Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutU-3400_Draft_NRTR_packet_20161111NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 2. Water resources in the study area Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Number Classification UT 1 to Muddy Creek SA 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 2 to Muddy Creek SB 17-9-(1) WS-IV Muddy Creek SC 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 3 to Muddy Creek SD 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 4 to Muddy Creek SE 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 5 to Muddy Creek SF 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 6 to Muddy Creek SG 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 7 to Muddy Creek SH 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 8 to Muddy Creek SI 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 9 to Muddy Creek SJ 17-9-(1) WS-IV Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area Map ID He ght Bankfull Depth Channel Velocity Clarity (ft) �'�'idth (ft) �in� Substrate SA 3 5-6 0.25-4 boulder, cobble, slow clear gravel, sand, silt SB 2-3 3-4 0* cobble, gravel, N/A N/A sand, silt SC (Muddy 7-8 18-20 0.5-12 bedrock, cobble, slow clear Creek) gravel, sand, silt SD 0.5-4.75 0.5-3 0.25-3 gravel, sand, silt slow clear SE 5-6 3-8 4-24 Coband gilt el, moderat clear , SF 3 4 2-12 gravel, sand, silt moderat clear SG 5-6 4-5 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SH 3 4-6 2-12 cobble, gravel, moderat clear sand, silt e SI 1-3 3-4 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SJ 4-5 6-7 2_ 12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt *No flow present at time of evaluation. November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Three ponds (approximately 2.16 acres) are located in the study area (Figure 3). These ponds consist of artificially excavated pits that are sustained by surface water runoff and high groundwater levels. All three ponds have surface water connection to jurisdictional stream features within the study area. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Muddy Creek and its tributaries do not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. There are no water bodies listed on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. These communities include: maintainedldisturbed, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype), Dry- Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest, and Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed areas occur along roadside and railroad shoulders, residential and commercial lawns, agricultural fields, and small areas of successional forests throughout the length of the study area. The vegetation in this community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, shrubs, and sparse canopy in lawn and roadside areas; planted crops and native grasses within agricultural areas; and successional forested areas consisting of canopies of monoculture pine or decreased hardwood species diversity with dense hardwood understory. Herbaceous and woody vine vegetation observed includes fescue, clover, wild onion, poison ivy, trumpet creeper, kudzu, goldenrod, ironweed, dog fennel, Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stilt grass, Chinese lespedeza, and dandelion. Canopy species includes loblolly pine, sweetgum, winged elm, Tree-of-Heaven, mimosa, and red maple, with flowering dogwood, persimmon, and Chinese privet, red maple, sweetgum, multiflora rose, roundleaf greenbrier and blackberry in the understory. Wetlands WA, WF, WH, WI, WJ, WK, WM, WN, WO, WP, WT, WLJ, WW, WY, WZ, WAA, and WAD occur within this community. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forests (Piedmont Subtype) occur along lower slopes, steep north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally well-drained small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community is found throughout Piedmont and may grade into a Piedmont/Low Mountain Forest or Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest at lower 4 November 2016 NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Three ponds (approximately 2.16 acres) are located in the study area (Figure 3). These ponds consist of artificially excavated pits that are sustained by surface water runoff and high groundwater levels. All three ponds have surface water connection to jurisdictional stream features within the study area. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Muddy Creek and its tributaries do not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. There are no water bodies listed on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. These communities include: maintainedldisturbed, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype), Dry- Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest, and Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed areas occur along roadside and railroad shoulders, residential and commercial lawns, agricultural fields, and small areas of successional forests throughout the length of the study area. The vegetation in this community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, shrubs, and sparse canopy in lawn and roadside areas; planted crops and native grasses within agricultural areas; and successional forested areas consisting of canopies of monoculture pine or decreased hardwood species diversity with dense hardwood understory. Herbaceous and woody vine vegetation observed includes fescue, clover, wild onion, poison ivy, trumpet creeper, kudzu, goldenrod, ironweed, dog fennel, Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stilt grass, Chinese lespedeza, and dandelion. Canopy species includes loblolly pine, sweetgum, winged elm, Tree-of-Heaven, mimosa, and red maple, with flowering dogwood, persimmon, and Chinese privet, red maple, sweetgum, multiflora rose, roundleaf greenbrier and blackberry in the understory. Wetlands WA, WF, WH, WI, WJ, WK, WM, WN, WO, WP, WT, WLJ, WW, WY, WZ, WAA, and WAD occur within this community. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forests (Piedmont Subtype) occur along lower slopes, steep north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally well-drained small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community is found throughout Piedmont and may grade into a Piedmont/Low Mountain Forest or Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest at lower 4 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. elevations. Dominant species in this community include American beech, northern red oak, red maple, and sweetgum in the overstory, and flowering dogwood, hop hornbeam, sweetgum, red maple, Japanese honeysuckle, grape, and poison ivy in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WP, WQ, WR, WAB, and WAC occur within this community. 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest The Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory community occurs along mid slopes, low ridges, upland flats and other dry-mesic upland areas on acidic soils within the study area. This community is found throughout the Piedmont and Coastal Plain and may occur between the Dry Oak-Hickory Forest and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype). White oak, laurel oak, willow oak, black jack oak, mockernut hickory, pignut hickory, shagbark hickory, and sweetgum dominate the overstory canopy, while red maple, sweetgum, black gum, gooseberry, and American holly occur in the understory. Wetlands WB, WC, WD, WE, and WG occur within this community. 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest The Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest occurs on rivers and stream floodplains where separate fluvial landforms and associated vegetation zones are too small to distinguish in the Piedmont and lower elevation mountain valleys. This community may grade into various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry upland forests. Dominant species in this community include sycamore, green ash, sweet gum, American elm, red maple in the overstory, and red maple, green ash, southern sugar maple, black walnut and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WL and WS occur entirely within this community. Wetlands WK and WT also partially occur within this community. 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest The Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest occurs on floodplain ridges and terraces other than active levees adjacent to the river channel. This community may grade to various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry forest communities. Dominant species in this community include loblolly pine, American elm, willow oak, red maple, and green ash in the overstory, and red maple, grape, poison ivy, and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetland WV and WX occur within this community. 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction because of grading and paving of portions of the study area. At this time, decisions regarding the final alignment and design of the proposed road widening have not been made. Therefore, community data are presented in the context of total coverage of each type within the study area (Table 4). Once a final alignment and preliminary design have been determined, probable impacts to each community type will be calculated. 5 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area Communit Covera e (ac.) Maintained/ Disturbed 181 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) 10.6 Dry-Mesic Oak Hickory 11.8 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest 8.8 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest 5.7 Total 217.9 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed habitats that may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species observed are indicated with *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats, wetlands, and stream corridors found within the study area include species such as eastern gray squirrel*, striped skunk, white-footed mouse, eastern cottontail*, raccoon*, Virginia opossum*, and white-tailed deer*. Birds common to the area include turkey vulture*, red-shouldered hawk*, American robin*, northern cardinal*, eastern towhee*, American crow*, gray catbird*, killdeer*, downy woodpecker*, wood thrush*, brown thrasher*, Carolina wren*, mourning dove*, blue jay*, American goldfinch*, northern flicker, European starling, and tufted titmouse*. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial communities located in the study area include the rough green snake, copperhead, rat snake, eastern box turtle, eastern fence lizard, pickerel frog*, American toad, gray treefrog, six-lined race runner*, and five-lined skink. 4.3 Aquatic Communities The aquatic communities in the study area consists of a large perennial stream Muddy Creek and its smaller perennial and intermittent unnamed tributaries. The streams and ponds within the project area could support various types of fish such as shiners, sunfish, darters, and carp*. Reptile and amphibian species likely supported by the stream and pond systems include the northern watersnake, two lined salamander*, and snapping turtle*. 4.4 Invasive Species Eight species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina were found to occur in the study area. The species identified were kudzu (Threat), tree-of-heaven (Threat), multiflora rose (Threat), Japanese stilt grass (Threat), mimosa (Moderate Threat), Chinese lespedeza (Threat), Chinese privet (Threat) and Japanese honeysuckle (Moderate Threat). NCDOT will manage invasive plant species as appropriate. 6 November 2016 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mouotain Presence of 11ow / persistent pools in stream 3 � no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of past human alteration z (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � Riparian zone O 3 no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = mar oints 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 4 (extensive dischar es = 0; no dischaz es = max oin[s) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2 „a Groundwa[er discharge 3 � 5 no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, e[c. = max oints) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 .. Presence of adjacent floodplain O r� 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 , no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints ,�'S", � Entrenchment / Floodplai� aceess 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Q dee I entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = 0; lar e ad'acent we[lands = max oints � Channel sinuosity ,� 9 extensive chancelization = 0; natural meander = max oints �— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �p Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 eMensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints) Size & diversity of channel bed substrate � �� (fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints NA 0— 4 0— 5 3 � 2 Evidence of channel incision or widening Q_ 5 0— 4 0— 5 � �+ dee I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints „F"'„ Presence of major bank failures a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 �„� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints � 14 Root depth and density on banks 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 3 r�„ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints � lmpac[ by agriculture, livestock, or [imber production 4 IS 0-5 0-4 0-5 substan[ial im act =0; no evidence = max oints � 6 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2 �. no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints � �� Habitatwmplexity � (little o� uo habita[=-0; fre uenC, va�c�e0 habftats = max oin�s) �� 0-6 0� � Ca Canopy coverage over s[reambed Q � 8 no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2 x 19 Substrate embeddedness (dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max NA* 0— 4 0— 4 2 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q � no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints �j 21 Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 � O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) "� Presence of fsh O 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 � � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = ma�c oints) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 35 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 2. Water resources in the study area Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Number Classification UT 1 to Muddy Creek SA 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 2 to Muddy Creek SB 17-9-(1) WS-IV Muddy Creek SC 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 3 to Muddy Creek SD 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 4 to Muddy Creek SE 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 5 to Muddy Creek SF 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 6 to Muddy Creek SG 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 7 to Muddy Creek SH 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 8 to Muddy Creek SI 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 9 to Muddy Creek SJ 17-9-(1) WS-IV Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area Map ID He ght Bankfull Depth Channel Velocity Clarity (ft) �'�'idth (ft) �in� Substrate SA 3 5-6 0.25-4 boulder, cobble, slow clear gravel, sand, silt SB 2-3 3-4 0* cobble, gravel, N/A N/A sand, silt SC (Muddy 7-8 18-20 0.5-12 bedrock, cobble, slow clear Creek) gravel, sand, silt SD 0.5-4.75 0.5-3 0.25-3 gravel, sand, silt slow clear SE 5-6 3-8 4-24 Coband gilt el, moderat clear , SF 3 4 2-12 gravel, sand, silt moderat clear SG 5-6 4-5 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SH 3 4-6 2-12 cobble, gravel, moderat clear sand, silt e SI 1-3 3-4 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SJ 4-5 6-7 2_ 12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt *No flow present at time of evaluation. November 2016 NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 2. Water resources in the study area Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Number Classification UT 1 to Muddy Creek SA 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 2 to Muddy Creek SB 17-9-(1) WS-IV Muddy Creek SC 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 3 to Muddy Creek SD 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 4 to Muddy Creek SE 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 5 to Muddy Creek SF 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 6 to Muddy Creek SG 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 7 to Muddy Creek SH 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 8 to Muddy Creek SI 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 9 to Muddy Creek SJ 17-9-(1) WS-IV Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area Map ID He ght Bankfull Depth Channel Velocity Clarity (ft) �'�'idth (ft) �in� Substrate SA 3 5-6 0.25-4 boulder, cobble, slow clear gravel, sand, silt SB 2-3 3-4 0* cobble, gravel, N/A N/A sand, silt SC (Muddy 7-8 18-20 0.5-12 bedrock, cobble, slow clear Creek) gravel, sand, silt SD 0.5-4.75 0.5-3 0.25-3 gravel, sand, silt slow clear SE 5-6 3-8 4-24 Coband gilt el, moderat clear , SF 3 4 2-12 gravel, sand, silt moderat clear SG 5-6 4-5 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SH 3 4-6 2-12 cobble, gravel, moderat clear sand, silt e SI 1-3 3-4 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SJ 4-5 6-7 2_ 12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt *No flow present at time of evaluation. November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Three ponds (approximately 2.16 acres) are located in the study area (Figure 3). These ponds consist of artificially excavated pits that are sustained by surface water runoff and high groundwater levels. All three ponds have surface water connection to jurisdictional stream features within the study area. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Muddy Creek and its tributaries do not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. There are no water bodies listed on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. These communities include: maintainedldisturbed, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype), Dry- Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest, and Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed areas occur along roadside and railroad shoulders, residential and commercial lawns, agricultural fields, and small areas of successional forests throughout the length of the study area. The vegetation in this community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, shrubs, and sparse canopy in lawn and roadside areas; planted crops and native grasses within agricultural areas; and successional forested areas consisting of canopies of monoculture pine or decreased hardwood species diversity with dense hardwood understory. Herbaceous and woody vine vegetation observed includes fescue, clover, wild onion, poison ivy, trumpet creeper, kudzu, goldenrod, ironweed, dog fennel, Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stilt grass, Chinese lespedeza, and dandelion. Canopy species includes loblolly pine, sweetgum, winged elm, Tree-of-Heaven, mimosa, and red maple, with flowering dogwood, persimmon, and Chinese privet, red maple, sweetgum, multiflora rose, roundleaf greenbrier and blackberry in the understory. Wetlands WA, WF, WH, WI, WJ, WK, WM, WN, WO, WP, WT, WLJ, WW, WY, WZ, WAA, and WAD occur within this community. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forests (Piedmont Subtype) occur along lower slopes, steep north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally well-drained small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community is found throughout Piedmont and may grade into a Piedmont/Low Mountain Forest or Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest at lower 4 November 2016 NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 2. Water resources in the study area Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Number Classification UT 1 to Muddy Creek SA 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 2 to Muddy Creek SB 17-9-(1) WS-IV Muddy Creek SC 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 3 to Muddy Creek SD 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 4 to Muddy Creek SE 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 5 to Muddy Creek SF 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 6 to Muddy Creek SG 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 7 to Muddy Creek SH 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 8 to Muddy Creek SI 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 9 to Muddy Creek SJ 17-9-(1) WS-IV Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area Map ID He ght Bankfull Depth Channel Velocity Clarity (ft) �'�'idth (ft) �in� Substrate SA 3 5-6 0.25-4 boulder, cobble, slow clear gravel, sand, silt SB 2-3 3-4 0* cobble, gravel, N/A N/A sand, silt SC (Muddy 7-8 18-20 0.5-12 bedrock, cobble, slow clear Creek) gravel, sand, silt SD 0.5-4.75 0.5-3 0.25-3 gravel, sand, silt slow clear SE 5-6 3-8 4-24 Coband gilt el, moderat clear , SF 3 4 2-12 gravel, sand, silt moderat clear SG 5-6 4-5 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SH 3 4-6 2-12 cobble, gravel, moderat clear sand, silt e SI 1-3 3-4 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SJ 4-5 6-7 2_ 12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt *No flow present at time of evaluation. November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Three ponds (approximately 2.16 acres) are located in the study area (Figure 3). These ponds consist of artificially excavated pits that are sustained by surface water runoff and high groundwater levels. All three ponds have surface water connection to jurisdictional stream features within the study area. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Muddy Creek and its tributaries do not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. There are no water bodies listed on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. These communities include: maintainedldisturbed, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype), Dry- Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest, and Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed areas occur along roadside and railroad shoulders, residential and commercial lawns, agricultural fields, and small areas of successional forests throughout the length of the study area. The vegetation in this community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, shrubs, and sparse canopy in lawn and roadside areas; planted crops and native grasses within agricultural areas; and successional forested areas consisting of canopies of monoculture pine or decreased hardwood species diversity with dense hardwood understory. Herbaceous and woody vine vegetation observed includes fescue, clover, wild onion, poison ivy, trumpet creeper, kudzu, goldenrod, ironweed, dog fennel, Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stilt grass, Chinese lespedeza, and dandelion. Canopy species includes loblolly pine, sweetgum, winged elm, Tree-of-Heaven, mimosa, and red maple, with flowering dogwood, persimmon, and Chinese privet, red maple, sweetgum, multiflora rose, roundleaf greenbrier and blackberry in the understory. Wetlands WA, WF, WH, WI, WJ, WK, WM, WN, WO, WP, WT, WLJ, WW, WY, WZ, WAA, and WAD occur within this community. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forests (Piedmont Subtype) occur along lower slopes, steep north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally well-drained small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community is found throughout Piedmont and may grade into a Piedmont/Low Mountain Forest or Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest at lower 4 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. elevations. Dominant species in this community include American beech, northern red oak, red maple, and sweetgum in the overstory, and flowering dogwood, hop hornbeam, sweetgum, red maple, Japanese honeysuckle, grape, and poison ivy in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WP, WQ, WR, WAB, and WAC occur within this community. 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest The Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory community occurs along mid slopes, low ridges, upland flats and other dry-mesic upland areas on acidic soils within the study area. This community is found throughout the Piedmont and Coastal Plain and may occur between the Dry Oak-Hickory Forest and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype). White oak, laurel oak, willow oak, black jack oak, mockernut hickory, pignut hickory, shagbark hickory, and sweetgum dominate the overstory canopy, while red maple, sweetgum, black gum, gooseberry, and American holly occur in the understory. Wetlands WB, WC, WD, WE, and WG occur within this community. 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest The Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest occurs on rivers and stream floodplains where separate fluvial landforms and associated vegetation zones are too small to distinguish in the Piedmont and lower elevation mountain valleys. This community may grade into various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry upland forests. Dominant species in this community include sycamore, green ash, sweet gum, American elm, red maple in the overstory, and red maple, green ash, southern sugar maple, black walnut and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WL and WS occur entirely within this community. Wetlands WK and WT also partially occur within this community. 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest The Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest occurs on floodplain ridges and terraces other than active levees adjacent to the river channel. This community may grade to various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry forest communities. Dominant species in this community include loblolly pine, American elm, willow oak, red maple, and green ash in the overstory, and red maple, grape, poison ivy, and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetland WV and WX occur within this community. 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction because of grading and paving of portions of the study area. At this time, decisions regarding the final alignment and design of the proposed road widening have not been made. Therefore, community data are presented in the context of total coverage of each type within the study area (Table 4). Once a final alignment and preliminary design have been determined, probable impacts to each community type will be calculated. 5 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area Communit Covera e (ac.) Maintained/ Disturbed 181 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) 10.6 Dry-Mesic Oak Hickory 11.8 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest 8.8 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest 5.7 Total 217.9 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed habitats that may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species observed are indicated with *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats, wetlands, and stream corridors found within the study area include species such as eastern gray squirrel*, striped skunk, white-footed mouse, eastern cottontail*, raccoon*, Virginia opossum*, and white-tailed deer*. Birds common to the area include turkey vulture*, red-shouldered hawk*, American robin*, northern cardinal*, eastern towhee*, American crow*, gray catbird*, killdeer*, downy woodpecker*, wood thrush*, brown thrasher*, Carolina wren*, mourning dove*, blue jay*, American goldfinch*, northern flicker, European starling, and tufted titmouse*. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial communities located in the study area include the rough green snake, copperhead, rat snake, eastern box turtle, eastern fence lizard, pickerel frog*, American toad, gray treefrog, six-lined race runner*, and five-lined skink. 4.3 Aquatic Communities The aquatic communities in the study area consists of a large perennial stream Muddy Creek and its smaller perennial and intermittent unnamed tributaries. The streams and ponds within the project area could support various types of fish such as shiners, sunfish, darters, and carp*. Reptile and amphibian species likely supported by the stream and pond systems include the northern watersnake, two lined salamander*, and snapping turtle*. 4.4 Invasive Species Eight species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina were found to occur in the study area. The species identified were kudzu (Threat), tree-of-heaven (Threat), multiflora rose (Threat), Japanese stilt grass (Threat), mimosa (Moderate Threat), Chinese lespedeza (Threat), Chinese privet (Threat) and Japanese honeysuckle (Moderate Threat). NCDOT will manage invasive plant species as appropriate. 6 November 2016 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mouotain Presence of 11ow / persistent pools in stream 3 � no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of past human alteration z (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � Riparian zone O 3 no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = mar oints 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 4 (extensive dischar es = 0; no dischaz es = max oin[s) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2 „a Groundwa[er discharge 3 � 5 no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, e[c. = max oints) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 .. Presence of adjacent floodplain O r� 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 , no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints ,�'S", � Entrenchment / Floodplai� aceess 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Q dee I entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = 0; lar e ad'acent we[lands = max oints � Channel sinuosity ,� 9 extensive chancelization = 0; natural meander = max oints �— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �p Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 eMensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints) Size & diversity of channel bed substrate � �� (fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints NA 0— 4 0— 5 3 � 2 Evidence of channel incision or widening Q_ 5 0— 4 0— 5 � �+ dee I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints „F"'„ Presence of major bank failures a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 �„� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints � 14 Root depth and density on banks 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 3 r�„ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints � lmpac[ by agriculture, livestock, or [imber production 4 IS 0-5 0-4 0-5 substan[ial im act =0; no evidence = max oints � 6 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2 �. no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints � �� Habitatwmplexity � (little o� uo habita[=-0; fre uenC, va�c�e0 habftats = max oin�s) �� 0-6 0� � Ca Canopy coverage over s[reambed Q � 8 no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2 x 19 Substrate embeddedness (dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max NA* 0— 4 0— 4 2 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q � no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints �j 21 Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 � O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) "� Presence of fsh O 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 � � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = ma�c oints) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 35 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Three ponds (approximately 2.16 acres) are located in the study area (Figure 3). These ponds consist of artificially excavated pits that are sustained by surface water runoff and high groundwater levels. All three ponds have surface water connection to jurisdictional stream features within the study area. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Muddy Creek and its tributaries do not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. There are no water bodies listed on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. These communities include: maintainedldisturbed, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype), Dry- Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest, and Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed areas occur along roadside and railroad shoulders, residential and commercial lawns, agricultural fields, and small areas of successional forests throughout the length of the study area. The vegetation in this community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, shrubs, and sparse canopy in lawn and roadside areas; planted crops and native grasses within agricultural areas; and successional forested areas consisting of canopies of monoculture pine or decreased hardwood species diversity with dense hardwood understory. Herbaceous and woody vine vegetation observed includes fescue, clover, wild onion, poison ivy, trumpet creeper, kudzu, goldenrod, ironweed, dog fennel, Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stilt grass, Chinese lespedeza, and dandelion. Canopy species includes loblolly pine, sweetgum, winged elm, Tree-of-Heaven, mimosa, and red maple, with flowering dogwood, persimmon, and Chinese privet, red maple, sweetgum, multiflora rose, roundleaf greenbrier and blackberry in the understory. Wetlands WA, WF, WH, WI, WJ, WK, WM, WN, WO, WP, WT, WLJ, WW, WY, WZ, WAA, and WAD occur within this community. