%
1%
% Sand
18%
---
100%
20%
% Gravel
54%
---
0%
56%
% Cobble
25%
---
0%
19%
% Boulder
2%
---
0%
3%
% Bedrock
1%
---
% Clay Hardpan
---
% Detritus/Wood
---
% Artificial
---
Largest Mobile (mm)l
115

C)
o
�
v
r
a
�
Q
O
�
r
Ln
ro
c rn
c
�U
..
p
N
O
a o
L
N
W
O
!2o.
a
x
p
+
Lpj
N
O
p
r Lh P*
O1
O
Q W
N
C
L
O
� U� r O) lf�
�
N
N
Q LC) O
O
Lo
Q
N
n
3
)
L
N
U
c
(0
(0
N
V ' N N
N
U
LO
N
U)
Q
C
S A C
O)
M
L
c
O
O O V O O O
�
O
O
N
c 0 N O
N M N
'O
g
N
O
U
y
x
=
N
r
4
U
!2
+
Q
c
�
aI1T
O
N �-
N N O
LO
I
I
a
p
O
O
W N M
Q
M T O
O
CD
N O r-
N V N
e v 0 v 0
N
d N Ln co C> M
O M N O c O
O
N co
Q LO
� O
L N D C N
O 2
N O 0
LO
Q W
O
O
O
O
V
N O
W p
N O
W (O V
OO O
O O O
O m
O)
m O) O)
O
O m O)
O W O
O O) O
r
(31) U011BA9 3

&
E
E ^
ƒ
®k�
i
//«k
LO // k
Cl) 72/ §)\E
)7/ 57!{
%
cc:
R§oo
§\/ it{§§
Mn k
,
£
o It
�® tm§g \/$/ e
c
k }
)
\
LO
F.
2 2 F \ a) w
0
kJ) G
o
,-6&
/k/�
_ 2 ,ao\
.\ 9 @=t)« c/ƒ\k
4
2/222 [[e7%
©
)4\// )]§)$
tom -2 }\\oa
7o6 c, R9 (6 m
2 & °°
= E
0
//^E
e -r @ E
c CLm±k ko/
®gag\�—° >Eo
-r 0) MX \\7
/}fi
E®]2/}f\
6� LL
}mRggRgw }R\m
\ u
;
co coa
.o
.
\ \ \ \
\ \
\
,
»i
»Ig

O
v
E
E
N )
E E a)
M E E 0
U7
O U Q
>
C N
O 7 N cc: m m
m a) a) .r
Lo
dU [n N 7
CD Mn °6
O
a5 _
M O h O a) N W N M
d
4) N O U M N N
a
LL
U
m
m
N
p)
�
N
C
.Q
O N U �
N -C 7
COm
m " 7 N
(0 L
:01 U
L y� 3
- O 0 a N 0
C m
LO
+
> O G m m N •� >+ ya
� O .C] U C Ui U .>
o
c 3 3 Q
m m o o 0 m
U)
E
O O CO O V M I�
14
� N N
O O r- Ln
O10
LL LL
O
U
!n N
)
�=E �_ NmE
N 3
C m�� A U
N
C Q C
O a) o)
C
N cOn 'a N LXO '6 3: y
E c.3 >=oLL
x 3 E E 3 O
0 LL
d. w Cfl W V Lo - N
O
N m� f� O
C 00
m cu N
O m m
Cfl
O
V N
O O
O 00 Cfl
O m m
V
O
O
O O
O O O (r
u01lenal3

?
:
E
� ^
ƒ
§ �a
F=E ////
LO
z %f\
/Eg!
-@0
2j=
c
)E) % �
C:
Lo
§\/ it{§§
RMn 05
cu
(n
\///}
-
.2
\
}
J
\
f
F g U
22F\
_
:@�-
0)j Qc):
0Co
2335
\ { _E_= %/)/
co
\}\j\ S{/D
: U)
-
)\\// )]§)$
�°9fg �g3o�
'00 /\ada
2
E E
@E
co CL ko/
®E�\g\\a0 >c
LO 2 12 �L 7
�k\ }
kf\ /\=
�
LL
}h=CD;co I- }_--
c C14CN � � c
cu
- o = co
. . . .
.
_
'T C\l o
g $
@
G 8 @
« « $
-
- - uo
mg

Q
E
E ^
ƒ
§ �a
yy\ /z2
R %f\ 0 0
2j= -@2=
Z E
)E0 % c
R§oo
§\/ it{§§
Mn k
R *wa 000m�
tmc=
-2
k }
ƒ
\
/
F g U)
#
22F\®�°
\
& {£
,-6 \ /
2 00
,Im}
_ \ E_= %ate
^ % \}\j\ S{/fj
:�,,
-
)\\// )2 22
09mRg ?\a=
'00
00co
2
= E
/ k y
/ /^a) co �/j
eE @E
@/�&=%±k ko/
0gag\CL-° >Eo
\7
^ -2=
/\\}
��\EE-c-
EX z
}mc>RRm° }LO
C\jC14 � <D
\ c -
tA "
\
\ \ \ \ \
\
p mg

R
E
� ^
ƒ
EE�
R %fS
% /Ego
-@2=
2j= 57!{
)E) % c
'
§\/ 0 t{§§
iE
Lo k
-�
\m§$ )\\\j
/
u 0
LL
ƒ
g
f
F g U)
CO
22F\ 2°
kJ)G
3
,-6& /k /k
2330
2 \ _E_= %/)/
\}\j\ L)C:2
:�,,
-
)\\// )]§)$
0cm-C �ggro
�4w d
\/ /\aa
/
E E
LO
m /^� )
et�® @E
k ko/
®gag\�-° >Eo
\7
° -2=
)0\EE /\\}
Ex z
}=c�mCD }_»+
\CN : C:;
/ \ \ (.0
/ /
•'
\
UOIJeA913

0
0
E
y Q
NLO
LO
E E 2 O
U
O U
w w :2 d O CL
0z N >
N c N
Ln LO 00 0
Mn W
O h co (n (D LO 00
p MCD
U> N M 00 N – O
0-
cu
LO 0
LL
L
U
LE
U
If
`n
O K a
O p
.d
N U) w
0) O w (0 W7 N
L N
D E
-p
O) L L
0
O
C O
p N N N .� M
L Q E L L N OO p O
Lfi "p L11 �
W
fnM
co O G O M N •E >+ m>
O .p L U C U� N
3 3 Q
0 m o o 2 0 m
y
E
O 0 0 LO M V Cl) Co.
MO CO N N S O O � O M
LL LL
LON
N N
N =E
L L N m E
y�
Q L3
C vo)�
p p � nQ._
.N ._ 0) -O -p w 0)
(i L U L 0
O cpn 'p 0) (0 N 'p y O
.3
LO E x 3 E E 3 0> =5 LL
0 LL
w '. W— O Ln O O O� m
` O Mm
c � N �� � O
C N c
(6 (6
m m
O
O O M M
M 00 00
O
O
M O O O
O O M
u01jena13

O
Q0
E
E
—
EE. �z2
E E 2 O
U
O0.
U
ww U d O
O O N >
Nc N
0 E
tt
Mn W
U
(6 D) h I- U (D LO co
U1 N a7 00 U O CD
-_
U N •- O
(6
LL
L
m
O
N
N
O
C
O U) V a
U) L 7
n
(n
N _
a) O w (0 C L N
O (0 L
0
U
L L O 03 C
c•o>� 0� U L
o � m �
(D
L Q E L L N >O O) O
O -O L Y Y > U
00
U)
co -O U C C
O G M (0 N T y6 N
> O
O a L U E Ui U .>
3 3 Q
0 m o O p m
N
E
0ONOO') V M� Lf7
N N O O O M
O
LL LL
(D
N
O
N N
O ,-. 0) co
a) L=E L y`°E
O N 3
M� 0)
N
C Q C
.N O 'O d '6 a N w
7 N
_ _ co
U L C 'O 2 (i L U L 0
U cOn 'O 0) CO 'a'6 y O
E .3 -o
x 3 E E 3- O> LL
0 LL
w M O r (f) M O S -O V A
11') O
(6 (6
m m
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 00
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O 0
0
uoijenal3

2
E
E ^
/
a =^3
$ y E /z2
EE2®
72= /)0
)7/ I7>
? §\/ 0
i5{§§
Mn k
§
\N0 )\\\�
$ ¥��o
§ _ LL
/
. .
)
CD F_
22F\ ~°
0
fu
L)
,-6&
/k/�
_m/c,E o
\
» 0 c/ƒ\\
4
2/222 0C:0-=
:�,,
©
)4\// )]§)»
°9-R �S3o9
\ \%w� /jeer
:
E
'
E
,
2
/�\ �/E
L k@E
o/
®gag\�-° >Eo
@t=C: -7=
§§\EE 72
-r /\\}
a z
}m@gfroh }099
cLo
\&&--C\j
cu
.
co_
-o
»
\ \ \ \ \
\
\
\
,
»p»e

Two individual samples may be entered below. Select sample type for each.
Riffle Surtare
Material Size Range (mm; Count
silt/clay 0 -0.062
100
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 -0-25
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
particle size (mm)
Size (mm)
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 - 6
fine gravel 6 - 8
medium gravel 8 - 11
medium gravel 11 - 16
coarse gravel 16 - 22
coarse gravel 22 - 32
very coarse gravel 32 -45
very coarse gravel 45 - 64
Type
D16 1.5
mean 12.1
silt/clay
0% bedrock 1 %
D35 17
dispersion 11.3
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
large cobble 128 - 180
very large cobble 180 - 256
18%
small boulder 256 -362
small boulder 362 -512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 100
bedrock -------------
clay hardpan
detritus/wood
artificial
total count: 101
,F Note:
Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Cold Springs Reach 1
100%
90
80%
70%
z
60%
50%
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
+cumulative % —# of particles
14
12
10
3
8 m
0
6 m
n
CID
4 N
2
0
0.01 0.1
1 10
100
1000 10000
particle size (mm)
Size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
D16 1.5
mean 12.1
silt/clay
0% bedrock 1 %
D35 17
dispersion 11.3
sand
18%
D50 29
skewness -0.28
gravel
54%
D65 51
cobble
25%
D84 97
boulder
2%
D95 210

Feature Percent of Reach
Riffle % Run
Mftle, Pool, Run, Glide
Pool % Glide
count
QY
Type
-
very fine sand
0.062 - 0.125
0.0
fine sand
0.125 - 0.25
0.9
medium sand
0.25 -0.5
5.9
coarse sand
0.5 - 1
8.4
very coarse sand
1 - 2
5.1
very fine gravel
2 -4
0.8
fine gravel
4 - 6
4.2
fine gravel
6 - 8
2.5
medium gravel
8 - 11
7.6
medium gravel
11 - 16
7.6
coarse gravel
16 - 22
9.2
coarse gravel
22 - 32
9.2
very coarse gravel
32 -45
4.2
very coarse gravel
45 - 64
10.9
small cobble
64 -90
8.4
medium cobble
90 - 128
5.1
large cobble
128 - 180
4.2
very large cobble
180 - 256
1.7
small boulder
256 - 362
1.7
small boulder
362 - 512
0.8
medium boulder
512 - 1024
0.8
large boulder
1024 - 2048
0.0
very large boulder
2048 -4096
0.0
total particle weighted count:
100
bedrock
---------------------
0.0
clay hardpan
0.0
detritus/wood
0.0
total weighted count: 100.0
Weighted pebble count by bed features Cold Springs Reach 1
30% riffle 34% pool 22% run 14% glide
--m-weighted percent -Riffle -Pool --Run -Glide _# of particles
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
50%
C
12
m
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
r�
Mi�lll
0.01 0.1
Size (mm)
D16 1
D35 10
D50 20
D65 40
D84 84
D95 180
1 10 100
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
mean 9.2
dispersion 12.1
skewness -0.24
12%
10% :�
0
4%
CD
2%
v
3
0% fD
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay
1%
sand
20%
gravel
56%
cobble
19%
boulder
30/

Riffle
cobble boulder
Material
Size Range (mm) Count
silt/clay
0 - 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 - 0.125
fine sand
0.125 - 0.25
medium sand
0.25 -0.5
coarse sand
0.5 - 1
very coarse sand
1 - 2
very fine gravel
2 -4
I
fine gravel
4 -6
I
fine gravel
6 - 8
I
medium gravel
8 - 11
I
_
1
medium gravel
11 - 16
0
coarse gravel
16 - 22
coarse gravel
22 - 32
very coarse gravel
32 -45
very coarse gravel
45 - 64
small cobble
64 -90
medium cobble
90 - 128
large cobble
128 - 180
very large cobble
180 - 256
small boulder
256 -362
small boulder
362 -512
medium boulder
512 - 1024
large boulder
1024 - 2048
very large boulder
2048 -4096
total particle count: 35
bedrock
-----
clay hardpan
-------------------
detritus/wood
artificial
total count: 35
Note:
Pool
Material
Size Range (mm) Count
silt/clay
0 - 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 - 0.125
fine sand
0.125 - 0.25
medium sand
0.25 - 0.5
coarse sand
0.5 - 1
very coarse sand
1 - 2
very fine gravel
2 -4
fine gravel
4 - 6
fine gravel
6 -8
medium gravel
8 - 11
medium gravel
11 - 16
coarse gravel
16 - 22
coarse gravel
22 - 32
very coarse gravel
32 -45
very coarse gravel
45 - 64
small cobble
64 - 90
medium cobble
90 - 128
large cobble
128 - 180
very large cobble
180 - 256
small boulder
256 - 362
small boulder
362 -512
medium boulder
512 - 1024
large boulder
1024 - 2048
verylarge boulder
2048 - 4096
total
particle count: 41
bedrock
clay hardpan
---------------------
detritus/wood
artificial
--------------------
total count: 41
Note:
Riffle Cold Springs Reach 1
100%
90%
80%
70%
c
-S 60%
a�
w 50%
40%
Q)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1
Size (mm)
D16 0.78
D35 9.8
D50 15
D65 48
D84 86
D95 170
Pool Cold Springs Reach 1
100%
90%
80%
70%
c
w 60%
w 50%
2 40%
a
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
— cumulative % —# of particles
6
5
4 c
3
Cr
3 0
-o
W
2
N
11 I IIIIIIIIH 10
1 10 100 1000 10000
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
cobble boulder
Type
mean 8.2
silt/clay
0%
dispersion 12.5
sand
23%
skewness -0.18
gravel
51%
cobble
23%
boulder
3%
0.1
Size (mm)
D16 1.2
D35 9.3
D50 18
D65 31
D84 69
D95 250
1 10
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
mean 9.1
dispersion 9.4
skewness -0.22
cumulative % —# of particles
cobble boulder
7
0%
sand
—
gravel
6
cobble
I
I
5
�
5%
3
4 m
o
I
3 �
I
I
CD
2 N
I
_
1
I
0
100 1000 10000
Type
silt/clay
0%
sand
20%
gravel
63%
cobble
12%
boulder
5%

Run
Material Size Range (mm) Count Run Cold Springs Reach 1 -cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 -0.062
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 -0.25 silt/clav sand gravel cobble boulder
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
r
100/
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
90%
very coarse sand 1 - 2
I
7
80%
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 -6
t -
I
I
I
I
I
fine gravel 6 -8
70%
medium gravel 8 - 11
o
. t 60%
medium gravel 11 - 16
coarse gravel 16 - 22
large boulder 1024 -2048
w 50%
coarse gravel 22 -32
c
very coarse gravel 32 -45
2 40%
very coarse gravel 45 -64
a 30%
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
20%
large cobble 128 - 180
very large cobble 180 -256
10%
no/
small boulder 256 -362
3.5
3
2.5
C
3
2 Cr
0
1.5 v
a
m
1
0.5
0
small boulder 362 -512
r
I
I
_I
__I I
I
°0.01
I
I
I
7
100
J�L_L
I
I
P
I
F
I
t -
I
I
I
I
I
3.5
3
2.5
C
3
2 Cr
0
1.5 v
a
m
1
0.5
0
small boulder 362 -512
°0.01
0.1
1 10
100
1000
10000
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 -2048
particle size (mm)
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 26
Size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
bedrock ---------------------
D16 1.3
mean 12.0
silt/clay 0%
clay hardpan
D35 9.5
dispersion 10.2
sand 23%
detritus/wood
D50
19
skewness -0.14
gravel 46%
artificial
D65 53
D84 110
cobble 27%
boulder 4%
total count: 26
D95 230
Note:
Glide
Material Size Range (mm)
Count
Glide Cold Springs Reach 1
+cumulative %
—# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 -0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
100%
siltIcIaV
sand gravel
boulder 4.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
90%
0
80 /o
----
- -
- - - - - - - -
------ - -
I
4
3.5
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 - 6
fine gravel 6- 8
medium gravel 8 - 11
medium gravel 11 - 16
r
70%
60%
3 3
v
2.5 91
coarse gravel 16 -22
w
50%
- - - -
- -
- - - - - - - -
------
°
coarse gravel 22 - 32
very coarse gravel 32 -45
verycoarse ravel 45 -64
0-
40%
309
20%
-
I
I
- 2 a
1.5 -'
m
1
-
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
large cobble 128 - 180
10%
I
- 0.5
very large cobble 180 -256
0%
0
small boulder 256 -362
small boulder 362 -512
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
10000
medium boulder 512 - 1024
particle size (mm)
large boulder 1024 - 2048
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 17
Size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
bedrock
D16 0.91
mean 7.8
silt/clay 6%
clay hardpan
D35
20
dispersion 15.1
sand
12%
detritus/wood
D50
25
skewness -0.37
gravel 65%
artificial ---
D65
32
cobble
18%
total count:
17
D84
67
boulder 0%
D95 130
Note:

