20170314 Ver 1 _PCN application _20170320

J McADAMS
3436 Toringdon Way
Suite 110
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
McAdamsCo.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
March 14, 2017
Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Nationwide Permit 39/GC 3890/Neuse Buffer Authorization
Twin Lakes
Cary, North Carolina
LEY -15010
Dear Ms. Alexander:
On behalf of Leyland Twin Lakes LLC, we are applying for a US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit 39, an NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) Water Quality Certification 3890, and a Neuse Buffer
Authorization for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with the
project known as Twin Lakes. The subject property is located southeast of the
intersection of Davis Drive and Airport Boulevard within the Town of Cary,
North Carolina. The project lies within the Neuse River Basin. The following
attachments are included as part of this permit application:
• Signed Agent Authorization
• Fig. 1 - USGS Quad — Cary
The John R. McAdams
• Fig. 2 - Wake County Soil Survey (Sheet: 36 & 46)
Company, Inc.
• Fig. 3.1 - Existing Conditions
• Fig. 3.2 - Existing Conditions with aerial
Raleigh /Durham, NC
2905 Meridian Parkway
• Fig. 4 — Overall Impact Exhibit (Insets 1-5)
Durham, North Carolina 27713
, Pre -Construction Notification
[phone]
• NC DWR Stream Buffer Determination (NBRRO# 03-143; issued June
Charlotte, NC
27, 2003)
3436 Toringdon Way
Suite 110
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
McAdamsCo.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

Ms. Karen Higgins
Twin Lakes
March 14, 2017
Page 2 of 7
• USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (Action ID: 2016-
01492; issued September 16, 2016)
PROJECT LOCATION/JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES: The subject
property is located southeast of the intersection of Davis Drive and Airport
Boulevard within the Town of Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. The project
area is 21.66 acres of the total 34 -acre property currently owned by Redus Twin
Lakes LLC, and will be developed by Leyland Alliance.
The subject property drains to Crabtree Creek, which is designated Class C/NSW,
a tributary to Crabtree Lake within the Neuse River basin (HUC 03020201).
There is one perennial stream feature (stream `A') which originates north of the
property, and flows south adjacent to the eastern property boundary for
approximately 500 linear feet before it flows into a lake (Lake A) that also lies
just east of the property boundary. The stream feature is depicted on the Wake
County Soils Survey map, but not the USGS quadrangle, and is therefore subject
to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (Figures 1 & 2). This feature is also
subject to the Town of Cary Urban Transition Buffer (UTB) rules, and will
require a 50 -ft UTB. Lake A is depicted on both the Wake County Soils Survey
map and the USGS quadrangle, and is therefore subject to the Neuse Riparian
Buffer Rules, as well as a 100 -ft Town of Cary UTB. There are no surface waters
within the subject property; however, Neuse and Town of Cary UTB, buffers for
the adjacent surface waters extend onto the subject property.
There are also three riparian wetland areas within the project boundary, wetlands
"A", "B", and "C" that total 0.319 acres. A jurisdictional wetland and stream
delineation performed by McAdams Company was field verified by Ms. Tasha
Alexander (USACE representative) on August 31, 2016. A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination was issued September 16, 2016 (AID SAW -2016-
01492). The NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) also field verified the
locations of surface waters on and adjacent to the subject property, and
LEY -15010

Ms. Karen Higgins
Twin Lakes
March 14, 2017
Page 3 of 7
documented their findings in a letter dated June 27, 2003 (NBRRO 03-143). This
buffer determination has no expiration date, and thus is still valid. The limits of
the streams and wetlands have not changed since these original determinations.
See Figures 1-3 and the enclosed documentation for existing conditions.Land use
within the vicinity of the project is mainly residential, commercial, and forested.
PROPOSED IMPACTS: The proposed mixed-use project known as Twin
Lakes is comprised of a 21.66 -acre project area within a 34 -acre parcel of land
currently owned by Redus Twin Lakes LLC, and will be developed by Leyland
Alliance. Twin Lakes will consist of a 131,000 square foot grocery anchor and
26,900 of commercial/retail development fronting Davis Drive,
pedestrian/greenway access paths, and public gathering spaces (Figure 4). The
proposed project will also include associated utilities, stormwater management,
and roadway improvements along Davis Drive.
The entire site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while
utilizing the remaining parcel. The design is for a high density project within the
project area, but all sedimentation and erosion control measures will be
implemented before construction to minimize runoff. A network of stormwater
management facilities will be strategically placed throughout the site to treat and
detain storm flows coming from the site.
Although efforts have been made to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters, two
wetlands will be impacted by grading and fill associated with two retaining walls,
a road, a sidewalk, and a parking lot. There is a total of 0.124 acres of riparian
wetland impacts associated with the proposed project, while avoiding the
remaining 0.195 acres of riparian wetlands. There are no stream impacts
associated with the proposed project. Chessway Drive in the northwest corner of
the project area must line up with the existing Chessway Drive on the north side
of Airport Boulevard as dictated by NCDOT. The proposed Chessway Drive, is
to provide access to the interior of the project area is to run along the perimeter
of the project area in order to allow adequate space for the proposed grocery
LEY -15010

Ms. Karen Higgins
Twin Lakes
March 14, 2017
Page 4 of 7
anchor and required parking, necessitating the proposed impact to wetland `A' of
0.107 ac (Inset 3). There is also 0.017 acre of wetland impact proposed to wetland
`B" associated with a public gathering park space on the southern end of the
proposed project, which will incorporate a retaining wall to minimize wetland
impacts, however, there is some minor grading required in this area and within
wetland `B' to construct and maintain the integrity of the retaining wall.
There are three proposed stormwater outfalls and one proposed sanitary sewer
connection will necessitate impacts to Neuse buffers. There is a total of 2,383 s.f.
of impacts to Zone 1 and 1,690 s.f. of impacts to Zone 2 of the Neuse buffer.
There is an existing Town of Cary sanitary sewer located within and parallel to
the Neuse Buffer along the existing lakes, which is dictating one proposed
sanitary connection to the existing sewer within Zone 2. The design of the three
stormwater outfalls are required to discharge to the existing lakes, and the through
the Neuse Buffer in these locations at a perpendicular or near perpendicular angle.
Typical construction equipment, such as a long-arm track -hoe, front end loader,
and bush hog will be used for the initial clearing.
TOTAL PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS:
Impact Location
Impact Type
Area of Impact
(acres)
__._1
Inset 3 (P) 1 Grading & Fill (retaining 0.107
wall, road, & parking lot)
Inset 5 (P) Grading & Fill (retaining 0.017
wall & sidewalk)
TOTAL
LEY -15010
0.124 acre