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forests (Piedmont Subtype) occur along lower slopes, steep north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally well-drained small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community is found throughout Piedmont and may grade into a Piedmont/Low Mountain Forest or Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest at lower 4 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. elevations. Dominant species in this community include American beech, northern red oak, red maple, and sweetgum in the overstory, and flowering dogwood, hop hornbeam, sweetgum, red maple, Japanese honeysuckle, grape, and poison ivy in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WP, WQ, WR, WAB, and WAC occur within this community. 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest The Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory community occurs along mid slopes, low ridges, upland flats and other dry-mesic upland areas on acidic soils within the study area. This community is found throughout the Piedmont and Coastal Plain and may occur between the Dry Oak-Hickory Forest and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype). White oak, laurel oak, willow oak, black jack oak, mockernut hickory, pignut hickory, shagbark hickory, and sweetgum dominate the overstory canopy, while red maple, sweetgum, black gum, gooseberry, and American holly occur in the understory. Wetlands WB, WC, WD, WE, and WG occur within this community. 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest The Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest occurs on rivers and stream floodplains where separate fluvial landforms and associated vegetation zones are too small to distinguish in the Piedmont and lower elevation mountain valleys. This community may grade into various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry upland forests. Dominant species in this community include sycamore, green ash, sweet gum, American elm, red maple in the overstory, and red maple, green ash, southern sugar maple, black walnut and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WL and WS occur entirely within this community. Wetlands WK and WT also partially occur within this community. 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest The Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest occurs on floodplain ridges and terraces other than active levees adjacent to the river channel. This community may grade to various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry forest communities. Dominant species in this community include loblolly pine, American elm, willow oak, red maple, and green ash in the overstory, and red maple, grape, poison ivy, and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetland WV and WX occur within this community. 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction because of grading and paving of portions of the study area. At this time, decisions regarding the final alignment and design of the proposed road widening have not been made. Therefore, community data are presented in the context of total coverage of each type within the study area (Table 4). Once a final alignment and preliminary design have been determined, probable impacts to each community type will be calculated. 5 November 2016 NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Archdale Road Widening (SR 1577/SR 1004) from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US-3ll (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale Guilford and Randolph Counties, North Carolina TIP U-3400 WBS Element No. 38996.1.1 o�'�% OF TRA'��� DIVISION 8 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 4 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest ..................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest ...................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest ......................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 6 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 7 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 9 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 9 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 9 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 9 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 9 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 9 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 9 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species .................................................................... 10 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 13 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 13 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................14 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B- Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C- Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D- Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 6 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 7 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 8 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties ......10 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) from Robbins Country Road (SR 1567) to US-311 (Main Street) in the Town of Archdale on the Guilford/Randolph County line (Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) minimum criteria determination checklist for the proposed project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on July 21, 2016, August 10, 15, 25, 2016, and September 6, 7, 27, 28, and 29, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A copy of the findings of the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) will be included in the final copy of the NRTR. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Black Education: B.S. Biology, 1991 M.S. Environmental Health, 1996 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, Present Environmental Scientist, HSMM 2002-2005 Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, 1999-2002 Environmental Technician, NCDWQ, 1997-1999 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GPS, stream assessment, T& E species assessment, natural communities assessment, environmental permitting, document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Christopher Dustin B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities' assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation. Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Elisabeth Webster, Phillip Beach, and Kim Hamlin. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of gently rolling hills with interstream divides characterized by gently rolling surfaces that become broken and hilly near streams. Elevations in the study area range from approximately 770 ft. to 878 ft. above sea level. Land cover in the project vicinity consists residential and commercial properties, agriculture fields and pastures, and forested areas. The project area lies within the town of Archdale, North Carolina. 3.1 Soils The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies three soil types within the study area and the Randolph County Soil Survey identifies seven soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area GUILFORD COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Coronaca-Urban land CuB Well Drained Non-Hydric complex Mecklenburg sandy MhB2 Well Drained Non-Hydric clay loam Mecklenburg-Urban MuB Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex RANDOLPH COUNTY SOILS Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric Helena sandy loam HeB/HeC Moderately Well Drained Hydric Mecklenburg clay loam MeB2/MeC2 Well Drained Non-Hydric Wilkes-Poindexter- wpC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott complex Wynott-Enon complex WtB/WtC Well Drained Non-Hydric Wynott-Wilkes- WzB Well Drained Non-Hydric Poindexter complex Mecklenburg-Urban MkC Well Drained Non-Hydric land complex 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Ten streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The locations of these streams are shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. The physical characteristics of these streams are provided in Table 3. 2 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 2. Water resources in the study area Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Number Classification UT 1 to Muddy Creek SA 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 2 to Muddy Creek SB 17-9-(1) WS-IV Muddy Creek SC 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 3 to Muddy Creek SD 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 4 to Muddy Creek SE 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 5 to Muddy Creek SF 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 6 to Muddy Creek SG 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 7 to Muddy Creek SH 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 8 to Muddy Creek SI 17-9-(1) WS-IV UT 9 to Muddy Creek SJ 17-9-(1) WS-IV Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area Map ID He ght Bankfull Depth Channel Velocity Clarity (ft) �'�'idth (ft) �in� Substrate SA 3 5-6 0.25-4 boulder, cobble, slow clear gravel, sand, silt SB 2-3 3-4 0* cobble, gravel, N/A N/A sand, silt SC (Muddy 7-8 18-20 0.5-12 bedrock, cobble, slow clear Creek) gravel, sand, silt SD 0.5-4.75 0.5-3 0.25-3 gravel, sand, silt slow clear SE 5-6 3-8 4-24 Coband gilt el, moderat clear , SF 3 4 2-12 gravel, sand, silt moderat clear SG 5-6 4-5 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SH 3 4-6 2-12 cobble, gravel, moderat clear sand, silt e SI 1-3 3-4 2_12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt SJ 4-5 6-7 2_ 12 cobble, gravel, slow clear sand, silt *No flow present at time of evaluation. November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Three ponds (approximately 2.16 acres) are located in the study area (Figure 3). These ponds consist of artificially excavated pits that are sustained by surface water runoff and high groundwater levels. All three ponds have surface water connection to jurisdictional stream features within the study area. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Muddy Creek and its tributaries do not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. There are no water bodies listed on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. These communities include: maintainedldisturbed, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype), Dry- Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest, and Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed areas occur along roadside and railroad shoulders, residential and commercial lawns, agricultural fields, and small areas of successional forests throughout the length of the study area. The vegetation in this community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, shrubs, and sparse canopy in lawn and roadside areas; planted crops and native grasses within agricultural areas; and successional forested areas consisting of canopies of monoculture pine or decreased hardwood species diversity with dense hardwood understory. Herbaceous and woody vine vegetation observed includes fescue, clover, wild onion, poison ivy, trumpet creeper, kudzu, goldenrod, ironweed, dog fennel, Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stilt grass, Chinese lespedeza, and dandelion. Canopy species includes loblolly pine, sweetgum, winged elm, Tree-of-Heaven, mimosa, and red maple, with flowering dogwood, persimmon, and Chinese privet, red maple, sweetgum, multiflora rose, roundleaf greenbrier and blackberry in the understory. Wetlands WA, WF, WH, WI, WJ, WK, WM, WN, WO, WP, WT, WLJ, WW, WY, WZ, WAA, and WAD occur within this community. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forests (Piedmont Subtype) occur along lower slopes, steep north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally well-drained small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community is found throughout Piedmont and may grade into a Piedmont/Low Mountain Forest or Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest at lower 4 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. elevations. Dominant species in this community include American beech, northern red oak, red maple, and sweetgum in the overstory, and flowering dogwood, hop hornbeam, sweetgum, red maple, Japanese honeysuckle, grape, and poison ivy in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WP, WQ, WR, WAB, and WAC occur within this community. 4.1.3 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest The Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory community occurs along mid slopes, low ridges, upland flats and other dry-mesic upland areas on acidic soils within the study area. This community is found throughout the Piedmont and Coastal Plain and may occur between the Dry Oak-Hickory Forest and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype). White oak, laurel oak, willow oak, black jack oak, mockernut hickory, pignut hickory, shagbark hickory, and sweetgum dominate the overstory canopy, while red maple, sweetgum, black gum, gooseberry, and American holly occur in the understory. Wetlands WB, WC, WD, WE, and WG occur within this community. 4.1.4 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest The Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest occurs on rivers and stream floodplains where separate fluvial landforms and associated vegetation zones are too small to distinguish in the Piedmont and lower elevation mountain valleys. This community may grade into various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry upland forests. Dominant species in this community include sycamore, green ash, sweet gum, American elm, red maple in the overstory, and red maple, green ash, southern sugar maple, black walnut and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetlands WL and WS occur entirely within this community. Wetlands WK and WT also partially occur within this community. 4.1.5 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest The Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest occurs on floodplain ridges and terraces other than active levees adjacent to the river channel. This community may grade to various mesic, dry-mesic, or dry forest communities. Dominant species in this community include loblolly pine, American elm, willow oak, red maple, and green ash in the overstory, and red maple, grape, poison ivy, and Japanese stilt grass in the understory and ground layers. Wetland WV and WX occur within this community. 4.1.6 Terrestrial Community Impacts Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction because of grading and paving of portions of the study area. At this time, decisions regarding the final alignment and design of the proposed road widening have not been made. Therefore, community data are presented in the context of total coverage of each type within the study area (Table 4). Once a final alignment and preliminary design have been determined, probable impacts to each community type will be calculated. 5 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area Communit Covera e (ac.) Maintained/ Disturbed 181 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) 10.6 Dry-Mesic Oak Hickory 11.8 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest 8.8 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest 5.7 Total 217.9 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed habitats that may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species observed are indicated with *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats, wetlands, and stream corridors found within the study area include species such as eastern gray squirrel*, striped skunk, white-footed mouse, eastern cottontail*, raccoon*, Virginia opossum*, and white-tailed deer*. Birds common to the area include turkey vulture*, red-shouldered hawk*, American robin*, northern cardinal*, eastern towhee*, American crow*, gray catbird*, killdeer*, downy woodpecker*, wood thrush*, brown thrasher*, Carolina wren*, mourning dove*, blue jay*, American goldfinch*, northern flicker, European starling, and tufted titmouse*. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial communities located in the study area include the rough green snake, copperhead, rat snake, eastern box turtle, eastern fence lizard, pickerel frog*, American toad, gray treefrog, six-lined race runner*, and five-lined skink. 4.3 Aquatic Communities The aquatic communities in the study area consists of a large perennial stream Muddy Creek and its smaller perennial and intermittent unnamed tributaries. The streams and ponds within the project area could support various types of fish such as shiners, sunfish, darters, and carp*. Reptile and amphibian species likely supported by the stream and pond systems include the northern watersnake, two lined salamander*, and snapping turtle*. 4.4 Invasive Species Eight species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina were found to occur in the study area. The species identified were kudzu (Threat), tree-of-heaven (Threat), multiflora rose (Threat), Japanese stilt grass (Threat), mimosa (Moderate Threat), Chinese lespedeza (Threat), Chinese privet (Threat) and Japanese honeysuckle (Moderate Threat). NCDOT will manage invasive plant species as appropriate. 6 November 2016 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mouotain Presence of 11ow / persistent pools in stream 3 � no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of past human alteration z (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � Riparian zone O 3 no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = mar oints 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 4 (extensive dischar es = 0; no dischaz es = max oin[s) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2 „a Groundwa[er discharge 3 � 5 no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, e[c. = max oints) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 .. Presence of adjacent floodplain O r� 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 , no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints ,�'S", � Entrenchment / Floodplai� aceess 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Q dee I entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = 0; lar e ad'acent we[lands = max oints � Channel sinuosity ,� 9 extensive chancelization = 0; natural meander = max oints �— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �p Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 eMensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints) Size & diversity of channel bed substrate � �� (fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints NA 0— 4 0— 5 3 � 2 Evidence of channel incision or widening Q_ 5 0— 4 0— 5 � �+ dee I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints „F"'„ Presence of major bank failures a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 �„� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints � 14 Root depth and density on banks 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 3 r�„ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints � lmpac[ by agriculture, livestock, or [imber production 4 IS 0-5 0-4 0-5 substan[ial im act =0; no evidence = max oints � 6 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2 �. no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints � �� Habitatwmplexity � (little o� uo habita[=-0; fre uenC, va�c�e0 habftats = max oin�s) �� 0-6 0� � Ca Canopy coverage over s[reambed Q � 8 no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2 x 19 Substrate embeddedness (dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max NA* 0— 4 0— 4 2 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q � no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints �j 21 Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 � O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) "� Presence of fsh O 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 � � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = ma�c oints) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 35 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area Communit Covera e (ac.) Maintained/ Disturbed 181 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) 10.6 Dry-Mesic Oak Hickory 11.8 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest 8.8 Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest 5.7 Total 217.9 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed habitats that may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species observed are indicated with *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats, wetlands, and stream corridors found within the study area include species such as eastern gray squirrel*, striped skunk, white-footed mouse, eastern cottontail*, raccoon*, Virginia opossum*, and white-tailed deer*. Birds common to the area include turkey vulture*, red-shouldered hawk*, American robin*, northern cardinal*, eastern towhee*, American crow*, gray catbird*, killdeer*, downy woodpecker*, wood thrush*, brown thrasher*, Carolina wren*, mourning dove*, blue jay*, American goldfinch*, northern flicker, European starling, and tufted titmouse*. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial communities located in the study area include the rough green snake, copperhead, rat snake, eastern box turtle, eastern fence lizard, pickerel frog*, American toad, gray treefrog, six-lined race runner*, and five-lined skink. 4.3 Aquatic Communities The aquatic communities in the study area consists of a large perennial stream Muddy Creek and its smaller perennial and intermittent unnamed tributaries. The streams and ponds within the project area could support various types of fish such as shiners, sunfish, darters, and carp*. Reptile and amphibian species likely supported by the stream and pond systems include the northern watersnake, two lined salamander*, and snapping turtle*. 4.4 Invasive Species Eight species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina were found to occur in the study area. The species identified were kudzu (Threat), tree-of-heaven (Threat), multiflora rose (Threat), Japanese stilt grass (Threat), mimosa (Moderate Threat), Chinese lespedeza (Threat), Chinese privet (Threat) and Japanese honeysuckle (Moderate Threat). NCDOT will manage invasive plant species as appropriate. 6 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S. Ten jurisdictional streams were identified in the study area (Table 5). The location of these streams is shown on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. USACE and NCDWR stream delineation forms are included in Appendix C. The physical characteristics and water quality designations of these jurisdictional streams are detailed in Section 3.2. The streams in the project area have been designated as warm water streams for the purposes of stream mitigation. Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area Compensatory Map ID Length (ft.) Classification Mitigation �ver Basin Required Buffer SA 501 Perennial Yes Randleman SB 607 Intermittent Yes Randleman Muddy 1613 Perennial Yes Randleman Creek (SC) SD 234 Perennial Yes Randleman SE 1654 Perennial Yes Randleman SF 431 Perennial Yes Randleman SG 210 Perennial Yes Randleman SH 751 Perennial Yes Randleman SI 140 Intermittent Yes Randleman SJ 184 Intermittent Yes Randleman SJ 380 Perennial Yes Randleman Total 6705 Thirty jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the study area. Wetland classifications and Division of Water Quality Wetland Ratings are presented in Table 6. All wetlands in the study area are within the Cape Fear River basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03030003). USACE wetland delineation forms and NCDWR wetland rating forms for each site are included in Appendix C. Descriptions of the terrestrial communities at each wetland site are presented in Section 4.1. 7 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area Map ID NCWAM Hydrologic NCDWR Wetland Area (ac.) Classification Classification Ratin WA Headwater forest PFOI 20 <0.01 WB Headwater farest PFO1 20 0.01 WC Headwater forest PFOI 20 0.01 WD Headwater forest PFO1 20 0.25 WE Headwater forest PFO1 12 0.10 WF Basin wetland* PEM1 5 <0.01 WG Headwater forest PFO1 18 0.07 WH Headwater forest PEM1 16 0.18 WI Headwater forest PFO1/PEM1 18 0.24 WJ Basin wetland* PEM1 12 <0.01 WK Headwater forest* PFOI/PEMI 49 0.59 WL Floodplain pool PFOl 24 0.02 WM Headwater forest* PEM1 16 0.18 WN Basin wetland* PEM1 16 0.02 WO Basin wetland* PEM1 14 <0.01 WP Headwater forest* PFO1/PEMI 24 0.05 WQ Headwater forest PFOI 18 0.03 WR Seep PFO1 20 <0.01 WS Bottomland pF01 25 0.31 Hardwood forest WT Bottomland pF01 29 0.15 Hardwood forest* WU Headwater forest* PEM1 25 0.02 WV Bottomland pF01 47 0.83 Hardwood forest WW Headwater forest* PEM1 29 0.15 WX Bottomland pF01 36 0.93 Hardwood forest WY Headwater forest* PFO1 33 0.03 WZ Headwater forest* PEM1 29 0.11 WAA Headwater forest* PEM1 33 0.06 WAB Headwater forest* PFO1 21 0.10 WAC Basin wetland PFO1 25 <0.01 WAD Headwater forest* PFO1 25 0.01 *Vegetation altered Total 4.41 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits The proposed project has been designated as a minimum criteria determination checklist for the purposes of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation. As a result, a Nationwide Permit (N WP) 23 will likely be applicable. 8 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. A NWP No. 33 may also apply for temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary causeways. The USACE holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. If a Section 404 permit is required, then a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the NCDWR will be needed. 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern Neither Guilford nor Randolph Counties are designated as coastal counties in North Carolina; therefore, Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) regulations do not apply. 5.4 Construction Moratoria There have been no construction moratoria requested for the proj ect at this time. Should future moratoria be requested by a commenting agencies, a copy of the letter will be included in the appendix of the final NRTR. 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules The Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed buffer rules are in effect for streams located within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin in Guilford and Randolph Counties. 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters There are no streams within the study area designated by the USACE as a Navigable Water under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts The NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands to the greatest extent practicable in choosing a preferred alternative and during project design. At this time, no final decisions have been made regarding the location or design of the preferred alternative. 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts The NCDOT will investigate potential on-site stream and wetland mitigation opportunities once a final decision has been rendered on the location of the preferred alternative. If on-site mitigation is not feasible, mitigation will be provided by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 9 November 2016 NatuYal Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species As of March 25, 2015, the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) lists one federally protected species for Guilford County, and as of December 26, 2012 two federally protected species for Randolph County (Table 7). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat requirements far each species are based on the current best available information from referenced literature and/or USFWS. Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford & Randolph Counties Scientific Name Common Name Count Federal Habitat Biological y Status Present Conclusion Helianthus Schweinitz's R E Yes No Effect schweinitzii sunflower Isotria Small whorled G T Yes No Effect medeoloides pogonia Notropsis Cape Fear shiner R E Yes Unresolved mekistocholas E - Endangered T - Threatened G— Species listed in Guilford County R— Species listed in Randolph County Schweinitz's sunflower USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August-October Habitat Description: Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to the Piedmont of North and South Carolina. The few sites where this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural vegetation are found in Xeric Hardpan Forests. The species is also found along roadside rights-of-way, maintained power lines and other utility rights-of-way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings and edges of upland oak-pine-hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and other sunny or semi-sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open ar partially open areas for sunlight. It is intolerant of full shade and excessive coinpetition from other vegetation. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston, Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion, among others. It is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel content; shallow, poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived from mafic rocks. Biological Conclusion: Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present in the study area along roadside shoulders and utility easements. Field investigations were conducted by SEPI biologists throughout areas of suitable habitat on September 27, 28, and 29, 2016. No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed. A review of 10 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. NCNHP records on September 13, 2016, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Small whorled pogonia USFWS Optimal Survey Window: mid-May-early July Habitat Description: Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing (second to third successional growth) mixed-deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests. It does not appear to exhibit strong affinities for a particular aspect, soil type, or underlying geologic substrate. In North Carolina, the perennial orchid is typically found in open, dry deciduous woods and is often associated with white pine and rhododendron. The species may also be found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes; moist slopes; ravines lacking stream channels; or slope bases near braided channels of vernal streams. The orchid, often limited by shade, requires small light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows under canopies that are relatively open or near features like logging roads or streams that create long-persisting breaks in the forest canopy. Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for small whorled pogonia in the form of a small tract of mixed- deciduous forest is present along Swathmore Road. Field investigations were conducted by SEPI biologists throughout areas of suitable habitat on July 21, 2016. No individuals of small whorled pogonia were observed. A review of NCNHP records on September 13, 2016, indicates no known occurrences within 0 mile of the study area. Cape Fear shiner USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April-June (tributaries); year round (large rivers) Habitat Description: The Cape Fear shiner is known only from the Cape Fear River watershed. In general, habitat occurs in streams with clean gravel, cobble, or boulder substrates. It is most often observed inhabiting slow pools, riffles, and slow runs associated with water willow (Justicia americana) beds, which it uses for cover. Juveniles can be found inhabiting slackwater, among large rock outcrops and in flooded side channels and pools. Spawning occurs May through June, when water temperatures reach 66 degrees Fahrenheit. Biological Conclusion: Unresolved Suitable habitat for the Cape Fear shiner is present in the study area in areas of Muddy Creek and its tributaries. Field investigations will be required by NCDOT biologists throughout areas of suitable habitat. A review of NCNHP records on September 13, 2016, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. 11 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Cape Fear shiner: Critical Habitat Designation Critical Habitat Description: For the Cape Fear Shiner, designated critical habitat areas are defined as: 1. Chatham County, NC. Approximately 41 miles of the Rocky River from North Carolina State Highway 902 Bridge downstream to Chatham County Road 1010 Bridge; 2. Chatham and Lee Counties, NC. Approximately 0.5 river mile of Bear Creek, from Chatham County Road 2156 Bridge downstream to the Rocky River, then downstream in the Rocky River (approximately 4.2 river miles) to the Deep River, then downstream in the Deep River (approximately 2.6 river miles) to a point 0.3 river mile below the Moncure, North Carolina, U.S. Geological Survey Gaging Station; and, 3. Randolph and Moore Counties, NC. Approximately 1.5 miles of Fork Creek, from a point 0.1 river mile upstream of Randolph County Road 2873 Bridge downstream to the Deep River then downstream approximately 4.1 river miles of the Deep River in Randolph and Moore Counties, North Carolina, to a point 2.5 river miles below Moore County Road 1456 Bridge. Primary constituent elements are physical and biological features of the designated critical habitat essential to the conservation of the species. Primary constituent elements are physical and biological features of the designated critical habitat essential to the conservation of the species. The constituent elements for the Cape Fear shiner include: clean streams with gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates with pools, riffles, shallow runs; slack water areas with large rock outcrops; and side channels and pools with water of good quality and relatively low silt loads. Critical Habitat Biological Conclusion: Designated critical habitat for the Cape Fear Shiner does not occur in the study area. Additionally, a review of NCNHP records on September 13, 2016, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Northern Long-eared Bat The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), USACE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect." The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Guilford and Randolph Counties, where TIP U-3400 is located. 