11 Two samples may be entered below. Select sample type for each. II
bed Sudpavement �
Sieve &
Sieve Sieve Sample
Size Weight Weight
Retained Passing
on Sieve Sieve
(g)
853
8%
--
---
431
4%
8%
8%
542
5%
4%
12%
699
6%
5%
17%
1214
11%
6%
23%
2514
23%
11%
34%
4628
43%
23%
57%
0
0%
43%
100%
Bed Sub -pavement Cold Springs Reach 1
cumulative % —wt of particles passing sieve
100
90%
80%
70%
m
60
m
- 50
40%
n 30%
20%
10%
0%
5000
4500
4000
3500 F
m
3000
2500
2000-
1500'.
000-1500y
1000
500
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
particle size (mm)
total wt retained in sieves: 10881 Size (mm)
D16 7.2 D65 70 sand 100%
Note:. • . D35 32 D84 92
D50 50 D95 110

1-11
Stream:
Cold Springs Reach 2
Watershed:
Forested
Location:
Harmon Den
Latitude:
35.76528
Longitude:
82.97472
State:
North Carolina
County:
Haywood
Date:
January 17, 2012
Observers:
Grant Ginn, Chris Engle, Megan Mailloux
Channel type:
B4
Drainage area (sq.mi.):
2.64
notes:
---
Dimension bankfull channel
typical
min
max
floodplain: width flood prone area (ft)
43.0
---
---
low bank height (ft)
1.9
---
---
riffle-run: x -area bankfull (sq.ft.)
26.7
---
---
width bankfull (ft)
23.8
---
---
mean depth (ft)
1.12
max depth (ft)
1.6
---
---
hydraulic radius (ft)
1.1
pool: x -area pool (sq.ft.)
26.6
26.6
26.6
width pool (ft)
20.2
20.2
20.2
max depth pool (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.1
hydraulic radius (ft)
1.2
dimensionless ratios: typical
min
max
width depth ratio
21.2
---
---
entrenchment ratio
1.8
---
---
riffle max depth ratio
1.4
---
bank height ratio
1.2
---
---
pool area ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
pool width ratio
0.8
0.8
0.8
pool max depth ratiol
1.9
1.8
1.8
hydraulics: typical
min
max
discharge rate (cfs)l
119.0
channel slope (%)
2.3
riffle -run
min
max
pool
velocity (ft/s)
4.5
---
---
4.5
Froude number
0.75
---
---
0.52
shear stress (lbs/sq.ft.)
1.579
---
---
1.722
shear velocity (ft/s)
0.903
---
---
0.943
stream power (Ib/s)
170.8
---
unit stream power (Ib/ft/s)
7.176
---
---
relative roughness
8.8
---
---
friction factor uV
4.9
---
threshold grain size (t'=0.06) (mm)
76.7
-
-
Shield's parameter
0.119

Pattern
typical
min
max
meander length (ft)
---
---
---
belt width (ft)
41.0
---
---
amplitude (ft)
---
---
---
radius (ft)
34.0
34.0
48.0
arc angle (degrees)
---
---
---
stream length (ft)
---
valley length (ft)
---
---
Sinuosity
Meander Length Ratio
---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
1.7
---
---
Radius Ratio
1.4
1.4
2.0
Profile
typical
min
max
pool -pool spacing (ft)
95.5
---
---
riffle length (ft)
25.0
16.0
27.0
pool length (ft)
28.0
24.0
32.0
run length (ft)
18.0
11.0
26.0
glide length (ft)
10.0
9.0
18.0
channel slope (%)
2.3
riffle slope (%)
2.87
2.78
4.95
pool slope (%)
0.47
0.47
1.27
run slope (%)
4.38
4.04
6.55
glide slope (%)
0.51
0.25
0.72
measured valley slope (%)
valley slope from sinuosity (%)
1.1
0.7
1.1
Riffle Length Ratio
Pool Length Ratio
1.2
1
1.3
Run Length Ratio
0.8
0.5
1.1
Glide Length Ratio
0.4
0.4
0.8
Riffle Slope Ratio
1.2
1.2
2.2
Pool Slope Ratio
0.2
0.2
0.6
Run Slope Ratio
1.9
1.8
2.8
Glide Slope Ratio
0.2
0.1
0.3
Pool Spacing Ratio
4
---
---
Channel Materials
Riffle
Sub
BkF
Surface
Pavement
Channel
D16 (mm)
5.2
---
9.5
7.3
D35 (mm)
23
---
37
22
D50 (mm)
39
---
67
46
D65 (mm)
58
---
86
77
D84 (mm)
120
---
120
160
D95 (mm)
210
---
140
270
mean (mm)
25.0
34.2
dispersion
5.3
4.9
skewness
-0.2
-0.1
Shape Factor
---
% Silt/Clay
0%
---
0%
0%
% Sand
14%
---
100%
11%
% Gravel
55%
---
0%
49%
% Cobble
28%
---
0%
34%
% Boulder
3%
---
0%
6%
% Bedrock
---
% Clay Hardpan
---
% Detritus/Wood
---
% Artificial
---
Largest Mobile (mm)l
152

CD
o
Q
Q
m
+
U
O
O
a
N
co
o
O N
CL
X
—U rn
Q
O)
a
a
V
a O
M O
C
�
7
�
p 1� 1f) V
jp
O
N 00 7
In
C O O
N
O
a
L
m
3
U
�
N
m
p
�
C
N
U N M N W
CD
O
CO
L
Q
O
O
N
t6 O O O O
C N OD OD O
vUpi
{
N 0 N N
co
p
C
U
a
U
Y
C
co
a
I
N CO W M
1
N O N O
p N N OD
t
O O
N
O) N
0 —0 — O
a
Q N
M
O N U� r--
�O
(0O
00rvLO
I- V O N
O_
O
Cl) I-- n 00
-
O N 00 V M �p
r
N N O d O
L N p C N
FE p 2 'o
N C a m
O
LO
M
p) I-- In co m
h I.C7
00 OD OD 00 00 �
r t`
(u) u01;en913

-2
E
� ^ /
a =^3
$ yy/ /z2
%f\
/E00
2j= -@2=
57>
)E0 %
cc:
? §\/ R§oo
it{§§
Mn k
j
��§� k�\\�
g k }
/
)
\
_ o F.
�
U)
m
0
kJ)G
L
,-6&
/k/r
2022
_ ,ao/
}
.
-\ 9 Cr- c/ƒ\\
4
2/222 000-=
/§4j]
»
(4\//
m2c��
E
\/@9@ co\®R
.
-\
ja=aa
/
;
= z
.
-2
� o
@E
@/�&_%±& ko/
®gag\�-° >Eo
C: C.) -7=
LO §§\kk\f\ /\\}
a z
}wCC) Iq}
Ce)�(0_
Co00 00
uco
cli C, \
\
-o
»
\ \ \ \
\
\ \
\
,
»p»e

CD
E
� ^
ƒ
§ �a
/z2
F= E
%f\ 0
2j= —@2=
c S
)E) �%%n
? G/ƒ
2=_ §}277
Mn k
m)/ )jG7/
0
J
0
4
;
$
g = }
)
-R FU)
CO
22F\
0
:@-- )
o
&
23.2)5 §}}/
=E=j o
��
\}\j/ S/ƒ�}
/§4j]
E
CD
\\
%
\\j% )/
\
E E
.
. .
./
CD
/ /F/�\ �/j
@E
@/�&_%±& ko/
®gag) I >Eo
@t=C:=2\7-7=
© c°e(DCO 2
/}f§
E®$EE-c
;
\x K
/ ° Nco CN J t
C.0
C\j ° » C,
cli
\ \
.
..o = _
. . . .
.'
G@+00^@@
§
c=««$@««
®yAl

Two individual samples may be entered below. Select sample type for each.
Riffle Surtare
Material Size Range (mm; Count
silt/clay 0 -0.062
100
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 -0-25
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
particle size (mm)
Size (mm)
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 - 6
fine gravel 6 - 8
medium gravel 8 - 11
medium gravel 11 - 16
coarse gravel 16 - 22
coarse gravel 22 - 32
very coarse gravel 32 -45
very coarse gravel 45 - 64
Type
D16 5.2
mean 25.0
silt/clay
0%
D35 23
dispersion 5.3
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
large cobble 128 - 180
very large cobble 180 - 256
14%
small boulder 256 -362
small boulder 362 -512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 100
bedrock -------------
clay hardpan
detritus/wood
artificial
total count: 100
F—Note:jjjjjjjjr-
Riffle
Surface Pebble Count, Cold Springs Reach 2
+cumulative % —# of particles
100%
90
80%
70%
z
60%
50%
U
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
100
1000
particle size (mm)
Size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
D16 5.2
mean 25.0
silt/clay
0%
D35 23
dispersion 5.3
sand
14%
D50 39
skewness -0.17
gravel
55%
D65 58
cobble
28%
D84 120
boulder
3%
D95 210
16
14
12
10
CID
8 0
m
6
m
4
2
0
10000

Feature Percent of Reach
Riffle % Run
Mftle, Pod, Run, Ode T
Pool % GlideO
count
ar
Type
silt/clay
very fine sand
0.062 - 0.125
0.0
fine sand
0.125 - 0.25
2.8
medium sand
0.25 -0.5
2.8
coarse sand
0.5 - 1
3.8
very coarse sand
1 - 2
1.9
very fine gravel
2 -4
0.0
fine gravel
4 - 6
2.8
fine gravel
6 - 8
2.8
medium gravel
8 - 11
4.7
medium gravel
11 - 16
7.5
coarse gravel
16 - 22
5.6
coarse gravel
22 - 32
9.4
very coarse gravel
32 -45
5.6
very coarse gravel
45 - 64
10.4
small cobble
64 -90
9.3
medium cobble
90 - 128
9.3
large cobble
128 - 180
9.3
very large cobble
180 - 256
6.5
small boulder
256 -362
4.7
small boulder
362 -512
0.9
medium boulder
512 - 1024
0.0
large boulder
1024 - 2048
0.0
very large boulder
2048 -4096
0.0
total particle weighted count:
100
bedrock
---------------------
0.0
clay hardpan
0.0
detritus/wood
0.0
total weighted count: 100.0
Weighted pebble count by bed features Cold Springs Reach 2
38% riffle 22% pool 24% run 16% glide
--m-weighted percent -Riffle -Pool -Run -Glide of particles
100%
90%
CO 70%
60%
c
50% ---- --
c
m
0 40%
d
0.
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1
Size (mm)
D16 7.3
D35 22
D50 46
D65 77
D84 160
D95 270
1 10 100
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
mean 34.2
dispersion 4.9
skewness -0.11
12%
10% :�
0
4%
CD
M
2%
•�m
3
0% m
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay
0%
sand
11%
gravel
49%
cobble
34%
boulder
6%

Riffle
cobble boulder
Material
Size Range (mm) Count
silt/clay
0 - 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 - 0.125
fine sand
0.125 - 0.25
medium sand
0.25 -0.5
coarse sand
0.5 - 1
very coarse sand
1 - 2
very fine gravel
2 -4
fine gravel
4 -6
fine gravel
6 - 8
medium gravel
8 - 11
0
medium gravel
11 - 16
coarse gravel
16 - 22
coarse gravel
22 - 32
very coarse gravel
32 -45
very coarse gravel
45 - 64
small cobble
64 -90
medium cobble
90 - 128
large cobble
128 - 180
very large cobble
180 - 256
boulder
256 - 362
boulder
362 - 512
E-esdboulder
512 - 1024
boulder
1024 - 2048
boulder
2048 -4096
total particle count: 41
bedrock
-----
clay hardpan
-------------------
detritus/wood
artificial
total count: 41
Note:
Pool
Material
Size Range (mm) Count
silt/clay
0 - 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 - 0.125
fine sand
0.125 - 0.25
medium sand
0.25 -0.5
coarse sand
0.5 - 1
very coarse sand
1 - 2
very fine gravel
2 -4
fine gravel
4 - 6
fine gravel
6 - 8
medium gravel
8 - 11
medium gravel
11 - 16
coarse gravel
16 - 22
coarse gravel
22 - 32
very coarse gravel
32 -45
very coarse gravel
45 - 64
small cobble
64 -90
medium cobble
90 - 128
large cobble
128 - 180
very large cobble
180 - 256
boulder
256 - 362
boulder
362 -512
boulder
Evea
512 - 1024
boulder
1024 - 2048
boulder
2048 - 4096
total
particle count: 23
bedrock
clay hardpan
IL—
detritus/wood
artificial
---
total count: 23
N
Riffle Cold Springs Reach 2
100%
90%
80%
70%
c
-S 60%
a�
w 50%
aa) 40%
iu
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1
Size (mm)
D16 4.5
D35 15
D50 43
D65 80
D84 140
D95 250
Pool Cold Springs Reach 2
100%
90%
80%
70%
c
w
60%
w 50%
c
40%
2
a 30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
—,cumulative % —# of particles
ravel cobble boulder 6
-- ----- --- 5
I
4 c
E3
CD
I �
I �
I
2 om
I u,
I
I 1
I
I
0
1 10 100 1000 10000
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
cobble boulder
Type
mean 25.1
silt/clay
0%
dispersion 6.4
sand
15%
skewness -0.19
gravel
44%
cobble
37%
boulder
5%
0.1
Size (mm)
D16 0.93
D35 16
D50 27
D65 48
D84 68
D95 120
1 10
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
mean 8.0
dispersion 15.8
skewness -0.39
cumulative % —# of particles
cobble boulder
6
0%
sand
—
gravel
5
cobble
13%
4 c
4%
3
Q
CD
3
2 N
1
0
100 1000 10000
Type
silt/clay
0%
sand
17%
gravel
65%
cobble
13%
boulder
4%

Run
Material Size Range (mm) Count
Run Cold Springs Reach 2 —cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder
100%
6
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
90%
very coarse sand 1 -2
80%
----------------------
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 -6
1
fine gravel 6 - 8
70%
1
4
medium gravel 8 - 11
cu t 60%
I
3
medium gravel 11 - 16
Cr
coarse gravel 16 -22
w 50%
--------------
---
1
3 0
coarse gravel 22 - 32
c
I
m
very coarse gravel 32 -45
2 40%
I I
verycoarse ravel 45 -64
0.
30%
1
2 m
w
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
20%
I
large cobble 128 - 180
1
very large cobble 180 -256
10%
—
I
small boulder 256 -362
0% 0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 - 512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048
particle size (mm)
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 26
Size (mm) Size Distribution Type
bedrock ---------------------
D16 12 mean 49.0 silt/clay 0%
clay hardpan
D35 33 dispersion 4.9 sand 4%
detritus/wood
D50 90 skewness -0.24 gravel 38%
artificial
D65 140 cobble 54%
D84 200 boulder 4%
total count: 26
D95 250
Note:
Glide
Material Size Range (mm) Count
Glide Cold Springs Reach 2 +cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 -0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
100% silt/claV sand gravel boulder 3.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
90%
— — — —
80%
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
--
3
-
very fine gravel 2 4
fine gravel 4 - 6
fine gravel 6 - 8
70%
2.5
mediumravel 8 - 11
g
L 60%
m
medium gravel 11 - 16
2
coarse gravel 16 -22
w 50% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
------
°
coarse gravel 22 - 321.5
_
1.5
very coarse gravel 32 -45
very coarse gravel 45 - 64
C- 30%
20%
1 m
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
0.5
large cobble 128 - 180
10% -
very large cobble 180 -256
0%
0
small boulder 256 -362
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 - 512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
particle size (mm)
large boulder 1024 - 2048
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 17
Size (mm) Size Distribution Type
bedrock
D16 14 mean 47.3 silt/clay 0%
clay hardpan
D35 25 dispersion 3.4 sand 6%
detritus/wood
D50 49 skewness -0.01 gravel 53%
artificial ---
D65 77 cobble 29%
total count: 17
D84 160 boulder 12%
D95 380
Note:

11 Two samples may be entered below. Select sample type for each. II
bed Sudpavement �
Sieve &
Sieve Sieve Sample
Size Weight Weight
Retained Passing
on Sieve Sieve
(g)
952
6%
--
---
494
3%
6%
6%
713
5%
3%
10%
951
6%
5%
14%
1539
10%
6%
21%
2300
15%
10%
31%
7979
53%
15%
47%
0
0%
53%
100%
Bed Sub -pavement Cold Springs Reach 2
cumulative % —wt of particles passing sieve
100
90
80%
70%
m
60
m
- 50
40%
n 30%
20%
10%
0%
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000 y
2000
1000
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
particle size (mm)
total wt retained in sieves: 14928 Size (mm)
D16 9.5 D65 86 sand 100%
Note: D35 37 D84 120
D50 67 D95 140