Ms. Karen Higgins
Twin Lakes
March 14, 2017
Page 5 of 7
TOTAL RIPARIAN B UFFER IMPACTS:
Note: All Uses are Deemed Allowable within the Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules Table of Uses.
AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands,
streams, and buffers have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. There is a total of 0.124 acres of riparian wetland impacts
associated with two proposed retaining walls, a parking lot and a sidewalk
within the project, while avoiding the remaining 0.195 acres of riparian
wetlands. There are retaining walls proposed to minimize wetland impacts,
however, there is some minor grading required in these areas to construct and
maintain the integrity of these retaining walls.
There is a total of 2,383 sf (0.055 acres) of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer impacts, and
1,690 sf (0.038 acres) of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer impacts. There are no stream
impacts associated with the project. The buffer impacts are necessary for the
installation of three stormwater outfalls and one sanitary sewer connection.
Impacts to Neuse Buffers associated with the proposed referenced
infrastructure have been minimized by designing them perpendicular to the
stream/lake shoreline and Neuse Buffers
LEY -15010
Impacts (square feet)
Impact Location
Impact Type
Zone 1 /
Zone 2
Inset 1 (P)
Stormwater outfall 739
528
Inset 2a (P)
Sanitary Sewer Connection 0
63
Inset 2b (P)
Stormwater outfall 720
451
Inset 4 (P)
Stormwater outfall 924
648
f Total Zone 1 Impacts: 2,383 sf
TOTALS
Total Zone 2 Impacts: 1,690 sf
Note: All Uses are Deemed Allowable within the Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules Table of Uses.
AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands,
streams, and buffers have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. There is a total of 0.124 acres of riparian wetland impacts
associated with two proposed retaining walls, a parking lot and a sidewalk
within the project, while avoiding the remaining 0.195 acres of riparian
wetlands. There are retaining walls proposed to minimize wetland impacts,
however, there is some minor grading required in these areas to construct and
maintain the integrity of these retaining walls.
There is a total of 2,383 sf (0.055 acres) of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer impacts, and
1,690 sf (0.038 acres) of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer impacts. There are no stream
impacts associated with the project. The buffer impacts are necessary for the
installation of three stormwater outfalls and one sanitary sewer connection.
Impacts to Neuse Buffers associated with the proposed referenced
infrastructure have been minimized by designing them perpendicular to the
stream/lake shoreline and Neuse Buffers
LEY -15010

Ms. Karen Higgins
Twin Lakes
March 14, 2017
Page 6 of 7
MITIGATION: There is 0.124 acre of total impacts to waters of the U.S. on
the project site. The applicant proposes mitigation in the form of avoidance and
minimization to waters of the U.S.
DIFFUSE FLOW & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: The
proposed stormwater management plan for Twin Lakes will be designed to
protect the downstream environment. The proposed project will result in a
significant increase in peak flow rates. To mitigate this impact, the proposed
facility has been sized such that post -development peak flow rates are no greater
than pre -development levels in the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10 -year storm events. The plan
incorporates stormwater management techniques to manage both water quantity
and quality aspects of site runoff. Stormwater management for Twin Lakes will
be accomplished by incorporating engineered stormwater best management
practice facilities to capture and treat the stormwater runoff from developed
areas. Two stormwater ponds are proposed. Other stormwater treatment devices
that will be used are level spreaders in conjunction with vegetated filter strips,
which are designed to remove a minimum of 40% average annual total
suspended solids (TSS), and provide 30% total nitrogen and 35% total
phosphorus removal. The stormwater ponds will serve the dual purpose of water
quality and water quantity (i.e. detention) control. Since the Town of Cary is a
delegated authority for NCDWR Stormwater Management Plans, the review
and approval of the SWMP is part of the Town of Cary review process. The
proposed development will be subject to the stormwater management
requirements set forth in the Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance
(LDO).
LEY -15010

Ms. Karen Higgins
Twin Lakes
March 14, 2017
Page 7 of 7
Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you should have any
questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
McAdams Company
I
r
Kevin Yates
Senior Environmental Consultant
Project Manager
Enclosures
LEY -15010

CSS NN A 4C''
pp Office Use Only:
a Corps action ID no.
v DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. A licant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: NWP: 39 / GP: 3890
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes
® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ® Yes
❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes
® No
below.
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project: Twin Lakes Center
2b.
County: Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Wells Fargo c/o Marc Curtis
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 15074 PG: 786
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
301 South College St., 15th Floor
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
704-383-1421
3f. Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Eventual Owner
41b. Name:
Jason Hess
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Leyland Twin Lakes, LLC
4d. Street address:
233 Route 17
4e. City, state, zip:
Tuxedo Park, New York 10987
4f. Telephone no.:
610-212-0781
4g. Fax no.:
33.86 ac.
4h. Email address:
Surface Waters
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kevin Yates
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
McAdams Company
5c. Street address:
2905 Meridian Parkway
5d. City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27713
5e. Telephone no.:
919-361-5000
919-361-2269
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
10745458727
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.826999 N Longitude: - 78.849210 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
33.86 ac.
2.
2a.
Surface Waters
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Crabtree Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW Stream Index Number 27-33-(1)
2c.
River basin:
Neuse / HUC: 03020201
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
The subject property is located southeast of the intersection of Davis Drive and Airport Boulevard within the
Town of Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. The project area is 21.66 acres of the total 34 -acre property
currently owned by Redus Twin Lakes LLC, and will be developed by Leyland Alliance.
The subject property drains to Crabtree Creek, which is designated Class C/NSW, a tributary to Crabtree Lake
within the Neuse River basin (HUC 03020201). There is one perennial stream feature (stream `A') which
originates north of the property, and flows south adjacent to the eastern property boundary for approximately
500 linear feet before it flows into a lake (Lake A) that also lies just east of the property boundary. The stream
feature is depicted on the Wake County Soils Survey map, but not the USGS quadrangle, and is therefore
subject to Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (Figures 1 & 2). This feature is also subject to the Town of Cary
Urban Transition Buffer (UTB) rules, and will require a 50 -ft UTB. Lake A is depicted on both the Wake
County Soils Survey map and the USGS quadrangle, and is therefore subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer
Rules, as well as a 100 -ft Town of Cary UTB. There are no surface waters within the subject property; however,
Neuse and Town of Cary UTB buffers for the adjacent surface waters extend onto the subject property.
There are also three riparian wetland areas within the project boundary, wetlands "A", "B", and "C" that total
0.319 acres. A jurisdictional wetland and stream delineation performed by McAdams Company was field
verified by Ms. Tasha Alexander (USACE representative) on August 31, 2016. A Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination was issued September 16, 2016 (AID SAW -2016-01492). The NC Division of Water Resources
(DWR) also field verified the locations of surface waters on and adjacent to the subject property, and
documented their findings in a letter dated June 27, 2003 (NBRRO 03-143). This buffer determination has no
expiration date, and thus is still valid. The limits of the streams and wetlands have not changed since these
original determinations. See Figures 1-3 and the enclosed documentation for existing conditions.
Land use within the vicinity of the project is mainly residential, commercial, and forested.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Riparian: 0.319 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d.
+/- 500 Lf. of Perennial Stream
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide commercial and retail uses to Cary,
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Wake County, NC.
The proposed mixed-use project known as Twin Lakes is comprised of a 21.66 -acre project area within a 34 -acre
parcel of land currently owned by Redus Twin Lakes LLC, and will be developed by Leyland Alliance. Twin
Lakes will consist of a 131,000 square foot grocery anchor and 26,900 of commercial/retail development fronting
Davis Drive, pedestrian/greenway access paths, and public gathering spaces (Figure 4). The proposed project will
also include associated utilities, stormwater management, and roadway improvements along Davis Drive.
The entire site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while utilizing the remaining parcel. The
design is for a high density project within the project area, but all sedimentation and erosion control measures
will be implemented before construction to minimize runoff. A network of stormwater management facilities
will be strategically placed throughout the site to treat and detain storm flows coming from the site.
Although efforts have been made to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters, two wetlands will be impacted by
grading and fill associated with two retaining walls, a road, a sidewalk, and a parking lot. There is a total of 0.124
acres of riparian wetland impacts associated with the proposed project, while avoiding the remaining 0.195 acres
of riparian wetlands. There will be no stream impacts because of the proposed project. Chessway Drive in the
northwest corner of the project area must line up with the existing Chessway Drive on the north side of Airport
Boulevard as dictated by NCDOT. The proposed Chessway Drive, is to provide access to the interior of the
project area is to run along the perimeter of the project area in order to allow adequate space for the proposed
grocery anchor and required parking, necessitating the proposed impact to wetland `A' of 0.107 ac (Inset 3). There
is also 0.017 acre of wetland impact proposed to wetland `B" associated with a public gathering park space on
the southern end of the proposed project, which will incorporate a retaining wall to minimize wetland impacts,
however, there is some minor grading required in this area and within wetland `B' to construct and maintain the
integrity of the retaining wall.
There are three proposed stormwater outfalls and one proposed sanitary sewer connection will necessitate impacts
to Neuse buffers. There is a total of 2,383 s.f. of impacts to Zone 1 and 1,690 s.f. of impacts to Zone 2 of the
Neuse buffer. There is an existing Town of Cary sanitary sewer located within and parallel to the Neuse Buffer
along the existing lakes, which is dictating one proposed sanitary connection to the existing sewer within Zone 2.
The design of the three stormwater outfalls are required to discharge to the existing lakes, and the through the
Neuse Buffer in these locations at a perpendicular or near perpendicular angle.
Typical construction equipment, such as a long-arm track -hoe, front end loader, and bush hog will be used for
the initial clearing.
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ❑ No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® preliminary ❑ Final ❑ (UNKNOWN)
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: McAdams & S&EC
Name (if known): Kevin Yates (McAdams) & Todd
Other:
Preuninger (S&EC)
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
• A preliminary jurisdictional determination for the project was issued by Ms. Tasha Alexander, of the USACE on
September 16, 2016 (USACE Action ID # 2016-01492).
• A buffer determination by S&EC was confirmed by NCDWR (then NCDWQ) on June 27, 2003. (NBRRO 03-143)
S.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d- 2e. 2f. -
Wetland impact ! Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
Grading & Fill (retaining ® Yes ® Corps
Inset 3 (P) wall, road, & parking lot) Riparian ❑ No ® DWQ 0.107 ac.
Inset 5 (P) Grading & Fill (retaining Riparian ® Yes ® Corps 0.017 ac.
wall & sidewalk) f ❑ No ® DWQ
I
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: (See Figure 4, Insets 3 & 5)
-------------
- ..........3.
0.124 ac
_-----
3.Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts N/A
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody I
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent
(P) or
01 ❑P❑T - -
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P
04 ❑P
4f. Total open water impacts N/A
4a. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
number
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
N/A
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. --
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e, 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
(T)
Inset 1 (P)
Stormwater outfall
Stream A
No
739
528
Inset 2a (P)
Sanitary Sewer Connection
Lake A
No
0
63
Inset 2b (P)
Stormwater outfall
Lake A
No
720
451
Inset 4 (P)
Stormwater outfall
Lake A
No
924
648
6h. Total buffer impacts
2,383
1,690
6i. Comments: (See Figure 4, Insets 1, 2, & 4)
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and buffers have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. There is a total of 0.124 acres of riparian wetland impacts associated with two proposed retaining
walls, a parking lot and a sidewalk within the project, while avoiding the remaining 0.195 acres of riparian
wetlands. There are retaining walls proposed to minimize wetland impacts, however, there is some minor grading
required in these areas to construct and maintain the integrity of these retaining walls.
There is a total of 2,383 sf (0.055 acres) of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer impacts, and 1,690 sf (0.038 acres) of Zone 2
Neuse Buffer impacts. There are no stream impacts associated with the project. The buffer impacts are necessary
for the installation of three stormwater outfalls and one sanitary sewer connection. Impacts to Neuse Buffers
associated with the proposed referenced infrastructure have been minimized by designing them perpendicular to
the stream/lake shoreline and Neuse Buffers.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