12 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on September 13, 2016 using 2014 color aerials. There are four ponds > 2 acres in size located within 1.13 miles of the study area. A visual survey for nest trees within 660 feet of the study area was conducted on September 29, 2016. No nest trees were observed. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database on September 13, 2016, revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. The project is not expected to have any adverse effects on the bald eagle. 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species As of December 26, 2012 (Randolph County) has one listed Federal Candidate species Georgia Aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum). There are no Candidate species listed for Guilford County as of March 25, 2015. 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat Guilford and Randolph Counties are considered inland counties. No Essential Fish Habitat is present in or within 1.0 mile of the study area. 13 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. 6.0 REFERENCES Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1976. A Field Guide to the Mammals: North America North of Mexico. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 255 pp. Conant, R. and J.T. Collins. 1991. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians (Eastern and Central North America). 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 450 pp. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. Environmental Laboratory. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. November 2010. Harrar, E.S. and J.G. Harrar. 1962. Guide to Southern Trees. New York: Dover Publications. 2°d ed. 709 pp. Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. 264 pp. National Geographic. 1999. Field Guide to the Birds of North America. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C. National Geographic Society. NatureServe. 2010. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: December 14, 2010). N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 1995. Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina. Fourth version. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. Raleigh, North Carolina. http://portal.ncdenr. org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/capefear/2005 N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2014. 2014 NC 303(d) List — Category 5 Final. December 19, 2014. http://portal.ncdenr. org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=140d4802-dc9e-4e4a- 8db2-1 ec3a336ceca&groupId=38364 14 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2013. Surface Water Classifications. Cape Fear River Basin. Updated December 9, 2013. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=10c60296- dcc8-439f-a41c-d475ea7adlfa&groupId=38364 N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program. 2016. Element Occurrence Shapefile. Biotics Database. Division of Land and Water Stewardship. Raleigh, North Carolina. June 2016. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2016. Natural Heritage Data Explorer [web application]. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC. Available at www.ncnhp.org. (Accessed: September 13, 2016). N.C. Department of Transportation. 2011. TE Plant Habitat Descriptions. June 29, 2011. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section. N.C. Department of Transportation. 2012. Invasive Exotic Plants of North Carolina. Cherri Smith. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section. N.C. Department of Transportation. 2015. TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. March 6, 2015. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2001. Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC. 134 pp. N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2010. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1, October 2010. N.C. Department of Transportation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's Wildflower Guide. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 490 pp. Peterson, R.T., editor. 1980. A Field Guide to the Birds of Eastern and Central North America. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 384 pp. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1183 pp. Rohde, F.C., R.G. Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater Fishes of the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 222 pp. 15 November 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report TIP U-3400, Guilford and Randolph Counties, N.C. Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR. Raleigh, North Carolina. 325 pp. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1977. Soil Survey of Guilfard County, North Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Soil Survey of Randolph County, North Carolina. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Guilford County, North Carolina. Updated March 25, 2012. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Randolph County, North Carolina. Updated December 26, 2012. United States Geological Survey. 2016. High Point East, North Carolina, Topographic Quadrangle (7.5-minute series). Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell, and W.C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Maryland. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press. 255 pp. 16 November 2016 Appendix A Figures 17 November 2016 �^����■ A �Lf ,�1'�*i� �" I�L�i �����1 f,I►+►���� r�� �:�►�•�� r ���r�''�/►%�%�t� l ��*'�'r�� ,����..� � _ . �_, _ «I ,. High , ,,<<<;;� ;�` � C;� _� Poi nt � ,A - .� - Project Vicinity � ,� L� _. _ '� , , � -, .- 4, . Arch d I e - , � -� init� '�� � - i- .I % :ed.., - J •'s,�, k � �- N W F���rbcicl kd �`�oyNoari�c4q, i N 9 �* * ��o z 0 \Q��tFhror tanNse��~P E PI E N G I N E E R I N G & C 0 N S T R U C T I 0 N Figure 1 - Project Vicinity U-3400 Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US 311/SR 1009 (Main Street) in Archdale Randolph and Guilford Counties, North Carolina November 2016 Qe .;un�tc G` eAy� ��b 3 w - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _rn_ _ r o n a _ �a � w � D p _, � i a` ��i:li:�ri ��� Q �' 1`� �J1 y Nn1a�n gr rtur <<�.�. ♦ P � Se e auI Dr H diy 1 O s q�ry `I � � _ �y � - � x - 2 n c�a �Pa 5��, i ��%!E)Il CI.lVcl1 R(� r��n�N's ��,��:� , Tnmty �h 5" r,, / =`Y ' d � _ Y _� Osbur� j, s a �J h l . 'a - OL Q 6 � L � � e ��"``\ � sti �1 s•. , }l � ,-nP, ..��,,. ��� , , k����� ��, ftoc:� ecui o� 'lt Rrl Legend OU3400 Project Area � Miles � i_��� � I This Exhibit is fop planning purposes only, and therefore is not for design, construction, or recording. The 1 inch ��,000 feet Fig u re 2. USGS Topogra ph ic Map .;���F-N°pTH�90 Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. ,�o a WeUands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS �� �cy�, receiverandZephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE ��3400 Archdale Road Widening �" ' SoUr�es: m .�' USGSHighPoiniEast24KTopographicQuadrangle 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from �����, Q��� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street in Archdale F^'TOFranNgp° E N G I N E E R I N G & November2o16 � y � � �• C O N S T R U C T I O N , � �' � ��p�s�.t, r . r ��„�•n; '.� -1 � _�:�t�S, y� s.. � ` — � � ����1�� � ' �•� � • � �J/�� , � • . , �,.. \ ` r � .;' t\�., �i� ,� c f , ;F '"„' • �.. � � = \ � � , � . , • � �� €;. ., <� '; - � � � , .. � _ , - - E . �. r y ,y�- . , 1 � �_. . ...', �' � ;. ' <'. tY_ .°7'� �'R `� . - . �1' - ,.. �4� � 1 ` ,� � - � , . . .. ., . . y _ tv ' ^ a. �1.� r \ _ ,� . ., ; .... .. ,.. , � . . , ��'.,, y� -.: •. ,.�. . ., .- ' � . � � � ��, � � �� ,� o�� , . ,, . - , y K , y � � •, , '� F � �� �/ `�} �,.��- ?�:"� ~� " �g` o�c�` - � . � �• '� ii � , • ' ; - - �. j" � . , 4 A� , �', � `� � :in� ��a� � � � r I � �,E � ��r _� � "{� W.,•' . . �* . r � � e fM � �. A..- �. � � .. -\ ., _ �' i . � . yt � `� ��.P _ .�,: r 'r*�?• .�a�' � f � Y� n � .. `"'�y'. ^ ` � . '1i � vr � . �. . � . ' . , . , . � *-y . : �.�r ; .4, . �� ' .��� ,_ ,' . ' _ 'S `. . y` . t - , � �T�t,��+ `i�' . ' - .. � ti, � . . �- � � � � ��� � �..��.f�... �.-�+�� �s.� - � � i4 � � �. f f � (q � �G� � r, i ;'� �������. ., - � w ��,` �� �� ,��z ¢ 4.�. ��; ��'�. '�� �• o �.� � '^ �,. � �,�-��;� ��"'"!-'� �� �� . 4 �(, . : r . mU +`!�. . }f�� �'J', . , .< • � ��K` t;:: � -�'- . ,�:r � f � w Lc . � ��p\} ,�'. �� ♦ �' �.' �� � � ` � � _' �� ;: �� �"`�_ ►�, .� '��q�,,,, _'!�� � yt ` ;..�. �.. . �.'^` � ��"r'. � � ' ...��:'k�r. lC;E��--�r w�� ,`�,` •. ti��i,� `*,�:+r �` '�, ♦'� �i� °` �,��.�'*'�-s' �` '�, �"` . . `*-;' ' � °' U � ;M. ,�v. ? i-?�s� �, . � 3. �►r` 1,' m . `,�� y `-. ,�y�,� .: • +�J3r� m` �''4 � .� ,/ ��•' �� � ,� +'. � '► �� ,r� ' ,,.- ,�`Y'!+ ,��' c�o , 'a ,t �'�t a �`�����, .`_9�,� ■��' '� �� ; �''_ � f �F"� 1, O�4 .� . � _ � __ � � �,,,' -� "� r�� ��',� � �. i ���� M. l '!i i .?� r � , _ �.. � ^ I � � + � t . •. Y� 4 . . , - . - ' 'r '��� F ` � �. y . �Y"\ � � •. ' ` ` . . Y- F _� y�. ; 9- �r �r, , � ;_ :.. � �` . �t. � f " '�"' � ' ♦ � ' �',' 1 E � -, T _ - s� ��,_� - �-�' ��, ?��.. �y.� . ,,y�� 1 �, � ��{ : . �- � �, � \'✓ � : �- . �C.4 � � . .. •,,' A. . �. • -,w.. � , ' . � � � ?`r . * . , . . ,. 7 ,M �� .� _ � �,� � ..� "��.., R F-1�. . P� ���` } _ *� . � _ � , `. � _�,r. i,�� ° - � � � �, �y � � �' , ` �� `� � 8Z2 C T ++ �4~� t� . Y T. �! 1 . ,``" ' ;., � '�` r: \ r . 1 v si � �C� t' ` � 1 - , � � ,,�y "� � ����`� � EFairfield Rd ,�� •� . , �°. ' �. '� �., �'�, .�� �, ^�� , f ,J . . � � �� �.>. .:-�� Y, _�, •' r � ��t'�'`"a � .�, . � I�.. ,'f� `�•.� � yt�i� �: ♦ t� ? �' i ' �U � r/ 4� � • ,l: ! � ."" , . � ' ':a. � . r ` �R \ �; i� . . ��, n'. -, .tl • ` � r5 ♦ ! �� ' � �' � ` �, � � . _ . _ �. ���„ �� �. _ . :. J . � �� . . . I '- 'l. . ��� ': 1 � . . . �( , - ' , . � � � . ��: � !� �. .. r `� y,��i . ;+� �.0 _ p � . � . �;' a : ,/� . � • �, ir � �4 � - � _ ,r� . I�Y YV.i� � �� `l�'*' . � � � `� � , �'� � � ' , d . - � - � ' *,* ,:y� �,"'� �1' . , • . � g, Q 4 � ,�. _ - �fi ; ., ti . � �� 4 � _ � '` • i _ �' �, � � , 1 - J� �%' r � w ��,:`.�- � �' .'�� .�' . ;+ +�: � , { �.r wn�`,. �' „�y4C�� �7'4' .. ��f, T' �� � yn��' C, ��,�.,. :� � . , `� , ' .� J. ?,�_ S '�'..% � � - ti , � �•. ,� ' ,i�,� �1. 4�' �� ' --�����' , 4 �.... �+.'� ,.�' -!�;. ,r � b, � , . ,. _ , . ; / . . �_ . • ,:.�. . , •. +_ ` ',�i . /-.,� f�*�5.:� • � a��� � "d,r'- '' `�.-�9$�, '��C�l4'4' , '�•�,'�''�,� .� V� r�. . ,,��. ,�.1,_a• �,� 4'. • _. . � � � � . `Q. F �'`' P-� er ' Y 2 1 . i � .,, � � � � ,�!i� yg �� �-. . { � - � R - � � • v . r r�{,� .� ` �.r f1 , ..,`� � rt! ' , . � . . .�j�i7�l� ' µ — �- � 't � � �v � � � "�^�� �" �' ! � �! ' .�, . '�t , i". � �.t11�� , . �i i � r r ►.s �p � '��� � t� ' s r i ;►►- i� '' .+' � � ,� . FI4 ' �C � �� • �j, � '*4.� ,,t,� � �, , f � _ w �� - .�.� .�-.`__ .,� " �' F °� , r � 'y 1 . • � � ,� � � I,� a„ +�,,.�`. �. I � ';. � .� �p ,� � t a �• "� � `� .r� � ,Y . , .e :1� '� ., � , :) J , "w'"" r � .& '' . , , , sA � - ` ;• � y' � �,., t �.: _ � � `��� 1'' �, ♦ r :� � "e � f� i W Fairfield Rd '`r" dfir�i� ,� . 1 .. ;"'y ,t r;; ,. � i r .. J.� �. � * M - � * ` �� a ' d � � � � �� ,��. �' ��/ f �:: * '�� ' i , �• .,� 4 �.1 � 'Q. � '3' �' " } ' ,` ��r�.+�. � . � ' � ��� ��,��[�I �� � l'` ",� � ` T � � � i i , � " y�,liitl�� � 1� R ar� i� .� ' _ . ` ,� ' 4.� '�/ � .t. � .. �T., r. � �. " , � ;'° ,� , ., = p„� , I � },' Q 4'�� � ' c + � y�:- C7 �� {' � P •�jy r � � ��' V,�' ,� � n��Y � � �` �' �7 �• /�l i�}~� � �a�� �.1Y." � • '� �J4� � '� ` ��� � �.� � � � ,r - � , . � �� (�,, � y�.� �, �ti-,.�r ', r `'� i:'�� " � `'� I �• �„� •i. • s�; ��w , ' �R � .. � { � � . . '� � �i � ,� a: M '�; /+ r' ��.#; tt � ► � f f� �,��, � � .�, " � i � � ` � : �"` . > . �� ; • a � :, xi.- �., ' �n, tw;- r � 1" T ' r ', 1 � � y °�' r '� 1�f'�'! :��"" r' • � Df � •r •� f .��}r" � , � R� � � � r �t � r � ����� ' � ^ � Ft� .,. + � "4F t � �� ,. E'1� '+ �. ,���wV �`� �'%�,�? �' ��, �,� � Q r� � ;�, �` '' "� , ..- Legend ; . � -�a . � � �.��;F�,: � , . � � � ";;a, �a .� �: �'��° ? ���� ��- :�"� ,; `°�� �` � � �-�: ��'�`'��:� ,, . ,`..`,� _ '� ��:r �.. :�����,'� ����'��Ir.. _ ., `► �'�'� ���,�r -:.�,: •, . ,�..� �°` ;�� _ - � ; . � U 3400 Project Area . �' ,�' . . �; _,,� u,, *.. ' r ��`�`�" _ � WeaverAve ~ '� �� F: � ..+�.. � ��1f±� �' y - -�. r }r U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US � � ; `' �"•'�� � - '� ` � ��•'` • +� �" � ��'�`' :P� � ' -_�"`"`.�► � � . , � � . . . � r ••r.�.,,., � �.. ' ' ,..`,tih.; P 1 q � ., ,��'� : y * , .�.� r4� ^� ,}i{-` _� �� ,�i - :� '�� ,� '�' '1 � � [� I' , � •+� . � p,. ► ♦ � �' 6 T`� . R . . r,. �.- � +�. �'r i� 1 � - T""`�" U-3400 Potential Open Waters of the US � ' �� � � p � � " ` � '� . '� �_ _ - , ^` � � �,��'.�' � � "� r` �'� �r� �'+� ;� �� 'r '�;'� ,.i' • ,�. �J � ♦ � • \! � �' �� 1 - �„v� �.' f. ,��te� t 1 ��� �; �` � r �� �; 'Ta� ■�k ; ' ' U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Perennial � F � `� � � ' � "�� � � f �' � ••^,..... � � . -�°P' '� �'' . " . �. t � `� � . �/�r � � . i Jf i� ���- v�� p y� k _ i2 ��� ^ `_ � ��. i. ti � Y , r . � :c ' Y: � �'7 ` �/�,F��.. *�y '• . F �. - ., � p � - i�c'_ - ' � � -. , . �, . � F� ...1 . - , , 1��l: ` � iP r / tiR. � . 1R, x _ , ,r. ` i^ �, Y .,.,, � 1 [f � ,i . . I ' � ••'+�•� U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Intermittent `� . +`�., � ' `��, \ �� ,.,� ��`�� •`�',•R' �� �'��� ����''�. ,� .�;�;?�� �,�`�`,� � �f��' ` � �.` _ .�f� - 5� �' �„ ` �' 4., . rr .�h � � ��� � . . � � � ` j � •,� 1 n�, \ U-3400 Ephemeral Channel ' ' . \4, , . � A � �:t .4�.: � : � �� ,�. ���/ � . ,�� ' �' �� � � � ` ''' �+' �� � >,� ,� . � � •_ �. .�i�'�. �T. � � � '�. � ��G,�r'�.. IQ � J" �.''. � • �,°� �` :, � �.. ,� / . "i � � � �' � U-3400 Upland Sample Point � . � - - ,' ,,, " � ',.,,��►��'�� ��� `;� "�. �,. "'�` a � � ,,�;•_� � � � � � ��. .,a ' �' . �' \, `� , �" �. � �� k . _ .,. . �p,� . , �� ',/� � �a � r S/ '�i *.� SI�'�`<,"r� � .w�`.... ' r�� , � � .�♦ : t' R� T'�" j e. �� -_9 � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point � � ', _ � , `, ,�€ 3 .�„ ,� . \ , ,»�. , �:�;- �� ,�`� � �: ,� ,� � �„ ,�,t , v � t - � . � �� � � . � � ��t+1� - _ � ;.: . " y. Roads ' `���' � �. � f 'F A.: , ; `t � � , ,` ,I � � �.�� �. � - ��"��M� . � . ; �'_�r �`�° . � .r : . .. w ".� .R � �� � s � `. �.z � �. r_l \�' • � '!Id/ � ��aca► � �t. ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3� 1. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Archdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N ' c; i''�' . ' � , `� = M , � , , � ,: �. � ..' '��.� '�f � � . . , � _` , ' ., �' � ti- v , -�• ^ . . p t . �, �, p�e�� '��' _ .. �♦ � a � .�* �� �,'` �' - � ,� ,_ r � ' � ,�i� �� � ,k„ ��, j � . �,,, s "�, ;r: �. . �r ., . �;,.�� , , r �'. � , a+ i �. �. . �. � . 2J� , ,, E . � i . ,�' `' . ' w - :y, y� ��. ',, c�, , i w'� � , � � � ��y si f ! ' � 7�, '�, ak4, ' . �� � - �,rs�:r � � �: ,� .�.h � +� J� i � � 1 ;y� r� F . , •� . . . „� ':����� � _ t a � t. oa � . • , � �r. �` - -.., . � �;`, -�• ` r � � � � ' � w Y � •. � , 1f '�e. .�, � V ' "l �' 'n �� a` ",- * � • � u � �,, fi,,� ,-» "� e C _ �{ • � r� r ` . � �. � � � . M" �'��. , '. '` -., P,J 11� .,�. � �� '�+�r+�.: . 1' �' �L°� ;,� ... . ' � . h � , ^ � ` •.C• � � � •. r ` t0 .� ';� a �t" !f'� , + ..''yr '' , J `;. •:�1 . � �p � . �' 0' A r � 4� '� I' 4. v� �' �"9' - . �' � � �.� i�. �r� � '' �F.: 'y.�'� � r. _ �"1� ♦ � i� .�1f � s . '�.�`� >.:r� � �„FY�, � . � t .at��:, n 1 � ^ ._. ~ �� ' . � , ��` �' _ , � 9 Y �;��� � � � 5�a r . �� a y y ' ''�'•. y� ^' ,'��, �,. ' • � . .�. ' \., '.,� ' ` ��� � w+ .�"�.`��' lG d , 1�.'� �� R�'`+ �' t� �! ` .. Y'y� `� � -6 �a .� �-' . , k ,�+� �I{ "� �r�. �Y. '...� lf>t �;_ � ` > � r ��d� ,r 'i' ' �.,� � : J: µ . � , . � �.,�\ ' r �4' �j� 1f ` *� ti r �" �, � i f'� .�.-F� t p�.�' •k�� ..�"� 'vY�"� � ~ � • ��4 �''� �', ,Vr r .�� •� .• �� ,.Y � f �.�. *,:f y"? :4 j�� � ,"MI �' ;��• T y �. ;' � R Y ., � � . .� � ` .?r, � � . '� ♦i s +as ,,� •; �,I t-�M t �r ^ ,�k m . � , ^ '��' �� +� � .. � r' ."'t , � �.... ,- a. � , M •i,.�1'.��E,, � .it' . . � r y p � '+ � v � � !":,.. ,,^ .. 9�y"./ �� ���� «� ''�, T r _ ,, A ` y�. -- -- r � ��� .� � i � � ��" _'�_c .^ .. � \ + , �` `n I: +„ � S , q?� ; Ay ��i r , �r;. � '� '� .' �`�• • . c {� � ` .�_fi�a Y f . � .. � _ _� ' - ��� � � � �.C'•' �J'' � � O- d � ��- � hr,�'.• � �. ' �!± .,�. �.i�,}t f. -�� w; -,q'�` � �� � � .�. � i � '� . �,. � � . �!, "•:/ !!".: 'Z.t�"i`, �'. �. � �%�.\ V'��i4' . M� , � �� �� '+ '+` .'.�'�er �.�R..t �� y„i� �� , � �� t . . �. , , .y ,�i - `' }� � � , i�.q�j� ��y '�. � . . - _���� � ".��� -.� 1 � �. 'Y�",��' "i'Y�� :\i�`e t'. r �'�'(� � ' \i'�'�;•� � � : k ,../'�"�� Pn` � , '' '�F` �� �� •M >�^'.7. d�a �'v �`.•.r y � +. .. � � � � � , , � ' i "� i.A. ,., . .�_z -� . � r � _, - . � � �a��.,. �. '.�t � �t . � � ► .'y ' , � - 4_ � � , . , . . , F: ti� � � + 1 , �� � .� - . .-. � . �, . , � 'i. 4 . :t� �. g►ti ' v •_ , � . r ..��.�'' . '�',.- + �.,�a. .� �. . . ,� • V.�,i-.� �/ �,�r;�,l _ .. .. . � . � _ � .� � ' . r �k S * . . � �, �`Zt���. ..f� � ��` � F' �',: • 1�., r . r yy �;, t � �A t�. y ; '�� � . •�,. « -�'. . {' � , � ' - . � : , ._ ..'�•.�- � �'. - �c . , � .. ,'r,_ ,�y� ' r: r , , �,,,r t, ti�y�, -' i, <'�, ,�t'. F � , .' �. '+^�+}� ! . . . . ; � -:...-- . 4 �.J t, �. .. . . ..� , a.:� `t !�� � . . � ',f t .. � 'r� � "� .1'' �4 T :., ' ��i . � ; ,�� -'�j � _ ,� � tr` . �'1 \��• ' � ��5=. ',y� ���� :� ' �� • � 4 �y��} 1� . � F +.�.. .y 1' , � • � ' r � � � � . � �..� . a�, .�,T,_+j����' � � a. , �,.,� •,r,�. �: • � -�An���. vz, : .� .r�,: � ii` � . mo `A e -. � - r� ; !"qqj " ,.� � ' � . - � • , � T �.�J - Y.y -1 . f� � ` a a��' �'S' � � `' a �. . .:; Swath re � , . _ � � • r i \ S,',���, `�. �iQ �" �..w � +�- �r . F�,�. Y� � •� �!� �r,�.4'. . �,y , "� y .l' �{{, �'1 w t - � r,t � '�v �,� %� ,I �pr�`. 'r j+ � . � _ sa� . _ .F'�- � .. � . •'`� \ . ' - `� '��"' - ^ �K• � ' � I . �; •�r � er p� �, ,� � �� � ., � , ,s,r �, ,.�. � .�� p � � � . , .� . 4,��.� � ,r,�fi.. .. r' � .� �', �'a<n , .- -s�1.,4 � � ��'y.' � �,� o�.� .�, ��+ - p�, " V �►' rM� 'C' ;� � . `� -�y�`.'h�rv��` �. . `� �- ��" �,�' -..� #Y- . ` �' .a � � ,.c n�* '`� S �. '� V i.-���'`' �~���,,y� "'��.�C �, ,'�. `fl' ,"i�: ,','� `'d'' !� 4 ` � ,� �D � y }'.:j���. •>ri�Q?,�� K -�: � � � `' "�#� �t 3 Y :`"� •`°'' �.� �ti � r T �',� �,� ',,-"' " 'r' ' f � � `r ' ' � _ � 0�" � 1 ,,; � '��` _ +� 9� . �'. � ' a : �` _ . � :�r �+ � St ,�'1'Id"��'- �; �' � . - � � ,�� ' �..: f .,� ' . �.�.: � "-!p'�'' . iY�.' . ��y'. . '~�i/►., , � 6�r�, �t , `;�,,' '� .,� `?.. � � `yF» . '!�, , ,}ta�„ • ,r. � � , r� - �" c -��;, - � ; ``�S r � 1 . � " 2, _ . , , ;��:,�,- �» ; ' �t�� � � �. ' , : (� '�' ` � o - '', „ - Y�. y . _ � �_ .i'+ '�'i'` .'� �'.�-. `'r.��'� .\"�R�� _ �'�� . ,r. !�� _L4,..� '^'' MK � *. . r �+..,. d/%} ..�. ���yF�1 r' :� *,. �r` � ' . ,n � ' @ � 'r^ .:. .'F„ . � � �4 "i�` �i.��dT,r, � '� .�. . � � �� �'A.�. �,�� �, t` �, �'�., lS`, . .�t �, ��{ 't` � �F f ' + � e r �. h� ' �� ���,�:..�5 � �,� �r.�?�! `�.� • � v - 'r. �.,�. _.t.- . � . . � �I � �� r� � � �y � f i � . � �'' ." s _ . T �.�. -�r� .r, �, ia ��. ��.�. , �+�'y� .� . '� : � � L`'�+. � � � �, *`` � 'y� �, „� ' � "� ' , . i, -�' � �� _!r. * f,'� .. � / 4 `,� ��-: (� � :� + w 1 _ - � � t��y . �a';� . �' 'y��•� � �' ;\ w ``� � ,r. .�1. •'� � .r � '��� ` ,�k . > .�S , .. R.� ��1 � w`� c. ,,�,.�' �'� +„�C � .,� *` �, � �, �..� •�. �i ��` � a 4 � F , �� � � � ^s ''vT' 4`� .,t �'�11 � _ ,�.' �`" � ,�t,� �"} �'�F ,` �. '•,ti . , � � `�!c � '��w ?I� �kb, ' 1 _ . `. ' .. ' \ . k � � �l�'"�;-� +� ` � w � ' � ��" 't ` � ` . . ,• � * � Y'> �, F� � '�? , . t . ' �' �c�-, . : !� , `,� ♦ �� -�`� '�� �.r�_- . . , • F �, � •"•� �. - � i � �--.�:y, . � ''' �+ .. 3� ` ' V � �� ���"'�'•`;e � . •� �"` . -4� � �' � �� T � . � Legend �, i�. _ � �,� Q .. �� ,� . y � � � T � . ; � , ��t - � � ��:� ' .;� ; � � r' _>:`'�' < � � ,''� � � . • � , � ` � � � `� , �. �, � ' �'� -;r� '�T �` ��: �' �,' ��`� ::�.. � .. __� ' 1 .. _ _ . � .. ,� ' •��•.�. \ J J � A U-3400 Project Area ;f e►� �..�' �, ' '��''�� � �' `�°`�.,: "` �,�; � `a` . � '� � ` � ' � 0 + . � , .�! r' p! ,- . ,.!��. � _"'.� _..�''� � .aQ_� .=sbr,�-.,.��r 1� � • w .. .,i ` r. � . ,- . .,. .,�R . . �, ^�. `' � ` _ � r. W f *.� �. ' '' �r•,' � � . � �r � �.. � • r - ,'���� � ����: , � :�. , �, �. y • r � i. .7 f � . � '. . .' •f } .; t ' q� "� 4�' v � �F� U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US `�' �j y� ' �`Y � �y �'� �`°y � �' y �_�` " ' - � � � � �. �. � r� " ��A��: � .`��'�Ry .t� .��• '�' .I.� � � . . ♦♦. _ �('y . �jr .. _ . . � . ^"/�• ,I w _. ^!.. '!S� ��;. ' +�� � ', . `� , b' -. '� - - • ,. '!. : U-3400 Potential O en Waters of the US � ,; ; . ` • - � '- , '�� `. .� ,- ti �� ` •� �`� , � ,� . � , �� _ F �j p ���^ ._ ' ' . c 4 � � � � �� � ` r � _ . r�, . ' w� . �� �. ^� � :� � � �` � - �' �.,�.} W � 1 .. '�:..,4 � � ., � ` ^ .1 `.y ' Y. �^- U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Perennial �- _ .�. ;� � �. -. ,, ;'; ., ���-�� � � �.��>�{`. *�, ' -:"�,,M �, ;�` � � �- � , . , . , '��. . .. , � . w� •I'�A� � ,..�. . .� ���'�;0,,��✓ � +� !e �$ �"'�• ��. . ♦-z ' � f. � y�, 2 ! � ..._... U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Intermittent ��" ` ,�, - S ► / �• --- *� � � � y ot A °. �'r :�'� `. ' ��"y' ?I � i ;,� �-14 ♦ A �<. �.` : p�i ��\h � Rd- , .� ` ` �, � �' ���• ��,} '` , ' ,,� !fk � �ti `���s ` Stratford ^� U-3400 Ephemeral Channel ' � � �'': ' ,'�+� . � , ''�� � , ,;�. '���A�� s� . .s• . ` ��w`\ � , ,, '� ,� � -�;�d �: `'�t _ , , , ,. y� �� � � � � ��' ,� ` e �'���• . Y � p , '^ � � � ? � � U-3400 Upland Sample Point " `� ��r� � ° ,� �� � �'.�,�#' , �,r+� � /.y'�,� , rt./ �, � i _ «.� �j ,i; ��` F �F;•.. f�$� J/ < �,. n • . �� , ' r y(� ,Y. . F, t�:{!�'� �\ " ���5.`—J'�A ��� ... (/ , � �`. ��. �+.. � CF'", •�T�e�.. . . R V�I . � '�,. y.T,'�. V � ♦-Y• h" \rv � � , t �� A � ^ y��l.. ♦ � � � � .1't;:l:�� �� \ � ��� d/�'�. r, � S'�. '.. � � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point . :�� �Y: z, '�,., � �'t�' �; ,_ � •_ �.�' J� �r .• *�' �'�� ` �'� s�: �`�, ;,` i�; � �-� � "'� ..M1r w ��� ~e i�+'� -a. � -. ";'��� � �� ���.;,�� r �.a �, �y� 4� �,'l ' �t + ' . �� y � y �r , ��`r f .�p� ��` ir .� ' ��, '�'� Q� \ '� �'Q" r '�' Roa d s �,� f.��' . � ��'l�+J� .,. . ' a �� �, �� • �ST K� •+Y � � '�i �,y _� �Ita �� �� ,� S' \ . �i 4 4. _ .� +� _ ... � - "��+ 1 !^ ''" __ .,,.� � �_..x:. ,'�...- `��' s.'�'_ � � �"���� ' �\���. ��`' _ i?� ''4ti1,�: ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3��. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Arehdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N q�a+7c . .-, . � . r � ., . , . y._ � �. - -�.�cr't �. --- ,��,+ ""'"' �,: f y .�w � - � le_ � 1 l�� \ .. r �� .} `l,•' -.2 7O" - �� , �S. S iP �L � , � � . ' � �/L '� � � . / r ��(iLl,, ' .. ,� 1 �` � . . �' 1 � � H� � 4 � . . i�� - • � �.. , � � _ .1 . � a �, � , � t . .. � F ���`� • �- '�. *� � ., an;� ��� ..� � �. � b: � , i , '`, �.- r� / ,�y �'`• t. " . .� .i I • . %71� � `I' v�' _ r � .� �� � � � � � � � y.w• �.�.� Jr', r_ �f. ,. , . : %� �' f -s, � I� f l,�, . I�� � �rA � �' e � �� ������ � ' �" �� � � 'r d��` , .,t., � ��¢ QA� �` .* t Q;t' y.. ,`� `i. �_}��F y� {�'•' '. _, . � � + \. `� r iti� _ �,��1 `^ \ ���F'� f•� fJf.,� � �f-.li � l��a'_ �.\. '� � ��� � .r. � r M � 4� 3 M r `C _ _ . . . ti �. . 4 . � �i `� �� 1�#.y� .' . . ..�`µ,�, �_ �� ,� ; � .�"`� �. ,.;-- � ,. � �� 'I ^ ��� '.� �: �r[. �' ':i . v � � �� �` 4� ` �' `♦� � { i� ` `Y t�,.;,;i �,, �' �� ,. t �� _�_ `!� i' , .� � �'1�'�� •, ., . : - , ..�... , . a . - - _ - • � � ,�� , -; fi , � *1 Y� Y`,. ^ _��. � �j1,3z ' ' � � „a.�� -_ ;, , ' ''i � � J� �r;,,t � :y�;;` ��`� � `�r,�" . � � �1{' `;�. : � �!X. � r.' n� f+ . fi _ �� .� FI' �a, .�� �i � =d�'', ;"Y_ � ., .e .k��,� F$-"...�]`1q,,,�r�' �"-`�'- $�''.�-� a '.�'. .� _ . A. �a � .�e� . r,�"' ' ": .. � t .!. + .1 .�. . * ..,� � � �'\.��`s.r�' �� � j:'� .' ��- �.r �� ;�,,�'� �' .� � .¢�' . `. I . ``� �.;._. �f ` 9� �� ' rt� s, f .. . 4 • .a.� � � �.�; � � �` �' . ', ` � �. , t _�Yi, ��� � � 51�. * �''h,. �Y . yw�,'�� �'�: �. � �,._.y� -. 1S � � . ac . � i.0 . ��. .�1. F `' .- ��`� r.r � - � �',:� , . .� _ ' 4 . �+��:� �� _ � -��.hL1_;�;,�, +►'' .:�-� �� � � y �� O- .�.'- - . _. �, �� � , �` � v" ,�.,�� . . �n. � , � � . + - ..; - � a �i ---- ._ :.*.. . , �� '�� � 'i �,r � z � � �s� R. , � ��! , 4y.., , , ` ~� `�' ',dr . _� +` f-� `` � �,. �r:�l . - ��i `4h`��; �';,�`` �-ti\� ,r `` �,�,� � �. ,, � ` � , j� .��,, ..'�, . � `,.i �TY c ' . ,►' ^k.� `;RY�` \ _.l, }� ��'"'�'�►' � `�"y- ' n r I �, . l . ♦ . . �,��� {tl •�!., 1 . "'� —/ '� � �. - ,.i �` .._' ' , _ -., . `,�� ....•. � . 3nc: , � . � ..� . �� • .r,. � . � ' '� . �, , . . - �^ ' • , t ,. e .' � . �' . �,a,4, ;� ;� � �. - �'4 `. . �' ' �. . . �,Y�' 'a- ��..Nl �. . � ,i -.: � � � , . � >f � . �� Y� ,x .. �� �` . � _ K�1 , ; '�' 4 ' � � � ..,-. .: �, �. „ �.. . ,�, -� ,- ;<; . �. . �T � •` ` , ` ^ , �, + • ek'� F " f •. .' ' .' ` f ' ' l ' ' �. ��� .rt� �..'�' � .. , �I'�" . • :, , �\�• . ."'� � ' � ✓. , , ' �'r � , �4 .• y � t i� � � '� - .�y V � �� �. ,'-s � , 4 , �� c t x ct � _ ay`,e'ir � � � eR e Rd � . � 1 k - • , � + ' ' � . � �` ' � +� +� - da� � � � \, , ,� ..! -"+a .'`� "' +�{��. `��Lp�+�� ^,r, .,� �,5p,►�*. � 1c��` � . Y� �s ' {� , . f �' ` 11 �, va+Y , a �l ��Ly �lr. � W :: • � � . - kT `, � ' �' � ~ � � � r_ . '' .�1 1 � � � .�',,.�� f' , �� �4�d`� �� :� i , ` • i� � �,s"_ . _ � -� ��� � ' � ` ,� ` -'� r 'ii`� ' � y� �, p � ��`i!.. �w�' � , 1 :s}Rjr•� ' � �', A I � � ..�h �y 4 � - a1 �� �4. � �) � :.. . . 1 .. �� � D ,��1��vS . . � � � ��� � �.�.. � � � l'. . . � � . r . f� '+7� . � �j�-a+;. �� �. � �. . � r r ' ' . - ' Ha�enwood � `�" , � � , �� � , -,"kc, r. T \ ' . � ^ � + -o _ !`� �:' _ . „ . `, � � �, .;r _ A ,�i ��,j, . � � - . �; '�`.;i�, � �,_ ���� � 4 � . ,�p � `M`� � .. . � � � - -� - .� � , . ; �� ' . , � �!7.i.. ,, ... � r + , � , }'�y� , + .,. � . • — � . . , t c — .F ., . _ �� � �t - �� 1� {w �^ "j;�", ' � �'S��« � e t � `� F . �:'!�y'.. ,F �� � Z it ,%� ,` '� � "'�..+- �,'t� � �, , / -:y-. , -'6 � . r....`��� �� ���'.�r� �„ .��. ., �, 'ti �' f u�1. ,�r� �, �J • ^A"+' . . . . � � . \ , K - ` _ - "��' .: � �' �t . fO.: �7 '> . r. � , ti � � � .�C ' � a � y���y, s Le end � kg� ��� � ��+r'��qL,�, ��� ��, ��,�j� .�, �, . ,� �. .11*i���.s��"' ,+�'� � ez�''.:.�., .._ �'\ . ,�a� � ���V" �-.��.. �t � � ' ` � Y " . .- .+:.y`=..r . �l �„ , �.iR�f;�.' �.�' . � '.`ti U-3400 Potential Wetland Wate U-3400 Potential Open Waters � �^- U-3400 Potential Waters of the ••'+�• � U-3400 Potential Waters of the U-3400 Ephemeral Channel � U-3400 Upland Sample Point � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point Roads C1��A_ _E •.A_-�:c��,.�.7..._�s 7!s l F T,e� - �. . -�.� __1Jcr,�� �'-� „o�r;� � . � � ...r� .i— 'ii • �.v��� ''� �.� -� �°. � � Q � � �� 4 ��, `•��at '� � �" �'� .'�. � !�,: > r : �''+ � `,���� . �, : ���� , � M �s* `� ���. � �� ,o�he ast �r - — �� � • . _ � Y. � �.��� ' . .. 4 . .. � . ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3��7. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Arehdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N Y ,, ' i ., � �' � ,� - ,, . L �;'�. ' ,� �, �c,�,a � , - ;,`� � - � � - -:u .. - - � ,�' `, . , . �• �,�� s�� � {4�`t �>' ,�<, . y _ ' .� .: :-.r * dman�St ��', - . '�. � ` r '+�: ! � �� � �Y -_ [� � _'c. ♦ ...�` �,�� , � �' ',,,d►�y�,. - �� � �''v Goo � r�',, � :�: � i � , '„� � �. r� � . � � �. �•- �* r r--' `.�� f �� �=�-' � i� �.t ,�,.. � ti. � 4 f „`����' .�,,�.��,atj ..` ] �:�� s ;`*;. � �t"' _y�a . : •�• :!1� � f� . — - �' ^ ,�� , � � ,=�.,..t. �•�''. a L� � � 7 1\ ;" \ . C �r . .?i1j � • . � �` • r . - , � � s-. � , �-�.�a .. . r ir � .�, . ` .: � . .� . .. . r�yy yy ;���4 ' � � ' t ��� ^ , 4`. " �f• i "�., � . � ' . - � ., 'p � �� • � �, ;y�- \ , _-t\�. ... � � - � ., -C-i � w� 'S , R �`}? � � k�1, • '�� � � e a�� `ti� v +rt �, -' �.,XF} �.L �-oi }�� .'h y'; � �N'��' , �� . � { ° ' �. . - r- � , _ , . � � '� 'Q' � _ ' � �'" • � � � .'`�` 1.�.5���.,� :.� Y �'r.;F: } v4 _[ �'nq' ^'4 .� r � a't5'" � ` ��' i � � , .� < <' ",*� ��c� ''� . �t rr LL' • �,� � i� � � r,` " , � ( ` ��;�� _� . �' � W�tipe.*. �. �.,,,i;/ 2.; k '�, f��`'!'����� . .� . . ...r, � �� _ .� '`" . a .�.�i�,.:t �' .- . '."'"i� ��' � .� .. • „ ' r�l :�t- �'. ��,. •,A.� ;��t�.; ��.�,'. ''o' �[ �ae�!�'� . y '\ Y , �• '1Y��� �:. � . �i�Y f .,,., :'� . a�, ( ,. � ��}J � � �`�h� ,.\ � . y= �� .�.\. a�.. � SI�, �'`�..�(l yl�. ,� >,�� � ' il � �� � '� • '` y � • �.. _ �C��. �a � c A �4- t!'t * "� •' 1 '�i ' •t^ � i ro�" �rtt'F . '!+� . �' 1 �y�' ti .:<< . '1+ .� J� �E..�. "? � �. �" a '�t, '� o� ""i �' '�•, -.i�i.y��� �� ._�: ^r. �f' � � �` ,,����� �. 'l � ,�,�f �.. . .� - �2� �.�i �.�q, ? ! ;�'�Jy�,., �+�. - �. i9'.• - `t�,, �j, Y, ' ����y �r � �y . \ � rr " F , .ri. � ,�,� w��� � ��'�� ~:�" � � a.. "s •' . � : ,� �+�}�,* � '� Iu' �' " �` ""� �y`�,� ' ���4`.. , � �� � .F,..1� h , 1+ �� � W� � - Y ' �� •�?�ti� � � A � + _ •� .4 �,1�it�y,i ` -�� � . � :� 'i, � - T;... � �� •".k. r. ' . 'iR: �� �.w�� . \ ., "P � � .,. . . - � , �1, � �' . . ' � . • �. "' � y�"st� �j�' � +�'R�• S fi'- .. � ,�, ��.,,, � k \ . . ��... ' ��.�r'+T f . (' a � ` �{r '�'�4�yi=4 ��., ::� � �� � • �� �� _ � .*F , , ,,y��", � �•i`. � . . , . t,, .t�'s r �� � : r ►' � . . �� �. � , . � - n,. j.+, , � � v},*��.' a� `'r �.... �` ' � �' «�M . � - ' �� ` � ',q ,'� �;. . "" ►'i"E � � . �'v. -L �• - . a � -F '� + �' �t �'' - �. �,� tit - �}�" . � . h�'� '� �. �., �' ti < °' jr��R ``: • � y. ��S„'1 ,,� ,�. • �,'" ::�- � ��� ,�i' f � � ESsex Sq a ���.�'y,- � . �* �t.�., i�.. '�. ��. +�'. •_�; . . � `•`L � � . ; � _+ . �, .,., . r , � � � .�r . , � . - � w- � ; �� "��. ; • � `' �:: i ��, ��., J ,.��p,Y� �4 Y � x } }� � f, �,ti �� �',�. � � , r . ,� .� '� - . '�.. t� �.�, 1 �. .� �..� +�r. / r ":! � '� '� l �!,* ` � � ' • � .. Y �� .. � �e+` '�� �, f �s�a t.r �'�t� '� �� �w' ,�� '�.;1 • � � � � .� . �. .j. ��� � , � �.4. . , � .. � '� . .X ti� � Ij: '� � '� � +` �' ; � :C„��,1;,.:: -;;�� � � �� , � � ��� �Kq _ ! \1, �, 't� _ F { �, ,��� � "' , j. r�" , � � . , '.�►, -. ,� �J � �Y �•.y...r . 3. ��. �'� Y � �_ �` ..�5. '►� : ` � � . �,. .. .�. Dale St � :�,'� � �r^ �. �j t � x,_�l - r.T ,`. �.. `v_ � � i - c i �r S ' �;;` � 4 .1''. � n *„ >. - �.}� � (� \� „� \ + � . � ^�„�3'= l ��� '\ . , t . _ �t ` + ,r. '` � � � t. � '�„� ?. ; \'{� •:.r'� •,�',�, ' x' '4� 1t i. k� '3 ` �' �Y' ♦ '* 4 . . `�,�� er.� '\ � q. � - .-r.i.. Y,,`• *'� ,: �-:�:' � �' r,� � '�.� , ����• � -� � �� �� � r �t �.'1i' `���� � � � ♦ r' � .{ �� ���: ���' -�:-�� ��''�`st�.�. !�;, � .� t � ,� N . . � � � . -s�), �`��+,, ��. I� O, . Y �>� t..^ " i �y,��y., � L� ,.�'(`^J,�3`' ,\ .'�`I\..� � ..c �n,�� .��� `� � 'y,� '" \' �� �►+. ��. 6"' >, ,,�t✓ �1, �•r� �5 'i�1 . ..`�T. r � � . �' _ l �ii �}('l� S� .r' 'Y`,.�y�Y7=�,T�i .� =4�S• � •"'+�"s : � 1. "�. -"'�,�u'�i�`�F .�. ` e,�..,..s,l.`x��.�� �'; f � ..� � �8� ��� i �'S. }'�.. . � � � F`r�e �•, -�^ ���r, �����t� `1...+f `i`,J� .+�".:sq � ��` :Q�'r � �.''w.�,�Y.' h [-_ . � `/� ' .�• rs . ai��.. '' Y'' `�. _t� ��` b,' '1 �.�'R?v �,�� ,.� a � �� �!�h \ � � ��-., ,1 4 . ;;� �� ��' � �Y�. ��+'''��� ,,,..� �e ,_,,� , , . � . , ' ,hb`R� b �' A�.� �e < ��'R'. : •rC �Ig.,�`YK .��'� t � �'`,+� S. ,�, r.? .� ,. �'�� •?,.�� � - �� ;�..� �',�.�','`�h _,� -.L ,_t"�' ��� ^a', ��' � �.,�'i ��/'. J4��- ` � � r �'�'�'� •� � � y'� �,,� � 4`A�1� -�+l' `'�.. ,�F ',� �,' \ � �yt. ' :.. � !} y��� ti �a�. - . �ic ��• �'�`�. � �;� ` r�`'��f- � �! �} -r� ..� F. �dF� �� .�' � - �p;: .,�; '"^ � �+FA; i, ♦ ,�1f, .l �� p' �� �{�, � r ,' y . :, � •�� .. r ... . .� ` '� , _, _ . . . . a , . .� �y '�'�' ,. . �. ��. � ` `► +1: � :i�""t �' . z . �,� '��j , . .. :�-. k�+�.� . �.� �, � � Y�.. - `�..,`� -. , i E �,��` ,�„ ,A -�., �♦. � � irK• �y r -'�4<, 1 . �3.d�� �� rh � --.c,,,f. � � � 3� 1 , k' �►,. � ���., '`�. ( ' " ;«G�, k- � � ` � '''�! ' <, a; j - ``�? ,�d��_ .� �! ' ,> � .; �'�:,y ��. . �� r � �., ;�s*�� �^ • �'�� : �,� . . �'+ �� � tr- ^ �� � '��;�, - ~k} . '�. � , �. ti `�w x �•_' f,t . }� - .��' �,1 i� R� . ; �� . � � �,R,�'��a. � ?'�. .�� \ .;�� ,.' ��� 3 �.. .�; �.. , , ��� _, ,��,�+ K. � �` ? '�� u, �' � ,1. _ -�' ,� b ' � ��`.�, .',A �' � `'Q ,t '�. �'' . - �� ��- \ � ' � � � "�, ��� �� J� � �.'��.Q, �► � � � , r"� t ' Yy i . �' � � � �r+}. . ��• � .� � .,d . . �ui� s � � Mk� � �R!��, r ' . �2 � . 1�A�_ �('��`�` tf° � � - �}I�, �. .. . ��..� •. ��' _�. . �'_:�� ��� +C� �' _ ..:�"�7, "%'� �, �;''� ,i `i � . ;..��, ', . - � , • 1`.! -4�� ,� - .'�:. ..f�� ; ,.c�'', .,s � "',� ��.,�. ��i, r St Y � ` _ .. .L, � �� 7, .�,� � a,f. y�, w ,+�. � . �`'+(v c . `��.�: �a � � ��.,�;' . v�7� v-��.�`f�. ��Vli4' '"' . > � ` , • _ . �4a' '� �- .�� �� _ }1 4:.b ,.. . • . . `` , i i+ . y, • �r���" f � ♦. . �y', ' 1,�1�•�! .L'� ikC. ; ` �C� . ;'� {'�r.`k� i �. � �� .��+t ��.. � i ' �, . .F : q� � �� =a1 • � � �_ �1'_ ,e� � y�'�. � � rti�`'.:'-. . � �� '�t� �-�:: ~ vr 1 ��• .,�1.r7� �� ���w '� . ."C;j��,� ��~ .i.�.y, �S. ,'��^* f� �}y,•• �Y�' ti :1 �r ,� Nl.•.*' � '"'�,� F�,' � �i �. f`�^ �[ t �.� +� 1� :, ��,�1' , "9�3 . . !Q,,,.'a .� � r�,. �i ��-,� �✓. � �Sdp.�'�.: ��'� .': �. �' �`�'e, V :.�:. `� . �� ,^5�.. .. V`M$� �.�a�'.. r.r � �,� , �+„� � e �.�..' - � �� . � � � . i . N� �:, �t....�:' -.�-..... ' ..` �'�� w� `�'� z ,`� ��\ '. !� y�f + .�,�j .. �.� � �:�.� �.: �, �i � � i r . + ... g� � - n. > Y'�� r '��'.1 ���r . .. l �� � "�,�!F . ,�, � �"�'''�'9' /�,. `y, . ,�' �.; ��'�. 4 • , a �_ �et '� �.: - ..•! ''�. "�.:. ..4� • �'.p \� ♦ 1 �, _ +r - ,t �� � , "'� � . .. - � ��* �� :1�:y�' ��i�, y� •'{x -� - .,i: �r, �V' .1�` i `` � t'P:. �, ;�i`..f '.F,. �,L'� 'v� �y t1�. '��`4' ' .�' ti�+,�,� ����',� � !�� e ,^ �.c.��� -�•, ���5�,,�. . T�.,'�t[ v ..�. , _ � � . .M1 t, � ,,� .,�. � . '[z�' �', �y �i, _��-..( 's � , �`��'� ;.T .r .. � x., f.�a�.. j� � � :`:�+'. ^�. , . i:..' . � @ " .r .. '.� (� `w' . ' �- �•L• ��"' ,. � \� �• ,n� . S � � �y�`E��i���.. � � � t . r.� '�.11 s ... � . _ '� -.�w L . 1 , � •"+` .? ` � . ;��. t' ,� �� ���� )�'k YaX�� � ~. .>�` \�` .'i. �~• t�t . '►�':; =r,r-`� 7� :i`�" :�\.� � . / � .. ` . ' �j-U�C�y . � � � -� ..�, � f f,�`•' � _„ ..y 3i , ;iw� � . , • , , �Y . �� � ,� �_ 'y : . , , . �. � - y� �y,,� �p � �1 �'�:' '°,�,. +� _ ` `� . �"' - C.���• ,,�. y �.i . . •" -�.� :�` , t 3`� r �� , ;, , �SF � . �� �` . y . . . �k(� . ... _ �� fi{�" '� rtl�- . �'r �� •� \. ',' ,� ,'1 ' _ �.