Stream:
Cold Springs Creek (Original)
Watershed:
Pigeon River
Location:
Pisgah National Forest,
Harmon Den,
1-40 Exit 7
Latitude:
35.76352
Longitude:
82.97678
State:
North Carolina
County:
Haywood
Date:
October 25,
2007
Observers:
SGG & CME
Channel type:
B4
Drainage area (sq.mi.):
2.77
notes:
---
Dimension
bankfull channel
typical
min
max
floodplain: width flood prone area (ft)
48.0
43.0
52.0
low bank height (ft)
2.1
1.8
2.4
riffle -run: x -area bankfull (sq.ft.)
33.4
33.4
34.6
width bankfull (ft)
24.7
23.4
24.7
mean depth (ft)
1.35
1.3
1.5
max depth (ft)
1.8
1.8
2.2
hydraulic radius (ft)
1.3
pool: x -area pool (sq.ft.)
33.4
30.0
33.4
width pool (ft)
29.6
25.2
29.6
max depth pool (ft)
2.3
2.3
2.3
hydraulic radius (ft)
1.1
dimensionless ratios:
typical
min
max
width depth ratio
18.3
15.8
18.4
entrenchment ratio
1.9
1.7
2.1
riffle max depth ratio
1.3
1.3
1.6
bank height ratio
1.2
1.0
1.3
pool area ratio
1.0
0.9
1.0
pool width ratio
1.2
1.0
1.2
pool max depth ratiol
1.7
1.7
1.7
hydraulics:
typical
min
max
discharge rate (cfs)l
123.0
202.1
218.6
channel slope (%)
2.4
riffle -run
min
max
pool
velocity (ft/s)
3.7
6.1
6.3
3.7
Froude number
0.57
0.94
0.95
0.38
shear stress (lbs/sq.ft.)
1.947
1.920
2.043
1.647
shear velocity (fUs)
1.002
0.995
1.027
0.922
stream power (Ib/s)
184.2
302.7
327.4
unit stream power (Ib/ft/s)
7.458
12.131
13.866
relative roughness
9.2
---
---
friction factor uV
3.7
5.9
6.2
threshold grain size (t'=0.06) (mm)
100.4
94.3
100.4
Shield's parameter
0.128

Pattern
typical
min
max
meander length (ft)
100.0
---
---
belt width (ft)
43.0
---
---
amplitude (ft)
---
---
---
radius (ft)
75.0
44.0
103.0
arc angle (degrees)
---
---
---
stream length (ft)
400.0
valley length (ft)
380.0
Sinuosity
1.1
Meander Length Ratio
4.0
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
1.7
---
---
Radius Ratio
3.0
1.8
4.2
Profile
typical
min
max
pool -pool spacing (ft)
87.0
51.0
113.0
riffle length (ft)
29.0
20.0
40.0
pool length (ft)
18.0
6.0
42.0
run length (ft)
13.0
5.0
34.0
glide length (ft)
11.0
5.0
20.0
channel slope (%)
2.38
riffle slope (%)
2.23
1.54
2.77
pool slope (%)
0.28
0.11
0.4
run slope (%)
5.32
4
7.84
glide slope (%)
0.63
0.44
0.83
measured valley slope (%)
valley slope from sinuosity (%)
2.5
Riffle Length Ratio
1.2
0.8
1.6
Pool Length Ratio
0.7
0.2
1.7
Run Length Ratio
0.5
0.2
1.4
Glide Length Ratio
0.4
0.2
0.8
Riffle Slope Ratio
0.9
0.6
1.2
Pool Slope Ratio
0.1
0
0.2
Run Slope Ratio
2.2
1.7
3.3
Glide Slope Ratio
0.3
0.2
0.3
Pool Spacing Ratio
3.5
2.1
4.6
Channel Materials
Riffle
Point
BkF
Surface
Bar
Channel
D16 (mm)
5.2
---
30
3.3
D35 (mm)
22
---
71
15
D50 (mm)
45
---
79
31
D65 (mm)
75
---
87
62
D84 (mm)
130
---
99
120
D95 (mm)
190
---
110
170
mean (mm)
26.0
19.9
dispersion
5.8
6.6
skewness
-0.2
-0.2
Shape Factor
---
% Silt/Clay
1%
---
0%
2%
% Sand
10%
---
100%
9%
% Gravel
48%
---
0%
53%
% Cobble
41%
---
0%
33%
% Boulder
0%
---
0%
0%
% Bedrock
1%
---
4%
% Clay Hardpan
---
% Detritus/Wood
---
% Artificial
---
Largest Mobile (mm)l
91

O
c°
O
O O
�
a
Q
J
m
X
0
M
+
C
U
l0
N
O
pO
I
F
o
a
o nm
x
O O
O
a
v
X
m n q m
a
o
O CO N N N
C
7
(p O O O O
O
L I N I-- 0 7
O
cm r O O O
�2
N
O
C.
•
0)
L
.3
d
�
_
(p
U
o
O
c
(6 p
C
N
N
V N 7 0
N
n O i
O
C
Y
C v
Cl) 0 0 0
L1
6
C O O) CO
U
o
m v N
(n
07
U
N
C
C
C
N
Q
n
X
O O
a
L
U
(n
4
N N
U
_
Y
X
of
a(6
M
C
N M
N M O
m
O
p c0 I' N
I
O
...
O
N m N M
d
0 0 N O
N
N
m
3
a
O
C
O
CC!
N O O
co
O 7 V
p V O O
N
X
d OD M W N M
O M N N M (D
N N N O O O
O O
a O O
O
L C
O
N p N
U FE O 2
y C O 07
X
O
O
O
1p
Co Or� O M
mr-- O P
O
O O d) d) O O Q7
co co co
(4) UOIJen913

E
E ^
ok_
N
w 77} 0 0
77� j§/a
))7 5»;E
�m%m®
2/§
ee£ ƒ\\\\
; 4
s \g// §\f\f
�c��
} 2
/
E
;
ƒ
_
F g n»s
° a.)
/
X22%
1k
0 k\)
a) LL
\
\/)f §//�
Sao/
f m`
®= c m m
\8522 E/»a]
:
® U) C: , <
U).
a) \]§k{
0
\ E
)
©CNfs LO
CN
7§&�— \/==a
\
E E
# y
_/
k /
m / §
e
=a7_ )
a \\¥�//c /\�
a) a) CD \ t R )
\/\EEl3' LL
5@�LoNaq= ace)
Lo
/7g®&\®\ cto
~
2 m
3§ S
g+
7 G@
.
p

_
E
E ^
k_
o
� //kms
E E CLCD 0
w 7a) j§\a
))7 5»;E
cc
7 § 0
2
ee£ �5§§§
; 4
z \f Cco 2&�
o
} 2
J
-
z ¥
co a) u)
k\)§
ac)
\
\/)f §//�
Sao/
7� r2cmm ;/f(G
§ 0 -0 m C: =
a)
f
\
©
�gCNo@ a$)«=
7gww/=a&
\
=
e
+
r E
% / ¥
y
k /
m / § (D
e ^2E
=a7_
\\¥�//// /\�
EU®§§f\t
-
Rk)j
EEl3'
/;5LL
/A
§///�}3/ §eco)
§n0 &N N
\®eo
:
_
Z @ @ @ $
_ =u!
7
y
?
¥g

s
E
E ^
k_
o
// k rCD«/\
77� j§a
5»;E
.
z))7 �m%m®
27§
ee£ ƒ\\\\
; 4
\$/7 2N -
����
} 2
ID
/
CDmu
00^_2 a)
-
�
e�=�
k�)§
o-== .0
\§)f §aa
j
a moo/
�� f m`
-
n= 5 f t
/8522 E/»a]
f
; � C:
\
a) \]§k{
_
E \
)
�g�gg a$)=�
10 \/=aw
\E
E
C)
/ ¥ y
e ^2f
_
=a7_
\\¥/ /\�
E8®
CD §{\t Rk)j
//\EEl3' LL
ƒ;5
§y w@@=g# §mss#
-4n4�_a�\ -d
NR
.
mCN
.
_ /nom
e�

CD
o
E
E
o �{
.
EE ��»k
,g c 77-2
j ®�
)$ f
-r
@ / § 0 C:
ee£ D-
\g/E \\\\{
a_o
} 2
0
2.2
\
co k / ) §
a) :03+ /
k §Gee
§ %
f
© %/S§
m�/{%
=o::
C \ /2222 S{}1 -
U
(47// \2
=
g
j°hmR
/
�>§ww
\a� ƒ/=a&
2
+
_ _
.2�/j
F�E
2 =±£___ ,E
\F\// /2§
__, Wig=
) % k / R ) / /
E/]EE!=' o>=LL
M E
\V)C\l C \
C=;
.
I co
m m 7@@
m 8
3
,
p
ae

Two individual samples may be entered below. Select sample type for each.
Riffle Surface
Material Size Range (mm) Count
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
Type
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 -0.25
medium sand 0.25 - 0.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
D16 5.2
mean 26.0
very fine gravel 2 - 4
fine gravel 4 - 6
fine gravel 6 - 8
medium gravel 8 - 11
medium gravel 11 - 16
coarse gravel 16 - 22
coarse gravel 22 - 32
very coarse gravel 32 -45
very coarse gravel 45 - 64
1
D35 22
dispersion 5.8
sand
10%
D50 45
skewness -0.20
gravel
48%
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
large cobble 128 - 180
very large cobble 180 - 256
cobble
41%
D84 130
small boulder 256 - 362
small boulder 362 - 512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 100
bedrock ------------
clay hardpan-------------
detritus/wood-------------
artificial
total count: 101
Note:
Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Cold Springs Creek (Original)
-cumulative % -# of partides
100%
90%
80%
m 70%
L
60%
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
particle size (mm)
Size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
D16 5.2
mean 26.0
silt/clay
1
D35 22
dispersion 5.8
sand
10%
D50 45
skewness -0.20
gravel
48%
D65 75
cobble
41%
D84 130
boulder
0%
D95 190
14
12
10
3
8
0
6
m
4 N
2
0
10000
bedrock 1

Feature Percent of Reach
Riffle % Run
RYffR, Pool, Run, GYde 'W
- . Pool% GlideO
Weighted pebble count by bed features
Material Size Range (mm) weighted
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
2.1
very fine sand 0.062 -0.125
0.0
fine sand 0.125 -0-25
0.5
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
3.8
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
3.2
very coarse sand 1 - 2
1.6
very fine gravel 2 - 4
6.8
fine gravel 4 -6
3.8
fine gravel 6 -8
2.1
medium gravel 8 - 11
4.2
medium gravel 11 - 16
8.5
coarse gravel 16 -22
5.4
coarse gravel 22 - 32
9.1
very coarse gravel 32 - 45
5.8
very coarse gravel 45 -64
9.0
small cobble 64 -90
9.6
medium cobble 90 - 128
11.7
large cobble 128 - 180
9.0
very large cobble 180 -256
3.8
small boulder 256 - 362
0.0
small boulder 362 - 512
0.0
medium boulder 512 - 1024
0.0
large boulder 1024 -2048
0.0
very large boulder 2048 -4096
0.0
total particle weighted count:
100
bedrock
3.8
clay hardpan ---------------------
0.0
detritus/wood--------------------
0.0
artificial
0.0
total weighted count:
103.8
Note:
Weighted pebble count by bed features Cold Springs Creek (Original)
29% riffle 29% pool 21 % run 21 % glide
weighted percent - Riffle - Pool -Run -Glide -# of particles
100%
90%
80%
70%
`m 60%
w
U
n
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1
Size (mm)
D16 3.3
D35 15
D50 31
D65 62
D84 120
D95 170
14%
6% o
v
4%
V I I I li I I- r
2%
CD
p
CD
o
0%
1 10 100 1000 10000
particle size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
mean 19.9
silt/clay
2% bedrock 4%
dispersion 6.6
sand
9%
skewness -0.15
gravel
53%
cobble
33%
boulder
0%

Riffle
Material Size Range (mm) Count
Riffle Cold Springs Creek (Original)
cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
medium sand 0.25 - 0.5
silVcla sand ravel cobble boulder
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
100 %
9
very coarse sand 1 - 2
90
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 -6
80%
fine gravel 6 - 8
medium gravel 8 - 11
70%
6 c'
medium gravel 11 - 16
m
60%
Cr
coarse gravel 16 -22
0
5
coarse gravel 22 -32
C 50%
– – – –
– – – – – – – – – –
--------
o
very coarse gravel 32 -45
a� 40%
4
very coarse gravel 45 - 64
2
_a
small cobble 64 -90
30%
3
N
medium cobble 90 - 128
2
large cobble 128 - 180
20%
very large cobble 180 -256
10%
1
small boulder 256 -362
small boulder 362 -512
0% 0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048
particle size (mm)
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 55
Size (mm) Size Distribution Type
bedrock -----
D16 3.9 mean 23.4 silt/clay 4% bedrock 2%
clay hardpan ------ –--- ---------
D35 15 dispersion 7.0 sand 5%
detritus/wood
D50 41 skewness -0.20 gravel 45%
artificial
D65 89 cobble 45%
D84 140 boulder 0%
total count: 56
D95 190
Note:
Pool
Material Size Range (mm) Count
Pool Cold Springs Creek (Original)
cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
medium sand 0.25 - 0.5
silt clav sand gravel cobblie boulder
100%
9
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
90%
– – – – –
– –
-- –
8
very fine gravel 2-4
fine gravel 4 - 6
80%
7
fine gravel 6 - 8
70%
medium gravel 8 - 11
6 na
medium gravel 11 - 16
t.� 60%
j
U
coarse gravel 16 - 22
I
5
coarse gravel 22 -32
w 50%
------------------
--- –
I-
°
very coarse gravel 32 -45
u
4
verycoarse ravel 45 - 64
40°/
C- 300
j
3 N
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
large cobble 128 - 180
20%
2
very large cobble 180 - 256
10 %
I
j
1
small boulder 256 - 362
small boulder 362 -512LJ�W
1
0% 0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048kE�
very large boulder 2048 -40
particle size (mm)
total particle count: 56
Size (mm) Size Distribution Type
bedrock
D16 2.6 mean 14.7 silt/clay 2% bedrock 2%
clay hardpan ---------------------
D35 12 dispersion 6.6 sand 9%
detritus/wood
D50 26 skewness -0.20 gravel 67%
artificial --------------------
D65 43 cobble 21%
D84 83 boulder 0%
total count: 57
D95 120
Note:

Run
Material Size Range (mm) Count
Run Cold Springs Creek (Original) cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
100%
7
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
90%
very coarse sand 1 -2
80%
________________
__________
_
6
very fine gravel 2 -4
fine gravel 4 -6
1
5
fine gravel 6 -8
70%
1
medium gravel 8 - 11
to. 600
3
medium gravel 11 - 16
4 c
coarse gravel 16 -22
w 50%
— — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
----- —
coarse gravel 22 -32
c
I
3 v
very coarse gravel 32 -45
2 40%
f
I
very coarse gravel 45 -64
0. 30%
I
I
I
2
small cobble 64 - 90
medium cobble 90 - 128
20%
I
I
large cobble 128 - 180
I
1
very large cobble 180 - 256
10%
I
small boulder 256 -3620%
0% 0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 - 512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
large boulder 1024 - 2048
particle size (mm)
very large boulder 2048 -40
total particle count: 39
Size (mm) Size Distribution Type
bedrock---------------------
12 mean 41.0 silt/clay 0% bedrock 7%
FD16
clay hardpan
D35 26 dispersion 3.6 sand 7%
detritus/wood
D50 56 skewness -0.13 gravel 43%
artificial
D65 86 cobble 43%
D84 140 boulder 0%
total count: 42
D95 180
Note:
Glide
Material Size Range (mm) Count
Glide Cold Springs Creek (Original) --*—cumulative % —# of particles
silt/clay 0 - 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 -0.125
fine sand 0.125 - 0.25
medium sand 0.25 -0.5
100% sit/claV sand gravel boulder 4.5
coarse sand 0.5 - 1
very coarse sand 1 - 2
90%
80%
—
------ ---
-- — — — — —
4
very fine gravel 2 -4----
fine gravel 4 - 6
I
3.5
fine gravel 6 - 8
70%
—
3
medium gravel 8 - 11
Y 60%
medium gravel 11 - 16
2.5
coarse gravel 16 -22
w 50%
----
----- ---
-- --
o
coarse gravel 22 -32
40%
—
2 a
very coarse gravel 32 -45
1.5
verycoarse ravel 45 - 64
0. 30%
20%
N
1
small cobble 64 -90
medium cobble 90 - 128
large cobble 128 - 180
10%
L
0.5
very large cobble 180 -256
0%
0
small boulder 256 -362
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 -512
medium boulder 512 - 1024
particle size (mm)
large boulder 1024 - 2048
very large boulder 2048 -4096
total particle count: 38
Size (mm) Size Distribution Type
bedrock
D16 1.1 mean 9.9 silt/clay 3% bedrock 5%
clay hardpan ---------------------
D35 11 dispersion 12.0 sand 15%
detritus/wood
D50 22 skewness -0.25 gravel 55%
artificial ---------------------
D65 43 cobble 23%
D84 89 boulder 0%
total count:40
D95 180
Note:

3) Bulk Sample
Sieve Analysis
Two samples may be entered below. Select sample type for each.
Ment ear
-
Point Bar Cold Springs Creek (Original)
cumulative % —wt
of particles passing sieve
Sieve &
Sieve
Sieve
Sample
Retained
Passing
sand
ravel
cobble
Size
Weight
Weight
on Sieve
Sieve
100%
1800
(mm)
(g)
(g)
(g)
90%
— — — — — — —
— — — — — —
— —
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
—
1600
46 2%
--- ---
40 2%
75 4%
2%
2%
2%
4%
80%
70%
1
1
1400
1200
172 9%
4%
8%
260%
1
—
0 0%
9%
17%
1
1000
0 0%
2010
83%
100%
40%
a 30 %
20%
10%
1
1
i 1
� 1
800
600 m
400
200
0%
0.1 1 10 100
particle size (mm)
Size (mm)
0
1000
total wt retained in sieves:
D16
D35
30
71
D65
D84
87
99
sand 100%
Note: • . t
D50
79
D95
110
°nim ear
Point Bar
Cold Springs Creek (Original)
cumulative% —wt of particles passing sieve
Sieve &
Sieve
Sieve
Sample
Retained
Passing
100%
sand
aravel
cobble
2500
Size
Weight
Weight
on Sieve
Sieve
(mm)
(g)
(g)
(g)
90%
80%
-------------
----------------
2000
r'415 0 -- --
607 10%
7%
7%
r
781 13%
10%
17%
70%
i
F
1024 17%
13%
30%60%
r
i
lsoo
2063 34%
17%
47%
:r
1101 18%
34%
82%
so
— — — — — — —
— — — — — —
------------
i
d
0 0%
18%
100%
40%
1000
n 30%
20%
500
10%
0%
0.1
1
10
100
0
1000
particle size (mm)
_IL
total:
5991
Size (mm)
D16
7.4
D65
45
Note:
- -
. •+
D35
19
D84
66
D50
33
D95
82

Photo No. 1
Cold Springs Reach 1 facing upstream 11/2/2011
Photo No. 2
Cold Springs Reach 1 facing upstream 11/2/2011
Cold Springs Reference Reach Photos

` -tell
tir _
y JJ��
L 1 � r ��
r1
�+% •fF, �w _
1
f
� )'
4
5
ll�fl.•
ll
low-
` t
y
` -tell
tir _
{
Kt
� .'¢' P til:+. � `- z' f•.. �, lyyc+_ i. /I'' �
y JJ��
L 1 � r ��
r1
�+% •fF, �w _
f
4
low-
` t
{
Kt
� .'¢' P til:+. � `- z' f•.. �, lyyc+_ i. /I'' �

ITT'
\,Ip
mac.;
P
ems*. dE
.Aw
lib
`
7w,- Iq
zr,
amu+ 4. `9 - � 1 �.i /•\i 1��
y

f 771
, s4 , Y r UM'
a. f w/lf
w' ,.a ts• �� �,-

Photo No. 11
Cold Springs Reach 3 facing downstream 1/17/2012
Cold Springs Reference Reach Photos

APPENDIX D
PROJECT PLAN SHEETS (11"x17")

rt
y1
�ur;�lalx7,m� �
f.
�r�Il7R6?a�lJ�l
��,�in�- f►l�bl �
1.2,333
:u�'vn'N:F.11i
t i, cam
TrR
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SHEET
INDEX
SHEET NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
TITLE SHEET
IA
SITE PLAN
2
TYPICAL SECTIONS
3-313
DETAILS
4-12
PLAN AND PROFILE
P1 -P3
PLANTING PLAN
ECI-EC5
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
XS -I - XS -15
CROSS SECTIONS
20 0
20 60
s.1
PLANS SHEETS 4-9
10 0
10 30
PLANS SHEET 10-12
20 0
20 60
HORIZONTAL PROFILE
2 0
2 6
VERTICAL PROFILE
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC ANIS EXCHANGE
JUNES BRANCH
STREAAIRESTORATIONPROZECT
JUNES BRANCH
JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
A PINAL PLANS 12/12/2012
BREVISION 1 1/25/2013
C REVISION 2 4/16/2013
REVISIONS
PROJECT LENG
PROPOSED RESTORATION:
BUh1GARNER BRANCH
JUNES BRANCH
HIGDON BRANCH
DORIS BRANCH
TOTAL LENGTH
= 1,069 FT
= 1,319 FT
= 422 FT
= 282 FT
= 3,092 FT
Prepared by:
Wolf Cree -
n=a;
EN....E..
W.IFCreek Engineering, Pllc
License No. P-01417
7 Florida An!n-
Woverville. North Carol Ina 28787
Phone: [phone]
.w if—keng—
O
_`rho r t
W
PROJECT ENGINEER
FINAL PLANS
Prepared for:
PROJECT MANAGER
s.1
X38
NC
95027
STREAAIRESTORATIONPROZECT
JUNES BRANCH
JACKSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
A PINAL PLANS 12/12/2012
BREVISION 1 1/25/2013
C REVISION 2 4/16/2013
REVISIONS
PROJECT LENG
PROPOSED RESTORATION:
BUh1GARNER BRANCH
JUNES BRANCH
HIGDON BRANCH
DORIS BRANCH
TOTAL LENGTH
= 1,069 FT
= 1,319 FT
= 422 FT
= 282 FT
= 3,092 FT
Prepared by:
Wolf Cree -
n=a;
EN....E..
W.IFCreek Engineering, Pllc
License No. P-01417
7 Florida An!n-
Woverville. North Carol Ina 28787
Phone: [phone]
.w if—keng—
O
_`rho r t
W
PROJECT ENGINEER
FINAL PLANS
Prepared for:
PROJECT MANAGER

MO
I M0
J_ WO
NO
PROPOSED PERMANENT
STREAM CROSSING (PIPE)
I OVERHEAD PROPOSED AGRICULTURAL GATES
UTILITY 2 ® 8' & 2 ® 10'
\'110 (BY OTHERS)
3 \o
'110
�60' EASEMENT BREAK
Mp
o f
3
0
Mph\
M"p FAbR�1ElY
MO ROAD
eASEU�eNT R0A,.
eO�NnTi A WETLANDS 1\
i
� it '���'?t
[ Av
�'� �z� _
>•- �i'� ° VRt
60 0 60
180
SCALE IN FEET
J
� s
s y
✓
S j
wy
t
1
u{ sir ip
a
-,-
ar;
a
�0°a
r:y Lj
y�r
F
K x• -
�
TEMPORARY TREE
PROTECTION FENCE
\\\ %//Y\\\\\
PROPOSED PERMANENT
STREAM CROSSING (PIPE)
-7-11, Rw
PROPOSED A
FENCE z
(BY OTHERS)
Z
�z
PROPOSED
AGRICULTURAL
GATE — 2 ® 8'
(BY OTHERS)
EXISTING 60"
CMP TO REMAIN
c
M0 �
_SMO
� �
� it '���'?t
[ Av
�'� �z� _
>•- �i'� ° VRt
60 0 60
180
SCALE IN FEET
1110
�f0
�O
O
O
0
Cn
m EXISTING
y WETLANDS 2
z
O
o /
EXISTING 36" & 24"
CMPs TO REMAIN

Wolf Creek Engineering
ENGINEERING G BNVIRONUENTAL CONSULTING
LICENSE NO. P-0417
7 Florida Ave W --ill., NC 28787
PHONE: [phone] WRN.WOLFCREMNG.COM
;RADE
MATERIAL WITHOUT HARVESTED GRAVEL
BANKFULL AT GRADE
BANKFULL BELOW GRADE
DIMENSIONS
BANK NLL AT GRADE
''i'J��pRtM("� TYPICAL SECTIONS
40 - - -
i
0.5
REACH
i
STATION
WBKF
(ft)
`
dRIFF
(ft)
dTOE
(ft)
POOL DIMENSIONS
WIN WDur dP00L
(ft) (ft) (ft)
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 1
1
100+37 TO 107+27
12.9
AS NOTED
� 1053 2
W EN
WBNf
0.88
WBENCH
WBKF
1.65
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 2
®CB
12/12/2012 SH
.7 MqA.
15.1
10.2
NATURAL1N 4:1 MAX
1.21
0.97
-
. Me¢41fa1
-.. l/ffi/zB1s Cl¢ 1 I= me 8017
1 :7
BANKFULL
GROUND
8:1 -
- - _ - BANKFULL - -
NGROUND-
1.6 8
0.85
0.68
2�' J dRIFF d_
4.3
1.28
dRIFF dTOE 25.
�amQ'pyyl
i
300+46 TO 304+22
-
BANK PROTECTION
WTD
0.65
BANK PROTECTION
WTH
BANK PROTECTION
GENERAL
NOTES:
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
400+00 TO 402+82
BANK PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
0.4 1 2 1
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
- 1.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL NECESSARY SUBSURFACE
1.9
W
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
1.09
WBEQ-
POOL -TO -POOL RATIO
2.6 - 4.6
UTILITY INVESTIGATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
2.4 - 4.2
2.0 - 3.5
1.3 - 2.3
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
1.8
-
1.8
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD
1.7
SECTION 1
SECTION 2` ,
_
VERIFICATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS, OBSTRUCTIONS, AND
UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT PROPOSED WORK. CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL RIFFLE
TYPICAL RIFFLE
OF EACH CHANNEL
A DLPROCEEDADOWNSTREAMTHEEUNLESM ENS APPROVED OTHERWISE BYH
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
2.
THE ENGINEER.
ALL. MECHANIZED EQUIPMENT OPERATED IN OR NEAR THE
STREAM OR ITS TRIBUTARIES SHALL BE INSPECTED REGULARLY
-
-
AND MAINTAINED TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF STREAM
OR
SECTION DETAIL FOR
SECTION DETAIL FOR
WATERS FROM FUELS, LUBRICANTS, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS OR OTHER
GRADE
CE
SECTION DETAIL FOR
BANKFULL BELOW GRADE
BANKFULL AT GRADE
TOXIC MATERIALS.
BANKFULL AT GRADE
3.
CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE LIMITED TO THAT WHICH IS
-
NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL
WBENCH
WIN WOUT
WBEKH
WIN WOUT
AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
-
4.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SAFE INGRESS
NATURAL RAND
4:1
EGRESS FROM SITE FOR ALL VEHICLES, INCLUDING BUT NOT
CE THALWEG
,tlgA,
CL THALWEG
LIMITED TO, TRAFFIC ON ADJACENT PUBLIC ROADS AFFECTED BY
10:1
_ _ _ _ _ BANKFULL _
ATUR N
81 _
BANKFULL
- - - - -
-
T UN
5.
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC.
CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS
d7pE dPoOL `y51
,,//
/� 2S/
dTOE dr+ooL ry`'>>
GENERATED BY
ALL FEDERAL,STATE AND TLOCALION CREGULATIONSTIVITIES IN CCORDANCE WITH
J/
6.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRS TO
MNK f'R�TECTI�N
SANK PROTECTION
BANK PROTECTION
BANK PROTECTION
EXISTING FACILITIES FROM DAMAGES OCCURRING AS A RESULT
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3A
OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. -
Wrw, -
7.
THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND
PRACTICES SHALL OCCUR PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
TYPICAL POOL
TYPICAL POOL
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: IN LOCATIONS WHERE MATURE VEGETATION EXISTS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CHANNEL, THE BENCH WIDTH (WBENCH) SHALL BE REDUCED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
TABLE 2A: SUPPLEMENTAL BED MATERIAL WITH HARVESTED GRAVEL
MATERIAL WITHOUT HARVESTED GRAVEL
TABLE 1:
SECTION
DIMENSIONS
DEPTH OF BED
MATERIAL
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 1
40 - - -
60 -
0.5
REACH
TYPICAL
SECTION
STATION
WBKF
(ft)
RIFFLE DIMENSIONS
WEED WTHAL WBENCH
(ft) (ft) (ft)
dRIFF
(ft)
dTOE
(ft)
POOL DIMENSIONS
WIN WDur dP00L
(ft) (ft) (ft)
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 1
1
100+37 TO 107+27
12.9
8.5
2.5 6
1.10
0.88
7.7
6.4
1.65
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 2
1
107+27 TO 112+35
15.1
10.2
3.1 8
1.21
0.97
9.0
7.5
1.82
JUNES BRANCH
2
200+97 TO 215+15
8.7
5.3
1.6 8
0.85
0.68
5.2
4.3
1.28
HIGDON BRANCH
i
300+46 TO 304+22
6.4
3.2
1.0 3
0.65
0.52
3.8
3.2
0.98
DORIS BRANCH
1 1
400+00 TO 402+82
3.6 1
1.3 1
0.4 1 2 1
0.40
0.32
2.3
1.9
1 0.60
NOTE: IN LOCATIONS WHERE MATURE VEGETATION EXISTS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CHANNEL, THE BENCH WIDTH (WBENCH) SHALL BE REDUCED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
TABLE 2A: SUPPLEMENTAL BED MATERIAL WITH HARVESTED GRAVEL
MATERIAL WITHOUT HARVESTED GRAVEL
REACH
PERCENT OF TOTAL MAX
HARVESTED
GRAVEL 1/2° STONE 3/4" STONE 2" STONE
6" STONE 12" STONE
DEPTH OF BED
MATERIAL
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 1
40 - - -
60 -
0.5
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 2
40 - - -
60 -
0.5
JUNES BRANCH
40 - - -
60 -
0.4
HIGDON BRANCH
40 - - -
60 -
0.3
DORIS BRANCH
100 I - 1 - 1 -
1 - 1 -
1 0.3
TABLE 2B: SUPPLEMENTAL BED
MATERIAL WITHOUT HARVESTED GRAVEL
3: MORPHOLOGIC TABLE
REACH
HARVESTEDDEPTH
SAND/CLAY 1/2" STONE
PERCENT OF TOTAL MAX
3/4" STONE 2" STONE
6' STONE 12" STONE
OF BED
MATERIAL
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 1
20 -
- 20
60 -
0.5
BUMGARNER BRANCH - 2
20 -
- 20
60 -
0.5
JUNES BRANCH
20 -
- 20
60 -
0.4
HIGDON BRANCH
20 -
1
- 20
60 -
0.3
DORIS BRANCH
50 -
- 50
- -
0.3
SURVEY:
THE COORDINATE SYSTEM IS THE NADB3(2007) STATE PLANE GRID.
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. BED MATERIAL ON RIFFLE SECTIONS SHALL CONSIST OF BED
MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM EXISTING CHANNEL AND
SUPPLEMENTED WITH MATERIAL ACCORDING TO TABLE 2A
AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. WHERE EXISTING BED
MATERIAL IS NOT PRESENT SUPPLEMENTAL BED MATERIAL
SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO TABLE 2B AND AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
2. THE CHANNEL BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO
THE BANK PROTECTION DETAILS ON SHEET 3A. PRIORITY
SHALL BE GIVEN TO IMPLEMENTATION OF METHOD 1. IF
SUITABLE TRANSPLANT MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE, THEN
METHODS 2 AND 3 SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
3. DIMENSION TOLERANCES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
WIDTH: +/- 0.5 FT
DEPTH: +/- 0.2 FT
RIFFLE ELEVATIONS: +/- 0.1 FT
POOL ELEVATIONS: + 0.1 FT, - 0.5 FT
STRUCTURE ELEVATIONS: +/- 0.1 FT
4. EXISTING CHANNEL INDICATED TO BE FILLED ON PLANS
SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 2 -FOOT LIFTS AND COMPACTED
TO IN-SITU SOIL DENSITY. CHANNEL SHALL BE FREE FROM
BRUSH AND ORGANIC DEBRIS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING.
5. PUMP AROUND OPERATION SHALL BE USED TO DIVERT FLOW
DURING CONSTRUCTION EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY THE
ENGINEER. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE
DRY OR IN ISOLATED REACHES EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY
THE ENGINEER.
TREE SURVEY HARVEST NOTES:
1. WOODY MATERIAL WILL BE HARVESTED ON-SITE FOR USE
AS IN -STREAM STRUCTURES FOR STREAMBANK STABILITY,
GRADE CONTROL AND AQUATIC HABITAT
ENHANCEMENT/RESTORATION. WOODY MATERIAL INCLUDES
BOTH LARGE AND SMALL SIZE DIAMETER TREES INCLUDING
STEM AND ROOT MASS. TREES WILL BE HARVESTED FROM
UPLAND AREAS AS WELL AS ALONG RECONSTRUCTED
STREAM BANKS DURING THE RESTORATION CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS.
2. PREFERRED HARVEST TREES TO BE SELECTED FOR
RESTORATION PURPOSES SHALL FIRST INCLUDE ALL
DISEASED, DAMAGED, HAZARD, AND UNDESIRABLE TREE
SPECIES UNTIL THE QUANTITIES NEEDED FOR STREAM
RESTORATION ARE MET. AREAS SELECTED FOR HARVEST
SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND
DELINEATED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST OR OTHER
PROFESSIONAL ECOLOGIST/BIOLOGIST.
3. ALL WOODY MATERIALS WILL BE STOCKPILED IN THE
APPROVED STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS.
4. IN ALL AREAS WHERE TREES ARE HARVESTED PROPER BMP
AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE
IMPLEMENTED AND THE AREA IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH
TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING/MULCH AS
HARVESTING OCCURS.
TABLE
3: MORPHOLOGIC TABLE
REACH
BUMGARNER
BRANCH 1
BUMGARNER
BRANCH 2
JUNES BRANCH HIGDON BRANCH
DORIS BRANCH
STREAM TYPE
34c
B4c
B4
B4c
B4c
DRAINAGE AREA (mit)
0.69
1.05
0.24
0.08
0.01
W KF(ft)
12.9
15.1
1 8.7
6.4
3.8
XSBKF(fe)
10.6
13.9
5.3
2.8
0.9
dMEAN(ft)
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.2
dMAX(ft)
1.1
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.4
SAVG (ft/ft)
0.024
0.015
0.025
0.016
0.019
SVALLFYft/ft)
D.023
0.015
0.028
0.022
0.022
W/D RATIO
15.6
16.4
14.1
14.5
16.6
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO
6.5
5.5
3.5
3
5.5
SINUOSITY
1.08
1.11
1.08
1.09
1.06
POOL -TO -POOL RATIO
2.6 - 4.6
2.7 - 4.7
2.4 - 4.2
2.0 - 3.5
1.3 - 2.3
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
1.8
2.5
1.8
1.7
1.7
SURVEY:
THE COORDINATE SYSTEM IS THE NADB3(2007) STATE PLANE GRID.
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. BED MATERIAL ON RIFFLE SECTIONS SHALL CONSIST OF BED
MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM EXISTING CHANNEL AND
SUPPLEMENTED WITH MATERIAL ACCORDING TO TABLE 2A
AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. WHERE EXISTING BED
MATERIAL IS NOT PRESENT SUPPLEMENTAL BED MATERIAL
SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO TABLE 2B AND AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
2. THE CHANNEL BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO
THE BANK PROTECTION DETAILS ON SHEET 3A. PRIORITY
SHALL BE GIVEN TO IMPLEMENTATION OF METHOD 1. IF
SUITABLE TRANSPLANT MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE, THEN
METHODS 2 AND 3 SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
3. DIMENSION TOLERANCES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
WIDTH: +/- 0.5 FT
DEPTH: +/- 0.2 FT
RIFFLE ELEVATIONS: +/- 0.1 FT
POOL ELEVATIONS: + 0.1 FT, - 0.5 FT
STRUCTURE ELEVATIONS: +/- 0.1 FT
4. EXISTING CHANNEL INDICATED TO BE FILLED ON PLANS
SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 2 -FOOT LIFTS AND COMPACTED
TO IN-SITU SOIL DENSITY. CHANNEL SHALL BE FREE FROM
BRUSH AND ORGANIC DEBRIS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING.
5. PUMP AROUND OPERATION SHALL BE USED TO DIVERT FLOW
DURING CONSTRUCTION EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY THE
ENGINEER. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE
DRY OR IN ISOLATED REACHES EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY
THE ENGINEER.
TREE SURVEY HARVEST NOTES:
1. WOODY MATERIAL WILL BE HARVESTED ON-SITE FOR USE
AS IN -STREAM STRUCTURES FOR STREAMBANK STABILITY,
GRADE CONTROL AND AQUATIC HABITAT
ENHANCEMENT/RESTORATION. WOODY MATERIAL INCLUDES
BOTH LARGE AND SMALL SIZE DIAMETER TREES INCLUDING
STEM AND ROOT MASS. TREES WILL BE HARVESTED FROM
UPLAND AREAS AS WELL AS ALONG RECONSTRUCTED
STREAM BANKS DURING THE RESTORATION CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS.
2. PREFERRED HARVEST TREES TO BE SELECTED FOR
RESTORATION PURPOSES SHALL FIRST INCLUDE ALL
DISEASED, DAMAGED, HAZARD, AND UNDESIRABLE TREE
SPECIES UNTIL THE QUANTITIES NEEDED FOR STREAM
RESTORATION ARE MET. AREAS SELECTED FOR HARVEST
SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND
DELINEATED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST OR OTHER
PROFESSIONAL ECOLOGIST/BIOLOGIST.
3. ALL WOODY MATERIALS WILL BE STOCKPILED IN THE
APPROVED STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS.
4. IN ALL AREAS WHERE TREES ARE HARVESTED PROPER BMP
AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE
IMPLEMENTED AND THE AREA IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH
TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING/MULCH AS
HARVESTING OCCURS.