The design is for high density development, but all proper sedimentation and erosion control measures will be
implemented, and there is a network of stormwater management facilities strategically placed throughout the site
to treat and minimize runoff.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and
installation, as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheets to be reviewed and approved by the NC Division
of Land Quality and/or Town of Cary Water Resources Department. All work will take place during dry
conditions and can be facilitated from high, non jurisdictional, stable ground adjacent to the shoreline. The
contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, and other
measures as shown on the erosion control plans, clearing only as necessary to install these devices. All erosion
and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing
rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain
all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's
representative.
All slopes shall be graded no steeper than the angle that can be retained by vegetative cover or other
adequate erosion control devices or structures. No material for construction will be placed in wetlands,
streams, or Neuse Buffers at any time. Excavation will be limited to the area necessary for site preparation;
all excavated material will be placed and retained on high ground above the flood pool elevation. All
excavated material will be placed landward of the normal pool elevation contour on high ground and
confined by adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent erosion and sedimentation into adjacent
waters, wetlands, or Neuse Buffers.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts
to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ Yes ® No
There is 0.124 acre of total impacts to waters of the
U.S. on the project site. The applicant proposes
mitigation in the form of avoidance and
minimization to waters of the U.S.
❑ DWR ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type I Quantity
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
square feet
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: There is 0.124 acre of total impacts to waters of the U.S. on the project site. The applicant
proposes mitigation in the form of avoidance and minimization to waters of the U.S.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
3 (2 for Catawba)
6f. Total buffer
mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee
responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Per the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses, the proposed activities are deemed an
allowable use.
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
Diffuse flow will be provide within the overall stormwater management
plant. The proposed stormwater management plan for Twin Lakes will be
designed to protect the downstream environment. The proposed project will
result in a significant increase in peak flow rates. To mitigate this impact, the
proposed facility has been sized such that post -development peak flow rates
are no greater than pre -development levels in the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10 -year
storm events. The plan incorporates stormwater management techniques to
manage both water quantity and quality aspects of site runoff. Stormwater
management for Twin Lakes will be accomplished by incorporating
engineered stormwater best management practice facilities to capture and ❑ Yes ® No
treat the stormwater runoff from developed areas. Two stormwater ponds are
proposed. Other stormwater treatment devices that will be used are level
spreaders in conjunction with vegetated filter strips, which are designed to
remove a minimum of 40% average annual total suspended solids (TSS), and
provide 30% total nitrogen and 35% total phosphorus removal.
The Town of Cary is a delegated authority for NCDWR Stormwater
Management Plans. The review and approval of the SWMP is part of the
Town of Cary review process. A copy of the final stormwater management
plan will be provided to NCDWR upon approval. The proposed stormwater
management facilities are designed in accordance with the N.C. Stormwater
Best Management Practices manual (NCDEQ).
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
New Proposed Impervious: 70%
® Yes ❑ No
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
q 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed stormwater management plan for Twin Lakes will be designed to protect the downstream
environment. The proposed project will result in a significant increase in peak flow rates. To mitigate this
impact, the proposed facility has been sized such that post -development peak flow rates are no greater than
pre -development levels in the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10 -year storm events. The plan incorporates stormwater
management techniques to manage both water quantity and quality aspects of site runoff. Stormwater
management for Twin Lakes will be accomplished by incorporating engineered stormwater best management
practice facilities to capture and treat the stormwater runoff from developed areas. Two stormwater ponds are
proposed. Other stormwater treatment devices that will be used are level spreaders in conjunction with
vegetated filter strips, which are designed to remove a minimum of 40% average annual total suspended
solids (TSS), and provide 30% total nitrogen and 35% total phosphorus removal. The stormwater ponds will
serve the dual purpose of water quality and water quantity (i.e. detention) control. Since the Town of Cary is a
delegated authority for NCDWR Stormwater Management Plans, the review and approval of the SWMP is
part of the Town of Cary review process. The proposed development will be subject to the stormwater
management requirements set forth in the Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO).
i
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Cary
i
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
®NSW
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
TO Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use control and stormwater
measures in place for specific areas which require them.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water will be directed to an existing Town of Cary sanitary sewer line.
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS web page (http://www.fws.gov/endangered/) and the Natural Heritage virtual workroom
(http://www.ncnhp.org,/web/nhp/nhp-map-viewer) were accessed on February 14, 2017 to determine if the
project would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat. Based on this research, the red -
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii), rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis), and Northern long-eared bat (Myotic
sptentrionalis) are federally listed species that occur in Wake County. Based on field inspections, it is
believed that no adverse impacts to threatened and endangered species and their known habitat will occur
due to the construction of the proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
An interactive map called the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper
(http://www.habitat.noaa.izov/Rrotection/efh/efhmgRper/ was accessed on February 14, 2017 to determine if
the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office interactive map, which shows the
locations of properties and districts in Wake County, North Carolina entered in the National Register of
Historic Places (http://gis.nedcr.gov/hpoweb/) was conducted on February 14, 2017. It did not reveal any
listing within the project area. It is believed the proposed project will not occur in or near an area that has
been designated as having historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal
governments.
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? 1 ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel
0745 (Map No. 3720074500J; effective date 5/2/2006) shows that there are no floodplains or floodways
on the subject property.
Kevin Yates
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
0-3/z
Applicant/Agent's ature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an auth tion letter from the applicant
is provide .}
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Owner �/ e (� S � r o All Blanks To Be Filled In
Name:
M.4 -c C✓ r'
S lg We -4-s. Fq r ci o
Address: 2_5c] —500-rq C0L4_-F 4-f _51— 154_k'1=L / Cr4ir2L�v1M_ , t -a c ZS Zv Z
Phone: ,oq 50--5— l 9LZ-l
Email: vvlc%-�—c • c 0 rf-; s 0— o m
Project Name/Description: Twin Lakes
Project Number: LEY -15010 Project Manager, Bill Derks/Kevin Yates
Date: June 17, 2016
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Tasha Alexander
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R. McAdams Company,
Inc. staff. {
Print Signature
& — 2 3 -- Z -o I Jo
Date
Raleigh-Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
[phone] [phone]
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COPY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 2016-01492 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Cary
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Wells Fargo / Marc Curtis
Address: 301 South College Street, 15th FL
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-383-1421
Size (acres): +-34 Nearest Town: Cary
Nearest Waterway: tJT to Crabtree Creelc Coordinates: 35.8269991 N, -78.8492101 W
River Basin/ HUC: Neuse / 03020201
Location description: The proicet is located at the southeast corner of Davis Drive and Airport Boulevard, Cary,
Wake County, North Carolina. (PIN 07454 587271
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area.
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tasha Alexander at 919-554-4884, ext. 35 or
[e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
Based on information submitted by the applicant, the project area appears to exhibit criteria for waters of the
_U.S. as defined in 33 C1,R 328, the JD Guidebook (i.e. Rapanos Guidance), the 1987 Wetland Delineation
Manual and the Regional Supplement to (lie 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0. The
approximate boundaries of the potential waters of the U.S. are depicted on the map submitted by McAdams
Company on July 20, 2016 labeled Twin Lakes, Preliminary JD Request, Figure 3. Existing Conditions, Project
N: LEY -15010.
D. Remarks: Site visit conducted on August 31, 2016 with Kevin Yates, McAdams.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A.
**It is not necessary to submit P1 RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: AZ4 4&M blyl
Tasha Alexander
Issue Date of JD: September 16, 2016 Expiration Date: N/A
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://re tig latojy.tisacesttrvey.coml.
Copy furnished: Kevin Yates, McAdams Company, 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, North Carolina, 27713