� �. ? sy � i*. , � � �+ � � 1�`. `�� y� '� • �`.. ,o y�y R p t ;.� . � ' �•'. .� �i' , r ^. M p � `� � ,� t +y, '� � i `. F"�` ������ �'w� �' V �' 'A 1 � �� - ����� �� ?ti � R.;t�~a ���. ���.. o .'S' "�+� 7 � r ;1 ' , �' � . � �.�,� ' `. ..'�: �i � � � �� 1 d� .� � ,�� . �� e_ 1,� ♦ �. "�^,\`"�'7..i,� s% -`:,{�. $►p� �, , j��'� . ��' � +yy\�,\`��.,.�.�, ��, � �=�' }� A.a"c1.; - ��-i �k. �.� �!`i . `�.��ir�f` �. � \ , .� � . , i'�4.. .f! �� . . � ,.� � � 1. � i , f � �. �ti. �e .,�' � � _ �'�.� z . �, •�� �'", �'+� � �:; �� ,.�• �"'�� �,.,'y� , , e �' ` • .` C 4 �`' * t mF �.�, • � e'. � �� !. . F �,� i yv.��.a` 1?�,.{; �t"i, �i� I�` '� � .�Y.� y . � .� R\ �� . ; M��. � ��O �•� ,r �i�. - i4 yi..:. `p�. ' t�. : . � ��- �t��. "'� _ ��' � .�., .•�`� `1�}����, � tR -S{.� }�� . �iQ, • � �� �,, v��� • : "",1�� t' T � v i � �. ��+- � '�a,l. \ \ 4 �, i.� �j' �� . i �-1 q t+ . �� Y' .1 W1� �' ��%� , , ' �c�i . 7�� . - ; . • � , �d',, �'p �t p �:,� � �} • -k. � +� �'; '�� S, ` �} ' ti� •' � Legend � '�`�-`� ��, a � r ���� ��; � � x ,�:� �' ,,��'` �` .. �� �,>°� � � _ �...,� ,,�.: , .. i• i, ,,-�`�.d,�('(������v .. ',y , , � ��' � � �� nW i , � {�4 � ° � �:�• � � :�L � -. �:�, /�° �'. �� � ~�' �� "}�` � U-3400 Project Area '��,i "'��` �,'�; � t; ,��� ,. �� � .��.n �� ,= \ '��,Y ;. ��; � � . - � � . � `• { . Y 4i � A '�.�► i ,. � '�' - �� ., s� .+�'°�'1�:; _i+�,� .. � r;: r��p r,; �.�. �.. s ' .4 t t � `. ��'.�`, � �,k� •:� r U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US _ . � ' Z , ` .";�' ��,y` ' �� _ �':� �""� , ti ^'� ` } �� � - . . �, e � r , F� �' �" ', � �a. � . �' x. , F � a_ ;; � �f , - \ ,� � �. ��. n • �, * U-3400 Potential Open Waters of the US ' s �' .;�� _ ` .. ...� 3 �` . ", � -� � ?. �,.a « �s � . �., ��'. . r, � ,��,, � � - , ` �� ti \�• �;. � � • ��� . • �_ .^��* � �^- U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Perennial '' ! �a��';��\�. ��� '� ��, �'�y�*`` '`�` '' '�' v � ; �`� ���, ��'' � � � .'�; � ` ,` d° ., '�°+ "� �� � � �''� � � ,. " ' o ` .� . t � .♦ ■� _ _ ` � �,� � :� � . '' `4� �`\, "'� ,: ' ,� °' '+� U 3400 Potential Waters of the US Intermittent .'• .. �'� .� - �: W� �'��� .;. � ��: -- � .. . . '.:4,+�` �� .� � .., � � . . ,,�. � �-. � � � � �;, ��-. '.��" �� -•• U . ^� U-3400 Ephemeral Channel �.�* . � 4 ° � . _ ;r,� , � ` ' -� -~��" ��' ^ ' .. � , �� , ��� � ��` : .: t .� :�y... �' ne ' � , + �-.. ,�- ��, �'� .�. , '��� . +-� i a ,� �a`s,����i� . Y, �'�` � U-3400 Upland Sample Point ., � ,k.� � -�, � ��`�` ` ��: �\ ' . �' ,��,�,.',. �"`� , /°�. • , r► �"�'�� .'': i�,< ' �, �.:.� � �� ,� � �� '� S � 4 �• \ , • y.V,��30 � �'. t � �- �� 4� - �'�r,`. ,r=���� ,��'w � . t. 1,,. m � �;`� '�'• , U 3400 Wetland Sample Point � � , . �, „ ,� � �� �-., � � , � _ , , � � _ ��`��'o ;' '� `1� •� � � �� � . � � y7 Roads ,. '� Y.. �,�� �T �` `�`. � :�, ♦• , � , _• }' , � � � ' � _ � - _ .� ..�; '�, '. � �� � �', �,�r' , �`'r' � , �, ' �. �, . .K^ ' `''�� � �'� :�1� , '1} X � � .�'- . 3.� : ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3�'�'1'. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Arehdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N tt �4� � .� , � �� —1 a, ��e, ' mQ� � - . �\ 4 \ l�ar'� 1�e� I .. �G'�'�/,� v! � �Yl� w r','� ../. ,�. �;�'�:'��. `. �t "; �{.Fs r' �,d C �a ,: � , � ,j, � , �'��y7� ` � � � r p � 1-..,`v .� .. ��[����. ` , x , . i Y�'� �' . h .+�','.��x j� I', �"'�"y�� �' �`�'.1�.�� �` � . �t ? t �. . K . i�• � . J ` . 4 4' � . i� . �� � � ` >;'' } � rt � , �` � � �. ti � i '�� , � �" �� �,.,� I`,�r � rf fiif /j' \ T�C 4;a� , r.� g + Y .� �' ' ; �� ' ` , ' _ f���� ��Y "�. j4����` �� .� •'j� �: ''" ,��t .._ � . r � y', -� .. ' . ..4�..s}�`). �IA � `, },.` .3. ` Y� � ^'.i !�a � tYr,4.��. . ���� � ,.C1 �".'.r�.✓+'�� . , �.' ��'�v, �! � `.` 1@''� .� �' ,p,\�� ��f �'���_ `•wti� ��� ��:` ' f '�l' �� �` �.. `_� _..i��� Y a�r��' � � ;��R.�.,�,��b�Y � . � ��M.' _ tY�'�' ����T, _ ,� {� . ! . i~� Y. .� � . .� ' � �:' . �'�` F �.' � � Y � . +' • � y��. � _ � ' !• � }� 1 y.� � M �'.• ti �;���.c t ,�� t` y. � : ����r�" ��y � • i �R"�' •� ` .ti'.�ts,�� '� 1. +9'� . � �\',�1`v l�!��l,� . � V ��'` �. f' `'3 a.. •+_�y.. � .� ���/ '� � '�,��,� -i. i�e�, �f��' � � :r�'?l. �� ` .� .` , �1' , i � :,,�'�. +t' "�T ,:' ��Ky, i� �, r .�':.7�}� i , `�� �•�'f.;;�.,,' r �,�1 . �e � ���.',� .� _ �,�'� � � � �'� •;�.r� a � .�t '� �► !, , . .. � y' , :� � , ,. . .. . �y �.�1� � - ., - � � «� `Y,� `~1� � Y'�►r �, � � � �y,` ,.�, �Y .?� r- � _ - '�` , �wv�s �� �.�� �,i t . ����. ` ��� '"" � .'t"i.. �� j :�� . � � �� ' ;'�f� k -.f " ��. �a�" C , � !'� ` ��..,�, - ' ','�V' ` - � � � M. �,;,,.'�:��i^' . ",,,'� 1 ` ,..�,. ; t � `� � � � �. y � _ ' � � . `�� 4� ,�i� C' � R�'� �4:.�� `1\,� � ,.: ��`` '�1� .�'r. - .. �r r. �,. .�. .= �'1•, . � �S ' x.i „Ca tp, � � � ,� . ,, � �.,. I `w : , . " +MI •� ` �`�,�' ` y� ' Fe ^' * ,.. � _ � . �'4' � ,,,i �L, ��'� .r. " .-�; -��t ;`��'+,y�j,,•� '"C�Sy ;,.'\• ,,�: - , . � .]� � �a' � + . z_ „«� . � • � . : � .�.�,: ' �,�A .� �� _ �`'� . . - � K� ._�` `, ��*= " ,'r F' . .� : � . �`` ��e 4► � �; . �.. �.:• , '� `�� !��• 'r � ' . � �! �`}� 9 .� ��'�� r_ ,.'��' `_�� , �. �'�} :�* R . � �; � � � � ��� � r. ��c� - - • �'Z'► �� �. :i � ,�, �a a . , . , � � _4: . v� °' - _ -- _ � ',�.. ."� �".� c.� �� _s „l` J � o��i �` -.` � �� • r `� � ,�,, � . �{,-' .�'�� . .. .'�-' -.�,. ;��j .:y`> �,�\�_ ., ; h��.�it, �. ' �,�a'* � '�4� �\� .f�1C�a.'..�,.5�'rp '`y +'� . � ♦ ` � � • . � � �'� �P� � � � �-. +`,��1'� � � . �•=�: .. � � �,` . ,, ,.. .,,..� �` �, +� � . . : c '���'f'� �� � ,. ` ti � * , "� �� � .� . �k - 3 . '• j� �„ n;� � s�' �� ,� � . , , ��' „ � �. - �� � , i'� � �''A . (`a.�r , "+ �", � �: � �c y. , ��� � p` , �4�h.�`� , .��,t�' .q+ » � : � '�� A�; �, � •� !�`�1.(a. �, is.. 'a'�. �'. , . � f `� }�� ` , j �.'±K,J .�' S .+ � s �: ��. • �' 'Yw " � �K�. L� � � • 'R _ � 1 �� � �' _ � ..� ,J ' - -> � �s t .r . .. N splJ �'1� • L t - ♦ .. �. �i��:� � . r. � ,r d 1 � � i! . - ��K: �. ���� :�� _i�y r� �,}r �i� ] . _ ��. '# �� . . - I` 1^!• ` � (q ,,� �' ' .. , y �p� .\' �� �1�,�.%�.`� ♦: �.�����. .,, � .�Ji �\ m ♦ �� ,_` 'I..� . . '� `}� . ,�1 �" , � 4i� . (�. - ,Y�,- !�• / _�� � ,1'' 13''�� , . y . •� � � �. ...y' � t � +I��a��� r� . � ,:r��4` ' ^:� .`� �. � :b.dt.\. � '. - ��� c J_�! � *T 4 �9�. � .-+K' �� � �� '�"' '�� � v<QC 'l ��. �a � � �:t�:'. �` . . r ' �'R,� 's;, � �' � t,� �4 q , " .� .�� �Y }, ♦� � . � �a\fo ,;,{ '` ' ' ��., � * � � , .�/� ;�`� _ �,i.,. .a��� �3_�� '� � ' �` �'f . . � _ , .��, r���-�`� ^�� :4rX .`+ ���`,t•�� y,•; �.� 'f,' .f�'�� � � ` �� - . .�`��i' „ ,�� `� `�. .s f ' � `� ' -V�Z` k` L �a t� t ,`�� ::. �4�'�G`\ _\, ,�'��. �: .�,,. . , `'�Y. f f •�� _� .`� .�. . . . F � , y �/J ���j� d • " _ � � , �'li+• �'4 `'_ ', �-' 1 -r � * `?� ,�.�F C• � ' . �.. . �{r ��� � � M1 ' :\. . � P^ -. � . , f� v . .�< �'`n :�� .0 y,,, a� . `�. %�, . � ♦ %,, ,l� �, ` V. �•`. �� � � � � /.�' ..'!ti � �? �jk.. ; � �� �' y ` �``n. r 1� ,�^ ��, '�7►•� , � d' t � � ;�v+.� �'C ! � �' .�+ � \ +�{y� •'�,�*. �1 +'' � . . � `S'1�!1 ,.t- �l � .:�� � j� �i. �1� y i+ �L. �' . � .:}ti� . T" ��. '� � -..�.. �i� y .L j'M � � , � ��\�, •�,'� � f\'•f � yL� _y.o� .4 �����1 t '�[ \�� `�V � ��... .:�r Fr� Yi`� 4� �� � �� �.'� .� ��\� �� ' �y I ^� � �� {✓ i4. o'l � '►.� ;.. y �� � 1�... �. . :b' �:��I��'�, ,.�t�11�,� - • . -_ .. . ��'. .,_�. ` � � ..� !� .t- .'}, . •��. t y� ,.f�� �� , � �•i����,�� � , �`�-\- a' `r� �"�'� e�'`a.,l �,�(� � � ' f. ,� . � ,F,1- �1 , • 1` 1 .1T� � `` . . _ �' �► �'`7+" , . . 'L� � � ' .' J� . /` 'v , ;� I r, �� � ,t��.,�,; 'E,;;Ser,. �•. . �. .� � �} � �� y�y �� c � �;., . .� � 3�� h�, }i!i �'� ,tt, � . �.., �' '•\' , ..�� . . '� � �d � -,\-�:.�'T"-� � �' . 4� _' ` 3 - . . , s y �:� �. , �, � '�,.' , ;'*` • ' Y'; , ,�+�� ` Pk', t `�� � ,�j , 'T� , ' . :,., .. . . � . �. �., � � ��� ;rlC `♦ � ,�-. �.-`t',�C �4> %l�..+ �..'��� r 4 ^�� .�Sd�. � � i�• � ��� '�'� � r.� {.n- . ,� jr �,�� � •��> . ti f , _ +. , , ° � x ,�` �►�!' = 4' . . :� � �i � _ . ` . _ . . . ��`� '�.��(�,�,' . -� .,,� • �� :r�, . ?�� ` �. �� . � �ti �..�� ���,. �~ � `�y ` �ti',.\. ��"- `''�w ' � :\., �� � �� �`'` v� i �•�� �: �;� �''. J�(� � , • : " .. ., , i , a .' ��. -. ,. ' , _ .._. . . 1!� .. . . �, �y�..� " � • �Y _ ! � "- /� • '� � � t � � 1 � ��t ,� "Eu� /''���, �� _ �� .�.i•, • �' � i �� � .. . F �� �i �M� �w�, � ti� �. s, *` 5 ��� .S./ Y .� -ti'`� �r-:.�,. _ . y�' ■ r.. . `� .\`�\'.+�. , .�� .�?!y-��'" � ��k ., . � ;�•., .y �r, , ''� + � L ';Cy,��,, ,. _ � �'�t: ��� . ' � �''r7 �: �, ' ? � � •'� �����f' '�y`'�r` h �e Z@� , _ %�, '- ��;a.y ._ 'A, n r�r. .�• • � �..+�--� � � •�-. -�) i_' S . . �� ' -r - '} ' i� „�1 � '"a����t L e'R � '•. • u . r� '. � � " �'� . � � v�' �' _ � . .. Q �� '-"' 7 � � ��ar''�^ r i � _� � . - . . c. .� , 'r . ' � 3 �� � �«� . - - • r �� k,.._ '►. � a` ���� ;a 'f t-� . + . � a'�' � �,��;.*y� _ --, . t F � � � ' ,'� '7` � 1� 1 � `+' � Legend �5. , , 5 -._ � , , . � 4 . . _ * _r � �y, �f 1. , �,` � � Y� .� .� '.' \� •4\ ' � �r f I' y���� t rt . R!' < P � r h � ' . . r j � .v w. - $ -. �.�t n,u- ,,� { '+ r. y , 'Z,�',. te r-� 'e �"1 •�, .�, �,�t' b;K� �'f''�` 4�1�� � �`cti�'. a�`� � � �i , �, ���• ' k�� ,� �ntersta - ,�„�',''e�•. � �. � U-3400 Pro ect Area ���'�:k� r ��,�,�,�. �: ,�-�;�: ,i �F' ;�Y��y"�' ''.i ,w �.�, � �'� _�- � �,t �y ����` , ��..ti, 1 •1� `i'� �'� ' .i + \�a X`� � .��' �k1 ��~ , 1 � ,�y`y j+ ).� `6� ~ `_ ��'� •� , ` , � � *a�^ , �" ,` �� �� � - !�r `� , �, � � ' V U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US :,r, _' � � ��, , � �. _�,�,�- t, • ���,�,����'c�. ,�:, :,� , � ��� �- Stateg5 ,�� F `��+ �•� ' � � �, 4:'�.�> ����r� �s�v�;��. '.S�`* ��-+.�.::;�,�1 a �r�'�, . . , . ,, -- ��: Inter . ..�,'-` _. '.��*;}•�Q't� •�..'Y_'�g1r,,. -! -, �F" , .�T+•- '",�f;, `�:'�, ,�µ,�f,\.. U-3400 Potential Open Waters of the US � . � ' ��,�!:'�'�� ,. � � u� �'� �. �. ,'° , ..�,�.� ,��,�`'� �, a�,,.�' � ��:��°� <'� .�y'. .' , ,k . � # . ., � . t �.`�, � '�,, � �� - �;�i. -,,;,• 4 •, . � ::� � `� `� r � - - ! — - _ -- � ." 7.ei ' � n �lE •��� ' ' r � �v. JY :t: �^- U 3400 Potential Waters of the US Perennial ,, !�� �,; �,; ,;Y �''.'�+. � r �•� �� �. :�,?� ��, , . � . � .-- � : + . ''� a,t�;' � ► .. .��� ., '".--�.� � Q ,� \ \ . ••'+�• � U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Intermittent r T "�''k` � `' �� .,� �"`3t. .'�� ` � r�t� ' X ' . ;���'d"� � , �� ^ � �4 ` � . - ��s.. �' . ' � �' � .ti -.� ��L.. �� ^�� rY r y � �i '� �. �., t . „�.+y . �:. _A _d_ _ '� . �� -i.c� .� .,�.• �ly�>�� y� S�l �` �'���• �r"- ��t�.K ,i� ri,� '��; •- a0`_� U 3400 Ephemeral Channel � r , �, � ' � � �. �:� . ���r �c , ;�,.`+� r� : ,, ...� . � �,�� ' .. . ` r . �,�„'`� ` ' t .�,� ��, �,� b \`' ' ,� �, :�, .� �� �;• � . 14 M' �� #T�'��� r ►����� ��+ �•�� i� �.%F'��. i � � 1! A ��5K ��w�� � '� � ti 4. ' ��Rrvy; ♦.. �.. t.� -ti M �7� U-3400 Upland Sample Point t��� , . . � �� y� �. _ �' ~� �\,` �'�:�.'ai . � � � '���'' i,.� g��� �, ���► i��, . . , � s.a„_4� ,,L,,ry.��''S►M�a �,. .�'.�� �"` ,. -�.;�'r`� , ,.. . '� �?t 'i � � * �' . �t� '�+�� ''L� `4 , t.�` 1. ..^e 'y.,� l . . 1 �'��`,���'� `� - �_p, "��r M ;.' ., � . ' � :1'\y�' � .�`.� �f �� � • .1-'7.i:. ���" . . : t � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point ..y� ':yti .., �,���.1 � +,� � �,�: �� �,;�,, :S'( '�'� �� '� F� .��"� } "��� , ,��-, �,�> �, ,�,,�.,�� �, ��,:.. ; � +�,, � .:�y � ,'�1 •�ij�.�'i, k �+ ..1� �� 7�\' �,``S;. yr•�,�� �`t .; �`' ,,y:� .e5 M � •,'�'i �� , r.. C�: �. �'�R��� •�� - T� !�r � .a . ��._. 1�' ..�1'- � \ y� �.'� . l� �� � �,�' ��t i �'��., i,� ti �.�� . �: ,� "t iT � `' `.� :� t .�; `f v `�s���i�' -` ,�.,� � '�, '��y `�`��` �t� ti �� �a h `� � ''�. Roads ;; :,� 4 .,� �� f '�- v�� "'+ ; t...,a . i � „� f ' � , v ' C .r . Y�, ( ���� r� ? : � �;'t �. ���� � �i� '•. �.� ` �` �, � ,�� . sX ' . � ' _ � .`��Y�K� \.� �. � � . �'���� �,'� ' i� _ ��"� G ��~ j \� � �' � y �� n, � ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3�a7. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Arehdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N .I � .. .. .. �"', . . . : . � q5': '.� _ . t� , . � ycy _\��yy�� '. "y � `� � ' "1` �\� w . ,;� ' . Y �� a � ��'° A'y�' �� . c 7. v •�\. � '� �. 1 � � . / r�i� 7�. ' ,�. ` ��cM'�+R .,..�. _�.�� .�i.� A' ::�( ' � ���1u ,�F;. � :Y• ', •y` �r' ..i;..� + ,� � .•� s � �,- ' ,i. � • .�,_ , ,�j ',� �r-',�*d.��i�,. �t;,ry�R•.,�` .i �. .s.. �.; r � �4'S j. k�,�y�`!}� +�: . `•�. ��' z `�i . . . -�+� '�' 'r'"��ry ��' . , : '?,.+�`_ :,,a+ �a ,R�� ' � r ��*� � °� �: \�•y� � y, � . � '., � ` � ``. ,,,��� ,� r'� ��• , ` �, ]�, �,t•, �� � -�..����� �' ".�. r � q� . 'r � `' " � ' q\ ;` .'�'. �k � •? f :' p � i }'>- � � j , i. � ',�i�. �'� � . � , �4'�. ' 4� �'A �' y..t`� �; ..A�} :��'�, 1G�,." .6 '� . . � J �.' �, � . . ,. �' � �� .� . �p�t� � , yc,� �j '1�' ` r * . �: . . � � � Z \ A . _ �,.4'_ ..� .y�\ . 9: � � � � . . ti ..� 4i . � _ � J �:.�a. -a' W, . �Y� '` �: ��� �`"`� '�' ! ��._ � �' N��y'w �� ' �7� +3►,..-'.$'y � 'd" � ,` � r ! : , ;l, _ 4 �,. N �" , �„� �e5 +�': ' � '�r�,,� �� � � ` � r r, ' } ,�� �i,;`, . , ,� .. , . , , , . �� ' ` s � . . �.. �f �a• � ,� , K� ,i`, _ f�:r ';•,- � � • , .. �-' .�` ~ ;, _ , , , . , . � �, , .4 , * , . �.. .�, . , ,,., . , . r� ,. �._ .� , '� .t` � �3� � � � �:r. � `� . ; � � � �. � _ '�+� _ �'�r� : � • �. , r , � • 2.. ��Y�� + �* . �` �� � ' +. „�. `y�� �.�• ; ,�t�" ,�+���? . . �,�� : r"�'i�4 ' � ` ' f� � ; \ . � .f;w � ..R. . \ 1 "�'r.. �� � iw�.' X�.�ti.�' a '��. O, r �11A�`; ; �1�1n'�� . .. _ lrE� �lTf�p����lr�LF ���FT � � ` �, ,, . yi► �-.�z � � ;, ,Q r .��, ti, . ��' � `+ '�.�` `1` f� `f`�t'ti�'� ` �:� � ;' �"� ''��+r�`'s-�`�i` � �' � ` � �� �' ��, � . � iff,� - 1��'!lliiFFFFM f (F�lF!'lfFTF ' ,r.. . .�i�' `'� M,'. '*tyy� • . , �i �' ,�'•- ♦ r`':,� \ 9~C'jJ � �''�% �.. � . . . , Y � t � �.. . � � �, . • �, �. ` � _ y , _ ,� adi ,. � *• y .a , ,�� � � ( � f � � � � .• . � V� `\' .. �� � � C� Ir'.?�Wj� L . �' � ��� .. ,�y +�,�� : , � � •• � + � ,p� .� .!` s_ � � ` b . ?�' �,, - • ." • . +'i ���s� �. �A�t . �J� � ",' `? '.;� �":,. .r �� � - � � M1r i• '+� .� �C � ' � ii �c j r . f�~ � ..4� . �� .� �' �' :. . �. 'J�F ���� ,,�;d�����, 1' � D ����' '. � � �`Y� 4�. _ . � � � `Nl�b`��y �� .a Y`I r `J 5,,, � � � � � �, .. }yfi , , /�` .: ,� Y �� �� '�•' ,+, c�D; ��, � � . <�' i � ;t �'JY�4�� * j, ..': ,� � Y�� `� � � N l.� : '�� ,._� , � ��� - `• � � . � � , ��� � ` �L_� �. A�.0 -- _ _ �_ _ , •- ', .t ,, ��� .�t �`` ��+ �,�,� � �� � _ . �- .. , , _ . . ... ._S ` � r Jt. �.r.. .�. . ' , . . .. �� a ����.t � �`� �i � .. y • yy \ � ' �.Y " • ••` ` k Vr� �«. � ;,. ��� F � n a'� �� �� . "�r+`1.'tf � .f��*'.` ., . .. ` \ �� ` � � . rjf � '� � � �rJ � .'t ' - � �, ���� . �� . �' �4 _� �. �ii� �fY.. . � � ` . � . w�� � �,j""� �` �, � !,� ,, L _ ' , � =,y . '� 1� , • ��� � ` �j, ' � , � � t , _ •_ ��:?��,�_ �'i�'�-� _ �(, .-.L� . � � �� \ .1 _Y l + � (�, tl� . � f � S'� �7. ��~ � �Tr �v��� � ��`,',,�' -�� ^ ` .i�� .�4 ' ��r�ti'1�.. 1 ���� . `` . ;�����KA. �- � � `_. .�''r� . . � I .�` .�L`, .�` � i•� y��, - \�... 0 , •7�Y�� .�'. �� T�.,�.. �L �? , .� �Y� ,I . �� �. r` ��. � � _'� � ��` �� ~�'tI � �\ L ~`S �. S � � 'I .T �'� ����` r`�. `,,�,. e � � • S. � ` �'. i .�.� � �r�+,����,�� s . '.#�`:,M.� -.�"��, �, . ` � :►1�1�R �'' ,]�� • � �.:s r�, �• � .�: ,� w• �•' � � �, � � . • !'+%, s _7:^ . � � ,, • ' � Y _ , ti ' ; �.. � � ` �." 'h '�y'b�: - K ' � �� �p.�i', r ' � ,v� �` - � �t� ��V �` ti «� '1 �\� i. ti a ��{ ����:r � , 'L . ' �y � � � 2F • �T I �` � �, ,,act� ..��`F''�1.. �.. �� .a ,'�.?� ..,Yr i . `"1,�y, '� • 'r_ � ,� . r � �, . . - �'� \ �: y� �,1.�1i����? � � �} �r �' �� '^t!',4_ ���� *.•. � .'�.^f, s+� ��''�ti ._��r `.ti' 'tr' M��' ��p ,� . eOC ��, ' � . � � y r.� ' ��� ��` " ,�„ �� ' � T-�. � .� `�` � . 1j �': � . * � 1 reyerr � i �.:. �x' '��`;e 'i ��j"��� ����� }k f �] � ^ �,; � x ` . "�u i�$l, �\�p,; , A•�,l�j � •': . � �� r � � . . 1� � ' � k� . G �i✓� _ ,, f _� .. . _ . .. � ��; .-k�4jl.'.tl,t: ♦� � . �;';: � .y9, ,�'+,h,, .,}. � !- . i�'�, �. , �,,F - , � , � . �. ' �` � ', �� . �� � � �, ' � � *��. f ` . � . � ` . ��.^� s�( � ' ., V f Legend �:�. , . �. . - , .= `�`` , t � .'�{ -, '�' � : � ' � �� ' �► y,�s t E r !li;treF u�N�P � I � � . � � '� � • � x �� i � U-3400 Project Area ? ��;��'� � . ,�ti=. �� x -'` ', �' : �� ,{ � � � � F �s � � _�- • � '� r " ,+'�`` +F � � ,�, U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US �� �> �=' "`,� � r„ ' .,�.��� � �..,,, !* ,,� ��:'.'��"�°, y � �;�;,; � A. `� '.���� -�;, � . . ' a, `p ,� 1�' �,�, �� � 'r � ! 7.: '�`'t��` �;+V� - �'y?1� � ��.�!��'�,. . . ,s�_ R � U-3400 Potential Open Waters of the US - - , = ,�r * . •.��, ; :; i� ,�`� '�� Y �e\ee St . , . i �"� • ��.''�, . ,,�. 1"'' � RD a �t�.�, ` � :- ��i � v�� ' _ , ,.i. �,* ; :- �^- U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Perennial _-= �- ��' ' . - �' � . � ' � _ ' F , � , � � ' ? . },'� � p� ::.y , t � � � p .. ,, i oi x � � ' . � � 4 �., �� [ .!1 � MI � �r,., �_.-• ."�� �P �� ••'+�• � U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Intermittent ��� � � � o,�!����!����� , �"� "� �' �y r � �' :�, �� 'j ,�� �� � .; . � � � �1' ,�'t r �y ` 'a � i , � C : * ' �: . �� � a :• �•. � " '�."�� �, � ' � : � , T � , .� \` � ' - a, . � {. <Y � �� . ��,, U-3400 Ephemeral Channel ?�, ,r �,,,r� � . :C `', , �y,:'."�, ,' ` <�'; � �•=, '>.��' , . .� � � y `��+. ; ��'��4• � r "` � � � � �'!CZ � -,�. � e ,; ` � ` v �; ' ^.'4'. , h► ` `\ �t _ a. . � `y itf \� a - �,�y^,��,' ' � . ' , ♦ ��� - �- �., "'i� c�, �-' :o � , 4� " �;� � -'�, •�� ��-y � \ 'l �'� 1 `�, �� � • � 4�l l, � . � � .., A` \� � � U-3400 Upland Sample Point - �' ' ��► . � r C �� y�}�y�� � ; � " � �.�� � ; � L�� '�� �,�.��'+, ' ��� '� y.. � � � � , ""� , ' . .,�' P � � + � '� ��;� ��"`" �,' ` - � �+•' � . + /i �, � �� ^� Y�t :'r"� i.'1'��� ` y, � � 1 � � � � -J'i`�= ', 1� ; � ,� � .� �- �""u4 � •, � . �4 v � ,�,"y� �� ,,,�y r-,.� � '� `q } � ♦ y,► ,y, '� � , ti ' � �� ..�. �� � ' " '� 41 :i•l . '1- 1;, A�' —a�� •��•r � ^ ��'� %� • , '�, � .f . . � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point ��.. .- - 4 . < � ° < ' ^�...�, ''� y � y � , ' �'r. '�' � y `� � . ' 3,� , ��. � ' �,�� �r�� -;s ..�h � ,1�� � >> �" a 1��`�� i�'a' Y " ��'�. -��� � Roads �������� .�». '��'`+. ,'1 , '.���", �i, :�t'Q,� ponPve "1�,. `.- ��`ti' k. �' � '`� -s� �+ "',wat,y.�`- ;. . . �t � ,� � . � `1�. � `'�� ` , L �'. �Z � ` �T �; • �:a .' ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3�V. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Arehdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N � ` � " � � "� � - , .'. ti'� � • ._ ,•� . ���. � _ -. '. . ... � ..� . _ � � r� � .,. . �, % �.w� ��- - � � - ., - � � �, �, St46� . . `` � � : � J'.t ; � "'�1 . 4 , . . �`'. .`' �.:: : , � . . : � � _ - �� ��� � . �- �M � _ � �. 1,� � � s-, "� . � �, � `� � i� '� � +�,c .� ��� �� ' , 1 '" y�,•' . � • � �,�+:� �'+ �' � w `a q�f; �[yy ,, ''y �'� �•`'. , a,�' ' + r �:,, l(�� e ! � `ir ti ' c `� - �.. . !!' \ �t .'f'.. � . �+. � �^T'��t'i;. ` 4iti�1��,. //�'�Ja�`l. ' �, � .," . . :�,�� �.Y'�:'� ��� � �\ � � �; \ �� rt �' ` ��" -n • . �ig,� � �,� r�, �t �a:� �'„ � • �, . • `'� .'� . ' � } . .� ..' .�4 . _ QO� ve . , . '•1• , , _,� y*! • ,F'' .;sa ._ � �: ... . �y�;�. /'v ° ,'�� '�' �i':�� � � . c'i4�� +i -' . �� � � r � .i �yy �r- '\�-~' � : � . '' '�>- ��' . . � P � ' �� �� �.' `_.�. , `�, '�4 '�.�`i... 'i_. "'.E� �� r • � ��� a�-.=�,; , �. •~•p,..` \•;L•.r 't. .t- , v , �.: .��*'•� "� �,•�k''3��1' ��. ,'�,. .Ec, ,�- . �` � .�� . � � .J �: � .�, . ;� .� . ,�,: . , .� - , � . .'� .-ll?, . ; ..ea.. � . � . �� . 'S i �;� - '� ��` ��;�:{� - �'r , ,,- �� . � ' � . °;����` ' �, ��'� . . �`.y, . . �, :i T ��� ,�• 5.•��; � . �:, . . .* - i,:w,. . - -_�.�.. .�y-- _. _. .'� , ��' `. .,. �'��..� _� �.: 2�„ �� �?` .. R .. .. .� ' .. ' � • ��.� .• .�^ ��, ��' � �`xt . �.. � � � �' �t � ` ,\� �� -� �, �:����1~_'� ..� . .. . _i . . ,� . , � • . . . � ,`• T� , . � .. �" - �� -��: ��d .,,,_,�[ t � ��' � � �. � ' .� . �'' ,�� t� ,, 1 j `.z_'1�.-'\� f 4<,�, �i' ,�.. - ,,, ,!4 O Y. �� y}� .;• .� r'1�, � ,J. . .,p ,i .. -'�..-.. � - . � - t.,� �� . .�, . ��� . ,;A �1 •l '�ib � , '\ �5 �� y� \� •Ib • . !� � ,� a . ' 71!_�+\'' ' ` \. ' . ' * � . . , ���� �"+� •��4er `�'' . � �. . . . � , 'r 'i � \., � � � � �• k � ' •.}' " "y _ "' .. .r� �; S h�4 � ��� _ '�j. , � i, a 'c ' I . �,�a -``�. , � �� � i. `� �p s�"• ' . `�'.�' " ``ci�'i� k \ !►'':�I��� �'�.. J�� � L 1 �. � 1�. .��` • � F_' .\ � /� � . . . � �. � . � .. .� C . 1 . .,..� � y� ��,���t "�� � •� ,�1 ..� =' �q ,�. - -, . . i:� s � ; ' .'� ' ',� C'' r' � ' ,� _ ;t� � �``'�� �. ra� � �� '�.�' �' � • �� � �'° j � ' "_�; -r-. ^` .f , . �������_��'-� l� � � . �� , . �:a. � �: •�� _ �' � 1 \ � ,1 X ,� °� ` 11 � . t::. .;r� 11��,.�'1.: ' yy ';a''�r^ � . . �.t � .. � � t. • �•� ��'� � � y � ' �' � � � � � � I � , � �, . _ - .. . . ��.�-' 1� h► 4 '� , � 1�� ` , c -�. -.4 � ��,�" 'y -� ' + � � J C," . . , .•,.Robin Cir � ^ , , „ ' '�p� _ � � � , •. �p 4 .�t' � rr41� fC . � . �j�,� � Y �, . y•� �'� � • '1i���'fi ��� �. d �n � � �t �, ` , . r �. _N _ � L� � S��.a. � � 14 Ati , ?TY �� �� � � 1 � ���' - t �� � :*' .` ' = � �� � �� V . 1y ] . . ' i � � �.J F ` r : t ^" � � '� '#. .� � � - T I �,� �, i �:� �• - - � , � .y � ' , . � � r' ..� •� .`, \ � . . .!1 ` y , , 1 �' �++�'� � �, � ♦ ' V � J ,� t'. .. . �� � M w. ' � ,,;+ \dr� ` ` � '�,, "�` f y�ti +�` `�C' '- ..�► �'1� '., . � �� . . � �. - �, `''��r�, � � � Y�'ti ' �.+�'c 1°:t ' '�R, • ', ,; ��t . , � �•�' � 'F�' t"�. r,�r� '- � �, , r - - , s � A ,�.� ��, �' , ` � ?: �, _� , t . ,� r�P � / . �� y�� � `i ,��,� � �.' l �„�"'�4:' �• •��'�1 �L�4 T" � r' �.%�f��%`r � � � -��+�'� �1 .. J � ? �. i �" � `ti � � � . 1� > - �'. ��`���t � , � i' �!� ; •u•� • •;'� -� �e' �.� ' ti < . � , � ; '� � � , � ';�, •�, .��2° �1�%: � � ,/' 3�. 'r. �t �'� `�.' '� +�,t ::� \ �Y ` �p' t - ?• ` ,� .`�. �. "�`�� •.7 "�., � ;�,:' -,1, e �''� :f�i,.�. -.✓`. ti ,r����j5 1!�,' �� �1 . . � . . � . , p .� - � _ O \ . �j% � , _ `j, � y;r . � , , � . � ', . 1 � " • a �, _ . �' , ,T�ill�' ' - •� :�►�� �t � , � �'�a��� •:�`� ,w�Y � �,�. d• V � � `�ti` L � , ,�r , �t . �` � y� ' I ��'' r �' �'f� � (�, ' �I �'i � I,. '�.. i�'. �.. , ti� .. . � '. � a .3�,y�{ � i°,�.y � .'T ,+ii.. . � � � � f' .� � +��1 : �y, � ��Qr �t` \' `� �s e � � � :; t'' � ' � t c r 'i���5��. � � ♦ i � . . ��` ti �+ o- ♦ � ' � l� + �' 4� ` � � � . . '� �` � �� 1`` � ' � �►,. lA `� ' - . . _ j�',�`�� , v ��: � CD � . .. �' ,� r-.. � '�� � � . � �'�� `� 'L1,�,�'�� . . �� � . ,f..�� � . ' 1 •� � � i � `��! � � t � �15.�._�. �� . . ♦�. . .t-\ � / � , . y � f '. • ' , ,�•, 9. ,e-, . ' � E' � � ;� . ��.� t •• . � � j� � � � : " Nor � •�!! .� �• _�� i�.� ►.. ;y IR' �'� ..� •.� + ► � �{�,� r"an �. . { 1� �t'`. -a .� v.-�, �, ,�j � �''•, w � ', � ..f�� ,` A�� � ,f�, �'�` r,�, �� - r�� ,- ,'A� ._� ��. .Yr'.��.i i� .��" �`• '4�.t "+r ' � , _, � .r ; �... �* ,.�.�,.. �\. . • ' y�Cc . " ,� � ' �� i•� r; 4 � i 7` :i' �i[ ]��.. ,� \ :�. � �' `i�j' �* ,�� r.y,l�-, ~ `� � ,• y� " P . ' d�e ' � . "e . ' �r � �' � � - � � � �.. .. +Y' , s � " . .. � �°' �;A ' � r_ -�' ( t � � tiy. w�} . * � � � �t. � ��� � ' � - �''� �. � �� _� `'� �` �- -, �` � - ' � , , : : .. , , . � �, � � ''�'t.�.�'` � ' � t `� ''�' J � ' ; � , ,� 4 ; �► ` ''"� w. � �� 1 � ... y� f ., ,. 1 %$ . * .. r'-�, � i� +b � !�►�s � .�' i, �► . � � • � ` c '` : � � �,'� "' '�>�` , , �� ., � .�_� , .,� � 4 '.^� i' ,3 �� �,,� �� � �_'�' '�C� �a �: y. \�,1 � ,.. ti � � . � : � . . ' � , �� ��� ?• ��•�+�4�- ,� `�• l�;� r i� . � � -;�, i� i T � �` � � ..V t ✓ .. a� � � ; •� � �. Legend �,- •� - . � ., �T ��`�4 ` »7� '��- •; !a � :r' �; '` F - r. ,/ '�` . . � * a . ..- y . !�' ' �r.+� . , � ,r„ FI' ,�.�q �.� � � i� "i'F[�'� � �� T Y:�:l �d.��� .r.�� �,.�.� �, � . :ti � � .�,\4 � ��i � U-3400 Project Area �, . �' .{ : � �*l English Ct � � �'��'� -. w , �, a `��`�: . ;�<�� - ���:;, : � � `� _, � �-�:� �'� ` �. � ��•., �s, ��� � � � ��M , �� t �; �+a ♦ ' ".- �.>����'�'' ` `! ;, iF ,�. . � '� ,.�(,, „� �?'`\i �. ;. U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US ��,- ���,,.t. '`�, . � ' `��• ' _�". ��' � � � . `;" � � '4 t w \ � S �` 7 ,�� .` t�� i , ' ~:�`�' ', �.k; �. ���h .� r a .x . a . U-3400 Potential Open Waters of the US _ s�. , �'�+ ,,- � ` � .,...,F,=�►� : `,�""'� `' _;,; };� , Y ;,'�'` "; ``'* �: ��-�`�,��.��'�, a� V.� ^� - '�� '� tr - �' . , : t: ,�l,h,a� - �.,:c f �r':� , � �.� � " +� �.,',�' \`� '�'� a.," a �• . ti _ • • " �^- U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Perennial -_ ���."r�� ���� '�"��'� ,� ` - " . rR �;,�'�'� � ��� ���' "� "� �*�'�� ?�Tr�`-�-� f , _ ; y�� t� ' " � � '"�,��*. � �' �. � ""'�, � � x � � � ; . � ' r�' ., ;u .,� � , � . ��' ' •; ; . rFj �j , �. . �,� ':2 � •, �` _ . � � � � , �R � ••'+�•� U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Intermittent ,� � it�, � '� �. , ' ; .�� �j}� r � ;<� �,` � ��; � �.� ' ; ,' ' � `t+tilS'}�,�,�1 r;�i� �'*�- ��yr;� . ��`�, �` f . ,� � � � �`,� . � • � �'� � f � � ^� U-3400 Ephemeral Channel � '."�`� . ' �� u r, _ ,,,, ; �. � �.' -5. � � .\: �_�� ' ��� ',�. . �\ :k, \ .+ ,� �' ` ' y. � -; ��, ,,` � Winchester Ct . � � �"�� � � U-3400 U land Sam le Point � ��" � � ' � 5,�� �' � ' , �` p p `` � ,,, � Y�; r .� ` e , � � ? ,, � �`` :�*�?' ��.3��� :� ^ :_` � �� � y � • , ,t� � ` '' � � � �,w � .� ��,,, , ,� ��� ��� � --.�� � � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point '� � ,� ' r;; � • � f w � ` � ,. - �► - _ . . �. . � ;�, r� - �,, � � �•; `,�-� yf �` � �-. .� � � � .. Trinit ' _ . . ..� �� � ' : ' �-` . ��� `�,`� ' '� ?"�• � . ',- .. . � - � � � yRd . ' .., ` '�� � }F ,�r ; , J Roads �; ��3i, � � ,::;:�' ��. V n ,' . �' �,�� i -:ri- 4?`� �� ;; �? 7� � . , �. � ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3��. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Archdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N •�F "F� ` �' _�� � • � �- ,�� �, � � • . ,r �; -� �p � � : , _ > �'�w �/+, � _ . � , iip•�. I I 1 ' i. � .* 'I� ' � fi .,���• $� " � �- �� '� � v. �'E. Foxboro Ct r, �� ��� "�,'�' `,..� �� � w �ti � r ...� - . j � - �y ` 4 �7 1 `, � ` � � � �� � `,i7t �� � �. � `� .. � . � . n.L.� � � `- � f. ��" � ' " '� ' ' . .+y ^ � '°1. `� ` t � . �¢ � �' , � 1% l� � � ���� ♦ � : m � ' � .. , ...r` ; 2:, 'S' ,! � �. �.. i � � � � t � , . , � � ' .4C . � ��� Cameron Ct ` � � �� � � � ' � .~ t �` � _ �� � 'i.��, `�" ?�+ � . �'� �<� a �� :% / �'Y� , A" �, � �yH. � �-� A' ' � � - � � � r . , a ,`� _ ,; .. ' _` ` ..'�'� r . �i �.• , �,. ,t��.i* �� . ��� � .�.� .i � , � � ' � ' � . - I'- ` . _ . �� - • � <. . �:� •a� . : �.1�, ��w � } '` �.�' .� . . �• ,l. � i •t �- � l. . '� Y r♦ , � �•;' .'i_� i rs- t' tL � �i�t � � � �� + r 1� y � �R�a �; � � -� � % t� � t � , ' ri., . � � � �� • �� �_A� K - � � . •�� � � +.� M� � � . �� r� F T�. p , M�' , R,� � �i �.� �� ,� 1`�, ���.; � �'� `� .. `� � ��U , ,� � ��f .� `�`r�. .'��w Y t ' "�`. }�t � ��� ,f �'��' / , � .. 4 R- N "' i.`l� �� � 'O�^�: 'M. \ ¢ r a �": ! ��� �E �t� � � � � / N � .. , � w.� d' � 1�'` R� � * �.d� :M � � F �T • � L !,' �� , •` . �� .r �« : � . . . ,F ..�`4 'Y� , . � V i k 4 , �/ P !� ♦ ��4"• • � � �,. .. � ,� � ��' YrY► ''i� F� �� V•� ?. �� 4�\�•��_��f �y, .. `��{-. � � j'� l' �I+ � . � '��s �4� \ 1 • �'� *e • � :� � .� . �7 '-. _ . ,+(" � S'. � � - 3 . �" ��. . � 1 -�.1 � :. . � : ( , ls �� � � _ . . �..fN �� .''�` � � 4 � �. _ � i �. � � �; �� �, ( , � , , _ . _ . _ � �T�.z�.`� � , ,. ,� � `�.�f$ '�� k�►� • �. � � r j � t. l���` � �. '� �'t' ��,� y, i tD �` �1' p* ' �'r'� • p � � t� y�, .^�'� .,a\ . �, s . ,t. ' .. �S ��~� , � � . � �'l "A �. y,!'wF' �' ��� : �.�`�.' ti� ' � _,_ 1 '� t . �', � .,' � i . �.; � ,�;:. , �"�� � . �,�. A2 _ . '� ' � . �� �� �."f.. 4 �'�\.. Y '� � R �'+ ��� � , �,' • . �� � '� C� , !'�'� ' �� �;..,+,�J�, � `�•' � _ ���� ��-. � . �� ��. ti, '� ' � ' �� �°t }_ . t � �„� "p ' ti . � `0�.1 �' ,, \ � , � �. _�.� . . +�' i ����� •t t _ _`�l - „ +� �#� i� . E,� "��.� �Y� M � w'� �� .r ,,�r ti �� ; , �. ���'� � � �� . .�` 8 �t � � ' . '� • ,�`_� r'� f -.: , �` �� . ` ' � t�1 ` '�i � � � � �' �� � _�; . . ' d; y � �'" C . ? �� �(�,. .� �� � �. � ' �` � '.i�.\ ,'.� r �` �`` h ��` c i � ~ � � � � � � F"ti � y �� �� � -. 1 J. � i . " -. . ��, � . ,�� 'n .`�� ,�' � ��.� 1 '�' '�,;;. .. �, rA� �� . r� a , . . . �T�� _ � . *`` '�.k,'�!. r t• `� .p ,4 • , , � � , � ��' � � 'S � ' ' _�� - � ;-�� � .�, ,'+.�� `L=� �' 3 "�0 1'r y�1 � l �_ r �` �^ . �' � _.'�a. - �j •'�;�,,��s� �,(s',� �- 1�, ,+ ;� -.'�� a, a k�,1� .. , � �� . � , , ���y1. -n �, � p. �'� , . ..` ��, ��y '�._. c �-�� `1�\ ' � � ��� � _ 'R�='�� . � `\ .�• �`,` �`f. :� . ,�.� _ - ��` •`,, �� .b.'M• •�', . , r, �, Py�Q. . �+ �.� b^. . � . ^`�.:, a"'\ �\ `i �p �1� -:y,� -R� .'.A t���, �• - � � �,��� Ar Y�:�:.� `�. , �,�4 cn . . - ; ' . I _ \ ��.. ,� Y I .+. . � �'�- �'.-�.''�s�.� - � . ".`., .� '. _��,' � - ;�, �. . �1'�` , �hdale . - ., . � . ,.� �'` , I 1� : / .,,,Tr r�� \ i , ,� L r ♦ �� . . . � � r� R . � : ��' �,: . ' \• �' r - - _ ' � . " �5cr, � r� �� �';:' , .� � � �--,,,, �� �. � + ' •� � �� ° f ' s • �; .� w ti 7 � y�., .. .. . . .•.. �.�� :,-� � �� ac , a. � � . v�. .,{,� � . .� ► a� � � :S .r" a.J . , , r . . . , �A, �.� ; ��,,�� � ,L �"h. ' } .�. � ��,. i �` , � �' l ,��� ~ .... �* " i �4 } '�' J T „ � �• a v' �5�4`;1'y _ . :* �� � .� �`�. ; `� -,. � '. � , - ..�,' �j�'�T" •,�. y �;. � . t�°� :-L.. ..•� .r<A �� �+� � �y.,, . 1 � r► � \ �..� - � �: ! � �. �' �.� :N� y. '�:`�� � ��� . �. '� :-- lh�'� .l �. � !`� �v' � f'} . . '�" _ . � !` � � �.�� 3_ (� �`'�t , � :.,�, � 2" • � ��t` '` 4 � Y r� � r � �� ?` �`%,1r '�b; ` � �� 1� `�. � '�1r ' , , _ , - .� . c. „� � . , . . «��. ^t .,� r -. ��r Birchwood Ct._ ' • ^ ' ti ,ti.' ,� �,.. �, . .. ,. ,� ' \ ; �'�,� . � �.,��� r . � _,. F fi��'�``�' . � ".�,. � .;�► ; �a- 1. 's �'�"�+ ; f � .�: = s' �` �' �� ,`_� � �" ' �. . � .,�'' � Z ��, .`. .cY'� ` � �. t��:_ '*�,, .,,�,5 - {} i.� .,�►�+ "�-r i t �};� � -. � 1. ����� ♦ �� �. �` � � ....: ��`: ��.�. .. -�?` . � '� 'T� A �' � � . . � t �'� � � , , _ ,� '�. Y' ;q�' •ti _ �Fr , , � .r�`'; �. �� , +� � ~ '` �c 3 i � ��,, Y, d - �,, �. �,.y ' �h � . �: •'� �,x �'�? � ' T(� �..,� � "�'s .1'1� � � � .�t4' ' , y► L!r ' , `� 'f.• ` `'• � . �� + �� e, �' . . �`*a.. � , i.. �' Y , '`\�'�i';� ` � � �..: �'�ye' �+. J�.�.�, �'� `� ��; `: , _ � � �A L ,?R�.L ac' � \ ,x,. ~ � . `'�,�� ''*'� ,��r, ` �t^,�`4.� iW� �,'. i .� :w. . � '� �, + � .;� '' � '�4•� i �.`M`v t 1; . .,�j, =a� .;t� L ��' �\_-•'A '� y, ,y� � ,�, ,�,.�!� '�y.,,� ''� � ,`� „��ry�.x c �c�' 1 �` :, •,�R:. s '��� y { `� r . • �: .�.� �t '1� . �� i!► "+7',' , �. A t ._�.. �� ti f.., � - - "' ,� •, { '. '� .. , .. .- i ' w �,; �' ..� � . t �''µ; ,\ � ',� �'"r �. , � °�►, ;v +Ym� ���j�,����` "•�. ' : � rt �`-�. ' - , > > � .� . 1 . . x ti " � 'y" �� a �J •-.�. � } '�V':� ��'� �w' s ~ • \ � 4 �` " ^�' �' � � . a wD�' '+C , ' '�. \� • v d * `+ 14t`-� +`�i! / t j ` �°. � �: '4, � �l � "'i �� 7 . � � � �•'•.��� y� `�� �` k ' :. (, �`�`� �. �•' t � � � Le e n d �a� ► �c � � . � �-o . � � . ;� , � � � g ,l�' ;4��} �; �• � .'�• � ; � , � � �.x , � �r,, 4 = � '�%� � �< `�c a u,w�� � (�y� . �� : j, � a a �R v� � ` � .'�. $ t� � .� 4 '�� +X� n4.C. �• �'� �', : � � . �\'� �t�l't -�. i� �` �� A�� V►l" � :9� U-3400 Pro ect Area �•'�► ��f � °���� �' ` -,;,� , ,� �: s ♦ � � -� . ��.``�� >_> , �r. � � .; �,,, ,�� � ' `l ;a� y.i� � ` `�, � ' � . . '� t. i, � , , � �� � � � ' ,�. x��� , . o �, w � � � ��4�� � � � �:\�\ 3.x. `�l r a �� �,�.� ,'��, '• -'�' . �. ,..�,�� i����,. '� ��+,r���_.�: `1'�: U-3400 Potential Wetland Waters of the US �'� ,� •'� � °� ��,,r • ,_� _ ,� ; � ', ' �� -.s , . , - �> ., �` ►���,�.,.,�'� .. �`�., U-3400 Potential Open Waters of the US `' �" r�' �T' `� �"� \ k" ��}� ' � 'i �. � S, i' � 'R� i + . y� a � 7 R1'� '� ��� �� - �f � :'�r',' � •,, 'a ' �� K` � ✓ •�� + . �; �1►. Js"a : ti � � � � � .F .�..� • ,`r. �;,. U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Perennial ^ ` �� -��` � � ` ��' *���" � � 'u: , �`; ��`. ; �� ��.��•' Y��, '" . � 'r � � � �- '� � � ' ,� �, .: : . " � d' ,.�. `i� .�a� �. ,1� � � � C '�.� � �� � � �'`^�i . t���� � �� fi �� , � � �.� '��y,�, s , � r � ^� ••+�•� U-3400 Potential Waters of the US - Intermittent � � { �.�..� ��� � � '�r• ''i� ��'.�-� t¢ ��- � '� a ��1.�.�`�., ;���,� y :. �. ` � �yy.� \ - �- � Y - ,A}��� �`h f'`�i� }'.\ � ��; . "a. 1 ,7 � � �'+' �� � r � . U-3400 Ephemeral Channel _ ., ,�*' . .' ,"� � � � , `� �� �`� f� '�j,�' ; ` �� � ��� � a�� ,,� ` �� • ��� � � = J.���;�. �r � , ' !�`, �n�{� � �. �.,. ��� �. � A� . ,� � 'y � `��, �. .;�� _ .�� . ` ' ti, _ �i` ' . •� � , .L•. th� 1� ��w �., �'4 �,•� e����1�� d�� ..�'� s► 7�•' � U-3400 Upland Sample Point -� v��� �' �, f" � �� ,.� �, �' . � � ����,_ � � �._ , :�.�.' ` + , �.� � �, ; �►a�".� '+*, � . � ���� , . { �� � +., 4 �J �' ,� �.- :�: `,� � ' � U-3400 Wetland Sample Point � � � ` �'�' � � . '`� - a'�'� �`_ �'. � s � � .�, �� � � � � �... � �4 : � �' .!!�i � i •T ._ ^I� 4. �� .1.� •�,rq� .� ''-'`ia" � � I ' \-. - �''L' . � , � �� + ' . , d '1' r� 1,. ���); . �.� C ..� . !, Z Roads \ *-���'` � ;�'�,�`, ' ��� '`' � ;;�� � � ` , � ' ,.�.�, . � ��� - �� � t � '. . ~ �.. \ . . . ` r, i, ♦ �. ,� e ` '! ,. * ja � -�: `�J.• • : ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 inch - 200 feet Figure 3�v. Jursidictional Features - F��OpT�Ch Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. h�,° R o Wetlands & Streams: All features located in the field were recorded using a handheld Geo-XH GNSS h �y;. receiverand2ephyrModel2antenna. GRAPHIC SCALE �'3400 Archdale Road Widening � Sources: 'b .c��� ESRI, NCDOT, SEPI 0 100 200 400 Archdale Road ( SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��"� �� Feet SR 1567 Robbins Countr Road to US 311/SR 1009 Main Street Ifl AI'Ci1CI8I2 "'�rnn.K� E N G I N E E R I N G & November 20�6 � y � ( �. C O N S T R U C T I O N — — � 3 -. T � � i 5 ,� - +. 1^. ' ,� � � � r-, � � a,.�_ ,..�.�, � , 4 � "*' - �"' � � . � j ��! '' L, � " / � �i T ;F . '�, ''� _ _ �`,�,� �_ ir' . � s .. � �. ,� ! • �'� . � . !. � . .. . �`�... .. i � � ' ' � `, •~` � ��Y ~� ,\ , �� � � � ^ • 0.. � � � �� '- i.� �� ',�1� � �'t /M � �� � �� -• ' � ! . � ., t .q ~ ' ,.,� a . ..•�T •�}� ,,f ��� yLr� „��, oti i ._�'i,�._ . ' 1.� , „ . t�� , , , f � � � , e . _�":.� -� . ... .� t , , ` _, . � t - _ _ , 'ir "� �' 4 \ .r4, - \ , I �� r C ._ ��„ w+r .. .... "' �j � �, ' • � 1 1 � f^ �_..�. � � K � �, � � _ _ �4 ,� . � �' i , ��` T' . , 1 . .�'IiI� � � � ,'.+.-• � ,, y , � `� ; , �/� . _ "T ^' �, �' � �'�' � ! � ti .