BURY END OF LOG VANE INTO
CHANNEL BANK (SEE TABLE FOR X
MIN DIMENSION "X")
BURY END OF LOG VANE INTO FOOTE 20•LOG
CHANNEL BED (SEE TABLE FOR •I. FILTE �jp A% S ANCHOR ROCKS
MIN DIMENSION "X� FABRIC A
SEE TABLE FOR NOTE: TOTAL LOG LENGTH INCLUDES THE ROOTBALL
°
LOG DIMENSIONS
S RUCT RE INVERT AND STA I ATION
(GRADE PT. ELEV) TABLE 5: LOG DIAMETERS
ER (IN) MAX DIAMETER (IN)
< 20 12 18
20-40 18 24
40-60 24 30
TABLE 4:
STRUCTURE
DIMENSIONS
NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR MIN ROCK DIMENSIONS
LOG VANE W/ HOOK
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
1/2 BANKFULL WIDTH
o
a
4
o
BACKFILL 0
SEE NOTE 1 m
REACH
L
(�)
STRUCTURES
W
(FT)
X
(FT)
BOULDERS
LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
(FT) (FT) (FT)
TOTAL LOG
LENGTH (FT)
BUMGARNER BRANCH 1
14
4
5
2.5-3.5 2.0-2.5 1.5-2.0
24
BUMGARNER BRANCH 2
16
5
5
2.5-3.5 2A-2.5 1.5-2.0
26
JUNES BRANCH
8
3
3
2.0-3.0 1.5-2.D 1.0-1.5
14
HIGDON BRANCH
5
2
3
2.0-3.0 1.5-2.0 1.0-1.5
11
DORIS BRANCH
2
1
3
2.0-3.0 1.5-2.0 1.0-1.5
8
TOTAL LOG LENGTH (FT) MIN DIAMETER
Wolf geek Engil
NOTES: RNGDIR2RING & lOiVIRONt16NTA1
1. STRUCTURE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST Of ����pQ'SN"' j•� ��4 7 Peoria. Ave]CSN9R No. P--: v
6' STONE, 2" STONE AND SOIL MIXED IN EQUAL a �� • � p]i0N2: (Oza) e38 -3e49 1nnr.
PARTS. WHERE EXISTING BED MATERIAL IS JUNES BRANCH RESTORATTON F
AVAILABLE AND OF SUFFICIENT SIZE IT MAY BE 05 c � ENVIRONMENTAL BANC AND EX1
USED IN PLACE OF QUARRY STONE, AS APPROVED =
BY THE ENGINEER. Q••' �� ""'
2. ALL VOIDS AND GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL ' ✓��g� �IN�' �;
DETAILS
BE CHINKED WITH STONE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION . ij��]//pH��►`�J
OF FILTER FABRIC. ///IRttt\✓nG.'� ""' As NOTEDcY6
12/12I20
/ STRUCTURE INVERT
BURY END OF LOG ✓ / (GRADE PT. ELEV) NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR BOULDER DIMENSIONS
VANE INTO CHANNEL
BED(SEETABLE FOR LOG SILL CL <_ 8')
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
SECURE FABRIC
TO HEADER LOG
F
w
i`
it
,�
0
1/2 BANKFULL WIDTH
NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR MIN ROCK DIMENSIONS
LOG VANE W/ HOOK
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
1/2 BANKFULL WIDTH
o
a
4
o
BACKFILL 0
SEE NOTE 1 m
Z_ FILTER FABRIC I
� S
/
12 e+'SGC
1/26/2019 dH 1 611lU
FILTER FABRIC
SET HEADER BACK
-
BACKFlLL
FlR'.
- -
SEE NOTE 1.
FOOTER ROCK
0.2'
FIRST HOOK ROCK SET
HEADER
CHINKED WITH BRUSH
`•
0.2' ABOVE GRADE PT.
AND STONE
/ov$,
FOOTER ROCK TYP
( )
STRUCTURE SHALL BE
STRUCTURE INVERT
AND STA LOCATION
HEADER ROCK
Q
CONSTRUCTED WITH BAFFLE
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
(GRADE PT. ELEV
GRADE SET F
-
¢
ELEVAT ON
NOT TO SCALE
FLOW _
- DROOF P
f-►
-F
GRADE AT CENTER OF BAFFLE
SHALL BE SET 0.2' ABOVE
�qg
oo •'
DOWNSTREAM HEAD -OF -RIFFLE
SLppE
" ��q LEVATION.
20
O
�
1
NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR MIN ROCK DIMENSIONS
HOOK RUN
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
ANCHOR ROCKS
BACKFILL
SEE NOTE 1
r /
45'-5 '
BURY END OF LOG
/A
VANE INTO CHANNEL
BANK (SEE TABLE
FOR 'X' MIN)
FLOW
FLOW
/
FOOTER -1
inr.
1�°S e^-.. A
STRUCTURE STA LOCATION
/ STRUCTURE INVERT
BURY END OF LOG ✓ / (GRADE PT. ELEV) NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR BOULDER DIMENSIONS
VANE INTO CHANNEL
BED(SEETABLE FOR LOG SILL CL <_ 8')
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
SECURE FABRIC
TO HEADER LOG
F
-
-FLOW
SEE NOTE 1
12 e+'SGC
1/26/2019 dH 1 611lU
FILTER FABRIC
SET HEADER BACK
ILTER FABRIC
1/2 BANKFULL WIDTH 1/2 BANKFULL WIDTH �
o
o �
4 a
� o
O
o Q
? FILTER FABRIC- w
/ o
/
FILTER FABRIC
J �.•`J
�
HOOK ROCK SET � o �ds °
30VE GRADE PT. STRUCTURE SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITH BAFFLE � B FOOTER ROCK (ttP)
TRUCTURE INVERT
INVERT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
NO STA LOCATION -j\ � FLOW _
;RADE PT. ELEV
GRADE SET FOR
'LOWS -, Jai Of ELEVATION -
DROP /
/
GRADE AT CENTER OF BAFFLE
$
� SHALL BE SET 0.2' ABOVE
! ? DOWNSTREAM HEAD -OF -RIFFLE °
`��` 3,4 ELEVATION.
SEEKNOTE 1
)
FOOTER ROCK (TYP} STRUCTURE INVERT
AND STA NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR MIN ROCK DIMENSIONS
LOCATION
_ (GRADE PT. ELEV)
NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR MIN ROCK DIMENSIONS
HOOK -LOG RUN BOULDER ARCH
PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW
NOT To SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
GRADE OF LOG
+ 0.2 ABOVE SET 0.2' ABOVE
ANCHOR ROCKS
BACKFILL STRUCTURE INVERT DOWNSTREAM HEAD -OF -RIFFLE
SEE NOTE 1 FILTER FABRIC ELEVATION
/ 9u
45-5 '
/ BURY END OF LOG
/A VANE INTO CHANNEL
BANK (SEE /
TABLE
/ FOR 'X' MIN)
FLOW � 3
FOOTE
LOG .�O STRUCTURE STA LOCATION as ANCHOR ROCK
N
FILTER
FIC
STRUCTURE INVERT
AND STA LOCATION \ \ \
/ STRUCTURE INVERT (GRADE Pi. ELEV) \ \ \
BURY END OF LOG
VANE INTO CHANNEL ✓ (GRADE PT. ELEV) NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR BOULDER DIMENSIONS FOOTER ROCK (ttP)
NOTE: SEE TABLE FOR MIN ROCK DIMENSIONS
BED (SEE TABLE FOR
LOG SILL - NO BAFFLE (L < 8')
BACKFILL
SEE NOTE 1
GRADE POINT ELEVATION
FILTER FABRIC
SET HEADER BACK
-
BACKFlLL
1/3 TO 1/2 DW OF
- -
SEE NOTE 1.
FOOTER ROCK
VOIDS SHALL BE
_.
HEADER
CHINKED WITH BRUSH
`•
LOG
AND STONE
CHANNEL BED FOOTER LOG
HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
SECTION A -A
SECTION B -B
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
FOOTER LOG
- + 0.2 ABOVE
PLAN VIEW STRUCTURE INVERT
NOT TO SCALE BOULDER ARCH W/ LOG
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE

TRANSPLANTED SOD MAT
FROM ON–SITE SOURCE
z
m
0
BED MATERIAL SHALL BE wo
INSTALLED PRIOR TO SOD
MATTING OF BANKS
SEED AND STRAW BARE
SOIL ACCORDING TO
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
.—BANKFULL BENCH
._.:/
METHOD 1 OR
METHOD 3 BANK
BANKFULL BOULDER
PROTECTION
2"X2"X24" HARDWOOD BENCH
WBED
STAKES AS REQUIRED
BANKFULL
BANK PROTECTION - METHOD 1=
BACKFILL
SOD MATTING -
BANK PROTECTION
NOT TO SCALE —
BASEFLOW
1/2 OF ROOTWAD
TO BE SET
B
BELOW BASEFLOW
z
m
2' (MIN)
BENCH
LIVE CUTTINGS
ROOTWAD
COIR FIBER ao
MATTING .-
BANK PROTECTION–
BANKFULL
SECTION
ZI
SEE BANK PROTECTION BACKFILL<:
BENCH
NOT TO SCALE
TOE MATTING INTO CHANNEL -
BED BY INSTALLING BED
MATERIAL AFTER INSTALLATION
OF MATTING
BED MATERIAL
SEED AND STRAW
2"X2"X18" HARDWOOD
TOPSOIL AND SOD STAKES ON 2' CENTERS
SALVAGED FROM SITE
NOTCHED
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
2"X2"X18" HARDWOOD
STAKES ON 2' CENTERS
BANK PROTECTION - METHOD 2
SOD AND MAT
NOT TO SCALE
2' (MIN)y
0
COIR FIBER MATTING
WITH BURLAP BACKING
NOTCHED ANCHORS
ON 3' CENTERS
BRUSH TOE OR ROOTWAD
ACCORDING TO PLANS
'-- 2"X2"X18" HARDWOOD
STAKES ON 2' CENTERS
BANK PROTECTION - METHOD 3
NOT TO SCALE
BANKFULL
BENCH
HARDWOOD
iN 2' CENTERS
I �– ac�.ywac
F 6V.
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STP 4
/BANKFULL WILLOW POSTS BRUSH FILL LIVE CUTTINGS. -SOD TRANSPLANTS
BENCH
BANKFi
/
BENCH
POOL
POOL EXCAVATED
TO BOTTOM OF
BRUSH TOE
i
3" TO 4" DIA. WILLOW
POSTS ON APPROX. 2'
CENTERS AT TOE OF
SLOPE BRUSH FILL ALIGNED WITH
CHANNEL BANK AND SOIL
ADDED TO FILL IN VOIDS LIVE CUTTINGS SET
PERPENDICULAR TO
CHANNEL
BRUSH TOE
PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
SOD TRANSPLANTS
CO SOIL LIFTS
CONSTRUCTED TO
/ANKFULL BENCH
3' (MIN) Z
NOTE: LIVE CUTTINGS SHALL
3" TO 4" WILLOW POSTS BE 4' LONG, Y" DIA
SILKY DOGWOOD OR
SILKY WILLOW.
BRUSH TOE
SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED GRADE
-
WBED
BANK PROTECTION
WTHAI /
(SEE DETAILS)
B
BANKFULL BANKFULL
BENCH
NCH
BENCH
LIVE CUTTINGS
MINIMUM DEPTH BED MATERIAL–
AS SPECIFIED
BANK PROTECTION–
TOP Of BRUSH
�2" ABOVE LOW WATER
BOTTOM OF
SEE SHEET 2, CHANNEL
SEE BANK PROTECTION BACKFILL<:
SUBGRADE
IN TABLE 2A
CONSTRUCTION NOTE 1
DETAILS AND CHANNEL
o
AND 2B
AND TABLE 2A AND 26
CONSTRUCTION NOTE 2
o � 1.5' (MIN)
BED MATERIAL DETAIL
BRUSH FILL
NOT TO SCALE
WITH SOIL
3' (MIN) Z
NOTE: LIVE CUTTINGS SHALL
3" TO 4" WILLOW POSTS BE 4' LONG, Y" DIA
SILKY DOGWOOD OR
SILKY WILLOW.
BRUSH TOE
SECTION
NOT TO SCALE