NOTIFICATION OF A17MINISTItATINT. APPEAL, OPTIONS AND PROCESS ESS AND
11ld Qt!FSI' F#)IZ APPFA1,
Applicant: Wells Fargo / Marc Curtis File Number: SAW -2016-01492 Date: September
16, 2016
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
[] PERMIT DENIAL -
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION 1- The'following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at Litt >I,)lwwvw.usace.army.mii/Missions/CivilWorks/Re u�? tatoryProgt-aitiatadPemiits.aspY or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
■ ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional detenninations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Tasha Alexander
CESAD-PDO
828-271-7980
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunitX to participate in all site investiations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: Tasha Alexander, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): July 20, 2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Kevin Yates; The John R. McAdams Company (McAdams)
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Twin Lakes, located at the southeast corner of Davis Drive and Airport Blvd.; PIN# 0745458727
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.826999 °N; Long. -78.849210
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree creek
°W.
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: NSA
Wetlands: 0.32 acres.
Cowardin Class: PF01A
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL
APPLY):
❑✓ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 5/13/2016
THAT
❑✓ Field Determination. Date(s): 511312018
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
ZMaps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Figure 3
✓❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app pt/consultant.
tf Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1.24,000; Cary
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: NRCS Soil Survey Sheets 36 & 46, Wake County, NC
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
10-1
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is.
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map 2014 or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this farm has not
necessaril Keen verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later urlsdictional determinations.
(REQUIRED)
4
G7�/��
Signature and4de of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Aquatic Resources Table — TWIN LAKE SITE — DAVIS DR. — CARY. NC
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Class
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Class of aquatic
resource
Wetland
A
35.828526
-78.849497
PFOIA
0.14 ac
_
non -section 10—wetland
Wetland
B
35.825870
I
-78.848029
PFOIA
0.025 ac
non -section 10—non-
tidal
Wetland
C
35.823219
-78.845317
PFOIA
0.15 ac
non -section 10 — non -
tidal

N TWIN LAKES
PRELIMINARY JD REQUEST
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
0 250 500 1,000
Feet PROJECT #: LEY -15010
I inch = 500 feet CARP, NORTH CAROLINA McADAIVIS
:Lfl

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
June 27, 2003
Todd Preuninger
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
11010 Raven Ridge Road *ErAvV1
Raleigh, NC 27614 �i����
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules.
NBRRO 03-143 M
Wakefield Davis Drive �4GINi+
7Y
S&EC #02-7260
Morrisville, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Preuninger:
This letter will serve as confirmation of the buffer determination made by S&EC at the subject property
referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 03-143.
On September 24, 2003, 1 conducted a site visit of features A, D, E, F, G, H, N and O involved in the
above referenced project as identified on the attached figures 1 and 2. It was determined that the features
shown on the Wake County Soil Survey and on the USGS Cary, NC Quad map could potentially be subject
to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T1 5A: 028.0233 (NCAC .0233). Features A
and D (and their associated ponds) are subject throughout property. Feature F is subject below flag #831.
Feature O, which was evaluated on April 24, 2002 by myself as part of the proposed Town Hall Extension
(NBRRO 02-114) was found to be subject below flag # 01. Features E, G, H and N were all found to be not
subject.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information relevant to 401
Water Quality Certifications, wetlands and other impacts to "waters of the state", please contact the Central
Office at 733-1786. (Note: if a 401 Water Quality Certification is needed, please be reminded not to begin
your project until the certification has been received.) Thank you for your attention to this matter and if this
office can be of any assistance or if you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Wake County
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist 1
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Site
S&
EC