�� � i.� ��_ . V � �+ �� _ � -�- � �' �:' �� ��• - � � � � �� � � r �' }�� � � , r " S � - f �. • . � ' , ��l + ts � .f .� � �i�' . J . � � . � � + . i: �� �\ ,��'�' ` " - � , , ' ' , ��— � � ' � .1� � � � � � .� � �` '�� . i � � ' � � -� I F �_ -,i ' �� � �+ �`� q� , ; "� �+ , � � 1. 1 ��0 �� � ,. � . � � � � � �1 ...,.. � � -, , 1 � ,�i � , ♦ u � `` t � � : � �� , i � i � � � �1 ' _ . �� � ��►�_ 7f'i r�.�. .. 1 , ' � 'a ;. e . � ' ' } �_ . .. � 1:i., ,�� �Z-, �;,. . � � , � �, ts. � �l l ; _ I! , 1 ' ' � ,ti � � � f . ..��? , ! _�- � s _, .��': - .• �.. �� .. �.. ��`�„�r� 1 ,�1 .`f.- � , : � -��k_ �� � �.. t'+ � � �{ r � _,�. �. J � � , ,�r •, �,' .t f � ,-�� *1� . y' '�` ':i. � ' • ' � I. � `�' � . • , A '� �.: y' �~ • T � . �` . ' y �dyy" , e� y •i ' � � !ti ! S Q rr'� a � ��' �- „' — \ — , � . .. � N �• � J,` • *i'�.. R' '' �.?�`� � � I ,`_T �' ��'*'+� �,, ' ^ �� . e�' �. �� • . '� �,''� �1 � V � . — ` � ''1 a v'! *.� '��y � - '� tl�or � , �.# gJ ,: 1 ! M � {j t� �+ } ' _ � � i' ['� 5�� , �1 l � � � � �� '{ �, � � 1 � � �} � � �, � '. ' ` _�' _ �.� � , � . F.� i " � ��" .f2 J `.. �.. .�.{ � � N� I � S R.. �t�j R. , ti � i ` � � {�,`'. i � � , .r.( i �f, "' ?�� , ..---� � �� ', , "t��� r- r �^ r IF � f : ► :�, . f � .L ;�; ;► S s � � ; :� .s . � �I � f J /� } "F�� , � `; � �. � ��: � �� i C ---.' �: � ► � ; ! t � I t ,� � ' �I y�w.��� �a �` � - y. � �T � . •l t .n . �• 'w�� �, t 1� ;^�;�. y,� •r� � ,�+�i �,, �Y �%! �, ''.;,s7r}�'�* X� '/�'`� ' l � ' • ; `. � - .#, � �i ., ��� j �+T M f' , �--� � �. ... SI ! '�. ' �` � \ . C 2 "''r� `7 �.� �'� � + w� . I �' r J+� � „ .� �t .+ � ` . ,r •� ' f� y e -`�' ` �' *`�'�`I}'-� ,` :` A � , � � ,-��, '.• ' _ ��+._� � ' !" � ,••� i 1 �le � \ 51 ,w,j '�.. ,4. i •g"'2T "e ��l� ti '�3� ''� 'aa. �� � k `..� _ a� � � 'f '' �/a l '� , .. - e '�'��:: '� l - s § r-���,,i � ♦ i �. �� '� �i! � �j 1 ' 'R•/ ��* f ~ 1' �• ` �� � � � � y ..� ,�-�' _ . Legend �; � ���: , :,,� � ���r" 'r �, ; � ,�.. � ;'.!! � � ' �`,.�s � w ' , 'Y � `r � "�► � ProjectArea '', �.;� .'�+��tr ,,,� • •'' ,� •�" . �w,� � �T �.;' ;; F �f , .fq". . , .R 1 ' i � ' �+ Z4,-1� �, , t . � . , �; . _ a �"t , ��. . a• t¢a�, ;, � Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ,• � �.�*'X .�: .�+.,, . � ^►�+e�l�, '�;#.,. � Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest = �" �` ` •i , �` ~` �'' \ M" � , ,,h .f► �"". � �. [ f � . � � -. r .+ �. �' �. . f �`�i=i " � �� Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest � � � ' i�`�r'�`�,� � y +� ��'�e►�,1+, '� �-�,, , ' �' � , 7'�r 1, , • � �-+,� , fi.`t ��� ,,! y` . � Maintained-Disturbed � :• `�" • +� "��` � .'4� ' �tA , '�,`' �'! a+ `. r. c�'��.���,,� � 4. ,-.� � � � _� � � � �. �,. -� ± �, �' '�` r' ��: *,. � � -t.n. .. -•�•r�•; ,a.,, ' r� '7�A �J9Tv. !4. S� � �, � �y,:�• ' h t . �r: �� ,4 ���'j��l.`- '"�..���„ 'T y#. `r"'�3` �. . ' . - � � . ; �'� �u"!• ����' ,� -it�.y ,� .5.�- • ��r ' ,. i��7.�� ;� �"� y'-. �-f • � •" • - �� � "y�'� , .w,�^� �> s-T+.. � '1' "'� �' '� .r � .a `�, iy .'�l: .;• j'�7 } '� ��.: .� f.1 L. . ��, � �T I . . - t "n� � Y '� ° �� ML � �y� �•. , ���• ' ` .s'M�i� 4��� . � '� ,�� ii +'r,{,. , � O _N�1`� _-t� �� r � �i �� � • i1 +�:�I . ,r `.�a{ �'�r ' , .� � i = '�� ,� "ti t' � •7F � � � - � �J �� q t7G � • ,�` z �. - � � �` .r �� '+y��''.�r 5 ' � � .�� ' �'. * 'i.� - . , . `�, . , •��- �� r ��� � w, � �F+�1 , a ' . '!}�ii '�+tti VI�.�?�� "� �~ �'• �h 'R •�•� • r� - ' " • • .� r�*I' ia�I. � � .y :�• ~' �,Q►% I14'.�+'� � � > � � � � .� • ^�•ti �� • j ..���� .'� � ' ��yr r�� � �s +.•+- "- i 'i'� '�;f y �:��r r ;. �tM�M�'��� .1►f*' � ' •�� .1r+' 1 � � 'ti t ;,,+�1" _'� � 1.. - q. '�.�', : y_��" . '� '�`� ti' .,,,� _- - X" , 's`Y �� 'i ; y � " ,� ,� . , d /�� . ." � , • a •Y �'i� � k� `t !�' � a , ' � � ' �'�'� � - .� � yY � .,i� ;,, 7 ` F�R �, • ♦ �." 4, +/•��' . � .. ''�' � ` ,%f4' ` �,S � ..� ► ��'= P ��• �,{ '« :• ` S.. 'Y �� _� � ��: �'';��;� y ,J�'� � . . -��,� � � �y "�'� �t .�'^ L� � ��, �� �'t' �y +� =t � s � • *' •' � y Ir' : � r`�i� � r� WA, �`•i.y`i. r r '��� 1 � . �'_ . � . �� �� •� '� . �{;�� ��' .�w- �.:{,�: �' � ` � • _ `,� � . � ��`• ��y� � '�� � 3� t. . ����`,��,�� � ' � �. � �V • i �' � , t. ,� i s ��� . � j� � �.� '�' 7 . 1l�,� � . � � �'�_ a i� � � _��, Y . a�,�, .t+.� : r' '� - - � � ' �, y . ' - '�"� � f �"��. � � ' % = � +rt � �'�►� i��' ;, • +�", � , •,'{►�r�,R'� � �-�, t'� if � y� , .. �� F#y���;' �1= � : ., ��' ' ��� �y� + �. �1.�..'� + � ; ,•4� �� � �:71:� .r1 •�\ i/�A!. + ! � . ,�r y nJ.� � ��Y • � � �• ��� � � � . " � .� y� `' R,� p . �� _ � „� � _' �" . �1. ,��. �^'��,3. � _.'�' �,�� �r� � . ��' , � '�Ml*��k�� �� .� "� � . - � k�r T ' ��• e . � s .Z-j' 'S ' '� t,, c �'!� :rr; A ��� . �.i, -i �r� " �' �, -- y'^}'i � `� � w �. ,. .. � ' � � 1 � fi }r... �:M1 ,'' � � ���� ��.y' �'�i\ ` �� �".�A�i�L � y � ,�/�:.' � , �r�.; '� .', -,�l '`-�� � . �.'�'q�±!� ,. `� , � :,, . -�_ �' � ` ,.���., i . �� � ��.,��� � ���r 'fi� f��y,y.� A'�L)�•�r� ���� ���'"` { ' �, ._' �•�' � ' : , � q+ �' . i�` - •�1,• ;fw� � i� ``� x � . � • �f ._',�� �sl ► ' � � �� �'�i �c� � , � f S , . � / ""' �; �� - � ' • � • � S . • � s. 'y ;..` r �;,;4" ,y�. �'�,•`..'• -`p i .'� � , . , . ,� '�R , � � .t y,� ; d•c '� • � �R�, �; c r ,,,� ���'` 4 �, � . ':, '� ?� S► ` t � �, ,� _ : v�� �i,��: • .� ' s � , ,# ?� ` � ' "�� ; '^+, " ti ' `if ' Y w �'�` �w .a . �, .�sti , � _.y � *. +,_l . � t •� '.� N, \ ,ti .a . .in � ..��+ ' !s �il� ,F w 3 � „�i ,. r w 4 '� . _ , v. . - . � � a+*� �,Na� ,:� � � , t� � �. -' � .#: �,C � , � , ; l� 1 _ �" ,# �� � - , y . , � � � ��� -,i'`. � �' . a 1` ' �t�.. ..rr� -� � ��", 1� d►� *• �� ,� , �+e�. " i ✓ '��� �w �-� � . _ i�T�t� ,:� „ • ,,� � � .y. � �+. . ;�'.� f ' � ,r � ', l'`r �, '�: 'R . _ t. .ir ., �,+ -+�,. *� ;r .t.i _.. �]�1 �� � K '•�0..� �� . � t,. .�.. �' y „� .'�: . . f . -. � ^ .� , «'l k , � , = r �".�is �► . a� �,�- . n. ! i ' ''a -`" '1 -� + • t� � .x. �i ; a _ ,�� •�'�" � �� , i�� ;4'�'. - A a„ , ' _- � t' :t. � ' ,� ,� ,`�. 8' .� _ � � � ,��y .. -.vr-,�-' ryFy � -� �� � � . .�'+R��� ,�. i '�'"' ' ' �!� ,y, Z �-':. `'�� : ' - �� . � � . � 1 . •� � ��i� +� !� �,1''f Y_yt� 1 *� , n . �+� R � f i., � ��i. } ',� y `< . �; - �. ,« l +jr J. � � ril -� ��,; ' � ' � ,1�. ��' ,i.,"�� ..�. '�. �i `��`� .. ~ ��, � "•.is �i � � >a � , ��� � • '� . �� � 4 _ ' •ti ^'�r •7 t �'��- � 1.�Y.�'� ����+...�-,� .�Ir��,�'T��� .� � . 1 �4� �.. 'i','��' + � � �,�-1" � J u�tF � - �s � i ^ �`- - �� � �. i ., • j ' � r-�j+ � � �i,t. - ^ � - ,3�.__� y 0 ri �{." �� , o �' . � .•,��"y ♦ '� -L,.._ �"" � �i^�w- * .� • '� � '�. �• � ,��' Z t� '�► '� ,'i ,r 3 � •3i{ •��y�� � * -'�+ia;�Y '? �+� . -��'�'�'�� . . .:�s.f.lqVTr,�'* ,� % ��•� ; , ��' �e ..M y r�. � � � �� � ,;� � . "r� ti+� � t ' r� s�����y ,�,.'+i I ,�s .r `�.� , 1;�. ' � .��t �;�'��' � �. �'?�.� r_=� �r'��y,► •'� a �. "{ .. 3 �` . `' •, ;�'• � �,�. : . � ' � ' �" , � "" -, .-�'��► � .r.�r-� `� .. ,: � � ` , ►� w �' .r . ..�; � � ,� ,, � fs4'�' �\ �,7 ;�r �,_ r���� `'�� � ` • � � y � •t � Y' # � ,; ' �i '�_ + M �" � , ;� , � - � � � �,� � ' 1'- • +�' `� w� ' ; _ `�� � � "�s� ' : -,. �; , � : � .. ..,,� , � .,� . �i,• - . r ^ � 1� �.� :.�_ a . +�• •S..'' f �f1h� _ � �. � .i � ��, . i•� * ' . , �.. y �, y ,�. ; � � : T , ,, _ .-� , � -� .1[ 1 . � _ T �1 �� , ��?�r •1 .•l �� ��••r� , � �� 1 �* � p •� / 5�..� �� ~� ��� 4 y � � r� � •r.� � -"P,� i �+ . "`+ `� �;Y �'�. y� _ , �ir Y ,'�' �!. �,�.1, � i ���b l' a j� • � _ � , t . i:i sJ��r�'_�� �,� jy' 1 t' �I �� I', .�. � . ,•� � Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest t,_. i r :.�� ° , . � .. y';�4y•.�,!q + , � ��j,}�^. }� ` + � r. I � .4 77T yJ �� '!� � �.'N � `,� �`1 �� � ►..ad'' ' � , -. � �� ��! S � ' ; +'1'�` � ' �i� , - ':1'. � :�;" �' • , ` ' �sC'� � .'e�' , �; ii �. � -� ',� n� 1 �' i � ' • +�� { � � �IC �u t if4. ;��2 � �']_�;� .`f,�, ,�Y'� w' , f f .� � � #',�y"!L �.�_ �V t � � �^9 +.�w .n- � �'�.� .t� [, �`� @ �- . ���, -y �� ., � � � �� � � � , 4v.. �. d . .�. _; Y 9' ' . �'�i.�;�v . T• .. � a�:ry � ���*� I M1..`, +� � `A w' �.. " ,�+� , �,�, - � a �a�'^� t `, � � 4 � '� �...� � �� k �°�' '! -'�T' ,;s: � �'� +'� � �w4.3:=- � � �!+ I . ' �,' 'J .: � T�' s:t� � :� .' �, ' � i'� ♦ � �� �.` � . .. � . T � ,1 �.,��*!� ' � ' ` � �' �., � ei4, ,`�•. �.� - s ,�'� • � � + . � • � . 4i , ��� . � � .�Y, . � , ,� � +1p ,. • �.'�°�� l � ��,�' � , � �..� �• �• � _ .� ��```r - \ ^ ..�� !♦ 5� ,t . ` ` ��{., , t �.�, � -'- ���'.�� � � � ThisExhibitisfoPrplanningpurposesonly,andthereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecording.The 1 ineh � 1,000 feet Figure 4�� - Natural Communities Map .� ���opT��eqo Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. �,o R �� I s°°�°es: GRAPHIC SCALE U-3400 Archdale Road Widening �p � � ESRIAerialMapping,NCDOT,SEPI o 500 1,000 2,00o Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��'q 4'� November 2016 � E N G I N E E R I N G & Feet SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US 311/SR 1009 (Main Street) in Archdale �N'O�*qa"� � 0 N 5 T R U C T I Q N •' . r` � - a• ' M�'- �'�Q.+� ♦ tg � t/+; � .. _•'�+ �� �t ,� t - � � ° � � � .' - . ry +H�'� . {` Y '� .: � �� '�i �` •• `L' � �,, • `.Y �,�1 ��1 , � � . �';�t,`'?. . M1�a. - - �r '� `'� . � .r�:�:C.� ; . k'" , � �. • ��� „�' � � •• `� � +t , '`�. �' . f'�! �� '~ . � �s�` '1• " .►�"� J� � S / �-.w,�_ f' �► z � _ . ^ � ' + � � �� � -��$ +y, y� r. � i. `F � ! ��''e� ., i`!+.!s� '" ri� � �,� s.Z •'I t y' �..� ` . ��, �. . s �� -4 � �. � ��� i +P�., �r. ����, �I � ,� f ��1,�* � ,�. . � _ .� r�' *_ � � "' � h �'''t .,� ��'`� ��z,�:i1 ��M��• ��• ?. '►i+1� a , �y ig .!'�� ;i` ,�' �ri" � • �a : .s,I �F�l.w ."1,�"' ; ' `,�; ' ,� � � _ + � Y.*i�3r's.' ^'7S� }t �, •"'� ,y •7.n,.a. : �} � i r�'� i1. �..� t- # e!� ! `1 ,� � c.�Il� �''"''- �, l ";^t-�, � `. t`�.,i� �"�. t�.-- �, ��.� ' -rl:� S # � ' ' 7� � � - 1 p �. e .. 4 ��� �' � �' T$ � � 'i. f1.t. � .,. ' .�, _ W . , .. � -. r �}i .. . ti. 1/`'�� � \- � �iR, '�: ►i , � � • . � . �� e �� � t�,, y / ' !'�i,r ' `' • i � C' .� a. f . � � � -- � l�' � S �Y. .' �L .` - "'�� �L .�i ` � ��� . � � . + � � </ `1 ' , �� � w - �/ � � •...� . � � * . `'ti t-. �� _� .�wr^- y� .F, Y�--_!.`'�i��y;,`4��;�; , �„'�:.i��1 ,• � . \ ..�' . ;�,1 .� s . `� � -'�.:. G �, '� ',, �t 3 .,,,y._ .,..-�r.. .�". _ . _A+�.�``♦ ;,r,� '� � y �� '!. . �t,� � , yar.�, r i„[ , ? '�' ,�cc., . �, � !- �r �a. � . ��Si „� � .. � �` irr + � � , - ��"•y; " .• �. r , : `:.}. ' ,:. , �e, r , ' _ a `��, ,,+� -�-.. `. `� " '.�+, f, '� F ' •�"f r t �� " p 4c�,xJh � �: � .�: � _��� ,� .. ��,� ,� � .� •.'.'�-+ '�•'�...�� Yk�/. a.�'M?� •1 �f'S i��.� Y � �� t�. r.,�.l� ' � 4, �' �� y ''1'91 �' a .'{''�.� : � ♦ � * � �T � � , i�"� ! S �1' ' '�• ' r/� �.. i." _ ^ _ ,� � r� �� "��� �� � •�'{~ � �'�� `�f..;, 4.;•*� q� i '�j T`�� ��1y� � `��J,,' : a '� �. �- ��' ^ � �`• � �.. wr. f ' .�� '! . ��y'!� �'„ 3". r' ",_��t • y � � ,,,�y� 7�i� _ , i, �� �� "t � �-t'.� � ',!��, y�^ �� � , r .lr� • -,c �� .'� . `��`� 4 �(��. _� �'_.-. 'f �i �-; � t ey �?�*`: ti'i�r t." ./ r�,,� � '"+..;. l'C .1 i � .�' r � . .�f '� �. �,'S ,'��;��Al�.` - � �. `' . r '��..'►'�+-'• r .�' i � �� •`` �..! it . ,: ti. 'k ��`+ ,��i� �' � .f � � �� `� /� 4 � � - `� _ Y . � 4, y..� �� ,'. . S . '�Y,.. � �,�' t `er � � ' �i 'R �s''� :s�-,s �, ry^• a ,' �T'� � * _ � '�'' '� - ����1' � � �� �� .y �� ' / ,s '� �) � �i °` ` ,►:� .- .�,.�. - � � \ '� �n. �. ,w� � � r n•� ? r isi�• y ly I '� �� •f�� 1 ti` , ',• �`� , � •� •'`� � \•, %� ' � i� ���'�� A � : ,� �� �. '�'�� '�'jl����,� , / . � i. �� , 3� .�.� � � �' �{�` � - +. '' - t �� '� .� '� .A.' � �\ �I�f'�� �i ..�! � . ;\b4� C� .'•�My+�,0y� � . r � tar;.���., �r .� � .'�} � i'S ,�,� _^d. `� . �e +� �,l. .. 0' � . ��' �'A ,y�. . ^ �.. , �, � t i w �'4• . i ��-'� - . .; "\�'�.�,+':� � Z . � - � � :!0 _ � +ti � �„ . �. r s � ` 1 �� � . _ �, t ^ ' �:'.,, �' � y�1 � , q+o' I '�, � * . .1�R.} �t � ���, �-.t �. t � .� '.�} � � ��� � '�u�, ♦ _ 1''� ��' + � 2'; �i�,S�I���' ... Y'! p �,� ;. .�Y-���. �� rt . .'�r._!������ i' � ` ��y.0 � _ ��...+r�� `,i., ey �"J,� �'�. M� �1ti �} • �, i��. i.y'� _ �� ..� , y.`�. � _h A � ���� q� �}' d ; � , + � , ��� .k. �+ `.r' ,. �':, r.�.ti � ti:��li+ i��,�Y,�'� i � ��T�►^�•.'�l��`-r� _ � - ';�`� M ~�" � ' ,'•.�' :y �4: �l�F_��,. �� �1' _� - ��i .� _ � � � � _" :' - ., . �{ t �,� � ^at � +.�'�,�i+ '�� ��` '`� . :yt� '��k 'S�'�` � �y r.�t. . ��\� 'r1��. D� . �e - _ �(„r,_y'''•�'`�� �3' �'w � � � - � .�4�'� i r � •� �iC . • � �+3 "'J,�' t�t, , <*2 _ {'� t:, -g' `�; s► . � � .;;, Y.. '�'!S�'• �i . -� � � � ,;z�:�. . �!'�, �;�4 +'Y � � � � � �:�.�i�y.,•� �r •.: �_ �;,� . a'*j,, i �.� ? ��. T' � ' A ` ' ��.s ���"' ' '�f � � � �^ � �� � . � �'�> + � : "�:.. ` .,� '#, t, _ . .�• If� . �`_'-�._ ���!�� �-� r�y ,� ~� ,, �'%'e�� �rr. '' r ��n,�'!�,.� s•'t���� Y � ��, ,���tt j .,•� � i�''�, � '' .v'I` � ' y ♦ r �. * ."" �� . . W ��A 7� � ,f '� �. I .� #' �,'.%. �� � ;Tµ 3., . . .'� 4 � ,. {} . '.r. y ,�/ ��,�r�,, „ ..... , '�`k=�- c'�"�`.ir : �`sl� � +i�,l��y,,:,_,'�t�1 ='� ;.. t `� Af�' � i,+. ��`.� �., � ,t � � ,� �'•' ,"�. '� _ r'�. . . . =�~ ' "'V �. , - �� , . , . .. . • . � '' ` '� ,'�`�. . : � ., . , L. . . '� } � I � w r,�;. ; f K� !,`��k �"� �ri °�,f,t1' ili: � � rr � �� L� �'�:` �r r ��. ` c�° f`+r __ � %_�s ,,�f � �* ** �� '��l'�,t�. �. � . ._ . �`C�y�� ,,� �'• •. � � '�tih,�, .e . .�.a,,;� __ ' ,_ - ' ,��� .� �. .�; .. — � ��.. �,, �+�r'iti �'.� �.+s!?� 3,..,�. A� �T�� _ .. �..i `,� �,� �,�`i�'� Yy j ' �< �,. �1 ��'�; � yS+ �� � S7K, ' - -- _ � -- - ��j �, 'j� „�,� ° `i*� . �'yyT_: � ! � •''. �r� �I � �� ��.- I�y @' � �:4,' .^Y�. .s^ ��A '.•�� ,Y":�r.+. .'t�:.`� Y �� �`,/�a r� �� I t���; �-�l�-. ��� �. 1- Y��� } �i�'� - r �y, �. .. _ . . ,u t t t �'�f t � � �'" `. ^ � , / i, i � %� �v :a ti�, � , }� , . .,:-,: �1�1�•' �+. "'s " . � �i+; � � ` � �'� ' i ,. '� s .` ...� . . i � � � . � �� �� � � . , � ' � � .,ri;, ^ '� ` . , � �- � - -,�-� , � � '�:� �� ' ' ` . .r . � -"K �� : � .� � -�'.�` � �' � �. �, � • -� j� � .�+' ( � .: � _ , � � i :# 74 * .wr ��vl y , � `� �`• ♦ ' � \ I y , ��.+ j �r�.'y ,+.. �i .� � q � ���'-S'w^'.p. ' \ ` .� �r � _ '�ji' � � - - �+1 .�'w!'1�i? � �., . �Y i �;.' S ` .f i�. '�.,���, k f�/ I i _ .�.��' ` �*y:�![ _ w .. _" � ry� y`�>,._ +•w'"' ��� ,�' /,�{ � � �.�r ~'� � � . k\ � i` , . q . '�. '+1�4'Aw � . b ��. "T�y+ -' �"" . �4"*� ✓i+' . � . - y ,� :, � , �.�- ��� �r• . . * ��:'''h ,�► y „ �'� �' �� . r . - .q. ---� �_ --�" , � .� ,. ,� _ , _ � � � 1l " . �s't s �, I . �- .. :a! � -y� ,�' ✓i�, � _ ��. �y�: �: �,4. * 1 �� �.� . F. �� '�"�4 4� . �1,� . � � 1 �- . � : s _ _ , + t A . , . � . �� �.. ., � . *� �l� i �, �` . ��"� r .��r ' ` �? � . ' y c� � �, ,y� ' ,4�r { �'" ;�u-N < ,�� ' ,' �r � + � , • � F +,� � �^ +� , ,�� • �. . � � ,� . �_ w;. , . •. � .. ' -r ' , i � � . . "'l+ r.. �• . y \ . . r ' � � } .4.. . � , `�" � �"- - . ! , . � ( .�� � "S . � � � ' r � t�� . � . �''. . ' •� � - ;: '�'1 t �� �14� `� ' S'y �'Ri'�• ' �f � �C. ��' .1 Y*" � A, .� ' * � T.. � t�' � ` 1l � J t �. � 'N•'�'�' i •, � ' •�'�.s �s � . � '� ' i�:'�1�V�: �! M "' : ��•+ c. �i� i.$ 'f'�T �al°�'?M• ,S� � �1�. +r . r'vi ����' * v .��". -�.,� _ �.•+y. I � ��*Iro���- �� ��• �'��'� � j, � J .f �� ��7L��9y�� f ✓.,1� Gl`?. "�' `4 ! . l T�� .S. �`' r" �' lE�� t ' � �'* -'�"� �� .lf* ' �'. ` � ti.r. � .�, ' ' . � "��q i, s ,�•,' � � , ti.�*',. �,, , f�> • !�, 1, , ,+� ; !+y; <�' r .✓ . , ��'� x�*t ('�: �r� � +� .'�; .r . � _ .�"�� ' i: �' . �'� .�: � '�� fy�, �'a . �. -vr' S. >a . �,. 7�� ..�� �... T�(� f • • .r .�" • �J�f ��� �r. *�. ` �` � . � �'. "" t s w+;+� �. � _ �• / \� ��x i , :;,�i� �[i'.•-,;���`��y' �., � �,' 7 � :'� "' r � '�;I�'+ � f•y``' ,T� y_ �,;' '.;�,, �.��. _ ��y .�1' _'Gt..� _'�_'�'r+a• +E..-4 . �t • -ti• ,e� � - .. f� ...�k ' t.4'^'.� �':, t.'v'`�, - 'L rc �.�J�,�►�.�� � $ r�-' �,. � ..r�� �^Jr� +� . , � �'.-ti:,.� - 7 �, ..s � •�► '1�/_ ..�� •�. -+�+ � t - . , � � _ ' „ � � S ., ' a � � � i,,, - '� � . , ` '� i�: �� � t � '., ,• �'+` �„ r'f .•� � �-.� � '�� ��`�' i � i �� ~ .s�. •� ��� � � „ '''1 ; ,'�i ; �'. • '� � K �. ��` , '�; �i�� ��, w. ` `'j. i' . -+-r 4 � ' , V ti`� 1 'v" ��t st. , .�,r-' _ . ♦ �;�„ � , �� ' • �� � :� �� �.� a � , +�. !l� `' �.� ��'�''a�. . r N� �,� ,X -�. �p � tj' 1•�� I ..'' ' � . � . ,'�l+,� ' � ' � • ' � .y y � . . , . , , } Td ' Y" ` .,,_•. t � ��1 - • -'� � ' .y"1,-. �, - � . , I ` �y � - �� : '. � 1,.., , , ' �, . , y�. ,,� �' i �' � �i4�.4,•.'M�F ,� `•wwr+�l!�'r ,'�� �'�'� _ �� 2+. -� j� 4 �r a � ,,�� t : - r '�, � * � �� s� .�y �.•, -�: ., t �. ,y� #. � � tt `'* -�` �' . +' �,�" ,_ �,. � - _ �!1T" �r- `�' •'_"i •y :�lt.yyl 'Y^ rt�`1'�+.- "�f1 ��i�• ''� � ����" �, �. i t 4t+� �7'� �.',�r; , ' ' , • �1�ii4 . i ) n � .c i'i � �., !� - `�, _ . J C 1� A�'. .+ � � �.. ; i .' � �i � � Y •�• - * � • '� '� � �.i �J a,. . 'r}� .y �� •� .� '�i ��+"���' J '� 7 '•!/" ��.. ,� ��i.•. -�•,- ' � • � '} � � � � , t , ,��'��,�:v: . �n'*�- - '� �'-' f i, '`+`..t,: , �` i� �f�4. '� 1 y .:lh�' is_ .r- .�',� � �'g' � 'E�F'�.. ,� i � �' �'.c� �` , � Yti• i' :�i''� t. �,� . ' . . ,• _ . , , , , .. , . , . .. , , > � ,4 � . d .� : . . , ,��� y� z� �.4��i �. ' , �."�i , " .?. . : � ��� •t,`�R.. , _ �a` � ' �4y. k. ,�. `t � -�' � ,�« ` � N ,�''` �,. . .y r� �w �. � �� �, fi� �' �_'.�r o�:'�' � }"-, "}.� l �, y '?• . r ,t �_ 7 �y 9 - ` . - -er �'�� w S.Ny �.,�"• ,�,L • \� ,��� � r ,. �- --�� !. '.: � '�' � �� %' � , i. �.�r . - �' 'r � �� �` f�'1r��. � �� h Legend �:� ji:; ����; �, , �:� _ _ � � _ ,K _ y � - ♦ .{ 4 Y' �9�:� � -�tl `1p ' z�r . . . '{,� � �!�, � �!` �^ � } - - ,� ,��. . . _ y+K9E Q y c. ,__ � _ ,�+ ,� .. . _..i -,- �, � . + � � � : �_ � ' # � �}� . - • - .- � � . �t�- • e. , .. . ;,'r'�'�� ��� �l �,�-• , _ , �; . . � T Pro ectArea � : � ��''��. � r'� �:.�, :•�+�� � �_h _ :` ,.�;a'; ..���: ,� � •` ! �� ,�r� ,, -;--�. ` s. � � � J ��� � ' �" �' �7 �Y.i�•.. 'r''�.� . , � �'� "�`, � `^ "" � � � "�' � : .�»�,, r � �` �y`�, ��a„��r � - r'td�,ti �� � \�1.A 'Y l ��y^�{ - �\ i� �� �♦ 111��' �'.♦ w`t""' '�v ' � ' � T ���;";+� � ...,�' fe. s},T�'T:l�_ 1f^+.��� � ,:., y��:+ s ., 4 �✓ �\\ - :� 's •.� R ;�►� • �, ��-- +� � Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest(Piedmont Subtype) ;� �"`� r+.'.�,5�� T�� i.�3 ���` �� � ��" ► ,�� _� .� � .�= �y _ f�� ♦ 41; + `�` '�. l ,� � �a �. t 4 ! N T � . 4�: �. -�� � � - w .. ii + 1 �' � ��T � � ► ' �' � �4:i �'t � ��� ,�C � > � y, � �� - .}+ , ��` Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest j y � f'' i�+¢��.�� '�y�a'.� ; �,�?�: �".'^� � ��.`"�{.�' �� j �� � _�„ � � � - �-` � ;*r �' Y'� �,-� � � +•�,. � � ..���.,. r ';� ;VI� �� Y1�:. �; t i `' �� �, aiild .'t � � �� � . , ^ J s. � �� � . �� . . ",_' �. ' ;'� � 1'ti��; ���� �s ,�_*;� si :t� �i \f �i .�.A�cc x �-, ffi�C7 � •� �p . ;� s1•�i: Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest , }. w, ��I_� '`� � �( � � ia� � i» -/ ` .` �`` �� ,� `, ` ��j*t� l�t, '� . "` ...�. .ETSi , . :� � � -F`' a •- �. ?'-4�. � Y �r+r•�w±•'C ' � . �=,.. • � �� F f�T� � �. . .��' '�c , 1'` t. . 1 �+' � �.. '.. h � t ^ �• � - ��. r 7 ,'� � �f�'*:'P• � __ ��t• R4., � u� t ti �ti. ,! K�"I�r ..R r.� . - - �Maintained-Disturbed � r �; ,��i -` .ws . �+�� : ,1 ' .. y . f j, ,;; �`la„ •' ,,� ���'+ _-� ,;� 4 ' � „�, • �. •"!�?� r.�, `� �"��' ti'y '��� t � tr' 1. „f.+ ` . . �� f's� �.`� ^-�F- .� ,4 'i ij w ,i � - . . i + : � Y�* �i'�� "`?,'�w'.�, ►.. � i4a � , . ..� 'y • j � _ v : �-.' r� � � .�... �' '�.�r .M ,� � ,. ,} . ��� � 1 . . . iE1 r •'. � 1 � } ti � * :a ' � ' �"�/���' . i� "'+s'.~a � f �'r'�M �1 , _ �''i - r:► - - o`^�i" .�.w,� -� �; � ; �,� I Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest � � � -�r, �� .�>��`� �:` «s� �,,, x.. . A' �� � ��' y � � � �^'v � �*- ��A --�1 fr-. }� wr R�,���F, - „'. ,.�' � `.' t. .1 s. � i �.•� _,�-tl F�. 'i. ,� � �-,a -.i►?s .J� ` � .- 1 �' �r, a �`� �+t� t 1'�- ' ��"'�-'i��^� i�i:L�-i'` '. � � 4.- _ i�� �� �,qZ�; ti 1�~4f ;�;�r . �`��',�. � . ,r"�`.. _ �` - - i .. , , ('�i'.,�'�`�'r�, .;� •r�, r.�:Y' ,.i� ��� rf�'�`� ;,� e :� .����` .,Y ' .. � 1, - :�-- _ {. � 1 �-� .� ..'w•r ��,:C• `••„.., ` ,'t?�Y ,,,,T��t �Mtr ,`K�, �-i�.r� �•f" '•r ,,, .�.. �. ,:�; �,.' ' ,��-^,•,,�j� �a� - .+,�j •; '� ;�.•'� .�_' / bl ?'Kr-^�, V1Y��! �i. �'C f, �"+S �' �"��) �;s ��'' •Y,,,���� ,�'�, <'t .�� 1� +i�' µa'��� ,,� ; 't���1 ��,�i��'� � r� ���[,,a '�r - +' �f' ! : �,�i� . � ; �.:,. .� \:J x ,�c y,�, i - F� ."it.tti,r �-, " t�'�;: r , �,� � .�-+ ,}�. �t�:3t. ! � �.� , y".`j. . � _ ' �I , '1:: : ,� . - ,"}�. .�-�Y`4� �.:c4,��t � r�.;i;l. - �y�. j ` t'�,.L!�S t. _E,-l�� 3 �:w , ���.�, _ ��� �:7�.� s.,3' .•� .��. �. ,�, ,..y .i' This Exhibit is foPr planning purposes only, and therefore is not for design, construction, or recording. The 1 i neh � 1,000 feet F i g u re 4�L - N atu ra I Co m m u n iti es M a p .� ���opT��c qo Exhibit was com iled from available information obtained from the sources listed below. �,o R �� I s°°�°es: GRAPHIC SCALE U-3400 Archdale Road Widening �p � � ESRIAerialMapping,NCDOT,SEPI o 500 1,000 2,00o Archdale Road (SR 1577/SR 1004) widening from ��'q 4'� November 2016 � E N G I N E E R I N G & Feet SR 1567 (Robbins Country Road) to US 311/SR 1009 (Main Street) in Archdale �N'O�*qa"� � 0 N 5 T R U C T I Q N Appendix B Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report November 2016 Plants Common Name American beech American elm American holly Blackberry Black gum Black jack oak Black walnut Chinese lespedeza Chinese privet Clover Dandelion Dog fennel Fescue Flowering dogwood Goldenrod Gooseberry Grape Green ash Hop Hornbeam Ironweed Japanese honeysuckle Japanese stilt grass Kudzu Laurel oak Loblolly pine Mimosa Mockernut hickory Multiflora rose Northern red oak Persimmon Pignut hickory Poison ivy Red maple Roundleaf greenbrier Shagbark hickory Southern sugar maple Sweetgum Sycamore Scientific Name Fagus grandifolia Ulmus americana Ilex opaca Rubus sp. Nyssa sylvatica var. sylvatica Quercus marilandica Juglans nigra Lespedeza cuneata Ligustrum sinense Trifolium sp. Taraxacum sp. Eupatorium capillifolium Festuca sp. Cornus florida Solidago sp. Vaccinium stamineum Vitis sp. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ostrya virginiana Vernonia sp. Lonicera japonica Microstegium vimineum Pueraria lobata Quercus laurifolia Pinus taeda Albizia julibrissin Carya tomentosa Rosa multiflora Quercus rubra Diospyros virginiana Carya glabra Toxicodendron radicans Acer rubrum Smilax rotundifolia Carya ovata Acer floridanum Liquidambar styraciflua Platanus occidentalis November 2016 Tree of Heaven Trumpet creeper White oak Wild onion Willow oak Winged elm Animals Common Name American crow American goldfinch American robin American toad Blue jay Brown thrasher Carolina wren Carp Copperhead Darters Downy woodpecker Eastern box turtle Eastern cottontail Eastern fence lizard Eastern gray squirrel Eastern towhee European starling Five-lined skink Gray catbird Gray treefrog Killdeer Mourning dove Northern cardinal Northern flicker Northern water snake Pickerel frog Raccoon Rat snake Red-shoulder hawk Rough green snake Shiners Ailanthus altissima Campsis radicans Quercus alba Allium sp. Quercus phellos Ulmus alata Scientific Name Corvus brachyrhynchos Spinus tristis Turdus migratorius Anaxyrus americanus Cyanocitta cristata Toxostoma rufum Thryothorus ludovicianus Cyprinidae family Agkistrodon contortrix Percina sp. Picoides villosus Terrapene carolina Sylvilagus floridanus Sceloporus undulates Sciurus carolinensis Piplio erythrophthalmus Sturnus vulgaris Plestiodon inexpectatus Dumetella carolinensis Hyla chrysoscelis Charadrius vociferous Zenaida macroura Cardinalis cardinalis Colaptes auratus Nerodia sipedon Rana palustris Procyon lotor Elaphe sp. Buteo lineatus Opheodrys aestivus Notropis sp. November 2016 Six-lined race runner Cnemidophorus sexlineatus Snapping turtle Striped skunk Sunf sh Tufted titmouse Turkey vulture Two lined salamander Virginia opossum White-footed mouse White-tailed deer Wood thrush Chelydra serpentina Mephitis mephitis Centrarchidae Baeolophus bicolor Cathartes aura Eurycea bislineata Didelphis virginiana Peromyscus leucopus Odocoileus virginianus Hylocichla mustelina November 2016 Appendix C Stream and Wetland Forms November 2016 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Stream SB Date: 9/6/2016 Project/Site: U-3400 Latitude: 35.89613 Evaluator: E. Black County: andolph Longitude:-79�964548 Total Points: High Point E. 27 Stream Determination: Other: Stream is at least intermittent if @.Q. QUad NamE': >19 or perennial if >30 I IlteffTlltt2nt A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =15_5 � Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 � 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes - 3 0 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Hydrology (Subtotal =6 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiah water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate 2 2 0.5 1 1 Yes = Stron 3 3 0 1.5 1.5 SCORE 0 0 1 1 1 3 C. BiOIOCjy (Subtotal = 5�5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 �perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: No flow present; Substrate: cobble, gravel, sand, silt. Shown as solid line on USGS sheet. Sk@tCil: No flow present at time of evaluation. Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate C� NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Stream SD Date: 9/7/2016 Project/Site: U-3400 Latitude: 35.898506 Evaluator: E. Black County: andolph Longitude:-79�966426 Total Points: Other: High Point E. 30 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent if @.Q. QUad NamE': >19 or perennial if >30 Pel'2nn181 A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =14 � Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 � 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 � 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes - 3 0 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Hydrology (Subtotal =�.5 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiah water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate 2 2 0.5 1 1 Yes = Stron 3 3 0 1.5 1.5 SCORE 2 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 3 C. BiOIOCjy (Subtotal =8�5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 1 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 �perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: Stream originates at culvert. Channel appears piped upstream Substrate:gravel, sand, silt. Does not appear on USGS sheet. Sketch: Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate C� 5-3 5-4.75 low NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Stream SI Date: 9/28/2016 Project/Site: U-3400 Latitude: 35.911661 Evaluator: Christopher Dustin County: andolph Longitude:-79�976965 Total Points: High Point E. 25.5 Stream Determination: Other: Stream is at least intermittent if @.Q. QUad NamE': >19 or perennial if >30 I IlteffTlltt2nt A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =14 � Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes - 3 0 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Hydrology (Subtotal =6.5 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiah water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate 2 2 0.5 1 1 Yes = Stron 3 3 0 1.5 1.5 SCORE 1 0 1 0.5 1 3 C. BiOIOCjy (Subtotal = 5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 �perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: Stream originates at culvert. Substrate:cobble, gravel, sand, silt. Heavy rainfall within 24 hrs. Sketch: Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate C� -3 low NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Stream SJ Date: 9/29/2016 Project/Site: U-3400 Latitude: 35.915799 Evaluator: Christopher Dustin County: andolph Longitude:-79�978253 Total Points: High Point E. 28 Stream Determination: Other: Stream is at least intermittent if @.Q. QUad NamE': >19 or perennial if >30 I IlteffTlltt2nt A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =14 � Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 � 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes - 3 0 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Hydrology (Subtotal =8 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiah water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate 2 2 0.5 1 1 Yes = Stron 3 3 0 1.5 1.5 SCORE 2 0 1 0.5 1.5 3 C. BiOIOCjy (Subtotal =6 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 �perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: Stream originates at culvert. Substrate:gravel, sand, silt. Heavy rainfall within 24 hrs. Sketch: Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate C� 7 low USACE [a DWQ Stream SB Site #_ (indicate on attached map) j STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the tollowing information for the stream reach under assessment: 1. ApplicanYs name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: E. Black 3. Date of evaluation: 9���2016 4. Time of evaluation: 1200 5. Name of stream: UT to Muddy C�eek 6. xiver basin: Cape Fear � <P��' .;+ .. ,. . 7. Approximate drainage area: �$ aC�eS 8, Stream order: FII'Sf 9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 ft 10. Counry: RBndOlph 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.896 Longitude (ex, -77.55661 q: "79•963 Method bcation determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note neazby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): Archdale Rd and Elaine St. in City of Archdale, NC. 14. Proposed channel work (ifany): Undetermined at this time. 15. Recent weather conditions: Sunny/Hot 16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny/HOt 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed X (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estima[e the water sudace area: 19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 0�o Residential 40 0�o Forested 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO _% Commercial 5% Industrial 10 0�o Agricultural 15 0�o Cleared / Logged _% Other ( 22. Bankfull width: 3'4� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2� 24. Channel slope down center of sheam: _Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to ]0%) _Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructions for wmpletion ot worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detertnining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terzain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteris[ic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the chazacteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a chazacteristic cannot be evalua[ed due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in [he scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment sec[ion. Where there aze obvious changes in the character of a sheam under review (e.g., the slream flows from a pasture into a forest), the sueam may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a sVeam reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of ]00 representing a sheam of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 30 Commenis: No flow in channel at time of evaluation. No biology noted. ChannN apPeers incisetl on up0er reac�. Channel unslable on lower reach with heary setliment loatl noteO. Channel crossas untler roatl Nrough 48" RCBC. Evaluator'sSignature ✓.L1,ar� �l/f��lr.�C-- Date 9/�,Z°/% This channel evaluation form is inte de�e used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps ot Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of sheam quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11 9 1 9-876-844 1 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE 1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 � (no flow or satLiration = 0; strong flow = max points) 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 (extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 2 3 Riparian zone 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 3 (no bufFer = 0; contiguous, wide bufFer = max points) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 (extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2 ,.� Groundwater discharge O � 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = tnax points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 Presence of adjacent floodplain � �, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2 a Entrenchment / floodplain access ,� � (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Presence of adjacent wetlands ,� g (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = n�ax points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 2 (exte�lsive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 � (extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2 (fine, l�omogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 � �+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) � Presence of major bank failures ,� a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) Root depth and density on banks Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 �„ (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) � Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 2 15 0-5 0-4 0-5 (substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 � F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) �1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 2 � (little ar no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 3 ,x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) Substrate embeddedness * 2 19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0— 4 0— 4 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maY points) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 Q O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = imax points) � 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 30 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal sn-eams. USACE A[D# DWQ Stream SD Site #_ (iodicate on attached map) . STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: 1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 3. Date of evaluation: 9���2016 5. Name of stream: UT to Muddy Creek 7. Approxima[e drainage area: � aCfeS 9. Leng[h of reach evaluated: 197 ft ll. Site cooidinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. �at�cude {ex. sa.e�zs�z>: 35.898 2. Evaluator's name: E. Black 4. Time of 6. River Iuation:1200 Cape Fear S. Stream order: Fifst lo. Counry: Randolph 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A tong�cuae �ex. -�zss66i i>:'79•966 � t -�►` ,;+ Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): Archdale Rd and Balfour Rd. in City of Archdale, NC. 14. Proposed channel work (if 15. Recent weather 16. Site conditions at time Undetermined at this time. Sunny/Hot �;,. Sunny/Hot 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed X (1-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does channel appeaz on USGS quad map? YES NO 21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 % Residential 40 0�o Forested 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO _% Commercial 5% Industrial 10 0�o Agricultural 15 0�o Cleared / Logged _% Other ( 22. Bankfull width: 0.5-3' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0.5-4.75' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 [0 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel [nstructions for completio� of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, teaain, vegetation, sheam classification, etc. Every chazacteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of [he stream reach under evaluatioa If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather wnditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the sheam may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuiTy, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a sffeam reach must range between 0 and lOQ with a swre of ] 00 representing a stream of the highest quality. Tota� score (trom reverse): 32 Comments: Few caddis flies larvae and salamanders noted. Channel originates al culvert. Upper reac� appaars �o be pipetl. Evaluator's Signature �/�is../�C —.