--i I—O.D. OF PIPE
PERMANENT CROSSING (PIPE)
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
[--3' (MIN) /
PIPE SIZE, TYPE AND
NUMBER AS INDICATED
ON PLAN SHEETS
PROPOSED CHANNEL
1- (MIN) PIPE INVERT ELEVATION TO BE
SET AS INDICATED ON PLAN SHEETS
PERMANENT CROSSING (IPE)
ELEVATION C -C
NOT TO SCALE
6" AGGREGATE
18" MINBASE COURSE PIPE SIZE, TYPE AND
—►I I--O.D. OF PIPE �CDVER � NUMBER AS INDICATED
I I (MIN) ON PIAN SHEETS
APPROVED BACKFILL) "�•
OR SELECT BACKFILL I
MATERIAL 2' (MIN)
4" (MIN) LOOSELY PLACED APPROVED
SUITABLE LOCAL MATERIAL OR SELECT
MATERIAL FOR PIPE FOUNDATION. (TYP)
PERMANENT CROSSING (PIPE)
SECTION D -D
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED CMP
GROUND
4'
TOP OF DITC
TOE OF DITC
TOE OF DITC
TOP OF DITC
2" STONE (TYP)
LASS B RIPRAP)
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION - PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
1.2 x %,
4'
NATURAL GROUND
12" STONE (TYP) 24" (MIN)
(CLASS B RIPRAP) til
2.� VARIES
FILTER FABRIC
BACKFILL
MATERIAL
EXISTING DITCH
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION - SECTION E -E
NOT TO SCALE
F
ARMORED RIFFLE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
RIPRAP
BED "MATERIAL
dw COIR FIBER
dmF � MATTING TO BE
PLACED PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OF
BED MATERIAL
18" DEPTH SECTION F -F
NOT TO SCALE
6" AGGREGATE'
US� r;
'°°'dT
BASE COURSE
_ _
]UNES BRANCH RESTORATION PR07ECT
12" STONE (TYP)
'088898 Tom`
^� ENVIRONMENTAL HANC AND EXCHANGE
12" (MIN)
(CLASS B RIPRAP)
••.„ pv`�
'
,ola �.
pg111111
DETAILS
PIPE SIZE, TYPE AND
1 �\ 201
anu AS NOTEDnyiMFoo
NUMBER AS INDICATED
\ \
wt< 12/12/2012 Rscc 1053
ON PLAN SHEETS
_
-------------------
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
..
1/16/Ypl cut 1 ABYRR® Emm COI rom
ONE (TYP)
PIPE FOUNDATION
PROPOSED CHANNEL
PROPOSED
B RIPRAP)
FILTER FABRIC (TYP) MATERIAL
BED THROUGH PIPE
CHANNEL BED
PERMANENT CROSSING
(PIPE)
NOTES:
SIZE, TYPE ANDSECTION
-
1. ARMORED RIFFLE BED MATERIAL SHALL BE
3ER AS INDICATED
-
-
COMPOSED OF MATERIAL IN THE FOLLOWING
'LAN SHEETS
NOT TO SCALE
-
PROPORTIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
MATERIAL % BY VOLUME
12-IN STONE 60
2-IN STONE 30
-
ONSITE SOIL 10
PIPE SIZE, TYPE AND
NUMBER AS INDICATED
ON PLAN SHEETS
PROPOSED CHANNEL
1- (MIN) PIPE INVERT ELEVATION TO BE
SET AS INDICATED ON PLAN SHEETS
PERMANENT CROSSING (IPE)
ELEVATION C -C
NOT TO SCALE
6" AGGREGATE
18" MINBASE COURSE PIPE SIZE, TYPE AND
—►I I--O.D. OF PIPE �CDVER � NUMBER AS INDICATED
I I (MIN) ON PIAN SHEETS
APPROVED BACKFILL) "�•
OR SELECT BACKFILL I
MATERIAL 2' (MIN)
4" (MIN) LOOSELY PLACED APPROVED
SUITABLE LOCAL MATERIAL OR SELECT
MATERIAL FOR PIPE FOUNDATION. (TYP)
PERMANENT CROSSING (PIPE)
SECTION D -D
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED CMP
GROUND
4'
TOP OF DITC
TOE OF DITC
TOE OF DITC
TOP OF DITC
2" STONE (TYP)
LASS B RIPRAP)
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION - PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
1.2 x %,
4'
NATURAL GROUND
12" STONE (TYP) 24" (MIN)
(CLASS B RIPRAP) til
2.� VARIES
FILTER FABRIC
BACKFILL
MATERIAL
EXISTING DITCH
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION - SECTION E -E
NOT TO SCALE
F
ARMORED RIFFLE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
RIPRAP
BED "MATERIAL
dw COIR FIBER
dmF � MATTING TO BE
PLACED PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OF
BED MATERIAL
18" DEPTH SECTION F -F
NOT TO SCALE

2163
2160
2155
2150
2145
r
O \ O
�+
O i
r i /0
le—
FENCE FROM WITHIN
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE—CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
BEGIN CONSTRUCTIOP
BUMGARNER BRANCH
STA 100+37
EXISTING FENCE
vx TO REMAIN O
+
=PROPOSED FENCE N
(BY OTHERS) O
><
/r
T REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
FROM WITHIN EASEMENT
EXISTING
BUMGARNER
/ O / O
O O
% O PROPOSED PERMANENT O
/ STREAM CROSSING WITH
1 ® 32' X 60" CMP &
PROPOSED 2 ® 8' 2 ® 32' X 24' CMP
AGRICULTURAL GATES
(BY OTHERS) '
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
P I ROPOSED OUTLET EXISTING 60' CM;"
PROTECTION TO P&4AL
\ ! /BUMGARNER
BRANCH r,•{'
PROPOSED 2 ® 10'
x
AGRICULTURAL GATES
C NSERVATIO x (BY OTHERS)
_^7
C11
x S ( cli CONSERVATION
0_9/ IOI N O /
-01O X
\,\
O W
�2— PROPOSED 2 ®8'_
l r N l� M AGRICULTURAL GATES N
(BY OTHERSww
N ri w
O O
W �orn (O
oa o a `�
1 1 l 0 1 0 \0 p�, �m p
= In 0 rn = N = to 20 0 20 60 0 O H
SCALE IN FEET = In =
IIIA II
I .I
OSI I Nip
CJ SO-.-
±U.)I
ONI
+aj
LO
ID
IIS
fnW
LEGEND
Q
W
�jI
0
i OLV
I +p..l
00
N
-
I
�
W,
1¢_
RIFFLE
—-x--
EXISTING
:
FENCE
U)
TREE
IIIA II
I .I
OSI I Nip
CJ SO-.-
±U.)I
fn W
NIW
Wol Creek Engineering
ENGINEERING k ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
LICENSE N0. P-0417
7 Florida Ave 1/eaveMlle, NO 28787
PHONE: [phone]/R1f.AOLFCREBBBNG.COM
JUNES BRANCH RESTORATION PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC AND EXCHANGE
PLAN & PROFILE
. . s9G 1053 4
>
3[REAY CROSSING
LO
ID
IIS
fnW
LEGEND
Q
W
-_,+Ln
ONI
_ I
RESTORATION
N
W
I
>
fn W
NIW
Wol Creek Engineering
ENGINEERING k ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
LICENSE N0. P-0417
7 Florida Ave 1/eaveMlle, NO 28787
PHONE: [phone]/R1f.AOLFCREBBBNG.COM
JUNES BRANCH RESTORATION PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC AND EXCHANGE
PLAN & PROFILE
. . s9G 1053 4
moo»
3[REAY CROSSING
ALIGNMENT, CROSSING k STRUCTURES
LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
PROPOSED
STREAM
RESTORATION
®
CUT
®
FILL
PROPOSED
ARMORED
RIFFLE
—-x--
EXISTING
FENCE
TREE
�
..._,,
. _-
L
_I l
PROPOSED ANENT
OSSNSREAM CR
PROPOSED 60" CMP
oINLET INV EL 2151.02
Go OUTLET INV EL 2150.40
m
O- cli [CP4
M�ON
N OEXISTING TERRAC
[V DN
Mei
I
X.fiIIISr
TI;NG'B
80 I I _otI
.-.�IW. .p+
E+
EDNN I
-1III 2-
_—..
JL1L
IIl
II�,
.
I,II
I
-
-1:jL:II
II
_
_-
-_.
-
2nw ¢ 1ao o ao N EXISTING 60" CMP
w 6 INV EL 2147.4
1
+ Io - ^M�
o tPROPOSED 6ANKFULL + ON
V) w 0 wPROPOSED GRADE •�-I�
PROPOSED BED 2
ii I
CO.
t
PROPOSED RIPRAP 1 -
t
A
07 S A'i 10+ 6.2I 10+4 2
163
1
160 1
155 1
150 1
145 1i
1
OvTvv I v I Tuu I ucTuu ► uo+uu 1 U4'*UU l Uo+UU
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUMGARNER B RANCH
Mei
80 I I _otI
.-.�IW. .p+
E+
EDNN I
-1III 2-
_—..
JL1L
IIl
II�,
.
I,II
I
-
-1:jL:II
II
_
_-
-_.
-
2nw ¢ 1ao o ao N EXISTING 60" CMP
w 6 INV EL 2147.4
1
+ Io - ^M�
o tPROPOSED 6ANKFULL + ON
V) w 0 wPROPOSED GRADE •�-I�
PROPOSED BED 2
ii I
CO.
t
PROPOSED RIPRAP 1 -
t
A
07 S A'i 10+ 6.2I 10+4 2
163
1
160 1
155 1
150 1
145 1i
1
OvTvv I v I Tuu I ucTuu ► uo+uu 1 U4'*UU l Uo+UU
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUMGARNER B RANCH
163
1
160 1
155 1
150 1
145 1i
1
OvTvv I v I Tuu I ucTuu ► uo+uu 1 U4'*UU l Uo+UU
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUMGARNER B RANCH

2153
2150
2145
2140
2135
• �'iiii�►�i�0� `` �a►♦♦®iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii°ilio ' �� ���+�iiiiiiiiiiiiiii°i°iioi�'
LICENSE NO. P-0417
.iii. ® �\�♦llelllllsl +ll/l/llllll,. ..;
A.iiiiii ����.-a>o `�oiiioioioiiQ:isiii i�. ����` •.o�o�oioioioioioiii
PHONE:
,•0) 658-3649 ' ' ,
All♦ `� �.:��®oicQiiiiiii' 'as�1►iiii � ♦ :.
• .• •A�iliAe AA' ++ ��.AiOzillQiiOD101il • lilll'lii�i',i+°•�i'►i0
� � � � / � �♦ll�, ♦�„��Cilii iOiiiii'v� ,�'� +.• • 1.
♦�iiA ♦♦ � ` ! t.OsieiiGl ' llliilOQiililiii�i'� �/I!��, _ •
LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
� 1 ♦li/tiiiliii•.
.• - �1+Al101i/09i1O1�0
lAi/Illi
• • ♦lull •
:• .• ��� ♦All♦ � �
�a .� „• _��.�.�.i�®�.... /�'•. �!���1�� ® Imo. _ ! _ _� �`.`�..�
•
�
�•,� fla�Cl''i•����� PROPOSED�I r�1a�_�����='��r'• ,,�/may i.
,
STREAM
RESTORATION
�e��' . • .I' irllilioi♦lio♦l:.se►li?elei...��4>.-_-..l♦�--
lli�lil 111/lil llllliliilEsli' •il: i s �i®�G>`� 2=;=1a b O�i�`l'l'��lill:101OOlIIO� 1 1 CUT
1
Illi` �lCllli�llilllililllllll/►Ill/lilt/llllll�ll�i���liil/ll.lsl�� l lllllllilliiC� ►�l�l��
!till. �� ♦`. ♦lilii.0illilil� . lllii:�ll-ii°d►lll/ Qllllli♦
FILL
• i�� �e \� i l�lil�iil�l�l�l�liGiOiililil i� Olil�l�l�l�l�lmli101�lal�l�lil�Q�� lolilO�i"� �' ��
PROPOSED
•� III I _ �-•°`'': ® _ � .' ����'�ARMORED
RIFFLE
-
EXISTING
FENCE
TREE
^. ;ice •
- • ' • ✓/®
2153
2150
2145
2140
2135
10a*uu -lun+uu lui+uu 108+00 i09+00 llu+uu
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUM GARNER B RANCH
I
EXISTING
60” CMP
1.98q
I
�
F-
J
W
:
_.
I
L
I
I
-
INV EL
2146.6-
- -
EXISTING
,.
TERRAE
TERRACE'
^
-J._._.�.
-L_
—
'
!
�I
o,�
':.>00
Co
_il....
'I t I
ed
II.
tn�
o a
i
I_
I
�.. _.
eo c"
r
N':
I
-
— _
��•—
I
__..
'�iiw
QJ
-
I ,_
pNi
-,-I..
t
O4-.
M�
-
0+)
-
- -
NN
I
f!!
il.
t
Ip pQw
'---i
-
-
'.._
Nj
p.N.rn +a
O U)—'
-.
O
-
I
I
-
._a'
�
f- J
rl
ON
a0.'.._-
M
I
__!-
I
'_. _'I
..•,
,._.
_: I
_v>_
OD
�:_ -I-
..o
Q
C,4
co
+
a
.• ..I
EXISTING
BED
C,4
-
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
_ 1
CO
.:
>
LC
Lr)
V1 W
L
PROPOSED RIPRAP
d
I
I
I
I
---
to w
U)
W
..
Ni
N d'
O
I
PROPOSED GRADE
I
I
I
I
PN R
-_.' -"__•
-_ ____..
`_ -_.-
_.: -'I- --.
n
L
noI
r
rn
i
759,
-�
I
_._;.
__I 8 ...
��-�I��
'
�¢�
---
m
I I
•
I
I ...
-'
_:
I
�I_
I
+
..>'•
'
`n�;
',
r:
_
'.
'�, 1
i
I
,L_I
;. i
,
I
_..
-,
I
I �.
� -
,
cn,
I
I :
_
O
p
I
"
(A�_
I
,
:
I
_ -
!
I.
I
_..I
I
I
I
,
i
I
cn.
I
o
I
ImI
o
L
S
T�
A:- 109+,86i
1
I
-
,
:
1
i
I
I I
I
r
rfn
2153
2150
2145
2140
2135
10a*uu -lun+uu lui+uu 108+00 i09+00 llu+uu
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUM GARNER B RANCH
I
1.98q
I
�
F-
J
W
I
^
—
!
�I
':.>00
Co
_il....
'I t I
ed
II.
tn�
o a
i
I_
I
�.. _.
eo c"
r
N':
I
-
— _
��•—
I
__..
'�iiw
QJ
-
I ,_
pNi
-,-I..
t
O4-.
M�
-
0+)
-
- -
NN
I
f!!
il.
t
Ip pQw
'---i
-
-
'.._
-.
-
I
��
-
._a'
�
f- J
rl
ON
a0.'.._-
M
I
__!-
I
'_. _'I
..•,
,._.
_: I
_v>_
OD
..
!
C,4
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
CO
J--...—
V1 W
L
PROPOSED RIPRAP
d
I
I
I
I
---
to w
I
PROPOSED GRADE
I
I
I
I
PN R
n
L
noI
r
rn
i
759,
I
m
I I
•
I
I
+
o
ao l
:
:
cn,
I
_
O
p
I
"
I
,
:
I
_ -
!
I.
I
_..I
I
I
I
i
I
cn.
o
I
ImI
o
L
S
T�
A:- 109+,86i
1
I
-
,
1
I
r
rfn
2153
2150
2145
2140
2135
10a*uu -lun+uu lui+uu 108+00 i09+00 llu+uu
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUM GARNER B RANCH

2148
2140
2135
2130
BEFORE YOU DIG! '
CALL 1-600-632-4949'
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
20 0 20 60
SCALE IN FEET
Wolf Creek Engineering
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
LICENSE NO. P-0417
7 FI -id. A- Weeverville, NC 28787
PRONE: [phone] WWW.WOLFCRBEKENG.COM
�°!NFt"' t; 1.$
I�1"' -,1p�\
PLAN & PROFILE
tw. w
erau AS NOTED;'5
12/12/2012 — -' a SGG 1053 �6
4/]8/19 CME 2
PROFILE LABELS
-
LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
PROPOSED
-
STREAM
RESTORATION
® CUT
I
® FILL
PROPOSED
ARMORED
RIFFLE
--x--- EXISTING
FENCE
{
`
=gam TREE
-
-;
-
:
I
-!
{
`
I
-
r
I
i_1
I
�
I
''I
II11
i
�
I
l
II
II
IT
—
-_
I
�
II
{i
I
II
I1II
I�.
I
I I
,I';II;
;;
I
II
iIII
;
i
S I
I
IiI
II,I
I I
I;
II
I
I
10
:
I
1
I
EXISTING TERRACE
�
��
I�
I
I
�
I
_
I
I '.
I
I
r
a
mLo
EXISTING BED
I
�._�•<<!_.
759'
j
N
WS
yJ
I
I.
In
w
PROPOSED BAN
-1
In wl
PROPOSED
I
I
�L,
�
I
I
I
I
I
+f
-
I
a
-,
!
-,
_L01
' ;-
.. !
..
STA.
111+86.,2
SIA:.
112+02.9
I
I I
�
I
I
I
I
I
,
110+00
2148
2145
2140
2135
2130
111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4' BUM GARNER B RAN C H