Project #: I Scale:
R2-7260 I V= 1320'
Project I Date:
Mar.: ,IAB 1 7122102
Figure 2 — Wake Co.
Soil Survey Map
Wakefield Davis Drive
Morrisville, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

PROJECT AREA
wy
�! a WATER RESOURCE
• FEATURE B �
{
W
I,J
fB2 W
POND FEATUREA `% w
WATER RESOURCE }
FEATURE A
N
e
B
f
W
" POND FEATURE B
r
USGS• SOIL SURVEY SHEETS 36 & 46 WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
LAT- 35.926999 N_ TONG: -78.849210 W
W,
1
N TWIN LAKES
NWP39 / GC3890
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 250 500 1,000 PROJECT #: LEY -1 5010 McADAMS
Feet
inch = soo feet CARY, NORTH CAROLINA

-;1I--!/1-"�Ll\-I I: ,--- I ,,�- " "-- I1 - ,II1� -1-, , /,- 1- , -1 - , 1,.-1.1 " �" ,, I , -I -1- -, , "", ", 1I"1�," \ , I�:II-,,,""I�I :. 1,- 1 ,",-, .-IL, � -. - -I-- -, 1 ,I , "1-, - 1-,/ -- I .,�I'I1,1,1,1,-1� 1 " II -, �- � -, -f" ­---�- i - -\I, -; ,-,��I"I"I - -� ---1- , I�,1 ,--- - -, - -I l- -1",, l:. -, "-" -,I , ,,- .I ,-.- 1I -1I-1 -I, I" -"-1 , , 1---- . - "l �-,I-I \--",-'-,, ,, -.lI --L--I I .---,, , l.�,I," ,-,,lI -II ,',-, --- I, -", I --- 1 . , ---"I-�-f 1 1 I '- I, . ,-,I , ,, ,- 1 - - �"
- cy1s,+ GENERAL NOTES:
19- \\l _ --- 1. PROJECT AREA (DEFINED TO BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
\-- ,
GALLA, GOWRISANKAR N ::\�/� \\� \ �\I EXISTING STREA 'A" CORRIDOR) : +/- 24.21 ACRES
111
I
II
I �I-I \-� I I " 1
II
PIN:0745379251 \ �,\
,\,-"
r, DB: 015964, PG: 01201 REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC . - - - - - - -- - \ \ _
PIN: 0745471096 ��•I �\ ( ; 2. OWNER:
DB: 015074, PG: 00786 \ REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC.
_ ,�'' ` `\ \\\ 1 INDEPENDENT DR STE 615
•1'�' \ A\ \` > \\ \ ,t \ =- JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202
SUBJECT PROPERTY
PRECISION I' \ \\ ` ,•"'
FRANCHISING INC \ \- �,� 3. DEVELOPER:
,
,
PIN:0745377213 I `, -' � �, -- - l
DB: 014622, - LAKES LLC.
\ ` •�
J,.� LEYLAND TW N
PG: 01496
..<.Av v \' -- P.O. BOX 878
LIMITS:OF DISTURBANCE
��� \\, 233 ROUTE 17
GALLA, GOWRISANKAR N , , , ,, TUXEDO PARK, NEW YORK 10987
PIN: 0745368889 „ \\ \ _--"___---
DB:015964, PG: 01201 - CONTACT: JASON HESS
- ,-7, ` -__ \\ � ' � PHONE: [phone]
JO - - -
6� . .
-
-- QpF� _, . , _. , , _ -„ _ �\ \ �-� _ . __ 4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN
P- - -- _ --- ;

PRECISION
FRANCHISING INC
PIN: 0745377213
DB: 014622,
PG:01496
cy�ss+/sT
GALLA, GOWRISANKAR N
PIN: 0745379251
DB: 015964, PG: 01201 REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC
PIN: 0745471096
DB: 015074, PG: 00786
SUBJECT PROPERTY
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
GALLA, GOWRISANKAR N
PIN: 0745368889
DB: 015964, PG: 01201
LIBBUS
ENTERPRISES
PROPERTIES LLC
PIN: 0745367213
DB: 014812,
PG: 01451 % \
DAVIS PARTNERS LLC E
PIN:0745369595
DB: 008541, PG: 00896
EXISTING STREAM "A"
L/
SEAGROVES, JAMES RAY
PIN: 0745369027
DB: 002571. PG: 00515
ANSARI, SHAKEEL I ANSARI, MANAZA S
PIN: 0745357598
DB: 015521. PG: 00483
I� II
� I I
WETLAND A I I \
+/ 0.141 AC.
`1 I
I
I
I
I
I
0
11
�1 1
a
1 1a 1 20' ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
,a
1 30' ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1 ' \
1 1
t1e 1
i
�s
a
1
� 0
1
REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC
PIN: 0745458727 a�
DB: 015074, PG: 00786 ll
BUSBY, WILHELMINAT
PIN: 0745451145
DB: 006134, PG: 00369
YATES, HERMAN HEIRS
PIN: 0745452517
DB: 001327, PG: 00—E—
LEGEND
......
LIMITS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
- — — — —
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
---------
EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
EXISTING CONCRETE
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS
EXISTING STREAM
EXISTING LAKE/POND
EXISTING WETLANDS = +/- 0.319 AC.
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 1
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2
SUBJECT PROPERTY
PARCELS
WRIGHT, WILLIAM L WRIGHT, EDITH A
PIN: 0745453245
DB: 004468, PG: 00426
G�
vy
O\'
TAYLOR, ROBERT T TAYLOR, AMBER D
PIN: 0745444852
DB: 015575, PG: 02283
1�
APOLLO USA LLC
PIN: 0745447646
DB: 016160, PG: 01022
MARION REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC
PIN:0745447200
DB: 013928, PG: 02482
' 1
GENERAL NOTES:
\, 1. PROJECT AREA (DEFINED TO BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CORRIDOR) : +/- 24.21 ACRES
\\ 2. OWNER:
REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC.
1 INDEPENDENT DR STE 615
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202
3. DEVELOPER:
LEYLAND TWIN LAKES LLC.
% P.O. BOX 878
233 ROUTE 17
TUXEDO PARK, NEW YORK 10987
CONTACT. JASON HESS
PHONE: [phone]
4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN
(HUC: 03020201) AND IS SUBJECT TO THE NEUSE BUFFER RULES.
5. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS IN THE TOWN OF CARY AND IS SUBJECT
% TO TOWN OF CARY URBAN TRANSITION BUFFER RULES.
6. THERE ARE +/- 0.319 ACRES OF WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT
\ AREA.
7. TASHAALEXANDER OF THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ISSUED A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FOR THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 (ACTION ID: 2016-01492).
8. THERE ARE THREE PONDS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT AREA THAT
\ ARE SUBJECT TO THE NEUSE BUFFER RULES AND TOWN OF CARY
URBAN TRANSITION BUFFER. THERE ARE NO STREAMS WITHIN THE
PROJECT AREA.
9. NC DWR (FORMERLY NC DWQ) CONFIRMED THE PRESENCE OF
SURFACE WATERS AND ISSUED A NEUSE BUFFER DETERMINATION ON
06/27/2003 (NBRRO 03-143).
EXISTING
LAKE "A"
WETLAND B
+/ 0.025 AC.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
WONG, RAYMOND
W WONG, YUK MUI
PIN: 0745449957
DB: 008917, PG: 00408
�1
%I
1
,1 EXISTING STORM
�1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT
I r �
LEE MOORE OIL CO
PIN: 0745541516
DB: 011479, PG: 02471
0
GOODWILL COMMUNITY
FOUNDATION INC
PIN: 0745541242
DB: 013687, PG. 00857
Source: Esri; DigitalGli