��t� Date 9/� /z o�l This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resuiting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a paHicular mitigation ratio or requirement. Focro subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE 1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2 (no flow or satLiration = 0; strong flow = max points) 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 (extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 2 3 Riparian zone 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 2 (no bufFer = 0; contiguous, wide bufFer = max points) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 (extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2 ,.� Groundwater discharge O � 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = tnax points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 Presence of adjacent floodplain � �, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2 a Entrenchment / floodplain access ,� � (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Presence of adjacent wetlands g (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = n�ax points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 0 9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 2 (exte�lsive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 � (extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2 (fine, l�omogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 � �+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) � Presence of major bank failures ,� a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) Root depth and density on banks Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 �„ (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) � Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4 15 0-5 0-4 0-5 (substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 � F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) �1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 2 � (little ar no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 � ,x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) Substrate embeddedness * 2 19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0— 4 0— 4 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 2 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maY points) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 2 O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = imax points) � 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 Q (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 32 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal sn-eams. USACE DWQ# Stream SI � Site #_ (indicate on attached map) � STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessmenL• 1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2, Evalua[or's name: C. DUStill 3. Date of evaluation: 10/29/2016 5. Name of stream: UT to Muddy Cfeek 7. Approximate drainage area: 11 eCf2s 9. Length of reach evaluated: �5 ft 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. i.auwae �ex sa s�zaizr. 35.911661 4. Time of evaluation: 2�57 6. River basin: Cape Fear 8. Stream order. FifSt 10. Counry: Randolph 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A �o�grt�de «x. -�zssbe i i �: '79.976965 :��i';. Method loca[ion deicrmined (circle): GPS Topo Sheef Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): South of the intersection of Archdale Rd. and Trindale Rd., City of Archdale, NC. 14. Proposed channel work (if any): UndBtB�rl'lined at this timB. 1.5. Recent weather 16. Site wnditions at time of 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Seetion ]0 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Wa[er Supply Watershed X (I-IV) 18. Is [here a pond or lake Iocated upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate [he water surface area: 19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO 21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 0�o Residential 30 0�o Commercial _% Industrial _% Agriculwral 25 o�a Forested 15 0�o Cleared / Logged _% Other ( 22. Bankfull width: 2-3� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1-3' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosiTy: _Straight X Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instractions for comple[ion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terraiq vegeta[ion, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic mus[ be scored using the same eeoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should refleet an overall assessment of the stream reach under evalua[ion. If a characteristic cannot be evalua[ed due to si[e or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where [here are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., [he stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach mus[ range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represen[ing a stream of the highest quality. To[al Score (from reverse): 42 Discharge fmm culvetl and wellands upstream are crea�ing channel. Evalua[or's Signature Ci'G�/wGro'�— �X/i,lvL"C Date �/����� This channel evaluation Torm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners a�vi or nmental professionals in ga[hering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The [otal score resulting from the completion of this form is subject [o USACE approval and does not imply a partieular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change—version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain � Presence of ilow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2 no Flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints Evidence of past human alteration 2 (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints) 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � 3 Riparianzone 0-6 0-4 0-5 � no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = max oints 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges (ex[ensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2 a 5 Groundwaterdischarge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 U(no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, e[c. = max oints) � 6 Presence of adjacent Floodplain Q_ q 0— 4 0— 2 0 (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints) Entrenchment / Floodplain access 2 p" � (dee I entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Presence of adjacent wetlands 8 (no wetlands = 0; lar e ad'acent we[lands = max oints) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 � Channel sinuosity ,� 9 (extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �� Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 (extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints) �� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2 fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oin[s Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3 �. 12 dee I incised = 0; s[able bed & banks = ma�c oints a13 Presenceofmajorbankfailures 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 � (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints) � 14 Root depth and density on banks 3 H(no visible roots = 0; dense roo[s [hrou hout = max oints) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 � IS �mpact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4 (substantial im act =0; no evidence = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 16 PresenceofrifFle-pool/ripple-poolcomplexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 F no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oin[s � �� Habita[complexity F" Qittle or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 4 .. �] � 8 Canopy coverage over s[reambed p_ 5 0— 5 0— 5 3 Q no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oin[s) x 19 Subs[rateembeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (dee I embedded = 0� Loose strucmre = max) 20 Presence of stream iuvertebra[es (see page 4) � � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = maac oints 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 C7 Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q O Z� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) 0 22 Presenceoffish 0-4 0-4 0-4 � � no evidence = 0; commoq oumerous es = max oints) � Evidence of wildiife use 23 0-6 0-5 0-5 � (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = ma�c oints Total Points Possible ]00 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 42 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. USACE AID# DWQ Stream SJ Site #_ (indicate on attached map) � STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide [he following information for the stream reach under assessment: 1. ApplicanPs name: NCDOT 2, Evaluator's name: C. Dustin 3. Date of evaluation: 10/29/2016 4. Time of evaluation: 4:00 5. Name of sVeam: UT t0 Muddy C�eek 6. River basin: C8p2 F08f 7. Approximate drainage 9. Length of reach evalua 36 acres 185 ft 11. Site coordina[es (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. Latimde (ex_ 3a 8zz3 i2�: 35.915799 8. Stream order. FifSt 10. Coumy: Randolph 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A �o���mae eex--�zssbe i i �: -79 • 978253 Method bcation determined (circle): GPS Topu Sheet Ortho (Aeriaq Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map iden[ifying stream(s) loca[ion): Under Archdale Rd and Runs parallel with Eden Terrace Rd, City of Archdale, NC. 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Und2te�mined 8t 1hiS tifll2. ]5. Recent weather conditions: SUf1f1y/HOt 16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sun�y/HOt 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Seetion 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habi[a[ _Trout Waters _Ou[standing Resource Wafers _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Sapply Watershed X (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poinfl YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO 21. Estimated walershed land use: 22. Bankfull width: 3-4' 30 o�oResidential 10 %Commercial _%Industrial _%Agricultural 60 0�o Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �=9� 24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep p 10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining [he mos[ appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classifieation, ero. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, en[er 0 in the scoring box and provide a� explanation in the commen[ section. Where there are obvious changes in [he character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a paswre into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches [hat display more continuity, and a separate form used [o evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach mus[ range between 0 and I OQ with a score of 100 representing a stream of fhe highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 35 Comments: Channel Runs along Etlen Terrace Road as roadsitle tlitch. Looks as if channel has �een reloca�ed or has naWralized into intermiltenl channel. / L/ Evaluator's Signature �'V7n.�lM"���'�— Date � � � This channel evaluation form is in[ended to be used only as a guide to assis[ Iandowners an en ironmental professionals in gathering the data required by [he United States Army Corps of Engineers [o make a preliminary assessmen[ of stream quali[y. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a paHicular mitiga[ion ra[io or requirement Form subject to change – version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-87G8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mouotain Presence of 11ow / persistent pools in stream 3 � no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of past human alteration z (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � Riparian zone O 3 no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = mar oints 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 4 (extensive dischar es = 0; no dischaz es = max oin[s) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2 „a Groundwa[er discharge 3 � 5 no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, e[c. = max oints) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 .. Presence of adjacent floodplain O r� 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 , no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints ,�'S", � Entrenchment / Floodplai� aceess 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 Q dee I entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oints 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = 0; lar e ad'acent we[lands = max oints � Channel sinuosity ,� 9 extensive chancelization = 0; natural meander = max oints �— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �p Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 eMensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints) Size & diversity of channel bed substrate � �� (fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints NA 0— 4 0— 5 3 � 2 Evidence of channel incision or widening Q_ 5 0— 4 0— 5 � �+ dee I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints „F"'„ Presence of major bank failures a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 �„� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints � 14 Root depth and density on banks 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 3 r�„ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints � lmpac[ by agriculture, livestock, or [imber production 4 IS 0-5 0-4 0-5 substan[ial im act =0; no evidence = max oints � 6 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2 �. no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints � �� Habitatwmplexity � (little o� uo habita[=-0; fre uenC, va�c�e0 habftats = max oin�s) �� 0-6 0� � Ca Canopy coverage over s[reambed Q � 8 no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2 x 19 Substrate embeddedness (dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max NA* 0— 4 0— 4 2 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q � no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints �j 21 Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 � O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) "� Presence of fsh O 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 � � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 � no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = ma�c oints) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 35 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 21-Ju1-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WA Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, P. Beach Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: Long.: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WpC-Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WA UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Liauidambar stvraciflua 3, Ulmus americana 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 40 ❑� 57.1% FAC 20 ❑� 28.6% FAC 10 ❑ 14.3% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 70 = TotalCover 20 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZD = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 90 x 3= 270 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 90 (n) 270 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WA Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-10 lOYR 4/2 100 Loam SO-12 SOYR 5/3 80 10YR 5/8 20 Loamy Sand 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 21-Ju1-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WA Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, P. Beach Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: Long.: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WpC-Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria; drainage feature. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WA Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, Ulmus americana 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Acer rubrum 2, Fraxinus Dennsvlvaniq 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 20 ❑� 66.7% FAC 10 ❑� 33.3% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 30 = TotalCover 15 ❑� 60.0% FAC 10 �❑ 40.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZS = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 10 x 2= 20 FAC species 45 x 3= 135 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 55 (n) 155 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.818 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WA Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 lOYR 3/2 100 Sandy Loam 2-12 10YR 5/2 90 7.5R 4/6 10 C M Sandy Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 21-Ju1-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: H►g Upldand DP Investigator(s): E. Black, P. Beach Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: Long.: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-WynOtt-EnOn COmplex 2-8% SlOpes NWI classification: NOne Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WB UDldand DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Nvssa svlvatica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) j , Acer rubrum 2, Liauidambar stvraciflua $, Carva tomentosa 4, Prunus serotina 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 10 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% SO = Total Cover 15 ❑� 57.7% FAC 5 ❑ 19.2% FAC 5 ❑ 19.2% UPL 1 ❑ 3.8% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% z6 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 15 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 15 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 45 x 3= 135 FACU species 1 x 4= 4 uP� species 5 x 5= Z5 Column Totals: 51 (n) 164 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.216 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WB Upldand DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 5/3 98 lOYR 5/8 2 C M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 21-Ju1-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: H►g yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, P. Beach Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: Long.: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria; drainage feature. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WB Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Ouercus ohellos 2, Acer rubrum 3, Nvssa svlvatica 4, Quercus laurifolia 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 20 ❑� 36.4% FACW 15 ❑� 27.3% FAC 10 ❑ 18.2% FAC 10 ❑ 18.2% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 55 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 20 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 20 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 30 x 2= 60 FAC species 45 x 3= 135 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 75 (n) 195 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.600 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WB Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 7.SYR 4/1 100 Silt Loam 2-12 10YR 5/2 75 10YR 5/8 25 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 21-Ju1-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WC Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, P. Beach Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: Long.: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-WynOtt-EnOn COmplex 2-8% SlOpes NWI classification: NOne Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WC UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Liriodendron tulinifere 3, Liquidambar stvraciflua 4, Nvssa svlvatica 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. Ulmus alata 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 15 ❑� 37.5% FAC 10 ❑� 25.0% FACU 10 �❑ 25.0% FAC 5 ❑ 12.5% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 2 ❑ 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 2 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66•7% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 30 x 3= 90 FACU species lZ x 4= 48 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 42 (n) 138 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.286 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WC Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/3 100 Loamy Sand 4-12 lOYR 4/2 100 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: Loam zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 21-Ju1-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WC Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, P. Beach Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: Long.: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria; drainage feature. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WC Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) 1, Ouercus ohellos 2, Liauidambar stvraciflua 3, Acer rubrum 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' circular ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 45 ❑� 643% FACW 15 ❑� 21.4% FAC 10 ❑ 14.3% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 70 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 45 x 2= 90 FAC species 30 x 3= 90 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 75 (n) 180 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.400 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WC Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 lOYR 5/1 100 Sandy Loam 3-12 10YR 5/2 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M Sandy Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WD Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.882231 Long.: -7g.g53451 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑d High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 3 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: heavy rain within previous 24 hours US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WD UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1. Carva ovata 2, Carva alabra 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Acer rubrum 2, Chionanthus virqinicus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' linear ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. Vitls rotundifolia 3. Cam�sis radicans 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 40 ❑� 80.0% FACU 10 ❑� 20.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 50 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 50.0% 5 �❑ 50.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 25 �❑ 73.5% 5 ❑ 14.7% 4 ❑ 11.8% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 34 = Total Cover FAC FACU FAC FAC FAC Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 39 x 3= 117 FACU species 55 x 4= ZZ� uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 94 (n) 337 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.585 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WD Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 5/3 85 lOYR 5/8 15 C PL Sandy Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: y�►D Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Saddle Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.882237 Long.: -7g.g53409 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑d High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑� Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 12 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WD Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) 1, Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, Ulmus rubra 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) j , Nvssa svlvatica 2, Ouercus �hellos 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' circular ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 40 ❑� 57.1% FAC 30 ❑� 42.9% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 70 = TotalCover 15 ❑� 75.0% FAC 5 �❑ 25.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZD = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 25 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 25 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 5 x 2= 10 FAC species 110 x 3= 330 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 115 (n) 340 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.957 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WD Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 5/2 55 lOYR 5/8 45 C M Silty Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WE Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.883542 Long.: -7g.g54369 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WE UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, Prunus serotina 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Carva alabra 2, ]uqlans niqra 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' linear ) 1, Vids rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 30 ❑� 60.0% FAC 20 ❑� 40.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 50 = TotalCover 30 ❑� 75.0% FACU 10 �❑ 25.0% UPL 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 35 x 3= 105 FACU species 50 X 4= 200 uP� species 10 X 5= 50 Column Totals: 95 (n) 355 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.737 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WE Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/2 100 Loam 4-12 10YR 4/3 95 10YR 3/6 5 C PL Sandy Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WE Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.883522 Long.: -7g.g54364 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑� Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 0 High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 1 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 5 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WE Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Liriodendron tulinifera 2, Nvssa svlvatica 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' linear ) 1, Lonicera iaaonica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 40 ❑� 57.1% FACU 30 ❑� 42.9% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 70 = TotalCover 20 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZD = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 50 x 3= 150 FACU species 45 X 4= 180 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 95 (n) 330 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.474 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WE Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-5 lOYR 2/1 100 Loam 5-12 10YR 5/2 70 10YR 5/8 30 C PL Sandy Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WF Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.884175 Long.: -7g.g54766 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: H0C - H01end 58ndy IOdm, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: NOn2 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation d❑ , Soil ❑ ydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � ,orH Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria; Heavy rain within previous 24 hours. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WF UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' circular ) j, Sambucus niqra ssa. canadensis 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' circular ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 10 Cn) 30 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WF Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/2 90 lOYR 3/6 10 C PL Sandy Clay Loam 4-12 2.5Y 5/3 75 10YR 5/8 25 C PL Sandy Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WF Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.884175 Long.: -7g.g54794 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation d❑ , Soil ❑ ydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � ,orH Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. Heavy rain within 24HRs. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WF Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15' circular ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' circular ) j, Sambucus niqra ssa. canadensis 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' circular ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' circular ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 10 Cn) 30 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WF Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 4/2 75 2.SY 3/6 25 C PL Sandy Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: WG Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.883953 Long.: -7g.g54837 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NwI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. Heavy rain within 24 hrs. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WG UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Fraxinus americana 2, Carva �mentosa 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' linear ) 1, Vids rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 40 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = TotalCover 15 ❑� 50.0% FACU 15 �❑ 50.0% UPL 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 30 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 3 ❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 3 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 43 x 3= 129 FACU species 15 X 4= 60 uP� species 15 x 5= 75 Column Totals: 73 (n) 264 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.616 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WG Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 2/2 100 Clay Loam 4-12 2.5Y 5/3 70 2.5Y 5/6 30 C PL Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: North Carolin Sampling Point: y�►G Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 349.0% � 2.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l.at.: 35.88396 Long.: -7g.g54845 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑d High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑� Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 3 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WG Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' linear ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. Toxiwdendron radicans 3. 4. 5. 6. ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 ❑� 100.0% FAC ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 71.4% FAC 2 ❑d 28.6% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 7 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 87 x 3= 261 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 87 Cn) 261 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WG Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 3/2 100 Silty Clay 4-12 2.5Y 5/2 65 10YR 4/6 35 C PL Silty Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WH Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.886479 Long.: -79.960487 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-WynOtt-EnOn COmplex 2-8% SlOpes NWI classification: NOne Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WH UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: j , Pinus taeda 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 2 ❑d 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% Z = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. Highly disturbed beside Railroad bed. Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species Z x 3= 6 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 2 Cn) 6 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WH Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 5/3 98 lOYR 5/8 20 C M Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: y�►H Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.886493 �ong.: -79.960501 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation d❑ , Soil ❑ ydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � ,orH Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 2 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WH Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ) Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Pinus taeda 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetatino meets wetland criteria. Vegetation highly disturbed. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 2 ❑d 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% Z = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species Z x 3= 6 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 2 Cn) 6 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WH Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/2 98 lOYR 3/6 20 C M Silty Clay Loam 4-10 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Sandy Clay 10-12 lOYR 4/2 95 lOYR 5/8 5 C M Sandy Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WI Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Lowland Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.88646 �ong.: -79.96094 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-WynOtt-EnOn COmplex 2-8% SlOpes NWI classification: NOne Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WI UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Ouercus ohellos 2, Pinus taeda 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Ouercus alba 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' linear ) 1, Toxicodendron radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 60 ❑� 923% FACW 5 ❑ 7J% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 65 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 2 ❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 2 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 60 x 2= 120 FAC species 7 x 3= 21 FACU species 5 x 4= Z� uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 72 (n) 161 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.236 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WI Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 2.SYR 5/2 100 Sandy Clay Loam 2-10 2.5Y 5/3 95 2.5Y 5/6 5 C M Sandy Clay Loam 10-12+ 2.SY 5/3 80 2.5Y 5/6 20 C M Silty Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 10-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyI H►etland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Lowland Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.88648 �ong.: -79.96098 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑d High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 5 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WI Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Ouercus ohellos 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' linear ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 ❑� 100.0% FACW ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria. Vegetation highly disturbed at sample point, railroad right of way. Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 30 x 2= 60 FAC species 5 x 3= 15 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 35 Cn) 75 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.143 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WI Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 2.SY 4/1 80 lOYR 3/6 20 C M Sandy Clay Loam 6-12+ 2.5Y 5/2 70 10YR 5/8 30 C M Sandy Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 15-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WJ Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.888726 Long.: -79.959471 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-WynOtt-EnOn COmplex 2-8% SlOpes NWI classification: NOne Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WJ UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) j , Pinus taeda 2, Liauidambar stvraciflua 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' circular ) 1, Andr000aon virainicus 2. Lesoedeza cuneata 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' circular ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetatino meets wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 25 ❑� 83.3% FAC 5 ❑ 16.7% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 30 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 50.0% FAC 10 ❑� 50.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 20 = TotalCover 2 ❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 2 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66•7% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 42 x 3= 126 FACU species 10 X 4= 40 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 52 (n) 166 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.192 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: W,J Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 2.SY 6/4 95 2.SY 5/6 5 C M Sandy Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 15-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yy) yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.888749 Long.: -79.959471 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑� Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 2.5 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WJ Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1. ]uncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species 5 x 1= 5 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 0 x 3= � FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 5 Cn) 5 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑d Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: W� Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 5/6 98 lOYR 5/8 20 Clay 6-12 10YR 5/1 60 10YR 5/6 40 Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 15-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WK Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89032 �ong.: -79.96102 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: H0C - H01end 58ndy IOdm, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: NOn2 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WK UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Toxicodendron radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Puereria montana var. lobata 2. Camosis radicans 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 80 ❑� 100.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 80 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 5 = TotalCover 30 �❑ 85J% FACU 5 ❑ 143% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 35 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species 30 X 4= 120 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 40 (n) 150 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.750 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WK Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 2.SY 5/4 85 lOYR 4/6 15 C M Silt Loam Mi xed matri x 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 15-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WK Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89031 �ong.: -79.961071 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WK Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Frexinus oennsvlvanica 2, Ulmus americana 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) j , Fraxinus �ennsvlvanip 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 1, Boehmeria cvlindrica 2. Microsteaium vimineum 3. ]uncus effusus 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 29 ❑� 53.7% FACW 25 0 46.3% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 54 = TotalCover 10 ❑� 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 35 �❑ 77.8% FACW 5 ❑ 11.1% FAC 5 ❑ 11.1% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 45 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species 5 x 1= 5 FACw species 74 x 2= 148 FAC species 30 x 3= 90 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 109 (n) 243 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.229 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WK Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 2.SY 5/1 80 lOYR 3/6 20 C M Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 15-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WL Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89046 Long.: -79.96148 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NwI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WL UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Frexinus oennsvlvanica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. Phvtolacca americana 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 ❑� 100.0% FACW ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 833% FAC 2 ❑ 16.7% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 12 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 80 x 2= 160 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species Z x 4= $ uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 92 (n) 198 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.152 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WL Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-10 lOYR 5/3 80 7.SYR 3/4 20 C M Loam 10-12+ 7.5YR 4/3 50 7.5YR 3/4 20 C M Clay Loam 7• SYR 4/2 matri x 30% 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 15-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WL Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, K. Hamlin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89046 �ong.: -79.96148 Soil Map Unit Name: H0C - H01end 58ndy IOdm, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Datum: NAD83 Yes � No � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WL Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Fraxinus oennsvlvanica 3, Platanus occidentalis 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' circular ) j , Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1, Toxicodendron radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 60 ❑� 46.2% FAC 20 ❑ 15.4% FACW 50 �❑ 38.5% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 130 = TotalCover 20 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZD = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 40 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 40 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 70 x 2= 140 FAC species 120 x 3= 360 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 190 (n) 500 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.632 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WL Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-5 lOYR 4/2 100 Loam 5-12+ 10YR 4/2 70 10YR 3/6 30 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 25-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WM Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.890213 �ong.: -79.960008 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-WynOtt-EnOn COmplex 2-8% SlOpes NWI classification: NOne Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WM UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Ulmus rubra 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'linear ) 1. Sambucus niara 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. ]uncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 5 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 5 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species 5 x 1= 5 FACW species 5 x 2= 10 FAC species 5 x 3= 15 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 15 Cn) 30 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WM Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 4/3 90 lOYR 3/6 10 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 25-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyM Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.890213 �ong.: -79.g5g9g Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WM Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Ulmus rubra 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'linear ) 1. Sambucus niara 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. ]uncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 20 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 20 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 5 = TotalCover 15 �❑ 100.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 15 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: 06� species 15 X 1= 15 FACW species 5 x 2= 10 FAC species 20 x 3= 60 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 40 Cn) 85 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.125 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WM Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-8 lOYR 4/2 80 lOYR 3/6 20 C M Silt Loam 8-12+ 2.5Y 4/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 25-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WN Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.8904 Long.: -79.9607 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NwI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WN UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Trifolium recens 2. Plantaao lanceolata 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 30 �❑ 93.8% FACU 2 ❑ 6.3% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 32 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 0 x 3= � FACU species 3Z x 4= iZ$ uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 32 Cn) 128 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WN Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12+ lOYR 4/4 50 lOYR 4/6 25 C M ClayLoam Matrix lOvrt 4/2 25�6 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 25-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyN Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89043 �ong.: -79.96081 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WN Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'linear ) 1. Fraxinus oennsvlvanica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. ]uncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 5 = TotalCover 80 �❑ 100.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 80 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species gp x 1= gp FACW species 5 x 2= 10 FAC species 0 x 3= � FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 85 Cn) 90 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.059 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑d Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WN Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-10 lOYR 4/2 80 lOYR 3/6 20 C M Loam SO-12 10YR 5/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Sandy Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 25-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WO Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89078 �ong.: -79.9609 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: H0C - H01end 58ndy IOdm, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: NOn2 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WO UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. ]uncus effusus 3, Rubus amutus 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 ❑� 100.0% FAC ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 30 �❑ 50.0% FAC 20 ❑� 33.3% OBL 10 ❑ 16.7% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 60 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species Zp x 1= Zp FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 60 x 3= 180 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 80 (n) 200 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.500 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WO Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-5 lOYR 4/3 100 Loam 5-10 SOYR 5/3 90 10YR 3/4 10 C M Loam 10-12 lOYR 4/3 95 lOYR 3/6 5 D M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 25-Aug-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyp yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89078 �ong.: -79.960953 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WO Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. Eutrochium fistulosum 3. ]uncus effusus 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 80 �❑ 80.0% FAC 10 ❑ 10.0% FACW 10 ❑ 10.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 100 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species 10 X 1= 10 FACW species 10 x 2= 20 FAC species 80 x 3= 240 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 100 (n) 270 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.700 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WO Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 2.SYR 3/2 100 Loam 3-12 10YR 4/2 85 7.5YR 3/4 15 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: Wp Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.8958 Long.: -79.9646 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: Wp UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Frexinus oennsvlvanica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' circular ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. �onicera iaoonica 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 ❑� 100.0% FACW ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 50.0% FAC 10 ❑d 50.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 20 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66•7% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 80 x 2= 160 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species 10 X 4= 40 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 100 (n) 230 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.300 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: Wp Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12+ lOYR 4/3 100 Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyp yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Undulating Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89583 �ong.: -79.96468 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: Wp Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Frexinus oennsvlvanica 2, Acer rubrum 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' linear ) 1. Sambucus niara 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Persicaria saa"�ta 2. Im�atiens ca�ensis 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 40 ❑� 80.0% FACW 10 0 20.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 50 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 5 = TotalCover 40 �❑ 61.5% OBL 25 ❑� 38.5% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 65 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: 06� species 40 X 1= 40 FACW species 70 x 2= 140 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 120 (n) 210 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.750 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: Wp Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12+ lOYR 4/2 90 lOYR 3/6 10 C Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WQ Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89583 �ong.: -79.96468 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WQ UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Dios�vros viminiana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) j , Ulmus alata 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. Smilax rotundifolia 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 25 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 25 = TotalCover 30 ❑� 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 30 = Total Cover ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 15 �❑ 50.0% FAC 15 ❑d 50.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 30 = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �5•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 55 x 3= 165 FACU species 30 X 4= 120 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 85 (n) 285 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.353 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: Wq Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 4/3 100 Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyQ yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.894673 �ong.: -7g.g64207 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: PF01E Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WQ Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' linear ) 1. Cornus amomum 2. Alnus serrulata 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. Im�atiens ca�ensis 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 15 ❑� 75.0% 5 ❑� 25.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 20 = Total Cover 40 �❑ 88.9% 5 ❑ 11.1% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 45 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover FACW FACW FAC FACW Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 25 x 2= 50 FAC species 40 x 3= 120 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 65 (n) 170 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.615 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: Wq Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 4/1 90 lOYR 3/6 10 C M Sandy Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WR Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.8955 Long.: -79.9650 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WR UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' linear ) 1, Liriodendron tulinifera 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'linear ) 1. Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' linear ) 1, Toxicodendron radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 ❑� 100.0% FACU ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 5 = TotalCover 70 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 70 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �5•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 80 x 3= 240 FACU species $� x 4= 320 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 160 (n) 560 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.500 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WR Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 lOYR 4/4 95 lOYR 7/8 5 C M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: y�►R Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.89551 Long.: -79.96506 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WR Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) j , Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Lonicera iaaonica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 10 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 95 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 95 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66•7% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 105 x 3= 315 FACU species 5 x 4= Z� uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 110 Cn) 335 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.045 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WR Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 2/1 100 Sandy Loam 6-12 SOYR 3/2 95 10YR 3/6 5 C M Loamy Sand 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑� Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WS Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.5% � 0.9 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.898391 �ong.: -7g.g67338 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WS UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Ouercus ohellos 2, Liauidambar stvraciflua 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 10 ❑� 50.0% FACW 10 ❑� 50.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 20 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 10 x 2= 20 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 20 Cn) 50 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.500 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WS Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 lOYR 3/3 100 Loam 3-12+ 10YR 4/3 80 10YR 4/6 20 D M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WS Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.898373 �ong.: -7g.g67368 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WS Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Ulmus americana 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 30 ❑� 75.0% FAC 10 ❑� 25.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 85 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 85 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 125 x 3= 375 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 125 Cn) 375 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WS Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-8 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 8-12+ 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WT Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 4.0% � 2.3 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.899601 �ong.: -7g.g70357 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WT UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) j , Ouercus ohellos 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 10 ❑� 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% SO = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 60 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 60 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 10 x 2= 20 FAC species 60 x 3= 180 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 70 Cn) 200 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.857 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WT Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/6 100 Sand 4-8 2.5Y 5/4 100 Sand 8-12+ 2.SY 6/4 100 Sand 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 06-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyT yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, E. Webster Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.899568 �ong.: -7g.g7p3g2 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: PFO Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WT Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Frexinus oennsvlvanica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) j , DiospYros virqiniana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. ]uncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 ❑� 100.0% FACW ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑ 16.7% OBL 20 ❑� 66.7% 5 ❑ 16.7% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 30 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66•7% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species 5 x 1= 5 FACW species 10 x 2= 20 FAC species 5 x 3= 15 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 20 (n) 40 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WT Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/2 100 Clay Loam 4-12+ 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 D M Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WU Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.0% � 0.6 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.90377 �ong.: -7g.g714g Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WU UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Platanus occidentalis 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' linear ) 1, Lonicera iaaonica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 10 ❑� 25.0% FAC 30 ❑� 75.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 20 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 20 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 4 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �5•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 30 x 2= 60 FAC species 30 x 3= 90 FACU species 5 x 4= Z� uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 65 (n) 170 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.615 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WU Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 3-12+ 10YR 4/3 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: y�►U Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bench Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.5% � 0.3 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.903788 Long.: -7g.g71556 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WU Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 90 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 90 = TotalCover 90 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 90 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 180 x 3= 540 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 180 Cn) 540 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WU Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 2/2 100 Loam 4-12+ 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WV Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.5% � 0.9 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.903418 �ong.: -7g.g71g79 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WV UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Ulmus americana 3, Quercus rubra 4, Platanus occidentalis 5, Liriodendron tulipifera 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) j , ]unicerus virqiniana 2, ��p1I1U5 W�OIII110I10 3, Fraxinus oennsvlvanica 4, Cornus florida 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' ) 1, Camosis radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 40 ❑� 44.4% FAC 15 ❑� 16.7% FAC 10 ❑ 11.1% FACU 10 ❑ 11.1% FACW 15 ❑� 16.7% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 90 = TotalCover 15 ❑� 50.0% FACU 5 0 16.7% FAC 5 ❑� 16.7% FACW 5 ❑� 16.7% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 30 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 85 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 85 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66•7% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 15 x 2= 30 FAC species 155 x 3= 465 FACU species 45 X 4= 180 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 215 (n) 675 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.140 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WV Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-11 lOYR 3/6 100 Clay Loam 11-12+ 10YR 4/4 100 Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WV Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.903411 Long.: -7g.g72p71 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: PF01 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) �❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WV Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, Pinus taeda 3, Fraxinus aennsvlvanica 4, Acer rubrum 5, Platanus occidentalis 6, Liriodendron tulipifera 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) j , Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, Fraxinus Dennsvlvaniq $, Acer rubrum 4, Platanus occidentalis 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 15 ❑� 143% FAC 15 ❑� 14.3% FAC 15 �❑ 14.3% FACW 25 0 23.8% FAC 25 ❑� 23.8% FACW 10 ❑ 9.5% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 105 = TotalCover 35 ❑� 33.3% FAC 30 �❑ 28.6% FACW 30 ❑� 28.6% FAC 10 ❑ 9.5% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 105 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 15 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 15 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 80 x 2= 160 FAC species 135 x 3= 405 FACU species 10 X 4= 40 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 225 (n) 605 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.689 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WV Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 lOYR 4/1 90 lOYR 4/6 10 C M Loamy Sand 2-12+ 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Loamy Sand 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: y�►y�► Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 0.5% � 0.3 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.905332 Long.: -7g.g7275 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑d , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Highly disturbed soils. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WW UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Liauidambar stvraciflua 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) j , Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, ]uqlans niqra 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 ❑� 100.0% FAC ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�ro ❑ 0.0% ❑ o.o�io ❑ 0.0% = TotalCover 60 ❑� 85.7% 10 ❑ 14.3% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 70 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 30 �❑ 60.0% 10 ❑� 20.0% 10 0 20.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 50 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover FAC UPL FAC Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 140 x 3= 420 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species 10 X 5= 50 Column Totals: 150 (n) 470 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.133 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WW Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 3/4 70 lOYR 4/6 30 C M Sandy Clay Loam 4-8 lOYR 6/6 60 lOYR 5/8 40 C M Sandy Clay gravel streaki ng 8-12+ 2.SY 6/4 60 lOYR 5/8 40 C M Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yyyy yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Lowland Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.5% � 0.3 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.905321 �ong.: -7g.g72(29 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: PEM1 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑d , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Highly disturbed soils in sewer easement Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑� Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: H►N/ N/etland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, ]ualans niara 3, Liquidambar stvraciflua 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) j , Liauidambar stvraciflua 2, QUercuS Dhellos 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. ]uncus effusus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1, Vids rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 45 ❑� 52.9% FAC 30 ❑� 35.3% UPL 10 ❑ 11.8% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 85 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 50.0% 5 �❑ 50.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 60 �❑ 80.0% 15 ❑� 20.0% ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 75 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover FAC FACW FAC OBL UPL FAC Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83•3% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: 06� species 15 X 1= 15 FACW species 5 x 2= 10 FAC species 120 x 3= 360 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species 30 X 5= 150 Column Totals: 170 (n) 535 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.147 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WW Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-10 2.SY 4/1 60 7.SYR 4/6 40 C M Clay gravel and organic streakina mixed in 10-14+ 2.5Y 4/1 75 7.5YR 3/4 25 C M Clay gravel amd organic streakina mixed in 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WX Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 1.5% � 0.9 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.905484 Long.: -7g,g73466 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WX UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Caroinus caroliniana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) j , Acer rubrum 2, Nvssa svlvatica $, Carpinus caroliniana 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. Microsteaium vimineum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 40 ❑� 100.0% FAC ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = TotalCover 10 ❑� 20.0% FAC 30 �❑ 60.0% FAC 10 ❑� 20.