2183
1pi1�E 111
2175
2170
2165
0
0
\ 0
N
P\RJ
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION'
— '-- JUNES BRANCH is
STA 200+97
OVERHEAD o \
/UTILITY
N J N
W \ Ww
M d U (D
_06 06 w N
+ +
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949 N to N o N
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER ___.__—_.>--- oo F co ¢ ¢
IT'S THE LAW! J cn v~i m
Wolf&eek Engineering
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
LICENSE NO. P-0417
;.PHONE: [phone] WWW.WOLPCREEKENG.COM
PLAN & PROFILEe.
i"�"' �i��' �� \� ♦ f .--. - -t1/III/1111Ni�
%�ir�'a� \;_� � �� �C \Y,.. `� �� •�� � �-jI1/j111111-A�I�I��I/IIIIIAIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIj�j11\ I i
► �/ �� 's � ♦AAc,� � � ���''.. �-�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIA
%r e,i�i A�G�iJ1�•1A�11A11�1�►Q►111��11\ �`` � � "�� G'I�'i''I�'�I�I�I�A�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�A�I�I�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1� ,
.•.001/ >A�1111�111♦\I/•. ��,'.�T ��� �rpw LIIIIIAIIIIIIIIII/IIG11111.�
>..E1:lrO.1o�1/11A111A11.1,►1.\M_� "ica � ���"�Cp� ��I/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiA1111111111GG111111111�
OsO.I.A1U111111�111hN11A.. • �� � O� �, •
►G`♦IU1/.111111...•a•./A1o11A11:��4'•O I �-•�IIIAIA11111011�•.
LOCATION KEY
/ � 1111111 11��•' ��•� �IIII��II/I/II�f�� `_� �� ®� �' � �,• � I I / I I I O.ea s. � �i!'I
►1 11�►11/11/ 111 ►1111f ♦ ������'
A♦ 1111 ♦ ft • • ! � ♦ o�----. �r�
►� �' Ii1n1000i�i�00i��iii�� $'�`.LEGEND
X11110111♦ 6'i/� �.�., Zffi
' X1111111 \r 1 5����� Ir`� ��Q./- y/'►1111/1� /S; W—\
' • ��IA1' I1111111111`� �s� �!. ! ��w � _� �'' `•`>* ��I�►III/IIIIIIIi�1 � �\
• . • • ��f 11111 `...�....,�\♦�, 'I ® �111A1►I 111 O I I \
11111 �.�'.�� \Sr i� �.����.�•r PROPOSED
STREAM
RESTORATION
A�111 � 111/Aj11111j \-a..
�11A1A 11111 '-�� .. •CUT
FILL
/1 11111
��� 11111111
I/IA•� / �i
PROPOSED
ARMORED
RIFFLE
FENCE
• • •EXISTING
TREE
• • • • • -
200+00
201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4'
2178
2175
2170
PAM -1I
2160
JUNES BRANCH
I
N
+
O
n
t
+ n
A
u 1I
-I
I
I
I
..-. _
I I
I
I
�
_I
I
r
tC)
I II
I
�
I
I
I
I
I I
i
I
P_I
-
N
N
-
�r
,
la.l
f/1
4J
In
Q
}
�
I M I�
�a
�I
:orb
N
cV
.- Q
Q
;-
N
N.
+
¢ :.
N
Kj M
-. _..
M
..
200+00
201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4'
2178
2175
2170
PAM -1I
2160
JUNES BRANCH
I
N
+
O
n
t
+ n
A
-I
I
I
..-. _
I I
I
I
�
I
M
O
C
H_
r
tC)
O
I
�
I
I
I
I
I I
i
¢�,,
N
N
-
�r
f/1
4J
In
Q
�I
�a
�I
:orb
N
Q
N
N.
+
¢ :.
N
Kj M
-. _..
M
..
yy:
.O
c1li'
N :,. 1011l
O pp
.
.-.--I---_
';..
,.
I._.. _ ._.J.
1 �.__
I._`
c
O%
,I:
_.,
I':._
'_-E-
-I
IJ1
:..,.:.N
-. O
-N
., -.+.
...
N�r7
NN
�.
I ,i-t�
I
d0
In ...
M
--�__
_. N....I
+r'�
I N.-
:0�
__...
, _
��__i
_
I...
QG.1
USW
..,
_ -._ I,,
QW
F -.J
V)
�j _. �7.I_..
NNII
W >>
}gyp --__-N
shy
N..
ON f
+[moo
d.•-_ _
�N.,..
+t�D ....
�O!, _.
f ni
-_.
-._..'..-
--..
:.
2:00%
I
_I._
_.-?�O
�I
N'-...:
to
N
�%
D,
'LJ__
F -JI
:.-''._SWI
•r -.
ON
M
Vim.
ON...
I"�
U),i-.._+
.�r..
N
?
L.
2 b�%
_.:_
i__-...
.N
I
._.'...
____•
+Il.._N
N
r
..
..
::..
_2.
'I.
_..
..
I, ._
Q
F.---.
-_..__
:
�.
ON..-..-I'.,-F.
I
(V
O)
_..
_
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
i
_ _.
Ni
_ O
N _.
O
N �n
w_
2.
GD%
:.
n
u~i w !
¢ �� , _
_ >>_
_ N N o
! N
N
a
_
EXISTING
TERRACE
N
N W
Q W
I_ {
PROPOSED G RADE!__.
.:.
_..
I
_. I:_
I
'N
I _-
:. ._
--
i I
PROPOSED BED
M
I
--N
M'.
M
}
_
0
I %
I
fn
F
J
w
M
N
t
I
Z.
0
to
w-
F-
tow
J
I
I
I
I
o%
Icli
a
-
'
•0
2.009,
-
ISI
O
a
.II
..
oll
i
-
!
-.. _.
...-
...
j
..
M
-. O
_-
I
.:
¢
I NN
_,. ..
M f7.,
__:
!
j
I...
F•
N
O
NIt
�-
+
EXISTING
BED
_
1/a
-j.
N
, , I
I
I
No
C,4
i. I
(V
Q
-
o
-�
9 611;
Al
200+00
201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4'
2178
2175
2170
PAM -1I
2160
JUNES BRANCH

2173
2170
2165
2160
2155
Wolf Creek Engineering
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
[phone] WWVf.WOLFCREEKENG.COM• •LICENSE NO. P-01417
04,18 Weaverville, NC 28787
vw
�.
cr+
.c•��101100111010010•.
•. ..��A90/101010/0001011011e.
..��0i0A111010001G'101010010110� :.
..s:�1�1101104A11111101110/11111/1111♦ �.. ��0
..'•�11G•111111111�v111111111111111111111/11. � ___
.v�1011♦i10100/011110000011010110011100011010.
1111110'11111111111A1111111A111/11111111A1/111�
.��00101001i00000000/100100001010000110111100100001♦
..�11A111111A111111111111111111111111111111111A111111�♦
100001000101/111000110110101001101110110001011000111111♦
♦11/0/110111/1111111111111111111/0001011101111/111/10h010
♦010A11101110111111111111/111111/0000000010001101000010100
i1110001011110011001111111101010100111111000001011110100001
' • 11�------ 11�1�1�♦���•►.�.1�1�1�1�1�1�®�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�11♦' 10-1-1�1♦1♦11�1�1�1�110,♦�1�1�1�1�1�11�
�\ • i�1111111ry01111111111101111111111111111GA��1/1111111111111111®A11111111111111��1 �•'■��•;�0�0A��11111111111�♦11111
♦� /1111111111111/1111�1i1111111111/1111♦111 I���'��i� �.111111111� '�
. �1�1�1�1�1�0�1�1�1�1�1�0�1�1�1�1�1�Qh�1�1�1�1�1�1®1�0�0� �11♦0♦0�0A1i� �•.�. �A!�j,;���.� • � � ` 111 A 1! :�
• 100010/000100011101110;1�A+% 1�a� r`- w0!r�,•. ®�•.rs %i _ •
MV -4-0 1100.x:
1 � . 010101111111♦e0a1101A1m13h♦1�1�w:r ��. � ^ � "ice � ►,moi � ,i �'.� Siay/�.� ��p\ �
��✓�I�• s�.�9��i.,��/.;I�i �� ��00
�� �. Ora.♦-�rC�J.���sS�;�l������0�� ����tp,���`�: r.,..
�:•• ire.— �i' _i�e�G'®_/go
��0� ♦1111111011 ��'('�►00101•10e A�O��, 1�:® (��LEGEND
♦1001/1 1'i�►10111101♦ . •
�1♦ 1011 X10001/000\>101� �'-�'\,���f
♦01♦1010101
14♦0110010 _ _��1�x�/►11/01110011011110110001101���011,?1111C1�101101�1.O1cAG 0?1s
PROPOSED
_SSTREAM
11��♦1�� o �0A1A®01011 1110001?OSi�>0000A0:'�Oo? c ��Q��a����//���'�' �o ��
♦ • •' v p♦•
� � ' • . �0�1�001� � � " L11�1.0:1:1.�,1.1:0:0.1:0A0:0@ea�.+:��. ��' ® � �RESTORATION
CUT
\ ♦11�5� 01.♦A.0♦111/011�•91C��������
FILL
PROPOSED
ARMORED
RIFFLE
EXISTING
FENCE
TREE
• �i 1/111�0� 1111111011��'�:� �!1♦�110111j�10A01As:0': � 1C ' :.y��ss � 0
�♦100011001 011♦10101011 1/1011/1�� � ���♦5/11•100`�00Ap`�` 10. = '��Sr'd� ��1�1��
� 1s11��0�� 1�1�1�1�111� 11G1�1�11111014 11/11A�1�•1�� f ��1♦®e1�10J��1
�•1�1♦�11/1� 11010/1A010 01011111010 10•1�� i ��� �i
s • • • � ♦_ ��1�1-1�0. • �1�1♦11i�1�1 • 11111041101�� �
.� _..
•' • 1
•. a .. .. .. .. ..
I
00
I
°DI N
I
In
+
I
: I
to W. N
I
it
i,
I
1
r
..!O°/ I...
I..
.N
04°
II
tD
00
�a0:.,
I
...I.....
I
N
I
_
2. Q Q '
a2i
-..
N
N
o_
+.
co
__
1
.'..
2 Otl%
.,
F...
00 _.....N
v~w
:
_
r�ICOT
'
n'
t
D
M
^
^
tnwi
N..
a_�J�..I
04
I rn�
pcv
-
EXISTING
oN
TERRACE
1
{
_....
i
-
NI
0)
+
PROPOSED GRADE
i
N'.
al
p N
1I
I
_ !
N>
N -.. I
In
PROPOSED BED
r
pC0'.,
1
-
..__
Q
o
-I-
'__..
1. i
-,_I
L
I
:Cry
ST
IYO
_
{
i-
I
Q
J -
>•,
NN
{
I
I
._.
I
I l
I !
I
I
T I
--...I
WI H-Wi
�
�J;
uO
I+t0+00
L�q
.a+-
...
I�,;
_
._�-.,!:�_._.
.,`,r.-.-
�.____._-�' ..
__..'1
I
I
.-.
--
-
..I�
_. F:•
I'.OONd
_NW7
0aON
�
._.
_
INN,
'
__-_
._q_.
.I.-._ __.-.___
_.
.
(7
4i:
WJ:
+
M
_. rN•
I
_ ? MN
+ __�I'
_-
--_: ___. _f.'! .
00
.-
°..-_
21.QQ::.
..
I
._.._.
.NIQNj.I
N
LLJ
N
p_+.
p
ppDD
N
_.___.
i .
._.,.
fq
N
.C�=O�
O+
M to CD ri
.__.'-_.. :.�W .!..yG:� .. �.__MM -I' _-.I.-- - ._i_. -...:_--I .>. _I..N _.-0.- !-_;} I__tD� (0 M_ .... i. -. 7
QO%--N N N r J "_ 1 N N op h�IID '.'.-M..-.,I..--i- -_F-.._ .. --O ._.W�+�009,cilw. .-', a w!- N.. o' MMu�� Nw1 Q�� NNoOn.....p N ^IN _ i.. : O
- 1 k t- J N. I._ ..._ -.
C
I r
v
op. o1011,
t
NWS....
°DI N
I
In
+
°D n
to W. N
O N
>
r
f -:I-
210
..!O°/ I...
I..
.N
04°
_.+ O_
tD
00
�a0:.,
...I.....
t_.._,
N
.._
_
2. Q Q '
a2i
-..
N
N
o_
+.
co
__
1
.'..
2 Otl%
.,
F...
00 _.....N
v~w
r�ICOT
'
^
^
tnwi
N..
a_�J�..I
04
I rn�
pcv
-
EXISTING
oN
TERRACE
1
{
_....
i
-
NI
0)
+
PROPOSED GRADE
i
N'.
al
p N
1I
I
_ !
N -.. I
PROPOSED BED
Q
o
-I-
-;
L
I
:Cry
ST
'A:207+991
_
{
i-
I
TA'•- 207+96.
r
{
I
I
I
I
I l
I !
I
I
T I
C
I r
v
op. o1011,
t
Q_
NWS....
°DI N
I
In
+
°D n
f -:I-
..!O°/ I...
I..
.N
W.I.
dW..
ONN+N
00
�a0:.,
...I.....
t_.._,
.._
2.00%
a2i
oN
+
o_
CC
1
v~w
^
^
tnwi
N..
a_�J�..I
PROPOSED BANKFULL
I rn�
pcv
-
EXISTING
oN
TERRACE
1
Q_
°DI N
I
In
+
°D n
EXISTING BED
00
CC
^
^
PROPOSED BANKFULL
N
oN
1
-
_.. _`�
+
PROPOSED GRADE
..
F
269+96
I
_ !
PROPOSED BED
-I-
-;
-
ST
'A:207+991
i-
TA'•- 207+96.
205+00 206+00 207+00 208+00 209+00 210+00
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1" = 40' VERTICAL:1" = 4'
2168
2165
2160
2155
2150
JUNES BRANCH