EXIS ING STREAM "A" --
E 2 NEUSE BUFF IN PACT = +/- 495
\ �' ;ZONE 1 N USE BUFFEF 32 SF ( 19 AC.) -
It�\ PROPOSE ST RMWATER OUTFALL #3
It -
.� • 'INSET 1 v _
�.
ED SA RY SEWER C TION
S TA N
•moo y mak' • �� �%p 0'
\ \ ZO E 2 NEUSE BU ER IMPACT +/- 63 SF (0.0 AC.)
i 1 \
ZONE 2 NEUSE F :RIMP T = +/- 451 SF .010 AC.)
\ ZO 1 NEUSE BUFF R IMP T = +/- 0 SF (0.017 AC.
-
,
-
PROPOSED WEGMANS
,
,
#
GROCERY STORE PROPOSED STOR E LL 2
' DAVIS PARTNERS LLC - '
PIN:0745369595
,
AT OUTFA
,
' DB: 008541 PG: 00896
I� I PROPOSED LEVE SPIRE DER
�IVA
TLANOA IN PACT
\ ' I +/- 671 SF (0 107 AC
INSET 2 ,
WE
WO1 ND
-
a
1 4C
It
1
LIBBUs �1
1 ��O
ENTERPRISES
PROPERTIES LLC
i Np
PIN: 0745367213
DB: 014812,
PG: 01451 ♦�♦ / �,. I�� - -- - �)
,
INSET".3' �� tv
i
, � � 20 ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
= I-
_ -- � 30 ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
'
SEAGROVES, JAMES RAY
1
PIN: 0745369027
DB: 002571, PG: 00515 `
�1
PROPOSED GREEN AY CONNECTION -
1
\ , 1k 'e
.
PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
------
L. — . — . — .�
---
--
It
TWIN LAKES MASTER ASSN INC
GALLA, GOWRISANKAR N
LAKE GROVE BLVD
PIN:0745644481
PIN.0745379251
DB: 015964, PG: 01201
EXISTING WETLANDS = +/- 0.319 AC.
PROPOSED RIPRAP
- - -
REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC
PIN: 0745447200
PIN:0745471096
DB: 013928, PG: 02482
-
DB: 015074, PG: 00786
•.�
PRECISION
, ';--------
�•
FRANCHISING INC
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 1
LIMITS OF�DISTURBANCE
PIN: 0745377213
DB:014622,
PIN: 0745546212
DB: 014661, PG 01023
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2
SUBJECT PROPE
Y •t
PG: 01496
GOODWILL COMMUNITY GRACE PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC
FOUNDATION INC
PIN -0745535801
�.
GALLA, GOWRISANKAR N
PIN: 0745541242
DB: 012444, PG: 01113
PROPOSED STORM ER
ANSARI SHAKEEL I ANSARI MANAZA S
PIN: 0745368889
MANAGEMENT F ILITY #2
SUBJECT PROPERTY
DB: 015964, PG: 01201
/
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
O�� �•'�••
J
EXIS ING STREAM "A" --
E 2 NEUSE BUFF IN PACT = +/- 495
\ �' ;ZONE 1 N USE BUFFEF 32 SF ( 19 AC.) -
It�\ PROPOSE ST RMWATER OUTFALL #3
It -
.� • 'INSET 1 v _
�.
ED SA RY SEWER C TION
S TA N
•moo y mak' • �� �%p 0'
\ \ ZO E 2 NEUSE BU ER IMPACT +/- 63 SF (0.0 AC.)
i 1 \
ZONE 2 NEUSE F :RIMP T = +/- 451 SF .010 AC.)
\ ZO 1 NEUSE BUFF R IMP T = +/- 0 SF (0.017 AC.
-
,
-
PROPOSED WEGMANS
,
,
#
GROCERY STORE PROPOSED STOR E LL 2
' DAVIS PARTNERS LLC - '
PIN:0745369595
,
AT OUTFA
,
' DB: 008541 PG: 00896
I� I PROPOSED LEVE SPIRE DER
�IVA
TLANOA IN PACT
\ ' I +/- 671 SF (0 107 AC
INSET 2 ,
WE
WO1 ND
-
a
1 4C
It
1
LIBBUs �1
1 ��O
ENTERPRISES
PROPERTIES LLC
i Np
PIN: 0745367213
DB: 014812,
PG: 01451 ♦�♦ / �,. I�� - -- - �)
,
INSET".3' �� tv
i
, � � 20 ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
= I-
_ -- � 30 ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
'
SEAGROVES, JAMES RAY
1
PIN: 0745369027
DB: 002571, PG: 00515 `
�1
PROPOSED GREEN AY CONNECTION -
1
\ , 1k 'e
.
PIN:0745357598
DB: 015521, Pc: oo483- INSET 4
`\ \` EXISTING _
` V WETLAND B LAKE A
0.025 AC. �
WETLAND B PACT
YATES, HERMAN HEIRS '� 747 SF (0. 17 AC.)
,
PIN:0745452517 A a,
' DB: 001327, PG 00-E-
-
,
or,
\N
BUSBY, WILHELMINAT ♦� /� �•� \
PIN: 0745451145 ♦♦; ✓.� ` ���'� `
DB: 006134, PG: 00369
�•.� INSET 5 ,oma
WRIGHT, WILLIAM L WRIGHT, EDITH A
PIN.0745453245
�-" DB: 004468, PG: 00426
-
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
IMPACT TOTALS
- WETLAND IMPACTS = +/- 5,418 SF (0.124 AC.) °
TAYLOR, ROBERT T TAYLOR, AMBER D \°
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS = /- 2 383 SF 0.055 AC. PIN.0745444852
DB: 015575, PG 02283 - WONG, RAYMOND\, 1
-F � ( ) W WONG, YUK MUI
� PIN: 0745449957
DB: 008917, PG 00408 \�
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS = +/- 1,690 SF (0.038 AC.) ` REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC
PIN: 0745458727
DB: 015074, PG 00786
LEGEND
---------------
•••-••-••-••-••' LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED BUILDING
EXISTING STORM
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORMWATER POND. \�
- — — — — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
APOLLO USA LLC
PIN: 0745447646 WETLAND C
------ EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - - - - - - - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DB: 016160, PG 01022 ;-__ +/- 0.153AC'
EXISTING CONCRETE - -- ----- PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
LEE MooREOIL co sTRutvcKcoNLEY KEPMORRISVICLF
PIN: 0745541516 & GORDON LLC REALTY LLC v e "
DB: 011479, PG 02471 PIN: 0745543536 PIN: 0745545506 _ ` -_
DB: 012358, PG: 02487 DB: 008327, PG 01777 �f -
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS PROPOSED EASEMENT
EXISTING STREAM
PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
------
L. — . — . — .�
---
--
It
TWIN LAKES MASTER ASSN INC
LAKE GROVE BLVD
PIN:0745644481
DB: 014217, PG 02526
EXISTING WETLANDS = +/- 0.319 AC.
PROPOSED RIPRAP
MARION REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC
PIN: 0745447200
DB: 013928, PG: 02482
-
-'
, ';--------
SCURFIELD, JANINE M
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 1
LIMITS OF�DISTURBANCE
PIN: 0745546212
DB: 014661, PG 01023
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2
• • • • • • • • • • • • • PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
GOODWILL COMMUNITY GRACE PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC
FOUNDATION INC
PIN -0745535801
PIN: 0745541242
DB: 012444, PG: 01113
'
ANSARI SHAKEEL I ANSARI MANAZA S
DB: 013687, PG 00857
PIN:0745357598
DB: 015521, Pc: oo483- INSET 4
`\ \` EXISTING _
` V WETLAND B LAKE A
0.025 AC. �
WETLAND B PACT
YATES, HERMAN HEIRS '� 747 SF (0. 17 AC.)
,
PIN:0745452517 A a,
' DB: 001327, PG 00-E-
-
,
or,
\N
BUSBY, WILHELMINAT ♦� /� �•� \
PIN: 0745451145 ♦♦; ✓.� ` ���'� `
DB: 006134, PG: 00369
�•.� INSET 5 ,oma
WRIGHT, WILLIAM L WRIGHT, EDITH A
PIN.0745453245
�-" DB: 004468, PG: 00426
-
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
IMPACT TOTALS
- WETLAND IMPACTS = +/- 5,418 SF (0.124 AC.) °
TAYLOR, ROBERT T TAYLOR, AMBER D \°
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS = /- 2 383 SF 0.055 AC. PIN.0745444852
DB: 015575, PG 02283 - WONG, RAYMOND\, 1
-F � ( ) W WONG, YUK MUI
� PIN: 0745449957
DB: 008917, PG 00408 \�
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS = +/- 1,690 SF (0.038 AC.) ` REDUS TWIN LAKES LLC
PIN: 0745458727
DB: 015074, PG 00786
LEGEND
---------------
•••-••-••-••-••' LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED BUILDING
EXISTING STORM
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORMWATER POND. \�
- — — — — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
APOLLO USA LLC
PIN: 0745447646 WETLAND C
------ EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - - - - - - - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DB: 016160, PG 01022 ;-__ +/- 0.153AC'
EXISTING CONCRETE - -- ----- PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
LEE MooREOIL co sTRutvcKcoNLEY KEPMORRISVICLF
PIN: 0745541516 & GORDON LLC REALTY LLC v e "
DB: 011479, PG 02471 PIN: 0745543536 PIN: 0745545506 _ ` -_
DB: 012358, PG: 02487 DB: 008327, PG 01777 �f -
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS PROPOSED EASEMENT
EXISTING STREAM
PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
------
L. — . — . — .�
EXISTING LAKE/POND
PROPOSED 2 -FT CONTOURS
TWIN LAKES MASTER ASSN INC
LAKE GROVE BLVD
PIN:0745644481
DB: 014217, PG 02526
EXISTING WETLANDS = +/- 0.319 AC.
PROPOSED RIPRAP
MARION REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC
PIN: 0745447200
DB: 013928, PG: 02482
-
-'
, ';--------
SCURFIELD, JANINE M
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 1
PROPOSED WALL
PIN: 0745546212
DB: 014661, PG 01023
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2
• • • • • • • • • • • • • PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
GOODWILL COMMUNITY GRACE PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC
FOUNDATION INC
PIN -0745535801
PIN: 0745541242
DB: 012444, PG: 01113
'
DB: 013687, PG 00857
SUBJECT PROPERTY
x _ x _ x _ x PROPOSED FENCE
PARCELS
J
NOTES:
N
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA
FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY
0
100 200 400
Feet
1 inch= 100 feet
EY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY15010 FIGURE 4 STREAM IMPACTS EXHIBIT PERMIT APP 24X36.mx0, 3/8/2017 2:50:55 PM, roth
TWIN LAKES
McADAMS
NWP39 / UUMW
FIGURE 4. OVERALL IMPACTS EXHIBIT DATE: 3/8/2017
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO: LEY -15010
DRAWN BY: roth