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 50 = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 15 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 15 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 105 x 3= 315 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 105 (n) 315 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WX Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 3-12+ 10YR 6/3 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M Sandy Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WX Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.90548 Long.: -7g.g73532 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: ChA - Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floode Nwt classification: PFO Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑� Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WX Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Nvssa svlvatica 2, Ulmus americana 3, Liquidambar stvraciflua 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) j , Fraxinus �ennsvlvanip 2, Carpinus caroliniana 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 10 ❑� 40.0% FAC 10 ❑� 40.0% FAC 5 �❑ 20.0% FAC ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 25 = TotalCover 15 ❑� 60.0% FACW 10 � 40.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZS = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACw species 15 x 2= 30 FAC species 35 x 3= 105 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 50 (n) 135 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.700 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WX Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 3-12+ 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑� Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WY Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.5% � 0.9 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.899906 �ong.: -7g.g(g239 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WY UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) 1, Liauidambar stvraciflua 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1, Festuca rubra 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 10 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% SO = Total Cover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 90 �❑ 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 90 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species 90 x 4= 360 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 100 Cn) 390 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.900 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WY Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 5/3 100 Sand 6-12+ lOYR 5/4 100 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: Sand zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 2g-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WY Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Gulch or Gully Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 1.0% � 0.6 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.899962 �ong.: -7g.g68314 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtC-Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WY Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Ouercus ohellos 2, Salix niara 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) j , Nvssa svlvatica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Persicaria oensvlvanica 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 45 ❑� 60.0% FACW 30 ❑� 40.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 75 = TotalCover 10 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 10 = Total Cover 30 ❑� 100.0% ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 30 = Total Cover 30 �❑ 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 30 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 5 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80•0% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: 06� species 30 X 1= 30 FACw species 75 x 2= 150 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 115 (n) 210 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.826 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WY Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 lOYR 2/2 100 Silt Loam 2-7 7.5YR 2/2 90 7.5YR 3/4 10 C M Silt Loam 7-12+ 7.SYR 4/1 95 7.SYR 4/6 5 C M Sandy Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WZ Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: Z,p% / 1.1 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.911461 �ong.: -7g.g77116 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WZ UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'circular ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' circular ) 1, Parthenocissus quinquefolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 0 x 3= � FACU species 5 x 4= Z� uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 5 Cn) 20 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WZ Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-5 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 5-12+ 10YR 5/3 98 10YR 5/6 2 Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: H►Z yyetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley bottom Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 1.0% � 0.6 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.91144 Long.: -7g,g77pg9 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 12 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WZ Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) j, Solidaao ruaosa ss�. ascera 2, Rubus arautus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ]uncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1, Vids rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 45 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 45 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 10 �❑ 100.0% OBL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 10 = Total Cover 40 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 40 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 3 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiqiv bv: oBL species 10 X 1= 10 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 85 x 3= 255 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= � Column Totals: 95 (n) 265 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.789 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WZ Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 6-12+ 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: H►pp Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.5% � 0.9 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.912099 �ong.: -7g.g7g779 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: V1►qq UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) j , ]unicerus virqiniana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FACU 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 0 x 3= � FACU species 5 x 4= Z� uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 5 Cn) 20 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAA Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 3/2 100 Sandy Clay Loam 6-12+ lOYR 4/3 100 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: Sandy Clay Loam zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: yypp y�►etland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley bottom Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: Z,p% / 1.1 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.912121 Long.: -7g.g7gg4g Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: WtB-Wynott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: H►qq N►etland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Vernonia noveborecensis 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1, Vids rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FACW 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 5 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 5 x 2= 10 FAC species 5 x 3= 15 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 10 Cn) 25 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.500 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAA Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-3 lOYR 4/1 100 Clay Loam 3-12+ 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 3/6 20 C M Silt Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAB Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.5% � 0.9 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.913699 �ong.: -7g.g77g59 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: MkC - Mecklenburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WAB UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) j , Ouercus stellata 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation does not meet wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 20 ❑� 100.0% UPL 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% ZD = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �•�% �A�B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 0 x 3= � FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species Z� x 5= 100 Column Totals: 20 Cn) 100 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAB Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 2/2 100 Loam 6-12 lOYR 3/2 100 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: Sandy Loam zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAB Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Gulch or Gully Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 1.0% � 0.6 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.913674 �ong.: -7g.g77gp9 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: MkC - Mecklenburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes NwI classification: PFO Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑�/ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WAB Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Liaustrum sinense 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' ) 1, Smilax rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 5 = TotalCover ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 10 Cn) 30 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAB Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 2/1 100 Silty Clay 6-12+ 10YR 3/1 90 10YR 3/4 10 C M Silty Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑� Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAC Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.0% � 0.6 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.914199 �ong.: -7g.g77g2g Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: MkC - Mecklenburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WAC UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1, Ulmus rubra 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ) ) ) Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 30' ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 100 ❑� 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% S00 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 5 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 105 x 3= 315 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 105 Cn) 315 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAC Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 4/2 100 Silt Loam 4-8 10YR 5/3 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M Clay 8-12 lOYR 5/4 50 lOYR 5/8 50 C M Clay 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 05-OCt-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAC Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Seep Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.5% � 0.3 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.91417 Long.: -7g,g77g(4 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: MkC - Mecklenburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes NwI classification: PFO Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑� Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WAC Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1, Acer rubrum 2, Ulmus rubra 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 50 ❑� 50.0% FAC 50 ❑� 50.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% S00 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 2 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 100 x 3= 300 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 100 Cn) 300 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAC Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-8 lOYR 5/2 60 lOYR 4/6 40 C M Clay 8-12+ lOYR 5/6 50 lOYR 5/8 50 C M Clay impervious layer 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Typ2: rlav lavar Depth (inches): R Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAD Upland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0% � 0.0 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.913535 Long.: -7g.g74727 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: MkC - Mecklenburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes Nwi classification: UPLAND Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point not in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology does not meet wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WAD UDland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ) ) ) Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: ) 1, Vids rotundifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ) Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetatino meets wetland criteria. 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 90 �❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 90 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 90 x 3= 270 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 90 Cn) 270 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAD Upland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 lOYR 3/2 100 Loam 2-8+ 10YR 4/3 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Silty Clay Loam 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not meet wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: U3400 Archdale Widening City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 29-Sep-16 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAD Wetland DP Investigator(s): E. Black, C. Dustin Section, Township, Range: S T R Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Gulch or Gully Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.5% � 0.3 ° Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �-at.: 35.91352 �ong.: -7g.g74668 Datum: NAD83 soil Map unit Name: MkC - Mecklenburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes NwI classification: PFO Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YeS 0 NO � (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � NO � Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y25 � NO � Hydric Soil Present? Yes � NO � Is the Sampled Area � Wetland Hydrology Present? YeS � NO � within a Wetland? Ye5 � NO � Remarks: Sample point in wetland. Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators lminimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aapivl ❑ Sur�ace Soii Cracks (s6) ❑� Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 0 High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) ❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): 0 Water Table Present? YeS � NO � Depth (inches): 0.5 Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No 0 (includes ca illa frin e Y25 � NO � Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology meets wetland criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: WAD Wetland DP Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1, Ulmus americana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' Linear ) j , Liauidambar stvraciflua 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (P�ot size: 15' linear ) 1, Camnsis radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Species? Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator pominance Test worksheet: % COVCI' Cnver S�tUS Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Vegetation meets wetland criteria 0 ❑ 0.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 = TotalCover 5 ❑� 100.0% FAC ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 5 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�ro o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�io 0 = TotalCover 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�io o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 = TotalCover 2 ❑ 100.0% FAC 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% o ❑ o.o�ro 0 ❑ 0.0% 2 = TotalCover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across AIl Strata: 1 (B) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0°/a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv: oBL species p x 1= p FACW species 0 x 2= 0 FAC species 7 x 3= Z1 FACU species � x 4= 0 uP� species � x 5= 0 Column Totals: 7 Cn) 21 �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑d DominanCe Test is > 50% ❑d Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1 ❑ Morphological AdapWtions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be oresent, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Definition of Vegetation Strata: Four Vegetation Strata: Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetati' n Yes � No � Present. � *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Soil Sampling Point: WAD Wetland DP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 lOYR 2/2 100 Silt Loam 4-12+ SGY 100 Loamy Sand soi 1=G1 eyl-5/lOGY 1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix ❑ Histosol (AS) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil meets wetland criteria. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? YES 0 NO � US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00� acres Wetland width 5 Soil series' WPC-Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott 8-15% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�2te 7/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Ulmus americana �2� Liquidambar styraciflua �3� Acer rubrum Wetland WA feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.o� acres Wetland width $ Soil series' WPC-Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott 8-15% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�2te 7/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Quercus laurifolia �2� Quercus phellos �3� Nyssa sylvatica Wetland WB feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat s �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00� acres Wetland width $ Soil series' WPC-Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott 8-15% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�2te 7/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer rubrum �2� Quercus phellos �3� Liquidambar styraciflua Wetland WC feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat s �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage pattern NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�25 acres Wetland width �� Soil series' WPC-Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott 8-15% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�2te 7/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Liquidambarstyraciflua �2� Ulmus rubra �3� Nyssa sylvatica Wetland WD feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � �ther: Drainage feature/Hill top � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat s �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage pattern NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.�o acres Wetland width 44 Soil series: WtB-Wynott-Enon 2-8% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/10/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Liriodendron tulipifera �2� Acer rubrum �3� Nyssa sylvatica Wetland WE feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � �ther: Drainage feature/Hill side � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value o x 4.00 = 00 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage pattern NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00� acres Wetland width � Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/10/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Sambucus canadensis �2) (3) Wetland WF feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage o x 4.00 = o� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat o 5 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value o x 4.00 = 00 G Recreation/Education o x 1.00 = 00 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage pattern NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o�o� acres Wetland width �$ Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/10/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer rubrum �2� Toxicodendron radicans (3) Wetland WG feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � �ther: Hillside drainage feature � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat 2 �$ x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o��$ acres Wetland width 34 Soil series: WtB-Wynott-Enon complex 2-8% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/10/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Pinus taeda �2� Liquidambar styraciflua �3� Carex sp. Wetland WH feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � 16 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: Concave land surface Nearest Road Tr�n�ty Rd. Wetland area 0�2� acres Wetland width 72 Soil series: WtB-Wynott-Enon complex 2-8% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/10/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Quercus phellos �2� Campsis radicans �3� Rubus sp. Wetland WI feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � �tlleT: Seep � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat 2 �$ x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: Concave land surface NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00s acres Wetland width 6 Soil series: WtB-Wynott-Enon complex 2-8% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/15/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Juncus effusus �2) (3) Wetland WJ feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage o x 4.00 = o� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake �✓ on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�58 acres Wetland width 153 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/15/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Ulmus americana �2� Fraxinus pennsylvanica �3� Liquidambar styraciflua Wetland WK feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage 2 x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.00 = g� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal 4 ** x 5.00 = 20 I Wildlife habitat 2 49 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake �✓ on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�02 acres Wetland width 15 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/15/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer rubrum �2� Fraxinus pennsylvanica �3� Platanus occidentalis Wetland WL feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � 24 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/slope NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o��$ acres Wetland width 57 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/15/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Juncus effusus �2� Sambucus nigra �3� Ulmus rubra Wetland WM feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � 16 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/slope NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�02 acres Wetland width 19 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/15/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Juncus effusus �2� Sambucus nigra �3� Fraxinus pennsylvanica Wetland WN feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � 16 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/slope NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00s acres Wetland width $ Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest j�ate 8/15/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Juncus effusus �2� Microstegium virmineum �3� Eutrochium fistulosum Wetland WO feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat o 14 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/slope NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.05 acres Wetland width 15 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 9�06/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Fraxinus pennsylvanica �2� Acer rubrum �3� Polygonum sagitatum Wetland WP feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � 24 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/slope NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.03 acres Wetland width 11 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 9�06/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Alnus serrulata �2� Cornus amomum �3� Microstegium vimineum Wetland W feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat 2 �$ x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value o x 4.00 = 00 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/slope NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00s acres Wetland width 3 Soil series: HeC-Helena sandy loam 6-10% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 9�06/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Microstegium vimineum �2) (3) Wetland WR feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � �tlleT: Seep � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland T Pollutant removal � rating **x5.00= 5� I Wildlife habitat � �� x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake �✓ on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0.31 acres Wetland width 94 Soil series' Chewacla 0-2%/Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer rubrum �2� Ulmus americana �3� Microstegium viminium Wetland WS feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑✓ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 25 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake �✓ on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0.15 acres Wetland width 30 Soil series: Chewacla 0-2% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography ✓� ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer rubrum �2� Juncus Effusus �3� Carex sp. Wetland WT feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat s 29 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: on drainage feature NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�02 acres Wetland width 30 Soil series' Chewacla 0-2%/Wynott-Enon complex 8-15% ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/21/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Microsteium vimineum �2� Solidago sp. (3) Wetland WLJ feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 25 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake �✓ on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�83 acres Wetland width 165 Soil series: Chewacla 0-2% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Fraxinus pennsylvanica �2� Acer rubrum �3� Ulmus americana Wetland WV feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage 2 x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.00 = g� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal 3 ** x 5.00 = 15 I Wildlife habitat s 47 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education 2 x 1.00 = 20 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: Drainage feature/sewer line easement NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0.15 acres Wetland width 86 Soil series' Chewacla 0-2% /Wynott-Enon Complex 8-15% ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer Rubrum �2� Juglans nigra �3� Juncus effusus Wetland WW feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 29 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake �✓ on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area 0�93 acres Wetland width 82 Soil series' Chewacla 0-2% /Wynott-Enon Complex 8-15% ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Fraxinus pennsylvanica �2� Nyssa Sylvatica �3� Liquidambar styraciflua Wetland WX feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.00 = g� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat 2 36 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education 2 x 1.00 = 20 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ✓ on pond or lake on perennial stream n on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.03 acres Wetland width 23 Soil series: WYnott-Enon Complex 8-15°/a ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Salix nigra �2� Quercus phellos �3� Polygonum sp. Wetland WY feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑✓ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � �ther: Drainage feature to pond � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization 3 x 4.00 = � 2 wetland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 33 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n✓ on intermittent stream �within interstream divide other: NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.� � acres Wetland width 50 Soil series: WYnott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Solidago sp. �2� Juncus effusus �3� Liquidambar styraciflua Wetland WZ feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.00 = g� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 29 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: Headwater intermittent stream NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.06 acres Wetland width 40 Soil series: WYnott-Enon Complex 2-8% slopes ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 30 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 55 % ✓� impervious surface 15 % Dominant vegetation �1� Solidago sp. �2� Vernonia sp. �3� Lonicera japonica Wetland WAA feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization a x 4.00 = 16 �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 33 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value o x 4.00 = 00 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: Headwater/drainage feature NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.�o acres Wetland width 40 Soil series' Mecklenburg-Urban land complex 2-10% ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 10 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % ✓� impervious surface 20 % Dominant vegetation �1� Bamboo sp. �2� Ligustrum sinense �3� Smilax rotundifolia Wetland WAB feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � � � x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: drainage feature/geomorphic location NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.00a acres Wetland width � Soil series' Mecklenburg-Urban land complex 2-10% ❑ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ✓❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* 0 Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 10 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % ✓� impervious surface 20 % Dominant vegetation �1� Ulmus rubra �2� Acer rubrum (3) Wetland WAC feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑✓ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization o x 4.00 = p� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 25 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 80 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version PT'OjeCt Narile U-3400 Archdale Rd. Widening COUrity Randolph NaTriO Of OValUatOP E. Black Wetland location ❑ on pond or lake IIon perennial stream n on intermittent stream within interstream divide ✓ Other: Headwaters of perennial stream NeaPeSi iZOad Archdale Rd. Wetland area o.o� acres Wetland width 4 Soil series' Mecklenburg-Urban land complex 2-10% ❑✓ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat ❑ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors � steep topography � ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest � Headwater forest � Swamp forest Q Wet flat 0 Pocosin � Bog forest Date 10/25/2016 Adjacent land use (within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) �✓ forested/natural vegetation 10 % � agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % ✓� impervious surface 20 % Dominant vegetation �1� Acer barbatum �2� Liquidambar styraciflua (3) Wetland WAD feet Flooding and wetness � semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated ❑✓ seasonally flooded or inundated ❑ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water n no evidence of flooding or surface water � Pinesavanna � Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen 0 Ephemeral wetland � Carolina bay � Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Banlc/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = 4� �'etland rating T Pollutant removal � ** x 5.00 = 10 I Wildlife habitat � 25 x 2.00 = 0 N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 40 G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 10 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius Appendix D Qualifications of Contributors November 2016 Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities: Investigator: Education: Experience: Responsibilities Elisabeth Webster B.S. Environmental Technology and Management, 2015 Environmental Planner, SEPI, 2015-Present Document preparation, GIS, T&E surveys Kim Hamlin M.S. Natural Resources, 2011 Project Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2012-Present Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities assessment, T&E species assessment, and document preparation Investigator: Phillip Beach Education: B.S. Natural Resources, 2006 Post Graduate Certificate in GIS, 2014 Experience: Responsibilities Project Manager, SEPI Engineering, 2006-Present Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities assessment, T&E species assessment, and document preparation November 2016