00411 4.1
2155
2150
2145
U
O
C')
O
PROPOSED
JUNES
, ,r
O
N i
N
EXISTING
WETLANDS
w \ w
PROPOSED
TEMPORARY TREE
PROTECTION FENCE
EXISTING
JUNES BRANCH
Lo
I /
04
0 1 It 00
LO of ao _ -- -- 3 W --- -� 3 w
cj
x x w w
OR 4
cq
- ----o vii — :m vri-'.__."__in C14
m 1~A-
_ -- SCALE IN FEET
ST EAM
Wolf Creek Engineering
Of Q O -------Q M—__._
�(00'----'�____
'YOU
®
0
BEFOREU DIG!
o c I J N
U) N---- -
CALL 1-800-632-4949-----
o
—__--
-
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER- \ _
o
IT'S THE LAW!
PLAN & PROFILE
d
, ,r
O
N i
N
EXISTING
WETLANDS
w \ w
PROPOSED
TEMPORARY TREE
PROTECTION FENCE
EXISTING
JUNES BRANCH
Lo
I /
04
0 1 It 00
LO of ao _ -- -- 3 W --- -� 3 w
cj
x x w w
OR 4
cq
- ----o vii — :m vri-'.__."__in C14
m 1~A-
_ -- SCALE IN FEET
I EXISTING
3 REMOVE APPROX 20' OF
EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
�\
O\
NO. O
�..
\ o
oa\ a��.ov\o� o�
J N N �J N J N -! N
\\ , _ _ _ _
\ e 3 w w�3 W\ \\,3 w_.�3 w
O O- \ w cd \� OR N\ V 01
5 Q GNi OI Q VO'� Q n� Q O
ck:w 'r J d' w \ sr \' w U)
N O N O N � p N4 g N
O< O 1¢- =OO H O r
m 0 J (n m N \gym N.� �\\ m 1n
LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
-.• A
ST EAM
Wolf Creek Engineering
RESTORATION
``11111rllll j�
``�� ,, 0
:O,• • '
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
LICENSE NO. P-0417
7 F7oride Ave eeev Ule, NC 28787
®
0
rj =—JUNES
PHONE: (828) ON -9840 1RIIf.NOLRCREEEEN6.COM
BRANCH RESTORATION PROJECT
RIFFLE
--%-----
^� ENVIRONMENTAL BANC AND EXCHANGE
+
595 C� `
PLAN & PROFILE
d
•,, ,``�cia�';
N
ERI11Mj/f�j \
^� AS NOTED 01td1. m eme
V
�+� 12/12/2012 ®- w SGG 1053 9
123/131 CYE I I
I STREAM CROSSING
I EXISTING
3 REMOVE APPROX 20' OF
EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
�\
O\
NO. O
�..
\ o
oa\ a��.ov\o� o�
J N N �J N J N -! N
\\ , _ _ _ _
\ e 3 w w�3 W\ \\,3 w_.�3 w
O O- \ w cd \� OR N\ V 01
5 Q GNi OI Q VO'� Q n� Q O
ck:w 'r J d' w \ sr \' w U)
N O N O N � p N4 g N
O< O 1¢- =OO H O r
m 0 J (n m N \gym N.� �\\ m 1n
LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
-.• A
2140 I I I rA: 21 +12.Is
5 A: 214+
210+00
211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00 215+00
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4'
2158 1
2155 I
2150 1
2145 1
2140 1
JUNES BRANCH
ST EAM
RESTORATION
®
CUT
®
FILL
PROPOSED
ARMORED
RIFFLE
--%-----
EXISTING
FENCE
TREE
2140 I I I rA: 21 +12.Is
5 A: 214+
210+00
211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00 215+00
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4'
2158 1
2155 I
2150 1
2145 1
2140 1
JUNES BRANCH
i
M
.__-
-N ..
_
+u)
f�z
r7N
LO
-..
+
1n
000
I
�....
I
.,I
Lt
..
•-.71')M
T
!
CO
MO)
,.__: �_.
.._
.I.
_. _
.....
....: ...I
.!. _....
...i
_..,
-
._
_.
7
__
i
,- - -
,I
._
: - I
....
_I.. :'...
W
I--
-j
p
.-�
;'OSI
+u)
Lr)
04
i
�I
°_.
1
_0
._
.Lp-
Iy>>L�]];._
o.j..
-.CV
'..
:.
_
04
_
� N '.-
N
�
cV
_^
'!•
_.
�
f00_
_
-
! ti
__:_.I-
:I
li
-
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
I
I.__.'._
-'�
- 009,•
_!-.
!
.:_..
.....:.....
_..
US
..__.
W
F
(!l
_dl
Q
-
y..
W
J_
-d �,
%-!
N
N ..
rnl
_.t d'
_,_...
`� d
,N�
_. _:___.._
_. _'_.._
,- - !
_
__.:
I _
-
_.,: _!
.I - I
EXISTING DRIVEWAY
.. _i...
_
_
_
i.,.
U)
Lu
:Fa -:J
..
+�.
'00-
!.
I..
�._-....
I
I
-NW
:.tn
W -I--
-Q
J- ..
_..�N'
"N-.
- :
..-:
o�o
_
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CMP j -
_.
t6 O
�_
539
_,. '
�J
+a'
_
-
PROPOSED' 60" CMP
I
_+U
! ',
.
-,
1.5
9
, -'-._
-
r
_: N
�,
o
a ^
INLET INV EL 2143.19
i
.
I
w
m
OUTLET INV EL 2142.73
t
W
64
�..
I.. ..
.:.__�_
IQ- rn00
+
.___
I:. N.
n
+.
o
f
_
M
�_
r
_.-:;_
!
1..
;.
^ :.
3 109 I�
.i ....:
•
-V)
N
N
N
':......
n N
+ U I N aO-
O
_l%)..
! N :
_, ._.
I+
o
0I
O._+
-
O._'.
M
"
v -
lnW
J ._
Q
__
_•�-�
t
_..1
d CAS
M r .. . '_+
m c) o r .
OI-
-;
PROPOSED BANKFULL
_
I..
N
M.;.+
:+I
�..
O :_.
...
tf+
��.
`-
IO .-
_ .-K�._•-d':
X00 00
I.
PROPOS
Q
rn
a
-r1
-'r -
N
N- :
+
rn
r1;
r�
-
:
¢�,_.
nw �'
C-4 'd, ami +">
N N' <r
o
N
ED GRADE[
DE
J.-
v1,
�Q-!
i -
.:_
Q ¢
_��cv _--;
o°
��.-
_ _
__ .
__
_ _ ¢
_ :, �_ ..
l N
PROPOSED BED
......_U1.,
i-
_ --
- ---
u~i w rQ ¢ W
�r
N a
c i
---
..
+
coMi
I -
0.9 e..
�_`y`
_,.In W -.-h' W ..
,.. N N.--
>
�+
0
.......
N an
_
_
N LL
_
Ul
r
f
i
I..�
i1q,��.
a
-
2.00 _
Ola1
I
--I_
-'
''-
0
EXISTIN
G BED,
:
.....
_ _:
_
04
l
w
_
N'
2,
�:
STA: 213 99
STAN 2h4+0
I_
2•
LIZ
PROPOSED
WATER
I ___.
!- ,
I -
1-
,_.STA
214+23.9-
- r
_;_ ..
I
-'-SURFACE ELEVATION ,
- 1--r
l
; .
_
_ ;
_.:
S
A..21.4+2�.5
BUMGARNER BRANCH
i
L
r
:
i.
STAN
213+03.
'I,
._ __
STA:
21
+63
.,PROPOSED RIPRAP .5TA._27.4+50.8_
!
E
ECFV.
2144:2
ELEYi
21
4:23,STA
T 214+17
!
STA.
2,1
4+84 2
;-
� I
2140 I I I rA: 21 +12.Is
5 A: 214+
210+00
211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00 215+00
FULL SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2' HALF SIZE PLAN - HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 40' VERTICAL:1 " = 4'
2158 1
2155 I
2150 1
2145 1
2140 1
JUNES BRANCH

214
8142.5
II1
IICGG�I1
P137.5
2135
PROPOSED DORIS I I
BRANCH
SEE SHEET 12
PROPOSED
HIGDON
BRANCH
PROPOSED
% BUMGARNER
BRANCH
SEE SHEET 6
\ LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
PROPOSED
EXISTING HIGDON rn STREAM
/ RESTORATION
XBRANCH
of w ® CUT
W /
0 n w ::2 w n o n s � ® FILL
J J
J N N N N N
3 w w w g w + j PROPOSED
0 0
w o ARMORED
ro z 1n z O) "� r �' RIFFLE
af GO Q I M_ I ¢ co O
w M _� + _� M+'1- -� M m cn / / i ---x--- EXISTING
W
0 0 0 0- /, FENCE
M!n M M 10 0 10 30 /
m v~i i'� In N.. m v~i f SCALE IN FEET / TREE
,.
Wolf Creek Engineering
CA1/0��
CONBULTINC
H•1GIN�8NG�E g+INO.
O •'
r'•�
1-0411
7 FloHde Ave W—ervDle• NC 28787
I
PHONE: [phone] WWW.WOLFCREEKENG.COM
:
R01�]UNES BRANCH RESTORATION PROJECT
sts c
w:
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC AND EXCHANGE
PLAN & PROFILE
S
: •3 '
AS NOTED "u
I
I
r,. 12/12/2012 ®. er scc 1053 11
- -
1/25/13 cv8 1
n�naov
ARMORED RUTUS
PROPOSED DORIS I I
BRANCH
SEE SHEET 12
PROPOSED
HIGDON
BRANCH
PROPOSED
% BUMGARNER
BRANCH
SEE SHEET 6
\ LOCATION KEY
LEGEND
PROPOSED
EXISTING HIGDON rn STREAM
/ RESTORATION
XBRANCH
of w ® CUT
W /
0 n w ::2 w n o n s � ® FILL
J J
J N N N N N
3 w w w g w + j PROPOSED
0 0
w o ARMORED
ro z 1n z O) "� r �' RIFFLE
af GO Q I M_ I ¢ co O
w M _� + _� M+'1- -� M m cn / / i ---x--- EXISTING
W
0 0 0 0- /, FENCE
M!n M M 10 0 10 30 /
m v~i i'� In N.. m v~i f SCALE IN FEET / TREE
,.
— —
¢
I
O
¢ M
I
to
I
I
:
I I
O
N
S
: •3 '
I
I
I
URF
S ACE ELEVATION
M
f
M
I
r
O
I
,
PRO
vV) .-
r>
!I
BUMGARNER BRANCH
I
�'-
r
a
n
0 0
M M
r
BAN
II
-
rn
I
r0� O'
}
}-
J
10
W
I
:�J
L.
M..__
i_-_
j
: III
-
t -I-.• : � .. I
o
o
PRO POSED—a;
BED
o
O.
5%
-
(nW
�
1
In
w
I
]ON
+M--
PROPOSED
I
1
0
I
{
.}
1
-
I
I
,
I
I
GRADE
TO
I
2:
.I EXISTING
Li
'
I
..
BED
_
!.
cn
I
m
I
ao
:
�
..
•
_.
_ _.
.._
O
'
I
N
I
i
� �
'2.019,'
'
, �;� ,,
I
._+. NJ ,
Nr
+MI
+M
�0.
aGo
'n
_
^
'..
.'
j
_EXISTING
:
_!.__
f -
_
�j
04
-
M !
IO
NI
oN
Nom.
NSI
+MO1
MtV
TERRACE'
PROPOSED
WATER
.... .. ...
..>
....M
-
>••I _. -'...
M .......
-..ON:--
M !
ON1
._..Nr
'ION
_. _qDQ-.
1 .1.M
�.
CO
'��
00
V) d.....FJ
fnW
'¢�-._..
>>I
¢[1.1i
..
M
N __..M
�_
}M
, 1�
MDO.--a
F}
61
-
--
X00
hit---
O !
-.,-
-
_
�W
--HJ
CJI
:Ind
F¢J
--oil--Mr
M
- ;�
Mr
M
+M
+��,
M.
-
I.
— —
¢
I_
O
¢ M
I
to
W
I
W
I I
O
N
S
: •3 '
I
I
I
URF
S ACE ELEVATION
M
f
M
I
r
O
I
,
PRO
vV) .-
r>
!I
BUMGARNER BRANCH
I
�'-
r
a
n
0 0
M M
r
BAN
II
-
rn
I
r0� O'
}
}-
J
10
W
I
:�J
L.
M..__
i_-_
-
t -I-.• : � .. I
o
o
PRO POSED—a;
BED
o
O.
5%
-
(nW
�
1
In
w
]ON
+M--
PROPOSED
1
0
I
{
.}
1
-
GRADE
TO
I
2:
.I EXISTING
Li
'
I
..
BED
_
!.
cn
I
ao
�
-�
_.
_ _.
O
N
I
I
i
� �
'2.019,'
'
, �;� ,,
O
�j
04
PROPOSED
WATER
Q.-
I
¢
I_
O
¢ M
I
+
M
vi of
�I
I
N N I OI O
v a
I I
_ I
S
: •3 '
I
I
I
URF
S ACE ELEVATION
-_
I
I I
I
I
I
,
u~i v~il
vV) .-
r>
!I
BUMGARNER BRANCH
I
�'-
r
a
n
0 0
M M
-
rn
I
r0� O'
}
}-
-
t -I-.• : � .. I
o
o
PRO POSED—a;
BED
o
-
1
:-
V)
0
.}
TO
.I EXISTING
'
..
BED
_
!.
cn
30/_+5u
sus+uu ;w3+5u 304+00 304+50 305+00
FULL SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 10' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 1' HALF SIZE PLAN — HORIZONTAL: 1 " = 20' VERTICAL:1 " = 2'
2144
21
2140
2137
2135
HIGDON BRANCH

V1,
I��LIVE STAKE SPACII6' LIVE STAKE SPACI3' ROW SPACING
\t♦�♦������3 LIVE STAKE SPACIPLAN VIE 3'ROW SPACING
BUDS FACING UPWARD—)f
PWARD SQUARE CUT TOP
LIVE CUTTING
MIN. %" DIA
ANGLE CUT 30 - 45 DEGRE
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
IST LIVE STAKE ROW
SET 1.5' FROM TOE
ON INSIDE OF BEND
NUMBER OF LIVE STAKE ROWS
CHANNEL INSIDE OUTSIDE
(FT)
DEPTH OF BEND TANGENT OF BEND
0 - 1.5 1 1 2
1.5 - 2.5 2 2 3
2.5 - 3.5 3 3 4
ROW
JIANIIVh h'AI Italy
NOT TO SCALE
SPACING
PLANTING NOTES:
TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED USING MULCH AND
TEMPORARY SEED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GROUND COVER AND
CONDITION THE SOIL.
2. MULCH MUST BE ADDED TO ACHIEVE 80% COVERAGE (ROUGHLY
2 TONS/ACRE FOR. WHEAT STRAW)
3. A FERTILITY SOIL TEST SHALL BE USED TO DETERMINE
FERTILIZER AMOUNTS OR, IF NO SOIL TEST IS AVAILABLE, A
STANDARD MIXTURE SHALL BE APPLIED OF 2 TONS OF LIME PER
ACRE AND 700-1000 LBS OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER PER ACRE.
BARE ROOT PLANTINGS
1, PLANT BARE ROOT SHRUBS AND TREES IN AREAS AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS.
2. PROVIDE 8' OF SPACING BETWEEN PLANTS.
3. LOOSEN COMPACTED SOIL AND PLANT IN HOLES FORMED WITH A
MATTOCK, DIBBLE BAR OR EQUAL.
4. PROVIDE PLANTING HOLE SUFFICIENT IN SIZE AND DEPTH TO
PREVENT CROWDING OF ROOTS.
5. ROOTS SHALL BE KEPT MOIST DURING TRANSPORTATION,
DISTRIBUTION, AND INSTALLATION.
6. PLANTS SHALL BE HEELED -IN INTO MOIST SOIL IF NOT
PROMPTLY PLANTED AFTER DELIVERY TO THE PROJECT SITE.
LIVE STAKES:
1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. STAKES THAT ARE SPLIT SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED.
3. STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ORTHOGONALLY TO THE BANK AND
WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARDS.
4. STAKES SHALL BE h TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3
FEET IN LENGTH.
5. AFTER INSTALLATION, THE TOP PORTION OF STAKES SHALL BE
PRUNED WITH A SQUARE CUT LEAVING NO LESS THAN 3 INCHES
AND NO MORE THAN 6 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND.
POOL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
IST LIVE STAKE ROW
SET AT EDGE OF LOW
WATER ON OUTSIDE
OF BEND
SEEDING
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
DENSITY
%MIX
PLANT MATERIAL
AREA
TOTALNENTMIX
scre)
Qbla
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
STRATUM
SIZE
STEMS/ACRE (Acres)
STEMS
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum 161
15
STREAMSIDE
Broom Sedge
Andropogon Wginicus
6
15
Black Willow
Salix nigra
Imidst
Live Stake
-
_
Indian Grass
Sorhgastrum nutans
8
20
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
I understory
Lire Stake
_
_
Eastem Gamma Grass Tdpsacum dactyoides
10
25
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amom
understory
Lire Stake
-
-
-
Jos-Pye Weed
Eupatonum fistulosum
4
10um
Deer tongue
Panicum clandestinum
s
15
1ST LNE STAKE ROW SHALL BE
Ninebark
PhySOCarpus opulifolius
understory
Lire Stake
-
-
-
Totals
40
100%
AT LEAST 1.5' FROM TOE OF
TOTAL
RIFFLE SECTION CHANNEL OR AT TOP OF BANK,SEEDING
WHICHEVER DISTANCE IS SHORTER
NOT TO SCALE
Black Cherry
Prunus serotina
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
PLANTING DATES
SEED TYPE
DENSITY
Red Oak
Quercus rubra
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
lbs/acre
Dogwood
Comus flodda
orerstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
TEMPORARY MIX
Green Ash
Raxinus pennsXvanica
IPIantanus
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
a„ 1 - Mayt
jWheat or Rye Grain I
50
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
May 1 -August 15
Brown Top Millet
20
Ricer Birch
Betula nigra
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
Aug 15 -Dec 31
lWheat or Rye Grain
50
Sycamore
occidentalis
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
Tulip Poplar
Linodendron tulipifera
overstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
White Oak
Quercus alba
I overstory
Bane Root
68
5.58
379
Witch Hazel
Hamamelis virginiana
Imidstory
Bare Root
68
5.58
379
TOTAL
680
3794
POOL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
IST LIVE STAKE ROW
SET AT EDGE OF LOW
WATER ON OUTSIDE
OF BEND

Wolf Creek Engineering
�\p1N 1CA4q//Z,
000, S ��
ENGINEERING k ENVIRONYSNTAL CONSULTING
LICENSE N0. P-04I7
0417rviLe,
;'
7 Florida AveNC 28787
• '
PHONE: [phone] NI/B.WOLFCREEKENG.COM
JUNES BRANCH RESTORATION PROJECT
0
:�
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC AND EXCHANGE
�ftINEFtQ
., ��../
''/'/"••�xIII
,ma
PLANTING PLANS
1LI
AS NOTED rT cme
I2/12/2012 --SGG 1053 1 P-2
LOCATION KEY
®BUFFER PLANTING
AREA
EXISTING WETLAND VEGETATION, NO
ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS REQUIRED
FAIRVIEW ROAD
O
CA•
- - .-
-
PROPOSEDJUNES
C—
-
-
^'
-__BRANCH
50 0 50 150
mmmmmmmmmmIl
SCALE IN FEET

50 0 so 150
SCALE IN FEET
BUFFER PLANTING
AREA
EXISTING WETLAND VEGETATION, NO
ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS REQUIRED
zz�
NO PLANTINGS
WITHIN EASEMENT
EXCLUSION