INSET 1 IMPACT TOTALS
\ SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS =
+/- 832 SF (0.019 AC.)
\ \ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS =
V `LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE _
+/- 495 SF (0.011 AC.)
\ \ I EXISTING NITARY SEWER
\ EXISTING S ITARY SEWE EASEMENT
`\ \ EXI TING STRE M "A"
_ \
EXISTINh SED T BASIN
PROPOSED GRE NWAY CONNECTION
- \ �\ •i �� �\ �� ZONE 2 NEUSE UFFER IMPACT = +/- 495 SF ( C.)
\r
\Z \ E 1 NEUS BUFFER IMPACT = +/- 832 SF: -(0.01 9 AC.)
--------
\ \ r�• PROPOSE RIPR P
y.r•' \ \ PROPOS D TOR ATER OUTFALL#3
\ PROPOSE ST RM PI E
30'ZONE 1 NEU E BUFFER
PROPOSED--------\. -- ,
STORMWATER - 20' ZONE 2 NEUSE B FFER
MANAGEMENT LEGEND
FACILITY #2
••� LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED BUILDING
---------------
--- — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
— — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
-- \ --- EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING CONCRETE — — PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS PROPOSED EASEMENT
L. J EXISTING STREAM — PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
PROPOSED '� \ 0 EXISTING LAKE/POND PROPOSED 2 -FT CONTOURS
-8FV0CER`fj' - 0 EXISTING WETLANDS PROPOSED RIPRAP
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER -ZONE 1 — PROPOSED WALL
\ 0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2 PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
SUBJECT PROPERTY — PROPOSED FENCE
\ 0 PARCELS
NOTES:
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS N 0 25 50 100
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY Feet
1 inch = 50 feet
FILE LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY 1501 0INSET i.mxd
DATE: 02/20/2017
JOB NO: LEY -15010
TWIN LAKES DRAWN BY: KKR
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 1
MCADAMS CARY, NORTH CAROLINA

1 � `\ a- INSET 2 IMPACT TOTALS
UBJe T PROPERTY'\ EXiTING STREAM-
\ ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS =
720 SF (0.017 AC.)
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS =
\ \ \ EXISTING,,SANITARY EWER 514 SF (0.011 AC.)
\ EXISTING SANITARY.,SEWER EASEMENT
�' V 20'ZO 2vNEUSE BUFFER
30' 1 NEUSE UFFER
\\ \ \\ \\ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
\ \ \ ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPAC - +/- 63 SF (0.001 AC.)
�IM� F I TUR'SA E \ �A
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CON ECTION
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER MPA =+/-451 SF (0.010AC.)
\\ �t� ,�•' \ \\ \\ ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPAC +/-720 SF (0.017AC.)
----------------\
l ••� }
PROPOSED RIPRAP
-
' I PROPOSED STORMWATER OUTFALL #2
PROP6ED STORM PIPE
\ \ -
---- _\ MOPOSEA LEVEL SP EADER EXISITING LAKE "A"
PROPOSED \ I
WEGMANS \ LEGEND
GROCERY -••— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED BUILDING
STORE \ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
4
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
--- EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING CONCRETE — — PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
\ EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS PROPOSED EASEMENT
L. J EXISTING STREAM — PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
._e 0 EXISTING LAKE/POND - - - PROPOSED 2 -FT CONTOURS
\ EXISTING WETLANDS •-•-• PROPOSED RIPRAP
\ 0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER -ZONE 1 — PROPOSED WALL
J \ \
\ 0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER -ZONE 2 PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
SUBJECT PROPERTY — PROPOSED FENCE
\ PARCELS
NOTES:
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS N 0 25 50 100
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY Feet
1 inch = 50 feet
FILE LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY15010 INSET 2.mxd
DATE: 02/20/2017
JOB NO: LEY -15010
TWIN LAKES DRAWN BY: KKR
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 2
MCADAMS CARY, NORTH CAROLINA

