NC0024201_Compliance Report_20170307

The Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District's pretreatment program is well managed. Thank you for
your continued support of the Pretreatment Program. If you have any questions or comments,
please call Cheng Zhang at [phone] (or email: [e-mail]).
i
S'ice�tely,
It
Danny Smith
Surface Water Protection Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Enclosure: 2017 Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District PCI Inspection Form
CC: Monti Hassan, DWR - PERCS Unit
Central Files
Cheng Zhang, RRO
Isabelle Wilcoxon, RRSD
R

tr
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)l
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Isabelle Wilcoxon
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 09/23/2015 Inspection Type (Check One): ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
IN1 I N I C 10 10 1 21 4 1 2 1 0 Ill 1 02 117 117 1 I P I J S J J 1
(DTIA) (1'YYl) 1N51'
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? 3
(rAC;I
SNS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired 1UP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Public Notice? (May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all S1Us on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
[1 YES ® NO
❑ YES ®NO
Limits: None
Reporting: None
bushed: None
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify yourselfl
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations _
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ® YES ❑ NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Percentage of solids at anaerobic digester Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in N
their file.q cmmnlete with sunnorting documents and cony of PERCS Approval Letter. and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
5/8/2015
® Yes ❑ No
8/14/2015
® Yes ❑ No
7/1/2020
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
1/30/2013
® Yes ❑ No
2/19/2013
® Yes ❑ No
2/1/2018
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
10/21/2011
® Yes ❑ No
10/21/2011
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/12/2012
® Yes ❑ No
10/15/2012
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
10/26/2015
® Yes ❑ No
11/30/2015
® Yes ❑ No
a. ®Yes ❑No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IIJ INSPECTION)
29. User Name1.
Rosemary Power Station
2. Kennametal
Reser's Fine Food
30. IUP Number
0007
0002
0009
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes E] No
®Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
1 05/31/2017
05/31/2017
5/31/2017
33. Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A
INA
471.J
NA
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes []No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? See Inspection Form from PO
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes D
I b. ❑Yes []No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
❑Yes❑NoMN/A❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
. Organic Management Plan (TOMP)7
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑No
® Yes ElNo
® Yes [:1No
its Sampling as Required b IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ Noll
® Yes ❑ No
1 Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
11
Sampling as Required b IUP, includin flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
11
❑YespNo®N/A
file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑YesONoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A 11
❑YespNo®N/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
All Reporting Non -Com liance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SN (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
aaYes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑YespNo®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.®YespNo❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SILT?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SILT in SNC?
I Ely s ® No
1 ❑ Yes ® No 11
❑ Yes ® No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
MYes❑No❑N/A
11
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
11
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP OVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
11
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoMN/AI
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑NoMN/Aa.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This❑Yes
®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
#47 — Rosemary was issued a NOV for the O&G violation from March 7, 2016 on July 25, 2016. Rosemary was in compliance for the
second 6 -month period of 2016.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING;
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number
NJ I i l l a I L
1. Industry
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type
Inspector
Fac. Type
1 l "I
1 S j
L 2j
(DTIA) (TYPI)
(INSP)
(FACC)
2. Industry Address:
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact: Title:
Phone: Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: The program is well managed.
Requirements: None.
Recommendations: The POTW may elect not to conduct monthly sampling one year before HWA by submit a LTMP modification to the
Division.
NOD: ❑ YES ®NO
NOV: ❑ YES ®NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ®NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Un5atisfactory_❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: Cheng Zhang DATE: 02/17/2017
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3