el
PROPOSED WEGMANS \
GROCERY STORE. - e
s
' \ e
I j INSET 3 IMPACT TOTALS
I I WETLAND IMPACTS =
IISUBAECT PR PERTY +/- 4,671 SF (0.107 AC.)
I
EXISITING
I PROPOSED G EENWAY CONNECTION LAKE "A"
I II LIMITS OF DISTURBA E
N� I EXISTING SANITARY SASEWE
v�
EXISTING SANITARYASEMENT
I
L
m - I
I
NOTES:
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY
LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY 1501 0INSET 3.mxd
TWIN LAKES
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 3
MCADAMS CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
N 0 25 50 100
Feet
1 inch = 50 feet
DATE: 02/20/2017
JOB NO: LEY -15010
DRAWN BY: KKR
\\ \\I
PROPOSED GREENWAY CON CTION
WETLAND A IMPACT
\ \
4,671 SF (0.107 AC.)
WETLAND A
0.141 AC.
e
I
\ \
20' ZONE
\
NEUSE BUFFER
____
Z
`•
50' PUBLIC 30' ZONE 1
`
RIGHT OF WAY NEUSE
BUFFER
I`
li
1
i 1
1
I
I 1 I
LEGEND
p
—LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
— PROPOSED BUILDING
1
I
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
I
1
——EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT — PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
1 I
--- EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
I
EXISTING CONCRETE
— — PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
t I I
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS PROPOSED EASEMENT
EXISTING STREAM
— PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
y I
0 EXISTING LAKE/POND
PROPOSED 2 -FT CONTOURS
I I I
0 EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPOSED RIPRAP
1 I
0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
-ZONE 1 — PROPOSED WALL
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
- ZONE 2 PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
1
I _ SUBJECT PROPERTY
— PROPOSED FENCE
0 PARCELS
T-
NOTES:
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY
LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY 1501 0INSET 3.mxd
TWIN LAKES
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 3
MCADAMS CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
N 0 25 50 100
Feet
1 inch = 50 feet
DATE: 02/20/2017
JOB NO: LEY -15010
DRAWN BY: KKR

1
INSET 4 IMPACT TOTALS
-. ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS =
924 SF (0.021 AC.)
1 ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS =
1 1 +/- 648 SF (0.015 AC.)
1
1 1 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
1 \ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
1 \
\ EXISITING LAKE "A"
SUBJECT PROPSY. \
1 PROP SED GREENWAY CONNECTION
1 \
\ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
1 \ ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACT =
648 SF (0.015 AC.)
\ \` ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER IMPACT =
PROPOSED \ +/- 924 SF (0.021 AC.)
STORMWATER \ 1
MANAGEMENT 1,
FACILITY #1 �•.�•'
:
......... \
`� �'•� PROPOSED RIPRAP
\ 1 1 PROPOSED STORMWATER OUTFALL #1
\\ %PROPOSED STORM PI
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
20' ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
\ 1
\ LEGEND
�! \\ ••— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED BUILDING
\ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
\ — — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
\ --- EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
y \
\ \ EXISTING CONCRETE — — PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
\ EXISTING 2-FT CONTOURS PROPOSED EASEMENT
EXISTING STREAM —PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
\ 0 EXISTING LAKE/POND ......... PROPOSED 2-FT CONTOURS
\ EXISTING WETLANDS •-•-•-• PROPOSED RIPRAP
\ l 0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 1 — PROPOSED WALL
\ 0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2 PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
\ I.
_ SUBJECT PROPERTY — PROPOSED FENCE
\ 0 PARCELS
NOTES:
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS N 0 25 50 100
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY Feet
1 inch = 50 feet
FILE LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY15010 INSET 4.mxd
DATE: 02/20/2017
JOB NO: LEY-15010
TWIN LAKES DRAWN BY: KKR
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 4
MCADAMS CARY, NORTH CAROLINA

\ \ INSET 5 IMPACT TOTALS
\ \ WETLAND IMPACTS =
747 SF (0.017 AC.)
Pf20P6S�b. \ \ =­STORMW,, 30' ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
TfER \ \
MANAGEMENT
FACILITY #1 \ \ 20' ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
/ !
EXISTING SANITA, RY SEWER
SUBJECT PRO ERTY
oll
�\
,:
. . . .......
LEGEND
RETAINING WA? L \
_
STbB
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED BUILDING
"A"
— PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
— — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
\
EXISITING LAKE
10
EXISTING CONCRETE
— — PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
•�'•
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS
PROPOSED EASEMENT
`" •�'•�••
L.J EXISTING STREAM
— PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
�> I•
0 EXISTING LAKE/POND
......... PROPOSED 2 -FT CONTOURS
6,000 SF PUBLICV
0 EXISTING WETLANDS
•-•-•-• PROPOSED RIPRAP
I•
GATHERING SPAG3_ `�'\
\
WETLAND B
�•
0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2
PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
0.025 AC.
•�.
_ SUBJECT PROPERTY
x — PROPOSED FENCE
•�'
0 PARCELS
NOTES:
N
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS 0
25 50 100
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY
WETLA B IMPACT
1 inch = 50 feet
FILE LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY15010 INSET 5.mxd
\
+/- 747 SF 017 AC.)
\
\
JOB NO: LEY -15010
TWIN LAKES
DRAWN BY: KKR
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 5
\
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
\ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING SA 1ITARY
SEWER EASEI9(IENT
/ !
EXISTING SANITA, RY SEWER
SUBJECT PRO ERTY
oll
,:
. . . .......
LEGEND
_
STbB
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED BUILDING
- -- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
— PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
— — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
--- EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
10
EXISTING CONCRETE
— — PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT
•�'•
EXISTING 2 -FT CONTOURS
PROPOSED EASEMENT
`" •�'•�••
L.J EXISTING STREAM
— PROPOSED CONCRETE/PAVEMENT
�> I•
0 EXISTING LAKE/POND
......... PROPOSED 2 -FT CONTOURS
.�••
0 EXISTING WETLANDS
•-•-•-• PROPOSED RIPRAP
I•
�••
0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER -ZONE 1
— PROPOSED WALL
�•
0 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER - ZONE 2
PROPOSED AMENITY SPACE
•�.
_ SUBJECT PROPERTY
x — PROPOSED FENCE
•�'
0 PARCELS
NOTES:
N
1. PARCEL BOUNDARY AND TRANSPORTATION DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS 0
25 50 100
2. ALL OTHER DATA FROM MCADAMS SURVEY
Feet
1 inch = 50 feet
FILE LOCATION: X:\Projects\LEY\LEY-15010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\LEY15010 INSET 5.mxd
DATE: 02/20/2017
JOB NO: LEY -15010
TWIN LAKES
DRAWN BY: KKR
NWP39 / GC3890
INSET 5
MCADAMS
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA